Correspondence, between the late Commodore Stephen Decatur and Commodore James Barron - which led to the unfortunate meeting of the twenty-second of March

By Author	[ A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z \| Other Symbols ]
By Title	[ A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z \| Other Symbols ]
By Language

Download this book: [ ASCII | HTML | PDF ]

Look for this book on Amazon

We have new books nearly every day.
If you would like a news letter once a week or once a month fill out this form and we will give you a summary of the books for that week or month by email.

Title: Correspondence, between the late Commodore Stephen Decatur and Commodore James Barron - which led to the unfortunate meeting of the twenty-second of March
Author: Decatur, Stephen, 1779-1820, Barron, James, 1769-1851
Language: English
As this book started as an ASCII text book there are no pictures available.

*** Start of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "Correspondence, between the late Commodore Stephen Decatur and Commodore James Barron - which led to the unfortunate meeting of the twenty-second of March" ***

produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive/American Libraries.)

CORRESPONDENCE,

BETWEEN THE LATE

COMMODORE STEPHEN DECATUR

AND

COMMODORE JAMES BARRON,

WHICH LED TO THE

UNFORTUNATE MEETING

OF THE

TWENTY SECOND OF MARCH

* * * * *

BOSTON:
PRINTED BY RUSSELL & GARDNER.

1820.

The friends of the late Commodore DECATUR, have learned, with very great
regret, that misconceptions injurious to him prevail, and are extending,
relative to the difference between him and Commodore BARRON. To place
the subject in its true light, they have thought it necessary to submit
to the public, without comment, the whole correspondence which preceded
the meeting.

CORRESPONDENCE, &c.

* * * * *

No. 1.

HAMPTON, (VA.) JUNE 12,[1] 1819.

SIR: I have been informed, in Norfolk, that you have said that you could
insult me with impunity, or words to that effect. If you have said so,
you will no doubt avow it, and I shall expect to hear from you.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,
JAMES BARRON.

To Commodore STEPHEN DECATUR,
_Washington_.

[1] With respect to the date of this letter, it may be proper to
observe, that, although it is 12th June, yet the figure 2, as made,
might well be mistaken for a 3: hence, in Commodore Decatur's letter of
reply, he considered the date to be 13th June. On referring, however, to
the post mark on the back of the letter, it was found to have been put
into the post office on the 12th: hence, in Commodore Decatur's letter
to Commodore Barron, of the 31st October, 1819, it is recognized as
dated on the 12th.

* * * * *

No. 2.

WASHINGTON, JUNE 17, 1819.

SIR: I have received your communication of the 13th instant. Before you
could have been entitled to the information you have asked of me, you
should have given up the name of your informer. That frankness which
ought to characterize our profession required it. I shall not, however,
refuse to answer you on that account, but shall be as candid in my
communication to you as your letter or the case will warrant.

Whatever I may have _thought, or said, in the very frequent and free
conversation I have had respecting you and your conduct_, I feel a
thorough conviction that I never could have been guilty of so much
egotism as to say that "_I_ could insult you" (or any other man) "with
impunity."

I am, sir, your obedient servant,
STEPHEN DECATUR.

To Commodore JAMES BARRON,
_Hampton, Virginia_.

* * * * *

No. 3.

HAMPTON, (VA.) JUNE 25, 1819.

SIR: Your communication of the 17th instant, in answer to mine of the
13th, I have received.

The circumstances that urged me to call on you for the information
requested in my letter, would, I presume, have instigated you, or any
other person, to the same conduct that I pursued. Several gentlemen in
Norfolk, not your enemies, nor actuated by any malicious motive, told me
that such a report was in circulation, but could not now be traced to
its origin. I, therefore, concluded to appeal to you, supposing, under
such circumstances, that I could not outrage any rule of decorum or
candor. This, I trust, will be considered as a just motive for the
course I have pursued. Your declaration, if I understand it correctly,
relieves my mind from the apprehension that you had so degraded my
character, as I had been induced to allege.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,
JAMES BARRON.

To Commodore STEPHEN DECATUR,
_Washington_.

* * * * *

No. 4.

WASHINGTON, JUNE 29, 1819.

SIR: I have received your communication of the 25th, in answer to mine
of the 17th, and, as you have expressed yourself doubtfully, as to your
correct understanding of my letter of the aforesaid date, I have now to
state, and I request you to understand distinctly, that I meant _no
more_ than to disclaim the _specific_ and _particular_ expression to
which your inquiry was directed, to wit: that I had said that _I_ could
insult you with impunity. As to the motives of the "several gentlemen in
Norfolk," your informants, or the rumors which "cannot be traced to
their origin," on which their information was founded, or who they are,
is a matter of perfect indifference to me, as is also your motives in
making such an inquiry upon such information.

Your obedient servant,
STEPHEN DECATUR.

To Commodore JAMES BARRON,
_Hampton, Virginia_.

* * * * *

No. 5.

HAMPTON, OCTOBER 23, 1819.

SIR: I had supposed that the measure of your ambition was nearly
completed, and that your good fortune had rendered your reputation for
acts of magnanimity too dear to be risked wantonly on occasions that can
never redound to the honor of him that would be great. I had also
concluded that your rancor towards me was fully satisfied, by the cruel
and unmerited sentence passed upon me by the court of which you were a
member; and, after an exile from my country, family, and friends, of
nearly seven years, I had concluded that I should now be allowed, at
least, to enjoy that solace, with this society, that lacerated feelings
like mine required, and that you would have suffered me to remain in
quiet possession of those enjoyments; but, scarcely had I set my foot on
my native soil, ere I learnt that the same malignant spirit which had
before influenced you to endeavor to ruin my reputation was still at
work, and that you were ungenerously traducing my character whenever an
occasion occurred which suited your views, and, in many instances, not
much to your credit as an officer, through the medium of our juniors;
such conduct cannot fail to produce an injurious effect on the
discipline and subordination of the navy. A report of this sort, sir,
coming from the respectable and creditable sources it did, could not
fail to arrest my attention, and to excite those feelings which might
naturally be expected to arise in the heart of every man who professes
to entertain principles of honor, and intends to act in conformity with
them. With such feelings I addressed a letter to you under date of the
13th June last, which produced a correspondence between us, which I have
since been informed you have endeavored to use to my farther injury, by
sending it to Norfolk by a respectable officer of the navy, to be shewn
to some of my particular friends, with a view of alienating from me
their attachment. I am also informed, that you have tauntingly and
boastingly observed, that you would cheerfully meet me in the field, and
hoped I would yet act like a man, or that you had used words to that
effect: such conduct, sir, on the part of any one, but especially one
occupying the influential station under the government which you hold,
towards an individual, situated as I am, and oppressed as I have been,
and that chiefly by your means, is unbecoming you as an officer and a
gentleman; and shews a want of magnanimity which, hostile as I have
found you to be towards me, I had hoped for your own reputation you
possessed. It calls loudly for redress at your hands: I consider you as
having given the invitation, which I accept, and will prepare to meet
you at such time and place as our respective friends, hereafter to be
named, shall designate. I also, under all the circumstances of the case,
consider myself entitled to the choice of weapons, place, and distance;
but, should a difference of opinion be entertained by our friends, I
flatter myself, from your known personal courage, that you would disdain
any unfair advantage, which your superiority in the use of the pistol,
and the natural defect in my vision, increased by age, would give you. I
will thank you not to put your name on the cover of your answer, as, I
presume, you can have no disposition to give unnecessary pain to the
females of my family.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,
JAMES BARRON.

Commodore STEPHEN DECATUR,
_Washington_.

* * * * *

No. 6.

WASHINGTON, OCTOBER 31, 1819.

SIR: Your letter of the 23d inst. has been duly received. Prior to
giving it that reply which I intend, its contents suggest the necessity
of referring to our June correspondence.

On the 12th June last, you addressed to me a note, inquiring whether I
had said that "I could insult you with impunity." On the 17th June, I
wrote you, in reply, as follows: "Whatever I may have _thought or said
in the very frequent and free conversations I have had respecting you
and your conduct_, I feel a thorough conviction that I never could have
been guilty of so much egotism, as to say that _I_ could insult you, or
any other man, with impunity."

On the 25th of June, you again wrote to me, and stated, that the report
on which you had grounded your query of 12th June, "could not now be
traced to its origin," and your letter is concluded in the following
words: "your declaration, if I understand it correctly, relieves my mind
from the apprehension that you had so degraded my character, as I had
been induced to allege." Immediately on receiving your letter of the
25th of June, I wrote to you, 29th June, as follows: "As you have
expressed yourself doubtfully as to your correct understanding of my
letter of the 17th June, I have now to state, and I request you to
understand, distinctly, that I meant _no more_ than to disclaim the
_specific_ and _particular_ expression, to which your inquiry was
directed, to wit: "that I had said that I could insult you with
impunity." Here ended our June correspondence, and, with it all kind of
communication, till the date of your letter of the 23d inst. which I
shall now proceed to notice.

Nearly four months having elapsed since the date of our last
correspondence, your letter was unexpected to me, particularly as the
terms used by you, in the conclusion of your letter to me of 25th June,
and your silence since receiving my letter of the 29th June, indicated,
as I thought, satisfaction on your part. But, it seems that you consider
yourself aggrieved by my sending our June correspondence to Norfolk. I
did not send the June correspondence to Norfolk, until three months had
expired after your last communication, and not then, until I had been
informed by a captain of the navy, that a female of your acquaintance
had stated, that such a correspondence had taken place.[1] If that
correspondence has, in any degree, "alienated your friends from you,"
such effect is to be attributed to the correspondence itself. I thought
the papers would speak for themselves, and sent them without written
comment.

[1] See the extracts from Capt. Carter's letter, post. page 13.

With respect to the court martial upon you for the affair of the
Chesapeake, to which you have been pleased to refer, I shall not treat
the officers, who composed that court, with so much disrespect, as to
attempt a vindication of their proceedings. The chief magistrate of our
country approved them; the nation approved them; and the sentence has
been carried into effect. But, sir, there is a part of my conduct, on
that occasion, which it does not appear irrelevant to revive in your
recollection. It is this; I was present at the court of inquiry upon
you, and heard the evidence then adduced for and against you; thence I
drew an opinion altogether unfavorable to you; and, when I was called
upon, by the Secretary of the Navy, to act as a member of the court
martial ordered for your trial, I begged to be excused the duty, on the
ground of my having formed such an opinion. The honorable Secretary was
pleased to insist on my serving; still anxious to be relieved from this
service, I did, prior to taking my seat as a member of the court,
communicate to your able advocate, general Taylor, the opinion I had
formed, and my correspondence with the Navy Department upon the subject,
in order to afford you an opportunity, should you deem it expedient, to
protest against my being a member, on the ground of my not only having
formed, but _expressed_ an opinion unfavorable to you. You did not
protest against my being a member. Duty constrained me, however
unpleasant it was, to take my seat as a member; I did so, and discharged
the duty imposed upon me. You, I find, are incapable of estimating the
motives which guided my conduct in this transaction.

For my conduct as a member of that court martial, I do not consider
myself as, in any way, accountable to _you_. But, sir, you have thought
fit to deduce, from your impressions of my conduct as a member of that
court martial, inferences of personal hostility towards you. Influenced
by feelings thence arising, you commenced the June correspondence, a
correspondence which I had hoped would have terminated our
communications.

Between you and myself there never has been a personal difference; but
I have entertained, and do still entertain the opinion, that your
conduct as an officer, since the affair of the Chesapeake, has been such
as ought to forever bar your readmission into the service.

In my letter to you, of the 17th June, although I disavowed the
_particular expressions_ to which you invited my attention, candor
required that I should apprise you of my not having been silent
respecting you. I informed you that I had had _very frequent and free
conversations respecting you and your conduct_; and the words were
underscored, that they might not fail to attract your particular
attention. Had you have asked what those frequent and free conversations
were, I should, with the same frankness, have told you; but, instead of
making a demand of this kind, you reply to my letter of 17th June, "That
my declaration, if correctly understood by you, relieved your mind," &c.
That you might correctly understand what I did mean, I addressed you as
before observed, on the 29th June, and endeavored, by _underscoring_
certain precise terms, to convey to you my precise meaning. To this last
letter I never received a reply.

Under these circumstances, I have judged it expedient at this time, to
state, as distinctly as may be in my power, the facts upon which I
ground the unfavourable opinion which I entertain, and have expressed,
of your conduct as an officer, since the court martial upon you; while I
disclaim all personal enmity towards you.

Some time after you had been suspended from the service, for your
conduct in the affair of the Chesapeake, you proceeded, in a merchant
brig, from Norfolk to Pernambuco; and by a communication from the late
Captain Lewis, whose honor and veracity were never yet questioned, it
appears--that you stated to Mr. Lyon, the _British consul_ at
Pernambuco, with whom you lived, "That if the Chesapeake had been
prepared for action, you would not have resisted the attack of the
Leopard; assigning, as a reason, that you knew, (as did also our
government,) there were deserters on board your ship; that the President
of the United States knew there were deserters on board, and of the
intention of the British to take them; and that the President caused you
to go out in a defenceless state, for the express purpose of having your
ship attacked and disgraced, and thus attain his favorite object of
involving the United States in a war with Great Britain." For
confirmation of this information, Captain Lewis refers to Mr. Thomas
Goodwin, of Baltimore, the brother of Captain Ridgely of the Navy, who
received it from Mr. Lyon himself. Reference was made to Mr. Goodwin,
who, in an official communication, confirmed all that Captain Lewis had
said. The veracity and respectability of Mr. Goodwin are also beyond
question. You will be enabled to judge of the impression made upon
Captain Lewis' mind, by the following strong remarks he made on the
subject:

"I am now convinced that Barron is a traitor, for I can call by no other
name a man who would talk in this way to an Englishman, and an
Englishman in office."

These communications are now in the archives of the Navy Department.

If, sir, the affair of the Chesapeake excited the indignant feelings of
the nation towards Great Britain; and was, as every one admits, one of
the principal causes which produced the late war, did it not behove you
to take an active part in the war, for your own sake?--Patriotism out of
the question! But, sir, instead of finding you in the foremost ranks, on
an occasion which so emphatically demanded your best exertions, it is
said, and is credited, that you were, after the commencement of the war,
to be found in the command of a vessel sailing under _British license_!
Though urged, by your _friends_, to avail yourself of some one of the
opportunities which were every day occurring in privateers, or other
fast sailing merchant vessels, sailing from France, and other places, to
return to your country during the war; it is not known that you
manifested a disposition to do so, excepting in the single instance by
the _cartel_ John Adams, in which vessel, you must have known, you could
not be permitted to return, without violating her character as a cartel.

You say you have been oppressed. You know, sir, that, by absenting
yourself, as you did for years, from the country, without leave from the
government, you subjected yourself to be stricken from the rolls. You
know, also, that, by the 10th article of the act for the better
government of the Navy, all persons in the Navy holding intercourse with
an enemy, become subject to the severest punishment known to our laws.
You have not, for the offences before stated, to my knowledge, received
even a reprimand; and I do know, that your pay, even during your
absence, has been continued to you.

As to my having spoken of you injuriously to "junior officers," I have
to remark, that such is the state of our service that we have but few
seniors. If I speak with officers at all, the probability is, it will be
with a junior.

On your return to this country, your efforts to re-establish yourself in
the service were known, and became a subject of conversation with
officers as well as others. In the many and _free_ conversations I have
had respecting you and your conduct, I have said, for the causes above
enumerated, that, in my opinion, you ought not to be received again into
the naval service; that there was not employment for all the officers
who had faithfully discharged their duty to their country in the hour of
trial; and that it would be doing an act of injustice to employ you, to
the exclusion of any one of them. In speaking thus, and endeavoring to
prevent your re-admission, I conceive that I was performing a duty I owe
to the service; that I was contributing to the preservation of its
respectability. Had you have made no effort to be re-employed, after the
war, it is more than probable I might not have spoken of you. If you
continue your efforts, I shall certainly, from the same feelings of
public duty by which I have hitherto been actuated, be constrained to
continue the expression of my opinions; and I can assure you, that, in
the interchange of opinions with other officers respecting you, I have
never met with more than one who did not entirely concur with me.

The objects of your communication of the 23d, as expressed by you, now
claim my notice. You profess to consider me as having given you "an
invitation." You say that you have been told, that I have "tauntingly
and boastingly observed, that I would cheerfully meet you in the field,
and hoped you would yet act like a man."

One would naturally have supposed, that, after having been so recently
led into an error by "rumors" which could not be traced, you would have
received, with some caution, subsequent rumors; at all events that you
would have endeavored to have traced them, before again venturing to act
upon them as if they were true. Had you have pursued this course, you
would have discovered, that the latter rumors were equally unfounded as
the former.

I never invited you to the field; nor have I expressed a hope that you
would call me out. I was informed by a gentleman with whom you had
conferred upon the subject, that you left Norfolk for this place,
somtime before our June correspondence, with the intention of calling me
out. I then stated to that gentleman, as I have to all others with whom
I have conversed upon the subject, that, if you made the call, I would
meet you; but that, on all scores, I should be much better pleased, to
have nothing to do with you. I do not think that fighting duels, under
any circumstances, can raise the reputation of any man, and have long
since discovered, that it is not even an unerring criterion of personal
courage. I should regret the necessity of fighting with any man; but, in
my opinion, the man who makes _arms his profession_, is not at liberty
to decline an invitation from any person, who is not so far degraded, as
to be beneath his notice. Having incautiously said I would meet you, I
will not now consider this to be your case, although many think so; and
if I had not pledged myself, I might reconsider the case.

As to "weapons, place, and distance," if we are to meet, those points
will, as is usual, be committed to the friend I may select on the
occasion. As far, however, as it may be left to me, not having any
particular prejudice in favor of any particular arm, distance, or mode,
(but, on the contrary, disliking them all,) I should not be found
fastidious on those points, but should be rather disposed to yield you
any little advantage of this kind. As to my skill in the use of the
pistol, it exists more in your imagination than in reality; for the last
twenty years I have had but little practice; and the disparity in our
ages, to which you have been pleased to refer, is, I believe, not more
than five or six years. It would have been out of the common course of
nature, if the vision of either of us had been improved by years.

From your manner of proceeding, it appears to me, that you have come to
the determination to fight some one, and that you have selected me for
that purpose; and I must take leave to observe, that your object would
have been better attained, had you have made this decision during our
late war, when your fighting might have benefitted your country as well
as yourself. The style of your communication, and the matter, did not
deserve so dispassionate and historical a notice as I have given it; and
had I believed it would receive no other inspection than yours, I should
have spared myself the trouble. The course I adopted with our former
correspondence, I shall pursue with this, if I shall deem it expedient.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,
STEPHEN DECATUR.

To Commodore JAMES BARRON,
_Hampton, Virginia_.

* * * * *

[EXTRACT.]

NORFOLK, AUGUST 24, 1819.

MY DEAR COMMODORE: Nothing had transpired here previous to my arrival,
on the subject of the correspondence; but a Lady, a Miss ----, I think
her name is, from Hampton, has stated, that a correspondence had taken
place between you and B. which she feared would end in a meeting. The
fears of this lady are at direct variance with the opinion of your
friends here, who think that he does not purpose saying more on the
subject.

As it seems that it was known at Hampton, and even here, that letters
had passed between you and B. may I venture to ask you to send a copy
of them to Mr. Tazewell, who I have just left. He will, with great
pleasure, he says, attend to your wishes.

Receive the best wishes of your friend,
W. CARTER.

Commodore DECATUR.

* * * * *

No. 7.

WASHINGTON, NOVEMBER, 1819.

SIR: Since my communication to you of the 31st ult. I have been informed
by a gentleman entitled to the fullest credit, that you were not afloat
till after the peace; consequently, the report which I noticed of your
having sailed under British license must be unfounded.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,
STEPHEN DECATUR.

Commodore JAS. BARRON.

* * * * *

No. 8.

HAMPTON, NOVEMBER 20, 1819.

SIR: Unavoidable interruption has prevented my answering your two last
communications as early as it was my wish to have done, but in a few
days you shall have my reply.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,
JAS. BARRON.

Commodore STEPHEN DECATUR.

* * * * *

No. 9.

HAMPTON, NOVEMBER 30, 1819.

SIR: I did not receive, until Tuesday, the 9th inst. your very lengthy,
elaborate, and historical reply, without date, to my letter to you of
the 23d ultimo; which, from its nature and _object_, did not, I
conceive, require that you should have entered so much into detail, in
defence of the hostile and unmanly course you have pursued towards me,
since the "affair of the Chesapeake," as you term it. A much more
laconic answer would have served my purpose, which, for the present, is
nothing more than to obtain at your hands honorable redress for the
accumulated insults which you, sir, in particular, above all my enemies,
have attempted to heap upon me, in every shape in which they could be
offered. Your last voluminous letter is _alone_ sufficient proof, if
none other existed, of the rancorous disposition you entertain towards
me, and the extent to which you have carried it. That letter I should no
otherwise notice, than merely to inform you it had reached me, and that
I am prepared to meet you in the field upon _any thing_ like fair and
equal grounds; but, inasmuch as you have intimated that our
correspondence is to go before the public, I feel it a duty I owe to
myself, and to the world, to reply particularly to the many calumnious
charges and aspersions with which your "_dispassionate_ and historical
notice" of my communication so abundantly teems; wishing you, sir, at
the same time, "distinctly to understand" that it is not for _you_
alone, or to justify myself in your estimation, that I take this course.
You have dwelt much upon our "June correspondence," as you stile it, and
have made many quotations from it. I deem it unnecessary, however, to
advert to it, further than to remark, that, although "nearly four
months" did intervene between that correspondence and my letter of the
23d ultimo, my silence arose not from any misapprehension of the purport
of your contumacious "_underscored_" remarks, nor from the malicious
designs they indicated, nor from a tame disposition to yield quietly to
the operation which either might have against me; but, from a tedious
and painful indisposition, which confined me to my bed, the chief part
of that period, as is well known to almost every person here. I
anticipated, however, from what I had found you capable of doing to my
injury, the use to which you would endeavour to pervert that
correspondence; and have not at all been disappointed. So soon as I was
well enough, and heard of your machinations against me, I lost no time
in addressing to you my letter of the 23d ultimo; your reply to which I
have now more particularly to notice. I have not said, nor did I mean to
convey such an idea, nor will my letter bear the interpretation, that
your forwarding to Norfolk, our "June correspondence," had, "in any
degree, alienated my friends from me;" but, that it was sent down there
with _that view_. It is a source of great consolation to me, sir, to
know, that I have more friends, both in and out of the navy, than you
are aware of; and that it is not in your power, great as you may imagine
your official influence to be, to deprive me of their good opinion and
affection. As to the reason which seems to have prompted you to send
that correspondence to Norfolk, "that a female of my acquaintance had
stated that such an one had taken place," I will only remark, that she
did not derive her information from me: that it has always been, and
ever will be, with me, a principle, to touch as delicately as possible,
upon reports said to come from _females_, _intended_ to affect
injuriously the character of any one; and that, in a correspondence like
the _present_, highly as I estimate the sex, I should never think of
introducing _them_ as authority. Females, sir, have nothing, or ought to
have nothing to do in controversies of this kind. In speaking of the
court martial which sat upon my trial, I have cast no imputation or
reflection upon the members individually who composed it (saving
yourself,) which required that you should attempt a vindication of their
proceedings; champion as you are, and hostile as some of them may have
been to me: nor does the language of my letter warrant any such
inference. I merely meant to point out to you, sir, what you appear to
have been incapable of perceiving: the indelicacy of your conduct, (to
say the least of it) in hunting me out as an object for malignant
persecution, after having acted as one of my judges, and giving your
voice in favour of a sentence against me, which I cannot avoid
repeating, was "cruel and unmerited." It is the privilege, sir, of a
man, deeply injured as I have been by that decision, and conscious of
his not deserving it, as I feel myself, to remonstrate against it; and I
have taken the liberty to exercise that privilege.

You say that "the proceedings of the Court have been approved by the
Chief Magistrate of our country, that the nation approved of them, and
that the sentence has been carried into effect." It is true the
President of the United States _did_ approve of that sentence, and that
it was carried into effect--full and complete effect, which I should
have supposed ought to have glutted the envious and vengeful disposition
of your heart; but I deny that the nation has approved of that sentence,
and as an appeal appears likely to be made to _them_, I am willing to
submit the question. The part you took on that occasion, it was totally
unnecessary, I assure you, "to revive in my recollection;" it is
indelibly imprinted on my mind, and can never, while I have life, be
erased. You acknowledge you were present at the Court of Inquiry in my
case, "heard the evidence for and against me, and had, therefore, formed
and expressed an opinion unfavorable to me," and yet, your conscience
was made of such pliable materials, that, _because_ the then "honorable
Secretary of the Navy was _pleased to insist_ on your serving as a
member of the Court Martial, and because _I_ did not protest against
it," you conceive that "_duty constrained_ you, however unpleasant, to
take your seat as a member," although you were to act under the solemn
sanction of an oath, to render me impartial justice upon the very
testimony which had been delivered in your hearing before the Court of
Inquiry, and from which you "drew an opinion, _altogether unfavorable to
me_." How such conduct can be reconciled with the principles of common
honor and justice, is to me inexplicable. Under such circumstances, _no_
consideration, no power or authority on earth, could, or ought to, have
forced any liberal high minded man to sit in a case which he had
prejudged, and, to retort upon you your own expressions, you must have
been "incapable of seeing the glaring impropriety of your conduct, for
which, although you do not conceive yourself in any way accountable to
_me_," I hope you will be able to account for it with your God, and your
conscience.

You say, between you and myself, there never has been a personal
difference, "and you disclaim all personal enmity towards me." If every
step you have taken--every word you have uttered, and every line you
have written, in relation to me--if your own admission of the very
frequent and free conversations you have had respecting me, and my
conduct, "since the affair of the Chesapeake," bear not the plainest
stamp of _personal hostility_, I know not the meaning of such terms;
were you not under the influence of feelings of this sort, why not, in
your official capacity, call me, or have me brought, before a proper
tribunal, to answer the charges you have preferred against me, and
thereby giving me a chance of defending myself? Why speak injuriously of
me to _junior_ officers, "which you do not deny?" Why the "many frequent
and free conversations respecting me and my conduct," which you have
taken so much pains to underscore? Why use the insulting expression,
that you "entertained, and still do entertain, the opinion that my
conduct, as an officer, since that 'affair' has been such as ought
forever to bar my readmission into the service," and that, in
endeavoring to prevent it, "you conceive you were performing a duty you
owe to the service, and were contributing to its respectability?" Why
the _threat_, that if I continued the "efforts" _you_ say I have been
making, to be "re-employed" you "certainly should be constrained to
continue the expression of those opinions?"

Does not all this, together with the whole tenor and tendency of your
letter, manifest the most marked _personal_ animosity against me, which
an honorable man, acting under a sense of public duty by which you
profess to "have been hitherto actuated," would disdain even to shew,
much more to feel?

I shall now, sir, take up the specific charges you have alleged against
me, and shall notice them in the order in which they stand. The first
is one of a very _heinous_ character. It is, that "I proceeded in a
merchant brig to Pernambuco." Could I, sir, during the period of my
suspension, have gone any where in a national vessel? Could I, with what
was due to my family, have remained idle? The sentence of the Court
deprived them of the principal means of subsistence. I was therefore
compelled to resort to that description of employment with which I was
best acquainted; and on this subject _you_ should have been silent. But
you add, that the late Captain Lewis, of the Navy, _who had_ it from a
Mr. Goodwin, who heard it from Mr. Lyon, the British Consul at
Pernambuco, with whom you undertake to say I lived, represented me as
stating, "that, if the Chesapeake had been prepared for action, I would
not have resisted the attack of the Leopard; assigning, as a reason,
that I knew, as also did our government, that there were deserters on
board the Chesapeake; and that I said to Mr. Lyon, further, that the
President of the United States knew there were deserters on board, and
of the intention of the British ship to take them, and that the ship was
ordered out under these circumstances, with a view to bring about a
contest which might embroil the two nations in a war."

The whole of this, Sir, I pronounce to be a falsehood, a ridiculous,
malicious, absurd, improbable falsehood, which can never be credited by
any man that does not feel a disposition to impress on the opinion of
the public that I am an idiot. That I should two years after the affair
of the Chesapeake, make such a declaration, when every proof that could
be required of a contrary disposition on the part of the Chief
Magistrate had been given, cannot receive credit from any one, but those
that are disposed to consider me such a character as you would represent
me to be. I did not live with Mr. Lyon, nor did I ever hold a
conversation with him so indelicate as the one stated in captain Lewis'
letter would have been. And with what object could I have made such a
communication? Mr. Lyon would naturally have felt a contempt for a man
that would have suffered himself to have been made a tool of in so
disgraceful an affair. I found Mr. Lyon transacting business in
Pernambuco: he produced to me a letter from Mr. Hill, the American
consul in that country, recommending him as entitled to the confidence
of his countrymen, every one of whom, in that port, put their business
into his hands. I did the same, and thus commenced our acquaintance; he
was kind and friendly to me, but never in any respect indelicate, as
would have been, in a high degree, such conversation between us. Of Mr.
Goodwin I know nothing. I have never seen him in all my life, nor do I
conceive that his hearsay evidence can ever be of any kind of
consequence against me; I was the first that informed the President, and
the Secretary of the Navy, that such a letter was in the Department,
even before I had seen it; and, again, if the mere oral testimony of a
British agent was to be considered as evidence sufficient to arraign an
American officer, I think the navy would quickly be in such a state, as
it might be desirable for their nation to place it in. As to the
_impressions_ made upon the mind of captain Lewis, from this
_information_, and the "strong remarks" he made upon the subject, which
you have thought proper to quote, they by no means establish the
_correctness_ of that information; but only go to shew the effect it
produced upon the mind of an individual, who seems to have imbibed a
prejudice against me, no otherwise to be accounted for, except your
acquaintance with him. He is now in his grave, and I am perfectly
disposed _there_ to let him rest; you must, however, have been hard
pressed indeed, to be compelled to resort to such flimsy grounds as
those, a degree weaker than even second handed testimony, to support
your charges against me. These communications, you observe, are now in
the archives of the Navy Department. Of this fact, Sir, I had long been
apprized; and had you, when searching the records of that Department for
documents to injure my character, looked a little further back, you
would perhaps have found others calculated to produce a very different
effect. Of my desire to return to the United States, during the late
war, there are certificates in the Navy Department of the first
respectability, which, if you had been disposed to find and quote, are
perhaps laying on the same shelf from whence you took those, that you
appear so anxious to bring to public view; I mean my letter applying for
service, as soon as an opportunity offered, after the term of my
suspension expired; and one letter, above all, _you_ should not have
passed over unnoticed, that which you received from my hand of May,
1803, addressed to the Secretary of the Navy, which was one of the
principal causes of your obtaining the first command that you were ever
honored with, and as you may have forgotten it, I will remind you, on
this occasion, that, but little more than one month previous to the date
of that letter, I by my advice and arguments, saved you from resigning
the service of your country in a pet, because you were removed from the
first lieutenancy of the New York, to that of second of the Chesapeake;
but all this and much more is now forgotten by _you_, yet there are
others that recollect those circumstances, and the history of your
conduct to me will outlive you, let my fate be what it may. The affair
of the Chesapeake did certainly "excite," and ought to have excited, the
indignant feeling of the nation towards Great Britain; but, however it
may have justified a declaration of war against that power, it was not,
as you assert "every one admits," one of the principal causes of the
late war. That it did not take place, sir, until _five years_ after,
when that affair had been amicably and of course honourably adjusted
between the two nations. I mention this fact, not on account of its
importance, but because you have laid so much stress on that "affair,"
as a reason why I ought to have returned home during the late war, and
to shew that, although it _did_ happen to be your fortunate lot to have
an opportunity of being in the foremost rank, on that occasion, of which
you seem inclined to vaunt, you are ignorant even of the causes which
led to it. Having, in your letter of the 5th inst. abandoned the charge
of my having sailed under "British license," after the commencement of
the late war, in consequence of information received by you from a
gentleman entitled to the fullest credit, that I was not afloat, until
after the peace, consequently the report which you noticed of my having
sailed under British license, must be unfounded. I have only to remark,
on this head, that in advancing a charge against me of so serious a
nature, and designed and so well calculated, as it was, to affect,
materially, my reputation, not only as an officer of the navy, but as a
citizen of the United States, you should first have ascertained that it
was founded on _fact_, and not on rumour, which you so much _harp_ upon;
and that upon a proper investigation you would have discovered your
other accusations to be equally groundless. For my not returning home
during the late war, I do not hold myself, to use your own expressions,
"in any way accountable to you," Sir. It would be for the government, I
should suppose, to take notice of my absence, if they deemed it
reprehensible; and they no doubt would have done so, had not the
circumstances of the case, in their estimation, justified it. That they
are perfectly satisfied upon this point, I have good reason to believe,
and trust I shall be able to satisfy my country also. The President's
personal conduct to me, and the memorial of the Virginia Delegation in
Congress, to him, prove how I stand with those high characters, your
opinion, notwithstanding, to the contrary. I deny, Sir, that I ever was
"urged" by my friends, as you in mockery term them, to return home
during the late war, nor could it have been requisite for me to have
been "urged" to do so by any one. Laying patriotism out of the question,
as you observe, as well as the reasons why you think "it behoved me" to
adopt that course, there were other incentives strong enough, God knows,
to excite a desire on my part to return; and I should have returned,
Sir, but for circumstances beyond my control, which is not incumbent on
me to explain to _you_.

Had the many opportunities really presented themselves which you allege
were "every day occurring," of which I might have availed myself to
return to my country, in privateers or other fast sailing merchant
vessels, from France and other places, but of which you produce no other
proof than random assertion, on which most of your other charges rest?
There were no such opportunities, as you say were "every day occurring;"
no, not one within my reach, and for some considerable time after the
news of the war arrived in Denmark, it was not believed that it would
continue six months; but, if I had received the slightest intimation
from the department that I should have been employed on my return, I
should have considered no sacrifice too great, no exertion within my
power should have been omitted to obtain so desirable an object, as any
mark of my country's confidence would have been to me in such a moment;
a gun boat, under my own orders, would not have been refused; but what
hope had I, when my letter of application for service was not even
honored by an answer. In regard to the John Adams, I do not deem it
proper on this occasion to explain my reasons for making the attempt to
return in that ship; but whenever I am called on by any person properly
authorized to make the enquiry, I am confident that I shall convince
them, that I had good reason to believe that I should obtain a passage
in her, notwithstanding your great knowledge on the occasion.

You say, by absenting myself, _for years_, from the country, without
leave from the government, I "subjected myself to be stricken from the
rolls." I knew also, by the 10th article of the act for the better
government of the navy, that all persons in the navy holding intercourse
with an enemy, became subject to the severest punishment known to the
law; and that, for these offences, as you are pleased to term them, "I
have not received, to your knowledge, even a reprimand;" but I presume
if I have not it is not your fault. What kind and humane forbearance
this, after what I have already endured! But, sir, as you seem to be so
very intelligent upon other points, pray tell me where was the necessity
of my asking for a furlough until the period of my suspension expired,
or even after having reported myself for duty without being noticed. As
to the charge of my holding intercourse with the enemy, I am at a loss
to conceive to what you allude, and should degrade myself by giving it
any other reply than to pronounce it--if you mean to insinuate there was
any unlawful or improper communication on my part with the government,
or any individual of Great Britain, as a _false_ and _foul_ aspersion on
my character, which no conduct or circumstance of my life, however it
might be tortured by your malice or ingenuity, can, in any manner,
justify or support. You say, also, that you _do know_ "that my pay, even
during my absence, was _continued to me_." It is not the fact, sir; I
never, and until very recently since my return, received but half pay.
This part of your letter I should not have regarded, were it not to shew
with what boldness, facility, and _sang froid_, you can make assertions
unsustained even by the shadow of truth; but, if you had made yourself
acquainted with the circumstances relative to my _half pay_, you would
have found that not one cent of it was received by me. The government
was so good as to pay the amount to my unfortunate female family, whose
kindest entertainment you have frequently enjoyed. Poor unfortunate
children! whose ancestors, every man of them, did contribute every
disposable shilling of their property, many of them their lives, and all
of them their best exertions, to establish the independence of their
country, should now be told that the small amount of my half pay was
considered, by an officer of high rank, too much for them! You have been
good enough to inform me that, on my return to this country, my
"_efforts_," as you have been pleased to call them, "to re-instate
myself in the service were known, and became a subject of conversation
with officers, as well as others;" and, but for those "efforts," it is
_more than probable_ you would not have _spoken of me_. This would
indeed have displayed a wonderful degree of lenity and courtesy on your
part, of which I could not have failed to be duly sensible. But, sir, I
beg leave to ask how, and where, did you get your information, that such
"efforts" were made by me; and even admit they were, why should you
_alone_, disclaiming, as you pretend to do, all "_personal enmity_"
against me, have made yourself so _particularly busy_ on the occasion?
Was it because your inflated pride led you to believe that the weight of
your influence was greater than that of any other officer of the navy,
or that you were more tenacious of its honor and "respectability," than
the rest of the officers were? You assure me, however, 'that, in the
interchange of opinion with other officers respecting me, you have never
met with more than one who did not entirely concur with you in the
opinion you have expressed of me.' Indeed! and what is the reason? It is
because I suppose you are most commonly attended by a train of
dependents, who, to enjoy the sunshine of your favour, act as _caterers_
for your vanity; and, revolving around you like _satellites_, borrow
their chief consequence from the countenance you may _condescend_ to
bestow upon them. You, at length, arrive at the main point; the "object"
of my letter of the 23d ultimo, which you might have reached by a much
_shorter route_, and have saved me the fatigue of being compelled, in
self defence, to travel with you so far as you have gone. The language
of defiance, represented to have been used by you, 'that you would
cheerfully meet me in the field, and hoped I would yet act like a man,'
are disavowed by you. And you further deny having ever invited me to the
field, or expressed a hope that I would call you out; but you observe
that, 'being informed by a gentleman with whom I had _conferred_ upon
the subject, that I left Norfolk, for the seat of government, some time
before our June correspondence, with the intention of calling you out,
you stated to that gentleman, as you have to _all others_ with whom you
have conversed upon the subject, that, if I made the call, you would
meet me; but that, upon all scores, you would be much better pleased to
have nothing to do with me.' I certainly do not _exactly_ know who that
intermeddling gentleman was, with whom you say I "conferred;" but, if I
may be allowed a conjecture, I think I can recognize in him the self
same officious _gentleman_, who, I am creditably informed, originated
the report of your having made use of the gasconading expressions you
have disowned:--In this respect I may be mistaken. Be this, however, as
it may, I never gave him, or any other person, to understand that my
visit to Washington last spring, was for the purpose of "calling you
out," nor _did_ I go there with _any such view_.

How you can reconcile your affecting indifference towards me, in the
remark "that, on all scores, you would be much better pleased to have
nothing to do with me," with the very active part which, it is generally
known, and which your own letter clearly evinces, you have taken against
me, I am at a loss to conceive. No, sir, you feel not so much unconcern
as you pretend and wish it to be believed you do, in regard to the
course of conduct my honor and my injuries may, in my judgment, require
me to pursue. You have a _motive_, not to be concealed from the world,
for all you have done or said, or for any future endeavors you may make,
to bar my "re-admission" into the service. It is true, you have never
given me a direct, formal and written invitation, to meet you in the
field, such as one gentleman of honor _ought_ to send to another. But,
if your own admissions, that you had "incautiously said you would meet
me if I wished it," and "that if you had not _pledged yourself_, you
might re-consider the subject," and all this too without any provocation
on my part, or the most distant intimation from me that I had a desire
to meet you, do not amount to a challenge, I cannot comprehend the
object or import of such declarations--made as they were in the face of
the world; and to those in particular, whom you knew would not only
communicate them to me, but give them circulation; under all the
circumstances of the case, I consider you as having thrown down the
gauntlet, and I have no hesitation in accepting it. This is, however, a
point which it will not be for you or me to decide, nor do I view it as
of any other importance than as respects the privilege allowed to the
challenged party in relation to the choice of weapons, distance, &c.
about which I feel not more "fastidious," I assure you, sir, than you
do; nor do I claim any advantage whatever, which I have no right to
insist upon; could I stoop so low as to solicit any. I know you too well
to believe you would have any inclination to concede them. All I demand
is to be placed upon equal grounds with you; such as two honorable men
may decide upon, _as just and proper_. Upon the subject of duelling, I
perfectly coincide with the opinions you have expressed. I consider it
as a barbarous practice which ought to be exploded from civilized
society; but, sir, there may be causes of such extraordinary and
aggravated insult and injury, received by an individual, as to render an
appeal to arms, on his part, absolutely necessary; mine I conceive to
be a case of that description, and I feel myself constrained, by every
tie that binds me to society, by all that can make life desirable to me,
to resort to this mode of obtaining that redress due to me, at your
hands, as the only alternative which now seems to present itself for the
preservation of my honor.

To conclude: you say, "from my manner of proceeding, it appears to you
that I have come to the determination to fight some one, and that I have
selected you for that purpose." To say nothing of the vanity you
display, and the importance you seem to attach to yourself, in thus
intimating, that, being resolved to _fight myself_ into favor, I could
no otherwise do so than by fixing upon you, the very reverse of which
you infer is the fact; I never wished to fight in this way, and, had you
permitted me to remain at rest, I should not have disturbed _you_; I
should have pursued the "even tenor of my way," without regarding you at
all. But all this would not have suited your ambitious views. You have
_hunted_ me out, have persecuted me with all the power and influence of
your office, and have declared your determination to attempt to drive me
from the navy, if I should make any "efforts" to be employed, and for
what purpose, or from what other motive than to obtain my rank, I know
not: if my life will give it to you, you shall have an opportunity of
obtaining it. And now, sir, I have only to add, that, if you will make
known your determination, and the name of your friend, I will give that
of mine, in order to complete the necessary arrangements to a final
close of this affair. I can make no other apology for the apparent
tardiness of this communication, than merely to state, that, being on
very familiar terms with my family, out of tenderness to their feelings,
I have written under great restraint.

I am, sir, your obedient servant,
JAMES BARRON.

* * * * *

No. 10.

WASHINGTON, _29th December, 1819_.

SIR: Your communication of the 30th ultimo reached me as I was on the
eve of my departure for the north; whence I did not return till the 22d
inst. It was my determination, on the receipt of your letter, not to
notice it; but upon mature reflection, I conceive, that as I have
suffered myself to be drawn into this unprofitable discussion, I ought
not to leave the false colouring and calumnies, which you have
introduced into your letter, unanswered. You state, that a much more
laconic reply to your letter of 23d October would have served your
purpose. Of this I have no doubt; and to have insured such an answer,
you had only to make a laconic call. I had already informed you of the
course I had felt myself bound to pursue respecting you, and of the
reasons which induced my conduct, and that, if you required it, I would
overcome my own disinclination and fight you. Instead of calling me out
for injuries which you chose to insist that I have heaped upon you,
_you_ have thought fit to enter into this war of words.

I reiterate to you, that I have not challenged, nor do I intend to
challenge you. I do not consider it essential to my reputation that I
should notice any thing which may come from you, the more particularly,
when you declare your sole object, in wishing to draw the challenge from
me, is, that you may avail yourself of the advantages which rest with
the challenged. It is evident, that you think, or your friends for you,
that a fight will help you; but in fighting, you wish to incur the least
possible risk. Now, sir, not believing that a fight of this nature will
raise me at all in public estimation, but may even have a contrary
effect, I do not feel at all disposed to remove the difficulties that
lay in your way. If we fight, it must be of your seeking; and you must
take all the risk and all the inconvenience which usually attend the
challenger, in such cases.

You deny having made the communication to the British consul at
Pernambuco, which captain Lewis and Mr. Goodwin have represented. The
man capable of making such a communication, would not hesitate in
denying it; and, until you can bring forward some testimony, other than
your own, you ought not to expect that the testimony of those gentlemen
will be discredited. As to the veracity of the British consul, I can
prove, if necessary, that you have, yourself, vouched for that.

You offer, as your excuse for not returning to your country, during our
war with England, that you had not been invited home by the then
Secretary, notwithstanding you had written him, expressive of your
wishes to be employed. You state, that, if you "had received the
slightest intimation from the department, that you would have been
employed on your return, you would have considered no sacrifice too
great, no exertion within your power should have been omitted to obtain
so desirable an object." From this, I would infer, that, in consequence
of not receiving this intimation, you did not make the exertions in your
power to return, and this I hold to be an insufficient excuse. You do
not pretend to have made any attempt, except by the way of the cartel,
the John Adams. You cannot believe, that reporting yourself to the
Department, at the distance of 4000 miles, when the same conveyance
which brought your letter would have brought yourself, will be received
as evincing sufficient zeal to join the arms of your country; and
besides, you say it was not believed, for a considerable time after the
news of war arrived in Denmark, that the war would last six months. With
those impressions, you must have known, that it would have occupied at
least that time for your letter to have arrived at the Department, you
to receive an answer, and then to repair to America. You deny that the
opportunities of returning were frequent. The custom house entries at
Baltimore and New York alone, from the single port of Bordeaux, will
show nearly an hundred arrivals; and it is well known, that it required
only a few days to perform the journey from Copenhagen to Bordeaux, by
the ordinary course of post. You deny having been advised to return to
this country, by your friends, during the war. Mr. Cook, of Norfolk,
your relative, says he wrote to you to that effect; and Mr. Forbes, then
our consul at Copenhagen, who is now at this place, says he urged you in
person to do so.

You have charged the officers who concur with me in opinion respecting
your claims to service, as being my satellites. I think I am not
mistaken, when I inform you, that all the officers of our grade, your
superiors as well as inferiors, with the exception of one who is your
junior concur in the opinion, that you ought not to be employed again,
whilst the imputations, which now lie against you, remain; nor have they
been less backward than myself in expressing their opinions.

Your charge of my wishing to obtain your rank, will apply to all who are
your juniors, with as much force as to myself. You never have interfered
with me in the service, and, at the risk of being esteemed by you a
little vain, I must say, I do not think you ever will. Were I disposed
to kill out of my way, as you have been pleased to insinuate, those who
interfere with my advancement, there are others, my superiors, who I
consider fairly barring my pretensions; and it would serve such purpose
better, to begin with them. You say, you were the means of obtaining me
the first command I ever had in service. I deny it: I feel that I owe my
standing to my exertions only.

Your statement, that your advice prevented me from resigning on a former
occasion, is equally unfounded. I have never, since my first admission
into the navy, contemplated resigning; and, instead of being ordered, as
you state, from the 1st lieutenancy of the New York, to the 2d of the
Chesapeake, Commodore Chauncy, who was then flag captain, can testify,
that I was solicited to remain as 1st lieutenant of the flag ship: and I
should have remained as such, had it not been for the demand which the
government of Malta made, for the delivery of the persons who had been
concerned in the affair of honour, which led to the death of a British
officer. It was deemed necessary to send all the persons, implicated in
that affair, out of the way; and I went home in the Chesapeake, as a
passenger.

You have been pleased to allude to my having received the hospitality of
your family. The only time I recollect having been at your house, was on
my arrival from the Mediterranean in the Congress, fourteen years past.
You came on board, and dined with me; and invited the Tunisian
ambassador and myself to spend the evening with you at Hampton. I
accepted your invitation. Your having now reminded me of it, tends very
much towards removing the weight of obligation I might otherwise have
felt on this score.

You speak of the good conduct of your ancestors. As your own conduct is
under discussion, and not theirs, I cannot see how their former good
character can at all serve your present purpose. Fortunately for our
country, every man stands upon his own merit.

You state that the "Virginia delegation in Congress" had presented a
memorial in your favour. I would infer from this, that all, or the
greater part of the Virginia delegation, had interposed in your behalf.
This, sir, is not the fact. A few of them, I am informed, did take an
interest in your case; but, being informed of the charges existing
against you, of which they were before unapprised, they did not press
farther your claims. From the knowledge I have of the high-minded
gentlemen that compose the Virginia delegation, if they would take the
trouble to examine your case, I should, for my own part, be entirely
satisfied to place the honour of the service upon their decision.

You offer as your excuse for permitting four months to intervene between
our June correspondence, (with which, from your letter, you appeared to
be satisfied) and your letter of 23d October, your indisposition. I am
authorized in saying, that, for the greater part of the four months, you
were out attending to your usual avocations.

Your offering your life to me would be quite affecting, and might (as
you evidently intend) excite sympathy, if it were not ridiculous. It
will not be lost sight of, that your jeopardizing your life depends upon
yourself, and not upon me; and is done with a view to fighting your own
character up. I have now to inform you, that I shall pay no further
attention to any communication you may make to me, other than a direct
call to the field.

Your obedient servant,
STEPHEN DECATUR.

To Commodore JAMES BARRON,
_Hampton, Va._

* * * * *

No. 11.

NORFORK, _January 16th, 1820_.

SIR: Your letter of the 29th ult. I have received. In it you say that
you have now to inform me that you shall pay no further attention to any
communication that I may make to you other than a direct call to the
field; in answer to which I have only to reply, that whenever you will
consent to meet me on fair and equal grounds, that is, such as two
honourable men may consider just and proper, you are at liberty to view
this as that call; the whole tenor of your conduct to me justifies this
course of proceeding on my part; as for your charges and remarks, I
regard them not, particularly your sympathy; you know not such a
feeling--I cannot be suspected of making the attempt to excite it.

I am, sir, yours, &c.
JAMES BARRON.

To Commodore STEPHEN DECATUR,
_Washington_.

* * * * *

No. 12.

WASHINGTON, _Jan. 24, 1820_.

SIR: I have received your communication of the 16th, and am at a loss to
know what your intention is. If you intended it as a challenge, I accept
it, and refer you to my friend Com. Bainbridge, who is fully authorized
by me to make any arrangement he pleases, as regards weapons, mode, or
distance.

Your obedient servant,
STEPHEN DECATUR.

Com. JAMES BARRON.

* * * * *

No. 14.

NORFOLK _Feb_. 6, 1820.

SIR: Your letter of the 29th of December found me confined to bed, with
a violent bilious fever, and it was eight days after its arrival before
I was able to read it; the fever, however, about that time, left me, and
my convalescence appeared to promise a moderately quick recovery. I,
therefore, wrote you my note of the 16th ultimo; in two days after I
relapsed, and have had a most violent attack, which has reduced me very
low, but as soon as I am in a situation to write, you shall hear from me
to the point.

I am, sir,
Your obedient servant,

JAMES BARRON.

Com. STEPHEN DECATUR,
_Washington_.

Transcriber Notes:

Obsolete spellings of words (e.g., behove, shew, somtime, stile, etc.)
have been retained.

On page 5, "degraged" was replaced with "degraded".

On page 7, "be the folllowing" was replaced with "by the following".

On page 9, "a Miss ******" was replaced with "a Miss----".

On page 10, in "I should no otherwise notice" the phrase "should no
otherwise" could have been "should not otherwise", but then "should no
otherwise" could have been correct at the time. Thus, no change was
made.

On page 13, "henious" was replaced with "heinous".

On page 16, "sattellites" was replaced with "satellites".

On page 18, the period after "obtain my rank" was replaced with a comma.

On page 18, a period was added after "22 inst".

On page 21, "NO. 12" was replaced with "No. 12".

There was no "No. 13" letter. Instead the letter numbers jump from
twelve to fourteen.

*** End of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "Correspondence, between the late Commodore Stephen Decatur and Commodore James Barron - which led to the unfortunate meeting of the twenty-second of March" ***

Home