Home
  By Author [ A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z |  Other Symbols ]
  By Title [ A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z |  Other Symbols ]
  By Language
all Classics books content using ISYS

Download this book: [ ASCII | HTML | PDF ]

Look for this book on Amazon


We have new books nearly every day.
If you would like a news letter once a week or once a month
fill out this form and we will give you a summary of the books for that week or month by email.

Title: A Manual of Elementary Geology - or, The Ancient Changes of the Earth and its Inhabitants - as Illustrated by Geological Monuments
Author: Lyell, Charles, Sir, 1797-1875
Language: English
As this book started as an ASCII text book there are no pictures available.
Copyright Status: Not copyrighted in the United States. If you live elsewhere check the laws of your country before downloading this ebook. See comments about copyright issues at end of book.

*** Start of this Doctrine Publishing Corporation Digital Book "A Manual of Elementary Geology - or, The Ancient Changes of the Earth and its Inhabitants - as Illustrated by Geological Monuments" ***

This book is indexed by ISYS Web Indexing system to allow the reader find any word or number within the document.



(This file was produced from images generously made


[Illustration: From a Painting by James Hall, Esq.  Engraved by
S. Williams.

STRATA OF RED SANDSTONE, SLIGHTLY INCLINED, RESTING ON VERTICAL SCHIST, AT
THE SICCAR POINT, BERWICKSHIRE.

TO ILLUSTRATE UNCONFORMABLE STRATIFICATION. See page 60.

_"The mind seemed to grow giddy by looking so far into the abyss of time;
and while we listened with earnestness and admiration to the philosopher
who was now unfolding to us the order and series of these wonderful events,
we became sensible how much farther reason may sometimes go than
imagination can venture to follow."_--PLAYFAIR, Biography of Hutton.]



           A MANUAL OF ELEMENTARY GEOLOGY:
  THE ANCIENT CHANGES OF THE EARTH AND ITS INHABITANTS

      AS ILLUSTRATED BY GEOLOGICAL MONUMENTS.


         BY SIR CHARLES LYELL, M.A. F.R.S.

AUTHOR OF "PRINCIPLES OF GEOLOGY," "TRAVELS IN NORTH AMERICA," "A SECOND
VISIT TO THE UNITED STATES," ETC. ETC.



"It is a philosophy which never rests--its law is progress: a point which
yesterday was invisible is its goal to-day, and will be its starting post
to-morrow."
                            EDINBURGH REVIEW, No. 132. p. 83. July, 1837.



  _FOURTH AND ENTIRELY REVISED EDITION._
  ILLUSTRATED WITH 500 WOODCUTS.

  LONDON:
  JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET.
  1852.



  LONDON:
  SPOTTISWOODES and SHAW,
  New-street-Square.



PREFACE TO THE FOURTH EDITION.


In consequence of the rapid sale of the third edition of the "Manual," of
which 2000 copies were printed in January last, a new edition has been
called for in less than a twelvemonth. Even in this short interval some new
facts of unusual importance in palæontology have come to light, or have
been verified for the first time. Instead of introducing these new
discoveries into the body of the work, which would render them inaccessible
to the purchasers of the former edition, I have given them in a postscript
to this Preface (printed and sold separately), and have pointed out at the
same time their bearing on certain questions of the highest theoretical
interest.[v-A]

As on former occasions, I shall take this opportunity of stating that the
"Manual" is not an epitome of the "Principles of Geology," nor intended as
introductory to that work. So much confusion has arisen on this subject,
that it is desirable to explain fully the different ground occupied by the
two publications. The first five editions of the "Principles" comprised a
4th book, in which some account was given of systematic geology, and in
which the principal rocks composing the earth's crust and their organic
remains were described. In subsequent editions this book was omitted, it
having been expanded, in 1838, into a separate treatise called the
"Elements of Geology," first re-edited in 1842, and again recast and
enlarged in 1851, and entitled "A Manual of Elementary Geology."

Although the subjects of both treatises relate to geology, as their titles
imply, their scope is very different; the "Principles" containing a view of
the _modern_ changes of the earth and its inhabitants, while the "Manual"
relates to the monuments of _ancient_ changes. In separating the one from
the other, I have endeavoured to render each complete in itself, and
independent; but if asked by a student which he should read first, I would
recommend him to begin with the "Principles," as he may then proceed from
the known to the unknown, and be provided beforehand with a key for
interpreting the ancient phenomena, whether of the organic or inorganic
world, by reference to changes now in progress.

Owing to the former incorporation of the two subjects in one work, and the
supposed identity of their subject matter, it may be useful to give here a
brief abstract of the contents of the "Principles," for the sake of
comparison.


_Abstract of the "Principles of Geology," Eighth Edition._


BOOK I.

  1. Historical sketch of the early progress of geology, chaps. i. to iv.

  2. Circumstances which combined to make the first cultivators of the
  science regard the former course of nature as different from the
  present, and the former changes of the earth's surface as the effects of
  agents different in kind and degree from those now acting, chap. v.

  3. Whether the former variations in climate established by geology are
  explicable by reference to existing causes, chaps. vi. to viii.

  4. Theory of the progressive development of organic life in former ages,
  and the introduction of man into the earth, chap. ix.

  5. Supposed former intensity of aqueous and igneous causes considered,
  chaps. x. and xi.

  6. How far the older rocks differ in texture from those now
  forming, chap. xii.

  7. Supposed alternate periods of repose and disorder, chap. xiii.


BOOK II.

CHANGES NOW IN PROGRESS IN THE INORGANIC WORLD.

  8. Aqueous causes now in action: Floods--Rivers--Carrying power of
  ice--Springs and their deposits--Deltas--Waste of cliffs and strata
  produced by marine currents: chaps. xiv. to xxii.

  9. Permanent effects of igneous causes now in operation: Active volcanos
  and earthquakes--their effects and causes: chaps. xxiii. to xxxiii.


BOOK III.

CHANGES OF THE ORGANIC WORLD NOW IN PROGRESS.

  10. Doctrine of the transmutation of species controverted,
  chaps. xxxiv. and xxxv.

  11. Whether species have a real existence in nature,
  chaps. xxxvi. and xxxvii.

  12. Laws which regulate the geographical distribution of species, chaps.
  xxxviii. to xl.

  13. Creation and extinction of species, chaps. xli. to xliv.

  14. Imbedding of organic bodies, including the remains of man and his
  works, in strata now forming, chaps. xlv. to l.

  15. Formation of coral reefs, chap. li.

It will be seen on comparing this analysis of the contents of the
"Principles" with the headings of the chapters of the present work (see p.
xxiii.), that the two treatises have but little in common; or, to repeat
what I have said in the Preface to the 8th edition of the "Principles,"
they have the same kind of connection which Chemistry bears to Natural
Philosophy, each being subsidiary to the other, and yet admitting of being
considered as different departments of science.[vi-A]
                                                             CHARLES LYELL.
                              _11 Harley Street, London, December 10. 1851._


FOOTNOTES:

[v-A] Postscript to 4th edition of the Manual, price 6_d._

[vi-A] As it is impossible to enable the reader to recognize rocks and
minerals at sight by aid of verbal descriptions or figures, he will do well
to obtain a well-arranged collection of specimens, such as may be procured
from Mr. Tennant (149. Strand), teacher of Mineralogy at King's College,
London.



POSTSCRIPT.

  Tracks of a Lower Silurian reptile in Canada--Chelonian footprints in
  Old Red Sandstone, Morayshire--Skeleton of a reptile in the same
  formation in Scotland--Eggs of Batrachians (?) in a lower division of
  the "Old Red," or Devonian--Footprints of Lower Carboniferous reptiles
  in the United States--Fossil rain-marks of the Carboniferous period in
  Nova Scotia--Triassic Mammifer from the Keuper of Stuttgart--Cretaceous
  Gasteropoda--Dicotyledonous leaves in Lower Cretaceous strata--Bearing
  of the recent discoveries above-mentioned on the theory of the
  progressive development of animal life.


_Tracks of a Lower Silurian reptile in Canada._--In the year 1847, Mr.
Robert Abraham announced in the Montreal Gazette, of which he was editor,
that the track of a freshwater tortoise had been observed on the surface of
a stratum of sandstone in a quarry opened on the banks of the St. Lawrence
at Beauharnais in Upper Canada. The inhabitants of the parish being
perfectly familiar with the track of the amphibious mud-turtles or
terrapins of their country, assured Mr. Abraham that the fossil impressions
closely resembled those left by the recent species on sand or mud. Having
satisfied himself of the truth of their report, he was struck with the
novelty and geological interest of the phenomenon. Imagining the rock to be
the lowest member of the old red sandstone, he was aware that no traces had
as yet been found of a reptile in strata of such high antiquity.

He was soon informed by Mr. Logan, at that time engaged in the geological
survey of Canada, that the white sandstone above Montreal was really much
older than the "Old Red," or Devonian. It had in fact been ascertained many
years before, by the State surveyors of New York (who called it the
"Potsdam Sandstone"), to lie at the base of the whole Silurian series. As
such it had been pointed out to me in 1841, in the valley of the Mohawk, by
Mr. James Hall[vii-A], and its position was correctly described by Mr.
Emmons, on the borders of Lake Champlain, where I examined it in 1842. It
has there the character of a shallow-water deposit, ripple-marked
throughout a considerable thickness, and full of a species of Lingula. The
flat valves of this shell, of a dark colour, are so numerous, and so
arranged in horizontal layers, as to play the part of mica, causing the
rock to divide into laminæ, as in some micaceous sandstones.

When I mentioned this rock in my Travels[vii-B] as occurring between
Kingston and Montreal, (the same in which the Chelonian foot-prints have
since been found,) I spoke of it as the lowest member of the Lower Silurian
series; but no traces of any organic being of a higher grade than the
Lingula had then been seen in it, and I called attention to the singular
fact, that the oldest fossil form then known in the world, was a marine
shell strictly referable to a genus now existing.

Early in the year 1851, Mr. Logan laid before the Geological Society of
London a slab of this sandstone from Beauharnais, containing no less than
twenty-eight foot-prints of the fore and hind feet of a quadruped, and six
casts in plaster of Paris, exhibiting a continuation of the same trail.
Each cast contained from twenty-six to twenty-eight impressions with a
median channel equidistant from the two parallel rows of foot-prints, the
one made by the feet of the right side, the other by those of the left. In
these specimens a greater number of successive foot-marks belonging to one
and the same series were displayed than had ever before been observed in
any rock ancient or modern. Mr. Abraham has inferred that the breadth of
the quadruped was from five to seven inches. A detailed account of the
trail was published by Professor Owen, in April 1851, from which the
following extracts are made.

"The foot-prints are in pairs, and the pairs extend in two parallel series,
with a channel exactly midway between the right and left series. The pairs
of the same side succeed each other at intervals, varying from one inch and
a half to two inches and a half, the common distance being about two
inches. The interval between the right and left pairs, measured from the
inner border of the small prints, is three inches and a half, and from the
outer border of the exterior or large prints, is seven inches. The shallow
median track is one inch and a quarter in breadth, varying in depth, but
not in its relative position to the right and left foot prints."

"The inference to be deduced from these characters is, that the impressions
were made by a quadruped with the hind feet larger and somewhat wider apart
than the fore feet, with both hind and fore feet either very short, or
prevented by some other part of the animal's structure from making long
steps; and with the limbs of the right side wide apart from those of the
left; consequently, that the quadruped had a broad trunk in proportion to
its length, supported on limbs either short, or capable only of short
steps, and with rounded and stumpy feet, not provided with long claws.
There are faint traces of a fine reticulate pattern of the cuticle of the
sole at the bottom of some of the foot-prints on one portion of the
sandstone; and the surface of the sand is generally smoother there than
where not impressed, which, with the rising of the sand at the border of
the prints, indicates the weight of the impressing body. The median groove
may be interpreted as due either to the abdomen or the tail of the animal;
but as there is no indication of any bending or movement of a tail from
side to side, it was probably scooped out of the soft sand by a hard
breast-plate or plastron. If this were so, it may be inferred that
the species was a freshwater or estuary tortoise rather than
a land tortoise."[viii-A]

Previously to this discovery, the trias was the oldest stratum in which
any remains or signs of a Chelonian had been detected. Numerous other
trails have since been observed (1850-51) in various localities in Canada,
all in the same very ancient fossiliferous rock; and Mr. Logan, who has
visited the spots, will shortly publish a description of the phenomena.

_Chelonian foot-prints in Old Red Sandstone, Morayshire._--Captain Lambart
Brickenden has just communicated to the Geological Society of London a
drawing and description of a continuous series of no less than thirty-four
foot-prints of a quadruped observed in the course of last year (1850), on a
slab of sandstone quarried at Cummingstone, near Elgin, in Morayshire, a
rock which has always been considered as an upper member of the Devonian or
"Old Red."[ix-A] A part of the track, the course of which was from A to B,
is represented in the annexed woodcut, fig. 521. The foot-prints are in
pairs, forming two parallel rows, which are somewhat less distant from each
other than those of the Lower Silurian tortoise of Canada above mentioned.
The stride, on the other hand, is four inches, or twice that of the
Beauharnais Chelonian. The hind foot is exactly of the same size,
being one inch in diameter, and larger than the fore foot in the
proportion of four to three.

[Illustration: Fig. 521. Scale one-sixth the original size.

Part of the trail of a (Chelonian?) quadruped from the Old Red Sandstone of
Cummingstone, near Elgin, Morayshire.--Captain Brickenden.]

_Skeleton of a reptile, allied to the Batrachians, in the Old Red Sandstone
of Morayshire._--Mr. Patrick Duff, author of a "Sketch of the Geology of
Morayshire" (Elgin, 1842), obtained recently (October, 1851), from the rock
above alluded to, the first example ever seen of the skeleton of a reptile
in the Old Red Sandstone. He has kindly allowed me to give a figure of this
fossil, of which Dr. Mantell has drawn up a detailed osteological account
for publication in the "Journal of the Geological Society of London." The
bones in this specimen have decomposed, but the natural position of almost
all of them can be seen, and nearly perfect casts of their form taken from
the hollow moulds which they have left. The matrix is a fine-grained,
whitish sandstone, with a cement of carbonate of lime. The skeleton
exhibits the general characters of the Lacertians, blended with
peculiarities that are Batrachian. Hence Dr. Mantell infers that this
reptile was either a freshwater Batrachian, resembling the Triton, or a
small terrestrial Lizard. Slight indications are visible of very minute
conical teeth. Captain Brickenden, who is well acquainted with the geology
of that part of Scotland, informs me that this fossil was found in the Hill
of Spynie, north of the town of Elgin, in a rock quarried for building, and
the same in which the Chelonian foot-prints, alluded to in the last page,
occur. The skeleton is about four and a half inches in length, but part of
the tail is concealed in the rock. Dr. Mantell has proposed for it the
generic name of Telerpeton, from +têle+, afar off, and +herpeton+, a
reptile; while the specific name Elginense commemorates the principal place
near which it was obtained.

[Illustration: Fig. 522. Natural size. _Telerpeton Elginense._ (Mantell.)

Reptile of Old Red Sandstone, from near Elgin, Morayshire.]

_Eggs of Batrachians (?) in the Old Red Sandstone of Scotland._--At page
344. of this work I have given two figures (figs. 397 and 398.) of small
groups of eggs, very common in the shales and sandstones of the "Old Red"
of Kincardineshire, Forfarshire, and Fife. I threw out as a conjecture,
that they might belong to gasteropodous mollusca, like those represented in
fig. 399. p. 345.; but Dr. Mantell, some years ago, showed me a small
bundle of the dried-up eggs of the common English frog (see fig. 524 _a_.),
black and carbonaceous, and so identical in appearance with the fossils in
question, that he suggested the probability of these last being of
Batrachian origin. The plants by which they are often accompanied (fig.
398. p. 344.), I formerly supposed to be Fuci, but Mr. Bunbury tells me
that their grass-like form agrees well with the idea of their being
freshwater, and of the family Fluviales.

The absence of all shells, so far as our researches have yet gone, in the
slates and sandstones of Scotland above alluded to, raises a presumption
against their marine origin, and a still stronger one against the fossil
eggs being those of Gasteropoda. It is well known that a single female of
the Batrachian tribe ejects annually an astonishing quantity of spawn. Mr.
Newport, author of many accurate researches into the metamorphoses of the
Amphibia, having examined my fossils from Forfarshire, concurs in Dr.
Mantell's opinion that the clusters of eggs (figs. 397. 398. p. 344.) may
be those of frogs; while other larger ones, occurring singly or in pairs in
the same slates, and often attached to a leaf, may be the ova of a gigantic
Triton or Salamander. (See figs. 523, 524, 525.) I may observe that the
subdivision of the Old Red Sandstone, in which these plants and ova occur
(No. 4. of the section, fig. 62. p. 48.), is considerably lower in position
than the rock in which the Telerpeton of Elgin is imbedded.

[Illustration: Fig. 523. Fossil.--Old Red.

Fig. 523. Slab of Old Red Sandstone, Forfarshire, with eggs of Batrachians.

  _a._ Ova in a carbonized state.
  _b._ Egg cells; the ova shed.]

[Illustration: Fig. 524. Recent.

Fig. 524. Eggs of the common frog, _Rana temporaria_, in a carbonized
state, from a dried-up pond in Clapham Common.

  _a._ The ova.
  _b._ A transverse section of the mass exhibiting the form of the
       egg-cells.]

[Illustration: Fig. 525. Eggs of Batrachians.--Old Red Sandstone.

Fig. 525. Shale of Old Red Sandstone, or Devonian, Forfarshire, with
impression of plants and eggs of Batrachians.

  _a._   Two pair of ova resembling those large Salamanders or Tritons
         on the same leaf.
  _b b._ Detached ova.
  _c._   Egg-cells of frogs or _Ranina_.]

_Foot-prints of Lower Carboniferous reptiles in the United States._--I have
stated, at p. 340., that in 1849, Mr. Isaac Lea observed the foot-marks of
a large reptile in the lowest beds of the coal formation at Pottsville,
about seventy miles N.E. of Philadelphia. These researches have since been
carried farther by Professor H. D. Rogers, in the same region of
anthracitic coal, lying on the eastern flank of the Alleghany Mountains.
Beneath the productive coal-measures of that country occurs a dense mass of
red shales and sandstones, which correspond nearly in position to the
millstone grit and Mountain Limestone of the south-east of England. In
these beds foot-prints, referred to three species of quadrupeds, have
lately been detected, all of them five-toed and in double rows, with an
opposite symmetry, as if made by right and left feet, while they likewise
display the alternation of fore foot and hind foot. One species, the
largest of the three, presents a diameter for each foot-print of about two
inches, and shows the fore and hind feet to be nearly equal in dimensions.
It exhibits a length of stride of about nine inches, and a breadth between
the right and left treads of nearly four inches. The impressions of the
hind feet are but little in the rear of the fore feet. The animal which
made them is supposed to have been allied to a Saurian, rather than to a
Batrachian or Chelonian; but more information is required before so
difficult a point can be decided. With these foot-marks were seen shrinkage
cracks, such as are caused by the sun's heat in mud, and rain-spots, with
the signs of the trickling of water on a wet, sandy beach; all confirming
the conclusion derived from the foot-prints, that the quadrupeds belonged
to air-breathers, and not to aquatic races.[xii-A] The Cheirotherian
foot-prints, figured by me at p. 338., in which the fore and hind feet are
very unequal in size, betoken a distinct genus, and occur in the midst of
the productive coal measures, being consequently less ancient.

_On Fossil Rain-marks of the Carboniferous Period in North
America._--Having alluded to the spots left by rain on the surface of
carboniferous strata in the Alleghanies, on which quadrupedal foot-prints
are seen, I may mention that similar rain-prints are conspicuous in the
coal measures of Cape Breton, in Nova Scotia, in which Mr. Richard Brown
has described Stigmariæ and erect trunks of trees, and where there are
proofs, as stated at p. 324., of many fossil forests ranged one above the
other. In such a region, if anywhere, might we expect to detect evidence of
the fall of rain on a sea-beach, so repeatedly must the conditions of the
same area have oscillated between land and sea. The intercalation of
deposits, containing shells of marine or brackish water, indicate the
constant proximity of a body of salt water when the clays which supported
the upright trees were formed. In the course of 1851, Mr. Brown had the
kindness to send me some greenish slates from Sydney, Cape Breton, on which
are imprinted very delicate impressions of rain-drops, with several
worm-tracks (_a_, _b_, fig. 526.), such as usually accompany rain-marks on
the recent mud of the Bay of Fundy, and other modern beaches.[xii-B]

[Illustration: Fig. 526. Carboniferous rain-prints with worm-tracks (_a_,
_b_) on green shale, from Cape Breton, Nova Scotia.]

[Illustration: Fig. 527. Casts of rain-prints on a portion of the
same slab, No. 526. seen on the under side of an incumbent layer
of arenaceous shale.

The arrow represents the direction of the shower.]

[Illustration: Fig. 528. Casts of carboniferous rain-prints and
shrinkage-cracks, (_a_) on the under side of a layer of sandstone, Cape
Breton, Nova Scotia.]

The casts of rain-prints, in figs. 527. and 528., project from the under
side of two layers, occurring at different levels, the one a sandy shale,
resting on the green shale (fig. 526.), the other a sandstone presenting a
similar warty or blistered surface, on which are also observable some small
ridges as at _a_, which stand out in relief, and afford evidence of cracks
formed by the shrinkage of subjacent clay, on which rain had fallen. Many
of the associated sandstones are described by Mr. Brown as ripple-marked.

The great humidity of the climate of the coal period had been previously
inferred from the nature of its vegetation and the continuity of its
forests for hundreds of miles; but it is satisfactory to have at length
obtained such positive proofs of showers of rain, the drops of which
resembled in their average size those which now fall from the clouds. From
such data we may presume that the atmosphere of the carboniferous period
corresponded in density with that now investing the globe, and that
different currents of air varied then as now, in temperature, so as to give
rise, by their mixture, to the condensation of aqueous vapour.

_Triassic Mammifer (Microlestes antiquus Plieninger.)_--In the year 1847,
Professor Plieninger, of Stuttgart, published a description of two fossil
molar teeth, referred by him to a warm-blooded quadruped[xiii-A], which he
obtained from a bone-breccia in Würtemberg occurring between the lias and
the keuper. As the announcement of so novel a fact has never met with the
attention it deserved, we are indebted to Dr. Jäger, of Stuttgart, for
having recently reminded us of it in his Memoir on the Fossil Mammalia of
Würtemberg.[xiii-B]

Fig. 529. represents the tooth first found, taken from the plate published
in 1847, by Professor Plieninger; and fig. 530. is a drawing of the same
executed from the original by Mr. Hermann von Meyer, which he has been
kind enough to send me. Fig. 529. is a second and larger molar, copied from
Dr. Jäger's plate lxxi., fig. 15.

[Illustration: Fig. 529. _Microlestes antiquus_, Plieninger. Molar tooth
magnified. Upper Trias, Diegerloch, near Stuttgart, Würtemberg.

  _a._ View of inner side?
  _b._ same, outer side?
  _c._ Same in profile.
  _d._ Crown of same.]

[Illustration: Fig. 530. _Microlestes antiquus_, Plien.

View of same molar as No. 529. From a drawing by Herman von Meyer.

  _a._ View of inner side?
  _b._ Crown of same.]

[Illustration: Fig. 531. Molar of _Microlestes_? Plien. 4 times as large as
fig. 529. From the trias of Diegerloch, Stuttgart.]

Professor Plieninger inferred in 1847, from the double fangs of this tooth
and their unequal size, and from the form and number of the protuberances
or cusps on the flat crowns, that it was the molar of a Mammifer; and
considering it as predaceous, probably insectivorous, he called it
Microlestes, from +mikros+, little, and +lêstês+, a beast of prey. Soon
afterwards, he found the second tooth also, at the same locality,
Diegerloch, about two miles to the south-east of Stuttgart. Some of its
cusps are broken, but there seem to have been six of them originally. From
its agreement in general characters, it is supposed by Professor Plieninger
to be referable to the same animal, but as it is four times as big, it may
perhaps have belonged to another allied species. This molar is attached to
the matrix consisting of sandstone, whereas the tooth, No. 529., is
isolated. Several fragments of bone, differing in structure from that of
the associated saurians and fish, and believed to be mammiferous, were
imbedded near them in the same rock.

Mr. Waterhouse, of the British Museum, after studying the annexed figs.
529. 531. and the descriptions of Prof. Plieninger, observes, that not only
the double roots of the teeth and their crowns presenting several cusps,
resemble those of Mammalia, but the cingulum also, or ridge surrounding the
base of that part of the body of the tooth which was exposed or above the
gum, is a character distinguishing them from fish and reptiles. "The
arrangement of the six cusps or tubercles in two rows, in fig. 529., with a
groove or depression between them and the oblong form of the tooth, lead
him, he says, to regard it as a molar of the lower jaw. Both the teeth
differ from those of the Stonesfield Mammalia[xiv-A], but do not supply
sufficient data for determining to what order they belonged. Even in regard
to the Stonesfield jaws, where we possess so much ampler materials, we
cannot safely pronounce on the order."

Professor Plieninger has sent me a cast of the smaller tooth, which
exhibits well the characteristic mammalian test, the double fang; but Mr.
Owen, to whom I have shown it, is not able to recognize its affinity with
any mammalian type, recent or extinct, known to him.

It has already been stated that the stratum in which the above-mentioned
fossils occur is intermediate between the lias and the uppermost member of
the trias. That it is really triassic may be deduced from the following
considerations. In Würtemberg there are two "bone-beds," one of great
extent, and very rich in the remains of fish and reptiles, which intervenes
between the muschelkalk and keuper, the other, containing the Microlestes,
less extensive and fossiliferous, which rests on the keuper, or superior
member of the trias, and is covered by the sandstone of the lias. The
last-mentioned breccia therefore occupies the same place as the well-known
English "bone-bed" of Axmouth and Aust-cliff near Bristol, which is
shown[xv-A] to include characteristic species of muschelkalk fish, of the
genus Saurichthys, Hybodus, and Gyrolepis. In both the Würtemberg bone-beds
these three genera are also found, and one of the _species_, Saurichthys
Mougeotii, is common to both the lower and upper breccias, as is also a
remarkable reptile called Nothosaurus mirabilis. The Saurian called Belodon
by H. Von Meyer of the Thecodont family, is another Triassic form,
associated at Diegerloch with Microlestes.

Previous to this discovery of Professor Plieninger, the most ancient of
known fossil Mammalia were those of the Stonesfield slate, a subdivision of
the Lower Oolite[xv-B] no representative of this class having as yet been
met with in the Fuller's earth, or inferior Oolite (see Table, p. 258.),
nor in any member of the lias.

_Thecodont Saurians._--This family of reptiles is common to the Trias and
Permian groups in Germany, and the geologists employed in the government
survey of Great Britain have come to the conclusion, that the rock
containing the two species alluded to at p. 306., and of which the teeth
are represented in figs. 348, 349., ought rather to be referred to the
Trias than to the Permian group.


CRETACEOUS GASTEROPODA.

In speaking of the chalk of Faxoe in Denmark (p. 210.) or the highest
member of the Cretaceous series, I have remarked that it is characterized
by univalve Mollusca, both spiral and patelliform, which are wanting or
rare in the white chalk of Europe. This last statement requires, I find,
some modification. It holds true in regard to certain forms, such as Cypræa
and Oliva, found at Faxoe; but M. A. d'Orbigny enumerates 24 species of
Gasteropoda from the white chalk (Terrain Sénonien) of France alone. The
same author describes 134 French species of Gasteropoda from the chloritic
chalk marl and upper greensand (Turonien), 77 from the gault, and 90 from
the lower greensand (Neocomien), in all 325 species of Gasteropoda, from
the cretaceous group below the Maestricht beds. Among these he refers 1 to
the genus Mitra, 17 to Fusus, 17 to Trochus, 4 to Emarginula, and 36 to
Cerithium. Notwithstanding, therefore, the peculiarity of the chambered
univalves of various genera, so abundant in the chalk, the Mollusca of the
period approximate in character to the tertiary and recent Fauna far more
than was formerly supposed.


DICOTYLEDONOUS LEAVES IN LOWER CRETACEOUS STRATA.

M. Adolphe Brongniart when founding his classification of the fossiliferous
strata in reference to their imbedded fossil plants, has placed the
cretaceous group in the same division with the tertiary, that is to say, in
his "Age of Angiosperms."[xvi-A] This arrangement is based on the fact,
that the cretaceous plants display a transition character from the
vegetation of the secondary to that of the tertiary periods. Coniferæ and
Cycadeæ still flourished as in the preceding oolitic and triassic epochs;
but with these fossils, some well-marked leaves of dicotyledonous trees
referred to several species of the genus Credneria, had been found in
Germany in the Quadersandstein and Pläner-kalk. Still more recently, Dr.
Debey of Aix-la-Chapelle has met with a great variety of other leaves of
dicotyledonous plants in the cretaceous flora[xvi-B], of which he
enumerates no less than 26 species, some of the leaves being from four to
six inches in length, and in a beautiful state of preservation. In the
absence of the organs of fructification and of fossil fruits, the number of
species may be exaggerated; but we may nevertheless affirm, reasoning from
our present data, that in the lower chalk of Aix-la-Chapelle,
Dicotyledonous Angiosperms flourished nearly in equal proportions with
Gymnosperms; a fact of great significance, as some geologists had wished to
connect the rarity of dicotyledonous trees with a peculiarity in the state
of the atmosphere in the earlier ages of the planet, imagining that a
denser air and noxious gases, especially carbonic acid in excess, were
adverse to the prevalence, not only of the quick-breathing classes of
animals, (mammalia and birds,) but to a flora like that now existing, while
it favoured the predominance of reptile life, and a cryptogamic and
gymnospermous flora. The co-existence, therefore, of dicotyledonous
angiosperms in abundance with Cycads and Coniferæ, and with a rich
reptilian fauna comprising the Iguanodon, Ichthyosaurus, Pliosaurus, and
Pterodactyl, in the lower cretaceous series tends, like the oolitic
mammalia of Stonesfield and Stuttgart, and the triassic birds of
Connecticut, to dispel the idea of a meteorological state of things in the
secondary periods widely distinct from that now prevailing.

_General remarks._--In the preliminary chapters of "The Principles of
Geology," in the first and subsequent editions, I have considered the
question, how far the changes of the earth's crust in past times confirm or
invalidate the popular hypothesis of a gradual improvement in the
habitable condition of the planet, accompanied by a contemporaneous
development and progression in organic life. It had long been a favourite
theory, that in the earlier ages to which we can carry back our geological
researches, the earth was shaken by more frequent and terrible earthquakes
than now, and that there was no certainty nor stability in the order of the
natural world. A few sea-weeds and zoophytes, or plants and animals of the
simplest organization, were alone capable of existing in a state of things
so unfixed and unstable. But in proportion as the conditions of existence
improved, and great convulsions and catastrophes became rarer and more
partial, flowering plants were added to the cryptogamic class, and by the
introduction of more and more perfect species, a varied and complex flora
was at last established. In like manner, in the animal kingdom, the
zoophyte, the brachiopod, the cephalopod, the fish, the reptile, the bird,
and the warm-blooded quadruped made their entrance into the earth, one
after the other, until finally, after the close of the tertiary period,
came the quadrumanous mammalia, most nearly resembling man in outward form
and internal structure, and followed soon afterwards, if not accompanied at
first, by the human race itself.

The objections which, in 1830, I urged against this doctrine[xvii-A], in so
far as relates to the passage of the earth from a chaotic to a more settled
condition, have since been embraced by a large and steadily increasing
school of geologists; and in reference to the animate world, it will be
seen, on comparing the present state of our knowledge with that which we
possessed twenty years ago, how fully I was justified in declaring the
insufficiency of the data on which such bold generalizations, respecting
progressive development, were based. Speaking of the absence, from the
tertiary formations, of fossil Quadrumana, I observed, in 1830, that "we
had no right to expect to have detected any remains of tribes which live in
trees, until we knew more of those quadrupeds which frequent marshes,
rivers, and the borders of lakes, such being usually first met with in a
fossil state."[xvii-B] I also added, "if we are led to infer, from the
presence of crocodiles and turtles in the London clay, and from the
cocoa-nuts and spices found in the isle of Sheppey, that at the period when
our older tertiary strata were formed, the climate was hot enough for the
Quadrumana, we nevertheless could not hope to discover any of their
skeletons, until we had made considerable progress in ascertaining what
were the contemporary Pachydermata; and not one of these has been
discovered as yet in any strata of this epoch in England."

Nine years afterwards, when these fossil Pachyderms had been found in the
London clay, and in the sandy strata at its base, the remains of a monkey,
of the genus Macacus, were detected near Woodbridge, in Suffolk; and other
Quadrumana had been met with, a short time previously, in different stages
of the tertiary series, in India, France, and Brazil.

When we consider the small area of the earth's surface hitherto examined
geologically, and our scanty acquaintance with the fossil Vertebrata, even
of the environs of great European capitals, it is truly surprising that any
naturalist should be rash enough to assume that the Lower Eocene deposits
mark the era of the first creation of Quadrumana. It is, however, still
more unphilosophical to infer from a single extinct species of this order,
obtained in a latitude far from the tropics, that the Eocene Quadrumana had
not attained as high a grade of organization as those of our own times,
when the naturalist is acquainted with all, or nearly all, the species of
monkeys, apes and orangs which are contemporary with man.

To return to the year 1830, Mammalia had not then been traced to rocks of
higher antiquity than the Stonesfield Oolite, whereas we have just seen
that memorials of this class have at length made their appearance in the
Trias of Germany. In 1830 birds had been discovered no lower in the series
than the Paris gypsum, or Middle Eocene. Their bones have now been found
both in England and the Swiss Alps in the Lower Eocene, and their existence
has been established by foot-prints in the triassic epoch in North America
(p. 297.). Reptiles in 1830 had not been detected in rocks older than the
Magnesian limestone, or Permian formation; whereas the skeletons of four
species have since been brought to light (see p. 336.) in the
coal-measures, and one in the Old Red sandstone, of Europe, while the
footprints of three or four more have been observed in carboniferous rocks
of North America, not to mention the chelonian trail above described, from
the most ancient of the fossiliferous rocks of Canada, the "Potsdam
Sandstone," which lies at the base of the Lower Silurian system.
(See above, p. vii.)

Lastly, the remains of fish, which in 1830 were scarcely recognized in
deposits older than the coal, have now been found plentifully in the
Devonian, and sparingly in the Silurian, strata; though not in any
formation of such high antiquity as the Chelonian of Montreal.

Previously to the discovery last mentioned, it was by no means uncommon for
paleontologists to speak with confidence of fish as having been created
before reptiles. It was deemed reasonable to suppose that the introduction
of a particular class or order of beings into the planet coincided, in
date, with the age of the oldest rock to which the remains of that class or
order happened then to have been traced back. To be consistent with
themselves, the same naturalists ought now to take for granted that
reptiles were called into existence before fish. This they will not do,
because such a conclusion would militate against their favourite hypothesis
of an ascending scale, according to which Nature "evolved the organic
world," rendering it more and more perfect in the lapse of ages.

In our efforts to arrive at sound theoretical views on such a question, it
would seem most natural to turn to the marine invertebrate animals as to a
class affording the most complete series of monuments that have come down
to us, and where we can find corresponding terms of comparison, in strata
of every age. If, in this more complete series of her archives, Nature had
really exhibited a more simple grade of organization in fossils of the
remotest antiquity, we might have suspected that there was some foundation
of facts in the theory of successive development. But what do we find? In
the Lower Silurian there is a full representation of the Radiata, Mollusca,
and Articulata proper to the sea. The marine Fauna, indeed, in those three
classes, is so rich as almost to imply a more perfect development than that
which now peoples the ocean. Thus, in the great division of the Radiata, we
find asteroid and helianthoid zoophytes, besides crinoid and cystidean
echinoderms. In the Mollusca of the same most ancient epoch M. Barrande
enumerates, in Bohemia alone, the astonishing number of 253 species of
Cephalopoda. In the Articulata we have the crustaceans, represented by more
than 200 species of Trilobites, not to mention other genera.

It is only then, in reference to the Vertebrata, that the argument of
degeneracy in proportion as we trace fossils back to older formations can
be maintained; and the dogma rests mainly for its support on negative
evidence, whether deduced from the entire absence of the fossil
representatives of certain classes in particular rocks, or the low grade of
the first few species of a class which chance has thrown in our way.

The scarcity of all memorials of birds in strata below the Eocene, has been
a subject of surprise to some geologists. The bones formerly referred to
birds in the Wealden and Chalk, are now admitted to have belonged to flying
reptiles, of various sizes, one of them from the Kentish chalk so large as
to have measured 16 feet 6 inches from tip to tip of its outstretched
wings. Whether some elongated bones of the Stonesfield Oolite should be
referred to birds, which they seem greatly to resemble in microscopic
structure or to Pterodactyles, is a point now under investigation. If it
should be proved that no osseous remains of the class Aves have hitherto
been derived from any secondary or primary formation, we must not too
hastily conclude that birds were even scarce in these periods. The rarity
of such fossils in the Eocene marine strata is very striking. In 1846,
Professor Owen, in his "History of the Fossil Mammalia and Birds of Great
Britain," was unable to obtain more than four or five fragments of bones
and skulls of birds from the London Clay, by the aid of which four species
were recognized. Even so recently, therefore, as 1846, as much was known of
the Mammalia of the Stonesfield Oolite, as of the ornithic Fauna of our
English Eocene deposits.

To reason correctly on the value of negative facts in this branch of
Paleontology, we must first have ascertained how far the relics of birds
are now becoming preserved in new strata, whether marine, fluviatile, or
lacustrine. I have explained, in the "Principles of Geology," that the
imbedding of the bones of living birds in deposits now in progress in
inland lakes appears to be extremely rare. In the shell-marl of Scotland,
which is made up bodily of the shells of the genera Limneus, Planorbis,
Succinea, and Valvata, and in which the skeletons of deer and oxen abound,
we find no bones of birds. Yet we know that, before the lakes were drained
which yield this marl used in agriculture, the surface of the water and the
bordering swamps were covered with wild ducks, herons, and other fowl. They
left no memorials behind them, because, if they perished on the land, their
bodies decomposed or became the prey of carnivorous animals; if on the
water, they were buoyant and floated till they were devoured by predaceous
fish or birds. The same causes of obliteration have no power to efface the
foot-prints which the same creatures may leave, under favourable
circumstances, imprinted on an ancient mud-bank or shore, on which new
strata may be from time to time thrown down. In the red mud of recent
origin spread over wide areas by the high tides of the bay of Fundy,
innumerable foot-tracks of recent birds (Tringa minuta) are preserved in
successive layers, and hardened by the sun. Yet none of the bones of these
birds, though diligently searched for, have yet been discovered in digging
trenches through the red mud. It is true that, in a few spots, the bones of
birds have been met with plentifully in the older tertiary strata, but
always in rocks of freshwater origin, such as the Paris gypsum or the
lacustrine limestone of the Limagne d'Auvergne. In strata of the same
age, in Belgium and other European countries, or in the United States,
where no less careful search has been made, few, if any, fossil birds
have come to light.

We ought, therefore, most clearly to perceive that it is no part of the
plan of Nature to hand down to after times a complete or systematic record
of the former history of the animate world. The preservation of the relics,
even of aquatic tribes of animals, is an exception to the general rule,
although time may so multiply exceptional cases that they may seem to
constitute the rule; and may thus impose upon the imagination, leading us
to infer the non-existence of creatures of which no monuments are extant.
Hitherto our acquaintance with the birds, and even the Mammalia, of the
Eocene period has depended, almost everywhere, on single specimens, or on a
few individuals found in one spot. It has therefore depended on what we
commonly call chance; and we must not wonder if the casual discovery of a
tertiary, secondary, or primary rock, rich in fossil impressions of the
foot-prints of birds or quadrupeds, should modify or suddenly overthrow all
theories based on negative facts.

The chief reason why we meet more readily with the remains of every class
in tertiary than in secondary strata, is simply that the older rocks are
more and more exclusively marine in proportion as we depart farther and
farther from periods during which the existing continents were built up.
The secondary and primary formations are, for the most part, marine,--not
because the ocean was more universal in past times, but because the epochs
which preceded the Eocene were so distant from our own, that entire
continents have been since submerged.

I have alluded at p. 299. to Mr. Darwin's account of the South American
Ostriches, seen on the coast of Buenos Ayres, walking at low water over
extensive mud-banks, which are then dry, for the sake of feeding on small
fish. Perhaps no bird of such perfect organization as the eagle or vulture
may ever accompany these ostriches. Certainly, we cannot expect the condor
of the Andes to leave its trail on such a shore; and no traveller, after
searching for footprints along the whole eastern coast of South America,
would venture to speculate, from the results of such an inquiry, on the
extent, variety, or development of the feathered Fauna of the interior
of that continent.

The absence of Cetacea from rocks older than the Eocene has been frequently
adduced as lending countenance to the theory of the late appearance of the
highest class of Vertebrata on the earth. That we have hitherto failed to
detect them in the Oolite or Trias, does not imply, as we have now seen,
that Mammalia were not then created. Even in the Eocene strata of Europe,
the discovery of Cetaceans has never kept pace with that of land
quadrupeds. The only instance cited in Great Britain is a species of
Monodon, from the London clay, of doubtful authenticity as to its
geological position. On the other hand, the gigantic Zeuglodon of North
America (see p. 207.), occurs abundantly in the Middle Eocene strata
of Georgia and Alabama, from which as yet no bones of land-quadrupeds
have been obtained.

Professor Sedgwick states in a recent work[xxi-A], that he possesses in the
Woodwardian Museum, a mass of anchylosed cervical vertebræ of a whale which
he found near Ely, and which he believes to have been washed out of the
Kimmeridge clay, a member of the Upper Oolite; but its true geological site
is not well determined. It differs, says Professor Owen, from any other
known fossil or recent whale.

In the present imperfect state then of our information, we can scarcely say
more than that the Cetacea may have been scarce, in the secondary and
primary periods. It is quite conceivable that when aquatic saurians, some
of them carnivorous, like the Ichthyosaurus, were swarming in the sea, and
when there were large herbivorous reptiles, like the Iguanodon, on the
land, such reptiles may, to a certain extent, have superseded the Cetacea,
and discharged their functions in the animal economy.

The views which I proposed originally in the Principles of Geology in
opposition to the theory of progressive development may be thus briefly
explained. From the earliest period at which plants and animals can be
proved to have existed, there has been a continual change going on in the
position of land and sea, accompanied by great fluctuations of climate. To
these ever-varying geographical and climatal conditions the state of the
animate world has been unceasingly adapted. No satisfactory proof has yet
been discovered of the gradual passage of the earth from a chaotic to a
more habitable state, nor of a law of progressive development governing the
extinction and renovation of species, and causing the Fauna and Flora to
pass from an embryonic to a more perfect condition, from a simple to a
more complex organization.

The principle of adaptation above alluded to, appears to have been
analogous to that which now peoples the arctic, temperate, and tropical
regions contemporaneously with distinct assemblages of species and
genera, or which independently of mere temperature gives rise to a
predominance of the marsupial tribe of quadrupeds in Australia, and
of the placental tribe in Asia and Europe, or to a profusion of reptiles
without mammalia in the Galapagos Archipelago, and of mammalia without
reptiles in Greenland.[xxii-A]

This theory implies, almost necessarily, a very unequal representation at
successive periods of the principal classes and orders of plants and
animals, if not in the whole globe, at least throughout very wide areas.
Thus, for example, the proportional number of genera, species, and
individuals in the vertebrate class may differ, in two different and
distinct epochs, to an extent unparalleled by any two contemporaneous
Faunas, because in the course of millions of ages, the contrast of climate
and geographical conditions may exceed the difference now observable in
polar and equatorial latitudes.

I shall conclude by observing, that if the doctrine of successive
development had been paleontologically true, as the new discoveries above
enumerated show that it is not; if the sponge, the cephalopod, the fish,
the reptile, the bird, and the mammifer had followed each other in regular
chronological order--the creation of each class being separated from the
other by vast intervals of time; and if it were admitted that Man was
created last of all, still we should by no means be able to recognize, in
his entrance upon the earth, the last term of one and the same series of
progressive developments. For the superiority of Man, as compared to the
irrational mammalia, is one of kind, rather than of degree, consisting in a
rational and moral nature, with an intellect capable of indefinite
progression, and not in the perfection of his physical organization, or
those instincts in which he resembles the brutes. He may be considered as a
link in the same unbroken chain of being, if we regard him simply as a new
species--a member of the animal kingdom--subject, like other species, to
certain fixed and invariable laws, and adapted like them to the state of
the animate and inanimate world prevailing at the time of his creation.
Physically considered, he may form part of an indefinite series of
terrestrial changes past, present, and to come; but morally and
intellectually he may belong to another system of things--of things
immaterial--a system which is not permitted to interrupt or disturb the
course of the material world, or the laws which govern its changes.[xxii-B]


FOOTNOTES:

[vii-A] Travels in North America by the Author, vol. ii. chap. 22.

[vii-B] Ibid. 1842.

[viii-A] Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 1851, vol. vii. p. 250.

[ix-A] The generally received determination of the age of this rock is
probably correct; but as there are no overlying coal-measures and no
well-known Devonian fossils in the whitish stone of Elgin, and as I have
not personally explored the geology of that district, I cannot speak as
confidently as in regard to the age of the Montreal Chelonian.

[xii-A] H. D. Rogers, Proceedings of Amer. Assoc. of Science, Albany, 1851.

[xii-B] See Memoir by the Author, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol.
vii. p. 240.

[xiii-A] Würtembergisch. Naturwissen. Jahreshefte, 3 Jahr. Stuttgart, 1847.

[xiii-B] Nov. Act. Acad. Cæsar. Leopold. Nat. Cur. 1850, p. 902. For
figures, see ibid. plate xxi. figs. 14, 15, 16, 17.

[xiv-A] See Manual, p. 268.

[xv-A] Manual, p. 289.

[xv-B] Ibid. p. 268.

[xvi-A] For Terminology, see Note, p. 223.

[xvi-B] Quart. Journ. vol. vii. Memoirs, p. 111.

[xvii-A] Principles, 1st ed. chaps. v. and ix.

[xvii-B] Ibid. p. 153.

[xxi-A] Preface to 5th ed. of Studies of University of Cambridge.

[xxii-A] Principles, 4th ed. 1835, vol. i. p. 231, and vol. i. chap. 9.
subsequent ed.

[xxii-B] In my Anniversary Address, for 1851, to the Geological Society,
the reader will find a full discussion of the facts and arguments which
bear on the theory of progressive development.--Quart. Journ. Geol.
Soc., vol. vii.



  CONTENTS.


  CHAPTER I.

  ON THE DIFFERENT CLASSES OF ROCKS.

  Geology defined--Successive formation of the earth's
  crust--Classification of rocks according to their origin and
  age--Aqueous rocks--Their stratification and imbedded fossils--Volcanic
  rocks, with and without cones and craters--Plutonic rocks, and their
  relation to the volcanic--Metamorphic rocks and their probable
  origin--The term primitive, why erroneously applied to the crystalline
  formations--Leading division of the work Page                           1


  CHAPTER II.

  AQUEOUS ROCKS--THEIR COMPOSITION AND FORMS OF STRATIFICATION.

  Mineral composition of strata--Arenaceous
  rocks--Argillaceous--Calcareous--Gypsum--Forms of
  stratification--Original horizontality--Thinning out--Diagonal
  arrangement--Ripple mark                                               10


  CHAPTER III.

  ARRANGEMENT OF FOSSILS IN STRATA--FRESHWATER AND MARINE.

  Successive deposition indicated by fossils--Limestones formed of corals
  and shells--Proofs of gradual increase of strata derived from
  fossils--Serpula attached to spatangus--Wood bored by Teredina--Tripoli
  and semi-opal formed of infusoria--Chalk derived principally from
  organic bodies--Distinction of freshwater from marine formations--Genera
  of freshwater and land shells--Rules for recognizing marine
  testacea--Gyrogonite and chara--Freshwater fishes--Alternation of marine
  and freshwater deposits--Lym-Fiord                                     21


  CHAPTER IV.

  CONSOLIDATION OF STRATA AND PETRIFACTION OF FOSSILS.

  Chemical and mechanical deposits--Cementing together of
  particles--Hardening by exposure to air--Concretionary
  nodules--Consolidating effects of pressure--Mineralization of organic
  remains--Impressions and casts how formed--Fossil wood--Göppert's
  experiments--Precipitation of stony matter most rapid where putrefaction
  is going on--Source of lime in solution--Silex derived from
  decomposition of felspar--Proofs of the lapidification of some fossils
  soon after burial, of others when much decayed                         33


  CHAPTER V.

  ELEVATION OF STRATA ABOVE THE SEA--HORIZONTAL AND INCLINED
  STRATIFICATION.

  Why the position of marine strata, above the level of the sea, should be
  referred to the rising up of the land, not to the going down of the
  sea--Upheaval of extensive masses of horizontal strata--Inclined and
  vertical stratification--Anticlinal and synclinal lines--Bent strata in
  east of Scotland--Theory of folding by lateral movement--Creeps--Dip and
  strike--Structure of the Jura--Various forms of outcrop--Rocks broken by
  flexure--Inverted position of disturbed strata--Unconformable
  stratification--Hutton and Playfair on the same--Fractures of
  strata--Polished surfaces--Faults--Appearance of repeated alternations
  produced by them--Origin of great faults Page                          44


  CHAPTER VI.

  DENUDATION.

  Denudation defined--Its amount equal to the entire mass of stratified
  deposits in the earth's crust--Horizontal sandstone denuded in
  Ross-shire--Levelled surface of countries in which great faults
  occur--Coalbrook Dale--Denuding power of the ocean during the emergence
  of land--Origin of Valleys--Obliteration of sea-cliffs--Inland
  sea-cliffs and terraces in the Morea and Sicily--Limestone pillars at
  St. Mihiel, in France--in Canada--in the Bermudas                      66


  CHAPTER VII.

  ALLUVIUM.

  Alluvium described--Due to complicated causes--Of various ages, as shown
  in Auvergne--How distinguished from rocks _in
  situ_--River-terraces--Parallel roads of Glen Roy--Various theories
  respecting their origin                                                79


  CHAPTER VIII.

  CHRONOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROCKS.

  Aqueous, plutonic, volcanic, and metamorphic rocks, considered
  chronologically--Lehman's division into primitive and
  secondary--Werner's addition of a transition class--Neptunian
  theory--Hutton on igneous origin of granite--How the name of primary was
  still retained for granite--The term "transition," why faulty--The
  adherence to the old chronological nomenclature retarded the progress of
  geology--New hypothesis invented to reconcile the igneous origin of
  granite to the notion of its high antiquity--Explanation of the
  chronological nomenclature adopted in this work, so far as regards
  primary, secondary, and tertiary periods                               89


  CHAPTER IX.

  ON THE DIFFERENT AGES OF THE AQUEOUS ROCKS.

  On the three principal tests of relative age--superposition, mineral
  character, and fossils--Change of mineral character and fossils in the
  same continuous formation--Proofs that distinct species of animals and
  plants have lived at successive periods--Distinct provinces of
  indigenous species--Great extent of single provinces--Similar laws
  prevailed at successive geological periods--Relative importance of
  mineral and palæontological characters--Test of age by included
  fragments--Frequent absence of strata of intervening periods--Principal
  groups of strata in western Europe                                     96


  CHAPTER X.

  CLASSIFICATION OF TERTIARY FORMATIONS.--POST-PLIOCENE GROUP.

  General principles of classification of tertiary strata--Detached
  formations scattered over Europe--Strata of Paris and London--More
  modern groups--Peculiar difficulties in determining the chronology of
  tertiary formations--Increasing proportion of living species of shells
  in strata of newer origin--Terms Eocene, Miocene, and
  Pliocene--Post-Pliocene strata--Recent or human period--Older
  Post-Pliocene formations of Naples, Uddevalla, and Norway--Ancient
  upraised delta of the Mississippi--Loess of the Rhine Page            104


  CHAPTER XI.

  NEWER PLIOCENE PERIOD.--BOULDER FORMATION.

  Drift of Scandinavia, northern Germany, and Russia--Its northern
  origin--Not all of the same age--Fundamental rocks polished, grooved,
  and scratched--Action of glaciers and icebergs--Fossil shells of glacial
  period--Drift of eastern Norfolk--Associated freshwater deposit--Bent
  and folded strata lying on undisturbed beds--Shells on Moel
  Tryfane--Ancient glaciers of North Wales--Irish drift                 121


  CHAPTER XII.

  BOULDER FORMATION--_continued_.

  Difficulty of interpreting the phenomena of drift before the glacial
  hypothesis was adopted--Effects of intense cold in augmenting the
  quantity of alluvium--Analogy of erratics and scored rocks in North
  America and Europe--Bayfield on shells in drift of Canada--Great
  subsidence and re-elevation of land from the sea, required to account
  for glacial appearances--Why organic remains so rare in northern
  drift--Mastodon giganteus in United States--Many shells and some
  quadrupeds survived the glacial cold--Alps an independent centre of
  dispersion of erratics--Alpine blocks on the Jura--Recent transportation
  of erratics from the Andes to Chiloe--Meteorite in Asiatic drift      131


  CHAPTER XIII.

  NEWER PLIOCENE STRATA AND CAVERN DEPOSITS.

  Chronological classification of Pleistocene formations, why
  difficult--Freshwater deposits in valley of Thames--In Norfolk
  cliffs--In Patagonia--Comparative longevity of species in the mammalia
  and testacea--Fluvio-marine crag of Norwich--Newer Pliocene strata of
  Sicily--Limestone of great thickness and elevation--Alternation of
  marine and volcanic formations--Proofs of slow accumulation--Great
  geographical changes in Sicily since the living fauna and flora began to
  exist--Osseous breccias and cavern deposits--Sicily--Kirkdale--Origin of
  stalactite--Australian cave-breccias--Geographical relationship of the
  provinces of living vertebrata and those of the fossil species of the
  Pliocene periods--Extinct struthious birds of New Zealand--Teeth of
  fossil quadrupeds                                                     146


  CHAPTER XIV.

  OLDER PLIOCENE AND MIOCENE FORMATIONS.

  Strata of Suffolk termed Red and Coralline crag--Fossils, and proportion
  of recent species--Depth of sea and climate--Reference of Suffolk crag
  to the older Pliocene period--Migration of many species of shells
  southwards during the glacial period--Fossil whales--Subapennine
  beds--Asti, Sienna, Rome--Miocene formations--Faluns of Touraine--Depth
  of sea and littoral character of fauna--Tropical climate implied by the
  testacea--Proportion of recent species of shells--Faluns more ancient
  than the Suffolk crag--Miocene strata of Bordeaux and Piedmont--Molasse
  of Switzerland--Tertiary strata of Lisbon--Older Pliocene and Miocene
  formations in the United States--Sewâlik Hills in India               161


  CHAPTER XV.

  UPPER EOCENE FORMATIONS.

  Eocene areas in England and France--Tabular view of French Eocene
  strata--Upper Eocene group of the Paris basin--Same beds in Belgium and
  at Berlin--Mayence tertiary strata--Freshwater upper Eocene of Central
  France--Series of geographical changes since the land emerged in
  Auvergne--Mineral character an uncertain test of age--Marls containing
  Cypris--Oolite of Eocene period--Indusial limestone and its
  origin--Fossil mammalia of the upper Eocene strata in
  Auvergne--Freshwater strata of the Cantal, calcareous and siliceous--Its
  resemblance to chalk--Proofs of gradual deposition of strata          174


  CHAPTER XVI.

  EOCENE FORMATIONS--_continued_.

  Subdivisions of the Eocene group in the Paris basin--Gypseous
  series--Extinct quadrupeds--Impulse given to geology by Cuvier's
  osteological discoveries--Shelly sands called sables moyens--Calcaire
  grossier--Miliolites--Calcaire siliceux--Lower Eocene in France--Lits
  coquilliers--Sands and plastic clay--English Eocene strata--Freshwater
  and fluvio-marine beds--Barton beds--Bagshot and Bracklesham
  division--Large ophidians and saurians--Lower Eocene and London Clay
  proper--Fossil plants and shells--Strata of Kyson in Suffolk--Fossil
  monkey and opossum--Mottled clays and sand below London Clay--Nummulitic
  formation of Alps and Pyrenees--Its wide geographical extent--Eocene
  strata in the United States--Section at Claiborne, Alabama--Colossal
  cetacean--Orbitoid limestone--Burr stone                              190


  CHAPTER XVII.

  CRETACEOUS GROUP.

  Divisions of the cretaceous series in North-Western Europe--Upper
  cretaceous strata--Maestricht beds--Chalk of Faxoe--White
  chalk--Characteristic fossils--Extinct cephalopoda--Sponges and corals
  of the chalk--Signs of open and deep sea--White area of white chalk--Its
  origin from corals and shells--Single pebbles in chalk--Siliceous
  sandstone in Germany contemporaneous with white chalk--Upper greensand
  and gault--Lower cretaceous strata--Atherfield section, Isle of
  Wight--Chalk of South of Europe--Hippurite limestone--Cretaceous
  Flora--Chalk of United States                                         209


  CHAPTER XVIII.

  WEALDEN GROUP.

  The Wealden divisible into Weald Clay, Hastings Sand, and Purbeck
  Beds--Intercalated between two marine formations--Weald clay and
  Cypris-bearing strata--Iguanodon--Hastings sands--Fossil fish--Strata
  formed in shallow water--Brackish water-beds--Upper, middle, and lower
  Purbeck--Alternations of brackish water, freshwater, and land--Dirt-bed,
  or ancient soil--Distinct species of fossils in each subdivision of the
  Wealden--Lapse of time implied--Plants and insects of
  Wealden--Geographical extent of Wealden--Its relation to the cretaceous
  and oolitic periods--Movements in the earth's crust to which it owed its
  origin and submergence                                                225


  CHAPTER XIX.

  DENUDATION OF THE CHALK AND WEALDEN.

  Physical geography of certain districts composed of Cretaceous and
  Wealden strata--Lines of inland chalk-cliffs on the Seine in
  Normandy--Outstanding pillars and needles of chalk--Denudation of the
  chalk and Wealden in Surrey, Kent, and Sussex--Chalk once continuous
  from the North to the South Downs--Anticlinal axis and parallel
  ridges--Longitudinal and transverse valleys--Chalk escarpments--Rise and
  denudation of the strata gradual--Ridges formed by harder, valleys by
  softer beds--Why no alluvium, or wreck of the chalk, in the central
  district of the Weald--At what periods the Weald valley was
  denuded--Land has most prevailed where denudation has been
  greatest--Elephant bed, Brighton                                      238


  CHAPTER XX.

  OOLITE AND LIAS.

  Subdivisions of the Oolitic or Jurassic group--Physical geography of the
  Oolite in England and France--Upper Oolite--Portland stone and
  fossils--Lithographic stone of Solenhofen--Middle Oolite, coral
  rag--Zoophytes--Nerinæan limestone--Diceras limestone--Oxford clay,
  Ammonites and Belemnites--Lower Oolite, Crinoideans--Great Oolite and
  Bradford clay--Stonesfield slate--Fossil mammalia, placental and
  marsupial--Resemblance to an Australian fauna--Doctrine of progressive
  development--Collyweston slates--Yorkshire Oolitic coal-field--Brora
  coal--Inferior Oolite and fossils                                     257


  CHAPTER XXI.

  OOLITE AND LIAS--_continued_.

  Mineral character of Lias--Name of Gryphite limestone--Fossil shells and
  fish--Ichthyodorulites--Reptiles of the Lias--Ichthyosaur and
  Plesiosaur--Marine Reptile of the Galapagos Islands--Sudden destruction
  and burial of fossil animals in Lias--Fluvio-marine beds in
  Gloucestershire and insect limestone--Origin of the Oolite and Lias, and
  of alternating calcareous and argillaceous formations--Oolitic
  coal-field of Virginia, in the United States                          273


  CHAPTER XXII.

  TRIAS OR NEW RED SANDSTONE GROUP.

  Distinction between New and Old Red Sandstone--Between Upper and Lower
  New Red--The Trias and its three divisions--Most largely developed in
  Germany--Keuper and its fossils--Muschelkalk--Fossil plants of
  Bunter--Triassic group in England--Bone-bed of Axmouth and Aust--Red
  Sandstone of Warwickshire and Cheshire--Footsteps of _Chirotherium_ in
  England and Germany--Osteology of the _Labyrinthodon_--Identification of
  this Batrachian with the Chirotherium--Origin of Red Sandstone and
  rock-salt--Hypothesis of saline volcanic exhalations--Theory of the
  precipitation of salt from inland lakes or lagoons--Saltness of the Red
  Sea--New Red Sandstone in the United States--Fossil footprints of birds
  and reptiles in the Valley of the Connecticut--Antiquity of the Red
  Sandstone containing them                                             286


  CHAPTER XXIII.

  PERMIAN OR MAGNESIAN LIMESTONE GROUP.

  Fossils of Magnesian Limestone and Lower New Red distinct from the
  Triassic--Term Permian--English and German equivalents--Marine shells
  and corals of English Magnesian limestone--Palæoniscus and other fish
  of the marl slate--Thecodont Saurians of dolomitic conglomerate of
  Bristol--Zechstein and Rothliegendes of Thuringia--Permian Flora--Its
  generic affinity to the carboniferous--Psaronites or tree-ferns       301


  CHAPTER XXIV.

  THE COAL OR CARBONIFEROUS GROUP.

  Carboniferous strata in the south-west of England--Superposition of
  Coal-measures to Mountain limestone--Departure from this type in north
  of England and Scotland--Section in South Wales--Underclays with
  Stigmaria--Carboniferous Flora--Ferns, Lepidodendra, Calamites,
  Asterophyllites, Sigillariæ, Stigmariæ,--Coniferæ--Endogens--Absence of
  Exogens--Coal, how formed--Erect fossil trees--Parkfield Colliery--St.
  Etienne, Coal-field--Oblique trees or snags--Fossil forests in Nova
  Scotia--Brackish water and marine strata--Origin of Clay-iron-stone   308


  CHAPTER XXV.

  CARBONIFEROUS GROUP--_continued_.

  Coal-fields of the United States--Section of the country between the
  Atlantic and Mississippi--Position of land in the carboniferous period
  eastward of the Alleghanies--Mechanically formed rocks thinning out
  westward, and limestones thickening--Uniting of many coal-seams into one
  thick one--Horizontal coal at Brownsville, Pennsylvania--Vast extent and
  continuity of single seams of coal--Ancient river-channel in Forest of
  Dean coal-field--Absence of earthy matter in coal--Climate of
  carboniferous period--Insects in coal--Rarity of air-breathing
  animals--Great number of fossil fish--First discovery of the skeletons
  of fossil reptiles--Footprints of reptilians--Mountain limestone--Its
  corals and marine shells                                              326


  CHAPTER XXVI.

  OLD RED SANDSTONE, OR DEVONIAN GROUP.

  Old Red Sandstone of Scotland, and borders of Wales--Fossils usually
  rare--"Old Red" in Forfarshire--Ichthyolites of Caithness--Distinct
  lithological type of Old Red in Devon and Cornwall--Term
  "Devonian"--Organic remains of intermediate character between those of
  the Carboniferous and Silurian systems--Corals and shells--Devonian
  strata of Westphalia, the Eifel, Russia, and the United States--Coral
  reef at Falls of the Ohio--Devonian Flora                             342


  CHAPTER XXVII.

  SILURIAN GROUP.

  Silurian strata formerly called transition--Term grauwacké--Subdivisions
  of Upper and Lower Silurian--Ludlow formation and fossils--Wenlock
  formation, corals and shells--Caradoc and Llandeilo
  beds--Graptolites--Lingula--Trilobites--Cystideæ--Vast thickness of
  Silurian strata in North Wales--Unconformability of Caradoc
  sandstone--Silurian strata of the United States--Amount of specific
  agreement of fossils with those of Europe--Great number of
  brachiopods--Deep-sea origin of Silurian strata--Absence of fluviatile
  formations--Mineral character of the most ancient fossiliferous rocks
                                                                        350


  CHAPTER XXVIII.

  VOLCANIC ROCKS.

  Trap rocks--Name, whence derived--Their igneous origin at first
  doubted--Their general appearance and character--Volcanic cones and
  craters, how formed--Mineral composition and texture of volcanic
  rocks--Varieties of felspar--Hornblende and augite--Isomorphism--Rocks,
  how to be studied--Basalt, greenstone, trachyte, porphyry, scoria,
  amygdaloid, lava, tuff--Alphabetical list, and explanation of names and
  synonyms, of volcanic rocks--Table of the analyses of minerals most
  abundant in the volcanic and hypogene rocks                           366


  CHAPTER XXIX.

  VOLCANIC ROCKS--_continued_.

  Trap dike--sometimes project--sometimes leave fissures vacant by
  decomposition--Branches and veins of trap--Dikes more crystalline in the
  centre--Foreign fragments of rock imbedded--Strata altered at or near
  the contact--Obliteration of organic remains--Conversion of chalk into
  marble--and of coal into coke--Inequality in the modifying influence of
  dikes--Trap interposed between strata--Columnar and globular
  structure--Relation of trappean rocks to the products of active
  volcanos--Submarine lava and ejected matter correspond generally to
  ancient trap--Structure and physical features of Palma and some other
  extinct volcanos                                                      378


  CHAPTER XXX.

  ON THE DIFFERENT AGES OF THE VOLCANIC ROCKS.

  Tests of relative age of volcanic rocks--Test by superposition and
  intrusion--Dike of Quarrington Hill, Durham--Test by alteration of rocks
  in contact--Test by organic remains--Test of age by mineral
  character--Test by included fragments--Volcanic rocks of the
  Post-Pliocene period--Basalt of Bay of Trezza in Sicily--Post-Pliocene
  volcanic rocks near Naples--Dikes of Somma--Igneous formations of the
  Newer Pliocene period--Val di Noto in Sicily                          397


  CHAPTER XXXI.

  ON THE DIFFERENT AGES OF THE VOLCANIC ROCKS--_continued_.

  Volcanic rocks of the Older Pliocene period--Tuscany--Rome--Volcanic
  region of Olot in Catalonia--Cones and lava-currents--Ravines and
  ancient gravel-beds--Jets of air called Bufadors--Age of the Catalonian
  volcanos--Miocene period--Brown-coal of the Eifel and contemporaneous
  trachytic breccias--Age of the brown-coal--Peculiar characters of the
  volcanos of the upper and lower Eifel--Lake craters--Trass--Hungarian
  volcanos                                                              408


  CHAPTER XXXII.

  ON THE DIFFERENT AGES OF THE VOLCANIC ROCKS--_continued_.

  Volcanic rocks of the Pliocene and Miocene periods
  continued--Auvergne--Mont Dor--Breccias and alluviums of Mont Perrier,
  with bones of quadrupeds--River dammed up by lava-current--Range of
  minor cones from Auvergne to the Vivarais--Monts Dome--Puy de Côme--Puy
  de Pariou--Cones not denuded by general flood--Velay--Bones of
  quadrupeds buried in scoriæ--Cantal--Eocene volcanic rocks--Tuffs near
  Clermont--Hill of Gergovia--Trap of Cretaceous period--Oolitic
  period--New Red Sandstone period--Carboniferous period--Old Red
  Sandstone period--"Rock and Spindle" near St. Andrews--Silurian
  period--Cambrian volcanic rocks                                       422


  CHAPTER XXXIII.

  PLUTONIC ROCKS--GRANITE.

  General aspect of granite--Decomposing into spherical masses--Rude
  columnar structure--Analogy and difference of volcanic and plutonic
  formations--Minerals in granite, and their arrangement--Graphic and
  porphyritic granite--Mutual penetration of crystals of quartz and
  felspar--Occasional minerals--Syenite--Syenitic, talcose, and schorly
  granites--Eurite--Passage of granite into trap--Examples near
  Christiania and in Aberdeenshire--Analogy in composition of trachyte and
  granite--Granite veins in Glen Tilt, Cornwall, the Valorsine, and other
  countries--Different composition of veins from main body of
  granite--Metalliferous veins in strata near their junction with
  granite--Apparent isolation of nodules of granite--Quartz veins--Whether
  plutonic rocks are ever overlying--Their exposure at the surface due
  to denudation                                                         436


  CHAPTER XXXIV.

  ON THE DIFFERENT AGES OF THE PLUTONIC ROCKS.

  Difficulty in ascertaining the precise age of a plutonic rock--Test of
  age by relative position--Test by intrusion and alteration--Test by
  mineral composition--Test by included fragments--Recent and Pliocene
  plutonic rocks, why invisible--Tertiary plutonic rocks in the
  Andes--Granite altering Cretaceous rocks--Granite altering Lias in the
  Alps and in Skye--Granite of Dartmoor altering Carboniferous
  strata--Granite of the Old Red Sandstone period--Syenite altering
  Silurian strata in Norway--Blending of the same with gneiss--Most
  ancient plutonic rocks--Granite protruded in a solid form--On the
  probable age of the granites of Arran, in Scotland                    449


  CHAPTER XXXV.

  METAMORPHIC ROCKS.

  General character of metamorphic rocks--Gneiss--Hornblende-schist
  --Mica-schist--Clay-slate--Quartzite--Chlorite-schist--Metamorphic
  limestone--Alphabetical list and explanation of other rocks of this
  family--Origin of the metamorphic strata--Their stratification is real
  and distinct from cleavage--Joints and slaty cleavage--Supposed causes
  of these structures--how far connected with crystalline action        463


  CHAPTER XXXVI.

  METAMORPHIC ROCKS--_continued_.

  Strata near some intrusive masses of granite converted into rocks
  identical with different members of the metamorphic series--Arguments
  hence derived as to the nature of plutonic action--Time may enable this
  action to pervade denser masses--From what kinds of sedimentary rock
  each variety of the metamorphic class may be derived--Certain objections
  to the metamorphic theory considered--Lamination of trachyte and
  obsidian due to motion--Whether some kinds of gneiss have become
  schistose by a similar action                                         473


  CHAPTER XXXVII.

  ON THE DIFFERENT AGES OF THE METAMORPHIC ROCKS.

  Age of each set of metamorphic strata twofold--Test of age by fossils
  and mineral character not available--Test by superposition
  ambiguous--Conversion of dense masses of fossiliferous strata into
  metamorphic rocks--Limestone and shale of Carrara--Metamorphic strata of
  modern periods in the Alps of Switzerland and Savoy--Why the visible
  crystalline strata are none of them very modern--Order of succession in
  metamorphic rocks--Uniformity of mineral character--Why the metamorphic
  strata are less calcareous than the fossiliferous                     481


  CHAPTER XXXVIII.

  MINERAL VEINS.

  Werner's doctrine that mineral veins were fissures filled from
  above--Veins of segregation--Ordinary metalliferous veins or
  lodes--Their frequent coincidence with faults--Proofs that they
  originated in fissures in solid rock--Veins shifting other
  veins--Polishing of their walls--Shells and pebbles in lodes--Evidence
  of the successive enlargement and re-opening of veins--Fournet's
  observations in Auvergne--Dimensions of veins--Why some alternately
  swell out and contract--Filling of lodes by sublimation from
  below--Chemical and electrical action--Relative age of the precious
  metals--Copper and lead veins in Ireland older than Cornish tin--Lead
  vein in lias, Glamorganshire--Gold in Russia--Connection of hot springs
  and mineral veins--Concluding remarks                                 488

       *       *       *       *       *

_Dates of the successive Editions of the "Principles" and "Elements" (or
Manual) of Geology, by the Author._


  Principles, 1st vol. in octavo, published in - - - Jan. 1830.

  ----, 2d vol.  do. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Jan. 1832.

  ----, 1st vol. 2d edition in octavo  - - - - - - -      1832.

  ----, 2d vol. 2d edition  do.  - - - - - - - - - - Jan. 1833.

  ----, 3d vol. 1st edition  do. - - - - - - - - - - May  1833.

  ----, New edition (called the 3d) of the whole work in 4 vols.
          12mo. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - May  1834.

  ----, 4th edition, 4 vols. 12mo. - - - - - - - - - June 1835.

  ----, 5th edition, do. do. - - - - - - - - - - - - Mar. 1837.

  Elements, 1st edition in one vol.  - - - - - - - - July 1838.

  Principles, 6th edition, 3 vols. 12mo. - - - - - - June 1840.

  Elements, 2d edition in 2 vols. 12mo.  - - - - - - July 1841.

  Principles, 7th edition in one vol. 8vo. - - - - - Feb. 1847.

  ----, 8th edition, now published in one vol. 8vo. - May 1850.

  Manual of Elementary Geology (or "Elements," 3d edition), now
  published in one vol. 8vo.  - - - - - - - - - - - - Jan. 1851.



_Works by Sir Charles Lyell._


  I.

  TRAVELS IN NORTH AMERICA,--1841-2. With Geological Observations on the
  United States, Canada, and Nova Scotia. With large coloured geological
  Map and Plates. 2 vols. post 8vo. 21_s._

  II.

  A SECOND VISIT TO THE UNITED STATES,--1845-6. _Second Edition._ 2 vols.
  post 8vo. 18_s._

  III.

  PRINCIPLES OF GEOLOGY; or the Modern Changes of the Earth and its
  Inhabitants considered, as illustrative of Geology. _Eighth Edition,
  thoroughly revised._ With Maps, Plates, and Woodcuts. 8vo. 18_s._

  IV.

  A MANUAL OF ELEMENTARY GEOLOGY; or the ANCIENT CHANGES of the Earth and
  its Inhabitants, as illustrated by Geological Monuments. Fourth Edition.
  _Thoroughly revised._ With 531 Woodcuts and Plates. 8vo. 12_s._



MANUAL OF ELEMENTARY GEOLOGY.



CHAPTER I.

ON THE DIFFERENT CLASSES OF ROCKS.

   Geology defined--Successive formation of the earth's
   crust--Classification of rocks according to their origin and
   age--Aqueous rocks--Their stratification and imbedded
   fossils--Volcanic rocks, with and without cones and craters--Plutonic
   rocks, and their relation to the volcanic--Metamorphic rocks and their
   probable origin--The term primitive, why erroneously applied to the
   crystalline formations--Leading division of the work.


Of what materials is the earth composed, and in what manner are these
materials arranged? These are the first inquiries with which Geology is
occupied, a science which derives its name from the Greek +gê+, _ge_, the
earth, and +logos+, _logos_, a discourse. Previously to experience we might
have imagined that investigations of this kind would relate exclusively to
the mineral kingdom, and to the various rocks, soils, and metals, which
occur upon the surface of the earth, or at various depths beneath it. But,
in pursuing such researches, we soon find ourselves led on to consider the
successive changes which have taken place in the former state of the
earth's surface and interior, and the causes which have given rise to these
changes; and, what is still more singular and unexpected, we soon become
engaged in researches into the history of the animate creation, or of the
various tribes of animals and plants which have, at different periods of
the past, inhabited the globe.

All are aware that the solid parts of the earth consist of distinct
substances, such as clay, chalk, sand, limestone, coal, slate, granite, and
the like; but previously to observation it is commonly imagined that all
these had remained from the first in the state in which we now see
them,--that they were created in their present form, and in their present
position. The geologist soon comes to a different conclusion, discovering
proofs that the external parts of the earth were not all produced in the
beginning of things, in the state in which we now behold them, nor in an
instant of time. On the contrary, he can show that they have acquired their
actual configuration and condition gradually, under a great variety of
circumstances, and at successive periods, during each of which distinct
races of living beings have flourished on the land and in the waters, the
remains of these creatures still lying buried in the crust of the earth.

By the "earth's crust," is meant that small portion of the exterior of our
planet which is accessible to human observation, or on which we are enabled
to reason by observations made at or near the surface. These reasonings may
extend to a depth of several miles, perhaps ten miles; and even then it may
be said, that such a thickness is no more than 1/400 part of the distance
from the surface to the centre. The remark is just; but although the
dimensions of such a crust are, in truth, insignificant when compared to
the entire globe, yet they are vast, and of magnificent extent in relation
to man, and to the organic beings which people our globe. Referring to this
standard of magnitude, the geologist may admire the ample limits of his
domain, and admit, at the same time, that not only the exterior of the
planet, but the entire earth, is but an atom in the midst of the countless
worlds surveyed by the astronomer.

The materials of this crust are not thrown together confusedly; but
distinct mineral masses, called rocks, are found to occupy definite spaces,
and to exhibit a certain order of arrangement. The term _rock_ is applied
indifferently by geologists to all these substances, whether they be soft
or stony, for clay and sand are included in the term, and some have even
brought peat under this denomination. Our older writers endeavoured to
avoid offering such violence to our language, by speaking of the component
materials of the earth as consisting of rocks and _soils_. But there is
often so insensible a passage from a soft and incoherent state to that of
stone, that geologists of all countries have found it indispensable to have
one technical term to include both, and in this sense we find _roche_
applied in French, _rocca_ in Italian, and _felsart_ in German. The
beginner, however, must constantly bear in mind, that the term rock by no
means implies that a mineral mass is in an indurated or stony condition.

The most natural and convenient mode of classifying the various rocks which
compose the earth's crust, is to refer, in the first place, to their
origin, and in the second to their relative age. I shall therefore begin by
endeavouring briefly to explain to the student how all rocks may be divided
into four great classes by reference to their different origin, or, in
other words, by reference to the different circumstances and causes by
which they have been produced.

The first two divisions, which will at once be understood as natural, are
the aqueous and volcanic, or the products of watery and those of igneous
action at or near the surface.

_Aqueous rocks._--The aqueous rocks, sometimes called the sedimentary, or
fossiliferous, cover a larger part of the earth's surface than any others.
These rocks are _stratified_, or divided into distinct layers, or strata.
The term _stratum_ means simply a bed, or any thing spread out or _strewed_
over a given surface; and we infer that these strata have been generally
spread out by the action of water, from what we daily see taking place near
the mouths of rivers, or on the land during temporary inundations. For,
whenever a running stream charged with mud or sand, has its velocity
checked, as when it enters a lake or sea, or overflows a plain, the
sediment, previously held in suspension by the motion of the water, sinks,
by its own gravity, to the bottom. In this manner layers of mud and sand
are thrown down one upon another.

If we drain a lake which has been fed by a small stream, we frequently find
at the bottom a series of deposits, disposed with considerable regularity,
one above the other; the uppermost, perhaps, may be a stratum of peat, next
below a more dense and solid variety of the same material; still lower a
bed of shell-marl, alternating with peat or sand, and then other beds of
marl, divided by layers of clay. Now, if a second pit be sunk through the
same continuous lacustrine _formation_, at some distance from the first,
nearly the same series of beds is commonly met with, yet with slight
variations; some, for example, of the layers of sand, clay, or marl, may be
wanting, one or more of them having thinned out and given place to others,
or sometimes one of the masses first examined is observed to increase in
thickness to the exclusion of other beds.

The term "_formation_," which I have used in the above explanation,
expresses in geology any assemblage of rocks which have some character in
common, whether of origin, age, or composition. Thus we speak of stratified
and unstratified, freshwater and marine, aqueous and volcanic, ancient and
modern, metalliferous and non-metalliferous formations.

In the estuaries of large rivers, such as the Ganges and the Mississippi,
we may observe, at low water, phenomena analogous to those of the drained
lakes above mentioned, but on a grander scale, and extending over areas
several hundred miles in length and breadth. When the periodical
inundations subside, the river hollows out a channel to the depth of many
yards through horizontal beds of clay and sand, the ends of which are seen
exposed in perpendicular cliffs. These beds vary in colour, and are
occasionally characterized by containing drift-wood or shells. The shells
may belong to species peculiar to the river, but are sometimes those of
marine testacea, washed into the mouth of the estuary during storms.

The annual floods of the Nile in Egypt are well known, and the fertile
deposits of mud which they leave on the plains. This mud is _stratified_,
the thin layer thrown down in one season differing slightly in colour from
that of a previous year, and being separable from it, as has been observed
in excavations at Cairo, and other places.[3-A]

When beds of sand, clay, and marl, containing shells and vegetable matter,
are found arranged in a similar manner in the interior of the earth, we
ascribe to them a similar origin; and the more we examine their characters
in minute detail, the more exact do we find the resemblance. Thus, for
example, at various heights and depths in the earth, and often far from
seas, lakes, and rivers, we meet with layers of rounded pebbles composed
of different rocks mingled together. They are like the shingle of a
sea-beach, or pebbles formed in the beds of torrents and rivers, which are
carried down into the ocean wherever these descend from high grounds
bordering a coast. There the gravel is spread out by the waves and currents
over a considerable space; but during seasons of drought the torrents and
rivers are nearly dry, and have only power to convey fine sand or mud into
the sea. Hence, alternate layers of gravel and fine sediment accumulate
under water, and such alternations are found by geologists in the interior
of every continent.[4-A]

If a stratified arrangement, and the rounded forms of pebbles, are alone
sufficient to lead us to the conclusion that certain rocks originated under
water, this opinion is farther confirmed by the distinct and independent
evidence of _fossils_, so abundantly included in the earth's crust. By a
_fossil_ is meant any body, or the traces of the existence of any body,
whether animal or vegetable, which has been buried in the earth by natural
causes. Now the remains of animals, especially of aquatic species, are
found almost everywhere imbedded in stratified rocks, and sometimes, in the
case of limestone, they are in such abundance as to constitute the entire
mass of the rock itself. Shells and corals are the most frequent, and with
them are often associated the bones and teeth of fishes, fragments of wood,
impressions of leaves, and other organic substances. Fossil shells, of
forms such as now abound in the sea, are met with far inland, both near the
surface, and at great depths below it. They occur at all heights above the
level of the ocean, having been observed at elevations of 8000 feet in the
Pyrenees, 10,000 in the Alps, 13,000 in the Andes, and above 16,000 feet
in the Himalayas.[4-B]

These shells belong mostly to marine testacea, but in some places
exclusively to forms characteristic of lakes and rivers. Hence it is
concluded that some ancient strata were deposited at the bottom of the sea,
and others in lakes and estuaries.

When geology was first cultivated, it was a general belief, that these
marine shells and other fossils were the effects and proofs of the deluge
of Noah; but all who have carefully investigated the phenomena have long
rejected this doctrine. A transient flood might be supposed to leave behind
it, here and there upon the surface, scattered heaps of mud, sand, and
shingle, with shells confusedly intermixed; but the strata containing
fossils are not superficial deposits, and do not simply cover the earth,
but constitute the entire mass of mountains. Nor are the fossils mingled
without reference to the original habits and natures of the creatures of
which they are the memorials; those, for example, being found associated
together which lived in deep or in shallow water, near the shore or far
from it, in brackish or in salt water.

It has, moreover, been a favourite notion of some modern writers, who were
aware that fossil bodies could not all be referred to the deluge, that
they, and the strata in which they are entombed, might have been deposited
in the bed of the ocean during the period which intervened between the
creation of man and the deluge. They have imagined that the antediluvian
bed of the ocean, after having been the receptacle of many stratified
deposits, became converted, at the time of the flood, into the lands which
we inhabit, and that the ancient continents were at the same time
submerged, and became the bed of the present sea. This hypothesis, although
preferable to the diluvial theory before alluded to, since it admits that
all fossiliferous strata were successively thrown down from water, is yet
wholly inadequate to explain the repeated revolutions which the earth has
undergone, and the signs which the existing continents exhibit, in most
regions, of having emerged from the ocean at an era far more remote than
four thousand years from the present time. Ample proofs of these reiterated
revolutions will be given in the sequel, and it will be seen that many
distinct sets of sedimentary strata, each several hundreds or thousands of
feet thick, are piled one upon the other in the earth's crust, each
containing peculiar fossil animals and plants which are distinguishable
with few exceptions from species now living. The mass of some of these
strata consists almost entirely of corals, others are made up of shells,
others of plants turned into coal, while some are without fossils. In one
set of strata the species of fossils are marine; in another, lying
immediately above or below, they as clearly prove that the deposit was
formed in a brackish estuary or lake. When the student has more fully
examined into these appearances, he will become convinced that the time
required for the origin of the rocks composing the actual continents must
have been far greater than that which is conceded by the theory above
alluded to; and likewise that no one universal and sudden conversion of sea
into land will account for geological appearances.

We have now pointed out one great class of rocks, which, however they may
vary in mineral composition, colour, grain, or other characters, external
and internal, may nevertheless be grouped together as having a common
origin. They have all been formed under water, in the same manner as
modern accumulations of sand, mud, shingle, banks of shells, reefs of
coral, and the like, and are all characterized by stratification or
fossils, or by both.

_Volcanic rocks._--The division of rocks which we may next consider are the
volcanic, or those which have been produced at or near the surface whether
in ancient or modern times, not by water, but by the action of fire or
subterranean heat. These rocks are for the most part unstratified, and are
devoid of fossils. They are more partially distributed than aqueous
formations, at least in respect to horizontal extension. Among those parts
of Europe where they exhibit characters not to be mistaken, I may mention
not only Sicily and the country round Naples, but Auvergne, Velay, and
Vivarais, now the departments of Puy de Dome, Haute Loire, and Ardèche,
towards the centre and south of France, in which are several hundred
conical hills having the forms of modern volcanos, with craters more or
less perfect on many of their summits. These cones are composed moreover
of lava, sand, and ashes, similar to those of active volcanos. Streams of
lava may sometimes be traced from the cones into the adjoining valleys,
where they have choked up the ancient channels of rivers with solid rock,
in the same manner as some modern flows of lava in Iceland have been known
to do, the rivers either flowing beneath or cutting out a narrow passage on
one side of the lava. Although none of these French volcanos have been in
activity within the period of history or tradition, their forms are often
very perfect. Some, however, have been compared to the mere skeletons of
volcanos, the rains and torrents having washed their sides, and removed all
the loose sand and scoriæ, leaving only the harder and more solid
materials. By this erosion, and by earthquakes, their internal structure
has occasionally been laid open to view, in fissures and ravines; and we
then behold not only many successive beds and masses of porous lava, sand,
and scoriæ, but also perpendicular walls, or _dikes_, as they are called,
of volcanic rock, which have burst through the other materials. Such dikes
are also observed in the structure of Vesuvius, Etna, and other active
volcanos. They have been formed by the pouring of melted matter, whether
from above or below, into open fissures, and they commonly traverse
deposits of _volcanic tuff_, a substance produced by the showering down
from the air, or incumbent waters, of sand and cinders, first shot up from
the interior of the earth by the explosions of volcanic gases.

Besides the parts of France above alluded to, there are other countries, as
the north of Spain, the south of Sicily, the Tuscan territory of Italy, the
lower Rhenish provinces, and Hungary, where spent volcanos may be seen,
still preserving in many cases a conical form, and having craters and often
lava-streams connected with them.

There are also other rocks in England, Scotland, Ireland, and almost every
country in Europe, which we infer to be of igneous origin, although they do
not form hills with cones and craters. Thus, for example, we feel assured
that the rock of Staffa, and that of the Giant's Causeway, called basalt,
is volcanic, because it agrees in its columnar structure and mineral
composition with streams of lava which we know to have flowed from the
craters of volcanos. We find also similar basaltic and other igneous rocks
associated with beds of _tuff_ in various parts of the British Isles, and
forming _dikes_, such as have been spoken of; and some of the strata
through which these dikes cut are occasionally altered at the point of
contact, as if they had been exposed to the intense heat of melted matter.

The absence of cones and craters, and long narrow streams of superficial
lava, in England and many other countries, is principally to be attributed
to the eruptions having been submarine, just as a considerable proportion
of volcanos in our own times burst out beneath the sea. But this question
must be enlarged upon more fully in the chapters on Igneous Rocks, in which
it will also be shown, that as different sedimentary formations, containing
each their characteristic fossils, have been deposited at successive
periods, so also volcanic sand and scoriæ have been thrown out, and lavas
have flowed over the land or bed of the sea, at many different epochs, or
have been injected into fissures; so that the igneous as well as the
aqueous rocks may be classed as a chronological series of monuments,
throwing light on a succession of events in the history of the earth.

_Plutonic rocks_ (Granite, &c.).--We have now pointed out the existence of
two distinct orders of mineral masses, the aqueous and the volcanic: but if
we examine a large portion of a continent, especially if it contain within
it a lofty mountain range, we rarely fail to discover two other classes of
rocks, very distinct from either of those above alluded to, and which we
can neither assimilate to deposits such as are now accumulated in lakes or
seas, nor to those generated by ordinary volcanic action. The members of
both these divisions of rocks agree in being highly crystalline and
destitute of organic remains. The rocks of one division have been called
plutonic, comprehending all the granites and certain porphyries, which are
nearly allied in some of their characters to volcanic formations. The
members of the other class are stratified and often slaty, and have been
called by some the _crystalline schists_, in which group are included
gneiss, micaceous-schist (or mica-slate), hornblende-schist, statuary
marble, the finer kinds of roofing slate, and other rocks afterwards
to be described.

As it is admitted that nothing strictly analogous to these crystalline
productions can now be seen in the progress of formation on the earth's
surface, it will naturally be asked, on what data we can find a place for
them in a system of classification founded on the origin of rocks. I
cannot, in reply to this question, pretend to give the student, in a few
words, an intelligible account of the long chain of facts and reasonings by
which geologists have been led to infer the analogy of the rocks in
question to others now in progress at the surface. The result, however, may
be briefly stated. All the various kinds of granite, which constitute the
plutonic family, are supposed to be of igneous origin, but to have been
formed under great pressure, at considerable depths in the earth, or
sometimes, perhaps, under a certain weight of incumbent water. Like the
lava of volcanos, they have been melted, and have afterwards cooled and
crystallized, but with extreme slowness, and under conditions very
different from those of bodies cooling in the open air. Hence they differ
from the volcanic rocks, not only by their more crystalline texture, but
also by the absence of tuffs and breccias, which are the products of
eruptions at the earth's surface, or beneath seas of inconsiderable depth.
They differ also by the absence of pores or cellular cavities, to which the
expansion of the entangled gases gives rise in ordinary lava.

Although granite has often pierced through other strata, it has rarely, if
ever, been observed to rest upon them, as if it had overflowed. But as this
is continually the case with the volcanic rocks, they have been styled,
from this peculiarity, "overlying" by Dr. MacCulloch; and Mr. Necker has
proposed the term "underlying" for the granites, to designate the opposite
mode in which they almost invariably present themselves.

_Metamorphic, or stratified crystalline rocks._--The fourth and last great
division of rocks are the crystalline strata and slates, or schists, called
gneiss, mica-schist, clay-slate, chlorite-schist, marble, and the like, the
origin of which is more doubtful than that of the other three classes. They
contain no pebbles, or sand, or scoriæ, or angular pieces of imbedded
stone, and no traces of organic bodies, and they are often as crystalline
as granite, yet are divided into beds, corresponding in form and
arrangement to those of sedimentary formations, and are therefore said to
be stratified. The beds sometimes consist of an alternation of substances
varying in colour, composition, and thickness, precisely as we see in
stratified fossiliferous deposits. According to the Huttonian theory, which
I adopt as most probable, and which will be afterwards more fully
explained, the materials of these strata were originally deposited from
water in the usual form of sediment, but they were subsequently so altered
by subterranean heat, as to assume a new texture. It is demonstrable, in
some cases at least, that such a complete conversion has actually taken
place, fossiliferous strata having exchanged an earthy for a highly
crystalline texture for a distance of a quarter of a mile from their
contact with granite. In some cases, dark limestones, replete with shells
and corals, have been turned into white statuary marble, and hard clays
into slates called mica-schist and hornblende-schist, all signs of organic
bodies having been obliterated.

Although we are in a great degree ignorant of the precise nature of the
influence exerted in these cases, yet it evidently bears some analogy to
that which volcanic heat and gases are known to produce; and the action may
be conveniently called plutonic, because it appears to have been developed
in those regions where plutonic rocks are generated, and under similar
circumstances of pressure and depth in the earth. Whether hot water or
steam permeating stratified masses, or electricity, or any other causes
have co-operated to produce the crystalline texture, may be matter of
speculation, but it is clear that the plutonic influence has sometimes
pervaded entire mountain masses of strata.

In accordance with the hypothesis above alluded to, I proposed in the first
edition of the Principles of Geology (1833), the term "Metamorphic" for the
altered strata, a term derived from +meta+, meta, _trans_, and +morphê+,
morphe, _forma_.

Hence there are four great classes of rocks considered in reference to
their origin,--the aqueous, the volcanic, the plutonic, and the
metamorphic. In the course of this work it will be shown, that portions of
each of these four distinct classes have originated at many successive
periods. They have all been produced contemporaneously, and may even now be
in the progress of formation. It is not true, as was formerly supposed,
that all granites, together with the crystalline or metamorphic strata,
were first formed, and therefore entitled to be called "primitive," and
that the aqueous and volcanic rocks were afterwards superimposed, and
should, therefore, rank as secondary in the order of time. This idea was
adopted in the infancy of the science, when all formations, whether
stratified or unstratified, earthy or crystalline, with or without fossils,
were alike regarded as of aqueous origin. At that period it was naturally
argued, that the foundation must be older than the superstructure; but it
was afterwards discovered, that this opinion was by no means in every
instance a legitimate deduction from facts; for the inferior parts of the
earth's crust have often been modified, and even entirely changed, by the
influence of volcanic and other subterranean causes, while superimposed
formations have not been in the slightest degree altered. In other words,
the destroying and renovating processes have given birth to new rocks
below, while those above, whether crystalline or fossiliferous, have
remained in their ancient condition. Even in cities, such as Venice and
Amsterdam, it cannot be laid down as universally true, that the upper parts
of each edifice, whether of brick or marble, are more modern than the
foundations on which they rest, for these often consist of wooden piles,
which may have rotted and been replaced one after the other, without the
least injury to the buildings above; meanwhile, these may have required
scarcely any repair, and may have been constantly inhabited. So it is with
the habitable surface of our globe, in its relation to large masses of rock
immediately below: it may continue the same for ages, while subjacent
materials, at a great depth, are passing from a solid to a fluid state, and
then reconsolidating, so as to acquire a new texture.

As all the crystalline rocks may, in some respects, be viewed as belonging
to one great family, whether they be stratified or unstratified, plutonic
or metamorphic, it will often be convenient to speak of them by one common
name. It being now ascertained, as above stated, that they are of very
different ages, sometimes newer than the strata called secondary, the term
primary, which was formerly used for the whole, must be abandoned, as it
would imply a manifest contradiction. It is indispensable, therefore, to
find a new name, one which must not be of chronological import, and must
express, on the one hand, some peculiarity equally attributable to granite
and gneiss (to the plutonic as well as the _altered_ rocks), and, on the
other, must have reference to characters in which those rocks differ, both
from the volcanic and from the _unaltered_ sedimentary strata. I proposed
in the Principles of Geology (first edition, vol. iii.), the term
"hypogene" for this purpose, derived from +hypo+, _under_, and +ginomai+,
_to be_, or _to be born_; a word implying the theory that granite, gneiss,
and the other crystalline formations are alike _nether-formed_ rocks, or
rocks which have not assumed their present form and structure at the
surface. This occurs in the lowest place in the order of superposition.
Even in regions such as the Alps, where some masses of granite and gneiss
can be shown to be of comparatively modern date, belonging, for example, to
the period hereafter to be described as tertiary, they are still
_underlying_ rocks. They never repose on the volcanic or trappean
formations, nor on strata containing organic remains. They are _hypogene_,
as "being under" all the rest.

From what has now been said, the reader will understand that each of the
four great classes of rocks may be studied under two distinct points of
view; first, they may be studied simply as mineral masses deriving their
origin from particular causes, and having a certain composition, form, and
position in the earth's crust, or other characters both positive and
negative, such as the presence or absence of organic remains. In the second
place, the rocks of each class may be viewed as a grand chronological
series of monuments, attesting a succession of events in the former history
of the globe and its living inhabitants.

I shall accordingly proceed to treat of each family of rocks; first, in
reference to those characters which are not chronological, and then in
particular relation to the several periods when they were formed.


FOOTNOTES:

[3-A] See Principles of Geology, by the Author, Index, "Nile,"
"Rivers," &c.

[4-A] See p. 18.

[4-B] See Geograph. Journ. vol. iv. p. 64.



CHAPTER II.

AQUEOUS ROCKS--THEIR COMPOSITION AND FORMS OF STRATIFICATION.

   Mineral composition of strata--Arenaceous
   rocks--Argillaceous--Calcareous--Gypsum--Forms of
   stratification--Original horizontality--Thinning out--Diagonal
   arrangement--Ripple mark.


In pursuance of the arrangement explained in the last chapter, we shall
begin by examining the aqueous or sedimentary rocks, which are for the most
part distinctly stratified, and contain fossils. We may first study them
with reference to their mineral composition, external appearance, position,
mode of origin, organic contents, and other characters which belong to them
as aqueous formations, independently of their age, and we may afterwards
consider them chronologically or with reference to the successive
geological periods when they originated.

I have already given an outline of the data which led to the belief that
the stratified and fossiliferous rocks were originally deposited under
water; but, before entering into a more detailed investigation, it will be
desirable to say something of the ordinary materials of which such strata
are composed. These may be said to belong principally to three divisions,
the arenaceous, the argillaceous, and the calcareous, which are formed
respectively of sand, clay, and carbonate of lime. Of these, the
arenaceous, or sandy masses, are chiefly made up of siliceous or flinty
grains; the argillaceous, or clayey, of a mixture of siliceous matter,
with a certain proportion, about a fourth in weight, of aluminous earth;
and, lastly, the calcareous rocks or limestones consist of carbonic
acid and lime.

_Arenaceous or siliceous rocks._--To speak first of the sandy division:
beds of loose sand are frequently met with, of which the grains consist
entirely of silex, which term comprehends all purely siliceous minerals, as
quartz and common flint. Quartz is silex in its purest form; flint usually
contains some admixture of alumine and oxide of iron. The siliceous grains
in sand are usually rounded, as if by the action of running water.
Sandstone is an aggregate of such grains, which often cohere together
without any visible cement, but more commonly are bound together by a
slight quantity of siliceous or calcareous matter, or by iron or clay.

Pure siliceous rocks may be known by not effervescing when a drop of
nitric, sulphuric, or other acid is applied to them, or by the grains not
being readily scratched or broken by ordinary pressure. In nature there is
every intermediate gradation, from perfectly loose sand, to the hardest
sandstone. In _micaceous sandstones_ mica is very abundant; and the thin
silvery plates into which that mineral divides, are often arranged in
layers parallel to the planes of stratification, giving a slaty or
laminated texture to the rock.

When sandstone is coarse-grained, it is usually called _grit_. If the
grains are rounded, and large enough to be called pebbles, it becomes a
_conglomerate_, or _pudding-stone_, which may consist of pieces of one or
of many different kinds of rock. A conglomerate, therefore, is simply
gravel bound together by a cement.

_Argillaceous rocks._--Clay, strictly speaking, is a mixture of silex or
flint with a large proportion, usually about one fourth, of alumine, or
argil; but, in common language, any earth which possesses sufficient
ductility, when kneaded up with water, to be fashioned like paste by the
hand, or by the potter's lathe, is called a _clay_; and such clays vary
greatly in their composition, and are, in general, nothing more than mud
derived from the decomposition or wearing down of various rocks. The purest
clay found in nature is porcelain clay, or kaolin, which results from the
decomposition of a rock composed of felspar and quartz, and it is almost
always mixed with quartz.[11-A] _Shale_ has also the property, like clay,
of becoming plastic in water: it is a more solid form of clay, or
argillaceous matter, condensed by pressure. It usually divides into
irregular laminæ.

One general character of all argillaceous rocks is to give out a peculiar,
earthy odour when breathed upon, which is a test of the presence of
alumine, although it does not belong to pure alumine, but, apparently, to
the combination of that substance with oxide of iron.[11-B]

_Calcareous rocks._--This division comprehends those rocks which, like
chalk, are composed chiefly of lime and carbonic acid. Shells and corals
are also formed of the same elements, with the addition of animal matter.
To obtain pure lime it is necessary to calcine these calcareous substances,
that is to say, to expose them to heat of sufficient intensity to drive off
the carbonic acid, and other volatile matter, without vitrifying or melting
the lime itself. White chalk is often pure carbonate of lime; and this
rock, although usually in a soft and earthy state, is sometimes
sufficiently solid to be used for building, and even passes into a
_compact_ stone, or a stone of which the separate parts are so minute as
not to be distinguishable from each other by the naked eye.

Many limestones are made up entirely of minute fragments of shells and
coral, or of calcareous sand cemented together. These last might be called
"calcareous sandstones;" but that term is more properly applied to a rock
in which the grains are partly calcareous and partly siliceous, or to
quartzose sandstones, having a cement of carbonate of lime.

The variety of limestone called "oolite" is composed of numerous small
egg-like grains, resembling the roe of a fish, each of which has usually a
small fragment of sand as a nucleus, around which concentric layers of
calcareous matter have accumulated.

Any limestone which is sufficiently hard to take a fine polish is called
_marble_. Many of these are fossiliferous; but statuary marble, which is
also called saccharine limestone, as having a texture resembling that of
loaf-sugar, is devoid of fossils, and is in many cases a member of the
metamorphic series.

_Siliceous limestone_ is an intimate mixture of carbonate of lime and
flint, and is harder in proportion as the flinty matter predominates.

The presence of carbonate of lime in a rock may be ascertained by applying
to the surface a small drop of diluted sulphuric, nitric, or muriatic
acids, or strong vinegar; for the lime, having a greater chemical affinity
for any one of these acids than for the carbonic, unites immediately with
them to form new compounds, thereby becoming a sulphate, nitrate, or
muriate of lime. The carbonic acid, when thus liberated from its union with
the lime, escapes in a gaseous form, and froths up or effervesces as it
makes its way in small bubbles through the drop of liquid. This
effervescence is brisk or feeble in proportion as the limestone is
pure or impure, or, in other words, according to the quantity of foreign
matter mixed with the carbonate of lime. Without the aid of this test,
the most experienced eye cannot always detect the presence of carbonate
of lime in rocks.

The above-mentioned three classes of rocks, the siliceous, argillaceous,
and calcareous, pass continually into each other, and rarely occur in a
perfectly separate and pure form. Thus it is an exception to the general
rule to meet with a limestone as pure as ordinary white chalk, or with clay
as aluminous as that used in Cornwall for porcelain, or with sand so
entirely composed of siliceous grains as the white sand of Alum Bay in the
Isle of Wight, or sandstone so pure as the grit of Fontainebleau, used for
pavement in France. More commonly we find sand and clay, or clay and marl,
intermixed in the same mass. When the sand and clay are each in
considerable quantity, the mixture is called _loam_. If there is much
calcareous matter in clay it is called _marl_; but this term has
unfortunately been used so vaguely, as often to be very ambiguous. It has
been applied to substances in which there is no lime; as, to that red loam
usually called red marl in certain parts of England. Agriculturists were in
the habit of calling any soil a marl, which, like true marl, fell to pieces
readily on exposure to the air. Hence arose the confusion of using this
name for soils which, consisting of loam, were easily worked by the plough,
though devoid of lime.

_Marl slate_ bears the same relation to marl which shale bears to clay,
being a calcareous shale. It is very abundant in some countries, as in the
Swiss Alps. Argillaceous or marly limestone is also of common occurrence.

There are few other kinds of rock which enter so largely into the
composition of sedimentary strata as to make it necessary to dwell here on
their characters. I may, however, mention two others,--magnesian limestone
or dolomite, and gypsum. _Magnesian limestone_ is composed of carbonate of
lime and carbonate of magnesia; the proportion of the latter amounting in
some cases to nearly one half. It effervesces much more slowly and feebly
with acids than common limestone. In England this rock is generally of a
yellowish colour; but it varies greatly in mineralogical character, passing
from an earthy state to a white compact stone of great hardness.
_Dolomite_, so common in many parts of Germany and France, is also a
variety of magnesian limestone, usually of a granular texture.

_Gypsum._--Gypsum is a rock composed of sulphuric acid, lime, and water. It
is usually a soft whitish-yellow rock, with a texture resembling that of
loaf-sugar, but sometimes it is entirely composed of lenticular crystals.
It is insoluble in acids, and does not effervesce like chalk and dolomite,
because it does not contain carbonic acid gas, or fixed air, the lime being
already combined with sulphuric acid, for which it has a stronger affinity
than for any other. Anhydrous gypsum is a rare variety, into which water
does not enter as a component part. Gypseous marl is a mixture of gypsum
and marl. Alabaster is a granular and compact variety of gypsum found in
masses large enough to be used in sculpture and architecture. It is
sometimes a pure snow-white substance, as that of Volterra in Tuscany, well
known as being carved for works of art in Florence and Leghorn. It is a
softer stone than marble, and more easily wrought.

_Forms of stratification._--A series of strata sometimes consists of one of
the above rocks, sometimes of two or more in alternating beds. Thus, in the
coal districts of England, for example, we often pass through several beds
of sandstone, some of finer, others of coarser grain, some white, others of
a dark colour, and below these, layers of shale and sandstone or beds of
shale, divisible into leaf-like laminæ, and containing beautiful
impressions of plants. Then again we meet with beds of pure and impure
coal, alternating with shales and sandstones, and underneath the whole,
perhaps, are calcareous strata, or beds of limestone, filled with corals
and marine shells, each bed distinguishable from another by certain
fossils, or by the abundance of particular species of shells or zoophytes.

This alternation of different kinds of rock produces the most distinct
stratification; and we often find beds of limestone and marl, conglomerate
and sandstone, sand and clay, recurring again and again, in nearly regular
order, throughout a series of many hundred strata. The causes which may
produce these phenomena are various, and have been fully discussed in my
treatise on the modern changes of the earth's surface.[14-A] It is there
seen that rivers flowing into lakes and seas are charged with sediment,
varying in quantity, composition, colour, and grain according to the
seasons; the waters are sometimes flooded and rapid, at other periods low
and feeble; different tributaries, also, draining peculiar countries and
soils, and therefore charged with peculiar sediment, are swollen at
distinct periods. It was also shown that the waves of the sea and
currents undermine the cliffs during wintry storms, and sweep away
the materials into the deep, after which a season of tranquillity
succeeds, when nothing but the finest mud is spread by the movements
of the ocean over the same submarine area.

It is not the object of the present work to give a description of these
operations, repeated as they are, year after year, and century after
century; but I may suggest an explanation of the manner in which some
micaceous sandstones have originated, those in which we see innumerable
thin layers of mica dividing layers of fine quartzose sand. I observed the
same arrangement of materials in recent mud deposited in the estuary of La
Roche St. Bernard in Brittany, at the mouth of the Loire. The surrounding
rocks are of gneiss, which, by its waste, supplies the mud: when this dries
at low water, it is found to consist of brown laminated clay, divided by
thin seams of mica. The separation of the mica in this case, or in that of
micaceous sandstones, may be thus understood. If we take a handful of
quartzose sand, mixed with mica, and throw it into a clear running stream,
we see the materials immediately sorted by the water, the grains of quartz
falling almost directly to the bottom, while the plates of mica take a much
longer time to reach the bottom, and are carried farther down the stream.
At the first instant the water is turbid, but immediately after the flat
surfaces of the plates of mica are seen alone reflecting a silvery light,
as they descend slowly, to form a distinct micaceous lamina. The mica is
the heavier mineral of the two; but it remains longer suspended, owing to
its great extent of surface. It is easy, therefore, to perceive that where
such mud is acted upon by a river or tidal current, the thin plates of mica
will be carried farther, and not deposited in the same places as the
grains of quartz; and since the force and velocity of the stream varies
from time to time, layers of mica or of sand will be thrown down
successively on the same area.

_Original horizontality._--It has generally been said that the upper and
under surfaces of strata, or the planes of stratification, as they are
termed, are parallel. Although this is not strictly true, they make an
approach to parallelism, for the same reason that sediment is usually
deposited at first in nearly horizontal layers. The reason of this
arrangement can by no means be attributed to an original evenness or
horizontality in the bed of the sea; for it is ascertained that in those
places where no matter has been recently deposited, the bottom of the ocean
is often as uneven as that of the dry land, having in like manner its
hills, valleys, and ravines. Yet if the sea should sink, or the water be
removed near the mouth of a large river where a delta has been forming, we
should see extensive plains of mud and sand laid dry, which, to the eye,
would appear perfectly level, although, in reality, they would slope gently
from the land towards the sea.

This tendency in newly-formed strata to assume a horizontal position arises
principally from the motion of the water, which forces along particles of
sand or mud at the bottom, and causes them to settle in hollows or
depressions, where they are less exposed to the force of a current than
when they are resting on elevated points. The velocity of the current and
the motion of the superficial waves diminish from the surface downwards,
and are least in those depressions where the water is deepest.

[Illustration: Fig. 1. Cross section.]

A good illustration of the principle here alluded to may be sometimes seen
in the neighbourhood of a volcano, when a section, whether natural or
artificial, has laid open to view a succession of various-coloured layers
of sand and ashes, which have fallen in showers upon uneven ground. Thus
let A B (fig. 1.) be two ridges, with an intervening valley. These original
inequalities of the surface have been gradually effaced by beds of sand and
ashes _c_, _d_, _e_, the surface at e being quite level. It will be seen
that although the materials of the first layers have accommodated
themselves in a great degree to the shape of the ground A B, yet each bed
is thickest at the bottom. At first a great many particles would be carried
by their own gravity down the steep sides of A and B, and others would
afterwards be blown by the wind as they fell off the ridges, and would
settle in the hollow, which would thus become more and more effaced as the
strata accumulated from _c_ to _e_. This levelling operation may perhaps be
rendered more clear to the student by supposing a number of parallel
trenches to be dug in a plain of moving sand, like the African desert, in
which case the wind would soon cause all signs of these trenches to
disappear, and the surface would be as uniform as before. Now, water in
motion can exert this levelling power on similar materials more easily
than air, for almost all stones lose in water more than a third of the
weight which they have in air, the specific gravity of rocks being in
general as 2-1/2 when compared to that of water, which is estimated at 1.
But the buoyancy of sand or mud would be still greater in the sea, as the
density of salt water exceeds that of fresh.

Yet, however uniform and horizontal may be the surface of new deposits in
general, there are still many disturbing causes, such as eddies in the
water, and currents moving first in one and then in another direction,
which frequently cause irregularities. We may sometimes follow a bed of
limestone, shale, or sandstone, for a distance of many hundred yards
continuously; but we generally find at length that each individual stratum
thins out, and allows the beds which were previously above and below it to
meet. If the materials are coarse, as in grits and conglomerates, the same
beds can rarely be traced many yards without varying in size, and often
coming to an end abruptly. (See fig. 2.)

[Illustration: Fig. 2. Section of strata of sandstone, grit,
and conglomerate.]

[Illustration: Fig. 3. Section of sand at Sandy Hill, near Biggleswade,
Bedfordshire. Height 20 feet. (Greensand formation.)]

_Diagonal or Cross Stratification._--There is also another phenomenon of
frequent occurrence. We find a series of larger strata, each of which is
composed of a number of minor layers placed obliquely to the general planes
of stratification. To this diagonal arrangement the name of "false or cross
stratification" has been given. Thus in the annexed section (fig. 3.) we
see seven or eight large beds of loose sand, yellow and brown, and the
lines _a_, _b_, _c_, mark some of the principal planes of stratification,
which are nearly horizontal. But the greater part of the subordinate laminæ
do not conform to these planes, but have often a steep slope, the
inclination being sometimes towards opposite points of the compass. When
the sand is loose and incoherent, as in the case here represented, the
deviation from parallelism of the slanting laminæ cannot possibly be
accounted for by any re-arrangement of the particles acquired during the
consolidation of the rock. In what manner then can such irregularities be
due to original deposition? We must suppose that at the bottom of the sea,
as well as in the beds of rivers, the motions of waves, currents, and
eddies often cause mud, sand, and gravel to be thrown down in heaps on
particular spots, instead of being spread out uniformly over a wide area.
Sometimes, when banks are thus formed, currents may cut passages through
them, just as a river forms its bed. Suppose the bank A (fig. 4.) to be
thus formed with a steep sloping side, and the water being in a tranquil
state, the layer of sediment No. 1. is thrown down upon it, conforming
nearly to its surface. Afterwards the other layers, 2, 3, 4, may be
deposited in succession, so that the bank B C D is formed. If the current
then increases in velocity, it may cut away the upper portion of this mass
down to the dotted line _e_ (fig. 4.), and deposit the materials thus
removed farther on, so as to form the layers 5, 6, 7, 8. We have now the
bank B C D E (fig. 5.), of which the surface is almost level, and on which
the nearly horizontal layers, 9, 10, 11, may then accumulate. It was shown
in fig. 3. that the diagonal layers of successive strata may sometimes have
an opposite slope. This is well seen in some cliffs of loose sand on the
Suffolk coast. A portion of one of these is represented in fig. 6., where
the layers, of which there are about six in the thickness of an inch, are
composed of quartzose grains. This arrangement may have been due to the
altered direction of the tides and currents in the same place.

[Illustration: Fig. 4. Cross section.]

[Illustration: Fig. 5. Cross section.]

[Illustration: Fig. 6. Cliff between Mismer and Dunwich.]

[Illustration: Fig. 7. Section from Monte Calvo to the sea by the valley of
Magnan, near Nice.

  A. Dolomite and sandstone. (Greensand formation?)
  _a_, _b_, _d_. Beds of gravel and sand.
  _c._ Fine marl and sand of St. Madeleine, with marine shells.]

The description above given of the slanting position of the minor layers
constituting a single stratum is in certain cases applicable on a much
grander scale to masses several hundred feet thick, and many miles in
extent. A fine example may be seen at the base of the Maritime Alps near
Nice. The mountains here terminate abruptly in the sea, so that a depth of
many hundred fathoms is often found within a stone's throw of the beach,
and sometimes a depth of 3000 feet within half a mile. But at certain
points, strata of sand, marl, or conglomerate, intervene between the shore
and the mountains, as in the annexed fig. 7., where a vast succession of
slanting beds of gravel and sand may be traced from the sea to Monte Calvo,
a distance of no less than 9 miles in a straight line. The dip of these
beds is remarkably uniform, being always southward or towards the
Mediterranean, at an angle of about 25°. They are exposed to view in nearly
vertical precipices, varying from 200 to 600 feet in height, which bound
the valley through which the river Magnan flows. Although in a general
view, the strata appear to be parallel and uniform, they are nevertheless
found, when examined closely, to be wedge-shaped, and to thin out when
followed for a few hundred feet or yards, so that we may suppose them to
have been thrown down originally upon the side of a steep bank, where a
river or alpine torrent discharged itself into a deep and tranquil sea, and
formed a delta, which advanced gradually from the base of Monte Calvo to a
distance of 9 miles from the original shore. If subsequently this part of
the Alps and bed of the sea were raised 700 feet, the coast would acquire
its present configuration, the delta would emerge, and a deep channel might
then be cut through it by a river.

It is well known that the torrents and streams, which now descend from the
alpine declivities to the shore, bring down annually, when the snow melts,
vast quantities of shingle and sand, and then, as they subside, fine mud,
while in summer they are nearly or entirely dry; so that it may be safely
assumed, that deposits like those of the valley of the Magnan, consisting
of coarse gravel alternating with fine sediment, are still in progress at
many points, as, for instance, at the mouth of the Var. They must advance
upon the Mediterranean in the form of great shoals terminating in a steep
talus; such being the original mode of accumulation of all coarse
materials conveyed into deep water, especially where they are composed in
great part of pebbles, which cannot be transported to indefinite distances
by currents of moderate velocity. By inattention to facts and inferences of
this kind, a very exaggerated estimate has sometimes been made of the
supposed depth of the ancient ocean. There can be no doubt, for example,
that the strata _a_, fig. 7., or those nearest to Monte Calvo, are older
than those indicated by _b_, and these again were formed before _c_; but
the vertical depth of gravel and sand in any one place cannot be proved to
amount even to 1000 feet, although it may perhaps be much greater, yet
probably never exceeding at any point 3000 or 4000 feet. But were we to
assume that all the strata were once horizontal, and that their present dip
or inclination was due to subsequent movements, we should then be forced to
conclude, that a sea 9 miles deep had been filled up with alternate layers
of mud and pebbles thrown down one upon another.

In the locality now under consideration, situated a few miles to the west
of Nice, there are many geological data, the details of which cannot be
given in this place, all leading to the opinion, that when the deposit of
the Magnan was formed, the shape and outline of the alpine declivities and
the shore greatly resembled what we now behold at many points in the
neighbourhood. That the beds, a, b, c, d, are of comparatively modern date
is proved by this fact, that in seams of loamy marl intervening between the
pebbly beds are fossil shells, half of which belong to species now living
in the Mediterranean.

[Illustration: Fig. 8. Slab of ripple-marked (new red) sandstone
from Cheshire.]

_Ripple mark._--The ripple mark, so common on the surface of sandstones of
all ages (see fig. 8.), and which is so often seen on the sea-shore at low
tide, seems to originate in the drifting of materials along the bottom of
the water, in a manner very similar to that which may explain the inclined
layers above described. This ripple is not entirely confined to the beach
between high and low water mark, but is also produced on sands which are
constantly covered by water. Similar undulating ridges and furrows may also
be sometimes seen on the surface of drift snow and blown sand. The
following is the manner in which I once observed the motion of the air to
produce this effect on a large extent of level beach, exposed at low tide
near Calais. Clouds of fine white sand were blown from the neighbouring
dunes, so as to cover the shore, and whiten a dark level surface of sandy
mud, and this fresh covering of sand was beautifully rippled. On levelling
all the small ridges and furrows of this ripple over an area of several
yards square, I saw them perfectly restored in about ten minutes, the
general direction of the ridges being always at right angles to that of the
wind. The restoration began by the appearance here and there of small
detached heaps of sand, which soon lengthened and joined together, so as to
form long sinuous ridges with intervening furrows. Each ridge had one side
slightly inclined, and the other steep; the lee-side being always steep, as
_b, c,--d, e_; the windward-side a gentle slope, as _a, b,--c, d_, fig. 9.
When a gust of wind blew with sufficient force to drive along a cloud of
sand, all the ridges were seen to be in motion at once, each encroaching on
the furrow before it, and, in the course of a few minutes, filling the
place which the furrows had occupied. The mode of advance was by the
continual drifting of grains of sand up the slopes _a b_ and _c d_, many of
which grains, when they arrived at _b_ and _d_, fell over the scarps _b c_
and _d e_, and were under shelter from the wind; so that they remained
stationary, resting, according to their shape and momentum, on different
parts of the descent, and a few only rolling to the bottom. In this manner
each ridge was distinctly seen to move slowly on as often as the force of
the wind augmented. Occasionally part of a ridge, advancing more rapidly
than the rest, overtook the ridge immediately before it, and became
confounded with it, thus causing those bifurcations and branches which are
so common, and two of which are seen in the slab, fig. 8. We may observe
this configuration in sandstones of all ages, and in them also, as now on
the sea-coast, we may often detect two systems of ripples interfering with
each other; one more ancient and half effaced, and a newer one, in which
the grooves and ridges are more distinct, and in a different direction.
This crossing of two sets of ripples arises from a change of wind, and the
new direction in which the waves are thrown on the shore.

[Illustration: Fig. 9. Sketch of ripples.]

The ripple mark is usually an indication of a sea-beach, or of water
from 6 to 10 feet deep, for the agitation caused by waves even during
storms extends to a very slight depth. To this rule, however, there are
some exceptions, and recent ripple marks have been observed at the depth
of 60 or 70 feet. It has also been ascertained that currents or large
bodies of water in motion may disturb mud and sand at the depth of 300
or even 450 feet.[21-A]


FOOTNOTES:

[11-A] The kaolin of China consists of 71·15 parts of silex, 15·86 of
alumine, 1·92 of lime, and 6·73 of water (W. Phillips, Mineralogy, p. 33.);
but other porcelain clays differ materially, that of Cornwall being
composed, according to Boase of nearly equal parts of silica and alumine,
with 1 per cent. of magnesia. (Phil. Mag. vol. x. 1837.)

[11-B] See W. Phillips's Mineralogy, "Alumine."

[14-A] Consult Index to Principles of Geology, "Stratification,"
"Currents," "Deltas," "Water," &c.

[21-A] Siau. Edin. New Phil. Journ. vol. xxxi.; and Darwin, Volc.
Islands, p. 134.



CHAPTER III.

ARRANGEMENT OF FOSSILS IN STRATA--FRESHWATER AND MARINE.

   Successive deposition indicated by fossils--Limestones formed of
   corals and shells Proofs of gradual increase of strata derived from
   fossils--Serpula attached to spatangus--Wood bored by
   Teredina--Tripoli and semi-opal formed of infusoria--Chalk derived
   principally from organic bodies--Distinction of freshwater from marine
   formations--Genera of freshwater and land shells--Rules for
   recognizing marine testacea--Gyrogonite and chara--Freshwater
   fishes--Alternation of marine and freshwater deposits--Lym-Fiord.


Having in the last chapter considered the forms of stratification so far as
they are determined by the arrangement of inorganic matter, we may now turn
our attention to the manner in which organic remains are distributed
through stratified deposits. We should often be unable to detect any signs
of stratification or of successive deposition, if particular kinds of
fossils did not occur here and there at certain depths in the mass. At one
level, for example, univalve shells of some one or more species
predominate; at another, bivalve shells; and at a third, corals; while in
some formations we find layers of vegetable matter, commonly derived from
land plants, separating strata.

It may appear inconceivable to a beginner how mountains, several thousand
feet thick, can have become filled with fossils from top to bottom; but the
difficulty is removed, when he reflects on the origin of stratification, as
explained in the last chapter, and allows sufficient time for the
accumulation of sediment. He must never lose sight of the fact that, during
the process of deposition, each separate layer was once the uppermost, and
covered immediately by the water in which aquatic animals lived. Each
stratum in fact, however far it may now lie beneath the surface, was once
in the state of shingle, or loose sand or soft mud at the bottom of the
sea, in which shells and other bodies easily became enveloped.

By attending to the nature of these remains, we are often enabled to
determine whether the deposition was slow or rapid, whether it took
place in a deep or shallow sea, near the shore or far from land, and
whether the water was salt, brackish, or fresh. Some limestones consist
almost exclusively of corals, and in many cases it is evident that the
present position of each fossil zoophyte has been determined by the
manner in which it grew originally. The axis of the coral, for example,
if its natural growth is erect, still remains at right angles to the
plane of stratification. If the stratum be now horizontal, the round
spherical heads of certain species continue uppermost, and their points
of attachment are directed downwards. This arrangement is sometimes
repeated throughout a great succession of strata. From what we know of
the growth of similar zoophytes in modern reefs, we infer that the rate
of increase was extremely slow, and some of the fossils must have
flourished for ages like forest trees, before they attained so large a
size. During these ages, the water remained clear and transparent, for
such corals cannot live in turbid water.

[Illustration: Fig. 10. Fossil _Gryphæa_, covered both on the outside and
inside with fossil serpulæ.]

In like manner, when we see thousands of full-grown shells dispersed every
where throughout a long series of strata, we cannot doubt that time was
required for the multiplication of successive generations; and the evidence
of slow accumulation is rendered more striking from the proofs, so often
discovered, of fossil bodies having lain for a time on the floor of the
ocean after death before they were imbedded in sediment. Nothing, for
example, is more common than to see fossil oysters in clay, with serpulæ,
or barnacles (acorn-shells), or corals, and other creatures, attached to
the inside of the valves, so that the mollusk was certainly not buried in
argillaceous mud the moment it died. There must have been an interval
during which it was still surrounded with clear water, when the testacea,
now adhering to it, grew from an embryo state to full maturity. Attached
shells which are merely external, like some of the serpulæ (_a_) in the
annexed figure (fig. 10.), may often have grown upon an oyster or other
shell while the animal within was still living; but if they are found on
the inside, it could only happen after the death of the inhabitant of the
shell which affords the support. Thus, in fig. 10., it will be seen that
two serpulæ have grown on the interior, one of them exactly on the place
where the adductor muscle of the _Gryphæa_ (a kind of oyster) was fixed.

Some fossil shells, even if simply attached to the _outside_ of others,
bear full testimony to the conclusion above alluded to, namely, that an
interval elapsed between the death of the creature to whose shell they
adhere, and the burial of the same in mud or sand. The sea-urchins or
_Echini_, so abundant in white chalk, afford a good illustration. It is
well known that these animals, when living, are invariably covered with
numerous spines, which serve as organs of motion, and are supported by rows
of tubercles, which last are only seen after the death of the sea-urchin,
when the spines have dropped off. In fig. 12. a living species of
_Spatangus_, common on our coast, is represented with one half of its shell
stripped of the spines. In fig. 11. a fossil of the same genus from the
white chalk of England shows the naked surface which the individuals of
this family exhibit when denuded of their bristles. The full-grown
_Serpula_, therefore, which now adheres externally, could not have begun to
grow till the _Spatangus_ had died, and the spines were detached.

[Illustration: Fig. 11. _Serpula_ attached to a fossil _Spatangus_
from the chalk.]

[Illustration: Fig. 12. Recent _Spatangus_ with the spines removed
from one side.

  _b._ Spine and tubercles, nat. size.
  _a._ The same magnified.]

[Illustration: Fig. 13.

  _a._ _Echinus_ from the chalk, with lower valve of the _Crania_ attached.
  _b._ Upper valve of the _Crania_ detached.]

Now the series of events here attested by a single fossil may be carried a
step farther. Thus, for example, we often meet with a sea-urchin in the
chalk (see fig. 13.), which has fixed to it the lower valve of a
_Crania_, a genus of bivalve mollusca. The upper valve (_b_, fig. 13.)
is almost invariably wanting, though occasionally found in a perfect
state of preservation in white chalk at some distance. In this case, we
see clearly that the sea-urchin first lived from youth to age, then died
and lost its spines, which were carried away. Then the young _Crania_
adhered to the bared shell, grew and perished in its turn; after which
the upper valve was separated from the lower before the _Echinus_ became
enveloped in chalky mud.

It may be well to mention one more illustration of the manner in which
single fossils may sometimes throw light on a former state of things, both
in the bed of the ocean and on some adjoining land. We meet with many
fragments of wood bored by ship-worms at various depths in the clay on
which London is built. Entire branches and stems of trees, several feet in
length, are sometimes dug out, drilled all over by the holes of these
borers, the tubes and shells of the mollusk still remaining in the
cylindrical hollows. In fig. 15. _e_, a representation is given of a piece
of recent wood pierced by the _Teredo navalis_, or common ship-worm, which
destroys wooden piles and ships. When the cylindrical tube _d_ has been
extracted from the wood, a shell is seen at the larger extremity, composed
of two pieces, as shown at _c_. In like manner, a piece of fossil wood
(_a_, fig. 14.) has been perforated by an animal of a kindred but extinct
genus, called _Teredina_ by Lamarck. The calcareous tube of this mollusk
was united and as it were soldered on to the valves of the shell (_b_),
which therefore cannot be detached from the tube, like the valves of the
recent _Teredo_. The wood in this fossil specimen is now converted into a
stony mass, a mixture of clay and lime; but it must once have been buoyant
and floating in the sea, when the _Teredinæ_ lived upon it, perforating it
in all directions. Again, before the infant colony settled upon the drift
wood, the branch of a tree must have been floated down to the sea by a
river, uprooted, perhaps, by a flood, or torn off and cast into the waves
by the wind: and thus our thoughts are carried back to a prior period, when
the tree grew for years on dry land, enjoying a fit soil and climate.

[2 Illustrations: Fossil and recent wood drilled by perforating Mollusca.

Fig. 14. _a_. Fossil wood from London clay, bored by _Teredina_.
         _b_. Shell and tube of _Teredina personata_, the right-hand
              figure the ventral, the left the dorsal view.

Fig. 15. _e_. Recent wood bored by _Teredo_.
         _d_. Shell and tube of _Teredo navalis_, from the same.
         _c_. Anterior and posterior view of the valves of same detached
              from the tube.]

It has been already remarked that there are rocks in the interior of
continents, at various depths in the earth, and at great heights above
the sea, almost entirely made up of the remains of zoophytes and
testacea. Such masses may be compared to modern oyster-beds and coral
reefs; and, like them, the rate of increase must have been extremely
gradual. But there are a variety of stony deposits in the earth's crust,
now proved to have been derived from plants and animals, of which the
organic origin was not suspected until of late years, even by
naturalists. Great surprise was therefore created by the recent
discovery of Professor Ehrenberg of Berlin, that a certain kind of
siliceous stone, called tripoli, was entirely composed of millions of
the remains of organic beings, which the Prussian naturalist refers to
microscopic Infusoria, but which most others now believe to be plants.
They abound in freshwater lakes and ponds in England and other
countries, and are termed Diatomaceæ by those naturalists who believe in
their vegetable origin. The substance alluded to has long been well
known in the arts, being used in the form of powder for polishing stones
and metals. It has been procured, among other places, from Bilin, in
Bohemia, where a single stratum, extending over a wide area, is no less
than 14 feet thick. This stone, when examined with a powerful
microscope, is found to consist of the siliceous plates or frustules of
the above-mentioned Diatomaceæ, united together without any visible
cement. It is difficult to convey an idea of their extreme minuteness;
but Ehrenberg estimates that in the Bilin tripoli there are 41,000
millions of individuals of the _Gaillonella distans_ (see fig. 17.) in
every cubic inch, which weighs about 220 grains, or about 187 millions
in a single grain. At every stroke, therefore, that we make with this
polishing powder, several millions, perhaps tens of millions, of perfect
fossils are crushed to atoms.

[3 Illustrations: These figures are magnified nearly 300 times, except
the lower figure of _G. ferruginea_ (fig. 18. _a_), which is magnified
2000 times.

Fig. 16. _Bacillaria vulgaris?_

Fig. 17. _Gaillonella distans._

Fig. 18. _Gaillonella ferruginea._]

[2 Illustrations: Fragment of semi-opal from the great bed of
Tripoli, Bilin.

Fig. 19. Natural size.

Fig. 20. The same magnified, showing circular articulations of a species of
_Gaillonella_, and spiculæ of _Spongilla_.]

The remains of these Diatomaceæ are of pure silex, and their forms are
various, but very marked and constant in particular genera and species.
Thus, in the family _Bacillaria_ (see fig. 16.), the fossils preserved in
tripoli are seen to exhibit the same divisions and transverse lines which
characterize the living species of kindred form. With these, also, the
siliceous spiculæ or internal supports of the freshwater sponge, or
_Spongilla_ of Lamarck, are sometimes intermingled (see the needle-shaped
bodies in fig. 20.). These flinty cases and spiculæ, although hard, are
very fragile, breaking like glass, and are therefore admirably adapted,
when rubbed, for wearing down into a fine powder fit for polishing the
surface of metals.

Besides the tripoli, formed exclusively of the fossils above described,
there occurs in the upper part of the great stratum at Bilin another
heavier and more compact stone, a kind of semi-opal, in which innumerable
parts of Diatomaceæ and spiculæ of the _Spongilla_ are filled with, and
cemented together by, siliceous matter. It is supposed that the siliceous
remains of the most delicate Diatomaceæ have been dissolved by water, and
have thus given rise to this opal in which the more durable fossils are
preserved like insects in amber. This opinion is confirmed by the fact that
the organic bodies decrease in number and sharpness of outline in
proportion as the opaline cement increases in quantity.

In the Bohemian tripoli above described, as in that of Planitz in Saxony,
the species of Diatomaceæ (or Infusoria, as termed by Ehrenberg) are
freshwater; but in other countries, as in the tripoli of the Isle of
France, they are of marine species, and they all belong to formations of
the _tertiary_ period, which will be spoken of hereafter.

A well-known substance, called bog-iron ore, often met with in peat-mosses,
has also been shown by Ehrenberg to consist of innumerable articulated
threads, of a yellow ochre colour, composed partly of flint and partly of
oxide of iron. These threads are the cases of a minute microscopic body,
called _Gaillonella ferruginea_ (fig. 18.).

[4 Illustrations: _Cytheridæ_ and _Foraminifera_ from the chalk.

Fig. 21. _Cythere_, Müll.
         _Cytherina_, Lam.

Fig. 22. Portion of _Nodosaria_.

Fig. 23. _Cristellaria rotulata._

Fig. 24. _Rosalina._]

It is clear that much time must have been required for the accumulation of
strata to which countless generations of Diatomaceæ have contributed their
remains; and these discoveries lead us naturally to suspect that other
deposits, of which the materials have usually been supposed to be
inorganic, may in reality have been derived from microscopic organic
bodies. That this is the case with the white chalk, has often been
imagined, this rock having been observed to abound in a variety of marine
fossils, such as shells, echini, corals, sponges, crustacea, and fishes.
Mr. Lonsdale, on examining, in Oct. 1835, in the museum of the Geological
Society of London, portions of white chalk from different parts of England,
found, on carefully pulverizing them in water, that what appear to the eye
simply as white grains were, in fact, well preserved fossils. He obtained
above a thousand of these from each pound weight of chalk, some being
fragments of minute corallines, others entire Foraminifera and Cytheridæ.
The annexed drawings will give an idea of the beautiful forms of many of
these bodies. The figures _a_ _a_ represent their natural size, but, minute
as they seem, the smallest of them, such as _a_, fig. 24., are gigantic in
comparison with the cases of Diatomaceæ before mentioned. It has, moreover,
been lately discovered that the chambers into which these Foraminifera are
divided are actually often filled with thousands of well-preserved organic
bodies, which abound in every minute grain of chalk, and are especially
apparent in the white coating of flints, often accompanied by innumerable
needle-shaped spiculæ of sponges. After reflecting on these discoveries, we
are naturally led on to conjecture that, as the formless cement in the
semi-opal of Bilin has been derived from the decomposition of animal and
vegetable remains, so also even those parts of chalk flints in which no
organic structure can be recognized may nevertheless have constituted a
part of microscopic animalcules.

  "The dust we tread upon was once alive!"--BYRON.

How faint an idea does this exclamation of the poet convey of the real
wonders of nature! for here we discover proofs that the calcareous and
siliceous dust of which hills are composed has not only been once alive,
but almost every particle, albeit invisible to the naked eye, still retains
the organic structure which, at periods of time incalculably remote, was
impressed upon it by the powers of life.

_Freshwater and marine fossils._--Strata, whether deposited in salt or
fresh water, have the same forms; but the imbedded fossils are very
different in the two cases, because the aquatic animals which frequent
lakes and rivers are distinct from those inhabiting the sea. In the
northern part of the Isle of Wight a formation of marl and limestone, more
than 50 feet thick, occurs, in which the shells are principally, if not
all, of extinct species. Yet we recognize their freshwater origin, because
they are of the same genera as those now abounding in ponds and lakes,
either in our own country or in warmer latitudes.

In many parts of France, as in Auvergne, for example, strata of
limestone, marl, and sandstone are found, hundreds of feet thick, which
contain exclusively freshwater and land shells, together with the
remains of terrestrial quadrupeds. The number of land shells scattered
through some of these freshwater deposits is exceedingly great; and
there are districts in Germany where the rocks scarcely contain any
other fossils except snail-shells (_helices_); as, for instance, the
limestone on the left bank of the Rhine, between Mayence and Worms, at
Oppenheim, Findheim, Budenheim, and other places. In order to account
for this phenomenon, the geologist has only to examine the small deltas
of torrents which enter the Swiss lakes when the waters are low, such as
the newly-formed plain where the Kander enters the Lake of Thun. He
there sees sand and mud strewed over with innumerable dead land shells,
which have been brought down from valleys in the Alps in the preceding
spring, during the melting of the snows. Again, if we search the sands
on the borders of the Rhine, in the lower part of its course, we find
countless land shells mixed with others of species belonging to lakes,
stagnant pools, and marshes. These individuals have been washed away
from the alluvial plains of the great river and its tributaries, some
from mountainous regions, others from the low country.

Although freshwater formations are often of great thickness, yet they are
usually very limited in area when compared to marine deposits, just as
lakes and estuaries are of small dimensions in comparison with seas.

We may distinguish a freshwater formation, first, by the absence of many
fossils almost invariably met with in marine strata. For example, there
are no sea-urchins, no corals, and scarcely any zoophytes; no chambered
shells, such as the nautilus, nor microscopic Foraminifera. But it is
chiefly by attending to the forms of the mollusca that we are guided in
determining the point in question. In a freshwater deposit, the number
of individual shells is often as great, if not greater, than in a marine
stratum; but there is a smaller variety of species and genera. This
might be anticipated from the fact that the genera and species of recent
freshwater and land shells are few when contrasted with the marine.
Thus, the genera of true mollusca according to Blainville's system,
excluding those of extinct species and those without shells, amount to
about 200 in number, of which the terrestrial and freshwater genera
scarcely form more than a sixth.[28-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 25. _Cyclas obovata_; fossil. Hants.]

[Illustration: Fig. 26. _Cyrena consobrina_; fossil. Grays, Essex.]

[Illustration: Fig. 27. _Anodonta Cordierii_; fossil. Paris.]

[Illustration: Fig. 28. _Anodonta latimarginatus_; recent. Bahia.]

[Illustration: Fig. 29. _Unio littoralis_; recent. Auvergne.]

Almost all bivalve shells, or those of acephalous mollusca, are marine,
about ten only out of ninety genera being freshwater. Among these last, the
four most common forms, both recent and fossil, are _Cyclas_, _Cyrena_,
_Unio_, and _Anodonta_ (see figures); the two first and two last of which
are so nearly allied as to pass into each other.

[Illustration: Fig. 30. _Gryphæa incurva_, Sow. (_G. arcuata_, Lam.) upper
valve. Lias.]

Lamarck divided the bivalve mollusca into the _Dimyary_, or those having
two large muscular impressions in each valve, as _a b_ in the Cyclas, fig.
25., and the _Monomyary_, such as the oyster and scallop, in which there is
only one of these impressions, as is seen in fig. 30. Now, as none of these
last, or the unimuscular bivalves, are freshwater, we may at once presume a
deposit in which we find any of them to be marine.

[Illustration: Fig. 31. _Planorbis euomphalus_; fossil. Isle of Wight.]

[Illustration: Fig. 32. _Lymnea longiscata_; fossil. Hants.]

[Illustration: Fig. 33. _Paludina lenta_; fossil. Hants.]

The univalve shells most characteristic of freshwater deposits are,
_Planorbis_, _Lymnea_, and _Paludina_. (See figures.) But to these are
occasionally added _Physa_, _Succinea_, _Ancylus_, _Valvata_, _Melanopsis_,
_Melania_, and _Neritina_. (See figures.)

[Illustration: Fig. 34. _Succinea amphibia_; fossil. Loess, Rhine.]

[Illustration: Fig. 35. _Ancylus elegans_; fossil. Hants.]

[Illustration: Fig. 36. _Valvata_; fossil. Grays, Essex.]

[Illustration: Fig. 37. _Physa hypnorum_; recent.]

[Illustration: Fig. 38. _Auricula_; recent. Ava.]

[Illustration: Fig. 39. _Melania inquinata._ Paris Basin.]

[Illustration: Fig. 40. _Physa columnaris._ Paris Basin.]

[Illustration: Fig. 41. _Melanopsis buccinoidea_; recent. Asia.]

In regard to one of these, the _Ancylus_ (fig. 35.), Mr. Gray observes that
it sometimes differs in no respect from the marine _Siphonaria_, except in
the animal. The shell, however, of the _Ancylus_ is usually thinner.[29-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 42. _Neritina globulus._ Paris basin.]

[Illustration: Fig. 43. _Nerita granulosa._ Paris basin.]

Some naturalists include _Neritina_ (fig. 42.) and the marine _Nerita_
(fig. 43.) in the same genus, it being scarcely possible to distinguish the
two by good generic characters. But, as a general rule, the fluviatile
species are smaller, smoother, and more globular than the marine; and they
have never, like the _Neritæ_, the inner margin of the outer lip toothed or
crenulated. (See fig. 43.)

[Illustration: Fig. 44. _Cerithium cinctum._ Paris basin.]

A few genera, among which _Cerithium_ (fig. 44.) is the most abundant, are
common both to rivers and the sea, having species peculiar to each. Other
genera, like _Auricula_ (fig. 38.), are amphibious, frequenting marshes,
especially near the sea.

[Illustration: Fig. 45. _Helix Turonensis._ Faluns, Touraine.]

[Illustration: Fig. 46. _Cyclostoma elegans._ Loess.]

[Illustration: Fig. 47. _Pupa tridens._ Loess.]

[Illustration: Fig. 48. _Clausilia bidens._ Loess.]

[Illustration: Fig. 49. _Bulimus lubricus._ Loess, Rhine.]

The terrestrial shells are all univalves. The most abundant genera among
these, both in a recent and fossil state, are _Helix_ (fig. 45.),
_Cyclostoma_ (fig. 46.), _Pupa_ (fig. 47.), _Clausilia_ (fig. 48.),
_Bulimus_ (fig. 49.), and _Achatina_; which two last are nearly allied and
pass into each other.

[Illustration: Fig. 50. _Ampullaria glauca_, from the Jumna.]

The _Ampullaria_ (fig. 50.) is another genus of shells, inhabiting
rivers and ponds in hot countries. Many fossil species have been
referred to this genus, but they have been found chiefly in marine
formations, and are suspected by some conchologists to belong to
_Natica_ and other marine genera.

All univalve shells of land and freshwater species, with the exception of
_Melanopsis_ (fig. 41.), and _Achatina_, which has a slight indentation,
have entire mouths; and this circumstance may often serve as a convenient
rule for distinguishing freshwater from marine strata; since, if any
univalves occur of which the mouths are not entire, we may presume that the
formation is marine. The aperture is said to be entire in such shells as
the _Ampullaria_ and the land shells (figs. 45-49.), when its outline is
not interrupted by an indentation or notch, such as that seen at _b_ in
_Ancillaria_ (fig. 52.); or is not prolonged into a canal, as that seen at
_a_ in _Pleurotoma_ (fig. 51.).

[Illustration: Fig. 51. _Pleurotoma rotata._ Subap. hills, Italy.]

[Illustration: Fig. 52. _Ancillaria subulata._ London clay.]

The mouths of a large proportion of the marine univalves have these notches
or canals, and almost all such species are carnivorous; whereas nearly all
testacea having entire mouths, are plant-eaters; whether the species be
marine, freshwater, or terrestrial.

There is, however, one genus which affords an occasional exception to one
of the above rules. The _Cerithium_ (fig. 44.), although provided with a
short canal, comprises some species which inhabit salt, others brackish,
and others fresh water, and they are said to be all plant-eaters.

Among the fossils very common in freshwater deposits are the shells of
_Cypris_, a minute crustaceous animal, having a shell much resembling that
of the bivalve mollusca.[31-A] Many minute living species of this genus
swarm in lakes and stagnant pools in Great Britain; but their shells are
not, if considered separately, conclusive as to the freshwater origin of a
deposit, because the majority of species in another kindred genus of the
same order, the _Cytherina_ of Lamarck (see above, fig. 21. p. 26.),
inhabit salt water; and, although the animal differs slightly, the shell is
scarcely distinguishable from that of the _Cypris_.

The seed-vessels and stems of _Chara_, a genus of aquatic plants, are very
frequent in freshwater strata. These seed-vessels were called, before their
true nature was known, gyrogonites, and were supposed to be foraminiferous
shells. (See fig. 53. _a._)

The _Charæ_ inhabit the bottom of lakes and ponds, and flourish mostly
where the water is charged with carbonate of lime. Their seed-vessels are
covered with a very tough integument, capable of resisting decomposition;
to which circumstance we may attribute their abundance in a fossil state.
The annexed figure (fig. 54.) represents a branch of one of many new
species found by Professor Amici in the lakes of northern Italy. The
seed-vessel in this plant is more globular than in the British _Charæ_, and
therefore more nearly resembles in form the extinct fossil species found in
England, France, and other countries. The stems, as well as the
seed-vessels, of these plants occur both in modern shell marl and in
ancient freshwater formations. They are generally composed of a large tube
surrounded by smaller tubes; the whole stem being divided at certain
intervals by transverse partitions or joints. (See _b_, fig. 53.)

[Illustration: Fig. 53. _Chara medicaginula_; fossil. Isle of Wight.

  _a._ Seed-vessel. magnified 20 diameters.
  _b._ Stem, magnified.]

[Illustration: Fig. 54. _Chara elastica_; recent. Italy.

  _a._ Sessile seed vessel between the division of the leaves of the
       female plant.
  _b._ Transverse section of a branch, with five seed-vessels magnified,
       seen from below upwards.]

It is not uncommon to meet with layers of vegetable matter, impressions of
leaves, and branches of trees, in strata containing freshwater shells; and
we also find occasionally the teeth and bones of land quadrupeds, of
species now unknown. The manner in which such remains are occasionally
carried by rivers into lakes, especially during floods, has been fully
treated of in the "Principles of Geology."[32-A]

The remains of fish are occasionally useful in determining the freshwater
origin of strata. Certain genera, such as carp, perch, pike, and loach
(_Cyprinus_, _Perca_, _Esox_, and _Cobitis_), as also _Lebias_, being
peculiar to freshwater. Other genera contain some freshwater and some
marine species, as _Cottus_, _Mugil_, and _Anguilla_, or eel. The rest are
either common to rivers and the sea, as the salmon; or are exclusively
characteristic of salt water. The above observations respecting fossil
fishes are applicable only to the more modern or tertiary deposits; for in
the more ancient rocks the forms depart so widely from those of existing
fishes, that it is very difficult, at least in the present state of
science, to derive any positive information from ichthyolites respecting
the element in which strata were deposited.

The alternation of marine and freshwater formations, both on a small and
large scale, are facts well ascertained in geology. When it occurs on a
small scale, it may have arisen from the alternate occupation of certain
spaces by river water and the sea; for in the flood season the river forces
back the ocean and freshens it over a large area, depositing at the same
time its sediment; after which the salt water again returns, and, on
resuming its former place, brings with it sand, mud, and marine shells.

There are also lagoons at the mouths of many rivers, as the Nile and
Mississippi, which are divided off by bars of sand from the sea, and
which are filled with salt and fresh water by turns. They often
communicate exclusively with the river for months, years, or even
centuries; and then a breach being made in the bar of sand, they are for
long periods filled with salt water.

The Lym-Fiord in Jutland offers an excellent illustration of analogous
changes; for, in the course of the last thousand years, the western
extremity of this long frith, which is 120 miles in length, including
its windings, has been four times fresh and four times salt, a bar of
sand between it and the ocean having been as often formed and removed.
The last irruption of salt water happened in 1824, when the North Sea
entered, killing all the freshwater shells, fish, and plants; and from
that time to the present, the sea-weed _Fucus vesiculosus_, together
with oysters and other marine mollusca, have succeeded the _Cyclas_,
_Lymnea_, _Paludina_, and _Charæ_.[33-A]

But changes like these in the Lym-Fiord, and those before mentioned as
occurring at the mouths of great rivers, will only account for some cases
of marine deposits of partial extent resting on freshwater strata. When we
find, as in the south-east of England, a great series of freshwater beds,
1000 feet in thickness, resting upon marine formations and again covered by
other rocks, such as the cretaceous, more than 1000 feet thick, and of
deep-sea origin, we shall find it necessary to seek for a different
explanation of the phenomena.[33-B]


FOOTNOTES:

[28-A] See Synoptic Table in Blainville's Malacologie.

[29-A] Gray, Phil. Trans., 1835, p. 302.

[31-A] For figures of recent species, see below, p. 183., and figs. of
fossils, see p. 228.

[32-A] See Index of Principles, "Fossilization."

[33-A] See Principles, Index, "Lym-Fiord."

[33-B] See below, Chap. XVIII., on the Wealden.



CHAPTER IV.

CONSOLIDATION OF STRATA AND PETRIFACTION OF FOSSILS.

   Chemical and mechanical deposits--Cementing together of
   particles--Hardening by exposure to air--Concretionary
   nodules--Consolidating effects of pressure--Mineralization of organic
   remains--Impressions and casts how formed--Fossil wood--Göppert's
   experiments--Precipitation of stony matter most rapid where
   putrefaction is going on--Source of lime in solution--Silex derived
   from decomposition of felspar--Proofs of the lapidification of some
   fossils soon after burial, of others when much decayed.


Having spoken in the preceding chapters of the characters of sedimentary
formations, both as dependent on the deposition of inorganic matter and the
distribution of fossils, I may next treat of the consolidation of
stratified rocks, and the petrifaction of imbedded organic remains.

_Chemical and mechanical deposits._--A distinction has been made by
geologists between deposits of a chemical, and those of a mechanical,
origin. By the latter name are designated beds of mud, sand, or pebbles
produced by the action of running water, also accumulations of stones and
scoriæ thrown out by a volcano, which have fallen into their present place
by the force of gravitation. But the matter which forms a chemical deposit
has not been mechanically suspended in water, but in a state of solution
until separated by chemical action. In this manner carbonate of lime is
often precipitated upon the bottom of lakes and seas in a solid form, as
may be well seen in many parts of Italy, where mineral springs abound, and
where the calcareous stone, called travertin, is deposited. In these
springs the lime is usually held in solution by an excess of carbonic acid,
or by heat if it be a hot spring, until the water, on issuing from the
earth, cools or loses part of its acid. The calcareous matter then falls
down in a solid state, encrusting shells, fragments of wood and leaves, and
binding them together.[34-A]

In coral reefs, large masses of limestone are formed by the stony skeletons
of zoophytes; and these, together with shells, become cemented together by
carbonate of lime, part of which is probably furnished to the sea-water by
the decomposition of dead corals. Even shells of which the animals are
still living, on these reefs, are very commonly found to be encrusted over
with a hard coating of limestone.[34-B]

If sand and pebbles are carried by a river into the sea, and these are
bound together immediately by carbonate of lime, the deposit may be
described as of a mixed origin, partly chemical, and partly mechanical.

Now, the remarks already made in Chapter II. on the original horizontality
of strata are strictly applicable to mechanical deposits, and only
partially to those of a mixed nature. Such as are purely chemical may be
formed on a very steep slope, or may even encrust the vertical walls of a
fissure, and be of equal thickness throughout; but such deposits are of
small extent, and for the most part confined to veinstones.

_Cementing of particles._--It is chiefly in the case of calcareous rocks
that solidification takes place at the time of deposition. But there are
many deposits in which a cementing process comes into operation long
afterwards. We may sometimes observe, where the water of ferruginous or
calcareous springs has flowed through a bed of sand or gravel, that iron
or carbonate of lime has been deposited in the interstices between the
grains or pebbles, so that in certain places the whole has been bound
together into a stone, the same set of strata remaining in other parts
loose and incoherent.

Proofs of a similar cementing action are seen in a rock at Kelloway in
Wiltshire. A peculiar band of sandy strata, belonging to the group called
Oolite by geologists, may be traced through several counties, the sand
being for the most part loose and unconsolidated, but becoming stony near
Kelloway. In this district there are numerous fossil shells which have
decomposed, having for the most part left only their casts. The calcareous
matter hence derived has evidently served, at some former period, as a
cement to the siliceous grains of sand, and thus a solid sandstone has been
produced. If we take fragments of many other argillaceous grits, retaining
the casts of shells, and plunge them into dilute muriatic or other acid, we
see them immediately changed into common sand and mud; the cement of lime,
derived from the shells, having been dissolved by the acid.

Traces of impressions and casts are often extremely faint. In some loose
sands of recent date we meet with shells in so advanced a stage of
decomposition as to crumble into powder when touched. It is clear that
water percolating such strata may soon remove the calcareous matter of the
shell; and, unless circumstances cause the carbonate of lime to be again
deposited, the grains of sand will not be cemented together; in which case
no memorial of the fossil will remain. The absence of organic remains from
many aqueous rocks may be thus explained; but we may presume that in many
of them no fossils were ever imbedded, as there are extensive tracts on the
bottoms of existing seas even of moderate depth on which no fragment of
shell, coral, or other living creature can be detected by dredging. On the
other hand, there are depths where the zero of animal life has been
approached; as, for example, in the Mediterranean, at the depth of about
230 fathoms, according to the researches of Prof. E. Forbes. In the Ægean
Sea a deposit of yellowish mud of a very uniform character, and closely
resembling chalk, is going on in regions below 230 fathoms, and this
formation must be wholly devoid of organic remains.[35-A]

In what manner silex and carbonate of lime may become widely diffused in
small quantities through the waters which permeate the earth's crust will
be spoken of presently, when the petrifaction of fossil bodies is
considered; but I may remark here that such waters are always passing in
the case of thermal springs from hotter to colder parts of the interior of
the earth; and as often as the temperature of the solvent is lowered,
mineral matter has a tendency to separate from it and solidify. Thus a
stony cement is often supplied to any sand, pebbles, or fragmentary
mixture. In some conglomerates, like the pudding-stone of Hertfordshire,
pebbles of flint and grains of sand are united by a siliceous cement so
firmly, that if a block be fractured the rent passes as readily through the
pebbles as through the cement.

It is probable that many strata became solid at the time when they emerged
from the waters in which they were deposited, and when they first formed a
part of the dry land. A well-known fact seems to confirm this idea: by far
the greater number of the stones used for building and road-making are much
softer when first taken from the quarry than after they have been long
exposed to the air; and these, when once dried, may afterwards be immersed
for any length of time in water without becoming soft again. Hence it is
found desirable to shape the stones which are to be used in architecture
while they are yet soft and wet, and while they contain their
"quarry-water," as it is called; also to break up stone intended for roads
when soft, and then leave it to dry in the air for months that it may
harden. Such induration may perhaps be accounted for by supposing the
water, which penetrates the minutest pores of rocks, to deposit, on
evaporation, carbonate of lime, iron, silex, and other minerals previously
held in solution, and thereby to fill up the pores partially. These
particles, on crystallizing, would not only be themselves deprived of
freedom of motion, but would also bind together other portions of the rock
which before were loosely aggregated. On the same principle wet sand and
mud become as hard as stone when frozen; because one ingredient of the
mass, namely, the water, has crystallized, so as to hold firmly together
all the separate particles of which the loose mud and sand were composed.

Dr. MacCulloch mentions a sandstone in Skye, which may be moulded like
dough when first found; and some simple minerals, which are rigid and as
hard as glass in our cabinets, are often flexible and soft in their native
beds; this is the case with asbestos, sahlite, tremolite, and chalcedony,
and it is reported also to happen in the case of the beryl.[36-A]

The marl recently deposited at the bottom of Lake Superior, in North
America, is soft, and often filled with freshwater shells; but if a
piece be taken up and dried, it becomes so hard that it can only be
broken by a smart blow of the hammer. If the lake therefore was drained,
such a deposit would be found to consist of strata of marlstone, like
that observed in many ancient European formations, and like them
containing freshwater shells.[36-B]

It is probable that some of the heterogeneous materials which rivers
transport to the sea may at once set under water, like the artificial
mixture called pozzolana, which consists of fine volcanic sand charged
with about 20 per cent. of oxide of iron, and the addition of a small
quantity of lime. This substance hardens, and becomes a solid stone in
water, and was used by the Romans in constructing the foundations of
buildings in the sea.

Consolidation in these cases is brought about by the action of chemical
affinity on finely comminuted matter previously suspended in water. After
deposition similar particles seem to exert a mutual attraction on each
other, and congregate together in particular spots, forming lumps, nodules,
and concretions. Thus in many argillaceous deposits there are calcareous
balls, or spherical concretions, ranged in layers parallel to the general
stratification; an arrangement which took place after the shale or marl had
been thrown down in successive laminæ; for these laminæ are often traced
in the concretions, remaining parallel to those of the surrounding
unconsolidated rock. (See fig. 55.) Such nodules of limestone have often a
shell or other foreign body in the centre.[37-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 55. Calcareous nodules in Lias.]

Among the most remarkable examples of concretionary structure are those
described by Professor Sedgwick as abounding in the magnesian limestone
of the north of England. The spherical balls are of various sizes, from
that of a pea to a diameter of several feet, and they have both a
concentric and radiated structure, while at the same time the laminæ of
original deposition pass uninterruptedly through them. In some cliffs
this limestone resembles a great irregular pile of cannon balls. Some of
the globular masses have their centre in one stratum, while a portion of
their exterior passes through to the stratum above or below. Thus the
larger spheroid in the annexed section (fig. 56.) passes from the
stratum _b_ upwards into _a_. In this instance we must suppose the
deposition of a series of minor layers, first forming the stratum _b_,
and afterwards the incumbent stratum _a_; then a movement of the
particles took place, and the carbonates of lime and magnesia separated
from the more impure and mixed matter forming the still unconsolidated
parts of the stratum. Crystallization, beginning at the centre, must
have gone on forming concentric coats, around the original nucleus
without interfering with the laminated structure of the rock.

[Illustration: Fig. 56. Spheroidal concretions in magnesian limestone.]

When the particles of rocks have been thus re-arranged by chemical forces,
it is sometimes difficult or impossible to ascertain whether certain lines
of division are due to original deposition or to the subsequent aggregation
of similar particles. Thus suppose three strata of grit, A, B, C, are
charged unequally with calcareous matter, and that B is the most
calcareous. If consolidation takes place in B, the concretionary action may
spread upwards into a part of A, where the carbonate of lime is more
abundant than in the rest; so that a mass, _d_, _e_, _f_, forming a portion
of the superior stratum, becomes united with B into one solid mass of
stone. The original line of division _d_, _e_, being thus effaced, the line
_d_, _f_, would generally be considered as the surface of the bed B, though
not strictly a true plane of stratification.

[Illustration: Fig. 57. Block section.]

_Pressure and heat._--When sand and mud sink to the bottom of a deep
sea, the particles are not pressed down by the enormous weight of the
incumbent ocean; for the water, which becomes mingled with the sand and
mud, resists pressure with a force equal to that of the column of fluid
above. The same happens in regard to organic remains which are filled
with water under great pressure as they sink, otherwise they would be
immediately crushed to pieces and flattened. Nevertheless, if the
materials of a stratum remain in a yielding state, and do not set or
solidify, they will be gradually squeezed down by the weight of other
materials successively heaped upon them, just as soft clay or loose sand
on which a house is built may give way. By such downward pressure
particles of clay, sand, and marl, may become packed into a smaller
space, and be made to cohere together permanently.

Analogous effects of condensation may arise when the solid parts of the
earth's crust are forced in various directions by those mechanical
movements afterwards to be described, by which strata have been bent,
broken, and raised above the level of the sea. Rocks of more yielding
materials must often have been forced against others previously
consolidated, and, thus compressed, may have acquired a new structure. A
recent discovery may help us to comprehend how fine sediment derived
from the detritus of rocks may be solidified by mere pressure. The
graphite or "black lead" of commerce having become very scarce, Mr.
Brockedon contrived a method by which the dust of the purer portions of
the mineral found in Borrowdale might be recomposed into a mass as dense
and compact as native graphite. The powder of graphite is first
carefully prepared and freed from air, and placed under a powerful press
on a strong steel die, with air-tight fittings. It is then struck
several blows, each of a power of 1000 tons; after which operation the
powder is so perfectly solidified that it can be cut for pencils, and
exhibits when broken the same texture as native graphite.

But the action of heat at various depths in the earth is probably the most
powerful of all causes in hardening sedimentary strata. To this subject I
shall refer again when treating of the metamorphic rocks, and of the slaty
and jointed structure.

_Mineralization of organic remains._--The changes which fossil organic
bodies have undergone since they were first imbedded in rocks, throw
much light on the consolidation of strata. Fossil shells in some modern
deposits have been scarcely altered in the course of centuries, having
simply lost a part of their animal matter. But in other cases the shell
has disappeared, and left an impression only of its exterior, or a cast
of its interior form, or thirdly, a cast of the shell itself, the
original matter of which has been removed. These different forms of
fossilization may easily be understood if we examine the mud recently
thrown out from a pond or canal in which there are shells. If the mud be
argillaceous, it acquires consistency on drying, and on breaking open a
portion of it we find that each shell has left impressions of its
external form. If we then remove the shell itself, we find within a
solid nucleus of clay, having the form of the interior of the shell.
This form is often very different from that of the outer shell. Thus a
cast such as _a_, fig. 58., commonly called a fossil screw, would never
be suspected by an inexperienced conchologist to be the internal shape
of the fossil univalve, _b_, fig. 58. Nor should we have imagined at
first sight that the shell _a_ and the cast _b_, fig. 59., were
different parts of the same fossil. The reader will observe, in the
last-mentioned figure (_b_, fig. 59.), that an empty space shaded dark,
which the _shell itself_ once occupied, now intervenes between the
enveloping stone and the cast of the smooth interior of the whorls. In
such cases the shell has been dissolved and the component particles
removed by water percolating the rock. If the nucleus were taken out a
hollow mould would remain, on which the external form of the shell with
its tubercles and striæ, as seen in _a_, fig. 59., would be seen
embossed. Now if the space alluded to between the nucleus and the
impression, instead of being left empty, has been filled up with
calcareous spar, flint, pyrites, or other mineral, we then obtain from
the mould an exact cast both of the external and internal form of the
original shell. In this manner silicified casts of shells have been
formed; and if the mud or sand of the nucleus happen to be incoherent,
or soluble in acid, we can then procure in flint an empty shell, which
in shape is the exact counterpart of the original. This cast may be
compared to a bronze statue, representing merely the superficial form,
and not the internal organization; but there is another description of
petrifaction by no means uncommon, and of a much more wonderful kind,
which may be compared to certain anatomical models in wax, where not
only the outward forms and features, but the nerves, blood-vessels, and
other internal organs are also shown. Thus we find corals, originally
calcareous, in which not only the general shape, but also the minute and
complicated internal organization are retained in flint.

[Illustration: Fig. 58. _Phasianella Heddingtonensis_, and cast of the
same. Coral Rag.]

[Illustration: Fig. 59. _Trochus Anglicus_ and cast. Lias.]

Such a process of petrifaction is still more remarkably exhibited in fossil
wood, in which we often perceive not only the rings of annual growth, but
all the minute vessels and medullary rays. Many of the minute pores and
fibres of plants, and even those spiral vessels which in the living
vegetable can only be discovered by the microscope, are preserved. Among
many instances, I may mention a fossil tree, 72 feet in length, found at
Gosforth near Newcastle, in sandstone strata associated with coal. By
cutting a transverse slice so thin as to transmit light, and magnifying it
about fifty-five times, the texture seen in fig. 60. is exhibited. A
texture equally minute and complicated has been observed in the wood of
large trunks of fossil trees found in the Craigleith quarry near Edinburgh,
where the stone was not in the slightest degree siliceous, but consisted
chiefly of carbonate of lime, with oxide of iron, alumina, and carbon. The
parallel rows of vessels here seen are the rings of annual growth, but in
one part they are imperfectly preserved, the wood having probably decayed
before the mineralizing matter had penetrated to that portion of the tree.

[Illustration: Fig. 60. Texture of a tree from the coal strata, magnified.
(Witham.) Transverse section.]

In attempting to explain the process of petrifaction in such cases, we
may first assume that strata are very generally permeated by water
charged with minute portions of calcareous, siliceous, and other earths
in solution. In what manner they become so impregnated will be
afterwards considered. If an organic substance is exposed in the open
air to the action of the sun and rain, it will in time putrefy, or be
dissolved into its component elements, which consist chiefly of oxygen,
hydrogen, and carbon. These will readily be absorbed by the atmosphere
or be washed away by rain, so that all vestiges of the dead animal or
plant disappear. But if the same substances be submerged in water, they
decompose more gradually; and if buried in earth, still more slowly, as
in the familiar example of wooden piles or other buried timber. Now, if
as fast as each particle is set free by putrefaction in a fluid or
gaseous state, a particle equally minute of carbonate of lime, flint, or
other mineral, is at hand and ready to be precipitated, we may imagine
this inorganic matter to take the place just before left unoccupied by
the organic molecule. In this manner a cast of the interior of certain
vessels may first be taken, and afterwards the more solid walls of the
same may decay and suffer a like transmutation. Yet when the whole is
lapidified, it may not form one homogeneous mass of stone or metal. Some
of the original ligneous, osseous, or other organic elements may remain
mingled in certain parts, or the lapidifying substance itself may be
differently coloured at different times, or so crystallized as to
reflect light differently, and thus the texture of the original body may
be faithfully exhibited.

The student may perhaps ask whether, on chemical principles, we have any
ground to expect that mineral matter will be thrown down precisely in
those spots where organic decomposition is in progress? The following
curious experiments may serve to illustrate this point. Professor
Göppert of Breslau attempted recently to imitate the natural process of
petrifaction. For this purpose he steeped a variety of animal and
vegetable substances in waters, some holding siliceous, others
calcareous, others metallic matter in solution. He found that in the
period of a few weeks, or even days, the organic bodies thus immersed
were mineralized to a certain extent. Thus, for example, thin vertical
slices of deal, taken from the Scotch fir (_Pinus sylvestris_), were
immersed in a moderately strong solution of sulphate of iron. When they
had been thoroughly soaked in the liquid for several days they were
dried and exposed to a red-heat until the vegetable matter was burnt up
and nothing remained but an oxide of iron, which was found to have
taken the form of the deal so exactly that casts even of the dotted
vessels peculiar to this family of plants were distinctly visible
under the microscope.

Another accidental experiment has been recorded by Mr. Pepys in the
Geological Transactions.[41-A] An earthen pitcher containing several quarts
of sulphate of iron had remained undisturbed and unnoticed for about a
twelvemonth in the laboratory. At the end of this time when the liquor was
examined an oily appearance was observed on the surface, and a yellowish
powder, which proved to be sulphur, together with a quantity of small
hairs. At the bottom were discovered the bones of several mice in a
sediment consisting of small grains of pyrites, others of sulphur, others
of crystallized green sulphate of iron, and a black muddy oxide of iron. It
was evident that some mice had accidentally been drowned in the fluid, and
by the mutual action of the animal matter and the sulphate of iron on each
other, the metallic sulphate had been deprived of its oxygen; hence the
pyrites and the other compounds were thrown down. Although the mice were
not mineralized, or turned into pyrites, the phenomenon shows how mineral
waters, charged with sulphate of iron, may be deoxydated on coming in
contact with animal matter undergoing putrefaction, so that atom after atom
of pyrites may be precipitated, and ready, under favourable circumstances,
to replace the oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon into which the original body
would be resolved.

The late Dr. Turner observes, that when mineral matter is in a "nascent
state," that is to say, just liberated from a previous state of chemical
combination, it is most ready to unite with other matter, and form a new
chemical compound. Probably the particles or atoms just set free are of
extreme minuteness, and therefore move more freely, and are more ready
to obey any impulse of chemical affinity. Whatever be the cause, it
clearly follows, as before stated, that where organic matter newly
imbedded in sediment is decomposing, there will chemical changes take
place most actively.

An analysis was lately made of the water which was flowing off from the
rich mud deposited by the Hooghly river in the Delta of the Ganges after
the annual inundation. This water was found to be highly charged with
carbonic acid gas holding lime in solution.[41-B] Now if newly-deposited
mud is thus proved to be permeated by mineral matter in a state of
solution, it is not difficult to perceive that decomposing organic
bodies, naturally imbedded in sediment, may as readily become petrified
as the substances artificially immersed by Professor Göppert in various
fluid mixtures.

It is well known that the water of springs, or that which is continually
percolating the earth's crust, is rarely free from a slight admixture
either of iron, carbonate of lime, sulphur, silica, potash, or some other
earthy, alkaline, or metallic ingredient. Hot springs in particular are
copiously charged with one or more of these elements; and it is only in
their waters that silex is found in abundance. In certain cases, therefore,
especially in volcanic regions, we may imagine the flint of silicified wood
and corals to have been supplied by the waters of thermal springs. In other
instances, as in tripoli and chalk-flint, it may have been derived in great
part, if not wholly, from the decomposition of infusoria or diatomaceæ,
sponges, and other bodies. But even if this be granted, we have still to
inquire whence a lake or the ocean can be constantly replenished with the
calcareous and siliceous matter so abundantly withdrawn from it by the
secretions of these zoophytes.

In regard to carbonate of lime there is no difficulty, because not only are
calcareous springs very numerous, but even rain-water has the power of
dissolving a minute portion of the calcareous rocks over which it flows.
Hence marine corals and mollusca may be provided by rivers with the
materials of their shells and solid supports. But pure silex, even when
reduced to the finest powder and boiled, is insoluble in water, except at
very high temperatures. Nevertheless Dr. Turner has well explained, in an
essay on the chemistry of geology[42-A], how the decomposition of felspar
may be a source of silex in solution. He has remarked that the siliceous
earth, which constitutes more than half the bulk of felspar, is intimately
combined with alumine, potash, and some other elements. The alkaline matter
of the felspar has a chemical affinity for water, as also for the carbonic
acid which is more or less contained in the waters of most springs. The
water therefore carries away alkaline matter, and leaves behind a clay
consisting of alumine and silica. But this residue of the decomposed
mineral, which in its purest state is called porcelain clay, is found to
contain a part only of the silica which existed in the original felspar.
The other part, therefore, must have been dissolved and removed; and this
can be accounted for in two ways; first, because silica when combined with
an alkali is soluble in water; secondly, because silica in what is
technically called its nascent state is also soluble in water. Hence an
endless supply of silica is afforded to rivers and the waters of the sea.
For the felspathic rocks are universally distributed, constituting, as they
do, so large a proportion of the volcanic, plutonic, and metamorphic
formations. Even where they chance to be absent in mass, they rarely fail
to occur in the superficial gravel or alluvial deposits of the basin of
every large river.

The disintegration of mica also, another mineral which enters largely
into the composition of granite and various sandstones, may yield
silica which may be dissolved in water, for nearly half of this mineral
consists of silica, combined with alumine, potash, and about a tenth
part of iron. The oxidation of this iron in the air is the principal
cause of the waste of mica.

We have still, however, much to learn before the conversion of fossil
bodies into stone is fully understood. Some phenomena seem to imply that
the mineralization must proceed with considerable rapidity, for stems of a
soft and succulent character, and of a most perishable nature, are
preserved in flint; and there are instances of the complete silicification
of the young leaves of a palm-tree when just about to shoot forth, and in
that state which in the West Indies is called the cabbage of the
palm.[43-A] It may, however, be questioned whether in such cases there may
not have been some antiseptic quality in the water which retarded
putrefaction, so that the soft parts of the buried substance may have
remained for a long time without disintegration, like the flesh of bodies
imbedded in peat.

Mr. Stokes has pointed out examples of petrifactions in which the more
perishable, and others where the more durable portions of wood are
preserved. These variations, he suggests, must doubtless have depended on
the time when the lapidifying mineral was introduced. Thus, in certain
silicified stems of palm-trees, the cellular tissue, that most destructible
part, is in good condition, while all signs of the hard woody fibre have
disappeared, the spaces once occupied by it being hollow or filled with
agate. Here, petrifaction must have commenced soon after the wood was
exposed to the action of moisture, and the supply of mineral matter must
then have failed, or the water must have become too much diluted before the
woody fibre decayed. But when this fibre is alone discoverable, we must
suppose that an interval of time elapsed before the commencement of
lapidification, during which the cellular tissue was obliterated. When both
structures, namely, the cellular and the woody fibre, are preserved, the
process must have commenced at an early period, and continued without
interruption till it was completed throughout.[43-B]


FOOTNOTES:

[34-A] See Principles, Index, "Calcareous Springs," &c.

[34-B] Ibid. "Travertin," "Coral Reefs," &c.

[35-A] Report Brit. Ass. 1843, p. 178.

[36-A] Dr. MacCulloch, Syst. of Geol. vol. i. p. 123.

[36-B] Princ. of Geol., Index, "Superior Lake."

[37-A] De la Beche, Geol. Researches, p. 95., and Geol. Observer
(1851), p. 686.

[41-A] Vol. i. p. 399. first series.

[41-B] Piddington, Asiat. Research. vol. xviii. p. 226.

[42-A] Jam. Ed. New Phil. Journ. No. 30. p. 246.

[43-A] Stokes, Geol. Trans., vol. v. p. 212. second series.

[43-B] Ibid.



CHAPTER V.

ELEVATION OF STRATA ABOVE THE SEA--HORIZONTAL AND INCLINED STRATIFICATION.

   Why the position of marine strata, above the level of the sea, should
   be referred to the rising up of the land, not to the going down of the
   sea--Upheaval of extensive masses of horizontal strata--Inclined and
   vertical stratification--Anticlinal and synclinal lines--Bent strata
   in east of Scotland--Theory of folding by lateral movement--Creeps--Dip
   and strike--Structure of the Jura--Various forms of outcrop--Rocks
   broken by flexure--Inverted position of disturbed strata--Unconformable
   stratification--Hutton and Playfair on the same--Fractures of
   strata--Polished surfaces--Faults--Appearance of repeated alternations
   produced by them--Origin of great faults.


_Land has been raised, not the sea lowered._--It has been already stated
that the aqueous rocks containing marine fossils extend over wide
continental tracts, and are seen in mountain chains rising to great heights
above the level of the sea. Hence it follows, that what is now dry land was
once under water. But if we admit this conclusion, we must imagine, either
that there has been a general lowering of the waters of the ocean, or that
the solid rocks, once covered by water, have been raised up bodily out of
the sea, and have thus become dry land. The earlier geologists, finding
themselves reduced to this alternative, embraced the former opinion,
assuming that the ocean was originally universal, and had gradually sunk
down to its actual level, so that the present islands and continents were
left dry. It seemed to them far easier to conceive that the water had gone
down, than that solid land had risen upwards into its present position. It
was, however, impossible to invent any satisfactory hypothesis to explain
the disappearance of so enormous a body of water throughout the globe, it
being necessary to infer that the ocean had once stood at whatever height
marine shells might be detected. It moreover appeared clear, as the science
of Geology advanced, that certain spaces on the globe had been alternately
sea, then land, then estuary, then sea again, and, lastly, once more
habitable land, having remained in each of these states for considerable
periods. In order to account for such phenomena, without admitting any
movement of the land itself, we are required to imagine several retreats
and returns of the ocean; and even then our theory applies merely to cases
where the marine strata composing the dry land are horizontal, leaving
unexplained those more common instances where strata are inclined, curved,
or placed on their edges, and evidently not in the position in which they
were first deposited.

Geologists, therefore, were at last compelled to have recourse to the other
alternative, namely, the doctrine that the solid land has been repeatedly
moved upwards or downwards, so as permanently to change its position
relatively to the sea. There are several distinct grounds for preferring
this conclusion. First, it will account equally for the position of those
elevated masses of marine origin in which the stratification remains
horizontal, and for those in which the strata are disturbed, broken,
inclined, or vertical. Secondly, it is consistent with human experience
that land should rise gradually in some places and be depressed in others.
Such changes have actually occurred in our own days, and are now in
progress, having been accompanied in some cases by violent convulsions,
while in others they have proceeded so insensibly, as to have been
ascertainable only by the most careful scientific observations, made at
considerable intervals of time. On the other hand, there is no evidence
from human experience of a lowering of the sea's level in any region, and
the ocean cannot sink in one place without its level being depressed all
over the globe.

These preliminary remarks will prepare the reader to understand the great
theoretical interest attached to all facts connected with the position of
strata, whether horizontal or inclined, curved or vertical.

Now the first and most simple appearance is where strata of marine origin
occur above the level of the sea in horizontal position. Such are the
strata which we meet with in the south of Sicily, filled with shells for
the most part of the same species as those now living in the Mediterranean.
Some of these rocks rise to the height of more than 2000 feet above the
sea. Other mountain masses might be mentioned, composed of horizontal
strata of high antiquity, which contain fossil remains of animals wholly
dissimilar from any now known to exist. In the south of Sweden, for
example, near Lake Wener, the beds of one of the oldest of the
fossiliferous deposits, namely that formerly called Transition, and now
Silurian, by geologists, occur in as level a position as if they had
recently formed part of the delta of a great river, and been left dry on
the retiring of the annual floods. Aqueous rocks of about the same age
extend for hundreds of miles over the lake-district of North America, and
exhibit in like manner a stratification nearly undisturbed. The Table
Mountain at the Cape of Good Hope is another example of highly elevated yet
perfectly horizontal strata, no less than 3500 feet in thickness, and
consisting of sandstone of very ancient date.

Instead of imagining that such fossiliferous rocks were always at their
present level, and that the sea was once high enough to cover them, we
suppose them to have constituted the ancient bed of the ocean, and that
they were gradually uplifted to their present height. This idea, however
startling it may at first appear, is quite in accordance, as before stated,
with the analogy of changes now going on in certain regions of the globe.
Thus, in parts of Sweden, and the shores and islands of the Gulf of
Bothnia, proofs have been obtained that the land is experiencing, and has
experienced for centuries, a slow upheaving movement. Playfair argued in
favour of this opinion in 1802; and in 1807, Von Buch, after his travels in
Scandinavia, announced his conviction that a rising of the land was in
progress. Celsius and other Swedish writers had, a century before, declared
their belief that a gradual change had, for ages, been taking place in the
relative level of land and sea. They attributed the change to a fall of the
waters both of the ocean and the Baltic. This theory, however, has now been
refuted by abundant evidence; for the alteration of relative level has
neither been universal nor every where uniform in quantity, but has
amounted, in some regions, to several feet in a century, in others to a few
inches; while in the southernmost part of Sweden, or the province of
Scania, there has been actually a loss instead of a gain of land, buildings
having gradually sunk below the level of the sea.[46-A]

It appears, from the observations of Mr. Darwin and others, that very
extensive regions of the continent of South America have been undergoing
slow and gradual upheaval, by which the level plains of Patagonia, covered
with recent marine shells, and the Pampas of Buenos Ayres, have been raised
above the level of the sea.[46-B] On the other hand, the gradual sinking of
the west coast of Greenland, for the space of more than 600 miles from
north to south, during the last four centuries, has been established by the
observations of a Danish naturalist, Dr. Pingel. And while these proofs of
continental elevation and subsidence, by slow and insensible movements,
have been recently brought to light, the evidence has been daily
strengthened of continued changes of level effected by violent convulsions
in countries where earthquakes are frequent. There the rocks are rent from
time to time, and heaved up or thrown down several feet at once, and
disturbed in such a manner, that the original position of strata may, in
the course of centuries, be modified to any amount.

It has also been shown by Mr. Darwin, that, in those seas where circular
coral islands and barrier reefs abound, there is a slow and continued
sinking of the submarine mountains on which the masses of coral are based;
while there are other areas of the South Sea, where the land is on the
rise, and where coral has been upheaved far above the sea-level.

It would require a volume to explain to the reader the various facts which
establish the reality of these movements of land, whether of elevation or
depression, whether accompanied by earthquakes or accomplished slowly and
without local disturbance. Having treated fully of these subjects in the
Principles of Geology[46-C], I shall assume, in the present work, that such
changes are part of the actual course of nature; and when admitted, they
will be found to afford a key to the interpretation of a variety of
geological appearances, such as the elevation of horizontal, inclined, or
disturbed marine strata, and the superposition of freshwater to marine
deposits, afterwards to be described. It will also appear, in the sequel,
how much light the doctrine of a continued subsidence of land may throw on
the manner in which a series of strata, formed in shallow water, may have
accumulated to a great thickness. The excavation of valleys also, and other
effects of _denudation_, of which I shall presently treat, can alone be
understood when we duly appreciate the proofs, now on record, of the
prolonged rising and sinking of land, throughout wide areas.

To conclude this subject, I may remind the reader, that were we to embrace
the doctrine which ascribes the elevated position of marine formations, and
the depression of certain freshwater strata, to oscillations in the level
of the waters instead of the land, we should be compelled to admit that the
ocean has been sometimes every where much shallower than at present, and at
others more than three miles deeper.

[Illustration: Fig. 61. Vertical conglomerate and sandstone.]

_Inclined stratification._--The most unequivocal evidence of a change in
the original position of strata is afforded by their standing up
perpendicularly on their edges, which is by no means a rare phenomenon,
especially in mountainous countries. Thus we find in Scotland, on the
southern skirts of the Grampians, beds of pudding-stone alternating with
thin layers of fine sand, all placed vertically to the horizon. When
Saussure first observed certain conglomerates in a similar position in the
Swiss Alps, he remarked that the pebbles, being for the most part of an
oval shape, had their longer axes parallel to the planes of stratification
(See fig. 61.). From this he inferred, that such strata must, at first,
have been horizontal, each oval pebble having originally settled at the
bottom of the water, with its flatter side parallel to the horizon, for the
same reason that an egg will not stand on either end if unsupported. Some
few, indeed, of the rounded stones in a conglomerate occasionally afford an
exception to the above rule, for the same reason that we see on a shingle
beach some oval or flat-sided pebbles resting on their ends or edges; these
having been forced along the bottom and against each other by a wave or
current so as to settle in this position.

Vertical strata, when they can be traced continuously upwards or downwards
for some depth, are almost invariably seen to be parts of great curves,
which may have a diameter of a few yards, or of several miles. I shall
first describe two curves of considerable regularity, which occur in
Forfarshire, extending over a country twenty miles in breadth, from the
foot of the Grampians to the sea near Arbroath.

The mass of strata here shown may be nearly 2000 feet in thickness,
consisting of red and white sandstone, and various coloured shales, the
beds being distinguishable into four principal groups, namely, No. 1. red
marl or shale; No. 2. red sandstone, used for building; No. 3.
conglomerate; and No. 4. grey paving-stone, and tile-stone, with green and
reddish shale, containing peculiar organic remains. A glance at the section
will show that each of the formations 2, 3, 4, are repeated thrice at the
surface, twice with a southerly, and once with a northerly inclination or
_dip_, and the beds in No. 1., which are nearly horizontal, are still
brought up twice by a slight curvature to the surface, once on each side of
A. Beginning at the north-west extremity, the tile-stones and conglomerates
No. 4. and No. 3. are vertical, and they generally form a ridge parallel to
the southern skirts of the Grampians. The superior strata Nos. 2. and 1.
become less and less inclined on descending to the valley of Strathmore,
where the strata, having a concave bend, are said by geologists to lie in a
"trough" or "basin." Through the centre of this valley runs an imaginary
line A, called technically a "synclinal line," where the beds, which are
tilted in opposite directions, may be supposed to meet. It is most
important for the observer to mark such lines, for he will perceive by the
diagram, that in travelling from the north to the centre of the basin, he
is always passing from older to newer beds; whereas, after crossing the
line A, and pursuing his course in the same southerly direction, he is
continually leaving the newer, and advancing upon older strata. All the
deposits which he had before examined begin then to recur in reversed
order, until he arrives at the central axis of the Sidlaw hills, where the
strata are seen to form an arch or _saddle_, having an _anticlinal_ line B,
in the centre. On passing this line, and continuing towards the S.E., the
formations 4, 3, and 2, are again repeated, in the same relative order of
superposition, but with a northerly dip. At Whiteness (see diagram) it will
be seen that the inclined strata are covered by a newer deposit, _a_, in
horizontal beds. These are composed of red conglomerate and sand, and are
newer than any of the groups, 1, 2, 3, 4, before described, and rest
_unconformably_ upon strata of the sandstone group, No. 2.

[Illustration: Fig. 62. Section of Forfarshire, from N.W. to S.E., from
foot of the Grampians to the sea at Arbroath (volcanic or trap rocks
omitted). Length of section twenty miles.]

An example of curved strata, in which the bends or convolutions of the rock
are sharper and far more numerous within an equal space, has been well
described by Sir James Hall.[48-A] It occurs near St. Abb's Head, on the
east coast of Scotland, where the rocks consist principally of a bluish
slate, having frequently a ripple-marked surface. The undulations of the
beds reach from the top to the bottom of cliffs from 200 to 300 feet in
height, and there are sixteen distinct bendings in the course of about six
miles, the curvatures being alternately concave and convex upwards.

[Illustration: Fig. 63. Curved strata of slate near St. Abb's Head,
Berwickshire. (Sir J. Hall.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 64. Block section.]

An experiment was made by Sir James Hall, with a view of illustrating the
manner in which such strata, assuming them to have been originally
horizontal, may have been forced into their present position. A set of
layers of clay were placed under a weight, and their opposite ends pressed
towards each other with such force as to cause them to approach more nearly
together. On the removal of the weight, the layers of clay were found to be
curved and folded, so as to bear a miniature resemblance to the strata in
the cliffs. We must, however, bear in mind, that in the natural section or
sea-cliff we only see the foldings imperfectly, one part being invisible
beneath the sea, and the other, or upper portion, being supposed to have
been carried away by _denudation_, or that action of water which will be
explained in the next chapter. The dark lines in the accompanying plan
(fig. 64.) represent what is actually seen of the strata in part of the
line of cliff alluded to; the fainter lines, that portion which is
concealed beneath the sea level, as also that which is supposed to have
once existed above the present surface.

[Illustration: Fig. 65. Experimental set-up.]

We may still more easily illustrate the effects which a lateral thrust
might produce on flexible strata, by placing several pieces of differently
coloured cloths upon a table, and when they are spread out horizontally,
cover them with a book. Then apply other books to each end, and force them
towards each other. The folding of the cloths will exactly imitate those of
the bent strata. (See fig. 65.)

Whether the analogous flexures in stratified rocks have really been due
to similar sideway movements is a question of considerable difficulty.
It will appear when the volcanic and granitic rocks are described, that
some of them have, when melted, been injected forcibly into fissures,
while others, already in a solid state, have been protruded upwards
through the incumbent crust of the earth, by which a great displacement
of flexible strata must have been caused.

But we also know by the study of regions liable to earthquakes, that there
are causes at work in the interior of the earth capable of producing a
sinking in of the ground, sometimes very local, but sometimes extending
over a wide area. The frequent repetition, or continuance throughout long
periods, of such downward movements seems to imply the formation and
renewal of cavities at a certain depth below the surface, whether by the
removal of matter by volcanos and hot springs, or by the contraction of
argillaceous rocks by heat and pressure, or any other combination of
circumstances. Whatever conjectures we may indulge respecting the causes,
it is certain that pliable beds may, in consequence of unequal degrees of
subsidence, become folded to any amount, and have all the appearance of
having been compressed suddenly by a lateral thrust.

The "Creeps," as they are called in coal-mines, afford an excellent
illustration of this fact.--First, it may be stated generally, that the
excavation of coal at a considerable depth causes the mass of overlying
strata to sink down bodily, even when props are left to support the roof of
the mine. "In Yorkshire," says Mr. Buddle, "three distinct subsidences were
perceptible at the surface, after the clearing out of three seams of coal
below, and innumerable vertical cracks were caused in the incumbent mass of
sandstone and shale, which thus settled down."[50-A] The exact amount of
depression in these cases can only be accurately measured where water
accumulates on the surface, or a railway traverses a coal-field.

[Illustration: Fig. 66. Section of carboniferous strata, at Wallsend,
Newcastle, showing "Creeps." (J. Buddle, Esq.) Horizontal length of
section 174 feet. The upper seam, or main coal, here worked out, was
630 feet below the surface.]

When a bed of coal is worked out, pillars or rectangular masses of coal are
left at intervals as props to support the roof, and protect the colliers.
Thus in fig. 66., representing a section at Wallsend, Newcastle, the
galleries which have been excavated are represented by the white spaces _a
b_, while the adjoining dark portions are parts of the original coal-seam
left as props, beds of sandy clay or shale constituting the floor of the
mine. When the props have been reduced in size, they are pressed down by
the weight of overlying rocks (no less than 630 feet thick) upon the shale
below, which is thereby squeezed and forced up into the open spaces.

Now it might have been expected, that instead of the floor rising up, the
ceiling would sink down, and this effect, called a "Thrust," does, in fact,
take place where the pavement is more solid than the roof. But it usually
happens, in coal-mines, that the roof is composed of hard shale, or
occasionally of sandstone, more unyielding than the foundation, which often
consists of clay. Even where the argillaceous substrata are hard at first,
they soon become softened and reduced to a plastic state when exposed to
the contact of air and water in the floor of a mine.

The first symptom of a "creep," says Mr. Buddle, is a slight curvature
at the bottom of each gallery, as at _a_, fig. 66.: then the pavement
continuing to rise, begins to open with a longitudinal crack, as at _b_:
then the points of the fractured ridge reach the roof, as at _c_; and,
lastly, the upraised beds close up the whole gallery, and the broken
portions of the ridge are re-united and flattened at the top, exhibiting
the flexure seen at _d_. Meanwhile the coal in the props has become
crushed and cracked by pressure. It is also found, that below the creeps
_a_, _b_, _c_, _d_, an inferior stratum, called the "metal coal," which
is 3 feet thick, has been fractured at the points _e_, _f_, _g_, _h_,
and has risen, so as to prove that the upward movement, caused by the
working out of the "main coal," has been propagated through a thickness
of 54 feet of argillaceous beds, which intervene between the two coal
seams. This same displacement has also been traced downwards more than
150 feet below the metal coal, but it grows continually less and less
until it becomes imperceptible.

No part of the process above described is more deserving of our notice than
the slowness with which the change in the arrangement of the beds is
brought about. Days, months, or even years, will sometimes elapse between
the first bending of the pavement and the time of its reaching the roof.
Where the movement has been most rapid, the curvature of the beds is most
regular, and the reunion of the fractured ends most complete; whereas the
signs of displacement or violence are greatest in those creeps which have
required months or years for their entire accomplishment. Hence we may
conclude that similar changes may have been wrought on a larger scale in
the earth's crust by partial and gradual subsidences, especially where the
ground has been undermined throughout long periods of time; and we must be
on our guard against inferring sudden violence, simply because the
distortion of the beds is excessive.

Between the layers of shale, accompanying coal, we sometimes see the
leaves of fossil ferns spread out as regularly as dried plants between
sheets of paper in the herbarium of a botanist. These fern-leaves, or
fronds, must have rested horizontally on soft mud, when first deposited.
If, therefore, they and the layers of shale are now inclined, or
standing on end, it is obviously the effect of subsequent derangement.
The proof becomes, if possible, still more striking when these strata,
including vegetable remains, are curved again and again, and even folded
into the form of the letter Z, so that the same continuous layer of coal
is cut through several times in the same perpendicular shaft. Thus, in
the coal-field near Mons, in Belgium, these zigzag bendings are repeated
four or five times, in the manner represented in fig. 67., the black
lines representing seams of coal.[53-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 67. Zigzag flexures of coal near Mons.]

_Dip and Strike._--In the above remarks, several technical terms have been
used, such as _dip_, the _unconformable position_ of strata, and the
_anticlinal_ and _synclinal_ lines, which, as well as the _strike_ of the
beds, I shall now explain. If a stratum or bed of rock, instead of being
quite level, be inclined to one side, it is said to _dip_; the point of the
compass to which it is inclined is called the _point of dip_, and the
degree of deviation from a level or horizontal line is called _the amount
of dip_, or _the angle of dip_. Thus, in the annexed diagram (fig. 68.), a
series of strata are inclined, and they dip to the north at an angle of
forty-five degrees. The _strike_, or _line of bearing_, is the prolongation
or extension of the strata in a direction _at right angles_ to the dip; and
hence it is sometimes called the _direction_ of the strata. Thus, in the
above instance of strata dipping to the north, their strike must
necessarily be east and west. We have borrowed the word from the German
geologists, _streichen_ signifying to extend, to have a certain direction.
Dip and strike may be aptly illustrated by a row of houses running east and
west, the long ridge of the roof representing the strike of the stratum of
slates, which dip on one side to the north, and on the other to the south.

[Illustration: Fig. 68. Diagram.]

A stratum which is horizontal, or quite level in all directions, has
neither dip nor strike.

It is always important for the geologist, who is endeavouring to comprehend
the structure of a country, to learn how the beds dip in every part of the
district; but it requires some practice to avoid being occasionally
deceived, both as to the point of dip and the amount of it.

[Illustration: Fig. 69. Apparent horizontality of inclined strata.]

If the upper surface of a hard stony stratum be uncovered, whether
artificially in a quarry, or by the waves at the foot of a cliff, it is
easy to determine towards what point of the compass the slope is steepest,
or in what direction water would flow, if poured upon it. This is the true
dip. But the edges of highly inclined strata may give rise to perfectly
horizontal lines in the face of a vertical cliff, if the observer see the
strata in the line of their strike, the dip being inwards from the face of
the cliff. If, however, we come to a break in the cliff, which exhibits a
section exactly at right angles to the line of the strike, we are then able
to ascertain the true dip. In the annexed drawing (fig. 69.), we may
suppose a headland, one side of which faces to the north, where the beds
would appear perfectly horizontal to a person in the boat; while in the
other side facing the west, the true dip would be seen by the person on
shore to be at an angle of 40°. If, therefore, our observations are
confined to a vertical precipice facing in one direction, we must endeavour
to find a ledge or portion of the plane of one of the beds projecting
beyond the others, in order to ascertain the true dip.

[Illustration: Fig. 70. Explanatory sketch.]

It is rarely important to determine the angle of inclination with such
minuteness as to require the aid of the instrument called a clinometer. We
may measure the angle within a few degrees by standing exactly opposite to
a cliff where the true dip is exhibited, holding the hands immediately
before the eyes, and placing the fingers of one in a perpendicular, and of
the other in a horizontal position, as in fig. 70. It is thus easy to
discover whether the lines of the inclined beds bisect the angle of 90°,
formed by the meeting of the hands, so as to give an angle of 45°, or
whether it would divide the space into two equal or unequal portions. The
upper dotted line may express a stratum dipping to the north; but should
the beds dip precisely to the opposite point of the compass as in the
lower dotted line, it will be seen that the amount of inclination may still
be measured by the hands with equal facility.

[Illustration: Fig. 71. Section illustrating the structure of
the Swiss Jura.]

[Illustration: Fig. 72. Ground plan of the denuded ridge, fig. 71.]

[Illustration: Fig. 73. Transverse section.]

It has been already seen, in describing the curved strata on the east coast
of Scotland, in Forfarshire and Berwickshire, that a series of concave and
convex bendings are occasionally repeated several times. These usually form
part of a series of parallel waves of strata, which are prolonged in the
same direction throughout a considerable extent of country. Thus, for
example, in the Swiss Jura, that lofty chain of mountains has been proved
to consist of many parallel ridges, with intervening longitudinal valleys,
as in fig. 71., the ridges being formed by curved fossiliferous strata, of
which the nature and dip are occasionally displayed in deep transverse
gorges, called "cluses," caused by fractures at right angles to the
direction of the chain.[55-A] Now let us suppose these ridges and parallel
valleys to run north and south, we should then say that the _strike_ of the
beds is north and south, and the _dip_ east and west. Lines drawn along the
summits of the ridges, A, B, would be anticlinal lines, and one following
the bottom of the adjoining valleys a synclinal line. It will be observed
that some of these ridges, A, B, are unbroken on the summit, whereas one of
them, C, has been fractured along the line of strike, and a portion of it
carried away by denudation, so that the ridges of the beds in the
formations _a_, _b_, _c_, come out to the day, or, as the miners say, _crop
out_, on the sides of a valley. The ground plan of such a denuded ridge as
C, as given in a geological map, may be expressed by the diagram fig. 72.,
and the cross section of the same by fig. 73. The line D E, fig. 72., is
the anticlinal line, on each side of which the dip is in opposite
directions, as expressed by the arrows. The emergence of strata at the
surface is called by miners their _outcrop_ or _basset_.

If, instead of being folded into parallel ridges, the beds form a boss or
dome-shaped protuberance, and if we suppose the summit of the dome carried
off, the ground plan would exhibit the edges of the strata forming a
succession of circles, or ellipses, round a common centre. These circles
are the lines of strike, and the dip being always at right angles is
inclined in the course of the circuit to every point of the compass,
constituting what is termed a qua-quaversal dip--that is, turning each way.

There are endless variations in the figures described by the basset-edges
of the strata, according to the different inclination of the beds, and the
mode in which they happen to have been denuded. One of the simplest rules
with which every geologist should be acquainted, relates to the V-like form
of the beds as they crop out in an ordinary valley. First, if the strata be
horizontal, the V-like form will be also on a level, and the newest strata
will appear at the greatest heights.

Secondly, if the beds be inclined and intersected by a valley sloping in
the same direction, and the dip of the beds be less steep than the slope
of the valley, then the V's, as they are often termed by miners, will
point upwards (see fig. 74.), those formed by the newer beds appearing
in a superior position, and extending highest up the valley, as A
is seen above B.

[Illustration: Fig. 74. Slope of valley 40°, dip of strata 20°.]

Thirdly, if the dip of the beds be steeper than the slope of the valley,
then the V's will point downwards (see fig. 75.), and those formed of the
older beds will now appear uppermost, as B appears above A.

[Illustration: Fig. 75. Slope of valley 20°, dip of strata 50°.]

Fourthly, in every case where the strata dip in a contrary direction to
the slope of the valley, whatever be the angle of inclination, the newer
beds will appear the highest, as in the first and second cases. This is
shown by the drawing (fig. 76.), which exhibits strata rising at an
angle of 20°, and crossed by a valley, which declines in an opposite
direction at 20°.[57-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 76. Slope of valley 20°, dip of strata 20°,
in opposite directions.]

These rules may often be of great practical utility; for the different
degrees of dip occurring in the two cases represented in figures 74 and 75.
may occasionally be encountered in following the same line of flexure at
points a few miles distant from each other. A miner unacquainted with the
rule, who had first explored the valley (fig. 74.), may have sunk a
vertical shaft below the coal seam A, until he reached the inferior bed B.
He might then pass to the valley fig. 75., and discovering there also the
outcrop of two coal seams, might begin his workings in the uppermost in the
expectation of coming down to the other bed A, which would be observed
cropping out lower down the valley. But a glance at the section will
demonstrate the futility of such hopes.

In the majority of cases, an anticlinal axis forms a ridge, and a synclinal
axis a valley, as in A, B, fig. 62. p. 48.; but there are exceptions to
this rule, the beds sometimes sloping inwards from either side of a
mountain, as in fig. 77.

[Illustration: Fig. 77. Cross section.]

On following one of the anticlinal ridges of the Jura, before mentioned, A,
B, C, fig. 71., we often discover longitudinal cracks and sometimes large
fissures along the line where the flexure was greatest. Some of these, as
above stated, have been enlarged by denudation into valleys of considerable
width, as at C, fig. 71., which follow the line of strike, and which we may
suppose to have been hollowed out at the time when these rocks were still
beneath the level of the sea, or perhaps at the period of their gradual
emergence from beneath the waters. The existence of such cracks at the
point of the sharpest bending of solid strata of limestone is precisely
what we should have expected; but the occasional want of all similar signs
of fracture, even where the strain has been greatest, as at _a_, fig. 71.,
is not always easy to explain. We must imagine that many strata of
limestone, chert, and other rocks which are now brittle, were pliant when
bent into their present position. They may have owed their flexibility in
part to the fluid matter which they contained in their minute pores, as
before described (p. 35.), and in part to the permeation of sea-water while
they were yet submerged.

[Illustration: Fig. 78. Strata of chert, grit, and marl, near St.
Jean de Luz.]

At the western extremity of the Pyrenees, great curvatures of the strata
are seen in the sea cliffs, where the rocks consist of marl, grit, and
chert. At certain points, as at _a_, fig. 78., some of the bendings of the
flinty chert are so sharp, that specimens might be broken off, well fitted
to serve as ridge-tiles on the roof of a house. Although this chert could
not have been brittle as now, when first folded into this shape, it
presents, nevertheless, here and there at the points of greatest flexure
small cracks, which show that it was solid, and not wholly incapable of
breaking at the period of its displacement. The numerous rents alluded to
are not empty, but filled with calcedony and quartz.

[Illustration: Fig. 79. Cross section.

  _g._ gypsum.
  _m._ marl.]

Between San Caterina and Castrogiovanni, in Sicily, bent and undulating
gypseous marls occur, with here and there thin beds of solid gypsum
interstratified. Sometimes these solid layers have been broken into
detached fragments, still preserving their sharp edges (_g g_, fig.
79.), while the continuity of the more pliable and ductile marls, _m m_,
has not been interrupted.

[Illustration: Fig. 80. Cross section.]

I shall conclude my remarks on bent strata by stating, that, in mountainous
regions like the Alps, it is often difficult for an experienced geologist
to determine correctly the relative age of beds by superposition, so often
have the strata been folded back upon themselves, the upper parts of the
curve having been removed by denudation. Thus, if we met with the strata
seen in the section fig. 80., we should naturally suppose that there were
twelve distinct beds, or sets of beds, No. 1. being the newest, and No. 12.
the oldest of the series. But this section may, perhaps, exhibit merely six
beds, which have been folded in the manner seen in fig. 81., so that each
of them is twice repeated, the position of one half being reversed, and
part of No. 1., originally the uppermost, having now become the lowest of
the series. These phenomena are often observable on a magnificent scale in
certain regions in Switzerland in precipices from 2000 to 3000 feet in
perpendicular height. In the Iselten Alp, in the valley of the Lutschine,
between Unterseen and Grindelwald, curves of calcareous shale are seen from
1000 to 1500 feet in height, in which the beds sometimes plunge down
vertically for a depth of 1000 feet and more, before they bend round again.
There are many flexures not inferior in dimensions in the Pyrenees, as
those near Gavarnie, at the base of Mont Perdu.

[Illustration: Fig. 81. Cross section.]

[Illustration: Fig. 82. Curved strata of the Iselten Alp.]

[Illustration: Fig. 83. Unconformable junction of old red sandstone and
Silurian schist at the Siccar Point, near St. Abb's Head, Berwickshire. See
also Frontispiece.]

_Unconformable stratification._--Strata are said to be unconformable,
when one series is so placed over another, that the planes of the
superior repose on the edges of the inferior (see fig. 83.). In this
case it is evident that a period had elapsed between the production of
the two sets of strata, and that, during this interval, the older
series had been tilted and disturbed. Afterwards the upper series was
thrown down in horizontal strata upon it. If these superior beds, as
_d_, _d_, fig. 83., are also inclined, it is plain that the lower
strata, _a_, _a_, have been twice displaced; first, before the
deposition of the newer beds, _d_, _d_, and a second time when these
same strata were thrown out of the horizontal position.

Playfair has remarked[60-A] that this kind of junction which we now call
unconformable had been described before the time of Hutton, but that he was
the first geologist who appreciated its importance, as illustrating the
high antiquity and great revolutions of the globe. He had observed that
where such contacts occur, the lowest beds of the newer series very
generally consist of a breccia or conglomerate consisting of angular and
rounded fragments, derived from the breaking up of the more ancient rocks.
On one occasion the Scotch geologist took his two distinguished pupils,
Playfair and Sir James Hall, to the cliffs on the east coast of Scotland,
near the village of Eyemouth, not far from St. Abb's Head, where the
schists of the Lammermuir range are undermined and dissected by the sea.
Here the curved and vertical strata, now known to be of Silurian age, and
which often exhibit a ripple-marked surface[60-B], are well exposed at the
headland called the Siccar Point, penetrating with their edges into the
incumbent beds of slightly inclined sandstone, in which large pieces of the
schist, some round and others angular, are united by an arenaceous cement.
"What clearer evidence," exclaims Playfair, "could we have had of the
different formation of these rocks, and of the long interval which
separated their formation, had we actually seen them emerging from the
bosom of the deep? We felt ourselves necessarily carried back to the time
when the schistus on which we stood was yet at the bottom of the sea, and
when the sandstone before us was only beginning to be deposited in the
shape of sand or mud, from the waters of a superincumbent ocean. An epoch
still more remote presented itself, when even the most ancient of these
rocks, instead of standing upright in vertical beds, lay in horizontal
planes at the bottom of the sea, and was not yet disturbed by that
immeasurable force which has burst asunder the solid pavement of the globe.
Revolutions still more remote appeared in the distance of this
extraordinary perspective. The mind seemed to grow giddy by looking so far
into the abyss of time; and while we listened with earnestness and
admiration to the philosopher who was now unfolding to us the order and
series of these wonderful events, we became sensible how much farther
reason may sometimes go than imagination can venture to follow."[60-C]

In the frontispiece of this volume the reader will see a view of this
classical spot, reduced from a large picture, faithfully sketched and
coloured from nature by the youngest son of the late Sir James Hall. It was
impossible, however, to do justice to the original sketch, in an
engraving, as the contrast of the red sandstone and the light fawn-coloured
vertical schists could not be expressed. From the point of view here
selected, the underlying beds of the perpendicular schist, _a_, are visible
at _b_ through a small opening in the fractured beds of the covering of red
sandstone, _d d_, while on the vertical face of the old schist at _a' a"_ a
conspicuous ripple-mark is displayed.

[Illustration: Fig. 84. Junction of unconformable strata near
Mons, in Belgium.]

It often happens that in the interval between the deposition of two sets of
unconformable strata, the inferior rock has not only been denuded, but
drilled by perforating shells. Thus, for example, at Autreppe and Gusigny,
near Mons, beds of an ancient (paleozoic) limestone, highly inclined, and
often bent, are covered with horizontal strata of greenish and whitish
marls of the Cretaceous formation. The lowest and therefore the oldest bed
of the horizontal series is usually the sand and conglomerate, _a_, in
which are rounded fragments of stone, from an inch to two feet in diameter.
These fragments have often adhering shells attached to them, and have been
bored by perforating mollusca. The solid surface of the inferior limestone
has also been bored, so as to exhibit cylindrical and pear-shaped cavities,
as at _c_, the work of saxicavous mollusca; and many rents, as at _b_,
which descend several feet or yards into the limestone, have been filled
with sand and shells, similar to those in the stratum _a_.

_Fractures of the strata and faults._--Numerous rents may often be seen in
rocks which appear to have been simply broken, the separated parts
remaining in the same places; but we often find a fissure, several inches
or yards wide, intervening between the disunited portions. These fissures
are usually filled with fine earth and sand, or with angular fragments of
stone, evidently derived from the fracture of the contiguous rocks.

The face of each wall of the fissure is often beautifully polished, as if
glazed, and not unfrequently striated or scored with parallel furrows and
ridges, such as would be produced by the continued rubbing together of
surfaces of unequal hardness. These polished surfaces are called by miners
"slickensides." It is supposed that the lines of the striæ indicate the
direction in which the rocks were moved. During one of the minor
earthquakes in Chili, which happened about the year 1840, and was described
to me by an eye-witness, the brick walls of a building were rent vertically
in several places, and made to vibrate for several minutes during each
shock, after which they remained uninjured, and without any opening,
although the line of each crack was still visible. When all movement had
ceased, there were seen on the floor of the house, at the bottom of each
rent, small heaps of fine brickdust, evidently produced by trituration.

[Illustration: Fig. 85. Faults. A B perpendicular, C D oblique
to the horizon.]

It is not uncommon to find the mass of rock, on one side of a fissure,
thrown up above or down below the mass with which it was once in contact on
the other side. This mode of displacement is called a shift, slip, or
fault. "The miner," says Playfair, describing a fault, "is often perplexed,
in his subterraneous journey, by a derangement in the strata, which changes
at once all those lines and bearings which had hitherto directed his
course. When his mine reaches a certain plane, which is sometimes
perpendicular, as in A B, fig. 85., sometimes oblique to the horizon (as in
C D, ibid.), he finds the beds of rock broken asunder, those on the one
side of the plane having changed their place, by sliding in a particular
direction along the face of the others. In this motion they have sometimes
preserved their parallelism, as in fig. 85., so that the strata on each
side of the faults A B, C D, continue parallel to one another; in other
cases, the strata on each side are inclined, as in _a_, _b_, _c_, _d_ (fig.
86.), though their identity is still to be recognized by their possessing
the same thickness, and the same internal characters."[62-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 86. E F, fault or fissure filled with rubbish, on each
side of which the shifted strata are not parallel.]

In Coalbrook Dale, says Mr. Prestwich[62-B], deposits of sandstone, shale,
and coal, several thousand feet thick, and occupying an area of many miles,
have been shivered into fragments, and the broken remnants have been placed
in very discordant positions, often at levels differing several hundred
feet from each other. The sides of the faults, when perpendicular, are
commonly separated several yards, but are sometimes as much as 50 yards
asunder, the interval being filled with broken _débris_ of the strata. In
following the course of the same fault it is sometimes found to produce in
different places very unequal changes of level, the amount of shift being
in one place 300, and in another 700 feet, which arises, in some cases,
from the union of two or more faults. In other words, the disjointed strata
have in certain districts been subjected to renewed movements, which they
have not suffered elsewhere.

We may occasionally see exact counterparts of these slips, on a small
scale, in pits of fine loose sand and gravel, many of which have doubtless
been caused by the drying and shrinking of argillaceous and other beds,
slight subsidences having taken place from failure of support. Sometimes,
however, even these small slips may have been produced during earthquakes;
for land has been moved, and its level, relatively to the sea, considerably
altered, within the period when much of the alluvial sand and gravel now
covering the surface of continents was deposited.

I have already stated that a geologist must be on his guard, in a region of
disturbed strata, against inferring repeated alternations of rocks, when,
in fact, the same strata, once continuous, have been bent round so as to
recur in the same section, and with the same dip. A similar mistake has
often been occasioned by a series of faults.

[Illustration: Fig. 87. Apparent alternations of strata caused
by vertical faults.]

If, for example, the dark line A H (fig. 87.) represent the surface of a
country on which the strata _a b c_ frequently crop out, an observer,
who is proceeding from H to A, might at first imagine that at every step
he was approaching new strata, whereas the repetition of the same beds
has been caused by vertical faults, or downthrows. Thus, suppose the
original mass, A, B, C, D, to have been a set of uniformly inclined
strata, and that the different masses under E F, F G, and G D, sank down
successively, so as to leave vacant the spaces marked in the diagram by
dotted lines, and to occupy those marked by the continuous lines, then
let denudation take place along the line A H, so that the protruding
masses indicated by the fainter lines are swept away,--a miner, who has
not discovered the faults, finding the mass _a_, which we will suppose
to be a bed of coal four times repeated, might hope to find four beds,
workable to an indefinite depth, but first on arriving at the fault G he
is stopped suddenly in his workings, upon reaching the strata of
sandstone _c_, or on arriving at the line of fault F he comes partly
upon the shale _b_, and partly on the sandstone _c_, and on reaching E
he is again stopped by a wall composed of the rock _d_.

[Illustration: Fig. 88. Cross section.]

The very different levels at which the separated parts of the same strata
are found on the different sides of the fissure, in some faults, is truly
astonishing. One of the most celebrated in England is that called the
"ninety-fathom dike," in the coal-field of Newcastle. This name has been
given to it, because the same beds are ninety fathoms lower on the northern
than they are on the southern side. The fissure has been filled by a body
of sand, which is now in the state of sandstone, and is called the dike,
which is sometimes very narrow, but in other places more than twenty yards
wide.[64-A] The walls of the fissure are scored by grooves, such as would
have been produced if the broken ends of the rock had been rubbed along the
plane of the fault.[64-B] In the Tynedale and Craven faults, in the north
of England, the vertical displacement is still greater, and has extended in
a horizontal direction for a distance of thirty miles or more. Some
geologists consider it necessary to imagine that the upward or downward
movement in these cases was accomplished at a single stroke, and not by a
series of sudden but interrupted movements. This idea appears to have been
derived from a notion that the grooved walls have merely been rubbed in one
direction. But this is so far from being a constant phenomenon in faults,
that it has often been objected to the received theory respecting those
polished surfaces called "slickensides" (see above, p. 61.), that the striæ
are not always parallel, but often curved and irregular. It has, moreover,
been remarked, that not only the walls of the fissure or fault, but its
earthy contents, sometimes present the same polished and striated faces.
Now these facts seem to indicate partial changes in the direction of the
movement, and some slidings subsequent to the first filling up of the
fissure. Suppose the mass of rock A, B, C, to overlie an extensive chasm _d
e_, formed at the depth of several miles, whether by the gradual
contraction in bulk of a melted mass passing into a solid or crystalline
state, or the shrinking of argillaceous strata, baked by a moderate heat,
or by the subtraction of matter by volcanic action, or any other cause.
Now, if this region be convulsed by earthquakes, the fissures _f g_, and
others at right angles to them, may sever the mass B from A and from C, so
that it may move freely, and begin to sink into the chasm. A fracture may
be conceived so clean and perfect as to allow it to subside at once to the
bottom of the subterranean cavity; but it is far more probable that the
sinking will be effected at successive periods during different
earthquakes, the mass always continuing to slide in the same direction
along the planes of the fissures _f g_, and the edges of the falling mass
being continually more broken and triturated at each convulsion. If, as is
not improbable, the circumstances which have caused the failure of support
continue in operation, it may happen that when the mass B has filled the
cavity first formed, its foundations will again give way under it, so that
it will fall again in the same direction. But, if the direction should
change, the fact could not be discovered by observing the slickensides,
because the last scoring would efface the lines of previous friction. In
the present state of our ignorance of the causes of subsidence, an
hypothesis which can explain the great amount of displacement in some
faults, on sound mechanical principles, by a succession of movements, is
far preferable to any theory which assumes each fault to have been
accomplished by a single upcast or downthrow of several thousand feet. For
we know that there are operations now in progress, at great depths in the
interior of the earth, by which both large and small tracts of ground are
made to rise above and sink below their former level, some slowly and
insensibly, others suddenly and by starts, a few feet or yards at a time;
whereas there are no grounds for believing that, during the last 3000 years
at least, any regions have been either upheaved or depressed, at a single
stroke, to the amount of several hundred, much less several thousand feet.
When some of the ancient marine formations are described in the sequel, it
will appear that their structure and organic contents point to the
conclusion, that the floor of the ocean was slowly sinking at the time of
their origin. The downward movement was very gradual, and in Wales and the
contiguous parts of England a maximum thickness of 32,000 feet (more than
six miles) of Carboniferous, Devonian, and Silurian rock was formed, whilst
the bed of the sea was all the time continuously and tranquilly
subsiding.[65-A] Whatever may have been the changes which the solid
foundation underwent, whether accompanied by the melting, consolidation,
crystallization, or desiccation of subjacent mineral matter, it is clear
from the fact of the sea having remained shallow all the while that the
bottom never sank down suddenly to the depth of many hundred feet at once.

It is by assuming such reiterated variations of level, each separately of
small vertical amount, but multiplied by time till they acquire importance
in the aggregate, that we are able to explain the phenomena of denudation,
which will be treated of in the next chapter. By such movements every
portion of the surface of the land becomes in its turn a line of coast, and
is exposed to the action of the waves and tides. A country which is
undergoing such movement is never allowed to settle into a state of
equilibrium, therefore the force of rivers and torrents to remove or
excavate soil and rocky masses is sustained in undiminished energy.


FOOTNOTES:

[46-A] In the first three editions of my Principles of Geology, I expressed
many doubts as to the validity of the alleged proofs of a gradual rise of
land in Sweden; but after visiting that country, in 1834, I retracted these
objections, and published a detailed statement of the observations which
led me to alter my opinion in the Phil. Trans. 1835, Part I. See also the
Principles, 4th and subsequent editions.

[46-B] See his Journal of a Naturalist in Voyage of the Beagle, and his
work on Coral Reefs.

[46-C] See chapters xxviii. to xxxi. inclusive.

[48-A] Edin. Trans. vol. vii. pl. 3.

[50-A] Proceedings of Geol. Soc. vol. iii. p. 148.

[53-A] See plan by M. Chevalier, Burat's D'Aubuisson, tom. ii. p. 334.

[55-A] See M. Thurmann's work, "Essai sur les Soulèvemens Jurassiques
du Porrentruy, Paris, 1832," with whom I examined part of these
mountains in 1835.

[57-A] I am indebted to the kindness of T. Sopwith, Esq., for three
models which I have copied in the above diagrams; but the beginner may
find it by no means easy to understand such copies, although, if he were
to examine and handle the originals, turning them about in different
ways, he would at once comprehend their meaning as well as the import of
others far more complicated, which the same engineer has constructed to
illustrate _faults_.

[60-A] Biographical account of Dr. Hutton.

[60-B] See above, p. 49. and section.

[60-C] Playfair, ibid.; see his Works, Edin. 1822, vol. iv. p. 81.

[62-A] Playfair, Illust. of Hutt. Theory, § 42.

[62-B] Geol. Trans. second series, vol. v. p. 452.

[64-A] Conybeare and Phillips, Outlines, &c. p. 376.

[64-B] Phillips, Geology, Lardner's Cyclop. p. 41.

[65-A] See the results of the "Geological Survey of Great Britain;"
Memoirs, vols. i. and ii., by Sir H. De la Beche, Mr. A. C. Ramsay,
and Mr. John Phillips.



CHAPTER VI.

DENUDATION.

   Denudation defined--Its amount equal to the entire mass of stratified
   deposits in the earth's crust--Horizontal sandstone denuded in
   Ross-shire--Levelled surface of countries in which great faults
   occur--Coalbrook Dale--Denuding power of the ocean during the
   emergence of land--Origin of Valleys--Obliteration of
   sea-cliffs--Inland sea-cliffs and terraces in the Morea and
   Sicily--Limestone pillars at St. Mihiel, in France--in Canada--in
   the Bermudas.


Denudation, which has been occasionally spoken of in the preceding
chapters, is the removal of solid matter by water in motion, whether of
rivers or of the waves and currents of the sea, and the consequent laying
bare of some inferior rock. Geologists have perhaps been seldom in the
habit of reflecting that this operation has exerted an influence on the
structure of the earth's crust as universal and important as sedimentary
deposition itself; for denudation is the inseparable accompaniment of the
production of all new strata of mechanical origin. The formation of every
new deposit by the transport of sediment and pebbles necessarily implies
that there has been, somewhere else, a grinding down of rock into rounded
fragments, sand, or mud, equal in quantity to the new strata. All
deposition, therefore, except in the case of a shower of volcanic ashes, is
the sign of superficial waste going on contemporaneously, and to an equal
amount elsewhere. The gain at one point is no more than sufficient to
balance the loss at some other. Here a lake has grown shallower, there a
ravine has been deepened. The bed of the sea has in one region been raised
by the accumulation of new matter, in another its depth has been augmented
by the abstraction of an equal quantity.

When we see a stone building, we know that somewhere, far or near, a quarry
has been opened. The courses of stone in the building may be compared to
successive strata, the quarry to a ravine or valley which has suffered
denudation. As the strata, like the courses of hewn stone, have been laid
one upon another gradually, so the excavation both of the valley and quarry
have been gradual. To pursue the comparison still farther, the superficial
heaps of mud, sand, and gravel, usually called alluvium, may be likened to
the rubbish of a quarry which has been rejected as useless by the workmen,
or has fallen upon the road between the quarry and the building, so as to
lie scattered at random over the ground.

If, then, the entire mass of stratified deposits in the earth's crust is at
once the monument and measure of the denudation which has taken place, on
how stupendous a scale ought we to find the signs of this removal of
transported materials in past ages! Accordingly, there are different
classes of phenomena, which attest in a most striking manner the vast
spaces left vacant by the erosive power of water. I may allude, first, to
those valleys on both sides of which the same strata are seen following
each other in the same order, and having the same mineral composition and
fossil contents. We may observe, for example, several formations, as Nos.
1, 2, 3, 4, in the accompanying diagram (fig. 89.); No. 1. conglomerate,
No. 2. clay, No. 3. grit, and No. 4. limestone, each repeated in a series
of hills separated by valleys varying in depth. When we examine the
subordinate parts of these four formations, we find, in like manner,
distinct beds in each, corresponding, on the opposite sides of the valleys,
both in composition and order of position. No one can doubt that the strata
were originally continuous, and that some cause has swept away the portions
which once connected the whole series. A torrent on the side of a mountain
produces similar interruptions; and when we make artificial cuts in
lowering roads, we expose, in like manner, corresponding beds on either
side. But in nature, these appearances occur in mountains several thousand
feet high, and separated by intervals of many miles or leagues in extent,
of which a grand exemplification is described by Dr. MacCulloch, on the
north-western coast of Ross-shire, in Scotland.[67-A] The fundamental rock
of that country is gneiss, in disturbed strata, on which beds of nearly
horizontal red sandstone rest unconformably. The latter are often very
thin, forming mere flags, with their surfaces, distinctly ripple-marked.
They end abruptly on the declivities of many insulated mountains, which
rise up at once to the height of about 2000 feet above the gneiss of the
surrounding plain or table land, and to an average elevation of about 3000
feet above the sea, which all their summits generally attain. The base of
gneiss varies in height, so that the lower portions of the sandstone occupy
different levels, and the thickness of the mass is various, sometimes
exceeding 3000 feet. It is impossible to compare these scattered and
detached portions without imagining that the whole country has once been
covered with a great body of sandstone, and that masses from 1000 to more
than 3000 feet in thickness have been removed.

[Illustration: Fig. 89. Valleys of denudation. _a._ alluvium.]

[Illustration: Fig. 90. Denudation of red sandstone on north-west coast of
Ross-shire. (MacCulloch.)]

In the "Survey of Great Britain" (vol. i.), Professor Ramsay has shown
that the missing beds, removed from the summit of the Mendips, must have
been nearly a mile in thickness; and he has pointed out considerable areas
in South Wales and some of the adjacent counties of England, where a series
of palæozoic strata, not less than 11,000 feet in thickness, have been
stripped off. All these materials have of course been transported to new
regions, and have entered into the composition of more modern formations.
On the other hand, it is shown by observations in the same "Survey," that
the palæozoic strata are from 20,000 to 30,000 feet thick. It is clear that
such rocks, formed of mud and sand, now for the most part consolidated, are
the monuments of denuding operations, which took place on a grand scale at
a very remote period in the earth's history. For, whatever has been given
to one area must always have been borrowed from another; a truth which,
obvious as it may seem when thus stated, must be repeatedly impressed on
the student's mind, because in many geological speculations it is taken for
granted that the external crust of the earth has been always growing
thicker, in consequence of the accumulation, period after period, of
sedimentary matter, as if the new strata were not always produced at the
expense of pre-existing rocks, stratified or unstratified. By duly
reflecting on the fact, that all deposits of mechanical origin imply the
transportation from some other region, whether contiguous or remote, of an
equal amount of solid matter, we perceive that the stony exterior of the
planet must always have grown thinner in one place whenever, by accessions
of new strata, it was acquiring density in another. No doubt the vacant
space left by the missing rocks, after extensive denudation, is less
imposing to the imagination than a vast thickness of conglomerate or
sandstone, or the bodily presence as it were of a mountain-chain, with all
its inclined and curved strata. But the denuded tracts speak a clear and
emphatic language to our reason, and, like repeated layers of fossil
nummulites, corals or shells, or like numerous seams of coal, each based on
its under clay full of the roots of trees, still remaining in their natural
position, demand an indefinite lapse of time for their elaboration.

No one will maintain that the fossils entombed in these rocks did not
belong to many successive generations of plants and animals. In like
manner, each sedimentary deposit attests a slow and gradual action, and the
strata not only serve as a measure of the amount of denudation
simultaneously effected elsewhere, but are also a correct indication of the
rate at which the denuding operation was carried on.

Perhaps the most convincing evidence of denudation on a magnificent scale
is derived from the levelled surfaces of districts where large faults
occur. I have shown, in fig. 87. p. 63., and in fig. 91., how angular and
protruding masses of rock might naturally have been looked for on the
surface immediately above great faults, although in fact they rarely exist.
This phenomenon may be well studied in those districts where coal has been
extensively worked, for there the former relation of the beds which have
shifted their position may be determined with great accuracy. Thus in the
coal field of Ashby de la Zouch, in Leicestershire (see fig. 91.), a fault
occurs, on one side of which the coal beds _a b c d_ rise to the height of
500 feet above the corresponding beds on the other side. But the uplifted
strata do not stand up 500 feet above the general surface; on the contrary,
the outline of the country, as expressed by the line _z z_, is uniform and
unbroken, and the mass indicated by the dotted outline must have been
washed away.[69-A] There are proofs of this kind in some level countries,
where dense masses of strata have been cleared away from areas several
hundred square miles in extent.

[Illustration: Fig. 91. Faults and denuded coal strata, Ashby de
la Zouch. (Mammat.)]

In the Newcastle coal district it is ascertained that faults occur in
which the upward or downward movement could not have been less than 140
fathoms, which, had they affected equally the configuration of the
surface to that amount, would produce mountains with precipitous
escarpments nearly 1000 feet high, or chasms of the like depth; yet is
the actual level of the country absolutely uniform--affording no trace
whatever of subterranean movements.[69-B]

The ground from which these materials have been removed is usually
overspread with heaps of sand and gravel, formed out of the ruins of the
very rocks which have disappeared. Thus, in the districts above referred
to, they consist of rounded and angular fragments of hard sandstone,
limestone, and ironstone, with a small quantity of the more destructible
shale, and even rounded pieces of coal.

Allusion has been already made to the shattered state and discordant
position of the carboniferous strata in Coalbrook Dale (p. 62.). The
collier cannot proceed three or four yards without meeting with small
slips, and from time to time he encounters faults of considerable
magnitude, which have thrown the rocks up or down several hundred feet. Yet
the superficial inequalities to which these dislocated masses originally
gave rise are no longer discernible, and the comparative flatness of the
existing surface can only be explained, as Mr. Prestwich has observed, by
supposing the fractured portions to have been removed by water. It is also
clear that strata of red sandstone, more than 1000 feet thick, which once
covered the coal, in the same region, have been carried away from large
areas. That water has, in this case, been the denuding agent, we may infer
from the fact that the rocks have yielded according to their different
degrees of hardness; the hard trap of the Wrekin, for example, and other
hills, having resisted more than the softer shale and sandstone, so as now
to stand out in bold relief.[70-A]

_Origin of valleys._--Many of the earlier geologists, and Dr. Hutton among
them, taught that "rivers have in general hollowed out their valleys." This
is true only of rivulets and torrents which are the feeders of the larger
streams, and which, descending over rapid slopes, are most subject to
temporary increase and diminution in the volume of their waters. The
quantity of mud, sand, and pebbles constituting many a modern delta proves
indisputably that no small part of the inequalities now existing on the
earth's surface are due to fluviatile action; but the principal valleys in
almost every great hydrographical basin in the world, are of a shape and
magnitude which imply that they have been due to other causes besides the
mere excavating power of rivers.

Some geologists have imagined that a deluge, or succession of deluges, may
have been the chief denuding agency, and they have speculated on a series
of enormous waves raised by the instantaneous upthrow of continents or
mountain chains out of the sea. But even were we disposed to grant such
sudden upheavals of the floor of the ocean, and to assume that great waves
would be the consequence of each convulsion, it is not easy to explain the
observed phenomena by the aid of so gratuitous an hypothesis.

On the other hand, a machinery of a totally different kind seems capable of
giving rise to effects of the required magnitude. It has now been
ascertained that the rising and sinking of extensive portions of the
earth's crust, whether insensibly or by a repetition of sudden shocks, is
part of the actual course of nature, and we may easily comprehend how the
land may have been exposed during these movements to abrasion by the waves
of the sea. In the same manner as a mountain mass may, in the course of
ages, be formed by sedimentary deposition, layer after layer, so masses
equally voluminous may in time waste away by inches; as, for example, if
beds of incoherent materials are raised slowly in an open sea where a
strong current prevails. It is well known that some of these oceanic
currents have a breadth of 200 miles, and that they sometimes run for a
thousand miles or more in one direction, retaining a considerable velocity
even at the depth of several hundred feet. Under these circumstances, the
flowing waters may have power to clear away each stratum of incoherent
materials as it rises and approaches the surface, where the waves exert the
greatest force; and in this manner a voluminous deposit may be entirely
swept away, so that, in the absence of faults, no evidence may remain of
the denuding operation. It may indeed be affirmed that the signs of waste
will usually be least obvious where the destruction has been most
complete; for the annihilation may have proceeded so far, that no ruins are
left of the dilapidated rocks.

Although denudation has had a levelling influence on some countries of
shattered and disturbed strata (see fig. 87. p. 63. and fig. 91. p. 69.),
it has more commonly been the cause of superficial inequalities, especially
in regions of horizontal stratification. The general outline of these
regions is that of flat and level platforms, interrupted by valleys often
of considerable depth, and ramifying in various directions. These hollows
may once have formed bays and channels between islands, and the steepest
slope on the sides of each valley may have been a sea-cliff, which was
undermined for ages, as the land emerged gradually from the deep. We may
suppose the position and course of each valley to have been originally
determined by differences in the hardness of the rocks, and by rents and
joints which usually occur even in horizontal strata. In mountain chains,
such as the Jura before described (see fig. 71. p. 55.), we perceive at
once that the principal valleys have not been due to aqueous excavation,
but to those mechanical movements which have bent the rocks into their
present form. Yet even in the Jura there are many valleys, such as C (fig.
71.), which have been hollowed out by water; and it may be stated that in
every part of the globe the unevenness of the surface of the land has been
due to the combined influence of subterranean movements and denudation.

I may now recapitulate a few of the conclusions to which we have
arrived: first, all the mechanical strata have been accumulated
gradually, and the concomitant denudation has been no less gradual:
secondly, the dry land consists in great part of strata formed
originally at the bottom of the sea, and has been made to emerge and
attain its present height by a force acting from beneath: thirdly, no
combination of causes has yet been conceived so capable of producing
extensive and gradual denudation, as the action of the waves and
currents of the ocean upon land slowly rising out of the deep.

Now, if we adopt these conclusions, we shall naturally be led to look
everywhere for marks of the former residence of the sea upon the land,
especially near the coasts from which the last retreat of the waters took
place, and it will be found that such signs are not wanting.

I shall have occasion to speak of ancient sea-cliffs, now far inland, in
the south-east of England, when treating in Chapter XIX. of the denudation
of the chalk in Surrey, Kent, and Sussex. Lines of upraised sea-beaches of
more modern date are traced, at various levels from 20 to 100 feet and
upwards above the present sea-level, for great distances on the east and
west coasts of Scotland, as well as in Devonshire, and other counties in
England. These ancient beach-lines often form terraces of sand and gravel,
including littoral shells, some broken, others entire, and corresponding
with species now living on the adjoining coast. But it would be
unreasonable to expect to meet everywhere with the signs of ancient shores,
since no geologist can have failed to observe how soon all recent marks of
the kind above alluded to are obscured or entirely effaced, wherever, in
consequence of the altered state of the tides and currents, the sea has
receded for a few centuries. We see the cliffs crumble down in a few years
if composed of sand or clay, and soon reduced to a gentle slope. If there
were shells on the beach they decompose, and their materials are washed
away, after which the sand and shingle may resemble any other alluviums
scattered over the interior.

[Illustration: Fig. 92. Section of inland cliff at Abesse, near Dax.

  _a._ Sand of the Landes.
  _b._ Limestone.
  _c._ Clay.]

The features of an ancient shore may sometimes be concealed by the
growth of trees and shrubs, or by a covering of blown sand, a good
example of which occurs a few miles west from Dax, near Bordeaux, in the
south of France. About twelve miles inland, a steep bank may be traced
running in a direction nearly north-east and south-west, or parallel to
the contiguous coast. This sudden fall of about 50 feet conducts us from
the higher platform of the Landes to a lower plain which extends to the
sea. The outline of the ground suggested to me, as it would do to every
geologist, the opinion that the bank in question was once a sea-cliff,
when the whole country stood at a lower level. But this is no longer
matter of conjecture, for, in making excavations in 1830 for the
foundation of a building at Abesse, a quantity of loose sand, which
formed the slope _d e_, was removed; and a perpendicular cliff, about 50
feet in height, which had hitherto been protected from the agency of the
elements, was exposed. At the bottom appeared the limestone _b_,
containing tertiary shells and corals, immediately below it the clay
_c_, and above it the usual tertiary sand _a_, of the department of the
Landes. At the base of the precipice were seen large partially rounded
masses of rock, evidently detached from the stratum _b_. The face of the
limestone was hollowed out and weathered into such forms as are seen in
the calcareous cliffs of the adjoining coast, especially at Biaritz,
near Bayonne. It is evident that, when the country was at a somewhat
lower level, the sea advanced along the surface of the argillaceous
stratum _c_, which, from its yielding nature, favoured the waste by
allowing the more solid superincumbent stone _b_ to be readily
undermined. Afterwards, when the country had been elevated, part of the
sand, _a_, fell down, or was drifted by the winds, so as to form the
talus, _d e_, which masked the inland cliff until it was artificially
laid open to view.

When we are considering the various causes which, in the course of ages,
may efface the characters of an ancient sea-coast, earthquakes must not be
forgotten. During violent shocks, steep and overhanging cliffs are often
thrown down and become a heap of ruins. Sometimes unequal movements of
upheaval or depression entirely destroy that horizontality of the base-line
which constitutes the chief peculiarity of an ancient sea-cliff.

It is, however, in countries where hard limestone rocks abound, that inland
cliffs retain faithfully the characters which they acquired when they
constituted the boundary of land and sea. Thus, in the Morea, no less than
three, or even four, ranges of what were once sea-cliffs are well
preserved. These have been described, by MM. Boblaye and Virlet, as rising
one above the other at different distances from the actual shore, the
summit of the highest and oldest occasionally exceeding 1000 feet in
elevation. At the base of each there is usually a terrace, which is in some
places a few yards, in others above 300 yards wide, so that we are
conducted from the high land of the interior to the sea by a succession of
great steps. These inland cliffs are most perfect, and most exactly
resemble those now washed by the waves of the Mediterranean, where they are
formed of calcareous rock, especially if the rock be a hard crystalline
marble. The following are the points of correspondence observed between the
ancient coast lines and the borders of the present sea:--1. A range of
vertical precipices, with a terrace at their base. 2. A weathered state of
the surface of the naked rock, such as the spray of the sea produces. 3. A
line of littoral caverns at the foot of the cliffs. 4. A consolidated beach
or breccia with occasional marine shells, found at the base of the cliffs,
or in the caves. 5. Lithodomous perforations.

In regard to the first of these, it would be superfluous to dwell on the
evidence afforded of the undermining power of waves and currents by
perpendicular precipices. The littoral caves, also, will be familiar to
those who have had opportunities of observing the manner in which the waves
of the sea, when they beat against rocks, have power to scoop out caverns.
As to the breccia, it is composed of pieces of limestone and rolled
fragments of thick solid shell, such as _Strombus_ and _Spondylus_, all
bound together by a crystalline calcareous cement. Similar aggregations are
now forming on the modern beaches of Greece, and in caverns on the
sea-side; and they are only distinguishable in character from those of more
ancient date, by including many pieces of pottery. In regard to the
_lithodomi_ above alluded to, these bivalve mollusks are well known to have
the power of excavating holes in the hardest limestones, the size of the
cavity keeping pace with the growth of the shell. When living they require
to be always covered by salt water, but similar pear-shaped hollows,
containing the dead shells of these creatures, are found at different
heights on the face of the inland cliffs above mentioned. Thus, for
example, they have been observed near Modon and Navarino on cliffs in the
interior 125 feet high above the Mediterranean. As to the weathered surface
of the calcareous rocks, all limestones are known to suffer chemical
decomposition when moistened by the spray of the salt water, and are
corroded still more deeply at points lower down where they are just reached
by the breakers. By this action the stone acquires a wrinkled and furrowed
outline, and very near the sea it becomes rough and branching, as if
covered with corals. Such effects are traced not only on the present shore,
but at the base of the ancient cliffs far in the interior. Lastly, it
remains only to speak of the terraces, which extend with a gentle slope
from the base of almost all the inland cliffs, and are for the most part
narrow where the rock is hard, but sometimes half a mile or more in breadth
where it is soft. They are the effects of the encroachment of the ancient
sea upon the shore at those levels at which the land remained for a long
time stationary. The justness of this view is apparent on examining the
shape of the modern shore wherever the sea is advancing upon the land, and
removing annually small portions of undermined rock. By this agency a
submarine platform is produced on which we may walk for some distance from
the beach in shallow water, the increase of depth being very gradual, until
we reach a point where the bottom plunges down suddenly. This platform is
widened with more or less rapidity according to the hardness of the rocks,
and when upraised it constitutes an inland terrace.

But the four principal lines of cliff observed in the Morea do not imply,
as some have imagined, four great eras of sudden upheaval; they simply
indicate the intermittence of the upheaving force. Had the rise of the land
been continuous and uninterrupted, there would have been no one prominent
line of cliff; for every portion of the surface having been, in its turn,
and for an equal period of time, a sea-shore, would have presented a nearly
similar aspect. But if pauses occur in the process of upheaval, the waves
and currents have time to sap, throw down, and clear away considerable
masses of rock, and to shape out at certain levels lofty ranges of cliffs
with broad terraces at their base.

There are some levelled spaces, however, both ancient and modern, in the
Morea, which are not due to denudation, although resembling in outline
the terraces above described. They may be called Terraces of Deposition,
since they have resulted from the gain of land upon the sea where rivers
and torrents have produced deltas. If the sedimentary matter has filled
up a bay or gulf surrounded by steep mountains, a flat plain is formed
skirting the inland precipices; and if these deposits are upraised,
they form a feature in the landscape very similar to the areas of
denudation before described.

In the island of Sicily I have examined many inland cliffs like those of
the Morea; as, for example, near Palermo, where a precipice is seen
consisting of limestone at the base of which are numerous caves. One of
these called San Ciro, about 2 miles distant from Palermo, is about 20 feet
high, 10 wide, and 180 above the sea. Within it is found an ancient beach
(_b_, fig. 93.), formed of pebbles of various rocks, many of which must
have come from places far remote. Broken pieces of coral and shell,
especially of oysters and pectens, are seen intermingled with the pebbles.
Immediately above the level of this beach, _serpulæ_ are still found
adhering to the face of the rock, and the limestone is perforated by
_lithodomi_. Within the grotto, also, at the same level, similar
perforations occur; and so numerous are the holes, that the rock is
compared by Hoffmann to a target pierced by musket balls. But in order to
expose to view these marks of boring-shells in the interior of the cave, it
was necessary first to remove a mass of breccia, which consisted of
numerous fragments of rock and an immense quantity of bones of the mammoth,
hippopotamus, and other quadrupeds, imbedded in a dark brown calcareous
marl. Many of the bones were rolled as if partially subjected to the action
of the waves. Below this breccia, which is about 20 feet thick, was found a
bed of sand filled with sea-shells of recent species; and underneath the
sand, again, is the secondary limestone of Monte Grifone. The state of the
surface of the limestone in the cave above the level of the marine sand is
very different from that below it. _Above_, the rock is jagged and uneven,
as is usual in the roofs and sides of limestone caverns; _below_, the
surface is smooth and polished, as if by the attrition of the waves.

[Illustration: Fig. 93. Cross section.

  _a._ Monte Grifone.
  _b._ Cave of San Ciro.[75-A]
  _c._ Plain of Palermo, in which are Newer Pliocene strata of
       limestone and sand.
  _d._ Bay of Palermo.]

The platform indicated at _c_, fig. 93., is formed by a tertiary deposit
containing marine shells almost all of living species, and it affords an
illustration of the terrace of deposition, or the last of the two kinds
before mentioned (p. 74.).

There are also numerous instances in Sicily of terraces of denudation. One
of these occurs on the east coast to the north of Syracuse, and the same is
resumed to the south beyond the town of Noto, where it may be traced
forming a continuous and lofty precipice, _a b_, fig. 94., facing towards
the sea, and constituting the abrupt termination of a calcareous formation,
which extends in horizontal strata far inland. This precipice varies in
height from 500 to 700 feet, and between its base and the sea is an
inferior platform, _c b_, consisting of similar white limestone. All the
beds dip towards the sea, but are usually inclined at a very slight angle:
they are seen to extend uninterruptedly from the base of the escarpment
into the platform, showing distinctly that the lofty cliff was not produced
by a fault or vertical shift of the beds, but by the removal of a
considerable mass of rock. Hence we may conclude that the sea, which is now
undermining the cliffs of the Sicilian coast, reached at some former
period the base of the precipice _a b_, at which time the surface of the
terrace _c b_ must have been covered by the Mediterranean. There was a
pause, therefore, in the upward movement, when the waves of the sea had
time to carve out the platform _c b_; but there may have been many other
stationary periods of minor duration. Suppose, for example, that a series
of escarpments _e_, _f_, _g_, _h_, once existed, and that the sea, during a
long interval free from subterranean movements, advances along the line _c
b_, all preceding cliffs must have been swept away one after the other, and
reduced to the single precipice _a b_.

[Illustration: Fig. 94. Cross section.]

[Illustration: Fig. 95. Valley called Gozzo degli Martiri, below
Melilli, Val di Noto.]

That such a series of smaller cliffs, as those represented at _e_, _f_,
_g_, _h_, fig. 94., did really once exist at intermediate heights in place
of the single precipice _a b_, is rendered highly probable by the fact,
that in certain bays and inland valleys opening towards the east coast of
Sicily, and not far from the section given in fig. 94., the solid limestone
is shaped out into a great succession of ledges, separated from each other
by small vertical cliffs. These are sometimes so numerous, one above the
other, that where there is a bend at the head of a valley, they produce an
effect singularly resembling the seats of a Roman amphitheatre. A good
example of this configuration occurs near the town of Melilli, as seen in
the annexed view (fig. 95.). In the south of the island, near Spaccaforno,
Scicli, and Modica, precipitous rocks of white limestone, ascending to the
height of 500 feet, have been carved out into similar forms.

[Illustration: Fig. 96. Cross section.]

This appearance of a range of marble seats circling round the head of a
valley, or of great flights of steps descending from the top to the bottom,
on the opposite sides of a gorge, may be accounted for, as already hinted,
by supposing the sea to have stood successively at many different levels,
as at _a a_, _b b_, _c c_, in the accompanying fig. 96. But the causes of
the gradual contraction of the valley from above downwards may still be
matter of speculation. Such contraction may be due to the greater force
exerted by the waves when the land at its first emergence was smaller in
quantity, and more exposed to denudation in an open sea; whereas the wear
and tear of the rocks might diminish in proportion as this action became
confined within bays or channels closed in on two or three sides. Or,
secondly, the separate movements of elevation may have followed each other
more rapidly as the land continued to rise, so that the times of those
pauses, during which the greatest denudation was accomplished at certain
levels, were always growing shorter. It should be remarked, that the cliffs
and small terraces are rarely found on the opposite sides of the Sicilian
valleys at heights so precisely answering to each other as those given in
fig. 96., and this might have been expected, to whichever of the two
hypotheses above explained we incline; for, according to the direction of
the prevailing winds and currents, the waves may beat with unequal force on
different parts of the shore, so that while no impression is made on one
side of a bay, the sea may encroach so far on the other as to unite several
smaller cliffs into one.

Before quitting the subject of ancient sea-cliffs, carved out of
limestone, I shall mention the range of precipitous rocks, composed of a
white marble of the Oolitic period, which I have seen near the northern
gate of St. Mihiel in France. They are situated on the right bank of the
Meuse, at a distance of 200 miles from the nearest sea, and they present
on the precipice facing the river three or four horizontal grooves, one
above the other, precisely resembling those which are scooped out by the
undermining waves. The summits of several of these masses are detached
from the adjoining hill, in which case the grooves pass all round them,
facing towards all points of the compass, as if they had once formed
rocky islets near the shore.[78-A]

Captain Bayfield, in his survey of the Gulf of St. Lawrence, discovered in
several places, especially in the Mingan islands, a counterpart of the
inland cliffs of St. Mihiel, and traced a succession of shingle beaches,
one above the other, which agreed in their level with some of the principal
grooves scooped out of the limestone pillars. These beaches consisted of
calcareous shingle, with shells of recent species, the farthest from the
shore being 60 feet above the level of the highest tides. In addition to
the drawings of the pillars called the flower-pots, which he has
published[78-B], I have been favoured with other views of rocks on the same
coast, drawn by Lieut. A. Bowen, R. N. (See fig. 97.)

[Illustration: Fig. 97. Limestone columns in Niapisca Island, in the Gulf
of St. Lawrence. Height of the second column on the left, 60 feet.]

In the North-American beaches above mentioned rounded fragments of
limestone have been found perforated by _lithodomi_; and holes drilled
by the same mollusks have been detected in the columnar rocks or
"flower-pots," showing that there has been no great amount of
atmospheric decomposition on the surface, or the cavities alluded
to would have disappeared.

[Illustration: Fig. 98. The North Rocks, Bermuda, lying outside the
great coral reef. A. 16 feet high, and B. 12 feet. _c._ _c._ Hollows
worn by the sea.]

We have an opportunity of seeing in the Bermuda islands the manner in
which the waves of the Atlantic have worn, and are now wearing out, deep
smooth hollows on every side of projecting masses of hard limestone. In the
annexed drawing, communicated to me by Lieut. Nelson, the excavations _c_,
_c_, _c_, have been scooped out by the waves in a stone of very modern
date, which, although extremely hard, is full of recent corals and shells,
some of which retain their colour.

When the forms of these horizontal grooves, of which the surface is
sometimes smooth and almost polished, and the roofs of which often overhang
to the extent of 5 feet or more, have been carefully studied by geologists,
they will serve to testify the former action of the waves at innumerable
points far in the interior of the continents. But we must learn to
distinguish the indentations due to the original action of the sea, and
those caused by subsequent chemical decomposition of calcareous rocks, to
which they are liable in the atmosphere.

Notwithstanding the enduring nature of the marks left by littoral action on
calcareous rocks, we can by no means detect sea-beaches and inland cliffs
everywhere, even in Sicily and the Morea. On the contrary, they are, upon
the whole, extremely partial, and are often entirely wanting in districts
composed of argillaceous and sandy formations, which must, nevertheless,
have been upheaved at the same time, and by the same intermittent
movements, as the adjoining calcareous rocks.


FOOTNOTES:

[67-A] Western Islands, vol. ii. p. 93. pl. 31. fig. 4.

[69-A] See Mammat's Geological Facts, &c. p. 90. and plate.

[69-B] Conybeare's Report to Brit. Assoc. 1842, p. 381.

[70-A] Prestwich, Geol. Trans. second series, vol. v. pp. 452. 473.

[75-A] Section given by Dr. Christie, Edin. New Phil. Journ. No.
xxiii., called by mistake the Cave of Mardolce, by the late M. Hoffmann.
See account by Mr. S. P. Pratt, F. G. S. Proceedings of Geol. Soc.
No. 32. 1833.

[78-A] I was directed by M. Deshayes to this spot, which I visited
in June, 1833.

[78-B] See Trans. of Geol. Soc., second series, vol. v. plate v.



CHAPTER VII.

ALLUVIUM.

   Alluvium described--Due to complicated causes--Of various ages, as
   shown in Auvergne--How distinguished from rocks in
   situ--River-terraces--Parallel roads of Glen Roy--Various theories
   respecting their origin.


Between the superficial covering of vegetable mould and the subjacent rock
there usually intervenes in every district a deposit of loose gravel, sand,
and mud, to which the name of alluvium has been applied. The term is
derived from _alluvio_, an inundation, or _alluo_, to wash, because the
pebbles and sand commonly resemble those of a river's bed or the mud and
gravel spread over low lands by a flood.

A partial covering of such alluvium is found alike in all climates, from
the equatorial to the polar regions; but in the higher latitudes of Europe
and North America it assumes a distinct character, being very frequently
devoid of stratification, and containing huge fragments of rock, some
angular and others rounded, which have been transported to great distances
from their parent mountains. When it presents itself in this form, it has
been called "diluvium," "drift," or the "boulder formation;" and its
probable connexion with the agency of floating ice and glaciers will be
treated of more particularly in the eleventh and twelfth chapters.

[Illustration: Fig. 99. Lavas of Auvergne resting on alluviums of
different ages.]

The student will be prepared, by what I have said in the last chapter on
denudation, to hear that loose gravel and sand are often met with, not
only on the low grounds bordering rivers, but also at various points on
the sides or even summits of mountains. For, in the course of those
changes in physical geography which may take place during the gradual
emergence of the bottom of the sea and its conversion into dry land, any
spot may either have been a sunken reef, or a bay, or estuary, or
sea-shore, or the bed of a river. For this reason it would be
unreasonable to hope that we should ever be able to account for all the
alluvial phenomena of each particular country, seeing that the causes of
their origin are so complicated. Moreover, the last operations of water
have a tendency to disturb and confound together all pre-existing
alluviums. Hence we are always in danger of regarding as the work of a
single era, and the effect of one cause, what has in reality been the
result of a variety of distinct agents, during a long succession of
geological epochs. Much useful instruction may therefore be gained from
the exploration of a country like Auvergne, where the superficial gravel
of very different eras happens to have been preserved by sheets of lava,
which were poured out one after the other at periods when the
denudation, and probably the upheaval, of rocks were in progress. That
region had already acquired in some degree its present configuration
before any volcanos were in activity, and before any igneous matter was
superimposed upon the granitic and fossiliferous formations. The pebbles
therefore in the older gravels are exclusively constituted of granite
and other aboriginal rocks; and afterwards, when volcanic vents burst
forth into eruption, those earlier alluviums were covered by streams of
lava, which protected them from intermixture with gravel of subsequent
date. In the course of ages, a new system of valleys was excavated, so
that the rivers ran at lower levels than those at which the first
alluviums and sheets of lava were formed. When, therefore, fresh
eruptions gave rise to new lava, the melted matter was poured out over
lower grounds; and the gravel of these plains differed from the first
or upland alluvium, by containing in it rounded fragments of various
volcanic rocks, and often bones belonging to distinct groups of land
animals which flourished in the country in succession.

The annexed drawing will explain the different heights at which beds of
lava and gravel, each distinct from the other in composition and age, are
observed, some on the flat tops of hills, 700 or 800 feet high, others on
the slope of the same hills, and the newest of all in the channel of the
existing river where there is usually gravel alone, but in some cases a
narrow stripe of solid lava sharing the bottom of the valley with the
river. In all these accumulations of transported matter of different ages
the bones of extinct quadrupeds have been found belonging to assemblages of
land mammalia which flourished in the country in succession, and which vary
specifically, the one from the other, in a greater or less degree, in
proportion as the time which separated their entombment has been more or
less protracted. The streams in the same district are still undermining
their banks and grinding down into pebbles or sand, columns of basalt and
fragments of granite and gneiss; but the older alluviums, with the fossil
remains belonging to them, are prevented from being mingled with the gravel
of recent date by the cappings of lava before mentioned. But for the
accidental interference, therefore, of this peculiar cause, all the
alluviums might have passed so insensibly the one into the other, that
those formed at the remotest era might have appeared of the same date as
the newest, and the whole formation might have been regarded by some
geologists as the result of one sudden and violent catastrophe.

In almost every country, the alluvium consists in its upper part of
transported materials, but it often passes downwards into a mass of
broken and angular fragments derived from the subjacent rock. To this
mass the provincial name of "rubble," or "brash," is given in many
parts of England. It may be referred to the weathering or disintegration
of stone on the spot, the effects of air and water, sun and frost,
and chemical decomposition.

[Illustration: Fig. 100. Cross section.

  _a._ Vegetable soil.
  _b._ Alluvium.
  _c._ Mass of same, apparently detached.]

The inferior surface of alluvial deposits is often very irregular,
conforming to all the inequalities of the fundamental rocks (fig. 100.).
Occasionally, a small mass, as at _c_, appears detached, and as if included
in the subjacent formation. Such isolated portions are usually sections of
winding subterranean hollows filled up with alluvium. They may have been
the courses of springs or subterranean streamlets, which have flowed
through and enlarged natural rents; or, when on a small scale and in soft
strata, they may be spaces which the roots of large trees have once
occupied, gravel and sand having been introduced after their decay.

[Illustration: Fig. 101. Sand-pipes in the chalk at Eaton, near Norwich.]

But there are other deep hollows of a cylindrical form found in England,
France, and elsewhere, penetrating the white chalk, and filled with sand
and gravel, which are not so readily explained. They are sometimes called
"sand-pipes," or "sand-galls," and "puits naturels," in France. Those
represented in the annexed cut were observed by me in 1839, laid open in a
large chalk-pit near Norwich. They were of very symmetrical form, the
largest more than 12 feet in diameter, and some of them had been traced, by
boring, to the depth of more than 60 feet. The smaller ones varied from a
few inches to a foot in diameter, and seldom descended more than 12 feet
below the surface. Even where three of them occurred, as at _a_, fig. 101.,
very close together, the parting walls of soft white chalk were not broken
through. They all taper downwards and end in a point. As a general rule,
sand and pebbles occupy the central parts of each pipe, while the sides and
bottom are lined with clay.

Mr. Trimmer, in speaking of appearances of the same kind in the Kentish
chalk, attributes the origin of such "sand-galls" to the action of the sea
on a beach or shoal, where the waves, charged with shingle and sand, not
only wear out longitudinal furrows, such as may be observed on the surface
of the chalk near Norwich when the incumbent gravel is removed, but also
drill deep circular hollows by the rotatory motion imparted to sand and
pebbles. Such furrows, as well as vertical cavities, are now formed, he
observes, on the coast where the shores are composed of chalk.[82-A]

That the commencement of many of the tubular cavities now under
consideration has been due to the cause here assigned, I have little doubt.
But such mechanical action could not have hollowed out the whole of the
sand-pipes _c_ and _d_, fig. 101., because several large chalk-flints seen
protruding from the walls of the pipes have not been eroded, while sand and
gravel have penetrated many feet below them. In other cases, as at _b b_,
similar unrounded nodules of flint, still preserving their irregular form
and white coating, are found at various depths in the midst of the loose
materials filling the pipe. These have evidently been detached from regular
layers of flints occurring above. It is also to be remarked that the course
of the same sand-pipe, _b b_, is traceable above the level of the chalk for
some distance upwards, through the incumbent gravel and sand, by the
obliteration of all signs of stratification. Occasionally, also, as in the
pipe _d_, the overlying beds of gravel bend downwards into the mouth of the
pipe, so as to become in part vertical, as would happen if horizontal
layers had sunk gradually in consequence of a failure of support. All these
phenomena may be accounted for by attributing the enlargement and deepening
of the sand-pipes to the chemical action of water charged with carbonic
acid, derived from the vegetable soil and the decaying roots of trees. Such
acid might corrode the chalk, and deepen indefinitely any previously
existing hollow, but could not dissolve the flints. The water, after it had
become saturated with carbonate of lime, might freely percolate the
surrounding porous walls of chalk, and escape through them and from the
bottom of the tube, so as to carry away in the course of time large masses
of dissolved calcareous rock[83-A], and leave behind it on the edges of
each tubular hollow a coating of fine clay, which the white chalk contains.

I have seen tubes precisely similar and from 1 to 5 feet in diameter
traversing vertically the upper half of the soft calcareous building
stone, or chalk without flints, constituting St. Peter's Mount,
Maestricht. These hollows are filled with pebbles and clay, derived from
overlying beds of gravel, and all terminate downwards like those of
Norfolk. I was informed that, 6 miles from Maestricht, one of these
pipes, 2 feet in diameter, was traced downwards to a bed of flattened
flints, forming an almost continuous layer in the chalk. Here it
terminated abruptly, but a few small root-like prolongations of it were
detected immediately below, probably where the dissolving substance had
penetrated at some points through openings in the siliceous mass.

It is not so easy as may at first appear to draw a clear line of
distinction between the _fixed_ rocks, or regular strata (rocks _in
situ_ or _in place_), and _alluvium_. If the bed of a torrent or river
be dried up, we call the gravel, sand, and mud left in their channels,
or whatever, during floods, they may have scattered over the
neighbouring plains, alluvium. The very same materials carried into a
lake, where they become sorted by water and arranged in more distinct
layers, especially if they inclose the remains of plants, shells, or
other fossils, are termed regular strata.

In like manner we may sometimes compare the gravel, sand, and broken
shells, strewed along the path of a rapid marine current, with a deposit
formed contemporaneously by the discharge of similar materials, year after
year, into a deeper and more tranquil part of the sea. In such cases, when
we detect marine shells or other organic remains entombed in the strata,
which enable us to determine their age and mode of origin, we regard them
as part of the regular series of fossiliferous formations, whereas, if
there are no fossils, we have frequently no power of separating them from
the general mass of superficial alluvium.

The usual rarity of organic remains in beds of loose gravel and sand is
partly owing to the rapid and turbid water in which they were formed having
been in a condition unfavourable to the habitation of aquatic beings, and
partly to their porous nature, which, by allowing the free percolation of
rain-water, has promoted the decomposition and removal of organic matter.

It has long been a matter of common observation that most rivers are now
cutting their channels through alluvial deposits of greater depth and
extent than could ever have been formed by the present streams. From this
fact a rash inference has sometimes been drawn, that rivers in general have
grown smaller, or become less liable to be flooded than formerly. But such
phenomena would be a natural result of any considerable oscillations in the
level of the land experienced since the existing valleys originated.

Suppose part of a continent, comprising within it a large hydrographical
basin like that of the Mississippi, to subside several inches or feet in
a century, as the west coast of Greenland, extending 600 miles north and
south, has been sinking for three or four centuries, between the
latitudes 60° and 69° N.[84-A] There might be no encroachment of the sea
at the river's mouth in consequence of this change of level, but the
fall of the waters flowing from the interior being lessened, the main
river and its tributaries would have less power to carry down to its
delta, and to discharge into the ocean, the sedimentary matter with
which they are annually loaded. They would all begin to raise their
channels and alluvial plains by depositing in them the heavier sand and
pebbles washed down from the upland country, and this operation would
take place most effectively if the amount of subsidence in the interior
was unequal, and especially if, on the whole, it exceeded that of the
region near the sea. If then the same area of land be again upheaved to
its former height, the fall, and consequently the velocity, of every
river would begin to augment. Each of them would be less given to
overflow its alluvial plain; and their power of carrying earthy matter
seaward, and of scouring out and deepening their channels, would
continue till, after a lapse of many thousand years, each of them would
have eroded a new channel or valley through a fluviatile formation of
modern date. The surface of what was once the river-plain at the period
of greatest depression, would remain fringing the valley sides in the
form of a terrace apparently flat, but in reality sloping down with the
general inclination of the river. Everywhere this terrace would present
cliffs of gravel and sand, facing the river. That such a series of
movements has actually taken place in the main valley of the Mississippi
and in its tributary valleys during oscillations of level, I have
endeavoured to show in my description of that country[85-A]; and the
freshwater shells of existing species and bones of land quadrupeds,
partly of extinct races preserved in the terraces of fluviatile origin,
attest the exclusion of the sea during the whole process of filling up
and partial re-excavation.

In many cases, the alluvium in which rivers are now cutting their channels,
originated when the land first rose out of the sea. If, for example, the
emergence was caused by a gradual and uniform motion, every bay and
estuary, or the straits between islands, would dry up slowly, and during
their conversion into valleys, every part of the upheaved area would in its
turn be a sea-shore, and might be strewed over with littoral sand and
pebbles, or each spot might be the point where a delta accumulated during
the retreat and exclusion of the sea. Materials so accumulated would
conform to the general slope of a valley from its head to the sea-coast.

_River terraces._--We often observe at a short distance from the present
bed of a river a steep cliff a few feet or yards high, and on a level with
the top of it a flat terrace corresponding in appearance to the alluvial
plain which immediately borders the river. This terrace is again bounded by
another cliff, above which a second terrace sometimes occurs: and in this
manner two or three ranges of cliffs and terraces are occasionally seen on
one or both sides of the stream, the number varying, but those on the
opposite sides often corresponding in height.

[Illustration: Fig. 102. River Terraces and Parallel Roads.]

These terraces are seldom continuous for great distances, and their
surface slopes downwards, with an inclination similar to that of the
river. They are readily explained if we adopt the hypothesis before
suggested, of a gradual rise of the land; especially if, while rivers
are shaping out their beds, the upheaving movement be intermittent, so
that long pauses shall occur, during which the stream will have time to
encroach upon one of its banks, so as to clear away and flatten a large
space. This operation being afterwards repeated at lower levels, there
will be several successive cliffs and terraces.

_Parallel roads._--The parallel shelves, or roads, as they have been
called, of Lochaber or Glen Roy and other contiguous valleys in Scotland,
are distinct both in character and origin from the terraces above
described; for they have no slope towards the sea like the channel of a
river, nor are they the effect of denudation. Glen Roy is situated in the
western Highlands, about ten miles north of Fort William, near the western
end of the great glen of Scotland, or Caledonian Canal, and near the foot
of the highest of the Grampians, Ben Nevis. Throughout its whole length, a
distance of more than ten miles, two, and in its lower part three, parallel
roads or shelves are traced along the steep sides of the mountains, as
represented in the annexed figure, fig. 102., each maintaining a perfect
horizontality, and continuing at exactly the same level on the opposite
sides of the glen. Seen at a distance, they appear like ledges or roads,
cut artificially out of the sides of the hills; but when we are upon them
we can scarcely recognize their existence, so uneven is their surface, and
so covered with boulders. They are from 10 to 60 feet broad, and merely
differ from the side of the mountain by being somewhat less steep.

On closer inspection, we find that these terraces are stratified in the
ordinary manner of alluvial or littoral deposits, as may be seen at those
points where ravines have been excavated by torrents. The parallel shelves,
therefore, have not been caused by denudation, but by the deposition of
detritus, precisely similar to that which is dispersed in smaller
quantities over the declivities of the hills above. These hills consist of
clay-slate, mica-schist, and granite, which rocks have been worn away and
laid bare at a few points only, in a line just above the parallel roads.
The highest of these roads is about 1250 feet above the level of the sea,
the next about 200 feet lower than the uppermost, and the third still lower
by about 50 feet. It is only this last, or the lowest of the three, which
is continued throughout Glen Spean, a large valley with which Glen Roy
unites. As the shelves are always at the same height above the sea, they
become continually more elevated above the river in proportion as we
descend each valley; and they at length terminate very abruptly, without
any obvious cause, either in the shape of the ground, or any change in the
composition or hardness of the rocks. I should exceed the limits of this
work, were I to attempt to give a full description of all the geographical
circumstances attending these singular terraces, or to discuss the
ingenious theories which have been severally proposed to account for them
by Dr. MacCulloch, Sir T. D. Lauder, and Messrs. Darwin, Agassiz, Milne,
and Chambers. There is one point, however, on which all are agreed, namely,
that these shelves are ancient beaches, or littoral formations accumulated
round the edges of one or more sheets of water which once stood at the
level, first of the highest shelf, and successively at the height of the
two others. It is well known, that wherever a lake or marine fiord exists
surrounded by steep mountains subject to disintegration by frost or the
action of torrents, some loose matter is washed down annually, especially
during the melting of snow, and a check is given to the descent of this
detritus at the point where it reaches the waters of the lake. The waves
then spread out the materials along the shore, and throw some of them upon
the beach; their dispersing power being aided by the ice, which often
adheres to pebbles during the winter months, and gives buoyancy to them.
The annexed diagram illustrates the manner in which Dr. MacCulloch and Mr.
Darwin suppose "the roads" to constitute mere indentations in a superficial
alluvial coating which rests upon the hillside, and consists chiefly of
clay and sharp unrounded stones.

[Illustration: Fig. 103. Cross section.

A B. Supposed original surface of rock.

C D. Roads or shelves in the outer alluvial covering of the hill.]

Among other proofs that the parallel roads have really been formed along
the margin of a sheet of water, it may be mentioned, that wherever an
isolated hill rises in the middle of the glen above the level of any
particular shelf, a corresponding shelf is seen at the same level passing
round the hill, as would have happened if it had once formed an island in a
lake or fiord. Another very remarkable peculiarity in these terraces is
this; each of them comes in some portion of its course to a _col_, or
passage between the heads of glens, the explanation of which will be
considered in the sequel.

Those writers who first advocated the doctrine that the roads were the
ancient beaches of freshwater lakes, were unable to offer any probable
hypothesis respecting the formation and subsequent removal of barriers of
sufficient height and solidity to dam up the water. To introduce any
violent convulsion for their removal was inconsistent with the
uninterrupted horizontality of the roads, and with the undisturbed aspect
of those parts of the glens where the shelves come suddenly to an end. Mr.
Agassiz and Dr. Buckland, desirous, like the defenders of the lake theory,
to account for the limitation of the shelves to certain glens, and their
absence in contiguous glens, where the rocks are of the same composition,
and the slope and inclination of the ground very similar, started the
conjecture that these valleys were once blocked up by enormous glaciers
descending from Ben Nevis, giving rise to what are called in Switzerland
and in the Tyrol, glacier-lakes. After a time the icy barrier was broken
down, or melted, first, to the level of the second, and afterwards to that
of the third road or shelf.

In corroboration of this view, they contended that the alluvium of Glen
Roy, as well as of other parts of Scotland, agrees in character with the
moraines of glaciers seen in the Alpine valleys of Switzerland. Allusion
will be made in the eleventh chapter to the former existence of glaciers in
the Grampians: in the mean time it will readily be conceded that this
hypothesis is preferable to any previous lacustrine theory, by accounting
more easily for the temporary existence and entire disappearance of lofty
transverse barriers, although the height required for the imaginary dams
of ice may be startling.

Before the idea last alluded to had been entertained, Mr. Darwin examined
Glen Roy, and came to the opinion that the shelves were formed when the
glens were still arms of the sea, and, consequently, that there never were
any barriers. According to him, the land emerged during a slow and uniform
upward movement, like that now experienced throughout a large part of
Sweden and Finland; but there were certain pauses in the upheaving process,
at which times the waters of the sea remained stationary for so many
centuries as to allow of the accumulation of an extraordinary quantity of
detrital matter, and the excavation, at points immediately above, of many
deep notches and bare cliffs in the hard and solid rock.

The phenomena which are most difficult to reconcile with this theory
are, first, the abrupt cessation of the roads at certain points in the
different glens; secondly, their unequal number in different valleys
connecting with each other, there being three, for example, in Glen Roy
and only one in Glen Spean; thirdly, the precise horizontality of level
maintained by the same shelf over a space many leagues in length
requiring us to assume, that during a rise of 1250 feet no one portion
of the land was raised even a few yards above another; fourthly, the
coincidence of level already alluded to of each shelf with a _col_, or
the point forming the head of two glens, from which the rain-waters flow
in opposite directions. This last-mentioned feature in the physical
geography of Lochaber seems to have been explained in a satisfactory
manner by Mr. Darwin. He calls these _cols_ "landstraits," and regards
them as having been anciently sounds or channels between islands. He
points out that there is a tendency in such sounds to be silted up, and
always the more so in proportion to their narrowness. In a chart of the
Falkland Islands by Capt. Sullivan, R.N., it appears that there are
several examples there of straits where the soundings diminish regularly
towards the narrowest part. One is so nearly dry that it can be walked
over at low water, and another, no longer covered by the sea, is
supposed to have recently dried up in consequence of a small shift in
the relative level of sea and land. "Similar straits," observes Mr.
Chambers, "hovering, in character, between sea and land, and which may
be called fords, are met with in the Hebrides. Such, for example, is the
passage dividing the islands of Lewis and Harris, and that between North
Uist and Benbecula, both of which would undoubtedly appear as _cols_,
coinciding with a terrace or raised beach, all round the islands, if the
sea were to subside."[88-A]

The precise horizontality of level maintained by the roads or shelves of
Lochaber over an area many leagues in length and breadth, is a
difficulty common in some degree to all the rival hypotheses, whether of
lakes, or glaciers, or of the simple upheaval of the land above the sea.
For we cannot suppose the roads to be more ancient than the glacial
period, or the era of the boulder formation of Scotland, of which I
shall speak in the eleventh and twelfth chapters. Strata of that era of
marine origin containing northern shells of existing species have been
found at various heights in Scotland, some on the east, and others on
the west coast, from 20 to 400 feet high; and in one region in
Lanarkshire not less than 524 feet above high-water mark. It seems,
therefore, in the highest degree improbable that Glen Roy should have
escaped entirely the upward movement experienced in so many surrounding
regions,--a movement implied by the position of these marine deposits,
in which the shells are almost all of known recent species. But if the
motion has really extended to Glen Roy and the contiguous glens, it must
have uplifted them bodily, without in the slightest degree affecting
their horizontality; and this being admitted, the principal objection to
the theory of marine beaches, founded on the uniformity of upheaval, is
removed, or is at least common to every theory hitherto proposed.

To assume that the ocean has gone down from the level of the uppermost
shelf, or 1250 feet, simultaneously all over the globe, while the land
remained unmoved, is a view which will find favour with very few
geologists, for the reasons explained in the fifth chapter.

The student will perceive, from the above sketch of the controversy
respecting the formation of these curious shelves, that this problem, like
many others in geology, is as yet only solved in part; and that a larger
number of facts must be collected and reasoned upon before the question
can be finally settled.


FOOTNOTES:

[82-A] Trimmer, Proceedings of Geol. Soc. vol. iv. p. 7. 1842.

[83-A] See Lyell on Sand-pipes, &c., Phil. Mag., third series, vol.
xv. p. 257., Oct. 1839.

[84-A] Principles of Geology, 7th ed. p. 506., 8th ed. 509.

[85-A] Second Visit to the U. S. vol. ii. chap. 34.

[88-A] "Ancient Sea Margins," p. 114., by R. Chambers.



CHAPTER VIII.

CHRONOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROCKS.

   Aqueous, plutonic, volcanic, and metamorphic rocks, considered
   chronologically--Lehman's division into primitive and
   secondary--Werner's addition of a transition class--Neptunian
   theory--Hutton on igneous origin of granite--How the name of primary
   was still retained for granite--The term "transition," why faulty--The
   adherence to the old chronological nomenclature retarded the progress
   of geology--New hypothesis invented to reconcile the igneous origin of
   granite to the notion of its high antiquity--Explanation of the
   chronological nomenclature adopted in this work, so far as regards
   primary, secondary, and tertiary periods.


In the first chapter it was stated that the four great classes of rocks,
the aqueous, the volcanic, the plutonic, and the metamorphic, would each
be considered not only in reference to their mineral characters, and
mode of origin, but also to their relative age. The preservation of the
shelves may have required, says Darwin, the quick growth of green turf
on a good soil; their abrupt cessation may mark the place where the soil
was barren, and when a green sward formed slowly. In regard to the
aqueous rocks, we have already seen that they are stratified, that some
are calcareous, others argillaceous or siliceous, some made up of sand,
others of pebbles; that some contain freshwater, others marine fossils,
and so forth; but the student has still to learn which rocks, exhibiting
some or all of these characters, have originated at one period of the
earth's history, and which at another.

To determine this point in reference to the fossiliferous formations is
more easy than in any other class, and it is therefore the most
convenient and natural method to begin by establishing a chronology for
these fossiliferous strata, and then to endeavour to refer to the same
divisions, the several groups of plutonic, volcanic, and metamorphic
rocks. This system of classification is not only recommended by its
greater clearness and facility of application, but is also best fitted
to strike the imagination by bringing into one view the past changes of
the inorganic world, and the contemporaneous revolutions of the organic
creation. For the sedimentary formations of successive periods are most
readily distinguished by the different species of fossil animals and
plants which they inclose, and of which one race after another has
flourished and then disappeared from the earth.

But before entering specially on the subdivisions of the aqueous rocks
arranged according to the order of time, it will be desirable to say a few
words on the chronology of rocks in general, although in doing so we shall
be unavoidably led to allude to some classes of phenomena which the
beginner must not yet expect fully to comprehend.

It was for many years a received opinion, that the formation of entire
families of rocks, such as the plutonic and those crystalline schists
spoken of in the first chapter as metamorphic, began and ended before any
members of the aqueous and volcanic orders were produced; and although this
idea has long been modified, and is nearly exploded, it will be necessary
to give some account of the ancient doctrine, in order that beginners may
understand whence many prevailing opinions, and some part of the
nomenclature of geology, still partially in use, was derived.

About the middle of the last century, Lehman, a German miner, proposed to
divide rocks into three classes, the first and oldest to be called
primitive, comprising the hypogene, or plutonic and metamorphic rocks; the
next to be termed secondary, comprehending the aqueous or fossiliferous
strata; and the remainder, or third class, corresponding to our alluvium,
ancient and modern, which he referred to "local floods, and the deluge of
Noah." In the primitive class, he said, such as granite and gneiss, there
are no organic remains, nor any signs of materials derived from the ruins
of pre-existing rocks. Their origin, therefore, may have been purely
chemical, antecedent to the creation of living beings, and probably coeval
with the birth of the world itself. The secondary formations, on the
contrary, which often contain sand, pebbles, and organic remains, must have
been mechanical deposits, produced after the planet had become the
habitation of animals and plants. This bold generalization, although
anticipated in some measure by Steno, a century before, in Italy, formed at
the time an important step in the progress of geology, and sketched out
correctly some of the leading divisions into which rocks may be separated.
About half a century later, Werner, so justly celebrated for his improved
methods of discriminating the mineralogical characters of rocks, attempted
to improve Lehman's classification, and with this view intercalated a
class, called by him "the transition formations," between the primitive and
secondary. Between these last he had discovered, in northern Germany, a
series of strata, which in their mineral peculiarities were of an
intermediate character, partaking in some degree of the crystalline nature
of micaceous schist and clay-slate, and yet exhibiting here and there signs
of a mechanical origin and organic remains. For this group, therefore,
forming a passage between Lehman's primitive and secondary rocks, the name
of _übergang_ or transition was proposed. They consisted principally of
clay-slate and an argillaceous sandstone, called grauwacke, and partly of
calcareous beds. It happened in the district which Werner first
investigated, that both the primitive and transition strata were highly
inclined, while the beds of the newer fossiliferous rocks, the secondary of
Lehman, were horizontal. To these latter, therefore, he gave the name
_flötz_, or "a level floor;" and every deposit more modern than the chalk,
which was classed as the uppermost of the flötz series, was designated "the
overflowed land," an expression which may be regarded as equivalent to
alluvium, although under this appellation were confounded all the strata
afterwards called tertiary, of which Werner had scarcely any knowledge. As
the followers of Werner soon discovered that the inclined position of the
"transition beds," and the horizontality of the flötz, or newer
fossiliferous strata, were mere local accidents, they soon abandoned the
term flötz; and the four divisions of the Wernerian school were then named
primitive, transition, secondary, and alluvial.

As to the trappean rocks, although their igneous origin had been already
demonstrated by Arduino, Fortis, Faujas, and others, and especially by
Desmarest, they were all regarded by Werner as aqueous, and as mere
subordinate members of the secondary series.[91-A]

This theory of Werner's was called the "Neptunian," and for many years
enjoyed much popularity. It assumed that the globe had been at first
invested by an universal chaotic ocean, holding the materials of all rocks
in solution. From the waters of this ocean, granite, gneiss, and other
crystalline formations, were first precipitated; and afterwards, when the
waters were purged of these ingredients, and more nearly resembled those of
our actual seas, the transition strata were deposited. These were of a
mixed character, not purely chemical, because the waves and currents had
already begun to wear down solid land, and to give rise to pebbles, sand,
and mud; nor entirely without fossils, because a few of the first marine
animals had begun to exist. After this period, the secondary formations
were accumulated in waters resembling those of the present ocean, except at
certain intervals, when, from causes wholly unexplained, a partial
recurrence of the "chaotic fluid" took place, during which various trap
rocks, some highly crystalline, were formed. This arbitrary hypothesis
rejected all intervention of igneous agency, volcanos being regarded as
modern, partial, and superficial accidents, of trifling account among the
great causes which have modified the external structure of the globe.

Meanwhile Hutton, a contemporary of Werner, began to teach, in Scotland,
that granite as well as trap was of igneous origin, and had at various
periods intruded itself in a fluid state into different parts of the
earth's crust. He recognized and faithfully described many of the
phenomena of granitic veins, and the alterations produced by them on the
invaded strata, which will be treated of in the thirty-second chapter.
He, moreover, advanced the opinion, that the crystalline strata called
primitive had not been precipitated from a primæval ocean, but were
sedimentary strata altered by heat. In his writings, therefore, and in
those of his illustrator, Playfair, we find the germ of that metamorphic
theory which has been already hinted at in the first chapter, and
which will be more fully expounded in the thirty-fourth and
thirty-fifth chapters.

At length, after much controversy, the doctrine of the igneous origin of
trap and granite made its way into general favour; but although it was, in
consequence, admitted that both granite and trap had been produced at many
successive periods, the term primitive or primary still continued to be
applied to the crystalline formations in general, whether stratified, like
gneiss, or unstratified, like granite. The pupil was told that granite was
a primary rock, but that some granites were newer than certain secondary
formations; and in conformity with the spirit of the ancient language, to
which the teacher was still determined to adhere, a desire was naturally
engendered of extenuating the importance of those more modern granites, the
true dates of which new observations were continually bringing to light.

A no less decided inclination was shown to persist in the use of the
term "transition," after it had been proved to be almost as faulty in
its original application as that of flötz. The name of transition, as
already stated, was first given by Werner, to designate a mineral
character, intermediate between the highly crystalline or metamorphic
state and that of an ordinary fossiliferous rock. But the term acquired
also from the first a chronological import, because it had been
appropriated to sedimentary formations, which, in the Hartz and other
parts of Germany, were more ancient than the oldest of the secondary
series, and were characterized by peculiar fossil zoophytes and shells.
When, therefore, geologists found in other districts stratified rocks
occupying the same position, and inclosing similar fossils, they gave to
them also the name of _transition_, according to rules which will be
explained in the next chapter; yet, in many cases, such rocks were found
not to exhibit the same mineral texture which Werner had called
transition. On the contrary, many of them were not more crystalline than
different members of the secondary class; while, on the other hand,
these last were sometimes found to assume a semi-crystalline and almost
metamorphic aspect, and thus, on lithological grounds, to deserve
equally the name of transition. So remarkably was this the case in the
Swiss Alps, that certain rocks, which had for years been regarded by
some of the most skilful disciples of Werner to be transition, were at
last acknowledged, when their relative position and fossils were better
understood, to belong to the newest of the secondary groups; nay, some
of them have actually been discovered to be members of the lower
tertiary series! If, under such circumstances, the name of transition
was retained, it is clear that it ought to have been applied without
reference to the age of strata, and simply as expressive of a mineral
peculiarity. The continued appropriation of the term to formations of a
given date, induced geologists to go on believing that the ancient
strata so designated bore a less resemblance to the secondary than is
really the case, and to imagine that these last never pass, as they
frequently do, into metamorphic rocks.

The poet Waller, when lamenting over the antiquated style of Chaucer,
complains that--

  We write in sand, our language grows,
  And, like the tide, our work o'erflows.

But the reverse is true in geology; for here it is our work which
continually outgrows the language. The tide of observation advances with
such speed that improvements in theory outrun the changes of nomenclature;
and the attempt to inculcate new truths by words invented to express a
different or opposite opinion, tends constantly, by the force of
association, to perpetuate error; so that dogmas renounced by the reason
still retain a strong hold upon the imagination.

In order to reconcile the old chronological views with the new doctrine of
the igneous origin of granite, the following hypothesis was substituted for
that of the Neptunists. Instead of beginning with an aqueous menstruum or
chaotic fluid, the materials of the present crust of the earth were
supposed to have been at first in a state of igneous fusion, until part of
the heat having been diffused into surrounding space, the surface of the
fluid consolidated, and formed a crust of granite. This covering of
crystalline stone, which afterwards grew thicker and thicker as it cooled,
was so hot, at first, that no water could exist upon it; but as the
refrigeration proceeded, the aqueous vapour in the atmosphere was
condensed, and, falling in rain, gave rise to the first _thermal ocean_. So
high was the temperature of this boiling sea, that no aquatic beings could
inhabit its waters, and its deposits were not only devoid of fossils, but,
like those of some hot springs, were highly crystalline. Hence the origin
of the primary or crystalline strata,--gneiss, mica-schist, and the rest.

Afterwards, when the granitic crust had been partially broken up, land
and mountains began to rise above the waters, and rains and torrents
ground down rock, so that sediment was spread over the bottom of the
seas. Yet the heat still remaining in the solid supporting substances
was sufficient to increase the chemical action exerted by the water,
although not so intense as to prevent the introduction and increase of
some living beings. During this state of things some of the residuary
mineral ingredients of the primæval ocean were precipitated, and formed
deposits (the transition strata of Werner), half chemical and half
mechanical, and containing a few fossils.

By this new theory, which was in part a revival of the doctrine of
Leibnitz, published in 1680, on the igneous origin of the planet, the old
ideas respecting the priority of all crystalline rocks to the creation of
organic beings, were still preserved; and the mistaken notion that all the
semi-crystalline and partially fossiliferous rocks belonged to one period,
while all the earthy and uncrystalline formations originated at a
subsequent epoch, was also perpetuated.

It may or may not be true, as the great Leibnitz imagined, that the whole
planet was once in a state of liquefaction by heat; but there are certainly
no geological proofs that the granite which constitutes the foundation of
so much of the earth's crust was ever at once in a state of universal
fusion. On the contrary, all our evidence tends to show that the formation
of granite, like the deposition of the stratified rocks, has been
successive, and that different portions of granite have been in a melted
state at distinct and often distant periods. One mass was solid, and had
been fractured, before another body of granitic matter was injected into
it, or through it, in the form of veins. Some granites are more ancient
than any known fossiliferous rocks; others are of secondary; and some, such
as that of Mont Blanc and part of the central axis of the Alps, of tertiary
origin. In short, the universal fluidity of the crystalline foundations of
the earth's crust, can only be understood in the same sense as the
universality of the ancient ocean. All the land has been under water, but
not all at one time; so all the subterranean unstratified rocks to which
man can obtain access have been melted, but not simultaneously.

In the present work the four great classes of rocks, the aqueous, plutonic,
volcanic, and metamorphic, will form four parallel, or nearly parallel,
columns in one chronological table. They will be considered as four sets of
monuments relating to four contemporaneous, or nearly contemporaneous,
series of events. I shall endeavour, in a subsequent chapter on the
plutonic rocks, to explain the manner in which certain masses belonging to
each of the four classes of rocks may have originated simultaneously at
every geological period, and how the earth's crust may have been
continually remodelled, above and below, by aqueous and igneous causes,
from times indefinitely remote. In the same manner as aqueous and
fossiliferous strata are now formed in certain seas or lakes, while in
other places volcanic rocks break out at the surface, and are connected
with reservoirs of melted matter at vast depths in the bowels of the
earth,--so, at every era of the past, fossiliferous deposits and
superficial igneous rocks were in progress contemporaneously with others of
subterranean and plutonic origin, and some sedimentary strata were exposed
to heat and made to assume a crystalline or metamorphic structure.

It can by no means be taken for granted, that during all these changes the
solid crust of the earth has been increasing in thickness. It has been
shown, that so far as aqueous action is concerned, the gain by fresh
deposits, and the loss by denudation, must at each period have been equal
(see above, p. 68.); and in like manner, in the inferior portion of the
earth's crust, the acquisition of new crystalline rocks, at each successive
era, may merely have counter-balanced the loss sustained by the melting of
materials previously consolidated. As to the relative antiquity of the
crystalline foundations of the earth's crust, when compared to the
fossiliferous and volcanic rocks which they support, I have already stated,
in the first chapter, that to pronounce an opinion on this matter is as
difficult as at once to decide which of the two, whether the foundations or
superstructure of an ancient city built on wooden piles, may be the oldest.
We have seen that, to answer this question, we must first be prepared to
say whether the work of decay and restoration had gone on most rapidly
above or below, whether the average duration of the piles has exceeded that
of the stone buildings, or the contrary. So also in regard to the relative
age of the superior and inferior portions of the earth's crust; we cannot
hazard even a conjecture on this point, until we know whether, upon an
average, the power of water above, or that of heat below, is most
efficacious in giving new forms to solid matter.

After the observations which have now been made, the reader will
perceive that the term primary must either be entirely renounced, or, if
retained, must be differently defined, and not made to designate a set
of crystalline rocks, some of which are already ascertained to be newer
than all the secondary formations. In this work I shall follow most
nearly the method proposed by Mr. Boué, who has called all
_fossiliferous_ rocks older than the secondary by the name of primary.
To prevent confusion, however, I shall always speak of these, when they
are of the aqueous class, as the _primary fossiliferous_ formations,
because the word primary has hitherto been almost inseparably connected
with the idea of a non-fossiliferous rock.

If we can prove any plutonic, volcanic, or metamorphic rocks to be older
than the secondary formations, such rocks will also be primary, according
to this system. Mr. Boué having with great propriety excluded the
metamorphic rocks, _as a class_, from the primary formations, proposed to
call them all "crystalline schists."

As there are secondary fossiliferous strata, so we shall find that there
are plutonic, volcanic, and metamorphic rocks of contemporaneous origin,
which I shall also term secondary.

In the next chapter it will be shown that the strata above the chalk have
been called tertiary. If, therefore, we discover any volcanic, plutonic, or
metamorphic rocks, which have originated since the deposition of the chalk,
these also will rank as tertiary formations.

It may perhaps be suggested that some metamorphic strata, and some
granites, may be anterior in date to the oldest of the primary
fossiliferous rocks. This opinion is doubtless true, and will be discussed
in future chapters; but I may here observe, that when we arrange the four
classes of rocks in four parallel columns in one table of chronology, it is
by no means assumed that these columns are all of equal length; one may
begin at an earlier period than the rest, and another may come down to a
later point of time. In the small part of the globe hitherto examined, it
is hardly to be expected that we should have discovered either the oldest
or the newest members of each of the four classes of rocks. Thus, if there
be primary, secondary, and tertiary rocks of the aqueous or fossiliferous
class, and in like manner primary, secondary, and tertiary hypogene
formations, we may not be yet acquainted with the most ancient of the
primary fossiliferous beds, or with the newest of the hypogene.


FOOTNOTES:

[91-A] See Principles, vol. i. chap. iv.



CHAPTER IX.

ON THE DIFFERENT AGES OF THE AQUEOUS ROCKS.

   On the three principal tests of relative age--superposition, mineral
   character, and fossils--Change of mineral character and fossils in the
   same continuous formation--Proofs that distinct species of animals and
   plants have lived at successive periods--Distinct provinces of
   indigenous species--Great extent of single provinces--Similar laws
   prevailed at successive geological periods--Relative importance of
   mineral and palæontological characters--Test of age by included
   fragments--Frequent absence of strata of intervening
   periods--Principal groups of strata in western Europe.


In the last chapter I spoke generally of the chronological relations of the
four great classes of rocks, and I shall now treat of the aqueous rocks in
particular, or of the successive periods at which the different
fossiliferous formations have been deposited.

There are three principal tests by which we determine the age of a given
set of strata; first, superposition; secondly, mineral character; and,
thirdly, organic remains. Some aid can occasionally be derived from a
fourth kind of proof, namely, the fact of one deposit including in it
fragments of a pre-existing rock, by which the relative ages of the two
may, even in the absence of all other evidence, be determined.

_Superposition._--The first and principal test of the age of one aqueous
deposit, as compared to another, is relative position. It has been already
stated, that where strata are horizontal, the bed which lies uppermost is
the newest of the whole, and that which lies at the bottom the most
ancient. So, of a series of sedimentary formations, they are like volumes
of history, in which each writer has recorded the annals of his own times,
and then laid down the book, with the last written page uppermost, upon the
volume in which the events of the era immediately preceding were
commemorated. In this manner a lofty pile of chronicles is at length
accumulated; and they are so arranged as to indicate, by their position
alone, the order in which the events recorded in them have occurred.

In regard to the crust of the earth, however, there are some regions where,
as the student has already been informed, the beds have been disturbed, and
sometimes extensively thrown over and turned upside down. (See pp. 58, 59.)
But an experienced geologist can rarely be deceived by these exceptional
cases. When he finds that the strata are fractured, curved, inclined, or
vertical, he knows that the original order of superposition must be
doubtful, and he then endeavours to find sections in some neighbouring
district where the strata are horizontal, or only slightly inclined. Here
the true order of sequence of the entire series of deposits being
ascertained, a key is furnished for settling the chronology of those strata
where the displacement is extreme.

_Mineral character._--The same rocks may often be observed to retain for
miles, or even hundreds of miles, the same mineral peculiarities, if we
follow the planes of stratification, or trace the beds, if they be
undisturbed, in a horizontal direction. But if we pursue them vertically,
or in any direction transverse to the planes of stratification, this
uniformity ceases almost immediately. In that case we can scarcely ever
penetrate a stratified mass for a few hundred yards without beholding a
succession of extremely dissimilar, calcareous, argillaceous, and siliceous
rocks. These phenomena lead to the conclusion, that rivers and currents
have dispersed the same sediment over wide areas at one period, but at
successive periods have been charged, in the same region, with very
different kinds of matter. The first observers were so astonished at the
vast spaces over which they were able to follow the same homogeneous rocks
in a horizontal direction, that they came hastily to the opinion, that the
whole globe had been environed by a succession of distinct aqueous
formations, disposed round the nucleus of the planet, like the concentric
coats of an onion. But although, in fact, some formations may be continuous
over districts as large as half of Europe, or even more, yet most of them
either terminate wholly within narrower limits, or soon change their
lithological character. Sometimes they thin out gradually, as if the supply
of sediment had failed in that direction, or they come abruptly to an end,
as if we had arrived at the borders of the ancient sea or lake which served
as their receptacle. It no less frequently happens that they vary in
mineral aspect and composition, as we pursue them horizontally. For
example, we trace a limestone for a hundred miles, until it becomes more
arenaceous, and finally passes into sand, or sandstone. We may then follow
this sandstone, already proved by its continuity to be of the same age,
throughout another district a hundred miles or more in length.

_Organic remains._--This character must be used as a criterion of the
age of a formation, or of the contemporaneous origin of two deposits
in distant places, under very much the same restrictions as the test
of mineral composition.

First, the same fossils may be traced over wide regions, if we examine
strata in the direction of their planes, although by no means for
indefinite distances.

Secondly, while the same fossils prevail in a particular set of strata for
hundreds of miles in a horizontal direction, we seldom meet with the same
remains for many fathoms, and very rarely for several hundred yards, in a
vertical line, or a line transverse to the strata. This fact has now been
verified in almost all parts of the globe, and has led to a conviction,
that at successive periods of the past, the same area of land and water has
been inhabited by species of animals and plants even more distinct than
those which now people the antipodes, or which now co-exist in the arctic,
temperate, and tropical zones. It appears, that from the remotest periods
there has been ever a coming in of new organic forms, and an extinction of
those which pre-existed on the earth; some species having endured for a
longer, others for a shorter, time; while none have ever reappeared after
once dying out. The law which has governed the creation and extinction of
species seems to be expressed in the verse of the poet,--

  Natura il fece, e poi ruppe la stampa.         ARIOSTO.
  Nature made him, and then broke the die.

And this circumstance it is, which confers on fossils their highest value
as chronological tests, giving to each of them, in the eyes of the
geologist, that authority which belongs to contemporary medals in history.

The same cannot be said of each peculiar variety of rock; for some of
these, as red marl and red sandstone, for example, may occur at once at the
top, bottom, and middle of the entire sedimentary series; exhibiting in
each position so perfect an identity of mineral aspect as to be
undistinguishable. Such exact repetitions, however, of the same mixtures of
sediment have not often been produced, at distant periods, in precisely the
same parts of the globe; and even where this has happened, we are seldom in
any danger of confounding together the monuments of remote eras, when we
have studied their imbedded fossils and relative position.

It was remarked that the same species of organic remains cannot be traced
horizontally, or in the direction of the planes of stratification for
indefinite distances. This might have been expected from analogy; for when
we inquire into the present distribution of living beings, we find that the
habitable surface of the sea and land may be divided into a considerable
number of distinct provinces, each peopled by a peculiar assemblage of
animals and plants. In the Principles of Geology, I have endeavoured to
point out the extent and probable origin of these separate divisions; and
it was shown that climate is only one of many causes on which they depend,
and that difference of longitude as well as latitude is generally
accompanied by a dissimilarity of indigenous species.

As different seas, therefore, and lakes are inhabited at the same period,
by different aquatic animals and plants, and as the lands adjoining these
may be peopled by distinct terrestrial species, it follows that distinct
fossils will be imbedded in contemporaneous deposits. If it were
otherwise--if the same species abounded in every climate, or in every part
of the globe where, so far as we can discover, a corresponding temperature
and other conditions favourable to their existence are found--the
identification of mineral masses of the same age, by means of their
included organic contents, would be a matter of still greater certainty.

Nevertheless, the extent of some single zoological provinces, especially
those of marine animals, is very great; and our geological researches have
proved that the same laws prevailed at remote periods; for the fossils are
often identical throughout wide spaces, and in a great number of detached
deposits, in which the mineral nature of the rocks is variable.

The doctrine here laid down will be more readily understood, if we
reflect on what is now going on in the Mediterranean. That entire sea
may be considered as one zoological province; for, although certain
species of testacea and zoophytes may be very local, and each region has
probably some species peculiar to it, still a considerable number are
common to the whole Mediterranean. If, therefore, at some future period,
the bed of this inland sea should be converted into land, the geologist
might be enabled, by reference to organic remains, to prove the
contemporaneous origin of various mineral masses scattered over a space
equal in area to the half of Europe.

Deposits, for example, are well known to be now in progress in this sea in
the deltas of the Po, Rhone, Nile, and other rivers, which differ as
greatly from each other in the nature of their sediment as does the
composition of the mountains which they drain. There are also other
quarters of the Mediterranean, as off the coast of Campania, or near the
base of Etna, in Sicily, or in the Grecian Archipelago, where another class
of rocks is now forming; where showers of volcanic ashes occasionally fall
into the sea, and streams of lava overflow its bottom; and where, in the
intervals between volcanic eruptions, beds of sand and clay are frequently
derived from the waste of cliffs, or the turbid waters of rivers.
Limestones, moreover, such as the Italian travertins, are here and there
precipitated from the waters of mineral springs, some of which rise up from
the bottom of the sea. In all these detached formations, so diversified in
their lithological characters, the remains of the same shells, corals,
crustacea, and fish are becoming inclosed; or, at least, a sufficient
number must be common to the different localities to enable the zoologist
to refer them all to one contemporaneous assemblage of species.

There are, however, certain combinations of geographical circumstances
which cause distinct provinces of animals and plants to be separated
from each other by very narrow limits; and hence it must happen, that
strata will be sometimes formed in contiguous regions, differing widely
both in mineral contents and organic remains. Thus, for example, the
testacea, zoophytes, and fish of the Red Sea are, as a group, extremely
distinct from those inhabiting the adjoining parts of the Mediterranean,
although the two seas are separated only by the narrow isthmus of Suez.
Of the bivalve shells, according to Philippi, not more than a fifth are
common to the Red Sea and the sea around Sicily, while the proportion of
univalves (or Gasteropoda) is still smaller, not exceeding eighteen in a
hundred. Calcareous formations have accumulated on a great scale in the
Red Sea in modern times, and fossil shells of existing species are well
preserved therein; and we know that at the mouth of the Nile large
deposits of mud are amassed, including the remains of Mediterranean
species. It follows, therefore, that if at some future period the bed of
the Red Sea should be laid dry, the geologist might experience great
difficulties in endeavouring to ascertain the relative age of these
formations, which, although dissimilar both in organic and mineral
characters, were of synchronous origin.

But, on the other hand, we must not forget that the north-western shores of
the Arabian Gulf, the plains of Egypt, and the isthmus of Suez, are all
parts of one province of _terrestrial_ species. Small streams, therefore,
occasional land-floods, and those winds which drift clouds of sand along
the deserts, might carry down into the Red Sea the same shells of
fluviatile and land testacea which the Nile is sweeping into its delta,
together with some remains of terrestrial plants and the bones of
quadrupeds, whereby the groups of strata, before alluded to, might,
notwithstanding the discrepancy of their mineral composition and _marine_
organic fossils, be shown to have belonged to the same epoch.

Yet while rivers may thus carry down the same fluviatile and terrestrial
spoils into two or more seas inhabited by different marine species, it
will much more frequently happen, that the co-existence of terrestrial
species of distinct zoological and botanical provinces will be proved by
the identity of the marine beings which inhabited the intervening space.
Thus, for example, the land quadrupeds and shells of the south of
Europe, north of Africa, and north-west of Asia, are different, yet
their remains are all washed down by rivers flowing from these three
countries into the Mediterranean.

In some parts of the globe, at the present period, the line of demarcation
between distinct provinces of animals and plants is not very strongly
marked, especially where the change is determined by temperature, as in
seas extending from the temperate to the tropical zone, or from the
temperate to the arctic regions. Here a gradual passage takes place from
one set of species to another. In like manner the geologist, in studying
particular formations of remote periods, has sometimes been able to trace
the gradation from one ancient province to another, by observing carefully
the fossils of all the intermediate places. His success in thus acquiring a
knowledge of the zoological or botanical geography of very distant eras
has been mainly owing to this circumstance, that the mineral character has
no tendency to be affected by climate. A large river may convey yellow or
red mud into some part of the ocean, where it may be dispersed by a current
over an area several hundred leagues in length, so as to pass from the
tropics into the temperate zone. If the bottom of the sea be afterwards
upraised, the organic remains imbedded in such yellow or red strata may
indicate the different animals or plants which once inhabited at the same
time the temperate and equatorial regions.

It may be true, as a general rule, that groups of the same species of
animals and plants may extend over wider areas than deposits of homogeneous
composition; and if so, palæontological characters will be of more
importance in geological classification than mineral composition; but it is
idle to discuss the relative value of these tests, as the aid of both is
indispensable, and it fortunately happens, that where the one criterion
fails, we can often avail ourselves of the other.

_Test by included fragments of older rocks._--It was stated, that
independent proof may sometimes be obtained of the relative date of two
formations, by fragments of an older rock being included in a newer one.
This evidence may sometimes be of great use, where a geologist is at a
loss to determine the relative age of two formations from want of clear
sections exhibiting their true order of position, or because the strata
of each group are vertical. In such cases we sometimes discover that the
more modern rock has been in part derived from the degradation of the
older. Thus, for example, we may find in one part of a country chalk
with flints; and, in another, a distinct formation, consisting of
alternations of clay, sand, and pebbles. If some of these pebbles
consist of similar flint and fossil shells, sponges, and foraminiferæ,
of the same species as those in the chalk, we may confidently infer that
the chalk is the oldest of the two formations.

_Chronological groups._--The number of groups into which the
fossiliferous strata may be separated are more or less numerous,
according to the views of classification which different geologists
entertain; but when we have adopted a certain system of arrangement, we
immediately find that a few only of the entire series of groups occur
one upon the other in any single section or district.

[Illustration: Fig. 104. Block section.]

The thinning out of individual strata was before described (p. 16.). But
let the annexed diagram represent seven fossiliferous groups, instead of
as many strata. It will then be seen that in the middle all the
superimposed formations are present; but in consequence of some of them
thinning out, No. 2. and No. 5. are absent at one extremity of the
section, and No. 4. at the other.

[Illustration: Fig. 105. Section South of Bristol. A. C. Ramsay.

Length of section 4 miles. _a_, _b_. Level of the sea.
  1. Inferior oolite.
  2. Lias.
  3. New red sandstone.
  4. Magnesian conglomerate.
  5. Coal measure.
  6. Carboniferous limestone.
  7. Old red sandstone.]

In the annexed diagram, fig. 105., a real section of the geological
formations in the neighbourhood of Bristol and the Mendip Hills, is
presented to the reader as laid down on a true scale by Professor
Ramsay, where the newer groups 1, 2, 3, 4. rest unconformably on the
formations 5 and 6. Here at the southern end of the line of section we
meet with the beds No. 3. (the New Red Sandstone) resting immediately on
No. 6., while farther north, as at Dundry Hill, we behold six groups
superimposed one upon the other, comprising all the strata from the
inferior oolite to the coal and carboniferous limestone. The limited
extension of the groups 1 and 2. is owing to denudation, as these
formations end abruptly, and have left outlying patches to attest the
fact of their having originally covered a much wider area.

In many instances, however, the entire absence of one or more formations of
intervening periods between two groups, such as 3. and 5. in the same
section, arises, not from the destruction of what once existed, but because
no strata of an intermediate age were ever deposited on the inferior rock.
They were not formed at that place, either because the region was dry land
during the interval, or because it was part of a sea or lake to which no
sediment was carried.

In order, therefore, to establish a chronological succession of
fossiliferous groups, a geologist must begin with a single section, in
which several sets of strata lie one upon the other. He must then trace
these formations, by attention to their mineral character and fossils,
continuously, as far as possible, from the starting point. As often as he
meets with new groups, he must ascertain by superposition their age
relatively to those first examined, and thus learn how to intercalate them
in a tabular arrangement of the whole.

By this means the German, French, and English geologists have determined
the succession of strata throughout a great part of Europe, and have
adopted pretty generally the following groups, almost all of which have
their representatives in the British Islands.

_Groups of Fossiliferous Strata observed in Western Europe, arranged in
what is termed a descending Series, or beginning with the newest._ (_See a
more detailed Tabular view_, pp. 360. 365.)

  1.  Post-Pliocene, including those of the
  Recent, or human period.

  2.  Newer Pliocene, or Pleistocene. }
  3.  Older Pliocene.                 } Tertiary, Supracretaceous[103-A],
  4.  Miocene.                        } or Cainozoic.[103-B]
  5.  Eocene.                         }

  6.  Chalk.                          }
  7.  Greensand.                      }
  8.  Wealden.                        }
  9.  Upper Oolite.                   } Secondary, or Mesozoic.[103-B]
  10.  Middle Oolite.                 }
  11.  Lower Oolite.                  }
  12.  Lias.                          }
  13.  Trias.                         }

  14.  Permian.                                 }
  15.  Coal.                                    }
  16.  Old Red sandstone, or Devonian.          } Primary fossiliferous,
  17.  Upper Silurian.                          }  or paleozoic.[103-B]
  18.  Lower Silurian.                          }
  19.  Cambrian and older fossiliferous strata. }

It is not pretended that the three principal sections in the above table,
called primary, secondary, and tertiary, are of equivalent importance, or
that the eighteen subordinate groups comprise monuments relating to equal
portions of past time, or of the earth's history. But we can assert that
they each relate to successive periods, during which certain animals and
plants, for the most part peculiar to their respective eras, have
flourished, and during which different kinds of sediment were deposited in
the space now occupied by Europe.

If we were disposed, on palæontological grounds[103-C], to divide the
entire fossiliferous series into a few groups less numerous than those in
the above table, and more nearly co-ordinate in value than the sections
called primary, secondary, and tertiary, we might, perhaps, adopt the six
groups or periods given in the next table (p. 104.).

At the same time, I may observe, that, in the present state of the
science, when we have not yet compared the evidence derivable from all
classes of fossils, not even those most generally distributed, such as
shells, corals, and fish, such generalizations are premature, and can
only be regarded as conjectural or provisional schemes for the founding
of large natural groups.

_Fossiliferous Strata of Western Europe divided into Six Groups._

  1. Post Pliocene and       }  from the Post-Pliocene to the
     Tertiary                }  Eocene inclusive.

  2. Cretaceous              {  from the Maestricht Chalk to the Lower
                             {  Greensand inclusive.

  3. Oolitic                    from the Wealden to the Lias inclusive.

  4. Triassic                {  including the Keuper, Muschelkalk, and
                             {  Bunter Sandstein of the Germans.

  5. Permian, Carboniferous, }  including Magnesian Limestone (Zechstein),
     and Devonian            }  Coal, Mountain Limestone, and
                             }  Old Red sandstone.

  6. Silurian and Cambrian   }  from the Upper Silurian to the oldest
                             }  fossiliferous rocks inclusive.


FOOTNOTES:

[103-A] For tertiary, Sir H. De la Beche has used the term
"supracretaceous," a name implying that the strata so called are
superior in position to the chalk.

[103-B] Professor Phillips has adopted these terms: Cainozoic, from
+kainos+, _cainos_, recent, and +zôon+, _zoon_, animal; Mesozoic,
from +mesos+, _mesos_, middle, &c.; Paleozoic, from +palaios+,
_palaios_, ancient, &c.

[103-C] Palæontology is the science which treats of fossil remains, both
animal and vegetable. Etym. +palaios+, _palaios_, ancient, +onta+, _onta_,
beings, and +logos+, _logos_, a discourse.



CHAPTER X.

CLASSIFICATION OF TERTIARY FORMATIONS.--POST-PLIOCENE GROUP.

   General principles of classification of tertiary strata--Detached
   formations scattered over Europe--Strata of Paris and London--More
   modern groups--Peculiar difficulties in determining the chronology of
   tertiary formations--Increasing proportion of living species of shells
   in strata of newer origin--Terms Eocene, Miocene, and
   Pliocene--Post-Pliocene strata--Recent or human period--Older
   Post-Pliocene formations of Naples, Uddevalla, and Norway--Ancient
   upraised delta of the Mississippi--Loess of the Rhine.


Before describing the most modern of the sets of strata enumerated in
the tables given at the end of the last chapter, it will be necessary
to say something generally of the mode of classifying the formations
called tertiary.

The name of tertiary has been given to them, because they are all posterior
in date to the rocks termed "secondary," of which the chalk constitutes the
newest group. These tertiary strata were at first confounded, as before
stated, p. 91., with the superficial alluviums of Europe; and it was long
before their real extent and thickness, and the various ages to which they
belong, were fully recognized. They were observed to occur in patches, some
of freshwater, others of marine origin, their geographical area being
usually small as compared to the secondary formations, and their position
often suggesting the idea of their having been deposited in different bays,
lakes, estuaries, or inland seas, after a large portion of the space now
occupied by Europe had already been converted into dry land.

The first deposits of this class, of which the characters were accurately
determined, were those occurring in the neighbourhood of Paris, described
in 1810 by MM. Cuvier and Brongniart. They were ascertained to consist of
successive sets of strata, some of marine, others of freshwater origin,
lying one upon the other. The fossil shells and corals were perceived to be
almost all of unknown species, and to have in general a near affinity to
those now inhabiting warmer seas. The bones and skeletons of land animals,
some of them of large size, and belonging to more than forty distinct
species, were examined by Cuvier, and declared by him not to agree
specifically and for the most part not even generically, with any hitherto
observed in the living creation.

Strata were soon afterwards brought to light in the vicinity of London, and
in Hampshire, which, although dissimilar in mineral composition, were
justly inferred by Mr. T. Webster to be of the same age as those of Paris,
because the greater number of the fossil shells were specifically
identical. For the same reason rocks found on the Gironde, in the South of
France, and at certain points in the North of Italy, were suspected to be
of contemporaneous origin.

A variety of deposits were afterwards found in other parts of Europe, all
reposing immediately on rocks as old or older than the chalk, and which
exhibited certain general characters of resemblance in their organic
remains to those previously observed near Paris and London. An attempt was
therefore made at first to refer the whole to one period; and when at
length this seemed impracticable, it was contended that as in the Parisian
series there were many subordinate formations of considerable thickness
which must have accumulated one after the other, during a great lapse of
time, so the various patches of tertiary strata scattered over Europe might
correspond in age, some of them to the older, and others to the newer,
subdivisions of the Parisian series.

This error, although most unavoidable on the part of those who made the
first generalizations in this branch of geology, retarded seriously for
some years the progress of classification. A more scrupulous attention to
specific distinctions, aided by a careful regard to the relative position
of the strata containing them, led at length to the conviction that there
were formations both marine and freshwater of various ages, and all newer
than the strata of the neighbourhood of Paris and London.

One of the first steps in this chronological reform was made in 1811, by
an English naturalist, Mr. Parkinson, who pointed out the fact that
certain shelly strata, provincially termed "Crag" in Suffolk, lay
decidedly over a deposit which was the continuation of the blue clay of
London. At the same time he remarked that the fossil testacea in these
newer beds were distinct from those of the blue clay, and that while
some of them were of unknown species, others were identical with species
now inhabiting the British seas.

Another important discovery was soon afterwards made by Brocchi in Italy,
who investigated the argillaceous and sandy deposits replete with shells
which form a low range of hills, flanking the Apennines on both sides, from
the plains of the Po to Calabria. These lower hills were called by him the
Subapennines, and were formed of strata of different ages, all newer than
those of Paris and London.

Another tertiary group occurring in the neighbourhood of Bordeaux and Dax,
in the south of France, was examined by M. de Basterot in 1825, who
described and figured several hundred species of shells, which differed for
the most part both from the Parisian series and those of the Subapennine
hills. It was soon, therefore, suspected that this fauna might belong to a
period intermediate between that of the Parisian and Subapennine strata,
and it was not long before the evidence of superposition was brought to
bear in support of this opinion; for other strata, contemporaneous with
those of Bordeaux, were observed in one district (the Valley of the Loire),
to overlie the Parisian formation, and in another (in Piedmont) to underlie
the Subapennine beds. The first example of these was pointed out in 1829 by
M. Desnoyers, who ascertained that the sand and marl of marine origin
called Faluns, near Tours, in the basin of the Loire, full of sea-shells
and corals, rested upon a lacustrine formation, which constitutes the
uppermost subdivision of the Parisian group, extending continuously
throughout a great table-land intervening between the basin of the Seine
and that of the Loire. The other example occurs in Italy, where strata,
containing many fossils similar to those of Bordeaux, were observed by
Bonelli and others in the environs of Turin, subjacent to strata belonging
to the Subapennine group of Brocchi.

Without pretending to give a complete sketch of the progress of
discovery, I may refer to the facts above enumerated, as illustrating
the course usually pursued by geologists when they attempt to found new
chronological divisions. The method bears some analogy to that pursued
by the naturalist in the construction of genera, when he selects a
typical species, and then classes as congeners all other species of
animals and plants which agree with this standard within certain limits.
The genera A. and C. having been founded on these principles, a new
species is afterwards met with, departing widely both from A. and C.,
but in many respects of an intermediate character. For this new type it
becomes necessary to institute the new genus B., in which are included
all species afterwards brought to light, which agree more nearly with B.
than with the types of A. or C. In like manner a new formation is met
with in geology, and the characters of its fossil fauna and flora
investigated. From that moment it is considered as a record of a certain
period of the earth's history, and a standard to which other deposits
may be compared. If any are found containing the same or nearly the same
organic remains, and occupying the same relative position, they are
regarded in the light of contemporary annals. All such monuments are
said to relate to one period, during which certain events occurred, such
as the formation of particular rocks by aqueous or volcanic agency, or
the continued existence and fossilization of certain tribes of animals
and plants. When several of these periods have had their true places
assigned to them in a chronological series, others are discovered
which it becomes necessary to intercalate between those first known;
and the difficulty of assigning clear lines of separation must
unavoidably increase in proportion as chasms in the past history of
the globe are filled up.

Every zoologist and botanist is aware that it is a comparatively easy
task to establish genera in departments which have been enriched with
only a small number of species, and where there is as yet no tendency in
one set of characters to pass almost insensibly, by a multitude of
connecting links, into another. They also know that the difficulty of
classification augments, and that the artificial nature of their
divisions becomes more apparent, in proportion to the increased number
of objects brought to light. But in separating families and genera, they
have no other alternative than to avail themselves of such breaks as
still remain, or of every hiatus in the chain of animated beings which
is not yet filled up. So in geology, we may be eventually compelled to
resort to sections of time as arbitrary, and as purely conventional, as
those which divide the history of human events into centuries. But in
the present state of our knowledge, it is more convenient to use the
interruptions which still occur in the regular sequence of geological
monuments, as boundary lines between our principal groups or periods,
even though the groups thus established are of very unequal value.

The isolated position of distinct tertiary deposits in different parts
of Europe has been already alluded to. In addition to the difficulty
presented by this want of continuity when we endeavour to settle the
chronological relations of these deposits, another arises from the
frequent dissimilarity in mineral character of strata of contemporaneous
date, such, for example, as those of London and Paris before mentioned.
The identity or non-identity of species is also a criterion which often
fails us. For this we might have been prepared, for we have already
seen, that the Mediterranean and Red Sea, although within 70 miles of
each other, on each side of the Isthmus of Suez, have each their
peculiar fauna; and a marked difference is found in the four groups of
testacea now living in the Baltic, English Channel, Black Sea, and
Mediterranean, although all these seas have many species in common. In
like manner a considerable diversity in the fossils of different
tertiary formations, which have been thrown down in distinct seas,
estuaries, bays, and lakes, does not always imply a distinctness in the
times when they were produced, but may have arisen from climate and
conditions of physical geography wholly independent of time. On the
other hand, it is now abundantly clear, as the result of geological
investigation, that different sets of tertiary strata, immediately
superimposed upon each other, contain distinct imbedded species of
fossils, in consequence of fluctuations which have been going on in the
animate creation, and by which in the course of ages one state of things
in the organic world has been substituted for another wholly dissimilar.
It has also been shown that in proportion as the age of a tertiary
deposit is more modern, so is its fauna more analogous to that now in
being in the neighbouring seas. It is this law of a nearer agreement of
the fossil testacea with the species now living, which may often furnish
us with a clue for the chronological arrangement of scattered deposits,
where we cannot avail ourselves of any one of the three ordinary
chronological tests; namely, superposition, mineral character, and the
specific identity of the fossils.

Thus, for example, on the African border of the Red Sea, at the height
of 40 feet, and sometimes more, above its level, a white calcareous
formation has been observed, containing several hundred species of
shells differing from those found in the clay and volcanic tuff of the
country round Naples, and of the contiguous island of Ischia. Another
deposit has been found at Uddevalla, in Sweden, in which the shells do
not agree with those found near Naples. But although in these three
cases there may be scarcely a single shell common to the three different
deposits, we do not hesitate to refer them all to one period (the
Post-Pliocene), because of the very close agreement of the fossil
species in every instance with those now living in the contiguous seas.

To take another example, where the fossil fauna recedes a few steps farther
back from our own times. We may compare, first, the beds of loam and clay
bordering the Clyde in Scotland (called glacial by some geologists),
secondly, others of fluvio-marine origin near Norwich, and, lastly, a third
set often rising to considerable heights in Sicily, and we discover that in
every case more than three-fourths of the shells agree with species still
living, while the remainder are extinct. Hence we may conclude that all
these, greatly diversified as are their organic remains, belong to one and
the same era, or to a period immediately antecedent to the Post-Pliocene,
because there has been time in each of the areas alluded to for an equal or
nearly equal amount of change in the marine testaceous fauna.
Contemporaneousness of origin is inferred in these cases, in spite of the
most marked differences of mineral character or organic contents, from a
similar degree of divergence in the shells from those now living in the
adjoining seas. The advantage of such a test consists in supplying us with
a common point of departure in all countries, however remote.

But the farther we recede from the present times, and the smaller the
relative number of recent as compared with extinct species in the
tertiary deposits, the less confidence can we place in the exact value
of such a test, especially when comparing the strata of very distant
regions; for we cannot presume that the rate of former alterations in
the animate world, or the continual going out and coming in of species,
has been every where exactly equal in equal quantities of time. The
form of the land and sea, and the climate, may have changed more in
one region than in another; and consequently there may have been a
more rapid destruction and renovation of species in one part of the
globe than elsewhere. Considerations of this kind should undoubtedly
put us on our guard against relying too implicitly on the accuracy of
this test; yet it can never fail to throw great light on the
chronological relations of tertiary groups with each other, and with
the Post-Pliocene period.

We may derive a conviction of this truth not only from a study of
geological monuments of all ages, but also by reflecting on the tendency
which prevails in the present state of nature to a uniform rate of
simultaneous fluctuation in the flora and fauna of the whole globe. The
grounds of such a doctrine cannot be discussed here, and I have explained
them at some length in the third Book of the Principles of Geology, where
the causes of the successive extinction of species are considered. It will
be there seen that each local change in climate and physical geography is
attended with the immediate increase of certain species, and the limitation
of the range of others. A revolution thus effected is rarely, if ever,
confined to a limited space, or to one geographical province of animals or
plants, but affects several other surrounding and contiguous provinces. In
each of these, moreover, analogous alterations of the stations and
habitations of species are simultaneously in progress, reacting in the
manner already alluded to on the first province. Hence, long before the
geography of any particular district can be essentially altered, the flora
and fauna throughout the world will have been materially modified by
countless disturbances in the mutual relation of the various members of the
organic creation to each other. To assume that in one large area inhabited
exclusively by a single assemblage of species any important revolution in
physical geography can be brought about, while other areas remain
stationary in regard to the position of land and sea, the height of
mountains, and so forth, is a most improbable hypothesis, wholly opposed to
what we know of the laws now governing the aqueous and igneous causes. On
the other hand, even were this conceivable, the communication of heat and
cold between different parts of the atmosphere and ocean is so free and
rapid, that the temperature of certain zones cannot be materially raised or
lowered without others being immediately affected; and the elevation or
diminution in height of an important chain of mountains or the submergence
of a wide tract of land would modify the climate even of the antipodes.

It will be observed that in the foregoing allusions to organic remains, the
testacea or the shell-bearing mollusca are selected as the most useful and
convenient class for the purposes of general classification. In the first
place, they are more universally distributed through strata of every age
than any other organic bodies. Those families of fossils which are of rare
and casual occurrence are absolutely of no avail in establishing a
chronological arrangement. If we have plants alone in one group of strata
and the bones of mammalia in another, we can draw no conclusion respecting
the affinity or discordance of the organic beings of the two epochs
compared; and the same may be said if we have plants and vertebrated
animals in one series and only shells in another. Although corals are more
abundant, in a fossil state, than plants, reptiles, or fish, they are still
rare when contrasted with shells, especially in the European tertiary
formations. The utility of the testacea is, moreover, enhanced by the
circumstance that some forms are proper to the sea, others to the land, and
others to freshwater. Rivers scarcely ever fail to carry down into their
deltas some land shells, together with species which are at once fluviatile
and lacustrine. By this means we learn what terrestrial, freshwater, and
marine species co-existed at particular eras of the past; and having thus
identified strata formed in seas with others which originated
contemporaneously in inland lakes, we are then enabled to advance a step
farther, and show that certain quadrupeds or aquatic plants, found fossil
in lacustrine formations, inhabited the globe at the same period when
certain fish, reptiles, and zoophytes lived in the ocean.

Among other characters of the molluscous animals, which render them
extremely valuable in settling chronological questions in geology, may be
mentioned, first, the wide geographical range of many species; and,
secondly, what is probably a consequence of the former, the great duration
of species in this class, for they appear to have surpassed in longevity
the greater number of the mammalia and fish. Had each species inhabited a
very limited space, it could never, when imbedded in strata, have enabled
the geologist to identify deposits at distant points; or had they each
lasted but for a brief period, they could have thrown no light on the
connection of rocks placed far from each other in the chronological, or, as
it is often termed, vertical series.

Many authors have divided the European tertiary strata into three
groups--lower, middle, and upper; the lower comprising the oldest
formations of Paris and London before-mentioned; the middle those of
Bordeaux and Touraine; and the upper all those newer than the middle group.

When engaged in 1828 in preparing my work on the Principles of Geology, I
conceived the idea of classing the whole series of tertiary strata in four
groups, and endeavouring to find characters for each, expressive of their
different degrees of affinity to the living fauna. With this view, I
obtained information respecting the specific identity of many tertiary and
recent shells from several Italian naturalists, and among others from
Professors Bonelli, Guidotti, and Costa. Having in 1829 become acquainted
with M. Deshayes, of Paris, already well known by his conchological works,
I learnt from him that he had arrived, by independent researches, and by
the study of a large collection of fossil and recent shells, at very
similar views respecting the arrangement of tertiary formations. At my
request he drew up, in a tabular form, lists of all the shells known to him
to occur both in some tertiary formation and in a living state, for the
express purpose of ascertaining the proportional number of fossil species
identical with the recent which characterized successive groups; and this
table, planned by us in common, was published by me in 1833.[110-A] The
number of tertiary fossil shells examined by M. Deshayes was about 3000;
and the recent species with which they had been compared about 5000. The
result then arrived at was, that in the lower tertiary strata, or those of
London and Paris, there were about 3-1/2 per cent. of species identical
with recent; in the middle tertiary of the Loire and Gironde about 17 per
cent.; and in the upper tertiary or Subapennine beds, from 35 to 50 per
cent. In formations still more modern, some of which I had particularly
studied in Sicily, where they attain a vast thickness and elevation above
the sea, the number of species identical with those now living was believed
to be from 90 to 95 per cent. For the sake of clearness and brevity, I
proposed to give short technical names to these four groups, or the periods
to which they respectively belonged. I called the first or oldest of them
Eocene, the second Miocene, the third Older Pliocene, and the last or
fourth Newer Pliocene. The first of the above terms, Eocene, is derived
from +êôs+, eos, _dawn_, and +kainos+, cainos, _recent_, because the fossil
shells of this period contain an extremely small proportion of living
species, which may be looked upon as indicating the dawn of the existing
state of the testaceous fauna, no recent species having been detected in
the older or secondary rocks.

The term Miocene (from +meion+, meion, _less_, and +kainos+, cainos,
_recent_) is intended to express a minor proportion of recent species (of
testacea), the term Pliocene (from +pleion+, pleion, _more_, and +kainos+,
cainos, _recent_) a comparative plurality of the same. It may assist the
memory of students to remind them, that the _Mi_ocene contain a _mi_nor
proportion, and _Pl_iocene a comparative _pl_urality of recent species; and
that the greater number of recent species always implies the more modern
origin of the strata.

It has sometimes been objected to this nomenclature that certain species of
infusoria found in the chalk are still existing, and, on the other hand,
the Miocene and Older Pliocene deposits often contain the remains of
mammalia, reptiles, and fish, exclusively of extinct species. But the
reader must bear in mind that the terms Eocene, Miocene, and Pliocene were
originally invented with reference purely to conchological data, and in
that sense have always been and are still used by me.

The distribution of the fossil species from which the results before
mentioned were obtained in 1830 by M. Deshayes was as follows:--

  In the formations of the Pliocene periods, older and newer  777
  In the Miocene                                             1021
  In the Eocene                                              1238
                                                             ----
                                                             3036
                                                             ----

Since the year 1830 the progress of conchological science has been most
rapid, and the number of living species obtained from different parts of
the globe has been raised from about 5000 to more than 10,000. New
fossil species have also been added to our collections in great
abundance; and at the same time a more copious supply of individuals
both of fossil and recent species, some of which were previously very
rare, have been procured, affording more ample data for determining the
specific character. Besides the reforms introduced in consequence of
these new zoological facilities, other errors of a geological nature
have been in many instances removed.


POST-PLIOCENE FORMATIONS.

I have adopted the term Post-Pliocene for those strata which are sometimes
called post-tertiary or modern, and which are characterized by having all
the imbedded fossil shells identical with species now living, whereas even
the Newer Pliocene, or newest of the tertiary deposits above alluded to,
contain always some small proportion of shells of extinct species.

These modern formations, thus defined, comprehend not only those strata
which can be shown to have originated since the earth was inhabited by man,
but also deposits of far greater extent and thickness, in which no signs of
man or his works can be detected. In some of these, of a date long anterior
to the times of history and tradition, the bones of extinct quadrupeds have
been met with of species which probably never co-existed with the human
race, as, for example, the mammoth, mastodon, megatherium, and others, and
yet the shells are the same as those now living.

That portion of the post-pliocene group which belongs to the human epoch,
and which is sometimes called _Recent_, forms a very unimportant feature in
the geological structure of the earth's crust. I have shown, however, in
"The Principles," where the recent changes of the earth illustrative of
geology are described at length, that the deposits accumulated at the
bottom of lakes and seas within the last 4000 or 5000 years can neither be
insignificant in volume or extent. They lie hidden, for the most part, from
our sight; but we have opportunities of examining them at certain points
where newly-gained land in the deltas of rivers has been cut through during
floods, or where coral reefs are growing rapidly, or where the bed of a sea
or lake has been heaved up by subterranean movements and laid dry. Their
age may be recognized either by our finding in them the bones of man in a
fossil state, that is to say, imbedded in them by natural causes, or by
their containing articles fabricated by the hands of man.

Thus at Puzzuoli, near Naples, marine strata are seen containing
fragments of sculpture, pottery, and the remains of buildings, together
with innumerable shells retaining in part their colour, and of the same
species as those now inhabiting the Bay of Baiæ. The uppermost of these
beds is about 20 feet above the level of the sea. Their emergence can be
proved to have taken place since the beginning of the sixteenth
century.[112-A] Now here, as in almost every instance where any
alterations of level have been going on in historical periods, it is
found that rocks containing shells, all, or nearly all, of which still
inhabit the neighbouring sea, may be traced for some distance into the
interior, and often to a considerable elevation above the level of the
sea. Thus, in the country round Naples, the post-pliocene strata,
consisting of clay and horizontal beds of volcanic tuff, rise at certain
points to the height of 1500 feet. Although the marine shells are
exclusively of living species, they are not accompanied like those on
the coast at Puzzuoli by any traces of man or his works. Had any such
been discovered, it would have afforded to the antiquary and geologist
matter of great surprise, since it would have shown that man was an
inhabitant of that part of the globe, while the materials composing
the present hills and plains of Campania were still in the progress
of deposition at the bottom of the sea; whereas we know that for
nearly 3000 years, or from the times of the earliest Greek colonists,
no material revolution in the physical geography of that part of
Italy has occurred.

In Ischia, a small island near Naples, composed in like manner of marine
and volcanic formations, Dr. Philippi collected in the stratified tuff and
clay ninety-two species of shells of existing species. In the centre of
Ischia, the lofty hill called Epomeo, or San Nicola, is composed of
greenish indurated tuff, of a prodigious thickness, interstratified in some
parts with marl, and here and there with great beds of solid lava. Visconti
ascertained by trigonometrical measurement that this mountain was 2605 feet
above the level of the sea. Not far from its summit, at the height of about
2000 feet, as also near Moropano, a village only 100 feet lower, on the
southern declivity of the mountain, I collected, in 1828, many shells of
species now inhabiting the neighbouring gulf. It is clear, therefore, that
the great mass of Epomeo was not only raised to its present height, but was
also _formed_ beneath the waters, within the post-pliocene period.

It is a fact, however, of no small interest, that the fossil shells from
these modern tuffs of the volcanic region surrounding the Bay of Baiæ,
although none of them extinct, indicate a slight want of correspondence
between the ancient fauna and that now inhabiting the Mediterranean.
Philippi informs us that when he and M. Scacchi had collected ninety-nine
species of them, he found that only one, _Pecten medius_, now living in the
Red Sea, was absent from the Mediterranean. Notwithstanding this, he adds,
"the condition of the sea when the tufaceous beds were deposited must have
been considerably different from its present state; for _Tellina striata_
was then common, and is now rare; _Lucina spinosa_ was both more abundant
and grew to a larger size; _Lucina fragilis_, now rare, and hardly
measuring 6 lines, then attained the enormous dimensions of 14 lines, and
was extremely abundant; and _Ostrea lamellosa_, Broc., no longer met with
near Naples, existed at that time, and attained a size so large that one
lower valve has been known to measure 5 inches 9 lines in length, 4 inches
in breadth, 1-1/2 inch in thickness, and weighed 26-1/2 ounces."[113-A]

There are other parts of Europe where no volcanic action manifests itself
at the surface, as at Naples, whether by the eruption of lava or by
earthquakes, and yet where the land and bed of the adjoining sea are
undergoing upheaval. The motion is so gradual as to be insensible to the
inhabitants, being only ascertainable by careful scientific measurements
compared after long intervals. Such an upward movement has been proved to
be in progress in Norway and Sweden throughout an area about 1000 miles N.
and S., and for an unknown distance E. and W., the amount of elevation
always increasing as we proceed towards the North Cape, where it may equal
5 feet in a century. If we could assume that there had been an average rise
of 2-1/2 feet in each hundred years for the last fifty centuries, this
would give an elevation of 125 feet in that period. In other words, it
would follow that the shores, and a considerable area of the former bed of
the Baltic and North Sea, had been uplifted vertically to that amount, and
converted into land in the course of the last 5000 years. Accordingly, we
find near Stockholm, in Sweden, horizontal beds of sand, loam, and marl
containing the same peculiar assemblage of testacea which now live in the
brackish waters of the Baltic. Mingled with these, at different depths,
have been detected various works of art implying a rude state of
civilization, and some vessels built before the introduction of iron, the
whole marine formation having been upraised, so that the upper beds are now
60 feet higher than the surface of the Baltic. In the neighbourhood of
these recent strata, both to the north-west and south of Stockholm, other
deposits similar in mineral composition occur, which ascend to greater
heights, in which precisely the same assemblage of fossil shells is met
with, but without any intermixture of human bones or fabricated articles.

On the opposite or western coast of Sweden, at Uddevalla, post-pliocene
strata, containing recent shells, not of that brackish water character
peculiar to the Baltic, but such as now live in the northern ocean, ascend
to the height of 200 feet; and beds of clay and sand of the same age attain
elevations of 300 and even 700 feet in Norway, where they have been usually
described as "raised beaches." They are, however, thick deposits of
submarine origin, spreading far and wide, and filling valleys in the
granite and gneiss, just as the tertiary formations, in different parts of
Europe, cover or fill depressions in the older rocks.

It is worthy of remark, that although the fossil fauna characterizing these
upraised sands and clays consists exclusively of existing northern species
of testacea, yet, according to Lovén (an able living naturalist of Norway),
the species do not constitute such an assemblage as now inhabits
corresponding latitudes in the German Ocean. On the contrary, they
decidedly represent a more arctic fauna.[114-A] In order to find the same
species flourishing in equal abundance, or in many cases to find them at
all, we must go northwards to higher latitudes than Uddevalla in Sweden, or
even nearer the pole than Central Norway.

Judging by the uniformity of climate now prevailing from century to
century, and the insensible rate of variation in the organic world in our
own times, we may presume that an extremely lengthened period was required
even for so slight a modification of the molluscous fauna, as that of which
the evidence is here brought to light. On the other hand, we have every
reason for inferring on independent grounds (namely, the rate of upheaval
of land in modern times) that the antiquity of the deposits in question
must be very great. For if we assume, as before suggested, that the mean
rate of continuous vertical elevation has amounted to 2-1/2 feet in a
century (and this is probably a high average), it would require 27,500
years for the sea-coast to attain the height of 700 feet, without making
allowance for any pauses such as are now experienced in a large part of
Norway, or for any oscillations of level.

In England, buried ships have been found in the ancient and now deserted
channels of the Rother in Sussex, of the Mersey in Kent, and the Thames
near London. Canoes and stone hatchets have been dug up, in almost all
parts of the kingdom, from peat and shell-marl; but there is no evidence,
as in Sweden, Italy, and many other parts of the world, of the bed of the
sea, and the adjoining coast, having been uplifted bodily to considerable
heights within the human period. Recent strata have been traced along the
coasts of Peru and Chili, inclosing shells in abundance, all agreeing
specifically with those now swarming in the Pacific. In one bed of this
kind, in the island of San Lorenzo, near Lima, Mr. Darwin found, at the
altitude of 85 feet above the sea, pieces of cotton-thread, plaited rush,
and the head of a stalk of Indian corn, the whole of which had evidently
been imbedded with the shells. At the same height on the neighbouring
mainland, he found other signs corroborating the opinion that the ancient
bed of the sea had there also been uplifted 85 feet, since the region was
first peopled by the Peruvian race.[115-A] But similar shelly masses are
also met with at much higher elevations, at innumerable points between the
Chilian and Peruvian Andes and the sea-coast, in which no human remains
were ever, or in all probability ever will be, discovered.

In the West Indies, also, in the island of Guadaloupe, a solid limestone
occurs, at the level of the sea-beach, enveloping human skeletons. The
stone is extremely hard, and chiefly composed of comminuted shell and
coral, with here and there some entire corals and shells, of species now
living in the adjacent ocean. With them are included arrow-heads, fragments
of pottery, and other articles of human workmanship. A limestone with
similar contents has been formed, and is still forming, in St. Domingo. But
there are also more ancient rocks in the West Indian Archipelago, as in
Cuba, near the Havanna, and in other islands, in which are shells identical
with those now living in corresponding latitudes; some well-preserved,
others in the state of casts, all referable to the post-pliocene period.

I have already described in the seventh chapter, p. 84., what would be
the effects of oscillations and changes of level in any region drained
by a great river and its tributaries, supposing the area to be first
depressed several hundred feet, and then re-elevated. I believe that
such changes in the relative level of land and sea have actually
occurred in the post-pliocene era in the hydrographical basin of the
Mississippi and in that of the Rhine. The accumulation of fluviatile
matter in a delta during a slow subsidence may raise the newly gained
land superficially at the same rate at which its foundations sink, so
that these may go down hundreds or thousands of feet perpendicularly,
and yet the sea bordering the delta may always be excluded, the whole
deposit continuing to be terrestrial or freshwater in character. This
appears to have happened in the deltas both of the Po and Ganges, for
recent artesian borings, penetrating to the depth of 400 feet, have
there shown that fluviatile strata, with shells of recent species,
together with ancient surfaces of land supporting turf and forests, are
depressed hundreds of feet below the sea level.[116-A] Should these
countries be once more slowly upraised, the rivers would carve out
valleys through the horizontal and unconsolidated strata as they rose,
sweeping away the greater portion of them, and leaving mere fragments in
the shape of terraces skirting newly-formed alluvial plains, as
monuments of the former levels at which the rivers ran. Of this nature
are "the bluffs," or river cliffs, now bounding the valley of the
Mississippi throughout a large portion of its course. Thus let _a b_,
fig. 106., represent the alluvial plain of the Mississippi, a plain
which, at the point alluded to, is more than 30 miles broad, and is
truly a prolongation of the modern delta of that river. It is bounded by
bluffs, the upper portions of which consist, both on the east and west
side, of shelly loam, No. 2. rising from 100 to 200 feet above the level
of the plain, and containing land and freshwater shells of the genera
_Helix_, _Pupa_, _Succinea_, and _Lymnea_, of the same species as those
now inhabiting the neighbouring forests and swamps. In the same loam
also, No. 2., are found the bones of the Mastodon, Elephant, Megalonyx,
and other extinct quadrupeds.

[Illustration: Fig. 106. Valley of the Mississippi.

  1. Alluvium.
  2. Loess.
  3. _f_. Eocene.
  4. Cretaceous.]

I have endeavoured to show that the deposits forming the delta and alluvial
plain of the Mississippi consist of sedimentary matter, extending over an
area of 30,000 square miles, and known in some parts to be several hundred
feet deep. Although we cannot estimate correctly how many years it may have
required for the river to bring down from the upper country so large a
quantity of earthy matter--the data for such a computation being as yet
incomplete--we may still approximate to a minimum of the time which such an
operation must have taken, by ascertaining experimentally the annual
discharge of water by the Mississippi, and the mean annual amount of solid
matter contained in its waters. The lowest estimate of the time required
would lead us to assign a high antiquity, amounting to many tens of
thousands of years to the existing delta, the origin of which is
nevertheless an event of yesterday when contrasted with those terraces,
_c_, and _d e_, fig. 106., formed of the loam No. 2. above mentioned. These
materials of the bluffs _a_ and _d_ were produced, the reader will observe,
during the first part of that great oscillation of level which depressed to
a depth of 200 feet a larger area than the modern delta and plain of the
Mississippi, and then restored the region to its former position.[117-A]

_Loess of the Valley of the Rhine._--A similar succession of geographical
changes, attended by the production of a fluviatile formation, singularly
resembling that which bounds the great plain of the Mississippi, seems to
have occurred in the hydrographical basin of the Rhine, since the time when
that basin had already acquired its present outline of hill and valley. I
allude to the deposit provincially termed _loess_ in part of Germany, or
_lehm_ in Alsace, filled with land and freshwater shells of existing
species. It is a finely comminuted sand or pulverulent loam of a yellowish
grey colour, consisting chiefly of argillaceous matter combined with a
sixth part of carbonate of lime, and a sixth of quartzose and micaceous
sand. It often contains calcareous sandy concretions or nodules, rarely
exceeding the size of a man's head. Its entire thickness amounts, in some
places, to between 200 and 300 feet; yet there are often no signs of
stratification in the mass, except here and there at the bottom, where
there is occasionally a slight intermixture of drifted materials derived
from subjacent rocks. Unsolidified as it is, and of so perishable a nature,
that every streamlet flowing over it cuts out for itself a deep gully, it
usually terminates in a vertical cliff, from the surface of which land
shells are seen here and there to project in relief. In all these features
it presents a precise counterpart to the loess of the Mississippi. It is so
homogeneous as generally to exhibit no signs of stratification, owing,
probably, to its materials having been derived from a common source, and
having been accumulated by a uniform action. Yet it displays in some few
places decided marks of successive deposition, where coarser and finer
materials alternate, especially near the bottom. Calcareous concretions,
also enclosing land-shells, are sometimes arranged in horizontal layers. It
is a remarkable deposit, from its position, wide extent, and thickness, its
homogeneous mineral composition, and freshwater origin. Its distribution
clearly shows that after the great valley of the Rhine, from Schaffhausen
to Bonn, had acquired its present form, having its bottom strewed over with
coarse gravel, a period arrived when it became filled up from side to side
with fine mud, which was also thrown down in the valleys of the principal
tributaries of the Rhine.

Thus, for example, it may be traced far into Würtemberg, up the valley of
the Neckar, and from Frankfort, up the valley of the Main, to above
Dettelbach. I have also seen it spreading over the country of Mayence,
Eppelsheim, and Worms, on the left bank of the Rhine, and on the opposite
side on the table-land above the Bergstrasse, between Wiesloch and
Bruchsal, where it attains a thickness of 200 feet. Near Strasburg, large
masses of it appear at the foot of the Vosges on the left bank, and at the
base of the mountains of the Black Forest on the right bank. The
Kaiserstuhl, a volcanic mountain which stands in the middle of the plain of
the Rhine near Freiburg, has been covered almost everywhere with this loam,
as have the extinct volcanos between Coblentz and Bonn. Near Andernach, in
the Kirchweg, the loess containing the usual shells alternates with
volcanic matter; and over the whole are strewed layers of pumice, lapilli,
and volcanic sand, from 10 to 15 feet thick, very much resembling the
ejections under which Pompeii lies buried. There is no passage at this
upper junction from the loess into the pumiceous superstratum; and this
last follows the slope of the hill, just as it would have done had it
fallen in showers from the air on a declivity partly formed of loess.

But, in general, the loess overlies all the volcanic products, even those
between Neuwied and Bonn, which have the most modern aspect; and it has
filled up in part the crater of the Roderberg, an extinct volcano near
Bonn. In 1833 a well was sunk at the bottom of this crater, through 70 feet
of loess, in part of which were the usual calcareous concretions.

The interstratification above alluded to, of loess with layers of pumice
and volcanic ashes, has led to the opinion that both during and since
its deposition some of the last volcanic eruptions of the Lower Eifel
have taken place. Should such a conclusion be adopted, we should be
called upon to assign a very modern date to these eruptions. This
curious point, therefore, deserves to be reconsidered; since it may
possibly have happened that the waters of the Rhine, swollen by the
melting of snow and ice, and flowing at a great height through a valley
choked up with loess, may have swept away the loose superficial scoriæ
and pumice of the Eifel volcanos, and spread them out occasionally over
the yellow loam. Sometimes, also, the melting of snow on the slope of
small volcanic cones may have given rise to local floods, capable of
sweeping down light pumice into the adjacent low grounds.

The first idea which has occurred to most geologists, after examining
the loess between Mayence and Basle, is to imagine that a great lake
once extended throughout the valley of the Rhine between those two
places. Such a lake may have sent off large branches up the course of
the Main, Neckar, and other tributary valleys, in all of which large
patches of loess are now seen. The barrier of the lake might be placed
somewhere in the narrow and picturesque gorge of the Rhine between
Bingen and Bonn. But this theory fails altogether to explain the
phenomena; when we discover that that gorge itself has once been filled
with loess, which must have been tranquilly deposited in it, as also in
the lateral valley of the Lahn, communicating with the gorge. The loess
has also overspread the high adjoining platform near the village of
Plaidt above Andernach. Nay, on proceeding farther down to the north, we
discover that the hills which skirt the great valley between Bonn and
Cologne have loess on their flanks, which also covers here and there the
gravel of the plain as far as Cologne, and the nearest rising grounds.

Besides these objections to the lake theory, the loess is met with near
Basle, capping hills more than 1200 feet above the sea; so that a barrier
of land capable of separating the supposed lake from the ocean would
require to be, at least, as high as the mountains called the Siebengebirge,
near Bonn, the loftiest summit of which, the Oehlberg, is 1209 feet above
the Rhine and 1369 feet above the sea. It would be necessary, moreover, to
place this lofty barrier somewhere below Cologne, or precisely where the
level of the land is now lowest.

Instead, therefore, of supposing one continuous lake of sufficient extent
and depth to allow of the simultaneous accumulation of the loess, at
various heights, throughout the whole area where it now occurs, I formerly
suggested that, subsequently to the period when the countries now drained
by the Rhine and its tributaries had nearly acquired their actual form and
geographical features, they were again depressed gradually by a movement
like that now in progress on the west coast of Greenland.[119-A] In
proportion as the whole district was lowered, the general fall of the
waters between the Alps and the ocean was lessened; and both the main and
lateral valleys, becoming more subject to river inundations, were partially
filled up with fluviatile silt, containing land and freshwater shells. When
a thickness of many hundred feet of loess had been thrown down slowly by
this operation, the whole region was once more upheaved gradually. During
this upward movement most of the fine loam would be carried off by the
denuding power of rains and rivers; and thus the original valleys might
have been re-excavated, and the country almost restored to its pristine
state, with the exception of some masses and patches of loess such as still
remain, and which, by their frequency and remarkable homogeneousness of
composition and fossils, attest the ancient continuity and common origin of
the whole. By imagining these oscillations of level, we dispense with the
necessity of erecting and afterwards removing a mountain barrier
sufficiently high to exclude the ocean from the valley of the Rhine during
the period of the accumulation of the loess.

The proportion of land shells of the genera _Helix_, _Pupa_, and _Bulimus_,
is very large in the loess; but in many places aquatic species of the
genera _Lymnea_, _Paludina_, and _Planorbis_ are also found. These may have
been carried away during floods from shallow pools and marshes bordering
the river; and the great extent of marshy ground caused by the wide
overflowings of rivers above supposed would favour the multiplication of
amphibious mollusks, such as the _Succinea_ (fig. 107.), which is almost
everywhere characteristic of this formation, and is sometimes accompanied,
as near Bonn, by another species, _S. amphibia_ (fig. 34. p. 29.). Among
other abundant fossils are _Helix plebeium_ and _Pupa muscorum_. (See
Figures.) Both the terrestrial and aquatic shells preserved in the loess
are of most fragile and delicate structure, and yet they are almost
invariably perfect and uninjured. They must have been broken to pieces had
they been swept along by a violent inundation. Even the colour of some of
the land shells, as that of _Helix nemoralis_, is occasionally preserved.

[Illustration: Fig. 107. _Succinea elongata._]

[Illustration: Fig. 108. _Pupa muscorum._]

[Illustration: Fig. 109. _Helix plebeium._]

Bones of vertebrated animals are rare in the loess, but those of the
mammoth, horse, and some other quadrupeds have been met with. At the
village of Binningen, and the hills called Bruderholz, near Basle, I found
the vertebræ of fish, together with the usual shells. These vertebræ,
according to M. Agassiz, belong decidedly to the Shark family, perhaps to
the genus _Lamna_. In explanation of their occurrence among land and
freshwater shells, it may be stated that certain fish of this family ascend
the Senegal, Amazon, and other great rivers, to the distance of several
hundred miles from the ocean.[120-A]

At Cannstadt, near Stuttgart, in a valley also belonging to the
hydrographical basin of the Rhine, I have seen the loess pass downwards
into beds of calcareous tuff and travertin. Several valleys in northern
Germany, as that of the Ilm at Weimar, and that of the Tonna, north of
Gotha, exhibit similar masses of modern limestone filled with recent shells
of the genera _Planorbis_, _Lymnea_, _Paludina_, &c., from 50 to 80 feet
thick, with a bed of loess much resembling that of the Rhine, occasionally
incumbent on them. In these modern limestones used for building, the bones
of _Elephas primigenius_, _Rhinoceros tichorinus_, _Ursus spelæus_, _Hyæna
spelæa_, with the horse, ox, deer, and other quadrupeds, occur; and in 1850
Mr. H. Credner and I obtained in a quarry at Tonna, at the depth of 15
feet, inclosed in the calcareous rock and surrounded with dicotyledonous
leaves and petrified leaves, four eggs of a snake of the size of the
largest European Coluber, which, with three others, had been found lying
in a series, or string.

They are, I believe, the first reptilian remains which have been met with
in strata of this age.

The agreement of the shells in these cases with recent European species
enables us to refer to a very modern period the filling up and
re-excavation of the valleys; an operation which doubtless consumed
a long period of time, since which the mammiferous fauna has undergone
a considerable change.


FOOTNOTES:

[110-A] See Princ. of Geol. vol. iii. 1st ed.

[112-A] See Principles, Index, "Serapis."

[113-A] Geol. Quart. Journ. vol. ii. Memoirs, p. 15.

[114-A] Quart. Geol. Journ. 4 Mems. p. 48.

[115-A] Journal, p. 451.

[116-A] See Principles, 8th ed. pp. 260-268.

[117-A] Lyell's Second Visit to the United States, vol. ii. chap. xxxiv.

[119-A] Princ. of Geol. 3d edition, 1834, vol. iii. p. 414.

[120-A] Proceedings Geol. Soc. No. 43. p. 222.



CHAPTER XI.

NEWER PLIOCENE PERIOD.--BOULDER FORMATION.

   Drift of Scandinavia, northern Germany, and Russia--Its northern
   origin--Not all of the same age--Fundamental rocks polished, grooved,
   and scratched--Action of glaciers and icebergs--Fossil shells of
   glacial period--Drift of eastern Norfolk--Associated freshwater
   deposit--Bent and folded strata lying on undisturbed beds--Shells on
   Moel Tryfane--Ancient glaciers of North Wales--Irish drift.


Among the different kinds of alluvium described in the seventh chapter,
mention was made of the boulder formation in the north of Europe, the
peculiar characters of which may now be considered, as it belongs in
part to the post-pliocene, and partly to the newer pliocene, period. I
shall first allude briefly to that portion of it which extends from
Finland and the Scandinavian mountains to the north of Russia, and the
low countries bordering the Baltic, and which has been traced southwards
as far as the eastern coast of England. This formation consists of mud,
sand, and clay, sometimes stratified, but often wholly devoid of
stratification, for a depth of more than a hundred feet. To this
unstratified form of the deposit, the name of _till_ has been applied in
Scotland. It generally contains numerous fragments of rocks, some
angular and others rounded, which have been derived from formations of
all ages, both fossiliferous, volcanic, and hypogene, and which have
often been brought from great distances. Some of the travelled blocks
are of enormous size, several feet or yards in diameter; their average
dimensions increasing as we advance northwards. The till is almost
everywhere devoid of organic remains, unless where these have been
washed into it from older formations; so that it is chiefly from
relative position that we must hope to derive a knowledge of its age.

Although a large proportion of the boulder deposit, or "northern drift," as
it has sometimes been called, is made up of fragments brought from a
distance, and which have sometimes travelled many hundred miles, the bulk
of the mass in each locality consists of the ruins of subjacent or
neighbouring rocks; so that it is red in a region of red sandstone, white
in a chalk country, and grey or black in a district of coal and coal-shale.

The fundamental rock on which the boulder formation reposes, if it consist
of granite, gneiss, marble, or other hard stone capable of permanently
retaining any superficial markings which may have been imprinted upon it,
is smoothed or polished, and usually exhibits parallel striæ and furrows
having a determinate direction. This direction, both in Europe and North
America, is evidently connected with the course taken by the erratic blocks
in the same district being north or south, or 20 or 30 degrees to the east
or west of north, according as the large angular and rounded stones have
travelled. These stones themselves also are often furrowed and scratched
on more than one side.

[Illustration: Fig. 110. Limestone polished, furrowed, and scratched by the
glacier of Rosenlaui, in Switzerland. (Agassiz.)

  _a a._ White streaks or scratches, caused by small grains of flint frozen
         into the ice.
  _b b._ Furrows.]

In explanation of such phenomena I may refer the student to what was said
of the action of glaciers and icebergs in the Principles of Geology.[122-A]
It is ascertained that hard stones, frozen into a moving mass of ice, and
pushed along under the pressure of that mass, scoop out long rectilinear
furrows or grooves parallel to each other on the subjacent solid rock. (See
fig. 110.) Smaller scratches and striæ are made on the polished surface by
crystals or projecting edges of the hardest minerals, just as a diamond
cuts glass. The recent polishing and striation of limestone by coast-ice
carrying boulders even as far south as the coast of Denmark, has been
observed by Dr. Forchhammer, and helps us to conceive how large icebergs,
running aground on the bed of the sea, may produce similar furrows on a
grander scale. An account was given so long ago as the year 1822, by
Scoresby, of icebergs seen by him drifting along in latitudes 69° and 70°
N., which rose above the surface from 100 to 200 feet, and measured from a
few yards to a mile in circumference. Many of them were loaded with beds of
earth and rock, of such thickness that the weight was conjectured to be
from 50,000 to 100,000 tons.[122-B] A similar transportation of rocks is
known to be in progress in the southern hemisphere, where boulders included
in ice are far more frequent than in the north. One of these icebergs was
encountered in 1839, in mid-ocean, in the antarctic regions, many hundred
miles from any known land, sailing northwards, with a large erratic block
firmly frozen into it. In order to understand in what manner long and
straight grooves may be cut by such agency, we must remember that these
floating islands of ice have a singular steadiness of motion, in
consequence of the larger portion of their bulk being sunk deep under
water, so that they are not perceptibly moved by the winds and waves even
in the strongest gales. Many had supposed that the magnitude commonly
attributed to icebergs by unscientific navigators was exaggerated, but now
it appears that the popular estimate of their dimensions has rather fallen
within than beyond the truth. Many of them, carefully measured by the
officers of the French exploring expedition of the Astrolabe, were between
100 and 225 feet high above water, and from 2 to 5 miles in length. Captain
d'Urville ascertained one of them which he saw floating in the Southern
Ocean to be 13 miles long and 100 feet high, with walls perfectly vertical.
The submerged portions of such islands must, according to the weight of ice
relatively to sea-water, be from six to eight times more considerable than
the part which is visible, so that the mechanical power they might exert
when fairly set in motion must be prodigious.[123-A]

Glaciers formed in mountainous regions become laden with mud and stones,
and if they melt away at their lower extremity before they reach the sea,
they leave wherever they terminate a confused heap of unstratified rubbish,
called "a moraine," composed of mud and pieces of all the rocks with which
they were loaded. We may expect, therefore, to find a formation of the same
kind, resulting from the liquefaction of icebergs, in tranquil water. But,
should the action of a current intervene at certain points or at certain
seasons, then the materials will be sorted as they fall, and arranged in
layers according to their relative weight and size. Hence there will be
passages from _till_, as it is called in Scotland, to stratified clay,
gravel, and sand, and intercalations of one in the other.

I have yet to mention another appearance connected with the boulder
formation, which has justly attracted much attention in Norway and other
parts of Europe. Abrupt pinnacles and outstanding ridges of rock are often
observed to be polished and furrowed on the north, or "strike" side as it
is called, or on the side facing the region from which the erratics have
come; while, on the other side, which is usually steeper and often
perpendicular, called the "lee-side," such superficial markings are
wanting. There is usually a collection on this lee-side of boulders and
gravel, or of large angular fragments. In explanation we may suppose that
the north side was exposed, when still submerged, to the action of
icebergs, and afterwards, when the land was upheaved, of coast-ice, which
ran aground upon shoals, or was _packed_ on the beach; so that there would
be great wear and tear on the seaward slope, while, on the other, gravel
and boulders might be heaped up in a sheltered position.

_Northern origin of erratics._--That the erratics of northern Europe have
been carried southward cannot be doubted; those of granite, for example,
scattered over large districts of Russia and Poland, agree precisely in
character with rocks of the mountains of Lapland and Finland; while the
masses of gneiss, syenite, porphyry, and trap, strewed over the low sandy
countries of Pomerania, Holstein, and Denmark, are identical in mineral
characters with the mountains of Norway and Sweden.

It is found to be a general rule in Russia, that the smaller blocks are
carried to greater distances from their point of departure than the larger;
the distance being sometimes 800 and even 1000 miles from the nearest rocks
from which they were broken off; the direction having been from N.W. to
S.E., or from the Scandinavian mountains over the seas and low lands to the
south-east. That its accumulation throughout this area took place in part
during the post-pliocene period is proved by its superposition at several
points to strata containing recent shells. Thus, for example, in European
Russia, MM. Murchison and De Verneuil found in 1840, that the flat country
between St. Petersburg and Archangel, for a distance of 600 miles,
consisted of horizontal strata, full of shells similar to those now
inhabiting the arctic sea, on which rested the boulder formation,
containing large erratics.

In Sweden, in the immediate neighbourhood of Upsala, I observed, in 1834, a
ridge of stratified sand and gravel, in the midst of which is a layer of
marl, evidently formed originally at the bottom of the Baltic, by the slow
growth of the mussel, cockle, and other marine shells, intermixed with some
of freshwater species. The marine shells are all of dwarfish size, like
those now inhabiting the brackish waters of the Baltic; and the marl, in
which myriads of them are imbedded, is now raised more than 100 feet above
the level of the Gulf of Bothnia. Upon the top of this ridge repose several
huge erratics, consisting of gneiss for the most part unrounded, from 9 to
16 feet in diameter, and which must have been brought into their present
position since the time when the neighbouring gulf was already
characterized by its peculiar fauna.[124-A] Here, therefore, we have proof
that the transport of erratics continued to take place, not merely when the
sea was inhabited by the existing testacea, but when the north of Europe
had already assumed that remarkable feature of its physical geography,
which separates the Baltic from the North Sea, and causes the Gulf of
Bothnia to have only one fourth of the saltness belonging to the ocean. In
Denmark, also, recent shells have been found in stratified beds, closely
associated with the boulder clay.

It was stated that in Russia the erratics diminished generally in size in
proportion as they are traced farther from their source. The same
observation holds true in regard to the average bulk of the Scandinavian
boulders, when we pursue them southwards, from the south of Norway and
Sweden through Denmark and Westphalia. This phenomenon is in perfect
harmony with the theory of ice-islands floating in a sea of variable depth;
for the heavier erratics require icebergs of a larger size to buoy them up;
and, even when there are no stones frozen in, more than seven eighths, and
often nine tenths, of a mass of drift ice is under water. The greater,
therefore, the volume of the iceberg, the sooner would it impinge on some
shallower part of the sea; while the smaller and lighter floes, laden with
finer mud and gravel, may pass freely over the same banks, and be carried
to much greater distances. In those places, also, where in the course of
centuries blocks have been carried southwards by coast-ice, having been
often stranded and again set afloat in the direction of a prevailing
current, the blocks will be worn and diminish in size the farther they
travel from their point of departure.

The "northern drift" of the most southern latitudes is usually of the
highest antiquity. In Scotland it rests immediately on the older rocks,
and is covered by stratified sand and clay, usually devoid of fossils,
but in which, at certain points near the east and west coast, as, for
example, in the estuaries of the Tay and Clyde, marine shells have been
discovered. The same shells have also been met with in the north, at
Wick in Caithness, and on the shores of the Moray Frith. The principal
deposit on the Clyde occurs at the height of about 70 feet, but a few
shells have been traced in it as high as 554 feet above the sea.
Although a proportion of between 85 or 90 in 100 of the imbedded shells
are of recent species, the remainder are unknown; and even many which
are recent now inhabit more northern seas, where we may, perhaps,
hereafter find living representatives of some of the unknown fossils.
The distance to which erratic blocks have been carried southwards in
Scotland, and the course they have taken, which is often wholly
independent of the present position of hill and valley, favours the idea
that ice-rafts rather than glaciers were in general the transporting
agents. The Grampians in Forfarshire and in Perthshire are from 3000 to
4000 feet high. To the southward lies the broad and deep valley of
Strathmore, and to the south of this again rise the Sidlaw Hills[125-A]
to the height of 1500 feet and upwards. On the highest summits of this
chain, formed of sandstone and shale, and at various elevations, are
found huge angular fragments of mica schist, some 3 and others 15 feet
in diameter, which have been conveyed for a distance of at least 15
miles from the nearest Grampian rocks from which they could have been
detached. Others have been left strewed over the bottom of the large
intervening vale of Strathmore.

Still farther south on the Pentland Hills, at the height of 1100 feet
above the sea, Mr. Maclaren has observed a fragment of mica-schist
weighing from 8 to 10 tons, the nearest mountain composed of this
formation being 50 miles distant.[125-B]

The testaceous fauna of the boulder period, in Scotland, England, and
Ireland, has been shown by Prof. E. Forbes to contain a much smaller
number of species than that now belonging to the British seas, and to have
been also much less rich in species than the Older Pliocene fauna of the
crag which preceded it. Yet the species are nearly all of them now living
either in the British or more northern seas, the shells of more arctic
latitudes being the most abundant and the most wide spread throughout the
entire area of the drift from north to south.

This extensive range of the fossils can by no means be explained by
imagining the mollusca of the drift to have been inhabitants of a deep
sea, where a more uniform temperature prevailed. On the contrary, many
species were littoral, and others belonged to a shallow sea, not above
100 feet deep, and very few of them lived, according to Prof. E. Forbes,
at greater depths than 300 feet.

From what was before stated it will appear that the boulder formation
displays almost everywhere, in its mineral ingredients, a strange
heterogeneous mixture of the ruins of adjacent lands, with stones both
angular and rounded, which have come from points often very remote. Thus we
find it in our eastern counties, as in Norfolk, Suffolk, Cambridge,
Huntingdon, Bedford, Hertford, Essex, and Middlesex, containing stones from
the Silurian and Carboniferous strata, and from the lias, oolite, and
chalk, all with their peculiar fossils, together with trap, syenite,
mica-schist, granite, and other crystalline rocks. A fine example of this
singular mixture extends to the very suburbs of London, being seen on the
summit of Muswell Hill, Highgate. But south of London the northern drift is
wanting, as, for example, in the Wealds of Surrey, Kent, and Sussex.

_Norfolk drift._--The drift can nowhere be studied more advantageously in
England than in the cliffs of the Norfolk coast between Happisburgh and
Cromer. Vertical sections, having an ordinary height of from 50 to 70 feet,
are there exposed to view for a distance of about 20 miles. The name of
diluvium was formerly given to it by those who supposed it to have been
produced by the violent action of a sudden and transient deluge, but the
term drift has been substituted by those who reject this hypothesis. Here,
as elsewhere, it consists for the most part of clay, loam, and sand, in
part stratified, in part devoid of stratification. Pebbles, together with
some large boulders of granite, porphyry, greenstone, lias, chalk, and
other transported rocks, are interspersed, especially through the till.
That some of the granitic and other fragments came from Scandinavia I have
no doubt, after having myself traced the course of the continuous stream of
blocks from Norway and Sweden to Denmark, and across the Elbe, through
Westphalia, to the borders of Holland. We need not be surprised to find
them reappear on our eastern coast, between the Tweed and the Thames,
regions not half so remote from parts of Norway as are many Russian
erratics from the sources whence they came.

White chalk rubble, unmixed with foreign matter, and even huge fragments
of solid chalk, also occur in many localities in these Norfolk cliffs.
No fossils have been detected in this drift, which can positively be
referred to the era of its accumulation; but at some points it overlies
a freshwater formation containing recent shells, and at others it is
blended with the same in such a manner as to force us to conclude that
both were contemporaneously deposited.

[Illustration: Fig. 111. The shaded portion consists of Freshwater
beds. Intercalation of freshwater beds and of boulder clay and
sand at Mundesley.]

This interstratification is expressed in the annexed figure, the dark mass
indicating the position of the freshwater beds, which contain much
vegetable matter, and are divided into thin layers. The imbedded shells
belong to the genera _Planorbis_, _Lymnea_, _Paludina_, _Unio_, _Cyclas_,
and others, all of British species, except a minute _Paludina_ now
inhabiting France. (See fig. 112.)

[Illustration: Fig. 112. _Paludina marginata_, Michaud. (_P. minuta_,
Strickland.) The middle figure is of the natural size.]

The _Cyclas_ (fig. 113.) is merely a remarkable variety of the common
English species. The scales and teeth of fish of the genera Pike,
Perch, Roach, and others, accompany these shells; but the species
are not considered by M. Agassiz to be identical with known British
or European kinds.

[Illustration: Fig. 113. _Cyclas_ (_Pisidium_) _amnica_, var.? The two
middle figures are of the natural size.]

The series of formations in the cliffs of eastern Norfolk, now under
consideration, beginning with the lowest, is as follows:--First, chalk;
secondly, patches of a marine tertiary formation, called the Norwich
Crag, hereafter to be described; thirdly, the freshwater beds already
mentioned; and lastly, the drift. Immediately above the chalk, or crag,
when that is present, is found here and there a buried forest, or a
stratum in which the stools and roots of trees stand in their natural
position, the trunks having been broken short off and imbedded with
their branches and leaves. It is very remarkable that the strata of the
overlying boulder formation have often undergone great derangement at
points where the subjacent forest bed and chalk remain undisturbed.
There are also cases where the upper portion of the boulder deposit has
been greatly deranged, while the lower beds of the same have continued
horizontal. Thus the annexed section (fig. 114.) represents a cliff
about 50 feet high, at the bottom of which is _till_, or unstratified
clay, containing boulders, having an even horizontal surface, on which
repose conformably beds of laminated clay and sand about 5 feet thick,
which, in their turn, are succeeded by vertical, bent, and contorted
layers of sand and loam 20 feet thick, the whole being covered by flint
gravel. Now the curves of the variously coloured beds of loose sand,
loam, and pebbles are so complicated that not only may we sometimes
find portions of them which maintain their verticality to a height
of 10 or 15 feet, but they have also been folded upon themselves in
such a manner that continuous layers might be thrice pierced in
one perpendicular boring.

[Illustration: Fig. 114. Cliff 50 feet high between Bacton
Gap and Mundesley.]

[Illustration: Fig. 115. Folding of the strata between East
and West Runton.]

[Illustration: Fig. 116. Section of concentric beds west of Cromer.

  1. Blue clay.
  2. White sand.
  3. Yellow Sand.
  4. Striped loam and clay.
  5. Laminated blue clay.]

At some points there is an apparent folding of the beds round a central
nucleus, as at _a_, fig. 115., where the strata seem bent round a small
mass of chalk; or, as in fig. 116., where the blue clay, No. 1., is in the
centre; and where the other strata, 2, 3, 4, 5, are coiled round it; the
entire mass being 20 feet in perpendicular height. This appearance of
concentric arrangement around a nucleus is, nevertheless, delusive, being
produced by the intersection of beds bent into a convex shape; and that
which seems the nucleus being, in fact, the innermost bed of the series,
which has become partially visible by the removal of the protuberant
portions of the outer layers.

To the north of Cromer are other fine illustrations of contorted drift
reposing on a floor of chalk horizontally stratified and having a level
surface. These phenomena, in themselves sufficiently difficult of
explanation, are rendered still more anomalous by the occasional inclosure
in the drift of huge fragments of chalk many yards in diameter. One
striking instance occurs west of Sherringham, where an enormous pinnacle of
chalk, between 70 and 80 feet in height, is flanked on both sides by
vertical layers of loam, clay, and gravel. (Fig. 117.)

[Illustration: Fig. 117. Included pinnacle of chalk at Old Hythe point,
west of Sherringham.

  _d._ Chalk with regular layers of chalk flints.
  _c._ Layer called "the pan," of loose chalk, flints, and marine shells
       of recent species, cemented by oxide of iron.]

This chalky fragment is only one of many detached masses which have been
included in the drift, and forced along with it into their present
position. The level surface of the chalk _in situ_ (_d_) may be traced for
miles along the coast, where it has escaped the violent movements to which
the incumbent drift has been exposed.[129-A]

We are called upon, then, to explain how any force can have been exerted
against the upper masses, so as to produce movements in which the
subjacent strata have not participated. It may be answered that, if we
conceive the _till_ and its boulders to have been drifted to their
present place by ice, the lateral pressure may have been supplied by the
stranding of ice-islands. We learn, from the observations of Messrs.
Dease and Simpson in the polar regions, that such islands, when they run
aground, push before them large mounds of shingle and sand. It is
therefore probable that they often cause great alterations in the
arrangement of pliant and incoherent strata forming the upper part of
shoals or submerged banks, the inferior portions of the same remaining
unmoved. Or many of the complicated curvatures of these layers of loose
sand and gravel may have been due to another cause, the melting on the
spot of icebergs and coast ice in which successive deposits of pebbles,
sand, ice, snow, and mud, together with huge masses of rock fallen from
cliffs, may have become interstratified. Ice-islands so constituted
often capsize when afloat, and gravel once horizontal may have assumed,
before the associated ice was melted, an inclined or vertical position.
The packing of ice forced up on a coast may lead to similar derangement
in a frozen conglomerate of sand or shingle, and, as Mr. Trimmer has
suggested[130-A], alternate layers of earthy matter may have sunk
down slowly during the liquefaction of the intercalated ice, so as
to assume the most fantastic and anomalous positions, while the
aqueous strata below, and those afterwards thrown down above, may
be perfectly horizontal.

A buried forest has been adverted to as underlying the drift on the coast
of Norfolk. At the time when the trees grew there must have been dry land
over a large area, which was afterwards submerged, so as to allow a mass of
stratified and unstratified drift, 200 feet and more in thickness, to be
superimposed. The undermining of the cliffs by the sea in modern times has
enabled us to demonstrate, beyond all doubt, the fact of this
superposition, and that the forest was not formed along the present
coast-line. Its situation implies a subsidence of several hundred feet
since the commencement of the drift period, after which there must have
been an upheaval of the same ground; for the forest bed of Norfolk is now
again so high as to be exposed to view at many points at low water; and
this same upward movement may explain why the _till_, which is conceived
to have been of submarine origin, is now met with far inland, and on
the summit of hills.

The boulder formation of the west of England, observed in Lancashire,
Cheshire, Shropshire, Staffordshire, and Worcestershire, contains in some
places marine shells of recent species, rising to various heights, from 100
to 350 feet above the sea. The erratics have come partly from the mountains
of Cumberland, and partly from those of Scotland.

But it is on the mountains of North Wales that the "Northern drift,"
with its characteristic marine fossils, reaches its greatest altitude.
On Moel Tryfane, near the Menai Straits, Mr. Trimmer met with shells of
the species commonly found in the drift at the height of 1392 feet above
the level of the sea.

It is remarkable that in the same neighbourhood where there is evidence of
so great a submergence of the land during part of the glacial period, we
have also the most decisive proofs yet discovered in the British Isles of
subaerial glaciers. Dr. Buckland published in 1842 his reasons for
believing that the Snowdonian mountains in Caernarvonshire were formerly
covered with glaciers, which radiated from the central heights through the
seven principal valleys of that chain, where striæ and flutings are seen
on the polished rocks directed towards as many different points of the
compass. He also described the "moraines" of the ancient glaciers, and the
rounded "bosses" or small flattened domes of polished rock, such as the
action of moving glaciers is known to produce in Switzerland, when gravel,
sand, and boulders, underlying the ice, are forced along over a foundation
of hard stone. Mr. Darwin, and subsequently Prof. Ramsay, have confirmed
Dr. Buckland's views in regard to these Welsh glaciers. Nor indeed was it
to be expected that geologists should discover proofs of icebergs having
abounded in the area now occupied by the British Isles in the Pleistocene
period without sometimes meeting with the signs of contemporaneous glaciers
which covered hills even of moderate elevation between the 50th and 60th
degrees of latitude.

In Ireland the "drift" exhibits the same general characters and fossil
remains as in Scotland and England; but in the southern part of that
island, Prof. E. Forbes and Capt. James found in it some shells which show
that the glacial sea communicated with one inhabited by a more southern
fauna. Among other species in the south, they mention at Wexford and
elsewhere the occurrence of _Nucula Cobboldiæ_ (see fig. 120. p. 149.) and
_Turritella incrassata_ (a crag fossil); also a southern form of _Fusus_,
and a _Mitra_ allied to a Spanish species.[131-A]


FOOTNOTES:

[122-A] Chap. xvi. and the references there given.

[122-B] Voyage in 1822, p. 233.

[123-A] T. L. Hayes, Boston Journ. Nat. Hist. 1844.

[124-A] See paper by the author, Phil. Trans. 1835, p. 15.

[125-A] See above, section, p. 48.

[125-B] Geol. of Fife, &c. p. 220.

[129-A] For a full account of the drift of East Norfolk, see a paper by the
author, Phil. Mag. No. 104. May, 1840.

[130-A] Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. vii. p. 22.

[131-A] Forbes, Memoirs of Geol. Survey of Great Britain, vol. i. p. 377.



CHAPTER XII.

BOULDER FORMATION--_continued_.

   Difficulty of interpreting the phenomena of drift before the glacial
   hypothesis was adopted--Effects of intense cold in augmenting the
   quantity of alluvium--Analogy of erratics and scored rocks in North
   America and Europe--Bayfield on shells in drift of Canada--Great
   subsidence and re-elevation of land from the sea, required to account
   for glacial appearances--Why organic remains so rare in northern
   drift--Mastodon giganteus in United States--Many shells and some
   quadrupeds survived the glacial cold--Alps an independent centre of
   dispersion of erratics--Alpine blocks on the Jura--Whether transported
   by glaciers or floating ice--Recent transportation of erratics from
   the Andes to Chiloe--Meteorite in Asiatic drift.


It will appear from what was said in the last chapter of the marine shells
characterizing the boulder formation, that nine-tenths or more of them
belong to species still living. The superficial position of "the drift" is
in perfect accordance with its imbedded organic remains, leading us to
refer its origin to a modern period. If, then, we encounter so much
difficulty in the interpretation of monuments relating to times so near our
own--if in spite of their recent date they are involved in so much
obscurity--the student may ask, not without reasonable alarm, how we can
hope to decipher the records of remote ages.

To remove from the mind as far as possible this natural feeling of
discouragement, I shall endeavour in this chapter to prove that what seems
most strikingly anomalous, in the "erratic formation," as some call it, is
really the result of that glacial action which has already been alluded to.
If so, it was to be expected that so long as the true origin of so singular
a deposit remained undiscovered, erroneous theories and terms would be
invented in the effort to solve the problem. These inventions would
inevitably retard the reception of more correct views which a wider field
of observation might afterwards suggest.

The term "diluvium" was for a time the popular name of the boulder
formation, because it was referred by some geologists to the deluge.
Others retained the name as expressive of their opinion that a series of
diluvial waves raised by hurricanes and storms, or by earthquakes, or by
the sudden upheaval of land from the bed of the sea, had swept over the
continents, carrying with them vast masses of mud and heavy stones, and
forcing these stones over rocky surfaces so as to polish and imprint
upon them long furrows and striæ.

But no explanation was offered why such agency should have been
developed more energetically in modern times than at former periods of
the earth's history, or why it should be displayed in its fullest
intensity in northern latitudes; for it is important to insist on the
fact, that the boulder formation is a _northern_ phenomenon. Even the
southern extension of the drift, or the large erratics found in the Alps
and the surrounding lands, especially their occurrence round the highest
parts of the chain, offers such an exception to the general rule as
confirms the glacial hypothesis; for it shows that the transportation of
stony fragments to great distances, and the striation, polishing, and
grooving of solid floors of rock, are here again intimately connected
with accumulations of perennial snow and ice.

That there is some intimate connection between a cold or northern climate
and the various geological appearances now commonly called glacial, cannot
be doubted by any one who has compared the countries bordering the Baltic
with those surrounding the Mediterranean. The smoothing and striation of
rocks, and the erratics, are traced from the sea-shore to the height of
3000 feet above the level of the Baltic, whereas such phenomena are wholly
wanting in countries bordering the Mediterranean; and their absence is
still more marked in the equatorial parts of Asia, Africa, and America; but
when we cross the southern tropic, and reach Chili and Patagonia, we again
encounter the boulder formation, between the latitude 41° S. and Cape Horn,
with precisely the same characters which it assumes in Europe. The evidence
as to climate derived from the organic remains of the drift is, as we have
seen, in perfect harmony with the conclusions above alluded to, the former
habits of the species of mollusca being accurately ascertainable, inasmuch
as they belong to species still living, and known to have at present a wide
range in northern seas.

But if we are correct in assuming that the northern hemisphere was
considerably colder than now during the period under consideration, owing
probably to the greater area and height of arctic lands, and to the
quantity of icebergs which such a geographical state of things would
generate, it may be well to reflect before we proceed farther on the entire
modification which extreme cold would produce in the operation of those
causes spoken of in the sixth chapter as most active in the formation of
alluvium. A large part of the materials derived from the detritus of rocks,
which in warm climates would go to form deltas, or would be regularly
stratified by marine currents, would, under arctic influences, assume a
superficial and alluvial character. Instead of mud being carried farther
from a coast than sand, and sand farther out than pebbles,--instead of
dense stratified masses being heaped up in limited areas,--nearly the whole
materials, whether coarse or fine, would be conveyed by ice to equal
distances, and huge fragments, which water alone could never move, would be
borne for hundreds of miles without having their edges worn or fractured;
and the earthy and stony masses, when melted out of the frozen rafts, would
be scattered at random over the submarine bottom, whether on mountain tops
or in low plains, with scarcely any relation to the inequalities of the
ground, settling on the crests or ridges of hills in tranquil water as
readily as in valleys and ravines. Occasionally, in those deep and
uninhabited parts of the ocean, never reached by any but the finest
sediment in a normal state of things, the bottom would become densely
overspread by gravel, mud, and boulders.

In the Western Hemisphere, both in Canada and as far south as the 40th and
even 38th parallel of latitude in the United States, we meet with a
repetition of all the peculiarities which distinguish the European boulder
formation. Fragments of rock have travelled for great distances from north
to south; the surface of the subjacent rock is smoothed, striated, and
fluted; unstratified mud or _till_ containing boulders is associated with
strata of loam, sand, and clay, usually devoid of fossils. Where shells are
present, they are of species still living in northern seas, and half of
them identical with those already enumerated as belonging to European drift
10 degrees of latitude farther north. The fauna also of the glacial epoch
in North America is less rich in species than that now inhabiting the
adjacent sea, whether in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, or off the shores of
Maine, or in the Bay of Massachusetts. At the southern extremity of its
course, moreover, it presents an analogy with the drift of the south of
Ireland, by blending with a more southern fauna, as for example at Brooklyn
near New York, in lat. 41° N., where, according to MM. Redfield and Desor,
_Venus mercenaria_ and other southern species of shells begin to occur as
fossils in the drift.

The extension on the American continent of the range of erratics during the
Pleistocene period to lower latitudes than they reached in Europe, agrees
well with the present southward deflection of the isothermal lines, or
rather the lines of equal winter temperature. Formerly, as now, a more
extreme climate and a more abundant supply of floating ice prevailed on the
western side of the Atlantic.

Another resemblance between the distribution of the drift fossils in Europe
and North America has yet to be pointed out. In Norway, Sweden, and
Scotland, as in Canada and the United States, the marine shells are
confined to very moderate elevations above the sea (between 100 and 700
feet), while the erratic blocks and the grooved and polished surfaces of
rock extend to elevations of several thousand feet.

[Illustration: Fig. 118. Cross section.

   K.  Mr. Ryland's house.
  _h_. Clay and sand of higher grounds, with _Saxicava_, &c.
  _g_. Gravel with boulders.
  _f_. Mass of _Saxicava rugosa_, 12 feet thick.
  _e_. Sand and loam with _Mya truncata_, _Scalaria Groenlandica_, &c.
  _d_. Drift, with boulders of syenite, &c.
  _c_. Yellow sand.
  _b_. Laminated clay, 25 feet thick.
   A.  Horizontal lower Silurian strata.
   B.  Valley re-excavated.]

I described in 1839 the fossil shells collected by Captain Bayfield from
strata of drift at Beauport near Quebec, in lat. 47°, and drew from them
the inference that they indicated a more northern climate, the shells
agreeing in great part with those of Uddevalla in Sweden.[134-A] The shelly
beds attain at Beauport and the neighbourhood a height of 200, 300, and
sometimes 400 feet above the sea, and dispersed through some of them are
large boulders of granite, which could not have been propelled by a violent
current, because the accompanying fragile shells are almost all entire.
They seem, therefore, said Captain Bayfield, writing in 1838, to have been
dropped down from melting ice, like similar stones which are now annually
deposited in the St. Lawrence.[134-B] I visited this locality in 1842, and
made the annexed section, fig. 118., which will give an idea of the general
position of the drift in Canada and the United States. I imagine that the
whole of the valley B was once filled up with the beds _b_, _c_, _d_, _e_,
_f_, which were deposited during a period of subsidence, and that
subsequently the higher country (_h_) was submerged and overspread with
drift. The partial re-excavation of B took place when this region was again
uplifted above the sea to its present height. Among the twenty-three
species of fossil shells collected by me from these beds at Beauport, all
were of recent northern species, except one, which is unknown as living,
and may be extinct (see fig. 119.). I also examined the same formation
farther up the valley of the St. Lawrence, in the suburbs of Montreal,
where some of the beds of loam are filled with great numbers of the
_Mytilus edulis_, or our common European mussel, retaining both its valves
and purple colour. This shelly deposit, containing _Saxicava rugosa_ and
other characteristic marine shells, also occurs at an elevated point on
the mountain of Montreal, 450 feet above the level of the sea.[135-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 119. _Astarte Laurentiana._

  _a._ Outside.
  _b._ Inside of right valve.
  _c._ Inside of left valve.]

In my account of Canada and the United States, published in 1845, I
announced the conclusion to which I had then arrived, that to explain
the position of the erratics and the polished surfaces of rocks, and
their striæ and flutings, we must assume first a gradual submergence of
the land in North America, after it had acquired its present outline of
hill and valley, cliff and ravine, and then its re-emergence from the
ocean. When the land was slowly sinking, the sea which bordered it was
covered with islands of floating ice coming from the north, which, as
they grounded on the coast and on shoals, pushed along such loose
materials of sand and pebbles as lay strewed over the bottom. By this
force all angular and projecting points were broken off, and fragments
of hard stone, frozen into the lower surface of the ice, had power to
scoop out grooves in the subjacent solid rock. The sloping beach, as
well as the floor of the ocean, might be polished and scored by this
machinery; but no flood of water, however violent, or however great the
quantity of detritus or size of the rocky fragments swept along by it,
could produce such long, perfectly straight and parallel furrows, as are
everywhere visible in the Niagara district, and generally in the region
north of the 40th parallel of latitude.[135-B]

By the hypothesis of such a slow and gradual subsidence of the land we may
account for the fact that almost everywhere in N. America and Northern
Europe the boulder formation rests on a polished and furrowed surface of
rock,--a fact by no means obliging us to imagine, as some think, that the
polishing and grooving action was, as a whole, anterior in date to the
transportation of the erratics. During the successive depression of high
land, varying originally in height from 1000 to 3000 feet above the
sea-level, every portion of the surface would be brought down by turns to
the level of the ocean, so as to be converted first into a coast-line, and
then into a shoal; and at length, after being well scored by the stranding
upon it of thousands of icebergs, might be sunk to a depth of several
hundred fathoms. By the constant depression of land, the coast would recede
farther and farther from the successively formed zones of polished and
striated rock, each outer zone becoming in its turn so deep under water as
to be no longer grated upon by the heaviest icebergs. Such sunken areas
would then simply serve as receptacles of mud, sand, and boulders dropped
from melting ice, perhaps to a depth scarcely, if at all, inhabited by
testacea and zoophytes. Meanwhile, during the formation of the unstratified
and unfossiliferous mass in deeper water, the smoothing and furrowing of
shoals and beaches is still going on elsewhere upon and near the coast in
full activity. If at length the subsidence should cease, and the direction
of the movement of the earth's crust be reversed, the sunken area covered
with drift would be slowly reconverted into land. The boulder deposit,
before emerging, would then for a time be brought within the action of the
waves, tides, and currents, so that its upper portion, being partially
disturbed, would have its materials re-arranged and stratified. Streams
also flowing from the land would in some places throw down layers of
sediment upon the _till_. In that case, the order of superposition will be,
first and uppermost, sand, loam, and gravel occasionally fossiliferous;
secondly, an unstratified and unfossiliferous mass, for the most part of
much older date than the preceding, with angular erratics, or with boulders
interspersed; and, thirdly, beneath the whole, a surface of polished and
furrowed rock. Such a succession of events seems to have prevailed very
widely on both sides of the Atlantic, the travelled blocks having been
carried in general from the North Pole southwards, but mountain chains
having in some cases served as independent centres of dispersion, of which
the Alps present the most conspicuous example.

It is by no means rare to meet with boulders imbedded in drift which are
worn flat on one or more of their sides, the surface being at the same time
polished, furrowed, and striated. They may have been so shaped in a glacier
before they reached the sea, or when they were fixed in the bottom of an
iceberg as it ran aground. We learn from Mr. Charles Martins that the
glaciers of Spitzbergen project from the coast into a sea between 100 and
400 feet deep; and that numbers of striated pebbles or blocks are there
seen to disengage themselves from the overhanging masses of ice as they
melt, so as to fall at once into deep water.[136-A]

That they should retain such markings when again upraised above the sea
ought not to surprise us, when we remember that rippled sands, and the
cracks in clay dried between high and low water, and the foot-tracks of
animals and rain-drops impressed on mud, and other superficial markings,
are all found fossil in rocks of various ages.

On the other hand, it is not difficult to account for the absence in many
districts of striated and scored pebbles and boulders in glacial deposits,
for they may have been exposed to the action of the waves on a coast while
it was sinking beneath or rising above the sea. No shingle on an ordinary
sea-beach exhibits such striæ, and at a very short distance from the
termination of a glacier every stone in the bed of the torrent which gushes
out from the melting ice is found to have lost its glacial markings by
being rolled for a distance even of a few hundred yards.

The usual dearth of fossil shells in glacial clays well fitted to preserve
organic remains may, perhaps, be owing, as already hinted, to the absence
of testacea in the deep sea, where the undisturbed accumulation of boulders
melted out of very large bergs may take place. In the Ægean and other parts
of the Mediterranean, the zero of animal life, according to Prof. E.
Forbes, is approached at a depth of about 300 fathoms. In tropical seas it
would descend farther down, just as vegetation ascends higher on the
mountains of hot countries. Near the pole, on the other hand, the same zero
would be reached much sooner both on the hills and in the sea. If the ocean
was filled with floating bergs, and a low temperature prevailed in the
northern hemisphere during the glacial period, even the shallow part of the
sea might have been uninhabitable, or very thinly peopled with living
beings. It may also be remarked that the melting of ice in some fiords in
Norway freshens the water so as to destroy marine life, and famines have
been caused in Iceland by the stranding of icebergs drifted from the
Greenland coast, which have required several years to melt, and have not
only injured the hay harvest by cooling the atmosphere, but have driven
away the fish from the shore by chilling and freshening the sea.

If the cold of the glacial epoch came on slowly, if it was long before it
reached its greatest intensity, and again if it abated gradually, we may
expect to find the earliest and latest formed drift less barren of organic
remains than that deposited during the coldest period. We may also expect
that along the southern limits of the drift during the whole glacial epoch,
there would be an intimate association of transported matter of northern
origin with fossil-bearing sediment, whether marine or freshwater,
belonging to more southern seas, rivers, and continents.

That in the United States, the _Mastodon giganteus_ was very abundant after
the drift period is evident from the fact that entire skeletons of this
animal are met with in bogs and lacustrine deposits occupying hollows in
the drift. They sometimes occur in the bottom even of small ponds recently
drained by the agriculturist for the sake of the shell marl. I examined one
of these spots at Geneseo in the state of New York, from which the bones,
skull, and tusk of a Mastodon had been procured in the marl below a layer
of black peaty earth, and ascertained that all the associated freshwater
and land shells were of a species now common in the same district. They
consisted of several species of _Lymnea_, of _Planorbis bicarinatus_,
_Physa heterostropha_, &c.

In 1845 no less than six skeletons of the same species of Mastodon were
found in Warren County, New Jersey, 6 feet below the surface, by a farmer
who was digging out the rich mud from a small pond which he had drained.
Five of these skeletons were lying together, and a large part of the bones
crumbled to pieces as soon as they were exposed to the air. But nearly the
whole of the other skeleton, which lay about 10 feet apart from the rest,
was preserved entire, and proved the correctness of Cuvier's conjecture
respecting this extinct animal, namely, that it had twenty ribs like the
living elephant. From the clay in the interior within the ribs, just where
the contents of the stomach might naturally have been looked for, seven
bushels of vegetable matter were extracted. I submitted some of this matter
to Mr. A. Henfrey of London for microscopic examination, and he informs me
that it consists of pieces of small twigs of a coniferous tree of the
Cypress family, probably the young shoots of the white cedar, _Thuja
occidentalis_, still a native of North America, on which therefore we may
conclude that this extinct Mastodon once fed.

Another specimen of the same quadruped, the most complete and probably the
largest ever found, was exhumed in 1845 in the town of Newburg, New York,
the length of the skeleton being 25 feet, and its height 12 feet. The
anchylosing of the last two ribs on the right side afforded Dr. John C.
Warren a true gauge for the space occupied by the intervertebrate
substance, so as to enable him to form a correct estimate of the entire
length. The tusks when discovered were 10 feet long, but a part only could
be preserved. The large proportion of animal matter in the tusk, teeth, and
bones of some of these fossil mammalia is truly astonishing. It amounts in
some cases, as Dr. C. T. Jackson has ascertained by analysis, to 27 per
cent., so that when all the earthy ingredients are removed by acids, the
form of the bone remains as perfect, and the mass of animal matter is
almost as firm, as in a recent bone subjected to similar treatment.

It would be rash, however, to infer from such data that these quadrupeds
were mired in _modern_ times, unless we use that term strictly in a
geological sense. I have shown that there is a fluviatile deposit in the
valley of the Niagara, containing shells of the genera _Melania_,
_Lymnea_, _Planorbis_, _Valvata_, _Cyclas_, _Unio_, and _Helix_, &c.,
all of recent species, from which the bones of the great Mastodon have
been taken in a very perfect state. Yet the whole excavation of the
ravine, for many miles below the Falls, has been slowly effected since
that fluviatile deposit was thrown down.

Whether or not, in assigning a period of more than 30,000 years for the
recession of the Falls from Queenstown to their present site, I have over
or under estimated the time required for that operation, no one can doubt
that a vast number of centuries must have elapsed before so great a series
of geographical changes were brought about as have occurred since the
entombment of this elephantine quadruped. The freshwater gravel which
incloses it is decidedly of much more modern origin than the drift or
boulder clay of the same region.[138-A]

Other extinct animals accompany the _Mastodon giganteus_ in the
post-glacial deposits of the United States, among which the _Castoroides
ohioensis_, Foster and Wyman, a huge rodent allied to the beaver, and
the _Capybara_ may be mentioned. But whether the "loess," and other
freshwater and marine strata of the Southern States, in which skeletons
of the same Mastodon are mingled with the bones of the Megatherium,
Mylodon, and Megalonyx, were contemporaneous with the drift, or were of
subsequent date, is a chronological question still open to discussion.
It appears clear, however, from what we know of the tertiary fossils of
Europe--and I believe the same will hold true in North America--that
many species of testacea and some mammalia, which existed prior to the
glacial epoch, survived that era. As European examples among the
warm-blooded quadrupeds, the _Elephas primigenius_ and _Rhinoceros
tichorinus_ may be mentioned. As to the shells, whether fresh water,
terrestrial, or marine, they need not be enumerated here, as allusion
will be made to them in the sequel, when the pliocene tertiary fossils
of Suffolk are described. The fact is important, as refuting the
hypothesis that the cold of the glacial period was so intense and
universal as to annihilate all living creatures throughout the globe.

That the cold was greater for a time than it is now in certain parts of
Siberia, Europe, and North America, will not be disputed; but, before we
can infer the universality of a colder climate, we must ascertain what was
the condition of other parts of the northern, and of the whole southern,
hemisphere at the time when the Scandinavian, British, and Alpine erratics
were transported into their present position. It must not be forgotten that
a great deposit of drift and erratic blocks is now in full progress of
formation in the southern hemisphere, in a zone corresponding in latitude
to the Baltic, and to Northern Italy, Switzerland, France, and England.
Should the uneven bed of the southern ocean be hereafter converted by
upheaval into land, the hills and valleys will be strewed over with
transported fragments, some derived from the antarctic continent, others
from islands covered with glaciers, like South Georgia, which must now be
centres of the dispersion of drift, although situated in a latitude,
agreeing with that of the Cumberland mountains in England.

Not only are these operations going on between the 45th and 60th parallels
of latitude south of the line, while the corresponding zone of Europe is
free from ice; but, what is still more worthy of remark, we find in the
southern hemisphere itself, only 900 miles distant from South Georgia,
where the perpetual snow reaches to the sea-beach, lands covered with
forests, as in Terra del Fuego. There is here no difference of latitude to
account for the luxuriance of vegetation in one spot, and the absolute want
of it in the other; but among other refrigerating causes in South Georgia
may be enumerated the countless icebergs which float from the antarctic
zone, and which chill, as they melt, the waters of the ocean, and the
surrounding air, which they fill with dense fogs.

I have endeavoured in the "Principles of Geology," chapters 7. and 8., to
point out the intimate connexion of climate and the physical geography of
the globe, and the dependence of the mean annual temperature, not only on
the height of the dry land, but on its distribution in high or low
latitudes at particular epochs. If, for example, at certain periods of the
past, the antarctic land was less elevated and less extensive than now,
while that at the north pole was higher and more continuous, the conditions
of the northern and southern hemispheres might have been the reverse of
what we now witness in regard to climate, although the mountains of
Scandinavia, Scotland, and Switzerland, may have been less elevated than at
present. But if in both of the polar regions a considerable area of
elevated dry land existed, such a concurrence of refrigerating conditions
in both hemispheres might have created for a time an intensity of cold
never experienced since; and such probably was the state of things during
that period of submergence to which I have alluded in this chapter.

_Alpine erratics._--Although the arctic regions constitute the great centre
from which erratics have travelled southwards in all directions in Europe
and North America, yet there are some mountains, as I have already stated,
like those of North Wales and the Alps, which have served as separate and
independent centres for the dispersion of blocks. In illustration of this
fact, the Alps deserve particular attention, not only from their magnitude,
but because they lie beyond the ordinary limits of the "northern drift" of
Europe, being situated between the 44th and 47th degrees of north latitude.
On the flanks of these mountains, and on the Subalpine ranges of hills or
plains adjoining them, those appearances which have been so often alluded
to, as distinguishing or accompanying the drift, between the 50th and 70th
parallels of north latitude, suddenly reappear, to assume in a more
southern country their most exaggerated form. Where the Alps are highest,
the largest erratic blocks have been sent forth, as, for example, from the
regions of Mont Blanc and Monte Rosa, into the adjoining parts of France,
Switzerland, Austria, and Italy, while in districts where the great chain
sinks in altitude, as in Carinthia, Carniola, and elsewhere, no such rocky
fragments, or a few only and of smaller bulk, have been detached and
transported to a distance.

In the year 1821, M. Venetz first announced his opinion that the Alpine
glaciers must formerly have extended far beyond their present limits, and
the proofs appealed to by him in confirmation of this doctrine were
afterwards acknowledged by M. Charpentier, who strengthened them by new
observations and arguments, and declared, in 1836, his conviction that the
glaciers of the Alps must once have reached as far as the Jura, and have
carried thither their moraines across the great valley of Switzerland. M.
Agassiz, after several excursions in the Alps with M. Charpentier, and
after devoting himself some years to the study of glaciers, published, in
1840, an admirable description of them, and of the marks which attest the
former action of great masses of ice over the entire surface of the Alps
and the surrounding country.[140-A] He pointed out that the surface of
every large glacier is strewed over with gravel and stones detached from
the surrounding precipices by frost, rain, lightning, or avalanches. And he
described more carefully than preceding writers the long lines of these
stones, which settle on the sides of the glacier, and are called the
lateral moraines; those found at the lower end of the ice being called
terminal moraines. Such heaps of earth and boulders every glacier pushes
before it when advancing, and leaves behind it when retreating. When the
Alpine glacier reaches a lower and warmer situation, about 3000 or 4000
feet above the sea, it melts so rapidly that, in spite of the downward
movement of the mass, it can advance no farther. Its precise limits are
variable from year to year, and still more so from century to century; one
example being on record of a recession of half a mile in a single year. We
also learn from M. Venetz, that whereas, between the eleventh and fifteenth
centuries, all the Alpine glaciers were less advanced than now, they began
in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries to push forward so as to cover
roads formerly open, and to overwhelm forests of ancient growth.

These oscillations enable the geologist to note the marks which they leave
behind them as they retrograde, and among these the most prominent, as
before stated, are the terminal moraines, or mounds of unstratified earth
and stones, often divided by subsequent floods into hillocks, which cross
the valley like ancient earth-works, or embankments made to dam up the
river. Some of these transverse barriers were formerly pointed out by
Saussure below the glacier of the Rhone, as proving how far it had once
transgressed its present boundaries. On these moraines we see many large
angular fragments, which, having been carried along on the surface of the
ice, have not had their edges worn off by friction; but the greater number
of the boulders, even those of large size, have been well rounded, not by
the power of water, but by the mechanical force of the ice, which has
pushed them against each other, or against the rocks flanking the valley.
Others have fallen down the numerous fissures which intersect the glacier,
where, being subject to the pressure of the whole mass of ice, they have
been forced along, and either well rounded or ground down into sand, or
even the finest mud, of which the moraine is largely constituted.

As the terminal moraines are the most prominent of all the monuments left
by a receding glacier, so are they the most liable to obliteration; for
violent floods or debacles are often occasioned in the Alps by the sudden
bursting of what are called glacier-lakes. These temporary sheets of water
are caused by the damming up of a river by a glacier which has increased
during a succession of cold seasons, and, descending from a tributary into
the main valley, has crossed it from side to side. On the failure of this
icy barrier, the accumulated waters are let loose, which sweep away and
level all transverse mounds of gravel and loose boulder below, and spread
their materials in confused and irregular beds over the river-plain.

Another mark of the former action of glaciers, in situations where they
exist no longer, is the polished, striated, and grooved surfaces of rocks
already alluded to. Stones which lie underneath the glacier and are pushed
along by it, sometimes adhere to the ice, and as the mass glides slowly
along at the rate of a few inches, or at the utmost two or three feet, per
day, abrade, groove, and polish the rock, and the larger blocks are
reciprocally grooved and polished by the rock on their lower sides. As the
forces both of pressure and propulsion are enormous, the sand, acting like
emery, polishes the surface; the pebbles, like coarse gravers, scratch and
furrow it; and the large stones scoop out grooves in it. Another effect
also of this action, not yet adverted to, is called "roches moutonnées."
Projecting eminences of rock are smoothed and worn into the shape of
flattened domes, where the glaciers have passed over them.

Although the surface of almost every kind of rock, when exposed in the open
air, wastes away by decomposition, yet some retain for ages their polished
and furrowed exterior; and, if they are well protected by a covering of
clay or turf, these marks of abrasion seem capable of enduring for ever.
They have been traced in the Alps to great heights above the present
glaciers, and to great horizontal distances beyond them.

There are also found, on the sides of the Swiss valleys, round and deep
holes, with polished sides, such holes as waterfalls make in the solid
rock, but in places remote from running waters, and where the form of the
surface will not permit us to suppose that any cascade could ever have
existed. Similar cavities are common in hard rocks, such as gneiss, in
Sweden, where they are called _giant caldrons_, and are sometimes 10 feet
and more in depth; but in the Alps and Jura they often pass into
spoon-shaped excavations and prolonged gutters. We learn from M. Agassiz
that hollows of this form are now cut out by streams of water, which flow
along the surface of glaciers, and then fall into fissures which are open
to the bottom. Here, forming a cascade, the stream cuts a round cavity in
the rock with the gravel and sand, which it either finds there or carries
down with it, and causes to rotate; and, as it usually happens that the
glacier is advancing, a locomotive cascade is produced, which converts the
first circular hole into a deep groove.

Another effect of a glacier is to lodge a ring of stones round the summit
of a conical peak which may happen to project through the ice. If the
glacier is lowered greatly by melting, these circles of large angular
fragments, which are called "perched blocks," are left in a singular
situation near the top of a steep hill or pinnacle, the lower parts of
which may be destitute of boulders.

_Alpine blocks on the Jura._--Now some or all the marks above
enumerated,--the moraines, erratics, polished surfaces, domes, striæ,
caldrons, and perched rocks, are observed in the Alps at great heights
above the present glaciers, and far below their actual extremities; also
in the great valley of Switzerland, 50 miles broad; and almost
everywhere on the Jura, a chain which lies to the north of this valley.
The average height of the Jura is about one third that of the Alps, and
is now entirely destitute of glaciers, yet it presents almost everywhere
similar moraines, and the same polished and grooved surfaces, and
water-worn cavities. The erratics, moreover, which cover it, present a
phenomenon which has astonished and perplexed the geologist for more
than half a century. No conclusion can be more incontestible than that
these angular blocks of granite, gneiss, and other crystalline
formations, came from the Alps, and that they have been brought for a
distance of 50 miles and upwards across one of the widest and deepest
valleys of the world, so that they are now lodged on the hills and
valleys of a chain composed of limestone and other formations,
altogether distinct from those of the Alps. Their great size and
angularity, after a journey of so many leagues, has justly excited
wonder; for hundreds of them are as large as cottages; and one in
particular, celebrated under the name of Pierre à Bot, rests on the side
of a hill about 900 feet above the lake of Neufchatel, and is no less
than 40 feet in diameter.

It will be remarked that these blocks on the Jura offer an exception to the
rule before laid down, as applicable in general to erratics, since they
have gone from south to north. Some of the largest masses of granite and
gneiss have been found to contain 50,000 and 60,000 cubic feet of stone,
and one limestone block near Devens, which has travelled 30 miles, contains
161,000 cubic feet, its angles being sharp and unworn.[143-A]

Von Buch, Escher, and Studer have shown, from an examination of the
mineral composition of the boulders, that those on the western Jura,
near Neufchatel, have come from the region of Mont Blanc and the Valais;
those on the middle parts of the Jura from the Bernese Oberland; and
those on the eastern Jura from the Alps of the small cantons, Glaris,
Schwytz, Uri, and Zug. The blocks, therefore, of these three great
districts have been derived from parts of the Alps nearest to the
localities in the Jura where we now find them, as if they had crossed
the great valley in a direction at right angles to its length: the most
western stream having followed the course of the Rhone; the central,
that of the Aar; and the eastern, that of the two great rivers, Reuss
and Limmat. The non-intermixture of these groups of travelled fragments,
except near their confines, was always regarded as most enigmatical by
those who adopted the opinion of Saussure, that they were all whirled
along by a rapid current of muddy water rushing from the Alps.

M. Charpentier first suggested, as before mentioned, that the Swiss
glaciers once reached continuously to the Jura, and conveyed to them
these erratics; but at the same time he conceived that the Alps were
formerly higher than now. M. Agassiz, on the other hand, instead of
introducing distinct and separate glaciers, imagines that the whole
valley of Switzerland was filled with ice, and that one great sheet of
it extended from the Alps to the Jura, when the two chains were of the
same height as now relatively to each other. Such an hypothesis labours
under this difficulty, that the difference of altitude, when distributed
over a space of 50 miles, gives an inclination of no more than two
degrees, or far less than that of any known glaciers. It has, however,
since received the able support of Professor James Forbes, in his
excellent work on the Alps, published in 1843.

In the theory which I formerly advanced, jointly with Mr. Darwin[143-B],
it was suggested that the erratics may have been transferred by floating
ice to the Jura, at the time when the greater part of that chain, and the
whole of the Swiss valley to the south, was under the sea. At that period
the Alps may have attained only half their present altitude, and may yet
have constituted a chain as lofty as the Chilian Andes, which, in a
latitude corresponding to Switzerland, now send down glaciers to the head
of every sound, from which icebergs, covered with blocks of granite, are
floated seaward.[144-A] Opposite that part of Chili where the glaciers
abound is situated the island of Chiloe, 100 miles in length, with a
breadth of 30 miles, running parallel to the continent. The channel which
separates it from the main land is of considerable depth, and 25 miles
broad. Parts of its surface, like the adjacent coast of Chili, are
overspread with recent marine shells, showing an upheaval of the land
during a very modern period; and beneath these shells is a boulder deposit,
in which Mr. Darwin found large travelled blocks. One group of fragments
were of granite, which had evidently come from the Andes, while in another
place angular blocks of syenite were met with. Their arrangement may have
been due to successive crops of icebergs issuing from different sounds, to
the heads of which glaciers descend from the Andes. These icebergs, taking
their departure year after year from distinct points, may have been
stranded repeatedly, in equally distinct groups, in bays or creeks of
Chiloe, and on islets off the coast, so as afterwards to appear, some on
hills and others in valleys, when that country and the bed of the adjacent
sea had been upheaved. A continuance in future of the elevatory movement,
in the region of the Andes and of Chiloe, might cause the former chain to
rival the Alps in altitude, and give to Chiloe a height equal to that of
the Jura. The same rise might dry up the channel between Chiloe and the
main land, so that it would then represent the great valley of Switzerland.
In the course of these changes, all parts of Chiloe and the intervening
strait, having in their turn been a sea-shore, may have been polished and
scratched by coast-ice, and by innumerable icebergs running aground and
grating on the bottom.

If we apply this hypothesis to Switzerland and the Jura, we are by no means
precluded from the supposition that, in proportion as the land acquired
additional height, and the bed of the sea emerged, the Jura itself may have
had its glaciers; and those existing in the Alps, which had at first
extended to the sea, may, during some part of the period of upheaval, have
been prolonged much farther into the valleys than now. At a later period,
when the climate grew milder, these glaciers may have entirely disappeared
from the Jura, and may have receded in the Alps to their present limits,
leaving behind them in both districts those moraines which now attest the
former extension of the ice.[144-B]

_Meteorites in drift._--Before concluding my remarks on the northern drift
of the Old World, I shall refer to a fact recently announced, the discovery
of a meteoric stone at a great depth in the alluvium of Northern Asia.

Erman, in his Archives of Russia for 1841 (p. 314.), cites a very
circumstantial account drawn up by a Russian miner of the finding of a mass
of meteoric iron in the auriferous alluvium of the Altai. Some small
fragments of native iron were first met with in the gold-washings of
Petropawlowsker in the Mrassker Circle; but though they attracted
attention, it was supposed that they must have been broken off from the
tools of the workmen. At length, at the depth of 31 feet 5 inches from the
surface, they dug out a piece of iron weighing 17-1/2 pounds, of a
steel-grey colour, somewhat harder than ordinary iron, and, on analysing
it, found it to consist of native iron, with a small proportion of nickel,
as usual in meteoric stones. It was buried in the bottom of the deposit
where the gravel rested on a flaggy limestone. Much brown iron ore, as well
as gold, occurs in the same gravel, which appears to be part of that
extensive auriferous formation in which the bones of the mammoth, the
_Rhinoceros tichorhinus_, and other extinct quadrupeds abound. No
sufficient data are supplied to enable us to determine whether it be of
Post-Pliocene or Newer Pliocene date.

We ought not, I think, to feel surprise that we have not hitherto succeeded
in detecting the signs of such aërolites in older rocks, for, besides their
rarity in our own days, those which fell into the sea (and it is with
marine strata that geologists have usually to deal), being chiefly composed
of native iron, would rapidly enter into new chemical combinations, the
water and mud being charged with chloride of sodium and other salts. We
find that anchors, cannon, and other cast-iron implements which have been
buried for a few hundred years off our English coast have decomposed in
part or entirely, turning the sand and gravel which enclosed them into a
conglomerate, cemented together by oxide of iron. In like manner meteoric
iron, although its rusting would be somewhat checked by the alloy of
nickel, could scarcely ever fail to decompose in the course of thousands of
years, becoming oxide, sulphuret or carbonate of iron, and its origin being
then no longer distinguishable. The greater the antiquity of rocks,--the
oftener they have been heated and cooled, permeated by gases or by the
waters of the sea, the atmosphere or mineral springs,--the smaller must be
the chance of meeting with a mass of native iron unaltered; but the
preservation of the ancient meteorite of the Altai, and the presence of
nickel in these curious bodies, renders the recognition of them in deposits
of remote periods less hopeless than we might have anticipated.


FOOTNOTES:

[134-A] Geol. Trans. 2d series, vol. vi. p. 135. Mr. Smith of Jordanhill
had arrived at similar conclusions as to climate from the shells of the
Scotch Pleistocene deposits.

[134-B] Proceedings of Geol. Soc. No. 63. p. 119.

[135-A] Travels in N. America, vol. ii. p. 141.

[135-B] Ibid. p. 99. chap. xix.

[136-A] Bulletin Soc. Géol. de France, tom. iv. 2de sér. p. 1121.

[138-A] See Travels in N. America, vol. i. chap. ii.

[140-A] Agassiz, Etudes sur les Glaciers.

[143-A] Archiac, Hist. des Progrès, &c. vol. ii. p. 249.

[143-B] See Elements of Geology, 2d ed. 1841.

[144-A] Darwin's Journal, p. 283.

[144-B] More recently Sir R. Murchison, having revisited the Alps, has
declared his opinion that "the great granitic blocks of Mont Blanc were
translated to the Jura when the intermediate country was under
water."--Paper read to Geol. Soc. London, May 30, 1849.



CHAPTER XIII.

NEWER PLIOCENE STRATA AND CAVERN DEPOSITS.

   Chronological classification of Pleistocene formations, why
   difficult--Freshwater deposits in valley of Thames--In Norfolk
   cliffs--In Patagonia--Comparative longevity of species in the mammalia
   and testacea--Fluvio-marine crag of Norwich--Newer Pliocene strata of
   Sicily--Limestone of great thickness and elevation--Alternation of
   marine and volcanic formations--Proofs of slow accumulation--Great
   geographical changes in Sicily since the living fauna and flora began
   to exist--Osseous breccias and cavern deposits--Sicily--Kirkdale--Origin
   of stalactite--Australian cave-breccias--Geographical relationship of
   the provinces of living vertebrata and those of the fossil species of
   the Pliocene periods--Extinct struthious birds of New Zealand--Teeth
   of fossil quadrupeds.


Having in the last chapter treated of the boulder formation and its
associated freshwater and marine strata as belonging chiefly to the close
of the Newer Pliocene period, we may now proceed to other deposits of the
same or nearly the same age. It should, however, be stated that it is
difficult to draw the line of separation between these modern formations,
especially when we are called upon to compare deposits of marine and
freshwater origin, or these again with the ossiferous contents of caverns.

If as often as the carcasses of quadrupeds were buried in alluvium during
floods, or mired in swamps, or imbedded in lacustrine strata, a stream of
lava had descended and preserved the alluvial or freshwater deposits, as
frequently happened in Auvergne (see above, p. 80,), keeping them free from
intermixture with strata subsequently formed, then indeed the task of
arranging chronologically the whole series of mammaliferous formations
might have been easy, even though many species were common to several
successive groups. But when there have been oscillations in the levels of
the land, accompanied by the widening and deepening of valleys at more than
one period,--when the same surface has sometimes been submerged beneath the
sea, after supporting forests and land quadrupeds, and then raised again,
and subject during each change of level to sedimentary deposition and
partial denudation,--and when the drifting of ice by marine currents or by
rivers, during an epoch of intense cold, has for a season interfered with
the ordinary mode of transport, or with the geographical range of species,
we cannot hope speedily to extricate ourselves from the confusion in which
the classification of these Pleistocene formations is involved.

At several points in the valley of the Thames, remnants of ancient
fluviatile deposits occur, which may differ considerably in age,
although the imbedded land and freshwater shells in each are of recent
species. At Brentford, for example, the bones of the Siberian Mammoth,
or _Elephas primigenius_, and the _Rhinoceros tichorhinus_, both of
them quadrupeds of which the flesh and hair have been found preserved in
the frozen soil of Siberia, occur abundantly, with the bones of an
hippopotamus, aurochs, short-horned ox, red deer, rein-deer, and great
cave-tiger or lion.[147-A] A similar group has been found fossil at
Maidstone, in Kent, and other places, agreeing in general specifically
with the fossil bones detected in the caverns of England. When we see
the existing rein-deer and an extinct hippopotamus in the same
fluviatile loam, we are tempted to indulge our imaginations in
speculating on the climatal conditions which could have enabled these
genera to co-exist in the same region. Wherever there is a continuity of
land from polar to temperate and equatorial regions, there will always
be points where the southern limit of an arctic species meets the
northern range of a southern species; and if one or both have migratory
habits, like the Bengal tiger, the American bison, the musk ox, and
others, they may each penetrate mutually far into the respective
provinces of the other. There may also have been several oscillations of
temperature during the periods which immediately preceded and followed
the more intense cold of the glacial epoch.

The strata bordering the left bank of the Thames at Grays Thurrock, in
Essex, are probably of older date than those of Brentford, although the
associated land and freshwater shells are nearly all, if not all,
identical with species now living. Three of the shells, however, are no
longer inhabitants of Great Britain; namely, _Paludina marginata_ (fig.
112. p. 127.), now living in France; _Unio littoralis_ (fig. 29. p.
28.), now inhabiting the Loire; and _Cyrena consobrina_ (fig. 26. p.
28.). The last-mentioned fossil (a recent Egyptian shell of the Nile) is
very abundant at Grays, and deserves notice, because the genus _Cyrena_
is now no longer European.

The rhinoceros occurring in the same beds (_R. leptorhinus_, see fig. 131.
p. 160.) is of a different species from that of Brentford above mentioned,
and the accompanying elephant belongs to the variety called _Elephas
meridionalis_, which, according to MM. Owen and H. von Meyer, two high
authorities, is the same species as the Siberian mammoth, although some
naturalists regard it as distinct. With the above mammalia is also found
the _Hippopotamus major_, and what is most remarkable in so modern and
northern a deposit, a monkey, called by Owen, _Macacus pliocenus_.

The submerged forest already alluded to (p. 130.) as underlying the drift
at the base of the cliffs of Norfolk is associated with a bed of lignite
and loam, in which a great number of fossil bones occur, apparently of the
same group as that of Grays, just mentioned. It has sometimes been called
"the Elephant bed." One portion of it, which stretches out under the sea at
Happisburgh, was overgrown in 1820 by a bank of recent oysters, and there
the fishermen dredged up, according to Woodward, in the course of thirteen
years, together with the oysters, above 2000 mammoths' grinders.[147-B]
Another portion of the same continuous stratum has yielded at Bacton,
Cromer, and other places on the coast, the bones of a gigantic beaver
(_Trogontherium Cuvierii_, Fischer), as well as the ox, horse, and deer,
and both species of rhinoceros, _R. tichorhinus_ and _R. leptorhinus_.

In studying these and various other similar assemblages of fossils, we have
a good exemplification of the more rapid rate at which the mammiferous
fauna, as compared to the testaceous, diverges when traced backwards in
time from the recent type. I have before hinted, that the longevity of
species in the class of warm-blooded quadrupeds is less great than in that
of the mollusca, the latter having probably more capacity for enduring
those changes of climate and other external circumstances which take place
in the course of ages on the earth's surface. This phenomenon is by no
means confined to Europe, for Mr. Darwin found at Bahia Blanca, in South
America, lat. 39° S., near the northern confines of Patagonia, fossil
remains of the extinct mammiferous genera Megatherium, Megalonyx, Toxodon,
and others, associated with shells, almost all of species already
ascertained to be still living in the contiguous sea[148-A]; the marine
mollusca, as well as those of rivers, lakes, or the land, having died out
more slowly than the terrestrial mammalia.

I alluded before (p. 125.) to certain marine strata overlying till near
Glasgow, and at other points on the Clyde, in which the shells are for the
most part British, with an intermixture of some arctic species; while
others, about a tenth of the whole, are supposed to be extinct. This
formation may also be called Newer Pliocene.

_Fluvio-marine crag of Norwich._--At several places within five miles of
Norwich, on both banks of the Yare, beds of sand, loam, and gravel,
provincially termed "crag," occur, in which there is a mixture of marine,
land, and freshwater shells, with ichthyolites and bones of mammalia. It is
clear that these beds have been accumulated at the bottom of the sea near
the mouth of a river. They form patches of variable thickness, resting on
white chalk, and are covered by a dense mass of stratified flint gravel.
The surface of the chalk is often perforated to the depth of several inches
by the _Pholas crispata_, each fossil shell still remaining at the bottom
of its cylindrical cavity, now filled up with loose sand which has fallen
from the incumbent crag. This species of Pholas still exists and drills the
rocks between high and low water on the British coast. The most common
shells of these strata, such as _Fusus striatus_, _Turritella terebra_,
_Cardium edule_, and _Cyprina islandica_, are now abundant in the British
seas; but with them are some extinct species, such as _Nucula Cobboldiæ_
(fig. 120.) and _Tellina obliqua_ (fig. 121.). _Natica helicoides_ (fig.
122.) is an example of a species formerly known only as fossil, but which
has now been found living in our seas.

Among the accompanying bones of mammalia is the _Mastodon_
_angustidens_[149-A] (see fig. 130.), a portion of the upper jawbone with a
tooth having been found by Mr. Wigham at Postwick, near Norwich. As this
species has also been found in the Red Crag, both at Sutton and at
Felixstow, and had hitherto been regarded as characteristic of formations
older than the Pleistocene, it may possibly have been washed out of the Red
into the Norwich Crag.

[Illustration: Fig. 120. _Nucula Cobboldiæ._]

[Illustration: Fig. 121. _Tellina obliqua._]

[Illustration: Fig. 122. _Natica helicoides_, Johnston.]

Among the bones, however, respecting the authenticity of which there
seems no doubt, may be mentioned those of the elephant, horse, pig,
deer, and the jaws and teeth of field mice (fig. 141.). I have seen the
tusk of an elephant from Bramerton near Norwich, to which, many serpulæ
were attached, showing that it had lain for some time at the bottom of
the sea of the Norwich Crag.

At Thorpe, near Aldborough, and at Southwold, in Suffolk, this
fluvio-marine formation is well exposed in the sea-cliffs, consisting of
sand, shingle, loam, and laminated clay. Some of the strata there bear
the marks of tranquil deposition, and in one section a thickness of 40
feet is sometimes exposed to view. Some of the lamellibranchiate shells
have both valves united, although mixed with land and freshwater
testacea, and with the bones and teeth of elephant, rhinoceros, horse,
and deer. Captain Alexander, with whom I examined these strata in 1835,
showed me a bed rich in marine shells, in which he had found a large
specimen of the _Fusus striatus_, filled with sand, and in the interior
of which was the tooth of a horse.

Among the freshwater shells I obtained the _Cyrena consobrina_ (fig. 26.
p. 28.), before mentioned, supposed to agree with a species now
living in the Nile.

I formerly classed the Norwich Crag as older Pliocene, conceiving that more
than a third of the fossil testacea were extinct; but there now seems good
reason for believing that several of the rarer shells obtained from these
strata do not really belong to a contemporary fauna, but have been washed
out of the older beds of the "Red Crag;" while other species, once supposed
to have died out, have lately been met with living in the British seas.
According to Mr. Searles Wood, the total number of marine species does not
exceed seventy-six, of which one tenth only are extinct. Of the fourteen
associated freshwater shells, all the species appear to be living. Strata
containing the same shells as those near Norwich have been found by Mr.
Bean, at Bridlington, in Yorkshire.

_Newer Pliocene strata of Sicily._--In no part of Europe are the Newer
Pliocene formations seen to enter so largely into the structure of the
earth's crust, or to rise to such heights above the level of the sea, as in
Sicily. They cover nearly half the island, and near its centre, at
Castrogiovanni, they reach an elevation of 3000 feet. They consist
principally of two divisions, the upper calcareous, the lower argillaceous,
both of which may be seen at Syracuse, Girgenti, and Castrogiovanni.

According to Philippi, to whom we are indebted for the best account of the
tertiary shells of this island, thirty-five species out of one hundred and
twenty-four obtained from the beds in central Sicily are extinct. Of the
remainder, which still live, five species are no longer inhabitants of the
Mediterranean. When I visited Sicily in 1828 I estimated the proportion of
living species as somewhat greater, partly because I confounded with the
tertiary formation of central Sicily the strata at the base of Etna, and
some other localities, where the fossils are now proved to agree entirely
with the present Mediterranean fauna.

Philippi came to the conclusion, that in Sicily there is a gradual
passage from beds containing 70 per cent. of recent shells, to those in
which the whole of the fossils are identical with recent species; but
his tables appear scarcely to bear out so important a generalization,
several of the places cited by him in confirmation having as yet
furnished no more than twenty or thirty species of testacea. The
Sicilian beds in question probably belong to about the same period as
the Norwich Crag, although a geologist, accustomed to see nearly all the
Pleistocene formations in the north of Europe occupying low grounds and
very incoherent in texture, is naturally surprised to behold formations
of the same age so solid and stony, of such thickness, and attaining so
great an elevation above the level of the sea.

The upper or calcareous member of this group in Sicily consists in some
places of a yellowish-white stone, like the calcaire grossier of Paris, in
others, of a rock nearly as compact as marble. Its aggregate thickness
amounts sometimes to 700 or 800 feet. It usually occurs in regular
horizontal beds, and is occasionally intersected by deep valleys, such as
those of Sortino and Pentalica, in which are numerous caverns. The fossils
are in every stage of preservation, from shells retaining portions of their
animal matter and colour, to others which are mere casts.

The limestone passes downwards into a sandstone and conglomerate, below
which is clay and blue marl, like that of the Subapennine hills, from
which perfect shells and corals may be disengaged. The clay sometimes
alternates with yellow sand.

South of the plain of Catania is a region in which the tertiary beds are
intermixed with volcanic matter, which has been for the most part the
product of submarine eruptions. It appears that, while the clay, sand,
and yellow limestone before mentioned were in course of deposition at
the bottom of the sea, volcanos burst out beneath the waters, like that
of Graham Island, in 1831, and these explosions recurred again and again
at distant intervals of time. Volcanic ashes and sand were showered down
and spread by the waves and currents so as to form strata of tuff,
which are found intercalated between beds of limestone and clay
containing marine shells, the thickness of the whole mass exceeding 2000
feet. The fissures through which the lava rose may be seen in many
places forming what are called _dikes_.

In part of the region above alluded to, as, for example, near Lentini, a
conglomerate occurs in which I observed many pebbles of volcanic rocks
covered by full grown _serpulæ_. We may explain the origin of these by
supposing that there were some small volcanic islands which may have been
destroyed from time to time by the waves, as Graham Island has been swept
away since 1831. The rounded blocks and pebbles of solid volcanic matter,
after being rolled for a time on the beach of such temporary islands, were
carried at length into some tranquil part of the sea, where they lay for
years, while the marine _serpulæ_ adhered to them, their shells growing and
covering their surface, as they are seen adhering to the shell figured in
p. 22. Finally, the bed of pebbles was itself covered with strata of shelly
limestone. At Vizzini, a town not many miles distant to the S.W., I
remarked another striking proof of the gradual manner in which these modern
rocks were formed, and the long intervals of time which elapsed between the
pouring out of distinct sheets of lava. A bed of oysters no less than 20
feet in thickness rests upon a current of basaltic lava. The oysters are
perfectly identifiable with our common eatable species. Upon the oyster
bed, again, is superimposed a second mass of lava, together with tuff or
peperino. In the midst of the same alternating igneous and aqueous
formations is seen near Galieri, not far from Vizzini, a horizontal bed,
about a foot and a half in thickness, composed entirely of a common
Mediterranean coral (_Caryophyllia cæspitosa_, Lam.). These corals stand
erect as they grew; and, after being traced for hundreds of yards, are
again found at a corresponding height on the opposite side of the valley.

[Illustration: Fig. 123. _Caryophyllia cæspitosa_, Lam.
(_Cladocora cæspitosa_, Ehr.)

  _a._  Stem with young stem growing from its side.
  _a*._ Young stem of same twice magnified.
  _b._  Portion of branch, twice magnified, with the base of a lateral
        branch; the exterior ridges of the main branch appearing through
        the lamellæ of the lateral one.
  _c._  Transverse section of same, proving, by the integrity of the main
        branch, that the lateral one did not originate in a subdivision
        of the animal.
  _d._  A branch, having at its base another laterally united to it, and
        two young corals at its upper part.
  _e._  A main branch, with a full grown lateral one.
  _f._  A perfect terminal star.]

The corals are usually branched, but not by the division of the animals as
some have supposed, but by the attachment of young individuals to the sides
of the older ones; and we must understand this mode of increase, in order
to appreciate the time which was required for the building up of the whole
bed of coral during the growth of many successive generations.[152-A]

Among the other fossil shells met with in these Sicilian strata, which
still continue to abound in the Mediterranean, no shell is more
conspicuous, from its size and frequent occurrence, than the great
scallop, _Pecten jacobæus_ (see fig. 124.), now so common in the
neighbouring seas. We see this shell in the calcareous beds at Palermo
in great numbers, in the limestone at Girgenti, and in that which
alternates with volcanic rocks in the country between Syracuse and
Vizzini, often at great heights above the sea.

[Illustration: Fig. 124. _Pecten jacobæus_; half natural size.]

The more we reflect on the preponderating number of these recent shells,
the more we are surprised at the great thickness, solidity, and height
above the sea of the rocky masses in which they are entombed, and the vast
amount of geographical change which has taken place since their origin. It
must be remembered that, before they began to emerge, the uppermost strata
of the whole must have been deposited under water. In order, therefore, to
form a just conception of their antiquity, we must first examine singly the
innumerable minute parts of which the whole is made up, the successive beds
of shells, corals, volcanic ashes, conglomerates, and sheets of lava; and
we must afterwards contemplate the time required for the gradual upheaval
of the rocks, and the excavation of the valleys. The historical period
seems scarcely to form an appreciable unit in this computation, for we
find ancient Greek temples, like those of Girgenti (Agrigentum), built of
the modern limestone of which we are speaking, and resting on a hill
composed of the same; the site having remained to all appearance unaltered
since the Greeks first colonised the island.

The modern geological date of the rocks in this region leads to another
singular and unexpected conclusion, namely, that the fauna and flora of a
large part of Sicily are of higher antiquity than the country itself,
having not only flourished before the lands were raised from the deep, but
even before their materials were brought together beneath the waters. The
chain of reasoning which conducts us to this opinion may be stated in a few
words. The larger part of the island has been converted from sea into land
since the Mediterranean was peopled with nearly all the living species of
testacea and zoophytes. We may therefore presume that, before this region
emerged, the same land and river shells, and almost all the same animals
and plants, were in existence which now people Sicily; for the terrestrial
fauna and flora of this island are precisely the same as that of other
lands surrounding the Mediterranean. There appear to be no peculiar or
indigenous species, and those which are now established there must be
supposed to have migrated from pre-existing lands, just as the plants and
animals of the Neapolitan territory have colonised Monte Nuovo, since that
volcanic cone was thrown up in the sixteenth century.

Such conclusions throw a new light on the adaptation of the attributes
and migratory habits of animals and plants to the changes which are
unceasingly in progress in the physical geography of the globe. It is
clear that the duration of species is so great, that they are destined
to outlive many important revolutions in the configuration of the
earth's surface; and hence those innumerable contrivances for enabling
the subjects of the animal and vegetable creation to extend their range;
the inhabitants of the land being often carried across the ocean, and
the aquatic tribes over great continental spaces. It is obviously
expedient that the terrestrial and fluviatile species should not only be
fitted for the rivers, valleys, plains, and mountains which exist at the
era of their creation, but for others that are destined to be formed
before the species shall become extinct; and, in like manner, the marine
species are not only made for the deep and shallow regions of the ocean
existing at the time when they are called into being, but for tracts
that may be submerged or variously altered in depth during the time that
is allotted for their continuance on the globe.


OSSEOUS BRECCIAS AND DEPOSITS IN CAVES OF THE PLIOCENE PERIOD.

_Sicily._--Caverns filled with marine breccias, at the base of ancient
sea-cliffs, have been already mentioned in the sixth chapter; and it was
noticed, respecting the cave of San Ciro, near Palermo (p. 75.), that upon
a bed of sand filled with sea-shells, almost all of recent species, rests
a breccia (_b_, fig. 93.), composed of fragments of calcareous rock, and
the bones of animals. In the sand at the bottom of that cave, Dr. Philippi
found about forty-five marine shells, all clearly identical with recent
species, except two or three. The bones in the incumbent breccia are
chiefly those of the mammoth (_E. primigenius_), with some belonging to an
hippopotamus, distinct from the recent species, and smaller than that
usually found fossil. (See fig. 132.) Several species of deer also, and,
according to some accounts, the remains of a bear, were discovered. These
mammalia are probably referable to the Post-Pliocene period.

The Newer Pliocene tertiary limestone of the south of Sicily, already
described, is sometimes full of caverns; and the student will at once
perceive that all the quadrupeds of which the remains are found in the
stalactite of these caverns, being of later origin than the rocks, must be
referable to the close of the tertiary epoch, if not of still later date.
The situation of one of these caves, in the valley of Sortino, is
represented in the annexed section.

[Illustration: Fig. 125. Cross section.

  _a_. Alluvium,                 } containing the remains of quadrupeds
  _b_, _b_. Deposits in caves,   } for the most part extinct.

  C. Limestone, containing the remains of shells, of which between 70 and
                80 per cent. are recent.]

_England._--In a cave at Kirkdale, about twenty-five miles N.N.E. of York,
the remains of about 300 hyænas, belonging to individuals of every age,
have been detected. The species (_Hyæna spelæa_) is extinct, and was larger
than the fierce _Hyæna crocuta_ of South Africa, which it most resembled.
Dr. Buckland, after carefully examining the spot, proved that the Hyænas
must have lived there; a fact attested by the quantity of their dung,
which, as in the case of the living hyæna, is of nearly the same
composition as bone, and almost as durable. In the cave were found the
remains of the ox, young elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, horse, bear,
wolf, hare, water-rat, and several birds. All the bones have the appearance
of having been broken and gnawed by the teeth of the hyænas; and they occur
confusedly mixed in loam or mud, or dispersed through a crust of stalagmite
which covers it. In these and many other cases it is supposed that portions
of herbivorous quadrupeds have been dragged into caverns by beasts of prey,
and have served as their food, an opinion quite consistent with the known
habits of the living hyæna.

No less than thirty-seven species of mammalia are enumerated by Professor
Owen as having been discovered in the caves of the British islands, of
which eighteen appear to be extinct, while the others still survive in
Europe. They were not washed to the spots where the fossils now occur by a
great flood; but lived and died, one generation after another, in the
places where they lie buried. Among other arguments in favour of this
conclusion may be mentioned the great numbers of the shed antlers of deer
discovered in caves and in freshwater strata throughout England.[155-A]

Examples also occur of fissures into which animals have fallen from time to
time, or have been washed in from above, together with alluvial matter and
fragments of rock detached by frost, forming a mass which may be united
into a bony breccia by stalagmitic infiltrations. Frequently we discover a
long suite of caverns connected by narrow and irregular galleries, which
hold a tortuous course through the interior of mountains, and seem to have
served as the subterranean channels of springs and engulphed rivers. Many
streams in the Morea are now carrying bones, pebbles, and mud into
underground passages of this kind.[155-B] If, at some future period, the
form of that country should be wholly altered by subterranean movements and
new valleys shaped out by denudation, many portions of the former channels
of these engulphed streams may communicate with the surface, and become the
dens of wild beasts, or the recesses to which quadrupeds retreat to die.
Certain caves of France, Germany, and Belgium, may have passed successively
through these different conditions, and in their last state may have
remained open to the day for several tertiary periods. It is nevertheless
remarkable, that on the continent of Europe, as in England, the fossil
remains of mammalia belong almost exclusively to those of the Newer
Pliocene and Post-Pliocene periods, and not to the Miocene or Eocene
epochs, and when they are accompanied by land or river shells, these agree
in great part, or entirely, with recent species.

As the preservation of the fossil bones is due to a slow and constant
supply of stalactite, brought into the caverns by water dropping from the
roof, the source and origin of this deposit has been a subject of curious
inquiry. The following explanation of the phenomenon has been recently
suggested by the eminent chemist Liebig. On the surface of Franconia, where
the limestone abounds in caverns, is a fertile soil, in which vegetable
matter is continually decaying. This mould or humus, being acted on by
moisture and air, evolves carbonic acid which is dissolved by rain. The
rain water, thus impregnated, permeates the porous limestone, dissolves a
portion of it, and afterwards, when the excess of carbonic acid evaporates
in the caverns, parts with the calcareous matter, and forms stalactite.

_Australian cave-breccias._--Ossiferous breccias are not confined to
Europe, but occur in all parts of the globe; and those lately discovered
in fissures and caverns in Australia correspond closely in character
with what has been called the bony breccia of the Mediterranean, in
which the fragments of bone and rock are firmly bound together by a
red ochreous cement.

Some of these caves have been examined by Sir T. Mitchell in the Wellington
Valley, about 210 miles west of Sidney, on the river Bell, one of the
principal sources of the Macquarie, and on the Macquarie itself. The
caverns often branch off in different directions through the rock, widening
and contracting their dimensions, and the roofs and floors are covered with
stalactite. The bones are often broken, but do not seem to be water-worn.
In some places they lie imbedded in loose earth, but they are usually
included in a breccia.

The remains found most abundantly are those of the kangaroo, of which there
are four species, besides which the genera _Hypsiprymnus_, _Phalangista_,
_Phascolomys_, and _Dasyurus_, occur. There are also bones, formerly
conjectured by some osteologists to belong to the hippopotamus, and by
others to the dugong, but which are now referred by Mr. Owen to a marsupial
genus, allied to the _Wombat_.

[Illustration: Fig. 126. _Macropus atlas_, Owen.

_a._ permanent false molar, in the alveolus.]

[Illustration: Fig. 127. Lowest jaw of largest living species of kangaroo.
(_Macropus major._)]

In the fossils above enumerated, several species are larger than the
largest living ones of the same genera now known in Australia. The annexed
figure of the right side of a lower jaw of a kangaroo (_Macropus atlas_,
Owen) will at once be seen to exceed in magnitude the corresponding part of
the largest living kangaroo, which is represented in fig. 127. In both
these specimens part of the substance of the jaw has been broken open, so
as to show the permanent false molar (_a._ fig. 126.) concealed in the
socket. From the fact of this molar not having been cut, we learn that the
individual was young, and had not shed its first teeth. In fig. 128. a
front tooth of the same species of kangaroo is represented.

[Illustration: Fig. 128. Incisor of _Macropus_.]

Whether the breccias, above alluded to, of the Wellington Valley, appertain
strictly to the Pliocene period cannot be affirmed with certainty, until we
are more thoroughly acquainted with the recent quadrupeds of the same
district, and until we learn what species of fossil land shells, if any,
are buried in the deposits of the same caves.

The reader will observe that all these extinct quadrupeds of Australia
belong to the marsupial family, or, in other words, that they are referable
to the same peculiar type of organization which now distinguishes the
Australian mammalia from those of other parts of the globe. This fact is
one of many pointing to a general law deducible from the fossil vertebrate
and invertebrate animals of the eras immediately antecedent to the human,
namely, that the present geographical distribution of organic _forms_ dates
back to a period anterior to the creation of existing _species_; in other
words, the limitation of particular genera or families of quadrupeds,
mollusca, &c., to certain existing provinces of land and sea, began before
the species now contemporary with man had been introduced into the earth.

Mr. Owen, in his excellent "History of British Fossil Mammals," has called
attention to this law, remarking that the fossil quadrupeds of Europe and
Asia differ from those of Australia or South America. We do not find, for
example, in the Europæo-Asiatic province fossil kangaroos or armadillos,
but the elephant, rhinoceros, horse, bear, hyæna, beaver, hare, mole, and
others, which still characterize the same continent.

In like manner in the Pampas of South America the skeletons of Megatherium,
Megalonyx, Glyptodon, Mylodon, Toxodon, Macrauchenia, and other extinct
forms, are analogous to the living sloth, armadillo, cavy, capybara, and
llama. The fossil quadrumana, also associated with some of these forms in
the Brazilian caves, belong to the Platyrrhine family of monkeys, now
peculiar to South America. That the extinct fauna of Buenos Ayres and
Brazil was very modern has been shown by its relation to deposits of marine
shells, agreeing with those now inhabiting the Atlantic; and when in
Georgia in 1845, I ascertained that the Megatherium, Mylodon, _Harlanus
americanus_ (Owen), _Equus curvidens_, and other quadrupeds allied to the
Pampean type were posterior in date to beds containing marine shells
belonging to forty-five recent species of the neighbouring sea.

There are indeed some cosmopolite genera, such as the Mastodon (a genus of
the elephant family), and the horse, which were simultaneously represented
by different fossil species in Europe, North America, and South America;
but these few exceptions can by no means invalidate the rule which has been
thus expressed by Professor Owen, "that in the highest organized class of
animals the same forms were restricted to the same great provinces at the
Pliocene periods as they are at the present day."

However modern, in a geological point of view, we may consider the
Pleistocene epoch, it is evident that causes more general and powerful
than the intervention of man have occasioned the disappearance of the
ancient fauna from so many extensive regions. Not a few of the species
had a wide range; the same Megatherium, for instance, extended from
Patagonia and the river Plata in South America, between latitudes 31°
and 39° south, to corresponding latitudes in North America, the same
animal being also an inhabitant of the intermediate country of Brazil,
where its fossil remains have been met with in caves. The extinct
elephant, likewise, of Georgia (_Elephas primigenius_) has been traced
in a fossil state northward from the river Alatamaha, in lat. 33° 50' N.
to the polar regions, and then again in the eastern hemisphere from
Siberia to the south of Europe. If it be objected that, notwithstanding
the adaptation of such quadrupeds to a variety of climates and
geographical conditions, their great size exposed them to extermination
by the first hunter tribes, we may observe that the investigations of
Lund and Clausen in the ossiferous limestone caves of Brazil have
demonstrated that these large mammalia were associated with a great many
smaller quadrupeds, some of them as diminutive as field mice, which have
all died out together, while the land shells formerly their
contemporaries still continue to exist in the same countries. As we may
feel assured that these minute quadrupeds could never have been
extirpated by man, so we may conclude that all the species, small and
great, have been annihilated one after the other, in the course of
indefinite ages, by those changes of circumstances in the organic and
inorganic world which are always in progress, and are capable in the
course of time of greatly modifying the physical geography, climate, and
all other conditions on which the continuance upon the earth of any
living being must depend.[158-A]

The law of geographical relationship above alluded to, between the
living vertebrata of every great zoological province and the fossils of
the period immediately antecedent, even where the fossil species are
extinct, is by no means confined to the mammalia. New Zealand, when
first examined by Europeans, was found to contain no indigenous land
quadrupeds, no kangaroos, or opossums, like Australia; but a wingless
bird abounded there, the smallest living representative of the ostrich
family, called the Xivi, by the natives (_Apteryx_). In the fossils of
the Post-Pliocene and Pleistocene period in this same island, there is
the like absence of kangaroos, opossums, wombats, and the rest; but in
their place a prodigious number of well preserved specimens of gigantic
birds of the struthious order, called by Owen Dinornis and Palapteryx,
which are entombed in superficial deposits. These genera comprehended
many species, some of which were 4, some 7, others 9, and others 11 feet
in height! It seems doubtful whether any contemporary mammalia shared
the land with this population of gigantic feathered bipeds.

To those who have never studied comparative anatomy it may seem scarcely
credible, that a single bone taken from any part of the skeleton may enable
a skilful osteologist to distinguish, in many cases, the genus, and
sometimes the species, of quadruped to which it belonged. Although few
geologists can aspire to such knowledge, which must be the result of long
practice and study, they will nevertheless derive great advantage from
learning what is comparatively an easy task, to distinguish the principal
divisions of the mammalia by the forms and characters of their teeth. The
annexed figures, all taken from original specimens, may be useful in
assisting the student to recognize the teeth of many genera most frequently
found fossil in Europe:--

[Illustration: Fig. 129. _Elephas primigenius_ (or Mammoth); molar of upper
jaw, right side; one third of nat. size.

  _a._ grinding surface.
  _b._ side view.]

[Illustration: Fig. 130. _Mastodon angustidens_ (Norwich Crag, Postwick,
also found in Red Crag, see p. 149.); second true molar, left side, upper
jaw; grinding surface, nat. size. (See p. 149.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 131. Rhinoceros.

_Rhinoceros leptorhinus_; fossil from freshwater beds of Grays, Essex
(see p. 147.); penultimate molar, lower jaw, left side; two-thirds
of nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 132. Hippopotamus.

Hippopotamus; from cave near Palermo (see p. 154.); molar tooth; two-thirds
of nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 133. Pig.

_Sus scrofa_, Lin. (common pig); from shell-marl, Forfarshire; posterior
molar, lower jaw, nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 134. Horse.

_Equus caballus_, Lin. (common horse); from the shell marl, Forfarshire;
second molar, lower jaw.

  _a._ grinding surface, two-thirds nat. size.
  _b._ side view of same, half nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 135. Tapir.

_Tapirus Americanus_; recent; third molar, upper jaw; nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 136. _a._ _b._ Deer.

Elk (_Cervus alces_, Lin.); recent; molar of upper jaw.

  _a._ grinding surface.
  _b._ side view; two-thirds of nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 137. _c._ _d._ Ox.

Ox, common, from shell marl, Forfarshire; true molar upper jaw;
two-thirds nat. size.

  _c._ grinding surface.
  _d._ side view.]

[Illustration: Fig. 138. Bear.

  _a._ canine tooth or tusk of bear (_Ursus spelæus_); from cave
       near Liege.
  _b._ molar of left side, upper jaw; one third of nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 139. Tiger.

  _c._ canine tooth of tiger (_Felis tigris_); recent.
  _d._ outside view of posterior molar, lower jaw; one-third of nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 140. _Hyæna spelæa_; second molar, left side, lower
jaw; nat. size. Cave of Kirkdale. (See p. 154.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 141. Teeth of a new species of _Arvicola_
(field-mouse); from the Norwich Crag. (See p. 149.)

  _a._ grinding surface.
  _b._ side view of same.
  _c._ nat. size of a and b.]


FOOTNOTES:

[147-A] Morris, Geol. Soc. Proceed., 1849.

[147-B] Woodward's Geology of Norfolk.

[148-A] Zool. of Beagle, part 1. pp. 9. 111.

[149-A] Owen, Brit. Foss. Mamm. 271. _Mastodon longirostris_,
Kaup, see _ibid._

[152-A] I am indebted to Mr. Lonsdale for the details above given
respecting the structure of this coral.

[155-A] Owen, Brit. Foss. Mam. xxvi., and Buckland, Rel. Dil. 19. 24.

[155-B] See Principles of Geology.

[158-A] See Principles of Geology, chaps. xli. to xliv.



CHAPTER XIV.

OLDER PLIOCENE AND MIOCENE FORMATIONS.

   Strata of Suffolk termed Red and Coralline crag--Fossils, and
   proportion of recent species--Depth of sea and climate--Reference of
   Suffolk crag to the older Pliocene period--Migration of many species
   of shells southwards during the glacial period--Fossil whales--Sub-
   apennine beds--Asti, Sienna, Rome--Miocene formations--Faluns of
   Touraine--Depth of sea and littoral character of fauna--Tropical
   climate implied by the testacea--Proportion of recent species of
   shells--Faluns more ancient than the Suffolk crag--Miocene strata of
   Bordeaux and Piedmont--Molasse of Switzerland--Tertiary strata of
   Lisbon--Older Pliocene and Miocene formations in the United
   States--Sewâlik Hills in India.


The older Pliocene strata, which next claim our attention, are chiefly
confined, in Great Britain, to the eastern part of the county of Suffolk,
where, like the Norwich beds already described, they are called "Crag," a
provincial name given particularly to those masses of shelly sand which
have been used from very ancient times in agriculture, to fertilize soils
deficient in calcareous matter. The relative position of the "red crag" in
Essex to the London clay, may be understood by reference to the
accompanying diagram (fig. 142.).

[Illustration: Fig. 142. Cross section.]

These deposits, judging by the shells which they contain, appear, according
to Professor Edward Forbes, to have been formed in a sea of moderate depth,
generally from 15 to 25 fathoms deep, although in some few spots perhaps
deeper. But they may, nevertheless, have been accumulated at the distance
of 40 or 50 miles from land.

The Suffolk crag is divisible into two masses, the upper of which has been
termed the Red, and the lower the Coralline Crag.[162-A] The upper deposit
consists chiefly of quartzose sand, with an occasional intermixture of
shells, for the most part rolled, and sometimes comminuted. The lower or
Coralline crag is of very limited extent, ranging over an area about 20
miles in length, and 3 or 4 in breadth, between the rivers Alde and Stour.
It is generally calcareous and marly--a mass of shells and small corals,
passing occasionally into a soft building stone. At Sudbourn, near Orford,
where it assumes this character, are large quarries, in which the bottom of
it has not been reached at the depth of 50 feet. At some places in the
neighbourhood, the softer mass is divided by thin flags of hard limestone,
and corals placed in the upright position in which they grew.

The Red crag is distinguished by the deep ferruginous or ochreous colour of
its sands and fossils, the Coralline by its white colour. Both formations
are of moderate thickness; the red crag rarely exceeding 40, and the
coralline seldom amounting to 20, feet. But their importance is not to be
estimated by the density of the mass of strata or its geographical extent,
but by the extraordinary richness of its organic remains, belonging to a
very peculiar type, which seems to characterize the state of the living
creation in the north of Europe during the older Pliocene era.

For a large collection of the fish, echinoderms, shells, and corals of the
deposits in Suffolk, we are indebted to the labours of Mr. Searles Wood. Of
testacea alone he has obtained from 230 species from the Red, and 345 from
the Coralline crag, about 150 being common to each. The proportion of
recent species in the new group is considered by Mr. Wood to be about
70[162-B] per cent., and that in the older or coralline about 60. When I
examined these shells of Suffolk in 1835, with the assistance of Dr. Beck,
Mr. George Sowerby, Mr. Searles Wood, and other eminent conchologists, I
came to the opinion that the extinct species predominated very decidedly in
number over the living. Recent investigations, however, have thrown much
new light on the conchology of the Arctic, Scandinavian, British, and
Mediterranean Seas. Many of the species formerly known only as fossils of
the Crag, and supposed to have died out, have been dredged up in a living
state from depths not previously explored. Other recent species, before
regarded as distinct from the nearest allied Crag fossils, have been
observed, when numerous individuals were procured, to be liable to much
greater variation, both in size and form, than had been suspected, and thus
have been identified. Consequently, the Crag fauna has been found to
approach much more nearly to the recent fauna of the Northern, British, and
Mediterranean Seas than had been imagined. The analogy of the whole group
of testacea to the European type is very marked, whether we refer to the
large development of certain genera in number of species or to their size,
or to the suppression or feeble representation of others. The indication
also afforded by the entire fauna of a climate not much warmer than that
now prevailing in corresponding latitudes, prepares us to believe that they
are not of higher antiquity than the Older Pliocene era.[163-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 143. Section near Ipswich, in Suffolk.

  _a._ Red crag.
  _b._ Coralline crag.
  _c._ London clay.]

The position of the red crag in Essex to the subjacent London clay and
chalk has been already pointed out (fig. 142.). Whenever the two
divisions are met with in the same district, the red crag lies
uppermost; and, in some cases, as in the section represented in fig.
143., it is observed that the older or coralline mass _b_ had suffered
denudation before the newer formation _a_ was thrown down upon it. At D
there is not only a distinct cliff, 8 or 10 feet high, of coralline
crag, running in a direction N.E. and S.W., against which the red crag
abuts with its horizontal layers; but this cliff occasionally overhangs.
The rock composing it is drilled everywhere by _Pholades_, the holes
which they perforated having been afterwards filled with sand and
covered over when the newer beds were thrown down. As the older
formation is shown by its fossils to have accumulated in a deeper sea
(15, and sometimes 25, fathoms deep or more), there must no doubt have
been an upheaval of the sea-bottom before the cliff here alluded to was
shaped out. We may also conclude that so great an amount of denudation
could scarcely take place, in such incoherent materials, without many of
the fossils of the inferior beds becoming mixed up with the overlying
crag, so that considerable difficulty must be occasionally experienced
by the palæontologist in deciding which species belong severally to each
group. The red crag being formed in a shallower sea, often resembles in
structure a shifting sand bank, its layers being inclined diagonally,
and the planes of stratification being sometimes directed in the same
quarry to the four cardinal points of the compass, as at Butley. That
in this and many other localities, such a structure is not deceptive or
due to any subsequent concretionary re-arrangement of particles, or to
mere lines of colour, is proved by each bed being made up of flat pieces
of shell which lie parallel to the planes of the smaller strata.

Some fossils, which are very abundant in the red crag, have never been
found in the white or coralline division; as, for example, the _Fusus
contrarius_ (fig. 144.), and several species of _Buccinum_ (or _Nassa_)
and _Murex_ (see figs. 145, 146.), which two genera seem wanting in
the lower crag.

[4 Illustrations: Fossils characteristic of the Red Crag.

Fig. 144. _Fusus contrarius._

Fig. 145. _Murex alveolatus._

Fig. 146. _Nassa granulata._

Fig. 147. _Cypræa coccinelloides._

Fig. 144. half nat. size; the others nat. size.]

Among the bones and teeth of fishes are those of large sharks
(_Carcharias_), and a gigantic skate of the extinct genus _Myliobates_, and
many other forms, some common to our seas, and many foreign to them.

The distinctness of the fossils of the coralline crag arises in part from
higher antiquity, and, in some degree, from a difference in the
geographical conditions of the submarine bottom. The prolific growth of
corals, echini, and a prodigious variety of testacea, implies a region of
deeper and more tranquil water; whereas, the red crag may have formed
afterwards on the same spot, when the water was shallower. In the mean time
the climate may have become somewhat cooler, and some of the zoophytes
which flourished in the first period may have disappeared, so that the
fauna of the red crag acquired a character somewhat more nearly resembling
that of our northern seas, as is implied by the large development of
certain sections of the genera _Fusus_, _Buccinum_, _Purpura_, and
_Trochus_, proper to higher latitudes, and which are wanting or feebly
represented in the inferior crag.

Some of the corals of the lower crag of Suffolk belong to genera unknown in
the living creation, and of a very peculiar structure; as, for example,
that represented in the annexed fig. (148.), which is one of several
species having a globular form. The great number and variety of these
zoophytes probably indicate an equable climate, free from intense cold in
winter. On the other hand, that the heat was never excessive is confirmed
by the prevalence of northern forms among the testacea, such as the
_Glycimeris_, _Cyprina_, and _Astarte_. Of the genus last mentioned (see
fig. 149.) there are about fourteen species, many of them being rich in
individuals; and there is an absence of genera peculiar to hot climates,
such as _Conus_, _Oliva_, _Mitra_, _Fasciolaria_, _Crassatella_, and
others. The cowries (_Cypræa_, fig. 147.), also, are small, and belong to a
section (_Trivia_) now inhabiting the colder regions. A large volute,
called _Voluta Lamberti_ (fig. 150.), may seem an exception; but it differs
in form from the volutes of the torrid zone, and may, like the living
_Voluta Magellanica_, have been fitted for an extra-tropical climate.

[Illustration: Fig. 148. _Fascicularia aurantium_, Milne Edwards. Family,
_Tubuliporidæ_, of same author.

Coral of extinct genus, from the inferior or coralline crag, Suffolk.

  _a._ exterior.
  _b._ vertical section of interior.
  _c._ portion of exterior magnified.
  _d._ portion of interior magnified, showing that it is made up of long,
       thin, straight tubes, united in conical bundles.]

[Illustration: Fig. 149. _Astarte_ (_Crassina_, Lam.); species common to
upper and lower crag.

_Astarte Omalii_, Lajonkaire; Syn. _A. bipartita_, Sow. Min. Con. T.
521. f. 3.; a very variable species most characteristic of the
coralline crag, Suffolk.]

[Illustration: Fig. 150. _Voluta Lamberti_, young individ.]

The occurrence of a species of _Lingula_ at Sutton is worthy of remark,
as these _Brachiopoda_ seem now confined to more equatorial latitudes,
and the same may be said still more decidedly of a species of _Pyrula_,
allied to _P. reticulata_. Whether, therefore, we may incline to the
belief that the mean annual temperature was higher or lower than now,
we may at least infer that the climate and geographical conditions were
by no means the same at the period of the Suffolk crag as those now
prevailing in the same region.

Of the echinoderms of the coralline crag about eleven species are known,
but some of these are in too fragmentary a condition to admit of exact
comparison. Of six which are the most perfect, Prof. E. Forbes has been
able to identify three with recent species: one of which, of the genus
_Echinus_, is British; a second, _Echinocyamus_, British and Mediterranean;
and a third, _Echinus monilis_, a Mediterranean species, also found fossil
in the faluns of Touraine.

One of the most interesting conclusions deduced from a careful comparison
of the shells of these British Older Pliocene strata and those now
inhabiting our seas, has been pointed out by Prof. E. Forbes. It appears
that, during the glacial period, a period intermediate, as we have seen,
between that of the crag and our own times, many shells, previously
established in the temperate zone, retreated southwards to avoid an
uncongenial climate. The Professor has given a list of fifty shells which
inhabited the British seas while the coralline and red crag were forming,
and which are wanting in the Pleistocene or glacial deposits. They must,
therefore, after their migration to the south, have made their way
northwards again. In corroboration of these views, it is stated that all
these fifty species occur fossil in the Newer Pliocene strata of Sicily,
Southern Italy, and the Grecian Archipelago, where they may have enjoyed,
during the era of floating icebergs, a climate resembling that now
prevailing in higher European latitudes.[166-A]

In the red crag at Felixstow, in Suffolk, Professor Henslow has found the
ear-bones of no less than four species of cetacea, which, according to Mr.
Owen, are the remains of true whales of the family _Balænidæ_. Mr. Wood is
of opinion that these cetacea may be of the age of the red crag, or if not
that they may be derived from the destruction of beds of coralline crag. I
agree with him that the supposition of their having been washed out of the
London clay, in which no _Balænidæ_ have yet been met with, is improbable.

Strata containing fossil shells, like those of the Suffolk crag, above
described, have been found at Antwerp, and on the banks of the Scheldt
below that city. In 1840 I observed a small patch of them near Valognes, in
Normandy; and there is also a deposit containing similar fossils at St.
George Bohon, and several places a few leagues to the S. of Carentan, in
Normandy; but they have never been traced farther southwards.

_Subapennine strata._--The Apennines, it is well known, are composed
chiefly of secondary rocks, forming a chain which branches off from the
Ligurian Alps and passes down the middle of the Italian peninsula. At the
foot of these mountains, on the side both of the Adriatic and the
Mediterranean, are found a series of tertiary strata, which form, for the
most part, a line of low hills occupying the space between the older chain
and the sea. Brocchi, as we have seen (p. 105.), was the first Italian
geologist who described this newer group in detail, giving it the name of
the Subapennines; and he classed all the tertiary strata of Italy, from
Piedmont to Calabria, as parts of the same system. Certain mineral
characters, he observed, were common to the whole; for the strata consist
generally of light brown or blue marl, covered by yellow calcareous sand
and gravel. There are also, he added, some species of fossil shells which
are found in these deposits throughout the whole of Italy.

We have now, however, satisfactory evidence that the Subapennine beds of
Brocchi belong, at least, to three periods. To the Miocene we can refer a
portion of the strata of Piedmont, those of the hill of the Superga, for
example; to the Older Pliocene, part of the strata of northern Italy, of
Tuscany, and of Rome; while the tufaceous formations of Naples, of Ischia,
and the calcareous strata of Otranto, are referable to the Newer Pliocene,
and in great part to the Post-Pliocene period.

That there is a considerable correspondence in the mineral composition of
these different Italian groups is undeniable; but not that exact
resemblance which should lead us to assume a precise identity of age,
unless the fossil remains agreed very closely. It is now indispensable that
a new scrutiny should be made in each particular district, of the fossils
derived from the upper and lower beds--especially such localities as Asti
and Parma, where the formation attains a great thickness; and at Sienna,
where the shells of the incumbent yellow sand are generally believed to
approach much more nearly, as a whole, to the recent fauna of the
Mediterranean than those in the subjacent blue marl.

The greyish brown or blue marl of the Subapennine formation is very
aluminous, and usually contains much calcareous matter and scales of mica.
Near Parma it attains a thickness of 2000 feet, and is charged throughout
with marine shells, some of which lived in deep, others in shallow water,
while a few belong to freshwater genera, and must have been washed in by
rivers. Among these last I have seen the common _Limnea palustris_ in the
blue marl, filled with small marine shells. The wood and leaves, which
occasionally form beds of lignite in the same deposit, may have been
carried into the sea by similar causes. The shells, in general, are soft
when first taken from the marl, but they become hard when dried. The
superficial enamel is often well preserved, and many shells retain their
pearly lustre, part of their external colour, and even the ligament which
unites the valves. No shells are more usually perfect than the microscopic
foraminifera, which abound near Sienna, where more than a thousand
full-grown individuals may be sometimes poured out of the interior of a
single univalve of moderate dimensions.

The other member of the Subapennine group, the yellow sand and
conglomerate, constitutes, in most places, a border formation near the
junction of the tertiary and secondary rocks. In some cases, as near the
town of Sienna, we see sand and calcareous gravel resting immediately on
the Apennine limestone, without the intervention of any blue marl.
Alternations are there seen of beds containing fluviatile shells, with
others filled exclusively with marine species; and I observed oysters
attached to many limestone pebbles. This appears to have been a point
where a river, flowing from the Apennines, entered the sea when the
tertiary strata were formed.

The sand passes in some districts into a calcareous sandstone, as at San
Vignone. Its general superposition to the marl, even in parts of Italy and
Sicily where the date of its origin is very distinct, may be explained if
we consider that it may represent the deltas of rivers and torrents, which
gained upon the bed of the sea where blue marl had previously been
deposited. The latter, being composed of the finer and more transportable
mud, would be conveyed to a distance, and first occupy the bottom, over
which sand and pebbles would afterwards be spread, in proportion as rivers
pushed their deltas farther outwards. In some large tracts of yellow sand
it is impossible to detect a single fossil, while in other places they
occur in profusion. Occasionally the shells are silicified, as at San
Vitale, near Parma, from whence I saw two individuals of recent species,
one freshwater and the other marine (_Limnea palustris_, and _Cytherea
concentrica_, Lam.), both perfectly converted into flint.

_Rome._--The seven hills of Rome are composed partly of marine tertiary
strata, those of Monte Mario, for example, of the Older Pliocene period,
and partly of superimposed volcanic tuff, on the top of which are usually
cappings of a fluviatile and lacustrine deposit. Thus, on Mount Aventine,
the Vatican, and the Capitol, we find beds of calcareous tufa with
incrusted reeds, and recent terrestrial shells, at the height of about 200
feet above the alluvial plain of the Tiber. The tusk of the mammoth has
been procured from this formation, but the shells appear to be all of
living species, and must have been embedded when the summit of the Capitol
was a marsh, and constituted one of the lowest hollows of the country as it
then existed. It is not without interest that we thus discover the
extremely recent date of a geological event which preceded an historical
era so remote as the building of Rome.


MIOCENE FORMATIONS.

_Faluns of Touraine._--The Miocene strata, corresponding with those named
by many geologists "Middle Tertiary," will next claim our attention. Near
the towns of Dinan and Rennes, in Brittany, and again in the provinces
bordering the Loire, a tertiary formation, containing another assemblage of
fossils, is met with, to which the name of _Faluns_ has been long given by
the French agriculturists, who spread the shelly sand and marl over the
land, in the same manner as the crag was formerly much used in Suffolk.
Isolated masses of these faluns occur from near the mouth of the Loire,
near Nantes, as far as a district south of Tours. They are also found at
Pontlevoy, on the Cher, about 70 miles above the junction of that river
with the Loire, and 30 miles S.E. of Tours. I have visited all the
localities above mentioned, and found the beds to consist principally of
sand and marl, in which are shells and corals, some entire, some rolled,
and others in minute fragments. In certain districts, as at Doué, in the
department of Maine and Loire, 10 miles S.W. of Saumur, they form a soft
building-stone, chiefly composed of an aggregate of broken shells, corals,
and echinoderms, united by a calcareous cement; the whole mass being very
like the coralline crag near Aldborough and Sudbourn in Suffolk. The
scattered patches of faluns are of slight thickness, rarely exceeding 50
feet; and between the district called Sologne and the sea they repose on a
great variety of older rocks; being seen to rest successively upon gneiss,
clay-slate, and various secondary formations, including the chalk; and,
lastly, upon the upper freshwater limestone of the Parisian tertiary
series, which, as before mentioned (p. 106.), stretches continuously from
the basin of the Seine to that of the Loire.

At some points, as at Louans, south of Tours, the shells are stained of a
ferruginous colour, not unlike that of the red crag of Suffolk. The species
are, for the most part, marine, but a few of them belong to land and
fluviatile genera. Among the former, _Helix turonensis_ (fig. 45. p. 30.)
is the most abundant. Remains of terrestrial quadrupeds are here and there
intermixed, belonging to the genera Deinotherium, Mastodon, Rhinoceros,
Hippopotamus, Chæropotamus, Dichobune, Deer, and others, and these are
accompanied by cetacea, such as the Lamantine, Morse, Sea-calf, and
Dolphin, all of extinct species.

Professor E. Forbes, after studying the fossil testacea which I obtained
from these beds; informs me that he has no doubt they were formed partly on
the shore itself at the level of low water, and partly at very moderate
depths, not exceeding 10 fathoms below that level. The molluscous fauna of
the "faluns" is on the whole much more littoral than that of the red and
coralline crag of Suffolk, and implies a shallower sea. It is, moreover,
contrasted with the Suffolk crag by the indications it affords of an
extra-European climate. Thus it contains seven species of _Cypræa_, some
larger than any existing cowry of the Mediterranean, several species of
_Oliva_, _Ancillaria_, _Mitra_, _Terebra_, _Pyrula_, _Fasciolaria_, and
_Conus_. Of the cones there are no less than eight species, some very
large, whereas the only European cone is of diminutive size. The genus
_Nerita_, and many others, are also represented by individuals of a type
now characteristic of equatorial seas, and wholly unlike any Mediterranean
forms. These proofs of a more elevated temperature seem to imply the higher
antiquity of the faluns as compared with the Suffolk crag, and are in
perfect accordance with the fact of the smaller proportion of testacea of
recent species found in the faluns.

Out of 290 species of shells, collected by myself, in 1840, at
Pontlevoy, Louans, Bossée, and other villages 20 miles south of Tours;
and at Savigné, about 15 miles north-west of that place; 72 only could
be identified with recent species, which is in the proportion of 25 per
cent. A large number of the 290 species are common to all the
localities, those peculiar to each not being more numerous than we might
expect to find in different bays of the same sea.

The total number of mollusca from the faluns, in my possession, is 302,
of which 45 only were found by Mr. Wood to be common to the Suffolk
crag. The number of corals obtained by me at Doué, and other localities
before adverted to, amounts to 43, as determined by Mr. Lonsdale, of
which 7 agree specifically with those of the Suffolk crag. Only one has,
as yet, been identified with a living species. But it is difficult, if
not impossible, to institute at present a satisfactory comparison
between fossil and recent _Polyparia_, from the deficiency of our
knowledge of the living species. Some of the genera occurring fossil in
Touraine, as the _Astrea_, _Lunulites_, and _Dendrophyllia_, have not
been found in European seas north of the Mediterranean; nevertheless the
_Polyparia_ of the faluns do not seem to indicate on the whole so warm a
climate as would be inferred from the shells.

It was stated that, on comparing about 300 species of Touraine shells
with about 450 from the Suffolk crag, 45 only were found to be common to
both, which is in the proportion of only 15 per cent. The same small
amount of agreement is found in the corals also. I formerly endeavoured
to reconcile this marked difference in species with the supposed
co-existence of the two faunas, by imagining them to have severally
belonged to distinct zoological provinces or two seas, the one opening
to the north, and the other to the south, with a barrier of land between
them, like the Isthmus of Suez, separating the Red Sea and the
Mediterranean. But I now abandon that idea for several reasons;
among others, because I succeeded in 1841 in tracing the Crag fauna
southwards in Normandy to within 70 miles of the Falunian type, near
Dinan, yet found that both assemblages of fossils retained their
distinctive characters, showing no signs of any blending of species
or transition of climate.

On a comparison of 280 Mediterranean shells with 600 British species, made
for me by an experienced conchologist in 1841, 160 were found to be common
to both collections, which is in the proportion of 57 per cent., a fourfold
greater specific resemblance than between the seas of the crag and the
faluns, notwithstanding the greater geographical distance between England
and the Mediterranean than between Suffolk and the Loire. The principal
grounds, however, for referring the English crag to the older Pliocene and
the French faluns to the Miocene epochs, consist in the predominance of
fossil shells in the British strata identifiable with species, not only
still living, but which are now inhabitants of neighbouring seas, while the
accompanying extinct species are of genera such as characterize Europe. In
the faluns, on the contrary, the recent species are in a decided minority,
and many of them, like the associated extinct testacea, are much less
European in character, and point to the prevalence of a warmer climate,--in
other words, to a state of things receding farther from the present
condition of Europe, geographically and climatologically, and doubtless,
therefore, receding farther in time.

_Bordeaux._--A great extent of country between the Pyrenees and the Gironde
is overspread by tertiary deposits, which have been more particularly
studied in the environs of Bordeaux and Dax, from whence about 700 species
of shells have been obtained. A large proportion of these shells belong to
the same zoological type as those of Touraine; but many are peculiar, and
the whole may possibly constitute a somewhat older division of the Miocene
period than the faluns of the Loire. We must wait, however, for farther
investigations, in order to decide this question with accuracy.

_Piedmont._--Many of the shells peculiar to the hill of the Superga, near
Turin, agree with those found at Bordeaux and Dax; but the proportion of
recent species is much less. The strata of the Superga consist of a bright
green sand and marl, and a conglomerate with pebbles, chiefly of green
serpentine, and are inclined at an angle of more than 70°. This formation,
which attains a great thickness in the valley of the Bormida, is probably
one of the oldest Miocene groups hitherto discovered.

_Molasse of Switzerland._--If we cross the Alps, and pass from Piedmont
to Savoy, we find there, at the northern base of the great chain, and
throughout the lower country of Switzerland, a soft green sandstone much
resembling some of the beds of the basin of the Bormida, above
described, and associated in a similar manner with marls and
conglomerate. This formation is called in Switzerland "molasse," said to
be derived from "mol," "_soft_" because the stone is easily cut in the
quarry. It is of vast thickness, and probably divisible into several
formations. How large a portion of these belong to the Miocene period
cannot yet be determined, as fossil shells are often entirely wanting.
In some places a decided agreement of the fossil fishes of the molasse
and faluns has been observed. Among those common to both, M. Agassiz
pointed out to me _Lamna contortidens_, _Myliobates Studeri_, _Spherodus
cinctus_, _Notidanus primigenius_, and others.

_Lisbon._--Marine tertiary strata near Lisbon contain shells which agree
very closely with those of Bordeaux, and are therefore referred to the
Miocene era. Thus, out of 112 species collected by Mr. Smith of Jordanhill,
between 60 and 70 were found to be common to the strata of Bordeaux and
Dax, the recent species being in the proportion of 21 per cent.

_Older Pliocene and Miocene formations in the United States._--Between the
Alleghany mountains, formed of older rocks, and the Atlantic, there
intervenes, in the United States, a low region occupied principally by beds
of marl, clay, and sand, consisting of the cretaceous and tertiary
formations, and chiefly of the latter. The general elevation of this plain
bordering the Atlantic does not exceed 100 feet, although it is sometimes
several hundred feet high. Its width in the middle and southern states is
very commonly from 100 to 150 miles. It consists, in the South, as in
Georgia, Alabama, and South Carolina, almost exclusively of Eocene
deposits; but in North Carolina, Maryland, Virginia, and Delaware, more
modern strata predominate, which I have assimilated in age to the English
crag and Faluns of Touraine.[172-A] If, chronologically speaking, they can
be truly said to be the representatives of these two European formations,
they may range in age from the Older Pliocene to the Miocene epoch,
according to the classification of European strata adopted in this chapter.

The proportion of fossil shells agreeing with recent, out of 147 species
collected by me, amounted to about 17 per cent., or one-sixth of the
whole; but as the fossils so assimilated were almost always the same as
species now living in the neighbouring Atlantic, the number may
hereafter be augmented, when the recent fauna of that ocean is better
known. In different localities, also, the proportion of recent
species varied considerably.

[Illustration: Fig. 151. _Fulgur canaliculatus._ Maryland.]

[Illustration: Fig. 152. _Fusus quadricostatus_, Say. Maryland.]

On the banks of the James River, in Virginia, about 20 miles below
Richmond, in a cliff about 30 feet high, I observed yellow and white sands
overlying an Eocene marl, just as the yellow sands of the crag lie on the
blue London clay in Suffolk and Essex in England. In the Virginian sands,
we find a profusion of an Astarte (_A. undulata_, Conrad), which resembles
closely, and may possibly be a variety of, one of the commonest fossils of
the Suffolk crag (_A. bipartita_); the other shells also, of the genera
_Natica_, _Fissurella_, _Artemis_, _Lucina_, _Chama_, _Pectunculus_, and
_Pecten_, are analogous to shells both of the English crag and French
faluns, although the species are almost all distinct. Out of 147 of these
American fossils I could only find 13 species common to Europe, and these
occur partly in the Suffolk crag, and partly in the faluns of Touraine; but
it is an important characteristic of the American group, that it not only
contains many peculiar extinct forms, such as _Fusus quadricostatus_, Say
(see fig. 152.), and _Venus tridacnoides_, abundant in these same
formations, but also some shells which, like _Fulgur carica_ of Say, and
_F. canaliculatus_ (see fig. 151.), _Calyptræa costata_, _Venus
mercenaria_, Lam., _Modiola glandula_, Totten, and _Pecten magellanicus_,
Lam., are recent species, yet of forms now confined to the western side of
the Atlantic, a fact implying that the beginning of the present
geographical distribution of mollusca dates back to a period as remote as
that of the Miocene strata.

Of ten species of zoophytes which I procured on the banks of the James
River, two were identical with species of the Faluns of Touraine. With
respect to climate, Mr. Lonsdale regards these corals as indicating a
temperature exceeding that of the Mediterranean, and the shells would
lead to similar conclusions. Those occurring on the James River are in
the 37th degree of N. latitude, while the French faluns are in the 47th;
yet the forms of the American fossils would scarcely imply so warm a
climate as must have prevailed in France, when the Miocene strata
of Touraine originated.

Among the remains of fish in these Post-Eocene strata of the United
States are several large teeth of the shark family, not distinguishable
specifically from fossils of the faluns of Touraine, and the
Maltese tertiaries.

_India._--The freshwater deposits of the Sub-Himalayan or Sewâlik Hills,
described by Dr. Falconer and Captain Cautley, may perhaps be regarded as
Miocene. Like the faluns of Touraine, they contain the Deinotherium and
Mastodon. Whether any of the associated freshwater and land shells are of
recent species is not yet determined. The occurrence in them of a fossil
giraffe and hippopotamus, genera now only living in Africa, as well as of a
camel, implies a geographical state of things very different from that now
established in the same parts of India. The huge Sivatherium of the same
era appears to have been a ruminating quadruped bigger than the rhinoceros,
and provided with a large upper lip, or probably a short proboscis, and
having two pair of horns, resembling those of antelopes. Several species of
monkey belonged to the same fauna; and among the reptiles, several
crocodiles, larger than any now living, and an enormous tortoise, _Testudo
Atlas_, the curved shell of which measured 20 feet across.


FOOTNOTES:

[162-A] See paper by E. Charlesworth, Esq.; London and Ed. Phil. Mag. No.
xxxviii. p. 81., Aug. 1835.

[162-B] See Monograph on the Crag Mollusca. Searles Wood, Paleont.
Soc. 1848.

[163-A] In regarding the Suffolk crag, both red and coralline, as
older Pliocene instead of Miocene, I am only returning to the
classification adopted by me in the Principles and Elements of
Geology up to the year 1838.

[166-A] E. Forbes, Mem. Geol. Survey, Gt. Brit., vol. i. 386.

[172-A] Proceedings of the Geol. Soc. vol. iv. part 3. 1845, p. 547.



CHAPTER XV.

UPPER EOCENE FORMATIONS.

   Eocene areas in England and France--Tabular view of French Eocene
   strata--Upper Eocene group of the Paris basin--Same beds in Belgium
   and at Berlin--Mayence tertiary strata--Freshwater upper Eocene of
   Central France--Series of geographical changes since the land emerged
   in Auvergne--Mineral character an uncertain test of age--Marls
   containing Cypris--Oolite of Eocene period--Indusial limestone and its
   origin--Fossil mammalia of the upper Eocene strata in
   Auvergne--Freshwater strata of the Cantal, calcareous and
   siliceous--Its resemblance to chalk--Proofs of gradual deposition
   of strata.


[Illustration: Fig. 153. Map of the principal tertiary basins of
the Eocene period.

N. B. The space left blank is occupied by secondary formations from the
Devonian or old red sandstone to the chalk inclusive.]

The tertiary strata described in the preceding chapters are all of them
characterized by fossil shells, of which a considerable proportion are
specifically identical with the living mollusca; and the greater the
number, the more nearly does the entire fauna approach in species and
genera to that now inhabiting the adjoining seas. But in the Eocene
formations next to be considered, the proportion of recent species is very
small, and sometimes scarcely appreciable, and those agreeing with the
fossil testacea often belong to remote parts of the globe, and to various
zoological provinces. This difference in conchological character implies a
considerable interval of time between the Eocene and Miocene periods,
during which the whole fauna and flora underwent other changes as great,
and often greater, than those exhibited by the mollusca. In the
accompanying map, the position of several Eocene areas is pointed out, such
as the basin of the Thames, part of Hampshire, part of the Netherlands,
and the country round Paris. The deposits, however, occupying these spaces
comprise a great succession of marine and freshwater formations, which,
although they may all be termed Eocene, as being newer than the chalk, and
older than the faluns, are nevertheless divisible into separate groups, of
high geological importance.

The newest of these, like the Faluns of the Loire, have no true
representatives, or exact chronological equivalents, in the British Isles.
Their place in the series will best be understood by referring to the order
of superposition of the successive deposits found in the neighbourhood of
Paris. The area which has been called the Paris basin is about 180 miles in
its greatest length from north-east to south-west, and about 90 miles from
east to west. This space may be described as a depression in the chalk,
which has been filled up by alternating groups of marine and freshwater
strata. MM. Cuvier and Brongniart attempted, in 1810, to distinguish five
different formations, comprising three freshwater and two marine, which
alternated with each other. It was imagined that the waters of the ocean
had been by turns admitted and excluded from the same region; but the
subsequent investigations of several geologists, especially of M. Constant
Prevost,[175-A] have led to great modifications in these theoretical views;
and now that the true order of succession is better understood, it appears
that several of the deposits, which were supposed to have originated one
after the other, were, in fact, in progress at the same time by the joint
action of the sea and rivers.

The whole series of strata may be divided into three groups, as expressed
in the following table:--

                   { _a._ Upper freshwater limestone, marls, and siliceous
  1. Upper Eocene  {      millstone.
                   { _b._ Upper marine sands, or Fontainebleau sandstone
                   {      and sand.

                   { _a._ Lower freshwater limestone and marl, or
                   {      gypseous series.
                   { _b._ Sandstone and sands with marine shells (_Sables_
  2. Middle Eocene {      _moyens_, or _grès de Beauchamp_).
                   { _c._ Calcaire grossier, limestone with marine shells.
                   { _d._ Calcaire siliceux, hard siliceous freshwater
                   {      limestone, for the most part contemporaneous
                   {      with _c_.

                   { _a._ Lower sands with marine shelly beds (_Sables_
  3. Lower Eocene  {      _inférieurs et lits coquilliers_).
                   { _b._ Lower sands, with lignite and plastic clay
                   {      (_Sables inférieurs et argiles plastiques_).

Postponing to the next chapter the consideration of the Middle and Lower
Eocene groups, I shall now speak of the Upper Eocene of Paris, and
its foreign equivalents.

The upper freshwater marls and limestone (1. _a_) seem to have been formed
in a great number of marshes and shallow lakes, such as frequently
overspread the newest parts of great deltas. It appears that many layers of
marl, tufaceous limestone, and travertin, with beds of flint, continuous
or in nodules, accumulated in these lakes. _Charæ_, aquatic plants, already
alluded to (see p. 32.) left their stems and seed-vessels imbedded both in
the marl and flint, together with freshwater and land shells. Some of the
siliceous rocks of this formation are used extensively for millstones. The
flat summits or platforms of the hills round Paris, large areas in the
forest of Fontainebleau, and the Plateau de la Beauce, between the Seine
and the Loire, are chiefly composed of these upper freshwater strata.

The upper marine sands (1. _b_), consist chiefly of micaceous and quartzose
sands, 80 feet thick. As they succeed throughout an extensive area deposit
of a purely freshwater origin (2 _a_.), they appear to mark a subsidence of
the subjacent soil, whether it had formed the bottom of an estuary or a
lake. The sea, which afterwards took possession of the same space, was
inhabited by testacea, almost all of them differing from those found in the
lower formations (2. _b_ and 2. _c_) and equally or still more distinct
from the Miocene Faluns of subsequent date. One of these upper Eocene
strata in the neighbourhood of Paris has been called the oyster bed,
"couche à _Ostrea cyathula_, Lamk.," which is spread over a remarkably wide
area. From the manner in which the oysters lie, it is inferred that they
did not grow on the spot, but that some current swept them away from a bed
of oysters formed in some other part of the bay. The strata of sand which
immediately repose on the oyster-bed are quite destitute of organic
remains; and nothing is more common in the Paris basin, and in other
formations, than alternations of shelly beds with others entirely devoid of
them. The temporary extinction and renewal of animal life at successive
periods have been rashly inferred from such phenomena, which may
nevertheless be explained, as M. Prevost justly remarks, without appealing
to any such extraordinary revolutions in the state of the animate creation.
A current one day scoops out a channel in a bed of shelly sand and mud, and
the next day, by a slight alteration of its course, ceases to prey upon the
same bank. It may then become charged with sand unmixed with shells,
derived from some dune, or brought down by a river. In the course of ages
an indefinite number of transitions from shelly strata to those without
shells may thus be caused.

Besides these oysters, M. Deshayes has described 29 species of shells,
in his work (Coquilles fossiles de Paris), as belonging to this
formation, all save one regarded by him as differing from fossils of the
calcaire grossier. Since that time the railway cuttings near Etampes
have enabled M. Hébert to raise the number to 90. I have myself
collected fossils in that district, where the shells are very entire,
and detachable from the yellow sandy matrix. M. Hébert first pointed out
that most of them agree specifically with those of Kleyn Spauwen, Boom,
and other localities of Limburg in Flanders, where they have been
studied by MM. Nyst and De Koninck.[176-A]

The position in Belgium of this formation above the older Eocene group is
well seen in the small hill of Pellenberg, rising abruptly from the great
plain, half a mile south-east of the city of Louvain, where I examined it
in company with M. Nyst in 1850. At the top of the hill, a thin bed of dark
greyish green tile-clay is seen 1-1/2 foot thick, with casts of _Nucula
Deshaysiana_. This clay rests on 12 feet of yellow sand, separated, by a
band of flint and quartz pebbles, from a mass of subjacent white sand 15
feet thick, in which casts of the Kleyn Spauwen fossils have been met with.
Under this is a bed of yellow sand 12 feet thick, and, at a lower level,
the railway cuttings have passed through calcareous sands like those of
Brussels, in which the _Nautilus Burtini_, and various shells common to the
older Eocene strata of the neighbourhood of London, have been obtained.
Every new fact which throws light on the true paleontological relations of
the strata now under consideration, (the Upper Marine or Fontainebleau beds
of the Paris basin, 1. _b_, p. 175.), deserves more particular attention,
because geologists of high authority differ in opinion as to whether they
should be classed as Eocene or Miocene.

Professor Beyrich has lately described a formation of the same age,
occurring within 7 miles of the gates of Berlin, near the village of
Hermsdorf, where, in the midst of the sands of which that country
chiefly consists, a mass of tile-clay, more than 40 feet thick, and of a
dark blueish grey colour, is found, full of shells, among which the
genera _Fusus_ and _Pleurotoma_ predominate, and among the bivalves,
_Nucula Deshaysiana_, Nyst, an extremely common shell in the Belgian
beds above-mentioned. M. Beyrich has identified eighteen out of
forty-five species of the Hermsdorf fossils with the Belgian species;
and I believe that a much larger proportion agree with the Upper Eocene
of Belgium, France, and the Rhine. On the other hand, eight of the
forty-five species are supposed by him to agree with English Eocene
shells. Messrs. Morris, Edwards, and S. Wood have compared a small
collection, which I obtained of these Berlin shells, with the Eocene
fossils of their museums, and confirmed the result of M. Beyrich, the
species common to the English fossils belonging not simply to the
uppermost of our marine beds, or those of Barton, but some of them to
lower parts of the series, such as Bracklesham and Highgate. On the
other hand, while these testacea, like those of Kleyn Spauwen and
Etampes, present many analogies to the Middle and Lower Eocene group,
they differ widely from the Falun shells,--a fact the more important in
reference to Etampes, as that locality approaches within 70 miles of
Pontlevoy, near Blois, and within 100 miles of Savigné, near Tours,
where Falun shells are found. It is evident that the discordance of
species cannot be attributed to distance or geographical causes, but
must be referred to time, or the different epoch at which the upper
marine beds of the Paris basin and the Faluns of the Loire originated.

_Mayence._--The true chronological relation of many tertiary strata on
the banks of the Rhine has always presented a problem of considerable
difficulty. They occupy a tract from 5 to 12 miles in breadth, extending
along the left bank of the Rhine from Mayence to the neighbourhood of
Manheim, and are again found to the east, north, and south-west of
Frankfort. In some places they have the appearance of a freshwater
formation; but in others, as at Alzey, the shells are for the most part
marine. _Cerithia_ are in great profusion, which indicates that the sea
where the deposit was formed was fed by rivers; and the great quantity
of fossil land shells, chiefly of the genus _Helix_, confirm the same
opinion. The variety in the species of shells is small, while the
individuals are exceedingly numerous; a fact which accords perfectly
with the idea that the formation may have originated in a gulf or sea
which, like the Baltic, was brackish in some parts, and almost fresh in
others. A species of _Paludina_ (fig. 154.), very nearly resembling the
recent _Littorina ulva_, is found throughout this basin. These shells
are like grains of rice in size, and are often in such quantity as to
form entire beds of marl and limestone. They are as thick as grains of
sand, in stratified masses from 15 to 30 feet in thickness.

[Illustration: Fig. 154. _Paludina._ Mayence.]

That these Rhenish tertiary formations agree more nearly with the Upper
Eocene deposits above enumerated, than with any others, I have no doubt,
since I had the advantage of comparing (August, 1850), with the
assistance of M. De Koninck of Liége, the fossils from Kleyn Spauwen,
Boom, and other Limburg localities, with those from Mayence, Alzey,
Weinheim, and other Rhenish strata. Among the common Belgian and Rhenish
shells which are identical, I may mention _Cassidaria depressa_,
_Tritonium flandricum_ De Koninck, _Cerithium tricinctum_ Nyst,
_Tornatella simulata_, _Rostellaria Sowerbyi_, _Nucula Deshaysiana_,
_Corbula pisum_, and _Pectunculus terebratularis_.

From these Upper Eocene deposits of the Rhine M. H. von Meyer has
obtained a great number of characteristic fossil mammalia, such as
_Palæomæryx medius_, _Hyotherium Meissneri_, _Tapirus Helveticus_,
_Anthracotherium Alsaticum_, and others. The three first of these are
species common to some of the lignite, or brown coal beds in
Switzerland, commonly classed with the molasse, but of which the true
age has not yet been distinctly made out.

The fossils of the sandy beds of Eppelsheim, comprising bones of the
Deinotherium, Mastodon, and other quadrupeds, are regarded by H. von Meyer
as belonging to a mammiferous fauna quite distinct from that of the Mayence
basin, and they are probably referable to the Miocene period.

The upper freshwater strata (1. _a_, p. 175.), of the neighbourhood of
Paris, stretch southwards from the valley of the Seine to that of the
Loire, and in the last-mentioned region are seen to be older than the
marine faluns, so that the perforating shells of the Miocene sea have
sometimes bored the hard compact freshwater limestones; and fragments of
the Upper Eocene rocks are found at Pontlevoy and elsewhere, which have
been rolled in the bed of the Miocene sea.

[Illustration: Fig. 155. Simplified geological map south of Paris.]

_Central France._--Lacustrine strata belonging, for the most part, to
the same Upper Eocene series, are again met with in Auvergne, Cantal,
and Velay, the sites of which may be seen in the annexed map. They
appear to be the monuments of ancient lakes, which, like some of those
now existing in Switzerland, once occupied the depressions in a
mountainous region, and have been each fed by one or more rivers and
torrents. The country where they occur is almost entirely composed of
granite and different varieties of granitic schist, with here and there
a few patches of secondary strata, much dislocated, and which have
probably suffered great denudation. There are also some vast piles
of volcanic matter (see the map), the greater part of which is newer
than the freshwater strata, and is sometimes seen to rest upon them,
while a small part has evidently been of contemporaneous origin.
Of these igneous rocks I shall treat more particularly in another
part of this work.

Before entering upon any details, I may observe, that the study of these
regions possesses a peculiar interest, very distinct in kind from that
derivable from the investigation either of the Parisian or English tertiary
strata. For we are presented in Auvergne with the evidence of a series of
events of astonishing magnitude and grandeur, by which the original form
and features of the country have been greatly changed, yet never so far
obliterated but that they may still, in part at least, be restored in
imagination. Great lakes have disappeared,--lofty mountains have been
formed, by the reiterated emission of lava, preceded and followed by
showers of sand and scoriæ,--deep valleys have been subsequently furrowed
out through masses of lacustrine and volcanic origin,--at a still later
date, new cones have been thrown up in these valleys,--new lakes have been
formed by the damming up of rivers,--and more than one creation of
quadrupeds, birds, and plants, Eocene, Miocene, and Pliocene, have followed
in succession; yet the region has preserved from first to last its
geographical identity; and we can still recall to our thoughts its external
condition and physical structure before these wonderful vicissitudes began,
or while a part only of the whole had been completed. There was first a
period when the spacious lakes, of which we still may trace the boundaries,
lay at the foot of mountains of moderate elevation, unbroken by the bold
peaks and precipices of Mont Dor, and unadorned by the picturesque outline
of the Puy de Dome, or of the volcanic cones and craters now covering the
granitic platform. During this earlier scene of repose deltas were slowly
formed; beds of marl and sand, several hundred feet thick, deposited;
siliceous and calcareous rocks precipitated from the waters of mineral
springs; shells and insects imbedded, together with the remains of the
crocodile and tortoise, the eggs and bones of water birds, and the
skeletons of quadrupeds, some of them belonging to the same genera as those
entombed in the Eocene gypsum of Paris. To this tranquil condition of the
surface succeeded the era of volcanic eruptions, when the lakes were
drained, and when the fertility of the mountainous district was probably
enhanced by the igneous matter ejected from below, and poured down upon the
more sterile granite. During these eruptions, which appear to have taken
place after the disappearance of the Eocene fauna, and in the Miocene
epoch, the mastodon, rhinoceros, elephant, tapir, hippopotamus, together
with the ox, various kinds of deer, the bear, hyæna, and many beasts of
prey, ranged the forest, or pastured on the plain, and were occasionally
overtaken by a fall of burning cinders, or buried in flows of mud, such as
accompany volcanic eruptions. Lastly, these quadrupeds became extinct, and
gave place to Pliocene mammalia, and these, in their turn, to species now
existing. There are no signs, during the whole time required for this
series of events, of the sea having intervened, nor of any denudation which
may not have been accomplished by currents in the different lakes, or by
rivers and floods accompanying repeated earthquakes, during which the
levels of the district have in some places been materially modified, and
perhaps the whole upraised relatively to the surrounding parts of France.

_Auvergne._--The most northern of the freshwater groups is situated in the
valley-plain of the Allier, which lies within the department of the Puy de
Dome, being the tract which went formerly by the name of the Limagne
d'Auvergne. It is inclosed by two parallel mountain ranges,--that of the
Forèz, which divides the waters of the Loire and Allier, on the east; and
that of the Monts Domes, which separates the Allier from the Sioule, on the
west.[181-A] The average breadth of this tract is about 20 miles; and it is
for the most part composed of nearly horizontal strata of sand, sandstone,
calcareous marl, clay, and limestone, none of which observe a fixed and
invariable order of superposition. The ancient borders of the lake, wherein
the freshwater strata were accumulated, may generally be traced with
precision, the granite and other ancient rocks rising up boldly from the
level country. The actual junction, however, of the lacustrine and granitic
beds is rarely seen, as a small valley usually intervenes between them. The
freshwater strata may sometimes be seen to retain their horizontality
within a very slight distance of the border-rocks, while in some places
they are inclined, and in few instances vertical. The principal divisions
into which the lacustrine series may be separated are the following:--1st,
Sandstone, grit, and conglomerate, including red marl and red sandstone.
2dly, Green and white foliated marls. 3dly, Limestone or travertin, often
oolitic. 4thly, Gypseous marls.

1. _a_. _Sandstone and conglomerate._--Strata of sand and gravel, sometimes
bound together into a solid rock, are found in great abundance around the
confines of the lacustrine basin, containing, in different places, pebbles
of all the ancient rocks of the adjoining elevated country; namely,
granite, gneiss, mica-schist, clay-slate, porphyry, and others. But these
strata do not form one continuous band around the margin of the basin,
being rather disposed like the independent deltas which grow at the mouths
of torrents along the borders of existing lakes.

At Chamalieres, near Clermont, we have an example of one of these deltas,
or littoral deposits, of local extent, where the pebbly beds slope away
from the granite, as if they had formed a talus beneath the waters of the
lake near the steep shore. A section of about 50 feet in vertical height
has been laid open by a torrent, and the pebbles are seen to consist
throughout of rounded and angular fragments of granite, quartz, primary
slate, and red sandstone; but without any intermixture of those volcanic
rocks which now abound in the neighbourhood, and which could not have been
there when the conglomerate was formed. Partial layers of lignite and
pieces of wood are found in these beds.

At some localities on the margin of the basin quartzose grits are found;
and, where these rest on granite, they are sometimes formed of separate
crystals of quartz, mica, and felspar, derived from the disintegrated
granite, the crystals having been subsequently bound together by a
siliceous cement. In these cases the granite seems regenerated in a new and
more solid form; and so gradual a passage takes place between the rock of
crystalline and that of mechanical origin, that we can scarcely distinguish
where one ends and the other begins.

In the hills called the Puy de Jussat and La Roche, we have the advantage
of seeing a section continuously exposed for about 700 feet in thickness.
At the bottom are foliated marls, white and green, about 400 feet thick;
and above, resting on the marls, are the quartzose grits, cemented by
calcareous matter, which is sometimes so abundant as to form imbedded
nodules. These sometimes constitute spheroidal concretions 6 feet in
diameter, and pass into beds of solid limestone, resembling the Italian
travertins, or the deposits of mineral springs. This section is close to
the confines of the basin; so that the lake must here have been filled up
near the shore with fine mud, before the coarse superincumbent sand was
introduced. There are other cases where sand is seen below the marl.

1. _b._ _Red marl and sandstone_.--But the most remarkable of the
arenaceous groups is one of red sandstone and red marl, which are identical
in all their mineral characters with the secondary _New Red sandstone_ and
marl of England. In these secondary rocks the red ground is sometimes
variegated with light greenish spots, and the same may be seen in the
tertiary formation of freshwater origin at Coudes, on the Allier. The marls
are sometimes of a purplish-red colour, as at Champheix, and are
accompanied by a reddish limestone, like the well-known "cornstone," which
is associated with the Old Red sandstone of English geologists. The red
sandstone and marl of Auvergne have evidently been derived from the
degradation of gneiss and mica-schist, which are seen _in situ_ on the
adjoining hills, decomposing into a soil very similar to the tertiary red
sand and marl. We also find pebbles of gneiss, mica-schist, and quartz in
the coarser sandstones of this group, clearly pointing to the parent rocks
from which the sand and marl are derived. The red beds, although destitute
themselves of organic remains, pass upwards into strata containing Eocene
fossils, and are certainly an integral part of the lacustrine formation.
From this example the student will learn how small is the value of mineral
character alone, as a test of the relative age of rocks.

2. _Green and white foliated marls._--The same primary rocks of Auvergne,
which, by the partial degradation of their harder parts, gave rise to the
quartzose grits and conglomerates before mentioned, would, by the reduction
of the same materials into powder, and by the decomposition of their
felspar, mica, and hornblende, produce aluminous clay, and, if a sufficient
quantity of carbonate of lime was present, calcareous marl. This fine
sediment would naturally be carried out to a greater distance from the
shore, as are the various finer marls now deposited in Lake Superior. And,
as in the American lake, shingle and sand are annually amassed near the
northern shores, so in Auvergne the grits and conglomerates before
mentioned were evidently formed near the borders.

[Illustration: Fig. 156. _Cypris unifasciata_, a living species,
greatly magnified.

  _a._ Upper part.
  _b._ Side view of the same.]

[Illustration: Fig. 157. _Cypris vidua_, a living species,
greatly magnified.[183-A]]

The entire thickness of these marls is unknown; but it certainly exceeds,
in some places, 700 feet. They are, for the most part, either light-green
or white, and usually calcareous. They are thinly foliated,--a character
which frequently arises from the innumerable thin shells, or
carapace-valves, of that small animal called _Cypris_; a genus which
comprises several species, of which some are recent, and may be seen
swimming swiftly through the waters of our stagnant pools and ditches. The
antennæ, at the end of which are fine pencils of hair, are the principal
organs of motion, and are seen to vibrate with great rapidity. This animal
resides within two small valves, not unlike those of a bivalve shell, and
moults its integuments periodically, which the conchiferous mollusks do
not. This circumstance may partly explain the countless myriads of the
shells of _Cypris_ which were shed in the ancient lakes of Auvergne, so as
to give rise to divisions in the marl as thin as paper, and that, too, in
stratified masses several hundred feet thick. A more convincing proof of
the tranquillity and clearness of the waters, and of the slow and gradual
process by which the lake was filled up with fine mud, cannot be desired.
But we may easily suppose that, while this fine sediment was thrown down in
the deep and central parts of the basin, gravel, sand, and rocky fragments
were hurried into the lake, and deposited near the shore, forming the group
described in the preceding section.

Not far from Clermont, the green marls, containing the _Cypris_ in
abundance, approach to within a few yards of the granite which forms the
borders of the basin. The occurrence of these marls so near the ancient
margin may be explained by considering that, at the bottom of the
ancient lake, no coarse ingredients were deposited in spaces
intermediate between the points where rivers and torrents entered, but
finer mud only was drifted there by currents. The _verticality_ of some
of the beds in the above section bears testimony to considerable local
disturbance subsequent to the deposition of the marls; but such inclined
and vertical strata are very rare.

[Illustration: Fig. 158. Vertical strata of marl, at Champradelle,
near Clermont.

  A. Granite.
  B. Space of 60 feet, in which no section is seen.
  C. Green marl, vertical and inclined.
  D. White marl.]

3. _Limestone, travertin, oolite._--Both the preceding members of the
lacustrine deposit, the marls and grits, pass occasionally into
limestone. Sometimes only concretionary nodules abound in them; but
these, where there is an increase in the quantity of calcareous matter,
unite into regular beds.

On each side of the basin of the Limagne, both on the west at Gannat, and
on the east at Vichy, a white oolitic limestone is quarried. At Vichy, the
oolite resembles our Bath stone in appearance and beauty; and, like it, is
soft when first taken from the quarry, but soon hardens on exposure to the
air. At Gannat, the stone contains land-shells and bones of quadrupeds,
resembling those of the Paris gypsum. At Chadrat, in the hill of La Serre,
the limestone is pisolitic, the small spheroids combining both the radiated
and concentric structure.

_Indusial limestone._--There is another remarkable form of freshwater
limestone in Auvergne, called "indusial," from the cases, or _indusiæ_,
of caddis-worms (the larvæ of _Phryganea_); great heaps of which have
been incrusted, as they lay, by carbonate of lime, and formed into a
hard travertin. The rock is sometimes purely calcareous, but there is
occasionally an intermixture of siliceous matter. Several beds of it are
frequently seen, either in continuous masses, or in concretionary
nodules, one upon another, with layers of marl interposed. The annexed
drawing (fig. 159.) will show the manner in which one of these indusial
beds (_a_) is laid open at the surface, between the marls (_b b_), near
the base of the hill of Gergovia; and affords, at the same time, an
example of the extent to which the lacustrine strata, which must once
have filled a hollow, have been denuded, and shaped out into hills and
valleys, on the site of the ancient lakes.

[Illustration: Fig. 159. Bed of indusial limestone, interstratified with
freshwater marl, near Clermont (Kleinschrod.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 160. Larva of recent Phryganea.[185-A]]

[Illustration: Fig. 161.

  _a_. Indusial limestone of Auvergne.
  _b_. Fossil _Paludina_ magnified.]

We may often observe in our ponds the _Phryganea_ (or Caddis-fly), in its
caterpillar state, covered with small freshwater shells, which they have
the power of fixing to the outside of their tubular cases, in order,
probably, to give them weight and strength. The individual figured in the
annexed cut, which belongs to a species very abundant in England, has
covered its case with shells of a small _Planorbis_. In the same manner a
large species of caddis-worm, which swarmed in the Eocene lakes of
Auvergne, was accustomed to attach to its dwelling the shells of a small
spiral univalve of the genus _Paludina_. A hundred of these minute shells
are sometimes seen arranged around one tube, part of the central cavity of
which is often empty, the rest being filled up with thin concentric layers
of travertin. The cases have been thrown together confusedly, and often
lie, as in fig. 161., at right angles one to the other. When we consider
that ten or twelve tubes are packed within the compass of a cubic inch, and
that some single strata of this limestone are 6 feet thick, and may be
traced over a considerable area, we may form some idea of the countless
number of insects and mollusca which contributed their integuments and
shells to compose this singularly constructed rock. It is unnecessary to
suppose that the _Phryganeæ_ lived on the spots where their cases are now
found; they may have multiplied in the shallows near the margin of the
lake, or in the streams by which it was fed, and their cases may have been
drifted by a current far into the deep water.

In the summer of 1837, when examining, in company with Dr. Beck, a small
lake near Copenhagen, I had an opportunity of witnessing a beautiful
exemplification of the manner in which the tubular cases of Auvergne were
probably accumulated. This lake, called the Fuure-Soe, occurring in the
interior of Seeland, is about twenty English miles in circumference, and in
some parts 200 feet in depth. Round the shallow borders an abundant crop of
reeds and rushes may be observed, covered with the indusiæ of the
_Phryganea grandis_ and other species, to which shells are attached. The
plants which support them are the bullrush, _Scirpus lacustris_, and common
reed, _Arundo phragmitis_, but chiefly the former. In summer, especially in
the month of June, a violent gust of wind sometimes causes a current by
which these plants are torn up by the roots, washed away, and floated off
in long bands, more than a mile in length, into deep water. The _Cypris_
swarms in the same lake; and calcareous springs alone are wanting to form
extensive beds of indusial limestone, like those of Auvergne.

4. _Gypseous marls._--More than 50 feet of thinly laminated gypseous marls,
exactly resembling those in the hill of Montmartre, at Paris, are worked
for gypsum at St. Romain, on the right bank of the Allier. They rest on a
series of green cypriferous marls which alternate with grit, the united
thickness of this inferior group being seen, in a vertical section on the
banks of the river, to exceed 250 feet.

_General arrangement, origin, and age of the freshwater formations of
Auvergne._--The relations of the different groups above described cannot be
learnt by the study of any one section; and the geologist who sets out with
the expectation of finding a fixed order of succession may perhaps complain
that the different parts of the basin give contradictory results. The
arenaceous division, the marls, and the limestone, may all be seen in some
places to alternate with each other; yet it can, by no means, be affirmed
that there is no order of arrangement. The sands, sandstone, and
conglomerate, constitute in general a littoral group; the foliated white
and green marls, a contemporaneous central deposit; and the limestone is
for the most part subordinate to the newer portions of both. The uppermost
marls and sands are more calcareous than the lower; and we never meet with
calcareous rocks covered by a considerable thickness of quartzose sand or
green marl. From the resemblance of the limestones to the Italian
travertins, we may conclude that they were derived from the waters of
mineral springs,--such springs as even now exist in Auvergne, and which may
be seen rising up through the granite, and precipitating travertin. They
are sometimes thermal, but this character is by no means constant.

It seems that, when the ancient lake of the Limagne first began to be
filled with sediment, no volcanic action had yet produced lava and
scoriæ on any part of the surface of Auvergne. No pebbles, therefore, of
lava were transported into the lake,--no fragments of volcanic rocks
embedded in the conglomerate. But at a later period, when a considerable
thickness of sandstone and marl had accumulated, eruptions broke out,
and lava and tuff were deposited, at some spots, alternately with the
lacustrine strata. It is not improbable that cold and thermal springs,
holding different mineral ingredients in solution, became more numerous
during the successive convulsions attending this development of volcanic
agency, and thus deposits of carbonate and sulphate of lime, silex, and
other minerals were produced. Hence these minerals predominate in the
uppermost strata. The subterranean movements may then have continued
until they altered the relative levels of the country, and caused the
waters of the lakes to be drained off, and the farther accumulation of
regular freshwater strata to cease.

We may easily conceive a similar series of events to give rise to
analogous results in any modern basin, such as that of Lake Superior,
for example, where numerous rivers and torrents are carrying down the
detritus of a chain of mountains into the lake. The transported
materials must be arranged according to their size and weight, the
coarser near the shore, the finer at a greater distance from land; but
in the gravelly and sandy beds of Lake Superior no pebbles of modern
volcanic rocks can be included, since there are none of these at present
in the district. If igneous action should break out in that country, and
produce lava, scoriæ, and thermal springs, the deposition of gravel,
sand, and marl might still continue as before; but, in addition, there
would then be an intermixture of volcanic gravel and tuff, and of rocks
precipitated from the waters of mineral springs.

Although the freshwater strata of the Limagne approach generally to a
horizontal position, the proofs of local disturbance are sufficiently
numerous and violent to allow us to suppose great changes of level since
the lacustrine period. We are unable to assign a northern barrier to the
ancient lake, although we can still trace its limits to the east, west,
and south, where they were formed of bold granite eminences. Nor need we
be surprised at our inability to restore entirely the physical geography
of the country after so great a series of volcanic eruptions; for it is
by no means improbable that one part of it, the southern, for example,
may have been moved upwards bodily, while others remained at rest, or
even suffered a movement of depression.

Whether all the freshwater formations of the Limagne d'Auvergne belong to
one period, I cannot pretend to decide, as large masses both of the
arenaceous and marly groups are often devoid of fossils. Much light has
been thrown on the mammiferous fauna by the labours of MM. Bravard and
Croizet, and by those of M. Pomel. The last-mentioned naturalist has
pointed out the specific distinction of all, or nearly all, the species of
mammalia, from those of the gypseous series near Paris. Nevertheless, many
of the forms are analogous to those of Eocene quadrupeds. The
_Cainotherium_, for example, is not far removed from the _Anoplotherium_,
and is, according to Waterhouse, the same as the genus _Microtherium_ of
the Germans. There are two species of marsupial animals allied to
_Didelphys_, a genus also found in the Paris gypsum. The _Amphitragulus
elegans_ of Pomel, has been identified with a Rhenish species from
Weissenau near Mayence, called by Kaup _Dorcatherium nanum_; and other
Auvergne fossils, e.g., _Microtherium Reuggeri_, and a small rodent,
_Titanomys_, are specifically the same with mammalia of the Mayence basin.

_Cantal._--A freshwater formation, very analogous to that of Auvergne,
is situated in the department of Haute Loire, near the town of Le Puy,
in Velay, and another occurs near Aurillac, in Cantal. The leading
feature of the formation last mentioned, as distinguished from those of
Auvergne and Velay, is the immense abundance of silex associated with
calcareous marls and limestone.

The whole series may be separated into two divisions; the lower, composed
of gravel, sand, and clay, such as might have been derived from the wearing
down and decomposition of the granitic schists of the surrounding country;
the upper system, consisting of siliceous and calcareous marls, contains
subordinately gypsum, silex, and limestone.

The resemblance of the freshwater limestone of the Cantal, and its
accompanying flint, to the upper chalk of England, is very instructive, and
well calculated to put the student upon his guard against relying too
implicitly on mineral character alone as a safe criterion of relative age.

When we approach Aurillac from the west, we pass over great heathy plains,
where the sterile mica-schist is barely covered with vegetation. Near
Ytrac, and between La Capelle and Viscamp, the surface is strewed over with
loose broken flints, some of them black in the interior, but with a white
external coating; others stained with tints of yellow and red, and in
appearance precisely like the flint gravel of our chalk districts. When
heaps of this gravel have thus announced our approach to a new formation,
we arrive at length at the escarpment of the lacustrine beds. At the bottom
of the hill which rises before us, we see strata of clay and sand, resting
on mica-schist; and above, in the quarries of Belbet, Leybros, and Bruel, a
white limestone, in horizontal strata, the surface of which has been
hollowed out into irregular furrows, since filled up with broken flint,
marl, and dark vegetable mound. In these cavities we recognize an exact
counterpart to those which are so numerous on the furrowed surface of our
own white chalk. Advancing from these quarries along a road made of the
white limestone, which reflects as glaring a light in the sun, as do our
roads composed of chalk, we reach, at length, in the neighbourhood of
Aurillac, hills of limestone and calcareous marl, in horizontal strata,
separated in some places by regular layers of flint in nodules, the coating
of each nodule being of an opaque white colour, like the exterior of the
flinty nodules of our chalk.

It will be remembered that the siliceous stone of Bilin, called _tripoli_,
is a freshwater deposit, and has been shown, by Ehrenberg, to be of
infusorial origin (see p. 24.). What is true of the Bohemian flint and
opal, where the beds attain a thickness of 14 feet, may also, perhaps, be
found to hold good respecting the silex of Aurillac, which may also have
been immediately derived from the minute cases of microscopic animalcules.
But even if this conclusion be established, the abundant supply both of
siliceous, calcareous, and gypseous matter, which the ancient lakes of
France received, may have been connected with the subterranean volcanic
agency of which those regions were so long the theatre, and which may have
impregnated the springs with mineral matter, even before the great outbreak
of lava. It is well known that the hot springs of Iceland, and many other
countries, contain silex in solution; and it has been lately affirmed, that
steam at a high temperature is capable of dissolving quartzose rocks
without the aid of any alkaline or other flux.[189-A]

Travellers not unfrequently mention, in their accounts of India, Australia,
and other distant lands, that they have seen chalk with flints, which they
have assumed to be of the same age as the Cretaceous system of Europe. A
hasty observation of the white limestone and flint of Aurillac might convey
the same idea; but when we turn from the mineral aspect and composition to
the organic remains, we find in the flints of the Cantal the seed-vessels
of the freshwater _Chara_, instead of the marine zoophytes so abundantly
imbedded in chalk flints; and in the limestone we meet with shells of
_Limnea_, _Planorbis_, and other lacustrine genera, instead of the oyster,
terebratula, and echinus of the Cretaceous period.

_Proofs of gradual deposition_.--Some sections of the foliated marls in the
valley of the Cer, near Aurillac, attest, in the most unequivocal manner,
the extreme slowness with which the materials of the lacustrine series were
amassed. In the hill of Barrat, for example, we find an assemblage of
calcareous and siliceous marls; in which, for a depth of at least 60 feet,
the layers are so thin, that thirty are sometimes contained in the
thickness of an inch; and when they are separated, we see preserved in
every one of them the flattened stems of _Charæ_, or other plants, or
sometimes myriads of small _Paludinæ_ and other freshwater shells. These
minute foliations of the marl resemble precisely some of the recent
laminated beds of the Scotch marl lakes, and may be compared to the pages
of a book, each containing a history of a certain period of the past. The
different layers may be grouped together in beds from a foot to a foot and
a half in thickness, which are distinguished by differences of composition
and colour, the tints being white, green, and brown. Occasionally there is
a parting layer of pure flint, or of black carbonaceous vegetable matter,
about an inch thick, or of white pulverulent marl. We find several hills in
the neighbourhood of Aurillac composed of such materials, for the height of
more than 200 feet from their base, the whole sometimes covered by rocky
currents of trachytic or basaltic lava.[190-A]

Thus wonderfully minute are the separate parts of which some of the most
massive geological monuments are made up! When we desire to classify, it
is necessary to contemplate entire groups of strata in the aggregate;
but if we wish to understand the mode of their formation, and to explain
their origin, we must think only of the minute subdivisions of which
each mass is composed. We must bear in mind how many thin leaf-like
seams of matter, each containing the remains of myriads of testacea and
plants, frequently enter into the composition of a single stratum, and
how vast a succession of these strata unite to form a single group! We
must remember, also, that piles of volcanic matter, like the Plomb du
Cantal, which rises in the immediate neighbourhood of Aurillac, are
themselves equally the result of successive accumulation, consisting of
reiterated sheets of lava, showers of scoriæ, and ejected fragments of
rock.--Lastly, we must not forget that continents and mountain-chains,
colossal as are their dimensions, are nothing more than an assemblage of
many such igneous and aqueous groups, formed in succession during an
indefinite lapse of ages, and superimposed upon each other.


FOOTNOTES:

[175-A] Bulletin des Sci. de la Soc. Philom., May, 1825, p. 74.

[176-A] Hébert. Bulletin. 1849, vol. vi. 2d series, p. 459.

[181-A] Scrope, Geology of Central France, p. 15.

[183-A] See Desmarest's Crustacea, plate 55.

[185-A] I believe that the British specimen here figured is
P. _rhombica_, Linn.

[189-A] See Proceedings of Roy. Soc., No. 44. p. 233.

[190-A] Lyell and Murchison, sur les Dépôts Lacust. Tertiaries du Cantal,
&c. Ann. des Sci. Nat. Oct. 1829.



CHAPTER XVI.

EOCENE FORMATIONS--_continued_.

   Subdivisions of the Eocene group in the Paris basin--Gypseous
   series--Extinct quadrupeds--Impulse given to geology by Cuvier's
   osteological discoveries--Shelly sands called sables moyens--Calcaire
   grossier--Miliolites--Calcaire siliceux--Lower Eocene in France--Lits
   coquilliers--Sands and plastic clay--English Eocene strata--Freshwater
   and fluvio-marine beds--Barton beds--Bagshot and Bracklesham
   division--Large ophidians and saurians--Lower Eocene and London Clay
   proper--Fossil plants and shells--Strata of Kyson in Suffolk--Fossil
   monkey and opossum--Mottled clays and sands below London
   Clay--Nummulitic formation of Alps and Pyrenees--Its wide geographical
   extent--Eocene strata in the United States--Section at Claiborne,
   Alabama--Colossal cetacean--Orbitoid limestone--Burr stone.


From what was said in the two preceding chapters, it has already
appeared that we have in England no true chronological representative of
the Miocene faluns of the Loire, and none of the Upper Eocene group
described in the last chapter. But, when we descend to the middle and
inferior divisions of the Eocene system of France, we find that they
have their equivalents in Great Britain.


MIDDLE EOCENE.--FRANCE.

_Gypseous series_ (2. _a_, Table, p. 175.).--Next below the upper marine
sands of the neighbourhood of Paris, we find a series of white and green
marls, with subordinate beds of gypsum. These are most largely developed in
the central parts of the Paris basin, and, among other places, in the Hill
of Montmartre, where its fossils were first studied by M. Cuvier.

The gypsum quarried there for the manufacture of plaster of Paris occurs as
a granular crystalline rock, and, together with the associated marls,
contains land and fluviatile shells, together with the bones and skeletons
of birds and quadrupeds. Several land plants are also met with, among which
are fine specimens of the fan palm or palmetto tribe (_Flabellaria_). The
remains also of freshwater fish and of crocodiles and other reptiles, occur
in the gypsum. The skeletons of mammalia are usually isolated, often
entire, the most delicate extremities being preserved; as if the carcasses,
clothed with their flesh and skin, had been floated down soon after death,
and while they were still swoln by the gases generated by their first
decomposition. The few accompanying shells are of those light kinds which
frequently float on the surface of rivers, together with wood.

M. Prevost has therefore suggested that a river may have swept away the
bodies of animals, and the plants which lived on its borders, or in the
lakes which it traversed, and may have carried them down into the centre
of the gulf into which flowed the waters impregnated with sulphate of
lime. We know that the Fiume Salso in Sicily enters the sea so charged
with various salts that the thirsty cattle refuse to drink of it. A
stream of sulphureous water, as white as milk, descends into the sea
from the volcanic mountain of Idienne on the east of Java; and a great
body of hot water, charged with sulphuric acid, rushed down from the
same volcano on one occasion, and inundated a large tract of country,
destroying, by its noxious properties, all the vegetation.[191-A] In
like manner the Pusanibio, or "Vinegar River," of Colombia, which rises
at the foot of Puracé, an extinct volcano, 7,500 feet above the level of
the sea, is strongly impregnated with sulphuric and muriatic acids and
with oxide of iron. We may easily suppose the waters of such streams to
have properties noxious to marine animals, and in this manner the entire
absence of marine remains in the ossiferous gypsum may be
explained.[191-B] There are no pebbles or coarse sand in the gypsum; a
circumstance which agrees well with the hypothesis that these beds were
precipitated from water holding sulphate of lime in solution, and
floating the remains of different animals.

In this formation the relics of about fifty species of quadrupeds,
including the genera _Paleotherium_, _Anoplotherium_, and others, have been
found, all extinct, and nearly four-fifths of them belonging to a division
of the order _Pachydermata_, which is now represented by only four living
species; namely three tapirs and the daman of the Cape. With them a few
carnivorous animals are associated, among which are a species of fox and
gennet. Of the _Rodentia_, a dormouse and a squirrel; of the _Insectivora_,
a bat; and of the _Marsupialia_ (an order now confined to America,
Australia, and some contiguous islands), an opossum, have been discovered.

Of birds, about ten species have been ascertained, the skeletons of some of
which are entire. None of them are referable to existing species.[192-A]
The same remark applies to the fish, according to MM. Cuvier, and Agassiz,
as also to the reptiles. Among the last are crocodiles and tortoises of the
genera _Emys_ and _Trionyx_.

The tribe of land quadrupeds most abundant in this formation is such as
now inhabits alluvial plains and marshes, and the banks of rivers and
lakes, a class most exposed to suffer by river inundations. Whether the
disproportion of carnivorous animals can be ascribed to this cause, or
whether they were comparatively small in number and dimensions, as in
the indigenous fauna of Australia, when first known to Europeans, is a
point on which it would be rash, perhaps, to offer an opinion in the
present state of our knowledge.

[Illustration: Fig. 162. _Paleotherium magnum._]

The Paleothere, above alluded to, resembled the living tapir in the form of
the head, and in having a short proboscis, but its molar teeth were more
like those of the rhinoceros (see fig. 163.). _Paleotherium magnum_ was of
the size of a horse, 3 or 4 feet high. The annexed woodcut, fig. 162., is
one of the restorations which Cuvier attempted of the outline of the living
animal, derived from the study of the entire skeleton. When the French
osteologist declared in the early part of the present century, that all the
fossil quadrupeds of the gypsum of Paris were extinct, the announcement of
so startling a fact, on such high authority, created a powerful sensation,
and from that time a new impulse was given throughout Europe to the
progress of geological investigation. Eminent naturalists, it is true, had
long before maintained that the shells and zoophytes, met with in many
ancient European rocks, had ceased to be inhabitants of the earth, but the
majority even of the educated classes continued to believe that the species
of animals and plants now contemporary with man, were the same as those
which had been called into being when the planet itself was created. It was
easy to throw discredit upon the new doctrine by asking whether corals,
shells, and other creatures previously unknown, were not annually
discovered? and whether living forms corresponding with the fossils might
not yet be dredged up from seas hitherto unexamined? But from the era of
the publication of Cuvier's Ossements Fossiles, and still more his popular
Treatise called "A Theory of the Earth," sounder views began to prevail. It
was clearly demonstrated that most of the mammalia found in the gypsum of
Montmartre differed even generically from any now existing, and the extreme
improbability that any of them, especially the larger ones, would ever be
found surviving in continents yet unexplored, was made manifest. Moreover,
the non-admixture of a single living species in the midst of so rich a
fossil fauna was a striking proof that there had existed a state of the
earth's surface zoologically unconnected with the present order of things.

[Illustration: Fig. 163. Upper molar tooth of _Paleotherium magnum_ from
Isle of Wight. (Owen's Brit. Foss. p. 317.)

Reduced one-third.]

_Grès de Beauchamp_ (2. _b_, Table, p. 175.).--In some parts of the Paris
basin, sands and marls, called the Grès de Beauchamp, or Sables Moyens,
divide the gypseous beds from the underlying Calcaire grossier. These sands
contain more than 300 species of marine shells, many of them peculiar, but
others common to the underlying marine deposit (No. 2. _c_.).

_Calcaire grossier_ (2. _c_, Table, p. 175.).--The formation called
Calcaire grossier consists of a coarse limestone, often passing into sand.
It contains the greater number of the fossil shells which characterize the
Paris basin. No less than 400 distinct species have been procured from a
single spot near Grignon, where they are embedded in a calcareous sand,
chiefly formed of comminuted shells, in which, nevertheless, individuals in
a perfect state of preservation, both of marine, terrestrial, and
freshwater species, are mingled together. Some of the marine shells may
have lived on the spot; but the _Cyclostoma_ and _Limnea_ must have been
brought thither by rivers and currents, and the quantity of triturated
shells implies considerable movement in the waters.

Nothing is more striking in this assemblage of fossil testacea than the
great proportion of species referable to the genus _Cerithium_ (see fig.
164.). There occur no less than 137 species of this genus in the Paris
basin, and almost all of them in the calcaire grossier. Now the living
_Cerithia_ inhabit the sea near the mouths of rivers, where the waters
are brackish; so that their abundance in the marine strata now under
consideration is in harmony with the hypothesis, that the Paris basin
formed a gulf into which several rivers flowed, the sediment of some of
which gave rise to the beds of clay and lignite before mentioned; while
a distinct freshwater limestone, called calcaire siliceux, which will
presently be described, was precipitated from the waters of others
situated farther to the south.

[Illustration: Fig. 164. Cerithium cinctum.[194-A]]

[4 Illustrations: EOCENE FORAMINIFERA.

Fig. 165. _Calcarina rarispina_, Desh.
         _b_. natural size.
         _a_, _c_. same magnified.

Fig. 166. _Spirolina stenostoma_, Desh.
         B. natural size.
         A, C, D. same magnified.

Fig. 167. _Triloculina inflata_, Desh.
         _b_. natural size.
         _a_, _c_, _d_, same magnified.

Fig. 168. _Clavulina corrugata_, Desh.
          _a_. natural size.
          _b_, _c_. same magnified.]

In some parts of the calcaire grossier round Paris, certain beds occur of a
stone used in building, and called by the French geologists "Miliolite
limestone." It is almost entirely made up of millions of microscopic
shells, of the size of minute grains of sand, which all belong to the class
Foraminifera. Figures of some of these are given in the annexed woodcut. As
this miliolitic stone never occurs in the Faluns, or Miocene strata of
Brittany and Touraine, it often furnishes the geologist with a useful
criterion for distinguishing the detached Eocene and Miocene formations,
scattered over those and other adjoining provinces. The discovery of the
remains of Paleotherium and other mammalia in some of the upper beds of the
calcaire grossier shows that these land animals began to exist before the
deposition of the overlying gypseous series had commenced.

_Calcaire siliceux_.--This compact siliceous limestone extends over
a wide area. It resembles a precipitate from the waters of mineral
springs, and is often traversed by small empty sinuous cavities.
It is, for the most part, devoid of organic remains, but in some
places contains freshwater and land species, and never any marine
fossils. The siliceous limestone and the calcaire grossier occupy
distinct parts of the Paris basin, the one attaining its fullest
development in those places where the other is of slight thickness.
They also alternate with each other towards the centre of the basin,
as at Sergy and Osny; and there are even points where the two rocks are
so blended together that portions of each may be seen in hand specimens.
Thus, in the same bed, at Triel, we have the compact freshwater
limestone, characterized by its _Limneæ_, mingled with the coarse marine
limestone, with its small multilocular shells, or "miliolites,"
dispersed through it in countless numbers. These microscopic testacea
are also accompanied by _Cerithia_ and other shells of the calcaire
grossier. It is very extraordinary that in this instance both kinds of
sediment must have been thrown down together on the same spot, yet each
retains its own peculiar organic remains.

From these facts we may conclude, that while to the north, where the bay
was probably open to the sea, a marine limestone was formed, another
deposit of freshwater origin was introduced to the southward, or at the
head of the bay; for it appears that during the Eocene period, as now, the
ocean was to the north, and the continent, where the great lakes existed,
to the south. From that southern region we may suppose a body of fresh
water to have descended, charged with carbonate of lime and silica, the
water being perhaps in sufficient volume to freshen the upper end of the
bay. The gypseous series (2. _a_, Table, p. 175.), before described, was
once supposed to be entirely subsequent in origin to the two groups, called
calcaire grossier and calcaire siliceux. But M. Prevost has pointed out
that in some localities they alternate repeatedly with both.

The gypsum, with its associated marl and limestone, is in greatest force
towards the centre of the basin, where the calcaire grossier and calcaire
siliceux are less fully developed. Hence M. Prevost infers, that while
those two principal deposits were gradually in progress, the one towards
the north, and the other towards the south, a river descending from the
east may have brought down the gypseous and marly sediment.

It must be admitted, as highly probable, that a bay or narrow sea, 180
miles in length, would receive, at more points than one, the waters of the
adjoining continent. At the same time, we must be prepared to find that
the simultaneous deposition of two or more sets of strata in one basin,
some freshwater and others marine, must have produced very complex results.
But, in proportion as it is more difficult in these cases to discover any
fixed order of superposition in the associated mineral masses, so also is
it more easy to explain the manner of their origin, and to reconcile their
relations to the agency of known causes. Instead of the successive
irruptions and retreats of the sea, and changes in the chemical nature of
the fluid, and other speculations of the earlier geologists, we are now
simply called upon to imagine a gulf, into one extremity of which the sea
entered, and at the other a large river, while other streams may have
flowed in at different points, whereby an indefinite number of alternations
of marine and freshwater beds would be occasioned.


LOWER EOCENE, FRANCE.

_Lits coquilliers_ (3. _a_, Table, p. 175.).--Below the calcaire grossier
are extensive deposits of sand, in the upper parts of which some marine
beds, called "lits coquilliers," occur, in which M. d'Archiac has
discovered 200 species of shells. Many of these are peculiar, but the
larger portion appear to agree with species of the calcaire grossier, so
that the line of demarcation usually adopted between the French Lower and
Middle Eocene formations, seems not to be very strongly drawn. _Sands and
plastic clay_ (3. _b_, Table, p. 175.)--At the base of the tertiary system
in France are extensive deposits of sands, with occasional beds of clay
used for pottery, and called "argile plastique." Fossil oysters (_Ostrea
bellovacina_) abound in some places, and in others there is a mixture of
fluviatile shells, such as _Cyrena cuneiformis_ (fig. 187. p. 204.),
_Melania inquinata_ (fig. 188.), and others, frequently met with in beds
occupying the same position in the valley of the Thames. Layers of lignite
also accompany the inferior clays and sands.

Immediately upon the chalk at the bottom of all the tertiary strata
there is often a conglomerate or breccia of rolled and angular chalk
flints, cemented by siliceous sand. These beds appear to be of littoral
origin, and imply the previous emergence of some portions of the chalk,
and its waste by denudation.

[Illustration: Fig. 169. _Cardium porulosum_. Paris and London basins.]

The lower sandy beds of the Paris basin are often called the sands of the
Soissonais, from a district so named 50 miles N.E. of Paris. One of the
shells of the formation is adduced by M. Deshayes as an example of the
changes which certain species underwent in the successive stages of their
existence. It seems that different varieties of the _Cardium porulosum_ are
characteristic of different formations. In the Lower Eocene of the
Soissonais this shell acquires but a small volume, and has many
peculiarities, which disappear in the lowest beds of the calcaire grossier.
In these the shell attains its full size, and many distinctive characters,
which are again modified in the uppermost beds of the calcaire grossier;
and these last modifications of form are preserved throughout the whole of
the "upper marine" (or Upper Eocene) series.[197-A]


ENGLISH EOCENE FORMATIONS.

The Eocene areas of Hampshire and London are delineated in the map
(fig. 153. p. 174.).

The following table will show the succession of the principal deposits
found in our island. The true place of the Bagshot sands, in this
series, was never accurately ascertained till Mr. Prestwich published,
in 1847, his classification of the English Eocene strata, dividing them
into three principal formations, in which the Bagshot sands occupied
the central place.[197-B]

                                                     Localities.
  1. Upper Eocene.    Wanting in Great Britain.

                    { _a._ Freshwater and            Headon Hill, Isle of
                    {      fluvio-marine beds.       Wight; and Hordwell
                    {                                Cliff, Hants.
  2. Middle Eocene  { _b._ Barton beds.              Barton Cliff, Hants.
                    { _c._ Bagshot and Bracklesham   Bagshot Heath, Surrey;
                    {      sands and clays.          Bracklesham Bay,
                    {                                Sussex.

                    { _a._ London Clay Proper,       Highgate Hill,
                    {      and Bognor beds.          Middlesex; I. of
                    {                                Sheppey; Bognor,
  3. Lower Eocene   {                                Sussex.
                    { _b._ Mottled and Plastic       Newhaven, Sussex;
                    {      clays and sands.          Reading, Berks;
                    {                                Woolwich, Kent.

[Illustration: Fig. 170. _Lymnea longiscata._

Freshwater Eocene strata, Isle of Wight.]

_Freshwater beds_ (2. _a_, Table, p. 175.).--In the northern part of the
Isle of Wight, beds of marl, clay, and sand, and a friable limestone,
containing freshwater shells, are seen, containing shells of the genera
_Lymnea_ (see fig. 170.), _Planorbis_, _Melanopsis_, _Cyrena_, &c., several
of them of the same species as those occurring in the Eocene beds of the
Paris basin. Gyrogonites, also, or seed-vessels of _Chara_, exhibiting a
similar specific identity, occur. At Headon Hill, on the western side of
the island, where these beds are seen in the sea-cliffs, some of the strata
contain a few marine and estuary shells, such as _Cytheræa_, _Corbula_,
&c., showing a temporary occupation of the area by brackish or salt water,
after which the river or a lake seems again to have prevailed. A species
of fan-palm, _Flabellaria Lamanonis_, Brong., like one which characterizes
the Parisian Eocene beds, has been recently detected by Dr. Mantell in this
formation, in Whitecliff Bay, at the eastern end of the island.

Several of the species of extinct quadrupeds already alluded to as
characterizing the gypsum of Montmartre have been discovered by Messrs.
Pratt and Fox, in the Isle of Wight, chiefly at Binstead, near Ryde, as
_Palæotherium magnum_, _P. medium_, _P. minus_, _P. minimum_, _P. curtum_,
_P. crassum_, also _Anoplotherium commune_, _A. secundarium_, _Dichobune
cervinum_, and _Chæropotamus Cuvieri_. In Hordwell cliff, also on the
Hampshire coast, several of these species, with other quadrupeds of new
genera, such as _Paloplotherium_, Owen, have been met with; and remains of
a remarkable carnivorous genus, _Hyænodon_. These fossils are accompanied
by the bones of _Trionyx_, and other tortoises, and by two land snakes of
the genus _Paleryx_, Owen, from 3 to 4 feet long, also a species of
crocodile, and an alligator. Among other fossils collected by Lady
Hastings, Sir Philip Egerton has recognized the well-known gar or bony pike
of the American rivers, a ganoid fish of the genus _Lepidotus_, with its
hard shining scales. The shells of Hordwell are similar to those of the
freshwater beds of the Isle of Wight, and among them are a few specifically
undistinguishable from recent testacea, as _Paludina lenta_ and _Helix
labyrinthica_, the latter discovered by Mr. S. Wood, and identified with an
existing N. American helix.

The white and green marls of this freshwater series in Hampshire, and some
of the accompanying limestones, often resemble those of France in mineral
character and colour in so striking a manner, as to suggest the idea that
the sediment was derived from the same region, or produced
contemporaneously under very similar geographical circumstances.

_Barton beds._--Both in the cliffs of Headon Hill and Hordwell, already
mentioned, the freshwater series rests on a mass of pure white sand without
fossils, and this is seen in Barton Cliff to overlie a marine deposit, in
which 209 species of testacea have been found. More than half of these are
peculiar; and, according to Mr. Prestwich, only 11 of them common to the
London Clay proper, being in the proportion of only 5 per cent. On the
other hand, 70 of them agree with the _calcaire grossier_ shells. As this
is the newest purely marine bed of the Eocene series known in England, we
might have expected that some of its peculiar fossils would be found to
agree with the upper Eocene strata described in the last chapter, and
accordingly some identifications have been cited with testacea, both of the
Berlin and Belgian strata. It is nearly a century since Brander published,
in 1766, an account of the organic remains collected from these cliffs, and
his excellent figures of the shells then deposited in the British Museum
are justly admired by conchologists for their accuracy.

_Bagshot Sands_ (2. _c_, Table, p. 197.).--These beds, consisting
chiefly of siliceous sand, occupy extensive tracts round Bagshot, in
Surrey, and in the New Forest, Hampshire. They succeed next in
chronological order, and may be separated into three divisions, the
upper and lower consisting of light yellow sands, and the central of
dark green sands and brown clays, the whole reposing on the London clay
proper.[199-A] Although the Bagshot beds are usually devoid of fossils,
they contain marine shells in some places, among which _Venericardia
planicosta_ (see fig. 171.) is abundant, with _Turritella sulcifera_ and
_Nummulites lævigatus_. (See fig. 174. p. 200.)

[Illustration: Fig. 171. _Venericardia planicosta_, Lamck.

_Cardita planicosta_, Deshayes.]

At Bracklesham Bay, near Chichester, in Sussex, the characteristic shells
of this member of the Eocene series are best seen; among others, the huge
_Cerithium giganteum_, so conspicuous in the calcaire grossier of Paris,
where it is sometimes 2 feet in length. The volutes and cowries of this
formation, as well as the lunulites and other corals, seem to favour the
idea of a warm climate having prevailed, which is borne out by the
discovery of a serpent _Palæophis typhæus_, exceeding, according to Mr.
Owen, 20 feet in length, and allied to the Boa, Python, Coluber, and
Hydrus. The compressed form and diminutive size of certain caudal vertebræ
indicate so much analogy with Hydrus as to induce the Hunterian professor
to pronounce the extinct ophidian to have been marine.[199-B] He had
previously combated with so much success the evidence advanced, to prove
the existence in the Northern Ocean of sea-serpents in our own times, that
he will not be suspected of any undue bias in contending for their former
existence in the British Eocene seas. The climate, however, of the Middle
Eocene period was evidently far more genial; and amongst the companions of
the sea-serpent of Bracklesham was an extinct Gavial (_Gavialis Dixoni_,
Owen), and numerous fish, such as now frequent the seas of warm latitudes,
as the sword-fish (see fig. 172. p. 200.) and gigantic rays of the genus
Miliobates. (See fig. 173.)

Out of 193 species of testacea procured from the Bagshot and Bracklesham
beds in England, 126 occur in the French calcaire grossier. It was
clearly, therefore, coeval with that part of the Parisian series more
nearly than with any other. The _Nummulites lævigatus_ (see fig. 174.),
a fossil characteristic of the lower beds of the calcaire grossier,
is abundant at Bracklesham.

[Illustration: Fig. 172. Prolonged premaxillary bone or "sword" of
a fossil sword-fish (_Cælorhynchus_). Bracklesham. Dixon's Fossils
of Sussex, pl. 8.]

[Illustration: Fig. 173. Dental plates of _Myliobates Edwardsi_.
Bracklesham Bay. Ibid. pl. 8.]

[Illustration: Fig. 174. _Nummulites_ (_Nummularia_) _lævigatus._
Bracklesham. Ibid. pl. 8.

  _a._ section of the nummulite.
  _b._ group, with an individual showing the exterior of the shell.]

_London clay proper_ (3. _a_, Table, p. 197.).--This formation underlies
the preceding, and consists of tenacious brown and blueish grey clay, with
layers of concretions called septaria, which abound chiefly in the brown
clay, and are obtained in sufficient numbers from the cliffs near Harwich,
and from shoals of the Essex coast, to be used for making Roman cement. The
principal localities of fossils in the London clay are Highgate Hill, near
London, the island of Sheppey, and Bognor in Hampshire. Out of 133 fossil
shells, Mr. Prestwich found only 20 to be common to the calcaire grossier
(from which 600 species have been obtained), while 33 are common to the
lits coquilliers (p. 196.), in which only 200 species are known in France.
We may presume, therefore, that the London clay proper is older than the
calcaire grossier. This may perhaps remove a difficulty which M. Adolphe
Brongniart has experienced when comparing the Eocene Flora of the
neighbourhoods of London and Paris. The fossil species of the island of
Sheppey, he observes, indicate a much more tropical climate than the Eocene
Flora of France, which has been derived principally from the "gypseous
series." The latter resembles the vegetation of the borders of the
Mediterranean rather than that of an equatorial region.

Mr. Bowerbank, in a valuable publication on the fossil fruits and seeds of
the island of Sheppey, near London, has described no less than thirteen
fruits of palms of the recent type _Nipa_, now only found in the Molucca
and Philippine islands. (See fig. 175.) These plants are allied to the
cocoa-nut tribe on the one side, and on the other to the _Pandanus_, or
screw-pine. Species of cocoa-nuts are also met with, and other kinds of
palms; also three species of _Anona_, or custard-apple; cucurbitaceous
fruits, also (the gourd and melon family), are in considerable abundance.
Fruits of various species of _Acacia_ are in profusion; and, although less
decidedly tropical, imply a warm climate.

[Illustration: Fig. 175. _Nipadites ellipticus._ Bow. Fossil
palm of Sheppey.]

The contiguity of land may be inferred not only from these vegetable
productions, but also from the teeth and bones of crocodiles and turtles,
since these creatures, as Mr. Conybeare has remarked, must have resorted to
some shore to lay their eggs. Of turtles there were numerous species
referred to extinct genera, and, for the most part, not equal in size to
the largest living tropical turtles. A snake, which must have been 13 feet
long, of the genus _Palæophis_ before mentioned, has also been described by
Mr. Owen from Sheppey, of a different species from that of Bracklesham. A
true crocodile, also, _Crocodilus toliapicus_, and another Saurian more
nearly allied to the gravial, accompany the above fossils. A bird allied to
the vultures, and a quadruped of the new genus _Hyracotherium_, allied to
the Hyrax, Hog, and Chæropotamus, are also among the additions made of late
years to the palæontology of this division.

[3 Illustrations: FOSSIL SHELLS OF THE LONDON CLAY.

Fig. 176. _Mitra scabra_.

Fig. 177. _Rostellaria macroptera_, Sow. One-third of nat. size.

Fig. 178. _Crassatella sulcata._]

The marine shells of the London clay confirm the inference derivable from
the plants and reptiles of a high temperature. Thus, many species of
_Conus_, _Mitra_, and _Voluta_ occur, a large _Cypræa_, a very large
_Rostellaria_, and shells of the genera _Terebellum_, _Cancellaria_,
_Crassatella_, and others, with four or more species of _Nautilus_ (see
fig. 182.) and other cephalopoda of extinct genera, one of the most
remarkable of which is the _Belosepia_.[202-A] (See fig. 183.)

[Illustration: Fig. 179. _Nautilus centralis._]

[Illustration: Fig. 180. _Voluta athleta._]

[Illustration: Fig. 181. _Terebellum fusiforme._]

[Illustration: Fig. 182. _Aturia zigzag._ Bronn. Syn. _Nautilus zigzag._
Sow. London clay. Sheppey.]

[Illustration: Fig. 183. _Belosepia sepiodea_, De Blainv.
London clay. Sheppey.]

The above shells are accompanied by a sword-fish (_Tetrapterus priscus_,
Agassiz), about 8 feet long, and a saw-fish (_Pristis bisulcatus_, Ag.),
about 10 feet in length; genera now foreign to the British seas. On the
whole, no less than 50 species of fish have been described by
M. Agassiz from these beds in Sheppey, and they indicate, in his
opinion, a warm climate.

[Illustration: Fig. 184. Molar of monkey (_Macacus_).]

_Strata of Kyson in Suffolk._--At Kyson, a few miles east of Woodbridge, a
bed of Eocene clay, 12 feet thick, underlies the red crag. Beneath it is a
deposit of yellow and white sand, of considerable interest, in consequence
of many peculiar fossils contained in it. Its geological position is
probably the lowest part of the London clay proper. In this sand has been
found the first example of a fossil quadrumanous animal discovered in Great
Britain, namely, the teeth and part of a jaw, shown by Mr. Owen to belong
to a monkey of the genus _Macacus_ (see fig. 184.). The mammiferous
fossils, first met with in the same bed, were those of an opossum
(_Didelphys_) (see fig. 185.), and an insectivorous bat (fig. 186.),
together with many teeth of fishes of the shark family. Mr. Colchester in
1840 obtained other mammalian relics from Kyson, among which Mr. Owen has
recognized several teeth of the genus _Hyracotherium_, and the vertebræ of
a large serpent, probably a _Palæophis_. As the remains both of the
_Hyracotherium_ and _Palæophis_ were afterwards met with in the London
clay, as before remarked, these fossils confirmed the opinion previously
entertained, that the Kyson sand belongs to the Eocene period. The
_Macacus_, therefore, constitutes the first example of any quadrumanous
animal found in strata as old as the Eocene, or so far from the equator as
lat. 52° N. It was not until after the year 1836 that the existence of any
fossil quadrumana was brought to light. Since that period they have been
found in France, India, and Brazil.

[Illustration: Fig. 185. Molar tooth and part of jaw of opossum.
From Kyson.[203-A]]

[Illustration: Fig. 186. Molars of insectivorous bats, twice nat. size.
From Kyson, Suffolk.]

_Mottled or Plastic Clays_, _&c._ (3. _b_, Table, p. 197.).--No
formations can be more dissimilar on the whole in mineral character than
the Eocene deposits of England and Paris; those of our own island being
almost exclusively of mechanical origin,--accumulations of mud, sand,
and pebbles; while in the neighbourhood of Paris we find a great
succession of strata composed of a coarse white limestone, and compact
siliceous limestone with beds of crystalline gypsum and siliceous
sandstone, and sometimes pure flint used for millstones. Hence it is by
no means an easy task to institute an exact comparison between the
various members of the English and French series, and to settle their
respective ages. It is clear that a continual change was going on in the
fauna and flora by the coming in of new species and the dying out of
others; and contemporaneous changes of geographical conditions were also
in progress in consequence of the rising and sinking of the land and
bottom of the sea. A particular subdivision, therefore, of time was
occasionally represented in one area by land, in another by an estuary,
in a third by the sea, and even where the conditions were in both
areas of a marine character, there was often shallow water in one,
and deep sea in another, producing a want of agreement in the state
of animal life.

At the commencement, however, of the Eocene formations in France and
England, we find an exception to this rule, for a marked similarity of
mineral character reigns in the lowest division, whether in the basins
of Paris, Hampshire, or London. This uniformity of aspect must be seen
in order to be fully appreciated, since the beds consist simply of sand,
mottled clays, and well-rolled flint pebbles, derived from the chalk,
and varying in size from that of a pea to an egg. These strata may be
seen at Reading, at Blackheath, near London, and at Woolwich. In some
of the lowest of them, banks of oysters are observed, consisting of
_Ostrea bellovicina_, so common in France in the same relative position,
and _Ostrea edulina_, scarcely distinguishable from the living eatable
species. In this formation at Bromley, Dr. Buckland found one large
pebble to which five full-grown oysters were affixed, in such a manner
as to show that they had commenced their first growth upon it, and
remained attached to it through life.

In several places, as at Woolwich on the Thames, at Newhaven in Sussex, and
elsewhere, a mixture of marine and freshwater testacea distinguishes this
member of the series. Among the latter, _Melania inquinata_ (see fig. 188.)
and _Cyrena cuneiformis_ are very common. They probably indicate points
where rivers entered the Eocene sea.

[Illustration: Fig. 187. _Cyrena cuneiformis_, Min. Con. Natural size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 188. _Melania inquinata_, Des. Nat. size.

Syn. _Cerithium melanoides_, Min. Con.]

With us as in France, clay of this formation is used in some places, as
near Poole in Dorsetshire, for pottery; and hence the name of plastic clay
was adopted for the group by Mr. T. Webster. Lignite also is associated
with it in some spots, as in the Paris basin.

Before the minds of geologists had become familiar with the theory of the
gradual sinking of the land, and its conversion into sea at different
periods, and the consequent change from shallow to deep water, the
freshwater and littoral character of this inferior group appeared strange
and anomalous. After passing through many hundred feet of London clay,
proved by its fossils to have been deposited in salt water of considerable
depth, we arrive at beds of fluviatile origin. Thick masses, also, of
shingle indicate the proximity of land, where the flints of the chalk were
rolled into sand and pebbles, and spread continuously over wide spaces, as
in the Isle of Wight, in the south of Hampshire, and near London, always
appearing at the bottom of the Eocene series. It may be asked why they did
not constitute simply a narrow littoral zone, such as we might look for in
strata formed at a moderate distance from the shore. In answer to this
inquiry, the student must be reminded, that wherever a gently-sloping land
is gradually sinking and becoming submerged, shingle may be heaped up
successively over a wide area, although marine currents have no power of
dispersing it simultaneously over a large space. In such cases it is not
the shingle which recedes from the coast, but the coast which recedes from
the shingle, which is formed one mass after another as often as successive
portions of the land are converted into sea and others into a sea beach.

The London area appears to have been upraised before that of Hampshire, so
that it never became the receptacle of the Barton clays, nor of the
overlying fluvio-marine and freshwater beds of Hordwell and the north part
of the Isle of Wight. On the other hand, the Hampshire Eocene area seems to
have emerged before that of Paris, so that no marine beds of the Upper
Eocene era were ever thrown down in Hampshire.

_Nummulitic formation of the Alps and Pyrenees._--It has long been
matter of controversy, whether the nummulitic rocks of the Alps and
Pyrenees should be regarded as Eocene or Cretaceous; but the number of
geologists of high authority who regard this important group as
belonging to the lowest tertiary system of Europe has for many years
been steadily increasing. The late M. Alex. Brongniart first declared
the specific identity of many of the shells of this formation with those
of the marine strata near Paris, although he obtained them from the
summit of the Diablerets, one of the loftiest of the Swiss Alps, which
rises more than 10,000 feet above the level of the sea.

Deposits of the same age, found on the flanks of the Pyrenees, contain also
a great number of shells common to the Paris and London areas, and three or
four species only which are common to the cretaceous formation.

The calcareous division consists often of a compact crystalline marble,
full of nummulites (see fig. 189.), shells of the class _Foraminifera_.

[Illustration: Fig. 189. _Nummulites_. Peyrehorade, Pyrenees.

  _a._ external surface of one of the nummulites, of which longitudinal
       sections are seen in the limestone.
  _b._ transverse section of same.]

The nummulitic limestone of the Alps is often of great thickness, and is
immediately covered by another series of strata of dark-coloured slates,
marls, and fucoidal sandstones, to the whole of which the provincial name
of "flysch" has been given in parts of Switzerland. The researches of Sir
Roderick Murchison in the Alps in 1847 enable us to refer the whole of
these beds to the Eocene period, and it seems probable that they most
nearly coincide in age with the Lower Eocene. They enter into the disturbed
and loftiest portions of the Alpine chain, to the elevation of which they
enable us therefore to assign a comparatively modern date.

The nummulitic formation, with its characteristic fossils, plays a far more
conspicuous part than any other tertiary group in the solid framework of
the earth's crust, whether in Europe, Asia, or Africa. It often attains a
thickness of many thousand feet, and extends from the Alps to the
Apennines. It is found in the Carpathians, and in full force in the north
of Africa, as, for example, in Algeria and Morocco. It has also been traced
from Egypt into Asia Minor, and across Persia by Bagdad to the mouths of
the Indus. It occurs not only in Cutch, but in the mountain ranges which
separate Scinde from Persia, and which form the passes leading to Caboul;
and it has been followed still farther eastward into India.

Some members of this lower tertiary formation in the central Alps,
including even the superior strata called _flysch_, have been converted
into crystalline rocks, and changed into saccharoid marble, quartz,
rock, and mica-schist.[206-A]


EOCENE STRATA IN THE UNITED STATES.

In North America the Eocene formations occupy a large area bordering the
Atlantic, which increases in breadth and importance as it is traced
southwards from Delaware and Maryland to Georgia and Alabama. They also
occur in Louisiana and other states both east and west of the valley of the
Mississippi. At Claiborne in Alabama no less than four hundred species of
marine shells, with many echinoderms and teeth of fish, characterize one
member of this system. Among the shells the _Cardita planicosta_, before
mentioned (fig. 171. p. 199.), is in abundance; and this fossil, and some
others identical with European species, or very nearly allied to them, make
it highly probable that the Claiborne beds agree in age with the central or
Bracklesham group of England, and the calcaire grossier of Paris.[206-B]

Higher in the series is a remarkable calcareous rock, formerly called "the
nummulite limestone," from the great number of discoid bodies resembling
nummulites which it contains, fossils now referred by A. d'Orbigny to the
genus _Orbitoides_, which has been demonstrated by Dr. Carpenter to belong
to the Foraminifera.[206-C] The following section will enable the reader to
understand the position of the three subdivisions of the series, Nos. 1,
2, and 3., the relations of which I ascertained in Clarke County, between
the rivers Alabama and Tombeckbee.

[Illustration: Fig. 190. Cross section.

  1. Sand, marl, &c., with numerous fossils.              }
  2. White or rotten limestone, with _Zeuglodon_.         } Eocene.
  3. Orbitoidal, or so called nummulitic limestone.       }
  4. Overlying formation of sand and clay without fossils. Age unknown.]

The lowest set of strata, No. 1., having a thickness of more than 100
feet, comprise marly beds, in which the _Ostrea sellæformis_ occurs, a
shell ranging from Alabama to Virginia, and being a representative form
of the _Ostrea flabellula_ of the Eocene group of Europe. In others beds
of No. 1., two European shells, _Cardita planicosta_, before mentioned,
and _Solarium canaliculatum_ are found, with a great many other species
peculiar to America. Numerous corals, also, and the remains of placoid
fish and of rays occur, and the "swords," as they are called, of sword
fishes, all bearing a great generic likeness to those of the Eocene
strata of England and France.

No. 2. (fig. 190.) is a white limestone, sometimes soft and argillaceous,
but in parts very compact and calcareous. It contains several peculiar
corals, and a large Nautilus allied to _N. zigzag_, also in its upper bed a
gigantic cetacean, called _Zeuglodon_ by Owen.[207-A]

[2 Illustrations: _Zeuglodon cetoides_, Owen. _Basilosaurus_, Harlan.]

Fig. 191. Molar tooth, natural size.]

Fig. 192. Vertebra, reduced.]

The colossal bones of this cetacean are so plentiful in the interior of
Clarke County as to be characteristic of the formation. The vertebral
column of one skeleton found by Dr. Buckley at a spot visited by me,
extended to the length of nearly 70 feet, and not far off part of another
backbone nearly 50 feet long was dug up. I obtained evidence, during a
short excursion, of so many localities of this fossil animal within a
distance of 10 miles, as to lead me to conclude that they must have
belonged to at least forty distinct individuals.

Mr. Owen first pointed out that the huge animal was not reptilian, since
each tooth was furnished with double roots (see fig. 191.), implanted in
corresponding double sockets; and his opinion of the cetacean nature of
the fossil was afterwards confirmed by Dr. Wyman and Professor R. W.
Gibbes. That it was an extinct species of the whale tribe has since been
placed beyond all doubt by the discovery of the entire skull of another
fossil of the same family, found to have the double occipital condyles
only met with in mammals, and the convoluted tympanic bones which are
characteristic of cetaceans.

Near the junction of No. 2. and the incumbent limestone, No. 3., next to be
mentioned, are strata characterized by the following shells: Spondylus
dumosus (_Plagiostoma dumosum_, Morton), _Pecten Poulsoni_, _Pecten
perplanus_, and _Ostrea cretacea_.

No. 3. (fig. 190.) is a white limestone, for the most part made up of the
_Orbitoides_ of d'Orbigny before mentioned (p. 206.), formerly supposed to
be a nummulite, and called _N. Mantelli_, mixed with a few lunulites and
small corals and shells.[208-A] The origin of this cream-coloured soft
stone, like that of our white chalk, which it much resembles, is, I
believe, due to the decomposition of the orbitoides. The surface of the
country where it prevails is sometimes marked by the absence of wood, like
our chalk downs, or is covered exclusively by the _Juniperus Virginiana_,
as certain chalk districts in England by yew trees and juniper.

Some of the shells of this limestone are common to the Claiborne beds, but
many of them are peculiar.

It will be seen in the section (fig. 190. p. 155.) that the strata, Nos. 1,
2, 3., are, for the most part, overlaid by a dense formation of sand or
clay without fossils. In some points of the bluff or cliff of the Alabama
river, at Claiborne, the beds Nos. 1, 2., are exposed nearly from top to
bottom, whereas at other points the newer formation, No. 4., occupies the
face of nearly the whole cliff. The age of this overlying mass has not yet
been determined, as it has hitherto proved destitute of organic remains.

The burr-stone strata of the Southern States contain so many fossils
agreeing with those of Claiborne, that it doubtless belongs to the same
part of the Eocene group, though I was not fortunate enough to see the
relations of the two deposits in a continuous section. Mr. Tuomey considers
it as the lower portion of the series. It may, perhaps, be a form of the
Claiborne beds in places where lime was wanting, and where silex, derived
from the decomposition of felspar, predominated. It consists chiefly of
slaty clays, quartzose sands, and loam, of a brick red colour, with layers
of chert or burr-stone, used in some places for millstones.


FOOTNOTES:

[191-A] Leyde Magaz. voor Wetensch Konst en Lett., partie v. cahier i. p.
71. Cited by Rozet, Journ. de Géologie, tom. i. p. 43.

[191-B] M. C. Prevost, Submersions Itératives, &c. Note 23.

[192-A] Cuvier, Oss. Foss., tom. iii. p. 255.

[194-A] This species is found both in the Paris and London basins.

[197-A] Coquilles caractérist. des Terrains, 1831.

[197-B] Quarterly Geol. Journal, vol. iii. p. 353.

[199-A] Prestwich, Quart. Geol. Journ. vol. iii. p. 386.

[199-B] Palæont. Soc. Monograph. Rept. pt. ii. p. 61.

[202-A] For description of Eocene Cephalopoda, see Monograph by F. E.
Edwards, Palæontograph. Soc. 1849.

[203-A] Annals of Nat. Hist. vol. iv. No. 23. Nov. 1839.

[206-A] Murchison, Quart. Journ. of Geol. Soc. vol. v., and Lyell, vol. vi.
1850. Anniversary Address.

[206-B] See paper by the author, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. iv, p. 12.;
and Second Visit to the U. S. vol. ii. p. 59.

[206-C] Quart. Journ. Geol Soc. vol. vi. p. 32.

[207-A] See Memoir by R. W. Gibbes, Journ. of Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad.
vol. i. 1847.

[208-A] Lyell, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 1847, vol. iv. p. 15.



CHAPTER XVII.

CRETACEOUS GROUP.

   Divisions of the cretaceous series in North-Western Europe--Upper
   cretaceous strata--Maestricht beds--Chalk of Faxoe--White
   chalk--Characteristic fossils--Extinct cephalopoda--Sponges and corals
   of the chalk--Signs of open and deep sea--Wide area of white
   chalk--Its origin from corals and shells--Single pebbles in
   chalk--Siliceous sandstone in Germany contemporaneous with white
   chalk--Upper greensand and gault--Lower cretaceous strata--Atherfield
   section, Isle of Wight--Chalk of South of Europe--Hippurite
   limestone--Cretaceous Flora--Chalk of United States.


Having treated in the preceding chapters of the tertiary strata, we have
next to speak of the uppermost of the secondary groups, called the Chalk
or Cretaceous (No. 6. Table, p. 103.), because in those parts of Europe
where it was first studied its upper members are formed of that
remarkable white earthy limestone, termed chalk (_creta_). The inferior
division consists, for the most part, of clays and sands, called
Greensand, because some of the sands derive a bright green colour from
intermixed grains of chloritic matter. The cretaceous strata in the
north-west of Europe may be thus divided[209-A]:

                       _Upper Cretaceous._

  1. Maestricht beds and Faxoe limestone.
  2. Upper white chalk, with flints.
  3. Lower white chalk, without flints, passing downwards into chalk marl,
     which is slightly argillaceous.
  4. Upper greensand.
  5. Gault.

                       _Lower Cretaceous._

  6. Lower greensand--Ironsand, clay, and occasional beds of limestone
    (Kentish rag).

_Maestricht Beds._--On the banks of the Meuse, at Maestricht, reposing on
ordinary white chalk with flints, we find an upper calcareous formation
about 100 feet thick, the fossils of which are, on the whole, very
peculiar, and all distinct from tertiary species. Some few are of species
common to the inferior white chalk, among which may be mentioned
_Belemnites mucronatus_ (see fig. 197.) and _Pecten quadricostatus_.
Besides the Belemnite there are other _genera_, such as Ammonite, Baculite,
and Hamite, never found in strata newer than the cretaceous, but frequently
met with in these Maestricht beds. On the other hand, Volutes and other
genera of univalve shells, usually met with only in tertiary strata, occur.

The upper part of the rock, about 20 feet thick, as seen in St. Peter's
Mount, in the suburbs of Maestricht, abounds in corals, often detachable
from the matrix; and these beds are succeeded by a soft yellowish
limestone 50 feet thick, extensively quarried from time immemorial for
building. The stone below is whiter, and contains occasional nodules of
grey chert or chalcedony.

M. Bosquet, with whom I lately examined this formation (August, 1850),
pointed out to me a layer of chalk from 2 to 4 inches thick, containing
green earth and numerous encrinital stems, which forms the line of
demarcation between the strata containing the fossils peculiar to
Maestricht and the white chalk below. The latter is distinguished by
regular layers of black flint in nodules, and by several shells, such as
_Terebratula carnea_ (see fig. 201.), wholly wanting in beds higher than
the green band. Some of the organic remains, however, for which St. Peter's
Mount is celebrated, occur both above and below that parting layer, and,
among others, the great marine reptile, called _Mosasaurus_, a saurian
supposed to have been 24 feet in length, of which the entire skull and a
great part of the skeleton have been found. Such remains are chiefly met
with in the soft freestone, the principal member of the Maestricht beds.

_Chalk of Faxoe._--In the island of Seeland, in Denmark, the newest member
of the chalk series, seen in the sea-cliffs at Stevens Klint resting on
white chalk with flints, is a yellow limestone, a portion of which, at
Faxoe, where it is used as a building-stone, is composed of corals, even
more conspicuously than is usually observed in recent coral reefs. It has
been quarried to the depth of more than 40 feet, but its thickness is
unknown. The imbedded shells are chiefly casts, many of them of univalve
mollusca, which, as they strictly belong to the Cretaceous era, are worthy
of notice, since such forms, whether spiral or patelliform, are wanting in
the white chalk of Europe generally. Thus, there are two species of
_Cypræa_, one of _Oliva_, two of _Mitra_, four of the genus _Cerithium_,
six of _Fusus_, two of _Trochus_, one _Patella_, one _Emarginula_, &c., on
the whole, more than thirty univalves, spiral or patelliform, not one of
which is common to the white chalk. At the same time, a large proportion of
the accompanying bivalve shells, echinoderms, and zoophytes, are
specifically identical with fossils of older parts of the Cretaceous
series. Among the cephalopoda of Faxoe, may be mentioned _Baculites
Faujasii_ and _Belemnites mucronatus_, shells of the white chalk.

The claws and entire shell of a small crab, _Brachyurus rugosus_
(Schlotheim), are scattered through the Faxoe stone, reminding us of
similar crustaceans enclosed in the rocks of many modern coral
reefs.[211-A] Some small portions of this coralline formation consist of
white earthy chalk; it is, therefore, clear that this substance must
have been produced simultaneously, a fact of some importance, as bearing
on the theory of the origin of white chalk; for the decomposition of
such corals as we see at Faxoe is capable, we know, of forming white
mud, undistinguishable from chalk, and which we may suppose to have
been dispersed far and wide through the ocean, in which such reefs as
that of Faxoe grew.

[Illustration: Fig. 193. Section from Hertfordshire, in England, to
Sena, in France.]

_White Chalk_ (2. and 3. Tab. p. 209.).--The highest beds of chalk in
England and France consist of a pure, white, calcareous mass, usually
too soft for a building stone, but sometimes passing into a more solid
state. It consists, almost purely, of carbonate of lime; the
stratification is often obscure, except where rendered distinct by
interstratified layers of flint, a few inches thick, occasionally in
continuous beds, but oftener in nodules, and recurring at intervals from
2 to 4 feet distant from each other.

This upper chalk is usually succeeded, in the descending order, by a great
mass of white chalk without flints, below which comes the chalk marl, in
which there is a slight admixture of argillaceous matter. The united
thickness of the three divisions in the south of England equals, in some
places, 1000 feet.[211-B]

The annexed section, fig. 193., will show the manner in which the white
chalk extends from England into France, covered by the tertiary strata
described in former chapters, and reposing on lower cretaceous beds.

Among the conspicuous forms of mollusca wholly foreign to the tertiary and
recent periods, and which we meet with in the white chalk, are the
Belemnite, Ammonite, Baculite, and Turrilite, all genera of _Cephalopoda_,
a family to which the living cuttle-fish and nautilus belong.

[Illustration: Fig. 194. Portion of _Baculites Faujasii_. Maestricht and
Faxoe beds and white chalk.]

[Illustration: Fig. 195. Portion of _Baculites anceps_. Maestricht and
Faxoe beds and white chalk.]

[Illustration: Fig. 196. Turrilites.

  _a._ _Turrilites costatus._ Chalk marl.
  _b._ Same, showing the indented border of the partition of the chambers.]

[Illustration: Fig. 197. Belemnites.

  _a._ _Belemnites mucronatus._
  _b._ Same, showing internal structure.

Maestricht, Faxoe, and white chalk.]

Among the brachiopoda in the white chalk, the _Terebratulæ_ are very
abundant. These shells are known to live at the bottom of the sea, where
the water is tranquil and of some depth (see figs. 198, 199, 200, 201.).
With these are associated some forms of oyster (see figs. 202. and 204.),
and other bivalves (figs. 203, 205, 206, 207, 208.).

[Illustration: Fig. 198. _Terebratula plicatilis_, dorsal view.
Upper white chalk.]

[Illustration: Fig. 199. _Terebratula plicatilis_, side view.]

[Illustration: Fig. 200. _Terebratula pumilus._ (_Magas pumilus_, Sow.)
Upper white chalk.]

[Illustration: Fig. 201. _Terebratula carnea._ Upper white chalk.]

[Illustration: Fig. 202. _Ostrea vesicularis._ _Gryphæa globosa_, Min. Con.
Upper chalk and upper greensand.]

[Illustration: Fig. 203. _Pecten 5-costatus._ White chalk, upper
and lower greensands.]

[Illustration: Fig. 204. _Ostrea carinata._ Chalk marl, upper
and lower greensands.]

[Illustration: Fig. 205. _Crania Parisiensis_, inferior or attached valve.
Upper white chalk.]

[Illustration: Fig. 206. _Plagiostoma Hoperi_, Sow. Syn. _Lima Hoperi_.
White chalk and upper greensand.]

[Illustration: Fig. 207. _Plagiostoma spinosum_, Sow. Syn. _Spondylus
spinosus_. Upper white chalk.]

Among the rest, no form marks the cretaceous era in Europe, America, and
India, in a more striking manner than the extinct genus _Inoceramus_
(_Catillus_ of Lamk.), the shells of which are distinguished by a
fibrous texture, and are often met with in fragments, having, probably,
been extremely friable.

[Illustration: Fig. 208. _Inoceramus Lamarckii._

Syn. _Catillus Lamarckii_.

White Chalk (Dixon's Geol. Sussex, Tab. 28. fig. 29.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 209. _Eschara disticha._

_a._ Natural size.
_b._ Portion magnified.

White chalk.]

[2 Illustrations: Fig. 210. Fig. 211. A branching sponge in a flint, from
the white chalk. From the collection of Mr. Bowerbank.]

With these mollusca are many corals (figs. 209, 210, 211.) and sea urchins
(fig. 212.), which are alike marine, and, for the most part, indicative of
a deep sea. They are dispersed indifferently through the soft chalk, and
hard flint, and some of the flinty nodules owe their irregular forms to
inclosed zoophytes, as in the specimen represented in fig. 211., where the
hollows in the exterior are caused by the branches of a sponge seen on
breaking open the flint, fig. 210.

[Illustration: Fig. 212. _Ananchytes ovata_. White chalk, upper and lower.

  _a_. Side view.
  _b_. Bottom of the shell on which both the oral and anal apertures are
       placed; the anal being more round, and at the smaller end.]

Of the singular family called _Rudistes_, by Lamarck, hereafter to be
mentioned, as extremely characteristic of the chalk of Southern Europe,
a single representative only (fig. 213.) has been discovered in the
white chalk of England.

[4 Illustrations: _Hippurites Mortoni_, Mantell. Houghton, Sussex. White
chalk. Diameter one seventh of nat. size.

Fig. 213. Two individuals deprived of their opercula, adhering together.

Fig. 214. Same seen from above.

Fig. 215. Transverse section of part of the wall of the shell, magnified
          to show the structure.

Fig. 216. Vertical section of the same.

On the side where the shell is thinnest, there is one external furrow and
corresponding internal ridge, a, b. figs. 213, 214.; but they are usually
less prominent than in these figures. This species has been referred to
_Hippurites_, but does not, I believe, fully agree in character with that
genus. I have never seen the opercular piece, or _valve_, as it is called
by those conchologists who regard the _Rudistes_ as bivalve mollusca. The
specimen above figured was discovered by the late Mr. Dixon.]

The remains of fishes of the Upper Cretaceous formations consist chiefly
of teeth of the shark family of genera, in part common to the tertiary,
and partly distinct. But we meet with no bones of land animals, nor any
terrestrial or fluviatile shells, nor any plants, except sea weeds, and
here and there a piece of drift wood. All the appearances concur in
leading us to conclude that the white chalk was the product of an open
sea of considerable depth.

The existence of turtles and oviparous saurians, and of a Pterodactyl or
winged-lizard, found in the white chalk of Maidstone, implies, no doubt,
some neighbouring land; but a few small islets in mid-ocean, like
Ascension, so much frequented by migratory droves of turtles, might perhaps
have afforded the required retreat where these creatures might lay their
eggs in the sand, or from which the flying species may have been blown out
to sea. Of the vegetation of such islands we have scarcely any indication,
but it consisted partly of cycadeous plants; for a fragment of one of these
was found by Capt. Ibbetson in the chalk marl of the Isle of Wight, and is
referred by A. Brongniart to _Clathraria Lyellii_, Mantell, a species
common to the antecedent Wealden period.

_Geographical extent and origin of the While Chalk._--The area over
which the white chalk preserves a nearly homogeneous aspect is so vast,
that the earlier geologists despaired of discovering any analogous
deposits of recent date. Pure chalk, of nearly uniform aspect and
composition, is met with in a north-west and south-east direction, from
the north of Ireland to the Crimea, a distance of about 1140
geographical miles; and in an opposite direction it extends from the
south of Sweden to the south of Bordeaux, a distance of about 840
geographical miles. In Southern Russia, according to Sir R. Murchison,
it is sometimes 600 feet thick, and retains the same mineral character
as in France and England, with the same fossils, including _Inoceramus
Cuvieri_, _Belemnites mucronatus_, and _Ostrea vesicularis_.

But it would be an error to imagine, that the chalk was ever spread out
continuously over the whole of the space comprised within these limits,
although it prevailed in greater or less thickness over large portions of
that area. On turning to those regions of the Pacific where coral reefs
abound, we find some archipelagoes of lagoon islands, such as that of the
Dangerous Archipelago, for instance, and that of Radack, with several
adjoining groups, which are from 1100 to 1200 miles in length, and 300 or
400 miles broad; and the space to which Flinders proposed to give the name
of the Corralline Sea is still larger; for it is bounded on the east by the
Australian barrier--all formed of coral rock,--on the west by New
Caledonia, and on the north by the reefs of Louisiade. Although the islands
in these areas may be thinly sown, the mud of the decomposing zoophytes may
be scattered far and wide by oceanic currents. That this mud would resemble
chalk I have already hinted when speaking of the Faxoe limestone, p. 211.;
and it was also remarked in an early part of this volume, that some even of
that chalk which appears to an ordinary observer quite destitute of organic
remains, is nevertheless, when seen under the microscope, full of fragments
of corals and sponges; together with the valves of entomostraca, the shells
of foraminifera, and still more minute infusoria.[215-A] (See p. 26.)

Now it had been often suspected, before these discoveries, that white
chalk might be of animal origin, even where every trace of organic
structure has vanished. This bold idea was partly founded on the fact,
that the chalk consisted of pure carbonate of lime, such as would result
from the decomposition of testacea, echini, and corals; and partly on
the passage observable between these fossils when half decomposed and
chalk. But this conjecture seemed to many naturalists quite vague and
visionary, until its probability was strengthened by new evidence
brought to light by modern geologists.

We learn from Lieutenant Nelson, that, in the Bermuda Islands, there are
several basins or lagoons almost surrounded and enclosed by reefs of
coral. At the bottom of these lagoons a soft white calcareous mud is
formed by the decomposition of _Eschara_, _Flustra_, _Cellepora_, and
other corallines. This mud, when dried, is undistinguishable from common
white earthy chalk; and some portions of it, presented to the Museum of
the Geological Society of London, might, after full examination, be
mistaken for ancient chalk, but for the labels attached to them. About
the same time Mr. C. Darwin observed similar facts in the coral islands
of the Pacific; and came also to the opinion, that much of the soft
white mud found at the bottom of the sea near coral reefs has passed
through the bodies of worms, by which the stony masses of coral are
everywhere bored; and other portions through the intestines of fishes;
for certain gregarious fishes of the genus _Sparus_ are visible through
the clear water, browsing quietly, in great numbers, on living corals,
like grazing herds of graminivorous quadrupeds. On opening their bodies,
Mr. Darwin found their intestines filled with impure chalk. This
circumstance is the more in point, when we recollect how the fossilist
was formerly puzzled by meeting, in chalk, with certain bodies, called
cones of the larch, which were afterwards recognized by Dr. Buckland to
be the excrement of fish.[216-A] These spiral coprolites (see figures),
like the scales and bones of fossil fish in the chalk, are composed
chiefly of phosphate of lime.

[2 Illustrations: Fig. 217. Fig. 218. Coprolites of fish called
_Iulo-eido-copri_, from the chalk.]

Mr. Dana, when describing the elevated coral reef of Oahu, in the Sandwich
Islands, says, that some varieties of the rock consist of aggregated
shells, imbedded in a compact calcareous base as firm in texture as any
secondary limestone; while others are like chalk, having its colour, its
earthy fracture, its soft homogeneous texture, and being an equally good
writing material. The same author describes, in many growing coral reefs, a
similar formation of modern chalk, undistinguishable from the
ancient.[216-B] The extension over a wide submarine area of the calcareous
matrix of the chalk, as well as of the imbedded fossils, would take place
the more readily, in consequence of the low specific gravity of the shells
of mollusca and zoophytes, when compared with ordinary sand and mineral
matter. The mud also derived from their decomposition would be much lighter
than argillaceous and other inorganic mud, and very easily transported by
currents, especially in salt water.

_Single pebbles in chalk._--The general absence of sand and pebbles in
the white chalk has been already mentioned; but the occurrence here and
there, in the south-east of England, of a few isolated pebbles of quartz
and green schist, some of them 2 or 3 inches in diameter, has justly
excited much wonder. If these had been carried to the spots where we now
find them by waves or currents from the lands once bordering the
cretaceous sea, how happened it that no sand or mud were transported
thither at the same time? We cannot conceive such rounded stones to have
been drifted like erratic blocks by ice[217-A], for that would imply a
cold climate in the Cretaceous period; a supposition inconsistent with
the luxuriant growth of large chambered univalves, numerous corals, and
many fish, and other fossils of tropical forms.

Now in Keeling Island, one of those detached masses of coral which rise up
in the wide Pacific, Captain Ross found a single fragment of greenstone,
where every other particle of matter was calcareous; and Mr. Darwin
concludes that it must have come there entangled in the roots of a large
tree. He reminds us that Chamisso, the distinguished naturalist who
accompanied Kotzebue, affirms, that the inhabitants of the Radack
archipelago, a group of lagoon islands, in the midst of the Pacific,
obtained stones for sharpening their instruments by searching the roots of
trees which are cast up on the beach.[217-B]

It may perhaps be objected, that a similar mode of transport cannot have
happened in the cretaceous sea, because fossil wood is very rare in the
chalk. Nevertheless wood is sometimes met with, and in the same parts of
the chalk where the pebbles are found, both in soft stone and in a
silicified state in flints. In these cases it has often every appearance of
having been floated from a distance, being usually perforated by
boring-shells, such as the _Teredo_ and _Fistulana_.[217-C]

The only other mode of transport which suggests itself is sea-weed. Dr.
Beck informs me, that in the Lym-Fiord, in Jutland, the _Fucus
vesiculosus_, often called kelp, sometimes grows to the height of 10
feet, and the branches rising from a single root form a cluster several
feet in diameter. When the bladders are distended, the plant becomes so
buoyant as to float up loose stones several inches in diameter, and
these are often thrown by the waves high up on the beach. The _Fucus
giganteus_ of Solander, so common in Terra del Fuego, is said by Captain
Cook to attain the length of 360 feet, although the stem is not much
thicker than a man's thumb. It is often met with floating at sea, with
shells attached, several hundred miles from the spots where it grew.
Some of these plants, says Mr. Darwin, were found adhering to large
loose stones in the inland channels of Terra del Fuego, during the
voyage of the Beagle in 1834; and that so firmly, that the stones were
drawn up from the bottom into the boat, although so heavy that they
could scarcely be lifted in by one person. Some fossil sea-weeds have
been found in the Cretaceous formation, but none, as yet, of large size.

But we must not imagine that because pebbles are so rare in the white
chalk of England and France there are no proofs of sand, shingle, and
clay having been accumulated contemporaneously even in the European
seas. The siliceous sandstone, called "upper quader" by the Germans,
overlies white argillaceous chalk, or "pläner-kalk," a deposit
resembling in composition and organic remains the chalk marl of the
English series. This sandstone contains as many fossil shells common to
our white chalk as could be expected in a sea-bottom formed of such
different materials. It sometimes attains a thickness of 600 feet, and
by its jointed structure and vertical precipices, plays a conspicuous
part in the picturesque scenery of Saxon Switzerland, near Dresden.

_Upper greensand_ (4. Tab. p. 209.).--The lower chalk without flints passes
gradually downwards, in the south of England, into an argillaceous
limestone, "the chalk marl," already alluded to, in which ammonites and
other cephalopoda, so rare in the higher parts of the series, appear. This
marly deposit passes in its turn into beds containing green particles of a
chloritic mineral, called the upper greensand. In parts of Surrey
calcareous matter is largely intermixed, forming a stone called
_firestone_. In the cliffs of the southern coast of the Isle of Wight, this
upper greensand is 100 feet thick, and contains bands of siliceous
limestone and calcareous sandstone with nodules of chert.

[2 Illustrations: Fossils of the Upper Greensand.

Fig. 219.

  _a._ _Terebratula lyra._       } Upper greensand.
  _b._ Same, seen in profile.    } France.

Fig. 220. _Ammonites Rhotomagensis._ Upper greensand.]

[Illustration: Fig. 221. _Hamites spiniger_ (Fitton);
near Folkstone. Gault.]

_Gault._--The lowest member of the upper Cretaceous group, usually about
100 feet thick in the S.E. of England, is provincially termed Gault. It
consists of a dark blue marl, sometimes intermixed with greensand. Many
peculiar forms of cephalopoda, such as the _Hamite_ (fig. 221.) and
_Scaphite_, with other fossils, characterize this formation, which, small
as is its thickness, can be traced by its organic remains to distant parts
of Europe, as, for example, to the Alps.

The phosphate of lime, found lately near Farnham, in Surrey, in such
abundance as to be used largely by the agriculturist for fertilizing soils,
occurs exclusively, according to Mr. R. A. C. Austen, in the upper
greensand and gault. It is doubtless of animal origin, and partly
coprolitic, probably derived from the excrement of fish.


LOWER CRETACEOUS DIVISION. (No. 6. Tab. p. 209.)

That part of the Cretaceous series which is older than the Gault has been
commonly called the Lower Greensand. The greater number of its fossils are
specifically distinct from those of the upper cretaceous system. Dr.
Fitton, to whom we are indebted for an excellent monograph on this
formation as developed in England, gives the following as the succession of
rocks seen in parts of Kent.

  No. 1. Sand, white, yellowish, or ferruginous, with
         concretions of limestone and chert                70 feet.
      2. Sand with green matter                            70 to 100 feet.
      3. Calcareous stone, called Kentish rag              60 to 80 feet.

In his detailed description of the fine section displayed at Atherfield,
in the south of the Isle of Wight, we find the limestone wholly wanting;
in fact, the variations in the mineral composition of this group, even
in contiguous districts, is very great; and on comparing the Atherfield
beds with corresponding strata at Hythe in Kent, distant 95 miles,
the whole series has lost half its thickness, and presents a very
dissimilar aspect.[219-A]

On the other hand, Professor E. Forbes has shown that when the sixty-three
strata at Atherfield are severally examined, the total thickness of which
he gives as 843 feet, there are some fossils which range through the whole
series, others which are peculiar to particular divisions. As a proof that
all belong chronologically to one system, he states that whenever similar
conditions are repeated in overlying strata the same species reappear.
Changes of depth, or of the mineral nature of the bottom, the presence or
absence of lime or of peroxide of iron, the occurrence of a muddy, or a
sandy, or a gravelly bottom, are marked by the banishment of certain
species and the predominance of others. But these differences of conditions
being mineral, chemical, and local in their nature, have nothing to do with
the extinction, throughout a large area, of certain animals or plants. The
rule laid down by this eminent naturalist for enabling us to test the
arrival of a new state of things in the animate world, is the
representation by new and different species of corresponding genera of
mollusca or other beings. When the forms proper to loose sand or soft clay,
or a stony or calcareous bottom, or a moderate or a great depth of water,
recur with all the same species, the interval of time has been,
geologically speaking, small, however dense the mass of matter accumulated.
But if, the genera remaining the same, the species are changed, we have
entered upon a new period; and no similarity of climate, or of geographical
and local conditions, can then recall the old species which a long series
of destructive causes in the animate and inanimate world has gradually
annihilated. On passing from the lower greensand to the gault, we suddenly
reach one of these new epochs, scarcely any of the fossil species being
common to the lower and upper cretaceous systems, a break in the chain
implying no doubt many missing links in the series of geological monuments
which we may some day be able to supply.

One of the largest and most abundant shells in the lowest strata of the
lower greensand, as displayed in the Atherfield section, is the large
_Perna mulleti_ of which a reduced figure is here given (fig. 222.).

[Illustration: Fig. 222. _Perna mulleti._ Desh. in Leym.

  _a._ Exterior.
  _b._ Hinge of upper valve.]

In the south of England, during the accumulation of the lower greensand
above described, the bed of the sea appears to have been continually
sinking, from the commencement of the period, when the freshwater
Wealden beds were submerged, to the deposition of those strata on which
the gault immediately reposes.

Pebbles of quartzose sandstone, jasper, and flinty slate, together with
grains of chlorite and mica, speak plainly of the nature of the
pre-existing rocks, from the wearing down of which the greensand beds
were derived. The land, consisting of such rocks, was doubtless
submerged before the origin of the white chalk, as corals can only
multiply in the clear waters of the sea in spaces to which no mud or
sand are conveyed by currents.


HIPPURITE LIMESTONE.

_Difference between the chalk of the north and south of Europe._--By the
aid of the three tests of relative age, namely, superposition, mineral
character, and fossils, the geologist has been enabled to refer to the same
Cretaceous period certain rocks in the north and south of Europe, which
differ greatly, both in their fossil contents and in their mineral
composition and structure.

If we attempt to trace the cretaceous deposits from England and France to
the countries bordering the Mediterranean, we perceive, in the first place,
that the chalk and Greensand in the neighbourhood of London and Paris form
one great continuous mass, the Straits of Dover being a trifling
interruption, a mere valley with chalk cliffs on both sides. We then
observe that the main body of the chalk which surrounds Paris stretches
from Tours to near Poitiers (see the annexed map, fig. 223., in which the
shaded part represents chalk).

[Illustration: Fig. 223. Map of south-western France.]

Between Poitiers and La Rochelle, the space marked A on the map separates
two regions of chalk. This space is occupied by the Oolite and certain
other formations older than the Chalk, and has been supposed by M. E. de
Beaumont to have formed an island in the cretaceous sea. South of this
space we again meet with a formation which we at once recognize by its
mineral character to be chalk, although there are some places where the
rock becomes oolitic. The fossils are, upon the whole, very similar;
especially certain species of the genera _Spatangus_, _Ananchytes_,
_Cidarites_, _Nucula_, _Ostrea_, _Gryphæa_ (_Exogyra_), _Pecten_,
_Plagiostoma_ (_Lima_), _Trigonia_, _Catillus_, (_Inoceramus_), and
_Terebratula_.[221-A] But _Ammonites_, as M. d'Archiac observes, of which
so many species are met with in the chalk of the north of France, are
scarcely ever found in the southern region; while the genera _Hamite_,
_Turrilite_, and _Scaphite_, and perhaps _Belemnite_, are entirely wanting.

On the other hand, certain forms are common in the south which are rare or
wholly unknown in the north of France. Among these may be mentioned many
_Hippurites_, _Sphærulites_, and other members of that great family of
mollusca called _Rudistes_ by Lamarck, to which nothing analogous has been
discovered in the living creation, but which is quite characteristic of
rocks of the Cretaceous era in the south of France, Spain, Sicily, Greece,
and other countries bordering the Mediterranean.

[Illustration: Fig. 224.

  _a._ _Radiolites radiosus_, D'Orb. (_Hippurites_, Lamk.)
  _b._ Opercular valve of same.

White chalk of France.]

[Illustration: Fig. 225. _Radiolites foliaceus_, D'Orb. Syn. _Sphærulites
agariciformis_, Blainv. White chalk of France.]

[Illustration: Fig. 226. _Hippurites organisans_, Desmoulins. Upper
chalk:--chalk marl of Pyrenees?[222-A]

  _a._ Young individual; when full grown they occur in groups adhering
       laterally to each other.
  _b._ Upper side of the opercular valve, showing a reticulated structure
       in those parts, _b_, where the external coating is worn off.
  _c._ Upper side of the lower and cylindrical valve.
  _d._ Cast of the interior of the lower conical valve.]

The species called _Hippurites organisans_ (fig. 226.) is more abundant
than any other in the south of Europe; and the geologist should make
himself well acquainted with the cast _d_, which is far more common in many
compact marbles of the upper cretaceous period than the shell itself, which
has often wholly disappeared. The flutings, or smooth, rounded,
longitudinal ribs, representing the form of the interior, are wholly
unlike the hippurite itself, and in some individuals, which attain a great
size and length, are very conspicuous.

Between the region of chalk last mentioned in which Perigueux is situated,
and the Pyrenees, the space B intervenes. (See Map, p. 221.) Here the
tertiary strata cover, and for the most part conceal, the cretaceous rocks,
except in some spots where they have been laid open by the denudation of
newer formations. In these places they are seen still preserving the form
of a white chalky rock, which is charged in part with grains of green sand.
Even as far south as Tercis, on the Adour, near Dax, where I examined them
in 1828, the cretaceous rocks retain this character. In that region M.
Grateloup has found in them _Ananchytes ovata_ (fig. 212.), and other
fossils of the English chalk, together with _Hippurites_.


FLORA OF THE CRETACEOUS PERIOD.

Although the fossil plants of the Cretaceous era at present known are
few in number, the rocks being principally marine, they suffice,
according to M. Ad. Brongniart, to show a transition character between
the vegetation of the secondary and that of the tertiary formations. The
tertiary strata, when compared to the older rocks, are marked by the
predominance of _Exogens_, which now constitute three-fourths of the
living plants of the globe.[223-A]

These exogens are wanting in the secondary strata generally, but in the
Cretaceous period they equal in number the _Gymnogens_ (_Coniferæ_ and
_Cycadeæ_) which abounded so much in the preceding Oolitic period, and
disappeared before the Eocene rocks were formed.[223-B] The discovery of a
tree-fern in the ferruginous sands of the Lower Cretaceous group of the
department of Ardennes in France is one of many signs of the contrast of
the flora, and doubtless of the climate, of this era with that of the
Pliocene and Modern periods.


CRETACEOUS ROCKS IN THE UNITED STATES.

If we pass to the American continent, we find in the state of New Jersey a
series of sandy and argillaceous beds wholly unlike our Upper Cretaceous
system; which we can, nevertheless, recognize as referable,
paleontologically, to the same division.

That they were about the same age generally as the European chalk and
greensand, was the conclusion to which Dr. Morton and Mr. Conrad came after
their investigation of the fossils in 1834. The strata consist chiefly of
greensand and green marl, with an overlying coralline limestone of a pale
yellow colour, and the fossils, on the whole, agree most nearly with those
of the upper European series, from the Maestricht beds to the gault
inclusive. I collected sixty shells from the New Jersey deposits in 1841;
five of which were identical with European species--_Ostrea larva_, _O.
vesicularis_, _Gryphæa costata_, _Pecten quinque-costatus_, _Belemnites
mucronatus_. As some of these have the greatest vertical range in Europe,
they might be expected more than any others to recur in distant parts of
the globe. Even where the species are different, the generic forms, such as
the Baculite and certain sections of Ammonites, as also the Inoceramus (see
above, fig. 208.) and other bivalves, have a decidedly cretaceous aspect.
Fifteen out of the sixty shells above alluded to, were regarded by
Professor Forbes as good geographical representatives of well-known
cretaceous fossils of Europe. The correspondence, therefore, is not small,
when we reflect that the part of the United States where these strata occur
is between 3000 and 4000 miles distant from the chalk of Central and
Northern Europe, and that there is a difference of ten degrees in the
latitude of the places compared on opposite sides of the Atlantic.[224-A]

Fish of the genera _Lamna_, _Galeus_, and _Carcharias_ are common to New
Jersey and the European cretaceous rocks. So also is the genus _Mosasaurus_
among reptiles, and _Pliosaurus_ (Owen), another saurian likewise obtained
from the English chalk. From New Jersey the cretaceous formation extends
southwards to North Carolina, Georgia, and Alabama, cropping out at
intervals from beneath the tertiary strata, between the Appalachian
Mountains and the Atlantic. They then sweep round the southern extremity of
that chain, and stretch northwards again to Tennessee and Kentucky. They
have also been traced far up the valley of the Missouri 275 English miles
above its mouth, to the neighbourhood of Fort Leavenworth; and southwards
to Texas, according to the observations of Ferdinand Römer; so that already
the area which they are ascertained to occupy in North America may perhaps
equal their extent in Europe. So little do they resemble mineralogically
the European white chalk, that limestone in North America is, upon the
whole, an exception to the rule; and, even in Alabama, where I saw a
calcareous member of this group, the marlstones are much more like the
English and French Lias than any other secondary deposit of the Old World.

At the base of the system in Alabama I found dense masses of shingle,
perfectly loose and unconsolidated, derived from the waste of paleozoic
(or carboniferous) rocks, a mass in no way distinguishable, except
by its position, from ordinary alluvium, but covered with marls
abounding in Inocerami.

In Texas, according to F. Römer, the chalk assumes a new lithological type,
a large portion of it consisting of hard siliceous limestone, but the
organic remains leaving no doubt in regard to its age.

In South America the cretaceous strata have been discovered in Columbia, as
at Bogota and elsewhere, containing Ammonites, Hamites, Inocerami, and
other characteristic shells.[225-A]

In the South of India, also, at Pondicherry, Verdachellum, and
Trinconopoly, Messrs. Kaye and Egerton have collected fossils belonging to
the cretaceous system. Taken in connection with those from the United
States they prove, says Prof. E. Forbes, that those powerful causes which
stamped a peculiar character on the forms of marine animal life at this
period, exerted their full intensity through the Indian, European, and
American seas.[225-B] Here, as in North and South America, the cretaceous
character can be recognized even where there is no specific identity in the
fossils; and the same may be said of the organic type of those rocks in
Europe and India which succeed next in the ascending and descending order,
the Eocene and the Oolitic.


FOOTNOTES:

[209-A] M. Alcide d'Orbigny, in his valuable work entitled Paléontologie
Française, has adopted new terms for the French subdivisions of the
Cretaceous Series, which, so far as they can be made to tally with English
equivalents, seem explicable thus:

  Danien.      Maestricht beds.
  Senonien.    Upper and lower white chalk, and chalk marl.
  Turonien.    Part of the chalk marl and the upper greensand, the latter
               being in his last work (Cours Elémentaire) termed
               Cénomanien.
  Albien.      Gault.
  Aptien.      Upper part of lower greensand.
  Neocomien.   Lower part of same.

[211-A] See paper by the author, Trans. of Geol. Soc., vol. v.
p. 246., 1840.

[211-B] Fitton, Geol. Trans., 2d series, vol. iv. p. 319.

[215-A] Proceedings of Geol. Soc., vol. iii. pp. 7, 8., 1842.

[216-A] Geol. Trans. Second Series, vol. iii. p. 232. plate 31.
figs. 3. and 11.

[216-B] Geol. of U. S. Exploring Exped. p. 252. 1849.

[217-A] See Chapters X. and XI.

[217-B] Darwin, p. 549. Kotzebue's First Voyage, vol. iii. p. 155.

[217-C] Mantell, Geol. of S. E. of England, p. 96.

[219-A] Dr. Fitton, Quart. Geol. Journ., vol. i. p. 179., ii. p. 55.,
and iii. p. 289., where comparative sections and a valuable table
showing the vertical range of the various fossils of the lower greensand
at Atherfield is given.

[221-A] Archiac, sur la Form. Crétacée du S. O. de la France, Mém. de la
Soc. Géol. de France, tom. ii.

[222-A] D'Orbigny's Paléontologie Française, pl. 533.

[223-A] In this and subsequent remarks on fossil plants I shall often
use Dr. Lindley's terms, as most familiar in this country; but as those
of M. A. Brongniart are much cited, it may be useful to geologists to
give a table explaining the corresponding names of groups so much spoken
of in palæontology.

       |         Brongniart.
       |             |        |Lindley.
       |             |        |           Examples.
  Cryptogamic.
       |             |1. Cryptogamous amphigens, or cellular cryptogamic.
       |             |        |Thallogens.
       |             |        |           |Lichens, sea-weeds, fungi.
       |             |2. Cryptogamous acrogens.
       |             |        |Acrogens.
       |             |        |           |Mosses, equisetums, ferns,
       |             |        |           |lycopodiums--Lepidodendron.
       |             |        |           |
  Phanerogamic.
       |             |3. Dicotyledonous gymnosperms.
       |             |        |Gymnogens.
       |             |        |           |Conifers and Cycads.
       |             |4. Dicot. Angiosperms.
       |             |        |Exogens.
       |             |        |           |Compositæ, leguminosæ, umbelliferæ,
       |             |        |           |cruciferæ, heaths, &c. All native
       |             |        |           |European trees except conifers.
       |             |5. Monocotyledons.
       |             |        |Endogens.
       |             |        |           |Palms, lilies, aloes, rushes,
       |             |        |           |grasses, &c.

[223-B] A. Brongniart, Veget. Foss. Dict. Univ., p. 111., 1849.

[224-A] See a paper by the author, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. i. p. 55.

[225-A] Proceed. Geol. Soc. iv. p. 391.

[225-B] See Forbes, Quart. Geol. Journ. vol. i. p. 79.



CHAPTER XVIII.

WEALDEN GROUP.

   The Wealden divisible into Weald Clay, Hastings Sand, and Purbeck
   Beds--Intercalated between two marine formations--Weald clay and
   Cypris-bearing strata--Iguanodon--Hastings sands--Fossil fish--Strata
   formed in shallow water--Brackish water-beds--Upper, middle, and lower
   Purbeck--Alternations of brackish water, freshwater, and
   land--Dirt-bed, or ancient soil--Distinct species of fossils in each
   subdivision of the Wealden--Lapse of time implied--Plants and insects
   of Wealden--Geographical extent of Wealden--Its relation to the
   cretaceous and oolitic periods--Movements in the earth's crust to
   which it owed its origin and submergence.


Beneath the cretaceous rocks in the S.E. of England, a freshwater formation
is found, called the Wealden (see Nos. 5. and 6. Map, p. 242.), which,
although it occupies a small horizontal area in Europe, as compared to the
chalk, is nevertheless of great geological interest, not only from its
position, as being interpolated between two great marine formations (Nos.
7. and 9. Table, p. 103.), but also because the imbedded fossils indicate a
grand succession of changes in organic life, effected during its
accumulation. It is composed of three minor divisions, the Weald Clay, the
Hastings, and the Purbeck Beds, of which the aggregate thickness in some
districts may be 700 or 800 feet; but which would be much more considerable
(perhaps 2000 feet), were we to add together the extreme thickness acquired
by each of them in their fullest development.

The common name of Wealden was given to the whole, because it was first
studied in parts of Kent, Surrey, and Sussex, called the Weald, (see Map,
p. 242.), and we are indebted to Dr. Mantell for having shown in 1822, in
his Geology of Sussex, that the whole group was of fluviatile origin. In
proof of this he called attention to the entire absence of Ammonites,
Belemnites, Terebratulæ, Echinites, Corals, and other marine fossils, so
characteristic of the cretaceous rocks above, and of the Oolitic strata
below, and to the presence of Paludinæ, Melaniæ, and various fluviatile
shells, as well as the bones of terrestrial reptiles and the trunks and
leaves of land plants.

[Illustration: Fig. 227. Position of the Wealden between two
marine formations.]

The evidence of so unexpected a fact as the infra-position of a dense mass
of purely freshwater origin to a deep-sea deposit (a phenomenon with which
we have since become familiar, in other chapters of the earth's
autobiography), was received, at first, with no small doubt and
incredulity. But the relative position of the beds is unequivocal; the
Weald Clay being distinctly seen to pass beneath the Greensand in various
parts of Surrey, Kent, and Sussex; and if we proceed from Sussex westward
to the Vale of Wardour, we there again observe the same formation, or, at
least, the lower division of it, the Purbeck, occupying the same relative
position, and resting on the Oolite (see fig. 228.). Or if we pass from the
base of the South Downs in Sussex, and cross to the Isle of Wight, we there
again meet with the Wealden series reappearing beneath the Greensand, and
cannot doubt that the beds are prolonged subterraneously, as indicated by
the dotted lines in fig. 229.

[Illustration: Fig. 228. Cross section.

  O, Oolite.
  G S, Greensand, or Lower Cretaceous.]

[Illustration: Fig. 229. Cross section.]

The minor groups into which the Wealden has been commonly divided in
England are, as before stated, three, and they succeed each other in the
following descending order[227-A]:--

                                                            Thickness.
  1st. Weald Clay, sometimes including thin beds of
       sand and shelly limestone                            140 to 280 ft.
  2d.  Hastings Sand, in which occur some clays and
       calcareous grits                                     400 to 500 ft.
  3d.  Purbeck Beds, consisting of various kinds of
       limestones and marls                                 150 to 200 ft.


_Weald Clay._

The first division, or Weald Clay, is of purely freshwater origin. The
uppermost beds are not only conformable, as Dr. Fitton observes, to the
inferior strata of the Lower Greensand, but of similar mineral composition.
To explain this, we may suppose, that as the delta of a great river was
tranquilly subsiding, so as to allow the sea to encroach upon the space
previously occupied by freshwater, the river still continued to carry down
the same sediment into the sea. In confirmation of this view it may be
stated, that the remains of the _Iguanodon Mantelli_, a gigantic
terrestrial reptile, very characteristic of the Wealden, has been
discovered near Maidstone, in the overlying Kentish rag, or marine
limestone of the Lower Greensand. Hence we may infer that some of the
saurians which inhabited the country of the great river continued to live
when part of the country had become submerged beneath the sea. Thus, in our
own times, we may suppose the bones of large alligators to be frequently
entombed in recent freshwater strata in the delta of the Ganges. But if
part of that delta should sink down so as to be covered by the sea, marine
formations might begin to accumulate in the same space where freshwater
beds had previously been formed; and yet the Ganges might still pour down
its turbid waters in the same direction, and carry seaward the carcasses of
the same species of alligator, in which case their bones might be included
in marine as well as in subjacent freshwater strata.

The Iguanodon, first discovered by Dr. Mantell, has left more of its
remains in the Wealden strata of the south-eastern counties, and Isle of
Wight, than any other genus of associated saurians. It was an
herbivorous reptile, and regarded by Cuvier as more extraordinary than
any with which he was acquainted; for the teeth, though bearing a great
analogy to the modern Iguanas which now frequent the tropical woods of
America and the West Indies, exhibit many striking and important
differences (see fig. 230.). It appears that they have been worn by
mastication; whereas the existing herbivorous reptiles clip and gnaw off
the vegetable productions on which they feed, but do not chew them.
Their teeth, when worn, present an appearance of having been chipped
off, and never, like the fossil teeth of the Iguanodon, have a flat
ground surface (see fig. 231.), resembling the grinders of herbivorous
mammalia. Dr. Mantell computes that the teeth and bones of this animal
which have passed under his examination during the last twenty years,
must have belonged to no less than seventy-one distinct individuals;
varying in age and magnitude from the reptile just burst from the egg,
to one of which the femur measured 24 inches in circumference. Yet
notwithstanding that the teeth were more numerous than any other bones,
it is remarkable that it was not till the relics of all these
individuals had been found, that a solitary example of part of a
jaw-bone was obtained. More recently remains both of the upper and lower
jaw have been met with in the Hastings Beds in Tilgate Forest. Their
size was somewhat greater than had been anticipated, and even allowing
that the tail was short, which Professor Owen infers from the short
bodies of the caudal vertebræ, Dr. Mantell estimates the probable length
of some of these saurians at between 30 and 40 feet. The largest femur
yet found measures 4 feet 8 inches in length, the circumference of the
shaft being 25 inches, and round the condyles 42 inches.

[2 Illustrations: Teeth of Iguanodon.

Fig. 230. Partially worn tooth of a young animal. (Mantell.)

Fig. 231. Crown of tooth in adult, worn down. (Mantell.)]

Occasionally bands of limestone, called Sussex Marble, occur in the Weald
Clay, almost entirely composed of a species of _Paludina_, closely
resembling the common _P. vivipara_ of English rivers.

[Illustration: Fig. 232. _Cypris spinigera_, Fitton.]

[Illustration: Fig. 233. _Cypris Valdensis_, Fitton. (_C. faba_,
Min. Con. 485.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 234. _Cypris tuberculata_, Fitton.]

[Illustration: Fig. 235. Sample with lamination.]

Shells of the _Cypris_, an animal belonging to the Crustacea, and before
mentioned (p. 31.) as abounding in lakes and ponds, are also plentifully
scattered through the clays of the Wealden, sometimes producing, like
the plates of mica, a thin lamination (see fig. 235.). Similar
cypriferous marls are found in the lacustrine tertiary beds of
Auvergne (see above, p. 183.).


_Hastings Sands._

This middle division of the Wealden consists of sand, calciferous grit,
clay, and shale; the argillaceous strata, notwithstanding the name,
being nearly in the same proportion as the arenaceous. The calcareous
sandstone and grit of Tilgate Forest, near Cuckfield, in which the
remains of the Iguanodon and Hyleosaurus were first found, constitute an
upper member of this formation. The white "sand-rock" of the Hastings
cliffs, about 100 feet thick, is one of the lower members of the same.
The reptiles, which are very abundant in it, consist partly of saurians,
already referred by Owen and Mantell to eight genera, among which,
besides those already enumerated, we find the Megalosaurus and
Plesiosaurus. The Pterodactyl, also a flying reptile, is met with in the
same strata, and many remains of Testudinata of the genera _Trionyx_ and
_Emys_, now confined to tropical regions.

[Illustration: Fig. 236. _Lepidotus Mantelli_, Agass. Wealden.

  _a._ palate and teeth.
  _b._ side view of teeth.
  _c._ scale.]

The fishes of the Wealden belong partly to the genera _Pycnodus_ and
_Hybodus_ (see figure of genus in Chap. XXI.), forms common to the Wealden
and Oolite; but the teeth and scales of a species of _Lepidotus_ are most
widely diffused (see fig. 236.). The general form of these fish was that of
the carp tribe, although perfectly distinct in anatomical character, and
more allied to the pike. The whole body was covered with large rhomboidal
scales, very thick, and having the exposed part covered with enamel. Most
of the species of this genus are supposed to have been either river fish,
or inhabitants of the coasts, having not sufficient powers of swimming to
advance into the deep sea.

[Illustration: Fig. 237. _Corbula alata_, Fitton. Magnified.]

The shells of the Hastings beds belong to the genera _Melanopsis_,
_Melania_, _Paludina_, _Cyrena_, _Cyclas_, _Unio_, and others, which
inhabit rivers or lakes; but one band has been found in Dorsetshire
indicating a brackish state of the water, and, in some places, even a
saltness, like that of the sea, where the genera _Corbula_ (see fig. 237.),
_Mytilus_, and _Ostrea_ occur. At different heights in the Hastings Sand,
in the middle of the Wealden, we find again and again slabs of sandstone
with a strong ripple-mark, and between these slabs beds of clay many yards
thick. In some places, as at Stammerham, near Horsham, there are
indications of this clay having been exposed so as to dry and crack before
the next layer was thrown down upon it. The open cracks in the clay have
served as moulds, of which casts have been taken in relief, and which are,
therefore, seen on the lower surface of the sandstone (see fig. 238.).

[Illustration: Fig. 238. Underside of slab of sandstone about one yard in
diameter. Stammerham, Sussex.]

Near the same place a reddish sandstone occurs in which are innumerable
traces of a fossil vegetable, apparently _Sphenopteris_, the stems and
branches of which are disposed as if the plants were standing erect on the
spot where they originally grew, the sand having been gently deposited upon
and around them; and similar appearances have been remarked in other places
in this formation.[230-A] In the same division also of the Wealden, at
Cuckfield, is a bed of gravel or conglomerate, consisting of water-worn
pebbles of quartz and jasper, with rolled bones of reptiles. These must
have been drifted by a current, probably in water of no great depth.

[Illustration: Fig. 239. _Sphenopteris gracilis_ (Fitton), from
near Tunbridge Wells.

_a._ portion of the same magnified.]

From such facts we may infer that, notwithstanding the great thickness of
this division of the Wealden (and the same observation applies to the Weald
Clay and Purbeck Beds), the whole of it was a deposit in water of a
moderate depth, and often extremely shallow. This idea may seem startling
at first, yet such would be the natural consequence of a gradual and
continuous sinking of the ground in an estuary or bay, into which a great
river discharged its turbid waters. By each foot of subsidence, the
fundamental rock, such as the Portland Oolite, would be depressed one foot
farther from the surface; but the bay would not be deepened, if newly
deposited mud and sand should raise the bottom one foot. On the contrary,
such new strata of sand and mud might be frequently laid dry at low water,
or overgrown for a season by a vegetation proper to marshes.


_Purbeck Beds._

Immediately below the Hastings Sands we find a series of calcareous
slates, marls, and limestones, called the Purbeck Beds, because well
exposed to view in the sea-cliffs of the Peninsula of Purbeck,
especially in Durlestone Bay, near Swanage. They may also be
advantageously studied at Lulworth Cove and the neighbouring bays
between Weymouth and Dorchester. At Meup's Bay in particular, Prof. E.
Forbes has recently examined minutely the organic remains of the three
members of the Purbeck group, displayed there in a vertical section 155
feet thick. To the information previously supplied in the works of
Messrs. Webster, Fitton, De la Beche, Buckland, and Mantell, he has made
most ample and important additions, so that it will be desirable to give
them at some length, it appearing that the Upper, Middle, and Lower
Purbecks are each marked by peculiar species of organic remains, these
again being different, so far as a comparison has yet been instituted,
from the fossils of the overlying Hastings Sands and Weald Clay. This
result cannot fail to excite much wonder, and it leads us to suspect
that the Wealden period, which many geologists have scarcely deigned
to notice in their classification, may comprehend the history of a
lapse of time as great as that of the Oolitic or Cretaceous
eras respectively.[231-A]

_Upper Purbeck._--The highest of the three divisions is purely freshwater,
the strata, about 50 feet in thickness, containing shells of the genera
_Paludina_, _Physa_, _Lymnea_, _Planorbis_, _Valvata_, _Cyclas_, and
_Unio_, with cyprides, and fish.

_Middle Purbeck._--To these succeed the Middle Purbeck, about 30 feet
thick, the uppermost part of which consists of freshwater limestone, with
cyprides, turtles, and fish of different species from those in the
preceding strata. Below the limestone are brackish-water beds full of
_Cyrena_, and traversed by bands abounding in _Corvulæ_ and _Melaniæ_.
These are based on a purely marine deposit, with _Pecten_, _Modiola_,
_Avicula_, and _Thracia_, all undescribed shells. Below this, again, come
limestones and shales, partly of brackish and partly of freshwater origin,
in which many fish, especially species of _Lepidotus_ and _Microdon
radiatus_, are found, and a reptile named _Macrorhyncus_. Among the
mollusks, a remarkable ribbed _Melania_, of the section _Chilira_, occurs.

Immediately below is the great and conspicuous stratum, 12 feet thick, long
familiar to geologists under the local name of "Cinder-bed," formed of a
vast accumulation of shells of _Ostrea distorta_ (fig. 240.). In the
uppermost part of this bed Mr. Forbes discovered the first echinoderm as
yet known in the Purbeck series, a species of _Hemicidaris_, a genus
characteristic of the Oolitic period. It was accompanied by a species of
_Perna_. Below the Cinder-bed freshwater strata are again seen, filled in
many places with species of _Cypris_, _Valvata_, _Paludina_, _Planorbis_,
_Lymnea_, _Physa_, and _Cyclas_, all different from any we had previously
seen above. Thick siliceous beds of chert, filled with these fossils, occur
in a beautiful state of preservation, often converted into chalcedony.
Among these Mr. Forbes met with gyrogonites (the spore vesicles of
_Charæ_), plants never before discovered in rocks older than the Eocene.
Again, beneath these freshwater strata, a very thin band of greenish
shales, with marine shells and impressions of leaves, like those of a large
_Zostera_, succeeds, forming the base of the Middle Purbeck.

[Illustration: Fig. 240. Ostrea distorta. Cinder-bed.]

_Lower Purbeck._--Beneath the thin marine band last mentioned, purely
freshwater marls occur, containing species of _Cypris_, _Valvata_, and
_Lymnea_, different from those of the Middle Purbeck. This is the beginning
of the Inferior division, which is about 80 feet thick. Below the marls are
seen more than 30 feet of brackish-water beds, at Meup's Bay, abounding in
a species of _Serpula_, allied to, if not identical with, _Serpula
coacervites_, found in the Wealden of Hanover. There are also shells of the
genus _Rissoa_ (of the subgenus _Hydrobia_), and a little _Cardium_ of the
subgenus _Protocardium_, in the same beds, together with _Cypris_. Some of
the cypris-bearing shales are strangely contorted and broken up, at the
west end of the Isle of Purbeck. The great dirt-bed or vegetable soil
containing the roots and stools of _Cycadeæ_, which I shall presently
describe, underlies these marls, resting upon the lowest freshwater
limestone, a rock about 8 feet thick, containing _Cyclades_, _Valvata_, and
_Lymnea_, of the same species as those of the uppermost part of the Lower
Purbeck. This rock rests upon the top beds of the Portland stone, which is
purely marine, and between which and the Purbecks there is no passage.

The most remarkable of all the varied successions of beds enumerated in the
above list, is that called by the quarrymen "the dirt," or "black dirt,"
which was evidently an ancient vegetable soil. It is from 12 to 18 inches
thick, is of a dark brown or black colour, and contains a large proportion
of earthy lignite. Through it are dispersed rounded fragments of stone,
from 3 to 9 inches in diameter, in such numbers that it almost deserves the
name of gravel. Many silicified trunks of coniferous trees, and the remains
of plants allied to _Zamia_ and _Cycas_, are buried in this dirt-bed (see
figure of living _Zamia_, fig. 241.).

These plants must have become fossil on the spots where they grew. The
stumps of the trees stand erect for a height of from 1 to 3 feet, and even
in one instance to 6 feet, with their roots attached to the soil at about
the same distances from one another as the trees in a modern
forest.[233-A] The carbonaceous matter is most abundant immediately around
the stumps, and round the remains of fossil _Cycadeæ_.[233-B]

[Illustration: Fig. 241. Zamia spiralis; Southern Australia.[233-C]]

Besides the upright stumps above mentioned, the dirt-bed contains the stems
of silicified trees laid prostrate. These are partly sunk into the black
earth, and partly enveloped by a calcareous slate which covers the
dirt-bed. The fragments of the prostrate trees are rarely more than 3 or 4
feet in length; but by joining many of them together, trunks have been
restored, having a length from the root to the branches of from 20 to 23
feet, the stems being undivided for 17 or 20 feet, and then forked. The
diameter of these near the roots is about 1 foot.[233-D] Root-shaped
cavities were observed by Professor Henslow to descend from the bottom of
the dirt-bed into the subjacent freshwater stone, which, though now solid,
must have been in a soft and penetrable state when the trees grew.[233-E]

[Illustration: Fig. 242. Section in Isle of Portland, Dorset.
(Buckland and De la Beche.)]

The thin layers of calcareous slate (fig. 242.) were evidently deposited
tranquilly, and would have been horizontal but for the protrusion of the
stumps of the trees, around the top of each of which they form
hemispherical concretions.

The dirt-bed is by no means confined to the island of Portland, where it
has been most carefully studied, but is seen in the same relative position
in the cliffs east of Lulworth Cove, in Dorsetshire, where, as the strata
have been disturbed, and are now inclined at an angle of 45°, the stumps of
the trees are also inclined at the same angle in an opposite direction--a
beautiful illustration of a change in the position of beds originally
horizontal (see fig. 243.). Traces of the dirt-bed have also been observed
by Dr. Buckland, about two miles north of Thame, in Oxfordshire; and by Dr.
Fitton, in the cliffs of the Boulonnois, on the French coast; but, as might
be expected, this freshwater deposit is of limited extent when compared to
most marine formations.

[Illustration: Fig. 243. Section in cliff east of Lulworth Cove.
(Buckland and De la Beche.)]

From the facts above described, we may infer, first, that the superior
beds of the Oolite, called "the Portland," which are full of marine
shells, were overspread with fluviatile mud, which became dry land, and
covered by a forest, throughout a portion of the space now occupied by
the south of England, the climate being such as to admit the growth of
the _Zamia_ and _Cycas_. 2dly. This land at length sank down and was
submerged with its forests beneath a body of fresh water, from which
sediment was thrown down enveloping fluviatile shells. 3dly. The regular
and uniform preservation of this thin bed of black earth over a distance
of many miles, shows that the change from dry land to the state of a
freshwater lake or estuary, was not accompanied by any violent
denudation, or rush of water, since the loose black earth, together with
the trees which lay prostrate on its surface, must inevitably have been
swept away had any such violent catastrophe then taken place.

The dirt-bed has been described above in its most simple form, but in some
sections the appearances are more complicated. The forest of the dirt-bed
was not everywhere the first vegetation which grew in this region. Two
other beds of carbonaceous clay, one of them containing _Cycadeæ_, in an
upright position, have been found below it, and one above it[234-A], which
implies other oscillations in the level of the same ground, and its
alternate occupation by land and water more than once.

_Table showing the changes of medium in which the strata were formed,
from the Lower Greensand to the Portland Stone inclusive, in the
south-east of England._

  1. Marine              Lower greensand.

  2. Freshwater          Weald clay.

  3. Freshwater       }
     Brackish         }  Hastings sand.
     Freshwater       }

  4. Freshwater          Upper Purbeck.

  5. Freshwater       }
     Brackish         }
     Marine           }
     Brackish         }  Middle Purbeck.
     Marine           }
     Freshwater       }
     Marine           }

  6. Freshwater       }
     Brackish         }
     Land             }
     Freshwater       }
     Land (dirt-bed)  }  Lower Purbeck.
     Freshwater       }
     Land             }
     Freshwater       }
     Land             }
     Freshwater       }

  7. Marine              Portland stone.

The annexed tabular view will enable the reader to take in at a glance the
successive changes from sea to river, and from river to sea, or from these
again to a state of land, which have occurred in this part of England
between the Cretaceous and Oolitic periods. That there have been at least
four changes in the species of testacea during the deposition of the
Wealden, seems to follow from the observations recently made by Professor
E. Forbes, so that, should we hereafter find the signs of many more
alternate occupations of the same area by different elements, it is no more
than we might expect. Even during a small part of a zoological period, not
sufficient to allow time for many species to die out, we find that the same
area has been laid dry, and then submerged, and then again laid dry, as in
the deltas of the Po and Ganges, the history of which has been brought to
light by Artesian borings.[235-A] We also know that similar revolutions
have occurred within the present century (1819) in the delta of the Indus
in Cutch[235-B], where land has been laid permanently under the waters both
of the river and sea, without its soil or shrubs having been swept away.
Even, independently of any vertical movements of the ground, we see in the
principal deltas, such as that of the Mississippi, that the sea extends its
salt waters annually for many months over considerable spaces, which, at
other seasons, are occupied by the river during its inundations.

It will be observed that the division of the Purbecks into upper, middle,
and lower, has been made by Professor E. Forbes, strictly on the principle
of the entire distinctness of the species of organic remains which they
include. The lines of demarcation are not lines of disturbance, nor
indicated by any striking physical characters or mineral changes. The
features which attract the eye in the Purbecks, such as the dirt-beds, the
dislocated strata at Lulworth, and the Cinder-bed, do not indicate any
breaks in the distribution of organized beings. "The causes which led to a
complete change of life three times during the deposition of the freshwater
and brackish strata must," says this naturalist, "be sought for, not simply
in either a rapid or a sudden change of their area into land or sea, but
in the great lapse of time which intervened between the epochs of
deposition at certain periods during their formation."

Each dirt-bed may, no doubt, be the memorial of many thousand years or
centuries, because we find that 2 or 3 feet of vegetable soil is the only
monument which many a tropical forest has left of its existence ever since
the ground on which it now stands was first covered with its shade. Yet,
even if we imagined the fossil soils of the Lower Purbeck to represent as
many ages, we need not expect on that account to find them constituting the
lines of separation between successive strata characterized by different
zoological types. The preservation of a layer of vegetable soil, when in
the act of being submerged, must be regarded as a rare exception to a
general rule. It is of so perishable a nature, that it must usually be
carried away by the denuding waves or currents of the sea or by a river;
and many dirt-beds were probably formed in succession, and annihilated in
the Wealden, besides those few which now remain.

[Illustration: Fig. 244. Cone from the Isle of Purbeck, resembling the
_Dammara_ of the Moluccas. (Fitton.)]

The plants of the Wealden, so far as our knowledge extends at present,
consist chiefly of Ferns, Coniferæ (see fig. 244.), and Cycadeæ, without
any exogens; the whole more allied to the Oolitic than to the Cretaceous
vegetation, although some of the species seem to be common to the chalk.
But the vertebrate and invertebrate animals indicate, in like manner, a
relationship to both these periods, though a nearer affinity to the
Oolitic. Mr. Brodie has found the remains of beetles and several insects of
the homopterous and trichopterous orders, some of which now live on plants,
like those of the Wealden, while others hover over the surface of our
present rivers. But no bones of mammalia have been met with among those of
land-reptiles. Yet, as the reader will learn, in Chapter XX., that the
relics of marsupial quadrupeds have been detected in still older beds, and,
as it was so long before a single portion of the jaw of an iguanodon was
met with in the Tilgate quarries (see p. 228.), we need by no means despair
of discovering hereafter some evidence of the existence of warm-blooded
quadrupeds at this era. It is, at least, too soon to infer, on mere
negative evidence, that the mammalia were foreign to this fauna.

In regard to the geographical extent of the Wealden, it cannot be
accurately laid down; because so much of it is concealed beneath the newer
marine formations. It has been traced about 200 English miles from west to
east, from Lulworth Cove to near Boulogne, in France; and about 220 miles
from north-west to south-east, from Whitchurch, in Buckinghamshire, to
Beauvais, in France. If the formation be continuous throughout this space,
which is very doubtful, it does not follow that the whole was
contemporaneous; because, in all likelihood, the physical geography of the
region underwent frequent change throughout the whole period, and the
estuary may have altered its form, and even shifted its place. Dr. Dunker,
of Cassel, and H. Von Meyer, in an excellent monograph on the Wealdens of
Hanover and Westphalia, have shown that they correspond so closely, not
only in their fossils, but also in their mineral characters, with the
English series, that we can scarcely hesitate to refer the whole to one
great delta. Even then, the magnitude of the deposit may not exceed that of
many modern rivers. Thus, the delta of the Quorra or Niger, in Africa,
stretches into the interior for more than 170 miles, and occupies, it is
supposed, a space of more than 300 miles along the coast, thus forming a
surface of more than 25,000 square miles, or equal to about one half of
England.[237-A] Besides, we know not, in such cases, how far the fluviatile
sediment and organic remains of the river and the land may be carried out
from the coast, and spread over the bed of the sea. I have shown, when
treating of the Mississippi, that a more ancient delta, including species
of shells, such as now inhabit Louisiana, has been upraised, and made to
occupy a wide geographical area, while a newer delta is forming[237-B]; and
the possibility of such movements, and their effects, must not be lost
sight of when we speculate on the origin of the Wealden.

If it be asked where the continent was placed from the ruins of which
the Wealden strata were derived, and by the drainage of which a great
river was fed, we are half tempted to speculate on the former existence
of the Atlantis of Plato. The story of the submergence of an ancient
continent, however fabulous in history, must have been true again and
again as a geological event.

The real difficulty consists in the persistence of a large hydrographical
basin, from whence a great body of fresh water was poured into the sea,
precisely at a period when the neighbouring area of the Wealden was
gradually going downwards 1000 feet or more perpendicularly. If the
adjoining land participated in the movement, how could it escape being
submerged, or how could it retain its size and altitude so as to continue
to be the source of such an inexhaustible supply of fresh water and
sediment? In answer to this question, we are fairly entitled to suggest
that the neighbouring land may have been stationary, or may even have
undergone a contemporaneous slow upheaval. There may have been an ascending
movement in one region, and a descending one in a contiguous parallel zone
of country; just as the northern part of Scandinavia is now rising, while
the middle portion (that south of Stockholm) is unmoved, and the southern
extremity in Scania is sinking, or at least has sunk within the historical
period.[237-C] We must, nevertheless, conclude, if we adopt the above
hypothesis, that the depression of the land became general throughout a
large part of Europe at the close of the Wealden period, a subsidence which
brought in the cretaceous ocean.


FOOTNOTES:

[227-A] Dr. Fitton, Geol. Trans. vol. iv. p. 320. Second Series.

[230-A] Mantell, Geol. of S. E. of England, p. 244.

[231-A] "On the Dorsetshire Purbecks," by Prof. E. Forbes, Edinb. Brit.
Assoc., Aug. 1850.

[233-A] Mr. Webster first noticed the erect position of the trees and
described the Dirt-bed.

[233-B] Fitton, Geol. Trans., Second Series, vol. iv. pp. 220, 221.

[233-C] See Flinders' Voyage.

[233-D] Fitton, ibid.

[233-E] Buckland and De la Beche, Geol. Trans., Second Series, vol. iv.
p. 16. Mr. Forbes has ascertained that the subjacent rock is a
freshwater limestone, and not a portion of the Portland oolite, as
was previously imagined.

[234-A] E. Forbes, ibid.

[235-A] See Principles of Geol., 8th ed. pp. 260-268.

[235-B] Ibid. p. 443.

[237-A] Fitton, Geol. of Hastings, p. 58.; who cites Lander's Travels.

[237-B] See above, p. 85.; and Second Visit to the U. S. vol. ii.
chap. xxxiv.

[237-C] See the Author's Anniv. Address, Geol. Soc. 1850, Quart. Geol.
Journ. vol. vi. p. 52.



CHAPTER XIX.

DENUDATION OF THE CHALK AND WEALDEN.

   Physical geography of certain districts composed of Cretaceous and
   Wealden strata--Lines of inland chalk-cliffs on the Seine in
   Normandy--Outstanding pillars and needles of chalk--Denudation of the
   chalk and Wealden in Surrey, Kent, and Sussex--Chalk once continuous
   from the North to the South Downs--Anticlinal axis and parallel
   ridges--Longitudinal and transverse valleys--Chalk escarpments--Rise
   and denudation of the strata gradual--Ridges formed by harder, valleys
   by softer beds--Why no alluvium, or wreck of the chalk, in the central
   district of the Weald--At what periods the Weald valley was
   denuded--Land has most prevailed where denudation has been
   greatest--Elephant bed, Brighton.


All the fossiliferous formations may be studied by the geologist in two
distinct points of view: first, in reference to their position in the
series, their mineral character and fossils; and, secondly, in regard to
their physical geography, or the manner in which they now enter, as mineral
masses, into the external structure of the earth; forming the bed of lakes
and seas, or the surface and foundation of hills and valleys, plains and
table-lands. Some account has already been given on the first head of the
Tertiary, the Cretaceous, and Wealden strata; and we may now proceed to
consider certain features in the physical geography of these groups as they
occur in parts of England and France.

The hills composed of white chalk in the S.E. of England have a smooth
rounded outline, and being usually in the state of sheep pastures, are free
from trees or hedgerows; so that we have an opportunity of observing how
the valleys by which they are drained ramify in all directions, and become
wider and deeper as they descend. Although these valleys are now for the
most part dry, except during heavy rains and the melting of snow, they may
have been due to aqueous denudation, as explained in the sixth chapter;
having been excavated when the chalk emerged gradually from the sea. This
opinion is confirmed by the occasional occurrence of long lines of inland
cliffs, in which the strata are cut off abruptly in steep and often
vertical precipices. The true nature of such escarpments is nowhere more
obvious than in parts of Normandy, where the river Seine and its
tributaries flow through deep winding valleys, hollowed out of chalk
horizontally stratified. Thus, for example, if we follow the Seine for a
distance of about 30 miles from Andelys to Elboeuf, we find the valley
flanked on both sides by a deep slope of chalk, with numerous beds of
flint, the formation being laid open for a thickness of about 250 and 300
feet. Above the chalk is an overlying mass of sand, gravel, and clay, from
30 to 100 feet thick. The two opposite slopes of the hills _a_ and _b_,
where the chalk appears at the surface, are from 2 to 4 miles apart, and
they are often perfectly smooth and even, like the steepest of our downs in
England; but at many points they are broken by one, two, or more ranges of
vertical and even overhanging cliffs of bare white chalk with flints. At
some points detached needles and pinnacles stand in the line of the cliffs,
or in front of them, as at _c_, fig. 245. On the right bank of the Seine,
at Andelys, one range, about 2 miles long, is seen varying from 50 to 100
feet in perpendicular height, and having its continuity broken by a number
of dry valleys or coombs, in one of which occurs a detached rock or needle,
called the Tête d'Homme (see figs. 246, 247.). The top of this rock
presents a precipitous face towards every point of the compass; its
vertical height being more than 20 feet on the side of the downs, and 40
towards the Seine, the average diameter of the pillar being 36 feet. Its
composition is the same as that of the larger cliffs in its neighbourhood,
namely, white chalk, having occasionally a crystalline texture like marble,
with layers of flint in nodules and tabular masses. The flinty beds often
project in relief 4 or 5 feet beyond the white chalk, which is generally in
a state of slow decomposition, either exfoliating or being covered with
white powder, like the chalk cliffs on the English coast; and, as in them,
this superficial powder contains in some places common salt.

[Illustration: Fig. 245. Section across Valley of Seine.]

[Illustration: Fig. 246. View of the Tête d'Homme, Andelys,
seen from above.]

Other cliffs are situated on the right bank of the Seine, opposite
Tournedos, between Andelys and Pont de l'Arche, where the precipices are
from 50 to 80 feet high: several of their summits terminate in pinnacles;
and one of them, in particular, is so completely detached as to present a
perpendicular face 50 feet high towards the sloping down. On these cliffs
several ledges are seen, which mark so many levels at which the waves of
the sea may be supposed to have encroached for a long period. At a still
greater height, immediately above the top of this range, are three much
smaller cliffs, each about 4 feet high, with as many intervening terraces,
which are continued so as to sweep in a semicircular form round an
adjoining coomb, like those in Sicily before described (p. 76.).

[Illustration: Fig. 247. Side view of the Tête d'Homme.
White chalk with flints.]

[Illustration: Fig. 248. Chalk pinnacle at Senneville.]

[Illustration: Fig. 249. Roches d'Orival, Elboeuf.]

If we then descend the river from Vatteville to a place called Senneville,
we meet with a singular needle about 50 feet high, perfectly isolated on
the escarpment of chalk on the right bank of the Seine (see fig. 248.).
Another conspicuous range of inland cliffs is situated about 12 miles below
on the left bank of the Seine, beginning at Elboeuf, and comprehending the
Roches d'Orival (see fig. 249.). Like those before described, it has an
irregular surface, often overhanging, and with beds of flint projecting
several feet. Like them, also, it exhibits a white powdery surface, and
consists entirely of horizontal chalk with flints. It is 40 miles inland,
its height, in some parts, exceeding 200 feet, and its base only a few feet
above the level of the Seine. It is broken, in one place, by a pyramidal
mass or needle, 200 feet high, called the Roche de Pignon, which stands out
about 25 feet in front of the upper portion of the main cliffs, with which
it is united by a narrow ridge about 40 feet lower than its summit (see
fig. 250.). Like the detached rocks before mentioned at Senneville,
Vatteville, and Andelys, it may be compared to those needles of chalk which
occur on the coast of Normandy, as well as in the Isle of Wight and in
Purbeck[241-A] (see fig. 251.).

[Illustration: Fig. 250. View of the Roche de Pignon, seen from the south.]

[Illustration: Fig. 251. Needle and Arch of Etretat, in the chalk cliffs of
Normandy. Height of Arch 100 feet. (Passy.)[241-B]]

The foregoing description and drawings will show, that the evidence of
certain escarpments of the chalk having been originally sea-cliffs, is far
more full and satisfactory in France than in England. If it be asked why,
in the interior of our own country, we meet with no ranges of precipices
equally vertical and overhanging, and no isolated pillars or needles, we
may reply that the greater hardness of the chalk in Normandy may, no doubt,
be the chief cause of this difference. But the frequent absence of all
signs of littoral denudation in the valley of the Seine itself is a
negative fact of a far more striking and perplexing character. The cliffs,
after being almost continuous for miles, are then wholly wanting for much
greater distances, being replaced by a green sloping down, although the
beds remain of the same composition, and are equally horizontal; and
although we may feel assured that the manner of the upheaval of the land,
whether intermittent or not, must have been the same at those intermediate
points where no cliffs exist, as at others where they are so fully
developed. But, in order to explain such apparent anomalies, the reader
must refer again to the theory of denudation, as expounded in the 6th
chapter; where it was shown, first, that the undermining force of the waves
and marine currents varies greatly at different parts of every coast;
secondly, that precipitous rocks have often decomposed and crumbled down;
and thirdly, that many terraces and small cliffs may now lie concealed
beneath a talus of detrital matter.

_Denudation of the Weald Valley._--No district is better fitted to
illustrate the manner in which a great series of strata may have been
upheaved and gradually denuded than the country intervening between the
North and South Downs. This region, of which a ground plan is given in the
accompanying map (fig. 252.), comprises within it the whole of Sussex, and
parts of the counties of Kent, Surrey, and Hampshire. The space in which
the formations older than the White Chalk, or those from the Gault to the
Hastings sand inclusive, crop out, is bounded everywhere by a great
escarpment of chalk, which is continued on the opposite side of the channel
in the Bas Boulonnais in France, where it forms the semicircular boundary
of a tract in which older strata also appear at the surface. The whole of
this district may therefore be considered geologically as one and the same.

[Illustration: Fig. 252. Geological Map of the south-east of England and
part of France, exhibiting the denudation of the Weald.

 1. Tertiary.
 2. Chalk and upper greensand.
 3. Gault.
 4. Lower Greensand.
 5. Weald clay.
 6. Hastings sand.
 7. Purbeck beds.
 8. Oolite.]

[Illustration: Fig. 253. Section from the London to the Hampshire basin
across the valley of the Weald.

  1. Tertiary strata.
  2. Chalk and firestone.
  3. Gault.
  4. Lower greensand.
  5. Weald clay.
  6. Hastings sands.]

[Illustration: Fig. 254. Highest point of South Downs, 858 feet.

Anticlinal axis of the Weald. Crowborough Hill, 804 feet.

Highest point of North Downs, 880 feet.[243-A]

Section of the country from the confines of the basin of London to
that of Hants, with the principal heights above the level of the sea
on a true scale.[243-B]]

The space here inclosed within the escarpment of the chalk affords an
example of what has been sometimes called a "valley of elevation" (more
properly "of denudation"); where the strata, partially removed by
aqueous excavation, dip away on all sides from a central axis. Thus, it
is supposed that the area now occupied by the Hastings sand (No. 6.) was
once covered by the Weald clay (No. 5.), and this again by the Greensand
(No. 4.), and this by the Gault (No. 3.); and, lastly, that the Chalk
(No. 2.) extended originally over the whole space between the North and
the South Downs. This theory will be better understood by consulting the
annexed diagram (fig. 253.), where the dark lines represent what now
remains, and the fainter ones those portions of rock which are believed
to have been carried away.

At each end of the diagram the tertiary strata (No. 1.) are exhibited
reposing on the chalk. In the middle are seen the Hastings sands (No. 6.)
forming an anticlinal axis, on each side of which the other formations are
arranged with an opposite dip. It has been necessary, however, in order to
give a clear view of the different formations, to exaggerate the
proportional height of each in comparison to its horizontal extent; and a
true scale is therefore subjoined in another diagram (fig. 254.), in order
to correct the erroneous impression which might otherwise be made on the
reader's mind. In this section the distance between the North and South
Downs is represented to exceed forty miles; for the Valley of the Weald is
here intersected in its longest diameter, in the direction of a line
between Lewes and Maidstone.

Through the central portion, then, of the district supposed to be denuded
runs a great anticlinal line, having a direction nearly east and west, on
both sides of which the beds 5, 4, 3, and 2, crop out in succession. But,
although, for the sake of rendering the physical structure of this region
more intelligible, the central line of elevation has alone been introduced,
as in the diagrams of Smith, Mantell, Conybeare, and others, geologists
have always been well aware that numerous minor lines of dislocation and
flexure run parallel to the great central axis.

In the central area of the Hastings sand the strata have undergone the
greatest displacement; one fault being known, where the vertical shift
of a bed of calcareous grit is no less than 60 fathoms.[244-A] Much of
the picturesque scenery of this district arises from the depth of the
narrow valleys and ridges to which the sharp bends and fractures of
the strata have given rise; but it is also in part to be attributed
to the excavating power exerted by water, especially on the
interstratified argillaceous beds.

Besides the series of longitudinal valleys and ridges in the Weald, there
are valleys which run in a transverse direction, passing through the chalk
to the basin of the Thames on the one side, and to the English Channel on
the other. In this manner the chain of the North Downs is broken by the
rivers Wey, Mole, Darent, Medway, and Stour; the South Downs by the Arun,
Adur, Ouse, and Cuckmere.[244-B] If these transverse hollows could be
filled up, all the rivers, observes Mr. Conybeare, would be forced to take
an easterly course, and to empty themselves into the sea by Romney Marsh
and Pevensey Levels.[245-A]

Mr. Martin has suggested that the great cross fractures of the chalk, which
have become river channels, have a remarkable correspondence on each side
of the valley of the Weald; in several instances the gorges in the North
and South Downs appearing to be directly opposed to each other. Thus, for
example, the defiles of the Wey in the North Downs, and of the Arun in the
South, seemed to coincide in direction; and, in like manner, the Ouse
corresponds to the Darent, and the Cuckmere to the Medway.[245-B]

[Illustration: Fig. 255. View of the chalk escarpment of the South Downs.
Taken from the Devil's Dike, looking towards the west and south-west.

  _a._ The town of Steyning is hidden by this point.
  _b._ Edburton church.
  _c._ Road.
  _d._ River Adur.]

Although these coincidences may, perhaps, be accidental, it is by no means
improbable, as hinted by the author above mentioned, that great amount of
elevation towards the centre of the Weald district gave rise to transverse
fissures. And as the longitudinal valleys were connected with that linear
movement which caused the anticlinal lines running east and west, so the
cross fissures might have been occasioned by the intensity of the upheaving
force towards the centre of the line.

But before treating of the manner in which the upheaving movement may
have acted, I shall endeavour to make the reader more intimately
acquainted with the leading geographical features of the district, so
far as they are of geological interest.

In whatever direction we travel from the tertiary strata of the basins of
London and Hampshire towards the valley of the Weald, we first ascend a
slope of white chalk, with flints, and then find ourselves on the summit of
a declivity consisting, for the most part, of different members of the
chalk formation; below which the upper greensand, and sometimes, also, the
gault, crop out. This steep declivity is the great escarpment of the chalk
before mentioned, which overhangs a valley excavated chiefly out of the
argillaceous or marly bed, termed Gault (No. 3.). The escarpment is
continuous along the southern termination of the North Downs, and may be
traced from the sea, at Folkestone, westward to Guildford and the
neighbourhood of Petersfield, and from thence to the termination of the
South Downs at Beachy Head. In this precipice or steep slope the strata are
cut off abruptly, and it is evident that they must originally have extended
farther. In the woodcut (fig. 255. p. 245.), part of the escarpment of the
South Downs is faithfully represented, where the denudation at the base of
the declivity has been somewhat more extensive than usual, in consequence
of the upper and lower greensand being formed of very incoherent materials,
the upper, indeed, being extremely thin and almost wanting.

[Illustration: Fig. 256. Chalk escarpment, as seen from the hill above
Steyning, Sussex. The castle and village of Bramber in the foreground.]

The geologist cannot fail to recognize in this view the exact likeness of a
sea cliff; and if he turns and looks in an opposite direction, or eastward,
towards Beachy Head (see fig. 256.), he will see the same line of heights
prolonged. Even those who are not accustomed to speculate on the former
changes which the surface has undergone may fancy the broad and level plain
to resemble the flat sands which were laid dry by the receding tide, and
the different projecting masses of chalk to be the headlands of a coast
which separated the different bays from each other.

In regard to the transverse valleys before mentioned, as intersecting the
chalk hills, some idea of them may be derived from the subjoined sketch
(fig. 257.), of the gorge of the river Adur, taken from the summit of the
chalk downs, at a point in the bridle-way leading from the towns of Bramber
and Steyning to Shoreham. If the reader will refer again to the view given
in a former woodcut (fig. 255. p. 245.), he will there see the exact point
where the gorge of which I am now speaking interrupts the chalk escarpment.
A projecting hill, at the point _a_, hides the town of Steyning, near which
the valley commences where the Adur passes directly to the sea at Old
Shoreham. The river flows through a nearly level plain, as do most of the
others which intersect the hills of Surrey, Kent, and Sussex; and it is
evident that these openings, so far at least as they are due to aqueous
erosion, have not been produced by the rivers, many of which, like the Ouse
near Lewes, have filled up arms of the sea, instead of deepening the
hollows which they traverse.

[Illustration: Fig. 257. Transverse Valley of the Adur in the South Downs.

  _a._ Town of Steyning.
  _b._ River Adur.
  _c._ Old Shoreham.]

Now, in order to account for the manner in which the five groups of
strata, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, represented in the map, fig. 252. and in the
section fig. 253., may have been brought into their present position,
the following hypothesis has been very generally adopted:--Suppose the
five formations to lie in horizontal stratification at the bottom of the
sea; then let a movement from below press them upwards into the form of
a flattened dome, and let the crown of this dome be afterwards cut off,
so that the incision should penetrate to the lowest of the five groups.
The different beds would then be exposed on the surface, in the manner
exhibited in the map, fig. 252.[247-A]

The quantity of denudation or removal by water of stratified masses assumed
to have once reached continuously from the North to the South Downs is so
enormous, that the reader may at first be startled by the boldness of the
hypothesis. But the difficulty vanishes when once sufficient time is
allowed for the gradual and successive rise of the strata, during which the
waves and currents of the ocean might slowly accomplish an operation, which
no sudden diluvial rush of waters could possibly have effected.

Among other proofs of the action of water, it may be stated that the great
longitudinal valleys follow the outcrop of the softer and more incoherent
beds, while ridges or lines of cliff usually occur at those points where
the strata are composed of harder stone. Thus, for example, the chalk with
flints, together with the subjacent upper greensand, which is often used
for building, under the provincial name of "firestone," has been cut into a
steep cliff on that side on which the sea encroached. This escarpment
bounds a deep valley, excavated chiefly out of the soft argillaceous or
marly bed, termed gault (No. 3.). In some places the upper greensand is in
a loose and incoherent state, and there it has been as much denuded as the
gault; as, for example, near Beachy Head; but farther to the westward it is
of great thickness, and contains hard beds of blue chert and calcareous
sandstone or firestone. Here, accordingly, we find that it produces a
corresponding influence on the scenery of the country; for it runs out like
a step beyond the foot of the chalk-hills, and constitutes a lower terrace,
varying in breadth from a quarter of a mile to three miles, and following
the sinuosities of the chalk escarpment.[248-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 258. Cross section.

  _a._ Chalk with flints.
  _b._ Chalk without flints.
  _c._ Upper greensand, or firestone.
  _d._ Gault.]

It is impossible to desire a more satisfactory proof that the escarpment
is due to the excavating power of water during the rise of the strata;
for I have shown, in my account of the coast of Sicily, in what manner
the encroachments of the sea tend to efface that succession of terraces
which must otherwise result from the intermittent upheaval of a coast
preyed upon by the waves.[248-B] During the interval between two
elevatory movements, the lower terrace will usually be destroyed,
wherever it is composed of incoherent materials; whereas the sea will
not have time entirely to sweep away another part of the same terrace,
or lower platform, which happens to be composed of rocks of a harder
texture, and capable of offering a firmer resistance to the erosive
action of water. As the yielding clay termed gault would be readily
washed away, we find its outcrop marked everywhere by a valley which
skirts the base of the chalk hills, and which is usually bounded on the
opposite side by the lower greensand; but as the upper beds of this last
formation are most commonly loose and incoherent, they also have usually
disappeared and increased the breadth of the valley. But in those
districts where chert, limestone, and other solid materials enter
largely into the composition of this formation (No. 4.), they give rise
to a range of hills parallel to the chalk, which sometimes rival the
escarpment of the chalk itself in height, or even surpass it, as in
Leith Hill, near Dorking. This ridge often presents a steep escarpment
towards the soft argillaceous deposit called the Weald clay (No. 5.;
see the strong lines in fig. 253. p. 243.), which usually forms a broad
valley, separating the lower greensand from the Hastings sands or Forest
ridge; but where subordinate beds of sandstone of a firmer texture
occur, the uniformity of the plain of No. 5. is broken by waving
irregularities and hillocks.

It will be easy to show how closely the superficial inequalities agree with
those which we might naturally expect to originate during the gradual rise
of the Wealden district. Suppose the line of the most energetic movement to
have coincided with what is now the central ridge of the Weald valley; in
that case the first land which emerged must have been situated where the
Forest ridge is now placed. Here many shoals and reefs may first have
existed, and islands of chalk devoured in the course of ages by the ocean
(see fig. 253.); so that the top of the shattered dome which first appeared
above water may have been utterly destroyed, and the masses represented by
the fainter lines (fig. 253.) removed.

[2 Illustrations: Fig. 259., Fig. 260.

The dotted lines represent the sea-level.]

The upper greensand is represented (fig. 259.) as forming on the left
hand a single precipice with the chalk; while on the right there are two
cliffs, with an intervening terrace, as before described in fig. 258.
Two strips of land would then remain on each side of a channel,
presenting ranges of white cliffs facing each other. A powerful current
might then scoop out a channel in the gault (No. 2.). This softer bed
would yield with ease in proportion as parts of it were brought up from
time to time and exposed to the fury of the waves, so that large spaces
occupied by the harder formation or greensand (No. 3.) would be laid
bare. This last rock, opposing a more effectual resistance, would next
emerge; while the chalk cliffs, at the base of which the gault is
rapidly undermined, would recede farther from each other, after which
four parallel strips of land, or rows of islands, would be caused, which
are represented by the masses which in fig. 260. rise above the dotted
line indicating the sea-level. In this diagram, however, the inclination
of the upper surface of the formations (Nos. 1. and 3.), is exaggerated.
Originally this surface must have been level, like the submarine
terraces produced by denudation, and described before (p. 74. and 77.);
but they were afterwards more and more tilted by that general movement
to which the region of the Weald owes its structure. At length, by the
farther elevation of the dome-shaped mass, the clay (No. 4.) would be
brought within reach of the waves, which would probably gain the more
easy access to the subjacent deposit by the rents which would be caused
in No. 3., and in the central part of the ridge where the uplifting
force had been exerted with the greatest energy. The opposite cliffs, in
which the greensand (No. 3.) terminates, would now begin to recede from
each other, having at their base a yielding stratum of clay (No. 4.).
Lastly, the sea would penetrate to the sand (No. 5.), and then the
state of things indicated in the dark lines of the upper section
(fig. 253.), would be consummated.

[Illustration: Fig. 261. The Coomb, near Lewes.]

It was stated that there are many lines of flexure and dislocation, running
east and west, or parallel to the central axis of the Wealden. They are
numerous in the district of the Hastings sand, and sometimes occur in the
chalk itself. One of the latter kind has given rise to the ravine called
the Coomb, near Lewes, and was first traced out by Dr. Mantell, in whose
company I examined it. This coomb is seen on the eastern side of the valley
of the Ouse, in the suburbs of the town of Lewes. The steep declivities on
each side are covered with green turf, as is the bottom, which is perfectly
dry. No outward signs of disturbance are visible; and the connection of the
hollow with subterranean movements would not have been suspected by the
geologist, had not the evidence of great convulsions been clearly exposed
in the escarpment of the valley of the Ouse, and the numerous chalk pits
worked at the termination of the Coomb. By the aid of these we discover
that the ravine coincides precisely with a line of fault, on one side of
which the chalk with flints (_a_, fig. 262.), appears at the summit of the
hill, while it is thrown down to the bottom on the other.

Mr. Martin, in his work on the geology of Western Sussex, published in
1828, threw much light on the structure of the Wealden by tracing out
continuously for miles the direction of many anticlinal lines and cross
fractures; and the same course of investigation has since been followed
out in greater detail by Mr. Hopkins. The mathematician last-mentioned
has shown that the observed direction of the lines of flexure and
dislocation in the Weald district coincide with those which might have
been anticipated theoretically on mechanical principles, if we assume
certain simple conditions under which the strata were lifted up by an
expansive subterranean force. He finds by calculation that if this force
was applied so as to act uniformly upwards within an elliptic area, the
longitudinal fissures thereby produced would nearly coincide with the
outlines of the ellipse, forming cracks, which are portions of smaller
concentric ellipses, parallel to the margin of the larger one. These
longitudinal fissures would also be intercepted by others running at
right angles to them, and both lines of fracture may have been produced
at the same time.[251-A] In this illustration it is supposed that the
expansive force acted simultaneously and with equal intensity at every
point within the upheaved area, and not with greater energy along the
central axis or region of principal elevation.

[Illustration: Fig. 262. Fault in the cliff hills near Lewes. Mantell.

  _a._ Chalk with flints.
  _b._ Lower chalk.[251-B]]

The geologist cannot fail to derive great advantage in his speculations
from the mathematical investigation of a problem of this kind, where
results free from all uncertainty are obtained on the assumption of certain
simple conditions. Such results, when once ascertained by mathematical
methods, may serve as standard cases, to which others occurring in nature
of a more complicated kind may be referred. In order that a uniform force
should cause the strata to attain in the centre of the ellipse a height so
far exceeding that which they have reached round the margin, it is
necessary to assume that the mass of upheaved strata offered originally a
very unequal degree of resistance to the subterranean force. This may have
happened either from their being more fractured in one place than in
another, or from being pressed down by a less weight of incumbent strata;
as if we suppose, what is far from improbable, that great denudation had
taken place in the middle of the Wealden before the final and principal
upheaval occurred. It is suggested that the beds may have been acted upon
somewhat in the manner of a carpet spread out loosely on a floor, and
nailed down round the edges, which would swell into the shape of a dome if
pressed up equally at every point by air admitted from beneath. But when we
are reasoning on the particular phenomena of the Weald, we have no
geological data for determining whether it be more probable that originally
the resistance to be overcome was so extremely unequal in different
places, or whether the subterranean force, instead of being everywhere
uniform, was not applied with very different degrees of intensity beneath
distinct portions of the upraised area.

The opinion that both the longitudinal and transverse lines of fracture
may have been produced simultaneously, accords well with that expressed
by M. Thurmann, in his work on the anticlinal ridges and valleys of
elevation of the Bernese Jura.[252-A] For the accuracy of his map and
sections I can vouch, from personal examination, in 1835, of part of the
region surveyed by him. Among other results, at which this author
arrived, it appears that the breadth of all the numerous anticlinal
ridges and dome-shaped masses in the Jura is invariably great in
proportion to the number of the formations exposed to view; or, in other
words, to the depth to which the superimposed groups of secondary strata
have been laid open. (See fig. 71. p. 55. for structure of Jura.) He
also remarks, that the anticlinal lines are occasionally oblique and
cross each other, in which case the greatest dislocation of the beds
takes place. Some of the cross fractures are imagined by him to have
been contemporaneous, others subsequent to the longitudinal ones.

I have assumed, in the former part of this chapter, that the rise of the
Weald was gradual, whereas many geologists have attributed its elevation to
a single effort of subterranean violence. There appears to them such a
unity of effect in this and other lines of deranged strata in the
south-east of England, such as that of the Isle of Wight, as is
inconsistent with the supposition of a great number of separate movements
recurring after long intervals of time. But we know that earthquakes are
repeated throughout a long series of ages in the same spots, like volcanic
eruptions. The oldest lavas of Etna were poured out many thousands, perhaps
myriads of years before the newest, and yet they, and the movements
accompanying their emission, have produced a symmetrical mountain; and if
rivers of melted matter thus continue to flow in the same direction, and
towards the same point, for an indefinite lapse of ages, what difficulty is
there in conceiving that the subterranean volcanic force, occasioning the
rise or fall of certain parts of the earth's crust, may, by reiterated
movements, produce the most perfect unity of result?

_Alluvium of the Weald._--Our next inquiry may be directed to the alluvium
strewed over the surface of the supposed area of denudation. Has any wreck
been left behind of the strata removed? To this we may answer, that the
chalk downs even on their summits are covered every where with gravel
composed of unrounded and partially rounded chalk flints, such as might
remain after masses of white chalk had been softened and removed by water.
This superficial accumulation of the hard or siliceous materials of the
disintegrated strata may be due in some degree to pluvial action; for
during extraordinary rains a rush of water charged with calcareous matter,
of a milk-white colour, may be seen to descend even gently sloping hills of
chalk. If a layer no thicker than the tenth of an inch be removed once in a
century, a considerable mass may in the course of indefinite ages melt
away, leaving nothing save a layer of flinty nodules to attest its former
existence. These unrolled flints may remain mixed with others more or less
rounded, which the waves left originally on the surface of the chalk, when
it first emerged from the sea. A stratum of fine clay sometimes covers the
surface of slight depressions and the bottom of valleys in the white chalk,
which may represent the aluminous residue of the rock, after the pure
carbonate of lime has been dissolved by rain water, charged with excess of
carbonic acid derived from decayed vegetable matter.[253-A]

Although flint gravel is so abundant on the chalk itself, it is usually
wanting in the deep longitudinal valleys at the foot of the chalk
escarpment, although, in some few instances, the detritus of the chalk has
been traced in patches over the gault, and even the lower greensand, for a
distance of several miles from the escarpment of the North and South Downs.
But no vestige of the chalk and its flints has been seen on the central
ridge of the Weald or the Hastings sands, but merely gravel derived from
the rocks immediately subjacent. This distribution of alluvium, and
especially the absence of chalk detritus in the central district, agrees
well with the theory of denudation before set forth; for to return to fig.
259., if the chalk (No. 1.) were once continuous and covered every where
with flint gravel, this superficial covering would be the first to be
carried away from the highest part of the dome long before any of the gault
(No. 2.) was laid bare. Now if some ruins of the chalk remain at first on
the gault, these would be, in a great degree, cleared away before any part
of the lower greensand (No. 3.) is denuded. Thus in proportion to the
number and thickness of the groups removed in succession, is the
probability lessened of our finding any remnants of the highest group
strewed over the bared surface of the lowest.

As an exception to the general rule of the small distance to which any
wreck of the chalk can be traced from the escarpments of the North and
South Downs, I may mention a thick bed of chalk flints which occurs near
Barcombe, about three miles to the north of Lewes (see fig. 263.), a place
which I visited with Dr. Mantell, to whom I am indebted for the
accompanying section. Even here it will be seen that the gravel reaches no
farther than the Weald Clay. The same section shows one of the minor east
and west anticlinal lines before alluded to (p. 244.).

[Illustration: Fig. 263. Section from the north escarpment of the South
Downs to Barcombe.

  1. Gravel composed of partially rounded chalk flints.
  2. Chalk with and without flints.
  3. Lowest chalk or chalk marl (upper greensand wanting).
  4. Gault.
  5. Lower greensand.
  6. Weald clay.]

_At what period the Weald Valley was denuded._--If we inquire at what
geological period the denudation of the Weald was effected, we shall
immediately perceive that the question is limited to this point, whether it
took place during or subsequent to the deposition of the Eocene strata of
the south of England. For in the basins of London and Hampshire the Eocene
strata are conformable to the chalk, being horizontal where the beds of
chalk are horizontal, and vertical where they are vertical, so that both
series of rocks appear to have participated in nearly the same movements.
At the eastern extremity of the Isle of Wight, some beds even of the
freshwater series have been thrown on their edges, like those of the London
clay. Nevertheless we can by no means infer that all the tertiary deposits
of the London and Hampshire basins once extended like the chalk over the
entire valley of the Weald, because the denudation of the chalk and
greensand may have been going on in the centre of that area, while
contiguous parts of the sea were sufficiently deep to receive and retain
the matter derived from that waste. Thus while the waves and currents were
excavating the longitudinal valleys D and C (fig. 264.), the deposits _a_
may have been thrown down to the bottom of the contiguous deep water E, the
sediment being drifted through transverse fissures, as before explained. In
this case, the rise of the formations Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, may have been
going on contemporaneously with the excavation of the valleys C and D, and
with the accumulation of the tertiary strata _a_.

[Illustration: Fig. 264. Cross section.]

This idea receives some countenance from the fact of the tertiary strata,
near their junction with the chalk of the London and Hampshire basins,
often consisting of dense beds of sand and shingle, as at Blackheath and in
the Addington Hills near Croydon. They also contain occasionally freshwater
shells and the remains of land animals and plants, which indicate the
former presence of land at no great distance, some part of which may have
occupied the centre of the Weald.

Such masses of well-rolled pebbles occurring in the lowest Eocene
strata, or those called "the plastic clay and sands" before described
(No. 3. _b_, Tab. p. 197.), imply the neighbourhood of an ancient shore.
They also indicate the destruction of pre-existing chalk with flints. At
the same time fossil shells of the genera _Melania_, _Cyclas_, and
_Unio_, appearing here and there in beds of the same age, together with
plants and the bones of land animals, bear testimony to contiguous land,
which probably constituted islands scattered over the space now occupied
by the tertiary basins of the Seine and Thames. The stage of denudation
represented in fig. 259., p. 249., may explain the state of things
prevailing at points where such islands existed. By the alternate rising
and sinking of the white chalk and older beds, a large area may have
become overspread with gravelly sandy, and clayey beds of fluvio-marine
and shallow-water origin, before any of the London clay proper (or
Calcaire grossier in France) were superimposed. This may account for the
fact that patches of "plastic clay and sand" (No. 3. _b_, Tab. p. 197.),
are scattered over the surface of the chalk, reaching in some places to
great heights, and approaching even the edges of the escarpments. We
must suppose that subsequently a gradual subsidence took place in
certain areas, which allowed the London clay proper to accumulate over
the Lower Eocene sands and clays, in a deep sea. During this sinking
down (the vertical amount of which equalled 800, and in parts of the
Isle of Wight, according to Mr. Prestwich, 1800 feet), the work of
denudation would be unceasing, being always however confined to those
areas where land or islands existed. At length, when the Bagshot sand
had been in its turn thrown down on the London clay, the space covered
by these two formations was again upraised from the sea to about the
height which it has since retained. During this upheaval, the waves
would again exert their power, not only on the white chalk and lower
cretaceous and Wealden strata, but also on the Eocene formations of
the London basin, excavating valleys and undermining cliffs as the
strata emerged from the deep.

There are grounds, as before stated (p. 205.), for presuming that the
tertiary area of London was converted into land before that of
Hampshire, and for this reason it contains no marine Eocene deposits so
modern as those of Barton Cliff, or the still newer freshwater and
fluvio-marine beds of Hordwell and the Isle of Wight. These last seem
unequivocally to demonstrate the local inequality of the upheaving and
depressing movements of the period alluded to; for we find, in spite of
the evidence afforded in Alum and White Cliff Bays, of continued
depression to the extent of 1800 or 2000 feet, that at the close of the
Eocene period a dense formation of freshwater strata was produced. The
fossils of these strata bear testimony to rivers draining adjacent
lands, and the existence of numerous quadrupeds on those lands.
Instead of such phenomena, the signs of an open sea might naturally
have been expected as the consequence of so much subsidence, had
not the depression been accompanied or followed by upheaval in a
region immediately adjoining.

When we attempt to speculate on the geographical changes which took place
in the earlier part of the Eocene epoch, and to restore in imagination the
former state of the physical geography of the south-east of England, we
shall do well to bear in mind that wherever there are proofs of great
denudation, there also the greatest area of land has probably existed. In
the same space, moreover, the oscillations of level, and the alternate
submergence and emergence of coasts, may be presumed to have been most
frequent; for these fluctuations facilitate the wasting and removing power
of waves, currents, and rivers.

We should also remember that there is always a tendency in the last
denuding operations, to efface all signs of preceding denudation, or at
least all those marks of waste from which alone a geologist can ascertain
the date of the removal of the missing strata within the denuded area. It
may often be difficult to settle the chronology even of the last of a
series of such acts of removal, but it must be, in the nature of things,
almost always impossible to assign a date to each of the antecedent
denudations. If we wish to determine the times of the destruction of rocks,
we must look any where rather than to the spaces once occupied by the
missing rocks. We must inquire to what regions the ruins of the white
chalk, greensand, Wealden, and other strata which have disappeared were
transported. We are then led at once to the examination of all the deposits
newer than the chalk, and first to the oldest of these, the Lower Eocene,
and its sand, shingle, and clay. In them, so largely developed in the
immediate neighbourhood of the denuded area, we discover the wreck we are
in search of, regularly stratified, and inclosing, in some of its layers,
organic remains of a littoral, and sometimes fluviatile character. What
more can we desire? The shores must have consisted of chalk, greensand, and
Wealden, since these were the only superficial rocks in the south-east of
England, at the commencement of the Eocene epoch. The waves of the sea,
therefore, and the rivers were grinding down chalk-flints and chert from
the greensand into shingle and sand, or were washing away calcareous and
argillaceous matter from the cretaceous and Wealden beds, during the whole
of the Eocene period. Thus we obtain the date of a great part at least of
that enormous amount of denudation of which we have such striking monuments
in the space intervening between the North and South Downs.

[Illustration: Fig. 265. Cross section.

   A.  Chalk with layers of flint dipping slightly to the south.
  _b._ Ancient beach, consisting of fine sand, from one to four feet thick,
       covered by shingle from five to eight feet thick of pebbles of
       chalk-flint, granite, and other rocks, with broken shells of recent
       marine species, and bones of cetacea.
  _c._ Elephant bed, about fifty feet thick, consisting of layers of white
       chalk rubble, with broken chalk-flints, in which deposit are found
       bones of ox, deer, horse, and mammoth.
  _d._ Sand and shingle of modern beach.]

There have been some movements of land on a smaller scale since the Eocene
period in the south-east of England. One of the latest of these happened in
the Pleistocene, or even perhaps as late as the Post-Pliocene period. The
formation called by Dr. Mantell the Elephant Bed, at the foot of the chalk
cliffs at Brighton, is not merely a talus of calcareous rubble collected at
the base of an inland cliff, but exhibits every appearance of having been
spread out in successive horizontal layers by water in motion.

The deposit alluded to skirts the shores between Brighton and Rottingdean,
and another mass apparently of the same age occurs at Dover. The phenomena
appear to me to suggest the following conclusions:--First, the
south-eastern part of England had acquired its actual configuration when
the ancient chalk cliff A _a_ was formed, the beach of sand and shingle _b_
having then been thrown up at the base of the cliff. Afterwards the whole
coast, or at least that part of it where the elephant bed now extends,
subsided to the depth of 50 or 60 feet; and during the period of
submergence successive layers of white calcareous rubble _c_ were
accumulated, so as to cover the ancient beach _b_. Subsequently, the coast
was again raised, so that the ancient shore was elevated to a level
somewhat higher than its original position.[257-A]


FOOTNOTES:

[241-A] An account of these cliffs was read by the author to the British
Assoc. at Glasgow, Sept. 1840.

[241-B] Seine-Inferieure, p. 142. and pl. 6. fig. 1.

[243-A] Botley Hill, near Godstone, in Surrey, was found by
trigonometrical measurement to be 880 feet above the level of the sea;
and Wrotham Hill, near Maidstone, which appears to be next in height of
the North Downs, 795 feet.

[243-B] My friend Dr. Mantell has kindly drawn up this scale at my request.

[244-A] Fitton, Geol. of Hastings, p. 55.

[244-B] Conybeare, Outlines of Geol., p. 81.

[245-A] Ibid., p. 145.

[245-B] Geol. of Western Sussex, p. 61.

[247-A] See illustrations of this theory by Dr. Fitton, Geol.
Sketch of Hastings.

[248-A] Sir E. Murchison, Geol. Sketch of Sussex, &c., Geol. Trans., Second
Series, vol. ii. p. 98.

[248-B] See fig. 94. p. 76.

[251-A] Geol. Soc. Proceed. No. 74. p. 363. 1841, and G. S. Trans.
2 Ser. v. 7.

[251-B] For farther information, see Mantell's Geol. of S. E.
of England, p. 352.

[252-A] Soulèvemens Jurassiques. Paris, 1832.

[253-A] See above, p. 82.

[257-A] See Mantell's Geol. of S. E. of England, p. 32. After
re-examining the elephant bed in 1834, I was no longer in doubt of its
having been a regular subaqueous deposit. In 1828, Dr. Mantell
discovered in the shingle below the chalk-rubble the jawbone of a whale
12 feet long, which must have belonged to an individual from 60 to 70
feet in length, Medals of Creation, p. 825.



CHAPTER XX.

OOLITE AND LIAS.

   Subdivisions of the Oolitic or Jurassic group--Physical geography of
   the Oolite in England and France--Upper Oolite--Portland stone and
   fossils--Lithographic stone of Solenhofen--Middle Oolite, coral
   rag--Zoophytes--Nerinæan limestone--Diceras limestone--Oxford clay,
   Ammonites and Belemnites--Lower Oolite, Crinoideans--Great Oolite and
   Bradford clay--Stonesfield slate--Fossil mammalia, placental and
   marsupial--Resemblance to an Australian fauna--Doctrine of progressive
   development--Collyweston slates--Yorkshire Oolitic coal-field--Brora
   coal--Inferior Oolite and fossils.


_OOLITIC OR JURASSIC GROUP._--Below the freshwater group called the
Wealden, or, where this is wanting, immediately beneath the Cretaceous
formation, a great series of marine strata, commonly called "the Oolite,"
occurs in England and many other parts of Europe. This group has been so
named, because, in the countries where it was first examined, the
limestones belonging to it had an oolitic structure (see p. 12.). These
rocks occupy in England a zone which is nearly 30 miles in average breadth,
and extends across the island, from Yorkshire in the north-east, to
Dorsetshire in the south-west. Their mineral characters are not uniform
throughout this region; but the following are the names of the principal
subdivisions observed in the central and south-eastern parts of England:--

                 OOLITE.

  Upper  { _a._ Portland stone and sand.
         { _b._ Kimmeridge clay.

  Middle { _c._ Coral rag.
         { _d._ Oxford clay.

  Lower  { _e._ Cornbrash and Forest marble.
         { _f._ Great Oolite and Stonesfield slate.
         { _g._ Fuller's earth.
         { _h._ Inferior Oolite.

     The Lias then succeeds to the Inferior Oolite.

The Upper oolitic system of the above table has usually the Kimmeridge
clay for its base; the Middle oolitic system, the Oxford clay. The Lower
system reposes on the Lias, an argillo-calcareous formation, which some
include in the Lower Oolite, but which will be treated of separately in
the next chapter. Many of these subdivisions are distinguished by
peculiar organic remains; and though varying in thickness, may be traced
in certain directions for great distances, especially if we compare the
part of England to which the above-mentioned type refers with the
north-east of France, and the Jura mountains adjoining. In that country,
distant above 400 geographical miles, the analogy to the English type,
notwithstanding the thinness, or occasional absence of the clays, is
more perfect than in Yorkshire or Normandy.

_Physical geography._--The alternation, on a grand scale, of distinct
formations of clay and limestone, has caused the oolitic and liassic series
to give rise to some marked features in the physical outline of parts of
England and France. Wide valleys can usually be traced throughout the long
bounds of country where the argillaceous strata crop out; and between these
valleys the limestones are observed, composing ranges of hills, or more
elevated grounds. These ranges terminate abruptly on the side on which the
several clays rise up from beneath the calcareous strata.

[Illustration: Fig. 266. Cross section.]

The annexed diagram will give the reader an idea of the configuration of
the surface now alluded to, such as may be seen in passing from London to
Cheltenham, or in other parallel lines, from east to west, in the southern
part of England. It has been necessary, however, in this drawing, greatly
to exaggerate the inclination of the beds, and the height of the several
formations, as compared to their horizontal extent. It will be remarked,
that the lines of cliff, or escarpment, face towards the west in the great
calcareous eminences formed by the Chalk and the Upper, Middle, and Lower
Oolites; and at the base of which we have respectively the Gault,
Kimmeridge clay, Oxford clay, and Lias. This last forms, generally, a broad
vale at the foot of the escarpment of inferior oolite, but where it
acquires considerable thickness, and contains solid beds of marlstone, it
occupies the lower part of the escarpment.

The external outline of the country which the geologist observes in
travelling eastward from Paris to Metz is precisely analogous, and is
caused by a similar succession of rocks intervening between the tertiary
strata and the Lias; with this difference, however, that the escarpments
of Chalk, Upper, Middle, and Lower Oolites, face towards the east
instead of the west.

The Chalk crops out from beneath the tertiary sands and clays of the Paris
basin, near Epernay, and the Gault from beneath the Chalk and Upper
Greensand at Clermont-en-Argonne; and passing from this place by Verdun and
Etain to Metz, we find two limestone ranges, with intervening vales of
clay, precisely resembling those of southern and central England, until we
reach the great plain of Lias at the base of the Inferior Oolite at Metz.

It is evident, therefore, that the denuding causes have acted similarly
over an area several hundred miles in diameter, sweeping away the softer
clays more extensively than the limestones, and undermining these last so
as to cause them to form steep cliffs wherever the harder calcareous rock
was based upon a more yielding and destructible clay. This denudation
probably occurred while the land was slowly rising out of the sea.[259-A]


_Upper Oolite._

The Portland stone has already been mentioned as forming in Dorsetshire
the foundation on which the freshwater limestone of the Lower Purbeck
reposes (see p. 232.). It supplies the well-known building stone of
which St. Paul's and so many of the principal edifices of London are
constructed. This upper member, characterized by peculiar marine
fossils, rests on a dense bed of sand, called the Portland sand, below
which is the Kimmeridge clay. In England these Upper Oolite formations
are almost wholly confined to the southern counties. Corals are rare in
them, although one species is found plentifully at Tisbury, in
Wiltshire, in the Portland sand converted into flint and chert, the
original calcareous matter being replaced by silex (fig. 267.).

[Illustration: Fig. 267. _Columnaria oblonga_, Blainv.

As seen on a polished slab of chert from the sand of the
Upper Oolite, Tisbury.]

Among the characteristic fossils of the Upper Oolite, may be mentioned
the _Ostrea deltoidea_ (fig. 269.), found in the Kimmeridge clay
throughout England and the north of France, and also in Scotland, near
Brora. The _Gryphæa virgula_ (fig. 268.), also met with in the same clay
near Oxford, is so abundant in the Upper Oolite of parts of France as to
have caused the deposit to be termed "marnes à gryphées virgules." Near
Clermont, in Argonne, a few leagues from St. Menehould, where these
indurated marls crop out from beneath the gault, I have seen them, on
decomposing, leave the surface of every ploughed field literally strewed
over with this fossil oyster.

[2 Illustrations: Upper Oolite: Kimmeridge clay. 1/4 nat. size.

Fig. 268. _Gryphæa virgula._

Fig. 269. _Ostrea deltoidea._]

[Illustration: Fig. 270. _Trigonia gibbosa._ 1/2 nat. size. _a._ the hinge.

Portland Oolite, Tisbury.]

The Kimmeridge clay consists, in great part, of a bituminous shale,
sometimes forming an impure coal several hundred feet in thickness. In
some places in Wiltshire it much resembles peat; and the bituminous
matter may have been, in part at least, derived from the decomposition
of vegetables. But as impressions of plants are rare in these shales,
which contain ammonites, oysters, and other marine shells, the bitumen
may perhaps be of animal origin.

The celebrated lithographic stone of Solenhofen, in Bavaria, belongs to one
of the upper divisions of the oolite, and affords a remarkable example of
the variety of fossils which may be preserved under favourable
circumstances, and what delicate impressions of the tender parts of certain
animals and plants may be retained where the sediment is of extreme
fineness. Although the number of testacea in this slate is small, and the
plants few, and those all marine, Count Munster had determined no less than
237 species of fossils when I saw his collection in 1833; and among them no
less than seven _species_ of flying lizards, or pterodactyls, six saurians,
three tortoises, sixty species of fish, forty-six of crustacea, and
twenty-six of insects. These insects, among which is a libellula, or
dragon-fly, must have been blown out to sea, probably from the same land to
which the flying lizards, and other contemporaneous reptiles, resorted.


_Middle Oolite._

_Coral Rag._--One of the limestones of the Middle Oolite has been called
the "Coral Rag," because it consists, in part, of continuous beds of
petrified corals, for the most part retaining the position in which they
grew at the bottom of the sea. They belong chiefly to the genera
_Caryophyllia_ (fig. 271.), _Agaricia_, and _Astrea_, and sometimes form
masses of coral 15 feet thick. In the annexed figure of an _Astrea_, from
this formation, it will be seen that the cup-shaped cavities are deepest on
the right-hand side, and that they grow more and more shallow, till those
on the left side are nearly filled up. The last-named stars are supposed to
be Polyparia of advanced age. These coralline strata extend through the
calcareous hills of the N.W. of Berkshire, and north of Wilts, and again
recur in Yorkshire, near Scarborough.

[Illustration: Fig. 271. _Caryophyllia annularis_, Parkin. Coral
rag, Steeple Ashton.]

[Illustration: Fig 272. _Astrea._ Coral rag.]

One of the limestones of the Jura, referred to the age of the English
coral rag, has been called "Nerinæan limestone" (Calcaire à Nérinées) by
M. Thirria; _Nerinæa_ being an extinct genus of univalve shells, much
resembling the _Cerithium_ in external form. The annexed section (fig.
273.) shows the curious form of the hollow part of each whorl, and also
the perforation which passes up the middle of the columella. _N.
Goodhallii_ (fig. 274.) is another English species of the same genus,
from a formation which seems to form a passage from the Kimmeridge clay
to the coral rag.[261-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 273. _Nerinæa hieroglyphica._ Coral rag.]

[Illustration: Fig. 274. _Nerinæa Goodhallii_, Fitton. Coral rag,
Weymouth. 1/4 nat. size.]

A division of the oolite in the Alps, regarded by most geologists as coeval
with the English coral rag, has been often named "Calcaire à Dicerates," or
"Diceras limestone," from its containing abundantly a bivalve shell (see
fig. 275.) of a genus allied to the _Chama_.

[Illustration: Fig. 275. Cast of _Diceras arietina_. Coral rag, France.]

[Illustration: Fig. 276. _Cidaris coronata._ Coral rag.]

_Oxford Clay._--The coralline limestone, or "coral rag," above described,
and the accompanying sandy beds, called "calcareous grits" of the Middle
Oolite, rests on a thick bed of clay, called the Oxford clay, sometimes not
less than 500 feet thick. In this there are no corals, but great abundance
of cephalopoda of the genera Ammonite and Belemnite. (See fig. 277.) In
some of the clay of very fine texture ammonites are very perfect, although
somewhat compressed, and are seen to be furnished on each side of the
aperture with a single horn-like projection (see fig. 278.). These were
discovered in the cuttings of the Great Western Railway, near Chippenham,
in 1841, and have been described by Mr. Pratt.[262-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 277. _Belemnites hastatus._ Oxford Clay.]

[Illustration: Fig. 278. _Ammonites Jason_, Reinecke. Syn. _A. Elizabethæ_,
Pratt. Oxford clay, Christian Malford, Wiltshire.]

[Illustration: Fig. 279. _Belemnites Puzosianus_, D'Orb. Oxford
Clay, Christian Malford.

  _a, a._ projecting processes of the shell or phragmocone.
  _b, c._ broken exterior of a conical shell called the phragmocone, which
          is chambered within, or composed of a series of shallow concave
          cells pierced by a siphuncle.
  _c, d._ The guard or osselet, which is commonly called the belemnite.]

Similar elongated processes have been also observed to extend from the
shells of some belemnites discovered by Dr. Mantell in the same clay
(see fig. 279.), who, by the aid of this and other specimens, has been
able to throw much light on the structure of this singular extinct
form of cuttle-fish.[263-A]


_Lower Oolite._

The upper division of this series, which is more extensive than the
preceding or Middle Oolite, is called in England the Cornbrash. It
consists of clays and calcareous sandstones, which pass downwards into
the Forest marble, an argillaceous limestone, abounding in marine
fossils. In some places, as at Bradford, this limestone is replaced by a
mass of clay. The sandstones of the Forest Marble of Wiltshire are often
ripple-marked and filled with fragments of broken shells and pieces of
drift-wood, having evidently been formed on a coast. Rippled slabs of
fissile oolite are used for roofing, and have been traced over a broad
band of country from Bradford, in Wilts, to Tetbury, in Gloucestershire.
These calcareous tile-stones are separated from each other by thin seams
of clay, which have been deposited upon them, and have taken their form,
preserving the undulating ridges and furrows of the sand in such
complete integrity, that the impressions of small footsteps, apparently
of crabs, which walked over the soft wet sands, are still visible. In
the same stone the claws of crabs, fragments of echini, and other signs
of a neighbouring beach are observed.[263-B]

_Great Oolite._--Although the name of coral-rag has been appropriated,
as we have seen, to a member of the Upper Oolite before described,
some portions of the Lower Oolite are equally intitled in many places
to be called coralline limestones. Thus the Great Oolite near Bath
contains various corals, among which the _Eunomia radiata_ (fig. 280.)
is very conspicuous, single individuals forming masses several feet
in diameter; and having probably required, like the large existing
brain-coral (_Meandrina_) of the tropics, many centuries before
their growth was completed.

[Illustration: Fig. 280. _Eunomia radiata_, Lamouroux.

  _a._ section transverse to the tubes.
  _b._ vertical section, showing the radiation of the tubes.
  _c._ portion of interior of tubes magnified, showing striated surface.]

[Illustration: Fig. 281. _Apiocrinites rotundus_, or Pear Encrinite;
Miller. Fossil at Bradford, Wilts.

  _a._ Stem of _Apiocrinites_, and one of the articulations, natural size.
  _b._ Section at Bradford of great oolite and overlying clay, containing
       the fossil encrinites. See text.
  _c._ Three perfect individuals of Apiocrinites, represented as they grew
       on the surface of the Great Oolite.
  _d._ Body of the _Apiocrinites rotundus_.]

Different species of _Crinoideans_, or stone-lilies, are also common in the
same rocks with corals; and, like them, must have enjoyed a firm bottom,
where their root, or base of attachment, remained undisturbed for years
(_c_, fig. 281.). Such fossils, therefore, are almost confined to the
limestones; but an exception occurs at Bradford, near Bath, where they are
enveloped in clay. In this case, however, it appears that the solid upper
surface of the "Great Oolite" had supported, for a time, a thick submarine
forest of these beautiful zoophytes, until the clear and still water was
invaded by a current charged with mud, which threw down the stone-lilies,
and broke most of their stems short off near the point of attachment. The
stumps still remain in their original position; but the numerous
articulations once composing the stem, arms, and body of the zoophyte, were
scattered at random through the argillaceous deposit in which some now lie
prostrate. These appearances are represented in the section _b_, fig. 281.,
where the darker strata represent the Bradford clay, which some geologists
class with the Forest marble, others with the Great Oolite. The upper
surface of the calcareous stone below is completely incrusted over with a
continuous pavement, formed by the stony roots or attachments of the
Crinoidea; and besides this evidence of the length of time they had lived
on the spot, we find great numbers of single joints, or circular plates of
the stem and body of the encrinite, covered over with _serpulæ_. Now these
_serpulæ_ could only have begun to grow after the death of some of the
stone-lilies, parts of whose skeletons had been strewed over the floor of
the ocean before the irruption of argillaceous mud. In some instances we
find that, after the parasitic _serpulæ_ were full grown, they had become
incrusted over with a coral, called _Berenicea diluviana_; and many
generations of these polyps had succeeded each other in the pure water
before they became fossil.

[Illustration: Fig. 282.

  _a._ Single plate or articulation of an Encrinite overgrown with
       _serpulæ_ and corals. Natural size Bradford clay.
  _b._ Portion of the same magnified, showing the coral _Berenicea_
       _diluviana_ covering one of the _serpulæ_.]

We may, therefore, perceive distinctly that, as the pines and cycadeous
plants of the ancient "dirt bed," or fossil forest, of the Lower Purbeck
were killed by submergence under fresh water, and soon buried beneath
muddy sediment, so an invasion of argillaceous matter put a sudden stop
to the growth of the Bradford Encrinites, and led to their preservation
in marine strata.[265-A]

Such differences in the fossils as distinguish the calcareous and
argillaceous deposits from each other, would be described by naturalists
as arising out of a difference in the _stations_ of species; but besides
these, there are variations in the fossils of the higher, middle, and
lower part of the oolitic series, which must be ascribed to that great
law of change in organic life by which distinct assemblages of species
have been adapted, at successive geological periods, to the varying
conditions of the habitable surface. In a single district it is
difficult to decide how far the limitation of species to certain minor
formations has been due to the local influence of _stations_, or how
far it has been caused by time or the creative and destroying law above
alluded to. But we recognize the reality of the last-mentioned
influence, when we contrast the whole oolitic series of England with
that of parts of the Jura, Alps, and other distant regions, where there
is scarcely any lithological resemblance; and yet some of the same
fossils remain peculiar in each country to the Upper, Middle, and Lower
Oolite formations respectively. Mr. Thurmann has shown how remarkably
this fact holds true in the Bernese Jura, although the argillaceous
divisions, so conspicuous in England, are feebly represented there,
and some entirely wanting.

[Illustration: Fig. 283. _Terebratula digona._ Bradford clay. Nat. size.]

The Bradford clay above alluded to is sometimes 60 feet thick, but, in many
places, it is wanting; and, in others, where there are no limestones, it
cannot easily be separated from the clays of the overlying "forest marble"
and underlying "fuller's earth."

The calcareous portion of the Great Oolite consists of several shelly
limestones, one of which, called the Bath Oolite, is much celebrated as
a building stone. In parts of Gloucestershire, especially near
Minchinhampton, the Great Oolite, says Mr. Lycett, "must have been
deposited in a shallow sea, where strong currents prevailed, for there
are frequent changes in the mineral character of the deposit, and some
beds exhibit false stratification. In others, heaps of broken shells are
mingled with pebbles of rocks foreign to the neighbourhood, and with
fragments of abraded madrepores, dicotyledonous wood, and crabs' claws.
The shelly strata, also, have occasionally suffered denudation, and the
removed portions have been replaced by clay."[266-A] In such
shallow-water beds cephalopoda are rare, and, instead of ammonites and
belemnites, numerous genera of carnivorous trachelipods appear. Out of
one hundred and forty-two species of univalves obtained from the
Minchinhampton beds, Mr. Lycett found no less than forty-one to be
carnivorous. They belong principally to the genera _Buccinum_,
_Pleurotoma_, _Rostellaria_, _Murex_, and _Fusus_, and exhibit a
proportion of zoophagous species not very different from that which
obtains in warm seas of the recent period. These conchological results
are curious and unexpected, since it was imagined that we might look
in vain for the carnivorous trachelipods in rocks of such high
antiquity as the Great Oolite, and it was a received doctrine that
they did not begin to appear in considerable numbers till the Eocene
period when those two great families of cephalopoda, the ammonites
and belemnites, had become extinct.

_Stonesfield slate._--The slate of Stonesfield has been shown by Mr.
Lonsdale to lie at the base of the Great Oolite.[266-B] It is a slightly
oolitic shelly limestone, forming large spheroidal masses imbedded in
sand, only 6 feet thick, but very rich in organic remains. It contains some
pebbles of a rock very similar to itself, and which may be portions of the
deposit, broken up on a shore at low water or during storms, and
redeposited. The remains of belemnites, trigoniæ, and other marine shells,
with fragments of wood, are common, and impressions of ferns, cycadeæ, and
other plants. Several insects, also, and, among the rest, the wing-covers
of beetles, are perfectly preserved (see fig. 284.), some of them
approaching nearly to the genus _Buprestis_.[267-A] The remains, also, of
many genera of reptiles, such as _Plesiosaur_, _Crocodile_, and
_Pterodactyl_, have been discovered in the same limestone.

[Illustration: Fig. 284. Elytron of _Buprestis_? Stonesfield.]

[Illustration: Fig. 285. Bone of a reptile, formerly supposed to be the
ulna of a Cetacean; from the Great Oolite of Enstone, near Woodstock.]

But the remarkable fossils for which the Stonesfield slate is most
celebrated, are those referred to the mammiferous class. The student should
be reminded that in all the rocks described in the preceding chapters as
older than the Eocene, no bones of any land quadruped, or of any cetacean,
have been discovered. Yet we have seen that terrestrial plants were not
rare in the lower cretaceous formation, and that in the Wealden there was
evidence of freshwater sediment on a large scale, containing various
plants, and even ancient vegetable soils with the roots and erect stumps of
trees. We had also in the same Wealden many land-reptiles and
winged-insects, which renders the absence of terrestrial quadrupeds the
more striking. The want, however, of any bones of whales, seals, dolphins,
and other aquatic mammalia, whether in the chalk or in the upper or middle
oolite, is certainly still more remarkable. Formerly, indeed, a bone from
the great oolite of Enstone, near Woodstock, in Oxfordshire, was cited, on
the authority of Cuvier, as referable to this class. Dr. Buckland, who
stated this in his Bridgewater Treatise[267-B], had the kindness to send me
the supposed ulna of a whale, that Mr. Owen might examine into its claims
to be considered as cetaceous. It is the opinion of that eminent
comparative anatomist that it cannot have belonged to the cetacea, because
the fore-arm in these marine mammalia is invariably much flatter, and
devoid of all muscular depressions and ridges, one of which is so prominent
in the middle of this bone, represented in the above cut (fig. 285.). In
saurians, on the contrary, such ridges exist for the attachment of muscles;
and to some animal of that class the bone is probably referable.

[Illustration: Fig. 286. _Amphitherium Prevostii_. Stonesfield
Slate. Natural size.

  _a_. coronoid process.
  _b_. condyle.
  _c_. angle of jaw.
  _d_. double-fanged molars.]

These observations are made to prepare the reader to appreciate more justly
the interest felt by every geologist in the discovery in the Stonesfield
slate of no less than seven specimens of lower jaws of mammiferous
quadrupeds, belonging to three different species and to two distinct
genera, for which the names of _Amphitherium_ and _Phascolotherium_ have
been adopted. When Cuvier was first shown one of these fossils in 1818, he
pronounced it to belong to a small ferine mammal, with a jaw much
resembling that of an opossum, but differing from all known ferine genera,
in the great number of the molar teeth, of which it had at least ten in a
row. Since that period, a much more perfect specimen of the same fossil,
obtained by Dr. Buckland (see fig. 286.), has been examined by Mr. Owen,
who finds that the jaw contained on the whole twelve molar teeth, with the
socket of a small canine, and three small incisors, which are _in situ_,
altogether amounting to sixteen teeth on each side of the lower jaw.

[Illustration: Fig. 287. _Amphitherium Broderipii_. Natural size.
Stonesfield Slate.]

The only question which could be raised respecting the nature of these
fossils was, whether they belonged to a mammifer, a reptile, or a fish. Now
on this head the osteologist observes that each of the seven half jaws is
composed of but one single piece, and not of two or more separate bones, as
in fishes and most reptiles, or of two bones, united by a suture, as in
some few species belonging to those classes. The condyle, moreover (_b_,
fig. 286.), or articular surface, by which the lower jaw unites with the
upper, is convex in the Stonesfield specimens, and not concave as in fishes
and reptiles. The coronoid process (_a_, fig. 286.) is well developed,
whereas it is wanting or very small, in the inferior classes of vertebrata.
Lastly, the molar teeth in the _Amphitherium_ and _Phascolotherium_ have
complicated crowns, and two roots (see _d_, fig. 286.), instead of being
simple and with single fangs.[269-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 288. _Tupaia Tana._ Right ramus of lower jaw, natural
size. A recent insectivorous mammal from Sumatra.]

[2 Illustrations: Part of lower jaw of _Tupaia Tana_; twice natural size.

Fig. 289. End view seen from behind, showing the very slight inflection of
the angle at _c_.

Fig. 290. Side view of same.]

[2 Illustrations: Part of lower jaw of _Didelphis Azaræ_; recent,
Brazil. Natural size.

Fig. 291. End view seen from behind, showing the inflection of the angle of
the jaw, _c. d._

Fig. 292. Side view of same.]

The only question, therefore, which could fairly admit of controversy
was limited to this point, whether the fossil mammalia found in the
lower oolite of Oxfordshire ought to be referred to the marsupial
quadrupeds, or to the ordinary placental series. Cuvier had long ago
pointed out a peculiarity in the form of the angular process (_c_, figs.
291. and 292.) of the lower jaw, as a character of the genus
_Didelphys_; and Mr. Owen has since established its generality in the
entire marsupial series. In all these pouched quadrupeds, this process
is turned inwards, as at _c d_, fig. 291. in the Brazilian opossum,
whereas in the placental series, as at _c_, figs. 290. and 289. there is
an almost entire absence of such inflection. The _Tupaia Tana_ of
Sumatra has been selected by my friend Mr. Waterhouse, for this
illustration, because that small insectivorous quadruped bears a great
resemblance to those of the Stonesfield _Amphitherium_. By clearing away
the matrix from the specimen of _Amphitherium Prevostii_ above
represented (fig. 286.), Mr. Owen ascertained that the angular process
(_c_) bent inwards in a slighter degree than in any of the known
marsupialia; in short, the inflection does not exceed that of the mole
or hedgehog. This fact turns the scale in favour of its affinities to
the placental insectivora. Nevertheless, the _Amphitherium_ offers some
points of approximation in its osteology to the marsupials, especially
to the _Myrmecobius_, a small insectivorous quadruped of Australia,
which has nine molars on each side of the lower jaw, besides a canine
and three incisors.[269-B]

Another species of _Amphitherium_ has been found at Stonesfield (fig.
287. p. 268.), which differs from the former (fig. 286.) principally
in being larger.

[Illustration: Fig. 293. _Phascolotherium Bucklandi_, Owen.

  _a._ natural size.
  _b._ molar of same magnified.]

The second mammiferous genus discovered in the same slates was named
originally by Mr. Broderip _Didelphys Bucklandi_ (see fig. 293.), and
has since been called _Phascolotherium_ by Owen. It manifests a much
stronger likeness to the marsupials in the general form of the jaw, and
in the extent and position of its inflected angle, while the agreement
with the living genus _Didelphys_ in the number of the premolar and
molar teeth, is complete.[270-A]

On reviewing, therefore, the whole of the osteological evidence, it will be
seen that we have every reason to presume that the _Amphitherium_ and
_Phascolotherium_ of Stonesfield represent both the placental and marsupial
classes of mammalia; and if so, they warn us in a most emphatic manner, not
to found rash generalizations respecting the non-existence of certain
classes of animals at particular periods of the past, on mere negative
evidence. The singular accident of our having as yet found nothing but the
lower jaws of seven individuals, and no other bones of their skeletons, is
alone sufficient to demonstrate the fragmentary manner in which the
memorials of an ancient terrestrial fauna are handed down to us. We can
scarcely avoid suspecting that the two genera above described, may have
borne a like insignificant proportion to the entire assemblage of
warm-blooded quadrupeds which flourished in the islands of the oolitic sea.

Mr. Owen has remarked that as the marsupial genera, to which the
_Phascolotherium_ is most nearly allied, are now confined to New South
Wales and Van Diemen's Land, so also is it in the Australian seas, that we
find the _Cestracion_, a cartilaginous fish which has a bony palate, allied
to those called _Acrodus_ and _Psammodus_ (see figs. 307, 308. p. 275.), so
common in the oolite and lias. In the same Australian seas, also, near the
shore, we find the living _Trigonia_, a genus of mollusca so frequently met
with in the Stonesfield slate. So, also, the Araucarian pines are now
abundant, together with ferns, in Australia and its islands, as they were
in Europe in the oolitic period. Many botanists incline to the opinion,
that the _Thuja_, _Pine_, _Cycas_, _Zamia_, in short, all the gymnogens,
belong to a less highly developed type of flowering plants than do the
exogens; but even if this be admitted, no naturalist can ascribe a low
standard of organization to the oolitic flora, since we meet with endogens
of the most perfect structure in oolitic rocks, both above and below the
Stonesfield slate, as, for example, the _Podocarya_ of Buckland, a fruit
allied to the _Pandanus_, found in the Inferior Oolite (see fig. 294.), and
the _Carpolithes conica_ of the Coral rag. The doctrine, therefore, of a
regular series of progressive development at successive eras in the animal
and vegetable kingdoms, from beings of a more simple to those of a more
complex organization, receives a check, if not a refutation, from the facts
revealed to us by the study of the Lower Oolites.

[Illustration: Fig. 294. Portion of a fossil fruit of _Podocarya_
magnified. (Buckland's Bridgew. Treat. Pl. 63.) Inferior Oolite,
Charmouth, Dorset.]

The Stonesfield slate, in its range from Oxfordshire to the north-east,
is represented by flaggy and fissile sandstones, as at Collyweston in
Northamptonshire, where, according to the researches of Messrs. Ibbetson
and Morris, it contains many shells, such as _Trigonia angulata_, also
found at Stonesfield. But the Northamptonshire strata of this age assume
a more marine character, or appear at least to have been formed farther
from land. They inclose, however, some fossil ferns, such as _Pecopteris
polypodioides_, of species common to the oolites of the Yorkshire
coast[271-A], where rocks of this age put on all the aspect of a true
coal-field; thin seams of coal having actually been worked in them
for more than a century.

[Illustration: Fig. 295. _Pterophyllum comptum._ (Syn. _Cycadites
comptus_.) Upper sandstone and shale, Gristhorpe, near Scarborough.]

In the north-west of Yorkshire, the formation alluded to consists of an
upper and a lower carbonaceous shale, abounding in impressions of
plants, divided by a limestone considered by many geologists as the
representative of the Great Oolite; but the scarcity of marine fossils
makes all comparisons with the subdivisions adopted in the south
extremely difficult. A rich harvest of fossil ferns has been obtained
from the upper carbonaceous shales and sandstones at Gristhorpe, near
Scarborough (see figs. 295, 296.). The lower shales are well exposed in
the sea-cliffs at Whitby, and are chiefly characterized by ferns and
cycadeæ. They contain, also, a species of calamite, and a fossil called
_Equisetum columnare_, which maintains an upright position in sandstone
strata over a wide area. Shells of the genus _Cypris_ and _Unio_,
collected by Mr. Bean from these Yorkshire coal-bearing beds, point to
the estuary or fluviatile origin of the deposit.

[Illustration: Fig. 296. _Hemitelites Brownii_, Goepp. Syn.
_Phlebopteris contigua_, Lind. & Hutt. Upper carbonaceous strata, Lower
Oolite, Gristhorpe, Yorkshire.]

At Brora, in Sutherlandshire, a coal formation, probably coeval with the
above, or belonging to some of the lower divisions of the Oolitic period,
has been mined extensively for a century or more. It affords the thickest
stratum of pure vegetable matter hitherto detected in any secondary rock in
England. One seam of coal of good quality has been worked 3-1/2 feet thick,
and there are several feet more of pyritous coal resting upon it.

_Inferior Oolite._--Between the Great and Inferior Oolite, near Bath, an
argillaceous deposit called "the fuller's earth," occurs, but is wanting in
the north of England. The Inferior Oolite is a calcareous freestone,
usually of small thickness, which sometimes rests upon, or is replaced by,
yellow sands, called the sands of the Inferior Oolite. These last, in their
turn, repose upon the lias in the south and west of England.

Among the characteristic shells of the Inferior Oolite, I may instance
_Terebratula spinosa_ (fig. 297.), and _Pholadomya fidicula_ (fig. 298.).
The extinct genus _Pleurotomaria_ is also a form very common in this
division as well as in the Oolitic system generally. It resembles the
_Trochus_ in form, but is marked by a singular cleft (_a_, fig. 299.) on
the right side of the mouth.

[Illustration: Fig. 297. _Terebratula spinosa._ Inferior Oolite.]

[Illustration: Fig. 298.

  _a._ _Pholadomya fidicula_, 1/3 nat. size. Inf. Ool.
  _b._ Heart-shaped anterior termination of the same.]

[Illustration: Fig. 299. _Pleurotomaria ornata._ Ferruginous Oolite,
Normandy. Inferior Oolite, England.]

As illustrations of shells having a great vertical range, I may allude to
_Trigonia clavellata_, found in the Upper and Inferior Oolite, and _T.
costata_, common to the Upper, Middle, and Lower Oolite; also _Ostrea
Marshii_ (fig. 300.), common to the Cornbrash of Wilts and the Inferior
Oolite of Yorkshire; and _Ammonites striatulus_ (fig. 301.) common to the
Inferior Oolite and Lias.

[Illustration: Fig. 300. _Ostrea Marshii._ 1/2 nat. size. Middle
and Lower Oolite.]

[Illustration: Fig. 301. _Ammonites striatulus_, Sow. 1/3 nat. size.
Inferior Oolite and Lias.]

Such facts by no means invalidate the general rule, that certain fossils
are good chronological tests of geological periods; but they serve to
caution us against attaching too much importance to single species, some
of which may have a wider, others a more confined vertical range. We
have before seen that, in the successive tertiary formations, there are
species common to older and newer groups, yet these groups are
distinguishable from one another by a comparison of the whole assemblage
of fossil shells proper to each.


FOOTNOTES:

[259-A] See Chapters VI. and XIX.

[261-A] Fitton, Geol. Trans., Second Series, vol. iv. pl. 23. fig. 12.

[262-A] S. P. Pratt, Annals of Nat. Hist., November, 1841.

[263-A] See Phil. Trans. 1850, p. 393.

[263-B] P. Scrope, Geol. Proceed., March, 1831.

[265-A] For a fuller account of these Encrinites, see Buckland's
Bridgewater Treatise, vol. i. p. 429.

[266-A] Lycett, Quart. Geol. Journ. vol. iv. p. 183.

[266-B] Proceedings Geol. Soc. vol. i. p. 414.

[267-A] See Buckland's Bridgewater Treatise; and Brodie's Fossil Insects,
where it is suggested that these elytra may belong to _Priomus_.

[267-B] Vol. i. p. 115.

[269-A] I have given a figure in the Principles of Geology, chap. ix., of
another Stonesfield specimen of _Amphitherium Prevostii_, in which the
sockets and roots of the teeth are finely exposed.

[269-B] A figure of this recent _Myrmecobius_ will be found in the
Principles, chap. ix.

[270-A] Owen's British Fossil Mammals, p. 62.

[271-A] Ibbetson and Morris, Report of Brit. Ass., 1847, p. 131.



CHAPTER XXI.

OOLITE AND LIAS--_continued_.

   Mineral character of Lias--Name of Gryphite limestone--Fossil shells
   and fish--Ichthyodorulites--Reptiles of the Lias--Ichthyosaur and
   Plesiosaur--Marine Reptile of the Galapagos Islands--Sudden
   destruction and burial of fossil animals in Lias--Fluvio-marine beds
   in Gloucestershire and insect limestone--Origin of the Oolite and
   Lias, and of alternating calcareous and argillaceous
   formations--Oolitic coal-field of Virginia, in the United States.


_LIAS._--The English provincial name of Lias has been very generally
adopted for a formation of argillaceous limestone, marl, and clay, which
forms the base of the Oolite, and is classed by many geologists as part of
that group. They pass, indeed, into each other in some places, as near
Bath, a sandy marl called the marlstone of the Lias being interposed, and
partaking of the mineral characters of the upper lias and inferior oolite.
These last-mentioned divisions have also some fossils in common, such as
the _Avicula inæquivalvis_ (fig. 302.). Nevertheless the Lias may be traced
throughout a great part of Europe as a separate and independent group, of
considerable thickness, varying from 500 to 1000 feet, containing many
peculiar fossils, and having a very uniform lithological aspect. Although
usually conformable to the oolite, it is sometimes, as in the Jura,
unconformable. In the environs of Lons-le-Saulnier, for instance, in the
department of Jura, the strata of lias are inclined at an angle of about
45°, while the incumbent oolitic marls are horizontal.

[Illustration: Fig. 302. _Avicula inæquivalvis_, Sow.]

The peculiar aspect which is most characteristic of the Lias in England,
France, and Germany, is an alternation of thin beds of blue or grey
limestone with a surface becoming light-brown when weathered, these beds
being separated by dark-coloured narrow argillaceous partings, so that
the quarries of this rock, at a distance, assume a striped and
riband-like appearance.[274-A]

Although the prevailing colour of the limestone of this formation is blue,
yet some beds of the lower lias are of a yellowish white colour, and have
been called white lias. In some parts of France, near the Vosges mountains,
and in Luxembourg, M. E. de Beaumont has shown that the lias containing
_Gryphæa arcuata_, _Plagiostoma giganteum_ (see fig. 303.), and other
characteristic fossils, becomes arenaceous; and around the Hartz, in
Westphalia and Bavaria, the inferior parts of the lias are sandy, and
sometimes afford a building stone.

[Illustration: Fig. 303. _Plagiostoma giganteum._ Lias.]

[Illustration: Fig. 304. _Gryphæa incurva_, Sow. (_G. arcuata_, Lam.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 305. _Nautilus truncatus._ Lias.]

The name of Gryphite limestone has sometimes been applied to the lias, in
consequence of the great number of shells which it contains of a species of
oyster, or _Gryphæa_ (fig. 304., see also fig. 30. p. 29.). Many
cephalopoda, also, such as _Ammonite_, _Belemnite_, and _Nautilus_ (fig.
305.), prove the marine origin of the formation.

[Illustration: Fig. 306. Scales of _Lepidotus gigas_, Agas.

_a._ two of the scales detached.]

The fossil fish resemble generically those of the oolite, belonging all,
according to M. Agassiz, to extinct genera, and differing remarkably from
the ichthyolites of the Cretaceous period. Among them is a species of
_Lepidotus_ (_L. gigas_, Agas.) (fig. 306.), which is found in the lias of
England, France, and Germany.[275-A] This genus was before mentioned (p.
229.) as occurring in the Wealden, and is supposed to have frequented both
rivers and coasts. The teeth of a species of _Acrodus_, also, are very
abundant in the lias (fig. 307.).

[Illustration: Fig. 307. _Acrodus nobilis_, Agas. (tooth); commonly called
fossil leach. Lias, Lyme Regis, and Germany.]

[Illustration: Fig. 308. _Hybodus reticulatus_, Agas. Lias, Lyme Regis.

  _a._ Part of fin, commonly called Ichthyodorulite.
  _b._ Tooth.]

But the remains of fish which have excited more attention than any others,
are those large bony spines called _ichthyodorulites_ (_a_, fig. 308.),
which were once supposed by some naturalists to be jaws, and by others
weapons, resembling those of the living _Balistes_ and _Silurus_; but which
M. Agassiz has shown to be neither the one nor the other. The spines, in
the genera last mentioned, articulate with the backbone, whereas there are
no signs of any such articulation in the ichthyodorulites. These last
appear to have been bony spines which formed the anterior part of the
dorsal fin, like that of the living genera _Cestracion_ and _Chimæra_ (see
_a_, fig. 309.). In both of these genera, the posterior concave face is
armed with small spines like that of the fossil _Hybodus_ (fig. 308.), one
of the shark family found fossil at Lyme Regis. Such spines are simply
imbedded in the flesh, and attached to strong muscles. "They serve," says
Dr. Buckland, "as in the _Chimæra_ (fig. 309.), to raise and depress the
fin, their action resembling that of a moveable mast, raising and lowering
backwards the sail of a barge."[276-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 309. _Chimæra monstrosa._[276-B]

_a._ Spine forming anterior part of the dorsal fin.]

_Reptiles of the Lias._--It is not, however, the fossil fish which form the
most striking feature in the organic remains of the Lias; but the reptiles,
which are extraordinary for their number, size, and structure. Among the
most singular of these are several species of _Ichthyosaurus_ and
_Plesiosaurus_. The genus _Ichthyosaurus_, or fish-lizard, is not confined
to this formation, but has been found in strata as high as the chalk-marl
and gault of England, and as low as the muschelkalk of Germany, a formation
which immediately succeeds the lias in the descending order.[276-C] It is
evident from their fish-like vertebræ, their paddles, resembling those of a
porpoise or whale, the length of their tail, and other parts of their
structure, that the habits of the Ichthyosaurs were aquatic. Their jaws and
teeth show that they were carnivorous; and the half-digested remains of
fishes and reptiles, found within their skeletons, indicate the precise
nature of their food.[276-D]

A specimen of the hinder fin or paddle of _Ichthyosaurus communis_ was
discovered in 1840 at Barrow-on-Soar, by Sir P. Egerton, which
distinctly exhibits on its posterior margin the remains of cartilaginous
rays that bifurcate as they approach the edge, like those in the fin of
a fish (see _a_, fig. 312.). It had previously been supposed, says Mr.
Owen, that the locomotive organs of the Ichthyosaurus were enveloped,
while living, in a smooth integument, like that of the turtle and
porpoise, which has no other support than is afforded by the bones and
ligaments within; but it now appears that the fin was much larger,
expanding far beyond its osseous framework, and deviating widely in its
fish-like rays from the ordinary reptilian type. In fig. 312. the
posterior bones, or digital ossicles of the paddle, are seen near _b_;
and beyond these is the dark carbonized integument of the terminal half
of the fin, the outline of which is beautifully defined.[277-A] Mr. Owen
believes that, besides the fore-paddles, these short-and stiff-necked
saurians were furnished with a tail-fin without bones and purely
tegumentary, expanding in a vertical direction; an organ of motion which
enabled them to turn their heads rapidly.[277-B]

[Illustration: Fig. 310. _Ichthyosaurus communis_, restored by
Conybeare and Cuvier.

_a._ costal vertebræ.]

[Illustration: Fig. 311. _Plesiosaurus dolichodeirus_, restored by
Rev. W. D. Conybeare.

_a._ cervical vertebra.]

[Illustration: Fig. 312. Posterior part of hind fin or paddle of
_Ichthyosaurus communis_.]

Mr. Conybeare was enabled, in 1824, after examining many skeletons nearly
perfect, to give an ideal restoration of the osteology of this genus, and
of that of the _Plesiosaurus_.[278-A] (See figs. 310, 311.) The latter
animal had an extremely long neck and small head, with teeth like those of
the crocodile, and paddles analogous to those of the _Ichthyosaurus_, but
larger. It is supposed to have lived in shallow seas and estuaries, and to
have breathed air like the Ichthyosaur, and our modern cetacea.[278-B] Some
of the reptiles above mentioned were of formidable dimensions. One specimen
of _Ichthyosaurus platyodon_, from the lias at Lyme, now in the British
Museum, must have belonged to an animal more than 24 feet in length; and
another of the _Plesiosaurus_, in the same collection, is 11 feet long. The
form of the _Ichthyosaurus_ may have fitted it to cut through the waves
like the porpoise; but it is supposed that the _Plesiosaurus_, at least the
long-necked species (fig. 311.), was better suited to fish in shallow
creeks and bays defended from heavy breakers.

In many specimens both of Ichthyosaur and Plesiosaur the bones of the head,
neck, and tail, are in their natural position, while those of the rest of
the skeleton are detached and in confusion. Mr. Stutchburg has suggested
that their bodies after death became inflated with gases, and, while the
abdominal viscera were decomposing, the bones, though disunited, were
retained within the tough dermal covering as in a bag, until the whole,
becoming water-logged, sank to the bottom.[278-C] As they belonged to
individuals of all ages they are supposed, by Dr. Buckland, to have
experienced a violent death; and the same conclusion might also be drawn
from their having escaped the attacks of their own predaceous race, or of
fishes, found fossil in the same beds.

[Illustration: Fig 313. _Amblyrhynchus cristatus_, Bell. Length varying
from 3 to 4 feet. The only existing marine lizard now known.

_a._ Tooth, natural size and magnified.]

For the last twenty years, anatomists have agreed that these extinct
saurians must have inhabited the sea; and it was argued that, as there
are now chelonians, like the tortoise, living in fresh water, and
others, as the turtle, frequenting the ocean, so there may have been
formerly some saurians proper to salt, others to fresh water. The common
crocodile of the Ganges is well known to frequent equally that river and
the brackish and salt water near its mouth; and crocodiles are said in
like manner to be abundant both in the rivers of the Isla de Pinos (or
Isle of Pines), south of Cuba, and in the open sea round the coast. More
recently a saurian has been discovered of aquatic habits and exclusively
marine. This creature was found in the Galapagos Islands, during the
visit of H. M. S. Beagle to that archipelago, in 1835, and its habits
were then observed by Mr. Darwin. The islands alluded to are situated
under the equator, nearly 600 miles to the westward of the coast of
South America. They are volcanic, some of them being 3000 or 4000 feet
high; and one of them, Albemarle Island, 75 miles long. The climate is
mild; very little rain falls; and, in the whole archipelago, there is
only one rill of fresh water that reaches the coast. The soil is for the
most part dry and harsh, and the vegetation scanty. The birds, reptiles,
plants, and insects are, with very few exceptions, of species found no
where else in the world, although all partake, in their general form, of
a South American type. Of the mammalia, says Mr. Darwin, one species
alone appears to be indigenous, namely, a large and peculiar kind of
mouse; but the number of lizards, tortoises, and snakes is so great,
that it may be called a land of reptiles. The variety, indeed, of
species is small; but the individuals of each are in wonderful
abundance. There is a turtle, a large tortoise (_Testudo Indicus_), four
lizards, and about the same number of snakes, but no frogs or toads. Two
of the lizards belong to the family _Iguanidæ_ of Bell, and to a
peculiar genus (_Amblyrhynchus_) established by that naturalist, and so
named from their obtusely truncated head and short snout.[279-A] Of
these lizards one is terrestrial in its habits, and burrows in the
ground, swarming everywhere on the land, having a round tail, and a
mouth somewhat resembling in form that of the tortoise. The other is
aquatic, and has its tail flattened laterally for swimming (see fig.
313.). "This marine saurian," says Mr. Darwin, "is extremely common on
all the islands throughout the archipelago. It lives exclusively on the
rocky sea-beaches, and I never saw one even ten yards inshore. The usual
length is about a yard, but there are some even 4 feet long. It is of a
dirty black colour, sluggish in its movements on the land; but, when in
the water, it swims with perfect ease and quickness by a serpentine
movement of its body and flattened tail, the legs during this time being
motionless, and closely collapsed on its sides. Their limbs and strong
claws are admirably adapted for crawling over the rugged and fissured
masses of lava which everywhere form the coast. In such situations, a
group of six or seven of these hideous reptiles may oftentimes be seen
on the black rocks, a few feet above the surf, basking in the sun with
outstretched legs. Their stomachs, on being opened, were found to be
largely distended with minced sea-weed, of a kind which grows at the
bottom of the sea at some little distance from the coast. To obtain
this, the lizards go out to sea in shoals. One of these animals was sunk
in salt water, from the ship, with a heavy weight attached to it, and
on being drawn up again after an hour it was quite active and unharmed.
It is not yet known by the inhabitants where this animal lays its eggs;
a singular fact, considering its abundance, and that the natives are
well acquainted with the eggs of the terrestrial _Amblyrhynchus_,
which is also herbivorous."[280-A]

In those deposits now forming by the sediment washed away from the
wasting shores of the Galapagos Islands the remains of saurians, both of
the land and sea, as well as of chelonians and fish, may be mingled with
marine shells, without any bones of land quadrupeds or batrachian
reptiles; yet even here we should expect the remains of marine mammalia
to be imbedded in the new strata, for there are seals, besides several
kinds of cetacea, on the Galapagian shores; and, in this respect, the
parallel between the modern fauna, above described, and the ancient one
of the lias, would not hold good.

_Sudden destruction of saurians._--It has been remarked, and truly, that
many of the fish and saurians, found fossil in the lias, must have met with
sudden death and immediate burial; and that the destructive operation,
whatever may have been its nature, was often repeated.

"Sometimes," says Dr. Buckland, "scarcely a single bone or scale has been
removed from the place it occupied during life; which could not have
happened had the uncovered bodies of these saurians been left, even for a
few hours, exposed to putrefaction, and to the attacks of fishes, and other
smaller animals at the bottom of the sea."[280-B] Not only are the
skeletons of the Ichthyosaurs entire, but sometimes the contents of their
stomachs still remain between their ribs, as before remarked, so that we
can discover the particular species of fish on which they lived, and the
form of their excrements. Not unfrequently there are layers of these
coprolites, at different depths in the lias, at a distance from any entire
skeletons of the marine lizards from which they were derived; "as if," says
Sir H. De la Beche, "the muddy bottom of the sea received small sudden
accessions of matter from time to time, covering up the coprolites and
other exuviæ which had accumulated during the intervals."[281-A] It is
farther stated that, at Lyme Regis, those surfaces only of the coprolites
which lay uppermost at the bottom of the sea have suffered partial decay,
from the action of water before they were covered and protected by the
muddy sediment that has afterwards permanently enveloped them.[281-B]

Numerous specimens of the pen-and-ink fish (_Sepia loligo_, Lin.; _Loligo
vulgaris_, Lam.) have also been met with in the lias at Lyme, with the
ink-bags still distended, containing the ink in a dried state, chiefly
composed of carbon, and but slightly impregnated with carbonate of lime.
These cephalopoda, therefore, must, like the saurians, have been soon
buried in sediment; for, if long exposed after death, the membrane
containing the ink would have decayed.[281-C]

As we know that river fish are sometimes stifled, even in their own
element, by muddy water during floods, it cannot be doubted that the
periodical discharge of large bodies of turbid fresh water into the sea may
be still more fatal to marine tribes. In the Principles of Geology I have
shown that large quantities of mud and drowned animals have been swept down
into the sea by rivers during earthquakes, as in Java, in 1699; and that
undescribable multitudes of dead fishes have been seen floating on the sea
after a discharge of noxious vapours during similar convulsions.[281-D]
But, in the intervals between such catastrophes, strata may have
accumulated slowly in the sea of the lias, some being formed chiefly of one
description of shell, such as ammonites, others of gryphites.

From the above remarks the reader will infer that the lias is for the most
part a marine deposit. Some members, however, of the series, especially in
the lowest part of it, have an estuary character, and must have been formed
within the influence of rivers. In Gloucestershire, where there is a good
type of the lias of the West of England, it may be divided into an upper
mass of shale with a base of marlstone, and a lower series of shales with
underlying limestones and shales. We learn from the researches of the Rev.
P. B. Brodie[281-E], that in the superior of these two divisions numerous
remains of insects and plants have been detected in several places, mingled
with marine shells; but in the inferior division similar fossils are still
more plentiful. One band, rarely exceeding a foot in thickness, has been
named the "insect limestone." It passes upwards into a shale containing
_Cypris_ and _Estheria_, and is charged with the wing-cases of several
genera of coleoptera, and with some nearly entire beetles, of which the
eyes are preserved. The nervures of the wings of neuropterous insects
(fig. 314.) are beautifully perfect in this bed. Ferns, with leaves of
monocotyledonous plants, and freshwater shells, such as _Cyclas_ and
_Unio_, accompany the insects in some places, while in others marine shells
predominate, the fossils varying apparently as we examine the bed nearer or
farther from the ancient land, or the source whence the fresh water was
derived. There are two, or even three, bands of "insect limestone" in
several sections, and they have been ascertained by Mr. Brodie to retain
the same lithological and zoological characters when traced from the centre
of Warwickshire to the borders of the southern part of Wales. After
studying 300 specimens of these insects from the lias, Mr. Westwood
declares that they comprise both wood-eating and herb-devouring beetles of
the Linnean genera _Elater_, _Carabus_, &c., besides grasshoppers
(_Gryllus_), and detached wings of dragon-flies and may-flies, or insects
referable to the Linnean genera _Libellula_, _Ephemera_, _Hemerobius_, and
_Panorpa_, in all belonging to no less than twenty-four families. The size
of the species is usually small, and such as taken alone would imply a
temperate climate; but many of the associated organic remains of other
classes must lead to a different conclusion.

[Illustration: Fig. 314. Wing of a neuropterous insect, from the Lower
Lias, Gloucestershire. (Rev. B. Brodie.)]

_Fossil plants._--Among the vegetable remains of the Lias, several species
of _Zamia_ have been found at Lyme Regis, and the remains of coniferous
plants at Whitby. Fragments of wood are common, and often converted into
limestone. That some of this wood, though now petrified, was soft when it
first lay at the bottom of the sea, is shown by a specimen now in the
museum of the Geological Society (see fig. 315.), which has the form of an
_ammonite_ indented on its surface.

[Illustration: Fig. 315. Petrified wood.]

M. Ad. Brongniart enumerates forty-seven liassic acrogens, most of them
ferns; and fifty gymnogens, of which thirty-nine are cycads, and eleven
conifers. Among the cycads the predominance of _Zamites_ and _Nilsonia_,
and among the ferns the numerous genera with leaves having reticulated
veins (as in fig. 296. p. 272.), are mentioned as botanical
characteristics of this era.[282-A]

_Origin of the Oolite and Lias._--If we now endeavour to restore, in
imagination, the ancient condition of the European area at the period of
the Oolite and Lias, we must conceive a sea in which the growth of coral
reefs and shelly limestones, after proceeding without interruption for
ages, was liable to be stopped suddenly by the deposition of clayey
sediment. Then, again, the argillaceous matter, devoid of corals, was
deposited for ages, and attained a thickness of hundreds of feet, until
another period arrived when the same space was again occupied by
calcareous sand, or solid rocks of shell and coral, to be again succeeded
by the recurrence of another period of argillaceous deposition. Mr.
Conybeare has remarked of the entire group of Oolite and Lias, that it
consists of repeated alternations of clay, sandstone, and limestone,
following each other in the same order. Thus the clays of the lias are
followed by the sands of the inferior oolite, and these again by shelly and
coralline limestone (Bath oolite, &c.); so, in the middle oolite, the
Oxford clay is followed by calcareous grit and "coral rag;" lastly, in the
upper oolite, the Kimmeridge clay is followed by the Portland sand and
limestone.[283-A] The clay beds, however, as Sir H. De la Beche remarks,
can be followed over larger areas than the sands or sandstones.[283-B] It
should also be remembered that while the oolitic system becomes arenaceous,
and resembles a coal-field in Yorkshire, it assumes, in the Alps, an almost
purely calcareous form, the sands and clays being omitted; and even in the
intervening tracts, it is more complicated and variable than appears in
ordinary descriptions. Nevertheless, some of the clays and intervening
limestones do, in reality, retain a pretty uniform character, for distances
of from 400 to 600 miles from east to west and north to south.

According to M. Thirria, the entire oolitic group in the department of the
Haute-Saône, in France, may be equal in thickness to that of England; but
the importance of the argillaceous divisions is in the inverse ratio to
that which they exhibit in England, where they are about equal to twice the
thickness of the limestones, whereas, in the part of France alluded to,
they reach only about a third of that thickness.[283-C] In the Jura the
clays are still thinner; and in the Alps they thin out and almost vanish.

In order to account for such a succession of events, we may imagine,
first, the bed of the ocean to be the receptacle for ages of fine
argillaceous sediment, brought by oceanic currents, which may have
communicated with rivers, or with part of the sea near a wasting coast.
This mud ceases, at length, to be conveyed to the same region, either
because the land which had previously suffered denudation is depressed
and submerged, or because the current is deflected in another direction
by the altered shape of the bed of the ocean and neighbouring dry land.
By such changes the water becomes once more clear and fit for the growth
of stony zoophytes. Calcareous sand is then formed from comminuted shell
and coral, or, in some cases, arenaceous matter replaces the clay;
because it commonly happens that the finer sediment, being first drifted
farthest from coasts, is subsequently overspread by coarse sand, after
the sea has grown shallower, or when the land, increasing in extent,
whether by upheaval or by sediment filling up parts of the sea, has
approached nearer to the spots first occupied by fine mud.

In order to account for another great formation, like the Oxford clay,
again covering one of coral limestone, we must suppose a sinking down
like that which is now taking place in some existing regions of coral
between Australia and South America. The occurrence of subsidences, on
so vast a scale, may have caused the bed of the ocean and the adjoining
land, throughout great parts of the European area, to assume a shape
favourable to the deposition of another set of clayey strata; and this
change may have been succeeded by a series of events analogous to that
already explained, and these again by a third series in similar order.
Both the ascending and descending movements may have been extremely
slow, like those now going on in the Pacific; and the growth of every
stratum of coral, a few feet of thickness, may have required centuries
for its completion, during which certain species of organic beings
disappeared from the earth, and others were introduced in their place;
so that, in each set of strata, from the Upper Oolite to the Lias, some
peculiar and characteristic fossils were embedded.


_Oolite and Lias of the United States._

[Illustration: Fig. 316. Section showing the geological position of the
James River, or East Virginian Coal-field.

  A. Granite, gneiss, &c.
  B. Coal-measures.
  C. Tertiary strata.
  D. Drift or _ancient alluvium_.]

There are large tracts on the globe, as in Russia and the United States,
where all the members of the oolitic series are unrepresented. In the state
of Virginia, however, at the distance of about 13 miles eastward of
Richmond, the capital of that State, there is a regular coal-field
occurring in a depression of the granite rocks (see section, fig. 316.),
which Professor W. B. Rogers first correctly referred to the age of the
lower part of the Jurassic group. This opinion I was enabled to confirm
after collecting a large number of fossil plants, fish, and shells, and
examining the coal-field throughout its whole area. It extends 26 miles
from north to south, and from 4 to 12, from east to west. The plants
consist chiefly of zamites, calamites, and equisetums, and these last are
very commonly met with in a vertical position more or less compressed
perpendicularly. It is clear that they grew in the places where they now
lie buried in strata of hardened sand and mud. I found them maintaining
their erect attitude, at points many miles distant from others, in beds
both above and between the seams of coal. In order to explain this fact we
must suppose such shales and sandstones to have been gradually accumulated
during the slow and repeated subsidence of the whole region.

It is worthy of remark that the _Equisetum columnare_ of these Virginian
rocks appears to be undistinguishable from the species found in the
oolitic sandstones near Whitby in Yorkshire, where it also is met with
in an upright position. One of the American ferns, _Pecopteris
Whitbyensis_, is also a species common to the Yorkshire oolites.[285-A]
These Virginian coal-measures are composed of grits, sandstones, and
shales, exactly resembling those of older or primary date in America and
Europe, and they rival or even surpass the latter in the richness and
thickness of the seams. One of these, the main seam, is in some places
from 30 to 40 feet thick, composed of pure bituminous coal. On
descending a shaft 800 feet deep, in the Blackheath mines in
Chesterfield county, I found myself in a chamber more than 40 feet high,
caused by the removal of this coal. Timber props of great strength
supported the roof, but they were seen to bend under the incumbent
weight. The coal is like the finest kinds shipped at Newcastle, and when
analysed yields the same proportions of carbon and hydrogen, a fact
worthy of notice when we consider that this fuel has been derived from
an assemblage of plants very distinct specifically, and in part
generically, from those which have contributed to the formation of
the ancient or paleozoic coal.

The fossil fish of these Richmond strata belong to the liassic genus
_Tetragonolepis_, and to a new genus which I have called _Dictyopyge_.
Shells are very rare, as usually in all coal-bearing deposits, but a
species of _Posidonomya_ is in such profusion in some shaley beds as to
divide them like the plates of mica in micaceous shales (see fig. 317.).

[Illustration: Fig. 317. Oolitic coal-shale, Richmond, Virginia.

  _a._ _Posidonomya._
  _b._ young of same.]

In India, especially in Cutch, a formation occurs clearly referable to the
oolitic and liassic type, as shown by the shells, corals, and plants; and
there also coal has been procured from one member of the group.


FOOTNOTES:

[274-A] Conyb. and Phil. p. 261.

[275-A] Agassiz, Pois. Fos. vol. ii. tab. 28, 29.

[276-A] Bridgewater Treatise, p. 290.

[276-B] Agassiz, Poissons Fossiles, vol. iii. tab. C. fig. 1.

[276-C] Ibid. p. 168.

[276-D] Ibid. p. 187.

[277-A] Geol. Soc. Proceedings, vol. iii. p. 157. 1839.

[277-B] Geol. Trans. Second Series, vol. v. p. 511.

[278-A] Geol. Trans., Second Series, vol. i. pl. 49.

[278-B] Conybeare and De la Beche. Geol. Trans.; and Buckland,
Bridgew. Treat., p. 203.

[278-C] Quart. Geol. Journ. vol. ii. p. 411.

[279-A] +Amblys+, _amblys_, blunt; and +rhygchos+, _rhynchus_, snout.

[280-A] Darwin's Journal, chap. xix.

[280-B] Bridgew. Treat., p. 125.

[281-A] Geological Researches, p. 334.

[281-B] Buckland, Bridgew. Treat., p. 307.

[281-C] Ibid.

[281-D] See Principles, _Index_, Lancerote, Graham Island, Calabria.

[281-E] A History of Fossil Insects, &c. 1845. London.

[282-A] Tableau des Veg. Fos. 1849, p. 105.

[283-A] Con. and Phil., p. 166.

[283-B] Geol. Researches, p. 337.

[283-C] Burat's D'Aubuisson, tom. ii. p. 456.

[285-A] See description of the coal-field by the author, and the plants by
C. J. F. Bunbury, Esq., Quart. Geol. Journ., vol. iii. p. 281.



CHAPTER XXII.

TRIAS OR NEW RED SANDSTONE GROUP.

   Distinction between New and Old Red Sandstone--Between Upper and Lower
   New Red--The Trias and its three divisions--Most largely developed in
   Germany--Keuper and its fossils--Muschelkalk--Fossil plants of
   Bunter--Triassic group in England--Bone-bed of Axmouth and Aust--Red
   Sandstone of Warwickshire and Cheshire--Footsteps of _Chirotherium_ in
   England and Germany--Osteology of the _Labyrinthodon_--Identification
   of this Batrachian with the Chirotherium--Origin of Red Sandstone and
   Rock-salt--Hypothesis of saline volcanic exhalations--Theory of the
   precipitation of salt from inland lakes or lagoons--Saltness of the
   Red Sea--New Red Sandstone in the United States--Fossil footprints of
   birds and reptiles in the Valley of the Connecticut--Antiquity of the
   Red Sandstone containing them.


Between the Lias and the Coal, or Carboniferous group, there is interposed,
in the midland and western counties of England, a great series of red
loams, shales, and sandstones, to which the name of the New Red Sandstone
formation was first given, to distinguish it from other shales and
sandstones called the "Old Red" (_c_, fig. 318.), often identical in
mineral character, which lie immediately beneath the coal (_b_).

[Illustration: Fig. 318. Cross section.

  _a._ New red sandstone.
  _b._ Coal.
  _c._ Old red.]

The name of "Red Marl" has been incorrectly applied to the red clays of
this formation, as before explained (p. 13.), for they are remarkably free
from calcareous matter. The absence, indeed, of carbonate of lime, as well
as the scarcity of organic remains, together with the bright red colour of
most of the rocks of this group, causes a strong contrast between it and
the Jurassic formations before described.

Before the distinctness of the fossil remains characterizing the upper and
lower part of the English New Red had been clearly recognized, it was found
convenient to have a common name for all the strata intermediate in
position between the Lias and Coal; and the term "Poikilitic" was proposed
by Messrs. Conybeare and Buckland[286-A], from +poikilos+, poikilos,
_variegated_, some of the most characteristic strata of this group having
been called _variegated_ by Werner, from their exhibiting spots and streaks
of light-blue, green, and buff colour, in a red base.

A single term, thus comprehending both Upper and Lower New Red, or the
Triassic and Permian groups of modern classifications, may still be useful
in describing districts where we have to speak of masses of red sandstone
and shale, referable, in part, to both these eras, but which, in the
absence of fossils, it is impossible to divide.


_Trias or Upper New Red Sandstone Group._

The accompanying table will explain the subdivisions generally adopted for
the uppermost of the two systems above alluded to, and the names given to
them in England and on the Continent.

                                                       Synonyms.
                                                  German.       French.

                 { _a._ Saliferous and          }             }
                 {      gypseous shales and     } Keuper      } Marnes irisées.
  Trias or Upper {      sandstone               }             }
    New Red      {
    Sandstone    { _b._ (wanting in England)    } Muschelkalk { Muschelkalk, ou
                 {                                            { calcaire
                 {                                            { coquillier.
                 {
                 { _c._ Sandstone and           } Bunter-     } Grès bigarré.
                 {      quartzose conglomerate  } sandstein   }

I shall first describe this group as it occurs in South Western and North
Western Germany, for it is far more fully developed there than in England
or France. It has been called the Trias by German writers, or the Triple
Group, because it is separable into three distinct formations, called the
"Keuper," the "Muschelkalk," and the "Bunter-sandstein."

[Illustration: Fig. 319. _Equisetites columnaris._ (Syn. _Equisetum
columnare_.) Fragment of stem, and small portion of same
magnified. Keuper.]

_The Keuper_, the first or newest of these, is 1000 feet thick in
Würtemberg, and is divided by Alberti into sandstone, gypsum, and
carbonaceous slate-clay.[287-A] Remains of Reptiles, called _Nothosaurus_
and _Phytosaurus_, have been found in it with _Labyrinthodon_; the detached
teeth, also, of placoid fish and of rays, and of the genera _Saurichthys_
and _Gyrolepis_ (figs. 325, 326, p. 289.). The plants of the Keuper are
generically very analogous to those of the lias and oolite, consisting of
ferns, equisetaceous plants, cycads, and conifers, with a few doubtful
monocotyledons. A few species, such as _Equisetites columnaris_, are common
to this group, and the oolite.

_The Muschelkalk_ consists chiefly of a compact, greyish limestone, but
includes beds of dolomite in many places, together with gypsum and
rock-salt. This limestone, a rock wholly unrepresented in England, abounds
in fossil shells, as the name implies. Among the cephalopoda there are no
belemnites, and no ammonites with foliated sutures, as in the incumbent
lias and oolite, but a genus allied to the Ammonite, called _Ceratite_ by
De Haan, in which the descending lobes (see _a_, _b_, _c_, fig. 320.)
terminate in a few small denticulations pointing inwards. Among the
bivalve shells, the _Posidonia minuta_, Goldf. (_Posidonomya minuta_,
Bronn) (see fig. 321.), is abundant, ranging through the Keuper,
Muschelkalk, and Bunter-sandstein; and _Avicula socialis_, fig. 322.,
having a similar range, is very characteristic of the Muschelkalk in
Germany, France, and Poland.

[Illustration: Fig. 320. _Ceratites nodosus._ Muschelkalk.

  _a._ Side view.
  _b._ Front view.
  _c._ Partially denticulated outline of the septa dividing the chambers.]

[Illustration: Fig. 321. _Posidonia minuta_, Goldf. (_Posidonomya
minuta_, Bronn.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 322. Avicula. Characteristic of the Muschelkalk.

  _a._ _Avicula socialis._
  _b._ Side view of same.]

The abundance of the heads and stems of lily encrinites, _Encrinus
liliiformis_ (or _Encrinites moniliformis_), show the slow manner in which
some beds of this limestone have been formed in clear sea-water.

[Illustration: Fig. 323. Voltzia. Bunter-sandstein.

  _a._ _Voltzia heterophylla._ (Syn. _Voltzia brevifolia_.)
  _b._  portion of same magnified to show fructification. Sulzbad.]

_The Bunter-sandstein_ consists of various coloured sandstones,
dolomites, and red-clays, with some beds, especially in the Hartz, of
calcareous pisolite or roe-stone, the whole sometimes attaining a
thickness of more than 1000 feet. The sandstone of the Vosges, according
to Von Meyer, is proved, by the presence of _Labyrinthodon_, to belong
to this lowest member of the Triassic group. At Sulzbad (or
Soultz-les-bains), near Strasburg, on the flanks of the Vosges, many
plants have been obtained from the "bunter," especially conifers of the
extinct genus _Voltzia_, peculiar to this period, in which even the
fructification has been preserved. (See fig. 323.)

Out of thirty species of ferns, cycads, conifers, and other plants,
enumerated by M. Ad. Brongniart, in 1849, as coming from the "grès
bigarré," or Bunter, not one is common to the Keuper.[288-A]

The footprints of a reptile (_Labyrinthodon_) have been observed on the
clays of this member of the Trias, near Hildburghausen, in Saxony,
impressed on the upper surface of the beds, and standing out as casts in
relief from the under sides of incumbent slabs of sandstone. To these I
shall again allude in the sequel; they attest, as well as the accompanying
ripple-marks, and the cracks which traverse the clays, the gradual
formation in shallow water, and sometimes between high and low water, of
the beds of this formation.


_Triassic group in England._

In England the Lias is succeeded by conformable strata of red and green
marl, or clay. There intervenes, however, both in the neighbourhood of
Axmouth, in Devonshire, and in the cliffs of Westbury and Aust, in
Gloucestershire, on the banks of the Severn, a dark-coloured stratum, well
known by the name of the "bone-bed." It abounds in the remains of saurians
and fish, and was formerly classed as the lowest bed of the Lias; but Sir
P. Egerton has shown that it should be referred to the Upper New Red
Sandstone, for it contains an assemblage of fossil fish which are either
peculiar to this stratum, or belong to species well known in the
Muschelkalk of Germany. These fish belong to the genera _Acrodus_,
_Hybodus_, _Gyrolepis_, and _Saurichthys_.

Among those common to the English bone-bed and the Muschelkalk of Germany
are _Hybodus plicatilis_ (fig. 324.), _Saurichthys apicalis_ (fig. 325.),
_Gyrolepis tenuistriatus_ (fig. 326.), and _G. Albertii_. Remains of
saurians have also been found in the bone-bed, and plates of an _Encrinus_.

[Illustration: Fig. 324. _Hybodus plicatilis._ Teeth. Bone-bed,
Aust and Axmouth.]

[Illustration: Fig. 325. _Saurichthys apicalis._ Tooth; nat. size,
and magnified. Axmouth.]

[Illustration: Fig. 326. _Gyrolepis tenuistriatus._ Scale; nat. size,
and magnified. Axmouth.]

The strata of red and green marl, which follow the bone-bed in the
descending order at Axmouth and Aust, are destitute of organic remains;
as is the case, for the most part, in the corresponding beds in almost
every part of England. But fossils have lately been found at a few
localities in sandstones of this formation, in Worcestershire and
Warwickshire, and among them the bivalve shell called _Posidonia
minuta_, Goldf., before mentioned (fig. 321. p. 288.).

The upper member of the English "New Red" containing this shell, in
those parts of England, is, according to Messrs. Murchison and
Strickland, 600 feet thick, and consists chiefly of red marl or
slate, with a band of sandstone. Spines of _Hybodus_, called
_ichthyodorulites_, teeth of fishes, and footprints of reptiles, with
remains of a saurian called _Rhyncosaurus_, were observed by the same
geologists in these strata.[290-A]

In Cheshire and Lancashire the gypseous and saliferous red shales and loams
of the Trias are between 1000 and 1500 feet thick. In some places
lenticular masses of rock-salt are interpolated between the argillaceous
beds, the origin of which will be spoken of in the sequel.

[Illustration: Fig. 327. Single footstep of _Chirotherium_. Bunter
Sandstein, Saxony; one eighth of nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 328. Line of footsteps on slab of sandstone.
Hildburghausen, in Saxony.]

The lower division or English representative of the "Bunter" attains a
thickness of 600 feet in the counties last mentioned. Besides red and green
shales and red sandstones, it comprises much soft white quartzose
sandstone, in which the trunks of silicified trees have been met with at
Allesley Hill, near Coventry. Several of them were a foot and a half in
diameter, and some yards in length, decidedly of coniferous wood, and
showing rings of annual growth.[290-B] Impressions, also, of the footsteps
of animals have been detected in Lancashire and Cheshire in this formation.
Some of the most remarkable occur a few miles from Liverpool, in the
whitish quartzose sandstone of Storton Hill, on the west side of the
Mersey. They bear a close resemblance to tracks first observed in a member
of the Upper New Red Sandstone, at the village of Hesseberg, near
Hildburghausen, in Saxony, to which I have already alluded. For many years
these footprints have been referred to a large unknown quadruped,
provisionally named _Chirotherium_ by Professor Kaup, because the marks
both of the fore and hind feet resembled impressions made by a human hand.
(See fig. 327.) The footmarks at Hesseberg are partly concave and partly in
relief; the former, or the depressions, are seen upon the upper surface of
the sandstone slabs, but those in relief are only upon the lower surfaces,
being in fact natural casts, formed in the subjacent footprints as in
moulds. The larger impressions, which seem to be those of the hind foot,
are generally 8 inches in length, and 5 in width, and one was 12 inches
long. Near each large footstep, and at a regular distance (about an inch
and a half), before it, a smaller print of a fore foot, 4 inches long and
3 inches wide, occurs. The footsteps follow each other in pairs, each pair
in the same line, at intervals of 14 inches from pair to pair. The large as
well as the small steps show the great toes alternately on the right and
left side; each step makes the print of five toes, the first or great toe
being bent inwards like a thumb. Though the fore and hind foot differ so
much in size, they are nearly similar in form.

The similar footmarks afterwards observed in a rock of corresponding age at
Storton Hill, were imprinted on five thin beds of clay, superimposed one
upon the other in the same quarry, and separated by beds of sandstone. On
the lower surface of the sandstone strata, the solid casts of each
impression are salient, in high relief, and afford models of the feet,
toes, and claws of the animals which trod on the clay.

As neither in Germany nor in England any bones or teeth had been met with
in the same identical strata as the footsteps, anatomists indulged, for
several years, in various conjectures respecting the mysterious animals
from which they might have been derived. Professor Kaup suggested that the
unknown quadruped might have been allied to the _Marsupialia_; for in the
kangaroo the first toe of the fore foot is in a similar manner set
obliquely to the others, like a thumb, and the disproportion between the
fore and hind feet is also very great. But M. Link conceived that some of
the four species of animals of which the tracks had been found in Saxony
might have been gigantic _Batrachians_; and Dr. Buckland designated some of
the footsteps as those of a small web-footed animal, probably crocodilean.

In the course of these discussions several naturalists of Liverpool, in
their report on the Storton quarries, declared their opinion that each of
the thin seams of clay in which the sandstone casts were moulded had formed
successively a surface above water, over which the _Chirotherium_ and other
animals walked, leaving impressions of their footsteps, and that each layer
had been afterwards submerged by a sinking down of the surface, so that a
new beach was formed at low water above the former, on which other tracks
were then made. The repeated occurrence of ripple-marks at various heights
and depths in the red sandstone of Cheshire had been explained in the same
manner. It was also remarked that impressions of such depth and clearness
could only have been made by animals walking on the land, as their weight
would have been insufficient to make them sink so deeply in yielding clay
under water. They must therefore have been air-breathers.

When the inquiry had been brought to this point, the reptilian remains
discovered in the Trias, both of Germany and England, were carefully
examined by Mr. Owen. He found, after a microscopic investigation of the
teeth from the German sandstone called Keuper, and from the sandstone of
Warwick and Leamington, that neither of them could be referred to true
saurians, although they had been named _Mastodonsaurus_ and _Phytosaurus_
by Jäger (fig. 329.). It appeared that they were of the _Batrachian_ order,
and attested the former existence of frogs of gigantic dimensions in
comparison with any now living. Both the Continental and English fossil
teeth exhibited a most complicated texture, differing from that previously
observed in any reptile, whether recent or extinct, but most nearly
analogous to the _Ichthyosaurus_. A section of one of these teeth exhibits
a series of irregular folds, resembling the labyrinthic windings of the
surface of the brain; and from this character Mr. Owen has proposed the
name _Labyrinthodon_ for the new genus. By his permission, the annexed
representation (fig. 330.) of part of one is given from his "Odontography,"
plate 64. A. The entire length of this tooth is supposed to have been about
three inches and a half, and the breadth at the base one inch and a half.

[Illustration: Fig. 329. Tooth of _Labyrinthodon_; nat. size.
Warwick sandstone.]

[Illustration: Fig. 330. Transverse section of tooth of _Labyrinthodon
Jaegeri_, Owen (_Mastodonsaurus Jaegeri_, Meyer); nat. size, and
a segment magnified.

_a._ Pulp cavity, from which the processes of pulp and dentine radiate.]

When Mr. Owen had satisfied himself, from an inspection of the cranium,
jaws, and teeth, that a gigantic _Batrachian_ had existed at the period of
the Trias or Upper New Red Sandstone, he soon found, from the examination
of various bones derived from the same formation, that he could define
three species of _Labyrinthodon_, and that in this genus the hind
extremities were much larger than the anterior ones. This circumstance,
coupled with the fact of the _Labyrinthodon_ having existed at the period
when the _Chirotherian_ footsteps were made, was the first step towards the
identification of those tracks with the newly discovered _Batrachian_. It
was at the same time observed that the footmarks of _Chirotherium_ were
more like those of toads than of any other living animal; and, lastly,
that the size of the three species of _Labyrinthodon_ corresponded with the
size of three different kinds of footprints which had already been supposed
to belong to three distinct _Chirotheria_. It was moreover inferred, with
confidence, that the _Labyrinthodon_ was an _air-breathing_ reptile from
the structure of the nasal cavity, in which the posterior outlets were at
the back part of the mouth, instead of being directly under the anterior or
external nostrils. It must have respired air after the manner of saurians,
and may therefore have imprinted on the shore those footsteps, which, as we
have seen, could not have originated from an animal walking under water.

It is true that the structure of the foot is still wanting, and that a
more connected and complete skeleton is required for demonstration; but
the circumstantial evidence above stated is strong enough to produce
the conviction that the _Chirotherium_ and _Labyrinthodon_ are one
and the same.

In order to show the manner in which one of these formidable _Batrachians_
may have impressed the mark of its feet upon the shore, Mr. Owen has
attempted a restoration, of which a reduced copy is annexed.

[Illustration: Fig. 331. _Labyrinthodon pachygnathus_, Owen.]

The only bones of this species at present known are those of the head, the
pelvis, and part of the scapula, which are shown by stronger lines in the
above figure. There is reason for believing that the head was not smooth
externally, but protected by bony scutella.


_Origin of Red Sandstone and Rock Salt._

We have seen that, in various parts of the world, red and mottled clays,
and sandstones, of several distinct geological epochs, are found associated
with salt, gypsum, magnesian limestone, or with one or all of these
substances. There is, therefore, in all likelihood, a general cause for
such a coincidence. Nevertheless, we must not forget that there are dense
masses of red and variegated sandstones and clays, thousands of feet in
thickness, and of vast horizontal extent, wholly devoid of saliferous or
gypseous matter. There are also deposits of gypsum and of muriate of soda,
as in the blue clay formation of Sicily, without any accompanying red
sandstone or red clay.

To account for deposits of red mud and red sand, we have simply to suppose
the disintegration of ordinary crystalline or metamorphic schists. Thus, in
the eastern Grampians of Scotland, as, for example, in the north of
Forfarshire, the mountains of gneiss, mica-schist, and clay-slate, are
overspread with alluvium, derived from the disintegration of those rocks;
and the mass of detritus is stained by oxide of iron, of precisely the same
colour as the Old Red Sandstone of the adjoining Lowlands. Now this
alluvium merely requires to be swept down to the sea, or into a lake, to
form strata of red sandstone and red marl, precisely like the mass of the
"Old Red" or New Red systems of England, or those tertiary deposits of
Auvergne (see p. 182.), before described, which are in lithological
characters quite undistinguishable. The pebbles of gneiss in the Eocene red
sandstone of Auvergne point clearly to the rocks from which it has been
derived. The red colouring matter may, as in the Grampians, have been
furnished by the decomposition of hornblende, or mica, which contain oxide
of iron in large quantity.

It is a general fact, and one not yet accounted for, that scarcely any
fossil remains are preserved in stratified rocks in which this oxide of
iron abounds; and when we find fossils in the New or Old Red Sandstone in
England, it is in the grey, and usually calcareous beds, that they occur.

The gypsum and saline matter, occasionally interstratified with such red
clays and sandstones of various ages, primary, secondary, and tertiary,
have been thought by some geologists to be of volcanic origin. Submarine
and subaerial exhalations often occur in regions of earthquakes and
volcanos far from points of actual eruption, and charged with sulphur,
sulphuric salts, and with common salt or muriate of soda. In a word, they
are vents by which all the products which issue in a state of sublimation
from the craters of active volcanos, obtain a passage from the interior of
the earth to the surface. That such gaseous emanations and mineral springs,
impregnated with the ingredients before enumerated, and often intensely
heated, continue to flow out unaltered in composition and temperature for
ages, is well known. But before we can decide on their real instrumentality
in producing in the course of ages beds of gypsum, salt, and dolomite, we
require to know what are the chemical changes actually in progress in seas
where this volcanic agency is at work.

Yet the origin of rock-salt is a problem of so much interest in
theoretical geology as to demand a full discussion of another hypothesis
advanced on the subject; namely, that which attributes the precipitation
of the salt to evaporation, whether of inland lakes or of lagoons
communicating with the ocean.

At Northwich, in Cheshire, two beds of salt, in great part unmixed with
earthy matter, attain the extraordinary thickness of 90 and even 100 feet.
The upper surface of the highest bed is very uneven, forming cones and
irregular figures. Between the two masses there intervenes a bed of
indurated clay, traversed with veins of salt. The highest bed thins off
towards the south-west, losing 15 feet in thickness in the course of a
mile.[295-A] The horizontal extent of these particular masses in Cheshire
and Lancashire is not exactly known; but the area, containing saliferous
clays and sandstones, is supposed to exceed 150 miles in diameter, while
the total thickness of the trias in the same region is estimated by Mr.
Ormerod at more than 1700 feet. Ripple-marked sandstones, and the
footprints of animals, before described, are observed at so many levels
that we may safely assume the whole area to have undergone a slow and
gradual depression during the formation of the Red Sandstone. The evidence
of such a movement, wholly independent of the presence of salt itself, is
very important in reference to the theory under consideration.

In the "Principles of Geology" (chap. 28.), I published a map, furnished to
me by the late Sir Alexander Burnes, of that singular flat region called
the Runn of Cutch, near the delta of the Indus, which is 7000 square miles
in area, or equal in extent to about one-fourth of Ireland. It is neither
land nor sea, but is dry during a part of every year, and again covered by
salt water during the monsoons. Some parts of it are liable, after long
intervals, to be overflowed by river-water. Its surface supports no grass,
but is encrusted over, here and there, by a layer of salt, about an inch in
depth, caused by the evaporation of sea-water. Certain tracts have been
converted into dry land by upheaval during earthquakes since the
commencement of the present century, and, in other directions, the
boundaries of the Runn have been enlarged by subsidence. That successive
layers of salt might be thrown down, one upon the other, over thousands of
square miles, in such a region, is undeniable. The supply of brine from the
ocean would be as inexhaustible as the supply of heat from the sun to cause
evaporation. The only assumption required to enable us to explain a great
thickness of salt in such as area is, the continuance, for an indefinite
period, of a subsiding movement, the country preserving all the time a
general approach to horizontality. Pure salt could only be formed in the
central parts of basins, where no sand could be drifted by the wind, or
sediment be brought by currents. Should the sinking of the ground be
accelerated, so as to let in the sea freely, and deepen the water, a
temporary suspension of the precipitation of salt would be the only result.
On the other hand, if the area should dry up, ripple-marked sands and the
footprints of animals might be formed, where salt had previously
accumulated. According to this view the thickness of the salt, as well as
of the accompanying beds of mud and sand, becomes a mere question of time,
or requires simply a repetition of similar operations.

Mr. Hugh Miller, in an able discussion of this question, refers to Dr.
Frederick Parrot's account, in his journey to Ararat (1836), of the salt
lakes of Asia. In several of these lakes west of the river Manech, "the
water, during the hottest season of the year, is covered on its surface
with a crust of salt nearly an inch thick, which is collected with shovels
into boats. The crystallization of the salt is effected by rapid
evaporation from the sun's heat and the supersaturation of the water with
muriate of soda; the lake being so shallow that the little boats trail on
the bottom and leave a furrow behind them, so that the lake must be
regarded as a wide pan of enormous superficial extent, in which the brine
can easily reach the degree of concentration required."

Another traveller, Major Harris, in his "Highlands of Ethiopia," describes
a salt lake, called the Bahr Assal, near the Abyssinian frontier, which
once formed the prolongation of the Gulf of Tadjara, but was afterwards cut
off from the gulf by a broad bar of lava or of land upraised by an
earthquake. "Fed by no rivers, and exposed in a burning climate to the
unmitigated rays of the sun, it has shrunk into an elliptical basin, seven
miles in its transverse axis, half filled with smooth water of the deepest
cærulian hue, and half with a solid sheet of glittering snow-white salt,
the offspring of evaporation." "If," says Mr. Hugh Miller, "we suppose,
instead of a barrier of lava, that sand-bars were raised by the surf on a
flat arenaceous coast during a slow and equable sinking of the surface, the
waters of the outer gulf might occasionally topple over the bar, and supply
fresh brine when the first stock had been exhausted by evaporation.[296-A]

We may add that the permanent impregnation of the waters of a large shallow
basin with salt, beyond the proportion which is usual in the ocean, would
cause it to be uninhabitable by mollusca or fish, as is the case in the
Dead Sea, and the muriate of soda might remain in excess, even though it
were occasionally replenished by irruptions of the sea. Should the saline
deposit be eventually submerged, it might, as we have seen from the example
of the Runn of Cutch, be covered by a freshwater formation containing
fluviatile organic remains; and in this way the apparent anomaly of beds of
sea-salt and clays devoid of marine fossils, alternating with others of
freshwater origin, may be explained.

Dr. G. Buist, in a recent communication to the Bombay Geographical Society
(vol. ix.), has asked how it happens that the Red Sea should not exceed the
open ocean in saltness, by more than 1/10th per cent. The Red Sea receives
no supply of water from any quarter save through the Straits of
Babelmandeb; and there is not a single river or rivulet flowing into it
from a circuit of 4000 miles of shore. The countries around are all
excessively sterile and arid, and composed, for the most part, of burning
deserts. From the ascertained evaporation in the sea itself, Dr. Buist
computes that nearly 8 feet of pure water must be carried off from the
whole of its surface annually, this being probably equivalent to 1/100th
part of its whole volume. The Red Sea, therefore, ought to have 1 per cent.
added annually to its saline contents; and as these constitute 4 per cent.
by weight, or 2-1/2 per cent. in volume of its entire mass, it ought,
assuming the average depth to be 800 feet, which is supposed to be far
beyond the truth, to have been converted into one solid salt formation in
less than 3000 years.[297-A] Does the Red Sea receive a supply of water
from the ocean, through the narrow Straits of Babelmandeb, sufficient to
balance the loss by evaporation? And is there an undercurrent of heavier
saline water annually flowing outwards? If not, in what manner is the
excess of salt disposed of? An investigation of this subject by our
nautical surveyors may perhaps aid the geologist in framing a true theory
of the origin of rock-salt.


_On the New Red Sandstone of the valley of the Connecticut River
in the United States._

In a depression of the granitic or hypogene rocks in the States of
Massachusetts and Connecticut, strata of red sandstone, shale, and
conglomerate are found occupying an area more than 150 miles in length from
north to south, and about 5 to 10 miles in breadth, the beds dipping to the
eastward at angles varying from 5 to 50 degrees. The extreme inclination of
50 degrees is rare, and only observed in the neighbourhood of masses of
trap which have been intruded into the red sandstone while it was forming,
or before the newer parts of the deposit had been completed. Having
examined this series of rocks in many places, I feel satisfied that they
were formed in shallow water, and for the most part near the shore, and
that some of the beds were from time to time raised above the level of the
water, and laid dry, while a newer series, composed of similar sediment,
was forming. The red flags of thin-bedded sandstone are often
ripple-marked, and exhibit on their under sides casts of cracks formed in
the underlying red and green shales. These last must have shrunk by drying
before the sand was spread over them. On some shales of the finest texture
impressions of rain drops may be seen, and casts of them in the incumbent
argillaceous sandstones. Having observed similar markings produced by
showers, of which the precise date was known, on the recent red mud of the
Bay of Fundy, and casts in relief of the same, on layers of dried mud
thrown down by subsequent tides, I feel no doubt in regard to the origin of
some of the ancient Connecticut impressions. I have also seen on the
mud-flats of the Bay of Fundy the footmarks of birds (_Tringa minuta_),
which daily run along the borders of that estuary at low water, and which I
have described in my Travels.[297-B] Similar layers of red mud, now
hardened and compressed into shale, are laid open on the banks of the
Connecticut, and retain faithfully the impressions and casts of the feet of
numerous birds and reptiles which walked over them at the time when they
were deposited, probably in the Triassic Period.

According to Professor Hitchcock, the footprints of no less than thirty-two
species of bipeds, and twelve of quadrupeds, have been already detected in
these rocks. Thirty of these are believed to be those of birds, four of
lizards, two of chelonians, and six of batrachians. The tracks have been
found in more than twenty places, scattered through an extent of nearly 80
miles from north to south, and they are repeated through a succession of
beds attaining at some points a thickness of more than 1000 feet, which may
have been thousands of years in forming.[298-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 332. Footprints of a bird. Turner's Falls, Valley of
the Connecticut. (See Dr. Deane, Mem. of Amer. Acad. vol. iv. 1849.)]

As considerable scepticism is naturally entertained in regard to the nature
of the evidence derived from footprints, it may be well to enumerate some
facts respecting them on which the faith of the geologist may rest. When I
visited the United States in 1842, more than 2000 impressions had been
observed by Professor Hitchcock, in the district alluded to, and all of
them were indented on the upper surface of the layers, while the
corresponding casts, standing out in relief, were always on the lower
surfaces or planes of the strata. If we follow a single line of marks we
find them uniform in size, and nearly uniform in distance from each other,
the toes of two successive footprints, turning alternately right and left
(see fig. 332.). Such single lines indicate a biped; and there is generally
such a deviation from a straight line, in any three successive prints, as
we remark in the tracks left by birds. There is also a striking relation
between the distance separating two footprints in one series and the size
of the impressions; in other words, an obvious proportion between the
length of the stride and the dimension of the creature which walked over
the mud. If the marks are small, they may be half an inch asunder; if
gigantic, as, for example, where the toes are 20 inches long, they are
occasionally 4 feet and a half apart. The bipedal impressions are for the
most part trifid, and show the same number of joints as exist in the feet
of living tridactylous birds. Now such birds have three phalangeal bones
for the inner toe, four for the middle and five for the outer one (see fig.
332.); but the impression of the terminal joint is that of the nail only.
The fossil footprints exhibit regularly, where the joints are seen, the
same number; and we see in each continuous line of tracks the three-jointed
and five-jointed toes placed alternately outwards, first on the one side
and then on the other. It is not often that the matrix has been fine enough
to retain impressions of the integument or skin of the foot; but in one
fine specimen found at Turner's Falls on the Connecticut, by Dr. Deane,
these markings are well preserved, and have been recognized by Mr. Owen as
resembling the skin of the ostrich, and not that of reptiles.[298-B] Much
care is required to ascertain the precise layer of a laminated rock on
which an animal has walked, because the impression usually extends
downwards through several laminæ; and if the upper layer originally trodden
upon is wanting, one or more joints, or even in some cases an entire toe,
which sank less deep into the soft ground, may disappear, and yet the
remainder of the footprint be well defined.

The size of several of the fossil impressions of the Connecticut red
sandstone so far exceeds that of any living ostrich, that naturalists at
first were extremely adverse to the opinion of their having been made by
birds, until the bones and almost entire skeleton of the _Dinornis_ and of
other feathered giants of New Zealand were discovered. Their dimensions
have at least destroyed the force of this particular objection. The
magnitude of the impressions of the feet of a heavy animal, which has
walked on soft mud, increases for some distance below the surface
originally trodden upon. In order, therefore, to guard against
exaggeration, the casts rather than the mould are relied on. These casts
show that some of the fossil birds had feet four times as large as the
ostrich, but not perhaps larger than the _Dinornis_.

Some of the quadrupedal footprints which accompany those of birds are
analogous to European _Chirotheria_, and with a similar disproportion
between the hind and fore feet. Others resemble that remarkable reptile,
the _Rhyncosaurus_ of the English Trias, a creature having some relation
in its osteology both to chelonians and birds. Other imprints, again,
are like those of turtles.

Among the supposed bipedal tracks, a single distinct example only has been
observed of feet in which there are four toes directed forwards. In this
case a series of four footprints is seen, each 22 inches long and 12 wide,
with joints much resembling those in the toes of birds. Professor Agassiz
has suggested that it might have belonged to a gigantic bipedal batrachian;
but the evidence on this subject is too defective to warrant such a bold
conjecture, and if we were to give the reins to our imagination, we might
as well conceive a bird having four toes projecting forwards as a huge
two-legged frog. Nor should we forget that some quadrupeds place the hind
foot so precisely on the spot just quitted by the fore foot, as to produce
a single line of imprints like a biped.

No bones have as yet been met with, whether of reptiles or birds, in the
rocks of the Connecticut, but there are numerous coprolites; and an
ingenious argument has been derived by Mr. Dana, from the analysis of these
bodies, and the proportion they contain of uric acid, phosphate of lime,
carbonate of lime, and organic matter, to show that, like guano, they are
the droppings of birds, rather than of reptiles.[299-A]

Mr. Darwin, in his "Journal of a Voyage in the Beagle," informs us that the
"South American ostriches, although they live on vegetable matter, such as
roots and grass, are repeatedly seen at Bahia Blanca (lat. 39° S.), on the
coast of Buenos Ayres, coming down at low water to the extensive mud-banks
which are then dry, for the sake, as the Gauchos say, of feeding on small
fish." They readily take to the water, and have been seen at the bay of San
Blas, and at Port Valdez, in Patagonia, swimming from island to
island.[300-A] It is therefore evident, that in our times a South American
mud-bank might be trodden simultaneously by ostriches, alligators,
tortoises, and frogs; and the impressions left, in the nineteenth century,
by the feet of these various tribes of animals, would not differ from each
other more entirely than do those attributed to birds, saurians,
chelonians, and batrachians, in the rocks of the Connecticut.

To determine the exact age of the red sandstone and shale containing these
ancient footprints in the United States, is not possible at present. No
fossil shells have yet been found in the deposit, nor plants in a
determinable state. The fossil fish are numerous and very perfect; but they
are of a peculiar type, which was originally referred to the genus
_Palæoniscus_, but has since, with propriety, been ascribed, by Sir Philip
Egerton, to a new genus. To this he has given the name of _Ischypterus_,
from the great size and strength of the fulcral rays of the dorsal fin
(from +ischys+; strength, and +pteron+, a fin). They differ from
_Palæoniscus_, as Mr. Redfield first pointed out, by having the vertebral
column prolonged to a more limited extent into the upper lobe of the tail,
or, in the language of M. Agassiz, they are less heterocercal. The teeth
also, according to Sir P. Egerton, who, in 1844, examined for me a fine
series of specimens which I procured at Durham, Connecticut, differ from
those of _Palæoniscus_ in being strong and conical.

That the sandstones containing these fish are of older date than the
strata containing coal, before described (p. 284.) as occurring near
Richmond in Virginia, is highly probable. These were shown to be as old
at least as the oolite and lias. The higher antiquity of the Connecticut
beds cannot be proved by direct superposition, but may be presumed from
the general structure of the country. That structure proves them to be
newer than the movements to which the Appalachian or Alleghany chain
owes its flexures, and this chain includes the ancient coal formation
among its contorted rocks. The unconformable position of this _New Red_
with ornithichnites on the edges of the inclined primary or paleozoic
rocks of the Appalachians is seen at 4. of the section, fig. 379. p.
327. The absence of fish with decidedly heterocercal tails may afford an
argument against the Permian age of the formation; and the opinion that
the red sandstone is triassic, seems, on the whole, the best that we can
embrace in the present state of our knowledge.


FOOTNOTES:

[286-A] Buckland, Bridgew. Treat., vol. ii. p. 38.

[287-A] Monog. des Bunten Sandsteins.

[288-A] Tableau des Genres de Veg. Fos., Dict. Univ. 1849.

[290-A] Geol. Trans., Second Series, vol. v.

[290-B] Buckland, Proc. Geol. Soc. vol. ii. p. 439.; and Murchison and
Strickland Geol. Trans., Second Ser., vol. v. p. 347.

[295-A] Ormerod, Quart. Geol. Journ. 1848, vol. iv. p. 277.

[296-A] Hugh Miller, First Impressions of England, 1847, pp. 183. 214.

[297-A] Buist, Trans. of Bombay Geograph. Soc. 1850, vol. ix. p. 38.

[297-B] Travels in North America, vol. ii. p. 168.

[298-A] Hitchcock, Mem. of Amer. Acad. New Ser., vol. iii. p. 129.

[298-B] This specimen is now in Dr. Mantell's museum.

[299-A] Amer. Journ. of Sci. vol. xlviii. p. 46.

[300-A] Journal of Voyage of Beagle, &c. 2d edition, p. 89. 1845.



CHAPTER XXIII.

PERMIAN OR MAGNESIAN LIMESTONE GROUP.

   Fossils of Magnesian Limestone and Lower New Red distinct from the
   Triassic--Term Permian--English and German equivalents--Marine shells
   and corals of English Magnesian limestone--Palæoniscus and other fish
   of the marl slate--Thecodont Saurians of dolomitic conglomerate of
   Bristol--Zechstein and Rothliegendes of Thuringia--Permian Flora--Its
   generic affinity to the carboniferous--Psaronites or tree-ferns.


When the use of the term "Poikilitic" was explained in the last chapter, I
stated, that in some parts of England it is scarcely possible to separate
the red marls and sandstones so called (originally named "the New Red"),
into two distinct geological systems. Nevertheless, the progress of
investigation, and a careful comparison of English rocks between the lias
and the coal with those occupying a similar geological position in Germany
and Russia, has enabled geologists to divide the Poikilitic formation; and
has even shown that the lowermost of the two divisions is more closely
connected, by its fossil remains, with the carboniferous group than with
the trias. If, therefore, we are to draw a line between the secondary and
primary fossiliferous strata, as between the tertiary and secondary, it
must run through the middle of what was once called the "New Red," or
Poikilitic group. The inferior half of this group will rank as Primary or
Paleozoic, while its upper member will form the base of the Secondary
series. For the lower, or Magnesian Limestone division of English
geologists, Sir R. Murchison has proposed the name of Permian, from Perm, a
Russian government where these strata are more extensively developed than
elsewhere, occupying an area twice the size of France, and containing an
abundant and varied suite of fossils.

Mr. King, in his valuable monograph, recently published, of the Permian
fossils of England, has given a table of the following six members of the
Permian system of the north of England, with what he conceives to be the
corresponding formations in Thuringia.[301-A]

          North of England.                      Thuringia.

  1. Crystalline or concretionary,     |1. Stinkstein.
     and non-crystalline limestone.    |
  2. Brecciated and pseudo-brecciated  |2. Rauchwacke.
     limestone.                        |
  3. Fossiliferous limestone.          |3. Dolomit, or Upper Zechstein.
  4. Compact limestone.                |4. Zechstein, or Lower Zechstein.
  5. Marl-slate.                       |5. Mergel-schiefer, or Kupferschiefer.
  6. Inferior sandstones of various    |6. Rothliegendes.
     colours.                          |

I shall proceed, therefore, to treat briefly of these subdivisions,
beginning with the highest, and referring the reader, for a fuller
description of the lithological character of the whole group, as it occurs
in the north of England, to a valuable memoir by Professor Sedgwick,
published in 1835.[302-A]

_Crystalline or concretionary limestone_ (No. 1.).--This formation is seen
upon the coast of Durham and Yorkshire, between the Wear and the Tees.
Among its characteristic fossils are _Schizodus Schlotheimi_ (fig. 333.)
and _Mytilus septifer_ (fig. 335.).

[Illustration: Fig. 333. _Schizodus Schlotheimi_, Geinitz. Syn. _Axinus
obscurus_, Sow. Crystalline limestone, Permian.]

[Illustration: Fig. 334. _Schizodus truncatus_, King; to show
hinge. Permian.]

[Illustration: Fig. 335. _Mytilus septifer_, King. Syn. _Modiola
acuminata_, James Sow. Permian crystalline limestone.]

These shells occur at Hartlepool and Sunderland, where the rock assumes an
oolitic and botryoidal character. Some of the beds in this division are
ripple-marked; and Mr. King imagines that the absence of corals and the
character of the shells indicate shallow water. In some parts of the coast
of Durham, where the rock is not crystalline, it contains as much as
forty-four per cent. of carbonate of magnesia, mixed with carbonate of
lime. In other places,--for it is extremely variable in structure,--it
consists chiefly of carbonate of lime, and has concreted into globular and
hemispherical masses, varying from the size of a marble to that of a
cannon-ball, and radiating from the centre. Occasionally earthy and
pulverulent beds pass into compact limestone or hard granular dolomite. The
stratification is very irregular, in some places well-defined, in others
obliterated by the concretionary action which has re-arranged the materials
of the rocks subsequently to their original deposition. Examples of this
are seen at Pontefract and Ripon in Yorkshire.

_The brecciated limestone_ (No. 2.) contains no fragments of foreign
rocks, but seems composed of the breaking-up of the Permian limestone
itself, about the time of its consolidation. Some of the angular masses
in Tynemouth Cliff are 2 feet in diameter. This breccia is considered by
Professor Sedgwick as one of the forms of the preceding limestone, No.
1., rather than as regularly underlying it. The fragments are angular
and never water-worn, and appear to have been re-cemented on the spot
where they were formed. It is, therefore, suggested that they may have
been due to those internal movements of the mass which produced the
concretionary structure; but the subject is very obscure, and after
studying the phenomenon in the Marston Rocks, on the coast of Durham, I
found it impossible to form any positive opinion on the subject. The
well-known brecciated limestones of the Pyrenees appeared to me to
present the nearest analogy, but on a much smaller scale.

_The fossiliferous limestone_ (No. 3.) is regarded by Mr. King as a
deep-water formation, from the numerous delicate corals which it includes.
One of these, _Fenestella retiformis_ (fig. 336.), is a very variable
species, and has received many different names. It sometimes attains a
large size, measuring 8 inches in width. The same zoophyte is also found
abundantly in the Permian of Germany.

[Illustration: Fig. 336. Fenestella.

  _a._ _Fenestella retiformis_, Schlot.
       Syn. _Gorgonia infundibuliformis_, Goldf.; _Retepora flustracea_,
       Phillips.
  _b._ Part of the same highly magnified.

Magnesian limestone, Humbleton Hill, near Sunderland.[303-A]]

Shells of the genera _Spirifer_ and _Productus_, which do not occur in
strata newer than the Permian, are abundant in this division of the series
in the ordinary yellow magnesian limestone. (See figs. 337, 338.)

[Illustration: Fig. 337. _Productus calvus_, Sow. Min. Con. Syn. _Productus
horridus_, Bronn's Index, &c., King's Monogr., &c.; _Leptæna_, Dalman.

Magnesian Limestone.]

[Illustration: Fig. 338. _Spirifer undulatus_, Sow. Min. Con. Syn.
_Triogonotreta undulata_, King's Monogr.

Magnesian Limestone.]

_The compact limestone_ (No. 4.) also contains organic remains,
especially corallines, and is intimately connected with the preceding.
Beneath it lies the _marl-slate_ (No. 5.), which consists of hard,
calcareous shales, marl-slate, and thin-bedded limestones. At East
Thickley, in Durham, where it is thirty feet thick, this slate has
yielded many fine specimens of fossil fish of the genera _Palæoniscus_,
_Pygopterus_, _Coelacanthus_, and _Platysomus_, genera which are all
found in the coal-measures of the carboniferous epoch, and which
therefore, says Mr. King, probably lived at no great distance from
the shore. But the Permian species are peculiar, and, for the
most part, identical with those found in the marl-slate or
copper-slate of Thuringia.

[Illustration: Fig. 339. Restored outline of a fish of the genus
_Palæoniscus_, Agass. _Palæothrissum_, Blainville.]

The _Palæoniscus_ above mentioned belongs to that division of fishes
which M. Agassiz has called "Heterocercal," which have their tails
unequally bilobate, like the recent shark and sturgeon, and the
vertebral column running along the upper caudal lobe. (See fig. 340.)
The "Homocercal" fish, which comprise almost all the 8000 species at
present known in the living creation, have the tail-fin either single or
equally divided; and the vertebral column stops short, and is not
prolonged into either lobe. (See fig. 341.)

[Illustration: Fig. 340. Shark.

_Heterocercal._]

[Illustration: Fig. 341. Shad. (_Clupea_, Herring tribe.)

_Homocercal._]

Now it is a singular fact, first pointed out by Agassiz, that the
heterocercal form, which is confined to a small number of genera in the
existing creation, is universal in the Magnesian limestone, and all the
more ancient formations. It characterizes the earlier periods of the
earth's history, when the organization of fishes made a greater approach to
that of saurian reptiles than at later epochs. In all the strata above the
Magnesian limestone the homocercal tail predominates.

A full description has been given by Sir Philip Egerton of the species of
fish characteristic of the marl-slate in Mr. King's monograph before
referred to, where figures of the ichthyolites which are very entire and
well preserved, will be found. Even a single scale is usually so
characteristically marked as to indicate the genus, and sometimes even the
particular species. They are often scattered through the beds singly, and
maybe useful to a geologist in determining the age of the rock.

[Illustration: Fig. 342. _Palæoniscus comtus_, Agassiz. Scale
magnified. Marl-slate.]

[Illustration: Fig. 343. _Palæoniscus elegans_, Sedg. Under surface of
scale magnified. Marl-slate.]

[Illustration: Fig. 344. _Palæoniscus glaphyrus_, Ag. Under surface of
scale magnified. Marl-slate.]

[Illustration: Fig. 345. _Coelacanthus caudalis_, Egerton. Scale showing
granulated surface magnified. Marl-slate.]

[2 Illustrations: Scales of fish. Magnesian limestone.

Fig. 346. _Pygopterus mandibularis_, Ag. Marl-slate.
    _a._ Outside of scale magnified.
    _b._ Under surface of same.

Fig. 347. _Acrolepis Sedgwickii_, Ag. Marl-slate.]

The _inferior sandstones_ (No. 6. Tab. p. 301.), which lie beneath the
marl-slate, consist of sandstone and sand, separating the magnesian
limestone from the coal, in Yorkshire and Durham. In some instances, red
marl and gypsum have been found associated with these beds. They have been
classed with the magnesian limestone by Professor Sedgwick, as being nearly
co-extensive with it in geographical range, though their relations are very
obscure. In some regions we find it stated that the imbedded plants are all
specifically identical with those of the carboniferous series; and, if so,
they probably belong to that epoch; for the true Permian flora appears,
from the researches of MM. Murchison and de Verneuil in Russia, and of
Colonel von Gutbier in Saxony, to be, with few exceptions, distinct from
that of the coal (see p. 307.).

_Dolomitic conglomerate of Bristol._--Near Bristol, in Somersetshire,
and in other counties bordering the Severn, the unconformable beds of
the Lower New Red, resting immediately upon the Coal, consist of a
conglomerate called "dolomitic," because the pebbles of older rocks are
cemented together by a red or yellow base of dolomite or magnesian
limestone. This conglomerate or breccia, for the imbedded fragments are
sometimes angular, occurs in patches over the whole of the downs near
Bristol, filling up the hollows and irregularities in the mountain
limestone, and being principally composed at every spot of the debris of
those rocks on which it immediately rests. At one point we find pieces
of coal shale, in another of mountain limestone, recognizable by its
peculiar shells and zoophytes. Fractured bones, also, and teeth of
saurians, are dispersed through some parts of the breccia.

These saurians (which until the discovery of the _Archegosaurus_ in the
coal were the most ancient examples of fossil reptiles) are all
distinguished by having the teeth implanted deeply in the jaw-bone, and
in distinct sockets, instead of being soldered, as in frogs, to a simple
alveolar parapet. In the dolomitic conglomerate near Bristol the remains
of species of two distinct genera have been found, called
_Thecodontosaurus_ and _Palæosaurus_ by Dr. Riley and Mr.
Stutchbury[306-A]; the teeth of which are conical, compressed, and with
finely serrated edges (figs. 348 and 349.).

[Illustration: Fig. 348. Tooth of _Palæosaurus_ platyodon, nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 349. Tooth of _Thecodontosaurus_, 3 times magnified.]

In Russia, also, Thecodont saurians occur, in beds of the Permian age, of
several genera, while others named _Protorosaurus_ are met with in the
Zechstein of Thuringia. This family of reptiles is allied to the living
monitor, and its appearance in a primary or paleozoic formation, observes
Mr. Owen, is opposed to the doctrine of the progressive development of
reptiles from fish, or from simpler to more complex forms; for, if they
existed at the present day, these monitors would take rank at the head of
the Lacertian order.[306-B]

In Russia the Permian rocks are composed of white limestone, with gypsum
and white salt; and of red and green grits, with occasionally copper ore;
also magnesian limestones, marlstones, and conglomerates.

The country of Mansfeld, in Thuringia, may be called the classic ground of
the Lower New Red, or Magnesian Limestone, or Permian formation, on the
Continent. It consists there principally of, first, the Zechstein,
corresponding to the upper portion of our English series; and, secondly,
the marl-slate, with fish of species identical with those of the bed so
called in Durham. This slaty marlstone is richly impregnated with copper
pyrites, for which it is extensively worked. Magnesian limestone, gypsum,
and rock-salt, occur among the superior strata of this group. At its base
lies the Rothliegendes, supposed to correspond with the Inferior or Lower
New Red Sandstone above mentioned, which occupies a similar place in
England between the marl-slate and coal. Its local name of Rothliegendes,
_red-lyer_, or "Roth-todt-liegendes," _red-dead-lyer_, was given by the
workmen in the German mines from its red colour, and because the copper has
_died out_ when they reach this rock, which is not metalliferous. It is, in
fact, a great deposit of red sandstone and conglomerate, with associated
porphyry, basaltic trap, and amygdaloid.

_Permian Flora._--We learn from the recent investigation of Colonel von
Gutbier, that in the Permian rocks of Saxony no less than sixty species of
fossil plants have been met with, forty of which have not yet been found
elsewhere. Two or three of these, as _Calamites gigas_, _Sphenopteris
erosa_, and _S. lobata_, are also met with in the government of Perm in
Russia. Seven others, and among them _Neuropteris Loshii_, _Pecopteris
arborescens_, and _P. similis_, with several species of _Walchia_
(Lycopodites), are common to the coal-measures.

Among the genera also enumerated by Colonel Gutbier are _Asterophyllites_
and _Annularia_, so characteristic of the carboniferous period; also
_Lepidodendron_, which is common to the Permian of Saxony, Thuringia, and
Russia, although not abundant. _Noeggerathia_ (see fig. 350.), supposed by
A. Brongniart to be allied to _Cycas_, is another link between the Permian
and carboniferous vegetation. Coniferæ, of the Araucarian division, also
occur; but these are likewise met with both in older and newer rocks. The
plants called _Sigillaria_ and _Stigmaria_, so marked a feature in the
carboniferous period, are as yet wanting.

[Illustration: Fig. 350. _Noeggerathia cuneifolia._ Ad. Brongniart.[307-A]]

Among the remarkable fossils of the rothliegendes, or lowest part of the
Permian in Saxony and Bohemia, are the silicified trunks of tree-ferns
called generically _Psaronius_. Their bark was surrounded by a dense
mass of air-roots, which often constituted a great addition to the
original stem, so as to double or quadruple its diameter. The same
remark holds good in regard to certain living extra-tropical arborescent
ferns, particularly those of New Zealand.

Psaronites are also found in the uppermost coal of Autun in France, and in
the upper coal-measures of the State of Ohio in the United States, but
specifically different from those of the rothliegendes. They serve to
connect the Permian flora with the more modern portion of the preceding or
carboniferous group. Upon the whole, it is evident that the Permian plants
approach nearer to the carboniferous ones than to the triassic; and the
same may be said of the Permian fauna.


FOOTNOTES:

[301-A] Palæontographical Society, 1848, London.

[302-A] Trans. Geol. Soc. Lond., Second Series, vol. iii. p. 37.

[303-A] King's Monograph, pl. 2.

[306-A] See paper by Messrs. Riley and Stutchbury, Geol. Trans., Second
Series, vol. v. p. 349., plate 29., figures 2. and 5.

[306-B] Owen, Report on Reptiles, British Assoc., Eleventh Meeting,
1841, p. 197.

[307-A] Murchison's Russia, vol. ii. pl. A. fig. 3.



CHAPTER XXIV.

THE COAL, OR CARBONIFEROUS GROUP.

   Carboniferous strata in the south-west of England--Superposition of
   Coal-measures to Mountain limestone--Departure from this type in North
   of England and Scotland--Section in South Wales--Underclays with
   Stigmaria--Carboniferous Flora--Ferns, Lepidodendra, Calamites,
   Asterophyllites, Sigillariæ, Stigmariæ--Coniferæ--Endogens--Absence of
   Exogens--Coal, how formed--Erect fossil trees--Parkfield Colliery--St.
   Etienne, Coal-field--Oblique trees or snags--Fossil forests in Nova
   Scotia--Brackish water and marine strata--Origin of Clay-iron-stone.


The next group which we meet with in the descending order is the
Carboniferous, commonly called "The Coal;" because it contains many beds
of that mineral, in a more or less pure state, interstratified with
sandstones, shales, and limestones. The coal itself, even in Great
Britain and Belgium, where it is most abundant, constitutes but an
insignificant portion of the whole mass. In the north of England, for
example, the thickness of the coal-bearing strata has been estimated at
3000 feet, while the various coal-seams, 20 or 30 in number, do not in
the aggregate exceed 60 feet.[308-A]

The carboniferous formation comprises two very distinct members: 1st, that
usually called the Coal-measures, of mixed freshwater, terrestrial, and
marine origin, often including seams of coal; 2dly, that named in England
the Mountain or Carboniferous limestone, of purely marine origin, and
containing corals, shells, and encrinites.

In the south-western part of our island, in Somersetshire and South Wales,
the three divisions usually spoken of by English geologists are:

  1. Coal-measures   { Strata of shale, sandstone, and grit, with
                     {   occasional seams of coal, from 600 to 12,000
                     {   feet thick.

  2. Millstone grit  { A coarse quartzose sandstone passing into a
                     {   conglomerate, sometimes used for millstones, with
                     {   beds of shale; usually devoid of coal;
                     {   occasionally above 600 feet thick.

  3. Mountain or     } A calcareous rock containing marine shells and
     Carboniferous   }   corals; devoid of coal; thickness variable,
     limestone       }   sometimes 900 feet.

The millstone grit may be considered as one of the coal sandstones of
coarser texture than usual, with some accompanying shales, in which coal
plants are occasionally found. In the north of England some bands of
limestone, with pectens, oysters, and other marine shells, occur in this
grit, just as in the regular coal-measures, and even a few seams of coal. I
shall treat, therefore, of the whole group, as consisting of two divisions
only, the Coal-measures and Mountain Limestone. The latter is found in the
southern British coal-fields, at the base of the system, or immediately in
contact with the subjacent Old Red Sandstone; but as we proceed northwards
to Yorkshire and Northumberland it begins to alternate with true
coal-measures, the two deposits forming together a series of strata about
1000 feet in thickness. To this mixed formation succeeds the great mass of
genuine mountain limestone.[309-A] Farther north, in the Fifeshire
coal-field in Scotland, we observe a still wider departure from the type of
the south of England, or a more complete intercalation of dense masses of
marine limestones with sandstones, and shales containing coal.


COAL-MEASURES.

In South Wales the coal-measures have been ascertained by actual
measurement to attain the extraordinary thickness of 12,000 feet, the beds
throughout, with the exception of the coal itself, appearing to have been
formed in water of moderate depth, during a slow but perhaps intermittent
depression of the ground, in a region to which rivers were bringing a
never-failing supply of muddy sediment and sand. The same area was
sometimes covered with vast forests, such as we see in the deltas of great
rivers in warm climates, which are liable to be submerged beneath fresh or
salt water should the ground sink vertically a few feet.

In one section near Swansea, in South Wales, where the total thickness of
strata is 3246 feet, we learn from Sir H. De la Beche that there are ten
principal masses of sandstone. One of these is 500 feet thick, and the
whole of them make together a thickness of 2125 feet. They are separated by
masses of shale, varying in thickness from 10 to 50 feet. The intercalated
coal-beds, sixteen in number, are generally from 1 to 5 feet thick, one of
them, which has two or three layers of clay interposed, attaining 9
feet.[309-B] At other points in the same coal-field the shales predominate
over the sandstones. The horizontal extent of some seams of coal is much
greater than that of others, but they all present one characteristic
feature, in having, each of them, what is called its _underclay_. These
underclays, co-extensive with every layer of coal, consist of arenaceous
shale, sometimes called firestone, because it can be made into bricks which
stand the fire of a furnace. They vary in thickness from 6 inches to more
than 10 feet; and Mr. Logan first announced to the scientific world in 1841
that they were regarded by the colliers in South Wales as an essential
accompaniment of each of the one hundred seams of coal met with in their
coal-field. They are said to form the _floor_ on which the coal rests; and
some of them have a slight admixture of carbonaceous matter, while others
are quite blackened by it.

All of them, as Mr. Logan pointed out, are characterized by inclosing a
peculiar species of fossil vegetable called _Stigmaria_, to the exclusion
of other plants. It was also observed that, while in the overlying shales
or "roof" of the coal, ferns and trunks of trees abound without any
_Stigmariæ_, and are flattened and compressed, those singular plants in the
underclays always retain their natural forms, branching freely, and sending
out their slender leaves, as they were formerly styled, through the mud in
all directions. Several species of _Stigmaria_ had long been known to
botanists, and described by them, before their position under each seam of
coal was pointed out. It was conjectured that they might be aquatic,
perhaps floating plants, which sometimes extended their branches and leaves
freely in fluid mud, and which were finally enveloped in the same mud.


CARBONIFEROUS FLORA.

These statements will suffice to convince the reader that we cannot arrive
at a satisfactory theory of the origin of coal till we understand the true
nature of _Stigmaria_; and in order to explain what is now known of this
plant, and of others which have contributed by their decay to produce coal,
it will be necessary to offer a brief preliminary sketch of the whole
carboniferous flora, an assemblage of fossil plants, with which we are
better acquainted than with any other which flourished antecedently to the
tertiary epoch. It should also be remarked that Göppert has ascertained
that the remains of every family of plants scattered through the
coal-measures are sometimes met with in the pure coal itself, a fact which
adds greatly to the geological interest attached to this flora.

_Ferns._--The number of species of carboniferous plants hitherto
described amounts, according to M. Ad. Brongniart, to about 500. These
may perhaps be a fragment only of the entire flora, but they are enough
to show that the state of the vegetable world was then extremely
different from that now established. We are struck at the first glance
with the similarity of many of the ferns to those now living, and the
dissimilarity of almost all the other fossils except the coniferæ. Among
the ferns, as in the case of _Pecopteris_ for example (fig. 351.), it is
not always easy to decide whether they should be referred to different
genera from those established for the classification of living species;
whereas, in regard to most of the other contemporary tribes, with the
exception of the coniferæ, it is often difficult to guess the family,
or even the class, to which they belong. The ferns of the carboniferous
period are generally without organs of fructification, but in some
specimens these are well preserved. In the general absence of such
characters, they have been divided into genera, distinguished chiefly
by the branching of the fronds, and the way in which the veins of
the leaves are disposed. The larger portion are supposed to have been
of the size of ordinary European ferns, but some were decidedly
arborescent, especially the group called _Caulopteris_, by Lindley,
and the _Psaronius_ of the upper or newest coal-measures, before
alluded to (p. 307.).

[Illustration: Fig. 351. _Pecopteris lonchitica._ (Foss. Flo. 153.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 352. Sphenopteris. (Foss. Flo. 101.)

  _a._ _Sphenopteris crenata._
  _b._ The same, magnified.]

[Illustration: Fig. 353. _Caulopteris primæva_, Lindley.]

All the recent tree-ferns belong to one tribe (_Polypodiaceæ_), and to a
small number only of genera in that tribe, in which the surface of the
trunk is marked with scars, or cicatrices, left after the fall of the
fronds. These scars resemble those of _Caulopteris_ (see fig. 353.). No
less than 250 ferns have already been obtained from the coal strata; and
even if we make some reduction on the ground of varieties which have been
mistaken, in the absence of their fructification, for species, still the
result is singular, because the whole of Europe affords at present no more
than 50 indigenous species.

[3 Illustrations: Living tree-ferns of different genera. (Ad. Brong.)

Fig. 354. Tree-fern from Isle of Bourbon.

Fig. 355. _Cyathea glauca_, Mauritius.

Fig. 356. Tree fern from Brazil.]

[3 Illustrations: _Lepidodendron Sternbergii._ Coal-measures,
near Newcastle.

Fig. 357. Branching trunk, 49 feet long, supposed to have belonged to _L.
Sternbergii_. (Foss. Flo. 203.)

Fig. 358. Branching stem with bark and leaves of _L. Sternbergii_.
(Foss. Flo. 4.)

Fig. 359. Portion of same nearer the root; natural size. (Ibid.)]

_Lepidodendra._--These fossils belong to the family of _Lycopodiums_, yet
most of them grew to the size of large trees. The annexed figures represent
a large fossil _Lepidodendron_, 49 feet long, found in Jarrow Colliery,
near Newcastle, lying in shale parallel to the planes of stratification.
Fragments of others, found in the same shale, indicate, by the size of the
rhomboidal scars which cover them, a still greater magnitude. The living
club-mosses, of which there are about 200 species, are abundant in tropical
climates, where one species is sometimes met with attaining a height of 3
feet. They usually creep on the ground, but some stand erect, as the _L.
densum_, from New Zealand (fig. 360.).

[Illustration: Fig. 360. Lycopodium.

  _a._ _Lycopodium densum_; banks of R. Thames, New Zealand.
  _b._ branch, natural size.
  _c._ part of same, magnified.]

In the carboniferous strata of Coalbrook Dale, and in many other
coal-fields, elongated cylindrical bodies, called fossil cones, named by
M. Adolphe Brongniart _Lepidostrobus_, are met with. (See fig. 361.)
They often form the nucleus of concretionary balls of clay-iron-stone,
and are well preserved, exhibiting a conical axis, around which a great
quantity of scales were compactly imbricated. The opinion of M.
Brongniart is now generally adopted, that the _Lepidostrobus_ is
the fruit of _Lepidodendron_.

[Illustration: Fig. 361. _Lepidostrobus ornatus_, Brong.; half
nat. size. Shropshire.]

[Illustration: Fig. 362. _Calamites cannæformis_, Schlot. (Foss. Flo. 79.)
Lower end with rootlets.]

[Illustration: Fig. 363. _Calamites Suckowii_, Brong.; natural size. Common
in coal throughout Europe.]

_Equisetaceæ._--To this family belong two species of the genus
_Equisetites_, allied to the living "horse-tail" which now grows in marshy
grounds. Other species, which have jointed stems, depart more widely from
_Equisetum_, but are yet of analogous organization. They differed from it
principally in being furnished with a thin bark, which is represented in
the stem of _C. Suckowii_ (fig. 363.), in which it will be seen that the
striped external pattern does not agree with that left on the stone where
the bark is stripped off; so that if the two impressions were seen
separately, they might be mistaken for two distinct species.

The tallest living "horse-tails" are only 2 or 3 feet high in Europe, and
even in tropical climates only attain, as in the case of _Equisetum
giganteum_, discovered by Humboldt and Bonpland, in South America, a height
of about 5 feet, the stem being an inch in diameter. Several of the
Calamites of the coal acquired the height and dimensions of small trees.

[Illustration: Fig. 364. _Asterophyllites foliosa._ (Foss. Flo. 25.)
Coal-measures, Newcastle.]

_Asterophyllites._--In this family, M. Brongniart includes several genera,
and among them _Calamodendron_, _Asterophyllites_, and _Annularia_. The
graceful plant, represented in the annexed figure, is supposed to be the
branch of a shrub called _Calamodendron_, a new genus, divided off by
Brongniart from the _Calamites_ of former authors. Its pith and medullary
rays seem to show that it was dicotyledonous, and it appears to have been
allied, by the nature of its tissue, to the gymnogens, or, still more, to
the _Sigillaria_, which will next be mentioned.

_Sigillaria._--A large portion of the trees of the carboniferous period
belonged to this genus, of which about thirty-five species are known. The
structure, both internal and external, was very peculiar, and, with
reference to existing types, very anomalous. They were formerly referred,
by M. Ad. Brongniart, to ferns, which they resemble in the scalariform
texture of their vessels, and, in some degree, in the form of the
cicatrices left by the base of the leafstalks which have fallen off (see
fig. 365.). But with these points of analogy to cryptogamia, they combine
an internal organization much resembling that of cycads, and some of them
are ascertained to have had long linear leaves, quite unlike those of
ferns. They grew to a great height, from 30 to 60, or even 70 feet, with
regular cylindrical stems, and without branches, although some species were
dichotomous towards the top. Their fluted trunks, from 1 to 5 feet in
diameter, appear to have decayed rapidly in the interior, so as to become
hollow, when standing; when, therefore, they were thrown prostrate on the
mud, they were squeezed down and flattened. Hence, we find the bark of the
two opposite sides (now converted into bright shining coal) to constitute
two horizontal layers, one upon the other, half an inch, or an inch, in
thickness. These same trunks, when they are placed obliquely or vertically
to the planes of stratification, retain their original rounded form, and
are uncompressed, the cylinder of bark having been filled with sand, which
now affords a cast of the interior.

[Illustration: Fig. 365. _Sigillaria lævigata_, Brong.]

_Stigmaria._--This fossil, the importance of which has already been pointed
out, was formerly conjectured to be an aquatic plant. It is now ascertained
to be the root of _Sigillaria_. The connection of the roots with the stem,
previously suspected, on botanical grounds, by Brongniart, was first
proved, by actual contact, in the Lancashire coal-field, by Mr. Binney. The
fact has lately been shown, even more distinctly, by Mr. Richard Brown, in
his description of the _Stigmariæ_ occurring in the underclays of the
coal-seams of the Island of Cape Breton, in Nova Scotia.

[Illustration: Fig. 366. Stigmaria attached to a trunk of
_Sigillaria_.[315-A]]

In a specimen of one of these, represented in the annexed figure (fig.
366.), the spread of the roots was 16 feet, and some of them sent out
rootlets, in all directions, into the surrounding clay.

The manner of attachment of the fibres to the stem resembles that of a ball
and socket joint, the base of each rootlet being concave, and fitting on to
a tubercle (see figs. 367 and 368.). Rows of these tubercles are arranged
spirally round each root, which have always a medullary cavity and woody
texture, much resembling that of _Sigillaria_, the structure of the
vessels being, like it, scalariform.

[Illustration: Fig. 367. Surface of another individual of same species,
showing form of tubercles. (Foss. Flo. 34.)]

[Illustration: Fig. 368. _Stigmaria ficoides_, Brong. One fourth of
nat. size. (Foss. Flo. 32.)]

_Conifers._--The coniferous trees of this period are referred to five
genera; the woody structure of some of them showing that they were allied
to the Araucarian division of pines, more than to any of our common
European firs. Some of their trunks exceeded 44 feet in height.

_Endogens._--Hitherto but few monocotyledonous plants have been
discovered in the coal-strata. Most of these consist of fruits referred
by some botanists to palms. The three-sided nuts, called
_Trigonocarpum_, seven species of which are known, appear to have the
best claim to rank as palms, although M. Ad. Brongniart entertains some
doubt even as to their being monocotyledons.


_Exogens._

The entire absence, so far as our paleontological investigations have
hitherto gone, of ordinary dicotyledons or exogens in the coal measures, is
most remarkable. Hence, M. Adolphe Brongniart has called this period the
age of acrogens, in consequence of the vast preponderance of ferns and
_Lepidodendra_.[316-A] Nevertheless, a forest of the period, now under
consideration, may have borne a considerable resemblance to those woody
regions of New Zealand, in which ferns, arborescent and herbaceous, and
lycopodiums, with many coniferæ, abound.

The comparative proportion of living ferns and _Araucariæ_, in Norfolk
Island, to all the other plants, appears to be very similar to that
formerly borne by these tribes respectively in a forest of the coal-period.

I have already stated that Professor Göppert, after examining the fossil
vegetables of the coal-fields of Germany, has detected, in beds of pure
coal, remains of plants of every family hitherto known to occur fossil in
the coal. Many seams, he remarks, are rich in _Sigillaria_,
_Lepidodendron_, and _Stigmaria_, the latter in such abundance, as to
appear to form the bulk of the coal. In some places, almost all the plants
are calamites, in others ferns.[316-B]

_Coal, how formed--Erect trees._--I shall now consider the manner in
which the above-mentioned plants are imbedded in the strata, and how
they may have contributed to produce coal. "Some of the plants of our
coal," says Dr. Buckland, "grew on the identical banks of sand, silt,
and mud, which, being now indurated to stone and shale, form the strata
that accompany the coal; whilst other portions of these plants have been
drifted to various distances from the swamps, savannahs, and forests
that gave them birth, particularly those that are dispersed through the
sandstones, or mixed with fishes in the shale beds." "At Balgray, three
miles north of Glasgow," says the same author, "I saw in the year 1824,
as there still may be seen, an unequivocal example of the stumps of
several stems of large trees, standing close together in their native
place, in a quarry of sandstone of the coal formation."[317-A]

Between the years 1837 and 1840, six fossil trees were discovered in the
coal-field of Lancashire, where it is intersected by the Bolton railway.
They were all in a vertical position, with respect to the plane of the
bed, which dips about 15° to the south. The distance between the first
and the last was more than 100 feet, and the roots of all were imbedded
in a soft argillaceous shale. In the same plane with the roots is a bed
of coal, eight or ten inches thick, which has been ascertained to extend
across the railway, or to the distance of at least ten yards. Just above
the covering of the roots, yet beneath the coal seam, so large a
quantity of the _Lepidostrobus variabilis_ was discovered inclosed in
nodules of hard clay, that more than a bushel was collected from the
small openings around the base of the trees (see figure of this genus,
p. 313.). The exterior trunk of each was marked by a coating of friable
coal, varying from one quarter to three quarters of an inch in
thickness; but it crumbled away on removing the matrix. The dimensions
of one of the trees is 15-1/2 feet in circumference at the base, 7-1/2
feet at the top, its height being 11 feet. All the trees have large
spreading roots, solid and strong, sometimes branching, and traced to a
distance of several feet, and presumed to extend much farther. Mr.
Hawkshaw, who has described these fossils, thinks that, although they
were hollow when submerged, they may have consisted originally of hard
wood throughout; for solid dicotyledonous trees, when prostrated in
tropical forests, as in Venezuela, on the shore of the Caribbean Sea,
were observed by him to be destroyed in the interior, so that little
more is left than an outer shell, consisting chiefly of the bark. This
decay, he says, goes on most rapidly in low and flat tracks, in which
there is a deep rich soil and excessive moisture, supporting tall
forest-trees and large palms, below which bamboos, canes, and minor
palms flourish luxuriantly. Such tracts, from their lowness, would be
most easily submerged, and their dense vegetation might then give rise
to a seam of coal.[317-B]

In a deep valley near Capel-Coelbren, branching from the higher part of the
Swansea valley, four stems of upright _Sigillariæ_ were seen, in 1838,
piercing through the coal-measures of S. Wales; one of them was 2 feet in
diameter, and one 13 feet and a half high, and they were all found to
terminate downwards in a bed of coal. "They appear," says Sir H. De la
Beche, "to have constituted a portion of a subterranean forest at the epoch
when the lower carboniferous strata were formed.[318-A]

In a colliery near Newcastle, say the authors of the Fossil Flora, a great
number of _Sigillariæ_ were placed in the rock as if they had retained the
position in which they grew. Not less than thirty, some of them 4 or 5 feet
in diameter, were visible within an area of 50 yards square, the interior
being sandstone, and the bark having been converted into coal. The roots of
one individual were found imbedded in shale; and the trunk, after
maintaining a perpendicular course and circular form for the height of
about 10 feet, was then bent over so as to become horizontal. Here it was
distended laterally, and flattened so as to be only one inch thick, the
flutings being comparatively distinct.[318-B] Such vertical stems are
familiar to our miners, under the name of coal-pipes. One of them, 72 feet
in length, was discovered, in 1829, near Gosforth, about five miles from
Newcastle, in coal-grit, the strata of which it penetrated. The exterior of
the trunk was marked at intervals with knots, indicating the points at
which branches had shot off. The wood of the interior had been converted
into carbonate of lime; and its structure was beautifully shown by cutting
transverse slices, so thin as to be transparent. (See p. 40.)

These "coal-pipes" are much dreaded by our miners, for almost every year in
the Bristol, Newcastle, and other coal-fields, they are the cause of fatal
accidents. Each cylindrical cast of a tree, formed of solid sandstone, and
increasing gradually in size towards the base, and being without branches,
has its whole weight thrown downwards, and receives no support from the
coating of friable coal which has replaced the bark. As soon, therefore, as
the cohesion of this external layer is overcome, the heavy column falls
suddenly in a perpendicular or oblique direction from the roof of the
gallery whence coal has been extracted, wounding or killing the workman who
stands below. It is strange to reflect how many thousands of these trees
fell originally in their native forests in obedience to the law of gravity;
and how the few which continued to stand erect, obeying, after myriads of
ages, the same force, are cast down to immolate their human victims.

It has been remarked, that if, instead of working in the dark, the miner
was accustomed to remove the upper covering of rock from each seam of coal,
and to expose to the day the soils on which ancient forests grew, the
evidence of their former growth would be obvious. Thus in South
Staffordshire a seam of coal was laid bare in the year 1844, in what is
called an open work at Parkfield Colliery, near Wolverhampton. In the
space of about a quarter of an acre the stumps of no less than 73 trees
with their roots attached appeared, as shown in the annexed plan (fig.
369.), some of them more than 8 feet in circumference. The trunks, broken
off close to the root, were lying prostrate in every direction, often
crossing each other. One of them measured 15, another 30 feet in length,
and others less. They were invariably flattened to the thickness of one or
two inches, and converted into coal. Their roots formed part of a stratum
of coal 10 inches thick, which rested on a layer of clay 2 inches thick,
below which was a second forest, resting on a 2-foot seam of coal. Five
feet below this again was a third forest with large stumps of
_Lepidodendra_, _Calamites_, and other trees.

[Illustration: Fig. 369. Ground-plan of a fossil forest, Parkfield
Colliery, near Wolverhampton, showing the position of 73 trees in a
quarter of an acre.[319-A]]

In the account given, in 1821, by M. Alex. Brongniart of the coal-mine
of Treuil, at St. Etienne, near Lyons, he states, that distinct
horizontal strata of micaceous sandstone are traversed by vertical
trunks of monocotyledonous vegetables, resembling bamboos or large
_Equiseta_.[319-B] Since the consolidation of the stone, there has been
here and there a sliding movement, which has broken the continuity of
the stems, throwing the upper parts of them on one side, so that they
are often not continuous with the lower.

From these appearances it was inferred that we have here the monuments
of a submerged forest. I formerly objected to this conclusion,
suggesting that, in that case, all the roots ought to have been found at
one and the same level, and not scattered irregularly through the mass.
I also imagined that the soil to which the roots were attached should
have been different from the sandstone in which the trunks are enclosed.
Having, however, seen calamites near Pictou, in Nova Scotia, buried at
various heights in sandstone and in similar erect attitudes, I have now
little doubt that M. Brongniart's view was correct. These plants seem
to have grown on a sandy soil, liable to be flooded from time to time,
and raised by new accessions of sediment, as may happen in swamps near
the banks of a large river in its delta. Trees which delight in marshy
grounds are not injured by being buried several feet deep at their base;
and other trees are continually rising up from new soils, several feet
above the level of the original foundation of the morass. In the banks
of the Mississippi, when the water has fallen, I have seen sections of a
similar deposit in which portions of the stumps of trees with their
roots _in situ_ appeared at many different heights.[320-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 370. Section showing the erect position of fossil trees
in coal sandstone at St. Etienne. (Alex. Brongniart.)]

When I visited, in 1843, the quarries of Treuil above-mentioned, the fossil
trees seen in fig. 370. were removed, but I obtained proofs of other
forests of erect trees in the same coal-field.

[Illustration: Fig. 371. Inclined position of a fossil tree, cutting
through horizontal beds of sandstone, Craigleith quarry, Edinburgh. Angle
of inclination from _a_ to _b_ 27°.]

_Snags._--In 1830, a slanting trunk was exposed in Craigleith quarry,
near Edinburgh, the total length of which exceeded 60 feet. Its diameter
at the top was about 7 inches, and near the base it measured 5 feet in
its greater, and 2 feet in its lesser width. The bark was converted into
a thin coating of the purest and finest coal, forming a striking
contrast in colour with the white quartzose sandstone in which it lay.
The annexed figure represents a portion of this tree, about 15 feet
long, which I saw exposed in 1830, when all the strata had been removed
from one side. The beds which remained were so unaltered and undisturbed
at the point of junction, as clearly to show that they had been
tranquilly deposited round the tree, and that the tree had not
subsequently pierced through them, while they were yet in a soft state.
They were composed chiefly of siliceous sandstone, for the most part
white; and divided into laminæ so thin, that from six to fourteen of
them might be reckoned in the thickness of an inch. Some of these thin
layers were dark, and contained coaly matter; but the lowest of the
intersected beds were calcareous. The tree could not have been hollow
when imbedded, for the interior still preserved the woody texture in a
perfect state, the petrifying matter being, for the most part,
calcareous.[321-A] It is also clear, that the lapidifying matter was not
introduced laterally from the strata through which the fossil passes, as
most of these were not calcareous. It is well known that, in the
Mississippi and other great American rivers, where thousands of trees
float annually down the stream, some sink with their roots downwards,
and become fixed in the mud. Thus placed, they have been compared to a
lance in rest; and so often do they pierce through the bows of vessels
which run against them, that they render the navigation extremely
dangerous. Mr. Hugh Miller mentions four other huge trunks exposed in
quarries near Edinburgh, which lay diagonally across the strata at an
angle of about 30°, with their lower or heavier portions downwards, the
roots of all, save one, rubbed off by attrition. One of these was 60 and
another 70 feet in length, and from 4 to 6 feet in diameter.

[Illustration: Fig. 372. Section of the cliffs of the South Joggins,
near Minudie, Nova Scotia.]

The number of years for which the trunks of trees, when constantly
submerged, can resist decomposition, is very great; as we might suppose
from the durability of wood, in artificial piles, permanently covered by
water. Hence these fossil snags may not imply a rapid accumulation of beds
of sand, although the channel of a river or part of a lagoon is often
filled up in a very few years.

_Nova Scotia._--One of the finest examples in the world of a succession of
fossil forests of the carboniferous period, laid open to view in a natural
section, is that seen in the lofty cliffs bordering the Chignecto Channel,
a branch of the Bay of Fundy, in Nova Scotia.[321-B]

In the annexed section (fig. 372.), which I examined in July, 1842, the
beds from _c_ to _i_ are seen all dipping the same way, their average
inclination being at an angle of 24° S.S.W. The vertical height of the
cliffs is from 150 to 200 feet; and between _d_ and _g_, in which space I
observed seventeen trees in an upright position, or, to speak more
correctly, at right angles to the planes of stratification, I counted
nineteen seams of coal, varying in thickness from 2 inches to 4 feet. At
low tide a fine horizontal section of the same beds is exposed to view on
the beach. The thickness of the beds alluded to, between _d_ and _g_, is
about 2,500 feet, the erect trees consisting chiefly of large _Sigillariæ_,
occurring at ten distinct levels, one above the other; but Mr. Logan, who
afterwards made a more detailed survey of the same line of cliffs, found
erect trees at seventeen levels, extending through a vertical thickness of
4,515 feet of strata; and he estimated the total thickness of the
carboniferous formation, with and without coal, at no less than 14,570
feet, every where devoid of marine organic remains.[322-A] The usual height
of the buried trees seen by me was from 6 to 8 feet; but one trunk was
about 25 feet high and 4 feet in diameter, with a considerable bulge at the
base. In no instance could I detect any trunk intersecting a layer of coal,
however thin; and most of the trees terminated downwards in seams of coal.
Some few only were based in clay and shale, none of them in sandstone. The
erect trees, therefore, appeared in general to have grown on beds of coal.
In some of the underclays I observed _Stigmaria_.

[Illustration: Fig. 373. Fossil tree at right angles to planes of
stratification. Coal measures, Nova Scotia.]

In regard to the plants, they belonged to the same genera, and most of them
to the same species, as those met with in the distant coal-fields of
Europe. In the sandstone, which filled their interiors, I frequently
observed fern leaves, and sometimes fragments of _Stigmaria_, which had
evidently entered together with sediment after the trunk had decayed and
become hollow, and while it was still standing under water. Thus the tree,
_a b_, fig. 373., the same which is represented at _a_, fig. 374., or in
the bed _e_ in the larger section, fig. 372., is a hollow trunk 5 feet 8
inches in length, traversing various strata, and cut off at the top by a
layer of clay 2 feet thick on which rests a seam of coal (_b_, fig. 374.)
1 foot thick. On this coal again stood two large trees (_c_ and _d_), while
at a greater height the trees _f_ and _g_ rest upon a thin seam of coal
(_e_), and above them is an underclay, supporting the 4-foot coal.

[Illustration: Fig. 374. Erect fossil trees. Coal-measures, Nova Scotia.]

If we now return to the tree first mentioned (fig. 373.), we find the
diameter (_a b_) 14 inches at the top and 16 inches at the bottom, the
length of the trunk 5 feet 8 inches. The strata in the interior
consisted of a series entirely different from those on the outside. The
lowest of the three outer beds which it traversed consisted of purplish
and blue shale (_c_, fig. 373.), 2 feet thick, above which was sandstone
(_d_) 1 foot thick, and, above this, clay (_e_) 2 feet 8 inches. But, in
the interior, were nine distinct layers of different composition: at the
bottom, first, shale 4 inches, then sandstone 1 foot, then shale 4
inches, then sandstone 4 inches, then shale 11 inches, then clay (_f_)
with nodules of ironstone 2 inches, then pure clay 2 feet, then
sandstone 3 inches, and, lastly, clay 4 inches. Owing to the outward
slope of the face of the cliff, the section (fig. 373.) was not exactly
perpendicular to the axis of the tree; and hence, probably, the apparent
sudden termination at the base without a stump and roots.

In this example the layers of matter in the inside of the tree are more
numerous than those without; but it is more common in the coal-measures
of all countries to find a cylinder of pure sandstone,--the cast of the
interior of a tree, intersecting a great many alternating beds of shale
and sandstone, which originally enveloped the trunk as it stood erect in
the water. Such a want of correspondence in the materials outside and
inside, is just what we might expect if we reflect on the difference of
time at which the deposition of sediment will take place in the two
cases; the imbedding of the tree having gone on for many years before
its decay had made much progress.

The high tides of the Bay of Fundy, rising more than 60 feet, are so
destructive as to undermine and sweep away continually the whole face of
the cliffs, and thus a new crop of erect trees is brought into view
every three or four years. They are known to extend over a space between
two and three miles from north to south, and more than twice that
distance from east to west, being seen in the banks of streams
intersecting the coal-field.

In Cape Breton, Mr. Richard Brown has observed in the Sydney coal-field a
total thickness of coal-measures, without including the underlying
millstone grit, of 1843 feet, dipping at an angle of 8°. He has published
minute details of the whole series, showing at how many different levels
erect trees occur, consisting of _Sigillaria_, _Lepidodendron_, _Calamite_,
and other genera. In one place eight erect trunks, with roots and rootlets
attached to them, were seen at the same level, within a horizontal space 80
feet in length. Beds of coal of various thickness are interstratified. Some
of the associated strata are ripple-marked, with impressions of rain-drops.
Taking into account forty-one clays filled with roots of _Stigmaria_ in
their natural position, and eighteen layers of upright trees at other
levels, there is, on the whole, clear evidence of at least fifty-nine
fossil forests, ranged one above the other, in this coal-field, in the
above-mentioned thickness of strata.[324-A]

The fossil shells in Cape Breton and in the Nova Scotia section (fig.
372.), consisting of _Cypris_, _Unio_ (?), _Modiola_, _Microconchus
carbonarius_ (see fig. 375.), and _Spirorbis_, seem to indicate brackish
water; but we ought never to be surprised if, in pursuing the same stratum,
we come to a fresh or purely marine deposit; for this will depend upon our
taking a direction higher up or lower down the ancient river or delta
deposit. When the Purbeck beds of the Wealden were described in Chap.
XVIII., I endeavoured to explain the intimate connection of strata formed
at a river's mouth, or in the tranquil lagoons of the delta, or in the sea,
after a slight submergence of the land, with its dirt-beds.

In the English coal-fields the same association of fresh, or rather
brackish water with marine strata, in close connection with beds of coal of
terrestrial origin, has been frequently recognized. Thus, for example, a
deposit near Shrewsbury, probably formed in brackish water, has been
described by Sir R. Murchison as the youngest member of the carboniferous
series of that district, at the point where the coal-measures are in
contact with the Permian or "Lower New Red." It consists of shales and
sandstones about 150 feet thick, with coal and traces of plants; including
a bed of limestone, varying from 2 to 9 feet in thickness, which is
cellular, and resembles some lacustrine limestones of France and Germany.
It has been traced for 30 miles in a straight line, and can be recognized
at still more distant points. The characteristic fossils are a small
bivalve, having the form of a _Cyclas_, a small _Cypris_ (fig. 376.), and
the microscopic shell of an annelid of an extinct genus called
_Microconchus_ (fig. 375.), allied to _Serpula_ or _Spirorbis_.

In the lower coal-measures of Coalbrook Dale, the strata, according to Mr.
Prestwich, often change completely within very short distances, beds of
sandstone passing horizontally into clay, and clay into sandstone. The
coal-seams often wedge out or disappear; and sections, at places nearly
contiguous, present marked lithological distinctions. In this single field,
in which the strata are from 700 to 800 feet thick, between forty and
fifty species of terrestrial plants have been discovered, besides several
fishes and trilobites of forms distinct from those occurring in the
Silurian strata. Also upwards of forty species of mollusca, among which are
two or three referred to the freshwater genus _Unio_, and others of marine
forms, such as _Nautilus_, _Orthoceras_, _Spirifer_, and _Productus_. Mr.
Prestwich suggests that the intermixture of beds containing freshwater
shells with others full of marine remains, and the alternation of coarse
sandstone and conglomerate with beds of fine clay or shale containing the
remains of plants, may be explained by supposing the deposit of Coalbrook
Dale to have originated in a bay of the sea or estuary into which flowed a
considerable river subject to occasional freshes.[325-A]

[2 Illustrations: Freshwater Fossils--Coal.

Fig. 375.

  _a._ _Microconchus carbonarius_.
  _b._ var. of same; nat. size, and magnified.

Fig. 376. _Cypris inflata_, natural size, and magnified. Murchison.[325-B]]

In the Edinburgh coal-field, at Burdiehouse, fossil fishes, mollusca,
and cypris, very similar to those in Shropshire and Staffordshire, have
been found by Dr. Hibbert.[325-C] In the coal-field also of Yorkshire
there are freshwater strata, some of which contain shells referred to
the genus _Unio_; but in the midst of the series there is one thin but
very widely spread stratum, abounding in fishes and marine shells, such
as _Ammonites Listeri_ (fig. 377.), _Orthoceras_, and _Avicula
papyracea_, Goldf. (fig. 378.)[325-D]

[Illustration: Fig. 377. _Ammonites Listeri_, Sow.]

[Illustration: Fig. 378. _Avicula papyracea_, Goldf. (_Pecten
papyraceus_, Sow.)]

No similarly intercalated layer of marine shells has been noticed in the
neighbouring coal-field of Newcastle, where, as in South Wales and
Somersetshire, the marine deposits are entirely below those containing
terrestrial and freshwater remains.[326-A]

_Clay-iron-stone._--Bands and nodules of clay-iron-stone are common in
coal-measures, and are formed, says Sir H. De la Beche, of carbonate of
iron, mingled mechanically with earthy matter, like that constituting the
shales. Mr. Hunt, of the Museum of Practical Geology, instituted a series
of experiments to illustrate the production of this substance, and found
that decomposing vegetable matter, such as would be distributed through all
coal strata, prevented the farther oxidation of the proto-salts of iron,
and converted the peroxide into protoxide by taking a portion of its oxygen
to form carbonic acid. Such carbonic acid, meeting with the protoxide of
iron in solution, would unite with it and form a carbonate of iron; and
this mingling with fine mud, when the excess of carbonic acid was removed,
might form beds or nodules of argillaceous iron-stone.[326-B]


FOOTNOTES:

[308-A] Phillips; art. "Geology," Encyc. Britan.

[309-A] Sedgwick, Geol. Trans., Second Series, vol. iv.; and Phillips,
Geol. of Yorksh. part 2.

[309-B] Memoirs of Geol. Survey, vol. i. p. 195.

[315-A] The trunk in this case is referred by Mr. Brown to _Lepidodendron_,
but his illustrations seem to show the usual markings assumed by
_Sigillaria_ near its base.

[316-A] For terminology of classification of plants, see above,
note, p. 223.

[316-B] Quart. Geol. Journ., vol. v., Mem., p. 17.

[317-A] Anniv. Address to Geol. Soc., 1840.

[317-B] Hawkshaw, Geol. Soc. Proceedings, Nos. 64. and 69.

[318-A] Geol. Report on Cornwall, &c. p. 143.

[318-B] Lindley and Hutton, Foss. Flo. part 6. p. 150.

[319-A] See papers by Messrs. Beckett and Ick. Proceed. in Geol. Soc.,
vol. iv. p. 287.

[319-B] Annales des Mines, 1821.

[320-A] Principles of Geol., 8th ed., p. 215.

[321-A] See figures of texture, Witham, Foss. Veget., pl. 3.

[321-B] See Lyell's Travels in N. America, vol. ii. p. 179.

[322-A] Quart. Geol. Journ., vol. ii. p. 177.

[324-A] Geol. Quart. Journ., vol. ii. p. 393.; and vol. vi. p. 115.

[325-A] Prestwich, Geol. Trans., 2d Series, vol. v. p. 440. Murchison,
Silurian System, p. 105.

[325-B] Silurian System, p. 84.

[325-C] Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin. vol. xiii. Horner, Edin. New Phil.
Journ., April, 1836.

[325-D] Phillips; art. "Geology," Encyc. Metrop., p. 590.

[326-A] Phillips; art. "Geology," Encyc. Metrop., p. 592.

[326-B] Memoirs of Geol. Survey, pp. 51. 255, &c.



CHAPTER XXV.

CARBONIFEROUS GROUP--_continued_.

   Coal-fields of the United States--Section of the country between the
   Atlantic and Mississippi--Position of land in the carboniferous period
   eastward of the Alleghanies--Mechanically formed rocks thinning out
   westward, and limestones thickening--Uniting of many coal-seams into
   one thick one--Horizontal coal at Brownsville, Pennsylvania--Vast
   extent and continuity of single seams of coal--Ancient river-channel
   in Forest of Dean coal-field--Absence of earthy matter in
   coal--Climate of carboniferous period--Insects in coal--Rarity of
   air-breathing animals--Great number of fossil fish--First discovery of
   the skeletons of fossil reptiles--Footprints of reptilians--Mountain
   limestone--Its corals and marine shells.


It was stated in the last chapter that a great uniformity prevails in the
fossil plants of the coal-measures of Europe and North America; and I may
add that four-fifths of those collected in Nova Scotia have been identified
with European species. Hence the former existence at the remote period
under consideration (the carboniferous) of a continent or chain of islands
where the Atlantic now rolls its waves seems a fair inference. Nor are
there wanting other and independent proofs of such an ancient land situated
to the eastward of the present Atlantic coast of North America; for the
geologist deduces the same conclusion from the mineral composition of the
carboniferous and some older groups of rocks as they are developed on the
eastern flanks of the Alleghanies, contrasted with their character in the
low country to the westward of those mountains.

The annexed diagram (fig. 379.) will assist the reader in understanding
the phenomena now alluded to, although I must guard him against
supposing that it is a true section. A great number of details have of
necessity been omitted, and the scale of heights and horizontal
distances are unavoidably falsified.

[Illustration: Fig. 379. Diagram explanatory of the geological structure of
a part of the United States between the Atlantic and the Mississippi.

Length from E. to W. 850 miles.

  Appalachian Coal Field.  Alleghanies, or Appalachians.

Same section--_continued_.

  Mississippi.  Illinois Coal Field.  Cincinnati.  Appalachian Coal Field.

  A B. Atlantic plain.
  B C. Atlantic slope.
  C D. Alleghanies or Appalachian chain.
  D E. Appalachian coal-field west of the mountains.
  E F. Dome-shaped outcrop of strata on the Ohio, older than the coal.
  F G. Illinois coal-field.
  _h._ Falls and rapids of the rivers at the junction of the hypogene and
       newer formations.
  _i_, _k_, _l_, _m_. Parallel folds of Appalachians becoming successively
                      more open, and flatter in going from E. to W.

_References to the different Formations._

  1. Miocene tertiary.
  2. Eocene tertiary.
  3. Cretaceous strata.
  4. Red sandstone with ornithichnites (new red or trias?) usually much
     invaded by trap.
  5. Coal-measures (bituminous coal).
  5' Anthracitic coal-measures.
  5'' Carboniferous limestone of the Illinois coal-field, wanting in the
     Appalachian.
  6. Old red or Devonian, Olive slate, &c.
  7. Primary fossiliferous or Silurian strata.
  8. Hypogene strata, or gneiss, mica schist, &c., with granite veins.

_Note._ The dotted lines at _i_ and _k_ express portions of rock removed
by denudation, the amount of which may be estimated by supposing similar
lines prolonged from other points where different strata end abruptly
at the surface.

_N.B._ The lower section at ** joins on to the upper one at *.]

Starting from the shores of the Atlantic, on the eastern side of the
Continent, we first come to a low region (A B), which was called the
alluvial plain by the first geographers. It is occupied by tertiary and
cretaceous strata, before described (pp. 171. 206. and 224.), which are
nearly horizontal. The next belt, from B to C, consists of granitic rocks
(hypogene), chiefly gneiss and mica-schist, covered occasionally with
unconformable red sandstone, No. 4. (New Red or Trias?), remarkable for its
ornithichnites (see p. 327.). Sometimes, also, this sandstone rests on the
edges of the disturbed paleozoic rocks (as seen in the section). The region
(B C), sometimes called the "Atlantic Slope," corresponds nearly in average
width with the low and flat plain (A, B), and is characterized by hills of
moderate height, contrasting strongly, in their rounded shape and altitude,
with the long, steep, and lofty parallel ridges of the Alleghany mountains.
The outcrop of the strata in these ridges, like the two belts of hypogene
and newer rocks (A B, and B C), above alluded to, when laid down on a
geological map, exhibit long stripes of different colours, running in a
N.E. and S.W. direction, in the same way as the lias, chalk, and other
secondary formations in the middle and eastern half of England.

The narrow and parallel zones of the Appalachians here mentioned, consist
of strata, folded into a succession of convex and concave flexures,
subsequently laid open by denudation. The component rocks are of great
thickness, all referable to the Silurian, Devonian, and Carboniferous
formations. There is no principal or central axis, as in the Pyrenees and
many other chains--no nucleus to which all the minor ridges conform; but
the chain consists of many nearly equal and parallel foldings, having what
is termed an anticlinal and synclinal arrangement (see above, p. 48.). This
system of hills extends, geologically considered, from Vermont to Alabama,
being more than 1000 miles long, from 50 to 150 miles broad, and varying in
height from 2000 to 6000 feet. Sometimes the whole assemblage of ridges
runs perfectly straight for a distance of more than 50 miles, after which
all of them wheel round together, and take a new direction, at an angle of
20 or 30 degrees to the first.

We are indebted to the state surveyors of Virginia and Pennsylvania, Prof.
W. B. Rogers and his brother Prof. H. D. Rogers, for the important
discovery of a clue to the general law of structure prevailing throughout
this range of mountains, which, however simple it may appear when once made
out and clearly explained, might long have been overlooked; amidst so great
a mass of complicated details. It appears that the bending and fracture of
the beds is greatest on the south-eastern or Atlantic side of the chain,
and the strata become less and less disturbed as we go westward, until at
length they regain their original or horizontal position. By reference to
the section (fig. 379.), it will be seen that on the eastern side, or in
the ridges and troughs nearest the Atlantic, south-eastern dips
predominate, in consequence of the beds having been folded back upon
themselves, as in _i_, those on the north-western side of each arch having
been inverted. The next set of arches (such as _k_) are more open, each
having its western side steepest; the next (_l_) opens out still more
widely, the next (_m_) still more, and this continues until we arrive at
the low and level part of the Appalachian coal-field (D E).

In nature or in a true section, the number of bendings or parallel folds is
so much greater that they could not be expressed in a diagram without
confusion. It is also clear that large quantities of rock have been removed
by aqueous action or denudation, as will appear if we attempt to complete
all the curves in the manner indicated by the dotted lines at _i_ and _k_.

The movements which imparted so uniform an order of arrangement to this
vast system of rocks must have been, if not contemporaneous, at least
parts of one and the same series, depending on some common cause. Their
geological date is well defined, at least within certain limits, for
they must have taken place after the deposition of the carboniferous
strata (No. 5.), and before the formation of the red sandstone (No. 4.).
The greatest disturbing and denuding forces have evidently been exerted
on the south-eastern side of the chain; and it is here that igneous or
plutonic rocks are observed to have invaded the strata, forming dykes,
some of which run for miles in lines parallel to the main direction of
the Appalachians, or N.N.E. and S.S.W.

The thickness of the carboniferous rocks in the region C is very great, and
diminishes rapidly as we proceed to the westward. The surveys of
Pennsylvania and Virginia show that the south-east was the quarter whence
the coarser materials of these strata were derived, so that the ancient
land lay in that direction. The conglomerate which forms the general base
of the coal-measures is 1500 feet thick in the Sharp Mountain, where I saw
it (at C) near Pottsville; whereas it has only a thickness of 500 feet,
about thirty miles to the north-west, and dwindles gradually away when
followed still farther in the same direction, till its thickness is reduced
to 30 feet.[329-A] The limestones, on the other hand, of the coal-measures,
augment as we trace them westward. Similar observations have been made in
regard to the Silurian and Devonian formations in New York; the sandstones
and all the mechanically-formed rocks thinning out as they go westward, and
the limestones thickening, as it were, at their expense. It is, therefore,
clear that the ancient land was to the east, where the Atlantic now is; the
deep sea, with its banks of coral and shells to the west, or where the
hydrographical basin of the Mississippi is now situated.

In that region, near Pottsville, where the thickness of the coal-measures
is greatest, there are thirteen seams of anthracitic coal, several of them
more than 2 yards thick. Some of the lowest of these alternate with beds of
white grit and conglomerate of coarser grain than I ever saw elsewhere,
associated with pure coal. The pebbles of quartz are often of the size of a
hen's egg. On following these pudding-stones and grits for several miles
from Pottsville, by Tamaqua, to the Lehigh Summit Mine, in company with Mr.
H. D. Rogers, in 1841, he pointed out to me that the coarse-grained strata
and their accompanying shales gradually thin out, until seven seams of
coal, at first widely separated, are brought nearer and nearer together,
until they successively unite; so that at last they form one mass, between
40 and 50 feet thick. I saw this enormous bed of anthracitic coal quarried
in the open air at Mauch Chunk (or the Bear Mountain), the overlying
sandstone, 40 feet thick, having been removed bodily from the top of the
hill, which, to use the miner's expression, had been "scalped." The
accumulation of vegetable matter now constituting this vast bed of
anthracite, may perhaps, before it was condensed by pressure and the
discharge of its hydrogen, oxygen, and other volatile ingredients, have
been between 200 and 300 feet thick. The origin of such a vast thickness of
vegetable remains, so unmixed with earthy ingredients, can, I think, be
accounted for in no other way, than by the growth, during thousands of
years, of trees and ferns, in the manner of peat,--a theory which the
presence of the Stigmaria _in situ_ under each of the seven layers of
anthracite, fully bears out. The rival hypothesis, of the drifting of
plants into a sea or estuary, leaves the absence of sediment, or, in this
case, of sand and pebbles, wholly unexplained.

[Illustration: Fig. 380. Cross section.]

[Illustration: Fig. 381. Cross section.]

But the student will naturally ask, what can have caused so many seams of
coal, after they had been persistent for miles, to come together and blend
into one single seam, and that one equal in the aggregate to the thickness
of the several separate seams? Often had the same question been put by
English miners before a satisfactory answer was given to it by the late Mr.
Bowman. The following is his solution of the problem. Let _a a'_, fig.
380., be a mass of vegetable matter, capable, when condensed, of forming a
3-foot seam of coal. It rests on the underclay _b b'_, filled with roots of
trees _in situ_, and it supports a growing forest (C D). Suppose that part
of the same forest D E had become submerged by the ground sinking down 25
feet, so that the trees have been partly thrown down and partly remain
erect in water, slowly decaying, their stumps and the lower parts of their
trunks being enveloped in layers of sand and mud, which are gradually
filling up the lake D F. When this lake or lagoon has at length been
entirely silted up and converted into land, say, in the course of a
century, the forest C D will extend once more continuously over the whole
area C F, as in fig. 381., and another mass of vegetable matter (_g g'_),
forming 3 feet more of coal, may accumulate from C to F. We then find in
the region F, two seams of coal (_a'_ and _g'_) each 3 feet thick, and
separated by 25 feet of sandstone and shale, with erect trees based upon
the lower coal, while, between D and C, we find these two seams united into
a 2-yard coal. It may be objected that the uninterrupted growth of plants
during the interval of a century will have caused the vegetable matter in
the region C D to be thicker than the two distinct seams _a'_ and _g'_ at
F; and no doubt there would actually be a slight excess representing one
generation of trees with the remains of other plants, forming half an inch
or an inch of coal; but this would not prevent the miner from affirming
that the seam _a g_, throughout the area C D, was equal to the two seams
_a'_ and _g'_ at F.

The reader has seen, by reference to the section (fig. 379. p. 327.), that
the strata of the Appalachian coal-field assume an horizontal position west
of the mountains. In that less elevated country, the coal-measures are
intersected by three great navigable rivers, and are capable of supplying
for ages, to the inhabitants of a densely peopled region, an inexhaustible
supply of fuel. These rivers are the Monongahela, the Alleghany, and the
Ohio, all of which lay open on their banks the level seams of coal. Looking
down the first of these at Brownsville, we have a fine view of the main
seam of bituminous coal 10 feet thick, commonly called the Pittsburg seam,
breaking out in the steep cliff at the water's edge; and I made the
accompanying sketch of its appearance from the bridge over the river (see
fig. 382.). Here the coal, 10 feet thick, is covered by carbonaceous shale
(_b_), and this again by micaceous sandstone (_c_). Horizontal galleries
may be driven everywhere at very slight expense, and so worked as to drain
themselves, while the cars, laden with coal and attached to each other,
glide down on a railway, so as to deliver their burden into barges moored
to the river's bank. The same seam is seen at a distance, on the right bank
(at _a_), and may be followed the whole way to Pittsburg, fifty miles
distant. As it is nearly horizontal, while the river descends it crops out
at a continually increasing, but never at an inconvenient, height above the
Monongahela. Below the great bed of coal at Brownsville is a fire-clay 18
inches thick, and below this, several beds of limestone, below which again
are other coal seams. I have also shown in my sketch another layer of
workable coal (at _d d_), which breaks out on the slope of the hills at a
greater height. Here almost every proprietor can open a coal-pit on his own
land, and the stratification being very regular, he may calculate with
precision the depth at which coal may be won.

The Appalachian coal-field, of which these strata form a part (from C
to E, section, fig. 379., p. 327.), is remarkable for its vast area;
for, according to Professor H. D. Rogers, it stretches continuously from
N.E. to S.W., for a distance of 720 miles, its greatest width being
about 180 miles. On a moderate estimate, its superficial area amounts to
63,000 square miles.

[Illustration: Fig. 382. View of the great Coal Seam on the Monongahela at
Brownsville, Pennsylvania, U. S.

  _a._ Ten-foot seam of coal.
  _b._ Black bituminous or carbonaceous shale, 10 feet thick.
  _c._ Micaceous sandstone.
  _d d._ Upper seam of coal, 6 feet thick.]

This coal formation, before its original limits were reduced by
denudation, must have measured 900 miles in length, and in some places more
than 200 miles in breadth. By again referring to the section (fig. 379., p.
327.), it will be seen that the strata of coal are horizontal to the
westward of the mountains in the region D E, and become more and more
inclined and folded as we proceed eastward. Now it is invariably found, as
Professor H. D. Rogers has shown by chemical analysis, that the coal is
most bituminous towards its western limit, where it remains level and
unbroken, and that it becomes progressively debituminized as we travel
south-eastward towards the more bent and distorted rocks. Thus, on the
Ohio, the proportion of hydrogen, oxygen, and other volatile matters,
ranges from forty to fifty per cent. Eastward of this line, on the
Monongahela, it still approaches forty per cent., where the strata begin to
experience some gentle flexures. On entering the Alleghany Mountains, where
the distinct anticlinal axes begin to show themselves, but before the
dislocations are considerable, the volatile matter is generally in the
proportion of eighteen or twenty per cent. At length, when we arrive at
some insulated coal-fields (5', fig. 379.) associated with the boldest
flexures of the Appalachian chain, where the strata have been actually
turned over, as near Pottsville, we find the coal to contain only from six
to twelve per cent. of bitumen, thus becoming a genuine anthracite.[333-A]

It appears from the researches of Liebig and other eminent chemists, that
when wood and vegetable matter are buried in the earth, exposed to
moisture, and partially or entirely excluded from the air, they decompose
slowly and evolve carbonic acid gas, thus parting with a portion of their
original oxygen. By this means, they become gradually converted into
lignite or wood-coal, which contains a larger proportion of hydrogen than
wood does. A continuance of decomposition changes this lignite into common
or bituminous coal, chiefly by the discharge of carburetted hydrogen, or
the gas by which we illuminate our streets and houses. According to
Bischoff, the inflammable gases which are always escaping from mineral
coal, and are so often the cause of fatal accidents in mines, always
contain carbonic acid, carburetted hydrogen, nitrogen, and olefiant gas.
The disengagement of all these gradually transforms ordinary or bituminous
coal into anthracite, to which the various names of splint coal, glance
coal, culm, and many others, have been given.

We have seen that, in the Appalachian coal-field, there is an intimate
connection between the extent to which the coal has parted with its
gaseous contents, and the amount of disturbance which the strata have
undergone. The coincidence of these phenomena may be attributed partly
to the greater facility afforded for the escape of volatile matter,
where the fracturing of the rocks had produced an infinite number of
cracks and crevices, and also to the heat of the gases and water
penetrating these cracks, when the great movements took place, which
have rent and folded the Appalachian strata. It is well known that, at
the present period, thermal waters and hot vapours burst out from the
earth during earthquakes, and these would not fail to promote the
disengagement of volatile matter from the carboniferous rocks.

_Continuity of seams of coal._--As single seams of coal are continuous over
very wide areas, it has been asked, how forests could have prevailed
uninterruptedly over such wide spaces, without being oftener flooded by
turbid rivers, or, when submerged, denuded by marine currents. It appears,
from the description of the Cape Breton coal-field, by Mr. Richard Brown,
that false stratification is common in the beds of sand, and some partial
denudation of these, at least, must often have taken place during the
accumulation of the carboniferous series.

In the Forest of Dean, ancient river-channels are found, which pass through
beds of coal, and in which rounded pebbles of coal occur. They are of older
date than the overlying and undisturbed coal-measures. The late Mr. Buddle,
who described them to me, told me he had seen similar phenomena in the
Newcastle coal-field. Nevertheless, instances of these channels are much
more rare than we might have anticipated, especially when we remember how
often the roots of trees (_Stigmariæ_) have been torn up, and drifted in
broken fragments into the grits and sandstones. The prevalence of a
downward movement is, no doubt, the principal cause which has saved so many
extensive seams of coal from destruction by fluviatile action.

The purity of the coal, or its non-intermixture with earthy matter,
presents another theoretical difficulty to many geologists, who are
inclined to believe that the trees and smaller plants of the
carboniferous period grew in extensive swamps, rather than on land not
liable to be inundated. It appears, however, that in the alluvial plain
and delta of the Mississippi, extensive "cypress swamps," as they are
called, densely covered with various trees, occur, into which no matter
held in mechanical suspension is ever introduced during the greatest
inundations, inasmuch as they are all surrounded by a dense marginal
belt of reeds, canes, and brushwood. Through this thick barrier the
river-water must pass, so that it is invariably well filtered before it
can reach the interior of the forest-covered area, within which,
vegetable matter is continually accumulating from the decay of trees and
semi-aquatic plants. In proof of this, I may observe, that whenever any
part of a swamp is dried up, during an unusually hot season, and the
wood set on fire, pits are burnt into the ground many feet deep, or as
far down as the fire can descend without meeting with water, and it is
then found that scarcely any residuum or earthy matter is left.[334-A]
At the bottom of these "cypress swamps" of the Mississippi, a bed of
clay is found, with roots of the tall cypress (_Taxodium distichum_),
just as the underclays of the coal are filled with _Stigmaria_.

_Climate of Coal Period._--So long as the botanist taught that a tropical
climate was implied by the carboniferous flora, geologists might well be at
a loss to reconcile the preservation of so much vegetable matter with a
high temperature; for heat hastens the decomposition of fallen leaves and
trunks of trees, whether in the atmosphere or in water.[335-A] It is well
known that peat, so abundant in the bogs of high latitudes, ceases to grow
in the swamps of warmer regions. It seems, however, to have become a more
and more received opinion, that the coal-plants do not, on the whole,
indicate a climate resembling that now enjoyed in the equatorial zone.
Tree-ferns range as far south as the southern part of New Zealand, and
Araucarian pines occur in Norfolk Island. A great predominance of ferns and
lycopodiums indicates warmth, moisture, equability of temperature, and
freedom from frost, rather than intense heat; and we know too little of the
sigillariæ, calamites, asterophyllites, and other peculiar forms of the
carboniferous period, to be able to speculate with confidence on the kind
of climate they may have required.

No doubt, we are entitled to presume, from the corals and cephalopoda of
the mountain limestone, that a warm temperature characterized the northern
seas in the carboniferous era; but the absence of cold may have given rise
(as at present in the seas of the Bermudas, under the influence of the gulf
stream) to a very wide geographical range of stone-building corals and
shell-bearing cuttle-fish, without its being necessary to call in the aid
of tropical heat.[335-B]


CARBONIFEROUS REPTILES.

Where we have evidence in a single coal-field, as in that of Nova Scotia,
or South Wales, of fifty or even a hundred ancient forests buried one above
the other, with the roots of trees still in their original position, and
with some of the trunks still remaining erect, we are apt to wonder that
until the year 1844 no remains of contemporaneous air-breathing creatures,
except a few insects, had been discovered. No vertebrated animals more
highly organized than fish, no mammalia or birds, no saurians, frogs,
tortoises, or snakes, were yet known in rocks of such high antiquity. In
the coal-field of Coalbrook Dale mention had been made of two species of
beetles of the family _Curculionidæ_, and of a neuropterous insect
resembling the genus _Corydalis_, with another related to the
_Phasmidæ_.[335-C] In other coal-measures in Europe we find notice of a
scorpion and of a moth allied to _Tinea_, also of one air-breathing
crustacean, or land-crab. Yet Agassiz had already described in his great
work on fossil fishes more than one hundred and fifty species of
ichthyolites from the coal strata, ninety-four belonging to the families of
shark and ray, and fifty-eight to the class of ganoids. Some of these fish
are very remote in their organization from any now living, especially
those of the family called _Sauroid_ by Agassiz; as _Megalichthys_,
_Holoptychius_, and others, which are often of great size, and all
predaceous. Their osteology, says M. Agassiz, reminds us in many respects
of the skeletons of saurian reptiles, both by the close sutures of the
bones of the skull, their large conical teeth striated longitudinally (see
fig. 383.), the articulations of the spinous processes with the vertebræ,
and other characters. Yet they do not form a family intermediate between
fish and reptiles, but are true _fish_, though doubtless more highly
organized than any living fish.[336-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 383. _Holoptychius Hibberti_, Ag. Fifeshire
coal-field; natural size.]

The annexed figure represents a large tooth of the _Megalichthys_,
found by Mr. Horner in the Cannel coal of Fifeshire. It probably
inhabited an estuary, like many of its contemporaries, and frequented
both rivers and the sea.

[Illustration: Fig. 384. _Archegosaurus minor_, Goldfuss. Fossil reptile
from the coal-measures, Saarbrück.]

At length, in 1844, the first skeleton of a true reptile was announced from
the coal of Münster-Appel in Rhenish Bavaria, by H. von Meyer, under the
name of _Apateon pedestris_, the animal being supposed to be nearly related
to the salamanders. Three years later, in 1847, Prof. von Dechen found in
the coal-field of Saarbrück, at the village of Lebach, between Strasburg
and Treves, the skeletons of no less than three distinct species of
air-breathing reptiles, which were described by the late Prof. Goldfuss
under the generic name of _Archegosaurus_. The ichthyolites and plants
found in the same strata, left no doubt that these remains belonged to the
true coal period. The skulls, teeth, and the greater portions of the
skeleton, nay, even a large part of the skin, of two of these reptiles have
been faithfully preserved in the centre of spheroidal concretions of
clay-iron-stone. The largest of these lizards, _Archegosaurus Decheni_,
must have been 3 feet 6 inches long. The annexed drawing represents the
smallest of the three of the natural size. They were considered by Goldfuss
as saurians, but by Herman von Meyer as most nearly allied to the
_Labyrinthodon_, and therefore connected with the batrachians, as well as
the lizards. The remains of the extremities leave no doubt that they were
quadrupeds, "provided," says Von Meyer, "with hands and feet terminating in
distinct toes; but these limbs were weak, serving only for swimming or
creeping." The same anatomist has pointed out certain points of analogy
between their bones and those of the _Proteus anguinus_; and Mr. Owen has
observed to me that they make an approach to the _Proteus_ in the shortness
of their ribs. Two of these ancient reptiles retain a large part of the
outer skin, which consisted of long, narrow, wedge-shaped, tile-like, and
horny scales, arranged in rows (see fig. 385.).

[Illustration: Fig. 385. Imbricated covering of skin of _Archegosaurus
medius_, Goldf.; magnified.[337-A]]

_Cheirotherian footprints in coal measures, United States._--In 1844,
the very year when the Apateon or Salamander of the coal was first met
with in the country between the Moselle and the Rhine, Dr. King
published an account of the footprints of a large reptile discovered by
him in North America. These occur in the coal strata of Greensburg, in
Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania; and I had an opportunity of examining
them in 1846. I was at once convinced of their genuineness, and declared
my conviction on that point, on which doubts had been entertained both
in Europe and the United States. The footmarks were first observed
standing out in relief from the lower surface of slabs of sandstone,
resting on thin layers of fine unctuous clay. I brought away one of
these masses, which is represented in the accompanying drawing (fig.
386.). It displays, together with footprints, the casts of cracks (_a_,
_a'_) of various sizes. The origin of such cracks in clay, and casts of
the same, has before been explained, and referred to the drying and
shrinking of mud, and the subsequent pouring of sand into open crevices.
It will be seen that some of the cracks, as at _b_, _c_, traverse the
footprints, and produce distortion in them, as might have been expected,
for the mud must have been soft when the animal walked over it and left
the impressions; whereas, when it afterwards dried up and shrank, it
would be too hard to receive such indentations.

No less than twenty-three footsteps were observed by Dr. King in the
same quarry before it was abandoned, the greater part of them so
arranged (see fig. 387.) on the surface of one stratum as to imply that
they were made successively by the same animal. Everywhere there was a
double row of tracks, and in each row they occur in pairs, each pair
consisting of a hind and fore foot, and each being at nearly equal
distances from the next pair. In each parallel row the toes turn the one
set to the right, the other to the left. In the European
_Cheirotherium_, before mentioned (p. 290.), both the hind and fore feet
have each five toes, and the size of the hind foot is about five times
as large as the fore foot. In the American fossil the posterior
footprint is not even twice as large as the anterior, and the number of
toes is unequal, being five in the hinder and four in the anterior foot.
In this, as in the European _Cheirotherium_, one toe stands out like a
thumb, and these thumb-like toes turn the one set to the right, and the
other to the left. The American _Cheirotherium_ was evidently a broader
animal, and belonged to a distinct genus from that of the triassic
age in Europe.[338-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 386. _Scale one-sixth the original._ Slab of sandstone
from the coal-measures of Pennsylvania, with footprints of air-breathing
reptile and casts of cracks.]

We may assume that the reptile which left these prints on the ancient
sands of the coal-measures was an air-breather, because its weight would
not have been sufficient under water to have made impressions so deep and
distinct. The same conclusion is also borne out by the casts of the cracks
above described, for they show that the clay had been exposed to the air
and sun, so as to have dried and shrunk.

[Illustration: Fig. 387. Series of reptilian footprints in the coal-strata
of Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania.

_a._ Mark of nail?]

The geological position of the sandstone of Greensburg is perfectly clear,
being situated in the midst of the Appalachian coal-field, having the main
bed of coal, called the Pittsburg seam, above mentioned (p. 331.), 3 yards
thick, 100 feet above it, and worked in the neighbourhood, with several
other seams of coal at lower levels. The impressions of _Lepidodendron_,
_Sigillaria_, _Stigmaria_, and other characteristic carboniferous plants,
are found both above and below the level of the reptilian footsteps.

Analogous footprints of a large reptile of still older date have since
been found (1849), by Mr. Isaac Lea, in the lowest beds of the coal
formation at Pottsville, near Philadelphia, so that we may now be said
to have the footmarks of two reptilians of the coal period, and the
skeletons of four.[340-A]


CARBONIFEROUS OR MOUNTAIN LIMESTONE.

We have already seen that this rock lies sometimes entirely beneath the
coal-measures, while, in other districts, it alternates with the shales and
sandstone of the coal. In both cases it is destitute of land plants, and
usually charged with corals, which are often of large size; and several
species belong to the lamelliferous class of Lamarck, which enter largely
into the structure of coral reefs now growing. There are also a great
number of _Crinoidea_ (see fig. 388.), and a few _Echinoderms_, associated
with the zoophytes above mentioned. The _Brachiopoda_ constitute a large
proportion of the Mollusca, many species being referable to two extinct
genera, _Spirifer_ (or _Spirifera_) (fig. 389.), and _Productus_
(_Leptæna_) (fig. 390.).

[Illustration: Fig. 388. _Cyathocrinites planus_, Miller.
Mountain limestone.]

[Illustration: Fig. 389. _Spirifer glaber_, Sow. Mountain limestone.]

[Illustration: Fig. 390. _Productus Martini_, Sow. (_P. semireticulatus_,
Flem.) Mountain limestone.]

Among the spiral univalve shells the extinct genus _Euomphalus_ (see fig.
391.) is one of the commonest fossils of the Mountain limestone. In the
interior it is often divided into chambers (see fig. 391. _d_); the septa
or partitions not being perforated, as in foraminiferous shells, or in
those having siphuncles, like the Nautilus. The animal appears, like the
recent _Bulimus decollatus_, to have retreated at different periods of its
growth, from the internal cavity previously formed, and to have closed all
communication with it by a septum. The number of chambers is irregular, and
they are generally wanting in the innermost whorl.

[Illustration: Fig. 391. _Euomphalus pentagulatus_, Min. Con.
Mountain limestone.

_a._ Upper side; _b._ lower, or umbilical side; _c._ view showing mouth
which is less pentagonal in older individuals; _d._ view of polished
section, showing internal chambers.]

[Illustration: Fig. 392. Portion of _Orthoceras laterale_,
Phillips. Mountain limestone.]

There are also many univalve and bivalve shells of existing genera in the
Mountain limestone, such as _Turritella_, _Buccinum_, _Patella_,
_Isocardia_, _Nucula_, and _Pecten_.[341-A] But the _Cephalopoda_ depart,
in general, more widely from living forms, some being generically distinct
from all those found in strata newer than the coal. In this number may be
mentioned _Orthoceras_, a siphuncled and chambered shell, like a _Nautilus_
uncoiled and straightened. Some species of this genus are several feet long
(fig. 392.). The _Goniatite_ is another genus, nearly allied to the
_Ammonite_, from which it differs in having the lobes of the septa free
from lateral denticulations, or crenatures; so that the outline of these is
continuous and uninterrupted (see _a_, fig. 393.). Their siphon is small,
and in the form of the striæ of growth they resemble _Nautili_. Another
extinct generic form of Cephalopod, abounding in the Mountain limestone,
and not found in strata of later date, is the _Bellerophon_ (fig. 394.), of
which the shell, like the living Argonaut, was without chambers.

[Illustration: Fig. 393. _Goniatites evolutus_, Phillips.[342-A]
Mountain limestone.]

[Illustration: Fig. 394. _Bellerophon costatus_, Sow.[342-B]
Mountain limestone.]


FOOTNOTES:

[329-A] H. D. Rogers, Trans. Assoc. Amer. Geol., 1840-42, p. 440.

[333-A] Trans. of Ass. of Amer. Geol., p. 470.

[334-A] Lyell's Second Visit to the U. S., vol. ii. p. 245. American
Journ. of Sci., 2d series, vol. v. p. 17.

[335-A] Principles of Geol., p. 696.

[335-B] For changes in climate, see Principles of Geol., chaps.
vii. and viii.

[335-C] Geol. Trans., 2d series, vol. vi. p. 330.

[336-A] Agassiz, Poiss. Foss., lib. 4. p. 62. and liv. 5. p. 88.

[337-A] Goldfuss, Neue Jenaische Lit. Zeit., 1848; and Von Meyer, Quart.
Geol. Journ., vol. iv. p. 51., memoirs.

[338-A] See Lyell's Second Visit, &c., vol. ii. p. 305.

[340-A] These impressions, found by Mr. Lea, were imagined to be in a rock
as ancient as the old red sandstone; but, according to Mr. H. D. Rogers,
they are in the lowest part of the coal formation.

[341-A] Phillips, Geol. of Yorksh., vol. ii. p. 208.

[342-A] Phillips, Geol. of Yorksh., pl. 20. fig. 65.

[342-B] Ibid., pl. 17. fig. 15.



CHAPTER XXVI.

OLD RED SANDSTONE, OR DEVONIAN GROUP.

   Old Red Sandstone of Scotland, and borders of Wales--Fossils usually
   rare--"Old Red" in Forfarshire--Ichthyolites of Caithness--Distinct
   lithological type of Old Red in Devon and Cornwall--Term
   "Devonian"--Organic remains of intermediate character between those of
   the Carboniferous and Silurian systems--Corals and shells--Devonian
   strata of Westphalia, the Eifel, Russia, and the United States--Coral
   reef at Falls of the Ohio--Devonian flora.


It was stated in Chap. XXII. that the Carboniferous formation is
surmounted by one called the "New Red," and underlaid by another called
the "Old Red Sandstone."[342-C] The British strata of the last mentioned
series were first recognized in Herefordshire and Scotland as of great
thickness, and immediately subjacent to the coal; but they were in
general so barren of organic remains, that it was difficult to find
paleontological characters of sufficient importance to distinguish them
as an independent group. In Scotland, and on the borders of Wales, the
"Old Red" consists chiefly of red sandstone, conglomerate, and shale,
with few fossils; but limestones of the same age, peculiarly rich in
organic remains, were at length found in Devonshire.

I shall first advert to the characters of the group as developed in
Herefordshire, Worcestershire, Shropshire, and South Wales. Its thickness
has been estimated at 8000 feet, and it has been subdivided into--

  1st. A quartzose conglomerate passing downwards into chocolate-red and
  green sandstone and marl.

  2d. Cornstone and marl--red and green argillaceous spotted marls, with
  irregular courses of impure concretionary limestone, provincially
  called Cornstone.

Here, as usual, fossils are extremely rare in the clays and sandstones in
which the red oxide of iron prevails; but remains of fishes of the genera
_Cephalaspis_ and _Onchus_ have been discovered in the Cornstone.

The whole of the northern part of Scotland, from Cape Wrath to the
southern flank of the Grampians, has been well described by Mr. Miller
as consisting of a nucleus of granite, gneiss, and other hypogene rocks,
which seem as if set in a sandstone frame.[343-A] The beds of the Old
Red Sandstone constituting this frame, may once perhaps have extended
continuously over the entire Grampians before the upheaval of that
mountain range; for one band of the sandstone follows the course of the
Moray Frith far into the interior of the great Caledonian valley; and
detached hills and island-like patches occur in several parts of the
interior, capping some of the higher summits in Sutherlandshire, and
appearing in Morayshire like oases among the granite rocks of
Strathspey. On the western coast of Ross-shire, the Old Red forms those
three immense insulated hills before described (p. 67.), where beds of
horizontal sandstone, 3000 feet high, rest unconformably on a base of
gneiss, attesting the vast denudation which has taken place.

But in order to observe the uppermost part of the Old Red, we must travel
south of the Grampians, and examine its junction with the bottom of the
Carboniferous series in Fifeshire. This upper member may be seen in Dura
Den, south of Cupar, to consist of a belt of yellow sandstone, in which Dr.
Fleming first discovered scales of _Holoptychius_, and in which species of
fish of the genera _Pterichthys_, _Pamphractus_, and others, have been met
with. (For genus _Pterichthys_, see fig. 400. p. 345.)

The beds next below the yellow sandstone are well seen in the large zone of
Old Red which skirts the southern flank of the Grampians from Stonehaven to
the Frith of Clyde. It there forms, together with trap, the Sidlaw Hills
and the strata of the valley of Strathmore. A section of this region has
been already given (p. 48.), extending from the foot of the Grampians in
Forfarshire to the sea at Arbroath, a distance of about 20 miles, where the
entire series of strata is several thousand feet thick, and may be divided
into three principal masses: 1st, and uppermost, red and mottled marls,
cornstone, and sandstone (Nos. 1. and 2. of the section); 2d, Conglomerate,
often of vast thickness (No. 3. ibid.); 3d, Roofing and paving stone,
highly micaceous, and containing a slight admixture of carbonate of lime
(No. 4. ibid.). In the first of these divisions, which may be considered as
succeeding the yellow sandstone of Fifeshire before mentioned, a gigantic
species of fish of the genus _Holoptychius_ has been found at Clashbinnie
near Perth. Some scales (see fig. 395.) have been seen which measured 3
inches in length by 2-1/2 in breadth.

At the top of the next division, or immediately under the conglomerate
(No. 3. p. 48.), there have been found in Forfarshire some remarkable
crustaceans, with several fish of the genus named by Agassiz _Cephalaspis_,
or "buckler-headed," from the extraordinary shield which covers the head
(see fig. 396.), and which has often been mistaken for that of a trilobite,
of the division _Asaphus_.

[Illustration: Fig. 395. Scale of _Holoptychius nobilissimus_, Agas.
Clashbinnie. Nat. size.]

Species of the same genus are considered in England as characteristic of
the second or Cornstone division (p. 343.).

[Illustration: Fig. 396. _Cephalaspis Lyellii_, Agass. Length 6-3/4 inches.
From a specimen in my collection found at Glammiss, in Forfarshire. See
other figures, Agassiz, vol. ii. tab. 1. _a_. and 1. _b_.

  _a._ One of the peculiar scales with which the head is covered when
       perfect. These scales are generally removed, as in the specimen
       above figured.
  _b, c._ Scales from different parts of the body and tail.]

[Illustration: Fig. 397. _Eggs of gasteropodous mollusk?_ Lower beds of
Old Red, Ley's Mill, Forfarshire.]

[Illustration: Fig. 398. _Fucoids and eggs of gasteropodous mollusk?_
Lower Old Red, Fife.]

In the same grey paving-stones and coarse roofing-slates, in which the
_Cephalaspis_ occurs, in Forfarshire and Kincardineshire, the remains of
marine plants or fucoids abound. They are frequently accompanied by groups
of hexagonal, or nearly hexagonal markings, which consist of small
flattened carbonaceous bodies, placed in a slight depression of the
sandstone or shale. (See figs. 397 and 398.) They much resemble in form the
spawn of the recent Natica (see fig. 399.), in which the eggs are arranged
in a thin layer of sand, and seem to have acquired a polygonal form by
pressing against each other. The substance of the egg, if fossilized, might
give rise to small pellicles of carbonaceous matter.

[Illustration: Fig. 399. Fragment of spawn of British species of _Natica_.]

These fossils I have met with, both to the north of Strathmore, in the
vertical shale beneath the conglomerate, and in the same beds in the Sidlaw
hills, at all the points where fig. 4. is introduced in the section, p. 48.

[Illustration: Fig. 400. _Pterichthys_, Agassiz; upper side, showing mouth;
as restored by H. Miller.[345-A]]

Beds of red shale and red sandstone, sometimes associated with
pudding-stone (older than No. 3., fig. 62. p. 48.), and destitute of
organic remains, separate, in the region of Strathmore, the above-described
fossiliferous strata from the older crystalline rocks of the Grampians.
But, in the north of Scotland, we find, at the base of the Old Red, other
grey slaty sandstones, in the counties of Banff, Nairn, Moray, Cromarty,
Caithness, and in Orkney, rich in ichthyolites of peculiar forms, belonging
to the genera _Pterichthys_ (fig. 400.), _Coccosteus_, _Diplopterus_,
_Dipterus_, _Cheiracanthus_, and others of Agassiz.

Five species of _Pterichthys_ have been found in this lowest division of
the Old Red. The wing-like appendages, whence the genus is named, were
first supposed by Mr. Miller to be paddles, like those of the turtle;
but Agassiz regards them as weapons of defence, like the occipital
spines of the River Bull-head (_Cottus gobio_, Linn.); and considers the
tail to have been the only organ of motion. The genera _Dipterus_ and
_Diplopterus_ are so named, because their two dorsal fins are so placed
as to front the anal and ventral fins, so as to appear like two pairs of
wings. They have bony enamelled scales.

_South Devon and Cornwall._--A great step was made in the classification of
the slaty and calciferous strata of South Devon and Cornwall in 1837, when
a large portion of the beds, previously referred to the "transition" or
most ancient fossiliferous series, were found to belong in reality to the
period of the Old Red Sandstone. For this reform we are indebted to the
labours of Professor Sedgwick and Sir R. Murchison, assisted by a
suggestion of Mr. Lonsdale, who, in 1837, after examining the South
Devonshire fossils, perceived that some of them agreed with those of the
Carboniferous group, others with those of the Silurian, while many could
not be assigned to either system, the whole taken together exhibiting a
peculiar and intermediate character. But these paleontological observations
alone would not have enabled us to assign, with accuracy, the true place in
the geological series of these slate-rocks and limestones of South Devon,
had not Messrs. Sedgwick and Murchison, in 1836 and 1837, discovered that
the culmiferous or anthracitic shales of North Devon belonged to the Coal,
and not, as preceding observers had imagined, to the transition period.

As the strata of South Devon here alluded to are far richer in organic
remains than the red sandstones of contemporaneous date in Herefordshire
and Scotland, the new name of the "Devonian system" was proposed as a
substitute for that of Old Red Sandstone.

The rocks of this group in South Devon consist, in great part, of green
chloritic slates, alternating with hard quartzose slates and sandstones.
Here and there calcareous slates are interstratified with blue crystalline
limestone, and in some divisions conglomerates, passing into red sandstone.

The link supplied by the whole assemblage of imbedded fossils, connecting
as it does the paleontology of the Silurian and Carboniferous groups, is
one of the highest interest, and equally striking, whether we regard the
_genera_ of corals or of shells. The _species_ are almost all distinct.

Among the more abundant corals, we find the genera _Favosites_ and
_Cyathophyllum_, common on the one hand to the Mountain limestone, and on
the other to the Silurian system. Some few even of the _species_ are common
to the Devonian and Silurian groups, as, for example, _Favosites
polymorpha_ (fig. 401.), very abundant in South Devon.

[Illustration: Fig. 401. _Favosites polymorpha_, Goldf., S. Devon.
From a polished specimen.

_a._ portion of the same, magnified to show the pores.]

The _Cyathophyllum cæspitosum_ (fig. 402.) and _Porites pyriformis_ (fig.
424. p. 356.) are more peculiarly characteristic of the Devonian rocks.

In regard to the shells, all the brachiopodous genera, such as
_Terebratula_, _Orthis_, _Spirifer_, _Atrypa_, and _Productus_, which are
found in the Mountain limestone, occur, together with those of the Silurian
system, except the _Pentamerus_. Some forms, however, seem exclusively
Devonian, as for example, _Calceola sandalina_ (fig. 403.) and
_Strygocephalus Burtini_ (fig. 404.), which have been met with both in the
Eifel, in Germany, and in Devonshire, in the very lowest Devonian beds.

[Illustration: Fig. 402. Cyathophyllum.

  _a._ _Cyathophyllum cæspitosum_, Goldf., Plymouth.
  _b._ a terminal star.
  _c._ vertical section exhibiting transverse plates, and part of
       another branch.]

Among the peculiar lamellibranchiate bivalves, also common to Devonshire
and the Eifel, we find _Megalodon cucullatus_ (fig. 405.). Several spiral
univalves are abundant, among which are many species of _Pleurotomaria_ and
_Euomphalus_. Among the Cephalopoda we find _Bellerophon_ and _Orthoceras_,
as in the Silurian and Carboniferous groups, and _Goniatite_ and
_Cyrtoceras_, as in the Carboniferous. In some of the upper Devonian beds,
a shell, resembling a flattened _Goniatite_, occurs, called _Clymenia_, by
Munster (_Endosiphonites_, Ansted.[347-A]).

[Illustration: Fig. 403. _Calceola sandalina_, Lam. Eifel; also South
Devon.

  _a._ both valves united.
  _b._ inner side of opercular valve.]

[Illustration: Fig. 404. _Strygocephalus Burtini_. (_Terebratula porrecta_,
Sow.) Eifel; also South Devon.

  _a._ valves united.
  _b_. side view of same.
  _c._ interior of larger valve, showing thick partition, and thinner one
       continued from it.]

[Illustration: Fig. 405. _Megalodon cucullatus_, Sow. Eifel; also
Bradley, S. Devon.

  _a._ the valves united.
  _b._ interior of valve, showing the large cardinal tooth.]

[Illustration: Fig. 406. _Clymenia linearis_, Munster. (_Endosiphonites
carinatus_, Ansted.) Cornwall.]

A peculiar species of trilobite, called _Brontes flabellifer_ (fig. 407.),
is found in the Devonian strata of the Eifel and in South Devon. It should
be observed, however, that the head in the specimen here figured by
Goldfuss, the most perfect which could be obtained, is incomplete, and a
restoration has been attempted by Mr. Salter in fig. 408., from data
supplied by other species of the same genus occurring in older rocks.

[Illustration: Fig. 407. _Brontes flabellifer_, Goldf. Eifel;
also S. Devon.]

[Illustration: Fig. 408. Restored outline of head of
_Brontes flabellifer_.]

For determining the true equivalents of the Devonian group in the Rhenish
provinces and adjacent parts of Germany, we are indebted to the labours of
Messrs. Sedgwick and Murchison, in 1839, from which it appears that rocks
of that age emerge from beneath the coal-field of Westphalia, and are also
found in troughs among the Silurian rocks in Nassau. Many of the
limestones, particularly those on the river Lahn, are identical, both in
structure and in coralline remains, with the beautiful marbles of
Babbacombe, Torquay, and Plymouth.

The limestones of the Eifel, long ago celebrated for their fossils, and
which lie in a basin supported by Silurian rocks, are found to be referable
to the lower part of the Devonian system.

In Russia, also, Messrs. Murchison and De Verneuil have shown (1840) that
the "Old Red" group occupies a wide area south from St. Petersburg. It was
formerly supposed to be the New Red Sandstone, on account of its saliferous
and gypseous beds; but it is now proved to be the Old Red by containing
ichthyolites of genera which characterize this group in the British Isles,
as, for example, _Holoptychius_, _Coccosteus_, _Diplopterus_, &c.[349-A],
associated with mollusca found in the Devonian of Western Europe. Among the
fish are also many species of sharks of the Cestraciont division, a fact
worthy of notice, because the squaloid fishes of the present day offer the
highest organization of the brain and of the generative organs, and make,
in these respects, the nearest approach to the higher vertebrate classes.


_Devonian Strata in the United States._

The position of this formation between the carboniferous rocks of
Pennsylvania and Ohio, is pointed out in the section, fig. 379. p. 327.,
and it is a remark of M. de Verneuil that in no European country is
there so complete and uninterrupted a development of the Devonian system
as in North America. At the falls of the Ohio, at Louisville, in
Kentucky, there is a grand display of one of the limestones of this
period, resembling a modern coral reef. A wide extent of surface is
exposed in a series of horizontal ledges, at all seasons, when the water
is not high; and the softer parts of the stone having decomposed and
wasted away, the harder calcareous corals stand out in relief, and many
of them send out branches from their erect stems precisely as if they
were living. Among other species I observed large masses, not less than
5 feet in diameter, of _Favosites gothlandica_, with its beautiful
honeycomb structure well displayed, and, by the side of it, the
_Favistella_, combining a similar honeycombed form with the star of the
_Astrea_. There was also the cup-shaped _Cyathophyllum_, and the
delicate network of the _Fenestella_, and that elegant and well-known
European species of fossil, called "the chain coral," _Catenipora
escharoides_, with a profusion of others (see fig. 423. p. 355.). These
coralline forms were mingled with the joints, stems, and occasionally
the heads, of lily encrinites. Although hundreds of fine specimens have
been detached from these rocks, to enrich the museums of Europe and
America, another crop is constantly working its way out, under the
action of the stream, and of the sun and rain, in the warm season when
the channel is laid dry. The waters of the Ohio, when I visited the
spot in April, 1846, were more than 40 feet below their highest level,
and 20 feet above their lowest, so that large spaces of bare rock were
exposed to view.[349-B]


_Devonian Flora._

With the exception of the fucoids above mentioned (p. 344.), but little
is known with certainty of the plants of the Devonian group. Those found
in the department of La Sarthe in France, and in various parts of
Brittany, formerly referred to the Devonian era, have been shown (in
1850), by M. de Verneuil, to belong to the carboniferous series. The
same may be said of the species of _Lepidodendron_, _Knorria_,
_Calamite_, _Sagenaria_, and other genera recently figured (1850), by
Mr. F. A. Römer, from the formation called "Greywacké à Posodonomyes" in
the Hartz.[350-A] They are accompanied by _Goniatites reticulatus_
Phillips, _G. intercostatus_ Phil., and other mountain limestone
species, and had been previously assigned to the oldest part of the
carboniferous series by Messrs. Murchison and Sedgwick.

If hereafter we should become well acquainted with the land plants of the
Devonian era, we may confidently expect that nearly all of them will agree
generically with those of the carboniferous period, but the species will be
as different as are the Devonian vertebrate and invertebrate animals from
the fossil species of the Coal.


FOOTNOTES:

[342-C] See section, fig. 318. p. 287.

[343-A] The Old Red Sandstone, by Hugh Miller, 1841.

[345-A] Old Red Sandstone. Plate 1. fig. 1. Mr. M.'s description of the
fish is most graphic and correct.

[347-A] Camb. Phil. Trans., vol. vi. pl. 8. fig. 2.

[349-A] See Proceedings of Geol. Soc., and the anniversary speech of
Dr. Buckland, P. G. S., for 1841.

[349-B] Lyell's Second Visit to the United States, vol. ii. p. 277.

[350-A] Memoir on the Hartz, Palæontographica of Dunker and Von Meyer,
part iii.



CHAPTER XXVII.

SILURIAN GROUP.

   Silurian strata formerly called transition--Term
   grauwacké--Subdivisions of Upper and Lower Silurian--Ludlow formation
   and fossils--Wenlock formation, corals and shells--Caradoc and
   Llandeilo beds--Graptolites--Lingula--Trilobites--Cystideæ--Vast
   thickness of Silurian strata in North Wales--Unconformability of
   Caradoc sandstone--Silurian strata of the United States--Amount of
   specific agreement of fossils with those of Europe--Great number of
   brachiopods--Deep-sea origin of Silurian strata--Absence of fluviatile
   formations--Mineral character of the most ancient fossiliferous rocks.


We come next in the descending order to the most ancient of the primary
fossiliferous rocks, that series which comprises the greater part of the
strata formerly called "transition" by Werner, for reasons explained in
Chap. VIII., pp. 91 and 92. Geologists have also applied to these older
strata the general name of "grauwacké," by which the German miners
designate a particular variety of sandstone, usually an aggregate of small
fragments of quartz, flinty slate (or Lydian stone), and clay-slate
cemented together by argillaceous matter. Far too much importance has been
attached to this kind of rock, as if it belonged to a certain epoch in the
earth's history, whereas a similar sandstone or grit is found sometimes in
the Old Red, and in the Millstone Grit of the Coal, and sometimes in
certain Cretaceous and even Eocene formations in the Alps.

The name of _Silurian_ was first proposed by Sir Roderick Murchison, for a
series of fossiliferous strata lying below the Old Red Sandstone, and
occupying that part of Wales and some contiguous counties of England, which
once constituted the kingdom of the _Silures_, a tribe of ancient Britons.
The strata have been divided into Upper and Lower Silurian, and these
again in the region alluded to admit of several well-marked subdivisions,
all of them explained in the following table.

                         UPPER SILURIAN ROCKS.

                               Prevailing         Thickness   Organic
                               Lithological       in Feet.    Remains.
                               characters.

             {                {Finely laminated   }      }
             {Tilestones.     { reddish and       }800?  }
             {                { green sandstones  }      }
             {                { and shales.       }      }
  1. Ludlow  {                                           }Marine mollusca of
  formation  {Upper           {Micaceous grey     }      } almost every order,
             {Ludlow.         { sandstone.        }      } the Brachiopoda most
             {                                    }      } abundant. Serpula,
             {Aymestry        {Argillaceous       }      } Corals, Sauroid fish,
             {limestone.      { limestone.        }2000  } Fuci.
             {                                    }      }
             {Lower           {Shale, with        }      }
             {Ludlow.         { concretions of    }      }
             {                { limestone.        }      }

             {Wenlock         }Concretionary      }      {Marine mollusca of
             {limestone.      } limestone.        }      { various orders as
  2. Wenlock {                }                   }1800  { before, Crustaceans
  formation. {                }                   }      { of the Trilobite
             {                }                   }      { family.
             {Wenlock         }Argillaceous       }      {Oldest bones of
             {shale.          } shale.            }      { fish yet known.


                         LOWER SILURIAN ROCKS.

                              {Flags of shelly    }     {
                              { limestone and     }     {Crinoidea, Corals,
  3. Caradoc {Caradoc         { sandstone, thick  }2500 { Mollusca, chiefly
  formation. {sandstones.     { bedded white      }     { Brachiopoda,
                              { freestone.        }     { Trilobites.

  4. Llandeilo {Llandeilo     }Dark coloured      }1200 {Mollusca,
  formation.   {flags.        } calcareous flags. }     { Trilobites.


UPPER SILURIAN ROCKS.

_Ludlow formation._--This member of the Upper Silurian group, as will
be seen by the above table, is of great thickness, and subdivided into
four parts,--the Tilestone, the Upper and Lower Ludlow, and the
intervening Aymestry limestone. Each of these may be distinguished near
the town of Ludlow, and at other places in Shropshire and Herefordshire,
by peculiar organic remains.

1. _Tilestones._--This uppermost division was originally classed by
Sir R. Murchison with the Old Red Sandstone, because they decompose
into a red soil throughout the Silurian region. At the same time he
regarded the tilestones as a transition group forming a passage from
Silurian to Old Red. It is now ascertained that the fossils agree in
great part specifically, and in general character entirely, with those
of the succeeding formation.

2. _Upper Ludlow._--The next division, called the Upper Ludlow, consists of
grey calcareous sandstone, decomposing into soft mud, and contains, among
other shells, the _Lingula cornea_, which is common to it and the lowest,
or tilestone beds of the Old Red. But the _Orthis orbicularis_ is peculiar
to the Upper Ludlow, and very common; and the lowest or mudstone beds, are
loaded for a thickness of 30 feet with _Terebratula navicula_ (fig. 410.),
in vast numbers. Among the cephalopodous mollusca occur the genera
_Bellerophon_ and _Orthoceras_, and among the crustacea the _Homalonotus_
(fig. 418. p. 354.). A coral called _Favosites polymorpha_, Goldf. (fig.
401. p. 346.) is found both in this subdivision and in the Devonian system.

[Illustration: Fig. 409. _Orthis orbicularis_, J. Sow. Delbury.
Upper Ludlow.]

[Illustration: Fig. 410. _Terebratula navicula_, J. Sow. Aymestry
limestone; also in Upper and Lower Ludlow.]

Among the fossil shells are species of _Leptæna_, _Orthis_, _Terebratula_,
_Avicula_, _Trochus_, _Orthoceras_, _Bellerophon_, and others.[352-A]

Some of the Upper Ludlow sandstones are ripple-marked, thus affording
evidence of gradual deposition; and the same may be said of the
accompanying fine argillaceous shales which are of great thickness, and
have been provincially named "mudstones." In these shales many zoophytes
are found enveloped in an erect position, having evidently become fossil on
the spots where they grew at the bottom of the sea. The facility with which
these rocks, when exposed to the weather, are resolved into mud, proves
that, notwithstanding their antiquity, they are nearly in the state in
which they were first thrown down.

The scales, spines (_ichthyodorulites_), jaws, and teeth of fish of the
genera _Onchus_, _Plectrodus_, and others of the same family, have been met
with in the Upper Ludlow rocks.

[Illustration: Fig. 411. _Pentamerus Knightii_, Sow. Aymestry.

  _a._ view of both valves united.
  _b._ longitudinal section through both valves, showing the central plate
       or septum; half nat. size.]

3. _Aymestry limestone._--The next group is a subcrystalline and
argillaceous limestone, which is in some places 50 feet thick, and
distinguished around Aymestry by the abundance of _Pentamerus Knightii_,
Sow. (fig. 411.), also found in the Lower Ludlow. This genus of
brachiopoda has only been found in the Silurian strata. The name was
derived from +pente+, _pente_, five, and +meros+, _meros_, a part, because
both valves are divided by a central septum, making four chambers, and in
one valve the septum itself contains a small chamber, making five; but
neither the structure of this shell, nor the connection of the animal with
its several parts, are as yet understood. Messrs. Murchison and De Verneuil
discovered this species dispersed in myriads through a white limestone
of upper Silurian age, on the banks of the Is, on the eastern flank of
the Urals in Russia.

[Illustration: Fig. 412. _Lingula Lewisii_, J. Sow. Abberley Hills.]

Three other abundant shells in the Aymestry limestone are, 1st, _Lingula
Lewisii_ (fig. 412.); 2d, _Terebratula Wilsoni_, Sow. (fig. 413.), which is
also common to the Lower Ludlow and Wenlock limestone; 3d, _Atrypa
reticularis_, Lin. (fig. 414.), which has a very wide range, being found in
every part of the Silurian system, except the Llandeilo flags.

[Illustration: Fig. 413. _Terebratula Wilsoni_, Sow. Aymestry.]

[Illustration: Fig. 414. _Atrypa reticularis._ Linn. Syn. _Terebratula
affinis_, Min. Con. Aymestry.

  _a._ upper valve.
  _b._ lower.
  _c._ anterior margin of the valves.]

4. _Lower Ludlow shale._--A dark grey argillaceous deposit, containing,
among other fossils, the new genera of chambered shells, the _Phragmoceras_
of Broderip, and the _Lituites_ of Breyn (see figs. 415, 416.). The latter
is partly straight and partly convoluted, nearly as in _Spirula_.

[Illustration: Fig. 415. _Phragmoceras ventricosum_, J. Sow. (_Orthoceras
ventricosum_, Stein.) Aymestry; 1/4 nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 416. _Lituites giganteus_, J. Sow. Near Ludlow; also in
the Aymestry and Wenlock limestones; 1/4 nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 417. Fragments of Orthoceras.

  _a._ Fragment of _Orthoceras Ludense_, J. Sow.
  _b._ Polished section, showing siphuncle. Ludlow.]

The _Orthoceras Ludense_ (fig. 417.), as well as the shell last mentioned,
is peculiar to this member of the series. The _Homalonotus
delphinocephalus_ (fig. 418.) is common to this division and to the Wenlock
limestone. This crustacean belongs to a group of trilobites which has been
met with in the Silurian rocks only, and in which the tripartite character
of the dorsal crust is almost lost.

[Illustration: Fig. 418. _Homalonotus delphinocephalus_, König.[354-A]
Dudley Castle; 1/2 nat. size.]

A species of Graptolite, _G. Ludensis_, Murch. (fig. 419.), a form of
zoophyte which has not yet been met with in strata newer than the Silurian,
occurs in the Lower Ludlow.

_Wenlock formation._--We next come to the Wenlock formation, which has been
divided (see Table, p. 351.) into

1. Wenlock limestone, formerly well known to collectors by the name of the
Dudley limestone, which forms a continuous ridge, ranging for about 20
miles from S.W. to N.E., about a mile distant from the nearly parallel
escarpment of the Aymestry limestone. The prominence of this rock in
Shropshire, like that of Aymestry, is due to its solidity, and to the
softness of the shales above and below. It is divided into large
concretional masses of pure limestone, and abounds in trilobites, among
which the prevailing species are _Phacops caudatus_ (fig. 422.) and
_Calymene Blumenbachii_, commonly called the Dudley trilobite. The latter
is often found coiled up like a wood-louse (see fig. 420.).

[Illustration: Fig. 419. _Graptolithus Ludensis_, Murchison. Lower Ludlow.]

[Illustration: Fig. 420. _Calymene Blumenbachii_, Brong. Wenlock, L.
Ludlow, and Aym. limest.]

[Illustration: Fig. 421. _Leptæna depressa._ Wenlock.]

[Illustration: Fig. 422. _Phacops caudatus_, Brong. Wenlock, Aym.
limest., and L. Ludlow.]

_Leptæna depressa_, Sow., is common in this rock, but also ranges through
the Lower Ludlow, Wenlock shale, and Caradoc Sandstone.

[Illustration: Fig. 423. _Catenipora escharoides._]

Among the corals in which this formation is very rich, the _Catenipora
escharoides_, Lam. (fig. 423.), or chain coral, may be pointed out as
one very easily recognized, and widely spread in Europe, ranging
through all parts of the Silurian group, from the Aymestry limestone
to the bottom of the series.

Another coral, the _Porites pyriformis_, is also met with in profusion; a
species common to the Devonian rocks.

_Cystiphyllum Siluriense_ (fig. 425.) is a species peculiar to the Wenlock
limestone. This new genus, the name of which is derived from +kystis+, a
_bladder_, and +phyllon+, a _leaf_, was instituted by Mr. Lonsdale for
corals of the Silurian and Devonian groups. It is composed of small
bladder-like cells (see fig. 425. _b._).

2. The Wenlock Shale, which exceeds 700 feet in thickness, contains
many species of brachiopoda, such as a small variety of the _Lingula
Lewisii_ (fig. 412.), and the _Atrypa reticularis_ (fig. 414.) before
mentioned, and it will be seen that several other fossils before
enumerated range into this shale.

[Illustration: Fig. 424. _Porites pyriformis_, Ehren. Wenlock limest. and
shale. Also in Aymestry limestone, and L. Ludlow.

_a._ Vertical section, showing transverse lamellæ.]

[Illustration: Fig. 425. Cystiphyllum.

  _a._ _Cystiphyllum Siluriense_, Lonsd. Wenlock.
  _b._ Section of portion, showing cells.]


LOWER SILURIAN ROCKS.

The Lower Silurian rocks have been subdivided into two portions.

1. The Caradoc sandstone, which abuts against the trappean chain called the
Caradoc Hills, in Shropshire. Its thickness is estimated at 2500 feet, and
the larger proportion of its fossils are specifically distinct from those
of the Upper Silurian rocks. Among them we find many trilobites and shells
of the genera _Orthoceras_, _Nautilus_, and _Bellerophon_; and among the
Brachiopoda the _Pentamerus oblongus_ and _P. lævis_ (fig. 426.), which are
very abundant and peculiar to this bed; also _Orthis grandis_ (fig. 427.),
and a fossil of well-defined form, _Tentaculites annulatus_, Schlot. (fig.
428.), which Mr. Salter has shown to be referable to the Annelids and to
the same tribe as _Serpula_.

[Illustration: Fig. 426. _Pentamerus lævis_, Sow. Caradoc Sandstone.
Perhaps the young of _Pentamerus oblongus_.

  _a, b._ Views of the shell itself, from figures in Murchison's Sil. Syst.
   _c._   Cast with portion of shell remaining, and with the hollow of the
          central septum filled with spar.
   _d._   Internal cast of a valve, the space once occupied by the septum
          being represented by a hollow in which is seen a cast of the
          chamber within the septum.]

[Illustration: Fig. 427. Cast of _Orthis grandis_, J. Sow. Horderley;
two-thirds of nat. size.]

[Illustration: Fig. 428. _Tentaculites scalaris_, Schlot. Eastnor Park;
nat. size, and magnified.]

The most ancient bony remains of fish yet discovered in Great Britain are
those obtained from the Wenlock limestones; but coprolites referred to fish
occur still lower in the Silurian series in Wales.

[Illustration: Fig. 429. _Ogygia Buchii_, Burmeister. Syn. _Asaphus
Buchii_, Brong. 1/4 nat. size. Radnorshire.]

2. The _Llandeilo flags_, so named from a town in Caermarthenshire, form
the base of the Silurian system, consisting of dark-coloured micaceous
grit, frequently calcareous, and distinguished by containing the large
trilobites _Asaphus Buchii_ and _A. tyrannus_, Murch., both of which are
peculiar to these rocks. Several species of Graptolites (fig. 430.)
occur in these beds.

[Illustration: Fig. 430. _a_, _b_. _Graptolithus Murchisonii_,
Beck. Llandeilo flags.]

[Illustration: Fig. 431. _G. foliaceus_, _Murchison_. Llandeilo flags.]

In the fine shales of this formation Graptolites are very abundant. I
collected these same bodies in great numbers in Sweden and Norway in
1835-6, both in the higher and lower shales of the Silurian system; and
was informed by Dr. Beck of Copenhagen, that they were fossil zoophytes
related to the genera _Pennatula_ and _Virgularia_, of which the living
species now inhabit mud and slimy sediment. The most eminent naturalists
still hold to this opinion.

A species of _Lingula_ is met with in the lowest part of the Llandeilo
beds; and it is remarkable that this brachiopod is among the earliest, if
not the most ancient animal form detected in the lowest Silurian of North
America. These inhabitants of the seas, of so remote an epoch, belonged so
strictly to the living genus _Lingula_, as to demonstrate, like the
pteriform ferns of the coal, through what incalculable periods of time the
same plan and type of organization has sometimes prevailed.

Among the forms of trilobite extremely characteristic of the Lower Silurian
throughout Europe and North America, the _Trinucleus_ may be mentioned.
This family of crustaceans appears to have swarmed in the Silurian seas,
just as crabs, shrimps, and other genera of crustaceans abound in our own.
Burmeister, in his work on the organization of trilobites, supposes them to
have swum at the surface of the water in the open sea and near coasts,
feeding on smaller marine animals, and to have had the power of rolling
themselves into a ball as a defence against injury. They underwent various
transformations analogous to those of living crustaceans. M. Barrande,
author of a work on the Silurian rocks of Bohemia, has traced the same
species from the young state just after its escape from the egg to the
adult form, through various metamorphoses, each having the appearance of a
distinct species. Yet, notwithstanding the numerous species of preceding
naturalists which he has thus succeeded in uniting into one, he announces a
forthcoming work in which descriptions and figures of 250 species of
Trilobite will be given.

[Illustration: Fig. 432. _Trinucleus ornatus_, Burm.]

_Cystideæ._--Among the additions which recent research has made to the
paleontology of the oldest Silurian rocks, none are more remarkable than
the radiated animals called _Cystideæ_. Their structure and relations were
first elucidated in an essay published by Von Buch at Berlin in 1845. They
are usually met with as spheroidal bodies covered with polygonal plates,
with a mouth on the upper side, and a point of attachment for a stem _b_
(which is almost always broken off) on the lower. (See fig. 433.) They are
considered by Professor E. Forbes as intermediate between the crinoids and
echinoderms. The _Sphæronites_ here represented (fig. 433.) occurs in the
Llandeilo beds in Wales.[358-A]

[Illustration: Fig. 433. _Sphæronites balticus_, Eichwald. (Of the
family _Cystideæ_.)

  _a._ mouth.
  _b._ point of attachment of stem.

Lower Silurian, Shole's Hook and Bala.]

_Thickness and unconformability of Silurian strata._--According to the
observation of our government surveyors in North Wales, the Lower Silurian
strata of that region attain, in conjunction with the contemporaneous
volcanic rocks, the extraordinary thickness of 27,000 feet. One of the
groups, called the trappean, consisting of slates and associated volcanic
ash and greenstone, is 15,000 feet thick. Another series, called the Bala
group, co