Title: The Railway Builders - A Chronicle of Overland Highways
Author: Skelton, Oscar Douglas, 1878-1941
Language: English
As this book started as an ASCII text book there are no pictures available.


*** Start of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "The Railway Builders - A Chronicle of Overland Highways" ***


[Transcriber's note: This book has varying page headers.  Those headers
have been collected at the start of each chapter as an introductory
paragraph.]



[Frontispiece: 'The surveyor, often an explorer as well, striking out
into the wilderness in search of mountain pass or lower grade.'  From a
colour drawing by C. W. Jefferys]



THE

RAILWAY BUILDERS


A Chronicle of Overland Highways


BY

OSCAR D. SKELTON



TORONTO

GLASGOW, BROOK & COMPANY

1916



  _Copyright in all Countries subscribing to
  the Berne Convention_



{v}

CONTENTS

                                                        Page

    I.  THE COMING OF THE RAILWAY  . . . . . . . . . . .   1
   II.  EARLY TRAVEL IN CANADA . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
  III.  THE CALL FOR THE RAILWAY . . . . . . . . . . . .  27
   IV.  THE CANADIAN BEGINNINGS  . . . . . . . . . . . .  36
    V.  THE GRAND TRUNK ERA  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  52
   VI.  THE INTERCOLONIAL  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  93
  VII.  THE CANADIAN PACIFIC--BEGINNINGS . . . . . . . . 109
 VIII.  BUILDING THE CANADIAN PACIFIC  . . . . . . . . . 131
   IX.  THE ERA OF AMALGAMATION  . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
    X.  THE CANADIAN NORTHERN  . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
   XI.  THE EXPANSION OF THE GRAND TRUNK . . . . . . . . 196
  XII.  SUNDRY DEVELOPMENTS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220
 XIII.  SOME GENERAL QUESTIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240
        BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 248
        INDEX  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249



{vii}

ILLUSTRATIONS


'THE SURVEYOR, OFTEN AN EXPLORER AS WELL,
    STRIKING OUT INTO THE WILDERNESS IN SEARCH
    OF MOUNTAIN PASS OR LOWER GRADE' . . . . . . . .   _Frontispiece_
  From a colour drawing by C. W. Jefferys.

THE FIRST RAILWAY ENGINE IN CANADA, CHAMPLAIN AND ST LAWRENCE RAILROAD,
1837 . . . . . . _Facing page_ 38
  From a print in the Château de Ramezay.

RAILROADS AND LOTTERIES  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       "       48
  An Early Canadian Prospectus.

SIR FRANCIS HINCKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       "       66
  From a portrait in the Dominion Archives.

RAILWAYS OF BRITISH NORTH AMERICA, 1860 (Map)  . . .       "       92

SIR GEORGE SIMPSON . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       "      110
  From a print in the John Ross Robertson Collection,
  Toronto Public Library.

SIR SANDFORD FLEMING   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       "      114
  From a photograph by Topley.

FLEMING ROUTE AND THE TRANS-CONTINENTALS (Map) . . .       "      118

{viii}

RAILWAYS OF CANADA, 1880 (Map) . . . . . . . . . . .       "      130

LORD STRATHCONA  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       "      134
  From a photograph by Lafayette, London.

LORD MOUNT STEPHEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       "      140
  From a photograph by Wood and Henry, Dufftown.
    By courtesy of Sir William Van Horne.

SIR WILLIAM CORNELIUS VAN HORNE  . . . . . . . . . .       "      148
  From a photograph by Notman.

RAILWAYS OF CANADA, 1896 (Map) . . . . . . . . . . .       "      180

CANADIAN NORTHERN RAILWAY, 1914 (Map)  . . . . . . .       "      194

CHARLES MELVILLE HAYS  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       "      200
  From a photograph by Notman.

GRAND TRUNK SYSTEM, 1914 (Map) . . . . . . . . . . .       "      218

CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY, 1914 (Map) . . . . . . . .       "      224

GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY, 1914 (Map) . . . . . . . . .       "      230

RAILWAYS OF CANADA, 1914 (Map) . . . . . . . . . . .       "      238



{1}

CHAPTER I

THE COMING OF THE RAILWAY

The Coming of the Railway--The Iron Road--The New Power--Engine and
Rail--The Work of the Railway


On the morning of October 6, 1829, there began at Rainhill, in England,
a contest without parallel in either sport or industry.  There were
four entries:

  Braithwaite and Ericsson's _Novelty_.
  Timothy Hackworth's _Sans-pareil_.
  Stephenson and Booth's _Rocket_.
  Burstall's _Perseverance_.

These were neither race-horses nor stagecoaches, but rival types of the
newly invented steam locomotive.  To win the £500 prize offered, the
successful engine, if weighing six tons, must be able to draw a load of
twenty tons at ten miles an hour, and to cover at least seventy miles a
day.  Little wonder that an eminent Liverpool merchant declared that
only a parcel of charlatans could have devised such a test, and wagered
that if a locomotive ever went ten miles an hour, he {2} would eat a
stewed engine-wheel for breakfast!

The contest had come about as the only solution of a deadlock between
the stubborn directors of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway, or
tramway, then under construction, and their still more stubborn
engineer, one George Stephenson.  The railway was nearly completed, and
the essential question of the motive power to be used had not yet been
decided.  The most conservative authorities thought it best to stick to
the horse; others favoured the use of stationary steam-engines, placed
every mile or two along the route, and hauling the cars from one
station to the next by long ropes; Stephenson, with a few backers,
urged a trial of the locomotive.  True, on the Stockton and Darlington
Railway, the first successful public line ever built, opened four years
before, a Travelling Engine, built by the same dogged engineer, had
hauled a train of some forty light carriages nearly nine miles in
sixty-five minutes, and had even beaten a stage-coach, running on the
highway alongside, by a hundred yards in the twelve miles from
Darlington to Stockton.  But even here the locomotive was only used to
haul freight; passengers were still carried in old {3} stage-coaches,
which were mounted on special wheels to fit the rails, and were drawn
by horses.  The best practical engineers in England, when called into
consultation, inspected the Stockton road, and then advised the
perplexed directors to instal twenty-one stationary engines along the
thirty-one miles of track, rather than to experiment with the new
Travelling Engine.

'What can be more palpably absurd and ridiculous,' the _Quarterly
Review_ had declared in 1825, 'than the prospect held out of
locomotives travelling twice as fast as stage-coaches!  We should as
soon expect the people of Woolwich to suffer themselves to be fired off
upon one of Congreve's ricochet rockets as trust themselves to the
mercy of such a machine, going at such a rate.'  And the _Quarterly_
was not alone in its scepticism.  The directors of the new railway had
found great difficulty in obtaining a charter from parliament--a
difficulty registered in a bill for parliamentary costs reaching
£27,000, or over $4000 a mile.  Canal proprietors and toll-road
companies had declaimed against the attack on vested rights.  Country
squires had spluttered over the damage to fox covers.  Horses could not
plough in neighbouring fields.  {4} Widows' strawberry-beds would be
ruined.  What would become of coachmen and coach-builders and
horse-dealers?  'Or suppose a cow were to stray upon the line; would
not that be a very awkward circumstance?' queried a committee member,
only to give Stephenson an opening for the classic reply in his slow
Northumbrian speech: 'Ay, verra awkward for the coo.'  And not only
would the locomotive as it shot along do such varied damage; in truth,
it would not go at all; the wheels, declared eminent experts, would not
grip on the smooth rails, or else the engines would prove top-heavy.

To decide the matter, the directors had offered the prize which brought
together the _Novelty_, the _Sans-pareil_, the _Rocket_, and the
_Perseverance_, engines which would look almost as strange to a modern
crowd as they did to the thousands of spectators drawn up along the
track on that momentous morning.  The contest was soon decided.  The
_Novelty_, an ingenious engine but not substantially built, broke down
twice.  The _Sans-pareil_ proved wasteful of coal and also met with an
accident.  The _Perseverance_, for all its efforts, could do no better
than five or six miles an hour.  The _Rocket_ alone met all
requirements.  In a {5} seventy-mile run it averaged fifteen miles an
hour and reached a maximum of twenty-nine.  Years afterwards, when
scrapped to a colliery, the veteran engine was still able, in an
emergency, to make four miles in four and a half minutes.  'Truly,'
declared Cropper, one of the directors who had stood out for the
stationary engine and the miles of rope, 'now has George Stephenson at
last delivered himself.'


Stephenson had the good fortune, he had earned it indeed, to put the
top brick on the wall, and he alone lives in popular memory.  But the
railway, like most other great inventions, came about by the toil of
hundreds of known and unknown workers, each adding his little or great
advance, until at last some genius or some plodder, standing on their
failures, could reach success.  Both the characteristic features of the
modern railway, the iron road and the steam motive power, developed
gradually as necessity urged and groping experiment permitted.

The iron road came first.  When men began to mine coal in the north of
England, the need grew clear of better highways to bear the heavy
cart-loads to market or riverside.  About 1630 one Master Beaumont laid
down broad {6} wooden rails near Newcastle, on which a single horse
could haul fifty or sixty bushels of coal.  The new device spread
rapidly through the whole Tyneside coal-field.  A century later it
became the custom to nail thin strips of wrought iron to the wooden
rails, and about 1767 cast-iron rails were first used.  Carr, a
Sheffield colliery manager, invented a flanged rail, while Jessop,
another colliery engineer, took the other line by using flat rails but
flanged cart-wheels.  The outburst of canal building in the last
quarter of the eighteenth century overshadowed for a time the growth of
the iron road, but it soon became clear that the 'tramway' was
necessary to supplement, if not to complete, the canal.  In 1801 the
first public line, the Surrey Iron Railway, was chartered, but it was
not until 1825 that the success of the Stockton and Darlington Railway
proved that the iron way could be made as useful to the general
shipping public as to the colliery owner.  At the outset this road was
regarded as only a special sort of toll-road upon which any carrier
might transport goods or passengers in his own vehicles, but experience
speedily made it necessary for the company to undertake the complete
service.

It took longer to find the new motive power, {7} but this, too, first
came into practical use in the land where peace and liberty gave
industry the fostering care which the war-rent Continent could never
guarantee.  Nowadays it seems a simple thing to turn heat energy into
mechanical energy, to utilize the familiar expansive power of water
heated to vapour.  Yet centuries of experiment, slowly acquired
mechanical dexterity, and an industrial atmosphere were needed for the
development of the steam-engine, and later of the locomotive.
Inventiveness was not lacking in the earlier days.  In the second
century before Christ, Hero of Alexandria had devised steam fountains
and steam turbines, but they remained scientific toys, unless for the
miracle-working purposes to which legend says that eastern priests
adapted them.  So in the seventeenth century, when the Norman, Solomon
de Caus, claimed that with the vapour of boiling water he could move
carriages and navigate ships, Cardinal Richelieu had him put in prison
as a madman.  About 1628 an Italian, Giovanni Branca, invented an
engine which had the essential features of the modern turbine, but his
crude apparatus lacked efficiency.

Once more the coal-mines of England set invention working on a
definite, continuous {8} object.  As the shafts were sunk to lower and
lower levels, it became impossible to pump the water out of the mines
by horse power, and the aid of steam was sought.  Just at the close of
the seventeenth century Savery devised the first commercial
steam-engine, or rather steam fountain, which applied cold water to the
outside of the cylinder to condense the steam inside and produce a
vacuum; while Papin, one of the Huguenot refugees to whom industrial
England owed so much, planned the first cylinder and piston engine.
Then in 1705 Newcomen and Cawley, working with Savery, took up Papin's
idea, separated boiler from cylinder, and thus produced a vacuum into
which atmospheric pressure forced the piston and worked the pump.  Next
Humphrey Potter, a youngster hired to open and shut the valves of a
Newcomen engine, made it self-acting by tying cords to the engine-beam,
had his hour for play or idling, and proved that if necessity is the
mother of invention, laziness is sometimes its father.  Half a century
passed without material advance; even as perfected in detail by
Smeaton, the Newcomen engine required thirty-five pounds of coal to
produce one horse-power per hour, as against one pound {9} to-day.
Then James Watt, instrument-maker in Glasgow, seeing that much of the
waste of steam was due to the alternate chilling and heating of the
cylinder, added a separate condenser in which to do the chilling, and
kept the temperature of the cylinder uniform by applying a
steam-jacket.  Later, by applying steam and a vacuum to each side of
the piston alternately, and by other improvements, Watt, with his
partner Boulton, brought the reciprocating steam-engine to a high stage
of efficiency.

It took fifty years longer to combine the steam-engine and the rail.
French and American inventors devised steam carriages, which came to
nothing.  England again led the way.  At Redruth in Cornwall Boulton
and Watt had a branch for the erection of stationary engines in Cornish
tin-mines, in charge of William Murdock, later known as inventor of the
system of lighting by gas.  Murdock devised a steam carriage to run
upon the ordinary highway, but was discouraged by his employers from
perfecting the machine.  Another mechanic at Redruth, Richard
Trevithick, captain in a tin-mine, took up the torch, built a 'Dragon'
for use on the common highway, but was baffled by the {10} hopeless
badness of the roads, and turned to making a locomotive for use on the
iron ways of the Welsh collieries.  Two years later, in 1803, he had
constructed an ingenious engine, which could haul a ten-ton load five
miles an hour, but the engine jolted the road to pieces, and the
versatile inventor was diverted to other schemes.  Blenkinsop of Leeds
in 1812 had an engine built with a toothed wheel working in a racked
rail, which did years of good service; and next year at Wylam on the
Tyne a colliery owner, Blackett, had the _Puffing Billy_ built, and
proved that smooth wheels would grip smooth rails.  Still another year,
and an engine-wright in a Tyneside colliery, George Stephenson, himself
born at Wylam, devised the _Blücher_, doubling effectiveness by turning
the exhaust steam into the chimney to create a strong draught.  Using
this steam blast, and adopting the multitubular boiler from a French
inventor, Seguin, Stephenson finally scored a triumph, due not so much
to unparalleled genius as to dogged perseverance in working out his own
ideas and in adapting the ideas of other men.

Thus by slow steps the steam railway had come.  It was a necessity of
the age.  Crude means of transport might serve the need of {11} earlier
days when each district was self-contained and self-sufficing.  But now
the small workshop and the craftsman's tool were giving way to the huge
factory and the power-driven machine.  The division of labour was
growing more complex.  Each district was becoming more dependent on
others for markets in which to buy and to sell.  Traffic was
multiplying.  The industrial revolution brought the railway, and the
railway quickened the pace of the industrial revolution.

To some critics, as to Ruskin, railways have appeared 'the loathesomest
form of deviltry now extant, animated and deliberate earthquakes,
destructive of all nice social habits or possible natural beauty.'
Animated and deliberate earthquakes they were indeed to prove,
transforming social and industrial and political structures the world
over.  With the telegraph and the telephone, they greatly widened the
scope and quickened the pace of business operations, making it
possible, and therefore necessary, for the captain of industry or
finance of the twentieth century to have under control ten times the
press of affairs which occupied his eighteenth-century forerunner.  The
railway levelled prices and levelled manners.  It enabled floods of
settlers {12} to sweep into all the waste places of the earth, clamped
far-flung nations into unity, and bound country to country.

Nowhere was the part played so momentous as in the vast spaces of the
North American continent, and not least in the northern half.  The
railway found Canada scarcely a geographical expression, and made it a
nation.



{13}

CHAPTER II

EARLY TRAVEL IN CANADA

Water Transport--Land Trails--Westward in 1800--Progress 1830--1850:
The Day of the Steamboat


British North America before the railway came was a string of scattered
provinces.  Lake Huron was the western boundary of effective
settlement: beyond lay the fur trader's preserve.  Between Upper and
Lower Canada and the provinces by the Atlantic a wilderness intervened.
With the peninsula of Ontario jutting southwest between Michigan and
New York, and the northeastern states of the Union thrusting their
borders nearly to the St Lawrence, the inland and the maritime
provinces knew less of each other than of the neighbouring states.

Settlement clung close to river, lake, and sea.  Till the Eastern
Townships were settled, Lower Canada had been one long-drawn-out
village with houses close set on each side of the river streets.  Deep
forest covered all the land save where the lumberman or settler had cut
a narrow clearing or fire had left a {14} blackened waste.  To cut
roads through swamp and forest and over river and ravine demanded
capital, surplus time, and strong and efficient governments, all beyond
the possibilities of early days.  On the other hand, the waterways
offered easy paths.  The St Lawrence and the St John and all their
tributaries and lesser rivals provided inevitably the points of
settlement and the lines of travel.

The development of water transport in Canada furnishes a record of the
interaction of route and cargo, of need and invention, of enterprise
and capital.  First came the bark canoe, quick to build, light to carry
round the frequent gaps in navigation, and large enough to hold the few
voyageurs or the rich-in-little peltry that were chief cargo in early
days.  It was the bark canoe that carried explorer, trader, soldier,
missionary, and settler to the uttermost north and south and west.  For
the far journeys it long held its place.  Well on into the nineteenth
century fur traders were still sending in supplies from Montreal and
bringing back peltry from Fort William in flotillas of great bark
canoes.  For shorter voyages the canoe gave place to the larger and
clumsier bateau, the characteristic eighteenth-century conveyance.
After the War of 1812 {15} the increasingly heavy downward freight of
grain and potash led to the introduction from the United States of the
still larger Durham boats.  Along the coast and on the Great Lakes the
sailing schooner long filled a notable place.  Finally the steamboat
came.  In 1809, only one year after the _Clermont_ had begun its
regular trips on the Hudson, and before any steamboat plied in British
home waters, John Molson of Montreal with John Bruce and John
Jackson--luckily for Canada not all three baptized 'Algernon'--built at
Montreal the 40-ton steamer _Accommodation_.  Seven years later Upper
Canada's first steamboat was launched, the 740-ton _Frontenac_, built
at the then thriving village of Ernestown.  The fleet of river and lake
steamers multiplied rapidly.  The speed and certainty and
comfort--relative, at least--of the steamboat at once gave a forceful
impetus to settlement and to travel, and for some sections ended the
pioneer period.

Meanwhile, the waterways were being improved.  Little was needed or
done in the great network of New Brunswick's rivers or in Nova Scotia's
shorter streams, but on the St Lawrence system, with a fall of nearly
six hundred feet from Lake Erie to tide-water at {16} Three Rivers,
canal construction was imperative.  As early as 1779 canals were built
round the rapids between Lake St Louis and Lake St Francis, on the St
Lawrence, with a depth of only a foot and a half of water on the sills.
Far westward, at Sault Ste Marie, the energetic North-West Company
built, about 1800, a canal half a mile long.  In the early twenties,
after the failure of a private company, the province of Lower Canada
constructed a boat canal between Montreal and Lachine, and a less
successful beginning was made on a canal round the Chambly rapids on
the Richelieu.  In Upper Canada the British government built the Rideau
Canal, chiefly for military purposes.  The Welland Canal was begun by a
private company in 1824, opened for small boats five years later, and
taken over by the province in 1840, after a record notable alike for
energy and perseverance and for jobbery and inefficiency.  After the
Union of 1841, when population, revenue, and credit were all growing,
energetic digging was begun on the St Lawrence system of canals, and by
1848 vessels of twenty-six foot beam and drawing nine feet of water
could sail from the ocean to Chicago.

Land transport came later than water {17} transport, and developed by
slower stages.  Road-making was an art which the settler learned
slowly.  The blazed trail through the woods sufficed for the visit to
the neighbour or the church, or for the tramp to the nearest grist-mill
with a sack of wheat on one's back.  'He who has been once to church
and twice to mill is a traveller,' the common saying ran.  The trail
broadened to a bridle-road for pack-horse or saddle-horse.  The winter,
that maligned stepmother of Canada, gave the settler an excellent
though fleeting road on the surface of the frozen river or across the
hard-packed snow.  Through the endless swamps jolting 'corduroy' roads
were built of logs laid crosswise on little or no foundation.  With
more hands and more money there came the graded road, fenced and
bridged, but more rarely gravelled.  Finally, little earlier than the
railway, came the macadamized road, and that peculiar invention of
Upper Canada, the plank road, built of planks laid crosswise on a level
way, and covered with earth to lessen the wear and noise.  Upon these
roads carriole or calèche, 'cutter' or 'lumber-wagon,' carried the
settler or his goods to meeting-place and market.  By 1816 a stage
route was established from Montreal to Kingston, a year later {18} from
Kingston to York (Toronto), and in 1826 from Toronto to Niagara and
from Ancaster to Detroit.

Road-making policy fluctuated between the Scylla of local neglect and
the Charybdis of centralized jobbery.  At first the settler was
burdened with the task of clearing roughly the road in front of his own
land, but the existence of vast tracts of Clergy Reserves, or other
grants exempt from clearing duties, made this an ineffective system.
Labour on roads required by statute, whether shared equally by all
settlers or allotted according to assessed property, proved little more
successful.  On the other hand, the system of provincial grants for
road-building too often meant log-rolling and corruption, and in the
Canadas it was discontinued after the establishment of municipal
institutions in 1841.  The reaction to local control was perhaps too
extreme, and we are to-day recognizing the need of more aid and control
by the central provincial authorities.  In the Maritime Provinces the
system worked better, and when the railway came these provinces
possessed a good network of great roads and by-roads, without a single
toll-gate.  With the passing of the Joint Stock Act by the Canadian
{19} legislature in 1849, toll-road companies were freely organized,
and many of the leading roads were sold by the government to these
private corporations, and without question their operations brought
marked improvement for a time.

To realize more concretely the mode of travelling before the railway
came, let us make the journey, say, from Quebec to Toronto, at three
different periods, in 1800, in 1830, and in 1850.

'In no part of North America,' wrote an experienced traveller just at
the close of the eighteenth century, 'can a traveller proceed so
commodiously as along the road from Quebec to Montreal.'[1]  A posting
service had been established which could fairly be compared with
European standards.  At regular intervals along the road the traveller
found post-houses, where the post-master kept four vehicles in
readiness: in summer the calèche, a one-horse chaise built for two
passengers, with a footboard seat for the driver and with the body hung
by broad leather straps or thongs of bull's hide; in winter the
carriole, or sledge, with or without {20} covered top, also holding two
passengers and a driver.  The drivers were bound to make two leagues an
hour over the indifferent roads, and in midwinter and midsummer the
dexterous, talkative, good-humoured driver, or _marche-donc_, usually
exceeded this rate for most of the journey of three days.  From
Montreal onward no one travelled in winter except an occasional Indian
messenger.  Even in summer few thought of going by land, though some
half-broken trails stretched westward.  The river was the king's
highway.  The summer traveller at once purchased the equipment needed
for a week's river journey--tent, buffalo-skins, cooking utensils, meat
and drink--and secured passage on board one of the bateaux which went
up the river at irregular intervals in brigades of half a dozen.  The
bateau was a large flat-bottomed boat, built sharp both at bow and
stern, with movable mast, square sail, and cross benches for the crew
of five or six.  Sometimes an awning or small cabin provided shelter.
In still water or light current the French-Canadian crew--always merry,
sometimes sober, singing their voyageur songs, halting regularly for
the inevitable 'pipe'--rowed or sailed; where the current was strong
they {21} kept inshore and pushed slowly along by 'setting' poles,
eight or ten feet long and iron shod; and where the rapids grew too
swift for poling, the crews joined forces on the shore to haul each
bateau in turn by long ropes, while the passengers lent a hand or shot
wild pigeons in the neighbouring woods.  At night the whole party
encamped on shore, erecting tents or hanging skins and boughs from
branches of friendly trees.  With average weather Kingston could be
reached in seven or eight days; the return journey down-stream was made
in two or three.  From Kingston westward the journey was continued in a
sailing schooner, either one of the government gunboats or a private
venture, as far as York, or even to the greater western metropolis,
Queenston on the Niagara river.  In good weather thirty or forty hours
sufficed for the lake voyage, but with adverse winds from four to six
days were frequently required.

Thirty years later those to whom time or comfort meant more than money
could make the through journey in one-third the time, though for the
leaner-pursed the more primitive facilities still lingered.  For the
summer trip from Quebec to Montreal the steamer had outstripped the
stage-coach.  Even with {22} frequent stops to load the fifty or sixty
cords of pine burned on each trip--how many Canadian business men
secured their start in prosperity by supplying wood to steamers on lake
or river!--the steamer commonly made the hundred and eighty miles in
twenty-eight hours.  The fares were usually twenty shillings cabin and
five shillings steerage, though the intense rivalry of opposing
companies sometimes brought reckless rate-cutting.  In 1829, for
instance, each of the two companies had one boat which carried and
boarded cabin passengers for seven and six-pence, while deck passengers
who found themselves in food were crowded in for a shilling.

From Montreal to Lachine the well-to-do traveller took a stage-coach,
drawn by four spanking greys, leaving Montreal at five in the morning,
for stage-coach hours were early and long.  At Lachine he left the
stage for the steamer, at the Cascades he took a stage again, and at
Côteau transferred once more to a steamer for the run to Cornwall.
Shortly after 1830 steamers were put on the river powerful enough to
breast the current as far as Dickenson's Landing, leaving only a
twelve-mile gap to be filled by stage, but in 1830 it {23} was still
necessary, if one scorned the bateau, to make the whole journey from
Cornwall to Prescott by land, over one of the worst through roads in
the province.  The Canadian stage of the day was a wonderful
contrivance, a heavy lumbering box, slung on leather straps instead of
springs, and often made without doors in order that, when fording
bridgeless streams, the water might not flow in.  With the window as
the only means of exit, heavy-built passengers found it somewhat
awkward when called upon, as they often were, to clamber out in order
to ease the load uphill, or to wait while oxen from a neighbouring farm
dragged the stage out of a mud-hole.  The traveller who 'knew the
ropes' provided himself with buffalo-skins or cushions; others went
without.  Arrived at Prescott, the passengers shifted to a river
steamer, fitted more commodiously than the little boats used in the
lower stretches, but still providing no sleeping quarters except in
open bunks circling round the dining-saloon.

For thousands of the immigrants who were pouring into Upper Canada the
fares of the river steamer were still prohibitive.  Many came on
bateaux, sometimes poled along as {24} of yore, sometimes taken in tow
by a steamer.  Often more than a hundred immigrants, men, women, and
children, would be crowded into a single thirty-foot bateau, 'huddled
together,' a traveller notes, 'as close as captives in a slave trader,
exposed to the sun's rays by day, and the river damp by night, without
protection.'[2]  Still more used the Durham boat for the river journey.
This famous craft was a large, flat-bottomed barge, with round bow and
square stern.  With centre-board down and mainsail and topsail set on
its fixed mast, it made fair progress in the wider stretches.  But on
the up trip it was for the most part poled or 'set' along.  Each of the
crew took his stand at the bow end of one of the narrow gangways which
ran along both sides of the boat, set firmly in the river bottom his
long, heavy, iron-shod pole, put his shoulder to it, and, bending
almost double, walked along the gangway to the stern and inch by inch
forced the boat up-stream.  'The noise made by the clanking of the iron
against the stones, as the poles were drawn up again toward the bow,
could be heard for a long distance on a calm summer's day.'  Finally,
at Prescott or Kingston the Durham boat was exchanged for {25} the
lower decks of the steamer, and the rest of the journey made with
somewhat greater speed, if not much greater comfort.

The twenty years which followed 1830 saw the steamboat in its prime.
The traveller going westward from Quebec in 1850 had a simple task
before him: a change at Montreal was the only necessary break in a
relatively comfortable and speedy journey.  Two days now sufficed for
the trip from Montreal to Toronto.  In the United States, river boats
had been evolved which far surpassed anything Europe had to offer in
luxury and speed.  Canadian business men were not far behind, and the
St Lawrence lake and river route was well supplied with crack steamers,
of the Royal Mail and rival lines, or with independent boats.  The
competition was at times intense, both in fares and in speed.  Many
Canadians of the day, absorbed in the local or personal rivalries of
these boats, and impressed by their magnificence and reliability, were
convinced that the last word in transportation had been said.  Yet, on
the lake and river, winter barred all through traffic.  The main
turnpike roads of the interior were greatly improved, but even on these
long-distance traffic was expensive, and the {26} by-roads, especially
in the spring and autumn, were impassable except at a snail's pace.
For traffic of town with town and province with province some means of
transport less dependent on time and tide was urgently needed.



[1] Isaac Weld, _Travels through the States of North America and the
Provinces of Upper and Lower Canada_ (Fourth Edition), p. 300.

[2] Shirreff, _A Tour through North America_, p. 143.



{27}

CHAPTER III

THE CALL FOR THE RAILWAY

National Unity--The Fight for Western Trade


We have seen how in England a succession of workers almost apostolic in
continuity had brought the steam railway to practical success, and how
in Canada, before the railway came, men were making shift with bateau
and steamer, with stage-coach and cart and calèche, to carry themselves
and their wares to meeting-place and market.  Now we may glance for a
moment at the chief hope and motive of those who brought the locomotive
across the seas.

In all but the very earliest years of railway planning and building in
Canada, two aims have been dominant.  One has been political, the
desire to clamp together the settlements scattered across the
continent, to fill the waste spaces and thus secure the physical basis
for national unity and strength.  The other has been commercial, the
desire to capture the trade and traffic of an ever-expanding and {28}
ever-receding west.  Local convenience and local interests have played
their part, but in the larger strategy of railway building the dominant
motives have been political and commercial.  They have been blended in
varying proportions; each has acted against the other as well as with
it, but at all times they give the key to facts which otherwise remain
a meaningless jumble of dates and figures.

The political motive is familiar and needs only brief reference.  That
the present Canada is not a natural geographical unit is an undeniable
fact.  Each of the principal sections has more natural connection with
the corresponding section of the United States than with the other
parts of Canada.  And sixty years ago it was doubtful whether any
common sentiment could take the place of the physical unity which was
lacking.  There was, of course, no national consciousness, based on
common history and common aspirations.  At best the link of the
scattered colonies was that of common loyalty to the British crown, and
at worst a common inherited antagonism to the great republic to the
south.  Yet far-seeing and courageous men were not content to accept
the decrees of geography or of the {29} diplomats who had been
over-generous in conceding territory to American claims.  They sought
unity and understanding, out of fear of aggression from their
overshadowing neighbours and out of faintly shaping hope of what the
northern half-continent might become.

For unity, knowledge and daily intercourse were needed; for knowledge
and intercourse, speedy and cheap transportation was essential.  Within
each province and between the two Canadas much had been done, but
neither river, canal, nor turnpike could serve to annihilate the vast
distances that separated east from west and west from farthest west.
Only the railway could achieve such a task.

But more was needed than patriotic sentiment.  All-red speeches might
adorn a banquet or win an election, but facts--or fictions--as to
freight and dividends were needed to beguile the capital from
investors' pockets.  The hope of securing for the Canadian provinces
the trade and traffic of the golden West was, in early years as in
late, much the strongest factor in railway policy.

When the white man came to North America, he found himself hemmed in to
the Atlantic coast by the long range of the Appalachians.  These
mountains, though not {30} lofty, were rugged and covered with dense
forests and tangled undergrowth.  There were few doorways to the great
open spaces beyond.  On the far north the southward intrusion of the
ocean, known as Hudson Bay, opened a precarious way, important in the
early days of the white man's period, possibly to become important
again in our own, but negligible during the intervening years.  From
the south, entrance could be had by the Mississippi and its
tributaries, offering for most of the year ten thousand miles of
navigable waters.  In the east the St Lawrence system, stretching three
thousand miles westward from the sea, and the Hudson and Mohawk rivers,
passing through a gap in the Alleghanies, offered still more convenient
access.

Early and late in the history of the white man's America the land and
the trade of the interior have been the prize sought by rival nations
and rival cities, and the possession of a speedy and convenient route
has been the means of securing the prize.  The later warfare was less
spectacular than the old, but no less keen.  The navvy took the place
of the Indian, pick and shovel and theodolite the place of bow and
musket, and a lower freight {31} by a cent on a bushel of wheat became
the ammunition in place of the former glass beads or fire-water.  But
seventeenth- or eighteenth-century Englishmen and Frenchmen on Hudson
Bay, Spaniards and Frenchmen on the Mississippi, Frenchmen and
Englishmen on the St Lawrence, Dutchmen and Englishmen on the Hudson,
did not strive more eagerly for control than the Montreal and Halifax,
Portland and Boston and New York, Philadelphia and Baltimore and New
Orleans of the nineteenth century.  The struggle became especially
intense when the advancing flood of settlers cut their way through the
Appalachian woods and burst into the prairies of the Mississippi
valley.  There was no longer a ten-year struggle to clear a space of
forty or fifty acres; at once the soil was ready for the plough.  For a
few years the grain of the valley states was needed for their own
inrushing settlers, but a surplus grew rapidly and had to find an
outlet in the east or in Europe.  The miraculous speed of western
settlement and the magnitude of the prize at stake soon centred public
interest on the question of the route which was to provide this outlet.

The Mississippi route was the first to be {32} developed.  In canoe and
pirogue, bateau, flatboat, and ark, settlers went up and produce came
down.  But the winding stream, the shifting channel, the swift current,
the frequent snag and sand-bar made navigation down-stream dangerous
and navigation upstream incredibly slow: the heavier vessels took three
months for the trip from New Orleans to Louisville.  With the coming of
the steamboat a strong impetus was given alike to settlement and to
export trade.  By the forties New Orleans ranked the fourth port in the
world and the Mississippi valley exceeded the British Isles in the
ownership of ships' tonnage.  In 1850 the Mississippi still carried to
the sea cargoes twice the value of those that sought the Lakes and the
Erie Canal, though in the import trade these proportions were reversed.
At this time a line drawn east and west through the centre of Ohio
marked the commercial watershed.  Not until after the Civil War did the
glories of the Mississippi pass away.

Next, New York devised its master-stroke, the Erie Canal.  Gouverneur
Morris and De Witt Clinton saw the opportunity which the Mohawk-Hudson
cleft in the Appalachian barrier offered, and the state rose to it.
{33} Digging was begun in 1817, and in 1825 the first barge passed from
Lake Erie to the Hudson.  At first the canal was only a four-foot
ditch, but it proved the greatest single factor in the development of
the region south of the Lakes.  Prosperous cities--Buffalo, Lockport,
Rochester, Syracuse, Utica, Schenectady--sprang up all along the route.
Cost of transport from Buffalo to New York was cut in four.  The
success of New York led Pennsylvania to build canals through the state
to Pittsburg, with a portage railroad over the Alleghanies, while in
the west canals were dug to connect Lake Erie with the Ohio, and Lake
Michigan with the Illinois and the Mississippi.

To the Canadian of that day the West meant Upper Canada or Canada West,
and 'the far west' meant Illinois and Indiana.  The Saskatchewan was to
him little more than the Yang-tse-Kiang.  But although the far west was
not under his own flag, it dominated his thoughts as greatly as the
North-West has dominated our thoughts half a century later.  Canada
sought its share of the western trade.  The Canadian provinces were
thinly peopled, their revenues were scanty and their credit low, but
the example of New York stirred them to the effort to remove the
barriers to {34} navigation in the St Lawrence, and to offer their
magnificent lake and river ship-route against the petty barge canal
which was capturing the western trade.  The Welland Canal was built to
carry east-bound traffic beyond the point where Buffalo tapped it, and
by 1848, as we have seen, canals were completed on the St Lawrence,
providing a nine-foot waterway from Chicago to Montreal.

It was a magnificent effort for a struggling colony.  But it was
scarcely finished--the paeans of self-congratulation on the unexpected
discovery of an enterprise quite Yankee in its daring were still
echoing--when it was found to have been made largely in vain.  So far
from monopolizing the trade of the western states, the St Lawrence
route Was not even keeping the east-bound traffic of Upper Canada
itself.  The reasons were soon plain.  The repeal in 1846 of the Corn
Laws and in 1848 of the differential duties in favour of the St
Lawrence route were temporary blows.  The granting of bonding
privileges by the United States in 1845 drew traffic from Canada to
southern routes.  Ocean rates were cheaper from New York than from
Montreal; in 1850, for example, the freight on a barrel of flour from
New York to {35} Liverpool was 1s. 3 1/2d., while from Montreal it was
3s. 0 1/2d.  This was because the majority of the vessels arriving at
Montreal came in ballast, and also because on the outward voyage the
offerings of timber made rates high.  Timber enjoyed a preference in
the British market, and, as has happened since, this preference was
simply absorbed by the vessel owner.  But most important of all, in the
United States the railway, with its speedy, all-year service, had
already taken the place of the canal.  The Canadian ports were fighting
with weapons obsolete before completed.



{36}

CHAPTER IV

THE CANADIAN BEGINNINGS

Portage Roads--Projects of the Forties--The St Lawrence and
Atlantic--The Great Western--The State and the Railway


From the beginning in Canada, to a much greater degree than in Great
Britain or in the United States, the railway was designed to serve
through traffic.  But it was regarded at first as only a very minor
link in the chain.  River and canal were still considered the great
highways of through traffic.  Only where there were gaps to be bridged
between the more important waterways was the railway at first thought
profitable.  In the phrase of one of the most distinguished of Canadian
engineers, Thomas C. Keefer, the early roads were portage roads.

In 1832, two years after the completion of the Liverpool and Manchester
Railway, a charter was granted by the legislature of Lower Canada to
the Company of the Proprietors of the Champlain and St Lawrence
Railroad, for a line from Laprairie on the St Lawrence to St Johns,
sixteen miles distant {37} on the Richelieu river, just above the
rapids.  From St Johns transportation to New York was easily effected,
through the Richelieu to Lake Champlain and thence to the Hudson.  This
portage road promised to shorten materially the journey from Montreal
to New York.

Construction was begun in 1835, and the road opened for traffic in July
1836.  The rails were of wood, with thin flat bars of iron spiked on.
These were apt to curl up on the least provocation, whence came their
popular name of 'snake-rails.'  At first horse power was used, but in
1837 the proprietors imported an engine and an engineer from England.
Some premonition of trouble made the management decide to make the
trial run by moonlight.  In spite of all the efforts of engineer and
officials, the _Kitten_ would not budge an inch.  Finally an engineer,
borrowed from the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, reported that all that
was needed was 'more wood and water,' and given these the _Kitten_
gambolled along at twenty miles an hour.

The Champlain and St Lawrence was at first operated only in the summer,
when its services as a portage route were most needed.  After a decade
of moderately successful working, it was decided, significantly, to
lengthen {38} the rail and shorten the water section of the route.  By
1852 the rails had been extended northward to St Lambert, opposite
Montreal, and southward to Rouse's Point, on Lake Champlain.  Twenty
years later this pioneer road, after a period of leasing, was
completely absorbed by the Grand Trunk Railway.

[Illustration: The first railway engine in Canada.  Champlain and St
Lawrence Railroad, 1837.  From a print in the Château de Ramezay.]

For ten years the sixteen-mile Champlain and St Lawrence was the sole
steam railway in British North America, while by 1846 the United
Kingdom had built over twenty-eight hundred miles, and the United
States nearly five thousand.  Political unrest, commercial depression,
absorption of public funds in canals, hindered development in Canada.
Many projects were formed and charters secured--for roads in the
western peninsula of Upper Canada, between Cobourg and Rice Lake, on
the Upper Ottawa, in the Eastern Townships, and elsewhere--but they all
came to nothing.  It was not until the railway mania broke out in
England in the middle forties--when 'King' Hudson, first of the great
promoters and speculators, turned all to gold; when ninety schemes were
floated in a single week, calling for eighty million pounds; when
companies capitalized at over seven hundred millions scrambled for
charters {39} and all England fought for their shares--that Canadian
promoters found interest awakened and capitalists keen to listen.  At
the same time, the active competition of United States roads for the
western traffic and the approaching completion of the St Lawrence canal
system prompted further steps.  A second stage in Canadian railway
building had begun.

First may be noted three small lines, which were in their beginnings
chiefly portage roads of the most limited type.  The Montreal and
Lachine, begun in 1846 and completed in 1847, was the second complete
road built.  Its track of eight miles took the place of the earlier
stage route round the Lachine rapids.  Five years later an extension,
the Lake St Louis and Province Line, was built from Caughnawaga, on the
opposite shore of the St Lawrence, to the boundary and beyond to
Mooer's Junction, where it made connection with American roads, and
thus offered a route from Montreal to New York rivalling the older
Champlain and St Lawrence route.  A steam ferry, which could carry a
locomotive and three loaded cars, was used for crossing from Lachine to
Caughnawaga.  The enlarged line, known as the Montreal and New York
Railroad, did not prosper, and was {40} eventually absorbed by its
rival, the Champlain and St Lawrence.  The third completed road, the St
Lawrence and Industry Village, was also built in Lower Canada, running
from Lanoraie on the north bank of the St Lawrence twelve miles to the
village of Industry, later Joliette.  It was opened for traffic in
1850, and was a road for use in summer only.  Meanwhile, the
desirability of building a road to circumvent Niagara had not escaped
attention.  In 1835 the Erie and Ontario Railroad was chartered, and in
1839 the line was opened from Queenston to Chippawa.  The grades near
Queenston were too steep for the locomotives of the day, and the road
was operated by horses; even so, it halted a hundred feet above the
level of the river, and failed to make good its promise as an effective
portage route.  In 1852 the charter was amended, and two years later
the road was rebuilt from Chippawa to Niagara-on-the-Lake, and operated
by steam.  It was later extended to Fort Erie and absorbed by the
Canada Southern.

More ambitious schemes were under way--the planning of the St Lawrence
and Atlantic in Canada East, and of the Great Western and later the
Northern in Canada {41} West.  These roads were all designed to secure
for Canadian routes and Canadian ports a share of the through traffic
of the West.  They were all links in longer chains; the time of
independent through roads had not yet come.  The St Lawrence and
Atlantic was built to secure the supremacy of the upper St Lawrence
route by giving Montreal a winter outlet at Portland.  The Northern,
running from Lake Ontario at Toronto to Georgian Bay at Collingwood,
was a magnified portage road, shortening by hundreds of miles the
distance from Chicago and the upper lakes to the St Lawrence ports.
The Great Western, connecting Buffalo and Detroit, was the central link
in the shortest route between New York and Chicago.  Not only were
these roads important in themselves, but the experience acquired in the
endeavour to finance and construct them largely determined the policy
of the great era of railway construction which began with the
chartering of the Grand Trunk.

The St Lawrence and Atlantic was the Canadian half of the first
international railway ever built.  At the outset much more than half of
the enterprise and activity was centred in the United States, for the
Canadas {42} were still apprentices in railway promotion and
construction.  The ambition of an American seaport prompted the
planning of the line, the untiring energy of an American promoter made
it possible, and American contractors built the greater part.

The little city of Portland possessed the most northerly harbour on the
Atlantic coast of the United States.  Mr John A. Poor, whose lifetime
was devoted to the extension of railways in northern New England,
dreamed of making it, by a road to Montreal, the outlet of the trade of
the West, at least so far as freight traffic went.  Passengers and
mails, he conceived, could best be carried to Europe from Halifax,
nearly six hundred miles nearer than New York to Liverpool, but the
railway connecting Halifax with the large American cities should pass
through Portland, and thus make it an important divisional point, if
not a terminus.  His enthusiasm fired his fellow-citizens: the city
subscribed for stock in the proposed road to Montreal, and guaranteed
bonds, while private subscriptions mounted still higher, at least on
paper.  More difficulty was experienced in inducing allies in Montreal
to undertake the Canadian half of the road.  Before 1845, however,
Montreal {43} business men were convinced that a railway to Portland or
Boston offered them the best means of recovering from the blow
inflicted by the repeal of the British preference on Canadian wheat and
flour.  If Montreal could not be the New York of Canada, it might at
least occupy the position which Buffalo was now achieving, gathering
all the trade of the interior to forward it in summer and especially in
winter over the new road.  The advantage of such a line in the
development of the Eastern Townships was also evident.

The only question in dispute in Canada was as to the relative merits of
the Boston and the Portland route.  The superior energy of the Portland
promoters weighed down the scale in favour of their city.  In February
1845 Poor struggled five days through a north-east blizzard, and
reached Montreal just in time to turn the vote of the Board of Trade
against Boston.  He organized a spectacular race of express sleighs to
disprove the claim that, though the British packet called at Portland
before going on to Boston, the route by Boston would prove speedier.
Relays of teams were provided all along the rival roads from Boston and
from Portland, five to fifteen miles apart; evergreen bushes {44} were
set up in the snow to mark the road; part of the Montreal mail was
taken off at Portland, and part at Boston, and dispatched by the rival
couriers.  The Portland relay covered the distance, nearly three
hundred miles, in twenty hours, and dashed into Montreal, with all
colours flying, twelve hours ahead of the Boston contingent.  The
cheers that greeted the victors marked the definite turn of popular
favour toward the Portland route.  Two allied companies were
incorporated--the Atlantic and St Lawrence to build the United States
section of the railway, and the St Lawrence and Atlantic to build from
Montreal to the border.

The St Lawrence and Atlantic was a valuable medium of experience, if
not of traffic.  In its management were found the leading business men
of Montreal, such as Moffat, M'Gill, Molson, Stayner, and Torrance.  At
first all was fair.  Subscriptions came in freely from Montreal and the
Eastern Townships.  One of the youngest of the directors, Alexander T.
Galt, then commissioner of the British-American Land Company, succeeded
in floating a large quantity of stock in England--the first of
countless railway appeals to the London market--only to have the
subscriptions {45} withdrawn in 1846 when the Hudson bubble burst.  The
Canadian stockholders put up what money they could.  The city of
Montreal took £125,000 stock.  The British-American Land Company and
the Montreal Seminary each lent £25,000.  Country subscribers were
permitted to make payments in pork or eggs for the use of the
construction gang, though one director resigned because not allowed to
turn in his farm.  The contractors, Black, Wood and Company, as was
customary in the United States at the time, took a large portion of
their payment in stock.  Still, funds were lacking.  Internal
difficulties developed; directors did not direct; and in 1849 the
finances were found to be in a hopelessly tangled state.  Galt then
took charge as president, with John Young--forwarder and born promoter,
active in all transportation schemes, whether for canal, railway, or
bridge--as vice-president.  Under their skilful financing the work went
on, but scarcely forty miles could be opened in 1849.  To complete the
road to the border, in the depression which prevailed, seemed utterly
beyond the unaided resources of private capitalists, and the directors
turned to the government for aid.

Meanwhile, Upper Canada lagged in action, {46} although schemes were
many.  Omitting merely local projects, the roads most in the public eye
were those leading west and north from Lake Ontario.  The Great Western
project had been longest under way, and showed a significant evolution.
In 1834 the legislature of Upper Canada had granted a charter to the
London and Gore Railroad Company.  This road was designed to carry the
products of the rich western peninsula to the bordering lakes, and
chiefly to Lake Ontario.  The main line was to run in the direction of
Governor Simcoe's great highway, Dundas Street, from Burlington Bay to
London, while power was taken to extend the road to Lake Huron and the
navigable waters of the Thames.  Nothing was done under this charter.
When it was renewed by an Act of 1845, the name was changed to the
Great Western, and, more important, the route was altered to extend
from the Niagara river via Hamilton to Windsor and Sarnia.  For
meanwhile the New York Central had reached Buffalo, and the Michigan
Central was being pushed westward from Detroit toward Chicago.  A road
through Canada would provide a shorter link than one south of Lake
Erie, and the Great Western was designed to fill this gap.

{47}

With all the possibilities of through and local traffic, and of
comparatively good grades and few curves, the road was long in
starting.  An eminent American engineer, Charles B. Stuart, reported
glowingly on the prospects.  Two citizens of Hamilton, Allan MacNab,
fiery politician and calculating lobbyist, and Isaac Buchanan, untiring
advocate of railways, protection, and paper money, threw themselves
into the campaign.  Samuel Zimmermann, the best known contractor of the
period, a Pennsylvanian who had come to Canada to take a Welland Canal
contract, and stayed to be the power behind the scenes in the
provincial legislature, was prepared to build the road.  Hudson gave
the scheme his approval.  All to no immediate purpose.  The contracts
were let, ground was broken at London in 1843, but the money to build
was not forthcoming.  In consequence the Great Western also turned to
parliament for aid.

The Toronto, Simcoe and Huron Union Railroad Company--later known as
the Northern--the first road in Upper Canada on which steam locomotives
were used, was still slower in emerging from the promotion stage.  The
idea of building a great portage road between Lake Huron and Lake
Ontario was an obvious {48} one, and proposals for its construction
were frequent.  It was not until the scheme was taken up by Frederick
Chase Capreol, a sanguine and ingenious Englishman many years resident
in Toronto, that any real progress was made.  Capreol conceived the
brilliant idea of combining the lure of a lottery and the increment of
land values to finance a road from Toronto to Georgian Bay.  His
proposal was to raise funds by a lottery for the purchase of 100,000
acres of land along the route of the railroad, and to pay for the road
out of the increase in the value of the land.  Objections moral and
financial were urged, and Capreol modified his scheme.  In 1849 an Act
was passed granting a charter and permitting the raising of money
either by subscription or by lottery, but it was reserved by the
governor-general for royal assent, on account of the lottery clause.
Capreol, nothing daunted, sailed for England, and in seven weeks was
back with royal assent assured.  The lottery, for all its alluring
promises, fell flat.  Then the Northern, too, clamoured for public aid.

[Illustration: Railroads and Lotteries.  An Early Canadian Prospectus]

With these local roads under way or actively promoted, still larger
projects loomed up.  A line from Montreal to Toronto, paralleling the
St Lawrence, and thus for the first {49} time competing with water
transport instead of merely supplementing it, began to be talked of as
possible.  The need of bringing the Maritime Provinces into closer
touch with the Canadas lent support to plans of a road from Halifax to
Quebec.  But for these extensive schemes public aid was even more
indispensable.

Hitherto the government of British North America had framed no definite
or continuous railway policy.  There had been general agreement that
railway building should be left to private enterprise.  In 1832, when
the charter of the Champlain and St Lawrence was under discussion in
the legislature of Lower Canada, some members advocated government
ownership, but Papineau, the French-Canadian leader, protested against
the jobbery that would follow.  In the forties the government of Canada
was selling its highways to toll-companies, and was not likely to
embark on railway construction.  In several later charters provision
was made for state purchase, after a term of years, at cost plus twenty
or twenty-five per cent.  Control of private companies in the interest
of the shipper was sometimes sought.  In the charter of the Champlain
and St Lawrence a maximum rate was prescribed {50} at 3d. a mile for
passengers and 9 3/4d. a mile per ton of freight, subject to reduction
when profits exceeded twelve per cent.  In Upper Canada the earlier
charters set no maximum, though the governor in council was given power
to approve rates.  It appeared to be held that different forwarding
companies would make use of the iron way, and afford sufficient
competition to protect shippers and passengers against extortion.  New
Brunswick in 1836 revealed the not modest expectations of profit which
prevailed.  It provided, in the St Andrews and Quebec charter, that
after ten years tolls, if excessive, might be reduced to yield only
twenty-five per cent profit.  The same sanguine expectations were
reflected in the provision made in eight charters issued by Lower
Canada between 1845 and 1850, that half the profits over a minimum
varying from ten to twenty-four per cent were to go to the state.

The prevalent belief in the great profits to be obtained influenced
public opinion against any grant of government aid, except during a
brief period before the Rebellion of 1837, when the lavish policy of
state construction and state bonuses adopted by the neighbouring
republic proved contagious in Upper Canada.  {51} Under the influence
of that example the Cobourg Railroad was to be granted a loan of
£10,000 as soon as an equal sum was privately subscribed and one-third
was paid up.  The Toronto and Lake Huron was promised £3 for every £1
of private capital expended, up to £100,000, while the London and Gore
was offered a loan of twice that sum; in both these cases the loan was
to be secured not only by a lien on the road, but by the liability of
the communities benefited to a special tax.  None of these generous
offers was taken up, and they were not renewed.  But a growing
realization of the importance of railways and of the evident difficulty
of building them in Canada solely by private funds compelled the
formation of a new policy of state assistance.  This new policy ushered
in the first great period of railway construction.



{52}

CHAPTER V

THE GRAND TRUNK ERA

The New State Policy--The Canadas: First Phase--The Maritime
Provinces--Halifax to Quebec--European and North American--Howe's
Negotiations--Hincks to the Rescue--The Maritime Provinces--The
Canadas: Second Phase--Struggle for the Contract--Floating the Grand
Trunk--Construction Under Way--The Grand Trunk in Straits--Causes of
Failure--Speculation and Jobbery--Great Western and Northern--The
Canadas: Third Phase--Municipal Enterprise


It has been seen that by the close of the forties British North America
was realizing both the need of railway expansion and the difficulty of
financing it.  Other factors combined to bring about the intervention
of the state on a large scale.  Both in the Canadas and in the Maritime
Provinces political disputes were giving place to economic activities.
The battle of responsible government had been fought and won.  Men's
energies were no longer absorbed by constitutional strife.  Baldwin and
LaFontaine were making way for Hincks and Morin; Howe had turned to
constructive tasks.  Responsibility was bringing new confidence and new
initiative, though colonial dependence still continued to hamper
enterprise.  British and American contractors discovered the virgin
field awaiting them, and local politicians discovered the cash value of
votes and influence.  The example set in the United States was
powerful.  Massachusetts {53} had guaranteed bonds of local roads to
the extent of eight millions, without ever having to pay a cent of the
interest; and though New York's experience had been more chequered, the
successes were stressed and the failures were plausibly explained away.

The eight or ten years which followed 1849 are notable not only for a
sudden outburst of railway construction and speculative activity
throughout the provinces, but for the beginning of that close
connection between politics and railways which is distinctively
Canadian.  In this era parliament became the field of railway debate.
Political motives came to the front: 'statesmen' began to talk of links
of Empire and 'politicians' began to press the claims of their
constituencies for needed railway communications.  Cabinets realized
the value of the charters they could grant or the country's credit they
could pledge, and contractors swarmed to the feast.  'Railways are my
politics,' was the frank avowal of the Conservative leader, Sir Allan
MacNab.

Three names are closely linked with this new policy--those of Howe in
Nova Scotia, Chandler in New Brunswick, and Hincks in Canada.

Francis Hincks, merchant, journalist, and {54} politician, moderate
reformer, and Canada's first notable finance minister, took the
initiative.  As inspector-general in the second Baldwin-LaFontaine
Cabinet, he brought down the first instalment of his railway policy in
1849.  In the previous session a committee of the House had considered
the demand of the Great Western and of the St Lawrence and Atlantic for
assistance, and had discussed the less advanced proposals for railways
from Montreal to Toronto and from Quebec to Halifax.  Allan MacNab, as
chairman of the committee, had listened sympathetically to the plea of
Allan MacNab, president of the Great Western, and the committee had
reported in favour of guaranteeing the stock of the two companies to
the extent of a million sterling.  No action was taken at this session.
Meanwhile Hincks, by instruction of his colleagues, had drawn up two
memoranda--one suggesting that the crown lands in the province might be
offered as security for the capital necessary to build the road within
the province, and the other urging the Imperial government to undertake
the road from Halifax to Quebec.  Capitalists gave no encouragement to
the first suggestion, and the British government had not replied to the
{55} second by the end of the session of 1848-49.  Accordingly, in
April 1849 Hincks brought down a new policy, based upon a suggestion of
the directors of the St Lawrence and Atlantic.  The proposal was, to
guarantee the interest, not exceeding six per cent, on half the bonds
of any railway over seventy-five miles long, whenever half the road had
been constructed, the province to be protected by a first charge after
the bondholders' lien.  MacNab seconded the resolution; voices from
Bytown and the Saguenay mildly questioned the policy, but the
resolution passed unanimously.

Even with this aid construction did not proceed apace.  It was still
necessary for the companies to complete half the road before qualifying
for government assistance.  This the St Lawrence road effected slowly,
in face of quarrels with contractors, repudiation of calls by
shareholders, and hesitancy of banks to make advances.  The Great
Western did not get under way until 1851, when American capitalists,
connected with the New York Central, took shares and a place on the
directorate.  In the same year the Toronto, Simcoe and Huron, later
known as the Northern, began construction.

Meanwhile suggestions from the Maritime {56} Provinces had brought
still more ambitious schemes within practical range, and these led
Hincks to take the second step in his policy of aid to railways.

In the Maritime Provinces, from 1835 to 1850, many railways had been
projected, but, with the exception of a small coal tramway in Nova
Scotia, built in 1839 from the Albion coal-mines to tide-water, not a
mile was built before 1847.  There, as elsewhere, the pamphleteer and
the promoter acted as pioneers, and the capitalist and the politician
took up their projects later.  The plans which chiefly appealed to
public attention looked to the linking up of St Andrews, St John, and
Halifax with Quebec and Montreal and with the railways of Maine.  From
the outset the projects in these provinces were much more ambitious
than the local beginnings in the Canadas.  They were more markedly
political and military in aim, and in consequence depended in greater
measure upon the aid of the British government.  When at last
construction was begun, the policy of provincial ownership was more
widely adopted.

When in 1876 Sandford Fleming drew up a record of the great work just
completed under his direction, the Intercolonial Railway, he {57}
called attention to the first proposal for such a road, found in an
article contributed to the _United Service Journal_ in 1832 by Henry
Fairbairn.[1]  The author proposed the two chief projects which for
half a century were to engross the attention of the Maritime Provinces:
a road from St Andrews to Quebec, which should 'convey the whole trade
of the St Lawrence, in a single day, to Atlantic waters,' and another
line from Halifax through St John to the border of Maine, which should
command for Halifax 'the whole stream of passengers, mails, and light
articles of commerce passing into the British possessions and to the
United States and every part of the continent of America.'

St Andrews was the winter port in British territory nearest to the
upper provinces.  If the territory in dispute on the Maine boundary
fell to New Brunswick and Quebec, a road not more than 250 or 300 miles
long could be built from this port to the city of Quebec.  In 1835 a
Railway Association was formed in St Andrews, an exploratory survey was
made, and the interest of Lower Canada was enlisted.  {58} In the
following year New Brunswick gave a charter to the St Andrews and
Quebec Railroad, and the Imperial government agreed to bear the cost of
a survey.  But the survey was speedily halted because of protests from
Maine; in 1842 the Ashburton Treaty assigned to the United States a
great part of the territory through which the line was projected, and
the promoters gave up.  Then in 1845 the railway mania in England
brought a revival of all colonial schemes.  Sir Richard Broun took up
the plan for a line from Halifax to Quebec, along with other grandiose
projects connected with his endeavour to revive the lost glories of the
baronetage of Nova Scotia, but did not get past the stage of forming a
provisional committee.  This discussion revived the flagging hopes of
St Andrews, and, as will be seen in detail later, a beginning was made
by a railway from St Andrews to Woodstock, the New Brunswick and
Canada, for which ground was broken in November 1847.

The provincial legislature early concluded that it would be impossible
to induce private capitalists to build an intercolonial road unaided.
They were unanimous also, not yet having emerged from the stage of
colonial dependence, in desiring to throw the burden {59} of such aid
as far as possible on the British government.  In the absence of a
colonial federation the United Kingdom was the main connecting-link
between the colonies in British North America, and was presumably most
interested in matters affecting more than a single colony.  The British
government, however, had by this time about decided that the old policy
of treating the colonies as an estate or plantation of the mother
country, protecting or developing them in return for the monopoly of
their trade, did not pay.  It had reluctantly conceded them political
home rule; it was soon to thrust upon them freedom of trade; and it was
not inclined to retain burdens when it had given up privileges.  Mr
Gladstone, secretary for the Colonies, agreed, however, in 1846, to
have a survey made at the expense of the three colonies concerned.

This survey, the starting-point for the controversies and the proposals
of a generation, was completed in 1848, under Major Robinson and
Lieutenant Henderson of the Royal Engineers.  'Major Robinson's Line,'
as it came to be known, ran roughly in the direction eventually
followed by the Intercolonial--from Halifax to Truro, and thence north
to Miramichi and the Chaleur Bay, and up the {60} Metapedia valley to
the St Lawrence.  The distance from Halifax to Quebec was computed at
635 miles, and the cost at £7000 sterling a mile or about £5,000,000.
Acting on the assurance of engineers that the route was feasible, each
of the three colonial governments offered in 1849 to set aside for the
work a belt of crown lands ten miles wide on each side of the railway,
and to pledge £20,000 a year to meet interest or expenses, if the
British government would undertake the project.  Downing Street,
however, replied politely but emphatically that no aid could be given.

After the plan of a northern route to Quebec was thus apparently given
its quietus, interest shifted to the Portland connections.  The
building of the road from Montreal to Portland added further strength
to the claims of this route.  On paper, at least, it seemed possible to
make the connection between Montreal and Halifax by following either
the northern or the southern sides of the great square.  One of the
southern sides was now under way, and by building the other, from
Portland to St John and Halifax, connection with the Canadas would be
completed.  Under the leadership once more of John A. Poor, Portland
took up the latter project.  The name of {61} the proposed road, the
European and North American, showed the influence of the same hope
which Fairbairn had expressed--that the road from Portland to Halifax
would become the channel of communication between the United States and
Europe, at least for passengers, mails, and express traffic.  With a
line of steamers from Halifax to Galway in Ireland, it was held that
the journey from New York to London could be cut to six or seven days.

In July 1850 a great convention assembled in Portland, attended by
delegates from New Brunswick and Nova Scotia as well as from Maine and
other New England states.  Intertwined flags and fraternal unity, local
development and highways to Europe, prospective profits and ways and
means of construction, were the themes of the fervent orators and
promoters.  The convention was enthusiastically in favour of the
project.  The 550 miles from Portland to Halifax--222 in Maine, 204 in
New Brunswick, and 124 in Nova Scotia--would cost, it was estimated,
$12,000,000, half of which might be raised by private subscription and
the rest by state and provincial guarantee.

The delegates from the Maritime Provinces {62} returned home full of
enthusiasm, but increasingly uncertain about the securing of the
necessary capital.  At this stage Joseph Howe came to the front.  He
had much earlier, in 1835, before entering parliament, taken the lead
in advocating a local railway from Halifax to Windsor, but had not been
prominent in recent discussions.  He now urged strongly that the
province of Nova Scotia should itself construct the section of the
European and North American which lay within its borders.  He proposed
further to seek from the Imperial government a guarantee of the
necessary loan, in order that the province might borrow on lower terms.
The Colonial Office, while expressing its approval of the Portland
scheme, declined to give a guarantee any more than a cash contribution.
Nothing daunted, Howe sailed for England in November 1850, and by
persistent interviews, eloquent public addresses and exhaustive
pamphlets, caught public favour, and in spite of Cabinet changes in
London secured the pledge he desired.

In the official reply of the Colonial Office Howe was informed that aid
would not be given except for an object of importance to the Empire as
a whole, and that accordingly {63} aid was contingent upon securing
help from New Brunswick and Canada to build the whole road from Halifax
to Quebec.  Major Robinson's line need not be followed if a shorter and
better could be secured; any change, however, should be subject to the
approval of the British government.  'The British Government would by
no means object to its forming part of the plan that it should include
provision for establishing a communication between the projected
railway and the railways of the United States.'  The colonies were to
bear the whole cost of the loan, and were to impose taxes sufficient to
provide interest and sinking fund, and thus ensure against any risk of
loss to the United Kingdom.

Howe returned triumphant.  The British government would guarantee a
loan of £7,000,000, which would build the roads to Portland and to
Quebec and perhaps still farther west.  He hastened to New Brunswick,
and won the consent of its government to the larger plan, went on to
Portland and allayed its murmurs, and with E. B. Chandler of New
Brunswick reached Toronto, then the seat of government of the province
of Canada, in June 1851.  His eloquence and the dazzling {64} offer of
cheap and seemingly unlimited capital soon won consent.  The
representatives of the three provinces agreed to construct the road
from Halifax to Quebec on joint account, while Canada would build the
extension from Quebec to Montreal, and New Brunswick the extension to
the Maine border, each at its own risk, but in all cases out of the
£7,000,000 guaranteed loan.

Then suddenly the bubble burst.  The Colonial Office, late in 1851,
declared that Howe had been mistaken in declaring that the guarantee
was to extend to the European and North American project.  The British
government had no objection to this road being built, but would not aid
it.  The officials of the Colonial Office declared that they never
meant to promise anything else.

It is difficult to assign with certainty responsibility for this
serious misunderstanding.  Possibly Howe's optimism and oratorical
vagueness led him to misinterpret the promises made, but his reports
immediately after the interviews were explicit, and in dispatches and
speeches sent to the Colonial Office and acknowledged with high
compliments, his version of the agreement had been set forth clearly
and for months had gone {65} unchallenged.  He cannot be freed from a
share of the blame, but the negligence of Downing Street was at least
equally the source of the misunderstanding.

The whole plan thus fell to the ground.  The consent of the three
provinces was essential, and New Brunswick would not support the
Halifax and Quebec project if the Portland road, running through the
most populous and influential sections of the province, was to be
postponed indefinitely.  Hincks determined to endeavour to save the
situation.  Accompanied by John Young and E. P. Taché, he visited
Fredericton and Halifax early in 1852, and hammered out a compromise.
New Brunswick agreed to join in the Halifax to Quebec project on
condition that the road should run from Halifax to St John and thence
up the valley of the St John river; Nova Scotia agreed to this change,
which made St John rather than Halifax the main ocean terminus, on
condition that New Brunswick should bear five-twelfths as against its
own three-twelfths of the cost.  It remained to secure the consent of
the Imperial government to this change in route, and accordingly
Hincks, Chandler, and Howe arranged to sail for England early in March.
Hincks sailed {66} on the day agreed; Chandler followed a fortnight
later; Howe, repenting of his bargain, postponed sailing a fortnight, a
month, six weeks, and then announced that because of election pressure
he could not go at all.  Hincks and Chandler found in office in London
a new government which appeared biased against the valley route.  Upon
a peremptory request from Hincks for a definite answer within a
fortnight, the British Cabinet, in spite of the previous promise to
consider the route an open question, declined to aid any but a road
following Major Robinson's line.  The negotiations broke off, joint
action between the provinces failed, and each province switched to its
own separate track.

[Illustration: Sir Francis Hincks.  From a portrait in the Dominion
Archives]

Howe steadily maintained the policy of state ownership, but had unusual
difficulty in carrying Nova Scotia with him.  The great English
contracting firm of Peto, Brassey, Betts and Jackson, whose operations
in the other provinces will be discussed at greater length, offered to
find the necessary capital if given the contracts on their own terms.
Many Nova Scotians were dazzled by the promises of the agents of this
firm, and Howe in 1853 was forced to agree to their proposals.  The
contractors found themselves unable to make {67} good their promises,
in face of panics on the stock market in England, and in the following
year Howe's original policy was sanctioned.  He himself retired from
political life for a time in order to carry through, as one of the
railway commissioners, the policy he had steadfastly urged.

It was on June 13, 1854, that the first sod was turned for the
construction of the Nova Scotia Railway, and a beginning made at last.
The road was to run from Halifax to Truro, with a branch to Windsor.
Progress was slow, but by 1858 the ninety-three miles planned had been
completed.  Then came a halt, when reality succeeded the glowing
visions of the prospectus, the service proved poor, and the returns
low.  Nine years later an extension from Truro to Pictou was
constructed.  This gave Nova Scotia at Confederation in 1867 145 miles
of railroad in all, built at a cost of $44,000 a mile, and connecting
Halifax with the Bay of Fundy and the Gulf of St Lawrence.  The gauge
adopted was five feet six, and the Nova Scotia road led the way in
Canada in using coal for fuel.

New Brunswick had a more chequered experience.  After the collapse of
the Halifax and Quebec project, her efforts were confined {68} to the
road running north from St Andrews and to the European and North
American.

The possibilities of St Andrews as an ocean terminus had been severely
hampered by the thrusting in of the Maine-wedge between New Brunswick
and Quebec, but still the town struggled on.  In 1847 shares in the
railway had been placed both in England and in the province, and the
legislature guaranteed the interest on debentures and also granted a
land subsidy.  Still, the money came in slowly.  Operations were time
and again suspended, contract after contract was made, and
reorganizations were effected.  In 1858 the road had reached
Canterbury, and four years later its temporary terminus at Richmond; in
1866 a branch to St Stephen was opened, and in 1868 an extension to
Woodstock, making 126 miles all told, costing about $20,000 a mile.  At
Confederation only a third of the distance between St Andrews and
Rivière du Loup on the St Lawrence had been completed, and the road was
in a receiver's hands.

The European and North American also had its troubles.  Maine proved
unable to build its section.  In 1852 the New Brunswick government made
a contract with the English {69} firm already referred to, under the
style of Peto, Betts, Jackson and Brassey, for the construction of a
line from Maine to Nova Scotia, at $32,500 a mile.  The province agreed
to subscribe $6000 stock and lend $9400 in bonds per mile; the
contractors were to find the rest of the money in England.  This they
failed to do.  The firm was dissolved in 1856, and the government took
over the road, completing it from St John to Shediac, 108 miles, in
1860.  The western half was not begun until August 1867.

To return to the upper provinces.  By 1851 the St Lawrence, the Great
Western, and the Northern were under way, and more ambitious schemes
proposed.  The Guarantee Act of 1849, which was the first phase of
Hincks's policy, assuring public aid for the second half of any road at
least seventy-five miles in length, was proving inadequate, and the
government was considering an extension of its policy.  At this
juncture the golden news arrived of Howe's success in securing the
£7,000,000 loan at bargain rates.  All hesitation was removed.  No
doubt was felt that the roads would pay, once they were built; the only
difficulty had been to find the money to build them.  And now
£7,000,000 was {70} available--£4,000,000 of it for Canada, at probably
3 1/2 per cent.  Paper computations soon proved that £4,000,000 would
suffice not only to build Canada's third of the Quebec-Halifax route,
but to build a trunk line from Quebec or Montreal through to Hamilton,
whence the Great Western ran to Windsor on the frontier opposite
Detroit.

At once a struggle began for the control of this fund.  The Montreal
merchants who had bought experience in building the St Lawrence and
Atlantic, John Young, Luther Holton, and D. L. Macpherson, with A. T.
Galt of Sherbrooke, were first in the field, and pressed for a charter
to build from Montreal to Kingston, intending later to extend this road
to Toronto.  Then the most noted firm of contractors in railway
history, Peto, Brassey, Betts and Jackson (the forms of the firm name
varied), who had built one-third of the railways of Britain, and also
roads in France and Spain and Italy and Prussia and India, were
attracted to this fresh field by Howe's campaign in England.  They sent
an agent to Toronto in 1851 to offer to construct all the roads needed,
and to find all the capital required, with partial government
guarantees.  Hincks, with whom the decision lay, was {71} eminently an
opportunist.  In 1849 he had argued against government ownership; now
he argued for it.  Yet he did not close the door against retreat.  The
new Act, passed in April 1852, marked the second or Grand Trunk phase
of his gradually shaping policy.  Besides providing for the Canadian
share of the Halifax to Quebec road, the Act contemplated three
alternative methods of continuing this Trunk line westward.  The
province was to build it if the guaranteed loan could be stretched far
enough; failing this, the province, together with such municipalities
as wished, could undertake the extension; should both modes fail,
private companies might be given the privilege, with a provincial
guarantee of half the cost, covering both principal and interest.  No
roads except those forming part of the Trunk line and the three already
under way were to be aided.  The Montreal and Kingston Railway, in
which Holton, Galt, and Macpherson were prime movers, was chartered,
and also the Kingston and Toronto, but in both charters a suspending
clause was included preventing the charters from taking effect until
special proclamation was made--after the other plans had failed.

The next move was to arrange terms with {72} the other provinces and
secure the promised Imperial guarantee.  How Hincks and Chandler's
mission failed has already been told.  Hincks then made another sharp
curve and decided for company control.  Before leaving Canada he had
made up his mind that the construction should be entrusted to British
contractors, and was authorized to negotiate with the Brassey firm.
Now that the Imperial guarantee had faded away, capital was needed more
than contractors.  The Brasseys promised both, offering, if given the
contract, to organize a company in England which would provide all the
capital not guaranteed by the province.

This seductive offer was to prove the main cause of the financial
embarrassment of the Grand Trunk.  It involved at the outset a dubious
connection between company and contractor, and also for two generations
an attempt to manage a great railway at a range of three thousand
miles.  So fatal did it prove that in later years each party to it
endeavoured to throw the responsibility for the initiative on the
other, and enemies of Hincks declared that he, as well as Lord Elgin,
the governor-general, had been bribed to wreck the negotiations with
the British government {73} in order to take up with Brassey.  Whether
or not Hincks was first to resume negotiations in London, it was the
contractors who had already taken the initiative in America, sending a
representative to Toronto, and taking part in the elections of 1851 in
Nova Scotia against Howe.  It is clear also that the British government
was unwilling to consider anything but the unacceptable Major Robinson
line.  Hincks was justified in looking elsewhere for capital, but he
was not justified in binding himself to one firm of contractors,
however eminent.

Hincks returned to Canada with a tentative contract in his pocket.  To
Canada, too, came Henry Jackson, a partner in the Brassey firm for this
enterprise, and one of the most skilful and domineering of the railway
lobbyists in Canada's annals, rich in such methods.  At once a battle
royal began in parliament.  On August 7, 1852, the Montreal and
Kingston and the Kingston and Toronto charters were proclaimed in
force; apparently the supposition of the government was that the
English contractors would simply subscribe for the bulk of the stock in
these companies.  But the Canadian promoters were not willing to give
up their rights so easily; a week after the {74} books were opened,
Galt, Holton, and Macpherson subscribed between them £596,500 and seven
of their associates took up the nominal balance of the capital of
£600,000 which was authorized.  Hincks met this move by bringing down a
bill to incorporate a new company, the Grand Trunk Railway Company of
Canada, and the rights of the rival claimants came before parliament
for decision.

On behalf of the English promoters it was urged that the Canadian
promoters could not raise the necessary capital, that the
Galt-Holton-Macpherson subscription was a fake, that the English
contractors could induce capitalists to invest freely at low rates, and
that their superior methods would result in a road of more solid
construction and lower working expenses than the ordinary American
railway.  Holton and Galt, on the other hand, contended that their
subscription was in good faith, that tenders were in, and that with
provincial guarantee and municipal aid, and by paying the contractors
partly in stock, they could finance the road.  It would be better, they
urged, to have the control in the hands of men who knew the province
rather than in the hands of outsiders.  The Grand Trunk Company,
seeking incorporation, was only a {75} sham company, under the thumb of
the contractors, formed to ratify a foregone contract with them.  If
the Montreal and Kingston Company was given control, it would invite
the Brassey firm to tender on the same basis as other contractors: no
more could honestly be asked.

Galt and Holton had the best of the argument, but Hincks had the votes,
and rumours which Jackson spread of the Brassey millions and the firm's
open door to all the money markets of Europe brought conviction or
afforded excuse.  The railway committee reported in favour of the
English promoters, though the competition had compelled them to reduce
their price by a thousand pounds a mile, and to accept a guarantee of
£3000 per mile instead of half the cost.  At the same time the Brassey
firm secured a charter for the Grand Trunk of Canada East, to run from
Quebec to Trois Pistoles--Canada's first section of the Halifax to
Quebec route.  The same aggressive firm had already secured a contract
for the Quebec and Richmond, which was to join the St Lawrence and
Atlantic at Richmond, and, as has been seen, for New Brunswick and Nova
Scotia roads.  With these contracts seemingly secure, Jackson sailed
for {76} home.  But Canadian promoters were quick to learn.  Galt had
another card to play.  As president of the St Lawrence and Atlantic he
proposed to amalgamate this road with the Montreal and Kingston, and to
build a bridge at Montreal, thus securing an essential part of the
trunk line.  Hincks became alarmed at the Montreal interests thus
arrayed against him, and proposed as a compromise that the Grand Trunk
should absorb the St Lawrence road and build the bridge at Montreal on
the condition that the opposition to its westward plans should be
abandoned.  Upon this all parties agreed, and the English and Canadian
promoters joined forces.

Negotiations were completed in England early in 1853.  As yet the Grand
Trunk Company was but a name.  The real parties to the bargain were
many.  First came John Ross, a member of the Canadian Cabinet, but
representing the future Grand Trunk, of which he was elected president.
The Barings and Glyns, eminent banking houses, had a twofold part to
play, as they were closely connected with the contractors and were also
the London agents of the Canadian government.  The contractors
themselves, Peto, Brassey, Betts and Jackson, of whom Jackson,
accompanied {77} by the company's engineer, A. M. Ross, had spent a
year studying the Canadian situation, put in anxious weeks hammering
out the details of the agreement and the prospectus to follow it.  Galt
represented the St Lawrence and Atlantic and the Atlantic and St
Lawrence, while Rhodes and Forsythe of Quebec had charge of the
interests of the Quebec and Richmond.  An agreement was reached to
amalgamate all the Canadian roads and to lease the Maine road for 999
years.  This left Toronto the western terminus.  An attempt to absorb
the Great Western and thus secure an extension to Windsor came to
nothing.  This failure gave Galt an opening for another brilliant
stroke of railway strategy.  A company had recently been chartered to
build a road from Toronto to Guelph and Sarnia, and the firm of Gzowski
and Co., of which Galt was a member, had secured the contract.  Galt,
acting with Alexander Gillespie, a prominent London financier who was
the agent of the Toronto, Guelph and Sarnia Railway, now proposed to
substitute this line as the westward extension.  Everybody was in an
amalgamating mood, and the bargain went through.  All contracts
previously made were taken over by the amalgamated company, and the
{78} investing public was told that all uncertainty as to the total
amount was thus removed--as it emphatically was, for the time.

A glowing prospectus was drawn up.  The amalgamated road would be the
most comprehensive railway system in the world, comprising 1112 miles,
stretching from Portland and eventually from Halifax (by both the
northern and the southern route) to Lake Huron.  The whole future
traffic between west and east must therefore pass over the Grand Trunk,
as both geographical conditions and legislative enactment prevented it
from injurious competition.  'Commencing at the debouchere [_sic_] of
the three longest lakes in the world,' the prospectus continued, 'it
pours the accumulating traffic in one unbroken line throughout the
entire length of Canada into the St Lawrence at Montreal and Quebec, on
which it rests on the north, while on the south it reaches the
magnificent harbours of Portland and St John on the ocean.'  It was
backed by government guarantee and Canadian investment, and its
execution was in the hands of the most eminent contractors.  The total
capital was fixed at £9,500,000 sterling.  The revenue was estimated at
nearly £1,500,000 a year, which, with working expenses at forty {79}
per cent of revenue, and debenture interest and £60,000 for lease of
the Atlantic and St Lawrence Railway deducted, would leave £550,000 or
11 1/2 per cent on the share capital.

On the advice of Baring and Glyn only half the capital was issued at
first.  This decision proved a serious mistake.  In 1853, when the
company was floated, money was abundant and cheap; the shares and bonds
issued were over-subscribed twenty times, and were quoted at a premium
before allotment.  Scarcely was the issue made when war with Russia
loomed up, and money rose from three to seven or eight per cent.  Never
again was it possible for the Grand Trunk to secure capital in such
abundance.

But this was for the future to disclose.  At once construction began in
Canada.  A. M. Ross was appointed chief engineer, and S. P. Bidder
general manager, both on the nomination of the English bankers and
contractors.  Plant was assembled in Canada, orders for rails and
equipment were placed in England, and navvies came out by the thousand.
At one time 14,000 men were directly employed upon the railways in
Upper Canada alone.  In July 1853 the last gaps in the St Lawrence and
Atlantic had been filled up, though not {80} in permanent fashion.  In
1854 the Quebec and Richmond section was opened; in 1855, the road from
Montreal to Brockville and from Lévis to St Thomas, Quebec; in 1856,
the Brockville to Toronto and Toronto to Stratford sections.  Not until
1858 was the western road completed as far as London.  The year 1859
saw the completion of the Victoria Bridge, the extension from St Mary's
to Sarnia, and a new road in Michigan, running from Port Huron to
Detroit.  By 1860 the eastern section extended to Rivière du Loup,
where a halt was made.

From the outset difficulties undreamed of had developed.  Money was
hard to get and early traffic returns were disappointing, so that the
company found it almost impossible to secure the balance of the capital
required.  The road from Montreal to Portland was found to require
heavy expenditure to bring it up to the standard.  The contractors, for
their part, were embarrassed by the company's shortage of funds and by
the great rise in the prices of land, materials, and labour.  Their own
activities, the Reciprocity Treaty of 1854 with the United States, the
Crimean War, had combined to bring on a period of inflated prices such
as Canada was not to experience {81} again for half a century.  With
wheat at two dollars a bushel, and 'land selling by the inch,' even
liberal margins of profit on contracts vanished.[2]

In these straits the company turned to the government for aid.  It had
many supporters in the House.  No one could deny the benefits which its
operations had conferred upon the province.  The government guarantee
of interest and the government nomination of a part of the board of
directors were plausibly held to involve responsibility for the
solvency of the company.  It was not surprising, therefore, that for a
decade after 1855 scarcely a year passed without a bill to amend the
terms {82} of the Grand Trunk agreement.  One year it was an additional
guarantee, another a temporary loan, again a postponement, and again a
still further postponement of the government's lien.  It soon came to
be recognized that the money which had been advanced under the
guarantee provisions must be considered a gift, not a loan, though to
this day the amount nominally due still figures as an asset on the
Dominion government's books.  Incidentally, the embarrassing government
directors were dispensed with in 1857.

The Grand Trunk was complete from Lake Huron to the Atlantic in 1860.
In the ten years that followed, working expenses varied from
fifty-eight to eighty-five per cent of the gross receipts, instead of
the forty per cent which the prospectus had foreshadowed; not a cent of
dividend was paid on ordinary shares--nor has been to this day.

What were the reasons for this disappointing result?  The root of the
trouble was that the road was not built solely or even mainly with a
view to operating efficiency and earning power.  It was the
politicians' road, the promoters' road, the contractors' road, at least
as much as the shareholders' road.  The government had encouraged the
building of {83} unprofitable sections, such as that east of Quebec,
for local or patriotic reasons.  Promoters had unloaded the Portland
road and later the Detroit and Port Huron road at excessive prices.
The contractors, east of Toronto, had had an eye mainly to construction
profits in planning the route, and heavy grades, bad rails, and poor
ballast increased maintenance charges beyond all expectations.  The
prophecy that operating expenses would not exceed forty per cent of
earnings, based on English experience, failed partly because earnings
were lower, but more because operating expenses were higher, than
anticipated.  The company had more than its share of hard luck from
commercial depression, and from loss on American paper money in the
Civil War.  Water competition proved serious in the east, while other
railways waged traffic wars in Upper Canada.  The trade of the far
west, which had been the most attractive lure, did not come in any
great amount for the first twenty years.  Differences of gauge, lack of
permanent connections at Chicago, lack of return freight, rate wars
with the American roads which had been built west at the same time or
later, the inferiority of Montreal to New York as of old in harbour
facilities and {84} ocean service, the failure of Portland to become a
great commercial centre--all meant hope and dividends deferred.
Finally, the management was working at long range: the road did not
enjoy the vigilant inspection or the public support that would have
attended control by Canadian interests.

The Grand Trunk did Canada good service, well worth all the public aid
that was given.  It would probably have given better service, and its
shareholders could not have fared worse, had the plans of Galt and his
associates not been interfered with, and the line been built gradually
under local control.


While the building of the Grand Trunk was the main achievement of the
period, it was by no means the only one.  The fifties were the busiest
years in the railway annals of older Canada.  In 1850 there were only
66 miles of road in all the provinces.  In 1860 there were 2065, of
which over 1700 had been added in the Canadas alone.  The Great Western
and the Northern were pushed forward under the provisions of the
earlier Guarantee Act; roads of more local interest were fostered by
municipal rivalry.  Their building brought unwonted activity in every
{85} branch of commerce.  A speculative fever ran through the whole
community; fortunes were made and lost in the provision trade, and land
prices soared to heights undreamed of.  This mood was the promoter's
happy chance, and still more charters were sought.  The pace quickened
till exhaustion, contagious American panics, poor harvests, and the
Crimean War--which first raised the price of the wheat Canada had to
sell, but later raised the price of the money she had to
borrow--brought collapse in 1857.

In this boom period jobbery and lobbying reigned to an extent which we
rarely realize in our memory of the good old times.  Railway
contractors were all-powerful in the legislature, and levied toll at
will.  The most notable 'contractor-boss' of the day was able, dealing
with the Great Western, to hold up a bill for double-tracking until
assured of the contract himself; dealing with the Grand Trunk, to force
from the English contractors a share in the enterprise before
consenting to help their schemes through; with the Northern, to collect
$100,000 as a condition of securing from the government the guarantee
bonds before they had been rightly earned.  Municipal officials were
bribed to help bonuses {86} through.  Existing roads were blackmailed
by pedlars of rival charters.  Glaringly fraudulent prospectuses were
issued.  On a smaller scale, the excitement and the rascality which had
marked the beginning of the great railway eras in the United Kingdom
and the United States were reproduced in Canada.

Of the other roads completed in this period, the two which had been
aided by Hincks's first Guarantee Act were most important.

The Great Western had a promising outlook.  It ran through a rich
country and had assured prospects of through western traffic.  The road
was completed from Suspension Bridge to Windsor in January 1854.  An
extension from Hamilton to Toronto was built in 1856, and a
semi-independent line from Galt to Guelph absorbed in 1860.  The Great
Western came nearest of any early road to being a financial success;
alone of the guaranteed roads it repaid the government loan, nearly in
full.  But after a brief burst of prosperity, from 1854 to 1856, it,
too, was continually in difficulties.  In 1856 it paid a dividend of 8
1/2 per cent, but three years later it paid nothing, and in the next
decade averaged less than three per cent.

The troubles of the Great Western came {87} chiefly from competition,
actual and threatened, and uncertain traffic connections.  To the
north, the chartering of the Toronto, Guelph and Sarnia, amalgamated
later with the Grand Trunk, cut into its best territory.  An endeavour
was made in 1854 to divide the remaining area, but two years later the
battle was renewed, the Great Western building to Sarnia and the Grand
Trunk tapping London and Detroit.  Between the Great Western and Lake
Erie a rival road direct from Buffalo to Detroit was threatened time
and again, but was not built until after Confederation.  South of Lake
Erie the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern was built shortly afterwards
by interests connected with the New York Central, thus threatening the
traffic connections of the Great Western both east and west.  To avert
loss of its western trade, the Great Western sunk large sums in aiding
the construction of a road from Detroit to Grand Haven, with ferry
connections to Milwaukee; but this experiment did not prove a success
and caused serious embarrassment.

The Northern Railway, whose promoters, as we have seen, naïvely
recognized that railways and lotteries were close akin, was opened as
far as Allandale in 1853, and to Collingwood {88} in 1855.  It was
scamped by the contractors, poorly built, and overloaded with debt.
The sanguine policy of building up a through traffic from the American
West, by water to Collingwood and rail to Toronto, proved a
will-o'-the-wisp.  In turn the company relied on independent steamers,
and set up a fleet of its own, but equally in vain so far as profit
went.  By 1859 the road was bankrupt.  A new general manager, Frederick
Cumberland, brought in a change of policy.  Local traffic was
sedulously cultivated, and a fair degree of prosperity followed.

Most of the lesser roads constructed looked to the municipalities
rather than to the provinces for aid.  The Municipal Loan Fund of 1854
was the third and last phase of Hincks's railway policy.  This was an
ingenious attempt to give the municipalities the prestige of provincial
connection without accepting any legal responsibility.  Municipalities
had previously been permitted to bonus or take stock in railways and
toll-roads, but their securities were unknown in the world's markets.
Hincks now provided that municipalities which wished money to aid
railways or other local improvements might practically pool their
credit and share in the credit of the province.  Provincial {89}
debentures were issued against the municipal obligations pooled in the
Fund, and the proceeds of their sale given to the municipalities.  A
sinking fund was to be maintained, and, if need be, the province could
levy through the sheriff on any defaulting town.

The municipalities made full use of their privileges.  It was believed
that railway investments would yield high dividends, and the more
optimistic expected to see all taxes made unnecessary by the profits
earned.  Town vied with town in extravagant enterprises.[3]  Not a cent
brought a dividend; instead, the municipalities found themselves
saddled with heavy interest payments.  One after another declined to
pay; Port Hope was $312,000 in arrears by 1861 and Cobourg $313,000.
The provincial government had {90} not the political courage to send in
the sheriff, and accordingly it was forced at last to assume the whole
burden.  Prudent municipalities which had declined to borrow at eight
per cent found themselves compelled to share the burdens of their
reckless neighbours.  Demoralization was widespread.

The railways constructed by such aid may be briefly noted.  The Buffalo
and Lake Huron, extending from Fort Erie to Goderich, was completed in
1858.  It had its origin in the ambition of Buffalo to have more
immediate connection with the rich western peninsula of Upper Canada
and the Lake trade beyond than was afforded by the Great Western.  The
London and Port Stanley, built in 1854-56, mainly by the city of
London, with smaller contributions from Middlesex and Elgin counties
and the city of St Thomas, failed to realize the expectations that it
would become the main artery of trade between Canada and the states
across the lake, but it developed a fair excursion trade and coal
traffic, and indirectly justified its construction.  The Erie and
Ontario portage road, rebuilt in 1854, has already been noted.  Another
portage road round Niagara Falls was the Welland Railway, planned by W.
Hamilton Merritt, {91} the projector of the Welland Canal.  It ran from
Port Colborne on Lake Erie to Port Dalhousie on Lake Ontario,
twenty-five miles, and was completed in 1859, only to add one more to
the list of unprofitable roads, and eventually to be absorbed by the
Great Western.

Farther east the rivalry of Port Hope and Cobourg led to the
construction of two roads, the Cobourg and Peterborough and the Port
Hope, Lindsay and Beaverton.  Both relied chiefly on timber traffic and
aimed to develop the farming country in the rear.  The Cobourg line,
begun in 1853, suffered disaster from the start: the contractor's
extras absorbed all the cash available; the three-mile bridge built on
piles across Rice Lake gave way, and after $1,000,000 had been expended
the road was sold for $100,000.  The Port Hope line, which absorbed a
branch from Millbrook to Peterborough in 1867, fared somewhat better.
The Brockville and Ottawa was a lumber road, carrying supplies up and
timber down.  It was chartered to run from Brockville to Pembroke, with
a branch from Smith's Falls on the Rideau Canal to Perth.  By 1859 it
had reached Almonte, and six years later struggled as far as Sand Point
on the Ottawa, when it {92} halted, till the Canadian Pacific project
gave it new life.  After failing to make ends meet for some years the
company went through repeated reorganizations in the early sixties.
The Bytown and Prescott, later the St Lawrence and Ottawa, built in
1854, was also a lumber road, promoted by interests connected with the
Ogdensburg Railway, whose terminus was opposite Prescott.  It suffered
the same financial fate, and was sold to the English company which had
supplied the rails, at a total sacrifice of municipal and other
creditors' interests.  Around the Long Sault rapids in the Ottawa there
was built in 1854 the thirteen-mile Carillon and Grenville, a summer
portage road, an early enterprise which retained its independence and
its old five-foot-six-inch gauge until 1912, when it was absorbed by
the Canadian Northern.  In Lower Canada the only minor road built which
has not been referred to was the Stanstead, Shefford and Chambly,
opened in 1859 from St Johns to Granby, and forming practically an
extension of the Champlain and St Lawrence from the former point.



[1] As a matter of fact, discussion of this scheme began in St Andrews
in 1827, and in 1828 John Wilson convened a meeting of the citizens to
further it.

[2] The Brassey firm were paid about £9000 sterling a mile for the line
from Toronto to Montreal, £8000 for the section from Quebec to Rivière
du Loup, £6500 for the Quebec and Richmond road, and £1,400,000 for the
Victoria Bridge.  Gzowski and Co., consisting of Messrs Gzowski,
Holton, Macpherson, and Galt, secured the Toronto to Sarnia contract at
£8000 a mile.  In both cases these prices included equipment.  The
English contractors were required to take a large portion of their pay
in depreciated bonds and stock, whereas the Canadian contractors were
given cash; on the other hand, Brassey had a higher price and less
difficult country to work in.  The English firm, with all their
experience, were not familiar with building roads in countries where
labour was dear, and the plant they sent out was antiquated compared
with the labour-saving equipment familiar to American and Canadian
contractors.  They claimed to have lost a million pounds on their
enterprise, while Galt, Holton, Macpherson, and Gzowski all made
fortunes.

[3] Port Hope borrowed for railway investment $740,000, Cobourg and
Brantford $500,000 each, and Brockville $400,000--all towns of less
than 5000 people.  The counties of Lanark and Renfrew borrowed
$800,000, and villages borrowed in proportion.  In all some $6,500,000
was borrowed through the Loan Fund for railway purposes alone, the bulk
of it in Upper Canada, while another three million was invested by
towns that borrowed on their own responsibility.  To aid the Brockville
and Ottawa Railway, for example, Lanark and Renfrew advanced $800,000,
Brockville $415,000, and the township of Elizabethtown $150,000, or
over half the cost of the road.  Huron and Bruce invested $300,000 in
the Buffalo and Lake Huron, and other municipalities $578,000, and so
on throughout the province.



[Illustration: Railways of British North America, 1860]



{93}

CHAPTER VI

THE INTERCOLONIAL

The Battle of the Gauges--Expansion and Competition--Local
Bonusing--The Intercolonial


The first 'age of iron--and of brass' came to an end before 1860.
Between 1850 and 1860, it has been seen, the mileage of all the
provinces grew from 66 to 2065.  By 1867 it had increased only 213
miles.  In two of the intervening years not a mile was built.  A halt
had come, for stock-taking and heart-searching.

This first era of activity had given as its most obvious result over
two thousand miles of railway.  In Nova Scotia, Halifax was linked with
the Bay of Fundy and the Gulf of St Lawrence; in New Brunswick, St John
was connected with the Gulf, and a road was struggling Canadaward from
St Andrews.  In the Canadas a 'Grant Trunk,' so nicknamed, ran from
Rivière du Loup the whole length of the province to Sarnia, while
lesser roads opened up new districts to the north or gave connection
with the grain-fields and the ocean {94} ports of the United States.
The western province, at all events, was well served for a pioneer
country, and the shipper and consumer had no great cause for complaint.

To the taxpayer it seemed otherwise.  He had been induced to embark on
a lavish policy of financial aid on the assurance that the roads would
at worst be no burden, and at best might yield large profits to the
state.  As a matter of fact, nine out of every ten dollars advanced
might be written off as lost.  The Grand Trunk, Great Western, and
Northern roads were indebted to the old province of Canada on July 1,
1867, in over twenty million dollars for principal advanced and in over
thirteen millions for interest.  Other roads were indebted to Canadian
municipalities in nearly ten millions for principal alone.  Yet the
taxpayer was not wholly justified in his grumbling.  There had been
waste and mismanagement, it is true, but the railways had brought
indirect gain that more than offset the direct loss.  Farming districts
were opened up rapidly, freights were reduced in many sections,
intercourse was facilitated, and land values were raised.  The
contribution to the railways was bread well cast upon the waters.  It
would have been better, if foresight had {95} equalled hindsight, to
have given the money out and out.

For the shareholder, English or Canadian, there was little but
disappointment.  Grand Trunk ordinary stock in 1865 was selling at 22,
and even Great Western at 65.  The securities of several of the minor
roads had been almost entirely wiped out by reorganizations.  In 1866
some $4,180,000 was paid in dividends and leases, representing only 2.7
per cent on the $158,000,000 which the roads had cost or were alleged
to have cost.  Premature extension into unremunerative territory, for
political or contracting reasons, excessive competition in the fertile
areas, heavy fixed charges on inflated capital or leased roads, water
competition, absentee proprietorship, all played their part.  Whatever
the causes, the results were clear, and capitalists long fought shy of
Canadian railway projects.


In the first thirty years of Canadian railway development no question
aroused more interest than that of the gauge to be adopted.  The cows
of the good Dutch burghers of New Amsterdam fixed the windings of
Broadway as they remain to this day.  The width of the carts used in
English coal-mines centuries ago {96} still determines the gauge of
railway track and railway cars over nearly all the world.  'Before
every engine,' declares Mr H. G. Wells, 'trots the ghost of a
superseded horse.'  When the steam locomotive was invented, and used
upon the coal-mine tramways, it was made of the same
four-foot-eight-and-a-half-inch gauge.  In England, in spite of the
preferences of Brunel, Stephenson's great rival, for a seven-foot
gauge, the narrower width soon triumphed, though the Great Western did
not entirely abandon its wider track until 1892.  In Canada the
struggle was longer and more complicated.

It was a question on which engineers differed.  Speed, steadiness, cost
of track construction, and cost of maintenance were all to be
considered, and were all diversely estimated.  In early years, before
the need of standardizing equipment was felt, many experiments were
made, especially in the United States.  In the southern states five
feet was the usual width, and the Erie was built on a gauge of six
feet, to fit an engine bought at a bargain.  But in the United States,
as in England, the four-foot-eight-and-a-half-inch width was dominant,
and would have been adopted in Canada without question, had not local
{97} interests, appealing, as often, to patriotic prejudice, succeeded
in clouding the issue.

When the road from Portland to Montreal was being planned, the astute
Portland promoters insisted upon a gauge of five feet six inches, to
prevent the switching of traffic to Boston.  Montreal, in its turn,
insisted on the same gauge for the Grand Trunk line, to ensure that all
east-bound traffic should be brought through Canada to Montreal.  It
carried its point, and the wider or 'provincial' gauge became the
standard in the Canadas, and later in the Maritime Provinces.

Experience proved that it was impossible to maintain different gauges
in countries so closely connected as Canada and the United States.  As
roads became consolidated into larger systems, the inconvenience of
transhipping at break of gauge became more intolerable.  The expedients
of lifting cars bodily to other trucks, of making axles adjustable, and
even of laying a third rail, proved unsatisfactory.  Late in the
sixties and early in the seventies the Great Western and the Grand
Trunk had to adopt the four-foot-eight-and-a-half-inch gauge solely,
and other lines gradually followed.

Meanwhile, the cry was going up for a still {98} narrower gauge.  In
pioneer districts, at least, it was contended, a road three feet six
inches wide, such as had recently been adopted in Norway, would
suffice, and would be much cheaper both to build and to operate.
Between 1868 and 1873 two experimental narrow-gauge lines were built
running north from Toronto--the Toronto and Nipissing, and the Toronto,
Grey and Bruce.  This proved only a temporary diversion, however, and
the decision of the Dominion government in 1874 to change the gauge of
the Intercolonial to four feet eight and a half inches, and the
adoption of the same standard by the Ontario government, ended the
controversy.


Memory is short and hope eternal.  Soon after Confederation another
burst of activity began in all the provinces of the new Dominion.  It
was distinctly the period of local development.

In Ontario the opportunity which the fertile western peninsula, jutting
down between New York and Michigan, offered for both local and through
traffic, led to many projects, much parliamentary jockeying, and at
last construction.  The Canada Southern was built in 1873, running
between Fort Erie, opposite {99} Buffalo, and Amherstburg on the
Detroit river.  It was controlled by the Vanderbilt interests and
operated in close co-operation with their other roads, the Michigan
Southern, Michigan Central, and New York Central.  The Great Western
met this attack upon its preserves by building in the same year the
Canada Air Line, from Glencoe near St Thomas, to Fort Erie, giving more
direct connection with Buffalo.  Both roads made use of the magnificent
International Bridge, built across the Niagara in 1873, under Grand
Trunk control.

The marked feature of this period, so far as Ontario was concerned, was
the rivalry of the cities along the lake and river front in building
new roads to tap the north country.  From London there was built in
1875 the London, Huron and Bruce, halting at Wingham.  From Hamilton,
or rather from Guelph, with connections to Hamilton, the Wellington,
Grey and Bruce reached Southampton on Lake Huron in 1873 and Kincardine
in 1874.  Both roads were virtually branches of the Great Western, and
were expected to bring to London and to Hamilton respectively the trade
of the rich northwestern counties.  The Ambitious City, as Hamilton
came to be {100} called at this period, a few years later invaded the
Northern Railway's territory by a line from Hamilton to Collingwood,
also extended southerly to Port Dover, but control of this road was
immediately acquired by the Northern interests.  From still more
ambitious Toronto two narrow-gauge routes were built between 1869 and
1874--the Toronto, Grey and Bruce running northwest to Owen Sound and
Teeswater, and the Toronto and Nipissing northeast to Coboconk and
Sutton.  Whitby also had its visions of terminal greatness, when the
Whitby and Port Perry was built in the later seventies.  The Port Hope,
Beaverton and Lindsay, renamed the Midland, was pushed northeast to
Orillia in 1872 and to Midland in 1875.  Cobourg's unfortunate northern
line was continued to the iron mines of Marmora.  Belleville was linked
with Peterborough in 1878-79 by the Grand Junction.  Kingston, with the
co-operation of interests in New York state, planned the Kingston and
Pembroke, which reached Mississippi in 1878, and five years later
compromised on Renfrew as a terminus.  The bankruptcy of the Brockville
and Ottawa did not prevent its extension through an allied company, the
Canada Central, to Pembroke in 1869 and to {101} Ottawa, by a branch
from Carleton Place, in 1876.

In Quebec the chief developments were the building of a line connecting
Quebec, Montreal, and Ottawa along the north shore of the St Lawrence,
and of further connections between Montreal and Quebec and United
States roads.  The North Shore route had been projected early in the
fifties, but, in spite of lavish cash and land bonuses, it was not
until the Quebec government took it up as a provincial road, in the
seventies, that it was pushed to completion.  On the south shore the
Eastern Townships triangle was interlaced by a series of smaller roads.
From Lévis, opposite Quebec, the Lévis and Kennebec ran south to the
Maine border, and the Quebec Central to Sherbrooke.  From Sherbrooke
and Lennoxville the Massawappi Valley gave connection with the
Connecticut and Passumpsic, to which it was leased for 999 years, while
branches of the Central Vermont and minor roads opened up new sections
and gave further connection with Montreal.

An interesting experiment, motived by the same desire for cheap pioneer
construction which in Ontario brought in the narrow gauge, was the
wooden railway built in 1870 from {102} Quebec to Gosford.  The rails
were simply strips of seasoned maple, 14'x7"x4", notched into the
sleepers and wedged in without the use of a single iron spike.  The
engine and car wheels were made wide to fit the rail.  In spite of its
cheap construction the road did not pay, and the hope of extending it
as far as Lake St John was deferred for a generation.  A similar wooden
railway was built from Drummondville to L'Avenir.

In Nova Scotia the chief local development was the opening in 1869 of a
road through the Annapolis Valley, the Windsor and Annapolis.  This
formed an extension of the government road from Halifax to Windsor, but
the province preferred to entrust it to a private company, giving a
liberal bonus.  In New Brunswick there was much activity, all by
private companies.  The western section of the European and North
American, from St John to the Maine boundary, was completed in 1869,
though it was not until 1871 that the road was opened through to
Portland--by a more circuitous route than Poor had originally planned.
From Fredericton a branch was built to meet this road, and a line to
Woodstock, which in turn was connected with the old New Brunswick and
Canada, still {103} pushing slowly north.  In the meantime Prince
Edward Island was building a narrow-gauge railway nearly two hundred
miles long; in 1873 she was forced into Confederation to find aid in
paying for it.

All this varied activity was made possible by a revival of the policy
of provincial and municipal assistance.  Whether from reasoned
conviction as to the indirect benefits of more roads, or because of the
log-rolling activities of rival towns and wily promoters, a systematic
and generous policy of aid was adopted.  This aid came chiefly from the
provinces and municipalities, the Dominion as yet confining itself to
works of inter-provincial concern.  Outright gifts for the most part
took the place of loans, since experience had proved that direct
returns upon the money invested were not to be looked for.  Curiously
meandering were the routes which promoters mapped out in the endeavour
to follow the shortest line between two bonuses.[1]

{104}

Governments could help to build roads, but could not ensure for them
traffic.  It took very few years to show that the interests of the
public were not best served by scores of petty isolated roads, and that
the interests of shareholders were not secured by the cut-throat
competition which prevailed in certain areas.  This competition was
keenest between the roads which were intimately connected with the
lines in the United States and dependent upon through traffic.  The
Grand Trunk had cut into the territory of the Great Western by
acquiring the Buffalo and Lake Huron line, and the Canada Southern and
the Great Western were disputing for every ton of freight between the
Niagara and the Detroit.  All were involved in the rate wars which
marked this period in {105} the United States.  In 1867 the Grand Trunk
and the Great Western agreed to maintain rates, pool certain traffic
receipts, refrain from competitive building, and co-operate in service.
The agreement broke down; another was made in 1876, only to fail in
turn.  More effective measures had to be adopted.


The outstanding achievement of the period, however, was the building of
the Intercolonial.  It had been projected largely in order to make
closer union between the provinces possible, but, as it turned out, it
was Confederation that brought the Intercolonial, not the Intercolonial
that brought Confederation.

After the breakdown of the negotiations in London in 1852, each
province had turned to its own tasks.  But each in building its own
roads had provided possible links in the future Intercolonial chain.
In Canada the Grand Trunk ran to a point 120 miles east of Quebec; in
New Brunswick, St John was connected with both the east and west
boundaries of the province; in Nova Scotia, a road ran north from
Halifax as far as Truro.  A gap of nearly five hundred miles between
Rivière du Loup and Truro remained.  To bridge this wilderness seemed
beyond the {106} private or public resources of the divided provinces.
Unanimous on one point only, they once more turned to the British
government.  In 1857 and 1858 dispatches and deputations sought aid,
but sought it in vain.  When the Civil War broke out in the United
States, official British sympathy was given to the South, and the
_Trent_ affair showed how near Britain and the North were to war, a war
which would at once have exposed the isolated colonies to American
attack.  The military argument for closer connection then took on new
weight with the British government, and it proposed, to a joint
delegation in 1861, to revert to its offer of ten years earlier--to
guarantee a colonial loan for a railway by an approved route.  The
colonies opposed the demand for a sinking fund, and again agreement was
postponed.  In 1863 Canada suggested that, as the British government
had made an approved route an essential condition, a definite survey
and selection should be undertaken forthwith.  It was agreed that a
commission of three engineers should be selected, one nominated by
Canada, one by New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, and one by Great Britain.
Canada nominated Sandford Fleming, a distinguished Scottish-Canadian
{107} engineer, who had been connected with the Northern and other
Upper Canada enterprises.  The other authorities paid him the
compliment of naming him as their representative also, to facilitate
the work.  During the progress of the survey negotiations for the union
of the provinces had begun, and when Confederation came about in 1867,
the building of the Intercolonial at the common expense of the
Dominion, with an imperial guarantee to the extent of £3,000,000, was
one of the conditions of union.  The old difficulty as to the route
through New Brunswick was still to be settled.  Again western and
southern New Brunswick struggled against the north and against far east
Quebec; again Halifax and St John found plausible arguments to uphold
their respective interests.  Finally, the views of Sir George Cartier
and Peter Mitchell triumphed in the Cabinet councils, and in March 1868
the engineer-in-chief advised the selection of the roundabout Bay of
Chaleurs route--roughly 'Major Robinson's line'--ostensibly because
safer from American attack, nearer possible steamship connection with
Europe, and no worse, if no better, than the other routes in
potentialities of local traffic.

The construction was entrusted in December {108} 1868 to a commission
of four; six years later the minister of Public Works took over direct
control.  Sandford Fleming remained engineer-in-chief for the building
as well as for the survey.  Tenders were submitted for the construction
of the whole road, but the government decided to award the contract in
small sections.  The road was not completed as speedily as had been
expected.  Difficulties arose, expected and unexpected--cuttings in
heavy rock, sliding clay banks, extensive swamps, lack of rock bottom
for heavy bridges.  Contractor after contractor found that he had
underestimated the task, and went bankrupt or threw up the contract.
Sometimes the contract was relet, sometimes the government completed it
by day work.  At last, on July 1, 1876, nine years after Confederation,
the five hundred miles between Truro and Rivière du Loup were opened
for traffic throughout.  In the meantime the Dominion had taken over
the Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Prince Edward Island government
roads.  In 1876 there were in all 950 miles of railway under the
control of the Dominion government, as against 4268 miles of private
lines.



[1] Ontario in 1871 offered subsidies ranging from two to four thousand
dollars a mile for colonization roads to the north; Quebec in 1869
offered money and later land; New Brunswick in 1864 gave $10,000 a mile
to various roads, besides taking $300,000 in stock in the European;
while Nova Scotia aided the Annapolis extension.  Municipal aid was
even more lavish in proportion: Toronto gave $350,000 to the Toronto,
Grey and Bruce, $150,000 to the Nipissing road, $100,000 to the
Northern, and $350,000 to the Credit Valley.  Hamilton backed the
Hamilton and North-Western by $200,000, London gave the London, Huron
and Bruce $150,000, and generous Kingston gave to the Kingston and
Pembroke over $300,000.  Counties like Elgin and Simcoe, Grey, and
Frontenac offered from $150,000 to $300,000, while from townships alone
the Wellington, Grey and Bruce received $680,000.  Montreal and Quebec
each helped the North Shore by a gift of a million dollars; Ottawa
county's $200,000 and the parish of Canrobert's $1000 were equally
sought; while to a lesser degree the Maritime Provinces showed the same
tendency.



{109}

CHAPTER VII

THE CANADIAN PACIFIC--BEGINNINGS

Across Continent in 1841--Early Stages--The Survey--The Allan
Project--Mackenzie's Policy--Macdonald's Policy


On March 3, 1841, Sir George Simpson, governor-in-chief of the Hudson's
Bay Company's domains, left London on a journey round the world.  All
the resources of a powerful and well-organized corporation were at his
disposal, and his own reputation for rapid travelling gave assurance
that on the actual journey not an hour would be lost.  A fortnight's
sail brought him from Liverpool to Halifax, and thence he journeyed by
steamer to Boston, by rail to Nashua, by coach to Concord, and by
sleigh to Montreal.  The portage railway from St John to Laprairie was
on his route, but it was not open in winter.

From Montreal Sir George and his party set out on May 4 in two light
thirty-foot canoes, each carrying a crew of twelve or fourteen men.  At
top speed they worked their way up the Ottawa and the Mattawa out to
Lake Nipissing, {110} and down the French River into Georgian Bay.
They camped every night at sunset, and rose each morning at one.  Their
tireless Canadian and Iroquois voyageurs worked eighteen hours a day,
paddling swiftly through smooth water, wading through shallows, or
towing the canoes through the lesser rapids, or portaging once to a
dozen times a day round the more difficult ones.  Each voyageur was
ready to shoulder his 180 pounds, strapped to his forehead, or to ferry
passengers ashore on his back.  They reached Sault Ste Marie on May 16,
only to find Lake Superior still frozen.  They picked their way very
slowly through the opening rifts along the shore, made the Company's
post at Fort William in eleven days, exchanged their large canoes for
smaller craft, and paddled and portaged through the endless network of
river and lake to Fort Garry, which they reached on June 10,
thirty-eight days out from Montreal.

[Illustration: Sir George Simpson.  From a print in the John Ross
Robertson Collection, Toronto Public Library]

From Fort Garry a fresh start was made on July 3, on horseback, with
baggage sent ahead in lumbering Red River carts.  Past Fort Ellice and
Fort Carlton, they pushed on with fresh supplies of horses at the
topmost speed that the limitations of their convoy of carts would
permit.  Band after band of Plains {111} Indians, adorned with
war-paint and scalp-locks, crossed their trail, but mosquito and
sand-fly proved more troublesome.  The travellers passed a band of
emigrants making slowly for the Columbia, and everywhere found
countless herds of buffalo.  In three weeks from Fort Garry they
reached Fort Edmonton.  Here forty-five fresh horses were in readiness
for riding, pack-horses took the place of carts, and the journey was
continued to the south-west.  The Rockies were crossed through Kootenay
Pass, and at last--after many a halt to find straying horses, and after
continuous annoyance from mosquitoes and venomous insects 'which in
size and appearance might have been mistaken for a cross between the
bulldog and the house-fly'--Fort Colville on the Columbia was reached
on August 18.  Their long horseback ride was over.  Favoured by
wonderfully fine weather, in the saddle eleven to twelve hours a day,
they had made their way through open prairie and rolling plain, tangled
thicket and burning forest and rushing river, and had covered the two
thousand miles from Fort Garry in six weeks and five days.  From Fort
Colville they reached the waters of the Pacific at Fort Vancouver
(Washington) in another six days.  The {112} continent had been crossed
in twelve weeks of actual travelling.

Sir George Simpson's journey stood as the record for many a year.  For
a generation after his day the scattered travellers from Red River
westward were compelled to rely on saddle-horse and plains cart and
canoe.  From Montreal and Toronto the railway could be utilized as far
as Collingwood, and thence the steamer to Port Arthur.  Then for a time
the government opened up a summer route to the Red River, beginning it
in 1869 and maintaining it until 1876.  The Dawson route, as it was
called, included forty-five miles of wagon-road from Port Arthur to
Lake Shebandowan, then over three hundred miles of water travel, with a
dozen portages, and again ninety-five miles of wagon-road from the Lake
of the Woods to Fort Garry.[1]  In 1870 it took ninety-five days to
transport troops from Toronto to Fort Garry over this route.  Such
makeshifts could not serve for long.  South of the {113} border the
railway was rapidly pushing westward, and in the new nation of the
north, as well, its time had come.

Ever after the coming of the locomotive, it needed only imagination and
a map to see all British North America clamped by an iron band.
Engineers like Bonnycastle and Synge and Carmichael-Smyth wrote of the
possibility in the forties.  Politicians found in the theme matter for
admirable after-dinner perorations--colonial governors like Harvey in
1847, colonial secretaries like Lytton and Carnarvon in the fifties,
and colonial premiers like Joseph Howe, who declared in Halifax in
1851: 'I believe that many in this room will live to hear the whistle
of the steam-engine in the passes of the Rocky Mountains, and to make
the journey from Halifax to the Pacific in five or six days.'
Promoters were not lacking.  In 1851 Allan Macdonnell of Toronto sought
a charter and a subsidy for a road to the Pacific, and the Canadian
authorities, in {114} declining, expressed their opinion that the
scheme was not visionary and their hope that some day Great Britain and
the United States might undertake it jointly.  Seven years later the
same promoter secured a charter for the Northwest Transportation,
Navigation, and Railway Company, to operate between Lake Superior and
the Fraser river, but could get no backing; four years previously John
Young, A. N. Morin, A. T. Galt, and John A. Poor had petitioned in vain
for a similar charter.  Then in 1862, on behalf of the Red River
Settlement, Sandford Fleming prepared an elaborate memorial on the
subject.  Edwin Watkin, of the Grand Trunk, negotiated with the
Hudson's Bay Company for right of way and other facilities, but the
project proved too vast for his resources.

[Illustration: Sir Sandford Fleming.  From a photograph by Topley]

Two things were needed before dreams on paper could become facts in
steel--national unity and international rivalry.  Years before
Confederation, such far-seeing Canadians as William M'Dougall and
George Brown had pressed for the annexation of the British territories
beyond the Lakes.  After Confederation, all speed was made to buy out
the sovereign rights of the Hudson's Bay Company.  Then came the first
Riel Rebellion, to {115} bring home the need of a western road, as the
_Trent_ affair had brought home the need of the Intercolonial.  The
decisive political factor came into play in 1870, when British Columbia
entered the federation.  Its less than ten thousand white
inhabitants--deeming themselves citizens of no mean country, and kept
to their demands by the urging of an indefatigable Englishman, Alfred
Waddington--made the construction of an overland railway an
indispensable condition of union, and Sir John Macdonald courageously
accepted their terms.

The other factor, international rivalry, exercised its influence about
the same time.  In the United States the railway had rapidly pushed
westward, but had halted before the deserts and the mountains lying
between the Mississippi and the Pacific.  The rivalry of pro-slavery
and anti-slavery parties in Congress long brought to deadlock all plans
of public aid to either southern or northern route.  Then the Civil War
broke the deadlock: the need of binding the West to the side of the
North created a strong public demand for a Pacific road, and Congress,
so stimulated, and further lubricated by the payment, as is proven, of
at least $476,000 in bribes, gave lavish loans {116} and grants of
land.  The Central Pacific, working from Sacramento, and the Union
Pacific, starting from Omaha, met near Ogden in Utah in 1869--or rather
here the rails met, for the rival companies, eager to earn the high
subsidy given for mountain construction, had actually graded two
hundred superfluous miles in parallel lines.  In 1871 the Southern
Pacific and the Texas Pacific were fighting for subsidies, and Jay
Cooke was promoting the Northern Pacific.  The young Dominion was
stirred by ambition to emulate its powerful neighbour.

These factors, then, brought the question of a railway to the Pacific
on Canadian soil within the range of practical politics.  Important
questions remained to be settled.  During the parliamentary session of
1871 the government of Sir John Macdonald decided that the road should
be built by a company, not by the state, that it should be aided by
liberal subsidies in cash and in land, and, to meet British Columbia's
insistent terms, that it should be begun within two, and completed
within ten, years.  The Opposition protested that this latter provision
was uncalled for and would bankrupt the Dominion, but the government
carried its point, though it was forced to hedge {117} later by a
stipulation--not included in the formal resolutions--that the annual
expenditure should be such as not to press unduly upon the Dominion's
resources.

The first task was to survey the vast wilderness between the Ottawa
valley and the Pacific, and to find, if possible, a feasible route.  So
able an explorer and engineer as Captain Palliser, appointed by the
British government to report upon the country west of the Lakes, had
declared in 1863, after four years of careful labour in the field,
that, thanks to the choice of the 49th parallel as Canada's boundary,
there was no possibility of ever building a transcontinental railway
exclusively through British territory.  The man chosen for the task of
achieving this impossibility was Sandford Fleming.  Appointed
engineer-in-chief in 1871, he was for nine years in charge of the
surveys, though for half that time his duties on the Intercolonial
absorbed much of his energy.  Mr Fleming possessed an unusual gift of
literary style, and his reports upon the work of his staff gave the
people of Canada a very clear idea of the difficulties to be
encountered.  His friend, the Rev. George M. Grant, who accompanied him
in a rapid reconnaissance in 1872, gave, in his book {118} _Ocean to
Ocean_, a vivid and heartening record of the realities and the promise
that he saw.

It had been decided, in order to hold the balance even between Montreal
and Toronto, to make the proposed Pacific road begin at some angle of
Lake Nipissing.  From that point nearly to the Red River there
stretched a thousand miles of woodland, rugged and rock-strewn, covered
by a network of countless lakes and rivers, interspersed with seemingly
bottomless swamps or muskegs--a wilderness which no white man had ever
passed through from end to end.  Then came the level prairie and a
great rolling plain rising to the south-west in three successive
steppes, and cut by deep watercourses.  But it was the third or
mountain section which presented the most serious engineering
difficulties.  Four hundred miles from the Pacific coast, and roughly
parallel, ran the towering Rocky Mountains, some of whose peaks rose
fifteen thousand feet.  Beyond stretched a vast plateau, three or four
thousand feet above sea-level, intersected by rivers which had cut deep
chasms or, to the northward, wide sheltered valleys.  Between this
plateau and the coast the Cascades interposed, rivalling the Rockies in
height and {119} rising sheer from the ocean, which thrust in deep
fiord channels.  At the head of some one of these fiords must be found
the western terminus.

[Illustration: Fleming Route and the Transcontinentals]

Early in the survey a practicable route was found throughout.  Striking
across the wilderness from Lake Nipissing to Lake Superior at the river
Pic, the line might skirt the shore of the lake to Fort William, or it
might run northerly through what is now known as the clay belt, with
Fort William and the lake made accessible by a branch.  Continuing
westward to the Red River at Selkirk, with Winnipeg on a branch line to
the south, the projected line crossed Lake Manitoba at the Narrows, and
then struck out northwesterly, through what was then termed the
'Fertile Belt,' till the Yellowhead Pass was reached.  Here the Rockies
could be easily pierced; but once through the engineer was faced by the
huge flanking range of the Cariboo Mountains, in which repeated
explorations failed to find a gap.  But at the foot of the towering
barrier lay a remarkable deep-set valley four hundred miles in length,
in which northwestward ran the Fraser and southeastward the Canoe and
the Columbia.  By following the Fraser to its great southward bend, and
then striking {120} west, a terminus on Bute or Dean Inlet might be
reached, while the valley of the Canoe and the Albreda would give
access to the North Thompson as far as Kamloops, whence the road might
run down the Thompson and the lower Fraser to Burrard Inlet.  The
latter route, on the whole, was preferred.

While this route was feasible, the mountain portion promised to be
extremely expensive.  This factor, together with the uncertainty of
government policy and the desire of Victoria to have the road built to
Bute Inlet and thence, by a bridge across Valdes Strait, carried down
to Esquimalt, made it necessary to seek untiringly, year after year,
for alternative routes.  The only important change made, however, until
after 1880, was the deflection of the line south of Lake Manitoba to
serve existing settlements.

Who was to build the road?  It would be a tremendous task for either
the government or the private capitalists of a nation of four million
people.  The United States had not begun its Pacific roads till it had
over thirty millions of people, and wealth and experience to
correspond.  It was estimated that the Canadian road would cost
$100,000,000, and it was certain that the engineering difficulties
{121} would be staggering.  In Canada few roads had paid the
shareholders, and though some had profited the contractors, the new
enterprise meant such a plunge in the dark that contractors and
promoters alike hesitated.  In the United States, however, the Pacific
roads had proved gold-mines for their promoters.  The land-grants were
valuable, and the privilege of granting contracts to dummy construction
companies controlled by themselves and thus reaping larger profits was
still greater.

It was not to be wondered at, therefore, that the first offer came from
American capitalists.  Alfred Waddington, enthusiast rather than
practical promoter, sought at Ottawa a charter for the road he had done
so much to secure, but his bill went no further than a first reading.
At Ottawa he was met by G. W. M'Mullen, a Canadian residing in Chicago,
who was visiting the Dominion on a canal deputation.  M'Mullen became
interested, and with his Chicago partners endeavoured to enlist the aid
of the men behind the Northern Pacific--Jay Cooke, General Cass, W. B.
Ogden, T. A. Scott, and others.[2] {122} M'Mullen soon found that
Waddington had exaggerated his influence, and that the government was
not yet prepared to discuss terms.  Sir Francis Hincks, stormy petrel
of railway building, whom Sir John Macdonald had just made his finance
minister, suggested to Sir Hugh Allan of Montreal that he should get
into touch with these Americans and provide the substantial Canadian
interest which was essential.

Sir Hugh Allan was then the foremost business man in Canada.  He was
head of the great Allan steamship line, and had become interested in
railways shortly before, when rumours of the intention of the Grand
Trunk to establish a rival steamship line to Great {123} Britain had
led him to assist in promoting the North Shore from Quebec westward, to
compete with the Grand Trunk and ensure traffic for his steamers.  He
now opened negotiations with the American capitalists through M'Mullen,
came to terms, and then sought associates in Canada.  Here difficulties
arose: Ontario objected that Allan's control would mean a Quebec rather
than an Ontario terminus, and that the Northern Pacific directors with
whom he was associated were simply conspiring to get control of the
Canadian road, in order to delay its construction and prevent it
becoming a rival to their own northerly route.  Sir George Cartier,
too, powerful in the Cabinet and salaried solicitor of the Grand Trunk,
was a stumbling-block; he declared himself emphatically opposed to
control by any '_sacrée compagnie américaine_.'  But Sir Hugh,
believing much in money and little in men, resolved to buy his way
through.  He soon started a backfire in Quebec which brought Cartier to
terms.  Ontario rivalry was harder to control: D. L. Macpherson and
other Toronto men organized the Interoceanic Railway Company to oppose
Allan's Canada Pacific Company.  Both companies sought charters and
aid.  Allan {124} pretended to drop his American associates; Macpherson
charged that the connection still existed.  The government endeavoured
to bring about an amalgamation, with Allan as president, and, failing
this, to organize a new company.  In the meantime Allan was spending
money so freely that even his New York associates were astounded.  The
Dominion elections were held in August 1872, and Macdonald, Cartier,
and Langevin drew heavily on Allan's funds, $162,500 in all, with a
promise from Cartier that 'any amount which you or your Company shall
advance for that purpose shall be re-couped to you.'  After the
election a new company, the Canadian Pacific, was organized, with
representative men from each province as directors; and the new board,
of its own motion, it was declared, elected Allan president.  To this
company the government granted a charter, promised a subsidy of thirty
million dollars and fifty million acres of land, but insisted upon
excluding the American interests.  Allan acquiesced, and, repaying the
advances made, informed New York that negotiations were ended.
M'Mullen and his associates, angry at this treatment, conveyed rumours
to Opposition leaders, and finally Allan's confidential {125}
correspondence, stolen by a clerk in the office of J. J. C. Abbott,
Allan's solicitor, was made public.[3]  The fat was in the fire.

With the political controversy which followed we are not here
concerned.  In Sir John Macdonald's defence it could be said, that
though Allan's money was taken no {126} special favours were shown in
the contract made; and that all that Allan secured by the government's
victory was the certainty that the railway project would not be
postponed or dropped altogether, and that he would be given control.
Sir Hugh Allan had said with much force: 'The plans I propose are in
themselves the best for the interests of the Dominion, and in urging
them on the public I am really doing a most patriotic action.'
Undoubtedly Sir John Macdonald sincerely held a similar opinion.

{127}

The Allan Company gave up its charter, unable to raise capital in face
of financial depression and political upheaval.  The Liberal party, led
by Alexander Mackenzie, and swept into power by a wave of popular
indignation, first endeavoured to induce other capitalists to take up
the work.  But the government's offers of $10,000 in cash and of 20,000
acres of land for each mile, plus an undetermined guarantee, had no
takers in the years of depression that followed.  Mackenzie then
decided that the government should {128} itself build the road.  He
planned to build at first only the indispensable sections, using the
waterways wherever possible, and hoped, but in vain, to secure British
Columbia's consent to an extension of the time set for completion.  His
first step was to subsidize the Canada Central, which ran from Ottawa
via Carleton Place to Pembroke, to extend its line as far as Lake
Nipissing, in order to connect with the proposed eastern terminus of
the Pacific road, and to award a contract (it was afterwards cancelled)
for a branch from this junction point to Georgian Bay.  Passing by for
the time the country north of Lake Superior, he next let contracts for
the greater part of the distance between Fort William and Selkirk and
for a road from Selkirk to Emerson, on the Manitoba border.  Here
connection was to be made with an American line, the St Paul and
Pacific, of which more will be heard presently.

When Mackenzie left office in 1878 the work of location or construction
was well advanced in all three sections.  For two years the new
administration of Sir John Macdonald carried on the same policy of
government construction at a moderate pace.  The work in hand was
continued and the gaps in the road {129} between Port Arthur and
Selkirk were put under contract.  The line was made to pass through
Winnipeg--instead of striking west from Selkirk, as the engineers had
previously advised, and thus side-tracking the ambitious city growing
up around old Fort Garry.  Contracts were let for two hundred miles of
the extension westward from Winnipeg.  Two seasons passed before the
new government could make up its mind as to the British Columbia
section.  Late in 1879 it decided to adhere to the route chosen under
the Mackenzie administration, through the Yellowhead Pass, down the
Thompson and the Fraser to Port Moody on Burrard Inlet.  The difficult
section from Yale, the head of navigation on the Fraser, to Savona's
Ferry, near Kamloops, was shortly afterwards placed under contract.

The ten years' time allotted for the construction of the Canadian
Pacific was nearly gone and there was little completed work to show.
Hard times, depression in the railway world, changes of government and
political upheavals, disputes as to route and terminus, had delayed
construction.  The building of the link north of Lake Superior,
necessary for all-rail connection between East and West on Canadian
territory, had been indefinitely postponed.  {130} Something had been
done, it is true.  Manitoba was being linked up with the East by a road
south to Minnesota and by another line to the head of Lake Superior,
and a start had been made in British Columbia.  Some day, under some
administration, the gaps would be filled up and the promise to British
Columbia would be redeemed.

Suddenly, in June 1880, Sir John Macdonald, speaking at Bath, made the
announcement that a group of capitalists had offered to build the road,
on terms which would ensure that in the end it would not cost Canada a
single farthing.  Four months later a contract was signed in Ottawa by
which the Canadian Pacific Syndicate undertook to build and operate the
whole road.  An entirely new turn had been given to the situation, and
the most important chapter in Canada's railway annals, if not in her
national life, had been begun.



[1] 'Lord Strathcona may still remember the man who came into his
office at Winnipeg and said: "Look at me; ain't I a healthy sight?
I've come by the government water route from Thunder Bay, and it's
taken me twenty-five days to do it.  During that time I've been
half-starved on victuals I wouldn't give a swampy Indian.  The water
used to pour into my bunk at nights, and the boat was so leaky that
every bit of baggage I've got is water-logged and ruined.  I've broke
my arm and sprained my ankle helping to carry half a dozen trunks over
a dozen portages, and when I refused to take a paddle on one of the
boats, an Ottawa Irishman told me to go to hell, and said that if I
gave him any more of my damned chat he'd let me get off and walk to
Winnipeg."'--W. L. Grant in _Geographical Journal_, October 1911, p.
365.

[2] The Northern Pacific was at many stages in its history closely
connected with Canadian affairs.  It had originally been projected in
New England: the first proposal was to use the Central Vermont and a
Canadian road to be built or acquired as the eastern links, then,
crossing into Michigan, the railway was to strike northwestward to the
Pacific.  When control fell into the hands of New York and Philadelphia
interests, these plans were dropped, but later the new management
negotiated with Governor Archibald of Manitoba, as well as with Sir
John Macdonald, to endeavour to put through an international road, the
first section running through Canada to Sault Ste Marie, the second
through Michigan and Minnesota, the third through the Canadian plains,
and the fourth through the Rockies to the sea on American territory.
Nothing came of the negotiations, though it may be noted that the
Canadian Pacific to-day has carried out precisely this plan, in
addition to its all-Canadian line.

[3] This correspondence will be found in the Journals of the House of
Commons, vol. vii, 1873.  In no other documents available to the public
has the connection between politics and railway promoting in Canada
been made so evident.  The following are a few brief extracts from
letters addressed by Sir Hugh Allan to various American associates
during 1872:


Thinking that as I had taken up the project there must be something
very good in it, a very formidable opposition was organized in Toronto,
which for want of a better took as their cry 'No foreign influence; no
Yankee dictation; no Northern Pacific to choke off our Canadian
Pacific,' and others equally sensible....  I was forced to drop
ostensibly from our organization every American name, and put in
reliable people on this side in place of them....  Mr M'Mullen was
desirous of securing the inferior members of the Government, and
entered into engagements of which I did not approve, as I thought it
was only a waste of powder and shot.  On a calm view of the situation I
satisfied myself that the decision of the question must ultimately be
in the hands of one man, and that man was Sir George E. Cartier, the
leader of the French party, which held the balance of power between the
other factions....  It was evident that some means must be adopted to
bring the influence of this compact body of men to bear in our favour,
and as soon as I made up my mind what to do, I did not lose a moment in
following it up.  A railroad from Montreal to Ottawa, through the
French country, north of the Ottawa river, has long been desired by the
French inhabitants; but Cartier, who is a salaried solicitor of the
Grand Trunk road, to which this would be an opposition, has interposed
difficulties, and by his influence prevented it being built....  The
plans I propose are in themselves the best for the interests of the
Dominion, and in urging them on the public I am really doing a most
patriotic action.  But even in that view, means must be used to
influence the public, and I employed several young French lawyers to
write it up in their own newspapers.  I subscribed a controlling
influence in the stock, and proceeded to subsidize the newspapers
themselves, both editors and proprietors.  I went to the country
through which the road would pass, and called on many of the
inhabitants.  I visited the priests and made friends of them, and I
employed agents to go among the principal people and talk it up.  I
then began to hold public meetings, and attended to them myself, making
frequent speeches in French to them, showing them where their true
interests lay ... and I formed a committee to influence the members of
the Legislature.  This succeeded so well that in a short time it had 27
out of 45 on whom I could rely, and the electors of the ward in this
city, which Cartier himself represents, notified him that unless the
contract for the Pacific Railway was given in the interests of Lower
Canada he need not present himself for re-election....

The policy adopted has been quite successful, the strong French
influence I succeeded in obtaining has proved sufficient to control the
elections, and as soon as the Government realized this fact, which they
were unwilling to admit and slow to see, they opened negotiations with
me....  Yesterday we entered into an agreement, by which the Government
bound itself to form a Company of Canadians, only according to my
wishes.  That this Company will make me President, and that I and my
friends will get a majority of the stock, and that the contract for
building the railroad will be given to this Company, in terms of the
Act of Parliament.  Americans are to be carefully excluded in the fear
that they will sell it to the Union [_sic_] Pacific, but I fancy we can
get over that some way or other.  This position has not been attained
without large payments of money.  I have already paid over $200,000,
and will have at least $100,000 more to pay.



[Illustration: Railways of Canada, 1880]



{131}

CHAPTER VIII

BUILDING THE CANADIAN PACIFIC

The Minnesota Venture--Canadian Pacific Syndicate--The
Contract--Political Opposition--Terms of the Contract--Organizing the
Company--Financing--Construction


In the months and years that followed, no men were so much in the mind
and speech of the Canadian public as the members of the new syndicate.
The leading members were a remarkable group of men.  Probably never in
the history of railway building, not even in the case of the 'Big Four'
who built the Central Pacific--Huntingdon, Stanford, Crocker, and
Hopkins--had the call of the railway brought together in a single
enterprise men of such outstanding individuality, of such ability and
persistence, and destined for success so notable.

The Canadian Pacific was not their first joint enterprise.  It was the
direct outcome of a daring venture in connection with a bankrupt
Minnesota railway, which had brought them wealth beyond their wildest
dreams, and had definitely turned their thoughts to railway work.

Early in the settlement of the northwestern {132} states the need of
railways, and of state aid to railways, was widely realized.  In 1857
Congress gave the territory of Minnesota a large grant of public lands
to use in bonusing railway building, and in the same year the
legislature of the territory incorporated a company, the Minnesota and
Pacific, to build from Stillwater through St Paul and St Anthony's
Falls (Minneapolis) to Red River points.  The state gave the new
company millions of acres of land and a cash subsidy, municipalities
offered bonuses, and a small amount of stock was subscribed locally.
Five years passed, and not a mile had been completed.  The company,
looted into insolvency by fraudulent construction company contracts,
was reorganized as the St Paul and Pacific, heir to the old company's
assets but not to its liabilities, and a beginning was made once more.
Trusting Dutch bondholders lent over twenty millions, and by 1871 the
road reached Breckenridge on the Red River, two hundred and seventeen
miles from St Paul.  Again a halt came.  Russell Sage and his
associates in control had once more looted the treasury.  The Dutch
bondholders, through their agent, John S. Kennedy, a New York banker,
applied for a receiver, and in 1873 one Jesse P. Farley was {133}
appointed by the court.  It seemed that the angry settlers might
whistle in vain for their road.

In St Paul at that time there lived two Canadians who saw the
opportunity.  The elder, Norman W. Kittson, had been Hudson Bay agent
and head of a transportation company on the Red River.  The younger,
James J. Hill, an Ontario farm-boy who had gone west while still in his
teens, owned a coal and wood yard in St Paul, and had a share in the
transportation company.  Neither had the capital or the financial
connection required to take hold of the bankrupt company, but they kept
on thinking of it day and night.  Soon a third man joined their ranks,
Donald A. Smith.  A Highland lad who had come to Canada at eighteen,
Donald Smith had spent a generation in the service of the Hudson's Bay
Company, mainly in the dreary wilds of Labrador and on the shores of
Hudson Bay.  When in 1871 he became chief commissioner of the
organization he had served so long and so well, it seemed to most men
that he was definitely settled in his life work and probably near the
height of his career.  But Fate knew, and Donald Smith knew, that his
career was only beginning.  Coming down from the north {134} each year
by the Red River to St Paul, on his way east, he talked over the
railway situation with Hill and Kittson.  The more they talked the
greater grew their faith in the country and the railroad.  It was a
faith, however, that few in the moneyed East shared with them.  It had
been the smashing of the rival road, the Northern Pacific, in 1873,
that had given the signal for the brief panic and the long depression
of the seventies.  The Minnesota road itself had twice become bankrupt.
The legislature would undoubtedly soon declare the land-grant
forfeited, unless the construction promised was completed.  To fill the
cup, in the middle seventies Minnesota and the neighbouring lands were
visited by unprecedented swarms of grasshoppers or Rocky Mountain
locusts.  Swarming down from the plateau lands of the Rockies in
columns miles high, covering the ground from horizon to horizon, they
swept resistlessly forward, devouring every green thing in their way.
When they had passed, hundreds of deserted shacks stood silent
witnesses to the settlers' despair.

[Illustration: Lord Strathcona.  From a photograph by Lafayette, London]

It was in 1876 that the further allies needed came from the East.
Thirty years earlier George Stephen, a younger cousin of Donald Smith,
had left his Highland hills to seek his {135} fortune in London, and
after a short apprenticeship there had gone still farther afield,
joining an uncle in Montreal.  He rose rapidly to a foremost place in
the wholesale trade of Montreal; selling led him into manufacturing,
and manufacturing into financial activities.  In 1876 he became
president of the Bank of Montreal.  Associated with him in the same
bank was still another shrewd, forth-faring Scot, Richard B. Angus, who
had risen steadily in its service until appointed to succeed E. H. King
as general manager in 1869.

A lawsuit in connection with the bank's affairs took both Stephen and
Angus to Chicago in 1876.  A week's adjournment left them with unwonted
leisure.  A toss of a coin sent them to St Paul rather than to St Louis
to spend the week.  Smith had already spoken of the project while in
Montreal, but at that distance caution had prevailed.  Now Stephen, who
had never before seen the prairie, was immensely taken with the rich,
deep soil he saw before him.  He knew from reading and experience that
grasshopper plagues did not last for ever.  He decided, therefore, to
join in the attempt to get control of the Minnesota road and its
land-grant, and the famous group was complete.  {136}

Once George Stephen had made up his mind, little time was ever lost.
He sailed for Europe and interviewed the Amsterdam committee in charge
of the Dutch bondholders' interests, Messrs Chouet, Weetjin and
Kirkhoven.  They despaired of ever seeing their money back, and were
weary of being assessed by the receiver for funds to keep the road
together.  Stephen left Amsterdam with an option in his pocket, given
for the sum of one guilder, agreeing to sell him the Dutch bonds for
something like the amount of the unpaid interest, and agreeing,
further, to wait until six months after reorganization for part of the
payment.  The next step was to provide the cash required for immediate
necessities.  About $300,000 was put up by the members of the group.[1]
Money was borrowed from the Bank of Montreal, $280,000 in the first
advance, and something under $700,000 in all, as Stephen stated to
inquiring shareholders at the bank's annual meeting in 1880.  Money was
advanced to the receiver to complete the most necessary extensions,
those required to save the land-grant and that necessary to reach the
Canadian {137} border to join the government road being built south
from Winnipeg.  The threatened forfeiture of the land-grant was thus
averted for a time.  Then the bonds were purchased for $6,780,000, the
floating obligations and part of the stock were bought up, and the
mortgage which secured the bonds was foreclosed.  The assets were
bought by the new company organized for the purpose, the St Paul,
Minneapolis and Manitoba, of which George Stephen was president, R. B.
Angus vice-president, and James J. Hill general manager.  Thus in June
1879 the whole system, comprising six hundred and sixty-seven miles of
railway, of which five hundred and sixty-five were completed, and the
land-grant of two and a half million acres, came into the possession of
the little group.[2]

The after fortunes of the road, which ten years later expanded into the
Great Northern of to-day, do not concern us here.  It is only necessary
to recount that the harvest reaped {138} by the adventurers[3] put the
tales of El Dorado to shame.  A few days after control of the railway
had been assured, the grasshoppers had risen in flight, and Minnesota
knew them no more.  Settlers swarmed in, the railroad platforms were
jammed with land-seekers, and between the land-buyers of to-day and the
wheat-shippers of to-morrow the owners of the once discredited railway
saw their coffers fill to overflowing.  In 1879 they divided among
themselves the whole fifteen millions of stock issued, floating sixteen
millions of bonds for extension and equipment.  For three years they
took no dividends, letting the profits go to further building.  Then in
1882 another $2,000,000 stock was issued, and in 1883 a deferred
dividend came in the shape of a $9,000,000 issue of bonds, or, rather,
the stockholders sold to themselves a $10,000,000 issue for ten cents
on the dollar.  Aside entirely from interest and dividends, the
stockholders of the Great Northern in the seventeen years following
1889 were presented with over $300,000,000 of interest-bearing
securities.  {139} All the railway annals of the United States cannot
present a duplicate of the startling success attained by these four or
five Canadians and their associates.[4]

These were the men to whom the Canadian government turned when the
minister of Railways, Sir Charles Tupper, urged them to unload upon a
private company the burden of completing the road to the Pacific.
'Catch them before they invest their profits,' was the advice of Sir
John's most intimate adviser, that shrewd Eastern Townships politician,
John Henry Pope.  Probably they came half-way.  They knew the West as
well as any men, and with their road built to the Canadian boundary and
with a traffic arrangement beyond to Winnipeg, they were already in the
field.  Of all the group Stephen was most reluctant to undertake the
new enterprise, but he was assured by his associates that the burdens
of management would be shared by all.  The government had also
approached Duncan M'Intyre, a Montreal capitalist who controlled the
Canada Central, running from Brockville by way of Ottawa to Pembroke,
{140} and under construction from that point to Callender, the eastern
end of the Canadian Pacific main line.  He was more than willing to
link up this railway with the larger project, and the group was formed.

[Illustration: Lord Mount Stephen.  From a photograph by Wood and
Henry, Dufftown.  By courtesy of Sir William Van Horne]

They debated the question with the government early in 1880.  It was
felt, however, that negotiations could not be concluded in Canada.
More capital would be needed than even these new-fledged millionaires
could or would furnish, and nowhere was capital so abundant as in
London.  In July, therefore, Sir John Macdonald, Sir Charles Tupper,
and John Henry Pope sailed for London, accompanied by George Stephen
and Duncan M'Intyre.  London capitalists did not bite as freely as
anticipated.  Barings and Rothschilds alike were chary about the
enterprise.  Sir Henry Tyler, president of the Grand Trunk, was
approached, and agreed to build if the link north of Lake Superior were
omitted in favour of a line through the United States, south of the
lake, a condition which Sir John, strongly urged on by Tupper, would
not accept.  An arrangement might have been made with a London group,
but only on condition of a four per cent guarantee for twelve years,
another condition which, less wisely, was also rejected.  In the {141}
end the quest proved unavailing.  It is true that the Paris firm of
Cohen, Reinach and Co. entered the syndicate, and that the London house
of Morton, Rose and Co. also joined.  It was really, however, the New
York end of that firm, Morton, Bliss and Co., which was interested.
Contrary to the general impression, the fact is, that though most of
the shares when issued eventually drifted into English hands, no
English financiers shared in the building of the Canadian Pacific until
it was within one hundred days of completion.  Perhaps, in view of the
Grand Trunk's record, it was as well that the men on this side of the
Atlantic were to be thrown on their own resources from the start, and
given the chance for bigness which responsibility brings.

Back to Ottawa the pilgrims came, and there on October 21, 1880, the
contract was signed by Charles Tupper for the government and by George
Stephen, Duncan M'Intyre, James J. Hill, John S. Kennedy, Morton, Rose
and Co. of London, and Cohen, Reinach and Co. of Paris.  Donald A.
Smith's name was not there.  It was only two years since he and Sir
John, on the floor of the House of Commons, had called each other
'liar' and 'coward' and any other sufficiently strong epithet they
{142} could put their tongues to, and it was to be a few years more
before the two Highlanders could cover their private feud with a
coating of elaborate cordiality.  So, to preserve appearances, Smith's
interest was kept a secret--but a very open one.

When parliament met in December 1880 the contract was laid before it.
The terms were princely.  For constructing some nineteen hundred miles
the syndicate were to be given free and complete the seven hundred and
ten miles under construction by the government,[5] $25,000,000 in cash,
and 25,000,000 acres of selected land in the Fertile Belt.  They were
promised exemptions from import duties on construction materials, from
taxes on land for twenty years after the patents were issued and on
stock and other property for ever, and exemption from regulation of
rates until ten per cent per annum was earned on the capital.
Assurance was given that for twenty years no competitive roads
connecting with the western states would be chartered: 'no line of
railway south of the Canadian Pacific, except such line as shall run
southwest or to the westward of southwest, nor to be within fifteen
miles {143} of latitude 49°.'  Ten years were given to complete the
task, and a million dollars were deposited as security.

The contract was received by Blake, then leader of the Opposition, and
his followers with a unanimous shout of disapproval.  During the
Christmas recess Blake endeavoured to raise the country against it.  A
rival syndicate was hastily organized, with Sir William Howland, A. R.
M'Master, William Hendrie, A. T. Wood, Allan Gilmour, George A. Cox, P.
Larkin, James M'Laren, Alexander Gibson, and other well-known
capitalists at its head.  After depositing $1,400,000 in chartered
banks as evidence of good faith, they offered to build the road for
$3,000,000 and 3,000,000 acres less, to pay duty on all supplies
imported, and to abandon the monopoly clause, the exemptions from
taxation, and the exemption from rate regulation.  With this weapon to
brandish Blake gave the government proposal no respite, but on a
straight party vote the contract was ratified by parliament and
received the formal royal assent in February 1881.

It was in many ways unfortunate that from the outset the Canadian
Pacific project was made the football of party politics, but it was
{144} perhaps inevitable.  The first duty of an Opposition is to
oppose, and even if some good measures are factitiously resisted, many
a 'job' is prevented by this relentless criticism.  The government
proposal, it would now seem, was on the whole in the country's
interest, but it had weak points.  In attacking these the Opposition
was led on to take up a position of hostility to the whole project,
while the government was equally indiscriminate in defending every jot
and tittle of the bargain.  In any event, with the bitter rivalry of
the Grand Trunk and the Canadian Pacific looming up, it is doubtful if
it could have been possible to prevent this antagonism being reflected
in the politics of a country where the issues are so largely economic
issues.

That the government was right in deciding for private construction and
operation, there has since been little question.  To build and operate
a pioneer road, to make the inevitable United States connections or
extensions, to undertake the subsidiary enterprises and to enter into
the flexible, intimate relations with producers and shippers necessary
for success, were tasks for which government departments were not well
fitted.  With the traditions which has unfortunately become established
{145} in Canadian politics, there would probably be campaign
contributions in the one case and graft in the other, but in the one
case, also, there would probably be efficiency, and in the other red
tape and stagnation.

As to what private company should be given the contract, there seemed
more room for discussion.  The members of the Howland syndicate were
successful and substantial business men, and their offer appeared to be
much better than the offer accepted.  It was, however, denounced as a
sham by the government forces, on the ground that its signers knew that
there was not the faintest likelihood of the ministry failing to carry
through the contract it had signed.  How successful the Howland group
would have proved we can only conjecture; it is certainly not likely
that they would have developed more courage, persistence, or enterprise
than the men who actually carried out the project; nor could they have
fulfilled their obligations more fully and more honourably.

The parties differed, again, on the question of the Lake Superior link.
The government urged the necessity of building at once an all-Canadian
route, regardless of the added expense.  The Opposition favoured such a
route eventually, but urged that it was better for the {146} present to
make use of a road running from the Sault through Northern Michigan and
Minnesota.  Such a road would bring to Montreal the traffic of the
American as well as the Canadian West.  Then, when our West had been
settled and traffic warranted, the task of cutting a road through the
wilderness north of the lake could be faced, and meantime it would not
be necessary to offer any company the extravagant terms necessary to
induce it to assume this burden from the start.  There was much weight
in this argument, which Sir Charles Tupper himself had strongly urged
only a few months before, and in the light of the later Canadian
Pacific extension through precisely this American territory as well as
through Maine, there was much buncombe in the flag-waving answer made.
Yet, on the whole, so necessary to national unity was an unbroken road,
so hard a country was this to make into one, that it was best to err on
the side of safety.  The political interests at stake warranted some
risk of money loss.

It was, however, on the question of the form and amount of the aid
offered that most controversy arose.  Sir John Macdonald had lightly
prophesied that in the end the road would not cost Canada a single
farthing.  He {147} doubtless meant that land sales would repay the
expenditure; even this did not prove true, and the statement awoke
unreasonable expectations as to the bargain to be made.  When the
contract was made public it was denounced as meaning nothing more or
less than that the country was to build the road and present it gratis
to the company.  To anticipate a few years, we may note the actual
results at the end of 1885, when the last rail had been laid.  The cost
of the main line only, including the government sections, and of
equipment, to that date, was approximately $150,000,000.  From private
sources some $50,000,000 net had been secured: the $65,000,000 stock
had been sold at varying prices, realizing slightly over $30,000,000
for the treasury, and first mortgage bonds, land-grant bonds less
amount redeemed, and outstanding accounts made up the balance.  The
government, on its part, had given, by the final arrangements,
$35,000,000 cash, and completed road costing another $35,000,000; three
and a half million acres of the land-grant had been sold for about
$11,000,000, and at only two dollars per acre the fourteen odd million
acres left were worth over $29,000,000.

On the other hand, it was urged that the aid {148} given was not so
great as it seemed.  The value of the government sections was
particularly questioned.[6]  Whatever its value, it was not more than
enough to induce capitalists to run the great risks involved.  The road
had to be operated as well as built, and few believed that for years to
come there would be sufficient traffic to make ends meet.  Its future
depended on the future of the West, and it needed a robust optimism at
times to believe that the West would overcome frost and drought and
other plagues.  The fact that in 1885 Canadian Pacific stock sold as
low as 33 3/4 in London, and a shade lower on this side of the water,
shows the estimate the world of finance put upon the bargain it had
made.  Nor was the road completed in 1886.  It was then only begun.
Grades had to be bettered, trestle-work filled up, extensions flung
out, terminals secured, and a new road built every few years.

{149}

Looking back now, after the lapse of thirty years, it would seem that
the government would have done better if it had given less of the land
which was to prove so valuable, and had, instead, guaranteed the
dividend on the stock for a term of years.  In the eighties, however,
western acres were held in little esteem and money guarantees, with
Grand Trunk memories fresh, looked dangerous--and it was in the
eighties that the decision had to be made.

[Illustration: Sir William Cornelius Van Horne.  From a photograph by
Notman]

More valid was the criticism of the remaining terms.  The exemption
from duties was wise, if inconsistent in a protectionist government,
and the exemption from regulation of rates until ten per cent was
earned had a precedent in a clause in the General Railway Act, not
repealed until 1888, exempting all roads from such regulation until
fifteen per cent on the capital invested had been earned.  The
exemption from taxation, however, was an unwarranted privilege,
throwing undue burdens on homesteading settlers; and the interpretation
afterwards given that the exemption on lands extended until twenty
years after the patent had been issued still further increased the
difficulty.  Objectionable, also, was the monopoly clause, barring
United States {150} connections for ten years.  It was claimed that
this exemption was essential if traffic was to be secured for the Lake
Superior link, and essential also if capital was to be secured from
England.  The Englishman, one of the heads of the road declared, hated
a monopoly at home as he hated the devil, but he looked with favour on
monopolies abroad.  The monopoly clause, as will be seen later, for a
time did more to split East and West than the Lake Superior link did to
bind them together in spirit.


But enough of discussion.  Action came quick.  Not a day was lost in
organizing and beginning work.

George Stephen was chosen president, and held the post until 1888.  To
him more than to any other man the ultimate success of the Canadian
Pacific was due.  Indomitable persistence, unquenchable faith,
unyielding honour stamped his character.  He was one of the greatest of
Empire builders.  He never despaired in the tightest corner, and never
rested while a single expedient remained untried.  Duncan M'Intyre
became one of the two vice-presidents, and took an active part in the
company's affairs until he dropped out {151} in 1884.  Richard B. Angus
came back from St Paul to become vice-president and a member of the
executive committee.  His long banking experience and his shrewd,
straightforward judgment proved a tower of strength in days of trial.

Donald A. Smith, while after 1883 a director and a member of the
executive committee, took little part in the railway's affairs, though
at Stephen's urging he more than once joined in going security when
help was most needed.  James J. Hill left the directorate and unloaded
his stock at the close of 1882, because the company refused to accept
his advice to omit the Lake Superior section, and because of the
growing divergence of interests between the St Paul, Minneapolis and
Manitoba and the Canadian Pacific.  With him retired John S. Kennedy.
The Baron de Reinach also withdrew at an early stage.  The English
directors, representing Morton, Rose and Co.  of London, retired as
soon as the road was completed, being replaced by representatives of
Morton, Bliss and Co. of New York.  E. B. Osler came in with the
Ontario and Quebec in 1884.  The board became more and more
distinctively Canadian.

One of the first steps taken by the directors {152} was to open offices
in Winnipeg, and put two men with United States experience in
charge--A. B. Stickney, later president of the Chicago Great Western,
as general superintendent, and General Rosser as chief engineer.  The
rate of progress was not satisfactory, and early in 1882 a fortunate
change was made.  William C. Van Horne, at that time general
superintendent of the Chicago, Milwaukee and St Paul, and still under
forty, was appointed general manager with wide powers.  Some years
earlier, when he was president of the Southern Minnesota, the leading
members of the St Paul syndicate had had an opportunity of learning his
skill.  He had been in railroading since fourteen, beginning as a
telegraph operator on the Illinois Central, and had risen rapidly in
the service of one Middle West road after another.  His tireless
driving force was precisely the asset the company now most needed.


The first task was to find the money necessary to build the nineteen
hundred miles remaining of the main line, to build or acquire necessary
branches and extensions, and to provide equipment.

The government subsidies were the first {153} resource.  The
$25,000,000 cash and the 25,000,000-acre land-grant were to be paid as
construction advanced.  If the land-grant were put on the market at
once, for sale to settlers, it would bring relatively little, in face
of the competition of the free homestead land in adjoining sections.
Three expedients were devised to make it available as soon as possible.
An extensive campaign was begun to advertise the government free land
and thus exhaust the supply along the railway line, and at the same
time provide producers of freight.  Bonds based on the security of the
land-grant were issued to the amount of $25,000,000; $10,000,000 of
this issue was sold in 1881 at 92, and varying proportions of the
remainder were used as pledge for the government loans or execution of
the contract.  These bonds were redeemed and cancelled as the lands on
which they were based were sold.  Further, the Canada North-West Land
Company was organized to buy five million acres for a long hold.  The
company included several members of the syndicate as well as some
English investors to whom land appealed more than railway stocks.  It
found itself unable to handle this amount and the purchase was reduced
to 2,200,000 acres.  Sales to other companies {154} and to individuals
brought the total amount received or due from land by the end of 1885
up to $11,000,000.

Next came the contributions of the members of the syndicate and other
private investors.  The capital stock authorized was $100,000,000.  In
1881 the members of the syndicate subscribed $5,000,000 at par.  In May
1882 they allotted themselves $10,000,000 at 25.  In December of the
same year $30,000,000 was issued at 52 1/2 to a syndicate of New York
bankers organized by W. L. Scott; this stock was eventually sold
largely in Holland and in England.  A final ten millions were pledged
in New York and Montreal for a loan of half that sum, and later sold
for about the amount of the loan.  All told, sixty-five millions of
stock had been issued and some thirty-one million dollars had been
brought into the treasury.

Then the flow ceased.  The brief gleam of prosperity which had shone
over North America after the gloom of the later seventies vanished.
Never had railway building been carried on so vigorously in the United
States as in the years 1881-83, and the reaction was correspondingly
severe.  The collapse of the boom which had accompanied the first {155}
operations in Manitoba, the failure of harvest after harvest, the
fading away of settlers and speculators alike, robbed all but a
persistent few of faith in the Canadian North-West and in the railway
whose fortunes rose or fell with it.  The way of the Canadian Pacific
was made particularly hard by the manoeuvres of rival companies.  Some
of the United States Pacific roads, awake to the seriousness of the
competition threatened, attacked it in the New York market.  The Grand
Trunk, naturally alarmed by the incursion of the new road into its best
paying territory in the East, used all the power of its influential
directors and its army of shareholders in England to bar the London
market.

The financial policy adopted by the Canadian Pacific was unique in the
records of great railway enterprises on this continent.  It was simply
to rely entirely on stock issues, to endeavour to build the road
without incurring any bonded debt.  Not until the last year of
construction, 1885, were bonds based upon the security of the road
itself issued for sale.  It was doubtless desirable, if possible, to
avoid the reckless methods by which so many American roads had been
hopelessly waterlogged by excessive bond issues.  The memory of the
{156} St Paul and Pacific's six-million share capital as against its
twenty-eight-million bonded indebtedness was fresh in the minds of the
members of the syndicate.  By keeping fixed charges low, while earning
power was still uncertain, they lessened the risk of having the road
pass out of the stockholders' control into a receiver's hands.  Yet as
bonds could have been sold more easily than stock, it increased the
difficulty of finding the necessary capital.  Even so, it came within
an ace of succeeding.

In pursuance of this policy the management, faced with a hesitating
market, decided upon a bold step.  Late in 1883, acting in accordance
with the advice of New York and London financiers, they decided to
endeavour to make a market for the unissued stock by giving assurance
of a dividend for a term of years.  They offered to deposit with the
government as trustees a sum sufficient to provide for ten years a
dividend of three per cent on the $65,000,000 stock already issued, to
be supplemented, if possible, by a further dividend out of current
revenues, and they arranged to make similar provision for the remaining
$35,000,000 as it was sold.  Over half the $16,000,000 necessary to
purchase this {157} annuity was deposited with the government at once
and security given for the early payment of the balance.  Only success
could have justified such a locking up of the funds urgently needed for
construction, and success did not come, though for a time it seemed
probable.  The sudden smash of the Northern Pacific, just completed by
Villard, brought the stock down lower than before the fillip had been
given.  With sixteen millions locked up or pledged the company was in a
worse state than before.[7]

In this emergency Stephen and Smith and M'Intyre pledged their St Paul
or other stock for loans in New York and Montreal, but still the gap
was unfilled.  They turned to the {158} government, requesting a loan
of $22,500,000, to be secured by a first charge on the main line.  In
return, they agreed to complete the road by May 1886, five years
earlier than the contract required.  The request at first was scouted
by Sir John Macdonald.  Parliament would not consent, and if parliament
consented the country would revolt.  Bankruptcy stared the company in
the face when John Henry Pope came to the rescue.  He soon convinced
Sir John that if the Canadian Pacific smashed, the Conservative party
would smash the day after, and the aid was promised.  The Cabinet was
won over, and Sir Charles Tupper, hastily summoned by cable from
London, stormed it through caucus, and the loan was made.

The funds thus secured were soon exhausted in rapid and costly
construction in the mountain and Lake Superior sections.  The
government's blanket mortgage on the road made it impossible to borrow
elsewhere.  So, after the Riel episode, to be noted later, a new
arrangement was made with the government by which the $35,000,000 stock
unsold was cancelled and an equal amount of first mortgage bonds
issued.  Twenty millions of this issue and the unsold lands were
substituted for the government's security, and the remainder of the
bonds {159} sold at 95.  This put the company once more in funds.  The
relief came none too soon.  In one fateful day in July, when the final
passing of the bill was being tensely awaited, the Canadian Pacific,
which now borrows fifty millions any day before breakfast, was within
three hours of bankruptcy for lack of a few hundred thousand dollars.
But by March 1886 every cent of the company's obligations to the
government was paid off, twenty millions in cash and the remainder in
land at $1.50 an acre.

The men behind the Canadian Pacific proved themselves possessed of
courage and determination such as will always win them honour.  At more
than one critical stage they staked their all to keep the work going.
But the fact remains that the bulk of the resources utilized in the
original building of the road were provided or advanced by the people
of Canada.  The Canadian Pacific is as truly a monument of public as of
private faith.


Meanwhile, the work of construction had been going ahead.  Under
William Van Horne's masterful methods the leisurely pace of government
construction quickened into the most rapid achievement on record.  A
time-schedule, {160} carefully made out in advance, was adhered to with
remarkably little variation.

Work was begun at the east end of the line, from the point of junction
with the Canada Central, but at first energy was devoted chiefly to the
portion crossing the plains.  Important changes in route were made.
The main line had already been deflected to pass through Winnipeg.  Now
a much more southerly line across the plains was adopted, making for
Calgary rather than Edmonton.  The new route was shorter by a hundred
miles, and more likely to prevent the construction of a rival road
south of it later.  For many years after the Palliser-Dawson-Hinds
reports of the late fifties, it had been assumed that the tillable
lands of the West lay in a 'Fertile Belt' or rainbow, following roughly
the Saskatchewan valley and curving round a big wedge of the American
desert projecting north.  Certainly the short, withered,
russet-coloured grass lands of the border country looked forbidding
beside the green herbage of the North Saskatchewan.  But in 1879
Professor Macoun's investigations had shown that the southern lands had
been belied by rumour, and that only a very small section was
hopelessly arid.  With this objection removed, the only drawback to the
{161} southern route was the difficulty of finding as good a route
through the mountains as the northerly Yellowhead Pass route afforded,
but on this the company decided to take its chances.

Work on the plains was begun in May 1881, and by the end of the year
161 miles had been completed.  This progress was counted too slow, and
under Van Horne's management a contract was made in 1882, with Langdon
and Shepard of St Paul, to complete the line to Calgary.  Later in the
year a construction company was organized, the North American Railway
Contracting Company, to build all the uncompleted sections of the main
line for $32,000,000 cash and $45,000,000 common stock.  This was
really a financing rather than a construction expedient, and was
abandoned within a year.

In this section the engineering difficulties were not serious, but the
pace of construction which was demanded, and the fact that every stick
of timber and every pound of food, as well as every rail and spike, had
to be brought a great distance, required remarkable organization.
Three hundred sub-contractors were employed on the portion of the line
crossing the plains.  Bridge-gangs and track-layers {162} followed
close on the graders' heels.  In 1882 over two and a half miles of
track a day were laid.  In the following year, for weeks in succession,
the average ran three and a half miles a day, and in one
record-smashing three days twenty miles were covered.  By the end of
this year the track was within four miles of the summit of the Rockies.

The change of route across the plains had made it essential to pierce
the Rockies by a more southerly pass than the Yellowhead.  The Kicking
Horse or Hector Pass, short but steep, was finally chosen, but here, as
at the Yellowhead, to cross the first range did not mean victory.  The
towering Selkirk range faced the pass, as the Cariboo Mountains flanked
the Rockies farther north.  Until the rails reached the hills the
engineers had found no way through them, and had contemplated a long
detour to the north, following the winding Columbia.  Then Major
Rogers, the engineer whom James J. Hill had suggested to take charge of
the location of the mountain section, following up a hint of Moberly,
an earlier explorer, found a route, steep but practicable, across the
Selkirks, following the Beaver river valley and Bear Creek, and then
through Rogers Pass into the valley of the Illecillewaet, {163} and so
through Eagle Pass to the settled location at Kamloops.  Both in the
Kicking Horse and in the Rogers Pass gradients of 116 feet to the mile
were found necessary, but these difficult stretches were concentrated
within one operating section of a hundred and twenty miles, and could
easily be overcome by the use of additional engines.  Unique provision
was made against the mountain avalanches by erecting diverting timbers
near the summits and building mile upon mile of snow-sheds, over which
the avalanches passed harmless.  As a result of these expedients and of
raising the road-bed across the prairies unusually high, the Canadian
Pacific lost less time through snow blockades than the great railways
of the eastern United States.

It was not until 1884 that the wilderness north of Lake Superior was
attacked in strong force.  Nine thousand men were employed here alone.
Rock and muskeg, hill and hollow, made this section more difficult to
face than even the Fraser Canyon.  In one muskeg area to-day seven
layers of Canadian Pacific rails are buried, one below the other.  The
stretch along the shore of the lake was particularly difficult.  The
Laurentian rocks were the oldest known to geologists, and, what was
{164} more to the purpose, the toughest known to engineers.  A dynamite
factory was built on the spot and a road blasted through.  One mile
cost $700,000 to build and several cost half a million.  The time
required and the total expenditure would have been prohibitive had not
the management decided to make extensive use of trestle-work.  It would
have cost over two dollars a cubic yard to cut through the hills and
fill up the hollows by team-haul; it cost only one-tenth of that to
build timber trestles, carrying the line high, and to fill up later by
train-haul.

An unexpected test of the need of this section came before it was
completed.  Early in 1885 the government realized too late that serious
trouble was brewing among the half-breeds and Indians of the
North-West.  Unless troops could be sent in before the grass grew, Riel
would have thousands of Indians on the war-path, and a long and bloody
contest and a serious setback to the West would be inevitable.  The
railway was far from complete, with a hundred and twenty miles of gaps
unfilled, and the government considered it impossible to get the troops
in in time.  But Van Horne, who had had much experience in handling
troops in the Civil War, did not have {165} that word in his
vocabulary, and astonished the authorities by offering to take men from
Kingston or Quebec to Qu'Appelle in ten days.  Part of the gaps were
bridged by temporary rails laid on ice and snow, only ninety miles
being uncompleted by spring.  In one stretch the men were marched
across the ice to save a long detour.  Through the rest they were
carried, covered with furs and straw, in contractors' sleighs along the
tote-roads from one camp to the next.  In four days from leaving
Kingston the first troops landed at Winnipeg; and though the revolt was
not prevented, it was speedily crushed.  There was no longer any
question about the value of the north shore link, and the opposition to
the Canadian Pacific fell from that hour.  It was even suggested that
the company should build a statue to Louis Riel.  As for the
government, it could well claim that its persistence in pushing through
this part of the road nearly offset its red-tape carelessness in
permitting the rebellion to come to a head.

Meanwhile, the government section between Port Arthur, or rather Fort
William, and Winnipeg had been taken over by the company in 1883,
though not entirely completed.  Two years later the thousands of
Chinese {166} navvies working on the difficult Kamloops-Port Moody
section finished their task, and the government work was done.  The
only gap remaining lay in the Gold Range, and here in the Eagle Pass,
at Craigellachie, on November 7, 1885, the eastward and westward
track-layers met.  It was only a year or so before that the Northern
Pacific had celebrated the driving of the last golden spike by an
excursion which cost the company a third of a million, and heralded the
bankruptcy of the road.  There was no banquet and no golden spike for
the last rail in the Canadian Pacific.  William Van Horne had announced
that 'the last spike would be just as good an iron spike as any on the
road,' and had it not been that Donald A. Smith happened along in time
to drive the spike home, it would have been hammered in by the navvy on
the job.  Six months later the first passenger train went through from
Montreal to Vancouver.  The longest railway in the world was open from
coast to coast, five years before the end of the time required by the
original contract.

To realize how great a work had been accomplished requires to-day some
effort of the imagination.  The Canada the present {167} generation
knows is a united Canada, an optimistic, self-confident Canada, with
rapidly rounding-out industries and occupations which give scope for
the most ambitious of her sons as well as for tens of thousands from
overseas.  It is a Canada whose nine provinces stretch almost unbroken
from ocean to ocean.  But the Canada of a generation earlier was far
other.  On the map it covered half a continent, but in reality it
stopped at the Great Lakes.  There was little national spirit, little
diversity of commercial enterprise.  Hundreds of thousands of our
best-born had been drawn by the greater attraction of United States
cities and farms, until one-fourth of the whole Canadian people were
living in the Republic.

It was the opening up of the West that changed the whole face of
Canadian life, that gave a basis for industrial expansion, that
quickened national sentiment and created business optimism.  And it was
the building of the Canadian Pacific that opened up the West and bound
it fast to the distant East.  Certainly not least among the makers of
Canada were the men who undertook that doubtful enterprise and carried
it through every obstacle to success; and not least {168} among the
generations whose toil and faith have made possible the nation of
to-day were the four millions of the Canada of the eighties who flung a
great railway across the vast unpeopled spaces of a continent to the
far Pacific.



[1] Stephen, Smith, Hill, and Kennedy each took one share, and Kittson
half a share; and later Angus, after leaving the service of the bank to
go with the railway, took the remaining half-share.

[2] Not all were willing to attribute to courage and luck alone the
full success of this stroke.  Some Dutch bondholders, independently of
the committee, asserted that Kennedy had not played fair, and Farley,
the receiver of the road, sued Hill for a share of the profits which he
alleged had been promised for his collusion.  In repeated trials Farley
was unable to produce evidence satisfactory to the courts, which held
that in any case his claim must be rejected because 'based on inherent
turpitude.'

[3] 'Most men who have really lived have had, in some shape, their
great adventure.  This railway is mine' (James J. Hill, in Valedictory
to the Shareholders of the Great Northern, July 1, 1912).

[4] It was from their St Paul investment that the leading men in the
group secured the basis and the bulk of their great fortunes; the
Canadian Pacific added little to their coffers.

[5] Including the Yale-Port Moody section, not yet formally under
contract.

[6] Giving evidence before the Senate Committee on Interstate Commerce
in New York in 1889, President Van Horne stated that the company was
obliged to abandon part of the surveys on which the government had
spent millions, and make new ones; that the government sections were
unwisely located, especially in British Columbia; that the cost of the
remainder was increased by having to join it to the unwisely located
sections, and that, allowing for the saving which could have been made
in location, he could have duplicated the latter for twelve or fifteen
millions.

[7] 'The payment to the government of $8,710,240, in advance, of
secured dividends, has deprived the company for the moment of the means
for continuous, vigorous exertion in construction, without enabling it
to recoup itself by the sale of its stock, as was confidently and
reasonably expected' (Letter of George Stephen to the government,
January 15,1884).

Speaking in parliament in 1885, Edward Blake declared that, omitting
the last ten millions issued, the company had raised on stock
$24,500,000, and, counting the next two dividend payments, they would
have paid or provided for dividends $24,875,000.  Already $7,000,000
had been paid out in dividends, members of the syndicate receiving
$3,610,000 on their $10,000,000 investment.  In other words, before the
road was opened for traffic, every cent paid in by the shareholders
would have been paid back or set aside for dividends, leaving not a
dollar for building the road.



{169}

CHAPTER IX

THE ERA OF AMALGAMATION

Subsidy and Control--Canadian Pacific Expansion--The Monopoly
Clause--The Grand Trunk


With the building of the Intercolonial, the Grand Trunk, and the
Canadian Pacific, the main lines of communication from ocean to ocean
were completed.  In the decade which followed, the marked features
were: the adoption by the Dominion government of a policy of aid to
purely local roads, and the expansion of the two great private
companies, partly by new construction and partly by acquisition of the
smaller lines.

It has been seen that the policy of Canada after 1851 and of the
Dominion after Confederation was to give assistance only to lines of
more than local and usually more than provincial importance.  During
the first ten or fifteen years after Confederation promoters looked to
province and municipality for aid, and did not look in vain.  Soon the
provinces outran their resources, and began to {170} clamour for
increased federal subsidies to meet the pressing charges.  But the
Dominion government concluded that, if it had to provide the money
needed, it might as well give it direct, and secure whatever political
credit the grants would entail.  In 1882 it decided to embark on a new
subsidy policy.

In that year Sir Charles Tupper, minister of Railways, introduced a
resolution to grant a subsidy of $3200 per mile--sufficient to provide
the hundred tons of steel rails required for each mile at the existing
price of $32 a ton--to each of four carefully selected roads, one in
each of the four original provinces.  During the next year eleven
subsidies were voted, chiefly to Quebec and New Brunswick roads; in
1885 twenty-five were voted, and fresh votes were made every year
thereafter.  Many of the subsidies lapsed through failure to begin
construction, but usually they were revoted.  The payments made
averaged a million dollars a year.  The practice did not make for pure
politics, and it often led to the construction of lines for which there
was no economic justification whatever.  Trusting shareholders were
induced to invest on the unfortunately wrong assumption that the
government had assured itself of the need {171} and the potential
profit of the line before endorsing it by a subsidy.[1]  In the western
provinces a parallel policy of aiding local lines was adopted in 1884,
except that land instead of cash was offered, a policy maintained until
1894.

He who paid the piper then stood on his rights to call the tune.
Acting upon the wide power conferred by the British North America Act,
the Dominion government in 1883 sweepingly designated as 'works for the
general advantage of Canada,' and therefore subject to federal control,
not only the main lines of railways, but the branch lines then or
thereafter connecting with or crossing these lines or any of them.  The
power thus claimed was not effectively exercised for some time.
D'Alton M'Carthy repeatedly urged in parliament from 1880 onward the
creation of a Dominion Railway Commission, but the opposition of the
railways proved too strong for him.  When in 1886 the United States set
up its Interstate Commerce Commission, the {172} government moved and
appointed a royal commission, with Sir A. T. Galt as chairman, to
consider the general question.  Their report noted the existence of
many grievances and suggested specific remedies, but considered that
until further experience of the workings of the English and American
commissions was available, Canada's needs could best be met by an
extension of the powers of the Railway Committee of the Cabinet.

It may be noted that in 1882 the selling of railway tickets by private
persons, a practice known as 'ticket scalping,' was prohibited in
Canada, though the railways were forced to buy the exclusive privilege
of selling their own tickets by agreeing to redeem unused portions.


The original contract with the Canadian Pacific had provided for an
eastern terminus near Lake Nipissing, in order to show preference
neither to Montreal nor Toronto, either of which could make connections
by independent roads.  Similarly, we shall see, thirty years later,
Moncton was chosen as a terminus of the National Transcontinental, to
hold the balance even between Halifax and St John.  It was, however,
impossible for the Canadian {173} Pacific to accept as permanent an
arrangement which left it halting in the wilderness, and depending upon
possibly rival railways for outlet to the great cities and ports of the
east.  It had, in fact, been empowered in its charter to acquire the
Canada Central and 'to obtain, hold, and operate a line or lines of
railway from Ottawa to any point at navigable water on the Atlantic
seaboard, or to any intermediate point'--terms sufficiently sweeping.
Few were surprised, therefore, when the directors began a policy of
eastward expansion, though many were surprised at the boldness and
extent of the plans and the speed and masterful strategy of the
execution.

The first and most obvious move was to buy out the Canada Central,
extending from Ottawa through Carleton Place to Pembroke, and under
construction westward to Callender on Lake Nipissing.  This was done in
1881, and the road was completed two years later.  Again, in 1881, the
parent line of the Canada Central, the Brockville and Ottawa, was
acquired, and three years later a controlling interest was secured in
the stock of the St Lawrence and Ottawa, thus giving connection with
the St Lawrence both at Brockville and {174} at Prescott.  Still
pressing eastward, the Canadian Pacific next sought entrance to
Montreal and to Quebec.  The North Shore road, built by the province of
Quebec, would most easily give the connection sought.  The province was
induced, in 1882, to sell to the Canadian Pacific the western section,
from Montreal to Ottawa.  At the same time the eastern section, from St
Martin to Montreal, was sold to the North Shore Syndicate.  The Grand
Trunk, alarmed at this advance, attempted to block further expansion by
securing, jointly with the Central Vermont, control of the latter
section.  But the Canadian Pacific had the ear of both the Dominion and
the provincial governments, and threats of aid in building a parallel
line forced the Grand Trunk to relinquish control to its great rival.
Not yet content, the Canadian Pacific sought winter ports at St John
and Halifax.  It secured control of the South-eastern Counties in
Quebec, built a short line through Maine to Mattawamkeag with the aid
of a large Dominion subsidy, acquired running rights or control by
lease over part of the old European and North American, and thus
entered St John.  In 1890 its eastern development was completed for
{175} a time by the lease of the New Brunswick Railway, which had
recently absorbed nearly all the small lines in western New
Brunswick.[2]

Meanwhile the management had been equally aggressive in obtaining
feeders in central and western Ontario, the very heart of the Grand
Trunk's territory.  In 1881 the Ontario and Quebec was chartered, by
interests friendly to the Canadian Pacific, to build a line from Ottawa
to Toronto, by way of Smith's Falls.  Two years later this company
acquired leases for 999 years of three important lines, and transferred
them, along with its own road, to the Canadian Pacific.  The first of
these lines was the Toronto, Grey and Bruce, the narrow-gauge railway
which ran north to Georgian Bay; the second was the Credit Valley,
extending from Toronto to St Thomas; the third, the Atlantic and
North-West, a road with little mileage but most useful charter powers,
used for the seaward extension.  Later, a railway was built from St
Thomas to Windsor.  Thus the Canadian Pacific secured access to {176}
Lake Ontario, Georgian Bay, and the Detroit river.  Not yet content, it
built a branch to Sault Ste Marie.  Here connection was made with the
'Soo' lines, giving outlet to St Paul and Minneapolis, and with the
several roads later combined to form the Duluth, South Shore and
Atlantic.  Both of these lines shortly afterwards came definitely under
its control.

In the prairie West the Canadian Pacific had been promised in 1880 a
monopoly of through traffic for twenty years.  The Dominion government,
it will be remembered, had agreed not to charter, nor to permit the
territories to charter, any lines between the Canadian Pacific and the
United States border, running south or southeast.  Going beyond these
terms, the Dominion endeavoured also to prevent Manitoba from
authorizing the construction of any such road, and disallowed one
chartering act after another.

From the outset this provision proved a source of bitter and dangerous
strife.  On the one side it was contended that without this clause the
necessary capital could not have been secured and that faith must be
kept; that the traffic of the West should go to build up the eastern
provinces, which had made a {177} vast outlay on the road, rather than
a foreign country; that the rates of the Canadian Pacific were as
reasonable as those of American roads; and that other causes than
railroad monopoly were responsible for the slow growth of the West.
But the West protested that the rates were exorbitant--otherwise
American competition would not have been feared--pointed to the exodus
of settlers and the discontent of those who stayed, and refused to be
sacrificed in the interests of foreign shareholders or even of sister
provinces.  Undoubtedly immigration was deterred, and relations between
East and West were seriously strained.  Finally, in 1888, the Dominion
government was forced to yield.  The company's consent was secured by a
bond guarantee for some necessary extensions, and the provision was
repealed.  The Northern Pacific was brought in by the Manitoba
government, and competitive local roads were chartered, but in this
period the control of the Canadian Pacific over the western field was
not seriously called in question.

The task before the management to secure traffic for the great system
thus built up was a difficult one.  It was a greater achievement to
operate the Canadian Pacific successfully {178} than to build it.  When
it is realized that when the company began operation the number of
white settlers between Portage la Prairie and Kamloops, within twenty
miles of the line, could be counted virtually on the fingers of one
hand, the difficulty of finding traffic may be appreciated.  Sandford
Fleming had estimated that the road could not pay until there were two
million people in the West.  Yet pay it did from the start.  The
company capitalized its scenery, and built up a paying tourist trade.
When wheat was lacking, ends were made to meet by carrying trainload
upon trainload of buffalo bones to eastern factories.  United States
traffic was carefully cultivated at both ends of the line.  An active
immigration campaign was carried on.  Various industries along the
line, from coal companies to flour mills, were helped forward for
years.  A loyal staff was built up, and by grace of efficiency the
company pulled through until the lean days of the early nineties were
over.

During this decade of extraordinary activity the Grand Trunk had been
neither content nor passive.  Offended by the incursions into its best
paying territory, it fought its younger rival in parliament and on the
stock exchange, {179} but with no lasting success in either quarter.
It was more successful in its own constructive policy of expansion.  In
1879 it had made a good bargain by selling to the Intercolonial the
branch from Lévis to Rivière du Loup, which did not earn operating
expenses, and by expending the proceeds in buying an extension to
Chicago, which enabled it at last to secure the through traffic from
the West for which it had been in large part originally designed.  Its
great coup came, however, in 1882, when the onward march of the
Canadian Pacific and the bitter experience of fruitless rate wars led
it to purchase its old rival, the Great Western, with its Michigan
extensions.  The construction of the St Clair tunnel between Port Huron
and Sarnia, completed in 1890, marked another forward step in its
western territory.  Meanwhile it had acquired, in 1884, the Midland
Railway, itself a recent amalgamation of the Midland, running from Port
Hope to Midland, with the Toronto and Nipissing, the Grand Junction,
from Belleville to Peterborough, and the Whitby and Port Perry,
effected by two enterprising financiers, George A. Cox and Robert
Jaffray.  Four years later it absorbed the Northern and Northwestern
roads, which had acquired {180} jointly a branch from Gravenhurst to
North Bay, so that here at least the older road checkmated its rival,
securing the very paying link between Toronto and the western lines of
the Canadian Pacific.



[1] One such company, the Caraquet, which was given $400,000 in
subsidies, declared, in floating $500,000 in bonds in England, that the
capacity of the road was taxed to its utmost, and that an immense
traffic was in sight.  At that time its entire rolling-stock consisted
of two locomotives, one passenger car, two box and fifteen flat cars,
and a snow-plough.

[2] The earliest intercolonial project, a railroad from St Andrews
north, was brought to completion in 1889 when a short road, the
Temiscouata, was built, linking the Intercolonial at Rivière du Loup
with the New Brunswick Railway at Edmundston.



[Illustration: Railways of Canada, 1896]



{181}

CHAPTER X

THE CANADIAN NORTHERN

The Opportunity--The Canadian Northern


The first quarter-century of Confederation failed to redeem the glowing
promises and high hopes of the founders of the new nation.  Much had
been done: the half-continent from ocean to ocean had been brought into
the fold of one union; national consciousness was slowly growing; great
efforts had been spent in linking the scattered parts by railways and
waterways.  But still political unity and economic prosperity both
lagged.  The country was torn by racial and religious bickerings.  In
the East, the exodus to the United States bled the country white; in
the West, drought, frost, and the low prices of grain kept settlers
away.  Canadian Pacific stock, selling in the middle nineties at 35,
registered the market's estimate of the future of the Canadian West.

Then, slowly at first, and soon with cumulative momentum, came a
transformation.  {182} World-wide causes worked with local factors to
change the whole face of affairs.  New discoveries of gold and rising
prices gave everywhere a fillip to trade.  In the United States the
disappearance of free land set its farmers looking elsewhere.  In
Canada change of methods, or the favourable turn of a climatic cycle,
enabled the lands of the North-West to prove their abounding fertility.
The discovery of gold in the Klondike afforded good advertising for
Canada if little more of permanence.  In the government and in the
financial, the railway and the industrial worlds there were men who
rose to the opportunity: no longer was Canada's light hid under a
bushel.  The most was made of the alluring gifts she had to offer to
men the world over who strove to better themselves, and the flood of
immigration began.

The first result of the swarming of thousands to the West was a demand
for new railways, to open up plain and prairie and mineral range, and
to make connection with East and West.  The building of the railways in
its turn gave a stimulus to every industry.  As in the early fifties
and early eighties, this period of rapid railway expansion--much
longer, however, than previous periods--was {183} an era of optimistic
planning and feverish speculation.

First to seize the golden opportunities were the group of men who built
the Canadian Northern.  Railway history offers no more remarkable
record than the achievement of these few men, who, beginning in 1895
with a charter for a railway one hundred miles long in Manitoba,
leading nowhere in particular, succeeded in building in twenty years a
road from ocean to ocean, and in keeping it in their own hands through
all difficulties and vicissitudes.

Yet it is not exactly correct to say that they began in 1895.  A long
apprenticeship had been served before that time.  William Mackenzie and
Donald Mann, the leaders in this group, had both been trained in
railway construction.  Both were Canadian-born; and had fared forth as
youths to make their way in the world.  William Mackenzie, born at
Kirkfield, Ontario, in 1849, had been in turn school-teacher,
country-store keeper, and lumberman before a contract on the Victoria
Railway--part of the Midland--revealed his destiny.  Donald Mann, born
four years later at Acton, Ontario, near James J. Hill's old home, had
been brought up for the Christian ministry, but by {184} twenty-one he
was foreman in a lumber camp.  At twenty-five he joined in the first
rush to Winnipeg, and next year he undertook the first of many
contracts on the Canadian Pacific.  William Mackenzie had also carried
through much work for this company.  In 1886 the notable partnership of
Mackenzie and Mann was formed.  The firm built the Calgary and
Edmonton, the Qu'Appelle, Long Lake and Saskatchewan, the Canadian
Pacific short line through Maine, and many minor railways.  They
developed capacities which made each the complement of the
other--Mackenzie a master of finance, and Mann as successful in
extracting a subsidy from a politician as in driving ahead the work of
construction.  Later Z. A. Lash, a shrewd and experienced corporation
lawyer, joined them, and the three, with able lieutenants, carried
through their ambitious plans without more than momentary pause, until
within sight of the goal.

It was in 1895 that William Mackenzie and Donald Mann, along with two
fellow-contractors, James Ross and H. S. Holt--it is noteworthy how
many Canadians eminent in finance and industry found their start in the
building of the Canadian Pacific--decided to buy some of the charters
of projected western {185} roads then going a-begging, and to build on
their own account.  They secured the charter of the Lake Manitoba
Railroad and Canal Company, carrying a Dominion subsidy of 6000 acres a
mile for a line from Portage la Prairie to Lake Manitoba and Lake
Winnipegosis, and induced the Manitoba government to add a valuable
guarantee of bonds and exemption from taxes.  In 1896 running rights
were secured over the track of the Manitoba and Northwestern from
Portage to Gladstone, and construction was pushed a hundred miles
northwest from Gladstone to Dauphin.  Next year Lake Winnipegosis was
reached.  Then the partners looked eastward.  The coming need of the
West was an outlet from Winnipeg to Lake Superior, to supplement the
Canadian Pacific.  Accordingly in 1898, under powers given by Dominion,
Ontario, and Minnesota charters, construction was begun both at
Winnipeg and near Port Arthur.  Three years later the line was
completed.  Meantime the earlier road had branched westerly at Sifton,
and by 1900 had crossed the border into Saskatchewan at Erwood; while
in 1899, in amalgamation with the Winnipeg Great Northern, chartered
and subsidized to Hudson Bay, the name of the {186} combined roads was
changed to the Canadian Northern.

Then came the coup which first made the public and rival railways
realize the ambitious reach of the plans of the new railway.  It will
be recalled that when, in 1888, the ban upon competition southward with
the Canadian Pacific had been lifted, the Northern Pacific had entered
Manitoba.  It had gradually built up a system of three hundred and
twenty miles, but had not given the competition looked for, dividing
traffic with the Canadian Pacific rather than cutting rates.  Now the
parent line was in the receiver's hands, and its straits gave the
Manitoba government its opportunity.  It leased for 999 years all the
Manitoba lines of the Northern Pacific, but decided it could not
profitably operate them itself without connection with the lakes.  The
only question was whether to re-lease them to the Canadian Pacific or
to the Canadian Northern.  After a lively contest the younger road
secured the prize.  At a stroke it thus obtained extensive terminals in
Winnipeg, a line south to the American border, branches westward
through fertile territory, and a link which practically closed the gap
between its eastern and its western roads.

{187}

The Canadian Northern had now become the third largest system in the
Dominion, stretching from Lake Superior to Saskatchewan, with nearly
thirteen hundred miles in operation in 1902.  The feeders were
extending through the rich farming lands of the West; the line to Port
Arthur supplemented the Canadian Pacific, providing a second spout to
the funnel.  But this merely local success did not long content its
promoters.  They announced their intention to build from sea to sea.
Transcontinental railways were then much in the air: the Grand Trunk,
the Trans-Canada, the Great Northern all planned extensive projects.
Reviving prosperity and new-found confidence were making a dollar look
as small to government and public alike as a dime had seemed some years
before.  Aid might confidently be looked for--but by which aspirant?

In 1902 and 1903 a junction of forces between the Grand Trunk and the
Canadian Northern was proposed, and would have had much in its favour.
The negotiators could not come to terms, however, and each road
continued on its independent plan.  Nothing daunted by the Dominion
government's decision to recognize and aid the Grand Trunk, {188} the
Canadian Northern turned to a policy of piecemeal construction, seeking
aid from the provinces as well as from the Dominion.

Making hay while the subsidy sun shone and the prosperity of the
Laurier regime was at its height, the Canadian Northern pressed forward
extensions, flung out branches, filled in gaps on every side.  The main
line was pushed westward to Edmonton in 1905.  Branch lines were thrown
out freely in all the prairie provinces.  In Ontario the gap north of
Lake Superior was bridged by a line from Port Arthur to Sudbury, not
completed until 1914.  Toronto and Ottawa were linked with the western
lines, and several feeders were acquired which gave connection with
Kingston and Brockville.  In Quebec the Great Northern, running from
Hawkesbury on the Ottawa to Quebec City, was absorbed in 1902, and the
Quebec and Lake St John five years later.  By building a tunnel three
miles long under Mount Royal, an entrance was secured into the heart of
Montreal.  Nova Scotia did its part by lending money to another
Mackenzie and Mann enterprise, the Halifax and South-western.  The
Inverness Railway in Cape Breton and the Nova Scotia Central with minor
lines were built or acquired, giving the {189} Canadian Northern first
place in mileage in the province.

The most difficult task still remained--building a third railway
through the mountains to the Pacific.  Surveys for a road from
Yellowhead Pass to Vancouver by Sandford Fleming's old route were begun
in 1908.  By the aid of lavish guarantees and subsidies this last link
in the transcontinental system was pushed to completion in 1915.

The financial and political aspects of this great enterprise were as
striking as was the construction.  Governments have many a time given
lavish aid, promoters have often built roads entirely out of the
proceeds of bond issues, financiers have dominated great railway
systems by a majority or controlling interest in the stock.  But never
before did a group of men plan to unite, on such a scale, all three
arrangements--to build ten thousand miles of railway without themselves
investing a dollar and still retain control.  The men behind the
Canadian Northern not only planned such a project, but carried it
through, displaying in the process, and at every stage of the
undertaking, a mastery of political diplomacy, an untiring persistence,
and great financial resourcefulness.  They are, {190} therefore,
entitled to a special place among the world's railway builders.

Their plan was simple in principle, if wondrously complicated in
working out.  It was to build the road by government subsidies and the
proceeds of the bonds guaranteed by government, and to control the road
by issuing to themselves, for their services of promotion and
management, practically all the common stock.  To carry out this
audacious plan, political influence, public enthusiasm, and the
confidence of outside investors in Canada's future were all required
and were all forthcoming.

Dominion and province vied in aid.  This aid took many forms.  The
Dominion had abandoned in 1894 its policy of giving land-grants, but
the original companies which combined to form the Canadian Northern had
previously been promised and later received over four million acres: up
to 1914 about eighteen million dollars had been realized from the sale
of parts of this land, and the grants unsold were worth at least ten
millions more.  In addition, Ontario gave two million acres and Quebec
one-third as much.  Cash subsidies were not wanting.  The Liberal
government of Sir Wilfrid Laurier voted something {191} less than two
millions in cash to aid in building the link between Winnipeg and Lake
Superior.  It declined to recognize or aid the extension to the Pacific
coast; but in 1912 the Conservative government of Sir Robert Borden
gave over six millions for this work, and in the following year fifteen
millions more for the Ontario and western Alberta sections of the main
line.  The provinces were less lavish, Quebec, Ontario, and Manitoba
offering all told six millions.

But it was neither to land-grants nor to cash subsidies that the
Canadian Northern looked for its chief aid, but to government
guarantees.  This device, the main form of state aid given in our first
railway era, had long been discredited by the unlucky fate of the Grand
Trunk and the Northern guarantees, and had been sparingly used since.
To the Canadian Northern its revival was chiefly due.  It was a
seductive form of aid: provided that the railway thus helped had good
traffic prospects, the government stood little chance of loss and the
railway greatly gained by the certainty of the sale of its bonds and
the higher price secured.  But, like other forms of the extension of
public credit, such as the issue of paper money, state guarantees are
{192} difficult to keep within bounds, and compel ever-fresh extensions
to save the old liability.  So Dominion and province alike found.  From
1903 to 1911, under Sir Wilfrid Laurier, the Dominion guaranteed bonds
of the Canadian Northern system to the extent of fifty-six millions;
from 1912 to 1914, under Sir Robert Borden, it endorsed the Canadian
Northern's notes for forty-nine millions more.  Nor were the provinces
behindhand.  Mainly in the seven years from 1908, the five westernmost
provinces pledged their credit on behalf of the same system to the
astounding amount of over one hundred and thirty millions, British
Columbia leading; Nova Scotia made a loan of another five millions.
Thus endorsed, usually as to both principal and interest, the bonds of
the Canadian Northern were floated with little difficulty, so long as
money was to be had at all by any seeker.

In the meantime, while the road was being built by state gifts and
bondholders' lendings, the great bulk of the stock of the parent road
and of the chief subsidiaries was conveyed to Messrs Mackenzie and Mann
for their services in promoting and managing the system.  This method
of financing had its dangers.  It meant that there was no large
commitment {193} of shareholders' capital, to secure support in
difficulty and compel responsibility in management.  It meant that the
control of the vast enterprise was in the hands of a few men, unchecked
by public inquiry or the criticism of independent
shareholders--whatever that might be worth.  It meant that with all the
cash capital taking the form of bonds, any failure to make ends meet,
any lengthened depression, would bring risk of the mortgage-holders'
foreclosure and receivership--not merely the shareholders' waiting for
a turn of the tide--except in so far as the burden could be shifted to
the governments that had endorsed the notes.

In the early years, thanks to general prosperity and to the strategic
location and careful management of the system, ends always met, and a
little over, and funds were always forthcoming for fresh expansion.
But early in 1914 a crisis arrived in the company's affairs.  The
mountain section particularly, what with the higher cost of labour and
the unexpected engineering difficulties, was calling for tens of
millions more; the stringency in the world's money markets, following
the Balkan Wars, made investors chary of even gilt-edged offerings.
There were many {194} millions of subsidies and guarantees still to
come from the state, but they would come only as the road was
completed, and meantime construction had to be financed.  The
partner-owners could not provide the ready cash needed for completing
the gigantic task.  The bondholders had no inducement to do so unless
further guaranteed by the state.  The western provinces were at last
becoming frightened of the load they had already assumed.  There was
only one resource, the Dominion government.  True, it had only in 1913
made a gift of $15,000,000 on solemn assurances that not a cent more
would be needed.  But, it was urged, the emergency was real.  The road
could not be left hanging half finished, after all the millions already
spent.  Canada's credit must be protected, and so the government, after
a lively struggle, put through a positively last guarantee of
forty-five millions.  In return it was given forty out of the hundred
millions stock to which the capital was reduced, and took the right to
appoint one government director.  Whether this step meant that the
government was now going to share the control and the profits of the
company, or whether it meant that it was henceforth to be saddled with
the {195} responsibility for any deficits, was a point much in dispute.
Later, the outbreak of war in Europe delayed, but did not altogether
halt, the floating of the loan and the completion of the remaining
links.

Meanwhile, the many subsidiary enterprises, which the example of the
Canadian Pacific has caused us to think appropriate to the
transcontinental railway, had been undertaken by its youngest rival.
Fast steamers between Montreal and Bristol, grain elevators, hotels,
express and telegraph companies, all brought grist to the mill.  Hardly
to be distinguished were the allied interests of the
partner-owners--iron-mines in the Lake Superior district, coal-mines in
Alberta and Vancouver Island, whaling and halibut fisheries on the
Pacific, and lumber-mills on the British Columbia coast--all bearing
some relation to the development of the railway system.

[Illustration: Canadian Northern Railway, 1914]

In 1896, a railway a hundred miles long, beginning and ending nowhere,
operated by thirteen men and a boy!  In 1914, a great transcontinental
system practically completed, over ten thousand miles in length, and
covering seven of Canada's nine provinces!  The impossible had been
achieved.



{196}

CHAPTER XI

THE EXPANSION OF THE GRAND TRUNK

The Darkest Days--New Men at the Helm--Expansion in the East--The Grand
Trunk


In the eighties, it will be recalled, the activity of the Canadian
Pacific in the eastern province had stirred the Grand Trunk to an
aggressive counter-campaign.  Line after line had been absorbed,
extension after extension had been built.  New life seemed to have been
injected into the old system.  Holders of even ordinary shares began to
dream of dividends.

The activity was brief and prosperity briefer.  Only in the golden days
from 1881 to 1883, when the West was enjoying its first 'boom' and
railway construction was at its height, did the policy of expansion
justify itself from the shareholder's point of view.  The year 1883 saw
the high-water mark of prosperity for the Grand Trunk; for in that year
dividends were paid not only on guaranteed but on first, second, and
third preference stock.  Not again until 1902 was even a {197} partial
payment made on the third preference; not until 1900, save for a
fraction in 1887, was anything paid on second preference; first
preference dividends were fractional and occasional, and even the
guaranteed stock dividends were passed time and again.  The financial
position of this great system in the middle nineties may be briefly
summed up in the statement that securities of the par value of
£16,000,000, which in 1883 had a market value of £12,000,000, were
worth in 1894 only £3,500,000.  The junior securities had become only
gambling counters on the stock exchange.

Where did the cause lie?  There was not one; there were several.  The
first was in capitalization.  The line had been hopelessly
over-capitalized to begin with, and the new acquisitions doubled fixed
charges, while net receipts increased only ten per cent; feeders had
proved suckers.[1]  Secondly, in the general commercial situation.  The
whole continent was undergoing a trying test of panic and depression,
of low prices and industrial stagnation.  For a quarter of a century
after {198} 1873 the gloom had been broken only at brief
intervals--from 1880 to 1883, and from 1887 to 1889.  In 1893 the price
of wheat fell to the lowest point in a century.  The great Mississippi
valley had been flooded with settlers, railway and steamship threw
their millions of bushels on the world's markets, while the gold basis
of prices failed to expand in proportion.  Western farms were, it was
said, 'plastered with mortgages'; one-sixth of the railways in the
United States went into receivers' hands in 1893 alone.  Free-silver
agitators denounced the 'gold bugs' of the east; Coxey armies marched
to Washington.  Another cause was in excessive competition.  The St
Lawrence was more accessible to shippers than ever, while the Canadian
Pacific had cut into the best paying territory in Ontario.  In the
Chicago traffic absolute demoralization ruled--reckless rate wars were
waged, agreement after agreement was broken, line was played against
line by grain-shipper or by dressed-beef magnate.  A final cause was in
management.  The attempt was still being made to manage a great railway
from London, three thousand miles away.  The Canadian officials had
little independent discretion; interminable delays, lack of initiative,
red {199} tape, nepotism, followed inevitably.  Here and there
officials strove strenuously to better conditions, but the odds were
against them.  Practically no Grand Trunk stock was held in Canada; it
was not even quoted on Canadian exchanges; Canadians regarded the road
entirely from the user's point of view.

The traveller and shipper had less to complain of than the shareholder.
The service of the road had been greatly increased.  The mileage was
large in proportion to population.  Rates were low.  True, it was a
rare event for a Grand Trunk train to arrive on time, but it usually
arrived.

For these various ills corresponding remedies were sought in turn.
Drastic capital reorganization was discussed, but nothing was done.
Commercial prosperity could not be revived by the efforts of a single
railway.  Competition was met by agreement after agreement,
'gentleman's' and otherwise, but in vain.  The most hopeful resource
lay in the only remaining direction, change of management.

In 1895 Sir Henry Tyler resigned from the presidency after twenty-three
years of faithful service.  His place was taken by Sir Charles
Rivers-Wilson, who had a record of efficient {200} service on the
borders of politics and finance.  The new president and a committee of
directors made a thorough investigation of the Grand Trunk, and
recommended some immediate improvements.  Their chief contribution to
its success, however, was the discovery of Charles M. Hays.

[Illustration: Charles Melville Hays.  From a photograph by Notman]

The great rival of the Grand Trunk had pressed forward to prosperity
under the driving power of an American general manager.  The new
administration decided that it, too, would look to the United States
for a chief executive of the ruthless efficiency and modern methods
which the crisis demanded.  They found him in the man who had pulled
the Wabash out of a similar slough of despond.  Mr Hays was not quite
forty when, in 1895, he was appointed general manager of the Grand
Trunk.  He had risen rapidly since the days when, a boy of seventeen,
he had entered the office of the Atlantic and Pacific.  At twenty-nine
he had been secretary to the general manager, and three years later
manager himself, of the Wabash.

His presence was soon felt.  The staff realized, some with relief, some
with consternation, that the good old leisurely days, the days of
vested interests, were gone.  {201} Many were pensioned, some were
dismissed.  In some cases American officials were imported to fill the
vacant posts, to the patriotic discontent of the old guard.  Equipment
was overhauled, larger freight cars were ordered, and new terminals
acquired.  The main bridges on the road--the Suspension at Niagara
Falls, the International at Fort Erie, and the Victoria at
Montreal--were all rebuilt on a larger scale between 1896 and 1901.
The double tracking of the main line from Montreal westward was
continued, and many of the sharp curves and heavy grades of the
original construction were revised.  Elevators at Portland, Montreal,
Midland, Tiffin, Goderich, Point Edward, and Fort William were built or
acquired.  Trains came in on time.  The whole system was 'speeded up.'

Later changes in the administration may be briefly summarized here.  In
1900 Mr Hays's five-year contract as general manager expired.  At the
same juncture a vacancy occurred in the presidency of the Southern
Pacific, which had fallen on evil days, and Hays was offered and
accepted the post at four times his salary with the Grand Trunk of
$25,000 a year.  A year later he was back again in Canada.  There was
not room in the {202} Southern Pacific for both Hays and Harriman, then
in financial control, and the Grand Trunk directors seized the
opportunity which the breach afforded.  In 1909 the wide recognition of
Mr Hays's great services led to long overdue increase of the authority
of the Canadian officials of the road by his appointment as president,
on the retirement of Sir Charles Rivers-Wilson.  Three years later,
with his projects for expansion still incomplete, he met a tragic death
in the sinking of the _Titanic_.  Mr Edson J. Chamberlin, who had
increased his reputation for efficiency by his management for four
years of the Grand Trunk Pacific, was chosen as successor in the
presidency.

Fortune favoured the new administration from the start.  The tide in
the continent's business affairs turned soon after the new men took the
helm.  The long depression ended, prices rose, farmers met mortgage
payments, factory chimneys smoked once more, traffic multiplied.

The first result of the improved conditions was the easing of the
tension in railway relations.  There was no longer a life-and-death
necessity for rate-cutting and traffic-stealing.  Rate wars between the
trunk lines in the United States came to an end.  On the {203} Canadian
side peace was longer in coming.  The rush to the Klondike in 1897
started a rate war between the Canadian Pacific and the Grand Trunk,
with its American connections, which lasted nearly a year.  In its
course rates were cut in the east as well as in the west, and the
Canadian Pacific sent its west-bound freight from Toronto by Smith's
Falls rather than use any longer the direct line of the Grand Trunk to
North Bay.  Peace was patched up, but the Canadian Pacific shortly
afterwards set about building a road of its own from Toronto north to
its main line, thus threatening the Grand Trunk with permanent loss of
western business, and providing it with one incentive toward the great
westward expansion it was soon to undertake.

Along with prudent retrenchments went increasingly aggressive
expansion, both east and west.  It was one of the main objects of Mr
Hays's policy to secure a hold on the rich traffic possibilities of New
York and the New England states.  Portland, the original New England
terminus of the Grand Trunk, had not become the great commercial centre
it once expected to be.  The first further step was taken in 1899, when
the Grand Trunk secured control of the five hundred miles of {204} the
Central Vermont, with which relations had been close for some years
past.  With running rights over a gap controlled by the Boston and
Maine, this gave a line from St Johns, Quebec, to the port of New
London, Connecticut; from this point connection was made by boat to New
York, where valuable terminal docks were owned.

New London was not the final goal, however--Providence and Boston
offered greater possibilities.  But to seize them it was first
necessary to break through the monopoly of New England land and water
transport, which the New York and New Haven line had acquired, or to
come to terms with the interests in control.  At first the word was to
fight.  The Grand Trunk was received with open arms by the business men
of Massachusetts and Connecticut, eager for competition in railways,
and in spite of all the political influence of the New Haven, Hays
secured a charter for his Southern New England Railroad, to run from
Palmer, on the Central Vermont system, to Providence; a branch from
Bellows Falls to Boston was also planned.  Construction was begun on
the Providence line in May 1912, but suddenly halted.  The Grand Trunk
management declared the {205} halt due to financial conditions, but New
England suspected a compromise with the New Haven.  Probably the change
in policy was mainly due to the change in management, the new
administration setting less store on the extension than the
Hays-Fitzhugh executive had done.

All these eastern activities, however, were overshadowed by the Grand
Trunk Pacific scheme.  It was not the first plan the Grand Trunk had
formed for westward expansion.  In the embryo days of the Canadian
Pacific, it may be recalled, the government had offered to the old line
the opportunity of carrying through the new one.  Later, a connection
with the Northern Pacific through Sault Ste Marie had been discussed,
but Van Horne had forestalled this move.  Still later an extension of
the Grand Trunk from Chicago northwesterly, possibly through control of
the Wisconsin Central, had been under consideration.  Nothing came of
these plans until the proved fertility and rapid settlement of the
Canadian North-West, the improved position of the Grand Trunk in the
money markets, and the threatened loss of traffic between Toronto and
North Bay, lured and urged the new administration forward.

{206}

In 1902 Mr Hays announced that the directors were considering building
a line from North Bay, through New Ontario westward, to a terminus on
the Pacific at Port Simpson or Bute Inlet.  It would be a line of the
highest standards.  Government aid, the announcement continued, would
certainly be sought and expected.

Once more railways became Canadian politics.  There was little doubt
that the government would aid either this or some rival
transcontinental scheme.  Opposition to the lavish subsidy policy of
the past had developed, indeed, but it was overwhelmed by the demands
from every quarter for a vigorous forward policy.  It was Canada's
growing time, and new-born confidence spurred country and government
on.  But if the line was to be not merely a private enterprise, but in
part a policy of state, then considerations of high politics and low
politics alike came in, and compelled material changes in the Grand
Trunk's scheme before it could secure government acceptance.

A road from North Bay west would satisfy the local demands of the
western provinces, but would not satisfy the local demands of the East,
or meet certain common national {207} aspirations.  Eastern, and
particularly Quebec, interests, demanded that any new trans-continental
should be built far to the north, opening up the wilderness between
Hudson Bay and the Laurentian highlands bordering the St Lawrence.  A
Quebec company, the Trans-Canada, was in fact urgently seeking support
for such a line, endeavouring, since patriotism is in Canada the last
refuge of the promoter, to stimulate investors by stressing the
military advantages of the remote route.  Again, the Maritime Provinces
protested against aid to a company to carry the traffic of the West to
Boston and Portland instead of to St John and Halifax.

Sir Wilfrid Laurier, the prime minister, endeavoured to combine all
these ends.  His plan provided for a road 3550 miles in length,
beginning at Moncton--a neutral point between the politically
inconvenient rivalries of St John and Halifax--crossing New Brunswick
northwesterly, skirting the Maine border, and on to Quebec City, where
the St Lawrence was to be crossed by a great bridge.  Thence it would
strike westerly far to the north of existing settlements.  From
Winnipeg the previously proposed route was followed.  The West would
have the development and {208} competition demanded, the hinterland of
Quebec and Ontario would be opened, and the ports of the Maritime
Provinces put on an equality with their American rivals.  And since
this vast project was much beyond the power of the Grand Trunk to
finance, it was arranged that the road should be divided into two
sections.  The eastern, from Moncton to Winnipeg, was to be built and
owned by the government and leased to the Grand Trunk Pacific, free for
seven years and at a rental of three per cent of the cost for
forty-three years following.  The western, from Winnipeg to the coast,
was to be built and operated by the company, aided by a government
guarantee of principal and interest on the greater part of the bond
issue.

The announcement of this plan in July 1903 led to a storm of
controversy as fierce as that which followed the launching of the
Canadian Pacific.  The Opposition brought forward various policies,
looking to a greater measure of government ownership; the minister of
Railways, Andrew G. Blair, resigned in protest; rival railways opposed
openly and sometimes by secret plot; two general elections were fought
on the issue.  But rarely is a government in Canada defeated on a {209}
proposal, sound or unsound, to spend untold millions, if the money is
to be had at all.  The agreement went through, with modifications, in
the following year, and the building of the great northern road began.

The railway policy of the past twenty years is still on its trial, but
some tentative conclusions may be ventured.

In the first place, it seems clear that a new transcontinental was
needed, not only to open the West, but to develop the hinterland of
eastern Canada.  The rediscovery of a vast clay belt north of the
height-of-land between Hudson Bay and the Great Lakes, its known
resources in timber and pulp and its probable mineral wealth, as well
as the farming areas of the western plains, and the forest, mine, and
fishery wealth of northern British Columbia, all gave some economic
justification for the adventure.  Perhaps even stronger were the
political considerations.  Here, again, if railways were Canada's
politics, it was not only because Canadians were materialists, but
because they were idealists.  They were determined that, in spite of
geography and diplomacy, in spite of Rocky Mountains and Lake Superior
wildernesses, Laurentian plateaus and Maine intrusions, {210} Canada
should be made one and independent.  Often this national spirit has
been manipulated to serve sordid ends in railway as in tariff matters;
the flag has covered a multitude of sinners.  Yet whether it was the
Grand Trunk or the Intercolonial, the Canadian Pacific or the Grand
Trunk Pacific, the national purpose has been strong, and must fairly be
set on the assets side of the sheet.  Sir Wilfrid Laurier and Sir John
Macdonald both worked with high courage and enduring faith for a
greater and more united Canada.  Any one who looked at a map of the
Dominion and realized how incredibly narrow a fringe of population was
strung out on the southern border, could not but feel that some attempt
to add a second storey to the structure, to give breadth as well as
length, was a national necessity.  Perhaps least defensible was the
Quebec-Moncton section; true, it was essential, if freight was to reach
the Maritime ports, that a shorter line with better grades than those
of the Intercolonial should be secured if possible.  Grades were
bettered in the lines secured, but the saving in distance was not as
great as old and incorrect surveys had led the government to anticipate.

How should the road be built, granted its {211} need?  Government
ownership had its advocates, but experience of political 'machines' and
a recognition of the difficulties of a government line in carrying on
steamship or irrigation or other subsidiary activities, or in making
international extensions, told heavily against such a policy.  The real
choice lay between the two private companies, the Grand Trunk and the
Canadian Northern, which were seeking to rival the Canadian Pacific.
Undoubtedly the best solution would have been to amalgamate these
companies, and thus to save the eventual outlay on a line north of Lake
Superior, on closely parallel lines in the prairies, and on the
enormously costly rival lines to be built through the Rockies.  True,
competition even in railway matters has still its merits, but one
strong competitor of the Canadian Pacific would have better served the
country than two in financial straits.  This solution appeared for a
time possible.  As has been seen, negotiations were carried on in 1902
and 1903 looking to such a union, but unfortunately without result.
Forced to choose, the government had no alternative but to give its aid
to the older and better known system.

What standards were to be set for the {212} new road?  The continent's
pioneer traditions were plain: build the road in the cheapest way it
could be made to hold together, with sharp curves and steep grades if
need be, with scanty ballast, wooden bridges, and light rails, since
traffic would be light and capital hard to get.  Then, if the country
developed, and perhaps after a reorganization or two, rebuild the road
on a permanent basis.  But 1903 was not 1873, and Mr Hays had learned
on the Wabash and on the Grand Trunk how difficult it was for a
second-class road to compete, and how costly was the process of
rebuilding with the line in operation.  He knew that with high and
rising wages for trainmen, and with frequency of service a minor matter
on the long stretches, it was essential to concentrate loads in as few
trains as possible, and that a locomotive could haul almost twice as
great a load on a four-tenths grade as on a one per cent grade.  So he
determined to build from the outset up to the highest standard,
securing a lower ruling grade than any other transcontinental enjoyed.
The policy meant high fixed charges and low operating costs.

What outlay would be involved and what state aid was needed?  Given the
route and the standard set, the outlay could not but be {213} vast.  It
proved, in fact, much greater than the estimates, as is the way with
most big enterprises.  The government section cost about a hundred and
sixty instead of sixty millions, and the Grand Trunk Pacific section
about a hundred and forty, or three hundred millions in all--twice the
estimate for the Panama Canal and nearly its actual cost.[2]  The
standard set was high, and proved difficult to attain; labour was
scarce and expensive, and prices of all materials were soaring
constantly.  The large expenditure lent colour to charges of corruption
in the construction of the government section.  Investigation after
investigation was held, however, without revealing any gross betrayal
of trust.  One contractor had been handled too tenderly for repeated
delays, possibly engineers sometimes stretched classification on a
losing contract, and doubtless contractors were as usual given the
privilege of contributing to party campaign funds.  But, fortunately
for the good name of Canada, the serious charges of corruption were not
sustained.

{214}

Of this great outlay the country bore the lion's share.  The Grand
Trunk Pacific was organized as a subsidiary company of the old Grand
Trunk, which secured control of ownership of all but a nominal share of
the $25,000,000 common stock, given it in return for guaranteeing part
of the Pacific bonds.  Only $20,000,000 preference capital stock was
provided for, and this was not issued.  The interest of the independent
shareholder was thus negligible.  The money required was secured by the
issue of bonds and debenture loans guaranteed by the government or the
Grand Trunk.  Up to 1914, in connection with the western section, the
government had guaranteed the company's bonds to the amount of over
eighty millions, had lent twenty-five millions for ten years at four
per cent, and had made or promised a cash gift of twenty-three
millions.  On the eastern section, the company was subsidized by the
use for seven years of the road, rent free, equivalent to thirty-four
millions.  It was a vast outlay, though not as difficult for the
country to bear as one-third the amount would have been a generation
earlier.  The unique and consoling feature, so far as posterity was
concerned, was that the bulk {215} of the government expenditure was
provided out of surplus current revenue, so that for the future the net
income to be received from rental would much more than balance interest
on borrowings.

Once the contract was ratified by parliament and by the Grand Trunk,
and the new company had been formally organized with Mr Hays as
president and Mr Frank Morse, and later Mr Chamberlin, formerly of the
Canada Atlantic, as general manager, the work of surveying and
determining the route began.  On the government section political
difficulties were met in New Brunswick, from the advocates of a route
down the St John to the city at its mouth, and engineering difficulties
of many forms in the long trail through the northern wilderness.  The
bridge which was being constructed by an independent company across the
St Lawrence at Quebec collapsed in 1907, with great loss of life, and
the delay in completing the second bridge made it necessary to depend
upon car-ferries for some time.  On the western section a good route
through the prairies was decided upon, not without vigorous protest
from the Canadian Pacific because of the close paralleling of its line.
After repeated surveys of the {216} Peace, Pine, Wapiti, and Yellowhead
Passes, the last was chosen, and a line was settled upon down the
Fraser and Skeena valleys, passing through two million acres of fertile
land.  Remarkably low grades were secured; in fact, as favourable as on
the prairie section.  Kaien Island, 550 miles north of Vancouver, was
chosen as the terminus, rather than Port Simpson as originally
designed, and soon on its magnificent harbour and most unpromising site
of rock and muskeg the new and scientifically planned city of Prince
Rupert began to rise.

As the main line ran far to the north of the St Lawrence lake and river
system, the original plan provided for the construction of branch lines
to Fort William, to North Bay, and to Montreal.  Of these only the
first, aided by the Dominion and also by the Ontario government, was
built.  For the connection with North Bay running rights over the
provincial road, the Timiskaming and Northern Ontario, sufficed.
Later, in 1914, the Dominion government itself decided to build the
Montreal branch.  In Alberta and Saskatchewan over 1200 miles of branch
lines were begun, under guarantees of bonds by the provincial
governments.  In British Columbia an independent {217} road, projected
by the contracting firm of Foley, Welch and Stewart--the Vancouver,
Pacific and Great Eastern--promised when completed to give the Grand
Trunk Pacific, by a traffic agreement, entrance into Vancouver.

The first contracts on the main line were let in 1905.  For ten years
construction went on, at the rate of a mile a day, with occasional
slackening from scarcity of labour or financial stringency, but with no
complete halt.  Last to be completed were the section to be built by
the company in the Central plateau of British Columbia and the section
built by the government west of Cochrane.  Meanwhile, the prairie lines
had been in operation through to Edmonton since 1910, and grain reached
Fort William over the Lake Superior branch in the same year.

From the beginning it had been questioned whether the Grand Trunk
Pacific would carry out its bargain to operate the government section.
The management professed its intention to perform every promise, but
fulfilment was delayed.  In 1915 the company demurred to assuming the
lease, on the double ground that the road was not definitely completed,
and that, since the change of government in 1911, the standard {218} of
construction agreed upon had not been maintained.  Accordingly the
government took power to operate the road from Winnipeg to Moncton, and
to expropriate the company's branch from Superior to Fort William,
pending further negotiations.

The great Canadian railway companies are much more than railways.  The
Grand Trunk system, in its new expansion, branched into every
neighbouring field which could be made to increase the traffic.  Fleets
of steamers, on the Pacific coast, on the Great Lakes, and on the New
England route, filled in gaps in its lines.  Modern car-ferries crossed
Lake Ontario and Lake Michigan, as well as the river Detroit.
Elevators, it has been noted, were built at strategic points on the way
from the wheat-field to the sea.  Magnificent hotels were opened at
Ottawa, Winnipeg, and Edmonton, with more rustic resorts in the parks
along the route.  Tourist traffic was stimulated by lowered fares and
alluring advertising.

[Illustration: Grand Trunk System, 1914]

The Grand Trunk of 1914 was a much greater factor in the life of Canada
than the Grand Trunk of 1894; it had become nation-wide in its
interests, and had shaken off the unfortunate traditions of its earlier
stagnant {219} days.  Difficult tasks still faced it: the building up
of the traffic of the far north would demand ceaseless effort, and when
the wheel of time should bring round slackened business once more, it
would call for all its powers to make ends meet in face of rising
wages, taxes, outlays of every kind.  The record of the recent past
gave assurance that the need would be met with courage and alert
endeavour.



[1] One recent acquisition, the Toronto Belt Railway, to meet a rental
of $19,000 and working expenses of $22,500, had gross receipts of less
than $5000 a year.

[2] The Chicago, Milwaukee and Puget Sound, a high-grade road built to
the Pacific coast at nearly the same time, was capitalized, it may be
noted, at $157,000 a mile, or nearly $70,000 a mile more than the cost
of the Grand Trunk Pacific and National Transcontinental.



{220}

CHAPTER XII

SUNDRY DEVELOPMENTS

The Canadian Pacific--The Great Northern--International
Connections--Government Roads--The Intercolonial--On to Hudson
Bay--Opening up New Ontario


All the restless activity upon the part of its older and its younger
rival did not rob the Canadian Pacific of the place it had held in the
life and interest of the Canadian people.  With a confident assurance
based on the extent and the strategic location of its lines, the
imperial richness of its endowment, and the proved efficiency of its
management, it pressed steadily forward until it became the world's
foremost transportation system.

The unbroken success and the magnitude of the operations of the
Canadian Pacific in this period are almost without precedent in railway
annals.  By 1914 it had under its control more than eighteen thousand
miles of railway, or more than six times the length of the original
transcontinental line.  It gave employment directly to ninety thousand
men, whose monthly pay-roll reached five million dollars, and
indirectly maintained many more, {221} justifying the boast of its
president in 1907 that directly or indirectly one-twelfth of the people
of Canada received their income from the Canadian Pacific.  In 1913
alone, the supreme year of Canadian railway expansion, the Canadian
Pacific appropriated for new construction and betterments, equipment,
terminal facilities, steamships and hotels, shops and elevators, nearly
one hundred million dollars, or more than the original cost of the
road.  It touched the life of the nation at every conceivable point.
From Atlantic to Pacific there was scarcely a town of any importance
that was not reached by its lines.  But its position was not merely
national.  It controlled over five thousand miles of railways in the
United States, taking rank amongst the foremost systems of the
Republic.  Its steamship lines stretched more than half-way round the
world, and in Liverpool and Trieste, Hong-Kong and Yokohama and Sydney,
the red-and-white house flag of the Canadian Pacific made the company
and the country known.

The management of the Canadian Pacific showed stability and continuity.
It trained up in its own ranks the men for its highest posts.  Sir
George Stephen, later Lord Mount {222} Stephen, on resigning the
presidency in 1888, had been succeeded by Mr, afterwards Sir, William
C. Van Horne.  As general manager, and then for eleven years as
president, Van Horne carried the road through its most difficult
period.  In spite of failure of crops, low prices, and the slow
trickling in of settlers, he kept aglow his own faith in the West and
communicated it to others.  Indomitable courage, tenacity of purpose,
breadth of vision, mastery of organization and detail marked him as one
of the great railroad builders of the century.  Even when he retired
from the presidency, becoming for another twelve years chairman of the
board of directors, it was only to find new outlets for his energy in
building pulp and paper mills in Quebec and railways in Cuba; for
though, unlike many millionaires, he had not narrowed into his own
business groove, and could paint a picture as well as buy one, the call
to action never failed to stir him.

When Van Horne came to the Canadian Pacific in 1882, he brought with
him the man destined to be his successor, Thomas G. Shaughnessy, a
young Irish-American still under thirty, who had been engaged in
railway work since he was sixteen.  Appointed {223} general purchasing
agent, he rose rapidly, becoming president in 1899 and chairman of the
board in 1911.  Sir Thomas Shaughnessy maintained the progressive
policy and the honourable record of straightforward management which
has distinguished the Canadian Pacific--a railway singularly free from
the questionable manipulations which have brought so many great
American systems to bankruptcy.  Other men left their impress on the
road: men like Sir William Whyte, for over twenty years in charge of
the western lines, David M'Nicoll, and George M. Bosworth and many
others, gave most effective service.

After the first hurried staking out of the claim was over, by 1890, the
Canadian Pacific refrained from further expansion until about 1898:
between these years only three hundred miles were added to the system.
Then reviving prosperity and the activity of rival roads led to a new
period of expansion.  The additions made in this time can best be
realized by a glance at the map (opposite next page).  The most
important may be noted briefly, beginning at the Pacific coast.

On Vancouver Island, the Esquimalt and Nanaimo Railway, which had been
projected {224} originally when it was hoped that Canada's first
transcontinental would find its terminus at Victoria by crossing the
straits from Bute Inlet, was acquired from the Dunsmuir interests.  On
the mainland of British Columbia activity was concentrated in the
southern section.  The rich mineral discoveries in the Boundary country
led to the extension of the Canadian Pacific westward from Lethbridge,
through the Crow's Nest Pass.  The company was given a Dominion
subsidy, and in return a general reduction of rates was secured.  After
years of contention with the Hill roads which were crowding into the
same territory, and in face of immense engineering difficulties, a
continuation of this line by way of Penticton gave promise of a second
through route.  Meanwhile, entrance was secured to Spokane and Portland
in the United States.  In the plains and prairie section a close
network of lines developed.  The narrow-gauge line of the Alberta
Railway and Irrigation Company, which had done good pioneer service,
under the guidance of Elliott Galt, in developing Alberta's
possibilities in coal and irrigated land, was absorbed in 1911.  The
northern country was traversed by two new east and west lines.  The
Qu'Appelle, Long Lake and {225} Saskatchewan, extending from Regina to
Prince Albert, lost to the Canadian Northern in 1906, was replaced by a
new line and 'cutoffs' and extensions built in every quarter.  South of
the border equal activity was displayed in throwing out feeders for the
Soo and Duluth lines.  The acquisition of the Wisconsin Central in 1909
gave the Canadian Pacific entrance into Chicago, while an agreement
with the Wabash made it possible to link up its western United States
lines with its southern Ontario road at Detroit.  In Ontario, a branch
from Toronto to Sudbury made the Canadian Pacific independent of the
Grand Trunk's North Bay link, an extension from Guelph to Goderich
tapped a fertile country, a line from Port M'Nicoll on Georgian Bay to
Bethany near Peterborough gave a short through route for grain, a lake
shore route eastward from Toronto provided access to the towns which
the Grand Trunk, in its promoters' concern for through traffic or in
its contractors' desire for low land charges, had side-tracked, while
stock purchase and later a lease of the Kingston and Pembroke gave
entrance into Kingston.  In Quebec, short tentacles were pushed up into
the Laurentian hills north of Ottawa; south of the St Lawrence the
chief step taken {226} was the 999-year lease of the Quebec Central,
sanctioned in 1912.  In the Maritime Provinces the New Brunswick
Southern or Shore line and the Dominion Atlantic, successor to the
Windsor and Annapolis, were leased in 1911, and running rights secured
over the Intercolonial into Halifax.

[Illustration: Canadian Pacific Railway, 1914]

A marked feature of the Canadian Pacific policy from the beginning was
the endeavour to control subsidiary or allied activities, and thus gain
well-rounded independence.  Its steamship lines came to girdle half the
world.  On the Pacific, service to Hong-Kong and Yokohama had begun in
1892 and to Australia in 1893, while a service on the coast from
Seattle to the far north, and on the lakes of central British Columbia,
followed.  The Great Lakes fleet was still earlier in being.  In 1903
the purchase of fourteen Elder-Dempster vessels ranging from five to
eight thousand tons gave a whole North Atlantic fleet for seven
millions, or the cost of a single _Lusitania_.  It was soon increased
by larger and faster boats.  A line to Trieste, to secure a share of
the immigration traffic from Eastern Europe, led to prolonged
complications with the Austrian government early in 1914, on account of
the hostility of German rivals.  {227} Hotels followed steamships, some
eight or ten being erected at strategic points from St Andrews to
Victoria.  Departing from the usual American practice, the company
owned and operated its own sleeping-cars, and maintained its own
express and telegraph companies.  Its car-shops provided much of its
rolling stock.  Grain elevators were built at terminal points.  In the
later years a systematic policy of developing its western lands was
adopted.  A special department of Natural Resources was established,
irrigation works were begun on a huge scale in the tract of three
million acres between Calgary and Medicine Hat, and ready-made farms
were provided or loans made to selected settlers.

The method of financing these countless enterprises was equally
striking.  Instead of increasing the proportion of bonded indebtedness,
as was customary, the company sought additional capital chiefly by the
sale of common stock.  This procedure was possible because of the
speculative value of the stock, based primarily on the growth of
traffic, and of the value of the western lands still unsold: the
dividend rose steadily to ten per cent in 1912, and the practice which
prevailed until 1909 of issuing the stock at par gave holders {228}
valuable rights.  In the latter year 125 was charged for the shares
allotted, in 1912 150, and in 1913 175.  As a result of the earlier
policy an unnecessarily high price was paid for new capital, but fixed
charges were kept low, and no great system was as safe from
foreclosure.  In 1914 the total assets of the company were valued at
over $800,000,000.


Fifth in mileage among the railway systems of Canada is the group of
fragments connected with the Great Northern Railway of the United
States.  James J. Hill had not been least among the members of the
original Canadian Pacific Syndicate, but differences with his
colleagues led to his retirement in 1883.  Thenceforward he devoted
himself entirely to the building up of the St Paul, Minneapolis and
Manitoba, the railway acquired from the Dutch bondholders.  Under the
name of the Great Northern it had been extended by 1893 from Lake
Superior to Puget Sound, and continued to grow steadily until, twenty
years later, it controlled nearly eight thousand miles.  The Great
Northern was remarkable in at least three respects.  Except for the
original grants for the Minnesota lines, it was built through to the
coast {229} without a dollar or an acre of subsidy from the state.  Its
capitalization was kept close to the actual cost of the road and its
fixed charges were low.  It took the lead among American roads in an
aggressive and enlightened endeavour to build up the country through
which it ran, not only by flexible rate charges, but by a direct
campaign of education among the farmers and other shippers on its route.

The mineral wealth of southern British Columbia and the farming wealth
of the western plains turned Hill's attention toward Canada once more
about the beginning of the twentieth century.  In British Columbia the
progress of the Great Northern invasion was slow.  The character of the
country made construction difficult, and the Canadian Pacific,
appealing to national prejudices, fought every inch of the way.  But Mr
Hill pressed on.  The coal-fields of the Crow's Nest Pass, in which he
acquired a controlling interest, were made accessible by a road from
the south, and a series of lines branching from Spokane entered the
Boundary mining region.  Winding in and out across the border the road
continued westward to Vancouver.  Fortunately duplication was in large
part avoided; by arrangements with the Canadian Pacific, the {230}
Canadian Northern, and the Northern Pacific, the difficult country
south of the Fraser was pierced by common lines, and common terminal
facilities were secured.  Meanwhile, in 1906 and 1907, more ambitious
schemes were announced--the building of north and south lines through
Brandon and Regina, and the construction of an east and west line from
Winnipeg to the Pacific.  In ten years, it was officially forecasted,
the Great Northern would have as extensive a system in Canada as in the
United States.  What was more startling, Mr Hill denounced
'spoon-feeding,' and did not ask for a cent of subsidy.  The building
of the Grand Trunk Pacific and the Canadian Northern postponed
indefinitely these larger plans.  Actual operations were confined to
the construction of branches running northward in Manitoba, to Brandon,
Morden, and Portage la Prairie, and the acquisition, jointly with the
Northern Pacific, of a lease of the Canadian Northern line from Pembina
to Winnipeg, under the name of the Midland, and of terminals in
Winnipeg.  Meanwhile, as the map shows, branches from the main Great
Northern line nosed up to the border at nearly a dozen other places.

The activities, real and projected, of the {231} Great Northern in
Canada brought up acutely the question of the interrelations of
Canadian and American roads.  To some these activities appeared
evidences of an infamous plot to drain Canadian traffic southward to
United States ports and roads: to others they seemed to be
philanthropic endeavours to rescue Western Canada from the clutches of
monopoly.  They were not, however, due to either political intrigue or
knight-errantry, but to the same desire for profit which had led the
Canadian Pacific to build up its great system in the western states.
Other things being at all equal, it was of course desirable that
Canadian traffic should follow Canadian territory to Canadian ports; it
was to this end that uncounted millions had been spent.  Yet patriotism
had a seamy reverse side of political buncombe.  Every hint of outside
competition in the preserves of railway or industrial corporations in
Canada was denounced in interested quarters as dangerous and
empire-smashing, while the counter-incursions into the territory of the
United States were ignored or regarded as merely normal business
enterprise.

[Illustration: Great Northern Railway, 1914]

As a matter of fact, in 1914 Canadian railways controlled four miles in
the United {232} States for every mile in Canada controlled by railways
of the United States.  The Canadian Pacific alone owned or leased over
five thousand miles in the United States, chiefly in the northwest,
while it had close working agreements with the Wabash and the New York,
New Haven and Hartford.  The Grand Trunk controlled over seventeen
hundred miles, two-thirds in the Michigan peninsula and the remainder
in New England, while the Canadian Northern ran for some forty miles
through the United States, south of the Lake of the Woods.  The
American interests in Canada were more scattered, but the Great
Northern, the Michigan Central, the Père Marquette, and the New York
Central all developed important Canadian extensions.

In short, the interrelations were certainly no more extensive than
would have been expected in the case of two friendly nations lying side
by side for three thousand miles, connected by ties of speech and by
common commercial and social customs.  The only difficulty which arose
out of the situation was the division of jurisdiction between the
Railway Commission of Canada and the Interstate Commerce Commission of
the United States.  The heads of the two commissions, Mr Justice {233}
Mabee for Canada and Mr Knapp for the United States, endeavoured in
1910 to work out a plan for joint control, but without final success.


In the past half-century government ownership of railways has been much
discussed in Canada, dividing attention with the allied question of
railway ownership of the government.  It cannot be said that any
decisive public opinion or policy has resulted.  Important steps toward
government ownership have been taken in the last twenty years.  The
Intercolonial and Prince Edward Island Railways have been retained by
the government and extended, a federal line has been built in Manitoba
and a provincial one in Northern Ontario, and the National
Trans-continental has been constructed by the government for lease to a
private company.  Yet, at the same time, the main railway projects
continued to be entrusted to private companies, and the proportion of
the whole mileage under private operation increased.

The most important incident in the Intercolonial's later history was
its extension from Quebec to Montreal in 1898, by the purchase of the
Drummond County Railway and the lease of a stretch of forty miles in
length from {234} the Grand Trunk.  Six years later the Canada Eastern,
running from Gibson to Loggieville, was purchased.  Many bankrupt lines
in the Maritime Provinces and Quebec were offered to the Intercolonial
as valuable feeders.  In the later years of the government of Sir
Wilfrid Laurier and in the first years of Sir Robert Borden's
administration, authority was sought to acquire such of these roads as
might be desired, but restrictions due to the action of the Canadian
Senate or the political difficulty of discriminating between the
railways prevented any rapid acquisition.  Changes in administration
were tried.  As a half-concession to the demand that the Intercolonial
should be operated by an independent commission, a board of management
was established in 1909, consisting of the chief officials of the road.
In 1913 this board was dissolved and the management vested in a single
commissioner, F. P. Gutelius, formerly of the Canadian Pacific.

Financial returns showed little improvement.  True, the record,
unbroken since 1873, of annual failure to meet even operating expenses,
was varied after 1898 by small surpluses in two years out of three, but
the net deficits since Confederation rose to over eleven {235} millions
by 1913; and while there was no question that the administration had
been improved, there was room for belief that the surpluses had been in
part book-keeping ones, obtained by including in the large capital
expenditure items properly chargeable to revenue.

At first sight this failure to meet operating expenses, much less to
pay interest on the investment, together with constantly increasing
capital outlay, seemed to warrant strong condemnation of government
methods.  And, in truth, a serious indictment could be framed.
Efficient government ownership is more difficult in a democratic
country where shippers, employees, would-be employees, supply dealers,
all have influence over the administration, than it is in a
bureaucratic state.  Intercolonial employees were given their posts and
kept in them by political influence, and their numbers were often as
excessive as energy was lacking.  Supplies of coal and new land as
required were usually purchased from political friends, with an
additional margin for campaign contributions;[1] at election times the
{236} road became a vast political machine.  Under the administration
of the governments of Laurier and Borden the grosser scandals ceased,
but in one form or other political influence continued to be exerted.

Yet this was not the whole story.  If the Intercolonial did not earn
dividends, there were other reasons at work than government
inefficiency.  The road ran for long stretches through barren country
where little local traffic originated.  In competing for through
traffic it was handicapped by the roundabout length of its route: it
ran along two sides of a triangle, while the Canadian Pacific,
subsidized by one political party, was built along the base, and the
National Transcontinental, built by the other party, came in between;
in summer it had to face the competition of the St Lawrence route as
well.  Nor was dividend-earning the sole standard of success to be
applied.  The Intercolonial was built originally for political and
military ends, not merely for commercial gain.  It had given shippers
the lowest rates in the world: 'the surplus is in the pockets of the
people,' one of the political heads declared.  If, it was often urged,
the canals of Ontario and Quebec were operated by the government at a
dead {237} loss, without a cent of tolls, why grudge the Maritime
Provinces, to whom Confederation had been less kind, the benefit of
operating at bare cost the government railways!  The Intercolonial had
undoubtedly done much to weld the eastern and central provinces
together, and this was worth more than a million dollars or two in
interest charges.

The desire for rates at cost, or lower, which has made the people in
Eastern Canada oppose all suggestions to turn over the Intercolonial to
the Canadian Pacific or Canadian Northern, led those of Western Canada
to urge government ownership of the other federal venture, the Hudson
Bay Railway.  Owing to its far northern position, Manitoba possesses
ocean ports, Nelson and Churchill, which are nearer Liverpool than New
York is.  Why, then, carry the grain of the prairie fifteen hundred or
two thousand miles to an Atlantic port before loading it on the ocean
freighter?  Proposals to build a railway to a Hudson Bay port and to
establish a steamship line to carry the traffic at sea seemed plausible
and won much western support.  Investigation soon made the difficulties
clear.  Hudson Bay was fairly free from ice, but Hudson Straits were
studded with icebergs far into the summer.  {238} Ships of special
construction would be needed for the dangerous passage, and, in any
event, grain could not be shipped until the spring after it was
harvested and would have to be stored in elevators during the winter.
And in the meantime the three transcontinental railways were enlarging
the eastern funnels, while the Panama Canal made an outlet by Vancouver
feasible.  Still, there was a gambling chance that something would come
of a railway to Hudson Bay, and if the stroke succeeded, Canada would
be given a new coast, and would front the sea at the north as well as
at the east and the west.  The territory between Le Pas, a terminus of
the Canadian Northern, and Port Nelson, selected as the better port on
Hudson Bay, had some mineral and agricultural promise.  So, in the
prosperous days of 1911, it was decided to attempt the work.  As it was
largely an experiment, the government's plan of state construction and
possibly operation found wide support.  The line was still under
construction in 1914.

[Illustration: Railways of Canada, 1914]

Another exploration road which amply justified the faith of its
promoters was the Timiskaming and Northern Ontario.  This railway,
striking up from North Bay into the mineral region and clay belt beyond
the {239} height-of-land, was begun by the Ontario government in 1902
as a colonization road.  It was fortunate enough to uncover the riches
of Cobalt's silver-camp in its construction; later, mining development
at Gowganda and Porcupine brought it traffic; and the building of the
Grand Trunk Pacific made it an important connecting link.  It was able,
then, from the outset to show favourable results, direct as well as
indirect.  It was built and controlled by a government commission,
efficient and more or less free from politics.



[1] The deputy-minister, Mr Collingwood Schreiber, instanced in 1882 an
attempt of a farmer, whose claim was nursed by influential politicians,
to collect $70,000 for a gravel-pit liberally estimated to be worth $5.



{240}

CHAPTER XIII

SOME GENERAL QUESTIONS

The Question of State Aid--The Railway Commission--Progress in
Service--The Unknown Builders


When the pace of construction slackened in 1914, Canada had achieved a
remarkable position in the railway world.  Only five other
countries--the United States, Russia, Germany, India, and, by a small
margin, France--possessed a greater mileage; and, relatively to
population, none came anywhere near her.  Three great systems stretched
from coast to coast.  Need still existed for local extensions, but by a
great effort the main trunk lines had been built.  Not only in mileage
were the railways of Canada notable.  In the degree to which the minor
roads had been swallowed up by a few dominating systems, in the wide
sweep of their outside operations, in their extension beyond the
borders of Canada itself, and in the degree to which they had been
built by public aid, they challenged attention.  While there were
nearly ninety railway companies in Canada in 1914, the three {241}
transcontinental systems controlled more than eighty per cent of the
total mileage.  The variety of the subsidiary undertakings--steamships,
hotels, express service, irrigation and land development, grain
elevators--has already been indicated.  The control by Canadian
railways of seven or eight thousand miles of lines in the United
States, with corresponding, if smaller, extensions into Canada by
American lines, was an outcome of geographic conditions, intimate
social and trade connections, and a civilized view of international
relations which no other countries could match.

The aid given by the state had been remarkable in variety and in
extent.  In cash subsidies alone, up to 1913, municipalities, chiefly
in Ontario, had given over $18,000,000; the provinces, in the order of
Quebec, Ontario, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Manitoba, and British
Columbia, double that sum; and the Dominion $163,000,000.  Land-grants
exceeded fifty million acres.  Guarantees reached $275,000,000--the
Dominion, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba
leading--with some sixty millions looming up in the year to follow.
The privately owned railways of the Dominion were then capitalized
{242} at a billion and a half; allowing for the 'water' in this
capitalization on the one hand, and for construction out of earnings on
the other, it may fairly be computed that, omitting the guarantees, the
state had contributed from one-third to one-half their cost.  The
objections to this policy were manifold.  It had been one great source
of rottenness in politics.  It had pauperized some sections of the
country, leading them to look to the government to take the initiative
in every movement.  The land subsidies had delayed settlement, and the
exemption of grants from taxation had pressed heavily on the average
settler.  The wealth of Canada tended to concentrate in a few
dominating groups.  Roads were built that were a sheer waste of
capital, useless for traffic or colonization, or recklessly cutting
into territory sufficient only for existing lines.  Yet the profits
side of the account was large.  Settlement had been hastened, transport
facilities had been provided, values had increased, social intercourse
had been ameliorated, national unity had been fostered, in ways
impossible had private enterprise been left to struggle on unaided.  In
future, it might be hoped, private capital could build unaided, or the
state act directly.

{243}

In the allied field of government regulation progress had been made.
Until very recent years, Canada had been more anxious to get new
railways than to control old ones, and, besides, the worse forms of
discrimination which stirred indignation in the United States had not
been widely practised in Canada.  But with the growing complexity of
the industrial organization, and the recognition that competition could
not solve the difficulties, a demand rose for more efficient
regulation.  The Dominion government, acting upon an able and thorough
report by Dr S. J. M'Lean, established in 1904 a Railway Commission,
permanent, non-political, and large enough to make it possible for its
members, singly or jointly, to hear complaints in all sections of the
Dominion.  Later, telegraph, telephone, and express rates and services
were added to its jurisdiction.  Hampered by few of the constitutional
limitations which have lessened the usefulness of the Interstate
Commerce Commission, and guided by efficient businesslike heads--Blair,
Killam, Mabee, Drayton--it soon established a unique reputation for
fairness, promptness, and common sense.

But it is not merely in mileage or in relationship {244} to the state
that change has come in the three-quarters of a century since the first
locomotive whistle was heard in Canada.  Let us glance at some of the
more striking changes in equipment and methods of operation.  In the
road bed, new standards of solidity have been set, grades cut down and
curves straightened at a cost of uncounted millions, busy stretches
double-tracked, steel bridges built in place of wooden trestles.  The
greatest single advance was the substitution, in the eighties chiefly,
of steel for iron rails, making construction cheaper and repair easier,
and permitting the running of heavier and faster trains.  Heavier
trains in turn brought heavier rails, eighty to one hundred pounds to
the yard being the usual weight on main tracks, instead of forty or
fifty in early days.  Locomotives grew steadily in size from the
_Kitten_ of 1837 to the huge _Mallet_ of to-day.  Freight engines were
differentiated from passenger engines.  Coal was substituted for wood
as fuel, and in some cases oil for coal.  Electricity replaced steam in
tunnels and other places where smoke was troublesome.  The crude little
freight cars, carrying four or five tons, gave way to cars carrying
thirty tons or more, specialized for all conceivable purposes, {245}
from cattle and coal cars and oil tanks to refrigerator cars for fruit
or meats or milk.  Passenger coaches, following, as in other matters,
American rather than English models, underwent a similar change, and
improved steadily in size, strength, and convenience.  The formal
division into classes which marks European railway travel has not taken
root in Canada; but between Pullman and parlour cars, first and second
classes, the actual variety is great.  Train dispatching, at first by
telegraph, and latterly by telephone, has become a fine art; safety
devices such as the air-brake, and more slowly block signals, have been
adopted.  The old confusing diversity of local time has been remedied
by the adoption of a zone system, in consequence largely of the
persistent advocacy of Sir Sandford Fleming.  Thus the increase in
mileage by no means represents the increase in service rendered: every
year the engines grow more powerful, the cars larger and the trains
longer, and the freight service more speedy and trustworthy.  True, the
service is still far from perfect, and when a heavy snowstorm paralyses
traffic, or the diversion to new competitive building of money which
should have gone into equipment brings about congestion, {246} vigorous
denunciation follows these brief reversions to the traffic conditions
of the good old days.


There is no work that man has wrought that would give nobler and more
enduring title to fame than the great cathedrals which mediaeval Europe
bequeathed to the world.  Yet no man's name is linked with theirs.
They were the work of generations, of an epoch, the expression of the
genius and the labour and the worship of uncounted thousands.  There is
a whole world of difference between the mediaeval cathedral and the
modern railway, but this they have in common, that they are the work
not of a few hands but of many, not a sudden creation, but the product
of labours continued year after year.  Leaders were indispensable; we
cannot forget the men who planned and the men who carried through and
the men who organized the working of the great railway systems.  Keefer
and Fleming, Poor and Waddington, Galt and Hincks and Howe, Macdonald
and Laurier, Mount Stephen and Strathcona, Van Horne and Hays,
Shaughnessy and Mackenzie, these and many more, though often bearing
feet of clay, we shall honour as builders of a mighty heritage.

{247}

But behind these loom up forgotten myriads who also were indispensable.
The surveyor, often an explorer as well, striking out into the
wilderness, braving sheer precipice and arctic blizzard in search of
mountain pass or lower grade; the man with the pick and shovel, a
mighty and ever-shifting army--English navvy, Irish canaller, Chinese
coolie, Swede or Italian or Ruthenian--housed in noisome bunkhouses,
often fleeced by employment agent or plundering sub-contractor, facing
sudden death by reckless familiarity with dynamite or slower death by
typhoid and dysentery; the men who carried on the humdrum work of every
day, track-mending, ticket-punching, engine-stoking; the patient,
unmurmuring payer of taxes for endless bonuses--these, too, were
perhaps not least among the Railway Builders of Canada.



{248}

BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE

There are surprisingly few secondary books dealing with Canadian
railway history available for the general reader.  The admirable
treatise by Dr S. J. M'Lean, 'National Highways Overland,' in vol. x of
_Canada and Its Provinces_, is much the best.  Trout, _The Railways of
Canada_ (1871), and the article by T. C. Keefer in _Eighty Years'
Progress of British North America_ (1863), are useful for the early
period, but are scarce.  There is, however, a wealth of first-hand
material--pamphlets, travellers' notes, company reports, Hansard
debates, committee inquiries, and departmental returns.  The largest
collections of such material are to be found in the Parliamentary
Library, Ottawa, the Library of the Department of Railways and Canals,
the Toronto Public Library, and the Library of Queen's University,
Kingston.

For progress from year to year since 1901, see Castell Hopkins, _The
Canadian Annual Review_, vol. i _et seq_.  See also, in this Series,
_The Day of Sir John Macdonald_ and _The Day of Sir Wilfrid Laurier_.



{249}

INDEX


Alberta, railways in, 184, 216, 224; grants in aid, 192, 241.

Allan, Sir Hugh, and the Pacific Scandal, 122-7.

America, North, ways of access into, 29-30; and transport development,
30-5.

Angus, R. B., and the Canadian Pacific Syndicate, 135, 136 n., 137, 151.

Ashburton Treaty, the, 57-8.


Blair, Andrew G., minister of Railways, 208.

Blake, Edward, his opposition to the C.P.R. contract, 143-5, 157 N.

Borden, Sir Robert, and the Canadian Northern, 191, 192.

Brassey, Betts, Peto and Jackson, railway contractors in the Maritime
Provinces, 66-67, 69, 73, 75; in Canada, 70, 72-6, 79, 80, 81 and note,
83.

British Columbia, its terms of union with Canada, 115, 116, 128, 130;
railway grants in aid, 192, 241.

Broun, Sir Richard, his railway, 58.

Buchanan, Isaac, promotes the Great Western, 47.


Canada, before the advent of the railway, 12-14, 19-26, 109-113;
development of water transport, 14-16, 33-5; of land transport, 16-19;
her railway policy, 27-30, 49-55, 64, 69-71, 169-72, 176, 190, 191,
209, 211, 233-9, 241-3; railway building, 36-49, 84-5, 93, 98, 182-3;
the Grand Trunk, 71-74, 81-2, 83, 88-90, 94, 187; the Intercolonial,
106-8; the C.P.R., 116, 122-9, 139-50, 158-9, 164-5, 176-7, 224; a
'boom' period, 85, 181-2, 196; the Canadian Northern, 190-1, 192, 194;
a period of depression, 197-8, 202; the Grand Trunk Pacific, 206-11,
213-15; railway interrelations with United States, 231, 232-3, 241;
government roads, 108, 233-239; Canada's position in the railway world,
240-1.  See Railways.

Canada Central Railway, 100, 128, 173.

Canada North-West Land Company, 153.

Canada Southern Railway, 40, 98-9, 104.

Canadian Northern Railway, 92; building of, 183, 185-9, 230, 232;
financing of, 190-5; other enterprises, 195, 211.

Canadian Pacific Railway, the great demand for, 114-17; the survey and
route, 117-20, 129, 160-1, 162-3; the Pacific Scandal, 120-7; the
syndicate, 130-42, 150-2; terms of building contract, 141-50, 172-173;
financing of, 139-42, 147-150, 152-9, 181, 227-8, 236; its
construction, 128, 159-68; development eastward, 173-175; further
expansion, 175-178, 223-6, 232; and other railways, 139-40, 173-6, 186,
203, 215, 225; the world's foremost transportation system, 220-1, 226-7.

Canadian Pacific Syndicate, the, 130-42, 150-2.

Capreol, F. C., his ingenious financing scheme, 48.

Caraquet Railway Company, 171 n.

Cartier, Sir George, 107; and the C.P.R. contract, 123, 124, 125 n.

Central Vermont Railway, 101, 122 n., 174, 204.

Chamberlin, Edson J., president of the Grand Trunk, 202, 215.

Champlain and St Lawrence Railway, 36-8, 39, 40, 49-50.

Chandler, E. B., 53; his railway mission, 63, 65-6.

Cox, George A., 143, 179.


Elgin, Lord, governor-general of Canada, 72.

England, the locomotive contest in, 1-5; her lead in railway
development, 7-10.  See Great Britain.

European and North American Railway, 60-2, 64, 68-9, 102, 174.


Farley, Jesse P., and the Canadian Pacific Syndicate, 132, 137 n.

Fleming, Sir Sandford, 245, 246; and the Intercolonial, 56-7, 106-8,
117; and the C.P.R., 114, 117-20, 178.


Galt, Sir A. T., 172; his railway enterprises, 44, 45, 70, 71, 74-6,
77, 81 n., 84, 114, 246.

Gladstone, W. E., colonial secretary, 59.

Grand Trunk Railway, 38; building and financing of, 71-84, 87, 94, 95,
97, 99, 104-5, 122-3, 187, 232; and the C.P.R., 155, 174, 178-80; in
low water, 196-9; changes of administration and material, 200-2,
218-19; eastern activities, 203-5; westward expansion, 205-6, 208, 211,
214.  See Grand Trunk Pacific.

Grand Trunk Pacific, 205; the demand for, 209; question of the route,
207-8, 210, 215-18; building and financing of, 208-9, 211-15, 217.

Grant, Rev. George M., 117.

Great Britain, her railway mileage in 1846, 38; her railway policy in
Canada, 54-5, 106; in the Maritime Provinces, 59, 60, 62-6, 73.  See
England.

Great Northern Railway, its development in Canada, 137-138, 187, 228-32.

Great Western Railway, building of, 40, 41, 46-7, 54, 55, 69, 70, 77,
84, 86-7, 91, 94, 95, 97, 99, 104-5; acquired by the Grand Trunk, 179.

Guarantee Acts, to aid railway building, 55, 69, 71, 84, 86.

Gutelius, F. P., manager of the Intercolonial, 234.

Gzowski and Co., railway contractors, 77, 81 n.


Hays, Charles M., 246; president of the Grand Trunk, 200-1, 203-4, 206,
212, 215; drowned in the 'Titanic' disaster, 202.

Hill, James J., and the C.P. Syndicate, 133, 134, 136 n., 137 and note,
141, 151, 162; and the Great Northern, 138 n., 228-30.

Hincks, Sir Francis, 52, 53, 246; his railway policy, 53-4, 56, 69,
70-1, 72-3, 88; and railway enterprises,  65-6, 73-6, 122.

Holt, H. S., and the Canadian Northern, 184.

Holton, Luther, his railway enterprises, 70, 71, 74-6, 81 n., 84.

Howe, Joseph, 52, 53, 246; his railway campaign in England, 62-4, 65-6,
69, 70; and state ownership, 66-7; his prophecy, 113.

Howland, Sir William, his railway syndicate, 143, 145.

Hudson, 'King,' railway promoter, 38, 47.

Hudson Bay Railway, 237-8.


Intercolonial Railway, 59-60, 98; building of, 105-8, 179; later
development, 233-7.


Jackson, Henry, railway contractor, 73, 75, 76.

Jaffray, Robert, 179.


Keefer, Thomas C., a distinguished engineer, 36, 246.

Kennedy, John S., and the C.P. Syndicate, 132, 136 n., 137 n., 141, 151.

Kittson, Norman W., and the St Paul and Pacific, 133, 134, 136 n.


Lash, Z.  A., and the Canadian Northern, 184.

Laurier, Sir Wilfrid, 246; his railway policy, 188, 190, 192, 207, 210.

Liverpool and  Manchester Railway, 2-4, 36.


Mabee, Justice, chairman of Railway Commission, 232-3, 243.

M'Carthy, D'Alton, and a Railway Commission, 171.

Macdonald, Sir John, 246; and the C.P.R., 115, 116, 122, 124-6, 128-9,
130, 140, 141-2, 158, 210.

Macdonnell, Allan, railway promoter, 113-14.

M'Intyre, Duncan, and the C.P.R., 139-40, 141, 150, 157.

Mackenzie, Alexander, and the C.P.R., 127-8.

Mackenzie, William, 246; and the Canadian Northern, 183-5, 189-90, 192.

M'Lean, S. J., his report on railways, 243.

M'Mullen, G. W., and the Pacific Scandal, 121-2, 123, 124.

MacNab, Sir Allan, promotes the Great Western, 47, 53.

Macpherson, D. L., his railway enterprises, 70, 71, 74-6, 81 n., 84,
123-4.

Manitoba, railways of, 176-7, 183, 185, 186, 233, 237; grants in aid,
191, 192, 241.

Mann, Donald, and the Canadian Northern, 183-5, 189-90, 192.

Maritime Provinces, their network of roads, 18; their railway projects
and policy, 55-69, 93, 104 n.; and the Intercolonial, 106-8, 237; and
the Grand Trunk Pacific, 207-8.

Merritt, W. Hamilton, and the Welland Canal, 90-1.

Midland Railway, 100, 179, 183, 230.

Minnesota venture, the, 131-9.

Mississippi, transport development on the, 31-2.

Mitchell, Peter, and the Intercolonial, 107.

Montreal, and the St Lawrence and Atlantic Railway, 42-4, 60.

Morse, Frank, manager of the Grand Trunk Pacific, 215.

Mount Stephen, Lord, and the C.P. Syndicate, 134-7; and the C.P.R.,
139, 140, 141, 150, 157 and note, 221-2, 246.

Municipal Loan Fund, the, 88-90.


National Transcontinental Railway, 172, 233, 236.

New Brunswick, railways in, 67-9, 102, 103 n., 175; grants in aid, 241.
See Maritime Provinces.

Northern Railway, building of, 40, 41, 47-8, 55, 69, 84, 87-8, 94, 100,
104 n.; acquired by the Grand Trunk, 179.

Northern Pacific Railway, 116, 121 n., 134, 157, 166, 177, 186, 230.

North-West Rebellion, the, and the C.P.R., 164-5.

Nova Scotia, railways in, 67, 102, 103 n., 188; grants in aid, 192,
241.  See Maritime Provinces.


Ontario, railways in, 40, 41, 45-8, 49, 50-1, 80, 89-92, 98-101, 103
n., 175, 216, 233; and the C.P.R. contract, 123; grants in aid, 103 n.,
190, 191, 192, 216, 241.

Osler, E. B., and the C.P.R., 151.


Pacific Scandal, the, 120-7.

Palliser, Captain, his mistaken view regarding a railway to the
Pacific, 117.

Papineau, L. J., and state ownership of railways, 49.

Peto, Brassey, Betts and Jackson, 66.  See Brassey.

Poor, John A., 246; his railway enterprises, 42-4, 60-1, 114.

Pope, John Henry, and the C.P.R., 139, 140, 158.

Prince Edward Island, its railway, 103, 233.  See Maritime Provinces.


Quebec, railways in, 36-40, 41-5, 49, 92, 101-2, 103 n.; grants in aid,
103 n., 190-1, 241.

Quebec and Richmond Railway, 75, 80, 81 n.


Railway Commission, the, 171-172, 243.

Railways, development of, 1, 4-12, 244-6; the gauge question, 95-8;
narrow-gauge lines, 98-100, 103, 224; wooden rails, 101-2; railway
profits, 50, 79, 82, 86, 94, 95, 121; railway jobbery, 85-6, 170-1 and
note, 213, 235 n., 236; grants in aid, 103 and note, 170-1, 241-2;
'ticket scalping,' 172.  See under Canada.

Reciprocity Treaty, the, 80.

Richelieu, Cardinal, and the power of steam, 7.

Rivers-Wilson, Sir Charles, president of the  Grand Trunk, 199-200, 202.

Robinson, Major, his railway survey, 59-60, 107.

Rogers, Major, his C.P.R. route through the Rockies, 162.

Ross, A. M., and the Grand Trunk, 77, 79.

Ross, James, and the Canadian Northern, 184.

Ross, John, first president of the Grand Trunk, 76.

Rosser, General, and the C.P.R., 152.

Ruskin, John, his opinion of the railway, 11.


Sage, Russell, and the St Paul and Pacific, 132.

St Lawrence, the canal system of the, 15-16, 34-5; river steamers of,
25.

St Lawrence and Atlantic Railway, 40, 41, 42-5, 54, 55, 69, 70, 75-6,
79.

St Paul, Minneapolis and Manitoba Railway, 128, 132, 134, 137, 151,
228.  See Great Northern.

Saskatchewan, railways in, 184, 216, 224-5; grants in aid, 192, 241.

Scott, W. L., and the C.P.R., 154.

Shaughnessy, Sir Thomas, president of the C.P.R., 222-223, 246.

Simpson, Sir George, his record journey to the Pacific, 109-12.

Smith, Donald, 133.  See Strathcona, Lord.

Stephen, George.  See Mount Stephen, Lord.

Stephenson, George, his locomotive triumph, 2-5, 10.

Stickney, A. B., and the C.P.R., 152.

Stockton and Darlington Railway, 2-3, 6.

Strathcona, Lord, 112 n.; and the C.P. Syndicate, 133-4, 141-2, 151,
157, 166, 246.

Surrey Iron Railway, 6.


Taché, E. P., his railway advocacy, 65.

Timiskaming and Northern Ontario Railway, 216, 238-9.

Trans-Canada Railway, 187, 207.

Tupper, Sir Charles, minister of Railways, 139, 140, 141, 146, 158, 170.

Tyler, Sir Henry, president of the Grand Trunk, 140, 199.


United States, their transport development, 25, 32-3; competition with
Canada for the western trade, 31-5, 39; railway development, 38, 52-3,
96, 115-16, 121; depression in, 198, 202; interrelations with Canada,
28, 50-1, 232-3.


Van Horne, Sir William, and the C.P.R., 148 n., 152, 159, 161, 164-5,
166, 205, 222, 246.

Waddington, Alfred, railway promoter, 115, 121, 122, 246.

Watkin, Edwin, his Pacific project, 114.

Watt, James, his reciprocating steam-engine, 9.


Young, John, his railway enterprises, 45, 65, 70, 114.


Zimmermann, Samuel, railway contractor, 47.



  Printed by T. and A. Constable, Printers to His Majesty
  at the Edinburgh University Press





*** End of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "The Railway Builders - A Chronicle of Overland Highways" ***

Copyright 2023 LibraryBlog. All rights reserved.