Home
  By Author [ A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z |  Other Symbols ]
  By Title [ A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z |  Other Symbols ]
  By Language
all Classics books content using ISYS

Download this book: [ ASCII | HTML | PDF ]

Look for this book on Amazon


We have new books nearly every day.
If you would like a news letter once a week or once a month
fill out this form and we will give you a summary of the books for that week or month by email.

Title: The Mormon Puzzle, and How to Solve It
Author: Beers, R. W.
Language: English
As this book started as an ASCII text book there are no pictures available.


*** Start of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "The Mormon Puzzle, and How to Solve It" ***


produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive/American Libraries.)



  THE MORMON PUZZLE;
  _AND HOW TO SOLVE IT._


  BY REV. R. W. BEERS, A.M.,
  PASTOR OF THE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, ELKTON, MD.


  "A disposition to reserve, and an ability to improve, taken
  together, would be my standard of a statesman"--EDMUND BURKE.


  FUNK & WAGNALLS, PUBLISHERS.
  CHICAGO: TIMES BUILDING.
  NEW YORK:1 8 & 20 ASTOR PLACE.
  LONDON: 44 FLEET STREET.
  1887



  Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1886,
  By FUNK & WAGNALLS,
  In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington, D. C.



  To my Parents,
  TO WHOSE SELF-SACRIFICE AND DEVOTION I OWE SO MUCH,
  THIS VOLUME IS LOVINGLY
  Dedicated.



PREFACE.


The following pages have at least the merit of being addressed to a
subject of living interest to the American people. Perhaps with the single
exception of the labor problem, the Mormon problem is the most important
question before the people of our country at the present time. It is a
problem which has thus far been unsolvable by the moralist, the statesman,
and the politician. It still remains a PUZZLE. No feasible plan has yet
been hit upon for getting rid of it.

From the past failures to solve it, it would seem that the problem has
either not been studied from the proper standpoint, or has been
misunderstood. Accordingly, we instituted a careful study of the problem
in all its different phases, and endeavored to conduct our investigation
in a fair and impartial manner. In doing so we consulted the leading
authorities, both Mormon and non-Mormon, and must here acknowledge our
indebtedness especially to "New Light on Mormonism," by Mrs. Ellen E.
Dickinson; "Illiteracy and Mormonism," by Henry Randall Waite; Professor
Coyner's "Handbook on Mormonism;" Schaff-Herzog's "Encyclopædia of
Religious Knowledge;" and back files of the _Independent_, _Christian
Union_, and _Deseret News_--all of which were freely used in the
preparation of this volume.

It has the merit of being the product of about two years' careful thought
and research. Most of the writings on Mormonism at the present day are the
result of a few days' study of the subject on the field of Utah; but,
apart from the insufficient time which such authors devote to the study of
so knotty a problem, their minds are very apt to be warped by the people
among whom their lot is cast during their short visit there, and they
almost inevitably present a one-sided view of the question.

Thus, some have fallen into the hands of _the Mormons_; and they have
returned from Utah delighted, and let fall from their lips naught but
encomiums for the priesthood and apologies for the Mormon system. Many of
our legislators have in this way been the dupes of the Mormon priesthood.
On this subject the much-lamented _Mary Clemmer_ wrote the following
pungent lines:

"Legislators constantly passing to and from California find Salt Lake City
a most attractive stopping-place. The Mormon hierarchy, sly, cunning,
astute, to the last limit of human nature, is ever sharply on the lookout
for these potent summer visitors. 'Prophets' and 'apostles' board every
train of cars that enters Utah bearing an important traveller. The freedom
of the city, the hospitality of the show 'happy families,' who are never
taken by surprise on an off-day of misery, is lavished upon the ingenuous
guest.... The facts impressed upon his senses, as well as his
understanding, are those of great industry, thrift, wealth, prosperity--of
shrewd men and of seemingly happy women. Indeed, their supreme occupation
while with him is to prove to him that they _are_ happy, while the men are
equally busy in spreading before him the vast resources of both the Church
and the Territory. This man, who is one of many men whose voice and vote
tells upon human affairs, leaves the Territory at last deeply in debt
personally for favors received and mentally somewhat dazed by the material
profitableness of a religious system that he wishes to denounce, but does
not pretend to understand."

On the other hand, many have fallen into the hands of _bitter non-Mormons_
during their brief stay in Utah; and their minds have been filled with
horrible stories of the brutalities and crimes of the Mormon people. They
have returned disgusted, and have uttered harsh tirades against the whole
Mormon system and all who believe in it, declaring that it should be
utterly exterminated, even by the sword. Of their utterances and writings
the official organ of the Mormon Church, the _Deseret News_, in its issue
of July 21st, 1886, reasonably complains. It says: "Salt Lake City is not
Utah, and conversation with a little knot of anti-Mormons does not impart
much accurate information on 'Mormonism.' The books that are written by
tourists who come in by the cars, take a hack, a ride around town, a sniff
at the lake, a glance at the Temple, and a guess at the situation, and who
make up their data from other publications and the yarns of persons who
take delight in filling up travellers with blood-curdling Munchausenisms,
are not likely to correct the public mind on a subject about which there
is more misinformation than almost any other.... And these books are not
any less reliable than the remarks and tales and remedies that fall from
the lips of men who spend a few weeks in a given locality in one Utah
town, and then go to the world and air their great experience and
knowledge about the 'Mormons' through 'a protracted residence in Utah.'"

It was our desire to avoid both Scylla and Charybdis--to treat the subject
with an unbiased mind--to get the real facts, and then propound, if
possible, a solution to the problem. We have not been in actual contact
either with Mormons or non-Mormons. We have not been on the field of Utah
at all, and believe that the value of this volume as an impartial study is
thereby greatly enhanced. Furthermore, while we have avoided the narrow
views of the subject which would almost inevitably have resulted from a
personal visit to Utah, we have been in communication both with leading
Mormons and non-Mormons on the field, and have in that way acquired all
the _reliable_ information which could have been obtained by a _long
residence_ there.

The result of our long and careful study, which was prosecuted while we
were engaged in regular pastoral duties, was first given to the members of
our own congregation in a series of lectures on week-day evenings; and
while they have since then been enlarged and carefully revised, they still
have the free oratorical style which, though inexcusable in a work
prepared exclusively for publication, may be pardoned in an oral lecture.

The solution of the "_Mormon Puzzle_" to which we have arrived is given
forth with the firm conviction that it is practicable, and if carried out
in its various parts would peaceably overcome all the bad qualities
belonging to Mormonism, which are the sole cause of the puzzle now before
the people of our country. Nevertheless, we do not anticipate for our
views the indorsement of the extremists on either side; but we believe
they will commend themselves to the fair-minded people of our land; at
least, it is hoped that all minds open to conviction may find something in
these pages worthy of their serious thought. We only ask that the reader
may adopt the precept of Bacon: "Read not to contradict and confute; nor
to believe and take for granted; but to weigh and consider."

THE AUTHOR.

PRESBYTERIAN PARSONAGE, ELKTON, MD.



TABLE OF CONTENTS.


  INTRODUCTORY REMARKS.


  PART I. HISTORY OF MORMONISM.

  CHAPTER I.                                                          PAGE

  Alleged Origin of Mormonism--Joseph Smith's Early Life--Finding
  the Peek-stone--Visited by an Angel--Received the Golden Plates--
  Was Smith a Swindler or an Enthusiast?--"Book of Mormon"
  Published, and Mormon Church Established--Smith's First Alleged
  Miracle--Rigdon Joins the Mormons--Mormonism Compared to
  Mohammedanism                                                         25

  CHAPTER II. HISTORY OF MORMONISM (_continued_).

  _The First Hegira_ from Palmyra to Kirtland--The First Temple--
  Rapid Growth of the Mormon Church--Brigham Young and other
  Missionaries Sent to Foreign Lands--The Name "Latter-day Saints"
  Adopted--Smith and Rigdon Compelled to Flee from Kirtland--_The
  Second Hegira_--The "Danites" Organized--Rapid Increase of the
  Mormons in Missouri--Jealousy of the Missourians--Mormons Driven
  across the Missouri River by a Mob--Their Property Confiscated--
  Their Leaders Imprisoned                                              38

  CHAPTER III. HISTORY OF MORMONISM (_continued_).

  _The Third Hegira_--Sufferings of the Mormons during their
  Journey into Illinois--An Account of the Murder of Mormons--
  Influence of this Persecution on the Minds of Mormons at the
  Present Time--_Nauvoo_--Its Location--Its Growth--The Second
  Mormon Temple Begun--Other Public Buildings--Laziness Whittled
  out of Nauvoo--Internal Dissensions Among the Mormons--Political
  Troubles--Smith Nominated for President of the United States--
  Warrants Issued against the Mormon Leaders--Constable Driven out
  of Nauvoo--Civil War Threatened--Smith Asked to Submit to Trial--
  Murder of Joseph Smith and his Brother--Rigdon Excommunicated,
  and Brigham Young Made Leader--Consecration of the "Pride of the
  Valley"                                                               45

  CHAPTER IV. HISTORY OF MORMONISM (_concluded_).

  _The Fourth Hegira_--Young's Shrewd Plan of a Western Kingdom--
  Nauvoo's Sad End--Journey of the Mormons to Council Bluffs--
  Young's Forethought--The Trip of the Pioneers Across the
  Wilderness--The Halt at Salt Lake Valley--Young Leads the
  Remaining Mormons from Council Bluffs to Salt Lake--Their
  Entertainment during their March--Folly of the Illinoisans in
  Driving them out into the Wilderness--Probable Result of
  Tolerance of the Mormons--Character of the Mormons--Life Begun
  Anew in Salt Lake Valley--Salt Lake City Established--Mills and
  Workshops Established and the Great Temple Begun--Increase of
  the Mormon Population--Value of their Property in Utah--Public
  Schools--A Final Brief Glance at their History--How the Mormon
  Puzzle will not be Solved                                             54


  PART II. THE POLITICAL PUZZLE.

  CHAPTER V.

  Mormonism a Theocracy--Manoeuvring for Office the Cause of the
  Expulsion of the Mormons from Missouri and Nauvoo--The "State of
  Deseret" Formed--Lands Illegally Obtained--Brigham's Movable
  House--Government Officials Compelled to Flee--Federal Troops
  Sent--The Oath of Disloyalty--The Endowment Rites--The American
  Flag at Half-mast--The Control of the Nation their Aim--The
  Political Puzzle Stated--Its Causes--Necessity of Government
  Action                                                                67

  CHAPTER VI. THE POLITICAL PUZZLE (_continued_).

  _The Possible Remedies_--The Military Remedy--The Government
  Responsible for the Situation in Utah--The Disfranchisement of
  Polygamists--Federal Trustees for the Mormon Church Corporation--
  Confiscation of Unlawful Funds--False Statements About Mormons--
  Letters from the Two Bancrofts--The Dissolution of the Emigrating
  Fund Company--The Federal Commission Remedy--The Woodburn Bill,
  or Idaho Statute                                                      77

  CHAPTER VII. THE POLITICAL PUZZLE (_concluded_).

  Objections to Proposed Remedies--_Gladstone_ on "Coercion"--A
  NEW PLAN ADVOCATED--_The Abolition of Female Suffrage_--_A
  National Colonization Scheme_--Natural Resources of Utah--
  Superiority of the Colonization Plan over Others--_The
  Establishment of National Free Schools_--Ignorance the Keystone
  of Mormon Despotism--Public Schools in Utah used for Mormon
  Purposes--Proposed Federal Superintendent of Schools in Utah--
  Territorial Schools Too Few--Necessity of Government Action--
  Prejudice Disarmed by this Plan--THE POLITICAL PUZZLE SOLVED          91


  PART III. THE SOCIAL PUZZLE.

  CHAPTER VIII.

  Polygamy only one of the Mormon Social Evils--Their Social
  System _a System of Bondage_--Contrary to Natural Law--Contrary
  to the Spirit of the Age--PERSONAL BONDAGE of the Mormons--
  Missionaries _Must_ Go on Duty--Dictation of the Priesthood with
  Regard to Boarders and Rents--Immigrants Under their Control--All
  Members Subject to Church Orders--Power of the Church over Daily
  Business--Mormon Mining Contractors--MENTAL BONDAGE of the
  Mormons--Converts Illiterate--The Mormon Church the Opponent of
  Free Education--No Independent Thought--Excommunication of Henry
  Lawrence and Others                                                  107

  CHAPTER IX. THE SOCIAL PUZZLE (_continued_).

  MORAL BONDAGE of the Mormons--Implicit Obedience to the
  Priesthood Enjoined--_Crimes Committed_ at their Command--
  Murders--The Mountain Meadows Massacre--Lee's Confession--A
  Mormon Carpenter's Confession--Theft--Falsehood--Perjury--Why
  was Polygamy Promulgated?--Why is Polygamy Practised?                118

  CHAPTER X. THE SOCIAL PUZZLE (_continued_).

  _Reasons why Mormon Slavery is Maintained_--Hope of Earthly
  Gain--Complete Organization of the Mormon Church--Prospect of
  Promotion in Office as a Bribe--Fear of Earthly Loss--System of
  Espionage--Apostasy Formerly Punished by Death--Mode of
  Inflicting the Punishment--Social Ostracism--Religious Conviction
  the Mainstay of the Mormon Social System                             131

  CHAPTER XI. THE SOCIAL PUZZLE (_concluded_).

  THE SOLUTION OF THE SOCIAL PUZZLE--Mormon Slavery and Negro
  Slavery Compared--The Duty of the Government to Break up Mormon
  Slavery--The Remedy the Same as for the Political Evils of
  Mormonism--Brigham Young Opposed to Immigration of Gentiles--A
  Growing Spirit of Restlessness--Necessity of Surrounding the
  Youth with an Atmosphere of Freedom--_Personal Bondage_ of the
  Mormons Overcome by Gentile Colonization--Social Ostracism no
  Longer Dreaded--_Mental Bondage_ Overcome by National Schools and
  Colonization--_Moral Bondage_ Overcome by the Same Means--This
  Policy not to be Confounded with the Let-Alone Policy--An
  Apparent Policy of Toleration--The Alarmist's Cry and its Answer--
  The Mormon Standpoint not to be Overlooked--The Cry of
  Unconstitutionality--The Proposed Polygamy Amendment to the
  Constitution--The Cry of Religious Persecution--Imprisonment
  Preferred to Sacrifice of Principle--Law Impotent to Break up
  Polygamy--Supposed Captivity of Mormon Women a Mistake--
  Mass-Meeting of Mormon Women to Plead for Polygamy--_Senator Hoar_
  on the Solution of the Social Puzzle--How the Law Should be
  Enforced and its Probable Effect--Superiority of the Colonization
  Plan over any Other Plan--Its Effectiveness Proved by the Oneida
  Community--_The Social Puzzle Solved_--The Duty of the Nation,
  the Citizen, and the Church                                          138


  PART IV. THE RELIGIOUS PUZZLE.

  CHAPTER XII.

  The Religious Aspects of Mormonism Paramount--General Ignorance
  Concerning the Mormon Religious System--SOURCES OF THEIR
  DOCTRINES--Revelation, not Reason, the Primary Source--All
  Religions Founded on Revelation--Sacred Books--The Mormon Bible--
  The "Book of Mormon"--Migrations of Jews to America--Visit of
  Jesus to America--"Book of Doctrine and Covenants"--The "Living
  Oracles"                                                             161

  CHAPTER XIII. THE RELIGIOUS PUZZLE (_continued_).

  MORMON DOCTRINES--Their Idea of God--Plurality of Gods--Mormon
  Sunday-School Hymn Concerning Smith--The Pre-existence of Souls--
  The Doctrine of Polygamy--Practised on the Plea of Self-Sacrifice
  and Ambition--Necessity of Preaching their Gospel to All--
  Preaching to the Dead--Baptismal Regeneration--Baptism for the
  Dead--Mormon Priesthood Necessary to Salvation--Melchizedek and
  Aaronic Priesthood--Mormon Endowments--Blood Atonement--Doctrine
  of "The Fulness of Times"                                            168

  CHAPTER XIV. THE RELIGIOUS PUZZLE (_continued_).

  Professor Coyner's Analysis of Mormonism--Rev. Dr. McNiece's
  Analysis--Reasons for the Growth and Tenacity of Mormonism--The
  Christian Element its Chief Source of Strength--No Mormon
  Converts from Heathenism--Protestantism the Source of its
  Recruits--Bible Doctrines in the Mormon "Catechism for Children"--
  The Mormon Articles of Faith--The Mormon Heresy Compared to
  Gnosticism in the Early Christian Church--A Clue to the Solution
  of the Religious Puzzle                                              181

  CHAPTER XV. THE RELIGIOUS PUZZLE (_concluded_).

  The Character of Efforts Hitherto put Forth to Solve the Puzzle--
  What has been Accomplished--The Plan Somewhere Defective--
  Mormonism to be Reformed, not Destroyed--Why Mormons will not
  Listen to Christian Missionaries--Moody and Sankey's Meetings in
  Salt Lake City--_The Deseret Evening News_ on Bishop Tuttle's
  Sermon--Mormonism a Perversion of Christianity--The Educational
  and Colonization Scheme best Fitted to Reform it--Proved by
  Comparing Roman Catholicism in the United States with Roman
  Catholicism in Mexico or Brazil--The Probable Effect of a Larger
  Intelligence--The Probable Effect of the Introduction of Gentile
  Colonies--The Religious Puzzle Solved--The Duty of the Hour          188



INTRODUCTORY REMARKS.


"Search for the truth is the noblest occupation of man."--MADAME DE STAËL.

"Never suppose yourself to understand the ignorance of another so long as
you are ignorant of his understanding."--COLERIDGE.



INTRODUCTORY REMARKS.


He was a sage and a seer who remarked concerning Mormonism: "It presents a
problem which the wisest politician has failed to solve, and whose outcome
lies in the mystery of the future." It is acknowledged to be the Great
Modern Abomination, the most pernicious heresy of this century; and yet in
ten years from its origin its devotees numbered thousands, and Joseph
Smith, its founder, predicted that it was to be the religious faith of the
Western Continent. To-day its membership numbers its hundreds of
thousands, its organizations extend over a large part of the globe, and
the most careless observer of the times must realize that this institution
has become one of the gravest and most difficult religious, social, and
political puzzles of the day.

Throughout our whole land it is universally despised and execrated; and if
popular odium could extinguish it, it would speedily be sunk in the slimy
depths of the Great Salt Lake. But thus far it has successfully withstood
even the fiercest opposition. That Mormonism is not the weak, empty,
insignificant thing which it is so generally assumed to be must be obvious
to any one who sets himself seriously to account for its origin, its
growth, and its present position and influence. There _must_ be more in
the system than is popularly supposed; otherwise the organization could
never have grown to be what it is, nor could it now stand up so
persistently and even prosperously in the presence of such universal
opposition.

Very much of what is said and written concerning Mormonism amounts to but
very little because of its obvious failure to understand what it
denounces; and it will be well for us at the outset to notice A FEW OF THE
MISTAKES CONCERNING MORMONISM that are now current.

1. Most people talk as if _Mormonism and polygamy are synonymous_, whereas
polygamy is only a comparatively trifling and non-essential part of
Mormonism. For ten years after the Church was founded, it was not heard
of; and it was not openly taught for twenty years. If it could be brought
to a sudden conclusion either by a new revelation, or stamped out by law,
Mormonism, with its preposterous claims, its absorption of things
political in things ecclesiastical, its ideas, some of them more than
heathenish, its intensely secular spirit, its standard of morality
lamentably low--MORMONISM, in its worst phases, and in what it is most
damaging to souls and fullest of peril to the Republic, would still stand
unscathed.

2. And then, in strict accordance with that false notion, is the idea that
_the Mormons are a mere horde of sensualized barbarians_, and should
consequently be dealt with in the most severe manner imaginable; whereas,
the fact is that the great mass of Mormons do not practise polygamy, and
_never have done so_. It is true that, as a people, they are chargeable
with the gravest crimes; and yet they have been perpetrated by _the few_,
while _the many_ have been, and are, devoted to what _they believe_ to be
the true and the right. Contrasts are often drawn (and truthfully drawn,
too) by their preachers between "the unworldly lives of the Saints and the
evil practices of the Gentiles," and pertinent examples are given of
aberration from rectitude of men intrusted with the making of our laws or
those who ministers at the altars of divine worship, until they regard
themselves as clothed with the resplendent robes of righteousness. Perhaps
the worst thing that can be said of the mass of the Mormons is that they
are poor, ignorant, and superstitious, and therefore an easy prey to a
corrupt and infamous priesthood. But many who are equally poor, ignorant,
and superstitious can be found in every State in the Union, and in some
States they are far greater in number than in Utah.

3. Then, too, there is another mistaken idea concerning Mormonism. The
assertion is often made that _it is an exotic--an importation from the Old
World_, and especially that the pollutions of polygamy may justly be
charged to the English, Swedes, and Danes. But this is not true. Facts
compel a conclusion far less flattering. Smith and his system are
essentially a New World product. It took its rise in a region lying
between the birthplace of the Rochester Rappings, from which Modern
Spiritualism sprang, and the seat of the Oneida Community. It had much in
common, too, with the great Campbellite movement, which antedated it only
by five or ten years, and from which it received a large number of
important accessions. Millerism and Shakerism were also near relatives and
neighbors. Yea, more--in Mormonism we have an obnoxious plant which
_sprang from Puritan seed_, though it first _took root_ in the Empire
State. Joseph Smith, its founder, and Brigham Young, its greatest leader,
were both born in Vermont. At least ninety per cent of the converts
gathered during the first ten years (1830-40) were of New England descent.
In 1860, out of a population in Utah of some 70,000, it is affirmed that
10,000 were born in New York and 20,000 in New England; while in the
legislature, of thirty-six members, thirteen were born in New York, six
in Massachusetts, and five in Vermont. And in an editorial written less
than two years ago, the official Mormon Church paper states that "of
twenty-eight men constituting the general authorities of the Church,
twenty-four were born in the United States and eighteen were of New
England birth or origin. Of twenty-seven 'Stakes of Zion,' twenty have
presidents born under the Stars and Stripes, and a large majority are of
New England parentage. The founders were mostly descendants of the Pilgrim
Fathers; the leading minds are nearly all of Puritan blood." It is,
however, some comfort to know that, since polygamy was accepted and
proclaimed, recruiting from among the sons of the Pilgrims has almost
altogether ceased; and yet it is well for those of us who are so boastful
of what Puritan thought and energy have accomplished for America to
remember that this greatest abomination of our land is also a product of
the thought and energy of the descendants of the Pilgrims--an institution,
therefore, ESSENTIALLY AMERICAN.

4. It is also commonly supposed at the present day that _about nine tenths
of the Mormons are foreign rather than American_; but the last census
gives Utah a foreign-born population of 43,933 and a native-born
population of 99,974. Making allowance for the probable preponderance of
the native element among the Gentile population, and allowing a large
subtraction from the latter figure on account of the thousands of children
born of foreign parentage in Utah, it would still be probable that the
native is, at least, equal to the foreign fraction in the general
aggregate. And this will be the more readily admitted when it is
remembered that, while public attention has been more attracted toward the
recent importations of converts from Europe, the earlier Mormons in Utah
were almost exclusively American. So far as personal prominence goes, if
not in numbers, _the native element has always been, and is now, entirely
predominant_.

Since, then, there are so many common mistakes with reference to
Mormonism, let us endeavor to look at the system fully in a fair and
impartial manner, considering _its marvellous history_, in the first
place; and, then, _its threefold character_ as a religious, social, and
political system, with which we have to deal not only as patriots, but
also as Christians.



PART I.

HISTORY OF MORMONISM.


"Examine history, for it is 'Philosophy teaching by experience.'"
--CARLYLE.

  "'Tis strange, but true; for truth is always strange,
  Stranger than fiction." BYRON.



CHAPTER I.

    Alleged origin of Mormonism--Joseph Smith's early life--Finding the
    peek-stone--Visited by an angel--Received the golden plates--Was Smith
    a swindler or an enthusiast?--"Book of Mormon" published, and Mormon
    Church established--Smith's first alleged miracle--Rigdon joins the
    Mormons--Mormonism compared to Mohammedanism.


It is acknowledged by all who have given careful thought to the subject,
that Mormonism presents us with a very extraordinary civilization and the
most peculiar religion under the sun; but _its history_ is as unique and
peculiar as the system itself, and is well worthy the attention of the
philosopher as well as the student of human nature and human history.

Its alleged origin was miraculous, and calculated to inspire its followers
with wonder, admiration, and awe. As Moses, the founder of Judaism,
received the two tables of the moral law, which constituted the brief
Bible of the Israelites, from the hand of God Himself, while the lightning
blazed around his head and the earth quaked beneath his feet, so Joseph
Smith (it is alleged) received his Golden Bible from the hand of an angel
on the Hill Cummorah near Palmyra, N. Y., amid thunder and lightning. He
is represented in an old picture as kneeling on the steep incline of that
hill, the wind blowing his long hair out in all directions, and his eyes
big with surprise. Above him in a cloud is the placid angel, gazing
intently upon the future prophet, who is eagerly taking his credentials
from a cemented stone chest which had been buried some 1400 years, while
out of the overshadowing cloud have come forth zigzags of lightning which
are playing around both Joseph and the angel.

The name of the angel was Moroni, and he informed Smith that the fate of
the early inhabitants of America was written on golden tablets within that
chest, and that these could be read only by the aid of some wonderful
stone spectacles called "Urim and Thummim," which were also in the chest.
Smith said that on opening the precious box he found six golden tablets
eighteen inches square held together by rings at the back, and also the
stone spectacles to decipher the tablets; and besides these, the sword of
Laban and a "breastplate" which had been brought from Jerusalem by the
early inhabitants of our land were inclosed in the chest.

The hill on which these sacred things were found is at present known as
Gold Bible Hill, and the true Mormon venerates it as a sacred spot, and
travels from afar to see its quiet but not remarkable beauty. It is a
conical elevation several hundred feet in height, and in its isolation and
peculiar form bears a certain resemblance to an extinct volcano. It is
smooth and green to the very top, from which there is a picturesque view
of hills and dales in all directions. It is situated in Wayne County, N.
Y., four miles from the village of Palmyra and three miles from the home
of the false prophet who has given it its present fame.

Like all other prophets, whether true or false, Joseph Smith was of very
humble origin. His father was a cooper by trade, and he dug wells and
worked on the neighboring farms when he could. His mother washed by the
day, but it is said that her employers were careful to have the clothes in
before dark, as experience had taught them they would disappear if left on
the lines over night. The whole family made baskets and maple sugar, and
raised and sold garden vegetables.

The youthful Joseph assisted generally, and (it is alleged) was an adept
in robbing hen-roosts and orchards. It seems that when quite young he
could read, but not write. His two standard volumes were "The Life of
Stephen Burroughs," the clerical scoundrel, and the autobiography of
Captain Kidd, the pirate. The latter work was eagerly and often perused.
At an early age he committed the following lines to memory, which seemed
to give him great pleasure:

  "My name was Robert Kidd,
    As I sailed, as I sailed;
  And most wickedly I did,
  And God's laws I did forbid,
    As I sailed, as I sailed."

A certain superstitious feeling concerning the Smith family existed in the
minds of their more ignorant neighbors on account of the reputation which
Mrs. Smith had for telling fortunes. She seems to have been a woman full
of odd conceits and superstitions, while at the same time she possessed a
great deal of natural talent; and Joseph resembled his mother in mental
quickness and imaginative power.

When he was scarcely fifteen years old, while he was watching the digging
of a well, he said that he found a peculiarly shaped stone that resembled
a child's foot in its outlines. It must have resembled the stone foot of
Buddha at Bangkok, Siam. At any rate, it has well been said that this foot
"has left footprints on the sands of time." This little stone, afterward
known as the "peek-stone" and the "Palmyra seer-stone," has been called
"the acorn of the Mormon oak."

For some time Joseph Smith obtained a subsistence by means of that stone.
In a kneeling posture, with a bandage over his eyes (so luminous was the
sight without it), with the stone in a large, white stove-pipe hat, and
this hat in front of his face, he claimed to see very remarkable sights,
such as buried treasures of gold and silver. He could trace stolen
property, tell where herds of cattle had strayed and where water could be
found. With the "peeker" he carried a rod of witch-hazel, which assisted
him in the discovery of water.

This state of affairs continued for some time. Then he disappeared, and
for four years his life is involved in much mystery; but during that time
he is known to have been in both Onondaga and Shenango counties, N. Y.,
since his name appears in the criminal records of both as a vagabond.
While he was wandering through the country during those years of mystery,
he doubtless heard the theories (as they were a common topic of
conversation at the time) that were afloat to account for the peopling of
America--the traditions collected from the Indians, the Hebrew traditions
among them, the discovery of ruined cities and temples in Central America,
the relics of pottery, and the bricks and stumps of axe-cut trees buried
far beneath the surface of the Mississippi.

During that time, also, he became interested in the great revivals that
prevailed in the churches of the different denominations in the vicinity
of his home at Palmyra. In 1821 five of the Smith family were awakened,
and united with the Presbyterian Church. Joseph, in his own account of his
early life, says that he "became somewhat partial to the Methodist sect,"
but he was not able to decide which was right. In his bewilderment he gave
himself up to prayer for days, that the truth might be made known to him
among all the conflicting opinions that he heard among these different
sects; and finally a heavenly messenger bade him not to join any sect.
And three years afterward, on September 22d, 1823, another celestial
visitant outlined to him about the golden plates he was to find and the
prophet he was to be. He was told that the North American Indians were a
remnant of Israel, the descendants of a certain family of Jews that
emigrated from Jerusalem in the time of Zedekiah, and were miraculously
led across the Eastern Ocean; and he was also told that before they had
fallen off from the faith a priest and prophet named Mormon had, by
direction of God, drawn up an abstract of their national records and
religious opinions, and buried it, and that he himself was selected to
recover and publish it to the world. He was also told that it contained
many prophecies relating to these "latter days," and would give
instructions as to "the gathering of the Saints" into a temporal and
spiritual kingdom, preparatory to the second coming of the Messiah, which
was _at hand_.

From that time on he declares that his days and nights were filled with
"visions," "voices," and "angels;" and, following the direction of an
angel, on the night of September 22d, 1827, amid a grand display of
celestial pyrotechnics, he received from the hand of the angel Moroni, the
son of Mormon, a chest that contained a number of golden tablets with
inscriptions, and with them a pair of stone spectacles by means of which
he was to decipher the characters. It is asserted that these plates were
seen by eleven persons, but all of them except three were members of
Smith's family or his near neighbors. The plates themselves disappeared
soon after the publication of the "Book of Mormon," and it is understood
that the angel took them again into his custody.

The tablets, Smith said, were covered with hieroglyphics, which he called
the "reformed Egyptian" language. A document was actually exhibited as a
confirmation of this assertion, and was seen by Professor Charles Anthon,
of Columbia College, New York City, who in a letter dated February 17th,
1834, relates that it was in fact a singular scroll, containing a mixture
of Greek, Hebrew, and Roman letters, with crosses and flourishes, and a
Mexican calendar given by Humboldt, but altered so that it could not be
well recognized.

For more than two years, by the aid of the stone spectacles, Smith was
engaged in translating the hieroglyphics into English. In March, 1830, the
translation was given into the printer's hands, was published under the
title of the "Book of Mormon," and that book is the corner-stone of that
great MODERN DELUSION called MORMONISM. A _delusion_ the writer prefers to
call it rather than "_the Latter-day swindle_," as Joseph Cook and many
others denominate it.

There are TWO VIEWS that may be taken of Joseph Smith by the Christian
world. One is that he was _a base swindler_, and concocted the Mormon
scheme with the express purpose of deluding the people; the other is that
he was _a religious enthusiast_, deceived and deluded himself. Arguments
may be adduced in support of either theory, and which are the stronger is
a question which every man must settle for himself.

1. On the one hand, it may be said that Smith's former life is in strict
accord with the theory that his scheme was a deliberate fraud; for he
swindled many of his neighbors with his "peek-stone."

But, on the other hand, it may be said that it is not so certain that he
was not himself deceived with regard to that matter also. At any rate, his
naturally superstitious and imaginative mind, which he inherited from his
mother, would strongly favor the idea that he really thought he saw
visions and heard voices. Even Joseph Cook says, in an address delivered
in Salt Lake City, May 17th, 1884: "I am not sure that he did not have in
his experience some spiritistic manifestations, which he mistook for a
revelation; but I am sure that if he had any superhuman revelation, it
came from below the earth rather than from above it."

2. Again, in support of the swindling theory, it may be said that, apart
from the "peek-stone" business, his previous immoral life and ignorance
favors the idea that he was a base villain; but, on the other hand, it
might be said that that is only another form of the old mistaken notion
that "no good thing can come out of Nazareth."

3. Then, too, it might be said that Mormonism was regarded as a swindle by
the people generally who lived right around him and were acquainted with
him and his character; but, on the other hand, it may be said that that is
no proof whatever that the Mormon scheme _was a fraud_, but only another
evidence of the truth of the well-known proverb: "A prophet is not without
honor except in his own country."

4. Again, it may be said that Joseph Smith was evidently a swindler,
because most of the "Book of Mormon" was copied from the manuscript of one
Solomon Spaulding, a Presbyterian clergyman of Western Pennsylvania.
Between 1809 and 1813 he lived in Northeastern Ohio, and, being fond of
the study of archæology, he became intensely interested in the ancient
mounds and fortifications which abound in that region, and he himself
opened up one near his own dwelling. Since these mounds gave unmistakable
evidences of the existence of an extinct race higher in the scale of
civilization than the present American Indians, he adopted the theory that
this Continent was peopled by a colony of ancient Israelites, and in a
time of infirm health he wrote an historical romance embodying that
theory.

The style of the book was a clumsy imitation of our English Bible, and the
book originally bore the title of "THE MANUSCRIPT FOUND," the idea at the
root of the book being that Mr. Spaulding discovered among other
prehistoric mementoes in one of the earth-mounds near his house an ancient
manuscript which gave an account of the wanderings and sufferings of the
Israelites after coming to America, and he merely translated the story as
contained in _the manuscript that was found_. He tried to have it
published and took it to a printing-office in Pittsburg, where it remained
for some time. It is said that in his book there was much repetition of
phrases common in Scripture, such as, "And it came to pass," and also that
he used the names Lehi, Nephi, Moroni, Lamanites, etc., which names are
all found in the "Book of Mormon."

It is supposed that this manuscript in some way unknown fell into the
hands of Smith, and that he and his confederates introduced into it the
religious part of the "Book of Mormon" touching the establishment of
another church.

But, on the other hand, it may be said that that has ever been strenuously
denied by the Mormons, and _has never yet been proved_. The editor of the
_Independent_ says, in the issue of January 7th, 1886, that Mrs. Spaulding
herself was in total ignorance concerning the fate of "The Manuscript
Found." During the year 1834, when the events must have been comparatively
well fixed in her memory, "she _thinks_ it was once taken to the
printing-office of Patterson & Lambdin [in Pittsburg]; but whether it was
ever brought back to the house again she is quite uncertain." The fact is,
that from the time it went into the hands of the printer its history is
lost. It is true that it _might_ have fallen into the hands of Smith or
his confederates, but it is just as likely that it did not. All that we
have learned of its contents has been obtained from the memory of persons
who had read it or heard it read fifty or more years ago, none of whom are
now living. The manuscript itself is not known to have been seen since it
was given to the printer. Whether it was destroyed, or is still in
existence, no one knows positively.

The only manuscript of Solomon Spaulding's yet found is the one recently
discovered in Honolulu, Sandwich Islands; but concerning this, Rev. Sereno
E. Bishop, of Honolulu, says: "Unlike the 'Book of Mormon,' the Spaulding
manuscript is not sham Hebraistic, but in ordinary English. It contains
perhaps no quotations from the Bible, unlike the other, which transfers
large portions of Isaiah and other books. Both devise a number of uncouth
names for their characters; both record a series of desperate wars; both
narrate a voyage across the Atlantic in ancient times and a settlement in
North America." Evidently the "Book of Mormon" was not copied from _that
manuscript_, and the Mormons welcomed it as disproving the Spaulding
origin of their sacred book, and have had an edition of it published.

5. Those who believe in the swindling theory will only say that _Spaulding
had more than one manuscript_, and the one recently found is not the one
that the "Book of Mormon" was taken from. Besides, the similarity of names
and the account of the wars mentioned in this manuscript and the "Book of
Mormon" would go far to substantiate the idea that _the "Book of Mormon"
was copied from some manuscript of Spaulding's_.

But, again, it may be said that there is no doubt that Joseph Smith was at
one time in the employ of the brother of Mrs. Spaulding, at whose house
she was then residing, just after her husband's death. Of course he heard
all the talk of the house, and much was said concerning the romance by
Solomon Spaulding, which all regarded as wonderful both in style and
substance. This talk would naturally make a great impression upon the
superstitious mind of Smith. He would be very apt to take it as absolute
truth, and _without seeing the manuscript at all_, was prepared to use
what he knew of it in getting up one of the greatest delusions in the
history of modern times.

6. Moreover, there can be no question at all concerning the fact that his
mind was strangely exercised by the popular religious movement that swept
through the country at that time, and his imaginative and superstitious
mind was deeply impressed by the eloquence of the different evangelists.
He became familiar with biblical language, and followed the inclination of
those about him to listen to any new-fangled doctrine; and surely the
religious teachings of the "Book of Mormon" are positive evidence of the
strongest character that the mind of Smith and his coadjutors were greatly
influenced by the doctrinal questions that were being agitated at that
time in Central New York--Calvinism, Universalism, Methodism, Millerism,
Romanism, Campbellism, and other _isms_.

Millerism in particular was attracting great attention at that time, and
so they incorporated into the "Book of Mormon" its leading tenets--viz.:
that the millennium was close at hand; that the Indians were to be
converted; and that America was to be the final gathering-place of the
Saints, who were to assemble at the New Jerusalem, somewhere in the
interior of the Continent.

Perhaps, in the absence of positive proof to the contrary, it is the part
of Christian charity to regard the founder of Mormonism as a strange
fanatic and _religious enthusiast of the same general type as Mohammed_.

But however that may be, the publication of the "Book of Mormon" created
an intense excitement in Central and Western New York; for the public mind
was at that time prepared for any new religious sensation.

Soon after the book appeared the Mormon Church was formally organized at
the house of one Peter Whitmer in Fayette, Seneca County, N. Y. The
membership consisted of only six, all men--the prophet and two of his
brothers, two Whitmers, and Oliver Cowdery, a school-teacher of that
neighborhood. They said it was 1800 years to a day since the resurrection
of Christ, and they professed to believe that their church was the "Church
of Christ" once more restored to the earth, holding the keys of authority,
and having the power to bind and loose and seal on earth and in heaven.

Within a week or two Smith added to his reputation by performing the first
great miracle of the "new dispensation," which was performed on a man
whose visage and limbs were frightfully distorted by a demoniacal
possession. Smith commanded the evil spirits to leave him in the name of
Christ, and the man said: "I see them going right through the roof." This
established the fact in the minds of certain people that Smith really had
a divine mission; but at the First Mormon Conference in June, Smith found
himself at the head of a visible church of only thirty members. This small
number of adherents showed that converts were not to be rapidly made in
that vicinity. Still, the excitement concerning the new Mormon doctrines
spread through Western New York into Northern and Eastern Ohio. Members
were sent West to preach and found churches wherever people would listen
to them, and they made many converts.

In December, 1830, Sidney Rigdon, a Campbellite preacher near Mentor, O.,
became a convert. He was erratic, but very eloquent; self-opinionated, but
well versed in the Scriptures; and in literary culture and intellectual
force was the greatest man among the early Mormons. After this the new
sect strengthened and spread.

Joseph was a veritable Numa Pompilius in the frequency and fitness of the
"revelations" he received for the guidance of his people in things great
and small; and seeing that but few followers were gained by him near his
home in New York, while many converts were being gathered in Ohio, he had
a revelation that Palmyra was not a place for the Saints to prosper in,
and he talked of the New Jerusalem in the West, and announced that it was
time for the faithful to remove with him to _Kirtland, O._

Smith has often been called the "American Mohammed," and Mormonism has
been compared to Mohammedanism; and in many respects they _are_ strikingly
similar, although in so far as Mormonism resembles Mohammedanism it is
true, as Dr. Jessup said before the Presbyterian General Assembly at
Saratoga, it is only "a pinchbeck imitation of a putty original." In
nothing, however, is there a greater similarity between those two
religions than in their history. Both Mohammed and Joseph Smith were the
subjects of fierce opposition and even persecution, and they both were
compelled to flee for their lives. The Mohammedans always reckon their
time from the "Hegira," or flight of the Prophet from Mecca to Medina; but
while the Mohammedans have only _one Hegira_ in their history, _the
Mormons have four_. And, for convenience, we will consider their history
under these four divisions.



CHAPTER II.

HISTORY OF MORMONISM (_continued_).

    _The First Hegira_ from Palmyra to Kirtland--The first Temple--Rapid
    growth of the Mormon Church--Brigham Young and other missionaries sent
    to foreign lands--The name "Latter-day Saints" adopted--Smith and
    Rigdon compelled to flee from Kirtland--_The Second Hegira_--The
    "Danites" organized--Rapid increase of the Mormons in
    Missouri--Jealousy of the Missourians--Mormons driven across the
    Missouri River by a mob--Their property confiscated--Their leaders
    imprisoned.


The First Hegira or exodus of the Mormons was from Palmyra to Kirtland,
O., in 1831. This was a very tedious journey at that time, since they
moved onward in wagons, carrying their household goods with them. On their
arrival at Kirtland they were greeted by one thousand Mormons, who were
the converts of Rigdon and other Mormon preachers.

Kirtland is three miles from Mentor, the home of the late President
Garfield, and twenty-two miles east of Cleveland, and is situated in a
remarkably fertile country. As soon as the Mormons arrived there they
purchased a square mile of land, which they laid out in half-acre lots. In
addition they bought a number of farms. They evidently expected to remain
there a long time, since they erected a number of substantial houses, and
a most beautiful temple, which Smith called the "School of the Prophets."

All Northern Ohio looked on in astonishment when the Mormons built their
temple. It was, indeed, a remarkable structure. It was begun in 1832 and
finished in 1836, the entire cost being $40,000. There was but little
resemblance between it and the small meeting-houses common to the rural
portion of Ohio; and although now it is over fifty years old, yet it is in
good preservation, considering the neglect with which it has been treated,
and might easily be restored to its former beauty. It is now owned by
Joseph Smith, Jr., the son of the prophet, who, however, has no
affiliation whatever with the Utah Mormons.

From the time the Mormons arrived at Kirtland they increased with
astonishing rapidity, notwithstanding the fact that they were generally
hated. Rigdon preached to crowds of people who flocked there from every
part of the lake region to hear his eloquence. He seems to have had a
wonderful power over the people, and so great an influence that it is felt
even to the present day in that vicinity.

But the work of the Mormons extended beyond Kirtland. In the year of the
First Hegira it extended over several of the States, and in three years
afterward Mormon societies were established in Canada, Missouri, Illinois,
Ohio, Virginia, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and in
nearly all of the Northern and Middle States and in some of the Southern
States. A large number of converts were made chiefly through the
earnestness and captivating eloquence of the Mormon preachers; for the
more intelligent and better educated were sent out for that purpose.
Besides, these missionaries had no compensation, and this was one secret
of their successful preaching. They braved every danger and faced a
frowning world rejoicing in tribulation. And then, too, the Mormons were a
community who had all goods _in common_; and this fact threw a
fascination over the new faith to thousands of uneducated people. They
heard Scriptural expressions used by the leaders, but they had only a
vague idea of what it was they professed; but still there was a novelty
about the movement that captivated them, and they were willing to be led
by insinuating men. Therefore the Mormon preachers won converts wherever
they went. Rigdon said that Kirtland was only the eastern boundary of the
promised land, and that from thence it would extend to the Pacific Ocean.

They were not content, however, to obtain followers only in our own
country. In May, 1835, missionaries were sent to foreign lands to make
proselytes; among the foreign missionaries was Brigham Young, who had
joined the Mormons at Kirtland in 1832, and was ordained an elder.

Previous to this, at a conference of elders on May 3d, 1833, the name
"Mormons" was repudiated and that of "Latter-day Saints" was adopted.

In 1835 Smith issued a command that the elders, who numbered between three
and four hundred, "should seek learning, study the best books, and get a
knowledge of kingdoms, countries, and languages." A professor of Hebrew
was hired to teach that language, and a seminary erected, which is now
used by the Methodists of Kirtland for their church.

The Mormons only remained in Kirtland seven years. Trouble had long been
threatening, but it culminated in 1838, when Smith and Rigdon were
compelled to flee on account of their bank bursting, with loss and
annoyance to many sufferers. They fled to Far West, Mo., where the main
body of their followers had in the mean time settled. This may be called
the SECOND HEGIRA.

It was on this particular westward march that the prophet organized a
military command and a body-guard, and began to assume the prerogatives of
his high military as well as spiritual mission. He had two hundred
disciplined men-at-arms after he reached the State line of Missouri as his
body-guard. They were called "Danites," and their conduct is said to have
precipitated the tragic scenes that were followed by the expulsion of the
Mormons from that State.

There had been some Mormons in Missouri since 1831 when Oliver Cowdery,
one of the original members of the Mormon Church, was sent there to look
for a fitting locality for the New Jerusalem, and, as they said, to
evangelize the Indians and Gentiles generally. His report of Jackson
County, Mo., was so favorable that Smith and Rigdon directed their steps
thither under the greatest difficulties in travelling, making a portion of
the distance of over three hundred miles on foot. On their arrival at
Independence they were so charmed with the country that they at once
selected it as the place for the New Zion; and, to silence all cavil among
his followers, Smith had a "revelation" to that effect.

The site of the temple was chosen with all the ceremony they could muster
for the occasion. Here, Smith said, the Latter-day Saints would finally
gather, Christ would appear in person, and the Mormons would reign a
glorious and triumphant people for a thousand years.

Smith and Rigdon returned again to Kirtland and remained there until 1838;
but meanwhile the Mormons increased rapidly in Missouri, settlements being
made not only in Jackson County, but also in Clay, Ray, and Caldwell
counties; and with their habitual industry and thrift they made homes of
comfort and rapidly gained wealth.

But while their general cause advanced, they were correspondingly hated
by their neighbors. _Jealousy and politics_ seem to have been the chief
causes of this animosity. They had acquired so much property that the
Missourians thought they would have "the rule of the counties" through
their numbers and property. Besides, the Mormons were wont to boast of
their political ascendancy. They called their prophet the
commander-in-chief of the armies of Israel. They said that State would
soon be in their hands, and finally the whole country. And the facts
seemed to justify this braggadocio, as the whole of Jackson County was
theirs, and converts were flocking to their ranks in great numbers.
Accordingly, a public meeting was held at Independence by the alarmed
Gentiles, which resulted in the Mormons being driven across the Missouri
River by an infuriated mob into Clay and Caldwell counties.

With this dispersion the other Mormon settlements suddenly developed into
places of importance, particularly a town called Far West. It was here
that Smith and Rigdon came when driven out of Ohio in 1838. With their
coming a new impetus seems to have been given to the Mormons. With all the
vexations caused them by their enemies, mills, workshops, farms, and
industries of many kinds sprang up in the wilderness.

With all these tragic circumstances there grew into a terrible reality one
of those wild and romantic histories which could only have taken shape on
a Western frontier, and which was developed by these unusual incidents,
and by the vanity and egotistical spirit evinced by the Mormons. They
claimed to be a chosen people under special divine direction. They shrank
not from urging such prerogatives and acting upon them. They were the
Saints, and all other people were Gentiles. They were the Lord's Saints,
and the earth was the Lord's. They were led by an inspired prophet.
Consequently, whenever the day of election for civil officers came, they
must vote solidly the Whig or the Democratic ticket, just as the leader
should indicate. It is obvious to any one knowing the fierce zeal of
partisan politics how this course on the part of the Mormons would subject
them to constant embroilments with surrounding citizens. Mutual acts of
plunder and retaliation between the Saints and Gentiles became frequent,
and they were terrible in their consequences. We must recollect all the
while that the Mormons were the persecuted party on account of their
eccentricities; and in a spirit of retaliation they in many instances
drove their opponents from their immediate vicinity, burning their houses
and confiscating their property. Worse than all, they drove some women and
children into the woods, and two children were born of homeless mothers.
This was the crowning event that fired the Missourians into a war of
extermination against the Mormons; and in consequence the State troops
were called out by the Governor, as he said, "to enforce order upon all
citizens, even if it was found necessary to exterminate the hateful and
obnoxious Mormons," _who were presumed to be in the wrong_.

A fearful drama followed under the leadership of Major-General Clark, who
is described as being as rude as the most uncivilized of Mormons. He
allowed the enemy to withdraw from the State, but he took all their lands
and property to pay the cost of the war. The Mormon property thus
confiscated was worth nearly two millions of dollars, _and that
confiscation was undoubtedly an act of lawlessness and injustice_.

The Mormon leaders were arrested and put in jail, and at a court-martial
it was decided to have them shot; but that act would have been so grossly
unlawful that, on the protest of one of the generals, the court rescinded
its orders.

With their leaders in jail, the Mormons submitted to the conditions of
peace offered them, and prepared to withdraw from the State into Illinois,
where Joseph Smith and his fellow-captives joined them after breaking from
prison while their guard was in a drunken slumber.



CHAPTER III.

HISTORY OF MORMONISM (_continued_).

    _The Third Hegira_--Sufferings of the Mormons during their journey
    into Illinois--An account of the murder of Mormons--Influence of this
    persecution on the minds of Mormons at the present time--_Nauvoo_--Its
    location--Its growth--The second Mormon Temple begun--Other public
    buildings--Laziness whittled out of Nauvoo--Internal dissensions among
    the Mormons--Political troubles--Smith nominated for President of the
    United States--Warrants issued against the Mormon leaders--Constable
    driven out of Nauvoo--Civil war threatened--Smith asked to submit to
    trial--Murder of Joseph Smith and his brother--Rigdon excommunicated
    and Brigham Young made leader--Consecration of the "Pride of the
    Valley."


The _Third Hegira_ or exodus of the Mormons was far more tragical than
either of the previous ones. Twelve thousand Mormons arrived on the banks
of the Mississippi River late in the autumn of 1838 in the most unhappy
plight. Their houses had been burned, their fields laid waste, and they
were nearly or quite destitute of every personal comfort. Every indignity
which had been offered to the Missourians by the Mormons was returned with
usury; and so terrible were their sufferings that the hearts of the
Illinois citizens were so touched by their distress that they received
with hospitality those who had travelled over the bleak prairies and
storms of wind and rain and snow. The aged, the young, and the sick had
been alike houseless and homeless in the most inclement season of the
year. Many who left homes of abundance died from exposure to the pitiless
elements.

A Mormon poet wrote concerning these times:

                  "Missouri,
  Like a whirlwind in her fury,
  Drove the Saints and spilled their blood."

And if we can look at this part of their history calmly and impartially,
can we fail to see that Missouri's treatment of the Mormons was inhuman,
unlawful, and impolitic?

A Mormon historian of these persecutions tells how twenty of the Mormons
in the flight to Illinois, sleeping in a log cabin by the wayside, were
shot dead through the crevices; and after the massacre was over, a boy who
had been concealed was dragged out from his hiding-place under a forge and
shot, while his murderers danced around him. This historian further
writes, after relating a number of such instances Of Gentile cruelty: "We
may forgive; BUT TO FORGET--NEVER." And no wonder. Their treatment was
barbaric, and to-day it is looked back to by the Mormons with just rage,
and is used by them to awaken in the minds of their children the same
spirit of hatred against a Government which has persecuted them from their
very beginning.

When to-day it is said that the Mormons would not be molested if they
would give up polygamy, they answer that those early persecutions took
place before they adopted this doctrine. The fact is, that the mobs which
attacked the first Mormons were made up in great part of the same low
element that mobs the Salvation Army--a coarse rabble that, like a
bull-dog, is ready to attack anything new. And as one nowadays hears a
Mormon tell the story how the fathers of his people were driven out from
their homes and forced to endure hardships untold and establish new homes
elsewhere, if the hearer is not beguiled into sympathizing with the
sufferers, he sees how the truly romantic story of those early days can
fire the Mormon heart. He can then realize how many a young man who, for
its own sake, would care nothing for his Mormon creed, will be ready to
fight desperately for it in his indignation at the persecutions heaped
upon his fathers. Thus, the remembrance of the persecutions through which
their early leaders passed in Missouri operates as a strong power to
support the zeal of the Mormons to-day.

After such trying and tragic events, their property lost and their health
greatly shattered, one might suppose that the Mormons would have been
ready to abandon their faith; but no, they were too strong in their belief
for that. Their endurance was, indeed, _marvellous_. They clung to each
other with great tenacity, and much pity was awakened in their behalf,
because it was generally believed at the time that they had been treated
with great injustice. Soon Smith was presented with a large tract of land
in Hancock County, Ill., and immediately he had a "revelation" that this
was the "centre spot," and he commanded the Saints to assemble there to
build a city and a temple. The angel told him to call the city _Nauvoo_,
which he said meant "_The Beautiful_."

It was located on the east bank of the Mississippi River, forty miles
above Quincy, Ill., and twenty miles west of Burlington, Ia. It was
situated at a bend of the river on rising ground, which commanded a
magnificent view of the Mississippi for many miles. The land given to
Joseph was divided into lots and sold to the Mormons, by which he realized
over one million of dollars.

The Saints from all quarters responded to the call to hasten to the new
city, and it immediately grew in importance. The Legislature granted it a
charter with extraordinary privileges, including the authorization of a
military body, afterward known as the "Nauvoo Legion," a corps to which
all the male Mormons capable of bearing arms belonged. Nauvoo became the
capital of the world to the Mormons, and attracted general attention. It
was changed from a desert into an abode of plenty and luxury. Gardens
sprang up as if by magic, fragrant with the most beautiful flowers of the
New and the Old World, whose seeds had been brought from distant lands as
souvenirs to the New Zion; broad streets were laid out, houses erected,
and the busy hum of industries was heard in the marts of commerce.
Steamboats unloaded their stores, and passengers came and departed for
fresh supplies of merchandise; fields waved with golden harvests, and
cattle dotted the neighboring hills.

As might be expected, some adventurers, robbers, and people of a generally
disreputable character joined the community to cloak their villainous
deeds in mystery and religion. Speculators, too, came and bought property
with the hope of large remuneration. These two classes of persons became
the source of much strife among the Mormons themselves, and between the
Mormons and Gentiles.

But, marvellous to relate, within three years after their expulsion from
Missouri the Mormons had a prosperous city of 10,000 people, while near
the city were at least 20,000 more, and in the whole United States and
elsewhere they numbered about 150,000, _not much less than their present
number_.

Soon after the city of Nauvoo had been laid out, the selection was made
for a remarkable temple which should be the crowning triumph of the wealth
and perseverance of the Saints, all of whom were called to contribute to
its erection by time and money. The foundation was laid with military
ceremonies April 6th, 1841.

This unique building was made of finely-polished white limestone, and
stood in the centre of a four-acre lot. It was 120 feet long by 83 feet in
width and 60 feet in height. There were two stories in the clear and two
in the recesses over the arches, making four tiers of windows--two Gothic
and two round. There was a carved marble font resting on twelve life-sized
oxen in marble in the basement for baptism. In structure the temple
resembled no other church edifice, but was remarkably unique and graceful
in its proportions, particularly the front of it, with its six fluted
columns, its carved Corinthian caps and broad piazza. The walls were of
massive thickness. The architectural ornaments of the interior were "holy
emblems," and the spire upon the tower, which was 100 feet in height, was
tipped with a gilt angel and his Gospel trump. Barnum, it is said, had
this gilt angel in his New York Museum for years after the destruction of
the temple.

The other public buildings in Nauvoo were the Seventies' Hall, the Masonic
Temple, the Concert Hall, and the large hotel which the Prophet said was
to be the "mission-house of the world," where he would entertain emperors,
kings, and queens from the Old World, who would come to him to inquire of
the new faith.

This city, although peculiar, had many _excellent features_. There was no
licensed place to sell liquors, and drunkenness was almost unknown. It was
well governed. All was order and peace. There was great thrift and
industry among the people. Loafers or idlers were in disrepute. If a
stranger entered Nauvoo and was found to be lazy he was at once "whittled"
out of the town by the deacons. This whittling process was a very
ingenious thing. It was a method by which the suspected person was
followed by certain officials who surrounded him or his abode, and in
unison whittled at sticks carried for the purpose. At first it might seem
a matter of accident; but its continuance from day to day was too much for
human endurance, and the undesirable stranger departed to the satisfaction
of his tormentors. Perhaps it would be a good thing if we had some similar
way of ridding ourselves of idlers all over our land.

But with all these good features, there were some indications of the
purpose of the Prophet to introduce polygamy, although his sons deny that
he ever practised it or even believed in it; but, however that may be,
intestine quarrels on the subject of polygamy and other dissensions in the
Mormon ranks served to bring on a crisis in affairs at Nauvoo in 1844,
which resulted in the murder of Joseph Smith and his brother, and the
expulsion of the Mormons from the State.

The real causes, however, were the same ones that operated against them in
Missouri. The people in the neighborhood were jealous of the
rapidly-growing and flourishing city. They complained that their property
disappeared mysteriously, perhaps stolen by the adventurers and robbers
who had joined the Mormons just to commit such deeds under a cloak, and
for whose acts the Mormons, as a people, were not to blame. But the chief
reason was political. Smith began to agitate the question of a restitution
of the property they had unjustly lost in Missouri. He visited Washington
and had an interview with President Van Buren, who said: "Sir, your cause
is just, but I can do nothing for you."

The Mormons boasted that they had 100,000 in the faith throughout the
country and that their vote was a balancing power. They voted in a body on
all political questions. They even carried their arrogance so far in 1843
as to nominate Joseph Smith for President of the United States, and they
have always declared that if he had lived until the next election he would
have obtained that office. The Illinoisans, at any rate, believed that the
Mormons determined to rule their State and intended to set all laws at
defiance; and it was this belief that stirred their most bitter animosity;
but internal dissensions among the Mormons gave them an opportunity to rid
themselves of them in a most tragic way.

On account of troubles among dissenting Mormons, warrants were issued
against Smith and other Mormon leaders; but the constable who served the
warrants was driven out of Nauvoo. This act fired the smouldering hatred
of the Illinoisans into terrible activity. The county authorities called
out the militia to enforce the law. The Mormons hastily armed, and a civil
war seemed impending, when the governor asked the Smiths to surrender and
take their trial as the best means of satisfying the turbulent parties.

Now the charter of Nauvoo had been so cunningly devised that the State
authorities were almost excluded from jurisdiction within its limits; and
so the Smiths, feeling sure of an acquittal, obeyed the summons of the
governor. They and other Mormon leaders were then conducted to Carthage
and indicted for treason, and lodged in jail.

But on the 27th of June, 1844, an infuriated mob took matters in their own
hands, decided to administer justice after their own fashion, and attacked
the jail early in the morning. They broke down the doors of the rooms
where the prisoners were confined, and horribly massacred Joseph and his
brother Hyrum.

Now, those two persons were defenceless prisoners, and the Governor of the
State had pledged to them safe conduct to the jail and before the court.
Their murder was nothing else than _a most foul assassination_, the
gravity of which was augmented by the fact that it was perpetrated by
those who claimed to be upholders of law in contradistinction to the
Mormons, who (they said) desired to set law at defiance.

But, besides being an act of lawlessness, it was the most impolitic thing
that the people could have done. The martyr-like death of Smith threw a
mantle of dignity over his person and a halo of consecration around his
character that could in no other way have been secured; and it is
reasonable to believe that, had Smith lived on, his own many weaknesses,
the vulgarizing of revelation at his hands, the growing suspicions and
disaffections of the faithful, and the fierce rancor and dissensions of
the factions would have shivered Mormonism into pieces and sunk the
fragments into depths too obscure for the searching of further history.

The Mormon people, with a self-control seldom seen, sought not to take
into their own hands any measures of vengeance for the murder of their
chieftain. After recovery from the first consternation over the awful
tragedy, they began to ask themselves, Who shall rule the Church? Sidney
Rigdon had already assumed the rôle of chief functionary, and had a
revelation on this subject. But Brigham Young, who was President of the
Twelve Apostles, hurried to Nauvoo from his mission in Boston; and by his
shrewd sense, firm will, and practical ability he succeeded in gaining the
leadership. Rigdon, who was accused of disaffection even in Smith's day,
was excommunicated, and Brigham was triumphant. He was strong where Smith
was weak--in prudence, sagacity, common-sense, and practical energy. These
natural Cromwellian qualities he brought to the front and put and kept in
force. He endeavored to heal matters between the Mormons and the Gentiles
by pacific advice, but contentions waxed rather than waned. The charter of
Nauvoo was repealed by the State Legislature in 1845, and Young gave out
the edict that the Mormons must leave Illinois.

But, in the midst of these stirring and exciting scenes, the Mormons gave
a curious exhibition of their faith in Joseph Smith. He had predicted the
completion of the temple, and Brigham commanded his followers to remain in
Nauvoo in order to fulfil the revelation of the Prophet. Unheard-of
exertions were made to carry out this command, and the temple was finished
to its minutest ornamentation. When it was ready, the Mormons flocked into
the city from every quarter, and there was great rejoicing over the
consecration of "The Pride of the Valley," as they called it. The interior
was elaborately decorated with festoons and wreaths of flowers, chants
were sung, prayers offered, and lamps and torches lighted to make it
resplendent. When all this was done, the walls were dismantled, the
ornaments taken down, and the symbols of their faith removed, to leave the
noble building to be trodden down and profaned by the Gentiles.

Then began the FOURTH HEGIRA or exodus of the Mormons, the most tragic of
them all.



CHAPTER IV.

HISTORY OF MORMONISM (_concluded_).

    _The Fourth Hegira_--Young's shrewd plan of a Western
    Kingdom--Nauvoo's sad end--Journey of the Mormons to Council
    Bluffs--Young's forethought--The trip of "The Pioneers" across the
    wilderness--The halt at Salt Lake Valley--Young leads the remaining
    Mormons from Council Bluffs to Salt Lake--Their entertainment during
    their march--Folly of the Illinoisans in driving them out into the
    wilderness--Probable result of tolerance of the Mormons--Life begun
    anew in Salt Lake Valley--Salt Lake City established--Mills and
    workshops established and the Great Temple begun--Increase of the
    Mormon population--Value of their property in Utah--Public schools--A
    final brief glance at their history--How the MORMON PUZZLE will not be
    solved.


Brigham long ere this had decided that his people must flee away to some
remote region where collisions and conflicts should cease; and his sturdy
will and untiring energy were exerted to carry out this decision. He
selected California as the future residence of the Saints. At that time it
formed a part of Mexico, and consequently was beyond the control of the
detested Stars and Stripes and the uncomfortable people who had thrice
expelled them from their dwelling-places. Brigham made known his purpose
to the people and declared that they would move as rapidly as possible
across Iowa to the Missouri River into the Indian country near Council
Bluffs that season.

This new exodus began in February, 1846, the bleakest and coldest month in
the year in that section of the country. An indescribable pageant of
ox-carts and mule-teams, loaded with women, children, and all sorts of
furniture passed out from Nauvoo to the miry tracks of the prairies; but
the spirits of all, except the sick and helpless, were unbroken. Here
Brigham Young proved himself the general as well as commander. He directed
every detail of the evacuation. He arranged that the population should not
move in a solid body, so as to disturb by their numbers the inhabitants of
the sparsely-populated country they would traverse, but they should move
in sections carefully selected, following each other at short intervals of
time.

But in spite of this preparation there was a report that some of the
Mormons intended to remain, and, in violation of the promises of the
State, the Illinoisans called out the militia, and _drove the defenceless
residents who remained from their homes at the point of the bayonet_,
after bombarding the city for three days and nights. This was in the month
of September, 1846. Thus ended Mormon history in Illinois; thus ended the
history of Nauvoo, which is as wonderful as that of any city ever built.
Its rise, progress, and destruction occupied only seven years, but many of
its mysteries have yet to be told.

Meanwhile, Brigham was leading his companies across the prairies to
Council Bluffs, their temporary halting-place. Men and women had been sent
forward through Brigham's foresight to plant crops by the wayside for
those who should follow to gather; but still there was terrible suffering
and much sickness among these bands, who toiled onward obedient to their
leader's direction. Dreams of a Mormon Empire, however, upon the Pacific
coast consoled the people in great measure for the loss of the homes from
which they fled and the hardships of their journey. As they moved slowly
across the plains in 1846, the hopes which inspired them are well set
forth in John Taylor's hymn, "_To Upper California_:"

  "We'll go and lift up our standards,
  We'll go there and be free;
  We'll burst off all our fetters,
  And break the Gentile yoke."

Having reached Council Bluffs, Brigham then was compelled to make
arrangements for the completion of the journey. The obstacles in the way
of this intention would have intimidated a less courageous man. There was
still about two thousand miles to traverse through an almost unknown
country before the Pacific would lie before them. If at that time it was
difficult to transport armed troops through the wilderness, what skill and
energy must it not have required to send a nearly unprovided-for, feeble,
and impoverished company of men, women, and little children such a great
distance? But his wisdom and forethought controlled the whole matter.

In 1847 Brigham and one hundred and forty-two pioneers pushed resolutely
westward over the wilderness track for eleven hundred miles; but while
they were on their journey they learned that California had been conquered
from Mexico, and that the Stars and Stripes were there supreme. They
therefore halted on their arrival at the Salt Lake Valley, and Brigham
Young, attracted both by the natural beauty and resources of that region,
determined to make it the future residence of the Saints.

They arrived in the Great Salt Lake Valley July 24th, and, ever since,
that day is the great day of celebration for the Mormons, eclipsing the
Fourth of July entirely. These pioneers began improvements for domestic
comfort and prepared as far as possible for the residence of the Saints
who were still at Council Bluffs in sickness, poverty, and discontent.
Getting matters into material shape, Brigham returned to Iowa, where his
presence seemed to inspire the expectant Mormons.

In the spring of 1848 they started from Council Bluffs for Salt Lake; and
where in the history of our country will you find a more daring act than
this of Brigham Young's? And where will you find a more heroic one than
this of the Mormon people? Well has it been said: "It was a pilgrimage
which has not been paralleled in the history of mankind since Moses led
the Israelites from Egypt." They had sickness, weariness, skirmishes with
the Indians; but they also had their pleasures and rewards in this
extraordinary journey of several months. They were surprised with
beautiful scenery, and they languished over dreary wastes. Brigham told
them stories, encouraged dancing to make them merry, and had theatrical
performances to distract their attention. Children were born, and numbers
died and were buried on the route, but they pressed on under their
leader's direction for their new home beyond the States and their enemies,
and in the autumn of 1848 crossed the Wahsatch Mountains and reached the
Salt Lake Valley, their future home, although at that time a wilderness.
Remember that this exodus was undertaken with the express purpose of
placing themselves beyond the reach of the statutes with which their faith
was in conflict; but while they were journeying toward their land of
promise, it was conquered by the United States from Mexico. Nevertheless,
they were in a remote and uninhabited portion of the national domain, and
where mountain barriers and leagues of wilderness lay between them and
those whom they regarded as their persecutors.

Now, it seems to me that the Government and people of Illinois did a most
impolitic thing when they drove the Mormons from their State into the
wilderness of the West. I firmly believe that if the Mormon Community had
been allowed to remain at Nauvoo, free to develop its theories, in so far
as they did not involve illegal acts, and in so far as they did, amenable
to the law, but without illegal interference, the subsequent results would
have been greatly changed.

Undoubtedly the best safeguard against error and its results is the
influence of truth; and the magnetic current of truth which mingles with
the common-sense of the people in every circle of society in a land like
this may be trusted sooner or later, without the aid of means outside the
law or extra proceedings within the law, to prevent the propagandists of
error, however they may associate, from doing serious damage to society.
Had the Mormons remained in Illinois and been treated humanely, in free
contact with the healthful currents of the life about them, the
irresistible influence of a hostile public sentiment and of laws humanely
exercised would undoubtedly have made the Mormon problem a matter of
little concern. To assert the contrary is to assume that law is inadequate
to the protection of a community from overt acts, and that the barriers of
religion and morality are insufficient for the protection of an
overwhelming majority against the contaminating influence of a generally
despised minority. We think we are warranted in making the statement that
the people and authorities of Illinois are in great measure responsible
for the development of a structure whose abnormal features, destined to
sure decay in that State, were driven to deeper root by persecution and to
free growth by exile. It is certainly evident that _their treatment of the
Mormon organization_, aside from considerations of Christian charity and
humanity, was _lamentably wanting in political wisdom_.

But it is said they were a set of cut-throats and libertines, who should
have been banished from all civilized society or cast in the depths of the
sea. But that idea is doubtless a wrong one, and never had its origin in
any mind except one full of prejudice. A picture, which we may
unquestionably accept as a fair one, of the Mormon Church in Nauvoo was
presented in the diary of the late Josiah Quincy, published in the
_Independent_ a few years ago. His dispassionate judgment did not lead him
to the conclusion, so general in those days, that the followers of Joseph
Smith were for the most part cut-throats, marauders, and libertines; on
the contrary, while finding in their fanatical ardor that which opposition
might develop into a disturbing element in society, he credits them with
qualities such as temperance, industry, and thrift, which are among the
most important essentials of good citizenship.

And, then, we invite you to look upon the thousands who poured over the
Wahsatch Mountains and descended into the fair valley below. What think
you of the _men_ who have toiled with unmurmuring bravery for months
through dangers of ambush and storm and flood on their westward way? Are
these all pretenders and knaves, or the willing dupes of such? Does this
theory, or the idea of lust suggested by the doctrine of polygamy (which
was not announced until four years afterward, and has never been practised
by more than a small fraction of the Mormon population), afford a
sufficient explanation of the spirit which animates this multitude to
espouse a common cause, to accept obloquy and exile, and to meet the
perils of the wilderness in the face of approaching winter? In this
stubborn adherence to a common purpose, in this fierce battle with
adverse circumstances, in this devotion to wives and children, do we find
evidence to warrant the belief that the aged men, the stalwart husbands,
and the youth of this great company are moved solely or chiefly by the
lowest and basest of aims?

These hundreds of gray-haired _women_, too, in the passionless calm of old
age; these many mothers with patient endurance bearing their part in the
struggles of this strange life and caring tenderly for their babes; these
young wives adhering to the fortunes of their husbands; the maidens found
in so many groups--are these representatives of womankind unreasoning
bond-creatures or depraved women whose chief mission is to minister to the
caprices and passions of base and brutal men? Is all of this endurance of
trial with a devotion approaching heroism the outcome of charlatanism,
hypocrisy, and libertinism? He who will answer these questions in the
affirmative must be a blind student of nature and human history. No. To
account for a movement like that which led 10,000 people into the
wilderness, casting themselves upon the future with a wonderful faith and
daring, requires an inspiration based upon something deeper and stronger
than the altogether grovelling and mercenary motives which suffice to
unite the fortunes of those who are only adventurers or knaves? Yes,
whatever may be said of the honesty or sincerity of those who moulded the
belief of these thousands into its eccentric form, as they enter and take
possession of Utah, they present the unmistakable evidences of _a faith
founded on sincere conviction_.

Such was the beginning of the history of Mormonism in Utah, or DESERET,
"The Land of the Honey-Bee," as the Mormons called it. Imposition upon
credulity there doubtless was; ambition, charlatanry, and lust, each may
be supposed to have had its place; but nothing short of a belief to which
men and women gave themselves without reserve could have accomplished the
results seen. And only this, taken in connection with the mistaken policy
of the Government of the United States, can account for the subsequent
marvellous growth of the Mormon organization.

Lands were at once surveyed and placed under careful cultivation, and Salt
Lake City was made habitable. Settlements were established in every
direction, the soil was subdued and irrigated for cultivation. The people
built the city and began the temple and established mills, workshops, and
numerous industries under the personal directions of the ever-watchful
bishops. Missionary corps were newly organized for foreign lands, and an
Immigration Fund established which soon resulted in a swarming influx to
Utah from all parts of Europe.

The Mormons have increased in the last thirty years between five and six
hundred per cent. The Mormon population of Utah from about 11,000 in 1850
had increased in 1880 to a little over 120,000 out of a total of nearly
144,000. In place of a wilderness we find a vast cultivated domain
threaded by highways and railroads. The wild lands of 1846 in 1880 yielded
a product in cereals of nearly two million bushels, and in precious metals
a value of nearly nine million and a half of dollars.

In the year 1882 the total value of the assessed property of the Territory
was $25,579,000. The public schools of the Territory, from the number of
thirteen only in 1850, had increased in 1880 to three hundred and ninety,
maintained at a cost of more than $200,000.

All these marvellous results have been chiefly due to the enterprise and
thrift of a people expelled as outlaws from Illinois, and under the ban
of the law during most of their sojourn in Utah.

       *       *       *       *       *

This, in brief, is the history of the Mormons. And who will say that it is
not wonderful and strangely unique? History, indeed, affords few examples
of the growth, from such humble foundations, of a fabric based on a
religious idea, so important and enduring as that which originated in the
supposed revelations made over thirty-five years ago to Joseph Smith, an
obscure resident in a country town of Wayne County, N. Y.

Born in 1830 of fanaticism and superstition; cast out from the place of
its birth immediately after; driven in contumely from its refuge in
Kirtland, O.; buffeted in Missouri, and driven to Illinois; baptized in
the blood of the Nauvoo riots, and compelled to fly into the wilderness,
and there developing into what it is to-day; with whatever contempt we may
regard its origin, with whatever loathing we may look upon its accursed
doctrines, it seems to me we are compelled to confess that there is
something in the Mormon organization which demands for its adherents, in
spite of its abhorrent features, a degree of respect and consideration.
They should be given as much respect, at least, as we would give the
honest Brahmin, Buddhist, or Mohammedan. Yea, more; for many even of their
latest converts have been taken from our Southern and Western States.

They have had four HEGIRAS, or exoduses, in their history thus far; and
many think they see indications, in the strong pressure of the law that is
now brought to bear upon them and the temporary flight of some of their
leaders, that they will soon enter upon another pilgrimage. And it is
supposed that Mexico will be their next resting-place. But the Mormons are
too strongly intrenched in Utah to be easily uprooted. They have too much
at stake there to leave unless driven out by the point of the bayonet, as
they were from Missouri and Illinois. But God forbid that this nation
should do anything which would drive them beyond the borders of our land
to infect the atmosphere of another! We can overcome this great evil in
this land of light and liberty far sooner and easier than it can be
overcome in any other land under the broad canopy of heaven. Nay, more; we
are responsible for it. It was bred and born in our country. Yes, this
iniquitous system sprang out of the bosom of the American nation; and _the
American nation is in honor bound to grapple with it and throttle it_. The
honor of the nation demands that it should be uprooted as speedily as
possible.

But the fact is, that we are confronted with a powerful organization, a
gigantic evil. And let no one suppose that a few words written on paper
sent out from Government headquarters at Washington would destroy this
system any more than a few words spoken authoritatively by Congress would
destroy Romanism or Presbyterianism in our land. Many years will be
required at the least for the effectual stamping out of the iniquities of
the Mormon system. The great PUZZLE to solve is this: What remedies will
be _effective_ and accomplish the object in _the shortest period of time_?

In endeavoring to find the solution of this puzzle, we must regard this
system in its THREEFOLD CHARACTER--viz.: as a _political_ system, as a
_social_ system, and as a _religious_ system. This we will endeavor to do
in the chapters that will follow.



PART II.

THE POLITICAL PUZZLE.


"The strange spectacle presented of a community, protected by a republican
form of government, to which they owe allegiance, sustaining by their
suffrages a principle and a belief which sets at naught that obligation of
absolute obedience to the law of the land, which lies at the foundation of
republican institutions."--PRESIDENT CLEVELAND.



CHAPTER V.

    Mormonism a Theocracy--Manoeuvring for office the cause of the
    expulsion of the Mormons from Missouri and Nauvoo--The "State of
    Deseret" formed--Lands illegally obtained--Brigham's movable
    house--Government officials compelled to flee--Federal troops
    sent--The oath of disloyalty--The Endowment rites--The American flag
    at half-mast--The control of the nation their aim--The political
    puzzle stated--Its causes--Necessity of Government action.


The American nation seems to be slow to understand, and to all appearance
is unwilling to believe, that the Mormon Church is A POLITICAL SYSTEM as
well as a religious system, cherishing ideas and aims utterly alien and
inimical to Democracy.

But, in the first place, it is _essentially_ a political organization, its
president being acknowledged as the supreme pontiff of the world, with
both temporal and spiritual jurisdiction; and as such he is entitled to
the implicit personal and unquestioning obedience of all Mormons.
Mormonism is first and foremost a theocracy, and claims to exercise the
only legitimate civil authority under the sun. It has no feature more
characteristic and no purpose more fundamental or fixed than that of
entire and undisputed temporal authority. In short, in its very nature and
genius it is an organization transfused and overflowing with the virus of
disloyalty and treason.

As early as 1833 Joseph Smith was openly accused of "aiming at monarchical
power and authority," and in Missouri his followers inaugurated the
practice, which has always since been followed, of voting solid; and this
idiosyncrasy I have already stated was largely the cause of their
expulsion from that State.

Then, crossing to Illinois and wild with schemes for kingdom-building,
Smith's manoeuvring for votes and offices was amazing. By trickery he
secured a charter which made the city of Nauvoo independent of the
Commonwealth. He was determined to be civil head of Nauvoo from the first,
soon of the county also, erelong of the State, and eventually of the
nation. His political game was played so recklessly for years that at
length the fear and hatred of both political parties were incurred, and
they united to crush the office-seeking hierarch and expel his followers.

Then they made their enforced exodus westward for the express purpose
that, going beyond mountains and deserts, they might forever escape all
interference from the wicked rulers of this world, and could set up the
kingdom of God, with all its external forms. When they started westward
Utah was not a part of the United States, and there they expected to be
beyond the detested Stars and Stripes; but when they arrived there, much
to their chagrin and disappointment, the flag of the free was supreme over
all that region, it having been wrested in the mean time from Mexico.

Their plans, therefore, were completely shattered. Still they thought
something could be done by energy and resolution; and so they made haste
to set up a free and independent government, named "The State of Deseret,"
hoping that they would be received at once into the Union as a sovereign
State. The modest (?) limits they fixed for their State included an area
of about 700 miles square, or one tenth of the national domain. Deseret
would extend from Oregon to the Mexican boundary, and from the Rockies to
the Pacific, or over the whole, or large parts, of nine of our largest
Territories.

Brigham Young was elected governor of this illegal Mormon State, some of
whose illegal legislative ordinances were afterward incorporated into the
Territorial statute-book; and for many years after Congress organized the
Territorial government, this unlawful "State of Deseret" organization was
maintained, collision between the two being prevented by the fact that
Brigham Young was governor of both. The bogus State organization was the
controlling power. Under its influence all sorts of arbitrary
anti-American laws were passed by which leading members of the priesthood
became the virtual owners of the mountain streams, the timbers, and the
best part of the public lands. The right of the American people to these
lands was ignored, and through the incorporation of some thirty-seven
little villages in the rich valleys of Utah, more than 400,000 acres of
the public lands were arbitrarily withdrawn from the control of the laws
of Congress and appropriated by these priestly leaders. This was done for
the express purpose of preventing those who were not Mormons from securing
any of the public lands in Utah.

There is a block of 18,000 acres lying in the southern part of the rich
and productive Cache Valley north of Salt Lake City, which Brigham Young
secured by trampling the laws of the United States under foot. It is said
that he had a four-roomed house built on runners. Hauling it to the centre
of a section of land, each one of the four quarters would have a room on
its corner. Four men would sleep there one night, each occupying a
separate room; and the next day they would make pre-emption filings at the
land-office, while four other men would perform a similar act the next
day and night; and so on, until most of the beautiful Cache Valley was
thus entered. Soon afterward the men appeared at the land-office, paid
over $1.25 per acre, and then they deeded the land to Brigham Young.

When the Government of the United States first undertook to establish a
surveyor-general's office in Salt Lake City for the sake of surveying the
public lands and disposing of them in accordance with the laws of
Congress, the surveyor-general was given to understand that that country
belonged to the Mormons, and he had to fly for his life. In 1856 all the
representatives of the Government without exception had to escape from the
Territory to save their lives, and were plainly shown that Americans had
no rights in Utah.

And when, with a new body of Federal representatives, there soon came a
military force under General Sidney Johnston sufficient to compel respect
and obedience, Brigham Young cursed the Government, the troops, and the
Gentiles, and in his usual coarse and emphatic style declared that he
would "send them all to hell on wooden legs," and that they had better
supply themselves then, when lumber was cheap. I mention these facts
simply to show that the main object of the Mormon leaders from the very
first was to establish a separate and independent government of their own,
whose authority should be considered by the Mormon people superior to the
authority of the Federal Government. And this accounts for the conflict
which has existed between the Mormon authorities and the United States
Government for the past thirty-five years, and which is still going on.

But not only does this hostility to our Government arise out of the
fundamental idea of their religion as a THEOCRACY and hence opposed to
_democracy_; but also, and in great part, _because of their early
persecutions in the States of Missouri and Illinois, and the unavenged
murder of their chief, Joseph Smith, whom they regarded as God's greatest
prophet_. The inhumanity, barbarity, and injustice that was meted out to
them in their early history I have already mentioned; and in considering
this perplexing puzzle, we must recollect that the Mormons have some cause
for their enmity to our Government. _On account of wrongs done them, they
are the sworn enemies of the Government and people of our land._

They practise certain secret and mysterious ordinances known as
"ENDOWMENTS." To the faithful Mormon these are made to seem precious
initiatory rites whereby he is advanced in his knowledge of the true faith
and exalted by the possession of new privileges. In reality they are a
sort of crudely-acted religious drama, not unlike the miracle plays of the
twelfth and fifteenth centuries. God and Satan, Adam and Eve, and others
are persons in the drama. In its course there is a jumble of washings and
anointings, of grips, and key-words and new names, and the investiture of
each of the initiated in an Endowment robe. This sacred undergarment is
always thereafter to be worn next to the person, carefully shrouding it at
the last for its burial. There are also prayers and solemn promises and
awful oaths, with penalties more awful, appended. It has been charged
against these rites that they are scenes of indecency and licentiousness;
but probably the charge is false. Absurd, irreverent, and even blasphemous
they doubtless are, but it is to be believed not indecent.

Now, among the oaths there taken is one of resentful hostility to the
American nation for not avenging the death of Joseph Smith or righting the
persecutions of the Saints; and thus the secret endowment ceremonies act
as a powerful agency in ministering an unpatriotic, if not treasonable,
bent to the Mormon system. Every Mormon who passes through the Endowment
House takes an oath of eternal enmity against the people and Government of
this land.

Yes, the fact is that there are 130,000 people in Utah cursing the
American flag! And this was clearly seen on the Fourth of July last
(1885), when the Stars and Stripes were hung at half mast on the Mormon
buildings of Salt Lake City. Thus did they insult the whole American
nation, and show their disloyalty in an unmistakable manner.

They are taught to be traitors to the Government. The children do not know
the name of our President, and are told that John Taylor is their
President. Many of the Mormons are scarcely conscious that there is a
world outside of Utah. Salt Lake City is their Mecca, and John Taylor is
greater than all the kings of the earth. They all believe him to be at the
head of the Government, and that the laws are broken when his commands are
not obeyed. It is flatly denied that the State has any authority over
them, and it is expected that all Mormons will, if required, shed their
blood in resisting the civil power if it interferes with their laws and
customs.

The country at large seems blindly ignorant of the dangerous character of
this institution that rears its insolent crest in the very heart of our
country. The truth is, that in Mormonism we are confronted with an
organized treason against our Government and our laws. Its spirit is that
of rebellion. It will not down; on the contrary, it is growing and
spreading daily. The Mormons are penetrating Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado,
Arizona, Nevada, and Washington Territory. The income of the Church is
about $3,000,000 annually, and is used in propagating the faith.
Emissaries are sent to England, Sweden, and Denmark, proselyting the
ignorant, and bringing them to our shores at the rate of about two
thousand every year, to swell the number in their kingdom. One of the
probable objects to be attained by the promulgation of the doctrine of
polygamy was the speedier increase of their numbers than could be obtained
in the ordinary Christian way. Their number in our land at the present
time is about 150,000, and they openly boast of their power in politics.
Recently Bishop Lunt, of Cedar City, Utah, in addressing a gathering of
the Saints, declared: "We look forward with perfect confidence to the day
when we will hold the reins of the United States Government. That is our
present temporal aim; after that we expect to control the Continent." And,
after speaking of how rapidly the Mormons are spreading in the Territories
and in Nevada, he said: "All this will in time help us to build up a
political power which will, sooner or later, compel the homage of the
demagogues of the country. Then, in some great political crisis, the two
political parties will bid for our support. Utah will be admitted as a
polygamous State, the other Territories we have peacefully subjugated will
be admitted also, and then we will hold the balance of power and will
dictate to the country. In time our sacred principles will spread
throughout the United States."

That is their confessed plan, and in its execution they are shrewd and
far-seeing politicians. No men better understand how to run "the machine."
If any one takes the Mormon leaders to be fools, he is wonderfully
mistaken as to their capacity. But while this is a shrewd plan from the
Mormon standpoint, it seems to me that a great deal of alarming talk has
been needlessly uttered about the fact that the Mormons are no longer
staying in Utah exclusively, but are going into other Territories also and
trying to subjugate them. The scattering of the Mormons would be the very
best way to break up the evil which would result from their political
power. If only the Mormons were to divide up, and companies of them go to
every Territory, their political power would be broken; for they would be
but a small minority of the people of any Territory, and their votes would
be neutralized. The only danger is in their being so massed together as to
control by their votes the State or the Territory wherein they dwell; and
the United States and the Territories should be on their guard so as to
prevent their becoming a majority or even a large minority of the people
in any one State or Territory where there are Mormon colonies at present.
But it is not very probable that the Mormons will in the near future
become the controlling element in any Territory or State outside of Utah.

The only political puzzle that we have _now_ to unravel is in connection
with _Utah_; and it is caused by _two things_: The _first_ is that _the
Mormons are greatly in the majority_, the Gentiles numbering about 30,000,
while the Mormons number about 120,000. The _second_ is, that _the Mormons
always vote solid_. If only their vote would be divided, as the Roman
Catholic vote and the vote of other church organizations, the evil would
not be so great; but on account of the completeness of their church
organization, the vote of all the Mormons is under the control of the
priesthood. One need not study long to note how thoroughly and skilfully
organized for power the Mormons are. _One will directs_, and by
ecclesiastical communications and telegraphic wires the direction is
speedily known unto the utmost limit of the land of their habitation, and
promptly the entire massed body moves in the line directed. Petty offices
abound in the system, and greater offices are rewards. There is, in fact,
no organization on earth, unless it be the Jesuit, that is so well fitted
as the Mormon to interest and keep loyal the members, to combine their
faculties and forces, and to move that combination with efficiency and
power whithersoever one master-will dictates. It is a mighty, terrible,
solid pyramid, with John Taylor and his two counsellors for its apex; the
twelve apostles come next; then the seventy, the patriarchs, high-priests,
elders, bishops, priests, teachers, and deacons; then, last of all, the
women at the base. Every fourth man is an officer; and as every member is
sworn to obedience to the one above him, the result is that the head of
the Church always casts the vote of the whole body.

In an article on "The Mormon Church," by Victoria Reed, in the _Bay State
Monthly_, not long ago, it was stated as an illustration of the despotism
of this institution that at church conferences there is never a dissenting
voice, and at the polls always the same unanimous vote. Every Mormon has a
vote to be cast as John Taylor dictates; and while the leaders of the
Saints observe the forms of republican polity, their despotism is as
absolute in its control as any on earth.

The great political _fact_, then, that we have to deal with is this: One
of our Territories is in the control of a despotism, which defies our
National Government, passively perhaps, nevertheless effectually, and
scoffs and spits at its rulers.

THE POLITICAL PUZZLE is how effectually to wrest the Territory from the
hands of the Mormon Presidency, and establish there a Republican
government in fact as well as in form--a government which will be in
harmony with American principles and institutions.

Something, surely, should be done. The United States should not yield to
this anti-American domination over so large a strip of her territory. She
should assert her authority, and maintain it there as elsewhere throughout
our land. Surely, those who say "_let it be_" are not cognizant of the
_vast territory_ which is now governed by the Mormon hierarchy. As Joseph
Cook says: "The State of Vermont can be hidden away in one of the valleys
of Utah and be no larger than a babe in a bed of full size." Utah has
84,476 square miles of territory; Vermont only 10,200 square miles.
Massachusetts, with her 7,800 square miles, could be hidden away in one
corner of this Mormon kingdom. Utah is larger than all New England, and
about equal in size to the Empire State and Keystone State combined.
Besides, its position is central, in the most important mining region on
the planet; and also central in a group of undeveloped commonwealths,
containing nearly a third of the territory of the United States. No; our
Government dare not allow this Territory any longer to be ruled by an
authority which is in deadly hostility to it, and sanctions what the law
of the land condemns.



CHAPTER VI.

THE POLITICAL PUZZLE (_continued_).

    THE POSSIBLE REMEDIES--The military remedy--The Government responsible
    for the situation in Utah--The disfranchisement of
    polygamists--Federal trustees for the Mormon Church
    corporation--Confiscation of unlawful funds--False statements about
    Mormons--Letters from the two Bancrofts--The dissolution of the
    Emigrating Fund Company--The Federal Commission remedy--The Woodburn
    bill, or Idaho statute.


The question at once arises, What remedies should we adopt to get rid of
this political evil--this _imperium in imperio_. The moral, the legal, and
the military are open to our choice.

There are some who think that the evil is so great and the danger to our
republican institutions so threatening as that there can be no adequate
remedy short of THE MILITARY. Such a remedy, they acknowledge, would be
severe, but the offence they consider as great beyond parallel, and the
exigency most grave.

But for one I am an advocate of peace. If there is any other possible way
of overcoming the evil, the use of the military arm should not be
advocated, for it would necessarily result in numberless widows and
orphans, and involve a heavy expense of blood and treasure. Bullets have
no eloquence for the American people. The less gunpowder we can get along
with the better. Our old wounds are not yet healed, and we are not
hankering after a fresh fray. The order from headquarters which would
summon the army to Utah would send a shiver through the heart of the
nation. Suppression by force of bayonet is _the very last resort_, and we
have not yet reached that point; and God forbid that we shall ever come to
that!

Besides, let us ask the question, Who is responsible for the present state
of affairs in Utah? We have already conclusively shown that the people and
authorities of Illinois were responsible for their isolation in the West,
since they drove them away from the surroundings that were calculated to
modify, and finally to change, the drift of sentiment. Yes, it was on
account of the un-Christian policy of the Illinoisans that we find the
Mormons in a Western domain wide enough for a kingdom, and practically as
far from the seat of authority as if responsible to a power beyond the
sea.

And what was the policy pursued by the National Government toward them
there? In the light of the fires kindled at Nauvoo, it would seem that
statesmanship would have discovered a necessity for the adoption of
measures calculated to restrain the evil tendencies of Mormonism and
prevent it from developing into an organization which must inevitably
sooner or later bring it into open conflict with the laws of the land. But
where in the records of Congress or upon the statute-books is there any
evidence of the really serious and statesmanlike consideration which this
movement demanded? There were a people openly seeking a refuge where they
would be free to disregard the popular opinion left behind them and to
transgress the laws of the Government to which they owed allegiance. Were
restrictive influences provided? Did the Government guard against the
realization of the boasted dreams of extended domain and self-government
entertained by this law-defying people by erecting guards against undue
encroachment on the public domain and by providing a government with the
necessary machinery for securing the impartial reign of law and order?
Were provisions made which would encourage the immigration into this
garden-land of any portion of the law-abiding thousands who were landing
upon our shores, and whose presence in Utah would have been a bulwark
against and an ultimate cure of the evils of Mormonism?

The facts are the best answers to these questions. There was a total
absence of wise legislation at the beginning. Afterward, laws were enacted
calculated to suit the use of those whom they should have controlled. Then
its laws and authority were nullified with impunity; and now we find a
people of law-breakers waxed strong and maintaining an attitude of
defiance to authority in the face of anathemas from the pulpit and the
press, and a hot fusilade of ineffective enactments from the halls of
Congress. This is the outcome of national legislation for Utah during the
last thirty-five years.

In view of the facts, we venture to affirm that the responsibility for the
present condition of affairs does not wholly lie at the door of the Mormon
Church, and much less at the doors of those who constitute the mass of the
Mormon people. Justice demands that the responsibility he laid at the door
of the Government and people of the United States.

And, surely, fire and sword are not the instruments with which to cure the
evils which our own supineness, want of statecraft, and mis-legislation
have permitted to poison the atmosphere. A Government which is itself
largely responsible for the evil it seeks to cure is in duty bound to
consider well and act wisely in the application of remedies.

But while the responsibility of the Government and people of the United
States binds them to the application of a cure for the evils invited which
shall not be intolerant or inhuman, it does not forbid the use of
_effective remedial measures_ suggested by political expediency and in
keeping with Christian charity. Still, it is well for us to remember that
we are bound as Americans to deal with this pernicious system on _American
principles_, and as Christians to deal with it on _Christian principles_.

The only measure which has yet been enacted looking to the cure of the
political evil in Utah was _the disfranchisement of the polygamists_ by
the Edmunds law of 1882; but although they have been disfranchised and
rendered inelegible to office, they are only about 12,000--a very small
fraction of the Mormons; and practically the old men, the Mormon leaders,
who have controlled the affairs of Utah for thirty years, have simply
abdicated in favor of their sons. Consequently the Territory is still
under Mormon rule, and the priesthood have it in their iron grasp. This
law is good so far as it goes, but does not go far enough to effectually
cure the evil.

But other and more radical measures have been _proposed_.

By the new Edmunds Bill, which passed the Senate on January 8th, 1886, it
is provided that _the President of the United States shall appoint
fourteen trustees to administer the property, business affairs, and
operations of the Mormon Church corporation_.

There is no doubt that this act strikes at the root of the political evil
in Utah, for the vast wealth of the Mormon Church in the control of the
priesthood is the foundation of their power. Nevertheless, the wisdom,
constitutionality, and effectiveness of the act are very questionable.

In the first place, if that law could be enforced, _it would open wide the
door of the meanest kind of political jobbery_. It is the most delicious
bit of patronage to which we have been treated for a long time. Fourteen
gentlemen are to be rewarded for distinguished party services by the
appointment to handle Mormon money. This is a new kind of party plum, and,
in my opinion, is simply infamous.

But, in the _second_ place, _there are grave doubts as to its
constitutionality_. It is with much hesitation that we call in question
the constitutionality of an act which is fathered by so conscientious a
constitutionalist as Senator Edmunds and carried by a large majority in so
conservative a body as the United States Senate. From _their_ standpoint,
perhaps, it is constitutional; but from another standpoint it seems to be
plainly unconstitutional. Congress is specifically prohibited from passing
any law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof. The Mormon Church is a religious organization, no matter
how false its religion may be. The Edmunds Bill places it under the care
of the Government of the United States, and provides for the
administration of all its temporal affairs. Now, if this can be done
respecting the Mormon Church, it can be done respecting the Catholic
Church or any one of the many Protestant establishments in our land. And
who can doubt that if all the vast property, real and personal, of the
Catholic Church were taken possession of by the Government, and its
management placed in the hands of fourteen trustees appointed by the
President--who can doubt that it would prohibit materially the free
exercise of that religion by its millions of communicants in this country?
Clearly, then, the attempt to control the Mormon Church corporation by
Government officials is contrary to the letter and spirit of the
Constitution, and entirely foreign to the spirit of American institutions.
If the United States once enters upon the business of administering church
property, the Mormons may not be the last victims.

Besides, if Congress has the right to appoint trustees of a religious
corporation in the Territories, then the State Legislatures would have the
right to appoint similar trustees in the States, and there would be
nothing to prevent a legislative body governed by infidels from putting
all church property into secular hands, or a Protestant or a Roman
Catholic legislative body from dealing in a similar manner with the
trustees of churches of an opposite faith. And, therefore, we regard this
proposed act to place the control of the Mormon Church property into hands
antagonistic to its spirit as a most dangerous departure from American
principles.

But, in the _third_ place, _the act would, in all probability, be
ineffective_. It is precisely what the rules of blood and iron in Germany
under the inspiration of Bismarck attempted to do with the Catholic Church
a few years ago. Bismarck said just what Senator Edmunds said: "We do not
propose to prohibit anybody from believing in and practising the faith of
the Catholic Church, but the Government of Germany intends to take charge
of all its temporal affairs--to appropriate its property and administer it
as we see fit to do." But there in Germany, where the power of the
Government is absolute, this was found impossible.

And if impossible there, it will be doubly so here. Very likely if this
proposition should become a law, and trustees be sent into the Territory,
they would find themselves mere official ornaments without anything to do,
for they would find no funds of which to take possession. The Mormons say
that whatever property their Church has is owned and held, just as the
property of the Presbyterian or Methodist Church, by the respective
congregations. Formerly its property, real and personal, was held as that
of the Catholic Church is--by a trustee in trust, and administered in the
same way. The President of the Church, like the bishop, was the nominal
owner, but held it in trust for the various congregations or parishes; but
the Mormon Church authorities have determined that the property should be
held and administered by and for each respective congregational or ward
organization; and so you see that if trustees were appointed _they would
likely find that the Mormon Church Corporation had no funds_.

Along with this enactment, there is another which provides for _the
confiscating of the funds unlawfully gathered by the Mormon Church_.

Now, this act is not open to the same constitutional objection that the
preceding is. It is a legal proposal, for only $50,000 can be held by any
religious organization free from taxation; but its wisdom, justice, and
practicability are very doubtful.

Its execution would be exceedingly difficult, so that not many honorable
men would be willing to take the position of trustees of the funds which
such a measure would remove from Mormon hands. The difficulty of
separating the funds unlawfully gathered by the Mormon Church from those
which justly belong to it would be very great, if not insuperable. Hence
it would be very hard to defend such a measure from the serious charge of
arbitrary interference with the rights of property.

It cannot be defended at all, unless it is put on the ground that the
Mormon people, by continued hostility to the Government, have forfeited
all political rights of every kind--even the right of property. It cannot
be defended on the basis of justice at all. It looks to us to be a
proposed theft in the name and under the authority of law.

But, as has been said before, in all probability if this measure should
become a law, the trustees would find no funds at all; for they could
easily be transferred (nominally at least) to private parties.

Just here let me say that the people should be on their guard as to what
they believe concerning the Mormons and the wealth of their Church.
Charges are made that have no foundation whatever in truth, and small and
trivial circumstances are so exaggerated and warped that they appear as
crooked monstrosities, and are presented to the world as common Mormon
occurrences.

A great deal that is said and published about the large amount of funds in
the hands of the Mormon leaders, and the use to which they are put, has
not a scintilla of truth in it, although the persons who publish it by
word or pen, being misinformed, thoroughly believe it themselves. Thus, in
one of the most reliable missionary magazines in our land, in May, 1885,
it was stated on the best authority that the Mormons had a large
corruption fund, and as a sample of the purposes to which it is put by
them, it gave the following instance: "When Bancroft, the historian, was
in Utah recently, he was told that if he would write certain things in his
history of Utah, they would take two hundred and forty complete sets of
his works, which would give him $40,000."

The writer determined to use that statement as _a test case_. He, thinking
that the greatest American historian, George Bancroft, was referred to,
sent him a letter of inquiry as to the truth of the statement, and the
following was his reply:

    "1623 H STREET, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 3, 1886.

    "_Rev. R. W. Beers, Elkton, Md._

    "SIR: Yours of February 2d is received. I am astonished that you
    should attribute to me anything so false as that I have been in Utah,
    and all that follows. You ought not to have needed to ask anybody
    about falsehoods so palpable.

        "Very respectfully,
            "GEORGE BANCROFT."

But how should any of the great number of people throughout our land who
read the missionary magazine where that statement occurred know that he
had not been in Utah, and that the statement was false?

Then the writer, knowing of another great historian Bancroft, Mr. H. H.
Bancroft, the Pacific coast historian, made the same inquiry of him, and
received the following reply:

    "SAN FRANCISCO, February 15, 1886.

    "_Rev. R. W. Beers._

    "MY DEAR SIR: In answer to your letter of the 8th inst., I would say
    that the Mormons never asked me to insert anything in my history of
    Utah, and never offered to take any copies of the work.


        "Very respectfully,
          "H. H. BANCROFT."

The writer then directed an inquiry to the person in Salt Lake City from
whom the statement in the magazine claimed to have been made, and asked
him his authority for his statement. The answer was: "The Bancroft alluded
to by me is H. H. Bancroft, the Pacific coast historian. His agent told me
the Mormons had agreed to take two hundred and forty sets of his complete
works in thirty-eight volumes, the gross amount of which (not the net
amount) would be about $40,000, if he would publish a certain kind of
history of Utah. Since Bancroft is a millionaire, the Mormon offer was not
very tempting."

But H. H. Bancroft flatly denies that any such offer was made him, and the
statement must clearly be pronounced untrue. And yet the person who made
the published statement was one of the leading Christian men of Utah,
desirous of disseminating nothing but the truth. He was misinformed,
whether intentionally or not.

There is a deep-seated prejudice against the Mormons in the breasts of
many in our land, which gives rise to many charges against them which have
no basis of truth whatever. We must, therefore, be on our guard, and not
believe quite everything that is published against them. Mr. A. M. Gibson,
legal adviser of the Mormon people at the national capital, says that the
reputed wealth of the Mormon Church amounting to millions "is all bosh;"
that "the Incorporated Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints is
actually in debt to-day, and is a borrower of money." If that is the case,
surely if the trustees were appointed according to the new Edmunds Bill,
they wouldn't have many funds to handle.

Another measure to break the political power of the priesthood proposed in
the new Edmunds Bill is to stop the importing of converts from abroad by
_abolishing the so-called Perpetual Emigrating Fund Company and
appropriating its surplus property to educational purposes_.

This seems to me to have not a scintilla of justice about it. The
emigration fund was originated by people who had been assisted to emigrate
to Utah, dedicating the repayment of the money advanced to them to assist
others in the same way. It was an entirely voluntary contribution. I
cannot see what right the United States has to intervene to destroy an
immigration company, if it is legally conducted, simply because the
religious sentiments of the Mormons are obnoxious to the people of the
United States. If anything is settled in American national life, it is
that no man shall be called to account for his religious opinions. And so
this proposed act must be an arbitrary interference with the rights of
property. If Congress has the right to dissolve an Emigrating Company and
use its surplus property for educational purposes, then a Socialistic
State Legislature would have the right to dissolve a railroad corporation,
pay its debts, and take possession of its surplus for the common benefit;
and this, surely, is a socialistic doctrine which the great majority of
the American people are not yet prepared to accept.

Besides, it would be _ineffective_. The attorney-general would doubtless
find no funds to handle. The Mormons say that the emigration fund
practically ceased to exist years ago. The emigration of Mormons now, they
say, is the result of their own saving, with such assistance as their
friends and relatives in the United States give them; and consequently,
although the Emigration Company would be abolished, missionaries would
continue to go every year to foreign countries and land converts by the
thousands upon our shores and take them to Utah and other Territories to
strengthen the power of the priesthood.

Even if all of the measures mentioned thus far as contained in the new
Edmunds Bill were enacted, the great political evil now in Utah would
remain. The Territory would still be in the hands of the Mormons, and
consequently in the hands of the priesthood.

Another radical measure has been proposed, and was strongly advocated by
ex-Governor Murray and many leading Gentiles of Salt Lake City, and was
recommended by ex-President Arthur. The measure proposed is _the abolition
of all Territorial government and the instituting of a government by a
Federal Commission, appointed by the President, of nine persons resident
in the Territory_.

It is claimed that, if this commission was composed of upright, patriotic,
and practical men, identified as citizens with the interests of the
Territory, they would give an immense impetus to business of all kinds and
induce enterprising men to settle there, because there would then be an
assurance that Utah was to be in truth an _American_ territory.

Now, there is no doubt at all that that would be an _effective_ remedy for
the political evil in Utah. The only questions to consider are: Is it
_lawful_? Is it _just_? Is it _wise_?

Senator Edmunds has declared it _unconstitutional_; and although there are
precedents in its favor, yet its constitutionality may well be questioned.
Certainly the Territory would not have a representative form of government
under a Legislative Commission. The government would be an oligarchy.

Besides, not _all_ the residents of Utah are disloyal in sentiment and
feeling. There are at least fifteen thousand, and probably thirty
thousand, loyal citizens; but the proposed plan confuses the innocent with
the guilty, and so _cannot be defended from the standpoint of justice_.
ALL are disfranchised, Mormons and Gentiles, alike.

And, then, it is _not wise_. The Mormons in all likelihood would not obey
the local laws passed by such a commission, because they would have no
voice in their making. They would not regard them as entitled to respect,
and there would as a result be more internal disorder and disquiet than
there is now, so that immigration of peaceable citizens would be checked
rather than encouraged.

Then, it lacks wisdom when we look at the evil to be overcome. The
political evil to be overcome is the existence of a non-republican
government in Utah. The government now there, though _republican in form,
in substance is oligarchical_, the real rulers being the triumvirate who
constitute the First Presidency of the Mormon Church. The problem is, how
to remove that un-republican oligarchy and set up a republican government
there as elsewhere. Now, see what is proposed! _A legislative commission
of nine appointed by the President!_ Why, the present government there is
more republican than that proposed. The government now in existence is
republican _in form_ at least, and the officers are elected by the
majority of the people and represent them truly. But the Legislative
Commission would be not even republican in form. The people would have
nothing whatever to do with their appointment--not even the Gentiles. That
government would be thoroughly undemocratic both in form and substance;
and even if it would truly represent the _Gentile_ population, it would
only represent a minority of citizens, and consequently would be
undemocratic; for the fundamental doctrine of democracy is that the
majority should rule the minority. As a proper substitute, then, for the
present form of government in Utah, the Legislative Commission must be
regarded as strikingly wanting. It does not solve the problem. It is
unwise, inexpedient, and unnecessary.

Another law, which is far more just than the preceding, has been proposed
recently by ex-Governor Murray (in his last official report), and was
strongly advocated by Joseph Cook in his Boston Monday Lecture delivered
February 8th, 1886. It was also introduced into the House of
Representatives on April 1st, 1886, by Mr. Woodburn, of Nevada. It is
known as the "Idaho Statute," because it has been in operation in the
Territory of Idaho. _It disfranchises every man and woman who believes,
teaches, or practices bigamy or polygamy, or who belongs to any
organization or association which believes, teaches, or encourages the
practice of bigamy or polygamy, and renders all such ineligible to any
office._ That law would only disfranchise the Mormons, the disloyal
element in the Territory, and would put Utah in the hands of the
law-abiding citizens alone.

But it is open to the grave constitutional objection of interference with
a religious belief. Those who simply _believe in polygamy_ would be
punished by this enactment; but our Government, whether national or State,
has no right to inquire into _the beliefs_ of our citizens. It is only
when they carry their beliefs into _actual practice_ of that which is
contrary to the laws of the land that our Government can rightfully punish
them or deprive them of civil rights.



CHAPTER VII.

THE POLITICAL PUZZLE (_concluded_).

    Objections to proposed remedies--_Gladstone_ on "Coercion"--A NEW PLAN
    ADVOCATED--_The Abolition of Female Suffrage_--_A National
    Colonization Scheme_--Natural resources of Utah--Superiority of the
    colonization plan over others--_The establishment of National Free
    Schools_--Ignorance the keystone of Mormon despotism--Public schools
    in Utah used for Mormon purposes--Proposed Federal Superintendent of
    schools in Utah--Territorial schools too few--Necessity of Government
    action--Prejudice disarmed by this plan--THE POLITICAL PUZZLE SOLVED.


All the measures that have yet been proposed are acknowledged to be
unusual and extraordinary, and are advocated only on the ground of
_necessity_, which William Pitt called "the argument of tyrants." It is
said that the facts to be dealt with are unprecedented. An insolent
anti-American empire has for years been growing in the body politic of
this country, and it must be overcome _at all hazards_. But let us pause a
moment. Is not that the great doctrine of the Jesuit--"_The end justifies
the means_"? That is an exceedingly dangerous doctrine to follow. No,
fellow-Americans, we _must_ not, we _dare_ not, allow our righteous,
passionate fervor against Mormon disloyalty to carry us so far as to
violate fundamental principles of the American Constitution. Whatever we
do, we must cling to the traditions of the past, and not depart from the
spirit of our cherished American principles.

Besides, all of these measures are open to the objection of _persecution_
from a Mormon point of view. Threats of bloody resistance, especially to a
Legislative Commission, have been made by Mormons even of quiet
disposition. Now, if the evil can in any way be overcome without
persecution, that way is by all means to be preferred.

Utah may well be called "_The American Ireland_." Ireland is practically
in rebellion against the Government of Great Britain, and she bases her
rebellion on wrongs and abuses. Utah is in practical rebellion against our
Government, and bases her disloyalty on the ground of injustice and abuse.
Coercive measures have long been tried with Ireland and have been of no
avail; and now Gladstone, the greatest living statesman, advocates pacific
measures. When he introduced his Irish Home Rule measure into the House of
Commons on the 8th of April, 1886, the most memorable day in the history
of modern English Parliaments, in his great speech (confessedly one of the
greatest efforts of his life) he said: "_Coercion, unless stern and
unbending, and under an autocratic government, must always fail_. Such
coercion England should never resort to until every other means has
failed. The basis of the whole mischief is the fact that the law is
discredited in Ireland. It comes to the Irish people with a foreign
aspect." So we have tried prohibitory and repressive methods with the
Mormons for thirty years, and they have failed. _They will fail to the
bitter end._ The longer they are tried, the worse the result. They will
only increase their enmity to the Government, heal over their internal
dissensions, bind them the closer together, and wed them more firmly to
their peculiar beliefs, which have made them objects of persecution.
History can teach us that; and so we believe that it is time to inaugurate
a change--viz., to work on the Christian plan, to overcome evil with
good.

The plan which I have to propose to overcome the existing political evil
in Utah and bring it into thorough harmony with our American institutions
has the merit of being _in strict accordance with Christian principles and
with American principles_, besides being, I think, _the most effective
plan_ in the end that could be proposed.

It involves THREE MEASURES, although the first is not absolutely essential
and is advocated solely because it would greatly hasten the time when Utah
would be redeemed--_i.e._, the time when the majority of the voting
population of Utah would be law-abiding citizens.

I. THE ABOLITION OF FEMALE SUFFRAGE in that Territory. This is one of the
good measures of the new Edmunds law. I believe in female suffrage as a
general principle; but I am opposed to it in Utah, as society exists there
at present.

We acknowledge that this measure may from one standpoint be regarded as
_unjust_. It may be said that it is unjust to punish the _women_ by
disfranchisement, and let the _men_ go free, especially as they are far
more guilty.

But, in reply, we say that there is no particular reason or justice in
allowing the confessedly ignorant and enslaved women of _Utah_ to vote,
while the highly intelligent women of _Massachusetts_ and _New York_ are
not allowed to vote. Until there is a Constitutional Amendment granting
female suffrage throughout the United States, no American principle is
violated by the disfranchisement of the Utah _women_; while the
disfranchisement of the Mormon _men_, who simply believe in polygamy,
would be in violation of a fundamental principle of our Constitution.

Then, too, it could not be regarded as a persecuting measure, for the
_Gentile_ women would be in the same category with the _Mormon_ women.

Besides, one of the main reasons why we believe women should be allowed
the franchise is that it would show a proper appreciation of their
intellectual and moral worth; but in a Territory where the state of
society is such as it is in Utah, where polygamy is proclaimed to be
divine, and where there are no laws against bigamy, adultery, and kindred
crimes, there can be no just appreciation of woman. Female suffrage under
such conditions is a mockery and a delusion. Hence we advocate its
abolition.

Now, see what would be accomplished by this measure, which is in thorough
harmony with American principles! The Mormon vote in 1882 was 23,251 out
of a total vote of 28,159. Of this vote, basing the estimate upon the
number registering, the female voters were slightly in excess of one half
of the entire number of Mormon suffragists. The disfranchisement of women
would, therefore, reduce the total Mormon vote at least one half. The
non-Mormon vote is now equal to considerably more than one fourth of the
whole number of Mormon males of voting age. Consequently, with the
disfranchisement of polygamists which has been accomplished, the
non-Mormon vote would be nearly one third of the legitimate Territorial
vote; and so by the abolition of female suffrage the problem would be
reduced to this: How can the proportion of the non-Mormon vote be
increased from one third of the total vote to a little more than one half?
The answer to that question will obviously lead to the ultimate solution
of this great Political Puzzle. This leads to the second feature of our
plan.

II. A NATIONAL COLONIZATION SCHEME, by which large numbers of law-abiding
citizens who are non-Mormons will be induced to settle in Utah _at once_.

This is the chief feature of our plan, and it seems to us the surest and
speediest way to overthrow Mormonism, besides being a peaceable and
Christian way. It is not a Utopian plan either, but one that is _entirely
feasible_.

The material resources of the Territory are vast and varied. Its
agricultural area is extensive and fertile, and parts of it are well
timbered and watered. Within its ample borders abound mines of the useful
and precious metals, as well as of coal and other minerals. It has more
forests than Nebraska. It is true that irrigation is in some degree
essential to successful agriculture, but Utah is not by any means the
barren region it has often been represented to be. Most people think of it
as a desert--a dry land, where no great multitude of human beings can ever
find a prosperous home. But it has well been called _the American Syria_.
Only let the soil have due irrigation, and it needs only to be tickled
with the hoe, as the proverb says, in order to laugh into harvests. You
may say the sage-bush, which is seen there in large quantities, is a mark
of desolation; but irrigate the pastures covered with it, and you have
bountiful harvests. As in Syria, when you irrigate the Jericho Plain you
have most vigorous growths, and as on the plain of Gennesaret there were
originally growths similar to the vegetation on the borders of the Nile,
so to-day irrigation gives extraordinary fruitfulness to the cultivated
lands of Utah.

It is true that the Mormon settlements extend to the full limits of the
Territory in every direction, following the natural sweep of the valleys
at the base of the mountains from north to south. It was Brigham Young's
policy to occupy the best land as quickly as possible, but only about
500,000 acres have yet been occupied; and estimating that there are
2,000,000 acres, or the one twenty-seventh part of the territory,
susceptible of cultivation (and this is a small estimate), there yet
remain 1,500,000 acres unappropriated for future settlement. And so,
notwithstanding the pre-emption of a large portion of the best arable
lands of the Territory by the Mormons, there is yet a large and fertile
acreage open for settlement. To ensure the occupancy of these wide and
inviting fields by thrifty, sturdy settlers opposed to the disloyal and
unlawful tenets of Mormonism, the laws relating to land-grants might be so
amended as to prevent sales to those who are not prepared to prove their
intention to become without reserve supporters of law and order.

But besides the agricultural resources, the mineral resources are also
great. Whole tiers of counties are underlaid with coal, and the mountain
ranges are impregnated in all their rifts with iron and lead, silver and
gold. Until the completion of the Union Pacific Railroad the vast mineral
wealth of Utah was untouched, the Mormon leaders being utterly opposed to
exploiting the mines, knowing that their development would bring in a
non-Mormon population; but since the building of the Union Pacific and the
extension branches north and south, Utah has produced $50,000,000 in
silver and lead, and its other mineral wealth, except coal and salt, as
yet undeveloped. Ex-Governor Murray, in his report for 1880, said: "I know
of no fact why it may not reasonably be claimed that Utah will prove the
richest repository of silver, gold, coal, lead, and other minerals, of all
the States and Territories of the West. Certainly no four hundred miles
of mountain ranges have produced as many mines of immense yields and so
many mining prospects as the suggestions of science and practical
observation make those of Utah appear. Many mining districts heretofore
inaccessible are now in close connection by railroads with the markets.
Much of the ore, on account of its low grade, has not heretofore paid to
mine; but which now, on account of superior methods in extracting and
reducing the ore, is made profitable. As a rule, the men who own the best
prospects are not able to develop them for lack of means. Capital is
needed, and with anything like reasonable business judgment can be made to
realize most gratifying results."

Now, with such natural resources, what might not Utah become? It is better
adapted for general settlement than Nevada, and quite as good as Colorado,
Arizona, or New Mexico. If its character and resources were fully and
fairly set forth, it would present an attractive field to the hardy and
adventurous emigrant. Rev. Dr. McNiece, of Salt Lake City, in a letter
received from him February 19th, 1886, says: "This is one of the grandest
and richest of all the Territories." Why not, then, encourage emigration
thither of the right class?

The Government might do much in this direction by offering special
inducements in the acquisition of lands, as it did notably in the case of
Oregon. Aid Societies, too, might be formed in the several States, as was
done in the case of Kansas, when it was thought necessary to rescue that
Territory from the grasp of the slave power.

There is already quite a large and powerful "Gentile" element in Utah,
which has for years been struggling against Mormonism. They are faithful
to the Government, and are generally enterprising, intelligent, and brave.
Let their hands be strengthened. They would gladly welcome large
accessions to their numbers and give to anti-Mormon settlers all the aid
in their power in making favorable locations.

The work of colonization should be begun at once and upon as large a scale
as possible; and as the result of inducements and restrictions such as
have been mentioned, it is safe to say that in a brief time the population
of Utah would be surrounded with a battery of influences whose electric
currents would act with irresistible force in hastening the establishment
of a normal condition of things.

It is true that this plan would not immediately deprive the Mormons of
control in the Legislature, but its effect would be to gradually introduce
into it an element which would speedily make its power felt; which would
afford active support to the governor and his assistants; and whose
influence would soon divide the already dissentient Mormon elements, in so
far as wise legislation is concerned, by winning the co-operation of the
Radical Mormon Party, who are opposed to the union of Church and State;
and so it is admirably adapted to break up the power of the disloyal
hierarchy. A wide discretion left in the hands of the governor as to the
use of the veto power (although _absolute veto_ power is a dangerous power
to be vested in any man under a Republican Government), and the
appointment to that position of a man of integrity and wisdom, would put
it in the power of the Executive to defeat any attempt at improper
legislation; while in a few years the majority of the voters of Utah would
be loyal, law-abiding citizens, and the legislative power would pass into
hands perfectly safe.

This plan is entirely practicable, and is offered in the assured
conviction that it presents the surest, speediest, and most peaceable
method of solving the Mormon political puzzle. It does not transgress any
American principle. It is not in any way unjust. And, surely, such a plan
is far preferable to that of a wholesale disfranchisement of the loyal as
well as the disloyal, not only as being more republican, but as being less
likely to involve the Government in a long and bitter quarrel with a
fanatic population. It does not take away any right (either the right of
franchise or of property) from the Mormon people, who are now the majority
of the citizens of the Territory. It could not, therefore, be regarded by
them as an act of persecution. Hence it would not inflame their fanaticism
nor increase their hostility to the Government; but it would tend to
disarm their prejudice and animosity, for this plan would subserve their
material interests by greatly increasing the value of their property. And
while I do not think it would be the part of wisdom to admit Utah into the
sisterhood of States until the majority of the voters are anti-Mormon,
still I verily believe that by this plan, some time before that object
would be obtained, many of the Mormons themselves would be on the side of
the Government and would defy the political dictation of the priesthood.
They could not mingle freely with a freedom-loving American people, such
as this plan would surround them with, without very soon becoming imbued
with some of their spirit of independence; and this would ultimately
result in their breaking from the despotism of their ecclesiastical
rulers.

But, as another step toward disarming the prejudice of the Mormons against
the Government and breaking up the political despotism of the Mormon
hierarchy for all time to come, we propose as

III. The third and last measure of our plan, THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL
FREE SCHOOLS all over the Territory. Edward Everett Hale has said that
America is to stand or fall according as she does or does not educate the
South and South-west. Until the mass of illiteracy is greatly diminished
in the Gulf States, and along the Mexican border (including all the
territory acquired from Mexico), great trouble may arise at any time in
the United States, from the collision of the uneducated portions with the
educated. In view of that fact, Wendell Phillips once said that no
thoughtful man could feel sure that _one flag_ would rule this belt of the
American Continent fifty years hence.

The education of the South and the South-west is the great task of the
statesmanship of to-day. There are a hundred million dollars lying in our
National Treasury, and we do not know what to do with it. The nation
should take some of it and undertake the work of public education in the
Territories; for while there is some objection to national aid to
education in the States, as a needless interference with State rights, yet
there is no doubt as to the right of the National Government to
appropriate money for educational purposes in the Territories, since they
are under its immediate control. The Government should begin educational
work in _all the Territories_ at once, and push it vigorously. Its future
safety and welfare demand it.

But especially is that necessary with regard to Utah. The despotism of the
Mormon hierarchy has for its keystone the superstition and ignorance of
the people. If the Government would put a public school in every school
district in Utah, it would undermine that despotism quicker than anything
else. Give the Mormons light and education, and they will burst the bonds
of their thraldom. The Mormon priesthood, well aware of this, take great
pains to keep the people unschooled. The public schools of the Territory
are entirely in the hands of the priesthood, and, as a general rule, only
Mormons are allowed to be teachers. They are scarcely worthy the name of
schools; but, more than that, in violation of a fundamental principle of
our Government, they are used for the propagation of religious tenets, and
accordingly they become the means of instilling disloyal sentiments into
the minds of the rising generation.

If Utah is to be thoroughly redeemed, it must be through proper influences
brought to bear upon the Mormon youth of to-day; but the only loyal
schools at present in Utah are those conducted by the Christian churches,
which are far from sufficient in number. It therefore becomes the duty of
the National Government to provide a loyal system of public instruction
for Utah.

This could be accomplished only partially by making the Superintendent of
Public Schools a Federal officer, as Senator Edmunds proposes in his new
bill. The administration of such an officer, if he be properly qualified,
and if he be supported by provision for the withholding of public funds
from schools which instruct in matters of religion, and have also the
power of vetoing the appointment of improper teachers, would so change the
character of the schools of Utah as to make them efficient means for
breaking down the disloyalty of the Mormons, instead of being, as they now
are, a potent means for the propagation of Mormonism. But that is not all
that is required.

The territorial schools now established are far too few to accomplish the
desired end. The National Government should make an ample appropriation.
It ought to put a public school in every city ward and every considerable
village. It ought to equip them with the best appliances and the best
teachers. It ought to fling their doors wide open to every comer. It
ought not to teach any religion, Mormon or Gentile; it need not; but it
ought to inculcate principles of patriotism and loyalty, and ought to
teach the pupils to think and question for themselves. The parental
instinct is stronger than a hierarchy. The appetite for knowledge is
invincible, even by superstition. It would not be necessary to establish a
compulsory system. It would be enough to establish a free system. The
schools established by the different Christian denominations have proved
that. Their Gentile schools are filled. The nation's schools would be
crowded.

This would also go a great way toward disarming the prejudice and
hostility of the older Mormons toward the Government. A great many of them
are immigrants from other countries, who on landing in America were
immediately taken to Utah; consequently the Mormon immigrant has known the
United States only as _an enemy_. It is time that we taught him that the
United States is _his friend_; and in what better way could this be done
than by establishing well-equipped schools for his children? This would
show that the Government had the interests of his family at heart. And we
all know that there is nothing which will so soon touch the heart of a
mother and father, too, as a kindness done to his child. Whatever
prejudice or hatred there might have been before toward that person, after
the kindness has been done to his child the prejudice departs and he
treats him as a friend. So would it be if the Government would establish
national schools of the best type in Utah. Many who are now its enemies
would be its friends. Yes, put liberty and education in that Territory in
the manner suggested, and liberty and education will solve the Mormon
political puzzle. "We can let the Mormons bring over their shiploads of
immigrants unhindered by us, so long as they bring them to a community
made free and enlightened. We can let them build their temple, so long as
we overtop it with the school-house and the college. We can let them
preach their superstitious liberalism, if we invite the ready minds of the
oncoming generation to demand rebelliously a reason for the faith and the
fear that are preached to them." Let the Government only grant a half
million of dollars, and school-houses can be built and equipped
everywhere. And to what better use could the money be put? It will not
cost as much to buy books and pay the salaries of competent teachers as it
would to dig graves in a war of extermination, and a far better result
would be effected, with no blood spilled and no tears shed except tears of
gratitude; for instead of heaps of men and women unnecessarily
slaughtered, we would have A REDEEMED PEOPLE--redeemed from slavery to
liberty, redeemed from disloyalty to loyalty.

We are firmly convinced that, if this plan were faithfully carried out in
all its parts, less than twenty years would see Utah, with her rich
harvests and vast mineral wealth being developed, and her million or more
of people, shining forth as a bright star in the galaxy of American
States, her people as loyal as those of Massachusetts or
Connecticut--loyal to the very core; and where now the Stars and Stripes
are cursed, trampled under foot, and placed at half-mast, they would then
be greeted with loudest cheers.



PART III.

THE SOCIAL PUZZLE.


"Proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants
thereof."--INSCRIPTION ON THE OLD LIBERTY BELL.

"The strength, the perpetuity, and the destiny of the nation, rest upon
our homes."--PRESIDENT CLEVELAND.



CHAPTER VIII.

    Polygamy only one of the Mormon social evils--Their social system _a
    system of bondage_--Contrary to natural law--Contrary to the spirit of
    the age--PERSONAL BONDAGE of the Mormons--Missionaries _must_ go on
    duty--Dictation of the priesthood with regard to boarders and
    rents--Immigrants under their control--All members subject to Church
    orders--Power of the Church over daily business--Mormon mining
    contractors--MENTAL BONDAGE of the Mormons--Converts illiterate--The
    Mormon Church the opponent of free education--No independent
    thought--Excommunication of Henry Lawrence and others.


If nine tenths of the people of our land were asked to denominate
Mormonism as a social system, the answer that would be given by unanimous
consent would be this: "It is a system of polygamy." And yet, after a
careful study of the social condition existing among the Mormons, it is
evident that _polygamy is only one of the social evils_--one of several
branches from one parent stock, and therefore cannot be said to be
descriptive of their whole social system.

One of the great political parties of our country has denounced slavery
and polygamy as "twin relics of barbarism;" and that is undoubtedly true.
But with regard to _Mormon_ polygamy, it will be seen that _slavery_ and
_polygamy_ do not occupy with reference to each other the relation of twin
sisters, but rather the relation of _mother_ and _daughter_: Slavery is
the mother of Mormon polygamy and of all the other social evils of the
so-called Latter-Day Saints; and therefore the proper denomination of
Mormonism as a social system would be a SYSTEM OF BONDAGE.

It is consequently a system contrary to natural law as well as to the
Christian conscience. According to Rousseau, the great French philosopher,
man is a being by nature loving justice and order. In his opinion, in an
ideal state of society each member would be free and the equal of every
other--_equal_ because no person or family or class would seek for any
rights or privileges of which any other was deprived; and _free_ because
each one would have his share in determining the rule common to all. It
was these doctrines, taking root in the minds and convictions of men, that
gave us our modern state of society, and that gave us our Nation, with its
free thought, free speech, free press, and free Institutions. The first
public official document in which these opinions were clearly set forth
was our "Declaration of Independence," which proclaimed that all men are
"equal" and that "they are endowed by their Creator with certain
inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness."

The same views also formed the element of strength in the French
Revolution. The first article of the "Declaration of the Rights of Man and
of the Citizen," adopted in 1789, at the beginning of the Revolution,
asserts: "Men are born free and equal, and have the same rights."

Indeed, these doctrines have been the source of all the social reforms of
the past century. They are the guiding-star of modern civilization. They
are the basis, not only of our Government, but also of our social system,
which is one of liberty and equal rights. They are the spring of all noble
thoughts given forth to the world and all the splendid achievements. To be
majestic and ennobling, thought must be unrestrained; to be praiseworthy,
deeds must be uncontrolled.

In England the dominant party at present (June, 1886) is the Liberal
Party, whose able leader is that "Grand Old Man," William E. Gladstone.
Last fall, just before their great election, that party issued a manifesto
of a very unusual character. It took the shape of a book entitled "Why am
I a Liberal?" and contained definitions and confessions of political faith
by the foremost leaders of the party. Among them Robert Browning answered
the question in this characteristic sonnet:

  "Why? Because all I haply can and do,
  All that I am now, all I hope to be,
  Whence comes it, save from fortune setting free
  Body and soul, the purpose to pursue
  God-traced for both? Of fetters not a few,
  Of prejudice, convention, fall from me.
  These shall I bid men, each in his degree
  Also God-guided, bear, and gayly too?

  "_But little do or can the best of us;
  That little is achieved through liberty._
  Who then dares hold, emancipated thus,
  His fellow shall continue bound? Not I,
  Who live, love, labor freely, nor discuss
  A brother's right to freedom. That is why."

Those are noble words, worthy a noble poet. If he had given no other poem
to the world, that would place him on the list of poets to be remembered
by future generations, who are destined to be, if possible, freer than we.
It is true, as Browning says, that liberty is the source of all
achievements worthy the name. Horace Mann once said: "Enslave a man and
you destroy his ambition, his enterprise, his capacity. In the
constitution of human nature, the desire of bettering one's condition is
the mainspring of effort. The first touch of slavery snaps this spring."

Since, therefore, this century is the century of progress, of grand and
noble achievements, LIBERTY is pre-eminently its watchword, the ruling
spirit of the age. The abolition of the negro-slave traffic, the
progressive obliteration of class distinctions and race distinctions in
law, the liberty of combination among laborers, the extension of the
franchise, the limitations of the powers of riches--in a word, all our
modern popular movements are only recognitions of the principle that each
individual man is born with the right to regulate his conduct and pursue
his ends in his own way, provided that he does not abridge the equal
rights of his fellow-men. The principle of individual liberty has been the
underlying principle of the social policy of the past hundred years.

But to this principle Mormonism is in the most bitter antagonism. It is
true that it does not antagonize it openly. If it did, it would thereby
strike its own death-blow. It claims to be in harmony with the spirit of
freedom, and the official Church organ, the _Deseret News_, has for its
motto, printed in large letters on its title-page, "_Truth and Liberty_."
Nevertheless, it tramples all freedom under foot. Its spirit is TYRANNY. A
greater despotism the world, perhaps, has never seen. That of the Persian
king in ancient times, and that of the Czar of all the Russias over his
serfs in more modern times, pale in comparison with the absolute despotism
of the Mormon chieftain and his two councillors. The condition of society
in Mormondom is that of bondage, utter and entire. The constituent
elements of man are body, soul, and spirit; and _these are all in slavery_
under the social system of the Mormons.

Let us, therefore, consider this subject under these _three_
heads--_personal bondage_, _mental bondage_, and _moral bondage_.

I. PERSONAL BONDAGE.--Every Mormon goes through the Endowment House, from
which no man emerges with his manhood remaining. He has sunk to be the
slave of the priesthood. In that house an awful oath is administered to
every one, obligating the individual, under fearful penalty, to uphold the
Church at every cost and obey it in all things. That terrible oath unmans
the whole Mormon race and brings them into bondage. The Mormon leaders
claim to be infallible--men inspired, who catch the very thought of God
and pronounce His words. They are the direct vicegerents of the Almighty,
and are at all times endowed by means of revelations with the wisdom to
guide their people aright in all things, temporal as well as spiritual.
This claim is admitted by all their followers. Accordingly, in the most
tyrannical way the priesthood dictates about all the affairs of the
people, telling them what store they must trade at, what newspaper they
must read, what school they must patronize. In fine, Brigham Young claimed
that his people could do nothing without his knowledge and approval, "even
to the ribbons a woman should wear." The control of the Church over all
the temporal affairs of the people is as absolute as their control of
purely spiritual matters. One of their prominent speakers said a few years
ago: "I cannot separate between temporal and spiritual affairs. The
priesthood has as much control over one as the other." Therefore the
Mormons are under _personal bondage_. Their persons, their services, their
property--all are under the control not of themselves individually, but of
their leaders.

At each semi-annual conference missionaries are appointed to go to the
outside world and proclaim the doctrines of their religion. At the least
calculation there are three hundred such missionaries constantly in the
field, going up and down in the States of our own land, and also the
countries of Europe and the isles of the sea. They must go at their own
expense, and are required to stay until recalled by the priesthood. If it
is necessary for a missionary to sell his last cow to get the means to pay
his expenses, he must do so, even though his family should be left
entirely destitute; and he is taught to believe that the greater the
sacrifice, the greater the glory in the next world.

A Presbyterian minister in the southern part of the Territory got the
privilege of boarding in a Mormon family. As soon as the priesthood found
it out this family was required to close its doors against the minister,
although they were greatly in need of the money which he was ready to pay
for his board.

Another minister in the northern part of the Territory hired a building
for a mission school from an old lady connected with the Mormon Church,
and paid a month's rent in advance. As soon as the priesthood found out
what she had done, they brought such pressure to bear upon her that she
went to the minister and urged him to give her back the building, although
in her poverty she greatly needed the rent. Is not that slavery? And yet
President Taylor has stood up in the great Tabernacle at Salt Lake City
and declared that they were in favor of the largest liberty for their own
people and for all mankind.

Thousands of converts to Mormonism are brought from Europe to Utah every
season, and this large immigration is under the complete control of the
Church. It can be sent to any place it is thought best. If a colony is
started in Arizona or Nevada, and it is thought best to enlarge it, the
immigration is sent thither. The persons must go where they are directed,
however much they might prefer to settle somewhere in the beautiful Salt
Lake Valley, the Switzerland of America. Every settlement is made under
the direction of the Church.

Not only is the foreign immigration under the control of the priesthood,
but all members who have already settled either in Utah or elsewhere are
subject to the orders of the Church. If the priesthood think it expedient
to send a thousand or two thousand into Colorado or Arizona or any other
locality, the number is divided out among the different wards, and each
ward must not only furnish its quota of men, but all the means for the
emigration; and the persons selected must go, although it is a great
sacrifice to them to leave their cultivated lands and comfortable homes
and go into the unbroken country of another Territory to again undergo the
trials and sufferings incident to pioneer life.

The power of the Church is also brought to bear on all the daily business
of life. In the mining districts of Southern Utah, the contractors for
furnishing salt, wood, charcoal, etc., are all Mormon bishops. They hire
the persons under them at starvation prices, and pay them in orders on the
co-operative supply stores, in which they are either principals or
partners; and the men so employed never see a dollar of cash. Should one
of the common people undertake to do any hauling, wood-supplying, or other
business with the mines, they would get an intimation that they must
desist. If this hint is disregarded, a meeting of the Council is called,
composed of the bishops and apostles; and as it is shown that some one of
them is being interfered with, the order goes forth from the Church that
this private enterprise must stop; and this no Mormon dare disregard. If
one of the mining companies undertakes to do its business with any except
the bishops, every obstacle possible is thrown in its way. Teams cannot
be hired. The bishop pays wages at about a dollar a day, payable from the
co-operative store; but if a mining superintendent wants men, he must pay
four dollars a day. Thus the Mormon bishops secure all the profits of
contracts from the mines. They take possession of all the woodlands and
cut off the wood, never taking the trouble to comply with the law. They
rule everything with a heavy hand, and woe to the poor man who dares to
try to make his living independently. The serfs of Russia in the olden
time were not more abject slaves than these people under the terrible
power of the Church. Independence of action is entirely taken away from
them. They are in _personal bondage_. Well may we exclaim: "Genius of
America! Spirit of our free institutions! where art thou?"

  "Shall our own brethren drag the chain
  Which not even Russia's menials wear?"

But this is not all.

II. The Mormons are not only in personal bondage, but worse than
that--they are in MENTAL BONDAGE.

Such tyranny as has been already alluded to is possible only because
Ignorance and her handmaid, Superstition, are throwing their dark pall
over the mass of the Mormon people. Mormonism grows mainly by imposition
upon the ignorant and the credulous. Joseph Smith, its founder, was
illiterate, and so was Brigham Young; and the mass of Mormons from the
beginning were from a class of people whose education was very limited.
Such also is the character of their converts now. They are gathered from
the very lowest classes of the peasantry of England, Germany, and
Scandinavia; and in our land the poor rural element of the Southern
States, commonly called the "cracker" element, is a favorite and
successful field for Mormon missionary labor, because the elders find as
much ignorance and credulity among the poor whites of Tennessee, Georgia,
and neighboring States, as they do among the low classes of Europe.

If you go into the Tabernacle at Salt Lake City, it is said, one is
reminded, in looking at the faces of the people, of what we can see in
Castle Garden. The marks of ignorance are stamped upon their very
countenances. It has been aptly said: "The illiteracy of the average
Mormon is denser than a London fog." In an article published in the
_Presbyterian Review_, April, 1881, Rev. Dr. McNiece, of Salt Lake City,
said that, so far as he knew, "after three years' observation in Utah,
there are only three persons among the entire body of Mormons who can make
the least claim to scholarship. One of these is a woman of notoriously
immoral character; one of the others is always spoken of as a religious
monomaniac; and the character of the third is such as to compel one to
believe that he supports Mormonism simply because of the lucrative office
which it gives him." According to the teachers engaged in the Christian
schools there, the ignorance met with is simply appalling. In many cases
neither men nor women know how to read. Children are plenty who never
heard of God, and know no more of Christ than a beggar in the city of
Nineveh in the days of Jonah. History and geography are to a great extent
unknown and untaught; even our own country outside of Utah is unknown. The
Mormon leaders take great pains to keep their people in ignorance.
Learning, intelligence, are everywhere at a discount.

The civilized world recognizes the fact that the diffusion of knowledge
elevates humanity. Shakespeare says:

  "Ignorance is the curse of God,
  Knowledge the wing wherewith we fly to heaven."

One of the chief features of this age is the desire for universal
education, and every true reformer seeks to place it within the reach of
all. _But the Mormon Church is the recognized opponent of free education._
Notwithstanding the fact that the Mormon priesthood has had control of
Utah for well-nigh forty years, that Territory is the only one in the
United States that has not a system of free schools, open to the poor as
well as the rich. The teachers with few exceptions are young, untaught,
and without experience; and the schools are scarcely worthy the name. The
main object of the Mormon school system seems to be to prevent the people
from learning to think and acquiring information.

Now, why is this? The only reason is that it is necessary for the Mormon
Church to keep her subjects in ignorance to enable her to control them.
This was the position taken by Brigham Young, and is the position taken by
the hierarchy to-day. The plea of poverty cannot be justified, for the
Church collects over a million dollars annually; but this tax of ten
dollars a year for every man, woman, and child in the Mormon Church is
spent, not for free schools, which would develop manhood and fit the
taxpayer to be an honorable citizen of the commonwealth, but for that
which rivets tighter the chains that bind the people.

The minds of the people are in a condition of slavery. Independent thought
there is none, and consequently free speech cannot exist. This is clearly
proved, when we call to mind one of the brightest spectacles in the
history of Utah. It was in 1869, when Henry Lawrence and his associates
boldly stood up in the "School of the Prophets" and raised their voices in
favor of free speech and free thought. A noble act of heroism that was--a
stand for a righteous principle--a deed which should gain for them
immortal fame, when we consider the real manhood it required for them to
face such a powerful and tyrannical hierarchy. A noble fight it was on
their part, but a losing fight; for they were at once expelled from the
Church, branded with the stigma of apostates, their business was ruined,
and they and their families were completely ostracized. That act of
expulsion by the Mormon leaders is a clear proof of the fact that they are
the bitter opponents of mental freedom. Who ever knew of any proposition
being debated in their conferences, or any nomination voted down by the
people? Who ever knew of any matter of interest being left to the people
to act upon freely and unrestrainedly? _The leaders do the thinking._ They
arrange all things. _The people must acquiesce and think as they do._ IS
THAT LIBERTY?

Milton says:

  "This is true liberty, when free-born men,
  Having to advise the public, may speak free."

But free thought and free speech are not the prerogatives of the Mormons.
They are MENTAL SLAVES.



CHAPTER IX.

THE SOCIAL PUZZLE (_continued_).

    Moral Bondage of the Mormons--Implicit obedience to the priesthood
    enjoined--_Crimes committed_ at their command--Murders--The Mountain
    Meadows Massacre--Lee's confession--A Mormon carpenter's
    confession--Theft--Falsehood--Perjury--Why was polygamy
    promulgated?--Why is polygamy practised?


Deplorable as the condition of the Mormon is, as already depicted in the
preceding chapter, that is not the worst that is to be said of their
social condition. They are not only in personal and mental slavery; far
worse than this, they are in MORAL BONDAGE. Sad to relate, their souls,
their consciences, are enslaved, and consequently their condition is far
worse than that of the negroes of the South before the Civil War. The
central thought running through all the discourses of the leaders is
obedience to the priesthood, and the consequences of refusing to obey
counsel. It matters not how absurd the doctrine may be, or how much it
outrages common-sense, if it is the declaration of the inspired
priesthood, it must be obeyed; and most of the people are so steeped in
superstition and ignorance that they obey without question all orders from
their chiefs, and even kiss the hand that rivets the chains that bind
them.

The tyranny of the priesthood was well illustrated when one of the
apostles on one occasion, while speaking in one of the ward meeting-houses
about the solemn duty of obeying the priesthood, happened to look through
the window and see a load of wood passing by. "Now I want you," said he,
"to obey the priesthood so implicitly and have so much confidence in
everything they tell you that if Brigham Young or any of the Twelve
Apostles should tell you that load of wood is a load of hay, you would all
say, 'Amen, that's a load of hay.'" Even though their very eyes should
belie the statement of their leaders, yet they must accept it as true,
because, forsooth, it came from inspired lips; and although they might be
commanded to do that which their own consciences disapproved, yet they
must do it, because it is a command given under inspiration, and their
consciences are lulled to sleep by the Jesuit doctrine, "The end justifies
the means." Surely, that is not religious liberty.

On account of this moral bondage, the worst crimes have been committed
against both God and man, which have been laid at the door of the Mormon
people, when in reality they were only the tools of the Mormon priesthood
and the victims of an enslaving fanaticism. They themselves would not have
committed them if they were allowed to do what their own consciences
dictated; but at the command of the mouthpiece of the Almighty Himself
they dared not disobey.

I. Thus, they have been guilty of MURDERS and ASSASSINATIONS for no other
reason than that the hierarchy uttered their mandates that they should be
accomplished.

Take, as an example, the _Mountain Meadows Massacre_, which is, perhaps,
the darkest page in the history of Mormonism in Utah. It was a horrible
butchery of one hundred and twenty innocent men and women who were
emigrants on their way from Arkansas to California; and the dastardly deed
cannot by any means be justified. For a long time the massacre was a deep
mystery, and the Mormons asserted that it was done by Indians; but the
mystery has been unravelled, and it is now known that that cruel deed lies
at the door of the Mormon Church, the murderers being Mormons with some
hired Indians, all led by John D. Lee, who was convicted of his crime and
executed on the ground where the murder occurred March 25th, 1877, almost
twenty years after the commission of the crime.

There were, no doubt, aggravations at the time leading the Mormons to the
commission of the crime which we should remember. Ordinarily the Mormons
were glad to see the arrival of Gentile emigrants _en route_ for the far
West, as it gave occasion for trade and barter; but at this time _Federal
troops were advancing toward Utah_, and consequently a spirit of intense
hatred toward the Americans and toward our Government was kindled in the
hearts of the Mormons, and especially of their leaders. Their persecutions
in Missouri and Illinois came up before their minds to increase their
hostility against the Gentiles. Just then it was that there came within
their borders this train of American emigrants. They regarded them
naturally as enemies, and their very presence at that time was a powerful
incentive to their extermination.

Moreover, these emigrants were from _Arkansas_, where only a short time
before Orley P. Pratt, one of the first Mormon apostles, had gained his
crown of martyrdom; and his murderer was not even arrested. Now the
opportunity of avenging the death of one of their leading Saints was put
within their reach, and this fact was another powerful inducement to
commit the crime. But after all is said that can be said in extenuation of
that terrible deed, it stands forth as _a most foul, shocking_, and
_unjustifiable butchery_.

Brigham Young, as Governor of Utah, was in honor bound to protect those
emigrants on their way across his Territory, and yet he was the author of
their destruction. On the fourth day after the emigrants left Cedar City,
in Southern Utah, about sixty Mormons, painted and disguised as Indians,
it is said, left that place in pursuit of them. They were under the
command of Bishop John D. Lee, and had all the equipments of a military
force except artillery. Lee invited the Piute Indians to accompany him,
and he directed the combined forces of the Mormons and Indians throughout
the entire siege. At Mountain Meadows the victims were overtaken. They
were taken completely by surprise, but they at once corralled their wagons
and prepared for defence. For four days they fought heroically. During the
third day's battle it became a necessity with the emigrants to get water.
It was in clear view, but it was covered by the rifles of the Mormons.
Hoping that the latter might have pity on children, they dressed two
little girls in white and sent them with a bucket in the direction of the
spring. _The Mormons shot them down._ The morning of the fourth day Lee
told the men under his command that his orders were to "kill the entire
company except the children." In order to do this, he used finesse and
stratagem. He sent a flag of truce to them, offering to protect them from
the Indians if they would lay down their arms. Putting confidence in his
promise, they marched up to the spring where Lee stood, and placed
themselves under his care. The line of march was then taken up, and after
the distance of half a mile had been traversed Lee gave the command to
halt; then immediately the command to shoot them down. All the men and
women were slain, stripped of their clothing, and left without burial.

In 1859 General Carlton raised a cairn of stones over the bleached
skeletons of the victims. Upon one of the stones he caused to be written:
"Here lie the bones of one hundred and twenty men, women, and children
from Arkansas, murdered on the tenth day of September, 1857." Upon a
cross-beam he caused to be painted: "Vengeance is mine, saith the Lord,
and I will repay it." Brigham Young ordered this monument to be destroyed,
and said the inscription should have read: "Vengeance is mine, saith the
Lord, and I _have_ repaid it."

Lee was at length tried and executed for his part in that terrible
butchery, but he was only the instrument of the Mormon leaders. He was in
moral bondage, bound to carry out the wishes of his leader, however
willing or unwilling he may have been to do so. He would never have
ordered that massacre if he had not received an express command, nor would
his troops have done the dastardly deed. _But they were in bondage._

This may be clearly proved from the dying confessions of Lee, which were
published after his execution. On the night previous to the massacre the
Mormons held a council meeting. In describing that conference, Lee says:
"I know that our total force was fifty-four whites and over three hundred
Indians. As soon as those persons gathered around the camp, I demanded of
Major Higbee what orders he had brought.... Major Higbee reported as
follows: 'It is the orders of the President that _all the emigrants must
be put out of the way_.' He then went on and said that none but friends
were permitted to leave the Territory, and that as these were our sworn
enemies, they must be killed. The men then in council knelt down in a
prayer circle and prayed, invoking the Spirit of God to direct them how to
act in the matter. After prayer Major Higbee said, 'Here are the orders,'
and handed me a paper from Haight. The substance of the orders were that
the emigrants should be _decoyed_ from their stronghold and all
exterminated, so that no one should be left to tell the tale, and then the
authorities could say it was done by the Indians.... I then left the
council and went away by myself, and bowed myself in prayer before God,
and asked Him to overrule the decision of that council. At the earnest
solicitation of Brother Hopkins, I returned with him to the council. When
I got back, the council again prayed for aid. After prayer Major Higbee
said, 'I have the evidence of God's approval of our mission. It is God's
will that we carry out our instructions to the letter.' The meeting was
then addressed by some one in authority. He spoke in about this language:
'Brethren, we have been sent here to perform a duty. It is a duty that we
owe to God, and to our Church and people. The orders of those in authority
are that all the emigrants _must_ die. Our leaders speak with inspired
tongues, and their orders come from the God of heaven. We have no right to
question what they have commanded us to do; it is our duty to obey.' I,
therefore, taking all things into consideration, and believing as I then
did that my superiors were _inspired_ men, who could not go wrong in any
matter relating to the Church or the duty of its members, concluded to be
obedient to the wishes of those in authority; I took up my cross, and
prepared to do my duty."

From that confession it is clear that Lee revolted at the idea of the
massacre, his conscience did not approve of it, and in committing it he
acted as a slave, as a martyr, regarding it as a _cross_.

So doubtless it was with others under his command. It is related that a
missionary teacher asked a carpenter to make some repairs to her
school-house. The Work was done at noon-time, when the children were away
from the school; and one day the man said, "I believe you are a Christian,
and I want to ask if you think I can be forgiven for helping in the
Mountain Meadows Massacre. I want to tell you; it is on my mind all the
time; but if you betray me my life will be of no account." The teacher
said she would not betray his confidence, and she believed, whatever his
sins might be, they would be forgiven if he repented of them. The
carpenter then told her how a lovely, golden-haired little girl was sent
to a spring for water that dreadful day, and that he was one of those
commanded to shoot her down; that her look of entreaty was forever before
his eyes; and then the strong man wept at the remembrance, while making
his confession, of a barbarity that he dared not refuse to accomplish. Was
not that man in moral slavery?

Now, as that massacre was executed on account of the moral bondage of the
Mormons to the priesthood, so also was the dastardly murder of Dr. J. K.
Robinson in Salt Lake City in October, 1866, the murder of the Aiken party
of six persons, the Potter and Parish murders, and the five hundred or
more other assassinations which stain the history of the Mormon Church.

II. But not only has murder resulted from this bondage. THEFT is indulged
in, not because their consciences approve it, but because they are taught
by the priesthood that the plundering of all those opposed to them,
whenever an opportunity occurs, is a duty, because whatever is taken from
the ungodly Gentiles is that much put into the treasury of the Lord.

III. FALSEHOOD, too, is indulged in, whenever it will conduce to the
benefit of the Church and shield her members from harm. A Mormon apostle,
in an address at Nephi, Utah, cautioned the children, when asked how many
wives their fathers had, to reply that they didn't know. "I'd rather have
you tell a lie," he said, "to defend your friends and parents, than tell
the truth, that will bring trouble upon them." The Mormons evidently do
not pattern after the Apostle Paul.

IV. PERJURY is indulged in to a large degree at the command of the
priesthood. Dora Young, one of the daughters of Brigham, apostatized and
declared that the first thing that opened her eyes to the atrocities of
Mormonism was her father's wholesale perjuries. John Taylor, the present
President of the Church, has also set the people the same example. When
placed upon the witness-stand, he has always been a very forgetful man,
and could never recollect anything that would be of value in any case
against any member of the Church. Such an utter absence of memory was,
perhaps, never before exhibited in a court of justice. George Q. Cannon,
also of the Mormon Presidency, the ruling spirit of the Mormons, said that
he did not know whether any record of plural marriage is kept or not,
although it is said that that book is one of the most important books they
have.

Now, when the leaders commit perjury in that way, what can be expected
from those who regard them as gods and as capable of no wrong act? And so
we find that Judge Zane had to dismiss one case altogether, owing to the
lack of evidence through false swearing. Women in polygamy have sworn that
they did not know the father of their children. A daughter of Brigham
Young professed on the witness-stand recently not to know that her sister
was married, although her sister had had a child by her polygamous
husband, and she had been in and out of the house frequently. Some time
ago a Mormon mother was called upon to testify before the Grand Jury as to
the marriage of her daughter to a well-known polygamist. The mother
testified that she knew nothing about the marriage of her daughter, and
denied knowledge of any facts connected with it; and afterward, on being
questioned by one of her lady friends how she could swear to such a lie,
she answered: "I only lied to their God; I did not lie to my God; and the
authority justified me in doing so." Oh, what a picture of moral slavery
does that present before our minds! The fearful oaths taken by a Mormon
when he passes through the Endowment House require him to defend a member
of the priesthood even by perjury, if necessary.

V. But that is not all, nor the worst. Under the head of moral bondage, I
think, must be put that vice, which is called a relic of barbarism, and
which has put Mormonism in antagonism to Christian civilization and the
laws of our land. I refer to the practice of POLYGAMY, which is with many
synonymous with Mormonism, but in reality is only one of the evils of that
social system.

Mormonism had its birth in 1830. Polygamy was not promulgated until
twenty-two years after, although Joseph Smith, it is alleged, received a
revelation on the subject nine years before its formal declaration to the
whole Mormon race. In dealing with Mormonism as a system, it must ever be
borne in mind that polygamy does not form a part of the organic structure
of Mormon society. It is an invention, recent in its establishment, and
wholly an exotic in this country as well as in the countries from which
Mormon recruits have been largely gathered; and it has been from the
commencement to this hour an open and conscious defiance, not only of the
public sentiment of the country, but also of its laws. It has known itself
to be a transgressor, and every polygamous marriage has been deliberately
contracted with this knowledge.

The question at once arises, WHY WAS IT PROMULGATED UNDER SUCH
CIRCUMSTANCES? What was the object of the leaders in declaring it to be a
divine revelation? While it may seem to many that polygamy is only an
element of weakness in the Mormon institution, and destined to bring
destruction upon the entire system, yet if we study the subject carefully
it will be seen that it contributes strength to Mormonism in many ways.

1. In the first place, their numbers are increased much more rapidly than
could be done by the monogamous system which is in vogue in our land.

2. In the next place, it gives a firmer union to the Mormon people, so
that apostasy cannot occur so frequently as it did in Missouri and Nauvoo.
By polygamy the Mormons are separated from all the rest of the civilized
world; and as the world repels them, they are driven in upon themselves,
to be welded closer together, to be mutual supports to each other under
persecutions and trials. The unfortunate women who practise polygamy and
the children begotten from it, even if they become malcontent, yet know
themselves to be caught in a net from which they see no escape; and they
remain in their place and practise, because, though their hearts are
broken, their homes are saved by a religious sanction from foul disgrace.
And even the thousands who are not polygamists (for not more than one
tenth of the Mormons are polygamists) will uphold polygamy, because some
near relatives, as sisters or daughters, are practisers of it. They,
therefore, although not in polygamy, will yet stand up for it; and for
them, too, with the actual practisers, it becomes a bond, binding all
together into a unity amazingly compact and unbreaking.

Having thus endeavored to answer the question, Why was polygamy
promulgated? let us now direct our attention to another and more important
question, WHY IS POLYGAMY PRACTISED?

Many suppose it is practised because it allows full sway to the passions
of the sensualists, who are the only persons who practise it; but that is
a great mistake. Some sensualists there doubtless are, who are
polygamists, in Utah; but at the least nine tenths cannot be branded by
any such infamous name. It is practised not because it is loved by the
people and desired by them, but because they are urged--yea, commanded by
the infallible priesthood to practise it. They regard it as the command of
God; and that is the only reason why it is practised by ninety-nine out of
every hundred of the polygamists of Utah. _It is because they are_ MORAL
BONDMEN.

Even Brigham Young openly avowed that when Joseph Smith gave him the order
for the first time it was a great trial to his soul; and it is said that
the locks of an apostle turned white in a single night when he was
commanded to take another wife. The idea of taking a second wife to a man
who is happily married is extremely distasteful. Polygamy, therefore, has
enslaved the Mormon men, blunting all the finer feelings of their soul.

But if the men are enslaved by polygamy, the women are martyrized. A
writer on Mormonism has said: "Whoever has read debasement in the women of
Utah has done them injustice. Some there be who are devoid of refined
sentiment and the nobler instincts of the sex, but no women in history
ever deserved more respect and sympathy than the true women among the
Mormons." They are taught to believe that polygamy is a divine
institution; they are taught that it is their duty to make a
self-sacrifice--to bear the cross in order to receive the crown. They are
forbidden to covet the entire love of their husband's heart, because God
designed to purify them from all selfishness and, besides, had commanded
that if any oppose this revelation on "Celestial Marriage" they shall be
destroyed; and while the Mormons do not use any visible coercion to draw
persons into this complex marriage, yet that revelation, with its
accompanying threat, stands like a frightful ogre, hanging over them like
a doom, and sounds the death-knell to their happiness. The Mormon men have
claimed that the women get accustomed to plural marriage and are happy in
it; but that is a libel upon the nature of woman. Surely no woman ever
desired to share her husband with another, and no husband could ever
please two wives. No; the wives of polygamists in Utah are living martyrs.
What days of silent grief and misery they must endure! The story of such
women can never be told. Many a young wife has exclaimed: "I am fainting
by the way; but for my children's sake I must bear up. What will be the
end of all this suffering?" Many more have found early graves, the strain
of mental anguish, added to physical labor, proving too much for their
powers of endurance. In thinking or reading of such heart-rending sorrows,
one is impelled to cry: "How long, O Lord, how long!"

And yet this moral bondage is suffered in this land, which is famed for
its light and liberty. It is a shame and disgrace to our nation.

  "How good to lead the nations of the earth
  In every field of valor and of worth!
  How good to hold the lightning in our hands,
  And flash our energies to other lands!
  How sweet erewhile to see the slave go free!
  How dear to-day the breath of liberty!
  How good to draw the larger, purer breath,
  After the years of battle and of death;
  To feel how well our country bore the strain,
  And settled back to rectitude again!

  "And yet--and yet, just now a wailing came
  Out of the West--our women steeped in shame,
  The name of wife and mother made disgrace,
  Home in our midst become the vilest place!
  What if no black wrist feels the iron chain,
  When snow-white breasts must bear the scarlet stain?
  What if the old plantation homes in ruin lie,
  If Mormon temples proudly kiss the sky?

      *       *       *       *       *

  The day-break of true chivalry is now;
  And every knight is ready for the vow.

      *       *       *       *       *

  How shall our flag, by Freedom's breath unfurled,
  Greet Liberty enlightening the world!
  Cowards! The brazen image at a glance
  Shall see the craven in each countenance!
  The torch it bears in its uplifted hand
  Shall not make light the shame-spot on our land.
  Day-break indeed! The midnight is not past.
  Freedom, forsooth! Not while yon temples last!
  Enlightenment! Our bitter inland sea
  Gives back the word in shameless mockery!"



CHAPTER X.

THE SOCIAL PUZZLE (_continued_).

    _Reasons why Mormon slavery is maintained_--Hope of earthly
    gain--Complete organization of the Mormon Church--Prospect of
    promotion in office as a bribe--Fear of earthly loss--System of
    espionage--Apostasy formerly punished by death--Mode of inflicting the
    punishment--Social ostracism--Religious conviction the mainstay of the
    Mormon social system.


Having already shown that the Mormon social system is a system of slavery
so complete as to bind with its fetters body, mind, and soul--the entire
man, let us now briefly inquire into THE REASONS WHICH CONTRIBUTE TO THE
MAINTENANCE OF THIS DEGRADING SYSTEM, which is so utterly hostile to the
enlightened and progressive spirit of the age.

I. There is, first, THE HOPE OF EARTHLY GAIN.

There is probably no system on earth which has a more cunning and complete
organization than the Mormon Church. Supreme over all is the President,
with his two Councillors. Then come the Twelve Apostles, who, in
connection with the President and his Councillors, form a High Council,
from whose decision there is no appeal. They may be regarded, therefore,
as the masters in this system of slavery. Then come the Seventies (who are
travelling missionaries), high-priests, elders, bishops, teachers, and
deacons. One of the most cunning things about the organization is the
large number of office-holders. There are over 23,000 officers reported as
belonging to the Church--that is, one out of every three men holds an
office either of honor or emolument. Each of these has a hope that if he
is faithful to his masters he will be in time promoted. If any one of
these 23,000 officers is disposed to criticise or become dissatisfied with
the system, the office which he holds, and especially the prospect of
future promotions, acts as a bribe to submission and acquiescence. Thus
the hope of earthly rewards is one of the great sources of strength to the
Mormon system, holding it intact.

II. Then, there is THE FEAR OF EARTHLY LOSS.

Hope and fear both operate upon the minds of the people, and cause them to
submit to be bound by the chains of a tyranny whose equal can be found
only by going back to the Dark Ages.

The Mormon hierarchy has a system of espionage, by which they are kept
informed in regard to the feelings of all the people. The whole Territory
is divided into twenty stakes or districts, each of which is presided over
by a high-priest. These districts are again subdivided into about two
hundred and thirty wards, each of which has a presiding bishop. The
teachers and deacons are his subordinates, whose duty it is to visit each
individual in their respective wards and find out all about his affairs,
both temporal and spiritual. In this way, through all these various
gradations, the leaders are able to put their finger on every man, woman,
and child in the whole Church.

Before the Gentiles forced their way into Utah, and Government troops were
stationed there, if any of the Mormons were, through this system of
inquisition, found to be discontented and unsubmissive to the priesthood,
inclined to free thought, free speech, and free action, he was soon taught
a lesson by the "Avenging Angels" that silence is the better part of
discretion, or that "dead men tell no tales." The Church held every man's
life in its hand. Terrible was the punishment meted out for any offence or
act of insubordination.

It is only a few years ago that it was the practice to inflict what they
call _blood atonement_ for any flagrant offence to the Church or any
disregard of its orders. Brigham Young, after the people were well
established in Utah, alluded on one occasion in a public address to the
persecutions in Missouri and Nauvoo, saying that they always began with
apostates and disaffected spirits; and then he said: "Do we see
disaffected spirits here? We do. Do we see apostates? We do. I say to
those persons, you must not court persecution here, lest you get so much
of it you will not know what to do with it. Do _not_ court persecution.
Now, keep your tongues still, _lest sudden destruction come upon you_. _I
say, rather than that apostates shall flourish here I will unsheath my
bowie-knife and conquer or die._ Now, you nasty apostates, clear out, or
judgment will be put to the line and righteousness to the plummet. Let us
call upon the Lord to assist us in this and every good work."

President H. C. Kimball, in an address delivered in Salt Lake City August
16th, 1857, said: "If men turn traitors to God and His servants, their
blood will surely be shed, or else they will be damned;" and this doctrine
was put into actual practice. The culprit was never allowed an opportunity
for defence. He remained in blissful ignorance of his danger, until at
midnight there came a knock on his door, and he was ordered to accompany
the four or five masked men that confronted him when he opened the door.
Then he knew his doom, and so did his family, who knew they looked their
last upon him. Being led to a secluded spot, a shovel was placed in his
hands, and he was made to dig his own grave. He was then seized, forced
upon his knees, his head held over the grave, and his throat cut from ear
to ear. His blood flowed into the grave, into which his body was thrown
and covered up, and no more was ever heard of him. His family dared not
mention their suspicions, and no Mormon ever dared to be inquisitive or
mention his name. Such instances were by no means rare.

Now the influx of the Gentiles has caused them to be more careful how they
punish apostates or insubordinates; but we know little or nothing of the
secret punishments that are still inflicted. The practice of blood
atonement is now stopped by the necessity of circumstances. In the
presence of thousands of Gentiles and Federal troops and Federal control,
the Mormon Church dare not any longer enforce its commands by the pistol
and the knife; but it has means of control none the less effective, which
it does not hesitate to use. The apostate is now, it is said, handed over
to "the buffetings of Satan," to be cursed in his business, in his family,
in his body, in his mind, in all things that belong to him; and the Mormon
priesthood have the will and power to see that these prophetic curses are
fulfilled to the letter.

There does not exist upon the face of this broad earth a more complete
social ostracism for religion than in Utah. Not many months ago a girl
brought home some sewing which she had for a Christian woman. The girl
looked round upon the happy home and burst into tears. Upon being asked
the cause of her grief, she replied: "Oh, that I lived in a happy
Christian home! You think me a Mormon, but I have _never_ been a Mormon at
heart. My mother was once the wife of a Presbyterian clergyman in England.
About three years after her marriage my father died. I was the only child
of my parents. My mother's people became Mormons, and my mother emigrated
with them to Utah, bringing me with her. Here she married a Mormon, and I
have been carefully taught in their religion; but I have my father's
Bible, sermons, and diary. I know that his religion is true, and not this
Mormon doctrine, which teaches of gods many, and heaven attained by
sensual courses--women earning their salvation and exaltation in heaven by
becoming the polygamous wives of some wicked man. I loath it; but I am
poor. I can only do plain sewing for a living, and while I remain with my
mother she will charge me nothing for board. I am not strong, and often
sick. If I come out boldly and say, 'I will go to the Church of my choice
and worship God according to the dictates of my conscience,' I shall be
turned into the street, perhaps be denounced as a bad character--not an
uncommon thing in Utah--and come to want. No, I must stop at home, be
quiet, worship God in my heart, and pray for forgiveness."

If a man apostatizes who is in business he is no longer supported by the
Mormons, and they in many places are nine tenths of the people. He is
despised. He can get no work, since the Mormons control nearly all
business contracts. The Mormon people will no longer hold intercourse with
him. His family is the butt of ridicule and contempt, and his children are
insulted and stigmatized. The entire family is as completely ostracized as
though they had been convicted of an infamous crime. Now, it certainly
requires strong heroism, real, sterling manhood, for one to face such a
prospect for his family. Most people would obey the dictates of the
hierarchy, whatever they might be, rather than bring such loss and shame
upon themselves and their children. Thus it is seen how fear of earthly
loss enters as a prominent factor in holding the Mormon people in bondage.

III. But lastly and chiefly, there is STRONG RELIGIOUS CONVICTION, which
is the main prop of this social system. In discussing the Mormon puzzle in
Utah, we must not forget that for twenty years this community was isolated
by a thousand miles of barren waste from civilization. During this time it
was literally a kingdom within itself; and Brigham Young was king, his
word law, his command a commandment from God. During that time the present
generation of Mormons were reared; and it is their strong conviction that
the word of the priesthood is the word of God.

If we only glance at history, we will find many evidences of the great
power of "Thus saith the Lord" over the minds of men. For religious
conviction persons have burned at the stake and endured all manner of
physical torture, to say nothing of the travail of soul through which they
have passed. It is to this power, also, that Mormonism owes its strength.
So strong is its control that the Mormons dare not, for fear of the loss
of their soul's salvation, enter protest against any command coming, as it
does, with these words prefixed: "Thus saith the Lord." The priesthood
claim to have control of the "seals" and "keys" by which the gates of both
heaven and hell can be opened and shut; and they take the keys by which
they pretend to open the gates of vengeance and rattle them above the
heads of the uneducated and superstitious, until they are frightened into
believing that, if they should disobey any edict of this priesthood, they
would be consigned to the flames of eternal fire. It is this fear of the
loss of their souls if they disobey, and the conviction that their leaders
cannot command anything but what God has commanded, that is the strongest
pillar that holds up their social fabric. Thus do the Mormon people with
their own hands rivet the chains which bind in a fearful bondage their
bodies, their minds, and their souls.



CHAPTER XI.

THE SOCIAL PUZZLE (_concluded_).

    THE SOLUTION OF THE SOCIAL PUZZLE--Mormon slavery and negro slavery
    compared--The duty of the Government to break up Mormon slavery--The
    remedy the same as for the political evils of Mormonism--Brigham Young
    opposed to immigration of Gentiles--A growing spirit of
    restlessness--Necessity of surrounding the youth with an atmosphere of
    freedom--_Personal Bondage_ of the Mormons overcome by Gentile
    colonization--Social ostracism no longer dreaded--_Mental Bondage_
    overcome by national schools and colonization--_Moral Bondage_
    overcome by the same means--This policy not to be confounded with the
    let-alone policy--An apparent policy of toleration--The alarmist's cry
    and its answer--The Mormon standpoint not to be overlooked--The cry of
    unconstitutionality--The proposed Polygamy Amendment to the
    Constitution--The cry of religious persecution--Imprisonment preferred
    to sacrifice of principle--Law impotent to break up polygamy--Supposed
    captivity of Mormon women a mistake--Mass-meeting of Mormon women to
    plead for polygamy--_Senator Hoar_ on the solution of the social
    puzzle--How the law should be enforced and its probable
    effect--Superiority of the colonization plan over any other plan--Its
    effectiveness proved by the Oneida Community--_The Social Puzzle
    solved_--The duty of the nation, the citizen, and the Church.


If our diagnosis of the Mormon social system is correct, then the only
effectual remedy will be one that reaches the real evil, which is
_slavery_; and as polygamy is only one of the results of slavery, remove
the cause and the result will likewise be removed.

But this slavery of the Mormons is very different from the negro slavery
in the South before our Civil War. The latter was a legalized traffic, and
the remedy for it was _law_. The slavery of the Mormons is a voluntary
one, and rests not upon law but upon religious conviction; and hence _law
cannot be an effectual remedy_. The Mormon Puzzle, then, is a much harder
one to solve than the Negro Puzzle before the war, and will require a
longer time for its solution.

The galley-slave realizes his bondage, feels his fetters, hears the twang
of his master's whip, and longs and plans for a release from his
servitude; but he who is enslaved by a mental or moral dogma, while he
thinks he is of all men the most free, is in the most fearful condition of
slavery. This is the condition of all those who, like the Mormons, are
compelled to yield a blind obedience to the teachings of an infallible
priesthood; and it must necessarily be the case that all such are unfitted
to discharge the duties pertaining to independent citizenship. He, and he
only, is fitted to become a worthy citizen of our nation who strives to be
an independent thinker, and who follows no guide but his own conscientious
sense of right and wrong; but he, and he only, is a good Mormon who obeys
counsel without question or gainsaying. It is, therefore, the imperative
duty of our Government to break up this slavery among the Mormons, and to
do it as speedily as possible. The Government is responsible for the
growth of this system within its domains, and it is in duty bound to
eradicate its evils so far as it lies within its power; but thus far the
root-evil of the system has not been recognized. All the efforts of the
Government have been directed only against one of the branches--namely,
polygamy. The real evil is slavery, and it seems to us that the same
remedy we suggested for the solution of the Mormon Political Puzzle is the
proper solution of the Mormon Social Puzzle.

1. A NATIONAL COLONIZATION SCHEME, which would surround the Mormons with a
people imbued with freedom, and exercising freedom of thought, speech, and
action.

2. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL FREE SCHOOLS of a high order all through
the Territory, by means of which the rising generation would be
continually surrounded with an atmosphere of freedom. Nothing can change
old Mormons, either men or women; but the young men and women--the rising
generation--may be reclaimed.

The system of bondage in vogue in Utah can only be successfully maintained
by its being isolated. The system thrived abundantly under Brigham Young,
because it was entirely isolated from the rest of the nation. There were
at various times individuals who dared to assert their God-given reason
and freedom; but being alone in the Territory, they were soon silenced.
But individual thought and expression have more encouragement now that the
days of isolation have to some extent passed away by the opening of the
Pacific Railroad and the mines of Southern Utah, and the influx of several
thousand Gentiles. Brigham Young knew that the immigration into Utah of a
large non-Mormon population would be the death-blow to his system, and so
he used every means in his power to prevent it. He opposed most
strenuously the opening of the railroad and the mines; but they were both
opened by the aid of United States troops. In the same year that the
Pacific Railroad was opened Henry Lawrence and his associates made their
noble stand in behalf of freedom of thought and action, and against the
dictation of the Church in temporal affairs; and ever since then there has
been a growing spirit of independence.

Among the young there is a growing restlessness and an increasing sense of
shame and wrong. The conditions are becoming dangerous, and the leaders
see it. The American flag is overhead. The bombshells which issue from a
free press are being heard and felt. Some flashes of the electric light of
knowledge are to be seen, and some of the hopes which make jubilant the
souls of American youth elsewhere are causing thrills in hearts in Utah
which have heretofore been stolid. The thing for us to do is to surround
them with an atmosphere of freedom, so that they will drink it in with
every breath; and it will not be long before it will permeate their entire
lives.

Their _personal bondage_ would be overcome by their coming in contact with
a people imbued with the true American sense of freedom. In a few years no
fear of consequences would prevent them from asserting their rights. The
tables would be turned, and woe to them who should deliberately trample
their freedom under foot!

Moreover, by bringing in a large population of non-Mormons, social
ostracism would not be dreaded as it now is. If the majority of the people
were Gentiles, pecuniarily it would be to the advantage of a man in every
way to break loose from his bondage to the Mormon priesthood. Think you
that a man would work under a Mormon bishop for one dollar a day when
under a non-Mormon he could double his wages? Think you that he would
continue to allow the priesthood to swallow up about one half of his
income when his income would be trebled each year if he broke away from
their power? Surely not.

Then, too, the _mental bondage_ of the people would thus be overcome. Even
aside from the establishment of national free schools, the illiteracy of
the people would be greatly overcome by the system of colonization
proposed; for a much more enlightened class of people would be brought in,
and by contact with them the scales of ignorance to a great extent would
drop from the Mormons' eyes, and they would see their bondage; and to see
it will be to break from it. Besides, the schools would inevitably be made
free and greatly improved; and the newspapers would be greater in number
and scattered all over the Territory; and who can estimate the power of a
free press?

Moreover, the _moral bondage_ of the Mormons would thus be overcome. Even
now, with only a small number of Gentiles in Utah, the Mormon leaders dare
not command their followers to murder and assassinate as once they did;
and polygamy would be more effectually overcome in that way than in any
other.

But the policy which I here advocate must not be confounded with the
let-alone policy which has been advocated by some, but which is a policy
which no true lover of humanity, if he knows the enormity of the existing
evils of the system, can hold for a moment. It was that policy which has
caused the system to attain its present rank growth. It was that policy
which has brought disgrace upon our nation in the eyes of the civilized
world. Shame that it should be held by any American! Was it the let-alone
policy by which the awful oppression of the priesthood was first broken in
England by that immortal hero and champion of liberty, John Wicliffe? Was
that the way in which Luther brought deliverance to the oppressed
thousands of Germany, and Knox established civil and religious freedom
upon the shattered ruins of priestly corruption and tyranny among
Scotland's hills and vales? The let-alone policy was tried in our land
with negro slavery for more than a hundred years. Did it die out? Let the
answer come from the half million graves where sleep the unreturning
heroes of the Blue and the Gray.

Accordingly, the policy which I advocate is not the let-alone policy. Far
from it. It is rather the antipodes of that policy, the furthest remove
from it possible. Instead of letting every Mormon alone in his voluntary
bondage, _it touches every Mormon_; it brings a power to bear upon every
one which he cannot help but feel. It brings him into personal contact
with the spirit of freedom as it is exemplified in the genuine American.

True, it may be called a policy of toleration; but therein lies its
strength and its superiority over any purely repressive policy, for it is
regarded as an axiom that to tolerate error where truth surrounds it is
the best means for its destruction. The evils in the Mormon system would
long ago have been sunk out of sight but for its isolation from vital
contact with truth. What the result of a battle between Truth and Error
will be is known to all; but to conquer, Truth must be brought into close
contact with Error. The trouble has been that Utah until quite recently
has been hedged in by a Chinese wall of separation, so that Truth and
Liberty have been shut out. The plan we advocate breaks down this Chinese
wall entirely, and lets in the light of Truth and Liberty upon every
Mormon soul. It allows Truth to have free course and fair play. There will
then be a hand-to-hand combat between Truth and Error; and who can doubt
as to the result? "_Truth is mighty and will prevail._"

But some alarmist may cry: "Ah! but it will take time for that moral
battle to be fought out to the end, and in the mean time the horrid cancer
will spread and spread, and even our own families will not be safe from
its infection."

But, in reply, it can be said that nothing short of the annihilation of
the Mormons would overcome polygamy very soon. Even at the shortest, it
will take several years to accomplish its effectual overthrow. The Utah
Commission, in their report to the Secretary of the Interior, September
24th, 1886, deemed it proper to reiterate on this point what they had
before said in their report for 1884, viz.:

"As the Government has to deal here with a people who are wonderfully
superstitious and fanatically devoted to their system of religion, the
public should not expect, as the immediate result of the present laws of
Congress, nor indeed of any legislation, however radical, the sudden
overthrow of polygamy; and the most that can be predicted of such
legislation is, that it will, if no step backward be taken, soon
ameliorate the harder conditions of Mormonism, and hasten the day for its
final extinction."

Furthermore, the cry that "even our own families will not be safe from the
infection of this ever-spreading cancer" is nothing but sheer cant--such a
cry as the ranting demagogue might raise; and it only shows how ignorant
most people are in regard to this question of Mormonism, even those who
claim to understand it. Polygamy is not taught by the Mormon missionaries,
and is not practised outside of Utah, and is practised there only by a
small minority of the people. In the letter of the First Presidency to the
Mormons at their semi-annual conference, dated October 6th, 1885, there
were the following statements, coming from the head of the Church, and
which are known to be true: "We never have believed or taught that the
doctrine of celestial marriage was designed for universal practice....
There appears to be a fallacious idea abroad regarding this doctrine. It
has been asserted that there was a design to propagate it outside of our
community, and thus introduce into the United States an element opposed to
the Christian views of this and other nations. On the contrary, our elders
have been instructed not to introduce the practice of that principle
anywhere outside of the gathering-place of the Saints; and they do not
preach it abroad to any extent, even in theory, except on occasions when
it is called for or when they are assailed on account of it.... It should
also be understood that the practice is not generally admissible even
among the Latter-Day Saints. It is strictly guarded, the intention being
to allow only those who are above reproach to enter into the
relationship.... The idea, therefore, that plural marriage is a menace to
the general monogamous system is without foundation. This fallacy is
further exhibited by the fact of the popular antipathy with which it is
regarded, people outside of our Church exhibiting a disposition the
reverse of favorable to its establishment in other communities, making the
extension of its practice abroad impossible." No; our own homes are not in
much danger from this evil. The Mormons in Utah will be the only
sufferers. There should be no selfish motive aroused for the destruction
of this evil. Neither we nor our families are in great danger. Honor and
humanity are the motives which should actuate every American to wipe out
this foul blot upon our nation's face and to uplift our brethren from the
degradation and bondage of this accursed system; and although the plan
with which we propose to accomplish this end will take some few years
before the climax will be reached, yet while the plan is gradually being
wrought out it will place a greater check upon the evil than any other
plan, and in the end will be effectual in breaking it up, which cannot be
said of any other plan yet proposed. And what is more, it would accomplish
the end with less of bitter spirit being manifested and with less property
and lives lost than any other plan that could possibly be brought forth,
because it is in strict accord with Christian principles and has nothing
in connection with it which could be construed by the Mormons as
_religious persecution_.

In dealing with this question we must not overlook the Mormon standpoint,
although it may differ from our own. The law against polygamy is regarded
by the Mormons, in the first place, as _unconstitutional_. The existing
prohibitory law is only a statute-law, which they claim to be out of
harmony with the fundamental law of our land as expressed in the
Constitution. The latter they claim to revere as inspired. Accordingly,
their constant hope and effort is to obtain admission into the Union as a
State, so that they might no longer be under the exclusive control of
Congress. Under the Constitution as it now is, Congress has no legislative
jurisdiction over the question of polygamy in the different States of the
Union. The whole subject, together with that of marriage and divorce, is
left with the States themselves, and may be regulated by them according to
their own discretion. Knowing this, the Mormons are working strenuously to
have Utah admitted as a State with all its rights and privileges; then
they could bid defiance to all the statute-laws of Congress on the subject
of polygamy, and in the exercise of their undoubted right they would enact
a law allowing polygamy, which would not transgress any article of our
Constitution. The earnest efforts of the Mormons will naturally be
directed to that end as long as the Constitution remains as it is. The
proper thing to do in order to completely overthrow that idea among the
Mormons is to pass the proposed _Polygamy Amendment_ to the Constitution.
The Mormons would then see that, so far as that institution is concerned,
they have nothing to gain by gaining political control of a State. No
State could establish polygamy, any more than it could establish slavery;
and if any State, owing to local public sentiment or partisan politics,
were remiss in dealing with polygamists, the general Government would have
power to supply the remedy. If such an amendment were made to the
Constitution, the cry of the Mormons concerning the unconstitutionality of
the Anti-Polygamy Law would be completely overcome; for, as the Utah
Commission very aptly say in their report for 1886, "they would probably
not have the hardihood to say that _the Constitution itself is
unconstitutional_, and it is not unreasonable to predict that the more
sagacious and influential persons among the Mormons would realize the
hopelessness of a further conflict with the Government, and accommodate
themselves to the inevitable by the exercise of that 'worldly wisdom'
which so often tempers and modifies the conduct of religious fanatics."

Nevertheless, the Mormons could still raise their greatest cry--that which
has the greatest weight with them--the cry of _religious persecution_;
because then, as now, they would claim that the law interfered with their
religion. We cannot admit the truth of their assertion. Chief-Justice
Waite was right when he delivered the opinion of the United States Supreme
Court on this subject: "Laws are made for the government of actions; and
while they cannot interfere with mere religious belief and opinions, they
may with practices. Suppose one believed that human sacrifices were a
necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that
the civil government under which we lived could not interfere to prevent
the sacrifice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn
herself upon the funeral pile of her dead husband, would it be beyond the
power of the civil government to prevent her from carrying her belief into
practice? So here, as a law for the organization of society under the
exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural
marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices to the
country because of his religious belief? To permit this would be to make
the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of the
land, and in effect to permit every citizen to become a law unto himself.
Government could exist only in name under such circumstances."

Those words express the views of at least nine tenths of the people in our
land. To deny those statements is to deny doctrines that are essential to
the possibility of civil government, and in effect would reduce society to
a state of anarchy in which every one may do as he pleases without any
legal responsibility. Crimes against society do not cease to be crimes
because they are religiously committed. Society can never take the
criminal's conscience, whether it be religious or otherwise, as a test or
guide on this subject, and yet live under the regulation of law.
Nevertheless, the Mormons do not agree with us in such views, and hold
that every person who is convicted under the Edmunds law is a martyr to
his religion.

And looking at the subject as they do, we cannot help but feel a measure
of respect for the Mormons while we deplore their bondage, when we find
them, after conviction in court, when the alternative is presented to
them of a promise to obey the law against polygamy hereafter or go to
prison, deliberately choose the latter, saying, as Abram H. Cannon, one of
the elders of the Church did, March 17th, 1886: "I would like to state,
your Honor, that I have always endeavored to keep the laws of the United
States, because I have been taught by my parents that the Constitution was
a sacred instrument. That I have failed in this respect and now stand
before you convicted of the crime of unlawful cohabitation is due to the
fact that I acknowledge a higher law than that of man, which is the law of
God; and that law being a part of my religion, sir, I have attempted to
obey it. When I embraced this religion I promised to place all that I had,
even life itself, upon the altar, and I expect to abide by that covenant
which I made. And, sir, I hope the day will never come when I must
sacrifice principle even to procure life or liberty. Honor, sir, to me is
higher than anything else upon the earth; and my religion is dearer to me
than anything else that I have yet seen. I am prepared, sir, for the
judgment of the court." Such a man one cannot help but respect; and we can
only wish that he stood up thus manfully in a nobler cause than that of
polygamy.

Shortly after Governor West went to Utah on his appointment by the
President, he visited the penitentiary of the Territory, and in an address
to the Mormon inmates promised them pardon if they would hereafter obey
the law; but after reflection, the following written reply was sent to him
signed by forty-eight Mormon prisoners:

    "UTAH PENITENTIARY, May 24, 1886.

    "_To his Excellency Caleb W. West, Governor of Utah_:

    "SIR: On the 13th instant you honored the inmates of the Penitentiary
    with a visit and offered to intercede for the pardon of all those
    enduring imprisonment on conviction under the Edmunds law, if they
    would but promise obedience to it in the future, as interpreted by the
    courts. Gratitude for the interest manifested in our behalf claims
    from us a reply. We trust, however, that this will not be construed
    into defiance, as our silence already has been. We have no desire to
    occupy a defiant attitude toward the Government, or to be in conflict
    with the nation's laws. We have never been even accused of violating
    any other law than the one under which we were convicted, and that was
    enacted purposely to oppose a tenet of our religion.

    "We conscientiously believe in the doctrine of plural marriage, and
    have practised it from a firm conviction of its being a divine
    requirement.

    "Of the forty-nine elders of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day
    Saints now imprisoned in the penitentiary for alleged violation of the
    Edmunds law, all but four had plural wives from its passage to
    thirty-five years prior to its passage. We were united to our wives
    for time and eternity by the most sacred covenants, and in many
    instances numerous children have been born as a result of our union,
    who are endeared to us by the strongest paternal ties.

    "What the promise asked of us implied you declined to explain, just as
    the courts have done when appeals have been made to them for an
    explicit and permanent definition of what must be done to comply with
    the law.

    "The rulings of the courts under this law have been too varied and
    conflicting heretofore for us to know what may be the future
    interpretations.

    "The simple status of plural marriage is now made, under the law,
    material evidence in securing conviction for unlawful cohabitation,
    thus, independent of our act, ruthlessly trespassing upon the sacred
    domain of our religious belief.

    "So far as compliance with your proposition requires the sacrifice of
    honor and manhood, the repudiation of our wives and children, the
    violation of sacred covenants, Heaven forbid that we should be guilty
    of such perfidy; perpetual imprisonment, with which we are threatened,
    or even death itself, would be preferable.

    "Our wives desire no separation from us, and were we to comply with
    your request they would regard our action as most cruel, inhuman, and
    monstrous, our children would blush with shame, and we should deserve
    the scorn and contempt of all just and honorable men.

    "The proposition you made, though prompted, doubtless, by a kind
    feeling, was not new, for we could all have avoided imprisonment by
    making the same promise to the courts; in fact, the penalties we are
    now enduring are for declining to so promise rather than for acts
    committed in the past. Had you offered us unconditional amnesty, it
    would have been gladly accepted; but, dearly as we prize the great
    boon of liberty, we cannot afford to obtain it by proving untrue to
    our conscience, our religion, and our God.

    "As loyal citizens of this great Republic, whose Constitution we
    revere, we not only ask for, but claim, our rights as freemen; and if
    from neither local nor national authority we are to receive equity and
    mercy, we will make our appeal to the Great Arbiter of all human
    interests, who in due time will grant us the justice hitherto denied.

    "That you may, as the governor of our important but afflicted
    Territory, aid us in securing every right to which loyal citizens are
    entitled, and find happiness in so doing, we will ever pray."

Now, this reply is respectful, sincere, and straightforward, yet firm and
vigorous, and shows no sign of weakness or indecision. We must credit the
signers with the courage of conviction and the qualities which cause men
to suffer rather than recant. Such acts show unmistakably the utter
futility of law _now_ as applied to Mormon polygamy. Had the law which was
enacted in 1862 then been rigidly put in force, and, if necessary,
supplemented by other legislation to make it effective, Mormon polygamy
might ere this have come to an end. Then it was in its first decade of
existence, and had not had time to be firmly grounded in the minds of the
people as a distinctive article of their faith; but now it has thirty-five
years of open practice back of it, and the example of father and mother,
who are stigmatized by any harsh appellation applied to polygamy.
Furthermore, the belief in it has been instilled into the minds of the
present generation from their childhood, and has become firmly grounded in
their belief.

There is one great mistake made by most people in regard to Utah polygamy.
They believe that the women of Utah are held by the men in a kind of
captivity, not being able to escape from their degradation, but would
gladly avail themselves of liberty if they only had an opportunity. The
fact is, that they are in voluntary servitude, and would not accept
liberty, because _they believe it is their duty to be polygamists_.

There was a mass-meeting of women held in Salt Lake City in the fall of
1878 which was attended by about two thousand women who were devoted
Mormons. At that meeting one woman seventy years of age said: "I thank God
that I am a polygamous wife;" and she said she had a "feeling of great
pity for those who did not enjoy this good blessing." Another old lady
said: "I would not abandon it to exchange with Queen Victoria and all her
dependencies." The secretary of the meeting said: "The women of this
country want to crush us, but it will be diamond cut diamond." And thus
for nearly three hour one speaker after another defended polygamy, all
believing it to be an inspired doctrine given by God to aid in redeeming a
sinful world from a condition of sin and pollution to one of holiness and
purity. The following resolution among others was unanimously adopted by
the meeting:

"_Resolved_, That we solemnly avow our belief in the doctrine of the
patriarchal order of marriage--a doctrine which was revealed to and
practised by God's people in past ages, and is now re-established on earth
by divine command of Him who is the same yesterday, to-day, and forever; a
doctrine which, if lived up to and carried out under the direction of the
precepts pertaining to it, and of the higher principles of our nature,
would conduce to the long life, strength, and glory of the people
practising it; and we therefore indorse it as one of the most important
principles of our holy religion, and claim the right of its practice."

It can be plainly seen from that meeting that the leading Mormon women are
in earnest in their plea for polygamy, and that it is practised because
_they believe God commanded it_; and consequently it can never be overcome
by human law.

SENATOR HOAR, who, with Senator Edmunds, has divided the honor of
originating radical laws against Mormon polygamy, seems himself to have
acknowledged their worthlessness as an effective remedy. The following
letter from him to Joseph Cook was read by the latter in connection with
his lecture delivered in Boston, February 2d, 1885:

    "WASHINGTON, January 31, 1885.

    "MY DEAR SIR: I am glad that the topics of Mormonism and the
    reorganization of the South are to be discussed in your lectures in
    Boston. Massachusetts is an old State. Her people dwell under
    institutions which have been ripening for two hundred and fifty years;
    but in the West, in the heart of the Continent, and in the South we
    are laying foundations still. If Mormonism live and grow, the
    Christian family will not be an element in the civilization of the
    great Central States of the future. If the 30,000,000 of the colored
    race who within fifty years will inhabit the States of the South are
    to be a race of peasants, denied their practical and equal share in
    the Government by such processes as have prevailed in recent years,
    the republic itself cannot continue. The Russian 'despotism tempered
    by assassination' is quite as desirable as Republicanism tempered by
    both assassination and fraud. _In the warfare with these things, the
    school and the Christian Church are to be our most potent instruments.
    They can accomplish more than any political party._ I have
    contemplated with the greatest satisfaction the noble work in this
    cause of our New England churches and of the associations they have
    organized.

        "I am yours, very truly,
            "GEORGE F. HOAR."

It is, indeed, true that the school and the Christian Church are more
"potent instruments" for the overthrow of polygamy than any laws of our
political legislators. Law does not reach the evil, for it rests upon a
strong religious conviction. _Law cannot reach it._ To make a law that a
man shall not be fanatical is to waste paper on which something sensible
might be written; for Congress to undertake to keep people from becoming
fanatics is unspeakably ludicrous. Legislation in that direction is
intrusive. Law provides for the punishment of an overt act, and is
absolutely powerless as to a man's eccentricity.

We do not mean to assert that the laws against polygamy should be stricken
from our statute-books. Far from it. On the contrary, it is a shame to our
country that they have been allowed so long to be nullified. Let us thank
God that during the past two years they have been enforced. They should be
most rigidly enforced, although no such system of inquisition and prying
into the most sacred relations of husband and wife through their children
should be instituted in the name of purity and justice, as the Mormons
claim is being now carried on there, and which called forth an earnest
protest by the women of Utah at a mass-meeting in the theatre of Salt Lake
City March 6th, 1886. Besides, other crimes in the Territory should not be
overlooked in zeal to punish that particular crime. The laws should be
impartially executed. Moreover, I believe the penalty for the crime should
be made to correspond better with the gravity of the crime. Six months'
imprisonment seems a very small penalty for such an enormous crime against
society; the Mormons purchase martyrdom at too cheap a price. It should be
increased to three or five years' imprisonment.

Nevertheless, no matter what the law may be, it cannot alone overcome this
evil. It may make the evil unpopular. It may act upon some as an educator,
and cause them to lose their implicit confidence in their leaders; and,
indeed, such is said to be the fact in Utah now. Dr. McNiece, in his
letter to the writer from Salt Lake City, dated February 12th, 1886, says:
"The people are beginning to lose faith in their leaders. The Lord is not
coming down on the Wahsatch Mountains with horses and chariots of fire to
deliver the persecuted (?) Saints, as Orson Pratt used to predict. In
fact, the people are beginning to doubt about the Lord's being on their
side at all." Now, that is a good sign; and it is, doubtless, true of the
more enlightened among the Mormons; but upon the masses of the people, the
only effect will be to weld them closer together; and I cannot but think
that the leaders are glad that they can raise the cry of persecution. That
cry puts down all internal dissension, and unites the people against a
common enemy. "The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church," has
passed into a proverb.

But the plan which we propose has nothing of persecution in connection
with it, and thus it will leave room for internal dissension; and from
within alone can Mormonism be effectually helped to eradicate its errors.
The evils will in this way be overcome by the people themselves, while in
reality the work will be accomplished by forces without.

That this system would prove effectual may be safely argued from the fact
that, wherever the Gentiles now live in any number, there polygamy is
discountenanced and is on the decline. JUDGE C. C. GOODWIN, editor of the
Salt Lake _Tribune_, in an article in _Harper's Weekly_, October, 1881,
said: "Not half of the daughters of Mormons who have grown up amid a large
population of Gentiles will ever enter into polygamy."

Besides, it may be argued from a parallel case, which actually did take
place in our own land. The Oneida Community, in the midst of one of the
most prosperous and intelligent communities in the State of New York,
openly defied popular sentiment and covertly transgressed the law by the
maintenance of a social system as abhorrent as that of polygamy; for they
practised promiscuous marriage. They were a community having all things in
common, and the women were as much common property as any other property.
Its members, however, were not mobbed; they were not terrorized in the
name of law; they were not driven into exile by persecution; but free
contact with the healthful currents of the life about them finally
resulted in the disintegration of that portion of their social fabric
which was maintained in opposition to law and the sentiment of their
neighbors. Now, with that practical example in mind, who would dare say
that the scheme we advocate would not be effectual in breaking up
polygamy?

Thus we trust that we have shown that this plan would effectually cure the
evils of the Mormon social system, and bring the Mormons out of the
personal, mental, and moral bondage, which now blinds their eyes and
benumbs their sensibilities.

We regard it the duty of the nation to set on foot this peaceful, yet most
effective, plan. Let the nation at once establish free schools all over
the Territory, to let the rising generation breathe constantly the air of
liberty and have the light of knowledge, that the ignorance and
superstition which form the cement which keeps the Mormon social system
from falling into ruins may not get possession of their minds and souls;
and let the nation offer large inducements for colonists to emigrate to
Utah, and give them every facility. Money spent in this way is for the
general welfare, and is as justifiable as to spend money for a national
exposition, or for checking the spread of cholera or yellow-fever. If the
nation would do these two things, that accursed system of bondage would
disappear within the next decade, and the citizens of Utah would "_be like
the rest of us_."

But if the nation fails to do this, then individual citizens throughout
the land, all lovers of humanity, and especially all Christian
denominations, should take the matter in hand; and they should not only
plant free schools in all parts of the Territory, a few of which have been
established already by five different Christian denominations; but they
should also form Utah Colonization Societies, whose object should be to
secure the planting of pure, freedom-loving, Christian families in every
Mormon city, town, and village; and they should not desist until the
Mormons are in a minority in Utah, the people freed from their bondage,
and the laws respected. Honor demands it; humanity cries out for it;
Christianity implores it.

  "Up _now_ for Freedom! Not in strife
  Like that your sterner fathers saw--
  The awful waste of human life,
  The glory and the guilt of war;
  But break the chain, the yoke remove,
  And smite to earth Oppression's rod,
  With those mild arms of Truth and Love,
  Made mighty through the Living God!"



PART IV.

THE RELIGIOUS PUZZLE.


"The true grandeur of nations is in those qualities which constitute the
true greatness of the individual."--CHARLES SUMNER.

"A Christian is the highest style of man."--YOUNG'S NIGHT THOUGHTS.

"There was never law, or sect, or opinion did so magnify goodness as the
Christian religion doth."--LORD BACON.



CHAPTER XII.

    The religious aspects of Mormonism paramount--General ignorance
    concerning the Mormon religious system--SOURCES OF THEIR
    DOCTRINES--Revelation, not reason, the primary source--All religions
    founded on revelation--Sacred books--The Mormon Bible--The "Book of
    Mormon"--Migrations of Jews to America--Visit of Jesus to
    America--"Book of Doctrine and Covenants"--The "Living Oracles."


The majority of persons are more interested, it seems, in the political
and social aspects of the Mormon question than in the purely religious;
and this is only natural, because events of a political nature are usually
more stirring than any other, and multitudes of people can grow indignant
over violations of the law of the land, who at the same time have no
deep-seated abhorrence of sin _per se_. The war against polygamy is
undoubtedly of great interest to the average citizen; and the Christian
himself cannot help sympathizing with the vigorous work of enforcing the
law against polygamy, even though he may not always be in sympathy with
the spirit of those who make the political phase paramount to every other.

The religious aspects of the question must ever have the pre-eminence in
the Christian's mind, because the eternal destinies of thousands of souls
are involved in this great heresy, and because Mormonism will continue to
have strength and vitality as a religious system, even though it be
stripped of its objectionable political and social features. The rank and
file of the people are devoted to their creed. They sincerely believe
themselves to be the real conservators of the faith once delivered to the
Saints. They are fortified by a system of theology as plausible to the
darkened understanding as it is pleasing to the natural heart. They are
living under a covenant of works, upon which they have staked their all,
and they have a hope of abundant rewards in the future. Their conception
of the divine law is narrow and inadequate, because their notions
respecting God are cramped and carnal. Gross error has become thoroughly
rooted in the minds of the people.

As we have already seen in treating of the political and social aspects of
Mormonism, _its real power lies in its doctrines_. It is the Mormon's
constant boast that nothing can shake the sure foundations of his faith.
He has a sincere conviction that his doctrines are invulnerable; but,
although the strength of Mormonism does lie in its doctrines, perhaps not
one hundredth of the people of our land know anything about their
religious tenets, save the doctrine of polygamy.

Let us, therefore, endeavor to get some idea of Mormonism as a religious
system--a system of doctrines and precepts; and in doing so let us
consider, in the first place,


I. THE SOURCES OF THEIR DOCTRINES.

Mormonism rests not upon human reason as its first great source, but upon
divine revelation. It is not a system of _philosophy_, therefore, but a
system of _religion_; for Professor Köstlin says: "Without revelation
there can be no religion; and it is a fact which should not be overlooked
that even those who, on account of their idea of God, absolutely reject
the idea of a direct, divine revelation, recognizing nothing but Nature in
her material existence and mechanical working, cannot help applying to
Nature expressions and conceptions which tend to raise her above the dumb
necessity, and constitute her a higher being, capable of moral relations;
nor can they for a longer period escape a feeling of thirst after
revelations of the secret depths of that being, which they then strive to
attain by ways more or less mystical and magical." (Schaff-Herzog's
"Encyclopædia of Religious Knowledge," Vol. III., page 2021.) And in
accordance with that statement, the editor of the _Independent_, in an
editorial note published April 8th, 1886, says: "The history of this world
shows that in respect to the subject of religion, the supernatural is to
human thought and feeling really the natural. We search that history in
vain for a religious system that has stamped itself upon the faith and
practice of men, operating upon them as a controlling power of comfort and
hope, and organizing itself into their personal and social life by forms,
usages, and modes of worship, and at the same time professedly based on
the discoveries and authority of unaided human reason. Philosophies in
abundance have been the products of such reason, but religious systems
never. All the idolatries of antiquity claimed to be supernatural, and the
same is true of all the forms of modern heathenism. Such is the assumed
character of Mohammedanism and Mormonism.... The world never has had, and,
judging by the past, never will have a religious system without this
element. It does not want, and will not accept, a religion that claims for
itself no higher basis than that of mere reason."

"_Thus saith the Lord_" is the one claim of all the religious systems of
the world. Accordingly we find that the adherents of all the great
religions have their sacred books, which they venerate as revelations from
heaven, from whence they claim their doctrines have emanated. The Brahmin
has his Vedas; the Buddhist has his Tripitaka; the Zoroastrian has his
Avesta; the Jew has the Law and the Prophets; the Christian has the Old
and New Testaments; the Mohammedan has the Koran. In like manner, the
Mormon has the "_Book of Mormon_." But the Book of Mormon is not the only
inspired book of the Latter-Day Saints. They adopt the Bible, the "Book of
Mormon," and the "Book of Doctrine and Covenants," as their inspired
Scriptures; and these are the sources of their doctrines.

1. _The Mormon Bible._--By those not familiar with Mormon literature, the
Mormon Bible and the "Book of Mormon" are frequently confounded. The
former, however, is simply our English version of the Scriptures, with
such modifications and distortions as Joseph Smith, the inspired
translator, saw fit to make. He twisted some passages in Genesis so as to
turn statements connected with the life of the patriarch Joseph into
prophecies relating to a great prophet called Joseph, who should come
forth in the latter days--referring to himself. He even had the audacity
to make interpolations in Christ's Sermon on the Mount; but our Bible, as
translated by Smith and interpreted by him and his successors, is accepted
by every Mormon as inspired, and is to be found in every Mormon Church.

2. _The "Book of Mormon"_ is the next source of their doctrines, and is
the more modern revelation, and therefore takes precedence over the Bible.
The supernatural origin of the book, according to the Mormon belief, we
have already given in Chapter I.

Mormon, after whom the book is called, was the last of the sacred prophets
of ancient America. He was the leader of a race called the Nephites, and
perished in a battle between his own race and the Lamanites in A.D. 420.

Both Nephites and Lamanites were descendants from the family of Lehi, an
Israelite of the tribe of Manasseh, who emigrated from Jerusalem to
America during the reign of King Zedekiah, 600 B.C.

The wars between these two races form the great bulk of the book. In the
year A.D. 420 the decisive battle was fought at Cummorah, in Western New
York. The Nephites were exterminated, with the exception of a few
individuals. Mormon, their leader, was slain, and with him 230,000. The
descendants of the victorious Lamanites are the North American Indians.

The "Book of Mormon" is said to be the condensed record of the history,
faith, and prophecies of the ancient inhabitants of America, made on
golden plates by the prophet Mormon. These plates he intrusted to his son
Moroni, who survived the awful battle of extermination. He was the last of
the Nephites to die, but before dying he sealed up the golden plates on
which all these events were written and hid them in the Hill Cummorah, the
very site of the final battle between the Nephites and Lamanites; and
there Joseph Smith, guided by the spirit of Moroni himself, found them in
1827, took them to his home, translated them by means of his magical
spectacles, and had them printed under the title "_The Book of Mormon_."

It is certainly a unique work. It is a collection of sixteen separate or
distinct books professing to be written at different periods by different
prophets. Its style is in imitation of the Bible, and it incorporates
about three hundred passages directly from the Holy Scriptures.

Among the records of the book are accounts of three different migrations
to the American Continent: 1. A colony from the Tower of Babel soon after
the flood, which was led by Jared, and which in time became a great
nation, but was destroyed for their sins. 2. A colony led by Lehi from
Jerusalem, which gave rise to the Nephites and Lamanites. 3. A number of
Israelites who came from Jerusalem about eleven years after Lehi.

The book also declares that a supernatural light which lasted three days
and three nights informed the inhabitants of America of the birth of
Christ, and later a terrible earthquake announced His crucifixion; and
three days afterward Jesus Himself appeared, descending out of heaven into
the chief city of the Nephites in the sight of the people, to whom He
exhibited His wounded side and the prints of the nails in His hands and
feet. He remained with them forty days, and repeated to them His Sermon on
the Mount, and appointed twelve American apostles, and gave them orders
regarding baptism and His holy communion.

This book was the foundation of Mormonism; and Sidney Rigdon said: "The
'Book of Mormon' is to govern the Millennial Church;" but whatever may
have been its uses to the Saints in the beginning of their career, it has
had little to do with their practices for many years, save as a text-book.

3. _The "Book of Doctrine and Covenants."_--Another source of Mormon
doctrine--and a more fruitful source than the Book of Mormon--is the "Book
of Doctrine and Covenants." This is a collection of all the multifarious
revelations that Joseph Smith claimed to receive and which he promulgated,
together with the only revelation put forth by Brigham Young--the one
which he set forth at Council Bluffs in 1847 to inspire and guide the
Saints in their projected western pilgrimage through the wilderness.

4. _Living Oracles._--The fourth source of Mormon doctrine is what has
well been called the "Living Oracles," the divine communications made
continually to the priesthood. Theoretically the Mormons hold the Bible
and their two sacred books to be the inspired Scriptures for their
guidance: the Old Testament, as addressed particularly to the Jewish
Church; the New Testament to the Judaic and European Christian Church; the
"Book of Mormon" to the Church of America, and the "Book of Doctrine and
Covenants" to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. But
practically, authority and guidance for them emanate from their living
leaders, and few of either chiefs or masses read any of the three sacred
books in order to know and follow the recorded teachings.

Thus Mormonism, through its belief in a continual revelation to the
priesthood, especially the First Presidency and the Twelve Apostles, has
marvellous ability to change itself to meet every emergency.



CHAPTER XIII.

THE RELIGIOUS PUZZLE (_continued_).

    MORMON DOCTRINES--Their idea of God--Plurality of gods--Mormon
    Sunday-school hymn concerning Smith--The pre-existence of souls--The
    doctrine of Polygamy--Practised on the plea of self-sacrifice and
    ambition--Necessity of preaching their gospel to all--Preaching to the
    dead--Baptismal regeneration--Baptism for the dead--Mormon priesthood
    necessary to salvation--Melchizedek and Aaronic priesthoods--Mormon
    Endowments--Blood Atonement--Doctrine of "The Fulness of Times."


Having thus considered the sources of Mormon doctrine--the ways in which
God has revealed His will and purposes unto them--let us consider in the
second place some of their


II. DOCTRINES AND PRACTICES.

1. _Their idea of God is materialistic._ While they profess to believe the
Trinity, they say that God was once a man, who has advanced in
intelligence and power so much that now He may be called perfect; but He
has still the form and figure of a man.

One of the standard Mormon works is called a "Key to the Science of
Theology," written by Parley P. Pratt, who, while he lived, was one of the
Twelve Apostles. It is now used as a text-book among the people. In
confirmation of the statement that they hold grossly corporeal ideas
concerning God, it says: "God has an organized individual tabernacle
embodied in material form and composed of material substance, in the
likeness of man, and possessing every organ, limb, and physical part that
man possesses."

Christ, too, is believed to have been the offspring of the material union
on the plains of Palestine of God and the Virgin Mary. Yet Christ is
believed to have had a previous existence, and His worship is enjoined as
Lord of all. The Holy Ghost, or Paraclete, is also material. Thus do they
lower the divinity to humanity instead of lifting up humanity to the
divinity.

2. Another doctrine is that of _Plurality of gods_.

Though there is one God supreme, there are many other beings entitled to
the name because possessed of the attributes of God, such as creative
power. All these gods were once men, and all men are potential gods. The
book of Parley Pratt, already quoted, says: "It will be recollected that
the last chapter recognizes a family of gods, or, in other words, a
species of beings who have physical tabernacles of flesh and bones in the
form of man, but so constructed as to be capable of eternal life.... A
general assembly, quorum, or grand council of the gods, with their
president at their head, constitute the designing and creating power....
Wisdom inspires the gods to multiply their species and to lay the
foundation for all the forms of life to increase in numbers, and for each
to enjoy himself in the sphere to which he is adapted."

Adam is said to be the god of Jesus Christ, Jesus Christ the god of Joseph
Smith, and Joseph Smith the god of this generation. They teach their
children that Joseph Smith is their god, and their little ones hear more
of him than they do of Jesus. Even in their hymns is this great error
taught. I will give one of the hymns found in their "Primary Hymn-Book,"
which is sung by the children in the Mormon Sunday-schools, called by
them "Primary Associations." It is as follows:

  "The seer, the seer, Joseph the seer!
  I'll sing of the Prophet ever dear;
  His equal now cannot be found
  By searching the wide world around.
  With gods he soared in the realms of day,
  And men he taught the heavenly way.
  The earthly Sun, the Heavenly Sun!
  I love to dwell on his memory dear;
  The chosen of God and the friend of man--
  He brought the Priesthood back again;
  He gazed on the past; on the present, too,
  And opened the heavenly world to view.

  "Of noble seed, of heavenly birth,
  He came to bless the sons of earth.
  With keys by the Almighty given
  He opened the full rich stores of heaven.
  O'er the world that was wrapt in sable night,
  Like the sun he spread his golden light.
  He strove, oh, how he strove to stay
  The stream of crime in its reckless way;
  With a mighty mind and a noble aim,
  He urged the wayward to reclaim;
  'Mid the foaming billows of angry strife
  He stood at the helm of the ship of life.
  The Saints, the Saints, his only pride!
  For them he lived, for them he died.
  Their joys were his--their sorrows, too;
  He loved the Saints and he loved Nauvoo.
  Unchanged by death, with a Saviour's love
  He pleads their cause in the courts above.
  The seer, the seer, Joseph the seer!
  Oh, how I love his memory dear
  The just and wise, the pure and free,
  A father he was and is to me.
  Let friends now rage in their dark hour,
  No matter--he is beyond their power.

  "He's free! He's free! the Prophet's free!
  He is where he will ever be
  Beyond the reach of mobs and strife.
  He rests unharmed, in endless life;
  His home's in the sky, he dwells with the gods,
  Far from the furious rage of mobs.
  He died, he died for those he loved--
  He reigns, he reigns in the realms above!
  He waits with the just who have gone before
  To welcome the saints to Zion's shore.
  Shout, shout, ye Saints! this boon is given--
  We'll meet our martyred seer in heaven."

Thus are the Mormon children early taught to think of Joseph Smith as
their Saviour, and as divine. Brigham Young, too, was regarded as God by
some of his followers even before his death; and no doubt before long,
when they forget to some extent his misdeeds that have been brought to
light since his death, they will deify him as well as Joseph Smith.
Indeed, they teach that all Mormons may, by obedience and holiness, become
gods in the celestial world, and people and rule a kingdom forever. Helped
by polygamy, men may become makers of worlds like this, of which Adam was
the fashioner; and in those worlds their posterity become the creatures
over whom they bear sway.

3. Another doctrine is _The Pre-existence of Souls_.

All men lived before they were born. They existed for ages as spirits,
waiting eagerly for fleshly tabernacles; and multitudes of these spirits
are now waiting, desiring to come to earth; for it is only by the way of
the flesh that they can reach the final bliss of their perfected being,
and therefore it is a work of great benevolence to provide earthly bodies
into which they may come to dwell.

4. _The Doctrine of Polygamy_ springs naturally out of the two preceding
doctrines. In the "Book of Mormon" this practice was forbidden; and in the
earlier revelations of Joseph Smith it was distinctly condemned; but it
was sanctioned in a revelation claimed to have been given to him at
Nauvoo, July 12th, 1843, although it was not promulgated until the fall of
1852 in Salt Lake City by Brigham Young. This doctrine is a necessary
sequence of their ideas with regard to the celestial world and the
pre-existent life of the human soul. Mr. Pratt, in one of his sermons,
says: "The spirit that dwells in each man and woman is, I venture to say,
more than five thousand years old. The Lord has ordained that these
spirits should come here and take tabernacles by a certain law and through
a certain channel; and _that_ law is the law of marriage. The Lord
ordained marriage on this globe between Adam and Eve as eternal in its
nature; hence we believe in marrying for eternity. Among these spirits in
the heavens are many more noble, more intelligent, that were called the
great and mighty ones, who were reserved till the fulness of time to come
forth upon the face of the earth through a noble parentage, who shall
train their tender minds in the truths of eternity, that they may be
prophets, priests, and kings to the Most High God. Among the Saints is the
most likely place for these spirits to take their tabernacles, to be
trained up by that people that are the most righteous of any other people
upon the earth. This is the reason that the Lord is sending them here,
brethren and sisters. The Lord has not kept them in reserve for five or
six thousand years, waiting for their bodies, to send them to the
Hottentots, the Hindoos, or the negroes, but to the Saints of Zion. Then,
is it not reasonable that the Lord should say unto his faithful and chosen
servants: 'Take unto yourselves more wives, that more of these noble
spirits should come forth through these my faithful and chosen
servants'?"

Thus do the Mormons have as one of the underlying principles of this
abominable practice one of the grandest sentiments of
humanity--_self-sacrifice for the sake of others_. It is that sentiment
which has taken hold of the Mormon women and led them not only to submit
in silence to what is entirely counter to their nature, but even to choose
it and glory in it. Brigham Young told his people often that the world was
rapidly hastening to a close, and there were multitudes of spirits waiting
for honorable bodies. The Gentiles were corrupt, and the ethereal spirits
were waiting anxiously for the favors of the Mormons. The women, he said,
would be selfish if they could not endure the wandering affections of
their husbands. It was their duty to make a self-sacrifice. Jesus had
given His life to redeem; why could they not help to save? It is on that
account that _the women of Utah_ have made the sacrifice of the most vital
principle of their souls.

The principle which has led _the Mormon men_ to embrace this doctrine,
which greatly increases their earthly cares and burdens, is _ambition_. In
heaven they will rule over their posterity; and, consequently, the more
wives they have, and the greater their posterity, the greater will be
their rank in heaven. Orson Hyde, in one of his sermons, said: "The
revelation of the Almighty to a man ... whom God designs to make a ruler
and a governor in his eternal kingdom is that he may have more wives, that
when he goes to another sphere he may still continue to perpetuate his
species; and of his kingdom there shall be no end." The Mormons declare
that those who have no wives are the servants of those who rule. Therefore
the object of the Mormon men in embracing polygamy, as they themselves set
forth, is to raise up a numerous posterity here and in the world to come,
that they may be exalted to the rank of "gods to reign upon thrones." They
believe that all the gods have many wives, and they rule over their
descendants, who are constantly increasing in number and dominion; and in
accordance with that belief, they teach that Jesus was a polygamist, and
that Mary and Martha were his plural wives, with whom he is now living in
marriage relations in the celestial world.

5. Another doctrine is that _the Latter-Day Gospel must be preached to all
men_. Until that gospel is accepted, none can be saved; and so, from the
earliest days, zeal for propagandism has been a marked feature of this
sect. At the very soonest the world must be conquered by this gospel. This
has from the first been their fixed design, and about three hundred
missionaries are always in the field. The order is: first, offer salvation
to the Gentiles till the Lord proclaims that their opportunity is past,
and then turn to the Jews. Moreover, they believe there is need for hot
haste; for these are the latter days, and the dread second coming of the
Son of God is at hand. Many of the devout Mormons believe that when the
great temple in Salt Lake City is finished, the Lord Jesus will descend to
earth and reign with His Saints for a thousand years.

But not only can none be saved until the Mormon gospel is accepted;
neither can any be condemned till it has been heard and rejected by him.
And so, not only must _the living_ hear the Latter-Day Gospel, but the
same proclamation must be made through all the bounds of the great
gathering-place of the dead. To these "spirits in prison," whose sad
misfortune it was to die before the Hill of Cummorah gave up its golden
plates to the great Prophet, must be made the offer of faith and baptism.
Hence, when Mormon missionaries die they go on preaching just as
before--so great is the task, so distant the goal, set before this
peculiar people.

6. They also believe in _Baptismal Regeneration_. They bless little
children, but baptize none under the age of eight. They practice the mode
of immersion, and they teach that it is able to wash away sins, and that
it may be repeated for the remission of sins whenever it is needed.
Consequently, when any of the Saints fall into heinous sins, they are
taught that those sins can be washed away by their being rebaptized.

7. They also believe in _Baptism for the Dead_. They base this doctrine on
Paul's statement in the fifteenth chapter of the First Epistle to the
Corinthians. They claim that since three things are essential to
salvation--faith, repentance, and baptism--and the latter is not possible
in the world of spirits, one in order to be saved after death must be
baptized by proxy--_i.e._, some Saint on earth must be immersed in his
behalf. It is claimed that here Mormonism is most unique, and performs its
noblest service to the race. In this way the Mormons save their ancestors
from everlasting punishment, and bring their souls within Zion; and this
service is extended beyond relatives, too, and is given to the heroes and
heroines of history. Washington, Franklin, and other famous men have thus
been vicariously baptized into the Mormon Church. A writer on Mormonism
has well said: "In fact, no one is safe from the clutches of Mormonism
after death. You may be made a Mormon without desiring it for all
eternity."

It is said that in the summer of 1884 a wealthy Mormon, while on a visit
to Boston, employed a young lady to look up his genealogy. Having learned
the names of about two hundred of his ancestors, he had the rite of
baptism performed for them all. And it is related that an old man, long a
convert to Mormonism, residing in the southern part of Utah, went thirty
miles distant to a place where the Saints were in conference for the
purpose of saving nearly one hundred of his ancestors from everlasting
destruction by being baptized for them. He made the journey in an ox-cart
with his two sons. The baptism, of course, was immersion in a river; and
the old man was dipped as many times as he could stand the operation, each
dip representing an entrance into the Mormon paradise for some one of the
otherwise lost hundred of his forefathers; and then his sons in turn were
baptized, until the object of their visit was fully accomplished.

8. Another doctrine is that _a priesthood duly authorized by God is
absolutely essential to salvation_. Without this no sacrament or rite is
acceptable to God or of value to men. It is only through their preaching
that sinners can repent and believe; and the remission of sins follows
baptism only when priestly hands administer it; and this authority comes
by no fancied apostolical succession, but from Joseph Smith as the sole
source. Before him for a thousand years there was no authority, and to-day
all is illegitimate outside the Mormon Church.

There are two classes of priesthood: _The Melchizedek_ and _the Aaronic_.
The Melchizedek priesthood is the higher branch, having special reference
to spiritual affairs, while the Aaronic priesthood has most to do with the
temporal interests of the Church. Both of these branches are obtained
through Joseph Smith, who received his ordination in a supernatural
manner. According to Mormon authority, an angelic messenger, calling
himself John the Baptist, met him in the woods of New York, May 15th,
1829, and ordained him to the Aaronic priesthood; and soon after, it is
claimed, he received his ordination to the Melchizedek priesthood at the
hands of the apostles Peter, James, and John.

The Aaronic priesthood includes (beginning with the lowest) the offices of
deacon, teacher, priest, and bishop. The Melchizedek priesthood includes
the offices of elder, high-priest, patriarch, seventy, and apostle. A
worse despotism than is exercised over the people by this priesthood
cannot be found on earth. Claiming to have the keys of heaven and hell,
and to have its authority directly from the Lord, it wields absolute
power, not only in spiritual but in all temporal affairs.

9. Another peculiar doctrine is with reference to _Endowments_. To get
one's endowments constitutes one of the most exalted privileges and
ambitions of the devout Mormon. These can be had only in Utah and in
connection with the temples, although in Salt Lake City, where as yet the
temple is unfinished, the Endowment House is used. After divers washings
and anointings and rubbings, the acting of an historic drama, the taking
of oaths and grips, and the giving of a new name, celestial wisdom and joy
are supposed to descend and forever rest upon the favored soul. Secret
marriage rites, which seal husband and wife for time and eternity, form
part of the ceremony.

In that hour, also, is put on the "endowment robe," a garment reaching
from head to foot, and made all in one piece, high-necked and with long
sleeves. This robe is said to be a sure defence against the adversary and
all physical ills. One must never be caught without it; but if, living and
dying, he wears that garment, and remembers the grips and his celestial
name, he is sure of heaven whatever may befall him.

The rites of the Endowment House are said to be a kind of bastard
Masonry, instituted by Joseph Smith at Nauvoo. A remarkable resemblance
has been pointed out between the ancient Eleusinian Mysteries and the
mysteries of the Endowment House as they are represented by some of the
historians of Mormonism. Their object, according to Brigham Young, is "to
receive all those ordinances in the house of the Lord which are necessary
for you, after you have departed this life, to enable you to walk back to
the presence of the Father, passing the angels, who stand as sentinels,
being enabled to give them the key-words, the signs and tokens pertaining
to the holy priesthood, and gain your eternal exaltation in spite of earth
and hell."

10. Another doctrine, which is peculiarly a Mormon doctrine, and the most
horrible doctrine ever taught by their leaders, is the doctrine of _Blood
Atonement_.

According to this doctrine there are some sins which cannot be forgiven or
atoned for except by cutting the throat of the man who committed them and
pouring out his blood as an atonement. Three of these sins are apostasy,
disclosing the secrets of the Endowment House, and marital unfaithfulness
on the part of a wife.

This doctrine has been frequently taught by the leaders of the Church, who
have declared that it is a meritorious act for any Saint to spill the
blood of a person guilty of any of these sins, and that he would thereby
be carrying out the golden rule of love. Thus, Brigham Young, in a sermon
delivered in the Bowery at Salt Lake City, September 21st, 1856, said:
"There are sins that men commit for which they cannot receive forgiveness
in this world or in that which is to come, and if they had their eyes open
to see their true condition they would be perfectly willing to have their
blood spilled upon the ground, that the smoke thereof might ascend to
heaven as an offering for their sins; and the smoking incense would atone
for their sins, whereas, if such is not the case, they will stick to them
and remain upon them in the spirit world.

"I know when you hear my brethren telling about cutting people off from
the earth that you consider it strong doctrine; but it is to save them,
not to destroy them."

And in another discourse, delivered in the Tabernacle of Salt Lake City,
February 8th, 1857, Brigham Young said: "I have known a great many men who
have left this Church, for whom there is no chance whatever for
exaltation; but if their blood had been spilled, it would have been better
for them. This is loving our neighbor as ourselves; if he needs help, help
him; and if he wants salvation, and it is necessary to spill his blood on
the earth in order that he may be saved, spill it. Any of you who
understand the principles of eternity, if you have sinned a sin requiring
the shedding of blood, except the sin unto death, would not be satisfied
nor rest until your blood should be spilled, that you might gain that
salvation you desire. This is the way to love mankind."

But although this horrible doctrine has been publicly preached again and
again, yet many of the Mormons deny that it was ever carried into actual
practice. The editor of the _Deseret News_, one of the Mormon leaders, not
long ago denied that blood atonement had ever been practised among the
Mormons, but he said "in the good time coming it will be." On the other
hand, it is claimed by many Gentiles that not only has it been put into
practice frequently in past years, but that it is actually done at the
present time. A Gentile observer, after several months' residence in Salt
Lake City in 1884, wrote: "As to the blood atonement, which Mormons
generally deny, you may be sure it is still practised."

After a careful study of the facts in the case, it seems to be clear that
the evidence is overwhelming in substantiation of the declaration that _it
was often practised in the past_; and it seems to be equally clear that,
while it _may_ be _the fact_ that this abominable practice is still
carried on, only more adroitly than formerly, yet _the mass of evidence_
is overwhelming in opposition to that view and in favor of the opinion
that the incoming of thousands of Gentiles and Federal officers have
effectually stopped the practice of that barbarous doctrine.
_Nevertheless, it remains one of their doctrines._

11. Another Mormon doctrine, and one of which much is made, is the
doctrine of the _Fulness of Times_. The Mormons claim that whatever good
thing in doctrine and practice has ever existed in the world under former
dispensations has been restored in these last days; and so to the
Latter-Day Saints have come all the blessings of all past ages, especially
the priesthood, polygamy, and all the offices and gifts of the days of the
apostles. They believe the day of miracles has not ceased, but that many
such have been wrought, especially healings of the sick, in the latter-day
dispensation. They believe, also, in giving one tenth of their income and
increase for the building of the temples and the progress of the Church.



CHAPTER XIV.

THE RELIGIOUS PUZZLE (_continued_).

    _Professor Coyner's_ analysis of Mormonism--_Rev. Dr. McNiece's_
    analysis--Reasons for the growth and tenacity of Mormonism--The
    Christian element its chief source of strength--No Mormon converts
    from heathenism--Protestantism the source of its recruits--Bible
    doctrines in the Mormon "Catechism for Children"--The Mormon Articles
    of Faith--The Mormon heresy compared with Gnosticism in the early
    Christian Church--A clue to the solution of the religious puzzle.


From the enumeration of some of the prominent and peculiar doctrines of
Mormonism which was given in the preceding chapter, it can very clearly be
seen that it is naught else than a jumble of a half dozen different
systems of religion.

_Professor Coyner_, Principal of the Salt Lake Collegiate Institute for
ten years, has analyzed it as follows: "Mormonism is made of twenty parts.
Take eight parts of diabolism, three parts of animalism from the
Mohammedan system, one part bigotry from old Judaism, four parts cunning
and treachery from Jesuitism, two parts Thugism from India, and two parts
Arnoldism, and then shake the mixture over the fires of animal passion and
throw in the forms and ceremonies of the Christian religion, and you will
have this system in its true component elements." But, subtle as that
analysis is, it cannot be true; for it does not include in the system, as
even one of its twenty parts, Christianity; and yet it seems to me that it
is the Christian element in the system which, mingled with a great deal
of error, gives it its real strength.

The analysis given by _Rev. Dr. R. G. McNiece_, of Salt Lake City, in the
_Presbyterian Review_, April, 1881, seems to be more correct, and about as
near the real truth as any one, perhaps, can come. He says: "Let Paganism,
Judaism, Mohammedanism, Jesuitism, Protestantism, and Diabolism be shaken
up together, and the result is Mormonism; for from Paganism comes its idea
of God; from Judaism its theory of the priesthood and special revelation;
from Mohammedanism its plural wife notions, and its sensual ideas of
heaven; from Jesuitism its cunning and arbitrary form of government, in
which the end is continually made to justify the means; from Protestantism
its talk about faith in Christ and the guidance of the Holy Spirit; and
its general policy from the devil, as any intelligent man will have to
confess after a careful study of its cunning, devilish ways and means."
From this analysis it is seen that its great strength lies in the shrewd
way in which it has blended Christian truth with heathen error.

The reasons of its growth and tenacity are many. It is especially adapted
to the intellectual capacities of the masses. To these are offered just
what they are sure to hunger after--bold assumption and boundless
assertion, together with great show of authority. For the superstitious it
has miracles, ecstasies, visions, and revelations. The secrecy of the
endowments, too, has a charm. The minds of the ignorant delight in
prodigies. "_Omne ignotum, pro mirifico._" For the lovers of prophecy
there is promised the New Jerusalem, an actual reign of the Saints, and an
equality with the Redeemer. The gross see charms in its sensual paradise,
and listen eagerly to the announcement that a conversation with their
spiritual ruler, or a journey on a mission while facing a frowning world,
will immediately clear them from their iniquities. These are all elements
in the system, which have led to its growth, and now keep it from falling
to pieces.

But _its chief source of strength is its recognition of many of the truths
of the Bible_. If its strength came from its heathenish doctrines and
practices, then it would naturally follow that its converts would be
gathered mainly from heathendom, whereas ninety-nine proselytes in every
hundred have been obtained from Christian churches.

About thirty years ago swarms of Mormon missionaries were sent to China,
Japan, India, Australia, South Africa, South America, and the Society and
Sandwich Islands, and they fondly hoped that many converts would be
gathered; but in less than five years they had all returned, completely
baffled and disgusted. They reported that the devil was far too lively in
those lands, and that, among the Hindoos especially, stupidity and awful
depravity were universal. Since then we hear of no more attempts to
evangelize the pagan world. A few hundred Sandwich Islanders and New
Zealanders have been baptized, but only after American and English
missionaries had first brought them to a knowledge of Gospel truth.

And it is said that no Roman Catholic has ever been brought into the
Mormon fold, Protestantism furnishing Mormonism its entire supplies. Yes,
the fact is that Mormonism has grown in strength and power by the addition
of those once members of Protestant Christian churches, or those very near
the entrance. Perhaps eight out of every ten who have come to Utah were of
that class; and it cannot well be questioned that hundreds of so-called
Mormons, though laboring under a great delusion and greatly misled by the
hierarchy, are still sincere believers in Christ and His Gospel. Rev. Dr.
McNiece says in the _Presbyterian Review_, April, 1881: "It is only just
to say that scattered all through the Mormon ranks are hundreds of devout,
worthy, kind-hearted, hospitable people, who came from England, Scotland,
and the Scandinavian countries, bringing their Bibles and Christian
sentiments with them, and who, although nominally Mormons, have never been
persuaded to embrace these odious pagan doctrines, which are the
distinctive features of Mormonism."

Besides, the Mormons believe in the Old and New Testaments as inspired,
and in the "Book of Mormon" itself there is much that is taken directly
from the Bible--as the Decalogue, the Sermon on the Mount, and other
teachings of our Lord; and in their "Catechism for Children," published in
1877, one finds mingled with many false teachings such sound biblical
propositions as these: that our first parents, having fallen under the
influence of Satan, "had not the least power to recover themselves from
the effects of that fall;" that in this condition "the justice of God
required a sacrifice to atone for the broken law, and our first parents
being subject, through transgression, to the penalty of the law, could not
make this sacrifice;" that to meet such a state of things, "God sent His
only begotten Son, who knew no sin, to die for the sins of the world, and
thus to satisfy divine justice;" that "this redemption by Jesus Christ is
the only one," and that it is available to all mankind, "but only on
conditions of obedience;" that these conditions are "as unchangeable as
their Author," and include faith, which is described as "a principle of
power" within the soul, and repentance, which is defined as a "forsaking
of sin, with full purpose of heart to work righteousness;" and that even
little children are "considered sinners in the sight of God," and as such
are "redeemed solely through the atonement of Christ," and are therefore
to be taught to repent and believe.

In reading such statements, and seeing them corroborated continually by
quotations from Scripture, it is not hard to imagine ourselves studying
the catechism of some Christian sect, differing from other sects in detail
and expression, but agreeing with them in the essentials of the common
Christianity. How far such truths are proclaimed by the Mormon teachers
and missionaries, or how far they still remain as vital convictions in the
breasts of thousands who once professed them in other communions, or who
have been taught them catechetically in the Mormon fold, it is very
difficult to determine.

In the Mormon Articles of Faith there is very little but what could be
subscribed to by some Christian denomination. It is presumed that these
Articles comprise all the essential beliefs of Mormonism. They are what
their missionaries constantly teach, and what the Mormons always give
forth as their creed. They are just one third the number of the
Thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England. They are as follows:

"1. We believe in God, the Eternal Father, and in His Son, Jesus Christ,
and in the Holy Ghost.

"2. We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for
Adam's transgression.

"3. We believe that, through the atonement of Christ, all mankind may be
saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel.

"4. We believe that these ordinances are: First, faith in the Lord Jesus
Christ; second, repentance; third, baptism by immersion for the remission
of sins; fourth, laying on of hands for the gift of the Holy Ghost.

"5. We believe that a man must be called of God by prophecy and by the
laying on of hands' by those who are in authority to preach the Gospel and
administer the ordinances thereof.

"6. We believe in the same organization that exists in the Primitive
Church--viz.: apostles, prophets, teachers, evangelists, etc.

"7. We believe in the gift of tongues, prophecy, revelation, visions,
healing, interpretation of tongues, etc.

"8. We believe the Bible to be the Word of God, as far as it is translated
correctly; we also believe the 'Book of Mormon' to be the Word of God.

"9. We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and
we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things
pertaining to the kingdom of God.

"10. We believe in the literal gathering of Israel, and in the restoration
of the Ten Tribes; that Zion will be built upon this continent; that
Christ will reign personally upon this earth, and that the earth will be
renewed and receive its paradisic glory.

"11. We claim the privilege of worshipping Almighty God according to the
dictates of our conscience, and allow all men the same privilege; let them
worship how, when, or where they will.

"12. We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and
magistrates; in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.

"13. We believe in being honest, true, chaste, benevolent, virtuous, and
in doing good to all men; indeed, we say that we follow the admonition of
Paul: 'We believe all things; we hope all things;' we have endured many
things, and hope to endure all things. If there is anything virtuous,
lovely, or of good report, or praiseworthy, we seek after these things."

The fact is, that this nineteenth century heresy bears much the same
relation to the Gospel of to-day that Gnosticism, Montanism, and
Manicheism did to that of the early centuries. On the true foundation of
the Old and New Testaments, it has built a structure of wood, hay, and
stubble. "To the law and the testimony," is the constant cry. Argument is
based almost entirely upon the Bible. Proof-texts are quoted by the
thousand.

Our object in directing attention to the Christian element in Mormonism is
not to furnish apology or to divert attention from its fearful errors; but
it is mentioned because it furnishes a decided clue to the vitality and
persistency of the system, and also opens our eyes as to the best way to
solve the religious puzzle which this system presents before us. The great
question to be answered is: How are we to get rid of _the erroneous
doctrines of Mormonism_?



CHAPTER XV.

THE RELIGIOUS PUZZLE (_concluded_).

    The character of efforts hitherto put forth to solve the puzzle--What
    has been accomplished--The plan somewhere defective--Mormonism to be
    reformed, not destroyed--Why Mormons will not listen to Christian
    missionaries--Moody and Sankey's meetings in Salt Lake City--_The
    Deseret Evening News_ on Bishop Tuttle's sermon--Mormonism a
    perversion of Christianity--The educational and colonization scheme
    best fitted to reform it--Proved by comparing Roman Catholicism in the
    United States with Roman Catholicism in Mexico or Brazil--The probable
    effect of a larger intelligence--The probable effect of the
    introduction of Gentile colonies--The religious puzzle solved--The
    duty of the hour.


Hitherto the efforts which have been put forth against Mormonism as a
religious system have been the same in character as when contending with
Buddhism, Confucianism, or any other pagan religion. _And what has been
accomplished?_

It is not our desire to depreciate what has been done in Utah by the noble
Christian men and women who have faced the insults of men and sometimes
death itself in battling with the errors of Mormonism. They are Christian
heroes and heroines, and are deserving of all praise and honor. They are
worthy to receive crowns and laurels that can never fade. But their
sterling worth and Christian heroism do not alter the facts concerning the
visible results of their labors. It is true that nearly twenty years
elapsed after the occupation of Salt Lake Valley by the Mormons before any
attempt was made to introduce the Gospel. It was only by the occupation
of Camp Douglas, in 1862, by several regiments of United States troops
that the way began to be opened; and only since 1865 has there been any
missionary work done in the Territory. But in the twenty years of
missionary work what has been accomplished? How many converts from
Mormonism have been obtained?

Rev. R. G. McNiece, D.D., of Salt Lake City, in a personal letter to the
writer, said: "The number of converts directly from the Mormon ranks I
cannot give you; but it is very small, especially among adults. Among the
youth the number is greater, and here is where the hope lies. The children
and youth come under Christian influence first in the day-schools
maintained by the Christian denominations. In the Sabbath-school this
influence is deepened, and thereby the way into the Church is opened. I
should say that THREE HUNDRED WOULD BE A LARGE ESTIMATE OF THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF CHRISTIAN CONVERTS FROM THE MORMON RANKS; but the work thus far
has been preparatory."

Now, while it is very true that the work has been in great measure
preparatory, nevertheless no such long preparation as twenty years should
be necessary in dealing with a people to a great extent speaking our own
language. If it were China, or Japan, or India just opened, and it
required time for the missionaries to get acquainted with the habits and
language of the people, it would be a very different thing. It seems from
the small crop of Christian converts thus far obtained that the system of
missionary work adopted is somewhere defective.

And does not the fact of the large Christian element in the Mormon
religious system show that it must not be treated as a pagan religion? and
that different methods must be adopted to overcome its evils? All
missionary labor in Utah up to the present time has been in open and
direct antagonism to the whole Mormon system, and its object has been
openly and professedly to exterminate it from the face of the earth. Now,
we raise the question, _Can any Christian sect be easily annihilated?_
Should it be our desire to exterminate it? Should not the object of all
our efforts be _to reform it_--to purge the gold of its dross? And so,
does it not seem far more likely that Mormonism is not to be _destroyed_
at all, but rather _reformed_ by various influences brought to bear upon
it?

The adult Mormons will not go to hear the Christian missionaries, for they
believe that all that is good in Christianity they have already in their
own system. The only difference is that they have more; they have an
enlarged and expanded Christianity. Consequently they think their system
is vastly superior to the Christian's. Mormon boys write "_Come to Jesus_"
on the clean, white window-sills of Christian chapels, while their parents
at home tell them that they know a hundredfold more truth than the
Christians, whose whole creed, they say, begins and ends with this
despised phrase.

The evangelists Moody and Sankey held a series of meetings in Salt Lake
City only a few years ago, and the _Deseret Evening News_, the official
Mormon organ, in an editorial on Moody's preaching in that city, said:
"There is not a man among the whole fraternity of evangelists who can
present anything of any value to the Latter-Day Saints which they have not
already received; and there is no preacher of them all who, if he were
desirous of learning the truth as it is in Jesus, but could learn very
many valuable lessons in the things of God from members of our Young
People's Improvement Associations, and even from our Sunday-school
children. 'Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ' is a saying the full meaning
of which is appreciated by the Latter-Day Saints. To exhort them to 'faith
in Christ' is the work of supererogation."

And shortly after, the same paper, in an editorial on a sermon preached by
Bishop Tuttle, of the Episcopal Church, in Philadelphia, said: "So far as
the institutions of modern Christendom are concerned, we candidly confess
our lack of confidence in their power to do anything for us.... We have
got so far beyond them through the revelations of the Almighty vouchsafed
in these latter days, that we look back upon their teachings as a man
reverts to the alphabet of his school-days, and we remember their
powerless forms and spiritless ceremonies as mere playthings compared with
the higher things of the kingdom to which the system they call _Mormonism_
has introduced us."

Thus we see that Christianity is discounted by the Mormons from the very
start; and can we, then, hope to accomplish its overthrow by the ordinary
means? From its peculiar relations to Christianity, must we not in reason
and fairness regard the Mormon Church, as we must the Roman Catholic
Church and even Mohammedanism, as being not utterly false, so much as a
mingling of error with truth? It is, therefore, a perversion of
Christianity. There is genuine Gospel enough in the Mormon creed to save
it from the grave. We are, therefore, to look for a repudiation of the
false rather than the destruction of both false and true together.

And what would be better calculated to effect this end than the
colonization and educational scheme, which we have already advocated as
the surest and easiest means to overcome the political and social evils of
the system? The Roman Catholic system is in many respects similar to the
Mormon system; and see what intelligence and a surrounding atmosphere of
pure Christian truth has done for Roman Catholicism in our land! What a
vast difference there is between the system here and the same system in
Mexico, Brazil, Spain, or Italy! There is a difference almost as wide as
the hemispheres. Take a Roman Catholic from our land to Brazil or Spain,
and he will scarcely recognize his religion in that religion called there
by the same name. And what has brought about this difference? The American
Roman Catholic has been surrounded by intelligence and a free, pure,
Christian society. These two things have so operated upon American Roman
Catholicism as to greatly reform it and almost radically change it, while
they did not antagonize it in a spirit of rancor. How wonderful the
revolution! And it has not ceased yet, but is ever going on. The same
things would thus be done, we believe, for Mormonism.

1. _A larger intelligence_ would surely modify or wholly set aside the
claims of the priesthood to the possession of divine authority and power,
and would relegate to the realm of oblivion such outlandish doctrines as
_baptisms for the dead_. As Froude says, "Ignorance is the dominion of
absurdity."

And, from the same cause, the demand would gradually spring up for pulpit
teaching, couched in a far better spirit, and of much higher intellectual
character. The presence of a few intelligent Gentiles has already put to
shame and almost banished from religious assemblies those harangues which
in days not very remote were accustomed to combine in about equal measure
the profane, the obscene, and the brutal.

2. And, then, _the introduction of Gentile colonists_ in large numbers
would naturally increase the force of effective preaching missionaries,
and they would then be supported, not by the churches in other parts of
our land, but by the Utah colonists themselves. In this way we would have
_more missionaries at less expense_, and they would accomplish more in the
end than an aggressive force, such as we now have, though it were
increased tenfold.

Then the Territory would be fairly flooded with Gospel institutions of
every sort. In every Mormon town there would be a school and a church; and
there being in every community a few who in character and life would be
truly Christlike, they, aided by the sharp criticisms of a free press,
would cuttingly and most effectually rebuke the seriously lax morals of
the Mormon Church; and before long it would be found to be politic and
necessary in sheer self-defence to remove from Church leadership whoever
in walk and conversation would fail to conform to what is at least decent.

It is most likely that in this way the better elements in Mormondom would
be led, unconsciously perhaps, to assert their force, and work out through
grace a religious reformation. The leaven of revolt is slowly working now.
It is well known that many Mormons do not countenance polygamy, and the
time may yet come when this view shall prevail, notwithstanding the
alleged revelations in the case. And there may come a time when, with
polygamy, other false doctrines will be questioned or rejected. And thus
reformed, purified, and made fit to live, we may expect to see Mormonism
continue for generations a sect fairly Christian, although it would
doubtless have many peculiar points; or there may come, through the
workings of the Gospel in this subtle way, such a division in belief among
the Mormon ranks as to rend asunder the entire Mormon organism.

To this work of internal reformation let us direct our forces. Let the
Christians of our land arise in all their might and endeavor to have
schools planted all over the Territory of Utah, that intelligence and
freedom may be widely disseminated; and let them form Colonization Aid
Societies to induce Christian families to emigrate to Utah, and settle in
every Mormon town and hamlet. Through _the faithful representation and
living of the Gospel_ I have all hope.

In strict accord with this belief, Rev. Arthur T. Pierson, D.D., pastor of
the Bethany Church, Philadelphia, in the _Homiletic Review_, October,
1885, said: "Salt Lake Valley needs nothing more to-day than colonies of
Christian tradesmen. Mormonism should be confronted with the witness of a
Christian community, consecrated workmen in all the learned professions
and departments of industry; Christian families free from the taint of
polygamy and full of the rich blessing of the normal household." Likewise,
Judge Osborne, of Utah, wrote recently as follows: "An excellent way to do
good with little or no cost would be the location of Christian families in
the Mormon towns.... The Mormon priesthood insist upon the complete
isolation of their dupes from Christian civilization. They say, 'You must
live your religion;' they obey, and the result is bitter fruit. Let a few
Christian families 'live _their_ religion' in their presence, and the
darkness of prejudice and superstition would roll away like the mist
before the morning sun."

Yes, put in every Mormon town a few noble Christian families, consecrated
men and women, who in character and life shall exhibit the sweet spirit of
the Man of Nazareth, who by example and precept shall show a more
excellent way, and presently error will depart, and iniquity hide its head
abashed. Let the various denominations combine and co-operate against the
common foe in that silent yet most effective way, and the Mormon Puzzle
will be solved, and solved forever. Let us all labor to this end.

  "O Christ, our land for thee;
    Naught less we crave,
  That Thou supreme mayst be
    From wave to wave.
  Naught less we ask of Thee,
  Our prayer unceasingly,
  Our land for Thee,
  All, all for Thee."


THE END.



_A NEW BOOK BY JOSIAH ALLEN'S WIFE._

_SWEET CICELY._--A story of the Josiah Allen's Wife's Series. Of thrilling
interest. Over 100 illustrations, 12mo, cloth, $2.00.

"Josiah Allen's Wife" has always been a shrewd observer of human nature as
it reveals itself in the round of homely, every day life, and the keen
sarcasm and adroit humor with which she lays bear its foibles, its
weaknesses and its grotesque outcroppings has rarely, if ever, been
equaled. The strong feature of all Miss Holley's humor, is its moral tone.
The present work will treat the "temperance sentiment" in new phase--that
of a semi-humorous novel.


SOME OPINIONS OF "JOSIAH ALLEN'S WIFE":

_The Woman's Journal_, Boston: "The keen sarcasm, cheerful wit and cogent
arguments of her books have convinced thousands of the 'folly of their
ways,' for wit can pierce where grave counsel fails."

_The Herald_, New York: "Her fun is not far-fetched, but easy and
spontaneous. She is now witty, now pathetic, yet ever strikingly
original."

_The Home Journal_, New York: "She is one of the most original humorists
of the day."

_The New Era_, Lancaster, Pa.: "Undoubtedly one of the truest humorists.
Nothing short of a cast-iron man can resist the exquisite, droll and
contagious mirth of her writings."


_ARCHIBALD MALMAISON._

A New Novel. By JULIAN HAWTHORNE. 12mo, paper, 15 cts; cloth, extra paper,
75 cts.

_INDEPENDENT, N. Y._ "Mr. Julian Hawthorne can choose no better compliment
upon his new romance, 'ARCHIBALD MALMAISON,' than the assurance that he
has at last put forth a story which reads as if the manuscript, written in
his father's indecipherable handwriting and signed 'Nathaniel Hawthorne,'
had lain shut into a desk for twenty-five years, to be only just now
pulled out and printed. It is a masterful romance; short, compressed,
terribly dramatic in its important situations, based upon a psychologic
idea as weird and susceptible of startling treatment as possible. It is a
book to be read through in two hours, but to dwell in the memory forever.
The employment of the central theme and the literary conduct of the plot
is nearly beyond criticism."

_R. H. STODDARD, IN NEW YORK MAIL AND EXPRESS._ "The climax is so
terrible, as the London _Times_ has pointed out, and so dramatic in its
intensity, that it is impossible to class it with any situation of modern
fiction.... Mr. Hawthorne is clearly and easily the first of living
romancers."

_THE LONDON TIMES._ "After perusal of this weird, fantastic tale
(Archibald Malmaison), it must be admitted that upon the shoulders of
Julian Hawthorne has descended in no small degree the mantle of his more
illustrious father. The climax is so terrible, and so dramatic in its
intensity, that it is impossible to class it with any situation of modern
fiction. There is much psychological ingenuity shown in some of the more
subtle touches that lend an air of reality to this wild romance."

_THE LONDON GLOBE._ "'Archibald Malmaison' is one of the most daring
attempts to set the wildest fancy masquerading in the cloak of science,
which has ever, perhaps been made. Mr. Hawthorne has managed to combine
the almost perfect construction of a typical French novelist, with a more
than typically German power of conception."

_THE ACADEMY._ "Mr. Hawthorne has a more powerful imagination than any
contemporary writer of fiction. He has the very uncommon gift of taking
hold of the reader's attention at once, and the still more uncommon gift
of maintaining his grasp when it is fixed."


_THE FORTUNES OF RACHEL._

A New Novel. By EDWARD EVERETT HALE. 12mo, paper, 25c.; cloth, $1.

_CHRISTIAN UNION, N. Y._ "Probably no American has a more devoted
constituency of readers than Mr. Edward Everett Hale, and to all these his
latest story, 'The Fortunes of Rachel,' will bring genuine pleasure. Mr.
Hale is emphatically a natural writer; he loves to interpret common things
and to deal with average persons. He does this with such insight, with
such noble conception of life and of his work, that he discovers that
profound interest which belongs to the humblest as truly as to the most
brilliant forms of life.... This story is a thoroughly American novel,
full of incident, rich in strong traits of character, and full of
stimulating thought; it is wholesome and elevating."

_BOSTON JOURNAL._ "The virtue of the book is the healthful, encouraging,
kindly spirit which prevades it, and which will help one to battle with
adverse circumstances, as indeed, all Mr. Hale's stories have helped."

_NEW YORK JOURNAL OF COMMERCE._ "A purely American story, original all
through, and Rachel is one of the pleasantest and most satisfactory of
heroines. She is a girl of the soil, unspoiled by foreign travels and
conventionalities. After surfeiting on romances whose scenes are laid
abroad, it is delightful to come across a healthy home product like this."


_RUTHERFORD._

A New Novel. By EDGAR FAWCETT. _Author of "An Ambitious Woman," "A
Gentleman of Leisure," "A Hopeless Case," "Tinkling Cymbals," etc._ 12mo,
paper, 25 cts; cloth, extra paper, $1.00.

_BOSTON GLOBE._ "Truly Mr. Fawcett has here wrought with skill in
producing some original and beautiful characters. The motive and plan are
those of a better book than he has ever written.... Rutherford is powerful
and will contribute much to the reputation of its clever author."

_SAT. EVENING GAZETTE, Boston._ "This story evinces grace as well as
facility of style, is effectively told throughout, and in its plot and
characters, is decidedly interesting. The sympathies of the reader are
keenly enlisted for two of the characters who have been reduced from
wealth to poverty, and the relation of their experiences in the latter
form of life affords opportunity for a very effective exhibition of this
phase of New York experience. The book is one of the most elaborate of Mr.
Fawcett's novels."

_NEW YORK TRIBUNE._ "Mr. Fawcett's story, 'Rutherford,' is more serious in
plan than most of his society novels; it has a motive which is not only
tragical, but impressive.... It is well constructed, and contains some
excellent sketches of fashionable life and touches of satire."


_THE HOYT-WARD CYCLOPÆDIA OF PRACTICAL QUOTATIONS._

Prose and Poetry. Nearly 20,000 Quotations and 50,000 lines of Concordance.

It contains the celebrated quotations and all the useful Proverbs and
Mottoes from the English, Latin, French, German, Italian, Spanish and
Portuguese, classified according to subjects. Latin Law Terms and Phrases,
Legal Maxims, etc. (all with translations).

It has a vast concordance of nearly 50,000 lines, by which any quotation
of note may at once be found and traced to its source. It is to quotations
what Young's or Cruden's Concordance is to the Bible.

Its Table of Contents; Index of Authors, giving date of birth, nativity,
etc.; Topical Index with Cross References, Index of Subjects, Index of
Translation, together with its immense Concordance and many other features
desirable in a work of reference, combine to make this Cyclopædia what it
is,

THE ONLY STANDARD BOOK OF QUOTATIONS.

Invaluable to the Statesman, Lawyer Editor, Public Speaker, Teacher or
General Reader.

_NOAH PORTER, D.D., LL.D., Pres. Yale College._ "It will be a help and a
pleasure to many."

_HON. SAMUEL F. RANDALL, WASHINGTON._ "The best book of quotations which I
have seen."

_GEO. F. EDMUNDS, U.S. SENATOR._ "It is the most complete and best work of
the kind with which I am acquainted."

_HON. ABRAM S. HEWITT._ "The completeness of its indices is simply
astonishing."

_HON. F. T. FRELINGHUYSEN, Secretary of State._ "Am much pleased with the
Cyclopædia of Quotations."

_HENRY WARD BEECHER._ "Good all the way through, especially the proverbs
of all nations."

_HENRY W. LONGFELLOW._ "Can hardly fail to be a very successful and
favorite volume."

_WENDELL PHILLIPS._ "Its variety and fullness and the completeness of its
index gives it rare value to the scholar."

Royal octavo, over 900 pp. Cloth, $5.00; Sheep, $6.50: Fancy Cloth, Extra
Gilt, $7.50; Half Morocco, Gilt, $8.00; Full Morocco, Extra Finish and
Gilt, $10.00.


FUNK & WAGNALLS, Publishers, 10 & 12 Dey St., N. Y.





*** End of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "The Mormon Puzzle, and How to Solve It" ***

Copyright 2023 LibraryBlog. All rights reserved.



Home