Home
  By Author [ A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z |  Other Symbols ]
  By Title [ A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z |  Other Symbols ]
  By Language
all Classics books content using ISYS

Download this book: [ ASCII ]

Look for this book on Amazon


We have new books nearly every day.
If you would like a news letter once a week or once a month
fill out this form and we will give you a summary of the books for that week or month by email.

Title: More Italian Yesterdays
Author: Fraser, Hugh, Mrs.
Language: English
As this book started as an ASCII text book there are no pictures available.
Copyright Status: Not copyrighted in the United States. If you live elsewhere check the laws of your country before downloading this ebook. See comments about copyright issues at end of book.

*** Start of this Doctrine Publishing Corporation Digital Book "More Italian Yesterdays" ***

This book is indexed by ISYS Web Indexing system to allow the reader find any word or number within the document.



MORE ITALIAN YESTERDAYS


   [Illustration: VENICE. THE GRAND CANAL.]



                                  MORE
                           ITALIAN YESTERDAYS


                                   BY
                            MRS. HUGH FRASER

                               AUTHOR OF

         “ITALIAN YESTERDAYS,” “A DIPLOMATIST’S WIFE IN JAPAN,”
                 “A DIPLOMATIST’S WIFE IN MANY LANDS,”
               “FURTHER REMINISCENCES OF A DIPLOMATIST’S
                           WIFE,” ETC., ETC.


              _WITH SIXTEEN ILLUSTRATIONS IN PHOTOGRAVURE_



                                 LONDON
                            HUTCHINSON & CO.
                            PATERNOSTER ROW
                                  1915



CONTENTS


  CHAPTER I

  SAINTS OF THE CHURCH

  A Friend in Rome—A story of two ways of loving—Aglaë
  and Boniface—Become Christians—A new life—Boniface
  endures terrible tortures—Martyrdom—Death of
  Aglaë—Church of St. Boniface—Alexis, the pilgrim—His
  travels—Return to Rome—A ragged beggar—His death and
  burial in St. Boniface’s Church—St. Alexis’
  Monastery—Trials of the Church after
  Constantine—Rome’s lowest ebb—Growth of the spiritual
  city—Benedict the Blessed, and Scholastica            pp.    1-15


  CHAPTER II

  FOUNDER OF MONASTICISM

  Norcia in the Sabines—A matrona—The twins, Benedict
  and Scholastica—Benedict goes to Rome—Conversion of
  Placidus—Benedict’s retirement to La Mentorella—Life
  in a cave—Temptations—Visit of St. Francis—Benedict’s
  ministering—Real founder of monastic life—Growth of
  his order—Placidus and Maurus—St. Benedict’s personality
  and conversions—His ideal of the religious life—His greatest
  miracles—His sister, Scholastica—The last day together—His
  ascension                                             pp.   16-38


  CHAPTER III

  ST. GREGORY THE GREAT

  Birth and lineage of St. Gregory—Path from the world to the
  cloister—Prayer, study, and charity—His cat—A prophecy—A
  Cardinal Deacon—Mission to Constantinople—Eutyches’
  heresy—Rome in pestilence—Gregory elected Pope—His
  unbelievable accomplishments—His life as Pope—Championship
  of the oppressed—Bond with English-speaking
  people—The great procession during the pestilence—Gregory’s
  successors                                            pp.   39-54


  CHAPTER IV

  MEMORIES OF THE PANTHEON

  The Pantheon—Hadrian’s best monument—Long idle—Consecrated
  as St. Mary of the Martyrs—The Cathedral, the
  symbol of the soul—Its purification—Continuity of the
  Church—A priest’s visit—The alabaster square—Procession
  of the martyr’s relics—Giovanni Borgi, the workman—Italian
  Guilds—Giovanni’s selflessness—His rescue of
  the forsaken children—Care of them—Crusade in behalf
  of all the waifs of Rome—His work of love—Giovanni’s
  successor, later Pius IX                              pp.   55-72


  CHAPTER V

  EARLY LIFE OF FATHER MASTAI

  Birth in 1792—A happy family—His youth—Epilepsy—The
  Church at the time of Napoleon—Abduction of Pius to
  Avignon—Napoleon’s downfall—Return of the Pope to
  Rome—His reception—Prophecies regarding Pius IX—His
  journey to Chile—Ocean trip—Across the Andes—Failure
  of mission—Rounding Cape Horn—English Settlement
  on the Cape—“Love-of-the-Soil”—The Falkland
  Islands                                               pp.   73-94


  CHAPTER VI

  POPE PIUS IX

  Director of Ospizio di San Michele—A splendid
  record—Archbishop of Spoleto—A turbulent populace—Order
  restored—Revolution in Europe—Spoleto saved—The earthquake
  in Umbria—New post at Imola—Secret societies—A
  Cardinal—Attack upon the three Prelates—The Cardinal’s
  bravery—How the Saints forgive—Pope Pius IX—His
  charity and justice—Defenders of the poor—Anecdotes
  of the Cardinal’s generosity                          pp.  95-112


  CHAPTER VII

  CAPTIVITY OF POPE PIUS VII

  Lebzeltern, the Ambassador of the Austrian Emperor—Origin
  of his mission—Napoleon’s anger against Pius VII—Arrest
  of the Pope—Protests from the Church—Napoleon
  excommunicated—Vaine efforts to evade the Bull—Instructions
  for the mission—“Do all, or else, _do nothing_”—Pius
  VII in his sixty-eighth year—The interview—The
  Pope’s position—His generosity—Message to Napoleon—Continued
  captivity—Return to Rome—Napoleon’s expiation         pp. 113-136


  CHAPTER VIII

  IN SABINA

  Castel Gandolfo—Its gardens—The Sabine Hills—The
  Reverendo—An expedition into the hills—The Campagna in
  the early morning—“Our Lady of Good Counsel”—Ancient
  Præneste—Italy’s landscape—Struggles of the
  Colonna—Destruction of Palestrina—Boniface’s revenge
  and expiation—Olevano, the haunt of artists—“Picturesque
  utility”—The wrong train—Romance of a pebble—The
  work of the Saints                                    pp. 137-158


  CHAPTER IX

  PEOPLE OF THE HILLS

  The Apennines—View from a peak—Real hospitality—Polenta—Woods
  of Sabina—A hill family—The cook—A queer adventure—People
  of the South—A night festival in the Abruzzi—The journey—The
  old organ—Marion Crawford’s boys—Juvenile
  theatricals                                           pp. 159-179


  CHAPTER X

  A STORY OF VENICE

  A follower of the Condottieri—The raw recruit—Division of
  the Dukedom of Milan—Carmagnola’s turn—Growth in
  wealth and power—Disaffection—Venice acquires his
  services—War with Milan—A leisurely campaign—Carmagnola
  at the height of his glory—Fortune turns against
  the Venetians—Stirrings of suspicion—Reception in Venice—The
  Senate Chamber—Growing dusk—The attack—End
  of his part in the world—Another story of the North—St.
  Raniero, the patron of Pisa—The power of temperance   pp. 180-199


  CHAPTER XI

  QUEEN JOAN OF NAPLES

  A conspicuous feminine sinner—Marriage of State—Her
  beauty—Her Hungarian husband—Petrarch and the monk—Joan’s
  ascent to the throne—The Naples succession—Her
  favourites—The churches of Naples—Joan’s lovers—Factions
  of Naples—Charles of Durazzo—A bold proposal—Charles’s
  ambitious plots—War of the Factions—Disappearance
  of Maria—Becomes the wife of Charles—Joan’s
  horror                                                pp. 200-217


  CHAPTER XII

  A MEDIÆVAL NIGHTMARE

  Pact between Charles and Andrew of Hungary—Joan’s homage
  to the Papal Legate—Andrew ignored—Arrival of Andrew’s
  mother—Andrew upheld by the Pope—His reprisals—“The
  man must die”—The Queen’s conspiracy—Last
  meeting of Charles and Andrew—The hunting expedition—The
  banquet in the monastery—The murder—Tempest
  breaks over Joan’s head—An evil blow at Charles—Trial
  of Andrew’s murderers—A nightmare of cruelty and
  fear                                                  pp. 218-243


  CHAPTER XIII

  THE VAMPIRE-MONARCH FROM HUNGARY

  Charles’s further acts as dictator—Rise of the favoured Louis
  of Taranto—Civil war—A scheme of the Empress of
  Constantinople—Interference of the King of Hungary—The
  Empress again to the rescue—Hungary’s advance—Death
  of the Empress—Flight of the Neapolitan nobles—Joan
  and her husband in Provence—Charles’s well-merited fate—The
  King of Hungary’s vengeance—Government by
  execution                                             pp. 244-257


  CHAPTER XIV

  END OF JOAN’S CAREER

  Joan detained at Aix—Greeted as a Queen—Joan pronounced
  innocent—Plans to regain Naples—Sale of a city—Return
  to Naples—Indecisive war—Proposal for personal
  conflict—Flight of the Royal Family—Maria’s narrow
  escape—Hungarians repulsed—Pope Clement as
  intermediary—Departure of the King of Hungary—Festivity
  in Naples—Death of Louis and Joan’s further marital
  adventures—Joan in trouble—Her untimely end           pp. 258-275


  CHAPTER XV

  NAPLES UNDER MURAT

  Beauty of Naples—Figures of its history—St. Januarius—Murat,
  King of Naples—Achievements as King—The Carbonari—England’s
  promises—Napoleonic diplomacy—Rise of the
  Bourbons—Alliance with Austria—Murat’s indecision—Distrust
  of the Allies—Murat’s statesmanship—Talleyrand’s
  diplomacy—Naples the gay—Conspiracy in the
  palace—The escape from Elba—Ideal government—War
  against Murat—Advance of the Austrians—Murat driven to
  Naples—Interview with his wife—Last instructions to his
  ministers—Escape                                      pp. 276-312


  CHAPTER XVI

  MURAT’S LAST DAYS

  Naples in anarchy—Entrance of Austrians—Murat’s repulse by
  Napoleon and by Louis—His demon of ill-luck—Shipwrecked—Aid
  in Corsica—Emperor of Austria’s proposal—Attempt
  against Naples—Murat betrayed into Ferdinand’s
  hands—Murat’s “trial”—Letter to his wife—Before his
  “judges”—A brave death—Ferdinand, the “Butcher
  King”                                                 pp. 313-328


  CHAPTER XVII

  ITALIAN SEAS

  Our moods and the seas—Memories in landscapes—The healing
  of the sea—A vision in the Bay of Naples—Marion Crawford’s
  yacht expected—The family together at Leghorn—Lady
  Paget—A bathing scene—Hugh Fraser—“Spannocchi”
  for dinner—The avenging boatman—Livorno,
  an anomaly—Sunset on the Mare Ligure—Bay of Spezia,
  a splurge of colour and light—A hail-storm in Venice—The
  joy of a gondola—Moods of Venice—A Giorgione
  beauty—The nurseries of Venice—Her shops—Saints and
  heresies of the thirteenth century                    pp. 329-353


  CHAPTER XVIII

  SOUTHERN SHORES

  Melancholy Ravenna—Early Byzantine architecture—Forests
  of stone-pine—Smiles and tears—The need of a little
  misfortune—Monte Gargano—Millions of Spanish
  merinos—Primæval forest—A forest miracle—Church of the
  Apparition of St. Michael—Other apparitions of the
  Archangel—The revelation to St. Aubert—The great round
  church—Order of the Knights of St. Michael—A “maiden”
  fortress of France                                    pp. 354-365


  INDEX                                                 pp. 366-372



ILLUSTRATIONS


  VENICE: THE GRAND CANAL                            _Frontispiece_

                                                        FACING PAGE
  ST. BENEDICT                                                   24
  ST. GREGORY                                                    44
  ROME: THE PANTHEON                                             62
  PIUS IX                                                        82
  PIUS IX IN LATER LIFE                                         106
  PIUS VII                                                      132
  QUEEN JOAN OF NAPLES                                          200
  CLEMENT VI                                                    260
  NAPLES: CASTEL DELL’UOVO                                      264
  THE TOMB OF QUEEN JOAN                                        274
  JOACHIM MURAT, KING OF NAPLES                                 288
  CAROLINE BUONAPARTE, QUEEN OF NAPLES                          310
  LIVORNO                                                       332
  TORCELLO: THE CATHEDRAL AND THE CHURCH OF ST. FOSCA           344
  RAVENNA                                                       354



MORE ITALIAN YESTERDAYS



CHAPTER I

SAINTS OF THE CHURCH


It was my good fortune, many years ago, to make friends with a
woman whose name was as beautiful as her mind—Mary Grace. We met in
another hemisphere, under the Southern Cross, and for many days lived
together in Chile’s one little Paradise, Viña del Mar. There, in shady
patios, trellised with jessamine and bougainvillea, we talked of the
impossible—of meeting in Rome and going together to the holy places and
making better acquaintance with the Saints. Two or three years later
the impossible happened. My Mary, with her daughter, Lilium, floated
into my mother’s drawing-room in the Odescalchi one April afternoon,
when the swallows were whirling above the courtyard and the house
seemed all roses and sunshine. In the weeks that followed all our dream
programme was realized; together we went to the Pope’s Mass, together
knelt at his feet while Leo XIII laid his hand on Lilium’s golden
head and blessed us and promised to pray for us and all our dear ones;
and together we wandered from place to place in the Eternal City, I,
who had known it all my life, learning many things from her who came
there for the first time, as so often happens. Of all those pleasant
inspiring hours, the one we both remembered most appreciatively, I
think, was that of our visit to a lonely spot on the Aventine—the hill
that somehow has always kept its character and is even to-day very
little hurt by the destructions that have defaced most of the other
quarters of the town.

My friend was Irish, _pur sang_, and her appreciations were extremely
individual ones: things that other people felt obliged to rave about
left her quite cold; but when she had caught and joined the links of
some beautiful story that the world had overlooked or forgotten, she
became a veritable flame of enthusiasm, and every tiny detail and
souvenir she could connect with it had to be sought out and stored in
the big warm shrine of her heart. I think, though I am not certain,
that she knew the story of the house on the Aventine before she came
to Rome. Any way, it was she who took me there, and we went over story
and house together, and were exceeding loath to come away when the Ave
Maria rang over the city and all respectable people turned their faces
homewards.

Here is the story, a story of two ways of loving. It is in two parts,
and I only learnt the first long after I was familiar with the second.
The beginning takes us back to the last years of the third century,
to the oft-mentioned reign of Diocletian. At that time, although the
Aventine had never been one of the most distinguished quarters of Rome,
it contained a few dwellings of nobles, who, doubtless, overlooked the
mass of poorer houses that swarmed about its base, for the sake of the
view, both over the city and towards the sea, from which comes always
the pleasant west wind that we Romans love. I have spoken of the palace
of the good Marcella, where in her old age she was so roughly treated
by Alaric’s Goths; before Marcella’s time there lived another noble
lady on the Aventine, with very different ideas as to the conduct of
life. Her name was Aglaë, not a Roman name, and I fancy she must have
come of Greek parentage, although she is spoken of as a noble Roman
matron. Of her husband, who seems to have died before the story begins,
we are told nothing; her whole existence was wrapped up in a quite
unsanctified passion for a handsome pagan called Boniface, a man of
generous heart, as the sequel shows, but a sensualist, like most of
his class at that time. He adored Aglaë, and the two must have passed
some enchanting hours wandering on the terraces of the Aventine villa,
or sitting hand in hand to watch the sun sinking red into the distant
sea. No thought of the future seems to have come to them there, nor any
gleam of a scruple as to their way of life. Youth and beauty and love
were theirs; this world was sweet, and they had never heard of another.

Then something happened. We are not told what it was—perhaps some
miracle witnessed by Boniface at the martyrdom of some obscure
Christian, one of those miracles which so often converted a crowd
of brutal, mocking bystanders into Christians, on the spot. Whatever
it was, it rent his soul, summoned his intelligence, and claimed him
for ever. If Aglaë was not with him at the moment he must have rushed
to her for one last visit to tell her of it, for her conversion was
simultaneous, and sudden as his own. From that moment the lovers
renounced each other for the love of Christ, and the remainder of their
lives was devoted to atoning for their guilt in the past. Aglaë, in her
lonely palace, gave herself up to prayer and penance; Boniface at once
joined himself to the band of Christians who made it their business to
gather up and bury the bodies of the martyrs. In no other way could he
assuage the tumult of pain and repentance that filled his heart at the
remembrance of his sins. Diocletian’s persecution was not confined to
Rome, but was raging in many other parts of the Empire, notably in Asia
Minor, and thither Boniface travelled with some devoted companions, in
order to help and cheer the poor Christians in their sufferings.

On arriving at Tarsus, St. Paul’s city, he got separated from his
fellow travellers, and, wandering around, found that a great number of
the Faithful were being cruelly tormented that day, in divers ways,
for the name of Christ, and his heart was torn both with compassion
for their pains and admiration for their heroism. Approaching them,
he kissed their chains and encouraged them to endure these passing
tortures for the sake of Him who would so quickly and splendidly reward
them by an eternity of joy. Of course he was at once arrested, and the
tormentors seem to have tasked their ingenuity in inventing agonies for
him to bear. His sins of the flesh were expiated by having his whole
body ploughed with hooks of iron, and by spikes of wood run in under
his nails and on his limbs; he had spoken sinful words—they poured
molten lead into his mouth; he had sinned in the lust of the eyes and
the pride of life—the executioners plunged him head downwards in a
cauldron of boiling pitch. But from this the Lord delivered him. When
they drew him forth, his eyes were clear, his brow unscarred, and he
looked once more—his last look—on the fair world where he had been so
sinfully happy, and through it all he praised God aloud, saying, “Lord
Jesus Christ, Son of God, I thank Thee!” Then came the order—so usual
when all the torments had failed, and the clear spirit still clung to
the lacerated body—“Behead him!”

As the axe fell, there was a terrific earthquake, and many of the
bystanders were converted then and there, but no one was allowed to
touch his body. Meanwhile his friends, who had been seeking for him
everywhere, learnt of his martyrdom, and came to gather up his remains.
But a strict watch had been set, and it was only after paying five
hundred pieces of silver that they could obtain possession of the dear
corpse. With love and tears they anointed it with precious balms and
wrapped it in costly coverings and transported it to Rome.

During these months Aglaë had been living a life of such whole-hearted
repentance that our dear Lord had taken her into great grace; and
now, by an exquisite, divine bit of indulgence—one of those flashes
of hot sympathy that come straight from the Sacred Human Heart of Him
in heaven to some poor broken human heart on earth—He sent an Angel to
tell her that her Boniface’s body was returning to Rome, and that she
could go and meet it. So Aglaë, in her sombre penitential dress, her
beautiful face covered with a veil, went forth, and, at a given place,
saw the little procession approaching from the sea. There was no danger
for her in looking at the beloved features now. Very quiet and strong
she seems to have been as she met the wayfarers, bade them pause with
their holy burden, and then led them back to her own house. There,
where he and she had loved and sinned, she received him who was to
leave her no more. Those who had brought him told her of his glorious
end, and she thanked the Lord for it again—for the angel had not let
her wait so long for the story. And when she had shown her gratitude
by most loving hospitality and precious gifts to those who had brought
his body, they went away and left her alone with her beloved. Ask any
loving woman what she did then. Which of us would not place our dear
tortured dead in our hall of honour, and burn sweet spices round them,
and light tall tapers and fill the place with every fragrance and
loveliness that the garden has to give?

All this, we may be sure, Aglaë did for Boniface; but she did that
from which most women are debarred. She turned her palace into a church
for his tomb, and prayed near it till she died; and then the poor and
suffering, who had been her one care from the day of her conversion,
came there and prayed for her soul. But we know that that went straight
to heaven.

So there stood the Church of St. Boniface, and, some two hundred years
later, a most noble Roman family had established their own palace close
to it, and the church, as we know it, now includes a part of the house
of Alexis. For this is where a great saint grew to manhood, the loved
son of rich and affectionate parents. Alexis had every gift of mind,
with beauty of countenance and strength of body; and, when the time was
ripe, his father and mother betrothed him to a bride of their choosing,
good and sweet, and very fair to see. In this they had, for the first
time, met with stubborn opposition from the boy who had never opposed
them before. He told them that he had vowed himself to a single life
for God’s service, and that no earthly bride, however beautiful, should
make him swerve from that allegiance. But they, like many other good
parents, persisted in their project, convinced that they knew what was
good for their son; and the preparations for his marriage went merrily
forward, each day but adding to the young man’s grief and perplexity.
Rome was Rome still; he could protest, but he had to obey his father’s
direct commands, and obey he did; but his vow had been made to a still
higher Authority, and he meant to keep it, and prayed for grace and
guidance to do so, nor were grace and guidance refused him, who, as the
Breviary puts it, “was of Rome’s noblest, but nobler yet through his
great love for Christ.”

On the night of his wedding, when the feasting and singing and
congratulating were over, and the matrons conducted the bride, probably
a child of thirteen or fourteen, to the lighted, perfumed bridal
chamber, Alexis would not so much as touch her hand, but like one,
Galahad, of another time and clime, bade her farewell and departed,
having received from God a special command to go on a pilgrimage to
the “illustrious Churches of the Universe.” He left all behind, riches
and servants, and even his name, and for seventeen long years, with
no companion but the Lady Poverty, wandered, a nameless poor pilgrim
through all the Holy Places, praising the Redeemer for His great
mercies, and praying for the hastening of the Kingdom of Heaven.

At the end of those seventeen years he was one day praying fervently
before an image of the Blessed Virgin, in the great church at Edessa,
when a voice came from the image, proclaiming his name and rank. The
people were greatly excited and wished to show him honour, both for
his own sake and because Our Lady herself seemed to wish it. But Alexis
knew better. That strange sweet voice had not rung in his ears to lure
him back to things of earthly pride, and for him the disclosure of
his identity was the command to depart from that land. He fled, and
boarded the first ship he could find to carry him away from Syria. He
never asked the vessel’s destination; it was enough for him that he was
obeying a command, but he was being led back to where the second phase
of his spiritual career awaited him—in his old home in Rome.

As the ship sped north and west, and one by one the lovely Greek
islands seemed to come floating towards him, like opals on the shifting
sapphire of the sea, he still kept silence, still prayed and praised.
What cared he whither her course was set? The white sails might have
been angel’s wings—so sure was Alexis that God was leading him. Then,
when the Apennines swam up blue from the bluer water, and scents of
violet and orange blossom were wafted out to greet the wanderer, he
knew that this was Italy—and home. Still he spoke not—questioned not;
past the isles of the Sirens, past Circe’s Promontory, still on, past
all that shore of coral and pearl, of palm and ilex and olive, with
Vesuvius’s dark smoke hanging like a menace in the background, the
little Syrian galley held her way, and at last the helmsman turned her
prow to the land; the sails were all furled but one; the enormous oars
worked her up against a rushing yellow current till the long quay was
reached, and with a rattling of chains the weary galley slaves shipped
their oars and bent down to look, each through his little opening, at
“the port of Rome.”

With the merchants and the free seamen Alexis stepped on shore, and
gazed at the city of his birth. He had been brought back—for what?
Blindly, joyfully, obediently, he had gone forth, to fare alone with
God, and alone with God he was still to be. An hour or so later a
haggard mendicant stood at the gate of a palace on the Aventine, asking
for charity. That was never refused in that house, and the servants
brought him in, showed him a dark corner under a stairway, close to
the entrance, where they told him he might sleep, and gave him some
scraps of food. Humbly and gratefully he accepted it all; he heard them
speak of the master and the mistress and the “widow” of the eldest son
who was long since dead; and that day or the next he must have seen
his father and mother, and the maid who had never been a wife, passing
through the courtyards or lingering in the garden.

God’s ways are not our ways. When He covets the love of certain
souls for Himself, He will not share it with any one, and that Divine
jealousy leads the chosen soul through hard paths. The hearts that
love God intensely are the very ones that are the most loving of their
fellows, especially of all who hold close to them in the sacred ties of
family affection. But these ties have to be snapped on earth when the
Divine Lover so wills—and Saints like Alexis, and poor sinners like the
rest of us, have to leave the broken ends in His hands, knowing that
the pain we are made to cause our dear ones is as necessary for them
as that which we suffer is for us, and that every pang of theirs is a
golden strand in the garment of their immortality.

Alexis’s parents had sinned against him and Heaven in trying to force
him to break his vow of virginity; their son had long forgiven them,
but Heaven in its mercy was allowing them to expiate their sin here
instead of hereafter; and, through their obstinacy, the young girl
who might, wedded to another spouse, have become a joyful mother of
children, had to spend her life in their sad house, waiting upon them,
and with the prospect of a very lonely age before her when they should
have passed away.

We may be sure that many and many a time Alexis longed to emerge from
his despised obscurity and comfort them all three, but it was not for
that God had brought him back. The command of silence was never lifted,
and so the son—the heir—lived on, a ragged beggar, laughed at and also
abused by his father’s servants, praying in St. Boniface’s Church by
day, sleeping in the cranny under the stairs at night, allaying his
hunger by the scraps the servants threw him, and always blessing them
and praising God, who thus satisfied His own servant’s hunger for
poverty and suffering and humiliation. This second trial, this exile of
the heart, lasted also seventeen years. At that time the very existence
of Rome was threatened by Alaric the Goth; once and twice he had turned
from its gates laden with the ransom exacted for not entering them;
he was threatening to approach again, and this time he had sworn to
enter and destroy. The population was crowding the churches to pray for
deliverance, when a mysterious voice rang out in each separate church,
“Seek ye the man of God, that he may pray for Rome!” Terror fell upon
the suppliant masses, and none dared speak or move. Then the same voice
cried, “Seek in the house of Euphemian.”

There was a rush to the Aventine, for all knew the great noble’s
dwelling. The Pope, Innocent I, had heard the command and himself
went thither, followed by all his ecclesiastics and the Senators as
well. When they reached Euphemian’s house it was the Pope who led them
to the dark corner under the stairs—dark no longer, but flooded with
celestial light, where the nameless beggar lay dying alone. His hands
were already cold, but in one he held a crucifix, in the other a slip
of parchment which no one could make him relinquish, though many tried
to take it away from him. Then Innocent commanded him, in the Name of
God, to give it up, and immediately Alexis let him take it with his own
hand. And the Pope, standing up beside the dying man, opened the slip,
and read aloud therefrom the name and family of the beggar; and a great
cry went through the house that it was Alexis, the son who had been
mourned for dead these many years. And father and mother and wife threw
themselves down beside him, embracing him and weeping bitterly, for in
that moment his soul had gone to God.

Then Innocent buried him in the Church of St. Boniface, and it was
called both by his name and that of Alexis for many years. Both their
bodies rest there, and a chapel was thrown out at one side to take
in the stairway, which, now covered with glass, remains to this day.
Both Boniface and Alexis had travelled and prayed and suffered in the
East, and their church came to be a heritage of both East and West;
for, five hundred years after the July day on which Alexis died, a
great monastery called after him and built close to the church on the
hill of the “house of Euphemian” sheltered monks of the Basilian and
Benedictine orders at the same time, an innumerable spiritual family
“to replace the fair family he had renounced to this world.”

The Aventine has been little touched by time and is still one of the
quietest and loveliest spots in Rome. At certain season it suffers
from malaria—blown up from the marshes near Ostia—and for that reason
both mediæval and modern builders have generally avoided it. But it
is full of gardens. That of St. Alexis’s Convent, now an Asylum for
the Blind, is famous for its orange and lemon trees; and one can trace
the dispositions of the terraces and courts of the old house in the
approaches to the church. I do not think that when my friend and I
were wandering there we noticed one curious feature which, however,
still exists to give one a glimpse of old Roman domestic ways—the queer
little cells, one on each side of the inner porch of Euphemian’s house
where the slave porter, and his companion the watch-dog, were _chained_
opposite to each other, to their respective posts! What queer and
sympathetic confidences they must have exchanged sometimes!

Alexis surely prayed for his native city, but all the prayers of all
her Saints could not avert the trials that were to visit on Rome her
past sins. Constantine the Great believed that he had left the Church
in the West impregnable in strength and assured of peace; and for
nearly three centuries after his death she was forced to fight for her
existence almost as stubbornly as she had during the three centuries
preceding it. In 361, only twenty-four years after the death of
Constantine, Julian the Apostate reversed his edicts and strained every
nerve to re-establish the worship of the Olympian deities. Paganism
was dead, and he failed in his iniquitous efforts to restore animation
to its corpse, but much suffering did he bring to the Church, and it
was only at the price of blood that she conquered in the end. After
Julian came the Barbarians—Alaric, Genseric, Odoacer, Totila—during the
short space of one hundred and thirty years Rome was taken and ravaged
five separate times, so that when, in 553, Narses, the prototype of
Napoleon, abolished the Senate and annexed the city to the Eastern
Empire, she had reached the lowest point in her history, and was
scarcely regarded as a prize even by the Lombards when, in response to
the invitation of Narses himself, they overran Italy from the Alps to
the sea, only to be finally expulsed by Charlemagne some two hundred
years later.

But the Church had realized the truth of the saying that the darkest
hour comes just before the dawn. The high courage that had come
unscathed through such appalling conflicts rose gallant and audacious
in its certainty of final victory, and at the very moment when Rome
seemed to be annihilated, decreed to it such a triumph as the world had
never seen before.

In 568, just a year after Narses, to gratify a personal spite, had
invited the hornet swarm of Lombards to cross the Alps, he died in the
city he had insulted. We must remember that there were two Romes, the
corporeal city, depopulated and impoverished, despoiled and dying—the
city of the government of the once proud “Senatus Populusque Romanus,”
which had failed signally at every point, and had crawled to the feet
of every conqueror; and the spiritual city, ruled by strong and holy
men who patiently went on with their invisible building, adding stone
to stone with such calmness and patience that in contemplating their
work one is almost led to believe that they were unconscious of the
material ruin around them.

During the forty years that followed the death of Narses there was
growing up in Rome a phalanx of learned and holy ones to replace
the leaders who had been found wanting, and we of to-day are still
the inheritors and possessors of the treasures they amassed. While
the grass grew unchecked in the streets, and all who could migrated
to happier lands, while commerce and war turned aside from the now
worthless prize, and the poor tethered their few goats and sheep in the
courtyards of the great ruined houses, the Benedicts, the Gregorys, the
Bonifaces, with their clear-eyed, disciplined cohorts, were building
the Liturgy, building the Monastic Orders, building the polity that
guides and rules the Church and the Faithful to-day. Nothing escaped
them; whether it were a question of the right antiphon for one of the
psalms of a Nocturn, the placing on the Index some doubtful legend of
a Saint (like that of our Saint George, which the popular fancy was
turning into a grotesque myth), the annihilation of some startling
new heresy which was raising its poisonous head, or the question of
bringing Constantinople to its senses by bold remonstrance with the
Emperor—to every detail was brought the thoroughness and directness of
trained minds, the compelling force of superior courage and invincible
intellect.

And this work had been going on silently and infallibly from the
moment that official persecution ceased. Through sieges and invasions,
desertions and desolations, the mills of God were grinding the grain
and filling the great storehouses with golden wealth. In 480, in
the little town of Nursia, high among the fastnesses of the Abruzzi,
where the snow lay thick in winter, as in the Alps, there was born
to the lord of the place a son, who was christened Benedict—“the
Blest,” and a little daughter whom the father, a great admirer of
learning, called Scholastica. When these two passed away, sixty-three
years later, Literature and Saintliness were throned in Europe, and
hold their thrones still in the innumerable fortresses manned by the
spiritual descendants of the Nursian twins. Outside the Church few,
comparatively, knew their names when they died. Learning and piety
would scarcely exist for us had they not lived.



CHAPTER II

FOUNDER OF MONASTICISM


In the heart of the Sabines, where the Nar breaks out from the rock
near the mountain called the Lioness, there has been since very early
times a little town, too inaccessible to tempt the spoiler and the
invader, too sturdy and independent to serve long as a footstool for
mediæval tyrants. It was well fortified, however, and the ancient
walls encircle it still, in good repair, as witnesses to its immunity
from the fate that has annihilated so many other little old cities,
its neighbours. Nature, stern and wild enough here, helped to protect
it. Even now it can only be reached by a carriage journey, a lengthy,
tedious business in the winter time, when the snow almost cuts it off
from communication with the outside world.

The townsfolk have long memories, however. The chief square is called
Piazza Sertorio, after the Roman General, Quintus Sertorius, who was
born here in the second century before Christ, and the only public
monument in Norcia is a statue of their other distinguished citizen,
St. Benedict, in the same square. People from other places do not
interest the good burghers of Norcia. They have accorded a passing
notice to a gentleman named Vespasian, known elsewhere as a fairly
successful Emperor, but, as they would tell you, “a person quite
without education”—that is to say, with no manners; nevertheless they
have allowed a hill in the vicinity to be called Monte Vespasio because
his mother was a decent woman and owned a farm there.

I fancy life in Norcia is in its essentials very much what it was
when, in the year of grace 480, the lord of the manor was informed
that his good wife had borne him twins, a son and a daughter. It is
easy, knowing the ways of the people, to call up the picture of the
“Matrona” in her best gown—the midwife is the most honoured woman in
every Roman town—coming down from the lady’s apartment in the tower to
the head of the house, sitting, quite forgotten and rather lonely, in
the hall, waiting for news from the centre of interest upstairs. His
own servants would only approach with signs of submission and respect;
not so the all-important Matrona! Conscious of her dignity and grave as
a judge, she would advance a few steps and wait for him to rise. Then,
as he approached on tiptoe and with some timidity, she would turn back
the woollen covering from the unexpectedly large bundle on her left
arm, and, without a word, show him two little pink faces where he only
expected one.

“Yes,” she would say in answer to his exclamations of delight and
astonishment, “two has Domine Dio sent to this noble house. Two will be
the gifts my lord must bestow on his lady”—this to remind him as well
of the double remuneration due to herself. “Pretty? Oh no, but they are
not bad—thanks be! Will it please my lord to send for the priest—the
‘feminuccia’ is the younger—and seems not over strong! I thank my
lord!”

My lord has been feeling in his pouch and has slipped two of his few
gold pieces into her hand, and, seeing that he is inclined to admire
the babies, she covers them up and stalks away. Her demeanour has been
rhadamanthine throughout. There must be no expression of admiration, no
kissing or fondling of the little creatures before they are baptized.
That would call the attention of the devil to the small unregenerates
who are still his property. When the taint of original sin has been
washed away they will be angels of innocence, beautiful cherubs to be
shown proudly to all and sundry—but not before!

So my lord sent for the priest, and pondered meanwhile on the names
he would give the new son and daughter, little dreaming, good man,
that fifteen centuries later those names would be household words
to every Catholic ear and perpetuated in the colossal literature of
sanctuaries of holiness and learning. He fixed on Benedict for the
boy, and Scholastica for the girl, and, so far as I can trace, it was
the first time the names had been used. Benedict means “the Blest”
or “Well-spoken,” Scholastica signifies a lover of learning, or “the
Well-taught”; so we may infer that the Lord of Norcia (it was called
Nursia then) was a man of more education than most country gentlemen
of those rough times, times of which history says, “Europe has perhaps
never known a more calamitous or apparently desperate period than
that which reached its climax at this date, the year 480. Confusion,
corruption, despair, and death were everywhere; social dismemberment
seemed complete. In all the ancient Roman world there did not exist
a prince who was not either a pagan, or an Arian, or a Eutychian. In
temporal affairs, the political edifice originated by Augustus—that
monster assemblage of two hundred millions of human creatures, ‘of
whom not a single individual was entitled to call himself free’—was
crumbling into dust under the blows of the Barbarians.”[1]

Nevertheless Rome still continued to be looked upon by the surrounding
provinces as the centre of education—there was none, at any rate, to
be had anywhere else within reach; and thither the Lord of Norcia,
a descendant of the great family of the Anicia so often mentioned in
the Roman chronicles, sent his son to be instructed in philosophy and
law—the two subjects which still promised some kind of a career to an
intelligent youth. Benedict was scarcely that yet—he was certainly not
more than twelve years old, so much of a child that his nurse, Cyrilla,
was sent with him to take care of him. Doubtless she found some
respectable people with whom to lodge, and indeed one feels some pity
for the simple countrywoman, charged with such a heavy responsibility
in a strange and, as it must have seemed to her, a very wicked great
city.

So it seemed to the boy too. He studied, tried to carry out his
father’s instructions as faithfully as he could, but all he saw around
him inspired him with such a horror of the world and its ways that
life became insupportable to him, and he resolved to fly into the
wilderness and seek for God. He was only fourteen years old, but he
knew with certainty that his life was not to lie in the crowded places.
The devout nurse did not oppose his decision; his will was hers, and
together they left Rome and took the road towards their old home. I
fancy that the boy only then told her that Norcia was not to be their
destination. Before reaching it he would find the place where Heaven
willed him to stay.

Thus they travelled on, till they came to La Mentorella, one of
the strangest spots in all those strange mountains. Its parent is
Guadagnolo, the highest standing town in the whole of Romagna, perched
on a peak 4,000 feet high, and yet shut in on every side with a wall
of rock that completely hides it from the outer world. Just below the
town a ledge of the precipitous rock juts out abruptly and affords
foothold for a church and hermitage, built here in memory of the
conversion of St. Eustace, the mighty hunter. He was called Placidus
then, and was a soldier, a noble and a good man, a commander-in-chief
much trusted by his Emperor, Trojan, and very upright and charitable in
all his dealings with his fellow men. It has been thought by scientific
historians that it is of him that Josephus spoke when recounting the
exploits of the Tribune Placidus in the war with the Jews. There are
links which seem to connect Placidus with the Octavian family, thus
making him a relation of Augustus, and some writers see in the young
Placidus, whom his father Tertullus confided to Benedict’s care, a
descendant of the gallant soldier and hunter of Trojan’s time.

Be all that as it may, we do know that in the days of his pagan
prosperity Placidus, hunting in the mountains, sighted a magnificent
stag and pursued it madly through the narrow defiles till it fled up
to the summit of an apparently inaccessible rock, and there turned and
stood still, gazing down on him. Then Placidus fell on his knees in
mortal fear, for between the creature’s antlers was a crucifix of fire
from which shot forth rays of such brilliance that they lighted up all
the hillside. And from it came a voice saying, “Placidus, why dost thou
pursue me? I am Christ, whom thou hast hitherto served without knowing
Me. Dost thou now believe?”

Yes, indeed, Placidus believed, and his whole house with him, and in
the after years was privileged to suffer great things for his, till
then, unknown Master. But for me, I never got much farther with his
story than that blessed word, “Whom thou hast served without knowing
Me.” When I read it I think of all the good, brave souls who thus
served in past ages, and of those who are serving thus now, all over
the world, truly and successfully, by the inner light which is imparted
to all, of every clime and every faith, so long as they are sincere and
have the “single eye” to which Christ promised that “the body shall be
full of light.”

Placidus, on becoming a Christian, took (or began to use, it may
have been his already) the name of Eustace. Either in his time or
soon afterwards a church was built on the site of his vision, and
the bell-tower of the “Madonna della Vulturella,” although its name
has been shortened to “La Mentorella,” still carries on its summit
a gigantic pair of antlers in commemoration of the miracle. Until
a few years ago (it may be so even now) the Feast of St. Eustace
attracted great crowds of pilgrims to the wild and beautiful spot. His
day—the day of his martyrdom under Trajan, who, after all his great
services, could not forgive him for refusing to sacrifice to the gods
on the occasion of the triumph which Eustace had won for him—falls on
September 20, that ominous “date which marks one of the blackest steps
of history,” as Dom Guéranger says, and the martyr’s Feast has been
combined with that of St. Michael on the 29th.

Then the lonely rocks of Guadagnolo resound to hymns and litanies,
and at night are all lit up with bonfires, one to every little group
of pilgrims, who make a point of passing the night there, each family
sleeping round its own well-stacked fire. For the autumn nights are
keen among those wild precipices, with two cold mountain streams,
the Girano and the Siciliano, roaring along their deep beds in the
impenetrable darkness below; and also the crags used to be the haunts
of naughty brigands who might well covet the gold chains and silver
buttons, the rich cloth and lace of the peasants’ costumes. So some
of the men kept watch, with their old-fashioned muzzle-loaders across
their knees, while their rosaries slipped through their fingers—and
the Blessed Madonna and St. Eustachio were pleased with their faith and
kept the robbers away, for never yet has the pilgrimage been disturbed
by those sons of Belial.

It was to La Mentorella that Benedict came, in the year 494, and there
he remained for a while, praying to be delivered from the snares of
the world. And the faithful Cyrilla stayed with him, and, their little
store of money being exhausted, begged food from the good people round
about, for herself and him. For she had not the courage to send and
ask for money at home, now that the boy had broken away from teachers
and parents to follow the higher call. And the neighbours gave gladly,
and lent her utensils to cook with. One day she was grinding meal in
a little sieve, a stone bowl pierced with holes. To her dismay she let
it drop, and it shivered in pieces at her feet. What should she say to
the lender? Hearing her lamentations, Benedict came to see what was
the matter. He picked up the broken pieces, and at once they welded
themselves together in his hands, and he gave her back the sieve,
whole. Her delight got the better of her prudence, or else some one
witnessed the miracle, for immediately the people cried out that they
had a saint in their midst, and they hung the stone bowl up in the
church as a sacred thing.

Their laudations horrified Benedict, and he ran away, alone this time,
to find a place where no such temptations could assault his humility.
At last he came to a solitary ravine with steep rocky walls through
which rushed a turbulent little river, which four hundred years earlier
had served Nero unwillingly, being dammed up and made to spread out
into pleasure lakes for his gardens a little farther on. All was
deserted now, and Benedict, being an active, agile boy, crept along
the face of the cliff and found a cave, so deep that the light of day
never penetrated beyond the entrance; and here he remained, sure of the
food his soul needed, solitary communion with God—and royally careless
about sustenance for his body. But a kindred heart found him out. Lower
down on the course of the Anio, a company of monks had established
themselves on the ruins of Nero’s villa. There were many such
communities then, living apart from the world to pray and do works of
charity and penance, under no fixed rule, and therefore insufficiently
organised, but many of them leading very holy lives all the same.

One of these monks of Sub Laqueum (as the place was called from the
artificial lakes), Romanus by name, found out Benedict’s hiding-place,
and took it upon himself to provide him with food. He told none of his
companions about the ardent young recluse, but every day he cut his
one loaf of bread in two, and going to the edge of the cliff he let
down the half loaf on a string, to which he had attached a little bell
so that Benedict should know when to come to the mouth of the cave and
reach out to catch the bread.

Romanus had given him a hair shirt and a monastic habit made of skins.
He slept on the bare ground and waged constant war on all the impulses
of the flesh. That rebelled, fiercely. Many a temptation assailed him.
The remembered beauty of one woman in Rome continually haunted him,
and very nearly dragged him forth from his cave to go and find her; but
when that thought came to him he pulled off his fur robe and rolled his
young body in a clump of thorns that grew on the platform of his cave,
till it was all one bleeding wound, and his soul regained the mastery.

   [Illustration: STATUE OF ST. BENEDICT. In a cave at Subiaco,
   near Tivoli.]

Seven centuries afterwards St. Francis came from Assisi to visit the
spot. He knelt there long, and shed many tears over the thicket of
thorns. Then he planted two rose trees there, and the thorns gave place
to roses that have bloomed for eight hundred summers, and were blooming
when I saw them, with never a thorn on their stems. But every leaf of
their foliage has a little white line zig-zagging across it—to mark
the flight of the defeated Serpent from St. Benedict’s Eden. There is
a pretty story that tells how, after nearly three years, the hermit’s
retreat was discovered. Sometimes the devil, in sheer spite (or maybe
the chafing points of rock on which Romanus was letting down the bread)
would cut the string, and then, as Romanus could not come back till the
next day, poor young Benedict, his whole supply for twenty-four hours
whirled away into the river below, would grow faint and hungry before
his benefactor could reach him again.

The devil is always rampantly busy at holy seasons—it enrages him to
see everybody trying to be good—and when Benedict had held out against
him for three solid years, he selected Easter Sunday for one of these
wicked tricks. Romanus’s string snapped, the loaf plunged into the
river, and Benedict, always blessing God, resigned himself and went on
with his prayers. The pangs of hunger made themselves felt with painful
persistence, but he tried to take no notice of them. Not so his kind
Creator. In His love for this faithful child He spoke to a good parish
priest who was sitting down to his Easter dinner at that moment with a
glad heart. “How canst thou enjoy these luxuries while a servant of God
is pining for food?”

The good priest sprang up, gathered together all that he could
carry, and, leaving his own dinner untouched, started out to find the
suffering recluse. He knew not his name or his dwelling, but angels
guided his steps and helped him to reach the inaccessible cave. There,
instead of some aged penitent, he found a tall boy, with beautiful,
serious eyes, and lithe and strong, though his body, clothed in
tattered skins, was terribly thin.

Benedict was as much surprised as his visitor. The latter spread the
good things before him and bade him eat.

“Nay, friend,” said Benedict, “thou bringest meat, eggs! How can I
partake of such luxurious food in this season? It is Lent.”

“Lent!” replied the Priest. “No, indeed, my son! Lent is over. This is
Easter Sunday!”

Then the boy fell to, rejoicing. He had lost count of the days in his
solitude.

The priest stayed some time with him and questioned him of his way
of life, and Benedict answered in all humility; and the visitor went
away convinced of the truth proclaimed by the mysterious voice when it
called him a servant of God.

Now some of the shepherds of that country—doubtless in seeking for
some strayed kid of the goats—had caught sight of Benedict in his
dark cave, and his matted hair and robe of skins had so terrified them
that they fled, thinking they had seen a strange wild beast. Now their
pastor told them about him, and the poor people began to come to him
to ask for his prayers. And those who felt called to a higher life
gathered themselves to him for guidance, and the fame of his sanctity
and the miracles he wrought went abroad, so that certain monks of Vico
Varo begged him to come and rule over them. He consented at last and
came, but when they realized that he meant to enforce a strict rule
instead of letting them follow their own varying inclinations, their
admiration—it had never been love—turned to hatred. Satan entered in
amongst them, and they resolved to poison him. When the fatal cup was
handed to Benedict, he took it without a word—and made the sign of the
Cross over it. It was shivered to fragments on the instant.

Then he left these false brethren and returned to his grotto, but never
more to his solitude. Many came to him, some praying that he would
guide their steps in religion, some to confide to him their sons to
educate. This multitude could not be housed in the clefts of the rock,
so he built twelve monasteries at Sub Laqueum, on the ruins of Nero’s
villa, and placed in each twelve monks who bound themselves to live
under certain plain and simple rules—much prayer, much labour, fasting
and penance, active charity, life-long chastity, and finally, poverty,
for no individual might own property of any kind. Thus began the
monastic life of the West. Up to Benedict’s time, as I have said, the
religious life was indeed led by many devout persons, but also by many
who lacked true devotion and brought the calling into some disrepute.
The founder _par excellence_ appeared, and immediately it took on the
character by which we recognize it now.

Its deepest and strongest foundation was in its humility. In Benedict
nature had been wholly subdued; his self-abasement was complete. No
vision of the future had been granted him as yet, no breath of prophecy
had whispered that in the years to come thirty thousand monasteries in
Europe would be called by his name.

Meanwhile his twelve little houses at Sub Laqueum—our Subiaco—prospered
exceedingly, and the numbers of his subjects increased daily. The times
were so terrible that men who loved God and His peace were overjoyed
to find a spot where war and murder came not, and where they could
serve God with quiet hearts. There were some such among the Barbarians
themselves, and more than one Goth asked to be enrolled among
Benedict’s spiritual children. All had to work, and the Goths, big
honest fellows, but dense and unskilful, joined the band of builders
and cultivators of the soil. The country was thickly wooded then, and
there was much felling to be done. One day a Goth, hewing away at a
tree, let his axe slip and fall into the lake. Immediately he began
to weep and lament, for the implements were few and precious. Benedict
came to him, saw what had happened, and made the sign of the Cross over
the water. At once the heavy axe floated to the surface, and the Saint
drew it forth and gave it back to the poor man, saying, “Ecce, labora,
et noli contristare!” (“There, work, and be not afflicted!”)

“Symbolical words,” says Montalembert, “in which we find an abridgment
of the precepts and examples lavished by the monastic order on so many
generations of conquering races! ‘Ecce, labora!’”

In the miserable and confused condition of public affairs it was
difficult for parents of the better classes to procure proper education
for their sons, and as soon as the fame of Benedict’s holiness spread
abroad, young boys of noble families were brought to him at Subiaco
and confided to his care in the hope that they too would devote
themselves to the service of God. Two of these, Placidus and Maurus,
were especially dear to him and were destined to become in a special
manner his disciples and helpers. Placidus, the younger of the two,
was the son of Tertullus, the feudal lord of Subiaco and of many other
towns, and a great benefactor to the infant community. But Benedict
would allow no distinctions of rank to interfere with the training
in obedience and humility which is the only sure foundation for the
religious life, and the two young patricians had to perform their share
of menial labour like all the rest.

One day Placidus had been sent to fetch water from the lake, and as
he stooped to lift out his heavy pitcher he lost his balance and fell
into the water, which at that spot formed a dangerous whirlpool. St.
Benedict witnessed the accident, and turning to Maurus, who stood,
horrified, beside him, said, “Go, my son, and save thy companion.”

Without an instant’s hesitation Maurus walked across the water with a
step as firm as if it had been dry land, drew the drowning boy out of
the whirlpool and set him safely on the bank. St. Gregory, in his life
of St. Benedict, says, “To what shall I attribute so great a miracle?
To the virtue of the obedience, or to that of the commandment?”

“To both,” says Bossuet; “the obedience had grace to accomplish the
command, and the command had grace to give efficacy to the obedience.”

St. Gregory gives us a beautiful picture of St. Benedict’s loving
training of these two predestined souls. He kept them always near him,
and would walk along the woody banks of the Anio leaning on Maurus and
leading Placidus by the hand, discoursing so wisely and yet so clearly
that the appeal to the more mature intelligence of the one was as
convincing as to the childlike mind of the other. They witnessed his
many miracles trembled at the punishments that fell on some unfaithful
members of the community, and stored up all his words in their
hearts—Placidus to be the Apostle of Sicily and the first martyr of the
Order, Maurus to become the founder of the religious life in France,
where he died at the age of seventy, after having, as the Breviary
puts it, “seen already more than one hundred of his spiritual children
precede him to heaven.”

Those first years at Subiaco were very happy and consoling ones for
St. Benedict, but wicked men, some envious of his fame, some the open
enemies of all virtue, tried by all means in their power to injure him
and corrupt his followers. He took no notice of their calumnies, was
unmoved by the attempt of one wretch to poison him; as long as he only
was attacked he went calmly on his way. But when the conspirators sent
a crowd of abandoned women to invade the garden where the monks were
working, he felt the time had come when he should depart and draw the
attacks away from his beloved disciples. So, having set all things in
order and adjured the mountain community to be faithful to its vows,
he travelled southwards, surely with a heavy heart, and did not pause
till he had put nearly a hundred miles between himself and his beloved
retreat at Subiaco.

About eighty-five miles from Rome, where the ever-capricious Apennines
sink to a rounded plain and rise in its centre in a natural fortress
of rock, there stood, in Roman times, the little town of Cassinum, once
the home of Varrus, whom Cicero called “sanctissimus et integerrimus,”
one of those who served God without knowing Him. The place was in
ruins when St. Benedict reached it, but he cared nothing for that;
what arrested him was the sight of the poor country people climbing the
hill to sacrifice to Apollo in the temple on the summit. Pagans yet! He
stayed to teach them Christianity, and very soon the temple and grove
of Apollo gave place to a church and monastery—the most famous in the
world, the monastery of Monte Cassino.

St. Benedict must have possessed even more than the Saint’s usual
gift of divine magnetism, for wherever he went eager disciples sprang
up around him—many faithful, some few less so, but all irresistibly
attracted to the man himself. As it had been at Subiaco, so it was
here. Very quickly he converted the poor people of the district,
signs and wonders too many to recount “confirming the word,” and his
inexhaustible charity making the harried peasants feel that they had
found a father, a doctor, a protector, in the benignly gentle monk. The
great heart that was utterly empty of self felt for all their sorrows
and hardships; the eyes that, as St. Gregory tells us, had already been
opened to the vision of the Godhead, saw, as mortals do not see, into
the hearts of men, and showed events taking place hundreds of miles
away as clearly as those close by, so that when his monks returned from
the missions on which he sent them, it was he who told them all they
had said and done and thought on the way.

He seems to have understood that God would spare him further wandering,
and accepted Monte Cassino as the cradle of the Order he was called
to found. Here he composed the Rule which became the model of all
succeeding Orders, and in its simple completeness contains the essence
and ideal of the religious life. That, according to St. Benedict, must
include prayer and praise and penance, labour, and unbounded charity,
but it does not consist in them. They are its garment, its inevitable
expression, so to speak, but the life is the life of the heart in
constant union with God. He was opposed to all undue extremes in
outward observances, though inflexible as to the keeping of the Rule.
“Let this,” he said, “be arduous enough to give the strong something to
strive for, but not so hard as to discourage the weak!”

He worked at Monte Cassino as if for eternity, yet it was revealed
to him that forty years after his death the Lombards would destroy
the convent and disperse the monks. It puzzles one to understand
that perfect trust and obedience. The knowledge saddened him, but it
never made him desist from his labours, so splendidly justified by
after events. “I have obtained from the Lord this much,” he told the
frightened disciples: “when the Barbarian comes he will take things,
not lives—_res, non animas_.” But other Barbarians were overrunning
the country, left now to its fate by its supine and helpless rulers
in Constantinople. The Goths were everywhere; many, indeed, became
devout followers of Benedict, but their Arian brethren pillaged and
persecuted, burnt and ravaged, unchecked, and terribly did the people
suffer. St. Benedict, who foresaw the great destinies of these northern
races when they should become enlightened, stood between the conquerors
and the conquered as judge and protector, and both in the end always
bowed to his ruling.

There is a wonderful story that I must set down, because it shows his
power over nature, both animate and inanimate things. To me it seems
more impressive than all his other miracles, even those of restoring
the dead to life. A particularly fierce Goth robber, named Galla,
“traversed the country, panting with rage and cupidity, and made
a sport of slaying the priests and monks who fell under his power,
and spoiling and torturing the people to extort from them the little
they had remaining. An unfortunate peasant, exhausted by the torments
inflicted upon him by the pitiless Goth, conceived the idea of bringing
them to an end by declaring that he had confided all that he had to
the keeping of Benedict, a servant of God; upon which Galla stopped the
torture of the peasant, but, binding his arms with ropes and thrusting
him in front of his own horse, ordered him to go before and show the
way to the house of this Benedict who had defrauded him of his expected
prey. Both thus pursued the way to Monte Cassino, the peasant on foot,
with his hands tied behind his back, urged on by the blows and taunts
of the Goth, who followed on horseback.

“When they reached the summit of the mountain they perceived the Abbot,
seated alone, reading at the door of his monastery. ‘Behold,’ said the
prisoner, ‘there is the Father Benedict of whom I told thee.’

“Then the Goth shouted furiously to the monk, ‘Rise up, rise up, and
restore quickly what thou hast received from this peasant!’ The man
of God raised his eyes from his book, and, without speaking, slowly
turned his gaze first on the Barbarian on horseback, and then upon the
husbandman, bound, and bowed down by his cords. Under the light of that
powerful gaze the cords which tied his poor arms loosed of themselves,
and the innocent victim stood erect and free, while the ferocious
Galla, falling on the ground, trembling and beside himself, remained
at the feet of Benedict, begging the Saint to pray for him. Benedict
called his brethren and directed them to carry the fainting Barbarian
into the monastery and give him some blessed bread. And when he had
come to himself the abbot represented to him the injustice and cruelty
of his conduct, and exhorted him to change it for the future. The Goth
was completely subdued.”[2]

The picture of the holy Abbot sitting and reading in the doorway is one
which recurs several times in his history, and it is good to know that
the doorway is one of the very few fragments remaining of Benedict’s
home at Monte Cassino. It still contains, I believe, an inscription to
that effect. The Lombard destruction left this archway standing, and
also the little tower whence Benedict’s bell called the monks to work
and prayer. One loves even to touch the stones that knew his presence
at Monte Cassino. Subiaco is full of him indeed, but it was at Monte
Cassino that his greatest work was done; over its foreseen destruction
he wept bitterly and it was there that he died.

A yet more notable encounter than the one with Galla took place at
the arched doorway, in 542, one year before Benedict’s death. Totila,
the Ostrogoth, swept down through Italy to retrieve the losses and
defeats inflicted on his predecessor by Belisarius. It was a triumphal
progress. He was on his way to Naples when the whim took him to see for
himself the venerated prophet of the holy mountain. But first he wished
to test the prophet’s powers. So he caused the captain of his guard to
be dressed in all his own royal robes, down to the famous purple boots,
gave him three noble counts for his attendants and a great escort of
soldiers, and told him to go and pass himself off on Benedict as the
real Totila. We are not informed how the unlucky captain regarded his
mission—probably with fear and reluctance—but it failed dismally. As
he approached the monastery, St. Benedict perceived him from afar, and
called out, “My son, put off the dress you wear! It is not yours.”

The captain, terrified, threw himself on the ground. Then remounting,
he and his whole company turned round and galloped away at full speed
to tell Totila that it was useless to attempt to deceive the man of
God. And Totila understood, and came himself, very humbly, and saw
the Abbot sitting as usual, in the doorway, reading a holy book. The
conqueror was afraid. He threw himself face downward on the sward and
dared not approach. Three times Benedict bade him rise—still he lay
prone. Then the Saint left his seat and came and raised Totila up and
led him to the house and talked long and earnestly with him, reproving
him for the wrong he had done, and showing him that he must treat his
conquered subjects kindly and justly. Also St. Benedict, mercifully
moved thereto by the sincerity of the Barbarian, told him what lay in
store for him. “You shall enter Rome; you shall cross the sea; nine
years you shall reign, and in the tenth you shall die.”

And Totila repented of his many evil deeds and begged the seer to
pray for him, and went back to his camp a changed man. Thenceforth
he protected the weak, restrained his followers and showed himself so
mild and wise that the delighted Neapolitans, who had been expecting
a repetition of the awful massacres ordered by Belisarius, said that
Totila treated them as if they were his own children. From that time
the tenth year was ever before his eyes, and when it came he died,
contrite and resigned.

One gleam from home was shed on St. Benedict at Monte Cassino. His
sister Scholastica had long since followed his example and given
herself to God. It was not permitted to women to take the final vows
before the age of forty, but that did not prevent them from preparing
for the irrevocable dedication by living together in religious
communities, under a fixed rule, from their early youth, when they
were so inclined. Such a life Scholastica had led, somewhere in the
solitudes of the Sabines—perhaps in her own home at Norcia; but she
came at last to Monte Cassino and built a convent there for herself
and her companions, so as to be near the brother she loved. Only once
a year did they meet, and then they spent the day together in a hut
on the side of Benedict’s mountain, he coming down with a few of the
brethren, and she accompanied by some of the nuns. All their discourse
was of holy things, and much they spoke of the longed-for joys of
heaven.

Now in the year 543 they had thus passed the day together, and evening
was drawing on. St. Benedict rose, saying that he and his companions
must return to the monastery, but Scholastica, for the first time in
all those years, begged him to remain with her till the morning. The
Saint was horrified. “Do you not know, my sister,” he exclaimed, “that
the Rule forbids a monk to pass the night out of the monastery? How can
you ask me to do such a thing?”

Scholastica did not reply. She bowed her head on her hands on the
table that had served for their repast, and wept, praying to God that
her brother might stay, for she knew that they were to meet no more in
this world. She wept so heart-brokenly that her tears flooded the table
and made little rivers on the ground. It was a mild February evening,
and the sun had sunk away from a calm and cloudless sky. But suddenly
a fearful tempest arose, the thunder roared, the rain came down in
torrents, the lightning seared the heavens from side to side.

“Sister, what have you done?” St. Benedict exclaimed, fearing that the
storm was a manifestation of the Divine displeasure.

Scholastica raised her head and smiled at him through her tears. “God
has granted what you refused,” she said. “Go back to the monastery now,
brother, if you can!”

But there was no going back through that tempest, and St. Benedict,
perceiving that the Lord was on Scholastica’s side, stayed with her
till morning, and they had great sweetness of holy converse all night
long. And when the sun rose, Scholastica asked for his blessing and
said farewell for the last time, and she and her nuns went down the
hill to their own convent, looking back many times, I think, to that
other one on the hill. And three days later she died, and her brother
saw her soul mount to heaven under the appearance of a spotless dove,
and he called his monks and said to them with great rejoicing: “My
sister is with God. Go and bring her body hither that we may bury it
with honour.” Which they did, and Benedict made her a grave at the foot
of the altar in his church.

Now he knew that his own end was approaching, and he disposed all
things rightly, and mightily exhorted his brethren to persevere and
to be faithful to their Rule. And he more than ever afflicted his body
with penance and abounded in charity to the poor. And thirty-four days
after Scholastica had departed, a great fever seized him, so that he
had no strength and suffered much. But he never ceased from praying,
and bade all his monks pray that God would have mercy on his soul.
On the sixth day of the fever he bade them carry him into the church,
where he had already caused his sister’s grave to be opened to receive
him. There, on the edge of the grave, supported by his disciples, he
received the Holy Viaticum, and then bade them lift him to his feet. He
stretched out his arms, praised God once more for all His goodness, and
died—_standing_, like the gallant warrior he was!

They buried him beside Scholastica. Two of his monks, whom he had sent
forth on a mission, were very far away from Monte Cassino when they
saw, in the dead of night, a vast number of the stars of heaven run
together to form a great bridge of light towards the east. A voice
spoke to them, saying, “By this road, Benedict, the beloved of God, has
ascended to heaven.”



CHAPTER III

ST. GREGORY THE GREAT


Three years before St. Benedict and his sister Scholastica passed
away, there was born, in a palace on the Cœlian Hill, a child who was
christened Gregory, a name which signified “Vigilant.” His lineage was
exceedingly illustrious, his parents belonging to the great old Gens
Anicia, a family of nobles which had been respected and honoured ever
since the days of the Republic, and in which, to use the words of a
chronicler of Gregory’s time, “the men seemed all to have been born
Consuls, and the women Saints.”

Gregory’s mother was St. Silvia, and I have seen the garden, on the
quiet Cœlian Hill, where as a child he ran about at her side, asking
a thousand questions, as clever children will, while she tended her
flowers and gathered healing herbs—the “basilica” and “Madrecara” and
“erba della Madonna” still dear to Roman apothecaries, to make into
medicines for the sick poor who thronged her charitable doors. Mothers
see a long way, and while Gregory’s father was planning a great career
in the world for his only son, Silvia was praying that God would keep
him pure, and make him great in His sight. And her prayers prevailed,
as mothers’ prayers generally do, and though she had to wait a little,
she lived to see their fulfilment.

As the boy grew up he threw himself heart and soul into his father’s
plans; he studied hard, and his naturally brilliant gifts brought him
much distinction. He rejoiced in all the pleasant things that birth and
wealth had bestowed on him—good looks, popularity, rich garments, and
sparkling jewels—and no doubt was immensely pleased and flattered when,
being still quite young, he was made Proctor of Rome. That charge,
however, was a grave one at the time, as the Lombards, the most cruel
and brutal of all the savage tribes that had threatened the eternal
city, chose the period of Gregory’s proctorship to descend upon her
and make her feel the weight of their heavy hand. There were religious
troubles too, and Gregory, who, through all his busy official life in
the world, was an ardent Christian, was deeply exercised and distressed
by them. But the world was only to claim him for a little while, in his
early manhood. Then he was withdrawn from it to be prepared, through
many long years of prayer and penance and study, to step forth towards
the end of his life as its rescuer and ruler. Little by little the
inner call came, faint at first, sometimes resisted, but ever stronger,
till Gregory understood and obeyed.

His heart had gone out at once to the Benedictine monks, when, on the
destruction of Monte Cassino by the Lombards, they had sought refuge
in Rome. Some of them became his most intimate friends, and their
encouragement smoothed his path from the world to the cloister. From
the moment when he recognized and embraced his vocation, all hesitation
left him. He sold all his goods, distributed the larger part to the
poor, and, as if to atone for what the Lombards had destroyed, built
and endowed six new monasteries, placing twelve Benedictines in each,
in Sicily. That done, he converted his home on the Cœlian into a
seventh, where he gathered another community about him, of the same
learned Order. His father was dead, and his mother, on becoming a
widow, had already built a convent close by, where she had taken the
veil herself.

Gregory now devoted himself to three things, prayer, study, and
charity. For his own use—he was quickly elected Abbot of the
monastery—he reserved a small cell, where he could enjoy the solitude
he now so greatly desired, but—a delightfully human touch!—he could not
get on without his favourite cat, and one can see him in imagination,
pausing from his writing to smooth her velvety head when she sprang
upon the table and rubbed it against his cheek! I had a little cat once
who would sit motionless on a chair beside me all night while I was
writing, but the instant I laid down the pen she was on my lap or my
shoulder, talking in her own way, most intelligently and cheeringly; so
I was mightily pleased when I read about St. Gregory’s cat!

The Benedictine Rule provided for all hospitality to strangers and
the poor, but at the same time directed that the monks themselves were
not to be disturbed from prayer and study. St. Gregory, however, seems
to have received all who wished to see him, perhaps as an exercise of
patience. Now there was a poor shipwrecked sailor who seemed inclined
to abuse the privilege. He came again and again, and was never turned
away, but on the occasion of what proved to be his last visit Gregory
had not a single thing left to give him. He was looking round his rough
cell in perplexity, when a messenger appeared bringing the silver
basin full of porridge which was the only food he allowed himself,
and which his mother sent him every day. Here was what was needed!
The next moment the needy sailor man was walking away with the hot
porridge and the silver porringer. What St. Silvia said when she heard
of the incident has not been recorded—but Gregory never gave the matter
another thought until one day, long after, when the importunate sailor
appeared to him in his true character, that of an angel of light,
and told him that God had taken note of his charity, and—an alarming
prophecy for the Saint—that he would be elected Pope and do great
things for the Church.

All he asked was to be left quiet in his monastery, where he was
putting his whole heart into living the life of a model monk. In his
ardour against himself, he carried his penances too far and fasted so
rigorously that he came near to dying—an imprudence for which he paid
ever after in broken health and in being debarred from fasting at all.
He complains pitifully of having to “drag about such a big body with
so little strength,” but this was the least of the trials that awaited
him.

In the year 577, when Gregory was about thirty-seven years of age, the
reigning Pope, Benedict I, sent for him and insisted upon making him
one of the Cardinal Deacons to whom was entrusted the jurisdiction of
the seven “Regions” into which the city was divided. Gregory protested,
but had to take on the charge, and from that time forward he belonged
less to himself than to others. He was too necessary and valuable to
be spared. The next year, Pope Benedict being dead, his successor,
Pelagius II, decided to send Gregory on a very difficult and important
mission to the Emperor Tiberius Constantinus at Constantinople, where
trouble of all kinds seemed to be brewing. Although Gregory bewails
this “thrusting out from port into the storm,” one cannot but feel how
the alert fighting spirit in the man leaps to the call. The born leader
may persuade himself that he is happiest in the seclusion he thinks
good for his soul, but when the call to arms comes, every repressed
fibre of his being wakes and cries for action.

When Gregory, taking with him several of his monks, sailed away from
Italy, he little dreamed that years were to pass before he should
return. On his arrival in Constantinople the first matter to claim his
attention was the ugly new heresy started by Eutychius, who had drawn
the Emperor and many others into the path of error by declaring that
there was to be no resurrection of the flesh. Gregory was politely
received by the Emperor, and instantly requested the latter to call a
conference in which the dogma should be discussed. Tiberius consented,
and there followed the famous conference in which Gregory’s fiery
eloquence and invincible logic quashed the heresy at once. When he had
finished speaking the Emperor commanded that a fire should be lighted,
and with his own hands, and in the presence of a vast concourse,
burnt the book which Eutychius had written to propound the heresy,
and declared himself now and for ever the faithful son of the Church.
Eutychius, touched to the heart by Gregory’s arguments, accepted
defeat and rebuke as but small punishment for his fault, and when he
was dying, soon afterwards, pulled up the skin of one poor emaciated
hand with the fingers of the other, and cried to those around him, “I
confess that in this flesh we shall rise from the dead.”

Gregory proved a successful ambassador in every way. The relations
between the Church and the imperial court had been badly interrupted by
the Lombard invasion, but he welded them smoothly and firmly together.
Tiberius died while Gregory was in Constantinople, and his successor,
Maurice, was badly disposed to the Church. Gregory brought him to a
better mind and obliged him to rescind an edict he had just issued
forbidding any member of the army to embrace the monastic life.

At last, after six years of what must have been the most anxious work,
requiring all that the great man had of wisdom and firmness and tact,
he returned to Italy—to find his beloved Rome in terrible distress from
a visitation of the pestilence. Gregory at once devoted himself to the
care of the sick and dying, and one can fancy how the poor people’s
eyes lighted up when he appeared among them again. Then the good Pope
Pelagius succumbed to the disease, and at once all eyes turned to
Gregory, who was unanimously elected as his successor.

   [Illustration: ST. GREGORY THE GREAT. Photo by Anderson, from
   the Statue in the Church of St. Gregory, Rome.]

Gregory was honestly horrified. He refused, he pleaded, he argued, but
no one would listen to him. Then he fled. Disguised as a peasant, he
slipped away and hid himself in a secret cave in the hills, entreating
the Lord to protect him from the awful honour which his fellow-citizens
wished to thrust upon him. They meanwhile were searching for him in
every direction, and would have failed in their quest had not Heaven
put itself visibly on their side. From very far off they beheld a tall
pillar of light resting before the fugitive’s cave—they rushed to it,
dragged him forth, and made him Pope. Seeing that his fellow-citizens
would not listen to him, he wrote to the Emperor Maurice, begging him
not to confirm the election, but the Romans intercepted the letter; the
Emperor was informed of the election in the usual way, and was only
too glad to give it the imperial sanction, still required then from
Constantinople.

For once the “Vox Populi” had proved itself what it never is nowadays,
the “Vox Dei,” and for fourteen years Gregory reigned, in virtue
and wisdom and glory, for the everlasting good of the people of God.
Every gift that Heaven had bestowed upon him vindicated its unerring
designs. He accomplished in those fourteen years so many wonderful
things that cold sense almost refuses its adherence to the visible
facts. His colossal labours for the Church gave us the Gregorian chant,
the Sacramentary of the Missal and the Breviary; his correspondence,
so vast that, like Napoleon and Julius Cæsar, he is supposed to have
dictated to several secretaries at once, embraces every point that
required treating of at home and abroad. His sermons, day after day,
instructed the ignorant in the plain truths of salvation while they no
less amazed and illuminated the minds of the most learned; and through
it all his soul was never disturbed from the calm heights of union with
God, his heart never closed to a single cry from the suffering and the
weary.

The much-abbreviated list of “some of his labours,” as the Breviary
puts it, would stagger the grasp of any modern scholar or ruler. In
a few lines he is shown to us “re-establishing the Catholic Faith
in many places where it had suffered, repressing the Donatists in
Africa, the Arians in Spain, expelling the Agnostics from Alexandria,
and refusing the ‘Pallium’ (the sign of pontifical investiture) to
Syagrius, the Bishop-elect of Autun, until he had turned the ‘heretic
Neophytes’[3] out of Gaul; quelling the audacity of John, the Patriarch
of Constantinople, who had dared to call himself the ‘Head of the
Universal Church,’ and so on, preaching, writing, praying, and through
it all suffering constantly and acutely.”

There is a legend to the effect that all these pains and sicknesses
had been voluntarily accepted in order to deliver a certain soul from
purgatory. The legend is only a legend, unsupported by the authority of
the Church—but it would have been just like St. Gregory to do it!

In every public or private trouble or upheaval, as well as in every
effort to reorganize and restore, his name, his presence is dominant.
After becoming Pope he lived chiefly at the Lateran palace, then the
official Papal residence, and they still keep there the narrow pallet
that served him for a bed, and—mark this, ye modern schoolboys!—the
little rod which he had to use to keep his dark-eyed, rampageous young
choristers in order!

The men who can govern others with the most unerring wisdom are often
entirely mistaken in their appreciation of themselves. Only the other
day the local and most successful Superior of a great missionary
order in America was bewailing his fate to me. “I told the Bishop he
was making a dreadful mistake in making me the Rector,” he declared,
“it is not my work—I was not intended to govern and lead! I am a born
free-lance—I want to travel all over the country seeking out the lost
souls. I am no good at anything else!”

But the Bishop knew better; and so it was with the great crowd
of clergy and laity who designated Gregory for the Papacy. What
he accomplished during his pontificate has been well summed up
by Montalembert: “Gregory, who alone amongst men has received, by
universal consent, the double surname of Saint and Great, will be an
everlasting honour to the Benedictine order, as to the Papacy. By his
genius, but especially by the charm and ascendancy of his virtue, he
was destined to organize the temporal power of the Popes, to develop
and regulate their spiritual sovereignty, to found their paternal
supremacy over the new-born crowns and races which were to become
the great nations of the future, and to be called France, Spain, and
England. It was he, indeed, who inaugurated the Middle Ages, modern
society, and Christian civilization.”

The task he undertook was a gigantic one, for on the one side he had to
contend with the exactions and oppressions of the corrupt and decrepit
Byzantine Emperors who were still the nominal rulers of Rome and his
own secular masters on the other, with the great new forces let loose
on the world in the increasing vigour and supremacy of the Lombards and
other northern nations, more than half barbarous still, but, as Gregory
clearly perceived, possessed of an intelligence and vitality which only
required training and instruction to grow into great new polities which
would replace the already dead Roman Empire.

To appreciate his labours one would have to read that colossal
correspondence which has fortunately been preserved entire. Beside the
mighty matters of Church and Empire which it sets forth, there shows
all through the most tender and minute care for the lower and therefore
unprotected classes, as well as for individual souls. Slavery, in every
form, excited Gregory’s generous indignation, and his most earnest
efforts were devoted to restoring slaves to the rank of human beings.
The peasants on the great estates were serfs—practically slaves. He
decreed that their marriages should be inviolable, their property their
own, their wills valid; that wherever possible the Church revenues
should be devoted to buying the freedom of slaves, and that never, on
any plea, should Christians be sold to Jews or pagans. At the same time
he enacted that neither Jews nor pagans should be baptized by force,
and commanded that the synagogues of the Jews should be restored to
them and that they should be allowed freedom of worship.

Always humble and diffident about asking anything for himself, it is
amusing to find him severely reprimanding a Bishop who had authorized
or permitted extortionate exactions to be practised against an obscure
farmer in Sardinia, and at the same time writing meekly to the overseer
of some ecclesiastical property in Sicily—a stud farm where were kept
four hundred stallions: “You have sent me one bad horse and four asses.
I cannot ride the horse, because it is bad, nor the asses, because they
are asses. If you would assist to sustain me, send me something that I
can use!”

But after all the special bond between St. Gregory and English-speaking
peoples lies in the memorable act by which England was evangelized,
after the Faith first planted there had been annihilated by the pagan
Barbarians, Saxons, Angles, Scandinavians, to whom she fell an easy
prey when Rome withdrew its protecting legions and abandoned her to her
fate.

It is rather sweet to know that it was the fair, innocent beauty of
a group of English children, standing, dazed and frightened, in the
market to be sold, that first touched his heart to such warm pity for
their country. He was then living as the Abbot of the community he had
founded on the Cœlian Hill, and enough has been said to show how happy
he was in his quiet life there.

It must have been some unusual necessity which took him far down
into the town on a certain day and through the noisy crowded slave
market. But on seeing the children, with their blue eyes full of tears
and their long golden hair shining in the sun, everything else was
forgotten; he stopped abruptly to ask who they were.

“Angles, from the isle of Britain,” was the answer, given indifferently
enough. The keeper knew that the big, dark-faced monk was not a
slave-buyer.

“Angles! They are born to be angels!” cried Gregory, and straightway
he flew to the Pope and besought permission to go with some of his
monks to Britain, to preach the Gospel. The Pope, taken by surprise,
consented; and before he had time to think over the matter, Gregory,
with his volunteers, had put three days of travelling between himself
and Rome. Then the news leaked out, and the people rose like one
man and rushed to the Pope, who was on his way to St. Peter’s, and,
arresting his progress, burst into indignant cries: “You have offended
St. Peter! You have ruined Rome in allowing Gregory to leave us!”

Pelagius saw his mistake and sent messengers in all haste to call
Gregory back. Of course he obeyed; he never forgot England, but it
was only in the sixth year of his own pontificate (596) that he could
carry out his design, and then he could not himself take part in the
expedition. He found a noble substitute in St. Augustine, and it must
have been with a glad heart that he sent him forth, and gave him and
his forty Benedictines the final blessing, as they knelt (so we are
told) on the grassy stretch below the steps of Gregory’s own convent
on the Cœlian Hill. The grass grows there still; still the green trees
shadow the enclosure called St. Gregory’s park, through which one
approaches the church, and still the flowers bloom in Silvia’s garden
where he played as a little boy. Even modern Rome has been loath to
encroach on the place so dear to him who loved Rome so much.

I have often wondered what became of the little English children he
saw, and seeing, loved. Surely he rescued them and placed them with
kind people to be cared for. His quick notice of them reminds one of
our own Pius IX, who could never pass an English child without stopping
to bless it, and, while blessing the child, to pray for England, whom
Augustine and his companions made “the Isle of Saints” and the “Dowry
of Mary.”

One more picture of St. Gregory must close this humble sketch of his
great life. As already related, after he had been elected Pope he
sent a letter to the Emperor Maurice, imploring him not to confirm the
decision of the people. And just then, as if jealous of all the good
work that was going forward, the Powers of Evil let loose a terrible
outbreak of the pestilence in Rome. They could not touch the spiritual
city—Rome invisible, the Sanctuary of the Faith—but the material
one seemed to be delivered into their hands, and terrible were its
sufferings. Poverty and neglect, and the ruin of ceaseless wars, had
made it vulnerable at every point; the pestilence had swept it again
and again, but this was the most frightful visitation of all. Gregory
and his monks, and many other charitable persons devoted themselves
to the sick and dying; the lazarets and hospitals were crowded—every
day with new sufferers as the dead were carried out; but it became
impossible to bury the dead fast enough. Neither prayer nor effort
seemed of any avail, and dull despair settled on all hearts. Apparently
this was to be the end.

Then Gregory instituted the first of those great processions which,
in moments of stress, have moved across the pages of history ever
since, aweing us a little by the whole-hearted faith and trust of our
ancestors in the mercy of Heaven. Gregory decreed that all, clergy
and laity, who could stand on their feet should put on the garments
of penitence and follow him through the stricken streets to pray at
the tomb of St. Peter. And all who could obeyed like one man. What a
sight that must have been when the Saint, “the strong, dark-faced man
of heavy build,” led his afflicted people from the “Mother of Churches”
at the Lateran Gate, down past all the ruined pomp of the Palatine and
the Colosseum and the Forum towards the river and the great Basilica of
Constantine beyond! How the response of the Major Litanies must have
thundered up from all those breaking hearts to the “skies of brass”
that hung over Rome! The ever-repeated “Te rogamus, audi nos!” and
“Libera nos, Domine,” even now bring tears to one’s eyes with their
almost despairing simplicity; _then_ they were the last appeals of a
crushed and ruined race for one more chance to repent and atone for its
heaped misdeeds.

And the chance was granted. As the endless procession moved along
towards St. Peter’s its leader paused before the Mausoleum of Hadrian,
that huge monument of pagan ambition, and raised his eyes and heart in
supplication, offering we know not what of his own life and destiny for
his people’s sins.

Suddenly he stood transfigured. The chanting ceased; all eyes followed
Gregory’s gaze, all ears were strained to catch the heavenly melody
that floated, high and clear, fresh as the song of birds at dawn, over
the sorrowing city.

    “Regina Cœli, laetare,
    Quia quem meruisti portare,
    Resurrexit, sicut, dixit!”

It was the chant of the Resurrection!

“Alleluia, Alleluia!” came the sequel in one burst from that great
multitude, as the angels’ voices grew fainter and were lost in the
depths overhead. And then, on hearts bursting now with relief and joy
there fell the awe that mortals feel in the presence of the Heavenly
Ones, for there, on the summit of the towering fortress, stood the
radiant archangel—and he was sheathing his flaming sword.

The pestilence was over. Once more God had had mercy on his people.
And, since the angels’ song was addressed to the Queen of Heaven, we
know that it was she whose prayers had stayed the arm that had clung
round her neck in Bethlehem.

St. Gregory passed to his reward on March 12, 604, having reigned
nearly fourteen years. The mourning city chose Sabinianus of Volterra
to succeed him, but only three years had elapsed when Sabinianus in
his turn made place for a Boniface (III) who lived but one year after
his election, and then came another Boniface, a Saint, a strong man of
the Abruzzi, and in his reign the world found out that though imperial
Rome was indeed dead, the Rome that Gregory and Benedict and their
fellow-workers had planted on her grave during that century of apparent
eclipse had taken root below and shot out branches above, and had
become as a mighty tree affording guidance, shelter, and sustenance to
the whole Christian world.

Each of the great Popes seems to have had a special mission to fulfil,
one that coloured all his acts and sheds its individual lustre on his
memory. No doubt or hesitation seems to accompany the acceptance and
fulfilment of it. Boniface’s mission bade him place the seal of visible
Christianity on the city and consecrate it to the Faith for all time.
To it was Boniface, the fourth of that name, who decreed and carried
out the triumph of which I spoke in a preceding chapter. But it is a
big subject and it must have a chapter to itself.



CHAPTER IV

MEMORIES OF THE PANTHEON


If you stand before San Pietro in Montorio and look down from the
spot where St. Peter was crucified, you will see, rounding up in the
low-lying heart of the city, a dome, white, huge, uncrowned, standing
out from the darker buildings round it like an enormous mother-of-pearl
shell, softly iridescent, yet, when storm is in the air, taking on a
grey and deathlike hue. That is the Pantheon, and thus it has stood,
reflecting every mood of the Roman sky, since the days of Hadrian, who
became Emperor in the year 117. Hadrian built the magic dome, but it is
not his name that stands out in the gigantic lettering on the pediment
over the portico. Ninety years before his time, Marcus Agrippa, the
intimate friend and (for his sins!) the son-in-law of Augustus, erected
a magnificent temple close to the Baths which still bear his name in
the Campus Martius, the field of which my brother has told the touching
story in “Ave Roma Immortalis.” Agrippa must have forgotten to properly
propitiate the gods; we moderns should say that he “had no luck,”
for his gorgeous temple was soon struck by lightning and presented a
forlorn appearance when Hadrian, that enthusiastic builder, decided to
restore it.

This he did on his usual princely scale; when he had done with it, the
Pantheon (properly “Pantheum,” “all-holy”) must indeed have dazzled the
eyes of the beholders, for the dome was entirely covered with tiles
of gilt bronze that under the rays of the sun made it seem a second
sun that had come to rest on earth. The gilt tiles were stripped off
in 663 by a greedy little Emperor, Constans II, who took them away to
Syracuse, whence the Saracens successfully looted them a few years
afterwards. So the thing that looks like mother-of-pearl is really
only covered with sheets of lead—but even lead, when the heavens have
looked on it long enough, may become a thing of life and beauty. When
Hadrian had finished his building there was nothing left of Agrippa’s
original one except the portico; but Hadrian, with rare moderation,
left the original founder’s name on that. The Pantheon, which is called
by archæologists “the most perfect pagan monument in Rome,” seems to
have been, in its beginnings, unfortunate, for only sixty-four years
after Hadrian’s death it again stood sadly in need of repair, if we
may believe the magniloquent inscription left on its front by Septimus
Severus and his son, Caracalla, when they had carried out their pious
designs of further restoration.

But it remains Hadrian’s best monument, substantially what he made it,
a vast and perfect round under a vast and perfect dome, a place where
the winds of heaven may sweep down from the central opening—thirty feet
across—overhead, and circle round the wide well of the interior and
rise to the sky again without having encountered the shock of a single
angle on their way. And for more than seventeen hundred and fifty
years the rain has fallen and the sun has shone, and the stars have
looked down on Hadrian’s pavement through the great opening, whence
worshippers now, like the worshippers in his time, could raise their
eyes and thoughts to the vault of heaven above.

But for two hundred years—as if to partly balance the three centuries
of persecution which had preceded them—the Pantheum was closed and
none were permitted to pray there, two hundred years during which the
silence was never broken, and stars and sun and winds had their way in
the stupendous empty fane. It was the Emperor Honorius of inglorious
memory who closed and sealed its bronze doors—the same that guard
it now (and perhaps this and a few other such acts, which showed him
at heart a sincere believer, should be remembered to his attenuated
credit), preferring to have it abandoned altogether rather than used
for the service of idols. And so it stood, a beautiful reproach, from
399 to 609, when our Pope Boniface told the Emperor Phocas that it
was a burning shame not to wash it of pagan stains and consecrate it a
church of the Lord.

Phocas—that blood-stained figure who emerges now and then to surprise
us by some memorable action—said the Pope was right, and gave him
the building to do with it as he liked. And then Boniface carried out
the great plan which must have been simmering in his brain for years.
The temple, built for the seven deities of the seven planets, was to
become the shrine of the bodies of the Saints and be consecrated to
the one True God, under the title of “St. Mary of the Martyrs.” Under
that perfect dome of exactly equal height and diameter (142 feet)
he would finally lay to rest all the sacred remains which were still
buried in the Catacombs all round the city. But there was much to do
first. The rich architectural disposition of the interior required no
alteration beyond the erection of a High Altar; the great window to
the sky Boniface would not close; when dust and rubbish were cleared
away the material preparations were over, but the tremendous ceremony
of purification and consecration had yet to be accomplished. For these
the illustrious predecessors of Boniface had been inspired to draw up
a ceremonial of such profound meaning and glorious diction as remains
matchless in the annals of the Liturgy.

We can only see it now with the eyes of the spirit, but, even while
trying to do that, we must not let the magnificence of the external
function make us forget that which the Church so lovingly and
repeatedly impresses upon us—first, that there is but one Sanctuary
_worthy_ of the Most High, His Throne and dwelling in the inaccessible
light of the Fixed Heaven, round which all universes that the human
mind can grasp revolve, like starry spindrift round a living sun; and,
secondly, that the home God has built for Himself on earth and loves
with the most passionate tenderness is the heart of the Christian,
where He will abide for time and eternity if it do not cast Him out.

The chief object of ecclesiastical architecture is to symbolize the
grandeur of the union between the soul and its Creator; as such, and as
the storehouse and dispensary of graces, the banqueting-hall where He
feeds us with Himself, the arsenal where He arms us for the combat and
trains us for His soldiers, where, in His surpassing love and mercy, He
deigns to remain in the adorable Eucharist, the consecrated Church is
the crown of human production, and rightly do we strain every nerve to
make it rich and noble and fair.

When that is done, and all that men can give has been lavished on
beautifying and enriching it, it has to be cleansed from every blemish
of earthy contact before it can be offered to the service of God. When
we wander through the Cathedrals of the world, Westminster Abbey,
Strasburg, Notre Dame, Milan, asking ourselves how mere men ever
attained to the production of such beauty and grandeur, do we ever stop
to think that those towering walls were washed from vault to pavement,
within and without, with holy oil, on the day of consecration?

The Cathedral was the symbol of the soul, and every act and prayer of
the ceremonial depicted for our fore-fathers—so well instructed in the
truths we first take for granted and then forget—the processes by which
God confers on us the gift of immortality. On the eve of the great day
all left the building, the new doors were closed, no step sounded on
the pavement, no voice might break the stillness of the place. It was
a dead thing waiting for life, as the soul that is not united to God
waits, under its inherited burden of sinfulness, for regeneration.

Outside the precincts a great tent has been erected, and here, all
through the night, the Bishop and his assistants have been praying the
prayers of David the great penitent. All night long the penitential
psalms have been going up, beseeching the Lord to wash away the sins
of His people, His exiles on earth who are waiting without the camp
and entreating Him to take them into grace and bring them to their
Father’s home. With the first faint light of dawn the prayers cease,
the supplicants arise, and the Bishop puts on his vestments, one by one
and with a special prayer for each, because he thus figures the Son of
God putting on the garment of our humanity. And because Christ, as man,
prayed to His Father and ours, the Bishop comes forth from the tent and
prostrates himself before the steps of the church in fervent prayer,
with all his clergy kneeling around him.

Now the natural soul is cold and blind, and closed to Grace; so the
church stands, unlighted and with fast-closed doors. And because the
Spirit of God is all gentleness and mercy, and condescends to most
patient stratagems to capture the heart He covets, the Bishop goes
three times round the great building, praying and knocking softly at
its doors, while the clergy follow him and pray too, as the angels pray
for us. At last the first barrier falls; the doors open, reluctantly
as it were. The Bishop crosses the threshold saying, “Peace eternal to
this House, in the Name of the Eternal.” The procession passes within,
the shadows swallowing up the gold and crimson of the vestments that
had been sparkling in the sun.

A strange sight the empty church presents now. On the pavement two
broad paths of ashes traverse its entire length and breadth, in the
form of a Greek cross. The assistants stand in silent groups while
the Bishop, slowly moving down from the apse to the entrance, and then
across from one transept to the other, traces in the ashes the Latin
and Greek alphabets with his crozier. Why? Because the first need of
the soul is instruction. “How shall they know except they first be
taught?” And since God will not take possession of a soul without its
own concurrence and consent, it must know Him before it receives Him.

Knowledge brings the desire for purification from sin, original or
actual; and now the church, the symbol of the soul, must be purified.
The Bishop mingles wine with water, to denote the Humanity and the
Divinity of Christ; to these he adds ashes to commemorate His death,
and salt as an emblem of His resurrection; the mystic flood is poured
in waves over the altar, and thence all down the pavement of the
church, while hundreds of acolytes scale the ladders placed against
the walls and the mystic liquid runs down them in glistening sheets
to mingle with the mimic ripples on the floor. Let it run. When it has
drained away the holy oil flows golden and fragrant over the carved and
gleaming walls, and pious hands are applying it to the exterior of the
building—sometimes even to its roof—in copious floods.

Now indeed the church is ready for its destiny, even as the Christian
emerges from Baptism ready for his God. The chants swell louder and
sweeter, the Alleluia rings out triumphantly from a thousand hearts,
the incense sends up its first perfumed spirals to hang among the
fretted arches of the deep vault; the sub-deacons approach the Pontiff
and offer for his blessing the rich vessels and vestments which are the
wedding presents of the Faithful to the new-born Bride of Christ—the
House is ready for the Master and His guests.

The guests are waiting still in the exiles’ tent, with Knights
and Prelates for their Guard of Honour. Such nobility could not be
entertained save in a spotless mansion. Their names? Oh, they had
many—Greek and Latin and Persian and Armenian—besides the “wonderful
new names” that had been given them in heaven, for these guests were
Holy Martyrs, and their relics were to be placed in the stone of
the High Altar, because the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass must always
be offered on them to-day, even as when the fervent yet trembling
Christian knelt before their tombs in the catacombs, and the doomed
priest asked the Lord to accept the sacrifice in honour of those whom
perhaps he had laid there an hour before.

Oh, the adorable continuity of the Church! In my eyrie in the Rockies,
one of the loneliest spots on earth, there came to my door quite
unexpectedly one summer evening—it was June 28—a missionary priest,
very tired. He had driven some hundred and fifty miles to get to us;
his game little horses, his buggy, his coat—everything about him was
covered with dust, but his eyes beamed with benevolence as he said,
“I have come to say Mass for you.” We could have kissed his feet. The
next morning, very early, in the sitting-room that was a bower of wild
flowers, my son and I knelt and watched him prepare the altar. From
his worn portmanteau the first thing he drew out was a square of white
alabaster of which the centre had been removed, replaced, and sealed
with a cross sunk into the stone. Very reverently he slipped it under
the white linen “corporal,” lighted the blessed candles on either
side—and began “Introibo ad altare Dei.”

   [Illustration: ROME. THE PANTHEON.]

The alabaster square contained relics of the Martyrs;—and our humble
home-made altar was, through them, His friends, as worthy of Him who
was about to descend upon it as the High Altar of St. Peter’s on that
morning of his Feast in Rome.


When St. Boniface cleansed and consecrated the Pantheon, he showed, in
the name he gave it, that it was to be the shrine of many valiant ones,
a shrine of which, more truly than of any of our battlefields, it could
be said:

    “On Fame’s eternal camping-ground
      Their silent tents are spread,
    And glory guards, with solemn round,
      The Bivouac of the Dead!”

But one almost doubts whether the Pontiff himself appreciated the
magnitude of the task he had undertaken. In person he went through
the many catacombs, for he was resolved that no smallest, humblest
hero of the Lord should miss his share of the final triumph. He had
had great cars prepared, decked with all possible richness, to convey
the precious remains, which had so long held the outposts of the city,
to the Pantheon in its very heart; but when he had gone through all
the dark, intricate passages of the underground cemeteries, tapping
at the walls and examining every atom of surface that might conceal
a once-proscribed tomb, I think his artificers must have had to build
more chariots for the returning army than they had expected, for it was
very great.

At last, however, all was ready. It was May 13, A.D. 609, and a
glorious morning, when the converging processions set forth, met, and
entered the city in triumph. The Pontiff in his splendid vestments
led the procession, swelled as it went along by all the inhabitants
of Rome. Long, serried ranks of prelates, priests, and monks followed
him, carrying tall lighted tapers that gleamed but faintly in the Roman
sun; the air was sweet with fragrances that grew stronger as the convoy
passed along the flower-strewn streets, and the perfume of hundreds of
censers swung up on the bright air. Rome was poor then, but the Romans
had still found blue and crimson tapestries to hang from the windows,
and every portico and window was crowded with eager onlookers who, as
the procession approached, took up the roar of welcome with which the
city greeted its dead.

But I think a hush fell when the dead came into sight at the turn of
the street or the entrance of the square, and the enormous cars moved
nearer, their dear terrible burden piled high above the sides, and
covered with silks and flowers through which here and there showed just
enough of a coffin’s outline to wring the heart and let loose a rain of
tears. “Twenty-seven great cars filled with the bones of the Martyrs
did Boniface the Pope bring to the Pantheum now consecrated to the
service of God and the honour of the Blessed Virgin.”

Truly may that splendid temple, open to the sky, claim its title
of “St. Mary of the Martyrs,” and rightly did the Pontiff and his
followers, as they brought them in, raise the triumphal shout, “The
Saints shall rejoice in their beds! Arise, ye friends of God, and enter
into the glory He has prepared for His elect!”


After all these great names it seems strange to have to record a
very humble one, that of a poor working-man, in connection with the
Pantheon, but I can never pass the famous church without remembering
a certain Giovanni Borgi whose memory was held in great benediction in
Rome in my young days.

During the preceding century the city was really in a fairly peaceful
and prosperous condition, but the many institutions of charity
which flourished under Gregory XVI and Pius IX had not reached the
point where they could provide night refuges for its many waifs and
vagrants. There were numbers of poor boys—street Arabs, as we should
call them—who wandered about in the daytime, earning a little here
and there, but subsisting chiefly on charity and having no fixed
dwelling-place of any kind. To these the broad steps and portico of the
Pantheon offered at least shelter from the weather, and they used to
gather there in crowds after dark, and sleep—as boys can sleep—on the
stones.

Now there was in Rome, towards 1780 or thereabouts, a poor mason
called Giovanni Borgi. He belonged to the “opera di San Pietro”—that
is, he was one of the workmen engaged for life by the administration
of St. Peter’s for the maintenance and repair of the Basilica, the
Vatican Palace and its many dependent buildings. The “opera” was a
close corporation and included artisans of every necessary craft, from
mosaic workers to bricklayers, plumbers, and carpenters. Of course
the privileges were largely hereditary, the Italian traditions of
Guilds leading the son to follow the trade or profession of his father
whenever possible, but high character and a blameless record were also
indispensable qualifications for every appointment.

Giovanni Borgi, though poor and almost illiterate, had worked all his
life in the holy places and was regarded by his fellows as very nearly
a saint. While he worked he prayed, and when working hours were over he
went regularly to the great Hospital of Santo Spirito in the “Borgo”
and sat up late into the night nursing the sick and comforting the
dying. The only reproach ever addressed to him was that he sometimes
got sleepy over his work the morning after some unusually long vigil
by the bedside of some sufferer who had entreated him to remain with
him. Everybody loved the queer little man, and he loved all the world
but himself. To this person he never gave a thought. Heaven had made
him short and stumpy—but he could walk as well as the youngest; he had
but one eye—but its sight was perfect; a funny bald head—but somebody
had given him an old wig to cover it with; what was there to complain
about? So, being empty of itself, his heart had room for others, and he
took his fellow-beings’ wants and sufferings very seriously.

One evening, before going to the hospital, he was accompanying a
religious procession through the streets, when he noticed the dark
forms of a little crowd of sleepers on the steps of the Pantheon.
Coming nearer, he found that they were boys of various ages, ragged
and forlorn, huddled together for warmth, and sound asleep. A little
farther on, under the tables where fowls were sold in the daytime,
more of these waifs had taken refuge. The sight grieved the good mason
deeply. He could not pass on and leave them thus. Rousing some of them,
he asked many questions and learnt that not one of them had a home or
a guardian. Orphans, runaway boys from the hill villages, waifs of
one sort and another—here was one of those collections of abandoned
children who would later become criminals unless some kind hand were
stretched out to save them. Giovanni did not hesitate for a moment. He
bade the little crowd follow him to his lodging. There was one of those
great ground-floor rooms only used for storing properties or cattle—no
Roman will sleep near the ground if he can help it, for fear of
fever—and in this barn-like place Giovanni bestowed his ragged guests
after giving them whatever he could beg or buy for their supper.

I do not think he went to the hospital at all that night. I fancy
he sat long in the brick-floored room, staring at the three wicks of
the “lucerna” and begging Heaven to show him what to do next. In the
morning he had to let his flock out, promising them some supper if they
would come back at nightfall, and exhorting them to be good meanwhile.
The poor little creatures needed no second invitation and turned up
faithfully, their numbers swelled by others to whom they had spoken
of their good luck. Giovanni saw that he would soon have a community
on his hands, and went to tell some priests, who were his friends,
that he must be helped to teach and govern as well as to maintain the
forsaken children. For their food—breakfast and supper—he begged, and
the kind-hearted neighbours responded generously. His first care was to
teach them the catechism, sitting among them in the evening and getting
them to talk about themselves; he also taught them what little he knew
of reading and writing; but it hurt him sorely to turn them out to face
all the temptations of the streets during the daytime.

Very soon the priests and some other charitable persons raised money
to rent a part of an old palace, somewhat in ill repair, but providing
luxurious quarters in comparison to the church steps and the fowl
market. The priests offered to devote their evenings to teaching the
boys, and found their efforts well rewarded, for the waifs, under
the kind, firm rule of old Giovanni, were eager to make the best
of their wonderful new advantages. He very soon solved the question
of occupation during the daytime by placing them out in a number of
workshops, where they could learn useful trades and earn something
towards their own maintenance. He sent them out in the morning, giving
each a loaf of bread to take with him for dinner; then he went to his
own work at St. Peter’s. During the dinner hour he would rush round
from one workshop to another to see that his “children” were behaving
themselves and that none had played truant. Then in the evening he
would go and fetch those of whose steadfastness he had any doubts, and
by nightfall the whole big family was safely housed in the corner of
the old Palazzo.

Whatever they had earned during the day had to be rendered up to “Tata
Giovanni” (Daddy John), as they had come to call him, and very dearly
they came to love their queer, kind protector. Old people used to
describe his taking them all out to Villa Borghese on holidays, and
said it was wonderful to see the old fellow flying round, playing ball
with the rest, his wig all awry and his mighty laugh showing how happy
he was with his children.

His good work had found friends and supporters from the beginning,
and being brought to the notice of Pius VI, the pontiff bought the
Palazzo Ruggia as a permanent home for it, and constituted himself its
chief protector. Thus encouraged, Tata Giovanni started on a crusade
which had for its object nothing less than the reclamation of all the
good-for-nothing boys in Rome! He used to seek them out and follow them
up, and if persuasion proved unavailing the dogged old man would seize
them by the arm and march them off to his “Asilo” without more ado.
Vagrancy, mendicancy, gambling roused his ire to such an extent that
his name became a terror to all youthful evil-doers, and they would fly
at the mere mention of it.

Life at the Asilo was conducted on lines of military precision. The
youngsters rose early, heard Mass, got a good breakfast, and marched
away to their work, where, as I have said, their guardian looked in on
some of them—and they never knew which it would be—during the course of
the day. When the Ave Maria rang they all came home, and as they passed
into the house, Tata Giovanni stood at the door with a bag in his hand,
and into this they had to drop their earnings—not a baiocco was to be
spent on the way or kept back!

Then came the lessons, followed by the rosary, and supper, this last
the crown of the day for the tired, healthy young people. The old
ideals still found many followers in those days, and it was not at all
unusual to see some great Cardinal “gird himself with a towel” and
trot humbly a score of times between the kitchen and the refectory
to wait on the boys. There were a hundred of them by this time, and
great was Daddy John’s preoccupation as to their morals. Long inured to
shortening his hours of sleep, he would pace the dormitories all night
long to see that all was as it should be, only sleeping himself for a
short hour in the morning; and certainly Heaven blessed his efforts,
for as years went on, and his waifs grew old enough to go out into the
world on their own account and others took their places, not one that I
ever heard of brought discredit on his education.

The sick at the hospital were not forgotten amid all these new labours
and responsibilities; Tata Giovanni (no one ever called him anything
else) went to them whenever he could, and when he could not he would
send some of the older boys in his place, thus teaching them the lesson
which had been the moral of his whole life—that no one must live for
himself alone, and that the poorest and most ignorant can always find
some sufferer to cheer and console. He died at last, the good, humble
old workman, fifteen years after he had strayed from the procession to
inspect the ragged sleepers on the steps of the Pantheon. He passed
away on June 28, 1798. The whole city mourned for him, and his boys
were broken-hearted. His work of love had become a public institution,
and, incorporated with another of the same kind, lived till a few years
ago, when it was swept aside and swallowed up with hundreds of other
beneficent foundations in the “indiscriminate brigandage” of Rome’s
latest rulers.

Several years after Tata Giovanni’s death a young gentleman of noble
birth, who came from Sinigaglia, was appointed the director of the
Asilo. It was not a distinguished appointment by any means; of course
no salary was attached to the position—it was not till the recent
laicization of charity that any but unpaid volunteers attended to the
wants of the poor in the Eternal City. That made no difference to this
handsome young man, for he came of a wealthy family, but his father,
who had had great ambitions for his son, was by no means pleased to
see him buried in an orphan asylum. The young man himself was suffering
under great despondency. He desired with all his heart to be a priest,
but his health was so bad that the Bishop did not think it wise to
ordain him. As a child he had suffered a severe shock from falling
into the water and narrowly escaping drowning, and ever since his
early youth he had suffered from sharp attacks of epilepsy, terrible
in themselves and yet more terrible in the constant dread that hung
over their victim, who never knew when he might be struck down by the
fearful visitation.

Very gladly did Giovanni Maria Mastai-Ferretti of Sinigaglia accept the
charge of the Asilo which he had already constantly visited as a helper
and instructor. And here, for four years, he who was to become Pius
IX lived with the orphans, subsisted on their rough fare and devoted
all his powers to making forsaken lads into good Christians and useful
citizens. Workshops were now installed in the Asilo itself, and the
higher arts went hand in hand with humble trades, each boy’s talent and
inclinations being carefully observed and consulted.

Many good artists and good workmen were given to the world by the
orphanage which had such humble beginnings, but for many of us
its chief interest lies in its connection with the Pope, to whom
it furnished the first opportunity of developing those gifts of
organization and command that later served humanity so well. Here he
waited, a humble postulant on the threshold of the priesthood; here
he prayed, as we know, those fervent, almost heart-broken prayers that
God would remove the infirmity which darkened his life and barred his
way to the Altar; it was to his little room in the Asilo that he was
brought back one night, apparently dying, having been struck down by
one of those fearful attacks in the street. From here he used to go,
day after day, to one or another of the city’s holy places to pray
for relief or resignation; from here he started on the pilgrimage to
Loreto, where the first light broke across the darkness and he received
the divine assurance that his prayers were heard, that the affliction
was about to pass away.

It was, finally, in the little Church of San Giuseppe dei Falegnami
(St. Joseph of the Carpenters) close to the Orphanage of Tata Giovanni,
that he said his first Mass, on Easter Sunday, April 11, 1819. It was
a very quiet affair, only a few near relations and his beloved orphans
assisting at it. His uncle Paulinus, who was a Canon of St. Peter’s
and who had been his tutor in sacred studies, stood beside him all
through, for the Pope had only consented to the young man’s ordination
on condition that he would never celebrate the Holy Mysteries unless
accompanied by another priest. This command the Pontiff rescinded soon
afterwards at Father Mastai’s earnest request. He felt assured that
his malady would trouble him no more, and Pius VII, in reply, said,
“I also believe that, my son.” From that moment, during his long and
eventful life, Giovanni Maria Mastai never suffered from any recurrence
of the attacks which had, to outward seeming, saddened so many years
of his life, but in reality had preserved and prepared him for his true
vocation.



CHAPTER V

EARLY LIFE OF FATHER MASTAI


Nearly a hundred years have passed since the day when the young priest
who was to be the best loved and the worst hated man in Europe said
his first Mass, and Time’s heavy wings have already blurred his memory
in their flight, to a fading outline for the present generation. Very
few now know anything about his early years, and in the story of them
the finger of God is so clear that it seems to be worth while to make a
brief record of the steps by which he was prepared for the burdens and
honours of his Pontificate. In reading about his childhood one seems
to be carried back not one, but many centuries, so sharply does it
contrast with the ideals placed before children in these latter days.
It seems to be a road on which there is no returning, but there can be
no harm in glancing back at it for a moment.

It was on May 13, 1792, that Pius IX was born, in the Umbrian seaport
of Sinigaglia, in the Papal States. His father, Count Mastai-Ferretti,
was the descendant of a long line of noblemen who had come thither
from Crema in Lombardy towards the end of the fourteenth century.
Home-loving but public-spirited men they had been, and for a long time
their fellow-citizens had confided to them the chief interests of the
town, one of the family always filling the office of Mayor, which had
thereby become practically hereditary, to the advantage and convenience
of all concerned. So Count Mastai was Mayor of his native city at the
time that his youngest son came to make the eighth in the house already
filled with the laughter and play of three sons and four daughters.

The mother of this large family was Caterina Solazzo, one of those
noble ladies of whom there were yet so many in Italy when I was
a child—a woman of high education and devout soul, who saw in her
maternal duties the highest honour to which woman could aspire, and
fulfilled them with whole-hearted joy and ardour. That meant work
such as the modern woman, who thinks she is an example to toilers for
the benefit of the race, would shrink from; the Countess had to rise
very early so that she should be the first to approach her children’s
bedsides when the rising sun woke the nursery to the frolic and
laughter of a new day, and from that moment till all were tucked up and
asleep at night she never let them out of her sight. The first words
they had ever spoken were the Holy Names, the first conscious movement
of each baby hand had been trained to make the sign of the Cross.

They were all good and happy children, and the mother-heart prayed
and watched and taught, doubtless forming noble plans for all; but
as the youngest grew older his sweetness and goodness filled her with
the hope that he might be called to the special service of God. Even
as a tiny child his charity was of the alert, all-embracing kind that
generally spells saintship in the end; toys, sweets, money—the little
boy always found poor children to bestow them upon, and would beg
from his protégés when his own stores were exhausted. Naturally of a
particularly cheerful and sociable disposition—as indeed he remained
all his life—yet he pondered much on the stories he heard, and took
things to heart in a way very unusual for a child of his age.

All devout and loyal subjects of the Papacy were grieving at that time
over the trials inflicted by Napoleon on Pius VI, kept a prisoner far
from his own dominions, and subjected to many insults and privations.
The Countess one evening told her son that he must pray for the Holy
Father, thus suffering at the hands of wicked men. The child was deeply
impressed; he obeyed, and prayed with tears for the Pope, and then,
in his young logic, proposed to pray for the prompt punishment of his
persecutors. Great was the surprise of the ardent little champion when
his mother pointed out that that would be wrong—he must pray for their
conversion instead!

Giovanni Maria was about ten years old when, romping about the ground
of his father’s country house, he fell into a pond and was nearly
drowned. At first the accident seemed to have had only slight effects,
but the malady which showed itself a little later, and from which he
suffered so long, was, probably with reason, ascribed to that cause. It
was a great sorrow to his father, who was bent upon his son’s entering
the army, a desire which the boy was ready to satisfy through filial
sentiment, but which went contrary to all his own wishes and to those
of his mother. He was sent to an ecclesiastical school, of course—no
other could be thought of then for a gentleman’s son—and, in spite of
bad health, worked hard and attained much distinction. As he grew up,
tall, handsome, and brilliantly intelligent, his father repeatedly
applied for a commission in the Noble Guards for him, but Prince
Barberini, then the chief authority in the Papal army, sternly refused
to grant it, saying that an officer subject to epileptic attacks would
be a danger to himself and others.[4]

By the time he was seventeen it was fairly clear to all that he could
never be a soldier, a relief to him and his mother, though a terrible
disappointment to the old Count. They had already brought him to Rome,
and under the care of his Uncle Paulinus, a Canon of St. Peter’s,
he worked assiduously at his theological studies, always hoping and
praying that the strange malady which had kept him out of the army
would not, in the end, keep him out of the Church.

Those early years in Rome were illuminated with the crowning joy of
seeing Pius VII return in triumph to the Throne of St. Peter, an event
which threw the Romans, gentle and simple, into a state of delirious
joy. Pius VI had died in captivity at Valance, on August 29, 1799; his
successor, Cardinal Chiaramonti, was elected at Venice (Rome being
in the hands of the French) on March 16, 1800, and on July 3 of the
same year, the French having been expelled from the Papal States by
the Neapolitans and Austrians, the new Pope, who had taken the name of
Pius VII, came back to his own. Everybody believed that once more “the
Church would have peace”; Napoleon, whose genius realized that there
was no governing a nation of atheists, had restored Religion to her
public place, and was preparing, by the Concordat, to harmonize Church
and State as far as the times would allow.

But the Napoleon whose unerring eye showed him the necessity of
religion for mankind had counted without the other Napoleon, whose
towering ambition demanded the sacrifice of all other claims to itself.
With his coronation as Emperor, all barriers seemed to break down; the
Pope was to become his submissive vassal or cease to reign. His demands
became more imperious and unreasonable every day, and reached the
limit of arrogance when he decided that the centre of Christendom was
to be transferred to Avignon: France was to enjoy that glory instead
of Italy, and the Pope, no longer an independent sovereign, was to
rule the Church for the advantage and according to the caprices of the
Emperor.

This proposition was first made soon after the election in Venice, when
Napoleon had brought the Pope to Paris to crown him in Notre Dame. Pius
VII replied, in an outburst of righteous indignation, that rather than
so degrade his office he would resign it, and cause another election
to be carried through; Napoleon could then do as he pleased with the
obscure Benedictine monk who would be left on his hands!

Surprised at his firmness, the Emperor yielded for the moment and
permitted him to return to Rome, but, amidst all the rejoicings with
which he was greeted, the good Pope’s heart was heavy. He knew the
character of his adversary too well. On the day of his coronation,
at the foot of the altar, Napoleon had solemnly sworn to uphold and
protect the Church. Immediately afterwards had come the insulting
proposal to transfer the seat of her government to his own dominions.
Who could say what he would do next?

That question did not long wait for its answer. The notion of having
the Papacy established at Avignon was too alluring to be renounced.
Again and again was it put forward, each time accompanied by some
outrageous demand. The Pope was informed that he was to close all
the Roman ports to British vessels; that he was to declare war (!)
on Great Britain; that he was to annul the marriage of Jerome, the
Emperor’s brother, with a Protestant lady in America; and so on. And
always Pius VII replied by his quiet “non possumus” (“we cannot”). Then
the great break came. The Emperor permitted himself an outburst of
temper in which all considerations of policy and decency were thrown
to the winds. On May 13, 1809, the trembling world was informed that
the States of the Church had become part of the French Empire. On June
10 all the Pope’s insignia in Rome were torn down and replaced by the
heraldic _réchauffé_ which now represented the arms of France; Rome was
elevated to the dignity of being proclaimed “a free French city!”

The outraged Pontiff responded by laying the usurper and his supporters
under the major excommunication; and then came the crowning atrocity,
the one which Napoleon, a contrite prisoner in St. Helena, called the
beginning of his own downfall.

In the darkness of a soft summer night the Vatican was surrounded by
French troops, and General Radet, sickly frightened at the task laid
upon him, made his way with a detachment of soldiers to the Pope’s
bedroom. The horrified attendants in the corridors and ante-rooms were
forcibly silenced, and Pius VII was roused from his sleep by the sudden
entrance of this sinister company. He was a brave man, and, although
it seemed only too probable that they had come to murder him, he lost
neither his nerve nor his dignity. He asked them what the errand was
which caused them thus to transgress on the rules of respect. At first
the general and his aides stood dumb, trembling with fear before the
helpless old man. At last Radet found his tongue and delivered his
master’s orders. The Pope was to rise at once and come downstairs,
where a coach was waiting to take him into France. The instructions
were that he was to be taken by force if he resisted, but so great
was the awe inspired by his sacred person that even in pronouncing the
arrest Radet could not bring himself to touch his victim.

There was no question of physical resistance. Gathering courage from
the Pontiff’s calm demeanour, Radet gave him a few minutes to put
on his clothes, and then hurried him downstairs surrounded by the
soldiers. Only two attendants were allowed to follow him. He was
hustled into the coach; mounted guards closed in on every side, and the
party galloped at full speed out of the Porta del Popolo, heading for
the north.

By this time the people had learnt what was happening, and they came
out in crowds and ran beside the coach entreating with tears and sobs
that their Father might not be taken away from them. The Pope blessed
them from the carriage window as he was whirled along; soon all the
mourning crowd was left behind, but at each town that he passed through
in his dominions the same heart-rending scenes were renewed. His
captors dared not pause—some attempt at a rescue might yet snatch him
from their grasp—and it was only when they reached Grenoble that they
stayed their flight. From there he was transferred to Savona, where he
passed three melancholy years of captivity; when Napoleon was preparing
to start on the Russian campaign he brought the Pope to Fontainebleau
for safer keeping, and there Pius VII remained for nearly two years
more.

The first care of the allies after the taking of Paris on March 31,
1814, was to officially reinstate the Pope in his temporal sovereignty,
and secure it from future molestation, but Pius VII was even then
approaching his own frontier.

After Leipsic and the train of disasters which marked the close
of 1813, Napoleon had informed his prisoner that he was free to go
whither he chose. But it was not until January 25 following that the
preparations for his journey were sufficiently completed for the Pope
to leave Fontainebleau, and then, worn out with suffering of mind and
body, he had to travel by stages of only a few miles at a time and
to rest for long periods on the way. He finally reached Rome in May
of that year, a few weeks after Napoleon had signed his abdication at
Fontainebleau. Then for Napoleon came Elba—the hundred days—the short
triumph, the irrevocable eclipse, and the five years at St. Helena.
“Qui mange du Pape en meurt.”

I used to have among my possessions a number of old coloured drawings,
the original designs for the decorations put up in Rome for the
return of Pius VII. It was a triumph not decreed by politicians,
but a spontaneous outburst of overwhelming joy. For five years the
entire government of the Church had been suspended; not once had the
Pontiff been allowed to make his voice heard in her affairs. There is
something strangely sinister in that silence, during which no Bishops
were appointed, and not a single line was added to the ecclesiastical
archives. The fear and depression that weighed down Catholic hearts
were indescribable, and the relief when the cloud lifted almost too
overwhelming to be borne. The Papal States had suffered much during
those years, and the Pope’s own city worst of all. Business was at a
standstill; more than a third of the population had migrated elsewhere,
preferring exile to the tyranny of the French rule. Those who remained
were frightfully impoverished by heavy taxation and by the general
paralysis of commerce which Napoleon’s wars and blockades had brought
not only on Italy, but on the whole of Europe.

The populations turned out _en masse_ to meet their sovereign as he
travelled home, and as he neared Rome many nobles who had retired to
their estates came to accompany him on the last stages of his journey.
Among these were Count Mastai-Ferretti and his son, Giovanni Maria,
now eighteen years of age. The event made a profound impression on
the young man. As a child he had wept and prayed for the Holy Father
in his captivity; through the first years of his youth the thought
of Pius VII, a helpless prisoner, had ever been present to his mind,
and many a fervent prayer had gone up for his sovereign’s and his
country’s deliverance. Now it had come, and to him, not yet illuminated
with knowledge of the future, as well as to all those around him, it
seemed as if all trouble were passed away, and the sun that shone so
gloriously on that 24th of May, when the people took the horses from
the Pope’s carriage and themselves dragged it through the rejoicing
streets, were but an earnest of unbroken peace and happiness to come.

Rome had seen many festivals, but none so spontaneously, madly joyful
as this. From every window floated crimson and blue silk draperies rich
with gold; the thousands of balconies were wreathed in flowers, and the
vast procession moved along in a rain of roses and lilies and violets
showered from above; music was everywhere, but it was drowned in the
shouts and hosannas of the multitude that had gone out to meet the
traveller with palms in their hands and now thronged the way before,
beside, behind him. The women were weeping for joy and audibly thanking
God for this great day; a hundred thousand persons knelt to receive his
blessing, and many, many of them must have remembered how they knelt
to receive it last, as the coach was whirled along the highway in the
summer’s dawn and the weeping supplicants just caught a glimpse of the
pale face and the blessing hand as it flashed by.

   [Illustration: PIUS THE NINTH. From a portrait taken soon
   after his election to the Papacy in 1846.]

Every town in the dominions had raised its triumphal arches, gathered
all its flowers for his progress, but Rome surpassed them and all the
records of herself that day. The “Te Deum” was sung in all the churches
as it had never been sung before; Rome’s thousand bells rang as if
they would never cease; and when darkness fell, St. Peter’s gathered
the stars to itself, and the magic dome, a hive of breathing gold,
glowed through the night, a beacon of joy to the dwellers in a hundred
mountain towns of Sabina and Latium and all the country round.

Thirty-two years were to elapse before the youth kneeling beside his
father to receive the Pope’s blessing, on that day, would himself
ascend the Papal Throne, but strange to say, Pius VII himself had
already foreseen the event. Pius IX had been reigning for some years
when, through the merest accident, the written prophecy was discovered.
Pius VII, while a prisoner at Fontainebleau, one day handed to his
body-servant a sealed packet, saying that it was not to be opened until
1846. The man religiously regarded the prohibition, and put the packet
away carefully. Before his own death he gave it to his son, repeating
the Pope’s instructions. 1846 was still far off, and the son laid the
thing aside and had forgotten all about it when the year in question
came round. Having occasion, however, to look through a number of old
papers, he came across this, and broke the seal. Inside, in Pius VII’s
handwriting, were these words, “The prelate who fills the office of
Bishop of Imola in 1846 will be elected Pope and will take the name of
Pius IX.”

Another prophecy, that of the venerable servant of God, Anna Maria
Taigi, uttered in 1823, is very full and clear. After describing
minutely the revolution of 1848 and all the sufferings that Rome
and its ruler would undergo at that time, she added, “The Pope whose
destiny this is, is now a simple priest and far beyond the sea.” After
minutely describing the personal appearance of Pius IX, she continued:
“He will be elected in a very unusual way and contrary to his own
and general expectation. He will inaugurate many wise reforms which,
if gratefully and wisely accepted by the people, will bring great
blessings upon them. His name will be honoured throughout the world.”
She spoke much of the great trials that he was to undergo in defence
of the Church, and of the special assistance Heaven would give him to
sustain them, and also of the gift of miracles which would be bestowed
on him during the latter years of his life. All that came to pass
precisely as the Saint foretold, and the present generation seems to
be seeing the beginning of the fulfilment of her closing prophecy: “At
last, after many and varied trials and humiliations, the Church shall
achieve, before the eyes of the world, such a glorious triumph that men
will be struck silent with awe and admiration.”

The famous prophecy of St. Malachy, the Archbishop of Armagh, who died
at Clairvaux in the arms of his friend St. Bernard, in 1148, designated
the title of Pius IX as “Crux de Cruce”—“Cross of a Cross”—and
certainly that prediction, supposed to refer to the Cross of Savoy, was
fulfilled!

Anna Maria Taigi’s mention of a “simple priest then beyond the sea”
refers to the mission to Chile, undertaken by Pius IX when he was as
yet only Father Mastai, the director of Tata Giovanni’s orphanage.
It is an episode of his history so generally forgotten that it seems
worth while to recall it briefly to the minds of Catholic readers. The
Republic of Chile was just five years old—it concluded its victorious
struggle with Spain for independence in 1818—when the Government sent
a respected prelate, Canon Cienfuegos, to Rome, to ask Pius VII to
reorganize ecclesiastical matters in Chile, where everything had been
left in a very unsatisfactory condition after the separation from the
Mother Country.

Pius VII gladly complied with the request. The mission would require
delicate handling, and he singled out a diplomatist prelate, Monsignor
Muzi, then Auditor of the Nunciatura at Vienna, for its accomplishment.
In order that his rank should be consonant with its dignity Monsignor
Muzi was made Archbishop of Philippi, and then appointed Vicar
Apostolic of Chile. He asked that Father Mastai might accompany him as
Auditor, a post corresponding to that of “Conseiller d’Ambassade” in a
secular embassy; and another well-known ecclesiastic, Father Sallusti,
was named as the secretary.

Long years afterwards one of the “boys” described the last evening of
Father Mastai at the Asilo. He had as yet said nothing to them of his
approaching departure, but at supper they noticed that he seemed very
sad. When the meal was over and they were about to leave the table,
he motioned to them to sit down again, as he had something to say
to them. Then he told them that the next day he must leave them, to
travel far away on the business of the Church. There were a hundred and
twenty boys, big and little, in the hall, and there broke from them one
simultaneous cry of grief. Sobbing and wailing they threw themselves
upon him, the little ones climbing up into his arms and clinging to his
knees, others catching at his garments as if to hold him back by force,
and those who could not reach him through the press lifting up their
voices in supplication that the “Caro Padre” would not leave them.

The father wept too as he caressed and embraced the _piccolini_, and
when at last he tore himself away and shut himself up in his room, a
number of the older boys broke in and insisted on staying with him all
night. The dear patient man did not resent thus being robbed of his
rest; he let them have their way, and talked to them long and earnestly
of their present duties and their future lives. He would return some
day, and how eagerly he would inquire for every one by name, how
rejoiced he would be at a good report, how immeasurably grieved at a
bad one.

With the dawn he had to leave them, and, as the narrator said, “We were
orphans more than ever before.”

Great as was the grief of “Tata Giovanni’s” boys on losing their
beloved Director, it did not equal the despair and indignation of
Countess Mastai when she learnt that her son had been picked out for a
journey which was full of perils and hardships so late as twenty years
ago, and in those early days was veritably appalling.

To the ardent young priest, this fact had only added to the readiness
he felt in carrying out the Pope’s wishes; he asked nothing better than
to suffer in such a cause, but his mother, without saying anything to
him, flew to Cardinal Consalvi, then Secretary of State, and implored
that the appointment might be cancelled. Pius VII, however, refused
to yield to her entreaties, and when Father Mastai came to receive his
final blessing before departing, he told him of the Countess’s request
and added “I assured her that you would return safe and sound.”

The embassy was to embark at Genoa, and it was there, while waiting
for the final preparations to be made, that its members received the
sad news of the death of Pius VII. This caused delay, and it was only
after the election of Leo XII and his confirmation of Archbishop Muzi’s
powers that the mission finally sailed from Genoa, on October 5, 1823.
Ninety years ago! The world has shrunk since then; the voyage that
I made in 1885 in three weeks took Monsignor Muzi and his companions
three months to accomplish.

The “good barque _Eloïse_,” manned by “thirty experienced seamen,” had
been chartered for the expedition, but one’s heart aches to think of
what those three good ecclesiastics must have suffered in one way and
another on board of her. Very few Italians of their class are good
sailors, and all the horrors of sea-sickness were certainly theirs,
combined with the unsavoury and unwholesome food that was all people
had to depend upon during sea-journeys before the discovery of steam
and cold storage. Storm after storm broke over the little vessel; she
was nearly wrecked off Teneriffe; one dreadful night, November 5, she
was waylaid by pirates, who overhauled her from stem to stern seeking
for plunder, and only abandoned her—in furious disgust—when Father
Mastai had shown them that there was not a single article of value
on board. Then came a sad encounter with a Brazilian slave-trader,
packed with unfortunate negroes, a sight most grievous and terrible to
the kind-hearted priests; and then, after two long months’ sailing, a
fearful storm which lasted eight days, during which the _Eloïse_ was so
beaten about that no one hoped to escape alive. It was all a searching
dispensation for quiet, stay-at-home Italian gentlemen who had followed
their pious way hitherto along the most familiar lines!

They reached Monte-Video on New Year’s Day, 1824, stopped a few days
for repairs, and made Buenos Ayres soon after, their joy at finding
themselves on terra firma much tempered by the extremely rude reception
accorded to them by the civil authorities. But Buenos Ayres was merely
the starting-point for the most difficult part of the journey, the
crossing of the Andes. Had the good Countess Mastai-Ferretti had the
slightest idea of what her cherished son was to encounter there, I
believe she would have died of anxiety before his return! I only met
one or two Europeans, when I was in Chile, who had accomplished the
feat, and they told me that nothing would induce them to attempt it
again.

I have described some of the terrors of the passes in former works,[5]
and will not enlarge upon them here. Suffice it to say that for two
whole months Monsignor Muzi and Fathers Sallusti and Mastai rode
through those appalling solitudes, over the bridle paths cut in the
face of the rock that towers thousands of feet above and sinks sheer
down thousands of feet below, paths where one false step means death,
and so narrow in some places that if two parties meet it is usual for
them—if they are not the fighting sort—to decide on the spin of a coin
which shall dismount, pitch its mules over the precipice and crawl past
the winners as best they can—to continue the journey on foot!

The resting-places are even now the haunts of outlaws and robbers.
The members of the Roman embassy of 1824 only escaped being murdered
_en masse_ because, through some unforeseen occurrence, they changed
the time of their departure from a hamlet called Desmochadas. Had they
waited till the hour first fixed upon, they would have shared the fate
of a party of merchants who, on that day, were massacred, to a man,
by a band of robbers. It was Father Mastai who discovered—and stayed
behind to take care of—a sick English officer named Miller, forsaken
in a wayside inn; and it was Father Mastai, the others said, who had
during the whole journey sustained their courage by his unfailing fun
and good humour. It seems to me that this is not the least glorious
note in all his wonderful record, and because few, even of those who
most loved and venerated him in his later years, have ever heard of it
I have written it here. The whole thing, somehow, is so absolutely Pius
IX!

Very sore and weary, the travellers reached Santiago on March 17, only
to encounter every kind of obstacle and annoyance in the attempt to
carry out the object of their mission. The Government had changed,
and the party in power had no desire to come to an understanding
with the Holy See. The people, indeed, received the envoys most
enthusiastically, but Chile in 1824 was apparently much what I found
it in 1885—a country of ardent believers ruled by atheists. Let some
expert explain the problem; I cannot! For seven months Monsignor Muzi
remained in Santiago, perseveringly trying to clear matters up and
reach some _modus vivendi_ between Church and State. But his efforts
were nullified by the hostility of the President and his supporters,
and at last he had to acknowledge his defeat and withdraw from the
conflict.

The _Eloïse_ meanwhile had successfully rounded Cape Horn and reached
Valparaiso, and on October 19 the Archbishop and his party embarked
once more on the gallant little vessel and started for home. Of course
no sailing vessel can pass through the twisting narrows and rocks of
the Straits of Magellan, so for three weeks—surely the most miserable
of their lives—those poor priests, children of Italy and the sun,
shivered in the awful cold of those frozen regions, where the sea is
the colour of cold steel, and the sailors, as they have often told me,
come down from the deck at night with their garments frozen stiff, and
have to work their way into them, still frozen stiff as boards in the
morning.

My own travelling in that part of the world did not include the
rounding of Cape Horn, but even the passage of the Straits in a big
liner, with the water smooth as glass, was such a freezingly wretched
experience that, having made it once, the prospect of its repetition
took something away from my eagerness to go home. But outside the Horn,
with the Antarctic Ocean, unbroken from the South Pole, flinging its
icy rollers against a little sailing vessel that took three weeks to
beat up on the other side—_that_, the skippers have told me, furnishes
merchant seamen with their best nightmares to their dying day! Most of
the coal supply for the West Coast is carried by this route, and by the
time it has reached the Horn, the coal, loaded under the damp English
skies, has ignited, and the remainder of the trip is made with hatches
battened down and the pleasing knowledge that a puff of air finding its
way into the hold will send the whole mass into a blaze!

Yet, there is a little English colony that lives and flourishes
in these cold seas some two hundred and fifty miles to the east of
the Horn, and we in England wear its wool and eat its mutton quite
habitually. I never could learn my geography properly until I began to
travel round the world. From that time maps became a special recreation
of mine, and I had, when travelling through the Straits of Magellan,
thought with both curiosity and pity of the handful of islands, so much
more exposed than even we were in those comfortless days. I was told
the place was a purgatory—that it was just possible to carry on life,
and that no one stayed there who could help it.

Some time afterwards, when we were established in Santiago, a card was
brought up and I gazed at it for a moment in some bewilderment. “The
Governor of the Falkland Islands!” Then it was true! Our indomitable
fellow-countrymen had really added another mesh to the net of empire
which Great Britain has cast over the world. My reflections were
interrupted by the entrance of a big handsome man who looked as if
he had just come out of Yorkshire. His clear blue eyes, ruddy cheeks,
and joyful bearing belied the sad tales I had heard, and when, in the
course of conversation, I asked some timid questions about his frozen
place of exile, he laughed in a way that was good to hear. Frozen?
Exile? Why, he would not live anywhere else for the world! A grand
climate, pleasant society, and better pasturage for sheep than could be
found anywhere else!

“Pasturage!” I exclaimed. “Do you mean to say that anything will _grow_
in that latitude?”

“Grow? I should think so!” he replied. “We get the back wash of the
Gulf Stream down there, and our sheep can graze all winter in the
open. Why, I have three trees, _real trees_, on Stanley Island! I
wish you and Mr. Fraser would come and pay me a visit there. My wife
and daughters would be so delighted to see you.” Then, turning to
my husband, he continued, “Our flocks are getting too big for their
feeding-grounds, so I have come to ask the Chilean Government to rent
us five hundred thousand acres in Patagonia for a supplementary run.
The pasturage is not as good as that in the Falklands, but it will be
better than nothing.”

Of course we instantly invited our visitor to dine. An English face
was always a joy to look at where one saw so few, and this man brought
the very atmosphere of the North Country with him. He told us many
interesting details about his little domain, the management of which he
took very seriously and evidently accomplished with much success. “Of
course I could do more,” he said regretfully, “if it were not for the
blind hostility of the Opposition.”

“Does it reach so far?” I asked politely. “I should have thought there
was quite enough to keep it busy at home.”

“Oh, I don’t mean the little crowd at Westminster,” he replied
indignantly. “Please understand, Mrs. Fraser, that I have an Opposition
_of my own_!”

“I do congratulate you,” I said; “that is certainly a triumph! What
Britisher could ask more?”

There is a little plant of which every Englishman carries the seeds
about with him. It is called Love-of-the-soil. Give him a bit of land
anywhere—the best or the worst, a vast fertile tract or a few miles of
desert island; tell him it is his very own to do as he likes with; and
before you can turn round every grain of its dust is sprouting with
Love-of-the-soil. He sees, knows, loves, only that spot. He will fight
for it, work for it, cheat for it if need be, perhaps even slay; for to
him it has taken on the sacred character of the mother country; it is
_his_ piece of England, and woe to any one who tries to take it away
from him! That is why English colonies succeed. And it is the lack of
this passion for the land which makes bad colonists of men of other
nationalities.

The Americans are simply brutal about their possessions. Out here in
the North-west one is horrified at the general callousness. I have
watched people making what _we_ should call a home, breaking new land,
building a charming house, working hard to make everything within and
without as perfect as they know how. A cloud of dust shows up on the
road, a motor car full of “land grabbers” kicks and coughs and stinks
at the gate; the next minute the hard-eyed hucksters are being shown
into all the sacred arena of airy rooms and flowering garden, are
fingering, valuing, depreciating; there follows an hour or two of hard
bargaining, and then your neighbour’s wife flies across lots to tell
you, with shining eyes, “We’ve sold the place!” “Sold the place?” I
cry. “Why, I thought it was to be your home!” “What does that matter?”
she retorts, huffed. “I got my price! We can easily build another house
that we shall like just as much.”

I suppose it is a form of the disease now diagnosed as Americanitis,
the feverish restlessness that would rather “trek” anywhere than stay
put for more than a year or two. But it is a terrible disqualification
for building a State. Since I have seen it at close quarters, I have
often thought of the contrast presented by that handful of North
Country shepherds and their descendants in the Falklands,[6] so proud
of doing their best with the best they could get, pleased with their
drizzly climate (it rains two hundred and fifty days in the year)
because it is so English, proud of their thriving little community,
sending out their pelts and mutton by the once-a-month steamer,
actually growing their pelargoniums and fuchsias in the open air, and
so furiously interested in their miniature politics that the Government
and the Opposition are ready to knock each other forty ways from Sunday
every time they meet! Good luck and long life to you, my incorrigible
brothers! The secret of success is certainly yours, and it all comes
from the little plant called Love-of-the-soil.



CHAPTER VI

POPE PIUS IX


After his return from Chile, Father Giovanni Maria Mastai was appointed
Director of the Ospizio di San Michele, a position which could not be
called a great advancement in the eyes of the world, but which carried
with it a most weighty burden of responsibility. Some idea of this
charge can be grasped when we explain that the so-called “Hospital”
embraced six separate large establishments—namely, an orphanage for
boys, another for girls (both containing complete schools for general
education as well as for the learning of trades and arts), a home
for the aged poor, a “protectory” for unruly boys, a reformatory for
fallen women, and a prison for political offenders. The endowments of
the Ospizio, together with its earnings, rendered an income of fifty
thousand dollars a year, then considered an ample sum for providing for
the wants of some thousands of persons. It will readily be understood
that this left little or nothing over for salaries to those in charge,
but, fortunately, in those days these were not needed, as all the
employees, except a few servants, were priests and religious who gave
their services for nothing except food and lodging.

In his own financial affairs Father Mastai was the worst manager
possible; he never kept any money longer than was needed to give it
away; but where other funds were concerned he made no mistakes, and
his administration was as wise and careful as possible. His friends
and family seem to have been a little surprised when his labours
and trials during the South American mission received no more public
recognition than this appointment to a burdensome task, but he himself
was delighted. He had looked back to the years spent with “Tata
Giovanni’s” boys with homesick regret; the work at San Michele was of
the same kind on a much larger scale—more orphans to train, more poor
to cherish, more sinners to help and save, and his generous heart was
fully satisfied.

The Holy Father, Leo XII, watched the new Director closely during
the two years he left him in charge. At the end of that short time
the improvement in all the different departments of the Ospizio was
fully evident, and its self-supporting funds had increased, in spite
of the innovation introduced by the new Director, who ordained that a
fair share of the inmates’ earnings should be set aside for their own
after-use and benefit.

Leo XII was now satisfied that he had not been mistaken in his judgment
of Father Mastai’s abilities and virtues, so, without any intermediate
promotion, on May 21, 1827, he appointed him Archbishop of Spoleto, the
Pope’s own native town. Great was the grief of the vast family at San
Michele on learning the news, for whether as simple priest, powerful
prelate, or Supreme Pontiff, Pius IX was always enthusiastically loved
by all who approached him.

Spoleto, as we know it to-day—but how can I describe it? One magic
pen has pictured the Umbrian cities with such divine felicity that
the rest of us must be for ever mute. Read what Edward Hutton says
about Spoleto, “a beautiful city of rose colour set on a high hill....
Spoleto, like a tall and sweet maiden ... kneeling at the head of her
long valley under the soft sky.” Read all that that pure-souled genius
has written about Umbria and Tuscany, and you will know whatever your
mind can grasp of that which the poet and the mystic and the artist
feel in that immortal region. My business is not with them, but with
the _anima latina_ of a holy, hard-working prelate sent in troublous
times to govern a turbulent populace already inoculated with the fever
of revolution, and preserving, in its murderous hatreds, the best
traditions of the late Middle Ages.

This was what the new Archbishop saw before him as, with his two
brothers, he approached Spoleto towards the end of June 1827: “A
violent party-feud raging between two factions, finding its way into
families, separating father from son, brother from brother, sister
from sister. Even the clergy had allowed themselves to be drawn into
the unhappy conflict, and as a natural consequence the interests of
religion were suffering lamentably.”[7] So the new Archbishop had
no light task before him. I fancy, however, that his was a nature
which was happiest in strenuous effort. There are people, even in
the modern world, who seem out of place unless they are leading a
forlorn hope. We had a friend long years ago, the Marquis de Bâcourt,
a delightful French diplomatist, with whom, after the vagrant manner
of diplomatists, we foregathered in various parts of the world before
meeting him again in Chile, which certainly just then was not a bed
of roses for foreign representatives. I was bewailing our own luck and
commiserating his, when he interrupted me by exclaiming. “Oh, but I am
really enjoying myself! I _love_ difficult and disagreeable affairs!”

Of these we know that Monsignor Mastai found many to adjust in his new
charge, and that he was signally successful in smoothing them out.
Within two years faction had died in the pretty Umbrian city on the
hill, enemies were reconciled, order restored, and the clergy aroused
to new zeal and regularity under his wise, strict rule. At the end of
those two years he held the people’s hearts in his hands, and well it
was for them that he did, for thus he was enabled to save the town and
its inhabitants from the terrible danger which suddenly threatened to
overwhelm Spoleto in 1830.

Leo XII had died on February 10 of the preceding year, and had been
succeeded by Pius VIII, whose beneficent reign was ended all too soon
by death on the eve of All Saints, 1830. The gentle old man had,
during his short Pontificate, attacked and handled with vigour and
wisdom some of the most important questions of the day, notably in
his regulations for mixed marriages and in his stern condemnation of
the secret societies. These had, during the last momentous year of his
life, produced the harvest of revolution which convulsed Europe more
or less from Warsaw to Rome; yet worse was to come, but Pius VIII was
spared the trial of witnessing it. That was reserved for his successor,
Gregory XVI, sturdy, imperturbable, broad-shouldered, bringing with him
the breezes of the Julian Alps and the hard good sense of the Venetian
from the mountains and the sea. He needed it all, for, as I have said
elsewhere, the storm that had muttered so long broke loose even before
his election; the henchmen of anarchy, who had long been secretly busy
in the Papal States, started a revolution in Rome itself in February
1830; this was promptly quelled, but the trouble in the more northerly
provinces was very serious, and the Pope had to appeal to Austria to
subdue it.

Spoleto had by no means escaped the general infection, but the
Archbishop had, by constant watchfulness and his great personal
influence, succeeded in preventing any open outbreak of the
revolutionary spirit which lurked there; what was his horror, and that
of the citizens, when it became known that a body of four thousand
insurgents, retreating before the Austrians, were approaching the town
with the intention of holding it against their pursuers! The place was
in a panic—the inhabitants already saw themselves trampled down and
massacred in the bloody conflict that would take place—saw the stern
punishment that the Austrians would inflict upon them for harbouring
the desperate revolutionaries.

It was in this emergency that Giovanni Maria Mastai showed the coolness
of a statesman and the courage of a soldier. At the risk of his life
he drove at full speed to the Austrian head-quarters and insisted
on interviewing the commander. To the surprised general he explained
that the armed insurgents who were demanding Spoleto’s hospitality at
the point of the bayonet were strangers to her, that she was in no
way responsible for them, and that she disclaimed all part in their
designs. This point being made clear, he undertook to bring the rebels
to submission, single-handed, if the general would promise not to let
his own men enter Spoleto. The promise was, naturally, most readily
given, the irritated commander being only too glad to relinquish an
unpleasant job. And then the Archbishop, getting into his carriage
again, rushed off to intercept the revolutionaries in their march on
the town.

To them he spoke only in words of tenderest pity. He said he knew that
they had been misled and deceived by wicked men, that their hearts were
not in this conflict, but really loyal to their sovereign, the Pope;
he told them that he would sympathize with their present situation,
brought about by despair at finding themselves far from their houses,
without means of returning, and threatened with the reprisals of
the Austrians. He showed them the hopelessness of the struggle into
which they had been drawn, and promised them, if they would lay down
their arms, not only a free pardon, but the means of returning to
their homes. His fatherly kindness carried all before it. Touched and
grateful, they surrendered their funny old muskets and cannon; the
Archbishop went to his palace, scraped together all the money he had
or could borrow on his own credit, and came back with twenty thousand
francs which he distributed amongst them according to their needs, and
had the joy of seeing them all depart, pacified and sober, for their
respective provinces.

History does not say that the people of Spoleto suggested any refunding
of that big sum of money, but they showed their gratitude and delight
in very enthusiastic ways—illuminating the city, having processions
and fireworks in honour of him who had obtained its deliverance, and
cheering to the skies whenever he showed himself, all of which was
doubtless most gratifying to their kind pastor’s heart; but he was
almost too busy to think much about such things at that moment, having
been charged by the Secretary of State with the conduct of all civil
matters in Umbria, the proper authorities—to a man—having fled at the
approach of the Austrians.

Talking of those penniless rebels, I ought to say that there was one
among them whom the Archbishop did not send home, because the man had
no home to go to. So he brought him into his own house, kept him there
in safety and comfort, and, regardless of what was sure to be said
in Rome about his interceding for such a character, sent to beg the
Pope to give him a passport which would take him across the frontier.
The passport was granted, and the next time any communication passed
between the charitable host and his quondam pensioner, the former had
become Pius IX and the latter Napoleon III, Emperor of the French.

In 1832 the whole province of Umbria was desolated by a destructive
earthquake in which a great number of lives were lost and many
thousands of persons rendered homeless. Spoleto suffered severely,
and once more the good Archbishop was the comfort and mainstay of his
people. He seemed to be everywhere at once, and called up doctors,
nurses, and provisions with miraculous celerity, finding money somehow
for all the dreadful needs and sending aid of every kind to the more
distant places where he could not go himself.

Other pastors were doing all they could for their own flocks, but
Monsignor Mastai’s zeal and charity were so conspicuous as to draw
down the special and enthusiastic commendation of Gregory XVI, who
immediately promoted him to the Archbishopric of Imola, a far more
important see than that of Spoleto. Naturally the Spoleto people were
frantic at the idea of losing him, and sent a deputation of their most
notable citizens to Rome to beg the Pope to change his mind. But they
failed in their object, and at the appointed time their Archbishop
received their last farewells—a tumult of tears and blessings—and
set out for his new post, stopping on the road at Loreto to ask for
Heaven’s assistance, as he had asked for it in his early youth, when
his malady appeared to be barring his way to the priesthood.

He found even more to do at Imola than he had at Spoleto in the matters
of reorganization and reform, and he threw himself into the work with
all the ardour of his brave, energetic soul, encountering many trials,
but coming victoriously through them all. Of course he made bitter
enemies, for his boundless charity to the poor broke out in a blaze
of indignation whenever he found that they were being oppressed or
defrauded. In such cases instant retribution overtook the offender, and
no amount of apparent contrition could ever obtain office for him again
if it depended on the decision of the Archbishop.

The secret societies, following their usual programme, had decided
to “remove” Monsignor Mastai without delay. He was sitting in his
study one morning when his faithful old servant, Baladelli, who had
accompanied him everywhere, entered to say that a lady, who seemed in a
great hurry, begged him to grant her a few minutes’ “conversation.”

“Ask her to wait a little,” said the Archbishop, as he rose and went
into his private chapel. Some time passed and the servant came and
found his master on his knees.

“Monsignore, will you not speak to that lady now?” he asked.

“Tell her to wait a little longer,” was the reply.

The man retreated, to return more than once. Monsignore, still on his
knees, always gave the same message, and at last Baladelli, after the
manner of old servants, lost his temper and exclaimed, “For goodness’
sake come and speak with that poor woman! She has been waiting for
hours.”

Then the Archbishop looked around at him and said, very quietly, “I
speak with the living, not with the dead.”

The frightened domestic rushed into the ante-room where the petitioner
had been left, and beheld a tumbled heap on the floor. Calling his
fellow-servants to help him, he raised it up. The heavy veil had
slipped from the face. The “lady” was a man, with a great sharp knife
concealed in his feminine garments. He was stone dead.

Monsignor Mastai was made a Cardinal (with the titular of the Church
of SS. Peter[8] and Marcellinus) on December 14, 1840, to the great
happiness of his mother, a widow since 1833. During her lifetime
he made a point of going once or more every year to visit her at
Sinigaglia in the old house where his childhood had been passed. He
frequently was obliged to come to Rome on business, and so long as he
was Archbishop of Spoleto he lodged at the orphanage of Tata Giovanni
on these occasions. That was no longer possible after he had been
promoted to the more important See of Imola, as he was then expected
to travel with a larger suite, for whom the orphanage did not provide
fitting quarters. He resented the expense of these more ostentatious
journeys, complaining that the money they cost would have been better
spent among his poor at Imola, but he had no choice in the matter and
had to submit to custom and tradition.

A very unpleasant adventure marked the third year of his Cardinalate.
In the heat of the summer he and two of his colleagues in the Sacred
College arranged to take a few weeks of rest in a small and lonely
villa in a remote part of the country. They knew, of course, that
the revolutionary agents were abroad and at work, but it had not
occurred to any of the trio that their own illustrious persons might
be designated as worthy objects of attack. But a certain Riotti, a
Piedmontese, deep-dyed in conspiracy, conceived the brilliant idea
of kidnapping the three prelates and holding them as hostages, to
be ransomed at the price of his own immunity should his treasonable
designs be discovered. So, in the dead of night this hero, with six
of his fellow-conspirators, broke into the Villa, and the unfortunate
prelates were roused from their sleep to find themselves confronted
with a band of desperate men armed to the teeth. The two other
Cardinals were not fighters, but Giovanni Maria Mastai was. What
weapons he used I know not—he had none at hand except his high courage
and biting tongue; but the outcome was that the ruffians fled from his
presence and were heard of no more. His companions said that it was
entirely owing to his bravery that the whole party was saved.

One spring day at Imola, while the Carnival was roaring through the
streets, the Archbishop was down on his knees in the church praying
for his people that they might not sin in their mirth. Alas, even his
fervent prayers could not altogether avert that calamity! A sudden
tumult of cries and footsteps came from the sacristy, and he rushed
thither to almost fall over a young man who lay gasping in his blood on
the pavement. At the same moment his pursuers broke in after him—three
men with knives in their hands, furiously intent on finishing their
victim. The Cardinal instantly placed himself before him, and, holding
up the gold cross which he wore on his breast, forbade them to come
a step nearer. In a torrent of burning eloquence he reproached them
with their atrocious cruelty and the sacrilege of which they had been
guilty, and ordered them to quit the church.

They stood for a moment cowed and broken, then they fled, and he turned
to the poor boy on the ground. Very tenderly he knelt down beside him,
and soothed and comforted him, pillowing his bleeding neck on his arm,
while the attendants who had arrived on the scene ran for a physician.
The latter came promptly, but said that the wound was mortal—there was
nothing to be done. Then, still kneeling on the ground and holding
the poor dying boy in his arms, the Cardinal helped him to make his
confession, called one of the priests of the church to administer
the last Sacraments, and knelt there till the young soul passed away,
comforted and at peace.

Where injuries or insults were offered to himself, Cardinal Mastai
forgave as only the Saints can forgive. The chief magistrate of Imola,
a hard and cruel man, had conceived the most bitter hatred of him
for his gentle methods and broad, progressive views, and expressed
his hostility with much violence. The Mayor’s wife, a good, devout
woman, was much distressed at his attitude, and sought by every means
in her power to heal the one-sided feud. A child was born to her, and
she secretly begged the Cardinal to volunteer to be its godfather—she
was sure her husband’s heart would be softened at such an evidence of
condescension and goodwill! Nothing loath, the good Cardinal approached
the Mayor personally, and with much gentleness and humility asked if
he would permit him to stand sponsor for the baby. Whereupon the Mayor
flew into a passion and exclaimed: “You! You presume to suggest such a
thing! You, who are a friend of malcontents and rebels! No, indeed! You
are too liberal for me!” Then he turned his back on his Archbishop and
left him—a suppliant refused!

   [Illustration: PIUS THE NINTH. In later life.]

The Archbishop accepted both the insult and the calumny without a
word of protest. A month later he changed his name and assumed that
of Pius IX. Learning that his old enemy was in Rome with his family
at the time, he sent him word that although he had refused to allow
the Archbishop of Imola to stand godfather to his child, he might not
feel the same objection to the Pope, who, if the infant were not yet
baptized, would be glad to be its sponsor. _En passant_ one is struck
with wonder that amid all the preoccupation and inevitable excitement
of that great change in his life, Pius IX should have found time to
think of the man at all. Naturally he had conquered, and his old enemy
could scarcely express his gratitude at receiving such an honour. Even
then the Pope remembered him again, and very soon afterwards seized an
opportunity of conferring on him a great material benefit. That is how
the Saints forgive!

Naturally he had conquered, and the favour was received with almost
unbelieving joy.

Oh, they were a good family, those Mastai-Ferrettis. After the
accession of Pius IX, his brother, Cardinal Ferretti, a most wise
and saintly man, acted as his Prime Minister for a time, before the
revolution. His memory was greatly venerated in Rieti, of which place
he was Cardinal-Bishop. A terrible thing happened while he was there.
One of the churches was broken into at night, the Tabernacle violated,
and the pyx containing the Blessed Sacrament stolen. On learning of
this frightful sacrilege, the next morning, the Cardinal called all his
clergy together, and he and they, with bare feet and ropes round their
necks, went in procession to the public square. The entire population
gathered round them, and then the Cardinal, standing bare-headed and
barefooted under the noonday sun, preached a sermon, taking for his
text the cry of Mary Magdalene on Easter morning, “They have taken away
my Lord, and I know not where they have laid Him.”

When the sermon ended, the people were kneeling on the stones, sobbing
like children. That night the door of the church was left open, and the
pyx was restored; its sacred contents were intact.

Pius IX early let his family know that they were to expect neither
wealth nor promotion from his hands. One ambitious relation asked him
for a title. “You have not the income to maintain it, my dear fellow,”
the Pope replied, “and I shall not provide you with one. Stay as you
are.” Another, a young nephew, was idling about Rome, giving himself
no end of airs because his uncle was on the Throne. His uncle sent him
back to Sinigaglia to learn sense in obscurity. Yet the poorest and
meanest could always obtain aid and sympathy from Pius IX. I remember
seeing the people push forward their written petitions as he used
to drive through the city or walk in the environs. The queer, often
dirty scraps of paper were received by one of the Cardinals or the
chamberlain who accompanied the Pope on these occasions, and every one
was examined, the circumstances verified, and genuine cases relieved
within twenty-four hours.

Only one class dreaded the approach of the Holy Father—neglectful or
fraudulent officials. He relied on no reports of public or private
institutions, but descended on them at all hours of the day or night,
in person and without giving the slightest warning, to see for himself
how things were being managed. Like Haroun-al-Raschid, he would slip
out alone, dressed as a layman, and dive unrecognized into hospitals,
schools, and prisons, only revealing his rank when he could not
obtain admittance otherwise; and where he found anything out of order,
correction and in serious cases heavy retribution instantly followed.

One night, dressed as a private gentleman, he was thus going through
the wards of the great Hospital of Santo Spirito, where, as in most
of the Roman hospitals, charitable visitors were always free to come
and cheer or tend the sick. That night a poor French artist was dying,
and he called for a priest. The attendants looked everywhere for the
Almoner or Chaplain of the Institution, but he was not to be found.
The Pope said, “I will take his place,” and to him the dying man made
his confession, from him received the last Sacraments, and passed away,
comforted and in peace. The next morning the Almoner was dismissed.

One day the Holy Father, walking in the Quirinal Gardens, passed a
sentry on duty. The man silently held out a loaf of bread for his
inspection. Pius IX took it, examined it, and asked one question, “Do
you always get bread as bad as this?” “Always, Santo Padre,” was the
reply. A sudden descent on the Commissariat department showed that he
had spoken the truth. When the sun rose again the cheating commissary
was repenting of his sins in prison. There is a beautifully practical
side to autocratic government!

Justice had nothing to blush for in the Rome of those days, and the
poor could obtain it as promptly and easily as the rich. There were
three separate institutions devoted entirely to the legal defence and
protection of persons who could not pay for the services of a lawyer.
One was the Arch-Confraternity of St. Ives, thus named after the
Saint still so dear to the people of Brittany, the lawyer who was a
priest and who devoted all his talents to the defence and protection
of the poor. But long before his time (he died on May 19, 1303) St.
Gregory had instituted in Rome seven official defenders of the poor,
one for each Region of the city. They were called _defensori_; some
eight hundred years later their official descendants, the College of
Procurators, took the title of “the Rights of the Poor,” and there was
also a civil office established by Urban VIII, of which the holder,
who had to be a noble and a layman, took the title of “Advocate
of the Poor,” exercising his powers in cases that came outside any
ecclesiastical administration.

The congregation of St. Ives remained the great stand-by of the lower
classes down to my own time. It was partly a religious sodality,
comprising both prelates and lawyers, who met every Sunday for pious
exercises, which were followed by a careful examination of such appeals
as had been laid before them during the week. They took up all just and
genuine claims and defended them at their own expense. Besides looking
after the rights of their humble fellow-countrymen, they undertook the
cases of all poor strangers who got into trouble in the city.

There was a third body, the Arch-Confraternity of the San Girolamo,
that devoted itself to the defence and aid of prisoners, and more
especially of poor widows. The gentlemen composing it—and they were
the flower of the aristocracy, ecclesiastical and social—made it their
business to assist impecunious prisoners in every possible way, paying
their fines, if such had been imposed on them, and arranging matters
with their creditors if they had been imprisoned for debt. The members
had free access to all the prisons, and they took their duties very
seriously, some of their number examining the food every day of the
year, and inquiring into all matters connected with the treatment of
the prisoners. Indeed some of the most important prisons were confided
to their sole charge. They did no end of good, particularly in bringing
about amicable settlements of disputes which would otherwise have
caused fierce litigation.

Our blessed Pius IX had a tender sympathy for poor debtors, and often
came to their assistance. He was constantly in money difficulties
himself—as generous people so often are—during the earlier part of his
career. When he became Archbishop of Spoleto he had to borrow a goodly
sum, on his brother’s security, from a Roman money-lender, to defray
the expenses of his installation, and he was so recklessly charitable
that again and again there was not wherewithal to buy food.

His old housekeeper at Spoleto used to weep over the bare shelves of
her larder—everybody was fed, she declared, except her master and his
household! It was hoped that things would be better when he moved to
Imola, where the Episcopal revenue was double that of Spoleto, but
the master’s ways were hopeless, and he only laughed when his people
remonstrated with him. There came a day at Imola when the distracted
steward, ready to tear his hair, exclaimed, “Eminenza, there was a
hundred dollars in the treasury this morning, and _it is all gone_! I
have not a cent for the _spese_” (the current expenses); “what shall we
do?”

The Cardinal reminded him that the Good God had promised daily bread to
his children.

“That is true, Eminenza,” said the poor man, “but—I am in terrible
difficulty, all the same!”

“Well,” said his master, “to-morrow is a fast day. I know you have some
cheese in the house. Serve that for dinner.”

“But the next day, Eminenza?”

“Oh, I will take care to leave enough for the next day!” was the
Cardinal’s reply.

On another occasion he was about to entertain a distinguished party at
dinner. The gentlemen were already gathered in the drawing-room when
their host was informed that a man wished to speak with him on urgent
business. He excused himself, and came into the dining-room, where he
found one of his parishioners in frantic distress. He wanted a loan to
save him from immediate bankruptcy.

“I have not a single dollar in my possession, my poor friend,” said the
Cardinal, “but——” he glanced round the room, where all his best plate
was laid out in preparation for the coming feast, and pounced on a
great gold soup-tureen, a cherished gift from his mother. “Take this,”
he said, putting it into the man’s hands, “it will pay your debts.”

With sublime carelessness he returned to his guests, and they and he
soon began to wonder why dinner was not served. A long time passed,
and then the steward, pale as death and with tears in his eyes, came
and informed him that somebody had stolen the gold soup-tureen! He had
looked everywhere, searched the servants’ rooms—the household was in an
uproar—but the tureen was gone!

“Oh, is that all?” he laughed. “I stole it myself! Get the old china
one and let us eat.”



CHAPTER VII

CAPTIVITY OF POPE PIUS VII


One beautiful evening of early summer in the year 1810, the packet-boat
plying between Genoa and Savona reached the latter port after a fair,
but exciting passage; for, albeit the sea was scarcely ruffled by the
breeze—which in itself was barely sufficient to fill the sails—yet
during the whole of the voyage from Genoa a couple of British frigates
had accompanied the packet-boat, keeping, however, much to the surprise
of the voyagers, at a considerable distance and without manifesting
any hostile intention. And when, at last, the packet-boat was safe at
anchor in the harbour of Savona, the frigates likewise lay to, within
about a cannon-shot of the land, and began, apparently, to make all
snug for the night.

Among the passengers who now walked down the gang-plank of the
packet-boat on to the quay, thankful for once to British eccentricity
for its unaccountable generosity in letting them go their way
unmolested, was a man, still young, with an expression of imperturbable
good nature not unmixed with a certain bland shrewdness. This person,
after directing a servant, by whom he was accompanied, to have his
baggage taken to an hotel—possibly the Roma—betook himself alone and
on foot to the Vescovado, the palace of the Bishop of Savona—“a fairly
large house,” as Napoleon had described it in a letter in which he had
attempted to excuse himself for the choice of it as a residence for his
prisoner, Pope Pius VII.

The traveller, on arriving at the door of the Vescovado, found
his farther way barred by a couple of gendarmes who were mounting
guard there; to them, on their asking his business, he replied that
he desired an interview with the Sovereign Pontiff, and requested
that they would let him pass. For all answer they stared at him,
open-mouthed, taking him for an eccentric; when their commander, a
Colonel Thévenot, who chanced to be passing, took the matter out of
their hands.

“Who are you, sir, and what do you want?” he inquired.

“I wish to see the Holy Father, as soon as possible,” replied the
other. “Allow me”—handing the colonel a visiting-card inscribed:

                      LE CHEVALIER DE LEBZELTERN,
                         CONSEILLER D’AMBASSADE
                                   DE
                SA MAJESTÉ L’EMPEREUR D’AUTRICHE ET ROI
                        APOSTOLIQUE DE HONGRIE.

Having read the card, Thévenot glanced suspiciously at the owner of it;
then, seeing that he had indeed to do with a serious person, he turned
rather red in the face.

“Tut-tut, my dear sir, surely you cannot expect to obtain admission
to the Pope in this rough-and-ready way,” he stammered. “It is really
quite out of the question, you know,” with a wave of the hand to where,
in the courtyard, a corporal’s guard of Fusiliers was preparing to
relieve the sentries posted in all the approaches of the building.

“Ah, the guard of honour, I suppose, for His Holiness,” returned the
Austrian, with the vestige of a smile; whereat Colonel Thévenot’s
equanimity gave way.

“Frankly, sir,” he broke out, “please understand that no living being
is allowed to enter here without a written order from General Berthier,
the commandant of the town.”

“Frankly, sir,” retorted Lebzeltern in his turn, “that does not apply
to myself, and I am going to enter.”

Happily for all concerned, the situation was dispelled at that moment
by the sound of heavy firing from the direction of the harbour, where
the British frigates had suddenly come in closer towards the town,
with the intention of ascertaining the range of the French artillery,
especially of some large cannon on a new fort. The orders of Napoleon
himself, who was acquainted with this custom of the British, were
positive in regard to such provocations; and it was strictly enjoined
upon his officers to take no notice of them except in the event of a
serious attack. Nevertheless the garrison of Savona lost its head upon
this particular occasion and opened an extensive fire upon the two
inquisitive ships. As Lebzeltern described it:

“It was a splendid sight; the weather was superb, the sea like a
mirror, the whole coast, as well as the English ships, being turned to
gold in the sunset. On the side of Savona thundered the cannon, their
smoke shot with flame; from the English, though, there came no sound
except that of their bands playing their well-known air of ‘Go to bed,
go to bed, and get up as quickly as you can!’”

In the confusion of what the French imagined to be the preliminaries
of an action, the gates of the Vescovado were closed, and Lebzeltern,
thus forced to abandon his quest for the moment, turned his footsteps
towards the hotel. There was nothing for it, as he saw, but to obtain
General Berthier’s permission to see the Pope, with whom alone his
mission to Savona was concerned. Having dined therefore, he dispatched
a messenger to the Papal _maestro di camera_, Monsignor Doria, bearing
a letter from Count Metternich, the Austrian Ambassador in Paris, under
whose instructions he was acting, together with a formal request for an
audience of the Holy Father.

Some explanation is necessary of the origin of Lebzeltern’s mission to
Savona; and so I trust the reader will not take it amiss if I venture
upon the attempt.

When, in the summer of 1809, Napoleon sent orders to Rome for the
arrest of the Pope, he did so under the impulse of one of those blind
rages of his which upset all the calculations of his wisest advisers,
and which only ended in raising up insurmountable barriers in the
way of his ultimate triumph. For years he had been angered by the
Pope’s refusal either to close the ports of the Papal States against
English ships and merchandise, or to expel the English residents in
his dominions. In answer to the Emperor’s repeated demands, Pius VII
had said that, as the Universal Spiritual Father of all the Christian
family, he absolutely refused to close their home and his (_i.e._
the Papal States) against his English children. Whereupon, in 1807,
Benevento and Pontecorvo were taken from the Papal States and erected
into French Duchies for Talleyrand and Bernadotte, to be held by
them as fiefs of the Empire. The next year Rome itself was occupied
by French troops, and the “legations” of Ancona, Urbino, Macerata,
and Camerino seized by Napoleon’s orders; and in 1809 the Eternal
City was declared to be annexed to the Empire as the capital of the
French _département_ or county of Rome. Finally, in the night of July
5-6, 1809, Pope Pius VII was arrested by General Radet and taken as a
prisoner to Savona.

Napoleon’s idea, in thus imprisoning the Pontiff and isolating him from
his accustomed friends, counsellors, and surroundings, was to wring
from him by suffering that compliance with the Imperial diplomacy which
the good old man had hitherto refused so uncompromisingly. To be sure,
now that Rome and the Papal States were in the hands of his soldiers,
the Emperor had no difficulty either in expelling or arresting the
English residing there, or in closing the whole of Romagna to British
merchandise; but, in his haste and anger, he had reckoned without the
religious difficulties of the new situation.

To begin with, in thus laying violent hands upon the person of the
Pope, he struck a blow not only at a fellow Sovereign, but at the Head
of the Catholic Church on earth, and in so doing wounded the whole of
the Church in its tenderest feelings, stirring up against himself a
resentment that knew no bounds, not only in France, Belgium, and Italy,
but also in Spain and Austria, as well as throughout the Catholic parts
of Germany and the Netherlands. Protests multiplied on every hand,
becoming increasingly violent, until Napoleon was forced to admit to
himself that he had made a terrible mistake, and that his glory and
power were insufficient to seduce the souls of men from their religious
allegiance to the successor of Saint Peter.

Moreover, the dangers and discomforts of his situation were rendered
intolerable by a Bull of Excommunication issued against him in that
summer of 1809, in the hour of his triumph over the Austrians at
Wagram; which Bull was served upon him in person, whilst surrounded by
his marshals, by a solitary ecclesiastic who, true to his mission, did
not honour him with any kind of salutation, but merely delivered the
parchment into the Emperor’s hand, turned his back upon him and walked
away.

Napoleon, indeed, feigned to make light of the excommunication, asking
of those about him whether the Pope expected the muskets to fall from
the hands of his, the Emperor’s, soldiers: but, in his heart, he was
greatly troubled. He had known for some time that such a Bull was on
its way to him, but had contrived to evade the service of it on him.
For Lebzeltern himself, who was Secretary of the Austrian Embassy in
Rome at the period of the Holy Father’s arrest, and who had long been a
valued and intimate friend of Pius VII, had been entrusted with another
such document at his departure from Rome on an order transmitted to
him from Napoleon through General de Miollis, ordering him (albeit a
foreign diplomatist) to quit French territory immediately.

Bearing with him, therefore, the Bull of Excommunication, Lebzeltern
had departed from Rome, being escorted on his way to Vienna as far
as Klagenfurt in Styria by a French officer. On reaching Schönbrunn,
however, he was arrested by the French military police; his baggage
and even his person was submitted to a degrading search, and at
length, every other means of purloining the Bull having been tried in
vain, Lebzeltern was threatened with being shot unless he gave up the
document—for Napoleon would appear to have entertained a superstition
that, if only he could escape from having the Bull served on him, its
effect would be annulled!

But nothing would induce Lebzeltern to reveal its hiding-place; and
so he was sent off as a State prisoner to Munich, with a special
recommendation to the Bavarian Government to treat him as harshly as
possible. Having passed some months there, however, he was exchanged
against a Baron d’Arétin, and came to Vienna, believing himself to be
free at last. But now Wagram had been fought, and Napoleon was master
there; and Lebzeltern was again arrested on a trumped-up charge of
seeking to escape from giving satisfaction to a French officer in
an affair of honour! Nor would Napoleon let him go, until compelled
to do so by the insistent demands of Metternich, who was just then
negotiating the peace preliminaries at Altenburg. At long length,
however, Lebzeltern was released, and joined the Austrian headquarters
near Schönbrunn, a few days before the signing of the Treaty of Vienna;
and it was he to whom Emperor Francis unburdened himself with tears in
his eyes on the subject of the Treaty.

Soon afterwards Lebzeltern went to Paris as Secretary of Embassy
under Metternich; and when, in the late spring of 1810, Napoleon asked
Metternich to find him a man to entrust with the errand of persuading
the Holy Father to accede to his views (_i.e._ the removal of the
Excommunication and the abdication of the Temporal Power in favour of
the Napoleonic dynasty), Metternich recommended Lebzeltern as the one
person qualified to speak to the Pope with any chance of being accorded
a favourable hearing.

The whole hinge of the matter was the Pope’s renunciation of the
Temporal Power; only in return for which would Napoleon (as he made
perfectly clear to Metternich) allow the Pontiff to return to Rome,
whence, alone, it was possible for Pius VII to direct the way of the
Catholic Church. And, unless the Pope would surrender the patrimony of
Peter, he should never see Rome again, and the Emperor would nominate
another Pontiff in his stead. The position was certainly simple enough,
according to Napoleon.

But Metternich had added, in private, a little word of his own in the
ear of his estimable subordinate on the eve of the latter’s departure
for Italy: “Do all,” said he, with a peculiar emphasis, “or else _do
nothing_.” And Lebzeltern, grasping the significance of the words,
had bowed, smilingly, before withdrawing to prepare for the journey.
He perfectly understood; what Metternich meant was, that he was
either to effect _in toto_ what both of them knew to be impossible,
or else he was to effect nothing at all. That is to say, he was not
to attempt any compromise by which the Pope might be hoodwinked into
doing what Napoleon wanted; for it was perfectly certain that Pius VII
would refuse to meet the Emperor’s views as laid down by the Emperor
himself for transmission by Lebzeltern. And, as Metternich realized,
the salvation not only of Austria, but of all Europe, depended upon
the Pope’s holding out against Napoleon; for the only thing that must
inevitably, sooner or later, bring about the Emperor’s downfall was the
sense of their outraged religion in the hearts of the vanquished.


After sending in his request for an audience to Monsignor Doria,
Lebzeltern went to call upon General Berthier, who was the commandant
of Savona and the Pope’s jailer. Berthier had heard of his arrival,
and began by telling Lebzeltern—who had told him that the object of
his mission was to discuss some Austrian religious business with the
Holy Father—that he could only be allowed to converse with Pius VII
in the presence of witnesses. To this Lebzeltern replied that it was
impossible for him to speak freely of the affairs of the Austrian
Court in the presence of any third party whomsoever; that, according
to Napoleon himself, the Pope was under no kind of restraint; and
lastly, that Napoleon both knew and approved of his, Lebzeltern’s,
mission. But it was not until Lebzeltern threatened to go back to Paris
immediately and to complain of the obstacle placed in his path, that
Berthier finally surrendered the point—albeit not without a violent
scene, in which he complained bitterly of the Emperor for placing him
(as was true enough) in so equivocal a position by first forbidding
him to allow any one to have access to the Pope without direct orders
to do so from Paris, and then sending Lebzeltern thus (under-handedly
and without as much as a line from any French official excepting a
passport) to match, as it were, his, Berthier’s, intelligence against
his obedience. Finally, he himself decided to give the preference to
his intelligence.

So it was all of four days after his arrival at Savona that Lebzeltern
was ushered by Monsignor Doria into the Pope’s presence.

At that time Pius VII although in his sixty-eighth year, looked
considerably younger, his hair being still jet-black and abundant,
and his dark eyes full of life and light. The smile too, which rarely
left his pale, kindly face, was peculiarly winsome in its frankness
and its serenity. The only signs about him of what he had endured of
late at the hands of the French administration were a weariness in his
voice and a marked stoop like that of a very old or very tired man. On
seeing Lebzeltern, though, he showed a greater animation and pleasure
than he had done for many months; especially was he delighted to learn
that their interview was to be an absolutely private one—for this he
regarded as a great indulgence on the part of his jailers, it being the
first time in his captivity (then nearly a year old) that he had been
allowed to speak with any except in the presence of a third party.

At first, records Lebzeltern, the Holy Father spoke of his sufferings
in the journey from Rome and of all he had endured since being torn
from the Eternal City; also he expressed his sympathies for his visitor
in what the latter had undergone of unjust imprisonment at the hands
of the French and the Bavarians. In return,[9] Lebzeltern, as he tells
himself, gave the Pontiff an outline of public events since their
last meeting in Rome, prior to the battle of Wagram: the Treaty of
Vienna and its results; the progress of the war in Portugal; and the
marriage of Napoleon to the Archduchess Marie-Louise. _All of which
events Lebzeltern, a professional diplomatist and an Austrian official,
believed to be hitherto unknown to the Pope_—wherein lies one of
the most curious points of modern history. For if Pope Pius VII was
supposed even by such men as Metternich and Lebzeltern to be still,
in May 1810, in ignorance of the marriage of Napoleon to Marie-Louise,
how can it be claimed that the Supreme Pontiff’s sanction had ever been
given to that marriage?

Apparently to Lebzeltern’s surprise, Pius VII had, however, actually
learned of the Imperial marriage through some secret channel. “...
Outwitting the watchfulness of his jailers, he received news day by
day....” For, amongst other indignities, no letters were ever permitted
to reach or issue from the Holy Father except such as had been approved
by Berthier and by a certain Chabrol, Prefect of the _département_
of Montnotte, by whom the Papal correspondence was always read and
censored; so that it was evidently Napoleon’s purpose to keep his
august prisoner in total ignorance of the majority of the world’s
events.

Nevertheless Pius VII spoke with no bitterness, but only with great
grief of the French Emperor, expressing the most sorrowful tenderness
towards the man whom he had crowned Emperor at Notre Dame a few years
previously. And all he asked was that he might be allowed to go back to
Rome in order to be able to do his duty by the Church as her Pastor.

At this point Lebzeltern made known the real object of his coming to
Savona: namely, that Napoleon was anxious to come to an understanding
with the Pope. To the latter this was, indeed, a most welcome surprise:
but almost immediately he seemed to realize that he was suddenly in
the presence of some sort of insidious temptation which was preparing
to attack him. And here Lebzeltern, by turning the talk during some
minutes to Austrian affairs, sought to give his listener time in
which to recover from the first effects of his surprise. And so for
a while they spoke of the dangers of a schism that threatened the
German episcopate, so long deprived by Napoleon of the guidance of
their Shepherd. And then as the Pope began more clearly to divine the
probable intentions of the Emperor towards him, he reverted to the
subject of his captor:

“I want nothing for myself,” he said, by way of warning Lebzeltern that
it would be of no use for him to offer any personal advantage to the
Pope (as such) as the price of a reconciliation with Napoleon. “I am
old, and have no need of anything; I have sacrificed all I had to my
duty. I have nothing left to lose. Therefore no personal consideration
can make me turn aside from the narrow road along which the sacred
voice of my conscience has so far led me. I want no pension; the alms
of the faithful will suffice me.... All I insist upon—and with all my
strength—is that I be allowed free communication with the Bishops and
the faithful.” Once, too, he seemed uncertain of even the diplomatist’s
own intentions towards him: “At Rome, my dear Lebzeltern,” he reminded
him, “I opened my heart to you in the conviction that you were
incapable of abusing my confidence....”—speaking rapidly in Italian.


And now, as Lebzeltern felt, the moment had come when he could no
longer defer the revelation of what it was that Napoleon proposed to
the Pope as the only possible basis of an agreement between them—that
is to say, the only price he would accept to let Pius VII out of
prison. It was by no means easy, as he gives one to understand, for the
young Austrian to do this thing; but at length he forced himself to the
point. After assuring the Holy Father once more of his own devotion
to him, as well as of that of Metternich and the Emperor Francis,
Lebzeltern proceeded to explain that Napoleon had in no way abated his
desire to be the Lord of Rome, which had long been one of the principal
objects of his ambition; also that he had in no way changed his mind
in regard to the Pope’s surrender of the Temporal Power; and that,
although Napoleon would not insist upon a formal deed of renunciation
on the part of Pius VII, yet, at the same time, he must insist that
the Pope should maintain an attitude of absolute submission in the
matter, an attitude which should in no way recall the past political
position of the Papacy, and which at bottom should be, in fact, an
acknowledgment of the suzerainty of the French Emperor.

The words were scarcely out of Lebzeltern’s mouth when the Pontiff took
him up with an amazing energy for so delicate a man.

“Is not Napoleon already, _de facto_, the master of Rome?” he demanded.
“Does he not parcel out my States as he pleases? Do not his troops
already hold my ports, camp in my capital, and live at my expense? And
all I can do is to oppose a few protests to his armed force. But I know
him; he is a man who never really wants what he says he wants—and what
he really wants he will never admit to a living soul beforehand.”

To which Lebzeltern, in order to restore the Pope’s equanimity, replied
by telling him how Metternich in speaking to Napoleon had declared
himself openly on the side of the Holy Father; and, moreover, had
emphatically impressed upon the Emperor the unchangeable principles[10]
of the Austrian Government in regard to the Catholic Church and its
visible spiritual Head on earth.

“I should indeed be grateful for any help that Austria could give
me,” said the Pope. “All I ask is that Napoleon will let me go back to
Rome, and that he will allow me to keep about me a sufficient number
of people for the business of consistories and councils—and that my
relations with the faithful may be free and unhampered. I have no
means of compelling Napoleon to restore the dominions of which he has
robbed me—very well, all I can do is to protest. Beyond that I can do
nothing.”

Here Lebzeltern, it must be recorded, made some attempt to persuade
the Holy Father to make what he called “sacrifices” in the interests
of the distracted Church—but of what nature, precisely, he did not
specify. But Pius VII, reading his mind, replied that the duty imposed
upon him by his conscience of defending the rights of the Holy See
and the patrimony of the Church—which patrimony he was bound by his
oath as Pope to transmit intact, in so far as in him lay, to his
successors—forbade his remaining silent under Napoleon’s iniquity: his
silence would be understood, by his enemies, to be a tacit abdication
of the Temporal Power, and would be considered by the faithful as a
cowardly surrender.

From this point in the conversation the two men understood each other’s
position and standpoint clearly—and yet both did their best to avoid
the blind-alley into which the talk was surely leading them.

“Let Napoleon only allow me to return to Rome,” pleaded the Pope—“the
catacombs will be enough for me, they have served as a shelter before
now for other Pontiffs.... As to my sustenance, as I said before, the
faithful will take care for it. No doubt Napoleon would offer me a
revenue from the funds of the religious orders he has suppressed—in the
same way that, when I went to Paris to crown him, he offered me some
eighteen or twenty million francs of such stolen money—an unspeakable
suggestion which I refused with horror and indignation! But, indeed,
now that I think of it—how could I possibly hold my tongue as he
proposes I should do, and not protest, while he would go on suppressing
convents and religious orders under my very eyes, as well as
introducing innovations that I could not pass over in silence without
becoming his accomplice in the face of all Christendom?”

In response Lebzeltern submitted that, possibly, Napoleon’s malevolent
dispositions towards the Church might be beneficially affected by the
removal of the ban of excommunication under which he still lay.

“But Napoleon would be excommunicated without any Bull of mine,”
replied the other. “For he is, _ipso facto_, as a persecutor of the
Church, outside her pale. Even if I had never issued any such ban
against him, he would still be excommunicated by his own acts.”

Lebzeltern now proposed that the Holy Father should write a letter to
Napoleon, demanding with all gentleness and moderation to be set at
liberty and allowed to resume his apostolic functions. “I would even
ask his help to that end,” pursued the Austrian, “and I would publish
the letter. Such a letter would in no way disparage the Vicar of
Christ, ever ready to forgive sinners; and, at the same time, it would
place Napoleon in an exceedingly embarrassing situation before the
world. By so doing, your Holiness would infallibly destroy at a single
blow those weapons of calumny which he is employing against you, and
which he means to go on employing.”

“Listen, Lebzeltern. You know that I am willing to concede all that it
is possible to concede; but where my conscience is concerned you behold
me perfectly resigned to remain as I am, a prisoner. If my captivity
were a thousand times harsher—if I had, even, to mount the scaffold—I
should not deviate by so much as a hair’s breadth from what my duty
demands of me. And it would be an unworthy betrayal of that duty if I
were to remove the ban of excommunication from Napoleon without good
and sufficient reason. As to the letter you propose that I should
write to him—a kind of encyclical, as it were—frankly, I feel that,
in sending such a thing to a man like Napoleon, who is capable of
changing the wording of it, and then publishing it to my detriment and
his own ends, I should do wrong in taking so grave a risk without first
consulting the Sacred College.”

And on Lebzeltern’s arguing that it was the Pope’s duty to make the
first move towards a reconciliation with the Emperor, Pius VII was
silent for a moment, as though deliberating upon his next words. At
last he spoke again.

“If Napoleon shows a desire to become reconciled to the Church, and if
he will prove his sincerity by some deed, the thing can be arranged—and
I assure you that no one is more desirous of it than I.”

And with that the first interview came to an end. Lebzeltern did not
see the Pontiff again until two days later. On May 18 he found him in a
condition of great fatigue from overwork (as may be easily understood
when one remembers that _the entire business of the Church had fallen
upon the shoulders of the venerable Pontiff, deprived by Napoleon’s
orders of assistance of any kind_ in the transaction of that stupendous
task!), and having before him a letter recently received from Cardinal
Fesch. In this letter the Cardinal had written of the Emperor’s
intention—unless an agreement were speedily come to between himself and
the Holy Father—of settling the question by choosing bishops that would
do his will from among the French clergy, bishops who would administer
their dioceses in accordance with Napoleon’s instructions alone, and
without any reference to the Pope.

In answer the Holy Father had condescended to write back to the
Cardinal to say that the Emperor was evidently bent upon making
impossible any reconciliation between them; and that any Episcopal
Council that the Emperor might call together upon his own initiative
would be absolutely null and void. Nevertheless he, the Pope, being
unwilling to refuse any chance of reconciliation, the Cardinal was to
exhort Napoleon upon the subject; to assure him of his glory in this
world and in the next if he would but sincerely become reconciled to
the Church; and, equally, to threaten him with condign punishment upon
himself and his dynasty if he should persist in his persecution of the
Church.

Lebzeltern now had to recognize that the Sovereign Pontiff had, in
his heart, lost all confidence in Napoleon’s good intentions; for
Pius VII now spoke of yet further pains and penalties that he had not
made use of and which were still at his disposal. Lebzeltern, though
undiscouraged, only tried the harder to incline the Pope towards an
understanding with the Emperor.

“If Napoleon will do something in favour of the Church, then, and
not before, will I withdraw my excommunication of him,” replied the
Pontiff. “To gain absolution, one must do penance——”

“Surely, Holy Father—but, generally speaking, the absolution precedes
the penance”—a specious argument this, of the diplomatist, seeing that
the fruit of the absolution is dependent upon the performance of the
penance.

All preliminaries being exhausted, it only remained for Lebzeltern to
disclose the absolutely last possible basis of an understanding between
the Pope and the Emperor.

“If the Emperor were willing to forgo any formal act of abdication of
the Temporal Power on the part of your Holiness,” he ventured, “might
he count in return upon your absolute silence as to the past?”—by
which Lebzeltern meant that the Pope should by his silence give a tacit
sanction to all the things that Napoleon had done to the Church and her
ministers—his imprisonment of the Pope and many of the Cardinals, his
sequestration of countless Church moneys, his closing of the multitudes
of religious houses, and his throwing of their occupants, destitute and
homeless, upon the world.

“Out of the question,” said the Pope. “I could never feel sure of any
pact with Napoleon.” Presently, however, he added, “The guarantee,
though, of a third party to any treaty I might make with him would
certainly ease my mind considerably—especially if Austria would furnish
the guarantee.” And then, in an access of reconciliation he continued:
“I have already told you what I would be disposed to do on my side
towards healing the breach between Napoleon and the Church. What more
does he want of me? Does he wish me to recognize him as Emperor of the
West? Very well, I am willing to do so. Does he wish me to crown him
as such at Rome? Very well, again I am quite ready to do so. For that
would not in any way be contrary to my conscience, provided only that
he makes his peace with the Church and ceases from persecuting her; but
I insist upon it that he shall respect her earthly Head in that Head’s
unchangeable capacity as the spiritual chief of Christendom!”

Lebzeltern was, indeed, astounded at the Pope’s generosity.

“Most Holy Father,” he stammered, “you have given too much not to give
just one little thing more—merely to allow your subjects to obey the
present Government in the Papal States, and to order them expressly to
do so.”

There followed a gesture of such pain on the part of the Sovereign
Pontiff, expressing so eloquently his repugnance to this proposal, that
Lebzeltern was penetrated with a shaft of regret for having made it.
Moreover, as he says himself, “I trembled at the thought of all I had
obtained from him!”

At the same time Lebzeltern felt convinced of the uselessness of the
Pope’s concessions. He knew that Napoleon, unless he could obtain the
one thing on which his heart was set—the actual sovereignty of the
Papal States, and that with the Pope’s consent and blessing—would not
for a moment consider anything else that might be offered him instead.

So Lebzeltern parted from the Holy Father for that day, his heart full
of indefinable misgivings for the dark future in which the power of
Napoleon loomed so vast and menacing, and in which there was no great
light visible to him of the Church, save only here and there, so to
speak, where the feeble red glow of a few distant, wide-scattered
sanctuary-lamps starred the mirk of the new Europe.

On May 20 Lebzeltern went for the last time to the Vescovado, to take
leave of the august prisoner within its walls.

   [Illustration: PIUS THE SEVENTH. Photo by Levy et ses freres
   after the painting in the Louvre, by David.]

On this last occasion of their meeting at Savona, the diplomatist found
Pius VII in a very strange frame of mind. Not by any means inclined to
withdraw the concessions he had made in the previous interview with
Lebzeltern, but only regretting them bitterly; hoping they might not
satisfy Napoleon, and so be rejected by him. On Lebzeltern’s presenting
for his consideration a written outline of the concessions in question,
the Pontiff, after considering them a little while, rose suddenly from
his chair and spoke as follows:

“I have made known to you, Lebzeltern, many of my most secret thoughts
and sentiments which I would never have entrusted to another living
man except my confessor; and I do not regret it because I am perfectly
certain that you will never abuse the confidence I have placed in you.
Nevertheless, please bear in mind that I only authorize you to report
of me to Napoleon and Metternich what I am now going to tell you, and
which is just what you yourself have seen and heard—that I am perfectly
resigned to God’s will regarding me, and that I humbly place my cause
in His hands. Say that no consideration of any kind shall induce me to
disobey my conscience and the Divine law. Tell them that I am calm and
serene, and that all I ask of the Emperor—for whom I only hope and pray
that he may be granted the grace to make his peace with our holy mother
the Church—is that he will allow me the means of communicating freely
with the faithful, and that he will no longer deprive them of the
services of their father and servant. Tell the Emperor that I entreat
him to remember that the glory of this world is in itself no passport
to heaven; that, albeit I yearn with all my heart to be reconciled
with him, yet that I will never be so at the price of my conscience.
Assure him very earnestly that I have not the smallest personal feeling
against him; that I forgive him with my whole heart all that he has
done to me; and that nothing could hurt me more than that he should
imagine me capable of harbouring resentments—which in themselves
are forbidden by God and have no place either in my heart or in my
inclination.”

Presently, among other things, he went on to speak of the private
misgivings with which Napoleon’s character inspired him. “Between
ourselves, Lebzeltern, I am convinced that Napoleon is not in good
faith when he says that he wishes to become reconciled with me.... If
only he would let me have some one here, at Savona, to help me in my
work, which is really and truly overwhelming; moreover, there is a vast
amount of specialist and technical business which I cannot possibly
transact by myself without consulting my expert advisers. And to make
matters worse for me, my health and my eyesight are giving out; I do
not feel that I shall be able to carry my burden of solitary labour
very much longer; besides, it is bad for my temper, which I confess
frankly I often have great difficulty in curbing.”

Nor is there anything wonderful in this when one remembers the
Pope’s situation after being imprisoned nearly a year in the house
of the Bishop of Savona, shut off from the Cardinals (of whom the
only news he had was that they had been imprisoned and maltreated
in French fortresses by order of Napoleon) and from the faithful.
Alone with his doubts and difficulties and age and ill health, and
the insidious temptations put before him by the Emperor’s instruments
(conscious, some of these, as was Fesch; unconscious, again, as was
Lebzeltern)—what is there astonishing or blameable in this “great
difficulty” so well and simply confessed by the most benignantly human
Barnabo Chiaramonte?

Presently he spoke again, to utter a final warning to Napoleon.

“If Napoleon continues to make war upon religion (even although he
does so under the guise of extending to it his hypocritical perfidious
protection); if he attempts to have me dragged to Paris; if he goes on
spreading the lie of my sacrificing the real interests of the Church
to secondary matters and to worldly motives; if he persists in forcing
me to more active reprisals,—then I shall have to use the last weapons
that remain to me and which would make a stir in the world that he does
not yet dream of. The only regret I should have in that case would be
that some others—who have been less unkind to me than he—might suffer
too. As to the precise nature of those weapons, it is possible that
their effect might be very different from anything you could imagine.
But make your mind easy; have no fear that I shall employ them unless
I am absolutely obliged to do so. Do not be afraid of my doing anything
precipitately, for I pray constantly for grace and strength sufficient
to enable me to carry my cross patiently. But if you only knew the
unvarying torment of my nights as well as of my days, Lebzeltern—the
unceasing anguish of my solitude—you would not wonder at what must
sometimes appear to you incomprehensible inconsistencies in my attitude
towards many things—as must have been noticeable in the talks between
us!”

And with that he dismissed Lebzeltern, who was as much moved as he;
for they now shared the same conviction of the utter emptiness of
Napoleon’s professions of a desire for reconciliation.

And as it proved; the doors of Savona did not open for Pius VII
until the next year, 1811—and then only to allow of his deportation
to another prison at Fontainebleau, where he was to remain until
Napoleon’s downfall. Once only did the Sovereign Pontiff weaken (with
none but the purest of good intentions) when, in 1813, he consented,
for a moment, to renounce the Temporal Power, in order that he might
be allowed to go back to Rome, thence to direct the Church. But in
vain, for Napoleon would not let him out of his hands, and Pius VII,
perceiving the mistake he had made, announced to all whom it might
concern his resumption of the inalienable dominions and Temporal
Sovereignty of the Popes. And in 1814 he returned to his rightful
throne in the Vatican amid the rejoicing of his subjects.

But what must have been his reflections in regard to his oppressor
during the five years (the exact duration of Napoleon’s crime against
him) that were consumed in the terrific expiation of St. Helena? And
his awe and amazement at the stupendous vindication of his trust in the
providence of Heaven?—for, as the Italian saying has it, “God does not
pay wages day by day, but only on Saturdays—and then He pays in full
with interest!”

Pius VII’s own revenge on Napoleon took the form of offering safe and
honoured homes, and the means to live, to his mother and his entire
family after his downfall. Whereby many descendants of the Bonapartes
are counted among the Roman nobles at this day.



CHAPTER VIII

IN SABINA


We had chosen Castel Gandolfo for our summer quarters and had spent
two or three delightful months in the Villa Brazzà, situated on the
lower edge of the town which climbed up the gentle slope behind, and
having for ourselves the open view of all the Campagna below us,
before. The house did not look very large from the road, but very
little of it showed itself to the road at all. When one had passed
under the arched _portone_ one found a great rambling residence with
a long terraced wing stretching down into the garden, and in the
garden itself pavilions, grottos, terraces, all bowered in flowers
and so artistically disposed that every one seemed isolated and only
approached by long winding walks delightfully shady and green.

Where the chief sitting-room opened towards the garden there was a
small terrace, completely shaded from the morning sun, with a fountain
so disposed that it fell all down one wall like a waterfall, and round
it clambered and waved the wreaths of a hundred creepers, ivy and
stephanotis and jessamine and maidenhair fern, all wet and blooming
in the gentle moisture of its spray. To the left, the wing in which my
own rooms were situated ran far down, affording shade and coolness; a
stairway led up to its roof where vast beds of petunias gave out their
sweet perfume and were visited every evening at sunset by humming-bird
moths who fed on the honey in the white and purple chalices till they
could scarcely fly away.

The house had been full of guests through July and August and the
summer had been divinely bright and cool. Through it all I had looked,
day after day, over towards the Sabine Hills, so remote and mysterious
for all their nearness to Rome, and a great desire was upon me to
penetrate into those blue fastnesses. They had been friends—at a
distance—all my life, since I could remember anything, and probably
before that, for the big eastern window of the room where I was born
looked straight towards them, and doubtless their sun-smitten peaks
were the first outside objects my eyes ever beheld. They are our
Sibyls, in Rome. They reflect every change of sun and wind, and very
early I learnt to tell the signs of the coming weather which they
infallibly gave us.

I made up my mind to reach them at last, and with some difficulty
persuaded my brother and my stepfather to come with me. We were joined
by a friend, an elderly English clergyman much loved by us and always
known as the “Reverendo.” He came of exceedingly well-known people,
but was a younger son with no money—and no encumbrances—and he had long
amused us with his quaint ways. He was rather elderly, very tall, with
a paganly handsome head, and a quiet way of saying incredible things
that made me love him much—and work him hard, for I was a rather spoilt
young person in those days and allowed myself unlimited whims, which my
blessed family helped me to carry out in the most exemplary way.

I always had a very tender spot for the Reverendo, and it became
something uncomfortably near pity when I heard, from our servants, of
certain straits to which he was put in order to appear properly at the
little gatherings to which we were always inviting him. He lived a long
way from our house, and his means quite forbade the luxury of cabs,
so in all weathers he came on foot. The carefully turned-up evening
trousers could be kept out of the mud, but not so the shoes below;
so the Reverendo brought clean ones—and evening socks—with him. The
porter’s lodge was just inside the _porte-cochère_, and he would turn
in there, regardless of what the inhabitants might be doing, sit down,
pull off the condemned foot-gear, toss it into various corners, put
on the clean things, and walk upstairs—all without a single word to
the porter’s wife and children, who put him down, quite smilingly, as
another “mad Englishman.” When the function upstairs was over he would
reappear, change once more, and depart, always in perfect silence.

But one evening Mrs. Porter told my maid she could have wept for the
poor gentleman! He came in as usual, sat down and pulled off boots
and socks, flung them away, and then discovered that he had forgotten
to bring fresh ones. Quite meekly he gathered up the muddy articles,
put them on and disappeared into the night, to return, nearly an hour
later, with his forgotten properties and go through the whole ceremony
over again.

Like so many quiet cultivated Englishmen whom circumstances more than
taste have landed in the “Establishment,” for life, he had the social
instinct very strongly developed, loved bright society, and never
refused an invitation. He caught gladly at the idea of riding through
Sabina with us, and I knew that our expedition would be a success,
which it might not have been without the little spice of interest that
an outsider always brings into an otherwise too strictly family party.

So, one divine September morning, we four rode forth, my dear mother
almost crying at our temerity in facing the brigands who were then
supposed to haunt the Eastern Hills. “Do bring back your ears with
you!” was her parting recommendation, and I know that during the days
of our absence she constantly dreaded receiving the grim packet of
severed ears which the old-time brigands were in the habit of sending,
with their little account for ransom, to the relatives of those they
had captured.

Years before, when we children were making expeditions from Rocca
di Papa, we had, to our immense joy, been provided with big,
formidable-looking toy pistols, which we were enjoined to carry “in
evidence” so that the report might go about that the party was always
strongly armed! The only brigand we ever caught sight of in our
rambles through the lonely country would be an occasional outlaw who
had escaped from the police to take hiding in the woods (where he was
charitably maintained by his sympathizing fellow-townsfolk) and who
would scuttle away like a startled hare at the approach of a big party
of young foreigners, whose yells would probably reach to Rome itself if
anybody interfered with them. The brigand of Romagna is, or was, a poor
creature, very easily disposed of; his cousin in Calabria or Sicily is
quite a different kind of person, a resolute, unscrupulous gentleman
whom it is not at all pleasant to meet.

In one of his Roman books Mr. Hare speaks of the unearthly beauty of
the Campagna and its surrounding hills in the first moments of the
dawn, and deplores the fact that so many travellers come and go away
again without ever having risen early enough to see it. I think dear
Mr. Hare made the discovery late in life himself, for, if I remember
rightly, it was during a journey of exploration that we made together
somewhere that the fact struck him—and I and my sister regarded him
then as distinctly middle-aged. My poor Annie was always a late riser,
and vehemently deprecated the unripe hours of the morning, as she did
every other kind of discomfort; but to me they were hours of purest
romance, and seldom have they seemed more perfect than on the day when
I and my three cavaliers rode away from Castel Gandolfo through the
woods towards Genazzano (not Genzano), where we were to halt on our way
to Palestrina.

Have you ever ridden through deep chestnut woods when the sun is still
so low that it only strikes the under branches of the trees, and creeps
up their trunks like a rising bath of gold? When every dell is still a
mist of cool emerald, and on the banks the level beams are kissing open
the tightly whorled fronds of the fern, filling the tiny cups of the
moss with topaz wine and turning its million-feathered spikelets into
an upstanding frieze of fairy spears, each strung with a yellow pearl?

Where some stream has cut its way deep through the rich soil the
forget-me-nots have grown so high and thick that they almost meet
across the water; their blue is too dreamy yet to reflect the sky; they
look up to that with the calm unseeing innocence of a newborn child
that as yet knows not day from night. Ah, look well then, for later in
the day the jealous tree-tops will take all the light to themselves,
and every lovely detail, below, only visible in that first fleeting
hour, will be lost in the deep forest shadow that is neither light nor
darkness, but all one quivering mysterious green.

We four rode through the woods silently, drinking in the crystal
freshness of the air; and then, almost before we knew it, we were
out in a blaze of heat, leaving the Alban Hills behind and crossing
the plain that divides them from the Sabines, one of the old roads
to Naples. In that first week of September it was like an unroofed
hot-house, vines and corn and pomegranates crowding against each other
till one would hardly have known where to get in the shears or the
sickle; the dust from our horses’ feet rose in golden clouds as we went
along, and everywhere was the whirr of wings and the long droning note
of the cicala.

We were glad enough to reach Genazzano and pause in the shade before
the old church; but we had had some difficulty in penetrating so far,
the Piazza and every street leading to it being full of peasants, who
had come in from all the surrounding district to pay their respects
to the Madonna del Buon Consiglio, on this, September 8, our Blessed
Lady’s birthday. Of course the greatest concourse takes place here on
April 25, the especial Feast of “Our Lady of Good Counsel,” but the
people are always glad to repair to this famous sanctuary, and on the
day we visited it the little town was full of the brilliant costumes
which one very rarely sees now.

The picture round which so much devotion centres is a very sweet one,
rather Byzantine in character, as is natural, for it came to Italy from
the other side of the Adriatic—miraculously transported, probably at
the time when all that country came under Moslem rule. It was thus that
the Holy House of Loreto, when the holy places of Jerusalem fell into
the hands of the Turks, was carried by the angels to Christian shores
and thence to Italy, the dwellers near its last Eastern resting-place
mourning despairingly round the deserted spot from which it disappeared
between dark and dawn on the night of December 9, 1294. I am writing
of Genazzano and not of Loreto just now, but I must pause to remark
that this miracle of the transportation of the house of the Blessed
Virgin is far more clearly attested than many events in our own modern
history; yet there are people, who would stake their lives on the truth
of those events, who dismiss the miracle of Loreto with a smile of
incredulity.

This picture of Our Lady of Good Counsel would not interest them. Yet I
would advise even such persons to go and have a look at the beautiful
copy of it in St. John Lateran’s. It is quite small, a half length
or less; the Blessed Mother holds the Child in her arms, and He is
reaching up to whisper in her ear; she listens, with her heart in her
deep sweet eyes, and the “counsel” is stored up for the children who
appeal to her in their perplexities. There is an exquisite expression
of confidence and familiarity on both the celestial Faces. Our Holy
Father, Pius X, has such a great devotion to Our Lady of Good Counsel
that, as all Catholics know, he has added the invocation “Mater Boni,
Consilii, ora pro nobis,” to the Litany of the Blessed Virgin.

From Genazzano we went on to Palestrina, arriving there in time to
go and watch the sunset from the ruined terraces of the Temple of
Fortune. The place has passed from hand to hand, used as a fortress
at one time and another since the fourth century before Christ; but to
me its interest never lay in those comparatively modern developments.
It is the story of times lost in the mist of ages, when those first
cyclopean blocks were fitted together without the aid of cement—when
a race, whose only traces are these mute huge stones that suggest all
and tell nothing, lived and fortified itself on this outpost of the
mountains—that is the story that I want to hear.

There at Palestrina, when the sun was sinking into the level gold of
the sea—forty miles away, but so clear and calm—I leaned over the
stone bulwark, red in the sunset, hot to my hand (had it not baked
in four or five thousand years of sunshine?), and felt that unearthly
thrill of a revelation palpitatingly near yet still withheld. It has
come only a few times in my life—once at Torcello, once among the
lost tombs of Etruria, there at Palestrina, and in the great hall of
the unmarked sepulchre of the last Ming Emperor in Pechilia. That was
modern indeed, a seventeenth-century affair, but the ancient spirit was
there—something that brooded over a lonely mighty country, unchanged,
untampered with, before the beginnings of history.

At Palestrina—or, to give the place its right name, Præneste—the
Emperors were mere upstarts; Camillus, who took it and made it an
appanage of Rome four hundred years or so before this time—Marius and
Sulla, and the Roman ladies who had summer villas here and left those
amazing “vanity boxes” (such arsenals of cosmetics and beautifiers as
surprise even our modern beauty-artists) behind them—all these seem
vulgar intruders on that sacredly ancient ground.

For, of all the cities of Romagna, Præneste has, I think, the most
perfect situation. It seems to have grown out of the wall of the
hills to watch over the southern roads to Rome. Before it the Campagna
stretches away to the sea and to the north, the horizon there brokenly
outlined by the low Volscian and Ciminian Hills. Not so towards the
sea; in the near distance a castle or a single tower breaks the plain,
midway Rome shimmers like a net of pearls thrown down across the Tiber;
but the west is the empty west always, left to the sun and the wind,
with the wide heavens above, and that one long sword of light laid on
its farther bound where the tideless Mediterranean laps against the
shore. To the south, at an almost direct angle, rise the Alban Hills,
near, familiar, friendly, with their symmetrical volcanic slopes
so restful to the eye; where they sink to the plain farthest from
Palestrina, the Appian Way leads on to Naples, and that is the way most
of the world travels; but the more beautiful road is the one which
leads, right past the foot of the Sabines, through the level valley
which separates them from the Alban range, to Anagni and Valmontone and
Frosinone, following the classic Liris as it takes an almost straight
course through the garden it has ploughed and watered.

Seen from the Campagna, the Albans seem to be a range running east and
west, thrown up to make a frame and background for Rome; but travel
down the Liris and you will realize that all we see from Rome, Monte
Cavo and his lesser brethren, with their scores of white towns, is
simply the culmination of a long branch of the Apennines, set up like
a screen between the central range and the fever-haunted sea-board
called Maremma. When about two-thirds of the distance to Naples is
accomplished the range rises in the isolated peak of Rocca Monfina
to the height of nearly 4,000 feet and becomes merged in the central
Apennines once more. The railway runs through now, but it is still a
wild, remote country, very feudal in its ways, with half-ruined castles
on every point of vantage, scowling down on a land that needs them no
longer, where fighting has ceased, and the good soil that has had its
way for centuries has brought forth those stores of corn and wine and
oil which seem to be South Italy’s inalienable dower.

From Palestrina, looking down on that September evening, the bursting
richness of it all seemed almost incredible. Right at the foot of the
hills a deep abandoned watercourse was a golden river of standing
corn, bordered far on either side with dense greenery fringing off
into vineyards so teeming with fruit that seen from above it was like
a great mantle of dark amethyst patterned here and there, where the
white grapes grew, with jade. The woody slopes of the Sabines sank into
the rich carpet, and rose, away to the north, in stormy outlines, now
softened into dreamy rose and lilac, against the clear evening sky.

As the sun sank, even the cold silver of the olive trees, standing
tier above tier on their shallow terraces, took on the flush, as if
bathed in wine, and the darker foliage of oak and chestnut burned with
sombre yet vivid intensity. Then the sun touched the sea—lingered, a
ball of living crimson, for an instant, and plunged out of sight. One
star hung its new-born silver against the paling west; another and
another answered it, till all the dying blue overhead was pierced and
patterned with the faint sparklets in their eternal dance. Then from
behind the wall of peaks a broad fan of misty silver was thrown up
against the sky, growing, spreading, washing purple and crimson to one
untinted sheen; another moment, and the harvest moon heaved a golden
shoulder over the crags, rolled up, rounded itself, and hung, a great
honey-coloured globe, flooding the hills and the Campagna and the
distant sea with calm all-embracing effulgence.

At the time of my first visit to Palestrina I was still sufficiently
attracted by the Middle Ages to find much romance in the struggles of
the Colonnas and their contemporaries, struggles which dragged the
harrow over the vast Temple of Fortune, reputed the biggest in the
world, threw its stones one upon another, and left the place merely
a beautiful tomb. Since then, I confess, my interest has died away.
I can feel no sympathy with the noble cut-throats—Sciarras, Colonnas,
Orsinis, whose deeds are written in blood over every page of the time.
I used to weep over the sufferings they inflicted on Boniface VIII,
but, apart from the outrage on his sacred office, which can never be
condoned, one cannot help feeling that he deserved something of what
he got, and that in spite of his high courage and notable intellect, he
had treated those his enemies very basely and cruelly.

His election in 1217 had been bitterly opposed by two Colonna
Cardinals, Giacomo and Pietro, who were furious at the thought that
the Papal chair should be filled by one of the Gaetanis of Anagni, the
hereditary rivals and enemies of their own family. The election went
through, in spite of them, and they, fearing the new Pope’s wrath,
fled to Palestrina, taking every member of the family with them. This
was an open declaration of war, and the Pope realized that there would
be no peace for his realm till they were subdued. With truly mediæval
promptitude he at once confiscated all their estates and called on all
good Christians to take up arms against them. Their other strongholds
fell one by one into his hands, but Palestrina, with its tremendous
defences and commanding position, resisted every attack of the
besiegers. It seemed impregnable.

Then Pope Boniface remembered that the most victorious and ruthless
leader of the day, Guido de Montefeltro, was down on his knees in a
convent at Ancona, praying to be forgiven some of his deeds of blood
before death should call him to judgment. He commanded him to leave his
retreat and come to give his advice as to the reduction of Palestrina.
Very unwillingly the old soldier obeyed, and returned to that world
which he had left just in time to save his wicked soul. He went and
looked at the Colonna fortress, examined the defences with the eye
of an expert, and returned to the Pope, who was at Rieti. He told him
that there was no hope of taking Palestrina by force of arms. “What,
then, am I to do?” cried Boniface. Guido knew, but was unwilling to
say. The Pope insisted on his giving his opinion, and the crafty old
fighter proffered the counsel for which Dante, with some justice, put
him in Malebolge—“Prometter lungo e tenere corto!” “Promise much—fulfil
little,” it would run in English.

Boniface instantly acted on the advice. The Colonnas were promised
full forgiveness. They thought it wise to accept and submit. In all the
habiliments of mourning repentance they issued from the stronghold they
were never to see again, and came in a body to Rieti. The Pope received
them, pronounced their crimes against himself forgiven, and kept them
at Rieti as his guests. But prudence, as he apprehended it, forbade
that he should leave that eyrie and refuge of rebellion standing for
them to fly to the next time they picked a quarrel with him. So, while
they were sunning themselves in his favour in the mountain city of the
south, he secretly dispatched a faithful friend, Ranieri, the Bishop
of Pisa, to wipe Palestrina off the face of the earth. Nothing was to
be spared except the cathedral. And very thoroughly did Ranieri do
his work. Every vestige of the fortress and palace and the big town
which had grown up with them was destroyed, “a plough was driven over
the ruins, the ground was sown with salt, and even the famous marble
staircase of a hundred steps, up which people could ride their horses
into the palace,” was swept away.

Then the Colonnas, landless, homeless, penniless, understood how much
the Pope’s forgiveness was worth, and they fled from his domains to
nurse their wrongs and wait for revenge.

That came in good, or rather, very evil time, and Boniface paid in full
during the awful days at Anagni, days so dreadful that one quarrels
with Dante for not regarding them as sufficient expiation for the
harassed Pontiff’s one great sin. He was driven into a quarrel with
Philippe le Bel, the King of France, and Sciarra Colonna, the head of
the proscribed house, caught at the chance, and offered his services to
the French. In company with their leader, William de Nogaret, he broke
into Anagni, Boniface’s own city where he had taken refuge, and, but
for the opposition of Nogaret, he would, apparently, have murdered his
great enemy on the spot.

Here Boniface showed all the valour of his race and place. He prepared
to meet death with the dignity of a priest and the courage of a
soldier. “If I am to die, I will die like a Pope,” he said. Every
friend, every Cardinal and chaplain and courtier fled as the shout of
“A Colonna, a Colonna,” rose from the lower streets of the mountain
town. Not a soul was left in the palace but the Pope. He put on his
pontifical vestments, placed the tiara on his head, and mounted his
throne, where he sat like a statue, awaiting certain death.

Colonna and Nogaret, with three hundred steel-clad men at their heels,
clanked into the hall, and stood dumb for a moment at the sight of
their great enemy, who neither spoke nor moved. Then they rushed upon
him, and Sciarra Colonna assailed him with a fiery torrent of abuse,
his anger feeding on itself till it ran through him like a flame,
and he struck the Pontiff on the face with his mailed hand. Nogaret
protested—Boniface said no word. He meant to suffer for his sins in
silence because so had the Redeemer suffered for sins not His. They
dragged the Pope from his throne, hustled him out into the Square, all
black with the gaping, cowardly crowd of his own subjects, put him on
a vicious horse with his face to the tail, and led him with outbursts
of derision through the streets. Not a hand was raised to defend him,
not a protest was heard. Then his conquerors brought him back to his
palace and locked him up, without food or drink, for three miserable
days, during which they sacked not only the palace, but every house
in the town, riding away at last glutted with plunder, destroying what
they could not carry off, and leaving literally nothing but bare walls
behind them.

Then, all danger being past, Boniface’s loving subjects bethought
themselves of letting him out. They found him fainting from exhaustion,
crying like a starved child for a morsel of bread and a cup of water.
The women wept over him then, and ran to minister to his wants; not so
much as a water-jar had been left in the palace, and they emptied their
bronze _concas_ into a wooden chest. Boniface died soon after, in Rome,
broken-hearted, and the carnival of anarchy in high places, with its
raging hate, and its fury of bloodshed, went on for many a long year
afterwards.

Truly, mediæval history makes depressing reading! How gladly the mind
reverts from it to the dawn of the centuries, when men fought for
their cities and their wives and children, but not for mere hatred of
their kind. And what a relief it is to turn from the endless carnage
of the later Middle Ages to the history that is not written in blood
and that charms and dominates us still, the history of strange, holy
lives every pulse of which was an act of love to God and mankind. It
is but a step from one to the other—from Boniface VIII and the Colonnas
and the Orsinis to Benedict and Scholastica—from smitten Palestrina to
cloistered Subiaco behind it in the hills.

On the way thither one stopped for a day in Olevano, to me the least
Italian, the most completely “foreignized” spot in all that country. It
has been for so many years the haunt of artists of every nationality
that it has none left of its own. Its beauty there is no denying;
it laughs in sunshine and prosperity, and for that, in these bad
times, one is grateful to it. But it is no more Italian than a fine
piece of staging at the Haymarket. The background is perfect, and
the inhabitants are healthy and handsome, but the moment they see a
traveller coming they throw themselves into paintable attitudes; all
naturalness seems gone; everything and everybody is harnessed to the
service of picturesque utility.

The famous inn, about which Gregorovius and Mr. Hare raved so
enthusiastically, resounds with northern tongues and with that
ear-splitting affliction known as German Italian. The walls are a
visitors’ book of untold price, where almost every notable artist of
the last hundred years has left his signature in sketch or portrait.
At every turn you are tripped up by easels, wet canvases, and artists’
umbrellas, and in the evening the beer flows freely and the jolly
brotherhood talks about itself at the top of its German voice, till
Italy—our shy melancholy Italy—fades into the background, and the weary
traveller trying to sleep in one of the bedrooms, which all open out
of the central dining-room, is led to believe that he has taken the
wrong train and been transported unawares to the scene of a “Kneipe” in
Munich or Dresden.

Talking about “wrong trains” reminds me of an absurd incident that
happened in England. A wayfarer who had taken a little more than was
good for him wandered into Victoria Station, having quite forgotten
the name of the place he wished to make for. But he could remember
what it was _not_. Into every train that came along he climbed—and
then asked the guard for what point it was bound. None of the answers
satisfied him, and he tumbled out on the platform again and again,
wailing, “Wrong train! wrong train!” At last, however, he struck the
right one, the guard’s answer to his query brought back the memory of
his domicile, and, much relieved, he sank down against the cushions
and began to smoke. At the first station on the road a clergyman got
into the compartment, and the train steamed on. Harder and harder the
reverend gentleman stared at his companion, who showed all too plainly
the evidences of his spree. Pretty soon, just as they were pulling
into another station, the Christian’s conscience bade him admonish his
erring brother.

“My friend,” he began in solemn tones, “do you know where you are going
to?” The overtaken one was all attention at once, and his monitor went
on, “You are going _straight to Hell_!”

“Oh, Lord!” moaned the sinner on the opposite seat, “wrong train
_again_!” And he sprang out of the carriage and stood weeping on the
platform while his one chance of getting home sped away from him into
the night.

We were little troubled by railways in the Sabines in my young days;
such innovations had not ever been contemplated, and all our travelling
was done on horses or mules. It was rather a long ride from Olevano to
Subiaco, and I was very tired and stiff when our little party straggled
into the road leading up to the town. But—what is youth without some
impossible romance? My “romance” had marched that way the year before,
with his company of Zouaves, condemned to garrison duty for three
dreary months in the hills, and _this_ (“parents, do you think you know
your children?”) was the utterly idiotic motive which had made me drag
my three unsuspecting men to Subiaco! I wanted to pick up a stone that
had been touched by the adored one’s foot! Very gingerly I climbed down
off my weary beast, selected a fine smooth pebble from the side of the
road where I knew my idol must have passed, and, with much difficulty,
scrambled up again. The pebble was afterwards polished, cut, and set in
Etruscan gold as a pendant, marked with a mystic inscription signifying
a challenge to fate to lessen the ardour of my attachment; and when I
found it among my trinkets, long years after my real fate had found and
claimed me, I could have wept for the delicious rainbow-tinted sorrows
of first youth!

But the treasure once secured, and the luxury of tears reserved for
some future unoccupied moment, I gave myself up to the magic of the
consecrated cleft in the hills, and, in spite of my own profound
ignorance in those days, in spite of the sceptical attitude of my
Presbyterian step-father and the Anglican Reverendo, and my dear
Marion’s bubbling fun and laughter—for he was a mere boy then, of the
most irrepressible kind—the “Sacro Speco” made a profound impression on
me.

It was as if a door leading out of some gay ball-room, all lights and
flowers and dance music, had suddenly been opened and I had passed
through it from the things of time to those of eternity. Fifteen
hundred years were wiped out—I saw St. Benedict, the “beloved, called
from the cleft in the rock,” praying, rejoicing, hiding from men to
be alone with God. And that seems to me the most wonderful thing in
the lives of the great founders—they had not at first the smallest
forethought of their mission. They only knew that they must save their
souls in fear and trembling, and in blind humility they withdrew from
all occasions of sin and prayed for purification.

It forms a curious contrast to the life led by most of us who consider
ourselves pretty decent Christians in the eyes of the world. _Our_
question is, “How much pleasure and amusement can I get in without
actually falling into mortal sin?” and many a dangerous permission we
grant ourselves or wring from our unwilling directors, that refused
would have prevented, or at least delayed, a hundred falls. It is so
terribly easy to do what all the rest are doing—to go and see the
problem play, read the interesting bad book, pay the visit at the
country house where the old admirer will meet us and spread the old
snares for our destruction and his own! We know all about it; it has
happened so often; but we go ahead, telling our hearts the lie they
know so well—“Oh, it doesn’t matter! I know just where to stop!”
Steeped in affection to sin—with, at the best, ages of Purgatory
awaiting us—we add every straw we can gather to our already huge
burden, and imagine we can lay it down with a good deathbed confession
and slip into Paradise with the best!

Very different was the point of view of the great Saints. For one
who was converted late in life, we read of scores to whom Perfection
called in the very dawn of reason; and it is precisely these, who
never committed a mortal sin in their lives, who were most severe with
themselves—most nervous, as we should say, about their final salvation.

Their sight, never clouded by any consent to evil, saw even in the most
trifling failings a heinous offence against the Divine Majesty, and its
infinite purity, visible to them, made their own fallen nature black
by contrast. So they took that nature in hand, these athletes (called
Benedict, and Francis, and Anthony, and many another blessed name
written in the _libro d’oro_ of the recording angel), and thought a
lifetime would not be too much to give to the task of subduing it. And
the Heavenly Father bade them go on and be of good courage; and never,
till the predestined moment came, did He let them dream that their
years of prayer and fasting were just a preparation for generalship
in His army, that in humbly striving to save their own souls they were
fitting themselves to save millions and millions of others.

The first symptom one notices about them is their complete disregard
of the natty little idol we call “respectability”—the Church calls
it “human respect.” We quite understand that great men should kick it
out of the way—who ever heard of Wellington or Kitchener asking “What
are people going to say?” Their gifts and their calling place them
above the reach of considerations by which we ordinary mortals are
content to regulate our actions. We admire, rave over, their splendid
carelessness. But when it comes to the Saints we take our shrunken
measure, try to fit it to their conduct, and shake our heads. Their
whole-heartedness is eccentricity, they thought nothing of inflicting
most damaging shocks on public opinion—what a pity! And if we see
any of our acquaintances beginning to follow in their steps we look
the other way, as if the poor dears had come out into the street
half-dressed.

I wonder how many of her friends cared to bow to the late Countess of
Denbigh when, a few years ago, she took Bridget’s place at the crossing
near Farm Street, and swept it diligently, and stretched out her
blessed hand for the pennies, and never thought she was doing anything
heroic—just keeping old Bridget’s crossing for her while she went to
Mass! I believe the very angels wanted to throw down their shining
mantles for her to walk over when she went to heaven—but I am sure
some of her friends on earth thought she was putting them in a most
embarrassing position.

Lady Georgiana Fullerton, in her “Life of Santa Francesca Romana,” has
described very truly and sympathetically these—to us—puzzling stages
in the development of saintship. They vary in degree, of course, in
each individual case, but the same note runs through all. “Permission
to labour first—the result far distant, but clear; the vision of that
result when once He had said, ‘Begin and work.’ To tarry patiently for
that signal, to obey it unhesitatingly when once given, is the rule
of the Saints. How marvellous is their instinct! How accordant their
practice! First, the hidden life, the common life; the silence of the
house of Nazareth; the carpenter’s shop: the marriage-feast, it may
be, for some; and at last ‘the hour is come,’ and the true work for
which they are sent into the world has to be done, in the desert or in
the cloister, in the temple or in the market-place, on Mount Tabor or
on Mount Calvary; and the martyr or the confessor, the founder or the
reformer of a religious order, comes forth, and in an instant, or in a
few years, performs a work at which earth wonders and angels rejoice.”



CHAPTER IX

PEOPLE OF THE HILLS


How much our Italy of Rome and Naples owes to the Apennines! How
gratefully should lovers of romance and history regard that mighty
chain that runs, an inland sea of crag and peak, forest and ravine,
between shore and shore! Physically and morally, it is the backbone
of the country, the fortress of tradition, the nurse of what our
modern cant calls “plain living and high thinking.” Its hard yet
beneficent climate, with sharp delimitations of season, its passes
so obdurate to the tainting allurements of railways, its hundreds
of sturdy self-contained little towns, each with its story of its
own saints and heroes, its ancestry of tradition that laughs at the
flight of centuries—all this has bred a race of men and women of whom
modern Italy knows little, but who form the residue by which the mixed
enfeebled masses of her cities and plains will in the end be saved.

Faith is strong; morals, though often transgressed, still clear
and commanding. New fads, make-believe religions, free love and
race-suicide presented as twin benefits to humanity, the worship of
materialism—all the old crimes that come dressed up as new virtues—find
no foothold here. The “pale pink uplift” of these modern shams would be
laughed to scorn by our people of Sabina and Abruzzi and Ciocciarìa.
Their parish priests tramp round amongst them as friends and mentors.
The _parroco_ and the apothecary may be the only persons in a whole
community who can read, but the child of ten knows the commandments
of God and the Church, and the innovator who attempts to make little
of these meets with a very cold reception. The people have many faults
and many weaknesses, but they are all human ones, and, frankly, I would
rather have to do with the man who has slain a rival or a sweetheart in
a fit of jealous anger than with a railway magnate or a prophet of the
Decadent! The murderer’s record is probably a good deal cleaner than
theirs.

So my inheritance of Sabina has always been very precious to me. Many
weary years have passed since I set foot there, but the remembrance of
young days spent in those high rich solitudes comes still as a fresh
breeze across the dusty wastes of the world, and very gladly shall
I return to them before I die. I have travelled so far and seen such
strange and endless varieties of scenery that I think I have a right
to say that there are few places on earth where nature has done more to
rejoice and strengthen the body and soul of man.

From Rome the Sabines are merely a noble chain of peaks culminating
in the calm lion profile of the couchant “Lionessa,” her face to the
north, waiting through the long blue days of summer for the crown
of snow that the winter lays on her brow. The slopes and spurs that
descend towards the Campagna are smiling enough—as they should be,
turned everlastingly to the sun and the sea. One must pass beyond all
that, climb by rough and narrow paths to the great tossed heart of the
hills and stand on some peak like Guadognolo, to take in the amazing
grandeur of the Sabines. Even from lower places, Olevano, for instance,
you may look east and west and south and north, and feel as if you
were standing on an island crag in an ocean of long sapphire billows
rolling away, breaker beyond breaker, into infinity—a sea that in some
moment of surpassing pride raised its breast too near the sky and froze
to stone in that passion of ambition; and your heart, the heart of the
native-born, tells you that every hollow between the breakers holds its
rivers and lakes smothered in olives and vines and corn, its walled
town and ancient church, its old fortified farm-houses, dazzlingly
white against the sun-warmed rock of the mounting ridge—farm-houses
with broad brick loggias garlanded with festoons of scarlet and
orange, the bursting red _pepperoni_ as big as citrons, and strings of
flame-coloured maize like golden pear-heads, all drying in the sun for
the winter’s needs.

Stop at one of these houses and ask for hospitality, and you will
find out what the word really means. I have often thought of it when I
was sitting through huge official dinners where the great ones of the
earth were arranging its destinies over the champagne and truffles—with
the murder of a nation in their hearts. The commanded smile, and the
cold, watchful eyes—the men fencing with words for rapiers, and we
women watching every play of the shrouded steel and pretending to talk
amiable nothings to each other; the gasp of relief at parting, and the
consignment to everlasting perdition of the adversary, which broke from
our worried mate when the door of the brougham had been clapped to and
we could sink back on the cushions as we rolled away!

Then would return a vision of some halt in the hills at home, of the
dark, cavernous kitchen with its freshly sprinkled brick floor and
its bunches of herbs hanging from the high blackened beams overhead
shedding their dry fragrance on the air, so cool and refreshing on
entering from the burning midday sunshine outside. “Favorisca!” cries
the “Sposa”—she may be eighteen or eighty, but that is her title
from her wedding day forward—“Condescend to enter! Let the signori be
accommodated!” The rush-bottomed chairs are set out on the loggia in
the shade, the boys are sent to fetch ice-cool water from the well,
and as the bucket goes splashing down into the invisible flood and
comes up all diamonds in the sun, “Sposa” brings out four or five heavy
glasses, freshly rinsed, in the fingers of one hand and a straw-bound
_fiaschetta_ of her own wine in the other. “Vino sincero, signori
miei!” she assures you as she sets it down on the deal table already
spread with the clean cloth that smells of rosemary. Aye, a “sincere
wine,” with no “dope” in its crimson or topaz depths, and the welcome
is as sincere as the wine. She pours it out, smiling, her handsome head
and rich costume standing out picturesquely against the dark doorway
behind her, within which one of her girls is kneeling on the bricks,
washing freshly pulled lettuce for your salad in a great copper bowl,
hand-beaten and reflecting the light from every one of its red-bronze
facets. Everything in the kitchen is of beaten copper; these people
would as soon think of cooking in any other metal as of sleeping in
cotton sheets—a degradation the poorest scorns to put up with.

“Sposa” disappears within the kitchen and one of the girls comes out to
entertain the visitors while the dinner is cooking. She stands with one
hand on the back of a chair, the other fingering her blue-and-yellow
apron, pink with shyness, but devoured with curiosity. Every detail
of one’s dress, every bit of jewellery, is being taken in—to be
described to all the other girls of the place when they meet at church
on Sunday, but she answers one’s questions with a confident smile.
How old? Oh, “in seventeen”—that is, sixteen last birthday. Her name?
Candiduccia, at the Signora’s service! Betrothed? A pinker flush and an
indescribable little movement of the shoulders, and then down goes her
head, while “Mammà,” whose sharp ears have heard all, replies in her
deep, sonorous tones, from among the pots and pans: “A good youth, but
he is getting a bad bargain! This lazy one has not spun half her linen
yet. I had mine all spun and woven by the time I was fourteen! Here,
thou! come and fetch the plates! The illustrious ones are hungry!”

Candiduccia dives into the kitchen, and a moment later your dinner is
before you—a big, dimpled omelet, trout from the stream fried in olive
oil, and crisp salad in a big majolica bowl. “Sposa” cuts the fresh,
rough bread—first making the sign of the Cross over the loaf—and serves
you cream-cheese made from goat’s milk, instead of butter. Butter
and cow’s milk do not enter into the Sabina bill of fare—our mountain
people do not care about these things; but it is a feast for the gods,
all the same.

When the time comes to go, you give “Sposa” what you think right, and
she takes it rather unwillingly, but very gratefully, and as you ride
away she and her girls stand at the door and wave their hands and say
“La Madonna v’accompagni,” and the boys, young rascals, will race your
horses to the foot of the hill or the turn in the road, knowing well
that you will give them a few coppers for their very own as soon as you
are out of sight of “Mammà,” who, you may be sure, will never hear of
the transaction.

If one is an invited guest at some important farm-house an elaborate
feast is prepared, and there are heart-burnings if the guests do not
eat heartily of everything. I remember once going with the Cavalettis
to the _bene_ of one of their tenants, for dinner—a really mediæval
repast which staggered even my robust young appetite. It began with
the _polentata_, a curious first course which is _de rigueur_ in
Sabina when guests of honour are being entertained. The chief table
was already set out with a dozen kinds of fresh and dried fruits,
_alicetti_ (the tiny local sardines), smoked ham, and home-made
liqueurs, all intended to stimulate the appetite.

But before sitting down to that we were led to a small pine-wood table
at one side of the room and requested to take our seats around it. Then
the mistress of the house advanced with a huge cauldron of polenta,
which, to my consternation, she poured out on the freshly-scrubbed
table-top, so deftly that it exactly covered the entire surface. I
stared, wondering what was to happen next; but my companions took
no notice of me, and the Marchese, whom his peasants adored—as did
everybody else who knew him—leant back in his chair and discussed the
condition of the game in the woods with “Sor Giacomo,” while the wife,
a piece of new string in her hands, watched the polenta cool and fix
to about the consistency of cream cheese. Then, suddenly leaning over
my shoulder, she cut it swiftly across and across with the string
in symmetrical divisions nearly a foot square, one for each person,
solemnly handed us each a spoon, and, bowing gracefully, begged us to
eat!

It was a searching preparation for a hearty meal!

On another occasion we were invited to dinner at the house of a country
notable many miles away, but still connected with the Cavaletti
domains. It was early autumn, and we had an enchanting ride in the
bright, cool morning through the deep woods where the chestnut burrs
came padding down on the moss with soft thuds as we passed, and here
and there some delicate ash or birch was already flaming into orange
with the first touch of the frost. They looked like torches alight in
the forest. They are so deep and green, those woods of Sabina, rich
with oak and chestnut, elm and beech, a fairyland of moss and fern
below, a world of sun and shadow above. The flowers are very delicate
too, harebells like thin amethyst, and the dainty wild pansy that lifts
her little startled head like a Louis XV beauty who has lost her way;
and there are stars of Bethlehem, growing always apart and lonely,
five white petals with a touch of greenish-gold for a heart, swinging
in the breeze on a long, translucent stem; and wild strawberries—snowy
flower and crimson berry springing side by side among the broad
trefoil leaves; and wild garlic, a mass of spotless bloom; and magic
elder with great posies of perfumed level rime; and fern so tall that
one could lose oneself in it, seeking for the threaded turquoise
of forget-me-nots that grow beneath; and thousands more, fragile,
exquisite things blooming in the deep peace of the undergrowth, while
far overhead the strong tree-tops laugh in the wind and take all the
sun.

I remember how sorry I was when we left the woods behind that day
and reached a tiny walled town with, of course, a church, a piazza, a
fountain, and one big house standing aggressively square to the street,
a typical Italian house with as many windows as could possibly be put
into it, all green-shuttered, and most of them balconied. That was all
I saw, for as we drew rein at the entrance we were surrounded by the
whole family, all grown-up men and women, who lifted us girls down from
our saddles, took possession of all our belongings, and all but carried
us up to a big, cool room on the first floor, with many expressions of
sympathy for our supposed fatigue after the long ride. I believe they
thought us rather daring for venturing ourselves on the shaggy mountain
ponies at all, for few Italian women in the country ever mount anything
more frisky than a tried and sober donkey.

Having settled us on the _canapé_—a very large sofa covered with green
and scarlet checks—and provided us with rosolio and cakes to keep us
good, all the ladies disappeared together. The men were buzzing around
the Marchese, who, like the lover of horses he was, insisted on seeing
the animals housed and fed; then a kind of electric thrill ran through
the house, the Signora and her daughters came to fetch us from the
salone, and everybody moved towards the dining-room. I was a little
surprised to see so few seats at the table, which was covered with
every kind of dainty and very prettily arranged; but the matter was
explained, when it became evident that the ladies of the family were to
wait upon us and their own men in approved feudal fashion.

I say “ladies” advisedly, for these were people as far removed from the
peasant class as they considered themselves from that of the Marchese.
They had never worn the costume of the contadine; they belonged to
the great respectable middle class from which most of the professions
are supplied; both men and women spoke without a trace of dialect, and
their manners were perfect—but then, thank Heaven, Italy is the natural
home of good manners! I shall never forget the gentle, unobtrusive
sweetness of those women as they moved about in perfect silence,
in their black Sunday frocks and little bits of ancient jewellery,
attending to all our wants so carefully and deftly, but refusing to
take any part in the conversation. That was not what was expected of
them!

The long, elaborate feast had gone from _ante-pasto_ and vermouth
right through to the sweets; my girl friend and I looked at each other
questioningly. We were growing fidgety and wondered who was to give the
signal to rise, since we were the only women at the table—when, to our
dismay and despair, the whole meal began all over again! Course after
course, in regular sequence, we had to sit it through and pretend to
taste the new varieties of fish, flesh, and fowl which came in a steady
stream from the kitchen. It was like some crazy dream!

I think we had sat at that table nearly four hours before we were
invited to take our coffee in the salone. The sun was sinking then,
and, to our intense relief, the Marchese announced that we must be
moving or we should not reach home that night. The farewells were
elaborate, and our gratitude for all the trouble the dear people
had taken was very real; they packed a whole hamper of ancient Roman
dainties for us to take along lest we should faint by the way; but
our joy when we got into the open air with our faces towards home was
inexpressible. As we entered the woods—less alluring in the dusk than
in the fresh morning hours—a shadowy fourth joined our party, a smiling
little man on a very small donkey. In two minutes the Marchese had
made friends with him, and called out to us in English, “Girls, think
up some compliments! This is the man who cooked the dinner! They sent
twenty miles for him—and he wants to know if you liked it!”


A woman noted for the charm and variety of her entertainments once said
to me, “I do try to give respectable parties, but somehow they always
turn into school feasts!” I am afraid the same kind of thing happens
to me in regard to serious subjects. With the best intentions in the
world I start to tell the story of some great person who has kindled my
admiration—and in the middle of the tale the sun strikes on my page—a
child laughs across the street—or some old refrain comes lilting to my
ears, and farewell to the historic train of thought! My hero or Saint
recedes into the shadows and relinquishes the canvas to a thousand
amiable little sprites of memory who hold it till they have frisked
through the very last step of their dance!

I do not know why, on this sunny July morning, there should rise before
me a picture of a dark old house in the steep street of a Sabina town,
where we drew rein after a long day’s ride to ask for rooms. The night
was falling, there was no inn in the place, and somebody had told us
that perhaps the people here would take us in. Our party was that with
which I left Castle Gandolfo some chapters ago—my stepfather, Marion,
and the Hon. and Rev. G—— C——, who had already several times saved
my life by stopping my runaway steed, a wall-eyed old crock given
to me because he looked so reassuringly tame. He was quiet enough at
that moment; we were both stiff and tired; and I slid to the ground
resolved not to go a step farther, whatever the people of the house
should say. The padrona came down and looked us over critically. Yes,
she could take in the gentlemen if they would all sleep in one room,
but it was impossible to receive the signorina—there was really nowhere
to put her! I replied by walking into the house and sitting down on
the first chair I could find, and defying her to turn me out. She
stood and looked at me, considering. “Well,” she said at last, “there
_is_ a room—it belongs to my little boy—perhaps he will not come home
to-night. Yes, you may sleep there, Poverina! I see you are tired out.”

She led me down a long, twisting passage and threw open a door,
holding the brass _lucerna_ high to light me in. I saw a bed and a
chair, and what I took to be a highly variegated wall-paper. “It will
do beautifully,” I said. “Tell the gentlemen that I don’t want any
supper—I am going straight to bed!”

“Buon riposo, bella mia!” (“A good rest, my beautiful”) she replied,
and shutting the door tramped away till her footsteps were lost in the
distance. Then I looked round. “What a funny room for a little boy!” I
thought. Guns and hunting-knives hung on racks all about, and what I
had thought was wall-paper turned out to be a gigantic collection of
the pictures off the French match-boxes which had just begun to find
their way into our part of the world, and which were not admitted into
our house because they were so improper. The little boy had covered the
walls with them from top to bottom! Well, it was none of my business,
and I prepared to lie down and forget them, but when I went to lock the
door I found that it had no key and would hardly close at all. Fatigue,
however, got the better of nervousness—it was a respectable house,
after all.

I was almost ready to get into bed, when a heavy step came along the
passage accompanied by the cheerful whistling of an old opera air.
I sprang up, too late to prevent the door being thrown wide open—and
found myself staring at a tall young man in town clothes and a red tie,
who jumped back as if he had been shot. I screamed—he swore—and then we
both broke into peals of laughter. As soon as he could get his breath
he apologized abjectly for the intrusion—“Mammà” had not told him
about any guests—I was a thousand times welcome to his room—and would I
permit him to look for some necessary articles before he relieved me of
the inconvenience of his presence? I tried to bow with proper dignity,
sitting on the edge of the bed with a cloak around me, and he scuttled
about, dived into various drawers for garments, tobacco, matches, and
took his leave with careful courtesy, never having even glanced in my
direction after the first startling encounter. The country dandy was
quite as much of a “blue-rose” as the Austrian Prince who earned his
name among the girls in Rome—but that paladin belongs to another story.

As one travels southward the character of the people changes, and in
the later years of my life I have felt more at home with my fellow
beings of the South than with the inhabitants of Romagna. Their outlook
is simpler, more indulgent, and their religious faith far more fervent.
I think the southern custom of going on pilgrimages was a very valuable
one to the contadini of the “Regno.” It used to be rare to find
middle-aged people of the labouring class in the province who had not
travelled a little in that way and thus learnt that the world was not
confined to their own small town or hamlet. I suppose the good custom
will die out in time, like so many others, but it will not suffer much
diminution while such wonderful new centres of attraction spring up
as, for instance, the “Santuario” of New Pompeii, which I described in
a former book.[11] But many an unforgotten shrine in the more remote
hills has, like La Mentorana in the Sabines, its one day or night of
glory in the year, when the peasants come in great bands, even from far
away, and the chants and litanies go up all night long in and around
some dim old church. Such a festival takes place at San Salvatore in
the Abruzzi, in the late summer, and is the scene of a great gathering
of the people of the Penisola Sarrcutina.

A night expedition is always alluring; and besides, I had wanted to see
this particular festa for years, so I took one of the servants with me,
a broad-shouldered woman of the people, strong enough to carry me if
need be, and we set out, in a carrozzella, on a moonless night towards
nine o’clock. Very soon we had left Sorrento and its lights behind
and were climbing by steep, narrow roads into the wild mountains that
cluster round Monte Sant’ Angelo. The chain of the Abruzzi that runs
out into the sea as the backbone of the Penisola rises sharp and high
from the rounded cup of the Piano di Sorrento, and, elsewhere, gives
way but little on either side to the needs of men. From the “Piano” and
the narrowing strip of level land, the cliffs facing the north plunge
clear into the water, which has worn them into huge caves, each with
its tiny cove of sand, divided from one another by great out-standing
buttresses of rock. As soon as one turns inland one is lost in the
twisting defiles that scar the mountains through and through; and the
deep old roads, narrow and steep, crawl up away from the regions of
vines and olives till they reach wild, empty highlands where only the
hardiest shrubs and flowers will grow.

It is an impressive experience to travel through these forgotten roads
on a starlit night, farther and farther from the sound of the sea and
the haunts of men. The loneliness is enormous; earth recedes from
sight and one is conscious of very little except that unfathomable
sky overhead, dripping and sprayed with live silver to its farthest
faintest depths, while some gorgeous planet of our own system wheels
its way between crag and crag as one moves along. Broom and wild
rosemary reach out from the wall of rock to brush your face; a tang
of bitter sweetness, clear as an exclamation, fills your nostrils for
an instant, and you know that you are passing a clump of immortelles
hidden in a cleft you cannot see.

And then the wild power of it all goes to your head; you are not a
modern mortal with a thousand anchors fastening you to the scrap-heap
of the workaday world, but a newborn princess of romance, travelling
through the hills of fairyland to take possession of your unknown,
enormous castle; its thousand windows are glowing gold beyond that
last peak, all lighted up for your reception; in its deep courts and
airy bowers invisible subjects will minister to your wants. In a high
tower looking south all the great books in the world are waiting to be
read; there is a terrace a hundred feet from the ground, perfumed and
trellised, where you can watch the stars; and not a single creature in
the whole world will ever find the way to the castle!

“Quì si và a piedi, ’cellenza!” said Maria, climbing down from her
seat. The little carriage could go no farther, and I returned suddenly
to earth and meekly followed her example. The sound of voices and
footsteps began to fill the air, and we came on shadowy groups resting
by the wayside, pilgrims who had come from far on foot. Then at a
sudden turn we were in the piazza, and all outer things, sky and stars
and peaks, were swallowed up in blackness, for the piazza was one blaze
of orange light from hundreds of torches, burning luridly and outlining
the dark façade of the church with red-gold gleams that rose and sank
like dancing waters; turning a face here, a costume there, to unearthly
brightness and then leaping away in tall tongues of fire, to be lost in
the mist of smoke overhead.

The crowd was so thick that we could scarcely reach the church, from
the open doors of which a flood of broad yellow radiance streamed
out over the heads of the pilgrims who knelt in serried ranks on the
portico, all faces turned to the interior, whence streamed that soft
illumination. When we stood on the threshold I saw that it came from
the High Altar, which seemed to be floating in a vast _mandorla_ of
light. Hundreds and hundreds of wax candles, each a tongue of steady
golden flame, surrounded the Tabernacle and reached, in an oval of
fire, almost to the roof. The walls of the church were covered with
white draperies to which were fastened wreaths and garlands and single
sprays of flowers, a delicate ornamentation as old as ancient Rome and
always used in the Penisola; and every pilaster was panelled from top
to bottom with crimson damask trimmed with gold—those precious strips
of drapery which the well-to-do families hoard from generation to
generation and lend to the different churches as required.

From door to altar rails the church was packed with kneeling
worshippers, and a great hush prevailed, for midnight had struck and
Mass was about to begin.

My companion, threading her way with coaxing apologies, pulled me
along till she found a place where we could both kneel by a pillar
at the top of the church, and just as we had settled ourselves a
sweet-voiced old organ, high up in an invisible gallery, sent out the
first notes of the chant, filling the little ancient building with a
flood of music—not the usual gay tunes that Italians love to hear in
church, but solemn, thrilling airs from some old Mass that I had never
heard before. The singers had been brought from far, and the voices
were of the best—which is saying a great deal in South Italy, where
everybody is born with “a harp in his throat.” Somehow it was one of
the most beautiful services I ever attended. The absorbed devotion of
the people, the reverent manner of the Celebrant and his assistants,
the full-throated responses that were taken up by the kneeling crowd
outside, where every sound was hushed the moment Mass began—it was the
very essence of whole-hearted, loving worship.

A number of persons went to Communion; there was a rousing sermon, and
then came much jollification in the piazza, crammed with little booths
that looked like altars of flame themselves, the wildly flaring torches
lighting up strange wares—long rosaries of yellow nuts that swung in
the wind, artificial roses set in a whirl of spun glass, each with its
pin to stick into hat or braids of hair, holy pictures in the crude
reds and blues that the people love, sweetmeats and honey-cakes and
fruit. Outside and everywhere beyond, the blackness of night, and on
that tiny plateau of the rocks a little whirlpool of life and fire.

We crept away, I and my Maria, and after some trouble found our
carrozzella and its driver, and started for home just as the darkness
thinned before the dawn. It was cold enough in the mountain roads then,
and I was glad to reach the lower levels and the hospitable gate of the
villa by the sea.

I think it was in that same year that my brother’s two boys,
enthusiastically aided by all the sailors, invented a kind of
switchback railway which really carried passengers! They got four
or five little trucks built—without saying a word to any of us—and,
coupling them together, started at the outer gate of the villa and
raced down the long paved incline which led, between walls covered
with stephanotis and jasmine, to the round garden in front of the
house. Here the encircling walk was also paved, and the impetus of the
downward rush carried the train once or twice round the whole space,
after which Luigi and Antonio submissively dragged it all the way to
the front gate again.

There was quite an excitement in whirling round the corners, and for
some days every member of the family had to get into the cars and be
carried along, an occasional upset only adding to the delight of the
experience, as far as Harold and Bertie were concerned. Then they built
a _ristorante_ at one point, and installed their sisters to dispense
lemonade and bonbons to the weary travellers, who were supposed to have
come from an immense distance. Of course the travellers had to pay—such
an undertaking costs money! Then, as the autumn days drew in, there
were night excursions, when the train, with headlights on, came roaring
down the garden to a great accompaniment of hoots and whistles, quite
an alarming thing to meet if one were taking a stroll in the twilight.

The _ferro-via_ was a great success, but the owners of the line panted
for more public recognition. We elders did not care to risk ourselves
in the trucks after dark, and for two or three evenings, as we sat
over our tea in the drawing-room, we wondered rather at the steady
persistence with which the train rushed backwards and forwards outside.
The boys were unusually silent about their exploits now, but from their
bright eyes and their sisters’ obstinate refusal to answer questions,
we could not help fancying that some kind of mischief was afoot. Then
one evening, just before dinner, Bonifazio came into the drawing-room,
looking very scared.

“Signora mia,” he exclaimed to my sister-in-law, “do you know what
the Signorini are doing? The entire town is gathered in the piazzale
outside the gate, and the young gentlemen are taking all the passengers
the cars will hold, twice round the garden—for two sous the trip!
And the young ladies are actually _selling refreshments to these
contadini_! For the love of Heaven, let the Signora stop this scandal!
The people are fighting to get into the cars!”

It would be interesting to know what is really going on in children’s
minds—those fairy plans which they weave steadily through lessons and
play and would rather die than confide to their elders! I remember
a surprise that my small brother and sister sprung upon the family
before I was married—a scheme all worked and irrevocably launched
before accident revealed it to any of the grown-ups in the house. Daisy
was about nine years old, and Arthur, her submissive slave, just over
seven. It was the height of the winter season, and there was the usual
rush of engagements for weeks ahead, when at some afternoon reception
a friend of my mother’s said to her: “We are so glad next Thursday is
free! We shall be so much interested to see your children’s play!”

“My children’s play? There must be some mistake,” my mother replied. “I
have not issued any invitations for theatricals!”

“Your little people have,” the lady retorted; “look at this!”

And she produced a card on which was written in a nice round hand,
“Miss Terry and Master Arthur Terry request the pleasure of Mrs. ——’s
company on Thursday next at 9 o’clock. (_Theatrakulls._)”

My mother’s feelings were not to be described! Within ten minutes three
or four other people smilingly informed her that they, too, had been
invited and certainly meant to come. There was nothing for it but to
go straight home and find out what the little monkeys had committed us
to. On being sternly questioned, Daisy, with the imperturbable calmness
that distinguished her even then, produced a list of some two hundred
names, culled from mamma’s visiting-book, and said: “These are the
people we have asked. We chose the ones we liked, of course. _I_ have
composed the play and it will be most interesting. Arthur is in love
with me, Sofia is my rival—I have one or two other children in it,
but they are rather stupid, so I shall have to do most of the acting
myself. Don’t worry me, please—you have nothing to do but order the
supper and send for the chairs!”

Of course we submitted. Everything had been done in order; Daisy
(Arthur could not write well enough as yet) must have devoted her
playtime, for days, to writing out the invitations, which the servants
had carried to their addresses, never doubting but that the Signora’s
authorization had been obtained. We were not allowed to see the last
rehearsals even—the drop-curtain of the little theatre in the ballroom
being jealously closed while they went on. I tried to get taken on as
manager—no use! “I know exactly what I am about,” said my small sister,
“I haven’t watched you grown-ups all these years for nothing! It’s
going to be a _great success_!”

Which it certainly was! Daisy’s speeches were a little long, because
some of the others forgot their parts and she had to bridge their
silences by expressing their sentiments for them. “I know what you
would say, dear friend—your heart is true, but you fear the vengeance
of the Marquis! Oh, I understand!” And so on. Then, at the critical
moment of the love scene, Arthur got stage-fright, and the Marquise,
who was naturally taller than her adorer, stooped towards him and
energetically whispered, “Go down on your knees and kiss my hand _this
minute, stupid_!” at which a roar of merriment swept through the room,
to end in a storm of applause, as the small boy, dropping on one knee,
gave the hand a smacking kiss and exclaimed ardently, “_My angel!_”

Oh yes, it was a great success. The little Marquise was a born actress,
and carried it all off so well that the guests declared they had never
enjoyed an evening so much. But we “grown-ups” had passed some anxious
moments; and when it was all over and the triumphant performers had had
all the applause, as well as all the cake and goodies, they wanted, we
extracted a sleepy promise that we should be at least warned the next
time they asked the town to a play!



CHAPTER X

A STORY OF VENICE


Here is a story of Venice.

In the early part of the fifteenth century a Northern soldier, riding
home through the sweet-smelling summer twilight, dreaming in all
probability of some dusky-eyed maiden of the border States, stopped by
the side of a field to look about him for a shelter for the night. That
he would be welcome at any inn, he was sure, for he was returning from
the wars to spend his not very hard-earned prize money, of which his
saddle-bags were full.

One can imagine him, pushing back his helmet and regarding the fair
country-side with the appreciative eye of the professional marauder,
smacking his dusty lips at the thought of the weeks of hilarious
wickedness that his loot would buy for him. The picture is not
overdrawn, I can assure the reader, for they were little more than wild
beasts, those followers of the great Condottieri, brought under an iron
discipline, the yoke of which they were willing to bear for a time,
in return for the ample pay and the opportunities which their service
afforded them of sacking unoffending towns and robbing and spearing
harmless and unarmed citizens and ravishing their wives and daughters.
Here and there, stray flowers in those acres of weeds, a fairly decent
character appeared among them, but, from such accounts as can be found,
these latter never seem to have stayed long in their ranks.

As it has been said, the rival bands that infested Italy and Southern
France in those merry days never made any serious attempt to injure
each other, unless driven to such unpleasant measures by the sternest
necessity—or, to be sure, unless some particularly rich bit of loot
was between them. As a general thing, though, they do not seem to have
displayed even the common courage of the wolf. The longer a campaign
could be dragged out the better for all concerned was their motto, and
they lived up to it, even to the point of punctiliously letting loose
all the prisoners they took from each other after every engagement. A
safer and more care-free life than theirs would be difficult, if not
impossible, to imagine. The people who hired them were, of course,
utterly unable to cope with their enemies—with their enemies’ bravos,
that is to say—by themselves, and were as completely helpless against
their own servants; it was altogether an ideal state of things.

To return to our trooper, breathing his horse and probably smacking
his lips over the prospect of the cheer with which his blood-spotted
loot would provide him for the next month or so. Looking around in the
early dusk, he noticed a boy working desultorily in the fields, and,
while his horse rested, he studied him. There was something in the way
in which he carried his head, and the set of his chin and jaw, which
sounded a sympathetic echo in the trooper’s breast. This was no common
peasant, he told himself, and called out to the boy to come over and
speak to him. Nothing loath, the youth obeyed, and the upshot of this
conversation was that the boy elected to take the trooper’s advice and
follow him.

The trooper, one imagines, must have been in the service of Facino
Cane, a grizzled, deaf old soldier with a high reputation, as
reputations went in those days, and it did not take the new recruit
long to show his worth. Even when he was still young, Cane seems to
have recognized in him an equal if not a superior, and refused flatly
to promote him, swearing that if he was given one step he would take
all the rest for himself.

Francesco Borsone, better known as Carmagnola, retired into himself,
and bided his time. Cane was great, and with Cane there was always
profitable employment in plenty. So he decided to remain where he
was; but if Facino Cane continued to behave as he had been doing of
late, it was not likely that he would last for very long, and in the
happy and quite possible event of his being assassinated before long
Carmagnola would take his place. There would be no one, he felt sure,
who would wish to oppose him, and if there were, he thought he knew how
to overcome their opposition. Cane had a splendid force under him—and
they would need a leader, to be of any use to themselves. They would
choose him for themselves. One can almost hear him saying to himself,
as he leaves the chief’s presence and looks back at the door, “Eh!
chì va piano va sano—chì va sano va lontano!” (“Who goes slowly goes
safely—who goes safely goes far!”)

Cane, for his part, was neither going slowly nor safely. Giovanni, Duke
of Milan, had but recently died. He had been as good a soldier as any
Condottiere that ever drew sword, and he had held his dukedom together
with his own good right arm. But now, in the hands of his eldest son,
Gian Maria, the inheritance was falling to pieces. Gian Maria was a
degenerate—a lunatic—it is even said that he fed his hounds with human
flesh; and, in a very short time, the cities of the dukedom—Piacenza,
Parma, Cremona, Lodi—revolted, and the several Condottieri, who had
formerly served Giovanni, seized the opportunity of realizing their
ambition, which was to become independent rulers themselves. There was
no great difficulty about this, once a division of the spoil was agreed
upon, for each had a small army at his back and the ability to use it.
The inhabitants, helpless in the face of trained fighters, put forward
no opposition, so that, in six months or less, six or seven dukes
existed where only one had existed before.

Cane seized upon Pavia, the younger son’s portion, and kept the heir a
prisoner in his own court. Not long afterwards he dethroned the elder
son, and, it is to be supposed, arranged his end for him at the hands
of the Milanese. He himself died in Pavia within a day of the Duke’s
assassination. No remark is made by historians on the subject of his
death save that he died, but where the character of his ducal prisoner
is considered and the excellent reasons he had for wishing his jailor
dead are taken into account, the latter’s end may, I think, be safely
laid at Filippo Maria’s door.

So that, in the end, Carmagnola was right in his determination to wait
upon events.

Now his turn came. The soldiers were left leaderless, and Carmagnola
seized the captainship instantly—at the age of twenty-two—while Filippo
Maria as instantly married Cane’s widow, in order to get the old
soldier’s estates, and, these being secured, brought a false accusation
against her, and had her executed.

This worthy couple then joined hands, to recover the lost cities, and
Carmagnola began to show something of his quality. He recaptured Milan,
killing the usurper, and one by one brought back the other cities to
his employer, as a reward for which he was made Count of Castelmuro and
married to a daughter of Giovanni Galleazzo, one Antonia.

It seemed as though Fortunatus’s purse had been emptied over him in
the years that followed; wealth, honour, position, all were his, and so
rich and powerful did he become that he was even permitted to invest in
the bonded debt of Venice.

He must have grown careless after a while, for his enemies—and they
were numbered by the score—contrived to get the Duke’s ear, and to
poison his mind. They probably used Carmagnola’s popularity with his
men as an instrument, and played upon Filippo’s morbid pride and his
unhealthy nerves until he saw in his great general a Frankenstein
of his own creation, which, if it were not itself destroyed, would
presently destroy him.

One cannot think that Carmagnola was anything but careless—for when
Philip demanded some of his bodyguard from him for a special purpose he
protested with honest vigour against this taking of a weapon from one
who knew how to use it and handing it to one who did not. Getting no
reply, he became impatient, and sought one in person, by forcing his
way into Philip’s presence, but he was stopped at the gate, and then
his temper left him.

His remarks were few and incisive, his opinions of the courtiers about
Philip’s person plain as the tower at which he shouted them, and he
wound up with an open threat directed at both. That done he turned and
rode off with his half-dozen attendants, and one brave gentleman who
had ridden out to pursue him was so terrified at the sight of him, as
he galloped across the marshy fields, his head on his chest, rage like
an embodied spirit beside him, that he thought better of his intention
and made back into the safe shelter of Abbiti. Carmagnola pursued his
way without pausing until he came to the Court of Amadeus of Savoy, who
was his own liege lord, and here he immediately offered his services,
explaining at the same time what had just happened to him.

Filippo, in the meanwhile, confiscated his estates and seized his wife
and daughter as hostages. That Antonia was his own sister—or, at least,
had always passed as such—made not the slightest difference to the
scoundrelly Filippo, and Carmagnola does not seem to have so much as
troubled his head about the women.

Yet, for some reason, he seems to have excused Filippo’s
conduct—openly, at least—and to have placed the blame where most of it
belonged—on his surroundings. Then, casually, as though the idea had
only just occurred to him, he spoke of various and choice pieces of
territory whose ownership, though nominally Filippo’s, was, he averred,
doubtful.

To his disappointment, Amadeus refused to be drawn into the affair,
and Carmagnola presently set off for Venice, always a safe resort for
warriors of any quality.

He arrived at an auspicious moment, for Venice was hesitating as to
the worth-whileness of an alliance which had been proposed to her by
Florence for the purpose of attacking Carmagnola’s late master, Filippo
of Milan.

The Venetians, living as they did in an almost continuous state of
war with one or other of their neighbours, were only too glad of the
opportunity of gaining the services of the famous freelance, and gave
him the command of their land army, within a very few weeks of his
arrival—Foscari, the Procurator of St. Mark, in the meantime pushing
forward the alliance with Florence, in season and out of season. In
this he was opposed by Mocenigo, the Doge, who, in spite of his eighty
years, and even on his deathbed, in the presence of senators and
ministers, uttered a solemn and prophetic warning against the war. He
must have been a truly wonderful old man, for in that farewell speech
of his, delivered from the edge of the grave, he gave a complete and
accurate account of the State’s finances, and of its employees’ down
to the ships’ caulkers and the manufacturers of fustian, besides
remembering the number of gentlemen with incomes between seven hundred
and four thousand ducats. At the end of it he told his hearers that
if they rejected his advice and quarrelled with Milan, in a very short
while they would find themselves under the heel of a military despotism
which would take the very coats from their backs—all of which presently
came to pass. Finally he warned them against Foscari, whose election to
the Dogeship some of them, as he knew, favoured.

But his warnings were in vain, for Foscari was elected over Loredano,
in a conclave, the account of which is curiously like that of a
political convention of to-day—the holding of a number of votes
in reserve, the speeches on both sides, the trick by which Foscari
irritated his noble old opponent into losing his temper and abusing
his adversaries. There is nothing new, of course, under the sun, but it
gives one a queer thrill when one comes upon things like these.

Soon afterwards Carmagnola was offered the command already referred
to, and Filippo, on hearing the news, made an attempt to have his old
comrade poisoned, but the agents were caught and executed after having
been thoroughly and soundly tortured.

There followed visits and embassies from Milan and Florence, the
Milanese, gay, careless, assured, the Florentines, grave and soberly
clad, leaving no stone unturned, no mine of favour unworked. Carmagnola
stalked through the Milanese Masque like a shadow through a field of
poppies, and when the Senators, torn between the pleadings of the
Florentine Ambassador and the easy, somewhat scornful reply of the
Milanese envoy, hesitated, the Condottiere, enraged by the attempt just
made upon his life, presented his side of the case, pointing out that
Filippo’s apparent strength was only the result of his, Carmagnola’s,
victories, and that of his own he had none at all, and openly
proclaiming his hatred and scorn both of the Duke and his soldiers.

That settled the matter, and the league with Florence, which presently
embraced Ferrara, Mantua, the Sienese, Amadeus VIII of Savoy, and King
Alphonso of Naples, was formed.

It is extremely difficult if not impossible to discover the true
character of Carmagnola at this time of day. Some speak of him as being
a double-faced villain, some—Sismondi, for instance—as of a demi-god.
Great he was, talented in many directions, and all but invincible; like
others, he may have had several sides to his nature, and each of these,
as it met for the moment the sun of events, may have represented the
whole man for the time being.

The Duke of Milan now began to feel the weight of the hand he had
turned against himself, although, at the outset of the war, Carmagnola
does not appear to have exerted himself greatly. Brescia fell—whether
to the Florentine commander or to the Venetian is a matter of opinion.
Probably the Florentine siege works and the effect of Carmagnola’s
reputation were equally responsible—and the Duke ceded the conquest on
December 30; not, however, before he had made an attempt to burn down
the Venetian arsenal, and another of his several agents had been caught
by the Venetians and carefully tortured to death.

Carmagnola, from all accounts, seems still to have been divided between
the desire of earning his pay from the Venetians and an unwillingness,
even now and in spite of everything, to push his old employer more
than was necessary to accomplish the ends he had in mind. This was
difficult, for the Venetians, having paid, like the hard-headed
merchants they were, wanted plenty of blood and destruction for their
money; and the amicable habit, which time and practice had crystallized
into a precedent, of returning prisoners after an engagement, in order
to keep the good work going on, was not at all to their minds.

It was not long before Filippo began to tire of the almost monotonous
series of defeats which overtook his leaders, and, though breathing
fire against Carmagnola, and complaining bitterly of what he was
pleased to call the “bad faith” of the poor Florentines (whom he had
been bullying so heartily and for so long), he was forced to sue for
the good offices of Pope Martin V, who, although none too pleased at
being dragged into such company, yet helped him, for the sake of the
smudged name he bore.

Of course such a peace could not last for any length of time. No one
of the parties to it trusted any of the others in the slightest, and
Venice had, so far, swallowed up all the profits of the campaign, which
included Brescia and all its castles and territory up to the Lago di
Garda, and a portion of Cremona besides.

This peace was concluded on December 30, 1426, and Carmagnola went
into winter quarters, under the admiring eyes of his temporary
fellow-citizens.

His family had contrived to join him by now, and the time passed
pleasantly away for the grizzled and somewhat war-worn captain. He had
punished Filippo, and had, besides, secured what promised to be the
most profitable employment upon which he had ever entered.

He knew the Visconti; he must have been quite sure that Filippo had
no intention of giving up the struggle as tamely as that, and when it
recommenced he would, he imagined, be able to dictate the terms under
which he could condescend to serve.

He was right in both conjectures. No sooner was the peace signed than
Filippo turned his energies to the accumulation of a force with which
to open a campaign in the spring. Besides this he assembled a fleet
for the purpose of attacking Mantua and Ferrara. This the Venetians
destroyed near Cremona on May 21, 1427.

Filippo, who had, up till now, taken small thought of anything except
numbers and talent, soon began to feel, as so many others have done
before and since, the extreme difficulty of getting any cohesive
action from a force which, split up into many small bodies, gave its
allegiance to six or seven separate commanders, all of equal merit,
and all claiming, on their records, the right to administer the whole.
Carmagnola, on the other hand, being a Condottiere himself, allowed no
one, however distinguished his birth or his position, even to approach
his throne, much less share it. The Venetian authorities themselves he
handled as roughly as he dared, and they, as Mocenigo had prophesied,
found themselves under a despotism which made the rule of the dreaded
“Ten” a kindergarten affair in comparison.

Filippo, exercising a purely imaginary authority, gave the command of
his troops to Nicolo Piccino, a pupil of the celebrated Braccio, and he
attacked Carmagnola at Casalecco on July 12, but so thick was the dust
under foot that before they had well engaged they became invisible and
separated without shock.

It was a leisurely campaign. Whatever might be the anxiety of the
principals to settle the quarrel, their defenders were not to be
hurried, and it was not until October 11 that Carmagnola was called
upon to fight a pitched battle. He had been spending most of his
time in the interval at the baths of Albano, where he took a cure for
rheumatism.

Suspicion is a disease among some people, and though its workings are
not by any means confined to one class, it must be owned that power
of any kind has always been a happy breeding-ground for it. With the
rulers of Venice it was hereditary, and, since it was unsafe openly to
suspect each other, they invariably lavished their venomous mistrust
upon their servants and instruments. But true to their Latinity, they
gave their victim no chance of feeling it or even of defending himself.
In silence they judged, in silence they acted, and always with such a
wealth of deception, cunning, and falsehood as to proclaim their own
cowardice and meanness from the housetops.

The battle of October 11 took place in a marsh near Macalo, and
Carmagnola, having lured his adversary Carlo Malastata into the
swamps—with which he himself was perfectly familiar—turned upon and
beat him soundly, capturing, it is said, upwards of five thousand,
including Malastata himself.

He made no attempt to pursue, and immediately released all of his
prisoners, thereby giving the Venetian Senate a solid handle for the
blade of calumny which they had been forging. When the protests of
the Venetians reached him, he refused to discuss the matter, merely
replying that it was the custom of war, and, further, that it was his
wish. His contempt for his employers was a little too open, and they,
though apparently acquiescing and praising his skill, were already
plotting his end. The gentle habit of executing a defeated general,
wherever possible, was in vogue then and for many years afterwards. As
long as Carmagnola could continue to win cities and provinces for them,
so long could he continue to live, but no longer.

A new peace was signed on April 18, 1428, and peace descended upon
Venice for nearly three years. Carmagnola passed the time in Venice
with his family around him; treated with all honour and respect to
his face, laughed at, as he knew, for his low birth and rough ways
behind his back. Disliked, but courted under pressure—for no one could
say how long this new peace would last, and Venice, in the field,
was Carmagnola. Without him, Filippo’s men—Piccino, Tonelli, and the
rest—would strip her to the waterfront.

The Florentines, grown confident and aggressive, now took the
opportunity to attack the Lord of Lucca, Paolo Quinigi, a one-time ally
of Filippo’s, and the Lucchesi, revolting, deposed Quinigi and sent him
to Milan as a prisoner. The Florentines were, soon afterwards, attacked
and routed by Piccino at Sarchio, on December 2, 1430; and once again
the old flame broke out.

Carmagnola, to everybody’s surprise, resigned his commission or,
rather, attempted to resign it, and the Senate, in a panic, offered
him such terms for another campaign as were never offered to any
Condottiere, before or since.

Carmagnola, who was then, or had been but a short while before, in
communication with Filippo, finally accepted the command, though with
reluctance. Perhaps he had the prophetic depression which so often
seizes commanders before a disaster; perhaps he had tired of Venice and
her service.

Fortune had turned against the Venetians. First their admiral,
Trevisano, was caught napping at Cremona and his fleet destroyed under
Carmagnola’s furious eyes. His remarks to the admiral afterwards and
to the Venetian Senate were so mixed and incoherent with rage that the
Senate hurriedly sent down special commissioners to assure him of their
confidence and love.

Piccino wandered about picking up odds and ends, a castle here, a town
there, but Carmagnola refused to move. Filippo, wild with delight,
hovered in his neighbourhood, sending taunts and insults to him on
every opportunity; but the old tiger lay in his lair.

He had been defeated at Soncino, and though that was a small and
unimportant event in itself, yet taken in conjunction with the disaster
to the fleet it became a disaster too. A distemper arose among the
horses that year in Italy, which accounts, in a large degree, for
Carmagnola’s inaction, and, though he roused himself sufficiently to
defeat the Hungarians at Friuli, he relapsed again afterwards into
inactivity.

No signs of impatience or mistrust escaped the Senate, however.
Instead, they sent a splendid deputation, begging him to give himself
the trouble of returning to Venice for a while to consult with the
Signoria as to the conduct of the coming campaign; and he, never
doubting that his position was unchanged, and that, surrounded by
enemies, Venice still looked to him as the one man who could save
her, rode through Lombardy in April 1432, accompanied by Gonzaga, the
Lord of Mantua, and embarked on the Brenta, hailed by the populace
and loaded with marks of deference and confidence by the great men
of the Senate who went out to meet him. All along the waterway crowds
turned out to greet the hope of Venice, and the rich and noble, whose
country houses stood along the banks of the river, turned out likewise,
decorating their homes and making festas as he passed.

A gay people they were, with their satins and their music and their
dancing and their love-making. April in Venice is made for kissing, it
is the only suitable occupation for any one with a spark of life in his
soul, and one can imagine the boats on the slow-moving river, as the
evening came on, and the lovers’ moon came out over the water—music,
love, youth, and fire.

It was through this that the great captain journeyed, leisurely, as
became his dignity. At Mestre he was met by some gentlemen of his
acquaintance, all smiles and bows and compliments, in whose company he
crossed the shadowy lagoons and disembarked.

Nine Senators, red-robed, capped, monuments of the dignity of the
State, were waiting for him here, and his progress to the Palace of
the Doge was almost regal in its splendour. With all formality he
was introduced into the presence of the Senate, and given a chair of
honour. He was welcomed, praised, and listened to with deferential
attention. It was growing late by now, and the Senate Chamber was
becoming too dim to distinguish the faces of those about him. But no
lights were called for, and he, dreaming no doubt of seeing his wife
and children again that night, sat on, while one Senator after another
rose and spoke and sat down again.

He had other things upon his mind too. Filippo—old days—old triumphs.
The promise that had been made him, that if he could but extinguish
the Visconti for ever, his old estates were to be given back to him,
besides new ones here in Venice. It had even been hinted, and hinted
strongly, that the only obstacle to his becoming Duke of Milan himself
was the man who called himself the Duke—Filippo Visconti. There seemed
to be no bar to his advancement to any position he might choose—he, the
son of a peasant, picked up at dusk by a wandering trooper in Savoy!

Dusk! It was getting towards dark now!

He stirred in his chair and looked about him. The place seemed less
crowded than it had been when he had last observed it, and thinking
that the moment had arrived when he could, at last, fling aside the
world and return to his family, he rose to depart.

What were those dark shapes hovering near his chair? Those were
no Senators! He peered at them as he passed; but they paid him no
attention, and he moved on towards the door.

Instantly he felt himself seized from behind, and the dark shapes
materialized into Sbirri—soldier police—as he struck out right and
left, bellowing and roaring in his fury. But he was only one, and there
were twenty or thirty of them, and he was chained hand and foot before
he had recovered from his first amazement.

The place was deserted now, save for them, and in the gloom he was
hurried along, pushed and hustled down, down, until a door creaked open
and he was flung into a cell, pitch-black and damp. The door slammed to
behind him, and his little part in the world was played.

The next day he was “put to the question,” but no records remain—none
being kept—of what passed in the little cell during the dread ordeal;
and twenty days later, gagged and chained, he was led out to the
piazza, and there, between the pillars, beheaded.

His grave is in the great Church of St. Francis, in Milan, beside his
wife.

While we are still in the North, the story of the Patron of Pisa, St.
Raniero, may interest my readers.

He was a Scacciari, born in Pisa about the year 1100, and grew up with
the other noble children of the place, cheerful and pleasure-loving
as were they—and as, it may be noticed in passing, were several of the
greatest Saints in the Calendar.

His conversion came about through a holy man, whose name has not
survived. Raniero, one day, was playing and dancing with some damsels
in the shade of a great tree, outside the city, when he noticed a man
standing near who seemed to be studying him intently; after a while,
he laid his lyre down on the grass and returned the gaze, with the
intention of bringing home to the stranger the annoyance which the look
was causing him. But the stranger continued to stare, and presently the
boy arose to approach him.

But, although he had risen to his feet, he made no attempt to
advance, for something in the stern, yet gently pitying eyes of the
other arrested his movement, and, before he could recover from the
half-hypnotized condition, the stranger himself was moving off.

Then the boy came to life, and ran after the man of God, flinging
himself upon his knees, and catching at the hem of his garment, and
crying out his sorrow for his sins; the other lifted him up, and bade
him be of good cheer, but Raniero by now was half blind with weeping,
and it was some time before he could see or hear clearly.

He did not turn back again towards Pisa, but made his way, by slow
stages, to the Holy Land—no very safe harbourage in the middle of the
twelfth century. On arriving, he took off his own clothes, and received
from a priest the shirt of a slave, which, for the proper humiliation
of the flesh, he continued to wear until he died.

Now it is the habit even of the most broad-minded of our Protesting
brethren deliberately to close every avenue by which information might
reach their intelligences, and to seal them up tightly, before they
embark upon any study of the Saints, or of the Church. In parenthesis
it must be said of the Germans, doubtless true to the Teutonic passion
for accuracy, that as a general rule they will and do search after and
transcribe the true facts of a happening, at whatever cost to their
own private feelings—as Haeckel found to his cost. Not so with the
English. They glory in incredulity—and prune their belief daily until
nothing more than the bare tree is left. So that one is not in the
least astonished to find in the middle of an Englishman’s otherwise
fairly faithful tale a shocked horror—indeed it cannot be described in
any other terms—at the thought of the desert’s being an abiding-place
for devils. Unprejudiced people, on the other hand, find that persons
with any real experience of the desert are quite ready to believe that
anything horrible might be found there. If ever there was a proper
ball-room for Satan, says one, it is the desert!

St. Raniero found them there, aplenty—so did St. Anthony, and St.
Ephrem, and St. Procopius, and St. Jerome, and many, many more.

St. Raniero vowed himself to abstinence, and a hard struggle he found
it to be until one morning, very early, when, after a night of tossing
and turning and praying, he fell asleep and dreamed that a wonderfully
wrought vessel of gold, covered with the most beautiful gems, stood
beside him. It was full of pitch and sulphur, and these presently
ignited, burning fiercely, and threatening the destruction of the vase.
But, just as it seemed to be on the point of destruction, a little
phial containing a few drops of water appeared, and he was bidden to
sprinkle some upon the fire; he did so with some difficulty, since it
was burning so fiercely, and behold, the fire was extinguished in a
moment.

On awakening he considered the dream for some time, trying to read
some meaning into it, and presently it was borne in upon him that the
vessel was his body, the pitch and sulphur his passions and appetites,
and that the water was temperance, which would quench these. From that
time onward he lived altogether upon bread and water, even performing
the most of his miracles with water, for which he had an especial
reverence, so that he came to be known in Pisa as “San Domini dell’
Acqua.”

That he was a water-drinker himself did not affect his detestation
of dishonesty in the matter of wine, however. Being at one time in
Messina, he stayed one night at an inn there, and, after watching the
inn-keeper for a little while, became persuaded that he was mixing
water with the wine which he was selling. Beckoning to him, Raniero
told him to cease, but the host first laughed and then grew angry,
telling him to mind his own business. Then the Saint took him by the
shoulder and turned him round, and pointed to a cask which was set in a
distant corner.

“See there,” he said. Every one by now was looking in the same
direction, and, to their terror and amazement, there appeared upon the
cask a huge black cat with enormous wings. The host flung himself at
the Saint’s feet, howling, and the rest of the company began to crowd
and push out of the place, but the Saint directed them to remain, and
dismissed the demon swiftly.

He returned afterwards to Pisa, where he lived for many years, and
performed many wonders, healings, and conversions before he died, and
his tomb is in the wall of the Duomo, where an altar has been erected
to his memory.



CHAPTER XI

QUEEN JOAN OF NAPLES


Of all feminine sinners known to history, Joan of Anjou, Queen of
Naples and of Jerusalem, affords, perhaps, the most conspicuous
example of the perils attendant upon what are known as “marriages of
State”—that is to say, marriages brought about for reasons of State
and without reference to the personal inclinations of the contracting
parties themselves.

   [Illustration: QUEEN JOAN OF NAPLES.]

The elder of the two daughters born to Charles, Duke of Calabria,
and Marie of Valois—both of whom had predeceased their father and
father-in-law, Robert, King of Naples—Joan was married, as a child of
fourteen, to her cousin Andrew the grandson of King Charles of Hungary,
the brother of King Robert; and on the death of the latter in the month
of January 1343, succeeded him as his granddaughter on the throne of
Naples. At that time Joan, although not yet fifteen years old, was
beautiful with the beauty and grace of a grown woman; her eyes were of
a shade of brown so deep as to be almost black; whilst the pallor of
her complexion was enhanced by the lustrous dark hair of her, which she
wore, according to the fashion of the day, in two long and heavy plaits
that fell nearly to her knees. Moreover, her tall, slender figure added
several years to her appearance, whilst the expression of her face,
albeit sensitive and gentle, was one of determination and of a latent
strength of purpose far beyond that of most girls of her age. For Joan
of Anjou had already learned the meaning both of love and of hate—the
hate of her husband, and the guilty love of another than he.

The name of the man for whom she had, even then, betrayed her Hungarian
husband was Robert of Cabano, the son of Filippa Cabano, and her
husband Raymond, a Saracen, bought out of slavery by another Raymond
Cabano who had given him his own name in baptism and had procured for
him the post of head cook to Charles the Hammer, King of Naples and
elder brother of King Robert, the grandfather and precursor of Queen
Joan. From being head cook, Raymond had since risen to the most eminent
post of Seneschal of the Kingdom of Naples.

The way of Joan’s loveless marriage—the source of all her sins and
misfortunes—to her cousin Andrew of Hungary was this: it had been
arranged by her grandfather, King Robert, in the intention of making
amends to Andrew for having usurped the sovereignty of Naples from
Andrew’s father, Carobert of Hungary, the eldest son of King Robert’s
brother, Charles the Hammer. With this object, King Robert had caused
Andrew to be brought as a child to his Court at Naples, that the boy
might become fitted by education and surroundings to be the husband of
Joan, and share with her the crown of Naples and of Jerusalem. For, be
it said, the Hungarian-born Andrew was by nature uncouth and savage
and cold, and altogether unsuited, both in his temperament and his
views of life, to fulfil King Robert’s expectations of him. Instead
of growing more tender, more responsive and affectionate in the genial
surroundings of the Neapolitan Court, as had been hoped might prove to
be the case, he seemed, on the contrary, to become daily more reserved,
more imbued with the sense of his own importance, more generally
domineering and less sympathetic towards those about him.

However, his marriage with Joan had been duly solemnized some months
before the death of old King Robert in order that the latter’s fondest
wish might be accomplished betimes; but, to the rage and disappointment
of Andrew, as soon as the King was dead, Joan alone had been proclaimed
as his successor by her cousin, Charles Duke of Durazzo and Albania,
who had presented her as their sole, legitimate sovereign, to the
populace assembled below the windows of the Castel Nuovo in a room of
which King Robert’s dead body, the breath but scarcely gone out of it,
lay still warm upon the bed on which he had died. Moreover not only
Charles of Durazzo, but others, including principally Robert of Cabano
and another cousin of the Queen, Louis of Taranto, had absolutely
refused to do homage to Andrew of Hungary; to Joan alone had they bent
the knee and sworn fealty.

Only one person of all those present had protested energetically
against the exclusion of Prince Andrew from the immediate proclamation
of sovereignty; this was a certain Father Robert, a monk, the tutor
of Andrew, whom he had accompanied from Hungary to Naples and whom
he never deserted as long as the prince lived. This Father Robert
earned the especial dislike of Petrarch, to whom the monk’s austere
and masterful personality was as gall on the tongue, to judge from the
poet’s description of him.

As has been told, then, by the time that King Robert passed away,
leaving his kingdom to Joan and to Andrew her consort, these two had
been man and wife for long months; during which period Joan had loved,
not her husband, but the handsome, swaggering Saracen, Robert of
Cabano. But by now, when she was become Queen of Naples by the death
of her grandfather, Joan had grown weary of the insolence of Robert’s
dominion over her, and was minded to throw off the yoke of it. Also,
her affections—which, be it said in justice to her, had formerly been
consistently offered to her husband and as consistently rejected by
him—had turned towards one of the very few completely disinterested
and unselfish persons at the Court. This was Bertrand of Artois, whose
father, Charles of Artois, had been appointed by King Robert’s will
one of the regents of the kingdom until Andrew and Joan should have
attained their twenty-fifth year.

Joan had only one sister, Mary, a mere child, who was scarcely thirteen
years old when Joan came to the throne; this Princess Mary, by the
terms of King Robert’s testament, was to inherit the throne in the
event of her elder sister’s dying without issue; in addition, the old
king had expressed a wish that Princess Mary should be affianced either
to Louis, King of Hungary, elder brother of Andrew, or, failing Louis,
to the Duke of Normandy, eldest son of the King of France. In case of
the death without heirs of both Joan and Mary, the sovereignty would by
rights fall to Charles of Durazzo, eldest son of King Robert’s younger
brother who had died some years previously, John, Duke of Durazzo and
Albania. John of Durazzo had left behind him a widow, Agnes, and two
younger sons besides Charles; these were Ludovico, Count of Gravina,
and Robert, Prince of the Morea. The youngest brother of King Robert,
Philip, Prince of Taranto, who had likewise predeceased him, had also
left a widow who bore the title of Empress of Constantinople inherited
from her grandfather, Baldwin II, and three sons, Robert, Philip, and
finally, Louis of Taranto, the handsomest and most accomplished knight
of his day, then but barely turned three-and-twenty.

There had survived King Robert, too, his widow, Sancia of Aragon, a
character as noble and holy as the majority of those composing the
Neapolitan Court were debased and self-seeking and unscrupulous. Before
departing this life, King Robert had obtained from Queen Sancia a
promise to the effect that she would remain in the world and at Court
for a whole year in order to watch over the young King and Queen,
Andrew and Joan—it being Queen Sancia’s announced intention to enter
as soon as possible into a convent, there to end her days in peace and
prayer—and to protect their relationship to one another from the perils
which, as the dying man had clearly foreseen, must inevitably menace
it. And, very particularly, he had warned his widow to be on her guard,
where Joan was concerned, against three especial dangers—the love of
Bertrand of Artois, the beauty of Louis of Taranto, and the ambition of
Charles of Durazzo.


So that, no sooner was King Robert dead, than his wishes in respect to
the mutual sovereignty of Andrew and Joan were contemptuously put aside
by those who proclaimed Joan, and Joan alone, as their new Queen to
the Neapolitan people; but Joan’s acquiescence in their proclamation of
her as sole sovereign cannot be overlooked, foreshadowing, as it would
almost seem to do, some already half-formed instinctive project of
becoming actually that which she had been proclaimed to be—the single
occupant of the throne.

Instantly, moreover, her Hungarian husband and his partisans, Father
Robert the Dominican Friar, together with divers Hungarian nobles,
and Giovanni Pipino, Count of Altamura, one of the most powerful
lords of the kingdom and the most hated by the people, held counsel
among themselves as to how they might best defeat the projects of the
Queen’s party. This, they decided, could only be done by acquainting
King Andrew’s mother, Elizabeth of Poland, and his brother, King Louis
of Hungary, with the terms of King Robert’s last will, and of how a
conspiracy had been set on foot to deprive King Andrew of his rightful
share in the government of Naples. Also, a complaint in the same
terms was to be sent to the Pope at Avignon and a request made of the
Holy Father that he would issue a Bull of coronation on King Andrew’s
behalf, thereby duly confirming him in his rights of, at least, equal
sovereignty with Joan his wife. At the same time, Father Robert tried
to impress upon Andrew the advisability of coming as soon as possible
to some kind of understanding upon the subject with Joan herself before
her favourites should have alienated her affections entirely from him.

These favourites whom the good monk had in mind were some of them men
and some of them women. Of the men—Robert of Cabano, Louis of Taranto,
and Bertrand of Artois—we have already seen something; of the women we
have as yet made acquaintance with only two, Filippa Cabano, the mother
of Robert the half-breed, and formerly governess to the princesses
Joan and Mary; and the Empress of Constantinople, their aunt and the
mother of Louis of Taranto and his brothers. Besides Donna Filippa
and the Empress, however, there were three others who had influence
over Joan—the Countesses of Terlizzi and Morcone, daughters of Donna
Filippa, and, lastly and supremely, a young and lovely girl of sixteen,
known simply as “Cancia,” who occupied, officially, the position of
tiring-woman to the young Queen.

Cancia had been put into this employment by her protectoress, Donna
Filippa, in order that by her wiles and companionship she might corrupt
the spirit of Joan, and render her the more averse to the remonstrances
of Father Robert the Dominican on behalf of Andrew of Hungary his
pupil, and so bring her more and more under the influence of her lover,
Robert of Cabano, Filippa’s own son. And Cancia had played her part so
effectually that, it is said, Joan loved her more even than she did her
own sister, Princess Mary.

And as it happened, Donna Filippa was beginning to suspect that, at
last, Joan was tiring of her intrigue with Robert, and that she might
at any moment turn elsewhere for the love denied her by her rightful
husband—for life without love was insupportable to Joan’s passionately
affectionate nature.

Old King Robert—Robert the Wise, as he is commonly styled—was buried
behind the high altar in the Church of Santa Chiara that he had built
himself, and where his splendid Gothic tomb may be seen to this day,
having on it his likeness both as King and as Franciscan monk; for
he was a tertiary of Franciscans and died, as becomes one, in their
uniform. In the same church are to be found the tombs, too, of many of
the actors in the tragedy of Queen Joan; of her father and mother and
her little sister Maria, and of Maria’s children by three successive
husbands, together with the graves of Charles of Durazzo and of
Raimondo Cabano the Seneschal. And here, in passing, I would like to
say that there are no churches in the whole world that can compare with
the old churches of the city of Naples for the number and the beauty
and the poignant interest of the tombs that these contain.

Some days after King Robert’s burial in Santa Chiara, Joan was
approached by Filippa Cabano with a request that she would create
Filippa’s son Robert Grand Seneschal of the Kingdom in succession to
his father, who was but shortly deceased; also that he might receive
the title of Count of Eboli. To both these outrageous demands the young
Queen at first turned a deaf ear; not until Filippa—who was accompanied
by Robert in person—threatened to make known to all the world the fact
of Joan’s new intrigue with Bertrand d’Artois did the young Queen
surrender to her demands. It would seem that Filippa had, for some
time, suspected the cooling of Joan’s fondness for her son, and so had
determined to obtain from her for Robert a commanding and unassailable
position in the State.

In that same State of Naples, then, there were already two increasingly
definite factions, each with a different aim; the party of the
Dominican Father Robert and of the Hungarian nobles, that sought to
bring about the supremacy of King Andrew and the subjugation of Queen
Joan; and the party of Donna Filippa with their programme of “Naples
for the Neapolitans”—that is, firstly of securing sole sovereignty for
the Queen, and secondly of making the Queen herself the puppet of their
own will and the instrument of their aggrandizement.

And round about these openly contending factions there prowled,
watchful and ruthless, Charles of Durazzo, seeking only the opportunity
to make himself master of the situation. There were no lengths to which
Duke Charles was not prepared to go in order to attain his aim and to
satisfy the ambition that devoured him; no crime, however frightful,
from the contemplation of which he shrank as a means to his end.
Cost what it might, he would be King of Naples and of Jerusalem. The
chroniclers describe him as a pale man with close-cropped hair and a
thick beard; and, when agitated, he had a trick of frowning. Charles of
Durazzo had felt greatly aggrieved at the bestowal of Joan’s hand in
marriage upon Andrew of Hungary; for of all King Robert’s nephews he,
Charles, had been the nearest in blood to the throne; and to him, as
such, Joan ought to have been given. But never for an instant had he
allowed so much as a glimpse of his disappointment to be seen by any
one; never once had he suffered a breath of complaint to escape him.

Nevertheless, his resolve was only the stronger for the iron
self-discipline of the man; and, now that Joan was Queen, the hour
was come for him to try the first of the two alternatives by which
he was to achieve his object. He was still a bachelor, and Joan had
found favour in his eyes by reason of her loveliness; therefore, before
having recourse to the other expedient that he had laid out for himself
in case of need, Charles had determined to attempt the enlistment of
Joan’s co-operation in his designs.

With this object he obtained a private audience of the Queen, and
straightway proceeded to lay siege to her sympathies by every kind of
flattery and the most skilful hints of the dangers that threatened
her from the side of ungrateful and grasping favourites. Though he
named no names, yet Joan understood only too well whom he meant, and
could not help evincing signs both of her comprehension and of her
agreement with him. From that he went on to speak more particularly of
the popular rejoicing at her succession to the throne, and, finally, of
the universal regret that she should be compelled by an unkind fate to
share that throne with one in every way unworthy both of herself and of
it.

Seeing clearly who it was to whom he referred in these terms, Joan
attempted feebly to protest; but was powerless to prevent him from
continuing with what he had to say of the certainty he felt that, if
Andrew of Hungary were ever to be admitted to an actual share in the
government, the people of Naples would infallibly rise in arms against
him and the detested Hungarians who surrounded him. It would, indeed,
Duke Charles assured the unhappy Queen, be only another instance of the
Sicilian Vespers; the Neapolitans would, of a surety, rise up as one
man and exterminate their foreign oppressors, including Andrew himself
and the monk whose mistaken counsels had inspired him with so suicidal
an ambition.

“But of what fault do they accuse Andrew?” asked Joan uncertainly.

In reply, the Albanian said that the people hated the Prince for his
stupidity, his coarseness and savagery; that the nobles accused him
of violating their privileges and of surrounding himself to their
detriment with the basest adventurers; and that, lastly, he himself,
Charles of Durazzo, accused Andrew of making Joan’s life a misery to
her.

And then, before she could recover from her amazement at his boldness,
Charles wound up by offering to remove Andrew from her path by
murdering him; whereupon, the better part in Joan triumphing for a
moment over the lower side of her nature, she dismissed Charles angrily
from her presence, calling him coward and insolent. Without undue haste
or appearance of anger, Charles left her, merely reminding her that it
was not altogether impossible that some day it should be his turn to
condemn and hers to be judged.


So that Duke Charles, having failed in his attempt to obtain Joan’s
consent to the murder of Andrew, must, instead, have recourse to the
second of the alternatives that had presented themselves to him.

This was to make himself the husband of the next heir to the throne—the
thirteen-year-old Maria, sister of Queen Joan. On reaching his own
palace, therefore, he sent for a notary, one Nicholas of Melazzo,
whose fate he held in his hands by means of a certain knowledge, and
ordered him to draw up a contract of marriage between the Princess
Maria, his cousin, and himself, Charles of Durazzo. This the notary,
albeit terrified at the audacity of the thing (seeing that Maria, as
will be remembered, was intended by the terms of King Robert’s will to
be the wife of either King Louis of Hungary or of the Duke of Normandy)
consented to do; and then Duke Charles ordered him at the same time to
seek out Tommaso Pace, the valet of King Andrew and the notary’s own
closest friend, and to find out if Pace had been approached at all by
any of Queen Joan’s partisans with a view to drawing him into any plot
against Andrew’s life. For, as Charles argued, if such a conspiracy
should ever arise, those concerned in it would be almost sure to
endeavour to win over the King’s valet to their undertaking in order
the more easily to carry it into effect.

From that day on it was noticed that a complete change had taken
place in the manner of the Duke of Durazzo towards King Andrew—or, to
give the latter the only title hitherto accorded to him, the Duke of
Calabria. For whereas hitherto Charles had shown himself the reverse
of friendly towards Andrew, and had been ever the loudest in his denial
of Andrew’s right to be crowned King of Naples, he now overwhelmed the
Hungarian with every kind of courtesy and friendly advance. Charles
even took pains to propitiate Andrew’s shadow, the honest Dominican,
excusing himself to Father Robert for his outrageous conduct in
proclaiming Joan alone as their new Queen to the people of Naples by
pleading the necessity of making an apparent concession to the popular
dislike of the Hungarian element in the kingdom. He did not hesitate
to declare to Father Robert his detestation of the persons who were
bent upon estranging the young Queen from her husband for their own
ends; finally he concluded by placing what power he possessed at the
monk’s disposal for the purpose of defeating the machinations of Joan’s
treacherous favourites directed against her rightful husband and the
legal partner of her throne.

To these assurances Father Robert lent a willing, although not an
entirely believing ear; for he could only attribute the change in
Duke Charles to some misunderstanding with the young Queen. At the
same time Charles and Andrew of Hungary were become the closest of
comrades; never, now, was Andrew seen in public without his Albanian
cousin-by-marriage; never did he withdraw himself from the circle of
his friends to the seclusion of his apartments but Charles of Durazzo
walked at his elbow.

And so things went on for a while, until at length the whole Court
was ranged definitely on one side or on the other: on that of
Queen Joan and the Neapolitan people itself, to whom Andrew and his
followers were entirely odious; or else on that of Andrew and those
who hoped eventually to make him sole sovereign of Naples to their own
advantage—the Hungarian “Heyducs,” the Count of Altamura, and their
kind.

The war of the factions had begun by the omission of Andrew’s name from
all the proclamations, warrants, and so forth issued by the Queen in
her own sole name. In retaliation for this indefensible slight, Andrew
had ordered his followers to break open all the prisons within reach
and to liberate their tenants, criminal or otherwise, in his name
alone and in honour of his succession to the throne of Naples. He had
also loaded the members of his own party—and especially the execrated
Altamura—with honours and riches by means of patents signed by himself
only, as the one supreme temporal authority in the kingdom. It may be
added that in all these arbitrary and illegal measures, so admirably
calculated to arouse the bitterest anger and the most murderous
hatred of the Queen’s supporters against him, Andrew of Hungary’s
one confident adviser was none other than his evil genius, Charles of
Durazzo.

From that moment the party of Joan, led by the Counts of San-Severino,
Mileto, Terlizzi, Balzo, Morcone, Catanzaro and Sant’ Angelo, and,
more especially, by the Queen’s ex-favourite Robert of Cabane, Count
of Eboli, and his successor in her affections, Bertrand d’Artois, was
resolved upon ridding the land of Andrew and of his minions. Of all the
angry barons who had rallied to Joan’s support, the last-mentioned,
Bertrand d’Artois, really loved her for herself, and was actuated by
no motive of personal gain, except—alas!—his lawless hope of becoming
united to her in matrimony once her husband were removed from the
path of his criminal passion. In vain his father, the brave and
noble Charles of Artois, one of the regents of the kingdom, strove to
dissuade him from the perilous course of a love as treasonable as it
was immoral; nothing was of any avail to hold back the young man from
the pursuit of his designs.

More successful, however, was the restraining influence of another
parent over another child in the same situation—the influence of the
Empress of Constantinople over her youngest-born, the handsome Louis of
Taranto, who, in deference to his mother’s entreaties, turned away his
eyes as well as he could from his lovely ill-mated cousin.


After the rupture between Joan and the Duke of Durazzo, many weeks
elapsed without her either meeting him or hearing much of his doings,
beyond that he was become the inseparable comrade of her husband;
although, indeed, at times she cannot have helped wondering what shape
his enmity towards her might eventually assume.

One radiant morning of spring, however, as she was in her room in
the Castel Nuovo, looking out over the town and the sea beyond, all
shimmering in the sunlight, towards Sorrento, there came a knock on the
door, and Donna Filippa Cabano, mother of the Grand Seneschal, entered
precipitately, her face blanched with alarm and anger, to say that
Princess Maria, Joan’s little sister, was nowhere to be found.

A short while previously the child had been playing happily by herself
in the castle grounds; and then, soon afterwards, she had simply
disappeared, none could say where or in what direction.

Joan’s consternation may be more easily imagined than described. Her
love for Maria was the one perfectly innocent, unspoilt love of her
whole existence, the very tenderest spot in all her heart. And now
Maria was gone from her; the horror and grief of it were such that she
shrieked as though a live coal had been laid upon her breast. That,
however, was only in the first anguish of her loss; recovering herself
quickly, she broke out in a storm of anger upon those responsible, by
their want of vigilance for the catastrophe; such was the Queen’s fury,
indeed, that Filippa fled from her in fear for her life. Instantly the
whole castle was in an uproar, its inhabitants scouring every nook and
cranny, indoors and out; but without success; and, presently, the whole
city of Naples was bent distractedly upon the same quest, hunting high
and low for the beloved little girl. All, though, was in vain; and
albeit during that day, and many days and nights to follow, the search
was diligently pursued, yet in spite of every effort no trace could be
found of the lost Princess.

The only drop of comfort vouchsafed to Joan during all those weary
hours of agonizing anxiety came from Bertrand d’Artois, who had been
led, somehow, to suspect the agency of the Duke of Durazzo in respect
to Maria’s disappearance; a drop, however, that Joan refused to accept,
saying that such a thing was beyond the bounds of probability. For no
one, even of Duke Charles’s household, let alone the Duke himself, had
so much as set foot within the castle precincts since the day when he
had left the place in anger. No stranger, even, had set foot, that
morning of Maria’s disappearance, inside the gates, except Nicholas
of Melazzo, for whose integrity Tommaso Pace, Prince Andrew’s own
body-servant, was willing to answer on his life.

In this manner a month went by, bringing to Joan despair of ever seeing
her sister again, until on April 30, 1343, there occurred an event
so amazing as to deprive her at first of every other sensation; until
her astonishment turned to fury at the insolent daring of it. On first
learning of it, she refused to believe it, and then, as the certainty
of it took the place of incredulity, her indignation knew no bounds.

For, on the stroke of noon on that day, she learned that her sister
had become the legal wife of Charles of Durazzo, having been publicly
married to him at an altar erected in the open air and in sight
of all the people before the church of Saint John by the Sea, not
a bowshot distant from the great gates of the Palazzo Durazzo.
The marriage had been solemnized by Duke Charles’s chaplain, the
necessary dispensation for the marriage of cousins, one of them being
a minor, having been received from Rome the day before; and, at its
conclusion, the newly-wedded pair had faced the spectators hand in
hand, and had solemnly declared that they took one another as husband
and wife, calling upon God and the people to bear witness to it.
Their announcement had been acclaimed with tumultuous vociferations
of applause and delight; after which the Duke and Duchess of Durazzo
received the Papal benediction, prior to being escorted in procession
round the city by their men-at-arms and the sympathetic populace to the
beating of drums and the blowing of trumpets.

So that Charles of Durazzo was now the husband—and, it need hardly be
said, the master—of the thirteen-year-old heir to the throne. And when,
after curbing the useless rage in her heart, Joan summoned the pair to
receive her congratulations, she realized her folly in quarrelling with
that all-daring and remorseless man; also she understood that nothing
short of the throne itself—let the price be what it might—would ever
satisfy his lust of power and glory and hate.


Thenceforth the temptation of Joan to be in very truth at once the
real ruler of her own dominions and at the same time the arbiter of
her own destiny increased and grew to terrific powers; the desire to
satisfy her wishes absolutely in everything became a kind of diabolical
possession, sweeping away every consideration of virtue and of mere
worldly prudence; save only when, in rare intervals of reaction, she
would fall upon her knees in the solitude of her chamber, her face in
her hands, sobbing as though her heart would break with the horror of
her situation.



CHAPTER XII

A MEDIÆVAL NIGHTMARE


To judge from the sequence of events, it would appear almost certain
that, in his amazing marriage with Princess Maria, Charles of Durazzo
must have had the assistance—or, at least, the tacit approval—of Andrew
of Hungary; and that, in return for this, Charles had promised Andrew
that he would take his part and support him against the faction of
the Queen. Certain it is, at all events, that, immediately after the
marriage of Charles and Maria, the party of Andrew, his Hungarian
barons and soldiers, redoubled in arrogance towards the Neapolitans,
and their excesses of violence and rapine which, erstwhile, had been
subjected to an intermittent restraint, now became such as to evoke
not only complaints but threats as well on the part of the unfortunate
people. Andrew, himself, however, took no notice of such protests, but
appeared, rather, to approve the outrages committed by his underlings.

And as certain was it in the opinion of his enemies that the time
was come when they might strike him with propriety as well as with
impunity.

On August 31, 1344, Queen Joan came, surrounded by her friends, to the
Church of Santa Chiara, there to do homage for her crown to the Papal
legate, Cardinal San Martino de Monti; for the Kingdom of Naples,
having been bestowed by the Pope upon the House of Anjou after the
deposition by them of that of the Hohenstaufen, was considered as a
fief of the Church.

By this ceremony the claims of Andrew of Hungary to a share in the
throne were formally ignored, and the single sovereignty ceremoniously
confirmed to Joan; for her husband was in no way admitted to join with
her in the act of homage, nor was there any reference to him by word
or deed from first to last; thereafter his position in the realm was
that of its first subject and nothing more. In fact, he was simply
the Prince Consort of Naples. During the ceremony—for he, like Joan,
had come to it with a numerous armed retinue—the followers of the
husband and wife not only kept up a brisk exchange of threats, but had
actually to be prevented by repeated energetic commands from drawing
their swords then and there. When it was over, and Andrew had returned
to the Castel Nuovo, his heart on fire with rage and humiliation
and disappointment, his first act was to dispatch a message to his
mother, Elizabeth of Poland, informing her of his resolution to depart
forthwith from the country which offered him nothing but deception and
betrayal.

Many months passed away, however, without either his carrying out his
avowed intention or any answer reaching him from his mother; for had
he meant what he said in the letter, the letter would never have been
written at all, but he would have gone himself instead of sending
it. So he had hesitated in his choice of a course of action; and,
hesitating, was lost.

In place of a return letter, his mother came to fetch him away with her
on the vessel in which she had sailed from the port of Danzig; and no
sooner was it known what she had come to do than there went up a sigh
of thankfulness from all the Court, most especially from those who by
her advent saw themselves delivered from the detestable necessity of
assassinating the Hungarian Prince in order to ensure their own safety
from his jealousy and resentment. At once, too, the friends—or, rather,
the party—of Joan set themselves to convince the Queen of Poland of
their amiable intentions towards her ungracious son by overwhelming her
with all manner of undesired civilities and entertainments. But nothing
could procure them the confidence of the terrified mother, or turn her
from her purpose of removing Prince Andrew from their midst.

The only person, though, who expostulated with Queen Elizabeth for
her project of withdrawing her son from Naples was his courageous and
resolute tutor, the Dominican, Father Robert, who implored her to have
patience and courage for a little while until he should have received
from the Pope, who was then living at Avignon, an answer to the
entreaty dispatched so long before, and in which Prince Andrew’s claims
to be the King of Naples—in accordance with the wishes of the deceased
King Robert—had been submitted to the judgment of the Holy Father with
an entreaty that he would ratify them.

But all that Father Robert could obtain from the thoroughly terrified
Elizabeth was a delay of three days, at the expiration of which time,
unless a favourable answer had been received from the Pope, she would
set sail once more for Danzig, taking Prince Andrew with her.

Not until the evening of that momentous third day, as she was
completing her preparations for departure, did the Dominican come
hurrying into Elizabeth’s presence, having in his hands a sheet of
parchment from which swung a seal upon a cord.

“Now, God be thanked!” he cried, proffering her the parchment, “you see
for yourself, madam—the Holy Father consents, and your son is King of
Naples and of Jerusalem! And, if I may say so, I think it is owing to
me more than to any one else!”

And he went on to explain to the delighted Elizabeth how, without
mentioning it to any one, he had taken on himself the responsibility of
promising that certain laws prejudicial to the Church in the Kingdom
of Naples should be abolished if the Pope would confirm the crown to
Andrew of Hungary. At this juncture Andrew himself entered the room and
was informed of the change in his situation by being hailed as King of
Naples by the Dominican. At once the young man’s whole nature leapt out
to grasp the splendour of his new power in an outburst of revengeful
exaltation over those who had hitherto insulted and belittled him. Now,
as he swore, they should indeed have reason to tremble for their former
boldness, their contempt and defiance of him!


A few days later Queen Elizabeth sailed away from Naples, her head
still full of forebodings; try as she would, she could not shake off
the fears that beset her so increasingly for the safety of her son whom
she was leaving behind with none but a handful of foreign adherents in
the midst of a Court and of a people bent, as she felt certain, upon
his destruction.

But these misgivings were in no wise shared by Andrew of Hungary,
who now proceeded without loss of time to carry out his intention of
punishing his seditious subjects.

The first of those upon whom his hand fell was one of the chief
Councillors of the Kingdom, a certain Andrew of Isernia, who had been
chiefly concerned in persuading Queen Joan—who had looked upon him as a
father—to set at naught the provisions of King Robert’s will and to let
herself be proclaimed the sole ruler of Naples to the detriment of her
husband.

In passing be it said that, instead of at once making public the
Pope’s recognition of him as King of Naples, with, of course, absolute
rights of life and death over its people, Prince Andrew had chosen to
keep the fact of his kingship a secret for a little time in order the
better to enjoy the grim jest of his opponents’ ultimate discomfiture
when they should learn of his real power over them. Nevertheless,
in the meantime, he had not been able to resist tasting the fruits
of sovereignty in the shape of an _hors d’œuvre_ to his banquet of
reprisals; with the consequence that Andrew of Isernia was found dead
one morning, near the Porta Petruccia of the city, bathed in blood,
with a score of sword-wounds on his body.

The news of Isernia’s murder was brought to Joan by Bertrand of Artois,
who had learned also of Andrew’s confirmation as King by the Pope, as
well as of the fact that a list of persons to be summarily dealt with
had been drawn up by the Hungarian; and, supremely, that his, Bertrand
of Artois’, name was the first upon the list.

This last item it was that finally removed any lingering scruples
from Joan’s heart; for she loved Bertrand with all the passionate
recklessness of her fiery nature, and the thought that his handsome
head should roll upon the board of a scaffold maddened her against
Andrew.

“That decides it,” she is said to have declared to her lover. “The man
must die.”

And, when he left her, Bertrand of Artois went out to gather
together the others who were also of his conspiracy in the Queen’s
service—Robert of Cabano, and the Counts of Terlizzi and Morcone;
Charles of Artois, the father of Bertrand himself; Godfrey of Marsano,
High Admiral of the Realm and Count of Squillace; and the Count of
Catanzaro. With these men were allied several women: notably, Catherine
of Taranto, Empress of Constantinople, mother of that Louis whose
beauty was splendid like the sun; Filippa, the mother of Robert of
Cabano and of his sisters the Countesses of Morcone and Terlizzi; those
two dusky beauties themselves; and, finally, Donna Cancia, the laughing
girl-demon and bosom-friend of the Queen.

To these was joined that same Tommaso Pace, valet to Prince Andrew,
with whom the notary, Master Nicholas of Melazzo, had of late
maintained the closest of relations in obedience to the orders of
Charles of Durazzo. No wonder, then, that within an hour after the
conference of the plotters Charles of Durazzo was in possession of
every detail of it, as well as of the names of the plotters themselves.

Now, before the actual ceremony of Andrew of Hungary’s proclamation
as King could take place, it was unavoidable that a few days should
be devoted to making all suitable preparations for that event; for,
so soon as Isernia’s killing had become known, Andrew had caused it
to be announced that the murder was not a murder at all in reality;
but merely a legal execution duly carried out by the person—a certain
Conrad de Gotis—empowered to do so by Andrew himself as King of Naples
by favour of the Pope. The unrest and uproar caused by this news in the
city were such that Andrew had thought it prudent to retire thence into
the neighbouring country until the time were come when, as crowned and
anointed King, he should be endowed with a real and efficient majesty
the which he was as yet very far from possessing. In this intention,
therefore, he had given out that he would go with the Court for a while
upon a hunting expedition into the district between Capua and Aversa.

Charles of Durazzo received a personal invitation from Prince Andrew
to join him and the others of the party, but declined on the ground
of his wife’s being extremely indisposed; this, the last meeting on
earth of the two men, took place on August 19 in the year 1345, towards
evening in a hall of the Castel Nuovo. It is said that, in declining
Andrew’s invitation, Charles begged him to accept a very fine falcon
from among those for which his perch was justly celebrated. The falcon
presented by Charles to Andrew may have been a jer-falcon, but I cannot
help thinking that in all likelihood the bird was a peregrine from the
cliffs between Sorrento and Amalfi. With Charles was also Nicholas
of Melazzo, from whom he had just been receiving the details of the
Queen’s conspiracy; and Charles, as he himself understood triumphantly,
was thenceforth to be master of the situation in the Kingdom of Naples.

The dawn of the next day saw a numerous cavalcade pass out from the
gate of the Castel Nuovo, and file slowly down through the city and
so out into the misty lowlands towards Melito, where the sport was
to begin. The illustrious company was headed by Andrew of Hungary
in person, and beside him rode Queen Joan on a white palfrey; whilst
close behind them pressed the throng of those who had sworn to return
to Naples only when Andrew should have ceased to breathe. Never before
had Andrew shown himself so gay, so responsive to all the delights of
life and friendship as on that morning; although he knew that he, as
well as the men who rode behind him, had death in his heart—the death
of many among those very men who were now preparing to consummate their
treachery by murdering him. But they, like Andrew of Hungary, were loud
in talk and laughter, exchanging jests incessantly amongst themselves
and even, now and again, with their victim himself as he turned in his
saddle and threw back to them a challenge of wits.

Of all that festive throng two alone rode silent and preoccupied. Both
were women. One of them, the Queen, kept her eyes fixed steadfastly
on the landscape before her from which the vapours were being rapidly
scattered and dispelled by the sunrise, so that none might read her
thoughts; whilst the other was an elderly German called Isolda, once
the nurse of Andrew and now his mother’s ambassador, who, like Queen
Joan, was too occupied with her own reflections to pay attention to
what was going on about her. For old Isolda’s heart was heavy with
an indefinable presentiment of some evil that threatened her beloved
foster-child; and her powerlessness to analyse or to avert it was
frightful to the faithful soul of her.

And so the August day grew to its full, hot and windless, and drew on
to afternoon and sank to airless evening, whilst hawk after hawk soared
into the grey-blue sky all a-quiver with the heat, after heron and
duck; or, else, hung poised there, hovering a little before swooping
down upon crouching hare or rabbit or partridge. But the main feature
of the sport was the hunting of wild boars with hound and spear; at
which Andrew of Hungary is said to have been an expert.

At dusk the royal party bent its way towards the town of Aversa, there
to pass the night in the monastery of San Pietro a Maiella, a house of
Celestine monks; for there was at hand no other building capable of
sheltering so many persons and their horses. The choice of a fitting
asylum for the Queen and her Consort and their followers was the
business of the Grand Seneschal, Robert of Cabano; and he it was who
undertook the necessary arrangements. By his orders a bed was prepared
for Joan and her husband in a room at the end of a corridor on the
third floor of the monastery and about sixty feet above the ground.


That night, the monks having retired long before to their cells, the
great refectory of the monastery rang with the jests and laughter of
the royal supper-party. Wine flowed in abundance—and none drank more
deeply than did Andrew of Hungary; until Robert of Cabano rose and said
that a draught of the same wine ought by rights to be given to each
of the Hungarian sentries posted outside the monastery to compensate
them for keeping their cheerless watch outside in the darkness. Which
proposal was carried out with loud applause in which the sentries, who
had been called into the hall to drink the health of the royal pair,
joined heartily, so that the place echoed to the thunderous shouts of
“Long live their Majesties, the King and Queen of Naples!”

This feasting and good fellowship were prolonged to a late hour, until
at length the conspirators became impatient of Andrew’s wakefulness.
Bertrand of Artois remarked pointedly that the chances were against
any of them rising betimes in the morning after sitting up so late the
night before. To which Andrew answered scornfully that, speaking for
himself, an hour or two of sleep was amply sufficient, and that in this
he hoped he was not alone. But when the Count of Terlizzi expressed a
doubt of Andrew’s being able to set an example of early rising under
the circumstances, the Prince gave a challenge to all present to be up
as soon as he in the morning; after which he withdrew with the Queen to
their apartment, and silence soon fell over all the building.

Towards two o’clock there came a knock on the door of the royal
bed-chamber, followed by a second and a third; at the last of which
Andrew sprang out of bed, calling out that he was awake and was coming
at once. It is said that Joan, who had not closed an eyelid, was minded
to warn her husband of his danger, but thought better of it, and kept
silence whilst he drew on his clothes and, going to the door, opened
it—to find himself confronted by a group of men, including his valet,
Tommaso Pace, who had knocked on the door, and Nicholas of Melazzo.

On the instant that Andrew showed himself, Bertrand of Artois, as some
say, seized him by his long hair and tried to pull back his head; but
he contrived to free himself, exclaiming, “This is a base jest!” Then,
perceiving that the intentions of the group were really hostile, he
endeavoured to retreat into the room for his sword, but was prevented
from doing so by Nicholas of Melazzo, who thrust his dagger for a bolt
through the staples of the door, whilst others, led by Bertrand of
Artois and Robert of Cabano, flung themselves upon the Prince like a
pack of wolves, trying to pull him down. But Andrew, now fighting with
all his strength, threw them off, and fled from them, shouting loudly
for help, and looking for an avenue of escape.

There was none, however, to be found; and at length, turning and
twisting from his assailants, Andrew slipped and fell; so that Bertrand
of Artois, the nearest of them, was enabled to grapple with him on
the floor, calling for a certain rope with which to strangle him.
This rope, which was of silk twisted with gold threads, they had had
made on purpose to kill the Prince with, because of a talisman that he
was said to have received from his mother that was held to render him
invulnerable to steel or poison. It seems to me probable that Robert
of Cabano had the rope ready in his hands, and that between them he
and Bertrand of Artois contrived to place it about the Prince’s neck;
for, as Gravena tells us, when Robert of Cabano saw that one of their
lot, the Count of Terlizzi, was turning away from the horrid scene, he
made him take hold of the rope and help them to draw it tight, saying:
“What are you doing, my brother-in-law? Here, take hold—the rope
is long enough for each of us to put a hand to it. What we want are
accomplices, not witnesses!”

And so, between them all, they dragged Prince Andrew to a balcony
overlooking the garden of the cloister, and, lifting him up, threw him
over, so that he was hanged. And when they knew that he was dead they
let go of the rope; and the body fell down into the moonlit garden, and
they went away to their beds.

But the din of the murder had awakened Andrew’s old nurse Isolda,
who now, looking out of her window, saw him lying there, and thought
that he was asleep. Going to the Queen’s room, the door of which was
fastened on the inside, she called out to Joan, saying that the Prince
was asleep in the garden. To which Joan only made reply, “Let him
sleep,” and would not speak further. Then Isolda went and awakened the
monks and made them go with her into the garden to where Andrew lay on
the grass; and when she saw that he was dead she rent the night with
her lamentations. And two of the monks knelt down by the corpse, one at
the head and the other at the feet, and said the Penitential Psalms for
the repose of the Prince’s soul, while two other monks went up to the
door of the Queen’s room and asked of her through it:

“Oh, Queen, what are your commands that we should do with the dead body
of your husband?”

But she would not return any answer to them; so they went away again,
very greatly affrighted and troubled in spirit. And later they sent
others of their company once and twice on the same business; but
Joan either would not or could not speak with them, until at last the
townspeople of Aversa gathered about the monastery gates began to howl
and to murmur amongst themselves, calling the Queen a murderess, and
saying that she was afraid to look upon the face of her dead husband.
Nor did she show herself at all to them; but, later in the day, was
borne out of Aversa and so back to Naples in a closed litter guarded by
horsemen.


And now, at last, the tempest which had been brewing for so long in
silence broke into lightning over the head of Joan.

Charles of Durazzo, who, as husband to the heir to the throne, was now,
next to Joan herself, the most considerable person in the kingdom—and,
further, by reason of all he knew, far the most powerful—now took the
chief direction of its affairs.

After leaving the body of Andrew of Hungary where it lay, exposed
for two whole days to the battering of the elements—for the weather
had suddenly turned wet and gusty—at the foot of the monastery wall
at Aversa, in order thereby to arouse to the full the compassion of
the populace that flocked to behold it, as well as to arouse their
indignation against the murderers, Charles ordered the remains to be
brought in state to the Cathedral of San Gennaro in the city. There,
having rallied to him the dead Prince’s Hungarian barons together with
the Count of Altamura, he met the funeral procession and caused the
coffin containing the body to be placed upon a catafalque, by which he
took his stand.

“Oh, people of Naples, gentle and simple alike, behold your King,
miserably strangled by his murderers!” he cried, drawing his sword and
laying it upon the coffin. “I appeal to you to help me avenge him!”

And immediately the vast church rang and echoed with the roar of those
to whom he addressed himself.

“Vengeance!” they bellowed, forgetting in their desire for savagery
how, but a short while before, they had groaned beneath the insolent
brutality of that same Andrew of Hungary. “Vengeance, vengeance,
vengeance!”—and from out the sombre interior of the cathedral the
roaring gushed in a flood of terrible sound, filling all the streets
with its clamour for blood. And, when the funeral was over, and the
coffin had been put away in the place prepared for it in the left
transept of the building, Duke Charles withdrew once more to his own
palace, well pleased with what he had done, there to apply his energies
to the work in hand.

Now it so happened that several of those who had conspired with Joan
to make an end of her husband had lost no time in claiming the various
rewards that they deemed to be due to them from her. Filippa Cabano
and Robert her son, as well as her daughters of Terlizzi and Morcone
and their husbands, redoubled in arrogance and in the daring of
their clamour for honours and money; whilst Cancia, their lascivious
instrument and the handmaid of their Sovereign, now secured from
punishment by that Sovereign’s impotence even to protest against her
shamelessness, turned the Castel Nuovo into a place without a name.

But of all Joan’s fellow-conspirators the one who asked her the most
staggering price was her aunt, Catherine of Taranto, Empress of
Constantinople, who asked that she should consent to announce her
betrothal to Robert of Taranto, the Empress’s eldest son. To this
insolent demand Joan could only summon sufficient strength to reply
by asking a delay of three days in which to make up her mind upon the
subject; which delay was granted her, the Empress only stipulating
that Prince Robert, in the meantime, should be allowed to take up his
quarters in the Castel Nuovo and to see and speak with Joan at least
once a day.

No sooner, though, did it reach the ears of Charles of Durazzo that
Robert of Taranto was installed in the Castel Nuovo as a preliminary to
his betrothal to the Queen, than the Duke flung himself on to a horse
and galloped furiously to the castle. On entering Joan’s presence, he
spoke briefly and to the point. To begin with, she must create him
Duke of Calabria in his own right, thereby acknowledging him to be
the heir to the throne as the husband of her sister. And as to Robert
of Taranto, Charles absolutely forbade her to marry him or any other
man without his express permission; threatening that if she dared to
do otherwise he would reveal to the whole world his knowledge of her
participation in the murder of Andrew of Hungary. This he did because
he had no intention whatsoever of allowing her to marry again and so
providing, possibly, a direct heir to the throne other than his wife
and himself. And again, Joan, helpless to refuse beneath her burden of
remorse and of terror both for herself and for others, had no choice
but to temporize as best she could.

There was now no other course open to her than that of an explanation
upon the subject of her situation with the Empress of Constantinople.

The latter, however, on learning of Duke Charles’s opposition to the
marriage of her son to Joan, declared her resolution of striking him a
blow that should assuredly wound him frightfully both in his affections
as well as in the esteem of the public, before whom, she assured Joan,
he would be eternally dishonoured by it in the event of his refusing to
listen to the voice of reason.

First of all, advised the Empress, Charles must be made acquainted with
the fact that his veto of Joan’s espousal to Robert was without reason;
for in very truth Joan was expecting shortly to become the mother
of Andrew of Hungary’s posthumous child, who, in the natural course
of things, must eventually succeed to the throne of Naples. Should
Charles, however, in the face of this, persist in placing obstacles
in the way of Joan’s marriage to Robert, then the blow of which
mention had been made—albeit the Empress had not divulged its nature
precisely—should be launched upon him. Furthermore, added the Empress,
she herself would at once inform Charles of Joan’s expectation of soon
becoming a mother.

Joan, it must be added, had told her aunt of Charles’s knowledge of the
persons primarily responsible for Andrew’s death; so that the Empress
should realize the peril that menaced her at the Duke of Durazzo’s
hands.

Undeterred, though, by learning of his power over her, Catherine of
Taranto betook herself immediately to the Palazzo Durazzo and boldly
faced the arch-schemer. In wickedness and courage she was a match for
him, and he knew it; so he received her news of the Queen’s condition
with smooth words very delicately barbed and very poisonous. Thanking
the Empress with every show of respectful gratitude for the honour
that she had conferred upon him by coming thus in person with the
all-important and all-welcome news, for himself he asked only the title
of Duke of Calabria, which alone could enable him to watch over Joan’s
interests properly, and those of her child. Should the Queen, he added,
see her way to complying with his request, then he should no longer
feel it his duty to bring all the accomplices of her husband’s murder
to justice; since if Andrew of Hungary’s progeny were, in time, to
occupy the throne, the murder itself would be rendered in a measure of
no effect. In the event of Joan’s refusal, however, the inquiry already
instituted in regard to the King’s assassins would be prosecuted to
the bitter end without respect for any one whosoever—an eventuality
which, as Charles pointed out to the Empress, with a diabolical smile,
might be very unpleasant for several of their mutual friends. By which
she was made to understand that Charles was perfectly aware of her own
share in that detestable transaction.

In answer, the resourceful Empress, careful to appear suitably
frightened by Charles’s hints, declared her willingness to do all she
could to promote his wishes, begging only a little time in which to
bring the Queen round to a more yielding frame of mind; a favour that
Charles could not help but grant her. And so they parted with the
mutual assurance of a complete understanding.

On returning to the Castel Nuovo, the Empress, having reported what
had passed to the unhappy Joan, withdrew to consider her own plan of
action in the struggle with Charles of Durazzo. At length she hit upon
a scheme so truly infernal as to claim pre-eminence over anything that
had preceded it in the long list of her iniquities. She would strike
her enemy to the heart; she would kill his intellect and break him as
surely as with an iron bar upon the wheel, through the one person that
he loved and venerated in all the world—his widowed mother, the saintly
Duchess Agnes of Durazzo.

Now it chanced that during those days Agnes of Durazzo lay sick of a
lingering and mysterious malady, the nature of which it was beyond the
ability of her physician to determine. In all probability the Duchess’s
disease was one of an internal tumour; be that as it may, it was in
every symptomatic particular only too well adapted to the unspeakable
purpose of the Empress, who forthwith set herself to disseminating
rumours destructive to the reputation of the good and gentle Duchess.
Not satisfied with this alone, moreover, she contrived by a hellish
stratagem to deceive even the Duchess’s doctor, so that he believed
himself justified in imparting his opinion to Charles of Durazzo in
person.

So that mad horror, as of a lost soul, took possession of Charles,
and the desire of the Empress that his mind should become the prey of
devils was fulfilled.

The luckless, blundering physician he dismissed curtly from his
presence after their interview. An hour later the unfortunate man
was discovered in a back street of Naples, stabbed to death—but not
before he had written out, by Charles’s orders, the recipe of a certain
draught to be administered to his illustrious patient; which thing was
done in the evening of the same day.

Shortly afterwards Charles was hastily summoned to his mother’s bedside
from the room in which he had spent the rest of that awful day alone
with his thoughts after parting from the doctor. On entering that
of his mother, her attendants withdrew, leaving the fast dying woman
alone with the son who had destroyed her in the interests of the family
honour.

What passed between them no man may say with any certainty; all that is
absolutely sure is that, when a few minutes had gone by, the scream of
a man in intolerable agony of soul rang out through the stone corridor;
and the Duchess’s servants, rushing to her room, found her lying dead
in the arms of her stricken son, who, himself, was entreating her
frantically to come back to him, sobbing as though his heart would
break, and imploring the mercy of Heaven for his misjudgment of her.

From that hour there was something very dreadful in the look of the
Duke of Durazzo, as though he were afraid of his own thoughts, and were
for ever struggling to free himself from their compulsion. The only
person who understood a little of what was in his mind was doubtless
the Empress of Constantinople, and, when she saw that the man was,
for the first time in all his life, the prey of a hideous remorse, she
became gradually afraid for herself and for her first-born, Robert of
Taranto, for whom she was plotting to secure the hand of the Queen.

Towards the end of the time agreed upon between Joan and the Empress
for the former to make public her betrothal to Robert, who was still
living in the Castel Nuovo, and while the whole town was lamenting the
mysterious death of the beloved Duchess Agnes of Durazzo, there came
to pass a thing which utterly set at naught all the calculations of the
Empress and of her eldest son.

It so happened that one day Robert of Taranto had gone out riding
with Charles of Durazzo, whom the astute mother of Robert had, since
the demise of Duchess Agnes, persuaded her son to conciliate by
every possible means in his power. Now both Robert and his mother had
overlooked, or were in ignorance of, the surpassing love that Louis
of Taranto, the youngest of Robert’s two brothers, had for some years
borne to Joan; which love Louis had kept in check to the best of his
ability while Andrew of Hungary lived. But now that Joan was a widow
and the prize of any man bold enough to snatch it from the rest, Louis
of Taranto felt no hesitation in doing so when the opportunity offered.

Therefore it came about that, on his return to the Castel Nuovo,
Robert found himself shut out. Despite his clamour to be admitted,
as he termed it, “to his own house,” and his threats to exact bloody
retribution from the sentries within for keeping him waiting, he
received no attention from anybody until his mother came out to him,
trembling and confused, to say that in his absence his brother Louis
had effected an entry into the castle, and had compelled Joan to go
through a form of marriage with him.

The effect of the news upon Robert may be easily imagined. After
staring, speechless, at his informant for a few minutes, there broke
from him a cry of rage, and, turning his horse, he tore off at a gallop
towards the Palazzo Durazzo. Here he found Duke Charles in the company
of the Duchess Maria and informed them, as well as he could for fury,
of what had taken place. It ended in Charles promising him that he
would leave no stone unturned to prevent the necessary confirmation
by the Pope of the union of Louis with the Queen; and that, so long as
he, Charles of Durazzo, lived, no such confirmation should be put into
practice.

That same day he wrote to the Pope at Avignon asking for a Papal
inquiry into the murder of Andrew of Hungary and laying before the Holy
Father the names of those implicated in it; thus he hoped to obtain
the deposal of Joan from the throne and the reversion of it to himself
as husband of the next rightful heir, Maria of Anjou; also to ensure
the destruction of the Empress of Constantinople as a participant in
Andrew’s death.

It was long before the Pope’s answer reached him, and when at last
it did it was rather disappointing. For Clement VI replied with a
Bull dated June 2, 1346, addressed to Beltram des Baux, Count of
Monte Scaglioso and Chief Justice of Sicily, bidding him draw up
a charge against the murderers of King Andrew—who were formally
anathematized—and to punish them with the utmost severity. A secret
codicil to the Bull, however, expressly forbade the Chief Justice to
proceed against, or in any way to implicate in his handling of the
case, either the Queen herself or any of her relatives. So, to avoid
causing still more lamentable disorders in the already distracted
kingdom, any such malefactors of the Blood Royal, added the Pope,
would be dealt with later by himself, alone, as the Supreme Head of the
Church and suzerain lord of the Kingdom of Naples.

The Count of Monte Scaglioso showed himself no laggard in discharging
the duty thus entrusted to his zeal and ability.

Within three days from the reception of the Papal Bull, he was able to
announce that the trial of the late King’s murderers would be held on
the following day in the great hall of San Luigi in the Castel Nuovo,
the same vast apartment in which Pope Celestino V had abdicated the
pontificate in 1294. In the hall were seats for all the principal
nobles of the kingdom round about that of the Chief Justice himself.
The two accused persons were both men—Tommaso Pace, King Andrew’s
valet, and Nicholas of Melazzo, the confederate of Charles of Durazzo
and the same who had played the part of Judas, as well as that of “Omri
who slew his master.” Both were brought from their prison to the Castel
Nuovo to undergo a preliminary torture that should make them confess
their guilt at once and so save the time and trouble of their judges.

On the way from the prison to the palace the accused passed by Charles
of Durazzo, to whom the wretched notary whispered, it is said, a
promise to reveal nothing of what had formerly passed between them, on
condition that Charles would provide for the other’s widow and orphans;
to which the Duke assented with a nod of the head.

And Nicholas of Melazzo kept his word; for, during all the torments
to which he was presently subjected, he held his mouth and played the
man. But with the valet it was very different; no sooner did Tommaso
Pace feel his arms being dislocated at the shoulder in the torture
known as that of “the Cord” than he shrieked for mercy, swearing to
tell everything, and imploring to be conducted before his judges. And
now there ensued the first of a series of hellish scenes that were to
follow each other in the drama of mediæval reprisal, that nightmare of
cruelty and fear.

As the two prisoners were being taken from the cell where they had
been tortured, to the hall of San Luigi, up a narrow, winding stairway,
the Count of Terlizzi, who was bringing up the doleful procession with
several of his men-at-arms—he having been present at the torturing of
both the accused, and being in terror of what Tommaso Pace might be
about to reveal—suddenly sprang upon the valet (who was walking behind
Nicholas of Melazzo and their jailers) and with the help of one of his
soldiers dragged him back into an embrasure of the stairway, and there,
taking him by the throat, forced him to put out his tongue, which they
cut out with a knife. Then pushing the fainting wretch before them,
they rejoined the procession; but not before Pace’s howls had drawn
the attention of Charles of Durazzo, who, like Terlizzi, had been
a witness of what had taken place in the torture-chamber. So struck
was he by the horrid energy of Terlizzi’s act, and understanding its
purport as he did, Charles fell for an instant beneath the spell of
the very danger which he had so laboriously created for the removal of
Joan and Louis of Taranto from his path. It may be that there rang in
his ears, together with the miserable valet’s inarticulate protests,
the words of the Psalm: “He hath digged a pit for others and is fallen
into it himself”; at any rate he glanced at Nicholas of Melazzo,
and, halting the procession, drew him aside to where they could speak
without being overheard. And Nicholas, reading the half-formed purpose
in his face, once more whispered his promise of secrecy. Whereupon
Charles, recovering his courage, promised on his part to take care of
the notary’s family, adding a command that Nicholas should name every
person concerned in the King’s assassination to the Chief Justice,
excepting Charles himself and the Queen and the members of the royal
family.

Which command Nicholas obeyed implicitly; but when the Chief Justice
began to question Tommaso Pace for a confirmation of the notary’s
evidence, the mutilated valet could only open his mouth and point to
where his tongue had been.

Nevertheless the Chief Justice ordered the immediate arrest of such
of the conspirators as were present in the hall of San Luigi; Robert
of Cabano and the Counts of Morcone and Terlizzi, the last of whom
had thus gained nothing by his barbarity upon Tommaso Pace. Of the
other conspirators, Filippa Cabano and her two daughters, together
with Donna Cancia, were thrown into prison immediately afterwards;
and the rest, the Lords Mileto, Catanzaro, and Squillace, being warned
in season, saved themselves by flight; old Charles of Artois and his
son Bertrand being still secure in their fortress of Sant’ Agata of
the Goths, near what was probably the real site of the Caudine Forks,
and from which, centuries later, the last Father of the Church, Saint
Alphonsus Liguori, was destined to take his episcopal title as Bishop
of Sant’Agata, where he died in the year 1788.


And when Nicholas of Melazzo had concluded his testimony, he was
sentenced, with his accomplice, Tommaso Pace, to be dragged at the
tail of a horse throughout the town, and then hanged by the neck in the
Mercato, the great market square in which Conradin of Hohenstaufen and
Frederick of Baden had been decapitated by order of Charles I of Anjou
in 1268, after the battle of Tagliacozzo. It was in this same square of
the Mercato that Masaniello’s rebellion broke out in the seventeenth
century; and here took place, also, the executions of the misguided
Liberals in 1799.

The sentence upon the notary and the valet having been forthwith
carried into effect, the other prisoners were on the following day
taken out of the Castel Nuovo and conveyed on to a galley in the bay,
their hands tied behind their backs, and having each a hook passed
through their tongue to prevent them from calling out to the crowd,
in passing, any mention of some forbidden name. When they had been
tortured on the galley—a precaution for which the Count of Monte
Scaglioso would seem to have been answerable—and their depositions
against one another duly written down and signed, needless to say they
were, one and all, condemned to be burned alive.

The next morning the crowd (composed mainly of descendants of the
slaves of the long-ago Romans) filled all the ways from the prison to
the Mercato, where on the side towards the Church of Sant’ Eligio—the
spot on which executions usually took place being before the other
church in the piazza, the ancient Church of Santa Croce—was erected
a huge pile of wood and many bundles of twigs about a number of posts
with staples to them. This was the pyre.

From an early hour the populace had been swarming the city, tossed
and churned hither and thither by its ravening for blood—no matter of
whom—and by its impatient excitement for the gratification of its lust
of cruelty. At last, however, its waiting was rewarded, and there went
up to the heavens a roar of pleasure as the prison-gates were thrown
open and the spectacle began of the procession to the Mercato. I need
not describe it, save to say that all along the way the condemned, each
in a separate cart, were tortured in a revolting manner with scourges,
razors, and red-hot pincers, so that several succumbed to their
sufferings before reaching the pyre intended for them. Amongst those
who died thus was Robert of Cabano, Grand Seneschal of the Kingdom,
and the only one of them all who refused to utter the least sound by
which to betray his torments to the mob. And when, finally, the dying
unfortunates were all made fast to the stakes and fire was put to them,
that same mob rushed over the intervening soldiers, extinguishing
the flames, and seizing the still palpitating bodies, tore them in
pieces for the sake of the bones, with which to make whistles and
dagger-handles.



CHAPTER XIII

THE VAMPIRE-MONARCH FROM HUNGARY


This detestable butchery, strictly in accord with the criminal
procedure of the day, was but the beginning of a reign of terror in
the city and realm of Naples. The murder of Andrew of Hungary was soon
no more than a pretext to serve Charles of Durazzo for ridding himself
of all persons who, in any way, dared to manifest their disapproval of
his assumption of the Dictatorship of the Kingdom, or to murmur against
his unbearable tyranny. Nor was it long before Louis of Taranto,
who by now had completely won the heart of Joan, and was seeking to
obtain from the Pope the dispensations necessary to make lawful their
irregular union, began to consider the high-handed and arrogant conduct
of Charles—whom and all whose works he abominated—as an intolerable
affront to himself. In consequence, having armed his retainers and
increased his forces as much as he could, Louis raised his standard as
King of Naples and Jerusalem, and bade his loyal subjects rally to him
in opposition to the Albanian usurper of his sovereign rights.

In this manner there broke out a regular civil war throughout the
country; now the victory inclined to Louis, and now to Charles and
his ally, Robert of Taranto, the elder brother of Louis and the
disappointed suitor of Joan. But a day soon came when there was no
longer left to Louis any more money; and without money he was naturally
helpless to pay his troops. Both he and Joan were in despair, when his
mother the Empress of Constantinople, who was living with them, showed
the true metal of which she was made.

Bidding the young couple take heart, Catherine of Taranto promised
solemnly that, if they would but lend her the half of their forces and
would content themselves with remaining for a week on the defensive
in the Castel Nuovo, she would bring them at the end of that time a
treasure such as they had never yet even imagined. To this proposal
they perforce consented; and the Empress, leading half her son’s army,
marched boldly out from Naples by the Porta Capuana, along the road
towards Benevento, and so came by way of the Caudine Forks to the
castle of Saint Agatha of the Goths, where Queen Joan’s former lover,
Bertrand of Artois, and his father, old Count Charles, were still
skulking from the law.

Now when Count Charles perceived that troops were preparing to besiege
him, and recognized their leader as the Empress, he sent out messengers
to inquire her intentions in coming thus with a large force into his
neighbourhood; to which Catherine replied, speaking as follows—her
speech is translated literally:

“My most beloved ones” (_Dilettissimi miei_), “pray report to our
friend Charles that we desire to speak with him privately upon a matter
of equal interest to us both; and that he need feel no uneasiness at
seeing us come thus with an armed force to him, for we have done so
expressly for a certain purpose, the which we will explain to him at
our leisure. We know that he is confined to his bed with an attack of
gout, and so we were not surprised that he did not come out in person
to greet us. And so pray salute him from us and reassure him as to our
intentions towards him; and say that we would fain enter to him—if such
be his pleasure—with Master Nicholas Acciajuoli our privy councillor,
and no more than ten of our soldiers, in order to confer with him upon
a subject too important to be confided to messengers.”

Completely deceived by the pernicious woman’s fair words as reported
to him, Count Charles sent out his son Bertrand to receive her with all
due ceremony, and to escort her to where he himself lay prostrate with
illness. Their meeting was cordial in the extreme; after expressing
the most heartfelt regrets at the venerable knight’s sad condition, the
Empress so soon as they were alone together, lowering her voice, said
that her object in so coming to him was to consult him in regard to the
state of affairs in Naples and to enlist his active support on behalf
of the Queen. At the same time, she went on to say, there being no
immediate reason for her return to the capital, she would be more than
grateful for the favour of being allowed to remain yet a few days with
him at Saint Agatha, in order to profit by his advice, and to give him
some account of all that had come to pass in Naples during his absence.

It ended in Count Charles’s head being quite turned by the Empress’s
flattery; so that he not only begged her to remain his guest for so
long as she pleased, but also gave orders for the gates of the castle
to be left open so that she might be accessible at all times to her
officers, civil and military, that were encamped outside the walls with
her army.

But the fatuous credulity of Count Charles was soon undeceived. At
a late hour of the following night, the gates of the fortress being
still open, and its rightful inmates sound asleep for the most part,
the foolish old Count was suddenly awakened from his slumbers by the
Empress of Constantinople, who, followed by several of her soldiers,
entered his room, a dagger in her hand, and, advancing to his couch,
seized him by the throat.

“O accursed traitor, you are now going to be punished as you deserve!”
she cried. And when he begged only mercy for his son—thinking the
Empress had in mind to slay them both lest at any time they should
conspire against the kingship of her son, Louis of Taranto—and offered
to put her in possession of his entire treasury if only she would spare
the life of his adored son. But to all his entreaties she answered
only that he must prepare to part for ever from his son, whom she had
decided to send away to the castle of Malfi; and that as for Count
Charles himself, the probability was that he would end his days in the
dungeons of that of Saint Agatha of the Goths. Prior to pronouncing
these sentences, however, she had compelled him to show her where his
immense treasures were concealed behind the wall of his bed-chamber—a
veritable Aladdin’s cave of gold in bars and in plate and of precious
stones.

The chronicler, Domenico Gravina, relates how that, a few days later,
Count Charles was found dead in his prison, the lips covered with a
bloody froth and the wrists all gnawed away—so we may suppose him to
have died either of rage or of some corrosive poison; or, very likely,
of both. And not long afterwards, his son Bertrand, in despair, hanged
himself from a grating in the vault at Malfi, into which he had been
transferred by order of Catherine of Taranto.

But retribution as condign as it was merited was about to fall upon the
head of that wicked woman.

On returning, laden with her ill-gotten spoils, to Naples, her triumph
was dashed to the ground to learn that, during her absence, Charles
of Durazzo, her ancient enemy and that of her house, had once more
sent word to Joan, demanding that she should instantly create him Duke
of Calabria, and so acknowledge him to be the rightful heir to the
throne as the husband of her sister Maria. This demand the Queen had
rejected with contumely; and Charles, stung to madness by her refusal,
had thereupon sent back word to inform her that he had, accordingly,
written to King Louis of Hungary, inviting him to take possession of
the kingdom, and promising to deliver to him the chief murderers of his
brother Andrew, who had so far escaped the just consequences of their
iniquity.

It was now indispensable, as Joan saw clearly, to secure the public
opinion of Europe to her side in the life-and-death struggle with her
implacable foe. Therefore she sent ambassadors to plead her cause with
the Florentine Republic, and to exonerate her of the crime generally
imputed to her of having caused the murder of her husband. She even
wrote in the same sense to the Hungarian King himself; but only
received for reply a letter in which Louis of Hungary enumerated the
proofs against her: her disordered life both before and after marriage;
the exclusive power that she had arrogated to herself; the fact that it
had been in no way owing to her exertions that King Andrew’s murderers
had ever been brought to justice; and that she had so quickly taken
another husband in his place,—all of which certainly pointed to Joan’s
aggravated guilt.

Indeed, the King of Hungary had already, on receipt of Charles of
Durazzo’s letter, written back to accept the offer of the throne and to
say that he would at once set about making preparations for coming down
to Naples at the head of a large army of Hungarians. For, apart from
Charles’s invitation to him, King Louis, stirred up by love for his
murdered brother, as well as by the tears of their mother, Elizabeth,
and the incitement of the Dominican Father Robert, who after Andrew’s
demise had taken refuge in Budapest, was now entirely bent on avenging
his brother to the utmost of his ability.

He had in the past made strong endeavours to obtain from the Pope at
Avignon a condemnation of Joan herself and of her accomplices of the
Blood Royal, complaining that whereas the less prominent members of
the plot against his brother had suffered the just penalty of their
sins, yet the principal authors of it had been let go unpunished;
and that Joan herself, the most guilty of all, had been suffered to
continue with impunity her career of shameless immorality. To which
the Holy Father had answered that the Queen’s conduct, both during and
after the murder of her husband, was of a surety most blameworthy; but
that, no tangible proof of complicity in Andrew’s death having been
brought against her, he, the Pope, although willing to do justice to
all parties in so far as in him lay, could not condemn Joan upon mere
hearsay evidence. Should such good and solid evidence be produced
before him against her, however, he would not fail to deal with her
accordingly; until then he must suspend judgment.


As before, it was again the Empress Catherine who came to the rescue
of the situation in which her son and his wife were now placed by
the action of Charles of Durazzo in inviting Louis of Hungary’s
intervention against them. As she saw clearly, the only thing left for
them to do now was to come to terms with their nearest enemy, Charles
himself, and to bribe him to combine with them against the invader who
was already hastening to overwhelm them. Accordingly, she arranged a
truce with Charles; and, together with Joan and Louis of Taranto, met
him in the gardens of the Castel Nuovo, where it was agreed between
him and Joan that he should be created Duke of Calabria, and formally
acknowledged as the heir to the throne. In return he was to join forces
with Joan and Louis against the King of Hungary.

So soon as this agreement had been carried out, Charles, who now saw
himself within measurable distance of the throne itself, set out from
Naples, with all the troops that could be spared for the purpose,
for the city of Aquila, where the populace was already declaring for
Louis of Hungary. With him went also Robert of Taranto, who had become
reconciled to his brother Louis in this the hour of the latter’s
greatest danger. And just as they departed for Aquila, the Empress
Catherine, who was watching the troops defile along the street towards
the Porta Capuana, was taken suddenly ill, and died, without speaking
again, in the evening of the same day.

In the meantime the King of Hungary had already entered Italy from
the north, and had struck into the Neapolitan territory on the side
of Apulia; and the news of his coming filled the Court of Naples with
dismay. For it had been hoped that his progress might have been stayed
by a legate whom the Pope had sent to meet him at Foglino, within a
long day’s march of the Neapolitan frontier, and to bar the way to him
with a threat of excommunication if he dared to advance any further
without the permission of the Holy Father; but the Hungarian had
refused to pay any attention to Papal remonstrances, and had continued
on his way through the States of the Church into the Kingdom of Naples.

On learning of these events Queen Joan hastily assembling such of the
nobles as she knew to be loyal to her, made them swear fidelity to
Louis of Taranto, her husband, and then took ship by night in one of
her own Provençal galleys for Marseilles, the port of Avignon, which
belonged to her—so that she was, in a sense, the landlady of the
Pope. So soon, then, as Joan had departed to seek refuge at the Papal
Court, Louis of Taranto, taking with him his dead mother’s Counsellor,
Nicholas Acciajuoli, set out with a small force for the citadel
of Capua on the River Volturno, thinking there to check the enemy.
Unhappily, though, the Hungarian monarch, obtaining information of his
adversary’s movements, turned aside, and, marching round the flank of
the Neapolitan forces by way of the mountains of Alife and Morcone,
seized upon the city of Benevento, in rear of Louis of Taranto’s army.

At Benevento, however, the King of Hungary was met by a deputation of
Neapolitan subjects who, frightened by the rapidity of his advance,
as well as by the Queen’s flight and by the sudden departure of her
husband for they knew not what place, had decided to make the best
terms they could for themselves with the revengeful new-comer. And so
they brought him the keys of the City, and made submission to him as
the rightful successor of the late King Robert. The news of this event
soon reached Louis of Taranto’s army, and at once a vile panic set
in, and very soon Louis found himself deserted by all save only the
faithful, intrepid Acciajuoli; for there was more courage beneath the
lawyer’s gown than beneath the breastplates of all the army.

Resistance to the Hungarian was no longer possible for Louis; and,
together with Acciajuoli, he returned to Naples in the evening of the
day on which he had learned of the Hungarian’s arrival at Benevento. At
Naples Louis was met by his brother Robert and by Charles of Durazzo,
both of whom, as well as all his other relations, entreated him to
go away at once, lest he should bring down the wrath of the Hungarian
upon them and upon the whole city. Turning his back upon the cowards,
Louis went down to the sea-shore, and, accompanied as ever by the loyal
Acciajuoli, embarked in a crazy, rotten rowing-boat manned by four
sailors, thanks to whose devotion he ultimately reached Leghorn, whence
he shortly joined Queen Joan in their kingdom of Provence.

The King of Hungary being encamped at Aversa, Charles of Durazzo and
Robert of Taranto now repaired there to him with the purpose of turning
away his anger from themselves and their families. They were received,
to their great consolation and encouragement, with every possible
manifestation of benignity; the King even going so far as to inquire
after their youngest brothers, Louis of Durazzo and Philip of Taranto,
and to express the most lively desire to make their acquaintance as
soon as possible. Finally, he begged they might be sent for, in order,
as he put it, “that he might make his entry into Naples in the midst
of all his family.” With these requests their elders made all speed to
comply, so that, within a few hours, the boy, Louis of Durazzo, and the
young man, Philip of Taranto, were with them in the castle of Aversa,
the Hungarian head-quarters. On their being presented to him, the King
embraced them, and chatted with them a little while; after which he
made them, with their elder brothers, sit down with him to supper, not
parting with them until a late hour of the night.

Now there were with the King of Hungary two noblemen of Naples, Lillo
of Aquila and the Count of Fondi, both of them brave and honourable
gentlemen and haters of cruelty and treachery. And when Charles of
Durazzo went to bed that night, these came to his bedside and bade
him beware, for that the Hungarian was a tyrant and no gentleman, and
that, for all his fair words, he had, only that morning, taken council
with his followers that he might put Charles himself to death and send
the other Neapolitan princes in captivity into Hungary. But to these
warnings Charles turned a deaf ear, although Lillo persisted in them
and implored him, for the sake of all he held dear in this world, to
save himself with his brothers and his cousins; until Charles angrily
bade his well-wishers to leave him in peace.

All the next day the demeanour of the King continued the same until the
evening, when, as they were all at supper, Charles received yet a last
warning of his danger from Lillo of Aquila, who was waiting upon him at
table.

“Oh, why does your Highness refuse to listen to me?” he whispered.
“Fly—fly—there is still time to save yourself.”

But Charles, irritated by Lillo’s persistency, threatened, unless he
held his peace, to repeat his words aloud to the King; and Lillo could
only bow in submission, whispering as he did so:

“At least, I have done my duty; and now may the will of God be done,
likewise, in regard to you.”

At that moment the King rose and confronted Charles with a terrible
countenance; so that the latter was now, at last, rudely awakened from
his dream of security.

“Ah, traitor, now I hold you in my hand!” cried the King. “Be sure that
I will do justice upon you—full justice—for your crimes—your daring
to march against my city of Aquila—you, by whose invitation I came to
give peace to this miserable land that has groaned so long beneath the
burden of you and yours.”

He then went on to reproach Charles with having been, together with
his mother’s brother, Cardinal de Périgord, the means of postponing
the coronation of Andrew, and so of bringing him to his untimely end;
furthermore he accused Charles of designing to obtain the kingdom for
himself by his abductive marriage with the Princess Maria, his own,
King Louis’, intended bride; which last delinquency had all along
rankled fearfully in the King’s mind, so that as he referred to it
his voice broke into a shout of fury. And then turning away from the
excuses and pleadings for mercy of his victim, he ordered the Voivode,
Stephen of Transylvania, to take charge of all the prisoners and to
keep them for the night in a room near his, the King’s, own apartment.

The next day King Louis, having visited that balcony in the Castle of
Averna from which the dead body of his brother Andrew had been hanged
and then thrown into the garden below, sent an order to the Voivode
Stephen that he was to have Charles of Durazzo brought by soldiers to
that same place and that they were to cut his throat; but the King
himself did not stay to witness the execution. And when word of the
King’s order was brought to the Voivode he told Charles to follow
him, and, together with some soldiers, they went out to the room of
the balcony. There the Voivode asked of Charles whether he wished
to confess his sins to a priest, who answered in the affirmative,
and so one of the monks came to him from the monastery and heard his
confession, and absolved him in so far as he was able to do. After
which Duke Charles knelt down over against the fatal balcony and
commended his poor soul to God, and was killed by having a very sharp
knife drawn across his throat (so that his head was nearly severed from
his body) by one of the soldiers, whilst another plunged a sword into
his heart that he might die quickly. And when the thing was done they
threw the dead body of the Duke over the balcony into the garden.

After that King Louis rode away with all his army from Aversa to
Naples, being met on the way by a large deputation of nobles and
citizens, of whom he took no notice, refusing to acknowledge their
greeting or to ride beneath a canopy they had provided for his entry
into the capital. On arriving in Naples the King at once gave himself
up to the work of vengeance. The first to die was Donna Cancia, who,
ever since the death of the other regicides, had been lying in prison;
she was burned alive in the Mercato. Soon after Cancia’s death the
King ordered the arrest of the Count of Squillace, Godfrey of Marsano,
promising to spare him if he would deliver up one of his relations, a
certain Conrad of Catanzaro, accused of having been among those privy
to the murder of Andrew. To this infamy Squillace consented, saving
his life by betraying Conrad to the Hungarian authorities, who had him
broken alive, as is related, upon a wheel studded with razor-blades—but
I incline to doubt this for more reasons than one.

But instead of assuaging the rage of King Louis, these monstrous
executions seem only to have filled him with a further appetite
for blood. As during the usurpation of power by Charles of Durazzo
after King Andrew’s murder, so now executions multiplied to such an
extent that they threatened soon to become the principal medium of
government; just as four centuries and a half later, in the time of
suppression of 1799, there set in an epidemic of frantic denunciation,
the general terror making of society a hot-bed of the basest passions
and motives—avarice, cowardice, and hate. And soon the people began to
think how they might rid them of the ghastly incubus that had come to
prey upon them in the person of the vampire-monarch from Hungary.



CHAPTER XIV

END OF JOAN’S CAREER


In those days of the King of Hungary’s assize in Naples Queen Joan
reached her county of Provence and began to travel across it from Nice,
where she had landed, towards Avignon.

On coming to the town of Aix, however, to her astonishment and
perplexity, her journey was interrupted by the townspeople, who, albeit
they received her with every mark of respect, yet set a guard about
the castle of the place, the Château d’Arnaud, in which she stayed; and
refused to let her issue thence until, as they said, they should have
had word from Avignon—but in regard to what matter, they would not tell
her at once.

Only after two months had gone by did the Archbishop of Aix present
himself before her with an explanation. It appeared that, at the very
moment of Joan’s landing in Provence, news had been brought to Aix
that the King of France had sent his son, the Duke of Normandy, to
Avignon to negotiate with Joan as to the cession of Provence to the
French Crown in exchange for a proportionate territory elsewhere; so
that, on seeing Joan arrive thus timely in their midst, the people
of Aix imagined, not unnaturally, that her presence among them must
be connected with the negotiations in question. And as they were
determined to die to the last man rather than pass under the detested
rule of the French, they had resolved, if need be, to keep the Queen
a hostage among them, in order to prevent her from carrying on the
dreaded negotiations. Having, however, and to their great thankfulness,
received from the Sovereign Pontiff himself an absolute denial of
any such purpose of negotiation, they at once and with many apologies
restored the Queen to liberty.

On nearing Avignon, what was her delight on seeing the beloved Louis
of Taranto come out to meet her, accompanied by all the Cardinals then
in attendance upon the Pope! Joan was now, indeed, greeted as a Queen
by her people, who strewed the way with flowers, the while a number of
mounted pages rode beside the royal pair, holding above them a canopy
of crimson velvet; and from every church the bells pealed out a welcome
to the sovereigns. In the castle they were received with all pomp
and circumstance by the Holy Father, who embraced and blessed them;
after which they took up their residence in the Ursuline Convent; and
a little later, to complete the gladness of Joan, her younger sister,
Maria, now the mother of two baby girls, arrived at Avignon from the
stricken city of Naples.

After the death of her husband in the castle of Aversa, Maria, bearing
her children in her arms, had taken refuge from the reprisals of the
King of Hungary in the monastery of Santa Croce, where the monks took
her in and fed and sheltered her during some days, although they knew
that not only their lives but the existence of the monastery itself
would fall a sacrifice to the Hungarian’s anger should he ever learn
of their charity to the widow of Charles of Durazzo. At length she had
contrived, thanks to the disguise of an old monastic gown, to embark
with her babies upon a ship bound for Provence; and her account of the
things that were being done by the Hungarian in Naples made both Joan
and her husband long to get back there with an army behind them, that
they, in their turn, might satisfy their vengeance.

About this time there arrived, too, at Avignon ambassadors from the
King of Hungary to the Pope, demanding in no measured terms the formal
condemnation of Joan as an accessory before the fact to the murder of
her husband, and her deposition from the throne of Naples; and, most
especially, that the Holy Father should give the kingdom instead to
Louis of Hungary. And now the Pope appointed a day for Joan on which
to plead her cause before him and to disprove the charges made against
her if she could; and this she did so ably that those who heard her
broke into loud applause, and the Pope pronounced her innocent before
all the world, and the Hungarian envoys were compelled to go away
empty—although, to this day, there are those who have their doubts
as to the veracity of Joan’s denial of the sin imputed to her. At any
rate, Pope Clement, who was a good and truth-loving Pontiff, believed
her, and there is an end of it.

   [Illustration: CLEMENT THE SIXTH.]

After the discomfiture of the Hungarians the Pope confirmed the
marriage of the Queen to her cousin, Louis of Taranto, and bestowed
upon the latter the title of King of Naples and of Jerusalem; he had
already, on March 27, given him the Golden Rose. Simultaneously the
Holy Father sent an apostolic legate, Cardinal de Boulogne, to the King
of Hungary, at Naples, to persuade him to cede the kingdom peaceably to
its rightful sovereigns.

While the Cardinal was engaged on this difficult task Nicholas
Acciajuoli betook himself, likewise, into Naples and set about raising
an army wherewith to drive out the Hungarians in the event of their
refusing to listen to the Cardinal’s arguments. But to maintain such an
army great expenses were unavoidable; and the Queen, who had sent him
in answer to a deputation of Neapolitans entreating her to return and
rule over them, was now obliged to raise money by every means at her
disposal. For this purpose she sold all her jewels; but these proving
insufficient, she begged the Pope to buy of her the city of Avignon. To
this he consented, and, on June 19, 1348, gave her for it a sum about
equal to sixty thousand pounds of our money. Which amply disproves the
statement made by Alexandre Dumas,[12] who says that the sale took
place on the day immediately prior to Joan’s trial, suggesting as
he does that the Pope’s decision was influenced by his eagerness to
acquire possession of the city—for the trial was held almost at once
after Joan’s arrival at Avignon on March 15.

In the meantime the King of Hungary had declined to accede to the
Pope’s instance that he should retire from Naples to his own kingdom;
and so there was nothing left for Joan and Louis of Taranto to do but
to dispossess him at the sword’s point. Thanks to the indefatigable
efforts of Acciajuoli—and, in perhaps even greater measure, to the
misrule of the Hungarian himself—matters were now ripe for an armed
intervention in Naples, where every strong place had surrendered to
the enemy, with the glorious exception of the castle of Melfi, of
which Lorenzo Acciajuoli, the son of Nicholas, was the commander.
From Melfi, where he had conferred with his son, Nicholas Acciajuoli
travelled throughout the country, crying the Queen’s acquittal and the
confirmation of her union with Louis of Taranto, and proclaiming far
and wide the great indulgences and blessings promised by the Pope to
all who should submit themselves to their lawful rulers, Queen Joan and
her consort, King Louis. And, finding himself everywhere greeted with
tumultuous declamations of loyalty towards Joan, and of detestation
of the Hungarian, Acciajuoli returned to the Queen at Avignon with the
news that she might safely entrust her cause to her own people.

On September 10, 1348, she left Provence for Naples, accompanied by
her husband and her sister and the counsellors Acciajuoli and Spinelli.
But when they came to the shores of Naples they could not land in the
harbour because all the castles on that side of the city were occupied
by the Hungarians, so that they had to go on to where the mouth of
the classic river Sebeto was crossed by a bridge, the Ponte Guiscardo;
thence they were escorted by the nobles and townspeople to the Palazzo
Adjutorio by the Porta Capuana, where they proceeded to establish
themselves and their Court.


For many months the fortunes of war inclined first to one side and
then to the other. It began by Nicholas Acciajuoli’s blockading the
Hungarians in their strongholds, whilst Louis of Taranto employed
his energies in reducing various of the rebellious barons to
allegiance. Little by little he extended his operations from the city
of Naples into the farthest confines of the kingdom; until, by dint
of perseverance, he had contrived to make himself, as it appeared,
master of it. But suddenly his good fortune deserted him, owing to his
abandonment by one of the King of Hungary’s mercenaries whom Louis had
seduced to the side of the Queen by heavy bribes. This was that Werner
who styled himself “the enemy of God,” and who now resold himself to
the Hungarian, to whose Vicar-General, Conrad Wolf (Conrado Lupo, as
the chronicler makes it), he opened the gates of Benevento.

The consequence of Werner’s treachery was to force Louis of Taranto
to fall back upon Naples; when the King of Hungary, on learning of it,
made all speed to rejoin his troops—he had fled from Italy for a while
to escape an epidemic of the plague—before Aversa, bringing with him
heavy reinforcements. Landing at Manfredonia, he advanced, practically
unopposed, so swiftly as to take his adversary completely by surprise.
Having made himself master of the fortresses of Trani, Canosa, and
Salerno in rapid succession, thus hemming in Louis of Taranto on the
east and on the south, he proceeded to lay siege to Aversa on the north
of Naples. This new move threatened disaster to Joan and her husband,
who, being forced to remain on the defensive in Naples, were obliged
to witness the spectacle of as gallant a resistance as was ever made
by any beleaguered garrison; and that without being able to come in
any way to the assistance of Pignatelli, the commandant of the place,
and his heroic soldiers, who only numbered about five hundred men, as
against some seventeen thousand of the enemy’s forces. During three
months Pignatelli flung back the King of Hungary’s attacks upon the
town; until, finally, despairing of taking Aversa by assault, the
Hungarian resolved to reduce it by starvation.

Gradually the circumstances of the little garrison became hopeless; so
that Pignatelli was confronted with the alternative of surrender or of
death either by starvation or in a last grapple with the besiegers. To
add to the general distress, a fleet of vessels bringing reinforcements
to Queen Joan from Provence under the leadership of Renaud des
Baux—some relation this, I fancy, of that terrible Chief Justice,
the Count of Monte Scaglioso—and upon the timely arrival of which all
depended, was delayed by contrary winds so that none could say where it
was or whether it would ever arrive at all.

   [Illustration: CASTEL DELL’UOVO, NAPLES. From an engraving
   after P. Sandby.]

Under these circumstances Louis of Taranto, abhorring the thought of
allowing the brave Pignatelli and his soldiers to sacrifice themselves
to no purpose (seeing that the ultimate surrender of Aversa was
inevitable), sent a message to the King of Hungary inviting him to
a personal encounter in the same spirit in which the Emperor Paul
Petrovitch sent a similar challenge to King George III of England.
Louis of Taranto’s proposal to the Hungarian was simplicity itself:
that he of them who should kill the other should be King of Naples and
of Jerusalem. To this the King of Hungary consented with the advice of
his counsellors, stipulating only that the combat should take place in
the presence of the Emperor of Germany as Cæsar and sovereign lord of
all the princes of the West; or of the King of England as a friend of
both parties; or of the Patriarch of Aquileia, whose pretensions to
equality with the Pope the Hungarian appears to have been by way of
encouraging in revenge for Clement VI’s decision in favour of Joan.

These proposals, however, came to naught, for in the meanwhile Aversa
surrendered to the Hungarians; so that there was no longer any call
for him to risk his life for nothing. He had only to close in upon
Naples, and the doomed city must at once fall into his hands; it
was not more than twelve miles from Aversa to the capital, and the
Hungarian advance-guard under Lupi was soon visible to the Neapolitans
at the Porta Capuana; for it was easier for them, being mounted troops,
to approach the city from the direction of Poggia than from that of
Capodimonte, the more direct but more hilly road to Aversa.

Providentially it was at this moment that the ships of Renaud des Baux
hove in sight of Naples, and speedily came to anchor in the port. Now
it chanced that Maria of Durazzo with her two children had taken refuge
from a possible sack of the city by the Hungarians in the Castel dell’
Uovo; that, as the reader will remember, stands upon a rock surrounded
on three sides by the sea and connected with the mainland by a causeway
on arches. Both Joan and Louis, being occupied in the town itself at
the time of the fleet’s arrival, and supposing that Maria had already
preceded them on board the flag-ship, remained at their posts until
the last, encouraging their people and exhorting them to hold firm
against the foe. But the Neapolitans, preferring surrender to possible
annihilation, sent out a deputation to the King of Hungary to beg for
terms; to the great anger and sorrow of their rightful sovereigns,
who only now, when all seemed over, reluctantly sought the shelter of
Des Baux’s vessels, off the Castel dell’ Uovo. Here, being now much
pressed for time, they embarked on the nearest of the ships and, still
in the belief that the Duchess of Durazzo was safe on board that of the
Admiral, they gave the signal to depart and sailed out of the harbour,
followed, as they imagined, by the rest of the fleet; for it was now
drawing on to night, and too dark for them to see clearly what was
taking place in rear of them.

Not until they reached Gaeta, towards noon of the following day, after
fighting their way through a dreadful storm, did they realize that the
Admiral’s ship, with the Queen’s sister on board, was not with the rest
of the squadron that now came toiling, ship by ship at long intervals,
into the harbour. What had happened to it? Had it sunk, or been flung
ashore by the waves during the night at some lonely spot upon that
inhospitable coast? This was the agonizing question that Joan asked of
herself and of Louis and of all about them. And none could answer her.

Suddenly, as all hope of her ever again holding her sister in her arms
seemed to be on the point of vanishing from before Joan’s eyes, a cry
of joy broke from her where she was leaning upon the gunwale of the
vessel, her gaze fixed upon the sea and the cloud-scuds to southward.
Hastening to her side, Louis saw that a ship in difficulties, a
considerable distance from them, was being driven, in spite of
persistent “tacking,” towards them in the harbour of Gaeta. Thinking
it must be the Admiral, Louis hoisted signals to him that he should
join them; but, to his amazement, no attention was at first paid to
his signals; by which I mean to say that Louis had flown the Royal
Standard, and that the other only continued the more desperately to
endeavour to keep out to sea.

Of a sudden, though, the new-comer’s sails were seen to collapse and
fall to the deck; and, judging from the way in which she was tossed
and rolled about by the waves, albeit without changing her position,
the watchers could see that she had cast anchor. Without further delay,
Louis, in order to put an end to Joan’s suspense, ordered a boat to be
lowered, and, together with several of his comrades-in-arms, sprang
into it and was rowed out—not without considerable difficulty—to the
vessel in the offing.

On drawing alongside, their feelings may more easily be imagined than
described at hearing the cries of a woman in distress come to them
from out the creaking, storm-tossed galley which was unquestionably
that of Des Baux. Moreover, the deck was crowded with sailors, who now
called to them to come quickly. Clambering over the side by means of a
rope-ladder thrown down by the crew, Louis of Taranto and his comrades
rushed towards the Admiral’s quarters at the poop end of the deck, to
find his cabin shut and barred, the while the voice of Maria of Durazzo
called to them from within, with redoubled energy, to come to her
assistance. In an instant they had broken down the door, and surging
into the roomy cabin, found themselves in the presence of Maria and
of the Admiral, who was endeavouring to stifle her cries and to push
her, with the help of his son, Robert des Baux, into a cupboard of the
apartment.

Without a moment’s hesitation, Louis of Taranto smote the Admiral with
his sword, so that he fell dead, whilst Maria sank on to a couch, her
face in her hands to shut out the sight of the killing. But having
slain the Admiral, Louis was content and ordered Robert des Baux to be
merely put in irons and taken with them back to the other vessel, where
Queen Joan was waiting so feverishly to learn if her sister were alive
and on board or not. And when Maria at last rejoined the Queen she told
her how, having once taken her away from the Castel dell’ Uovo on his
flag-ship, the Admiral, instead of sailing in the wake of the rest of
the fleet, had shaped his course for Marseilles; how he had tried to
compel her to marry his son, and how at length the sailors, learning of
it, and angered at his attempt to make the coast of France instead of
following the Queen, had broken into mutiny on coming within sight of
the ships at Gaeta.


It would seem that the younger Des Baux was less to blame in the affair
than his father. At any rate, there is no evidence to show that he
shared the latter’s fate; although this may well have been owing to
the fact that soon after Louis of Taranto’s return with her sister to
the Queen, news was brought to them from Naples of a sudden change
in the situation there. It appeared that, soon after the departure
of the Queen and her husband from the city, the answer of the King
of Hungary to the deputies sent out to surrender the city to him was
received and made known to the inhabitants. But of such a nature was
it, so atrociously haughty and so sinister withal, that, rather than
submit themselves to so despotic and so resentful a Prince, the unhappy
Neapolitans declared their intention of dying with arms in their hands
in the defence of their families and their homes. No sooner did the
Hungarians learn of this resolve than a desperate attack was delivered
by them upon the Porta Capuana, which they succeeded in penetrating,
and compelled the defenders to fall back towards the harbour and the
fortresses in the southern quarter of the city.

As the Hungarians were, however, advancing through the black, deserted
streets upon the Castel Nuovo, in the hope of capturing at least a
portion of the royal family, the amazing rashness of their venturing
thus under cover of night into the midst of a hostile, well-armed, and
well-barricaded populace suddenly became patent to the Neapolitans,
as well as the extreme exhaustion of the Hungarian men and horses.
No sooner had the Neapolitans recognized their opportunity than they
seized it, flinging themselves upon their enemies, whom they now beat
back to the Porta Capuana and out through it into the country beyond,
amidst great slaughter and an indescribable confusion, taking no
prisoners, but killing all who fell into their hands.

This was practically the end of that war of the Hungarians against
Queen Joan and Louis of Taranto, after whom messengers were dispatched
that night to Gaeta, asking them to return, and to lead their subjects
once more against the foreigners, who, said the message, had been
beaten back from Naples and were in full retreat upon their former
eastern base about Benevento. Soon after the return to Naples of Joan
and Louis, however, a truce for twelve months was arranged between
them and the Hungarian, who was now more willing to listen to reason
than he had been before; so that when the Pope was invited by Joan to
mediate between them, he welcomed the suggestion thankfully enough.
Pope Clement’s first proposal, though, that Joan should make the King
of Hungary the heir to her crown, and so put her sister Maria out of
the succession, Joan refused even to contemplate; and then the Pope
suggested that she should pay a lump sum in cash to the King of Hungary
as ransom for all the fortresses that he still held in his hands in the
Kingdom of Naples; in return for which he was to abandon all further
claims upon and to the Crown.

To this Joan agreed willingly; but when the proposal was made known to
the King of Hungary, he said: “It is not for money or lands that I have
fought, but for vengeance on my brother’s murderers. But now my work
is done; the angry shades are satisfied, and I am going back to my own
country.” Nor would he accept so much as a single piece of money for
all the strong places and the power that were still his in the Kingdom
of Naples; but gave all over, undefiled by money, to Joan, and then
departed as he had come, triumphant and unapproachable.

After Louis of Hungary had gone away, there came a legate from the
Pope to crown Louis of Taranto as King of Naples and to solemnly ratify
once more his marriage with the Queen. All of which was carried out on
May 25, 1351, and the next three days, with an accompaniment of much
feasting and tourneys; also a general amnesty was issued to all who
had in any way taken part against their lawful Sovereigns in the late
wars. The ecclesiastical ceremonies took place in the Chapel of Justice
built by Charles II, to which Joan afterwards added the church called
“Chiesa dell’ Incoronata” in memory of her wedding to Louis of Taranto.
Among the frescoes in the church are portraits of Joan and of Louis and
of the infant son of the Duke of Calabria, all painted by Roberto di
Oderisio or, as some say, by his master, the great Giotto, himself.

It is recorded that the festivities passed off to the satisfaction of
all and were only marred by a single untoward event. For it happened
that as King Louis was riding back from his coronation beside the
Queen, and was passing through the Porta Petruccia towards the Castel
Nuovo, a party of ladies threw down upon him an immense quantity of
flowers, making his horse rear up and break the rein. To save himself
lest it should fall and crush him, the King sprang out of the saddle;
but in doing so he loosened the crown so that it fell from his head
into the roadway and was broken into three pieces. And that same day
there fell sick and died his infant daughter by Joan. However, the King
forbade that the festivities should be spoiled by mourning; and so they
were carried to their conclusion. And in memory of his coronation King
Louis instituted the Order of the Knot.

The short rest of his life, though, was full of wars and disquiet and
disillusionment, for he was constantly employed in repressing rebellion
and in checking the independent tendencies of his barons. Among the
most formidable of the disturbers of his peace was Louis of Durazzo,
brother of that evil Charles who had perished by order of the King
of Hungary at Aversa. Louis of Durazzo was defeated, however, and
ended his days in the Castel dell’ Uovo. But he left behind him a son
Charles, whose life was spared in answer to the pleading of Joan, who
took charge of him and loaded him with kindnesses and married him to
her niece, Margaret, the daughter of Maria of Durazzo and of that other
Charles.


Worn out by incessant campaigning, King Louis fell victim to a malarial
fever on June 5, 1362, in the forty-third year of his age.

Soon afterwards Joan married James of Aragon, King of Minorca, who
had first fallen in love with her at Avignon, where the history of his
fortunes and adventures, combined with the melancholy handsomeness of
him, had made a deep impression both upon Joan and upon her sister. For
James of Aragon had spent no less than thirteen years of his life as a
prisoner in an iron cage, and was even said to have been reduced to the
necessity of begging his bread. No sooner was he married to Joan than
he devoted himself to making war upon Pedro the Cruel, the usurper of
his throne, and died near Navarre, in 1375.

After King James’ demise Joan married again, as her fourth husband,
Duke Otho of Brunswick; by now having no children alive of her own, she
adopted as her successor Charles of Durazzo, her nephew by marriage,
whose life she had saved.

During the next few years, Joan, as the result of a quarrel with Pope
Urban VI (who, as Bartolomeo Prignani, had been formerly one of her
own subjects) gave her support to the Anti-Pope, Clement VII, whom
she sheltered in the Castel dell’ Uovo. For this she was promptly
excommunicated, being at the same time declared deposed from the
throne, whilst her subjects were formally relieved of their allegiance
to her. The Crown of Naples was bestowed by the Holy Father upon
Charles of Durazzo, whom Joan had already proclaimed her successor,
and who now showed his gratitude in the following remarkable manner.
Hastily borrowing an army from his great-uncle, old King Louis of
Hungary, who was still alive, Charles set out for Naples, where his
wife and their two children were even then living as honoured guests
and relatives under Joan’s roof. So soon as she learned of this, Joan
sent word to Louis of Anjou, brother of the King of France, to say that
she appointed him her successor instead of Charles, and begging him to
come to her aid against the latter.

On the approach of Charles’s army, Joan sent out his wife and children
to plead with him that he would treat her generously; but, instead of
doing so, Charles laid siege to Joan in the Castel Nuovo; her husband,
Duke Otho, he had blockaded behind him in the castle of Aversa. At
length, though, the German fought his way through the containing force
before Aversa, and fell upon Charles of Durazzo’s flank and rear-guard
by way of Piedigrotta. Long the unequal combat raged, but at last when
Otho himself, after being wounded and having broken his sword, and,
thanks to his leading his men and becoming separated from them in the
midst of the enemy, had been taken prisoner, the little remnant of his
followers, surrounded and hopelessly outnumbered, had no choice but to
surrender. Whereupon Charles of Durazzo redoubled his efforts against
the Castel Nuovo, and shortly afterwards succeeded in taking it; after
which he wrote to the King of Hungary to say that the Queen of Naples
was his prisoner, and asking that monarch’s good pleasure in regard to
her.

Some months now passed, during which Otho of Brunswick, on promising
to quit Neapolitan territory for ever, was given his liberty, and
the French army of Louis of Anjou compelled to abandon its march upon
Naples. At the end of that time an answer was received from the King
of Hungary, commanding that Joan should be put to death as a last
propitiatory sacrifice to his murdered brother.

Since the taking of Naples the Queen had been sent for safe keeping to
the castle of Muro in Calabria.

   [Illustration: THE TOMB OF QUEEN JOAN AT NAPLES.]

On May 5, 1385, as she was praying in her room there, that looked
out over the ravine and the town below, the door was opened very
stealthily, so that the Queen thought it was one of her maids and did
not turn her head to look at the intruder. Nor did she ever, in all
probability, see who it was that had entered, for in the same moment
a cord was slipped over her head and swiftly drawn right about her
throat as only a man of strong hands could draw it; so that she died
instantly, her unfinished prayer upon her lips. And the four Hungarian
soldiers who had seen her die left her lying there, and went away
quietly to report to their commanding officer that the thing was done
as it had been ordered. And the cord with which they had done it was
the same with which Andrew of Hungary had been strangled at Aversa; so,
at least, it is said.



CHAPTER XV

NAPLES UNDER MURAT


The fairest and, in some respects, the wickedest spot on the face of
the earth is that wonder-city that broods by the “tideless, dolorous,
midland sea,” Vesuvius smoking like some monstrous chimney of hell
behind her, the deep blue, translucent glory of the sea like a drift of
our Blessed Lady’s mantle before.

Travelling round that bay, and on, around the point, towards Calabria,
hardly a dreamy mile goes by that some of the history of thousands of
years ago does not present itself.

It has been the home of saints and of scholars; of soldiers a few, of
statesmen a many; of some of the most beautiful characters that ever
walked the earth, and of some of the very worst that ever polluted the
world with their presence. At the top of the list stands St. Januarius,
Bishop of Benevento, who with six of his companions came to Naples
during the ninth persecution to comfort and strengthen the Faithful,
and, being seized with his companions, was taken to Pozzuoli, and there
flung to the wild beasts, and who, when they refused to harm him, was
plunged into a blazing furnace out of which he came intact, and was
thereafter beheaded; but who stands at the bottom I should be afraid to
say. At this point there is an _embarras de richesses_!


Of all the landmarks of history with which the kingdom of Naples is
dotted, none perhaps is more rich in romance or more imbued with the
spirit of tragedy than a certain straggling, half-ruined castle near
the little village of Pizzo, upon the coast of Calabria.

A round tower, grey and sullen with age, faces the sea; in the wall of
it is set a small, heavily barred window through which one of the very
few comparatively good kings of Naples looked his last upon a world
which had seen him rise from a peasant to a monarch.

There is neither space nor need to recapitulate here the life of Murat.
Italy, Russia, Germany, Austria, Egypt, had felt the tread of his
all-shattering squadrons, whose onset no horse or foot of continental
Europe had ever been able to withstand. The Dictator of Europe had
given him his sister for a wife. Naples had been proud to own him for
her king. Glory, wealth, splendour had been his, and he could have
kept them—I think it is safe to say that he could have kept them, had
he been able to stand firm. But he had not the strength, even when he
joined the Coalition in 1814. While he was still fighting Eugène he
could not resist the temptation to intrigue with the viceroy, who,
of course, instantly saw to it that the allies were notified of the
fact. In those stormy days nobody trusted his neighbour, nor did any
one blame his neighbour particularly for trying to keep his political
balance in any way that he could; so that Murat’s inconsistency, let
us call it, was not held against him afterwards. The Bourbons were not
popular, either, and Ferdinand, that perfect product of the hapless,
helpless race, was generally detested. It must be said for the Bourbons
that their sins are, as a rule, of the negative sort, and cruelty is
not one of them. Ferdinand, however, besides being a spineless king,
was a brute and a coward, which, again, are not Bourbon traits.

Joachim Murat’s position was always a difficult one, to be sure.
Although King of Naples, he was, in Napoleon’s time, only a king at
his imperial brother-in-law’s pleasure, and regarded by the latter as a
little more than a Pro-Consul, elevated to a throne in order to carry
out his master’s wishes. At the same time he was conscientious enough
to attempt the task of being a real king—and a good one. He loved the
_flaire_ of kingship, but he did recognize some of his responsibilities
towards his subjects, and continued, while Napoleon’s back was turned,
to govern fairly well. The Neapolitans loved show and noise and
ceremony, and they liked the handsome, dashing, open-handed cavalryman.
The country was rich too. In those days, even if the peasants lived
like cattle, at least they had plenty to eat and drink, and even now
those times are spoken of as a bankrupt speaks of the fat years behind
him.

“Era una schiuma d’oro” (“It was a froth of gold”), said one old man to
me, some years ago, “before this Government of robbers took possession
of it!”

Of all Napoleon’s kinglings, Bernadotte alone contrived to keep his
crown, and that may very well have been because Napoleon did not choose
him, but only acceded to the popular demand when he let him reign.

Murat came to the throne of the Two Sicilies in 1808, when poor unlucky
Joseph was compelled, much against his will, to go to Spain. Joachim
was not always popular; indeed, that would have been impossible in
the condition of things which prevailed in 1810 and 1811. He could
not always be on the spot, and, in his absence, he had to trust to
his Government. This being made up of Neapolitans—both Liberal and
otherwise—and of the Frenchmen who had come in with him, did not trust
itself, and the King’s authority came to be decentralized beyond all
control from the throne. His life was conspired against several times.
Once in particular a plot was hatched to assassinate him while he was
hunting in the woods of Mondragone, but one of the conspirators turned
king’s evidence and the plotters were caught. When they were brought to
trial, and their guilt was proved, their advocate was making the best
he could of a bad job, when the presiding judge stopped the proceedings
to read aloud a paper which he had just received from the King.

“I had hoped,” it said, “that those accused of conspiring against my
person might have been proved innocent; but I have heard with regret
that the Solicitor-General has demanded a heavy punishment against
them all. Their guilt may perhaps be real, but I am desirous of still
preserving a ray of hope that they may be innocent, and I hasten to
stop the decision of the Tribunal and to pardon the accused. I order
that upon receipt of this paper the trial be closed and the unhappy men
set at liberty. As the trial concerns a foolish attempt upon my life,
and the sentence is not yet pronounced, I do not offend against the law
of the State if, without having received a recommendation to mercy, I
thus use the highest and best prerogative of the Crown.”

Murat set many public works on foot, notably during 1812. Roads
and bridges and theatres were built, marshes drained and aqueducts
constructed, the most noteworthy of which achievements were the Strada
di Posilippo, the Campo di Marte, the observatory on the height of
Miradone, and a lunatic asylum. This latter caused a good deal of
surprise as well, for lunatics were not generally coddled in that
fashion in the Naples of 1812.

In the middle of all this activity Murat was recalled to Paris, and
it was only after many months and many experiences that he set eyes
upon his kingdom again. Had his advice, which was to halt the 1812
campaign at Smolensk and establish a settled Government in Poland, been
followed, it is possible, and more than possible, that the disastrous
affair would have had a different termination, for Napoleon could have
kept his communications open; but the Emperor, at that time, suspected
Murat and Ney and Rapp, believing that a weariness of war and a desire
to reap some of the fruits of their labour were at the bottom of the
really excellent counsel that they offered him, and so he pushed on to
Moscow, partly from impatience, partly to satisfy the gnawing appetite
of the _folie de grandeurs_ which had hold of him, partly because he
did not trust his own men. “Ours is not an army of position,” he said;
“it is an army of attack—not of defence.”

Murat’s conduct during the campaign was such as to extract an unwilling
praise even from the Emperor, who was no believer in praise as an agent
for anything but the rank and file. Only when Murat left the wreck of
the army, the command of which Napoleon had entrusted to him, on the
Oder, did the quarrel which the war had drugged into a false quiet
break out again.

Napoleon, on hearing of Joachim’s return to his kingdom, wrote a
frightful letter to Caroline, and this falling into her husband’s
hands drew from him a reply which threatened to break up the relations
between the two for all time, and it was only Caroline’s self-control
and tact that healed the breach for the time-being.

A common danger and the ties of their old comradeship drew them
together again when Murat arrived in Bohemia, and then he fought
stoutly and well. It is hardly credible and, were it not history, it
would be absolutely inconceivable, that, while battling whole-heartedly
for the French in Bohemia, Murat was engaged, through his Government,
in an attempt to unify Italy by the assistance of Great Britain, which
was to supply 25,000 men, who, with his own troops and the disaffected
Italians in the ranks of the French garrisons, were to drive the
tricolour over the Alps. He contrived to persuade himself that he was
honest in his intentions, too, by a process of reasoning peculiar to
several of the Emperor’s lieutenants in those times. As Frenchmen
they marched with the armies of France, and served her to the best
of their splendid ability; as kings and grand dukes they served their
subjects—or thought they did—with equal enthusiasm. Bentinck, however,
being an Englishman, failed to understand the presence of their
separate political entities in one person, and withdrew, so that the
unification of Italy, fortunately, one cannot but think, fell through,
and Joachim returned to Naples in 1813.

It was then that the society known as the Carbonari, who had appeared
in the kingdom three years before, began to spread themselves in all
classes of society, conspiring in the sweet Italian fashion, which
conspires for the sake of the pure delight of intriguing. They had
no definite aim. Their professed _raison d’être_ was a vague dream of
a vague constitution, _à l’Anglaise_. In such hands, of course, this
would have been about as fruitful of any real liberty as the Commune,
and none knew this better than Lord William Bentinck; but any stone
will do to throw at the devil, and Lord William hastened to communicate
with the liberty-loving thieves, murderers, and brigands who
represented the society of Naples. There were, to be sure, some honest
men among them, whose hearts were stronger than their heads. There
always are a few in these affairs, enticed in by flattery and utterly
uninformed as to the real object of their associates, who are pushed to
the front for the public to see.

Among these was a certain young gentleman, a man of fortune and
courage—a captain of militia in his own town, which stood upon the
summit of a high and precipitous mountain. His name was Capobianco
(“white-head”), and at the time when he came to the notice of the
authorities they had discovered the trafficking of the society with
Lord William, who had been sending across volumes containing the new
Sicilian laws which had been enacted in that island under the Bourbons,
or, to speak more accurately, had been forced upon the Bourbons by Lord
William under pain of being left to look after themselves and being
compelled to fight for their own possessions. The conspirators must
have been a simple-minded people if they really believed that Ferdinand
had promulgated anything of the kind without compulsion.

Lord William promised the Neapolitans a similar code if they would
only restore Ferdinand—Lord William was always rather free with his
promises—and the Government of Naples, finding the horrid thing in
their midst, proscribed the society and threatened with most dreadful
punishments any one who mentioned the word “constitution.” Whereupon
the Carbonari dropped down into Calabria and proceeded to shout it
aloud, among them young Capobianco.

As it has been said, his town was practically inaccessible, so
that, despairing of his capture, General Janelli made a pretence
of refusing to believe in his association with the Carbonari; after
several ineffectual efforts to entrap him (for Capobianco had a native
mistrust of authority under any guise save that of the Church), he one
day invited him to dinner upon the occasion of a public festival in
Cosenza. Capobianco hesitated, but finally made up his mind to attend,
feeling that he would be safe if he took unfrequented byways and
surrounded himself with a dependable escort.

He would feel safe, he told himself, in Cosenza, for he intended to
arrive when the banquet should be already begun, and leave before it
was over, and, in the house of the General, he would be in the company
of all of the authorities of the Province, whose presence he seems to
have conceived to be a safeguard, for some reason or another.

So he went and was royally entertained. Healths were drunk, compliments
were exchanged, and Capobianco proposed to depart, followed by the
salutations of the General. He got no farther than the ante-room,
though, where the gendarmes were waiting for him. They seized him and
dragged him off to prison, where, the next morning, he was tried by a
Military Commission, condemned, and publicly beheaded before midday in
the Square.

When this was bruited abroad, some of the “patriots” fled to Sicily
and the Bourbons, to breathe, as we are told, “the free atmosphere of
Sicily under the Bourbons,” and Joachim’s unpopularity began to assume
the proportions of a menace.

Still, however, the better elements were upon his side, perhaps
from expediency—for Murat’s servants would receive short shrift at
Ferdinand’s hands should that monarch return—but they gave Joachim some
very good advice among them, even if some of it is rather too subtle.
Napoleon’s hands were too full to allow of his interference, and he,
in his dealings with the allies, invariably quoted 50,000 Neapolitan
troops as part of his own force. The allies knew better, though. Two
fatal defects in a ruler are overcraftiness and inconsistency. Murat
had both. At one time, as it has been seen, he hastened to pardon those
who had conspired against his life; a year later he allowed his own
resentment against the Carbonari to lead him into an attempt to crush
them by a severity which merely drove them in on each other and made
a solid body out of a struggling mob. Before this, with an ideal the
meaning of which very few of them understood, the Carbonari—the leaders
of the movement, that is to say—were fighting the clouds; but the
harrying they received gave them a definite grievance and one that was
shared, for purely personal reasons, by thousands, who would otherwise
never have joined the movement at all.

The craftiness which Murat conceived to be policy delivered him into
the hands of men far cleverer than himself, whose life’s business it
was to overreach one another.

He was a brave man and a most excellent soldier, but those were not
qualities that could help him in the thimble-rigging, knife-in-the-boot
game of Napoleonic statecraft, played by men who had not an illusion
remaining about each other, and who, with the possible exception of
the Russians, had each and all betrayed their neighbours over and over
again.

Murat, at Ollendorf upon the shores of the Ulm, received several very
polite and pressing invitations to an alliance from the Austrian
Commissioner, Count von Mier, and he had listened to them, as one
of his contemporaries says, without disdain. Wishing, though, to get
an idea of what his own people might think of such a suggestion, he
consulted two or three of his Ministers and generals on the subject.
The result did not help him much, for they all held different opinions.
One held that France’s welfare was that of Naples, and that, with the
return of the Bourbons to Paris, everything that the Revolution and the
Empire had done for Italy would be wiped out; another that Murat’s duty
was to establish himself firmly and hold fast to his throne, whatever
might happen to his own people and the Emperor. Upon one point they
were all agreed, and that was that Murat’s first and most imperative
duty was to so order his relations with the Powers as to exclude any
possible chance of Ferdinand’s return—it was as to the best way of
attaining that desired condition of things that they differed.

“The old and the new era,” said one, advocating the continuance of the
existing alliance with France, “are at war with one another, and the
victory cannot for the present be assigned to any particular state or
people. Should the new triumph, all the social institutions of Europe
will, in twenty years’ time, be established upon the basis of the civil
polity introduced by the French; but if the old, all progress will be
arrested and the new States be thrown back towards the hated condition
of the past.”

He goes on to remark upon the reliance to be placed upon the word of
the kings, then struggling against Napoleon, “for if kings promise
to-day, they will break their words to-morrow.”

The other finishes his address, in which he advises Murat to let France
bleed to death by herself, thus:

“Above all, I beseech you not to be caught by false glory, but to
believe that there is only one way to preserve your reputation, which
is to preserve your throne!” The military element seems to have been
of the same opinion as number two, but Joachim wavered—as well he
might, for both parties to the discussion were right. Even if he
joined himself to the allies, it was quite likely that this throne
would be taken from him at the first convenient moment. The Bourbons
were everywhere, and Spain, Italy, Austria, and presently France would
be filled with them. Their clamour would rise, in a hurricane, and
what could those who professed to hold their own crowns as gifts from
the Almighty say in answer to them? If the Emperor of Austria ruled
by Divine Right, he must believe that Ferdinand did the same. If the
Divine Right could be disregarded in one case, it could be disregarded
in all, and there were plenty of evilly disposed persons who desired
nothing better. It would be a weapon in their hand, and they had plenty
of weapons already.

In spite of this, and in the face of it, Francis of Austria, by a
treaty concluded on January 11, 1814, acknowledged Joachim’s dominion
and sovereignty over the States he ruled, and Joachim, as a matter of
form, returned the compliment.

Thus Naples was definitely placed in the ranks of France’s enemies,
Austria agreeing to furnish 30,000 men for Italy, and Naples 30,000,
the allied forces to be under the command of the King of Naples, or, in
his absence, of the officer highest in rank in the Austrian army.

This, together with a promise that Francis would use his good offices
to bring about a reconciliation between Naples and England, as well as
with Austria’s allies, was the published treaty, but there were several
secret clauses, some of which seem to indicate a lack of humour in the
high contracting parties.

Francis, having acknowledged Joachim’s sovereignty, pledged himself to
obtain the renunciation of it from Ferdinand (as though the consent
of that individual made any difference to anybody!), while Joachim
promised, on his part, to indemnify Ferdinand, thereby acknowledging
that his own claim was that of _force majeure_ and nothing else; and
yet the principle of Ferdinand’s Divine Right was never called into
question! But at the same time Murat was in correspondence with General
Miollis commanding the French troops in Rome, and with Barbou and
Fouché, assuring them of his devotion and attachment to France, and
endeavouring to explain away his treaty with Francis on the ground of
political necessity!

Miollis withdrew into Sant’ Angelo, and the Neapolitan troops forced
the little body of French under Lascolette to shut themselves up in
the citadel of Civita Vecchia. But now, after having inaugurated his
campaign, Murat’s indecision prevented him from giving any definite
orders, and his generals instantly began to suspect him of playing them
false.

Proceeding into the States of Rome, he found anarchy prevailing in
every direction, and, already torn with conflicting emotions, he found
himself the target of generals, magistrates, and Austrian Ministers,
who maintained that he had not acted up to his part of the treaty.

   [Illustration: JOACHIM, KING OF NAPLES. Photo copyright by
   Neurdein Freres.]

That aroused him, and he woke up from his lethargy long enough to start
the Neapolitan troops forward and to settle the civil administration a
little. A good many Frenchmen still remained in the Neapolitan army,
and in order to retain them, and have some company in his matricidal
course, he assured them that the treaty was a feint, and that he was
working heart and soul for his beloved country. But he so entangled
himself with lies that he presently found it difficult to move in
any direction without finding the net of them about his feet. The
Neapolitans disliked and distrusted the French, because they saw in
them a drag upon Joachim’s wheel. The French despised the Neapolitans,
and presently departed, seeing clearly whither they were being led.
Since the only officers of any value in the Neapolitan army were these
Frenchmen, Murat was now compelled to rely upon the Germans—that is to
say, the very men he had fought against in the preceding year.

The French were not in sufficient numbers to offer any real resistance,
and it was not long before Civita Vecchia, Sant’ Angelo, Florence,
Leghorn, Ferrara, and Ancona were in Murat’s hands.

Bentinck presently landed at Leghorn with 14,000 Anglo-Sicilians,
and Eugène, the Viceroy, found himself with 50,000 men opposed to
45,000 Austrians, 20,000 Neapolitans, 8,000 Germans under Murat, and
Bentinck’s Anglo-Sicilians.

Of course Murat mistrusted his allies, and the allies returned the
compliment with interest. He had no very high opinion of them as
soldiers either, in which he was justified. Bellegarde carried his
suspicion so far as to refuse to build a bridge or two over the Po,
lest Murat might use them against him, and Murat became convinced
that Bellegarde and Bentinck wanted to make him attack the Viceroy in
order to injure his troops and his reputation—for what were 30,000
Neapolitans in the scale against 50,000 Frenchmen commanded by good
officers and in the hands of such generals as Eugène had on his staff?
He discovered, too, that Bentinck, who had landed as his ally, was
permitting his Sicilians to distribute pamphlet copies of an edict of
Ferdinand’s, reminding the Neapolitans of his rights, and inciting them
to rise against Joachim!

Bentinck was not a very clever man, and here he showed himself to be
a fool. He had already given the Duke of Wellington a good deal of
trouble by ruining the Duke’s market for specie in Spain, offering a
higher price for it than the Duke could afford to give, and by various
other ill-judged and ill-timed schemes. Now, having Joachim on his
side—the one man among them all who could lead an army—he deliberately
attempted to ruin his influence in the moment of action, by turning his
own men against him, and by siding with Bellegarde in every question
of military policy, wherein neither of them was really worthy to be
allowed to carry out his, Joachim’s, orders.

From the Austrian monarch Murat might have expected that sort of thing,
for Austria had at one time and another during the last twenty years
broken her word to about everybody with whom she had had any dealings.
Metternich boasted of it openly, and had Murat been gifted with a
little more political foresight, he might have felt even then the hands
that were pulling him down.

It may be said that he hoped for Napoleon’s triumph in the latter’s
Homeric fight, nor could he be blamed where all the circumstances
are considered. In every transaction, says one of his staff, “whether
emanating from the rulers of kingdoms or the commanders of the armies
that were sitting about in Italy, some perfidy transpired or lay
concealed.”

The only people who were really happy at this time were the
Neapolitans, who, with the English markets opened, began to prosper
after the long, lean years, and held their heads high now that their
King and their armies had been, as they thought, distinguishing
themselves. Poor Joachim now received a petition from his generals,
published with the approval of the whole army, begging him to summon
a council of war and hear their “opinions”! It is a wonder that the
veteran of a hundred pitched battles did not hang somebody for the
impertinence, for from any point of view it is difficult to understand
what they expected of him in the way of action. But he let the incident
pass.

Now the Pope, who had been released by Napoleon, approached the Papal
Dominions and reached Taro before Joachim, who was in Bologna, was
aware of the fact. Joachim, who had a good part of the Papal States in
his possession and hoped for more—since Francis of Austria had promised
him his assistance in the matter—sought by every means to avert the
Holy Father’s onward progress from Reggio; but he had a stronger man
than himself to deal with, and one who had at his back the enthusiasm
of a people. Murat’s own officers helped to draw the Papal carriage in
one place, and his men broke their ranks, falling over one another for
the privilege of being allowed to approach the returning exile.

In spite of all that Joachim’s envoy, General Carrascosa, could
do, Pius’s determination to proceed was unaffected, and the General
returned to his master, begging him for his own sake to give way before
the popular enthusiasm, which every day was increasing. Murat, however,
decided upon a middle course. He would render to the Pope all the
honour in his power, but he would give him no assistance.

At Bologna the Pope called upon Murat, and, though alone and helpless
in the face of his opponent’s armed strength, extracted from him the
return of the Patrimony of Peter to the Church. Pius did not relinquish
his claim to the rest of the Papal possessions either, and continued on
his way to Cesena, his native place, by the Strada Emilia, among his
own subjects, although Murat, fearing the excited feeling among the
latter, wished him to go through Tuscany.

Murat’s power was toppling over, for, do what he might, his interests
were the interests of the France that he was fighting. But what could
he do? It would take a clever man to find his way safely out of such
an impasse as confronted Joachim. Could he have remained neutral, it
is possible that he might have survived the hurricane; but that was
almost impossible, cut off as he was from France and encircled by the
allies. Besides, the quarrel with England had brought such misery to
his subjects that this condition alone was reason enough for attempting
the impossible. Napoleon was battling with his back to the wall, and
even though he fought as man never fought before or since, the tide was
engulfing him. His own Ministers were carrying on secret correspondence
with the enemy, and preparing their own salvation, careless either of
their duty or of their country’s humiliation.

When on April 15, 1814, Murat received the news of the capitulation
of Paris and the abdication of the Emperor, he paled as he read the
dispatch, and betrayed great agitation and nervousness, and for several
days afterwards he was gloomy and unapproachable.

He repaired quietly to Bologna, and, while Italy went mad and raved in
its madness, while the Milanese murdered Prina, and Eugène Beauharnais
took refuge with the King of Bavaria, he returned to Naples, where he
was received like a conqueror and was compelled to bow his appreciation
and render his thanks for a display not one word or one smile of which,
as he well knew, was genuine. The people expected very naturally that
a new order of things would bring them a new Government, and Murat’s
own suspicions were confirmed when the treaty of peace was signed at
Paris, and the Congress of Vienna was summoned without any mention of
him at all. Legitimacy was now the rage, and Joachim, though without an
invitation, dispatched the Duke di Campochiaro and Prince de Cariati as
his representatives to Vienna. That done, he turned to his kingdom and,
taking time by the forelock, summoned the most able men of the country
to him and set them to work upon the land, the finances, and the army,
only warning them not to follow too hard after the latest fashion, nor
to “run backwards blindfold.”

At the same time, on his own account, he lightened the heaviest of
the taxes, brought in measures for the encouragement of trade with
England, and permitted the free export of grain. Then he decreed that
the offices of State were to be given only to Neapolitans, and that
foreigners holding them, who refused to be naturalized, must resign,
after which he sat down to wait upon events.

By these measures he contrived to win over a large part of the people,
and, by degrees, the old Murat began to emerge from his hiding-place
in the personality of the new. His council had agreed with him in
almost every question of importance; the counsels which he received,
while suggesting a constitution, were really sincere in their hopes
for the maintenance of his dynasty. His army, which he had had time to
put into shape again, was with him; the newspapers were obsequious in
their praises of his virtues; and all the corporate bodies in the State
announced their readiness to pledge their lives and property in his
support.

The Congress of Vienna began to pay some attention to these signs of
popular approval, and it was noised abroad that the Emperor of Russia
had let fall the remark that “it was impossible to restore the ‘Butcher
King’ now that the interests of the people had to be considered.” Then
Caroline of Austria, Ferdinand’s wife, died suddenly, and so little was
her decease lamented that Francis forbade the Court to go into mourning
for her.

It may well be imagined that Joachim began to feel safe on his throne,
and the fact that, by an agreement concluded at Charmont some little
time before the fall of Napoleon, Austria, Russia, Prussia, and England
had confirmed the principles of the alliance between Austria and Murat
helped him to hope that after all, and in spite of everything, he might
be allowed to remain. He had not reckoned, though, with Talleyrand,
whose desire it was, just then, to show himself as a reformed character
who was ready to do anything to prove his detestation of the fiend whom
he had been serving, and of all the fiend’s family, which, of course,
included Joachim.

Talleyrand had besides a private grudge against Joachim, for the latter
had openly mistrusted him for years, and Napoleon’s parting remarks on
the subject of his late Minister for Foreign Affairs must still have
been tingling in that gentleman’s ears when he set out for Vienna. “I
should have hanged him long ago,” said the Emperor: “I always knew that
he would be the first to betray me when the occasion offered itself!”

Talleyrand, who had arrived at the Congress as an apologist both for
France and himself, a man with no claims to consideration from anybody,
outside the pale of Christian intercourse as an excommunicate bishop
and an unfrocked priest, a creature at the sight of whom Francis
and his Catholic princess must have shuddered; without a friend—or a
case—bankrupt of power and credit—contrived by the sheer force of his
own genius to dominate the whole Congress after the first half-dozen
sittings.

He set Austria and Russia by the ears, and heated up the quarrel
until there was every prospect of war; lined up their adherents and
pushed them into the conflict, and manœuvred so marvellously that,
in a very short while, France and her friendship were the objects
of the diplomacy of both contending parties. Metternich, Nesselrode,
Hardenberg, Castlereagh, Stewart, and Stackelberg were little more than
children in his hands. His confrères, Noailles, Dupin, and Dalberg,
had no voice in the questions that arose. Talleyrand was the Congress,
and when he began to use his power to pay off some of his grudges and
enmities, it was on Murat that his hand first fell. More Legitimist
than the Legitimists, he set out to earn the million francs promised
him by Ferdinand for the throne of Naples.

The first inkling that Murat received of the turn that affairs had
taken was a request, couched in the terms of a command, from Francis
that he would restore the Marches to the Pope. Now the Marches in
question had been promised to Murat by Francis himself, not twelve
months before, and Murat in answer proceeded to increase his garrison
and commenced to strengthen the fortifications of Ancona. He, besides,
started a quarrel with the Pope, and dispatched a Minister of his
called Magella into the Marches to assist the Carbonari in their plots
against the dominion of the Holy Father.

It was about this time that he began to receive overtures, couched in
the most affectionate and brotherly language, from Napoleon at Elba. A
succession of disguised conspirators from Paris and other places passed
in and out of the Palace in Naples, generally under cover of the spring
night, while the city disported itself along the waterfront, and gay
ladies and gay men sat over their cards in the great cool rooms, or
wandered about in the sleeping gardens.

For Naples was gay in those days. People saw light ahead after the
years of gloom. Hunger had vanished—real hunger, at any rate. The
king’s public works gave employment. Uniforms glittered everywhere. To
their minds, Naples was a Paris in miniature; so the lights shone and
the world danced and played on, music lay over the place in a rainbow
web of sound, and the blue sea smiled at the stars.

But up in the palace, behind closed doors, Murat sat with his chin in
his hand, and his eyes wandering out to the sea from time to time, as
though he expected to see something there—something whose name was
never mentioned except between him and his wife, and then only in
whispers.

By ones and twos the mysterious figures arrived, coming in through side
doors, and staying awhile, talking with their hands to their mouths,
some volubly and eagerly, some gently and hesitatingly; but one thing
could be observed of all of them, and that was that somewhere on their
persons, casually as a trifle, but plain enough to eyes that looked for
it, was either a small bunch of violets, or a strip of violet-coloured
ribbon, or a bit of violet-coloured silk.

“Are you fond of the violet?” they would ask when they met. “It will
return in the spring,” was the answer—and it was spring already down
there. Spring breaks February in Naples. The king was, outwardly, as
gay as any, and only Caroline and a very few devoted friends saw the
other side of him. The ambassadors of the allies were watching him, as
he knew, and, as was bound to happen, word came to them that strange
visitors were being entertained at the palace, among them Princess
Pauline, Napoleon’s sister, who shortly afterwards returned to Elba.

Ferdinand, free of his rather dreadful Austrian consort, proceeded to
espouse a certain Lucia Migliano, a lady, it is said, of noble birth,
but of a vulgar and immoral character—which is probably true, for how
could any clean and self-respecting woman have ever been induced to
marry Ferdinand?

That monarch now swore to the constitution of 1812. He opened,
dissolved, and reopened a Parliament, and generally walked in the
popular path. Those happenings, naturally, reacted upon the Neapolitans
and helped to undermine Joachim’s position badly. The Carbonari broke
out again, soon afterwards, and Joachim began to be afraid lest these
popular spasms should come to the ears of the Congress and affect his
interests; so he attempted to arrange matters with the Carbonari, which
only went to their heads and made them more offensive than ever.

Things could not remain so for long, and there is no saying what might
have happened had not Napoleon discovered that the allied Powers had
not the slightest idea of living up to their word with him, that the
promised annuity—promised on the basis of the huge private fortune
which they had looted from him—was never going to be paid, and that
some one, whom he had small difficulty in connecting with the Bourbon
Government in Paris, was attempting to poison him.

On the evening of March 4, 1815, Murat, with some of his family,
was amusing himself as best he could, attempting to divert his mind
from the problems and questions which had harassed him all day, in
his wife’s apartments, when there appeared in the doorway a bowing
attendant, begging the King and Queen Caroline to give an audience to
a messenger who was awaiting their pleasure in the next room. Murat
assented carelessly and told the attendant to bring him in, but the
former replied that the new-comer had particularly asked that the King
and Queen would give themselves the trouble to hear what he had to say,
alone.

By this time Murat had an inkling of the news which awaited him and
hurried out of the room, the Queen upon his arm. In the small apartment
leading out of the gallery they found Count Colonna, who came forward
out of the dark corner where he had been waiting, and presented his
dispatches.

It is a picture that stands out vividly in the imagination: the Count
studying Murat’s face as the latter reads the message, and glancing
from time to time at the Queen, trying to read something of her
husband’s mind in her face; Murat blinking in the half light over the
words, rejoicing in the news as he thinks of the manner in which the
Congress of Legitimacy has been treating him, but endeavouring to keep
his features composed and his pleasure out of his voice.

“That will spoil Metternich’s sleep for awhile,” one can almost hear
him saying to himself. “And Talleyrand—how will he get out of this?
On guard, messieurs! You will have to exercise something besides your
tongues now!”

Napoleon had escaped from Elba, and announced that he proposed to chase
the Bourbons out of France, and suggested an alliance, begging Murat at
the same time to place a battleship or a frigate at the disposition of
his, the Emperor’s, mother and sister.

Hurrying back to his guests, Murat divulged the news, and his cheer and
excitement were so obvious that some of them guessed then the course
which he would pursue.

The next morning Murat dispatched special messengers to Vienna and
London, in which he assured the Governments of Austria and Great
Britain that, whatever might be the result of Napoleon’s raid, he
himself would remain faithful to his treaty obligations.

Neither of his correspondents had the slightest belief in his
protestations, and Francis, without waiting, took steps to crush him if
he moved—or if he did not. But Murat’s heart was high, and the memories
of the golden years were like wine. He felt a real remorse for the
part which he had played, and the splendour of Napoleon’s lone-handed
assault upon a world in arms appealed to every soldierlike instinct in
him.

He did not forget his own ambition, though, and he desired to make
himself so powerful that he could treat with either Austria or France
upon terms of something like equality. It was Italy that he wanted. The
great Powers would have their hands full now, and he hoped to be able
to surprise the Germans while the armies of Europe were engaged with
the Emperor.

Caroline, however, joined with his Ministers and his Council in
opposition to war. Naples and Italy had had enough, and, even in the
unlikely event of Murat’s correspondents in the north having been
accurate in their figures or right in their appreciation of the popular
feeling, it was practically certain that, whether the victor in the
coming contest were to be the Emperor or the allies, neither would
allow Murat to attack Italy and rule it undisturbed.

He assured his Council that Italy was ready to rise on either side of
the Po. He explained his mistrust of the Congress. He agreed that,
although it would be unsafe to diminish the army in the present
condition of Europe, yet Naples could not support the troops unless
fresh taxes were imposed; and that being out of the question the only
alternative was to quarter them upon somebody else. He went on to point
out that political liberty was at the last gasp in Italy. But even that
battle-cry failed to arouse the enthusiasm of his audience. Political
liberty as a theory upon which to speculate over a glass or two of wine
in the cool of the evening was well enough, but political liberty as a
reason for draining the country of blood and money any longer was quite
another affair.

The common people cared very little, if anything at all, for it; what
they wanted was food and drink, and a chance to save a little money,
and marry, and be happy. The taste survives in Naples and Calabria to
this day. They _like_ an overlord, they _like_ having somebody over
them who will order their ways and provide them with work and see to
their well-being, and knock their heads together when they misbehave
and pat them upon the back before their fellows when they are good.
It is, after all, the ideal form of government. No other approaches in
efficiency to a beneficent and intelligent autocracy. The main trouble
is that very few autocracies have any intelligence. I am sure I do not
know why. Logically a man who has been trained to rulership from the
cradle should make a better ruler than the accident of a convention;
and on the whole, one may say, he does. A constitutional monarch is
generally a far better ruler than either Mr. Roosevelt, Mr. Taft, or
Mr. Wilson, or any President of the French Republic that ever lived. So
was King Edward VII, so was Queen Victoria. And then, from nowhere in
particular and without any training at all, a Lincoln emerges and gets
elected—that is the mystery which I have never been able to fathom—by
a number of people whose individual opinions upon any subject of real
importance are worth less than nothing!

Murat, as has been seen, made a habit of mistaking craft for
statesmanship, and his Council, by now, were beginning to be aware of
it. Frenchmen and Neapolitans, they saw that war would be extremely
dangerous for both countries—particularly for Naples—and they resolved
to wait to declare themselves until word came from London and Vienna.
Murat, however, paid no heed to their resolution or their opinion, and
broke up the Council, secretly determined to make the effort.

Some of the troops with which he proposed to undertake the conquest of
Italy were more fit for sneak-thieving than for actual fighting against
drilled men. The artillery, sappers, and cavalry were even worse than
the infantry, and when we are told that regiments of the latter were
taken from the prisons and from the galleys, and that half of the
generals and colonels were French, and the dissensions between the
natives and the foreigners are remembered, one cannot but think that
Joachim must have been a little off his head with the strain he had
been enduring for the past year, if he hoped to annex Italy with such a
force as that.

In reply to Murat’s request for permission to pass through the Papal
States, the Holy Father appointed a regency and betook himself to
Genoa, accompanied by many of the cardinals. As this occurred in the
middle of Holy Week, the sacred offices were interrupted, many of the
priests leaving the city to follow the Pope, and the indignation of
the Romans knew no bounds. Murat wisely refrained from approaching
the city, and proceeded to Ancona, from whence he instructed the
ambassadors at the Congress to renew his protestations of fidelity to
his treaties.

This quite unnecessary insult roused Francis of Austria effectually,
and he dispatched Frimont, Bianchi, Mohr, Neipperg, and Wied, with
48,000 infantry, 7,000 cavalry, and 64 guns, to repay Joachim for it.
Besides these, Nugent had a brigade in Tuscany, the Po was fortified
at Piacenza, Borgoforte, Occhiobello, and Lagoscuro by the Germans, who
occupied every possible crossing, and had at their backs the fortresses
of Pizzighettone, Mantua, and Legnano, with detachments in Commachio
and at the bridge of Goro. It was a solid affair against which Joachim
was ramming his head.

He, as soon as war had been declared, on March 30, annexed—on paper—the
districts of Cerebino, Pesaro, and Gubbio, and issued edicts vilifying
in the usual manner his opponents, whom he accused of every fault of
which he himself had been guilty. Also he addressed the inattentive and
quite careless Italians, reminding them of such grievances as he could
remember, and, when the stock of those ran short, inventing several
entirely new ones.

He had a few partial successes at first before Frimont arrived upon
the scene. Carrascosa managed to drive some Austrians—it is all but
impossible to arrive at the real figures and facts of these contests,
but I should be inclined to say about 1,500—from Cesena. Later they
came upon some more at Anzola, and these retired before them, probably,
or, I should say, certainly, under orders. At Spilimberto he had a
personal brush with them, which resulted in a haphazard sort of success
which he seems to have made no attempt whatever to push. A few days
later after investing Ferrara—the operation could not have been a
very serious one, for it was only conducted for two and a half days—he
attempted to storm the bridge-head at Occhiobello, but finding it to be
out of the question, left the army encamped on the spot, and returned
to Bologna, where he learned what had become of two legions of his
Guard which he had sent to Tuscany—for no military reason that I have
been able to discover, save the very problematical one of “rousing” the
Tuscans.

They were commanded by Generals Pignatelli, Strongoli, and Livron, who,
being of equal rank, were to act in concert, but not to attempt to take
precedence of each other—which, as one historian very truly says, was a
“strange and unusual idea in the composition of the army.”

These contrived to get as far as Pistoia, where, hearing that the
garrison had designs upon them, they retired in something of a hurry to
Florence.

It was there that Joachim received a communication from Lord William
Bentinck to the effect that since he had broken his treaty with Francis
he could consider the treaty with England broken as well. He might have
expected this piece of information, one would think, but it seems to
have depressed him greatly.

The King’s edicts, too, had fallen flat. They had produced, we are
told, “promises, applause, poetic effusions, and popular orations,
but neither arms nor action; thus furnishing much future work for the
police, and nothing for war.”

The forces he had counted upon did not materialize, and Joachim called
his Ministers together. These had discovered by now that he never
called upon them for advice unless he was in trouble, and their ardour
and loyalty were shaken. Still, when he laid the facts before them
they gave him the best they had, in the face of the rather desperate
circumstances. The army was straggled out over a line between Reggio,
Carpi, and Ravenna, without any supports or reserves, in the face of
an enemy stronger, numerically and morally, and in their position. One
blow might be the end; so Joachim’s advisers recommended him to hold
on to the places he had only so long as it would take to send back the
sick and the baggage, and then look for some point of attack where the
result would be a little less certain.

A few days later the Germans stormed Carpi and chased General Pepes
almost as far as Modena, and only Murat’s appearance upon the scene
halted the pursuit. On the 15th they seized Spilimberto, the defenders
of which retired in considerable disorder to Sant’ Ambrogio. By now,
however, the advice of the Council had been carried out, and the
remains of the army, unhampered, were able to move about and were
directed upon the Reno, Ravenna, and Forlì. The troops upon the Reno
were, however, attacked by the Germans and, after a three-hours’ fight,
retreated upon Bologna.

Joachim, at Imola, now discovered that the Austrian army had been
divided into two parts, one under Bianchi, the other under Neipperg.

The former was advancing by the Florentine Road, the latter by the
Strada Emilia, the idea being to enclose Joachim and force him into a
general engagement between them. They were divided by the chain of the
Apennines, and Murat perceived that Neipperg, at least, was inferior to
him. Fired by the memories of ’96, he resolved to attack Bianchi and,
if possible, cripple him before Neipperg could come to his assistance,
after which he would still be able to fight Neipperg, unless things
went very wrong indeed, with superior numbers.

Macerata was Murat’s objective; but it was twenty days’ march for
troops who reckoned a day’s work as lightly as did his. For all that,
he contrived the retreat with creditable skill in spite of a scuffle
with Neipperg near the Roneo.

But when the battle of Macerata was fought, Joachim’s fortune, which
had been so shy and fickle of late, deserted him entirely. Though he
fought a stubborn enough battle, and though his own dispositions were
solid and well thought out, his instruments failed him. General Maio
and General Lecchi made little or no attempt to shock their opponents,
allowing their men to drift into action anyhow; and as the day waned,
and the Neapolitans became too listless even to fire, word came to the
king from General Montigny in the Abruzzi, telling him that the Germans
had taken Antrodoco and Aquila, that the people were rising for the
Bourbons, and that the magistrates had transferred their allegiance,
while he and the few faithful men who had remained with him had been
forced back to Popoli.

At the same time came a dispatch from the Minister of War, telling him
of the enemy’s appearance upon the Liris, of the horrified feelings of
the people, and of the helpful activities of the Carbonari in Calabria.

Joachim instantly decided to take his troops back into the kingdom of
Naples, and ordered a general retreat.

Then it was that he became fully aware of the sort of staff he had
been leaning upon. Some of the troops seem to have been prepared to
behave themselves, had their commanders given them any opportunity of
so doing, but the generals had had enough and more than enough, and, to
use an Americanism, they “lay down upon him” completely.

When he called a Council the next morning they informed him that the
larger part of their men had deserted, and that the rest would not obey
orders. When one comes to think about it, there does not seem to be any
particular reason why they should have, since no one made the faintest
show of imposing any kind of discipline upon them.

The enemy advanced on either side while this discussion was in
progress, and one brigade, which had obeyed the order to march and
which Joachim opposed to them, rested upon their arms, and proved to
be utterly indifferent to the results. On his arrival in the Abruzzi,
Joachim was astounded to discover that Montigny—he of the “faithful
few”—had abandoned his post at Antrodoco without even waiting for the
enemy to appear, and that his unedifying conduct alone was the cause
of the magistrates’ defection. Also it was Montigny and no one else who
had deliberately abandoned Aquila, although the enemy, by reason of the
condition of the roads, could not have brought up the guns necessary to
reduce the place.

Joachim, still dazed with this infamy, now received word, through
Prince Cariati, whom he had sent to the Congress of Vienna, that
the allies were going to exterminate him, that no hope of any sort
of reconciliation remained; at the same time a letter from Napoleon
censured the recklessness of his campaign and went on to say that it
might prove the ruin of his own effort.

In this state of affairs Murat bethought himself of the possibilities
of a constitution as a prop to his now tottering throne. It would be
funny if it were not so melancholy! A constitution! with the Austrians
at his gates, an English fleet in the Bay, the entire kingdom torn
to pieces, the Carbonari in every quarter, his army vanished, and his
friends in flight!

Commodore Campbell had already threatened, unless the ships and the
stores in the arsenal were delivered up to him, to fire a thousand
rockets into the city. Poor Caroline collected some of the Ministers
and magistrates and asked for their advice, whereupon the Minister for
Police informed her that the first assault of an enemy would ignite
a conflagration in the city which nothing would be able to suppress.
They were reminded too, by a general officer, that there were still
ten double ranges of batteries wherewith to defend themselves, and
he suggested that Campbell was counting upon the moral effects of his
threat among the people.

So Caroline, after the invariable accusations of treaty-breaking
with which everybody opened verbal fire on an enemy, and the equally
invariable appeal to history, stipulated for her own and her family’s
safe return to France in an English vessel. Caroline was a Bonaparte,
and she could keep her head even in a crisis of this sort. She had
ruled wisely and well in her husband’s absence, backing him up, in
spite of her opposition to the war, stoutly. Now she proclaimed the
terms of accommodation, and, having provided for a temporary peace, she
turned to the immediate needs of the situation, and, having heartened
the city militia with her own courage, she pacified and quieted the
populace. With her in the palace was her sister Pauline and her uncle,
Cardinal Fesch, besides her four young children, whom she decided to
send to Gaeta.

Stout old Macdonald, the Minister for War, of whom Napoleon said during
the Peninsular Campaign, “I would not dare to let McDonald within sound
of the pipes!” was sent to supersede Manhir, and he did presently
succeed in driving the Austrians beyond the Melfa; but no further
advantage was gained, because the troops with which Murat was hoping to
effect a junction were stampeded at Mignano.

Murat’s reign was over. The Bourbons were upon the top of him, and all
that he could do, now, was to escape before they closed every road.
He believed that the Bourbons wished to capture him and wreak their
vengeance upon him for the lean and restricted years.

Leaving the wreck of his army to Carrascosa, he made his way into
Naples as the sun was dropping over the hills, and hurried by
roundabout ways towards the Palace. He was in civilian dress, having
discarded his uniform when he left the army, but he was recognized
and, to his surprise, treated by those whom he met with all the respect
which had been his as a king. In the harbour he could see the British
fleet lying at anchor, and perhaps the sight was not altogether an
unwelcome one, for he had learned of Caroline’s treaty with Campbell,
and, little as the English might be to his taste, at least they had
been worthy and steadfast enemies and infinitely better company for him
than the Bourbons.

A little pleased, even through the fogs of his depression, at the
manner in which he had been received by the people, he ran into the
palace, seeking for his wife. He found her in her own apartment, in the
same room where they had first heard of Napoleon’s departure from Elba,
two short months before, and in which he had left her to depart upon
this last disastrous campaign.

It must have been rather dark in there now that the twilight had come
down, and the memories of the past must have crowded thickly about him
as he entered. He found Caroline alone, save for a lady-in-waiting,
and he went straight to her and caught her in his arms, his voice, at
first, too choked for utterance.

At last, when he could master his voice, he spoke calmly enough, and
his tremendous self-restraint was worthy of the old Murat of Jena and
Eylau.

“We are betrayed by fortune, my dear,” he said, “and all is lost!”

Caroline was even steadier than he, and she smiled into his eyes.

“Not all,” she answered quickly, “if we preserve our honour and our
constancy!”

   [Illustration: CAROLINE, QUEEN OF NAPLES. From a photo by
   Mansell after the picture by Madame Lebrun.]

Sitting down together, they dismissed the lady-in-waiting with
instructions to gather together the few proved friends who still
remained to them, and then set themselves to the preparations for their
departure. An hour or more they spent together, and then Murat emerged,
his head high, and his face alight from the contact with his splendid
wife. His Ministers had assembled, and with them he arranged such of
the affairs of the kingdom as admitted of arrangement, and placed them
in such a shape that the Bourbon could not help but keep them so, for
his own sake, and every last one of his acts and thoughts was directed
towards the future welfare of his people. Nothing else appeared to
have any place in his mind at all. He was cool, quiet, cheerful, and
collected, heartening those around him, and as freehanded to the French
who were leaving him, and the servants whom he was leaving, as though
he were taking the Crown instead of laying it down.

He had regained the priceless possession of hope. Napoleon’s star was
still shining. France had taken him to her arms. Without the shedding
of a single drop of blood he had regained the throne and, though all
the world might be in arms against him, he had faith in himself, the
faith that moveth mountains. Murat had resolved to go and join him,
and, when the world war was over, and Napoleon’s foot was again upon
the neck of his enemies, to return to Naples and drive Ferdinand into
the sea and under it.

Caroline knew of his intention, for she let him go alone, and his
instructions to Carrascosa (before the latter departed to the little
house, three miles out of Capua, where Lord Burghersh, Bianchi, and
Neipperg waited to arrange the terms of the treaty of Casa Lanza)
show her hand plainly, for Carrascosa was told to stipulate that
the property sold or given away by Murat must be guaranteed to its
possessors, in order, as Joachim said, to leave him the character of a
good king and that the Neapolitans might cherish his memory. He knew,
and so did Caroline, exactly how long it would take Ferdinand to make
himself loathed and abominated by the people whose yoke Joachim had
lifted.

That these did not trust Ferdinand’s eloquent vow to abstain from
retaliation against those who had served Murat was made plain in
the very beginning of the negotiations, for they refused to take
his personal word for the fulfilment of any part of the treaty,
and demanded the guarantee of the Emperor of Austria. It was little
security enough, in all conscience, for the guarantees of Francis had
been the jest of Europe for years past, but they seemed to think that
it might bind the hands of the “Butcher King” for awhile.

On the same evening that the treaty was ratified Joachim departed
incognito for Pozzuoli. From there he went on to Ischia, where he
was received with all the respect due to a monarch, and on the 22nd
he sailed for France with a few friends. Caroline, as regent, still
remained in the palace, and the Neapolitan populace in the absence of
the troops went off their heads. They had been hard held lately, and
now they made up for it. They broke open the prisons and committed
atrocities that do not bear writing about. Even the presence of 300
marines from the British fleet could do little to control the mob, but
they produced a temporary calm, during which Caroline embarked on one
of the British men-of-war with Macdonald and two others.



CHAPTER XVI

MURAT’S LAST DAYS


No sooner was Caroline on board than the city broke out again and
anarchy reigned, until the Austrians sent in some troops in answer to
the frantic appeals of the magistrates, and these, with the British
Marines, set upon the mob, killing a hundred or more of the worst of
them before order was restored.

The riot and the subsequent slaughter had apparently no effect upon
the people’s feelings, for on the very next day they illuminated the
city gorgeously, and the sound of their merriment could be heard
out at sea. All the ships in the harbour were dressed, even that
one which sheltered Caroline and her followers, and on the 23rd the
Austrians entered with Crown Prince Leopold of Bourbon at their head,
who graciously acknowledged the howls of the crowd. Everything that
suggested Murat—flags, statues, pictures—was destroyed, and Caroline,
from the deck of the British ship, watched the general jubilation over
her husband’s fall.

Joachim, passing Gaeta, saw his standard still flying from that
fortress, and, even then, would have landed and joined the garrison had
he been permitted to do so, but the port was blocked up with vessels
and he was forced to proceed on his way.

He reached Fréjus on May 28; but as the shore became clearer and the
outline of the coast grew into the horizon, the hopes with which he had
left Caroline began to weaken, and he became oppressed with a sense of
helplessness, seeming to feel that he was struggling against hopeless
odds. The sight of the country he had once served so well, and where
his name had been a household word—he was known as “the Achilles of
France”—struck chill upon his heart. He had loved his mistress, and had
never counted the cost, but he had sided against her too, and, as he
well knew, a country, like a woman, forgets a thousand acts of devotion
in the face of one affront. He had no friends there any more save,
perhaps, his brother-in-law; but Napoleon had a woman’s memory for past
wrongs too, and though his letters had been full of affection while
the issue of his own attempt was still problematical, now that he had
succeeded he could repay to the uttermost farthing.

He might need Murat to lead the cavalry—nay, as it seemed, he _must_
need him, for he could not, surely, allow a personal spite to prevent
him from using that weapon of weapons when the hilt of it was held
out to him! Murat was not the only one either. Ney had sworn to bring
the Emperor back in a cage like a wild beast—and he had taken Ney to
his heart as soon as they met. Marmont had deliberately gone over to
the enemy—taking his corps with him. Indeed, of all Napoleon’s former
adherents it might be said that only Soult had proved to be the true
metal, for he had not laid down his arms till after the Emperor had
descended from the throne, and he had fought his last fight with as
high a courage and as steadfast a heart as his first. Soult had never
surrendered, nor had he ever allowed it to be said that force of arms
had compelled him to submit to the allies. He had obeyed the decision
of his countrymen, and that was all.

The evil days upon which he had fallen had eaten into Murat’s
self-confidence badly, and he dared not even proceed to Paris, but
remained at Toulon. From there he wrote to Fouché, whom he still
imagined to have kindly feelings towards him—Fouché!—because in his
prosperity he had befriended him.

“You know,” he wrote, “the motive and the result of the war in Italy.
Arrived in France. I now offer my arm to the Emperor and trust that
Heaven may allow me to atone for the disasters of the King by the
success of the Captain.”

Fouché presented the letter to Napoleon without comment, and the latter
read it. “What treaties of peace have I concluded with the King of
Naples since the war of 1814?” he asked, handing it back, and Fouché
bowed himself out.

Murat remained at Toulon, growing daily more hopeless, although
the inhabitants treated him with great respect. But he had passed
the point where the respect or otherwise of private citizens could
affect him. Then came Waterloo, and the South of France took on the
political aspect of the unhappy kingdom which he had just quitted.
The Monarchists rose and smote out right and left, massacring their
political opponents, and looting everything that those unfortunates
left behind them. Marshal Brune, who had previously been sent by the
Emperor to maintain order in the south, was torn to pieces by a mob,
and Joachim was forced to hide himself as best he could from the “White
Terror,” which was overrunning the land.

From his hiding-place he wrote again to Fouché, but that adaptable
gentleman was now Minister to Louis XVIII, and vouchsafed no answer.
Fouché was one of those human chameleons that fit themselves into any
colour scheme, and all the wars, plots, revolutions, and armageddons of
the past years had passed him by. He had just succeeded in betraying
Wellington, to whom he had promised Napoleon’s plan of campaign, by
sending the plans and then taking steps to see that the messenger
was delayed long enough on the frontier to make the delivery of them
useless; and now he was more monarchist than the poor old monarch
himself, hunting out his late associates mercilessly. Murat begged for
a passport to England, but no notice was taken of his appeal.

In despair, and having escaped, by what seemed to be a miracle, from
the hands of the Marquis de la Rivière, who owed his life to Joachim’s
favour, he wrote to Louis himself, requesting Fouché to deliver his
letter. But Fouché sent no word, and no answer came from Louis, who
probably never saw the letter at all; and, seeing no other hope for
him, Murat resolved to go to Paris and place himself in the hands
of the allied Sovereigns. They could not, in reason, blame him for
doing to them that which they had all at various periods during the
past twenty years done to one another. He had been a great figure—a
greater figure than any of them. They had now no reason for betraying
his confidence; and they were neither vengeful nor bloodthirsty. He
would be safer with them than among his own countrymen. His idea was to
travel by sea—for to attempt a land journey would have been something
not far removed from suicide—to Havre de Grâce, whence he could make
his way to Paris with little risk. So, having made arrangements for a
vessel, and chosen a wild and unfrequented part of the coast and a dark
night for his embarkation, he set out.

But the vessel, for some reason or other, did not arrive at the spot
that night, and Murat was compelled to retire among the rocks and
vineyards for shelter, and here he remained, hoping against hope, until
the darkness gave way to the summer dawn, and the light from the faint
topaz-coloured east on the waters showed nothing that looked like the
craft he had bargained for.

Perhaps it was meant, that crushing disappointment, for there is no
saying, in the light of the conditions which reigned at the capital,
whether he would ever have reached the sanctuary of the allies at
all. The White Terror, a plague as fierce and irresponsible as the
Red one of a quarter of a century earlier, was raging uncontrolled
and uncontrollable, and the deeds of Murat, as King of Naples in 1814,
would not have counted then for the Emperor’s broken Marshal. Fouché’s
agents very nearly caught him that time, and he had to fly from cover
to cover like a hunted hare; but he escaped from them, and a while
later slipped away in a little ship that was bound for Corsica.

Even now the demon of his ill luck, still unsatiated, continued to
pursue him, for, after two days, a storm overtook them which forced
them to lower their single, three-cornered sail, and let the boat
run under bare poles for a day and a half, at the end of which time,
when the little ship was filling rapidly, they were picked up by the
_Corriera_ on her way to Bastia. A large French vessel which they had
spoken a few hours earlier had refused to have anything to do with
them, and, when this other one, more charitable, came alongside, Murat,
uncovering his face, told the captain his name.

“A Frenchman,” he said, “I speak to Frenchmen, and, nearly shipwrecked,
I ask aid from those who are themselves out of danger.”

Greatly to his surprise and his gratification, he was treated with
every honour and welcomed on board as a king, and the next day he
landed at Bastia.

He had come at a moment when Corsica was in the throes of a civil
war of its own, between the followers of the Bourbons, the adherents
of Napoleon, and a party who, sitting on the fence between, called
themselves Independents. Many of Murat’s old-time companions in arms
had been natives of Corsica, and, the Napoleonists and Independents
being in the majority, they called upon Joachim to help them crush
the remainder and rule over the island afterwards. This was the sort
of invitation which the fiery cavalryman was always only too ready to
accept, and his heart soared into the heavens!

One begins to understand the reason why Napoleon could hold all Europe
down when one reads the adventures of Murat and Ney and Soult. Even
when the great force behind them was removed, and they were struggling
single-handed, while the least and weakest chance remained to continue
fighting they would fight. They never counted the odds, they never
parleyed with a compromise, repeated defeats never cooled their
courage; they would follow as hard upon the faintest ray of hope as
they had galloped into the blazing sunlight of an assured victory.

It was not long before Joachim became the object of the deepest
suspicion to such authorities as still remained in Corsica, and
he removed himself to Vescovado, and thence to Ajaccio, with the
enthusiastic assistance of the discontented element in the island.
Once more, under the action of the popular support, he began to feel a
king, and frequently remarked that if strangers rallied to him in this
fashion, the Neapolitans might be expected to rise _en masse_ at his
appearance. “I accept it as a happy augury!” he exclaimed.

It seems incredible that, after his experience among them, Joachim
should have an illusion left about his late subjects. But he evidently
had, and he determined to descend upon Salerno, where 3,000 of his
former troops were quartered. They were, he was sure, discontented with
the Bourbons—being what they were, they were bound to be discontented
with any sort of established authority—and with these he expected to
march towards Avellino, increasing his following as he went, throwing
a panic into the capital before him; in fine, repeating the Napoleonic
performance, and seating himself firmly upon the throne before the
Austrians could descend upon him.

He had completed his arrangements, when he received a letter from
Maceroni informing him that the latter was upon his way to Ajaccio, and
that he was bringing good news with him.

He waited a day for him, and Maceroni, when he appeared, presented
Murat with a note written in French.

“His Majesty the Emperor of Austria” (it ran) “will grant an asylum to
King Joachim on the following conditions:

“First. That the King shall assume a private name; and the Queen having
taken that of Lipano, the same is proposed to the King.

“Second. That the King shall reside in one of the cities of Bohemia,
Moravia, or Upper Austria, or, if he should prefer it, in the country;
but in one of these provinces.

“Third. That he shall pledge his word of honour not to quit the
Austrian territory without the express permission of the Emperor, and
to live as a private individual subject to the laws of the Austrian
monarchy.”

It was signed by Metternich, and dated from Paris, on September 1.

But Joachim, in spite of his friend’s entreaties, would have none of it.

“_Quem Deus vult perdere, prius dementat._” Joachim’s soul was aflame
now, and he spoke contemptuously of the offer.

“A prison, then,” he cried, “is to be my asylum! A prison is a tomb,
and nothing remains for a king who has lost his throne but the death of
a soldier. You have come too late, Maceroni. I have already determined
on my fate.... If I fail, imprisonment must be the natural consequence,
but I will never consent to drag out the miserable remnant of my days
in slavery. Bonaparte resigned the throne of France, yet he returned
to it in the same way which I now attempt.... I have not resigned my
throne or forfeited my right, therefore a fate worse than imprisonment
would be contrary to human justice; but be assured that Naples shall be
my St. Helena!”

On the night of September 28 the forlorn hope embarked at Ajaccio.
The weather was mild and clear, the sea calm, and both the troops and
their leader happy and confident. They did not know that Ferdinand
had had intelligence of every move that Joachim had made since his
landing in Corsica, through one of Joachim’s own servants, a man of the
name of Cabarelli. This man, who owed everything that he possessed to
Murat’s kindness, accosted him at Ajaccio, and, while offering himself
to his old master’s service, begged him not to attempt the crazy
enterprise. In this he was acting according to his orders, for the
Neapolitan Government was frightened; but having discovered, doubtless
from Joachim’s own rash words, that he was bent upon the affair and
would allow nothing to stop him, Cabarelli forwarded to his employers
Joachim’s entire plans, preparations, and movements.

The only thing that he did not learn was the destination of the little
force, and the lack of that knowledge prevented Ferdinand from taking
any steps towards dealing with Joachim when he should arrive. Ferdinand
was afraid, too, of any rumour spreading, for Murat had still many
friends in the kingdom, and he, Ferdinand, had none.

For a week all went well with the expedition, but on the seventh day a
storm arose which lasted for three days and which scattered the little
fleet hopelessly. Joachim’s boat chanced to find its way into the
Gulf of Santa Eufemia, and Joachim, after some hesitation, resolved to
stake all upon the throw, and land at Pizzo with the twenty-eight men
remaining to him.

This was on October 8. It was a festa, and, in consequence, the militia
were paraded in the market-place, when the party came ashore. No sooner
were these on land than they raised Murat’s standard and advanced upon
the town, shouting “Long live King Murat!”

But there was no response, and the onlookers remained silent. It was
as though a cold mist had settled upon the sunny morning, and Murat
hastened on to Monteleone, where he trusted to the gratitude of the
citizens for many favours which he had done them in the past. But two
Bourbon adherents, a certain Captain Trentacapilli, and an agent of the
Duke dell’ Infantado, hastily collected a following of men and weapons
and met Joachim on the road, where they opened fire upon him.

He, however, did not return their fire, but only saluted them,
whereupon, taking heart from his inaction, they fired again, killing
one and injuring another of his followers. The remainder prepared to
defend themselves, but Joachim prevented them.

Now a crowd began to collect, and very soon the only avenue of escape
for Joachim was by the steep cliff, down which he ran, hailing, as he
arrived upon the beach, his ship, which was still but a little distance
from the land. His captain, Barbara, though—another upon whom Joachim
had lavished every sort of kindness and whom he had raised from nothing
at all to the rank of a baron—paid no heed to him, and sailed away with
the booty which he had on board.

Then Joachim, despairing at last, attempted to make his escape in a
small skiff which lay on the beach; but it was too heavy for him to
move, and the next moment Trentacapilli and his rabble were upon him,
striking him in the face and tearing off the jewels which he wore
upon his cap and breast, and bellowing their insults at him, while he
was being led up to the grey, straggling castle; and only when he was
inside the gates and out of sight did their howling cease.

A tiny light penetrated through the gloom that surrounded him when
Captain Stratti, upon hearing who the prisoner was, treated him with
marked deference and respect, addressing him as “Majesty” and securing
for him the best room that he could. General Nunziante also, upon
arriving, paid him every mark of respect, and endeavoured, as far as
it was possible for him to do, to show his sympathy for the unfortunate
and betrayed captive.

This treatment appears to have restored Murat considerably, and that
night he slept soundly and peacefully. No idea of the sort of vengeance
which Ferdinand and his abominable Government were preparing for him
appears to have entered his head, and he still seems to have thought
it possible to come to some arrangement with that royal hyena, for he
remarked to Nunziante, the day before his execution, that it would be
easy to come to an accommodation with Ferdinand by the latter yielding
to him the kingdom of Naples and by his yielding to Ferdinand his
claims to Sicily.

Ferdinand, in the meanwhile, having recovered from the nightmare of
terror which had seized him upon the receipt of the news of Joachim’s
landing at Pizzo, allowed his joy and relief full play. At first he
wanted to imprison every one who could even be suspected of a suspicion
in the direction of Muratism, but his courage failed him, and he had
to content himself with dispatching Canosa—who may, I think, without
injustice, be classed among the three or four worst and most despicable
characters that ever infested that sunny land—into Calabria with carte
blanche to represent his master.

The order for Murat’s execution was sent down by signal telegraph, and,
that done, a court-martial was composed to try him! Seven “judges” were
chosen, three of whom, besides the Procurator-General, had been raised
from poverty and obscurity and loaded with money and honours by Murat
himself; and, in order to save themselves from any taint of common
gratitude or even decency, which might bring them into disfavour with
their present sovereign lord, they first of all thanked the latter
humbly for deigning to make use of them, and by their bearing and
remarks during the trial made it impossible for Murat to sit in the
same room with them even had he desired to do so.

In the round tower Joachim spent the last night of his life, mercifully
undisturbed by the knowledge of the court which was to go through the
farce of trying him. It was long after daylight when Nunziante entered,
so softly that the sleeping man did not awaken. Nor did Nunziante
arouse him—an act of charity which must surely have been put to his
credit when the long roll-call summoned him in his turn.

On Joachim’s awakening and opening his eyes, Nunziante broke the news
of his approaching trial as gently as possible.

“I am lost, then!” exclaimed Murat. There were tears in his eyes, and
Nunziante himself was unable to speak for emotion, but he brought his
prisoner pen and paper.

   “MY DEAR CAROLINE,” wrote Murat. “My last hour has struck. Within
   a few moments I shall have ceased to live and you will have lost
   your husband. Do not forget me! My life has never been stained by
   an act of injustice. Adieu, my Achilles, my Letitia, my Lucian,
   and my Louisa. Show yourselves worthy of me. I leave you without
   a kingdom, without wealth, in the midst of many enemies. Be
   united and rise above misfortune. Look upon yourselves as you
   are, not as you might be, and God will bless your humility. Do
   not curse my memory. Know that my greatest misery in this last
   hour of my life is to die far from my children. Receive your
   father’s blessing—receive my embraces and my tears. May the
   memory of your unhappy father be ever present with you.

                                                        “JOACHIM.”

In the letter he placed some locks of hair.

With infamous cynicism, a defender had been appointed for him before
the court, but Murat, rising above his misery, rejected the melancholy
foolery with a contempt the expression of which must have cut into the
horny feelings of his judges and left them sore for many a long day.

He was their King, he told them, but went on to observe: “If I am to be
tried in the light of a Marshal of France, I may be tried by a Council
of Marshals; if as a General, by Generals. But before I descend so low
as to submit to the decision of the judges who have been selected _many
pages must be torn from the history of Europe_!”

To Storace, who had been appointed to defend him, and who now begged
to be allowed to do what he could, Joachim replied: “You cannot save
my life. Allow me to save my dignity. I forbid you to speak in my
defence.”

Storace, who, with Stratti and Nunziante, appears as one of the three
rays of human light in the whole horrid affair, left him sadly, as the
magistrate entered and with gusto proceeded to torment the victim with
questions. But he did not get very far before Joachim turned upon him.

“I am Joachim Murat,” he replied, “King of the Two Sicilies and your
King. Leave me and relieve my prison of your presence!”

It seems to have occurred to him that possibly Ferdinand was revenging
himself now for the murder of the Duc d’Enghien—for he mentioned the
tragedy and swore to Stratti that he had had no hand in it. He had been
Governor of Paris when the young Duke was kidnapped and shot, but he
could have done nothing to save him. Murat was speaking the truth. The
Duc d’Enghien was murdered by Talleyrand, who devised the whole affair
and drove Napoleon into giving the order by suggesting the result of it
upon the Royalists, who had, then, made several attempts upon the First
Consul’s life.

Murat then thanked Stratti for his kindness and begged to be left
alone, when he crossed his arms on his breast and stared at the
portraits of his family. His first notice of the sentence which had
been pronounced upon him came through a priest, whose name was Masdea.
The latter, as he told Joachim, had had cause to be grateful to him in
the past for some unexpected help in the building of a church, and it
was that which had induced him to brave the displeasure of Joachim’s
enemies now. He assured Joachim that his prayers would be offered up
for the repose of his soul, and begged him to prepare himself as a
Christian to appear before his Maker; and Joachim did so, Masdea says,
with philosophic resignation.

The “court” by now had its sentence ready.

“Joachim Murat, by the fortune of arms, having returned into
that private life in which he was born, and having ventured with
twenty-eight comrades to attempt this rash enterprise, not trusting
to the force of arms [this, by the way, seems to be a queer sort of
grievance], but to rebellion, has excited the people to rise against
the lawful sovereign, endeavoured to revolutionize the kingdom and
Italy, and is therefore condemned to die as a public enemy, by the
law made during the Decennium, and which is still maintained in full
vigour.”

Joachim seemed to be very little interested in the reading of his doom.
Except for an occasional glance of cold contempt, he paid no attention
to the herald or his message.

Then he was led down some stone steps into a sort of court, which may
be seen to this day, and placed against the wall on the left of the
foot of the stairs.

He refused to have his eyes bound, and looked calmly on while the
muskets of the firing party were being loaded. When all was ready, he
straightened himself up and looked steadily at his executioners.

“Spare my face,” he said, “and aim at my heart.”


So died Joachim Murat, in the forty-eighth year of his life, and he met
his end with a fearlessness and dignity which shone the brighter for
the squalid surroundings in which he displayed them.

There is a story still current in the Penisola, that after his death
his head was cut off, by Ferdinand’s order, and carried to Naples, in
order that the “Butcher King” might be sure that his gallant enemy was
no more.

One would have imagined that the gruesome proof would have satisfied
him, and having seen it he would have been content to bury it decently.
But the report goes on to say that nothing would induce him to part
with it afterwards, and that he kept it in a specially constructed
case, under lock and key, by the side of his bed. Here, whenever his
crazy panics seized him, he could open the box and finger the head and
reassure himself again.

And all this happened, not in the time of Caligula or Tiberius, but
three years before the birth of Queen Victoria.



CHAPTER XVII

ITALIAN SEAS


Let us return to happier themes!

Many and enchanting books have been written about Italian cities and
Italian country, but none about our Italian seas. People who look at
the map may think this a limited subject; there is the Mediterranean,
and there is the Adriatic—what more can be said? _Amici miei_, to a
sea-lover there are as many seas as ports; the dear salt water and
the sunrise and the sunset know it, and have a separate caress for
each. They make—or fit into—the thousand moods of mind that colour a
pilgrim’s life, and the pictures of them in my gallery of remembrance
are clearer than any of my landscapes and more helpful—because they
never hurt.

The landscapes, all except the loveliest ones where the spirit poised
for one longing instant—like a bird on the topmast of a ship, and,
like the bird, was given no more than time to take breath and wing
away again—are mostly inhabited. Here your friend quarrelled with you;
there your true love kissed you and betrayed; farther on your child
was sick and every aspect of the most beautiful scenery in the world
brings back only the poignant watches when a flush of colour in the
little face sent you crazy with joy, and something wrong again with
the little pulse froze your heart with fear. On land we cannot get
away from ourselves and others; earth is greedily dominant, monstrously
exacting. But the sea repudiates all individual ties. You must be empty
of yourself, or it will not speak to you at all. Its laws are not our
laws, and the first thing it does, if you are docile to its magic, is
to wash out your personality, and oh, how glad some of us are—or would
be—if we only could utterly forget that irritant, insistent factor of
existence!

In our long wanderings most paths, as we look back on them, show the
little red stains where we cut our feet; we have left shreds of our
soul’s garments on many a thorn by the way; but for me, and I fancy
for some of you others, the breath and the sound and the touch of the
sea have been nothing but coolness and healing, a sunbath for life’s
chillinesses, a fountain of strength in its languors. I think I should
know now the right point to make for, according to the distemper that
might be assailing me; and though twenty years ago I sought and loved
the onslaught of the Atlantic and the Valhalla of the March tides in
the Channel, to-day I would fare no farther than my home seas, those
that lap and sing on the Italian shores.

I was sailing up into the Bay of Naples once just as the morning
had conquered the last star; the sky was a faint milky blue and the
mountains were cowled outlines, very dark and still. Not a breath
stirred the sea, not a sound came from the land. Suddenly from the
shadows that were neither land nor sea, I saw coming towards me a tall,
glorious form, floating on the water, pointing to the sky, clothed in
long, straight robes of white, making for open sea with the steady rush
of a seabird on rested pinions. It took all the growing daylight to
itself—it _was_ the daylight, for a few breathless seconds—a vision of
the Immaculate Conception, it seemed to me; then the music of ripple
on prow whispered across the water, the sun leapt up behind Sant’
Angelo; I rubbed my eyes, and lo, a slender vessel with snowy sails,
tall and narrow, from some strange port, such sails as our seamen never
unfurled. She brought the wind as she had taken the daylight, and a
moment later she swept past in her immaculate pride and was gone.

I always rather resented the advent of battleships and royal yachts
and gaudy truck of that kind in our southern waters, but the private
yachts inspired us with a pleasant mysterious interest that was not
unwelcome. Once, when we were watching anxiously for my brother,
during his venturesome sail from New York to Naples, and the children
were cruising round the Bay not far from Naples, a large, beautiful
yacht was seen to come in and cast anchor off Santa Lucia, and at once
the greatest excitement prevailed on the Crawford felucca. Was that
the _Alda_? Oh, surely it must be! At once the _Margherita_ headed
for the port, and the nearer she came to the new arrival, the surer
was everybody that the _Alda_—which none of them had seen, as Marion
had just bought her—had reached port at last. How well she had stood
the voyage! No sign of the heavy weather mentioned in the wire from
Gibraltar! No sign of the Padrone either, but, of course, he would have
had to go on shore to report himself and get his harbour papers from
the Consul. What was this? Dark-faced sailors in fezes? How like Marion
to pick up a Lascar crew in New York! Let us row round her and hail
somebody. Good heavens! The first shout brought a dozen lovely Turkish
ladies to the cabin windows, smiling, interested, only too ready to ask
the pretty boatful on board. The children stared open-mouthed! Then a
burst of uncontrollable laughter shook the _Margherita_ from stem to
stern. Papa had certainly not brought a harem from New York! “A casa,”
came the order to the grinning sailors, and the _Margherita_ turned
tail and ran for home.

There is a busy, unromantic seaport called Livorno, a long way up
the coast from Naples, a Tuscan town of white streets and shadeless
squares, all alive with commerce, and, until I came to years of reason,
represented to me by the huge flapping straw hats, fine as silk and
pale gold in colour, which we children regarded as signals of summer,
when, on the first hot day, the ribbons that held them were tied under
our chins, and we were admonished, on pain of sunstrokes and spankings,
not to take them off. I had among my possessions a toy Swiss cottage
all made of the same pretty straw, and I imagined that “Leghorn”
was a straw city with bunches of red poppies and blue ribbons on the
house-tops for ornament. It was rather a blow to discover, on being
taken there when I was seven years old, that the only traces of my toy
city were the thin golden strings which most of the women were plaiting
with lightning quickness as they walked in the streets or sat in the
doorways.

   [Illustration: LIVORNO. Photo by Brogi.]

After that, as I grew older, Leghorn meant just the sea in some of
its most enchanting aspects, for it was very rarely that we missed our
few weeks of bathing there in September, if we had spent the summer in
the north. It was the beginning of the autumn homecoming; we took an
apartment on the long, bright boulevard that faces the sea, the cook
and one or two of the servants came up from Rome to look after us,
and, always, we had a royally good time. The last, I think, was the
best of all, happening after a memorable summer in the Bagni de Lucca,
which I have described elsewhere. My sister had just become engaged,
and her fiancé, Erich von Rabe, of course followed us to Leghorn. Hugh
Fraser was there, occupied mostly, it seemed to me, in saving the Paget
children from getting drowned, since they would attempt to follow their
indomitable young mother in her long swims out into the deep.

Lady Paget did everything beautifully; she was built like a goddess and
could not do anything else, whether she rode or danced or glided about
in great old rooms or flowery gardens; but she never seemed more of a
goddess than when she stood for an instant in her clinging draperies
with her arms above her head and then leapt, like a curved arrow, out
and down into the sun-kissed waves. One held one’s breath while they
engulfed her—and then, yards beyond, up came that proud, small head,
and away she would go, with long, easy strokes, a being at one with the
sun and the sea—a joy to behold.

All that was in the morning when the spaces under the big tents on the
outrunning piers of the _stabilimenti_ were crowded to the very edge
with cheery, chattering groups, the ladies embroidering as fast as they
talked, the children romping, the young men making love, and the old
people, who would not face the cold joy of a plunge, smiling benignly
on it all. The piers were low, and a sudden gust of wind would fling
the salt water up without warning; then there were shrieks mingled with
laughter, flurrying of skirts and scraping of chairs and snatching
up of babies, and all the fun of settling down again, only to renew
the game at the next shower. This gathering only took place in the
morning. As soon as the sun was right overhead, the ladies packed their
fancy-work into their reticules, wiped the remains of _ciambelle_ from
the children’s mouths, straightened their hats—all with an incessant
fire of chatter like that of a tree full of roosting sparrows suddenly
disturbed—and away everybody trailed along the blazing white boulevard
for home, midday dinner, and the rapturous quiet of the siesta
afterwards.

I believe I was a little jealous, even then, of the kind of official
ownership which the Ambassador and his family seemed to claim in the
man who, though neither of us dreamed it yet, was very soon to be my
husband. Anyway, I permitted myself an occasional mood of pleasant
melancholy towards evening when my own dear people, like all the others
who had any deference at all for public opinion, were driving round
and round the public gardens, listening to the band. Two of our party
had agreed to slap public opinion quite brutally in the face; these
were my erratic sister and her equally erratic fiancé. They hired a
little sailing boat, and day after day, towards 4 o’clock, went off
by themselves, unchaperoned save by the boatman, for long expeditions,
whence they returned, gloriously happy and hungry, just in time for a
very late dinner.

Once and once only they lured me out, why, I could not imagine at the
moment, as I was a bad sailor in those days and did not in the least
want to go. But I soon found out their wicked motive. I had taken it
upon myself to order the meals while we were at Leghorn, as my mother
thought it would be good practice for me. Now there was one dish which
we all, except Annie and Erich, particularly disliked, a fry of very
bony, very rank-smelling crayfish, called _spannocchi_. After one trial
I had steadily refused to have it brought to the table. But those two
young monsters liked _spannocchi_, and they laid their plot quite
cleverly, and everything turned out just as they intended. We beat
out to sea, the weather was squally, and in a short time I was lying,
a sea-sick heap, in the bottom of the boat, begging with tears to be
taken home. This was what they had been waiting for. “Not unless you
promise us _spannocchi_ for dinner to-morrow!” they exclaimed in a
breath, grinning down at me in my misery. They looked as big and wicked
as the pictures of the demon lover in our old ballad book, when he is
sailing the faithless wife to hell!

Of course I promised—and was a most unpopular person with the rest of
the family at dinner time the next night. But their boatman avenged
me in the end. The day before we returned to Rome they took leave
of him with a little present, and he, who had all along imagined
them to be a young married couple, because they came unaccompanied,
testified his gratitude and goodwill in true Italian fashion, by crying
enthusiastically, “Heaven bless you, my good Signori, and may it be _a
fine boy_!”

Annie put her head down and ran for home, and Erich was not allowed to
come to dinner that night.

Livorno is an anomaly—an Italian city with no history, no ancient
monuments, no works of art. In fact it always seemed to me less Italian
than any spot I knew in the whole country, but in the days when we
used to frequent it I took that, as one took everything else in that
cheerful age, for granted, and it was only long afterwards that I
gave myself the trouble to hunt up the cause of the phenomenon. Then
I learnt that down to the days of the Medici it was a small fishing
village with a few hundred inhabitants, bearing for some unknown reason
the name of another tiny place farther north, Livorno Vercellese. The
Medici first noted its possibilities, and set to work to make it the
real port of Florence, till then largely dependent for such a commodity
on Pisa, a little farther up the coast.

Pisa, the ancient rival of Genoa and Venice, still sick with memories
of her past greatness, and, since 1405, the bought-and-paid-for fief
of Florence, was always seething with disaffection and conspiracy.
Its last desperate effort at retrieving its independence was made
in 1494, and the Florentines were put to the trouble of besieging it
and taking it by force. It was some sixty or seventy years later (I
think during the reign of Francesco, the father of Marie de Medici)
that Livorno recommended itself to the Ruler of the Republic as a fine
spot for a port that would have no disturbing memories of independence
to interfere with its usefulness. In order to ensure this they did
not colonize it with Italians at all, but craftily invited the more
commercially minded among the malcontents of all Europe to come and
open up trading houses there. The invitation was eagerly accepted;
persecuted Catholics from England and Germany, Moors from Spain,
Jews in great numbers from all parts, came, settled, and flourished,
the Jews of course outnumbering all the rest, so that the Leghorn
population is largely Jewish to this day. But there are also several
old English merchant houses, that, while still affecting to regard
England as “home,” are deeply rooted in the bright little city on the
Ligurian Sea, and very kind and hospitable were their representatives
to us. I remember certain commodities—great chests of tea, rolls of
English flannel, and fine table linen—my mother always sent for to
one of these Leghorn merchants, and I fancy it is due to the little
English-speaking community that the town is generally known by that
barbarous travesty of its Italian name.

In our times it has of course all the unsightly riches of a great
modern military and commercial centre—foundries, docks, shipyards,
fortifications, naval arsenals, and all the rest of it, but its real
attractions lie in the marvellous freshness of its air and its unbroken
sea-line, changing in tint at every hour of the day and taking on
certain splendours that I never remember seeing elsewhere. Livorno
always seems cool, for when the sun is shining his hottest the breeze
never fails, and the billows roll in and break in laughter and thunder
on the rocks and toss their spray almost to the windows of your room,
where the light comes up in a glow of green and gold through the
Venetians and the wind plays games with the clean white curtains all
day long.

But it is at evening that the Mare Ligure takes you and holds you
with a spell of its own. At sunset the wind generally dies down, and
then the sun sinks slowly over a softly moving but untroubled sea. The
sky clears of its dancing clouds, and becomes not sky, somehow, but a
fathomless infinity of breathing rose and topaz, transparent and liquid
like jewelled wine. And every ripple and dimple of the water soaks up
the transcendent flush, swaying rhythmically, and smoothing out into
vast pools of melting mother-of-pearl in which that living wet crimson
seems to lie like a transparent veil over deeper tints that float
beneath. When the sun is gone, the red deepens to the velvet of a dark
June rose, and the western sky is flame, not light; but hurrying night
has chilled the east behind you, and now every ripple is violet blue on
its hither side, the golden glow recedes farther and farther towards
the west, is sucked away in the trail of the sun at last, and then
nothing is left of the day but a forsaken sweep of primrose and the
wraith of a new-born star.

For sheer splurge of colour and light one must go farther north and be
out in the Bay of Spezia some September noon, when the harbour is full
of white battleships all beaconed with signals like strung flowers,
and the bands are playing madly and salutes are crashing through the
music for some royal holiday. The white town and the green hills behind
it seem to thrill visibly in unison, and the sea is cobalt, that would
make your eyes ache but for the fringe of feathery white ripples that
the breeze combs up all over its surface, and the sky is transparent
turquoise, and night seems a thousand years away. Farther on yet Genoa
the Superb has a sea as blue, a sky as stainless, but she dominates in
her white and emerald loveliness so that her setting is almost effaced.
One forgets to notice the steps of the throne where Sovereign Beauty
queens it so royally.

Then cross the plain to Venice, the witch who holds east and west in
her soft hands and plays with their riches as a millionaire’s child
might slip a rain of gold pieces from one palm to another, in idleness,
recking nothing of their value. Sea and sky, priceless palace and empty
island—it is all hers—she can never exhaust her past; and our century,
jejune and vulgar as it is, only seems to touch her to a scornful
smile.

But Venice can tremble still. Once in many years there sweeps down
on her one of Nature’s handfuls of retribution—a storm that makes her
quake to her artificial incredible foundations. I saw one such. It was
in May, Venice’s most perfect month. We had been out to the Lido that
morning, bathing in water smooth as cream; there was not a cloud in the
sky. We had barely got home when inky darkness descended, and out of
it burst a gale that lashed the Grand Canal to fury, and a machine-gun
fire of hail was flung against the windows, to result, an instant
later, in a crash of broken glass and tumbling bricks that was truly
appalling. Through the tumult came shrieks and cries. Every window in
the Ducal Palace was smashed, and most of the others in the town. When
it was over—the whole thing did not last more than twenty minutes—I
went out on our balcony and picked up, from the thick layer lying
there, hailstones as big as pigeons’ eggs. The next day we went out
again to the Lido, and where a long, green pergola of vines had shaded
the way to the bathing establishment now stood a bare tracery of dry
branches. Not a single leaf was left.

But generally the Adriatic waits on Venice with subservient calm,
and one can float over those vast yet not unpictured lagoons in still
assurance that one’s reveries will not be disturbed. I doubt whether
such lengths of languorous idling be good for young, strong people, but
as a rest-cure for tired ones there can be nothing more complete. The
shape and build of the gondola (what a perfect name for the gliding,
sinuous thing!) was evolved by an artist in comfort; the enormous
leather cushions let you sink into their thickness as far as you please
without ever touching the limit of their pleasant elasticity. Whether
cowled in to keep off the sun’s rays in the day, or uncovered to give
you all the coolness of the evening, the gondola seat relieves you of
all responsibility for your body; it holds you as an experienced nurse
holds a tired child; and in its silent, swan-like rush through the
water you get just the sense of motion necessary to keep your nerves
employed yet soothed.

With the right companion, what talks are possible, as you glide out
in the last flush of evening towards the more distant lagoons and wait
for the moon to come up out of Istria across the sea! Your gondolier,
silent as Charon, is behind you and you forget his existence. And all
the rest is behind too, but very far behind—daily life with its horrid
strident claims and calculations that won’t even leave honey-mooning
couples alone! Time has ceased, and the world is standing still to
let you look at life in its beauty and kiss its face in its peace.
When at last you say, without turning your head, “A casa, Sandruccio,”
your black swan quivers an instant from low stern to dark-arched prow,
swings round in the smallest space any boat did ever turn in, and you
float back to the regular rhythm of Sandruccio’s twenty-foot oar, till
a necklace of light lies low on the land, and the faintest of songs—a
very mist of music—is wafted over the water.

“Alla Pizzetta?” inquires Sandruccio, speaking for the first time, and
in a voice expressing much amused indulgence for dreaming lovers. A few
minutes later he is imperiously ordering fellow-gondoliers out of his
way to the steps, is holding the side of the swan the eighth of an inch
off the grind of the stone, and you and your other self dance on shore
to become light-hearted young people, keeping time surreptitiously
to the gay waltz of the band and laughing at everything and nothing
because all the festive crowd around you is doing the same thing.

Witch and tyrant as she is—and perhaps for that very reason, since
tyrants must know how to yield as well as how to rule—Venice will meet
you in almost all your moods, and create new ones for you if you have
none of your own.

I used to get dazzled with all the splendour of palaces and churches;
these last are so full of the glorification of great men—the monuments
and ornamentation are so obtrusive that there seems scarcely any room
for prayer. San Marco itself, dream of beauty as it is, inspires less
devotion than many a humble country church without a single work of
art to recommend it. Without the ineffable Presence in the Tabernacle
I should have felt more piously disposed at the foot of the lonely
shrine out in the lagoon, where the Blessed Madonna’s picture smiles
down from its tall tarred post on the flowers that one or other of her
children brings there every day. The water laps gently at her feet, the
sky arches blue overhead, and one can dream very good and happy dreams
as one gazes up at her. But in San Marco, just as in the Doges’ Palace,
one is teased by two things—the necessity of thought and appreciation,
and that horrid sense one has in so many places in Italy of all the
prying irreverence that expert—sceptic—heretics have brought to bear
on it—as if the cleverest ant that ever crawled and builded underground
could measure the courses of the stars!

To forget, and rest from, other people’s thoughts, I used to walk a
good deal through those narrow noiseless streets where never hoof or
wheel comes to break the stillness, where old houses lean close to
share old secrets, and the shadows lie clear and cool through most of
the daylight hours. When the sun does strike down he turns the grey to
gold, seems to gather up all the perfume of the small hidden gardens
and fling it to you with a laugh on a spray of jasmine that has tossed
itself over some ancient wall, or a tangle of red carnations spilling
down through the scroll-work of a balcony projecting the wide curve of
its iron bars far overhead, above the street.

Through a half-open _portone_, dull green like the narrow canals
in the shade, you catch a glimpse of a courtyard deep-sunk between
high walls that are dimpled and lichened to indescribable richness
of colour, and gleaming here and there with some lovely fragment
of bas-relief. Cupid with one wing gone and half a bow, a row of
bursting pomegranates trailing off into nothing, a few letters of some
once-pompous inscription—who knows, who cares? They served out their
own uses centuries ago and were stuck in here to corner a window-frame,
to key an arch, to replace a brick, but the sun and the rain and the
salt sweetness of Adriatic airs have fused and mellowed them to the
gold-white tint of fresh curds, smoothed their marbled surface to the
velvet uniformity of magnolia petals.

There is a fountain in the courtyard, of course, a rough half-shell of
stone set into the wall, where a slow jet trickles all day long, and
is just now spilling over the brim of the red copper _conca_ that some
woman has set atilt below it—and forgotten, perhaps to run upstairs and
pull in the wire that dangles overhead between two windows, flapping
with garments of many colours like a string of signals at sea. For
there are windows that look into the courtyard, row above row—and there
she is, looking out of one, a red-haired, brown-eyed young creature,
with broad shoulders and sunburnt throat, a strapping baby, trying to
wriggle out of its swaddling bands, in her arms. In a minute she comes
down, and clatters over the broad, damp stones in her wooden clogs
with yellow-velvet toe-caps—and the sight of them sets me dreaming
of the Venetian ladies three hundred years ago, picking their way to
Mass through the narrow twisting _calle_ on clogs too, but such clogs!
A narrow stem, twelve or fourteen inches high, resting on a base not
more than two inches wide, and spreading at the top into a pretty
little slipper, lined with velvet, and the whole thing was covered with
crimson velvet and gold lace held in place by dozens of gold-headed
nails! How any woman grown ever balanced herself on those stilts is a
mystery to me still.

My father at one time collected ancient footgear and then forgot
all about it; so it came to pass that in a corner of our old nursery
at the Villa Negroni there lay the strangest heap of toys that any
modern child ever had to play with—several pairs of these exquisitely
ornamented _sabots_ tumbled in with pink and scarlet silk slippers of
the Watteau period, and later. One pair I remember, with heels like
knitting-pins, so high that only the very point of the foot touched
the ground at all. But oh, how the little feet that wore them must have
suffered! They had certainly walked in such shoes from childhood, for
the foot had sunk down and lost shape until, pathetically small as the
little slipper was, it was as lumpy and shapeless as a clenched fist
and almost as broad as it was long.

By the time I remembered her again, after my mental excursion, my
Giorgione beauty had twisted a towel into a turban, placed it on
her red hair, and, lifting the _conca_ on to her head with a turn of
the hand, and without spilling a drop, had disappeared up the dark
stairway, all in less time than it takes to tell. Then, after stealing
one fat pink oleander blossom from the tree in the corner, I went on
my way, sniffing its nutty sweetness, to lose myself in the silent
labyrinth of those little-trodden alleys, and then be suddenly brought
to a standstill by a deep, narrow canal, unbridged, green, silent,
serving as the water door to the rooms of dark old houses that frowned
at each other across it. At every few yards stone steps led down, the
water lapping confidentially over the lowest ones.

   [Illustration: TORCELLO. THE CATHEDRAL AND THE CHURCH OF ST.
   FOSCA. Photo by Alinari.]

From far away comes the long warning cry, “_O, Premí_,” that has
puzzled generations of etymologists unable to give even a guess at its
derivation. But everybody knows its meaning—you hear it a hundred times
a day at every angle of the canals, telling those whom it concerns that
a gondola is coming round the corner. The next moment it has swung
into sight, the long, sinuous black thing cutting through the water
so smoothly and imperiously, pulling up suddenly without jerk or sound
beside the steps to let its fare slip on shore or its gondolier deliver
a message—in the soft, lisping dialect that sounds like insects’ wings
in a summer noon—to some one waiting for it on a balcony above.

It is the little things that are so real and charming in Venice, I
think—the glimpses of life among the unchanging, persistent common
people, who live as they have always lived in the discreet, still
atmosphere of the back streets and the forgotten waterways.


Sometimes grown-up Venice is a little overpowering; one feels called
upon to note every turn and building for fear of missing some
exquisite bit of architecture, some play of light and shade that
must be remembered. Then one is glad to get away to one or another
of the islands that lie around her, the nurseries where she played,
and dreamed of the future, a thousand years ago. The dearest of them
all to me is Torcello. We rowed out there one morning in August, when
the sea was very calm and the sun a little veiled by clouds sweeping
slowly up from the south. As we approached the island it seemed as if
its few buildings were flush with the water; so low does it lie that
the grasses and wild roses on the shore were dipping in the wash of
the ripples. Some peasants had been cutting the grass, the scent of
new-mown hay filled the air, and two great boats pushed out from some
inlet and passed between us and the land, laden ten feet high with a
cargo of fragrant green gold. As they met the breeze, up went the tawny
sails, and they skimmed away over the blue water like bees heavy with
pollen.

Then there was the cool rush of the turning prow, our gondola ran in
softly to the strand, some one held up an arm and I sprang on shore—to
find myself in another age and another clime. I had to wait a few
minutes to realize what it all meant, for the _ambiente_ was new to my
senses. A stretch of turf and wild roses—that explained itself—youth
and roses never need introduction—but the still white church, so
long and low, with its slender columns like altar candles, its grave
Byzantine lines—that made me pause. It seemed as if some saint had
turned from his prayers to ask me what I came for, and I could only
reply, “You must tell me: there is nothing here that I have a name for,
but there is something that was mine—give it back to me!”

When I walk through a familiar room in the dark, a peculiar warning
like a ghostly touch is laid on my forehead as I come near any object
on a level with it, and that same feeling came to me there at Torcello,
I remember. It seemed as if it all were known to me, as if every flower
and blade of grass called out, “We were here with you before!”—as if
the small forsaken basilica had meant the heart of home in some lapsed
period that life, as I knew it, could in no way account for. Its
loveliness was so removed, so ascetic, that one held one’s breath for
fear of disturbing its peace: the marble seats, the central throne,
seemed all peopled by grave shades of presbyters, surrounding their
Bishop, their long, straight vestments marked with the gold cross from
shoulder to shoulder and from neck to feet: I could almost fancy I
heard their deep chant, first from this side of the mounting tribune
and then from that, echoing in the cold spaces overhead and dying away
down the nave among the columns.

I believed the old story then, that Torcello had been the first
resting-place of the hunted exiles fleeing seaward from the Huns. It
was not that; I doubt whether the basilica was really built in the
seventh century as the guide books say; Rialto had its church long
before Torcello; but Rialto has been the artery of Venice’s throbbing
vitality too long for any associations to cling to it now, while
Torcello has stood aside, a recluse that has never wavered in its
loyalty to the Past, and the Past is enshrined there for all time. I
was surprised to find that it and I were friends. There are only two
of all the dead-and-gone centuries of Europe that seem really my own
besides the one I was born in—and they do not belong to the chaotic
times of Barbarian invasion and Byzantine supremacy. But the nameless
sweetness of the airs that play so gently over the forsaken island said
something that day that could never be forgotten, and the impression
was so strong and so perfect that I have never wished to tamper with it
by a second visit.

Strangely enough, Torcello dismissed us with contumely, for as we left
it in the late afternoon we encountered a fearful storm and came, I
think, very near to being swamped. The thunder simply hurled itself
from every quarter at once, the sea rose in inky billows of terrifying
dimensions, and between them and the rain we were drenched to the skin,
and very thankful when Sandruccio, who behaved splendidly, finally
landed us on the slippery steps of our hotel.

For a day or two after that we stayed within call, so to speak, and
had no fancy for putting out to the lagoons. There were mornings when
it was pleasant to be utterly and frankly frivolous and do nothing
but wander under the arcades of the Piazzetta and in and out of the
bewilderingly pretty shops. Such a spread of colour and glitter they
were, and so tempting was it to pick up some of the alluring trifles
for the new home we were going to make in Peking! The Murano glass
at Salviati’s I still think the most beautiful product of our own or
any other time. Every tint of sea and sky and jewel gleamed in the
ethereal beakers and vases; I remember a tall goblet of transparent
topaz shot with gold, that twisted and curled on its tendril stem like
a newly opened convolvulus, spreading at last into a cup too ethereal
for earthly lips to touch, so full of light that the most sparkling
wine would have darkened it; and all round, for handles, were blown
wreaths of milky, iridescent foam, so faint that it seemed as if they
must run down its sides and wet your fingers with salt spray. It was
like getting into the Sea-king’s palace under the sea to spend an hour
at Salviati’s; every lovely freak and fancy of sun and water, from
the brooding sapphire of secret caves to the last bubble of spray on a
curling wave, it was all there, caught and crystallized for mortals to
love and handle.

Those were the days of beads—one wore as many chains as one liked,
the more the better—and for years I went round with a little Venetian
rosary of blue and gold flecked with fairy roses round my neck. The
mother-of-pearl overcame me altogether—long garlands of the tiny
shells strung in fanciful patterns—each perfect in itself and shot with
rainbows through its moonlight sheen—but the dignity of a married woman
forbade the wearing of such things now. For years they lay about on my
dressing-table reflected in the depths of a Venetian mirror which also
accompanied me everywhere, a big oval set in a frame of translucent
flowers and leaves, neither white nor silver nor pearl, but just the
colour of the foam when the sun shines through it.

We went out to Murano once and saw all the processes of glass-blowing,
and they made a little vase for me while I was there; but the secrets
of those marvellous colours were not explained, and I came away with
one cherished illusion intact—I am still sure that the glass-blowers
have a tributary tribe of nymphs and fairies who gather their tints for
them out at sea, in nets woven of sunbeams and moonrays!

During that honeymoon summer, Venice indoors, with all its matchless
art treasures, appealed to me less than Venice out-of-doors. At the
time of my first stay there I was only sixteen, but mature enough
to appreciate what I was seeing, and my dear old step-father was
a splendid guide and allowed us to miss nothing. He was a strange
combination, dear man—an expert at explaining beauty of colour and
technique and stonily impervious to impression or atmosphere. All that
remained to him of his Calvinistic New England education was a giant
conscience, to which other people’s inclinations had to bow wherever
he took the lead, as he did, imperiously, in matters of sight-seeing.
Often I would have begged off some expedition, feeling surfeited
already with beauty and history, and longing to be healthily frivolous
for a few hours, as youth needs to be sometimes.

But it was of no use—go with him I must, and very glad I was of it
afterwards, for, returning in later years to the places where he had
piloted me about, I could make at once for the things I wanted to see
again, without troubling my head about the others. One of these, alas!
was gone when Hugh and I, just married, came to Venice. The St. Peter
Martyr of Titian had perished in a fire. I had lingered before it
long, as a girl, for there was something more than mere beauty in the
painting; one felt there was truth, relatively as absolute as that for
which the Saint gave his life—a picture not only of himself, but of
what he died for, loyalty to the unalterable essence of things as they
are.

It is as hard to describe a beloved picture as a beloved face, but
this one had been seldom copied or reproduced, and it is gone now, so I
will try. In a dark glade of the woods through which flamed red bars of
sunset, two ruffians were attacking the Saint and his companion; Peter
knelt between them in the foreground, looking up to heaven ere the last
blow fell, with a wonderful expression of mingled pain and joy. The
sweep of the drapery, the slight sinking to one side, showed that his
strength was gone already, but through the physical anguish on his face
there shone such radiance that one knew heaven was already opened to
his eyes—it was not trust, it was certainty. The assassins, great bulky
brutes, towered over him, but their figures were shadowed and dark and
formless as evil itself; all the light, all the reality, were centred
on the bending head, the dying eyes, the praying hands, the mystic
cross that barred the priestly garment. I think there were palms and
angels hovering overhead; but in a very old drawing, half life-size,
of this picture—to all appearance contemporary with the painting—that I
found among my dear father’s possessions, they were absent.

In the background lay the body of the martyr’s slain companion,
martyred too, but all the glory and the promise seemed to be for
Peter—none for him. As I have said, I was only sixteen then, and knew
less about Peter the Martyr than I did about Confucius or Genghis
Khan, and for many years I wondered why the other martyr had remained
nameless and unsainted. It shows the incompleteness of my education
when I confess that it was only a year or two ago that I pieced his
story together for myself. Let some one correct me if I am wrong,
but I _think_ the neglected companion was Conrad, the confessor of
Saint Elizabeth of Hungary, a man of high learning and much piety, but
to whom, on account of his harsh treatment of the “dear Saint,” the
Church refused the honours of canonization. But we know that Conrad was
murdered for the Faith, and may be equally sure that it was owing to
Saint Elizabeth’s prayers that Heaven allowed him to expiate his fault
by a heroic death.

The thirteenth century, so rich in Saints, was appallingly prolific
in heresies too, and of these the Manichæan, ancient as the devil
himself, was just then the most aggressive. It had gained much ground
in the north of Italy, and when Peter was born in Verona his whole
family had been led away by it. But the true Faith was still taught
in the schools, and by the time the boy was seven years old he had
learnt the Apostles’ Creed, and neither blows nor caresses at home
could shake him in his loyalty to it. Later he was sent to Bologna to
pursue the studies considered necessary for a gentleman in those days,
but Providence had other designs and uses for him. He was yet in his
teens when the call came; he answered it at once, renounced the world
and took the Habit of the Preachers, the sons and followers of Saint
Dominic. The Breviary says, “With great splendour did his virtues shine
in religion,” especially in his gifts of preaching, which brought the
strayed lambs back to the fold by thousands at a time. He had always
prayed for the crowning grace of martyrdom, and when it approached he
told those who loved him that his end was close at hand. The Manichæans
feared him as much as they hated him, for he was as stern with the
recalcitrant as he was tender to the contrite. He was returning, in the
exercise of his ministry, from Como to Milan when they murdered him.
With his last breath he repeated the Apostles’ Creed.

The antiphon for his Feast repeats the words used by Innocent IV in
the Bull of his canonization, which took place the year after his
death, an immense number of authentic miracles having already testified
to the honour and glory God had bestowed upon him in Paradise. “As
purest flame leaps up from the depths of smoke, as the rose blooms on
the thorny branch, so Peter, Teacher and Martyr, is born of faithless
parents.” “Soldier in the Preachers’ camp, he stands now in the ranks
of the warriors triumphant.” “His soul was all angelic, his tongue
fruitful, his life apostolic, and his death precious.” “The unconquered
athlete battles strong in death, professing aloud the Faith for which
he bleeds. It is thus that the martyr triumphs as he dies for the
Faith.”

To all but us benighted Catholics “the Faith,” in these latter days,
is a mere sun-myth, and the blackest heresy a disease that has lost
all its terrors—as harmless as chicken pox or a cold in the head. Let
us, who know better, at least have the grace to acknowledge our debt to
the great ones who fought for our heritage and kept it clean with their
blood!



CHAPTER XVIII

SOUTHERN SHORES


The real life of the Adriatic coast seems to diminish visibly when
one leaves Venice and drops down towards Ravenna; it has been drawn
away inland to busy cities that turn their backs on the sea, and the
sea itself has sullenly withdrawn, leaving ancient ports empty and
useless, like stranded wrecks that will never feel the leap of the
waves beneath their keels again. One should visit Ravenna either in
the heyday of irrepressible youth, or much later in life when twilight
is companionable and sympathetic; otherwise its melancholy is too
all-pervading, too depressing to be healthy. It is a city of ghosts,
big-eyed, hard-featured Byzantine ghosts; the great mosaics are full of
their portraits, and, with all the beauty of gold and colour, there is
something sinister and deathly in those tall, straight figures, stiff
of gesture, rapacious of eye—likenesses caught unawares of people who
in their hearts prized power and wealth above all other things in this
life or the next.

I do not think any one Italian-born can feel much more than judicial
admiration of the severe early architecture, perfect though it be. The
sharp square outlines, the sulky red—that might be _rosso antico_, so
little has it yielded in tint or surface to the touch of Time—all this,
to me, seems misplaced under the dreamy blue of the Italian sky. Within
the churches the long aisles of double-storied arches cramp the spaces
where fancy might soar and prayer take wing. They make an impression
of narrowness, almost of Puritanism, that stifles emotion and frowns
at joy. Of course all this is rank artistic heresy, or will seem so to
the crowd of submissive art experts who tumble over each other in their
haste to repeat the dictums of a few famous specialists; but I fancy
there are many simple-minded people who will agree with me all the
same.

   [Illustration: RAVENNA. A general view of the town.]

It has always puzzled my own ignorance to understand how anything so
un-Italian as the early Byzantine style came to take root and flower
successfully on Italian soil. The radiant, light-flooded climate does
so much to soften and humanize the alien growth that it buys its pardon
for it in the end; but when some enthusiast, thrilled with admiration
for what he has seen basking in southern sunshine, undertakes to
reproduce it under the cold and lowering English skies, its true
character is shown at once. It is all too akin to them. One escapes
from the prison gloom of Westminster Cathedral to fly to the Brompton
Oratory and sink down in a corner and thank Heaven that St. Philip Neri
was a Roman, and that his sons and followers can still give us churches
with big, airy domes and broad, smooth naves where the light flows
free, and transepts that open wide for worshippers and pool up the
blessed sunshine like any bay in the Mediterranean.

But there was one point on which Ravenna, in my day at least (for it
has suffered since then), yielded the palm to no Mediterranean port—the
stately forest of stone-pines that stood like troops at rest, for
miles along the shore. The stone-pine is always beautiful, whether as
a solitary, striking up, one shaft of grace and strength, against the
sky, or as in great companies sunk to the knees in the deep turfy mould
that their needles have piled below them in the course of centuries.
They grow thus in the south over many a green acre of Villa land,
sheltering an unending profusion of the delicate wild flowers that
thrive in that rich soil.

But for real forests of stone-pines you must go farther north and
skirt the coast. There you will see them in their glory, miles of them
together, and if you are quiet and will listen, you will learn a great
deal. For, like the sons of the prophets, they have secrets of their
own that have never been shared with other tribes, secrets that have
only been confided to them—and that is why the solitary pine is such
a true solitary; he invites no companions from the gregarious world
around: towering and alone, he seems to gaze at unseen horizons, to
praise the Lord in the murmur of the far-spreading branches that crown
the fretted column of his stem; as for Elijah on Mount Carmel, so for
him the past and the present and the future blend unto one great chord
of trusting acceptance that no passing storms can shatter, no warm
caress lure from its allegiance.

Have you, in some fleeting moment, caught the opening bars of an air
that has haunted you afterwards for years, and then been led to where
some great orchestra gave it to you in all its completeness? That was
what happened to me when I first stood in the “Pineta” of Viareggio,
and heard the full-voiced chant of the pines and the sea. I realized
that they were part of one another, so to speak, that the whisper of
the Villa pine in the south is an echo and a greeting brought by the
wind from the family home in the north, where all the secrets of tree
music are guarded as in some jealous ancient academy—no outsiders are
ever privileged to carry them away! Psalms and marches and dirges, the
wild call of the Laga, the C Major of the Te Deum, the wail of the De
Profundis—the trees overhead and the surges on the shore will let you
hear it all, and once heard it can never be forgotten.

It seems strange that Viareggio, the most prosaic and unpicturesque
of all the Italian watering-places on the Ligurean shores, should
possess this wonder still in its perfection, while the sister forest
on the Adriatic side has been forsaken by the sea and devastated both
by fire and by the frosts of that terrible winter of 1878-1879. We
once abandoned Leghorn and went instead to Viareggio for our September
bathing—a great mistake only made up to us by the drives through the
Pineta in the evenings. The discomforts and the ugliness of the town
have long since been forgotten—perhaps because the ups and downs of
existence have shown me far less bearable ones—and now the most vivid
recollection is that of the enchanted air and fragrances of the Pineta.

I think it will be so in the next life; if we win through all right,
we shall remember nothing of earth but its sweetnesses, and the
_very_ wise people refuse to look at anything else, even now! The real
philosophers, who are the real Saints, always seem to smile, though
sometimes it is through tears. And there is one queer thing about
tears—the people who have never wept don’t begin to know even how to
smile, much less how to laugh. I am always sorry and frightened for
them if they are nice good people, for we all have to pay our little
tribute to trouble, our tithe to humanity’s debt; some get it spread
all over a lifetime, some all in a moment, and these are the spoiled
ones of the nursery on whom I suppose long discipline might have lain
too heavily for their courage. I remember one startling case that
impressed me very deeply, that of a nice American family, father,
mother, and daughters twain, pleasant, harmless, good-looking people
with plenty of money and perfect health. I liked being with them,
though our views of life were severed as the poles, mine reaching out
to the impossible and sensational (I was very young!), and theirs so
satisfied with the comfortable half-lights of their own surroundings
that they simply could not imagine anything desirable beyond.

One day I gave voice to my curiosity. “Do tell me about yourself,
Mrs. ——,” I said to the mother. “You look just as young as your own
daughters. I don’t think you can ever have had a trouble!”

“I never have,” she replied, turning on me her mild, satisfied gaze.
“I cannot remember a single sorrow in all my life, not a death in
my family, not an hour’s sickness even, amongst us all. We have all,
_always_, had everything we could wish for.”

It was the first time I had ever heard any one say such a thing, and
I felt awe-struck and envious. A few months afterwards they all went
back to America—at least they started to go. Their ship went down
in mid-ocean, and the dear people reached home sooner than they had
expected. But for that sharp, short suffering, it is just possible that
life and its unending pleasantnesses might have made it hard for them
to get to heaven at all.

There was more than mere fun in Thackeray’s tale of “The Rose and the
Ring.” When the Fairy Blackstick frowned at Prince Giglio and said,
“What you need, young man, is a little misfortune!” she asserted a most
obvious and irritating fact. But it has one delightful side to it—that
bitter draught that wise Doctor Fate insists on our taking from time
to time; the good things, even tiny little ones that we never noticed
before, do taste so wonderfully sweet afterwards!

We were talking of shore forests—there is one, not of pine, but
beeches, on the Adriatic, exactly opposite Naples on the Tyrrhenian
Sea.[13] Here a great promontory runs out towards the east, rising into
mountains which have caused the whole to be called the “Monte Gargano,”
though each peak has its own name besides. People call the isolated
district (which really belongs to the Province of Molise) Manfredonia,
from the name of its chief town, long a pet stronghold of Suabian King
Manfred, who founded and fortified it in the thirteenth century. But
Nature protected the Monte Gargano in another way and a very effectual
one. It was meant to be an island; on the western side the Abruzzi
shrinking back in the real mainland, and the Adriatic, withdrawing
slowly from the coast, have left a strip of land many miles wide, flat,
marshy, abominably feverish, as a kind of defensive trench to cut off
the Gargano promontory from the rest of Italy, and, as it were, remind
it for ever that by formation it does not belong to her at all, but to
the limestone plateau of Dalmatia, across the way.

This vast plain (for it stretches far and far past the promontory,
towards the south) refuses to nourish a single tree on the few feet of
soil which cover the mother-rock, but it provides such splendid food
for sheep that since time immemorial it has been given up to them.
Alphonsus I annexed it as a royal meadow in 1445, and imported his
Spanish merinos with such success that two hundred years later four
and a half million of the beautiful creatures were herded by Neapolitan
peasants on these pastures. Even now, though only a scanty half-million
graze on them, the sheep are lords and owners of all that ground.

During the summer they are led to the mountains, partly for their
own sake, partly for that of their keepers, who could not live in the
miasma-haunted plains in August and September. In crossing, even by
train, the twenty-two miles that separate Foggia from Manfredonia,
the traveller is always warned to close the carriage windows; but in
October the sheep are all driven back, and for weeks the three great
roads that converge towards the flats are just broad ribbons of dust
through which comes the drumming of invisible millions of little
hoofs. Along the edges of the yellow cloud phantom figures of shepherds
dressed in sheepskins take shape at intervals and disappear again, and
the dogs, dear faithful things, fly round and herd up the stragglers
and nip at the legs of truants with the noisy joy that even long
marches through the scorching plains can never quite suppress.

From every point on those plains Monte Gargano can be seen, raising
its peaks against the blue, and clothed down to the very water’s edge
in magic beechwoods, homes of light and shadow and flickering gold,
musical with song, fragrant with wild flowers and carpeted with the
rich mould that a thousand autumns have spread along its ways. Nothing
is ever disturbed on Monte Gargano. But for the sea and the fever-land,
the forest would long ago have been cut down, its riches dispersed,
its very site perhaps forgotten; but now all stands as it did from the
first, and winter and summer have their own way there, and the herdsmen
fold their cattle in the deep caves of the hills even as they did
fourteen hundred years ago, in the reign of the holy Pope St. Gelasius,
when heaven’s gates opened one May morning to let through a flash
of wings and the gleam of an archangel’s sword, and the fairest of
Gargano’s peaks became Monte Sant’ Angelo.

And this was the way of it. While the rest of Italy was torn with the
struggles of rival barbarians, and desolated by the rapacity of men
like the Galla who drove his poor captives before him to the feet of
St. Benedict at Monte Cassino, the peasants of Monte Gargano, safe in
their isolation, lived as they live to-day, obscure, contented, minding
their own affairs—which are chiefly their own cattle—with all their
mind.

In that wild place the cattle stray sometimes, and it is hard to
find them again. And so it happened that on May 8, towards 493, or
thereabouts, a young herdsman went climbing in the hills with some
companions to look for a valuable steer that he had lost. Having
wandered and searched for some time in vain, they were feeling deeply
discouraged, when they perceived the creature hopelessly entangled
in a thicket of briars at the entrance of a deep cavern. In fear, or
irritation, one of the pursuers drew his bow and let fly an arrow at
the animal, but, to the men’s amazement, the missile turned in the
air and struck him who had shot it. Terrified at this portent, they
all fled and did not stop till they reached the town of Sipontum,
far below, where they related what had happened to them. Fear fell
on the inhabitants, and no one had the courage to go and examine the
cavern, though all were consumed with curiosity to know what, or who,
it contained. In this dilemma they referred the case to their Bishop,
and he replied that he must lay the thing before the Lord, and ordained
three days of fasting and prayer for all the population, during which
they were to join him in begging that Heaven’s will in the matter might
be made clear.

And the petition was granted, for on the third day the great Archangel
Michael appeared to the Bishop and told him that the portent of the
returning arrow was intended to show that he wished to have a sanctuary
consecrated in that cave to the glory of God, and in honour of the
angels. So immediately the Bishop came forth, and, gathering all the
people to him, led them, with prayers and chants, into the heart of the
hills to the mysterious cavern, and entering in, they found it hollowed
out and disposed in the form of a church, with all things ready, so
that the Bishop at once said Mass there; and from that hour so many
wonderful miracles took place on that spot that all men knew certainly
that it was greatly favoured by heaven. And from that day to this
it has been a place of holy pilgrimage, where many sinners have been
converted, and many, afflicted with terrible diseases, cured.

The church celebrates the Apparition of St. Michael the Archangel on
Monte Gargano, on May 8, but the feast of that spring morning is not
the only one in which she commemorates his glorious interventions on
her behalf. Far away in the north, another promontory, strangely like
that of Monte Gargano, once encircled by forests too, but now cut off
from the land at each return of the tide, the Mont Saint-Michel, stands
as the last outpost of France, flinging defiance at its twin peak
across the water in Britain. There is something strangely significant
in the choice of these two points for the most notable apparitions of
the great Archangel who commands the heavenly hosts and watches with
such sublime benignity over the destinies of men. One in the north
and one in the south, the great lonely rocks rise sheer from the sea
as if set apart as resting-places where the glorious pinions might be
folded for a while, and the effulgence of the angelic countenance, too
overwhelming for man to bear as it comes straight from the Presence of
God, a little tempered and veiled by the mists of sorrowful earth. But
one feels, too, that the purity of the lonely rock, the brave song of
the wind, the long roll of Atlantic surge and the chant of Adriatic
billows, were dear and welcome to the Warrior Angel, who holds our
world in his hands as the Creator’s chief Minister, who carries out His
mandates, chastizing when he must, but so tender to the contrite, so
inspiring to the valiant, so royal in protection to the oppressed!

Of all the peaks that bear his name through the length and breadth
of Europe none has been more signally his own than this one on the
coast of Brittany. The East has its own, in Phrygia, where also the
Archangel deigned to manifest his love for us poor mortals by his
visible presence, and where the marvel of that love is commemorated
under the title of “The Synax of Michael, Prince of the Army and of the
other Incorporeal Powers.” The Greeks always give such thunderously
full titles to their friends in heaven! But I am sure they cannot
honour their great protector half so heartily as he has been honoured
on the Mont Saint-Michel ever since he touched it and consecrated it
for all time, in the eighth century. The details that have come down
to us of that Apparition are somewhat less full than those of the one
at Monte Gargano, but the subsequent history of the French sanctuary,
which stood for just a thousand years as an impregnable fortress, is
connected, right through, with humanity as the lonely shrine of the
South has never been. Its name alone is like a war-cry—“Saint Michel au
Péril de la Mer,” Saint Michael of the Peril of the Sea—and bespeaks
the invincible ally of the race that was once the ardent apostle of
Christianity and its most valiant champion.

It was to Saint Aubert that the revelation came, when he was Bishop
of Avranches, in the reign of Childeburt II. The Archangel appeared to
him in his sleep, says the Breviary, and bade him build a church on the
sentinel rock, round which already many pious hermits were gathered to
serve God in solitude. Now Saint Aubert was a man who reflected much
before taking any new step, and he hesitated so long that the Archangel
had to repeat his visit three times before he was obeyed—a great
encouragement, this, to timid souls!—but then the Saint went to work
valiantly enough. The rock was of a strange rounded shape, and he built
on its summit a great round church, as closely resembling the holy
cave at Monte Gargano as possible. Then he sent to that place to fetch
stones and relics from it, all of which he set with great honour in the
newer sanctuary; and when all was done he established and endowed there
a monastery of twelve “holy clerks for the perpetual service of the
Blessed Archangel.”

But Richard I, Duke of Normandy, wished still further to honour St.
Michael, so he sent away the clerks and established the Benedictines
in their place; and the fame of the Shrine and of the many miracles
performed there drew a great concourse of pilgrims from all over the
world, especially royal pilgrims from England and Europe generally,
so that when the Order of the Knights of St. Michael was instituted,
this was their Chapter House. By that time it was already one of the
most ancient and one of the few “maiden” fortresses of the realm, and
never, until the monarchy succumbed to the Revolution, did a single
foe to France succeed in setting foot within its walls. For a thousand
years, seven times a day, the praises of God had rung out from it over
the sea; for a thousand years the standard of France floated stainless
above its battlements. “_Monsieur Saint-Michel, Archange, premier
Chevalier, qui pour la querelle de Dieu victorieusement batailla contre
le dragon_” (it is thus that his titles are given in the Institutes of
the Order founded in 1469), took care of his own—till France drove him
away.



INDEX


A

Acciajuoli, Lorenzo, 262

Acciajuoli, Nicholas, 246, 251-2, 261 _et sq._

Aglaë, 3 _et sq._

Agnes, Duchess of Durazzo, 204, 235 _et sq._

Aix, Archbishop of, 258

Alaric the Goth, 3, 10

Alban Hills, 142, 145 _et sq._

Alexander, Emperor of Russia, 294

Alexis, St., 6 _et sq._

Alphonsus Liguori, St., 241-2

Altamura, Giovanni Pipino, Count of, 205, 212-13, 230

Amadeus VIII of Savoy, 185, 187

Ancona, 289, 296, 302

Andrew of Hungary, Prince (Duke of Calabria), 1st Consort of Queen
Joan of Naples, his marriage to Queen Joan, 200 _et sq._; his
temperament, 201-2; his disappointment at Joan’s sole occupancy of
the throne, 202 _et sq._, 219; Charles of Durazzo plots against, 210;
forms a friendship with Charles of Durazzo, 211 _et sq._; begged to
leave Naples by his mother, 219 _et sq._; his crown confirmed by the
Pope, 221-2; his murder planned, 223 _et sq._, 254; goes on a hunting
expedition, 224 _et sq._; murdered by his enemies, 228-9, 248, 255,
275; lying-in-state of, 230-1; Papal Bull to inquire into the murder
of, 238 _et sq._; his murderers tried and sentenced, 239 _et sq._;
Joan’s complicity in the death of, 249 _et sq._, 260; King Louis seeks
to avenge the death of, 248 _et sq._

Andrew of Isernia, 222 _et sq._

Angles, 49

Anicia, family of, 19, 39

Anthony, St., 156, 197

Apennines, the, 146, 159

Appian Way, 145

Aquileia, Patriarch of, 265

Arétin, Baron d’, 119

Artois, Bertrand d’, 203-4, 206-7, 213, 215, 222-3, 227-8, 241, 245-6

Artois, Charles d’, 203, 213, 223, 241, 245 _et sq._

Asilo, The, 69 _et sq._, 84 _et sq._

Aubert, St., 364-5

Augustine, St., 50-1

Aventine, The, 2 _et sq._

Avignon, 77 _et sq._, 205, 220, 238, 251, 258, 260


B

Bacourt, Marquis de, 97

Baldwin II, 204

Balzo, Count of, 213

Barberini, Prince, 76

Barbou, 288

Baux, Renaud des, 268-9

Baux, Robert des, 268-9

Beauharnais, Eugène de, 277, 293

Bellegarde, 289, 290

Benedict, St., 15 _et sq._, 22 _et sq._, 52, 152, 156

Benedict I, 42-3

Benedictine Rule, 31 _et sq._, 40 _et sq._, 50

Bentinck, Lord William, 282-3, 289, 290, 304

Bernadotte. _See_ Charles XIV

Bernard, St., 84

Berthier, General, 115-16, 131 _et sq._

Bianchi, 303, 305-6, 311

Bonaparte, Caroline. _See_ Murat

Bonaparte, Prince Jerome, 78

Bonaparte, Joseph (King of Naples, afterwards King of Spain), 279

Bonaparte, Napoleon. _See_ Napoleon

Bonaparte, Pauline (Princess Borghese), 297, 309

Boniface, St., 3 _et sq._, 10 _et sq._

Boniface III, 52

Boniface IV, 54, 57 _et sq._

Boniface VIII, 147 _et sq._

Borghese, Villa, 68

Borgi, Giovanni, 65 _et sq._, 84, 86, 96, 104

Bossone, Francesco, 182 _et sq._

Bossuet, _cited_, 29

Boulogne, Cardinal de, 261

Brennan, Rev. Richard, 97

Brompton Oratory, 355

Brune, Marshal, 315

Burghersh, Lord, 311


C

Cabano, Filippo, 201, 206 _et sq._, 214-15, 223, 231, 241

Cabano, Raymond, 201, 207

Cabano, Robert of, Count of Eboli, 200 _et sq._, 213-14, 223, 226 _et
sq._, 231, 241, 243

Cabarelli, 321

Calabria, Duke of. _See_ Charles

Campbell, Commodore, 308

Campochiaro, Duke di, 293

Cancia, Donna, 206, 223, 231, 241, 256

Cane, Facino, 182 _et sq._

Canosa, 324

Capobianco, 282 _et sq._

Caracalla, 56

Carbonari, the, 282 _et sq._, 296, 298

Cariati, Prince de, 293, 307

Carmagnola. _See_ Francesco Borsone

Caroline of Austria, Queen of Spain, 294, 297

Carrascosa, General, 291, 303, 309, 311

Cassino Monte, 30 _et sq._, 361

Castel Nuovo (Naples), 214, 219, 224 _et sq._, 269, 273

Castlereagh, Viscount, 295

Catanzaro, Count of, 213, 223, 241, 256

Catherine of Taranto, Empress of Constantinople, 204, 206, 214, 223,
232 _et sq._, 245 _et sq._

Cavaletti, Marchese, 164 _et sq._

Celestine V, 239

Charlemagne, 13

Charles I of Anjou, 242

Charles, Duke of Calabria, 200

Charles, Duke of Durazzo, presents Joan as sole sovereign to the
Neapolitans, 202; refuses to do homage to Andrew of Hungary, 202; his
ambition, 204, 208; obtains an audience with Joan and plots against
Andrew, 209 _et sq._; secretly marries Princess Maria of Calabria,
211, 216 _et sq._; propitiates Andrew, 211 _et sq._; appeals to the
people to avenge Andrew’s death, 231; objects to re-marriage of Joan,
232 _et sq._; tragic death of his mother, 235-6; and the Papal inquiry
into the murder of Prince Andrew, 238 _et sq._; his tyranny, 244; civil
war between Louis of Taranto and, 244 _et sq._; invites King Louis of
Hungary to take possession of Naples, 248 _et sq._; a truce with Joan,
250; attempts to conciliate King Louis, 253; King Louis’s accusations
against, 254-5; his execution by order of King Louis, 255-6

Charles, Duke of Durazzo (son of Prince Louis), 272 _et sq._

Charles IV, Emperor of Germany, 265

Charles, King of Hungary, 200

Charles, King of Naples, 201

Charles XIV, King of Sweden, 117, 278

Chile, 1, 84 _et sq._

Cienfuegos, Canon, 85

Civita Vecchia, 289

Clement VI, 205, 220-1, 238, 244, 249, 250-1, 259 _et sq._, 265, 270

Clement VII (Anti-Pope), 273

Colonna, Count of, 299

Colonna, family of, 147 _et sq._

Conradin of Hohenstaufen, 242

Consalvi, Cardinal, 86

Constans II, 56

Constantine the Great, 13

Constantinople, Empress of, _See_ Catherine of Taranto

Crawford, Marion, 154, 169, 331

Cyrilla, 19, 20, 22-3


D

Dalberg, Duke, 295

Dante, 149, 150

Denbigh, Countess of, 157

Diocletian, 2, 4

Dominic, St., 352

Doria, Monsignor, 116, 121-2

Dumas, Alexandre, 261

Dupin, 295

Durazzo. _See_ Agnes, Charles, and Louis


E

Edessa, 8

Elizabeth of Hungary, St., 351

Elizabeth of Poland, Queen, 205, 219 _et sq._, 249

Enghien, Duc d’, 326

Ephrem, St., 197

Euphemian, 11-12

Eustace, St., 20 _et sq._

Eutychius, 43-4


F

Falkland Isles, 91 _et sq._

Ferdinand VII, King of Spain, 278, 284, 286, 288, 297, 311-12, 321,
326, 328

Ferrara, 289

Fesch, Cardinal, 129, 134, 309

Filippo Maria, Duke of Milan, 183 _et sq._

Florence, 289, 336

Fondi, Count of, 253

Foscari, Doge of Venice, 186-7

Fouché, Joseph, Duke of Otranto, 288, 315 _et sq._

Francis of Assisi, St., 24, 156

Francis, Emperor of Austria, 119, 125, 300, 320

Frederick of Baden, 242

Frimont, 303

Fullerton, Lady Georgina, 157


G

Gargano, Monte, 359 _et sq._

Genazzano, 141 _et sq._

Genoa, 336 _et sq._

Genseric, 13

George III of England, 264-5

Gian Maria, Duke of Milan, 183

Giotto, 271

Giovanni, Duke of Milan, 182-3

Gonzaga, Lord of Mantua, 193

Goths, the, 28, 32 _et sq._

Gotis, Conrad de, 224

Grace, Mary, 1 _et sq._

Gravina, Domenico, 247

Gregory, St., 29, 31, 39 _et sq._, 110

Gregory XVI, 65, 98-9, 102

Guadagnolo, 20 _et sq._

Guéranger, Dom, 22


H

Hadrian, 52, 55

Hardenberg, Prince Von, 295

Hare, Augustus J., 141, 152, 154

Honorius, Emperor, 57

Hutton, Edward, _cited_, 97


I

Imola, 83, 102 _et sq._, 111

Infantado, Duke dell’, 322

Innocent I, 11

Innocent IV, 352

Isolda (Nurse to Andrew of Hungary), 225-6, 229

Italian seas, 329 _et sq._

Ives, St., 109


J

James of Aragon, King of Minorca (3rd Consort of Queen Joan of Naples),
272

Januarius, St., 276

Jerome, St., 197

Joan of Anjou, Queen of Naples, 200 _et sq._

Joan of Naples, Queen, her beauty, 200, 209, 214; her marriage to
Andrew of Hungary, 200 _et sq._; her intrigue with Robert of Cabano,
201, 203, 206 _et sq._; is proclaimed sole ruler of Naples, 202
_et sq._, 222; and Charles of Durazzo’s scheming against Andrew,
209, 210; her love for Bertrand d’Artois, 213, 223; abduction of
her sister, Princess Maria, 214 _et sq._; and Charles of Durazzo’s
marriage to Princess Maria, 216-17; her act of homage for her crown,
218-9; Andrew’s confirmation as King, 222; and the murder of Prince
Andrew, 223 _et sq._; her fellow-conspirators’ claims, 231 _et sq._;
her marriage to Louis of Taranto, 237-8, 244; Charles of Durazzo and
Robert of Taranto make war upon, 244 _et sq._; accused by King Louis
of Hungary of the murder of Prince Andrew, 248 _et sq._; departs
for Marseilles on the entrance of King Louis into Naples, 251; her
reception at Aix, 258; Clement VI declares her innocent of Andrew’s
death, 260; her marriage to Louis of Taranto confirmed by the Pope,
260, 271; returns to Naples, 262; her attempt to wrest Naples from
Louis of Hungary, 262 _et sq._; invites the Pope’s mediation, 270; her
third marriage to James of Aragon, 272; her fourth marriage to Duke
Otho of Brunswick, 273; supports the anti-Pope, Clement VII, 273; the
ingratitude of her successor and nephew, 273 _et sq._; put to death by
order of Louis of Hungary, 274-5

John, Patriarch of Constantinople, 46

Josephus, 20

Julian the Apostate, 13

Julius Cæsar, 45


L

Louis, King of Hungary, 211; informed of conspiracy to deprive his
brother Andrew of sharing the crown with Joan, 205; invited by Charles
of Durazzo to take possession of Naples, 248-9; accuses Joan of
complicity in the murder of Andrew, 248 _et sq._; enters Italy, 251;
Charles of Durazzo and Robert of Taranto attempt to conciliate, 253;
orders Charles to be executed, 255, 272; wreaks vengeance on Andrew’s
murderers, 256, 270; terrorises the country, 256-7; requested by the
Pope to retire from Naples, 261; fighting between Louis of Taranto and,
262 _et sq._; consents to abandon Naples, 270; orders Queen Joan to be
put to death, 274-5

La Mentorella, 20, 22 _et sq._

Lascolette, 288

Lebzeltern, Chevalier de, 114 _et sq._, 118 _et sq._

Lecchi, General, 306

Leghorn, 289, 322 _et sq._, 357

Leo XII, 87, 98

Leo XIII, 1

Leopold of Bourbon, Crown Prince, 313

Lillo of Aquila, Count, 253-4

Livron, General, 304

Lombards, 40, 44, 48

Loreto, 143

Louis of Anjou, Prince, 273

Louis of Durazzo, Prince, 253, 272

Louis of Taranto, Prince (afterwards King of Naples), 2nd husband of
Queen Joan, his personal appearance, 204, 214; marries Joan of Naples,
237; civil war between Charles of Durazzo and, 244 _et sq._; resists
Louis of Hungary, 250 _et sq._, 262 _et sq._; joins Queen Joan at
Provence, 252; his marriage to Joan confirmed by Clement VI, 260; his
rescue of Princess Maria, 265 _et sq._; returns to Naples with Queen
Joan, 270; his coronation, 271; his death, 272

Louis XVIII, 316


M

Macdonald, Marshal, 309, 312

Maceroni, 319, 320

Magella, 296

Maio, General, 306

Malachy, St., 84

Malastrata, Carlo, 191

Marcella, 3

Marcellinus, 103

Marcus Agrippa, 55

Marie Louise, Empress of France, 123

Marie de Medici, 336

Marie of Valois, 200

Marius, 145

Marmont, Marshal, 314

Martin V, 189

Mary of Calabria, Princess (afterwards Duchess of Durazzo), 203, 206-7,
311, 214 _et sq._, 238, 248

Masaniello, 242

Masdea, Father, 327

Mastai-Ferretti, Cardinal, 107, 255, 259, 262, 265 _et sq._

Mastai-Ferretti, Count, 73 _et sq._, 81

Mastai-Ferretti, Countess, 74 _et sq._

Mastai-Ferretti, Giovanni. _See_ Pius IX

Maurice, Emperor, 44-5, 51

Maurus, 29 _et sq._

Metternich, Count, 116, 119 _et sq._, 133, 290, 295, 299, 320

Mier, Count Von, 285

Milan Cathedral, 59

Milan, Dukes of. _See_ Gian, Giovanni, and Filippo

Mileto, Count of, 213, 241

Miollis, General de, 118, 288

Mocenigo, Doge of Venice, 186, 190

Mohr, 303

Monastic Orders, 14-15

Montalembert, _cited_, 19, 28, 34, 47

Montefeltro, Guido de, 148

Monte Scaglioso, Bertram des Baux, Count of, 238-9, 242, 264

Montigny, General, 306-7

Morcone, Count of, 213, 223, 241

Morcone, Countess of, 206, 223, 231, 241

Moscow, 280

Murano, 348-9

Murat, Caroline Queen of Naples, 297 _et sq._, 308 _et sq._, 325

Murat, Joachim, King of Naples, his descent from power, 277; his
difficult position, 278; conspiracies against his life, 279, 280; his
public works, 280; and the Smolensk campaign, 280; attempts to unify
Italy, 281; and the suggested alliance with Austria, 285 _et sq._; and
Pope Pius VII, 291-2, 296; receives the news of Napoleon’s abdication,
292-3; adjusts his kingdom, 293-4; Talleyrand’s enmity towards, 294 _et
sq._; and Napoleon’s escape from Elba, 299 _et sq._; engages in war
against Austria, 303 _et sq._; his defeat, 309 _et sq._; resolves to
join Napoleon, 311; at Toulon, 315-16; his perils _en route_ for Paris,
316 _et sq._; and Austria’s offer to, 319 _et sq._; lands at Pizzo,
3; is imprisoned, 322 _et sq._; his trial and death sentence, 324 _et
sq._; last letter to Caroline, 325; his execution, 327-8

Muzi, Monsignor, 85, 87 _et sq._


N

Naples, under Queen Joan, 201 _et sq._; under Murat, 276 _et sq._

Napoleon I, 13,45; his persecution of Pius VII, 75, 77 _et sq._, 114
_et sq._; elevates Murat to the throne of Naples, 278; pushes on to
Moscow, 280; his quarrel with Murat, 281; his abdication, 292, 294; his
distrust of Talleyrand, 295; at Elba, 296; his escape from Elba, 299,
310; suggests an alliance with Murat, 299-314; his star once more in
the ascendant, 311; and Murat’s appeal to, 315; his power in Europe,
318; and Duc d’Enghien, 326

Napoleon III, 101

Narses, 13-14

Neipperg, Count, 303, 305-6, 311

Nero, 23, 27

Nesselrode, Count, 295

Ney, Marshal, 280, 314, 318

Nicholas of Melazzo, 211, 215, 223-4, 228, 239 _et sq._

Noailles, Count de, 295

Nogaret, William de, 150-1

Norcia. _See_ Nursia

Normandy, Duke of, 203, 211, 258

Notre Dame, 59, 77, 124

Nunziante, General, 323 _et sq._

Nursia, 15 _et sq._


O

Oderisio, Roberto di, 271

Odescalchi Palace, 1

Odoacer, 13

Olevano, 152

Orsini, family of, 147

Otho, Duke of Brunswick (4th Consort of Queen Joan of Naples), 273-4


P

Pace, Tommaso, 211, 215, 223, 228, 239 _et sq._

Palestrina, 144 _et sq._

Pantheon, 55 _et sq._

Paul Petrovitch, Emperor, 264

Paul, St., 4

Pelagius II, 43-4, 50

Pepes, General, 305

Périgord, Cardinal de, 254

Peter, St., 51, 118, 350 _et sq._

Peter, St. (the exorcist), 103

Petrarch, 202

Philip of Taranto, Prince, 253

Philippe le Bel, King of France, 150

Phocas, Emperor, 57

Piccino, Nicolo, 190, 192 _et sq._

Pignatelli, General, 264

Pisa, 196 _et sq._, 336

Pius VI, 69, 75-6

Pius VII, and the ordination of Pius IX, 72; returns in triumph to the
throne of St. Peter, 76-7; Napoleon’s insolent demands upon, 77-8, 116
_et sq._; excommunicates Napoleon, 78, 119 _et sq._; is arrested by
the French troops, 79, 116; imprisoned at Savona and Fontainebleau,
80; returns to Rome, 80, 291; rejoicing in Rome, 81 _et sq._;
prophesies the election of Father Mastai to the Papacy, 83; reorganizes
ecclesiastical matters in Chile, 85; his death, 87; Lebzeltern obtains
an audience with, 122 _et sq._; his personal appearance, 122; and
Murat, 292, 296, 302

Pius VIII, 98

Pius IX, 50, 65; appointed director of the Asilo, 70 _et sq._; his
infirmity, 71-2, 76; his ordination, 72; his birth and early life,
73 _et sq._; witnesses the return to Rome of Pius VII, 76, 81-2;
prophecies concerning his election to the Papacy, 83-4; undertakes
mission to Chile, 84 _et sq._; last evening at the Asilo, 85-6;
appointed Director of the Ospizio di San Michele, 95-6; appointed
Abp. of Spoleto, 96 _et sq._; and the revolutionaries in Spoleto, 99
_et sq._; appointed Abp. of Imola, 102; his fearless zeal, 102; his
escape from assassination, 103; made a Cardinal, 103; Riotti’s attempt
to kidnap, 104-5; his great humility, 106-7; his charity and love of
justice, 108 _et sq._

Pius X, 143

Pizzo (Calabria), 277, 323

Placidus. _See_ St. Eustace

Prina, 293

Procopius, St., 197


Q

Quintus, Sertorius, 16


R

Radet, General, 78-9, 117

Ranieri, Bp. of Pisa, 149, 196 _et sq._

Rapp, Marshal, 280

Ravenna, 354 _et sq._

Richard I, Duke of Normandy, 365

Riotti, 104

Rivière, Marquis de la, 316

Robert, Father, 202, 205-6, 208, 212, 220-1, 249

Robert, King of Naples, 200 _et sq._, 211, 220, 222

Robert of Taranto, Prince, 232-3, 236 _et sq._, 244, 250

Romanus, 24 _et sq._

Rome, the Aventine, 2 _et sq._; the centre of education, 19; pestilence
in, 51 _et sq._; the Pantheon, 55 _et sq._; Giovanni Borgi founds the
Asilo in, 65 _et sq._; Pius VII returns to 76-7, 81, 136, 291; the
Vatican, 78 _et sq._, 136; the Campagna and its cities, 137 _et sq._;
the Sabines from, 160


S

Sabine Hills, 138 _et sq._, 159 _et sq._

St. Michael, Mont, 363 _et sq._

St. Peter’s (Rome), 63, 65, 68, 83

Sant’Angelo, 288-9

Sant’Angelo, Count of, 213

Santa Chiara, Church of, 207, 218

Santa Croce, Church of, 243, 259

Sant’Eligio, Church of, 222

San Gennaro (Naples), Cathedral of, 230-1

St. John Lateran, 143

San Marco (Venice), 341

San Martino de Monti, Cardinal, 218

San Michele, Ospizio di, 95-6

San Pietro a Maiella, 226

San Severino, Count of, 213

Santo Spirito, Hospital of, 109

Sallusti, Father, 85 _et sq._

Sancia of Aragon, Queen, 204

Savona, 113 _et sq._

Scholastica, St., 15 _et sq._, 36 _et sq._, 152

Sciarra, family of, 147

Septimus Severus, 56

Silvia, St., 39, 41-2, 50

Sinigaglia, 70 _et sq._, 104, 108

Soult, Marshal, 314, 318

Spezia, 336

Spinelli, 262

Spoleto, 96 _et sq._, 111

Squillace, Godfrey of Marsano, Count of, 223, 241, 256

Stackelberg, 295

Stephen of Transylvania (Voivode), 255

Strasburg Cathedral, 59

Stratti, Captain, 323, 326-7

Strongoli, General, 304

Subiaco, 24, 27 _et sq._, 34, 152, 154

Sub Laqueum. _See_ Subiaco

Sulla, 145


T

Taigi, Anna Maria, 83-4

Talleyrand, Prince de, 117, 294-5, 236

Taranto. _See_ Robert of, Louis, King of Naples, and Philip of

Tarsus, 4

Terlizzi, Count of, 213, 223, 227 _et sq._, 240

Terlizzi, Countess of, 206, 223, 231, 241

Tertullus, 20, 28

Thackeray, W. M., 359

Thévenot, Colonel, 114-5

Tiberius Constantinus, Emperor, 43-4

Totila, 13, 34 _et sq._

Trajan, Emperor, 21

Trentacapilli, Captain, 322


U

Urban VI, 273

Urban VIII, 110


V

Vatican, the, 65, 78, 136

Venice, 180 _et sq._, 336 _et sq._

Vescovado, Palace of, 114 _et sq._

Vespasian, Emperor, 16

Vesuvius, Mt., 8

Viareggio, 356 _et sq._

Vico Varo, Monks of, 26-7

Victoria, Queen, 301, 328


W

Wellington, Duke of, 290

Westminster Abbey, 59

Westminster Cathedral, 355

Wied, 303

Wolf, Conrad, 263


_Printed by Hazell, Watson & Viney, Ld., London and Aylesbury._



FOOTNOTES:


[1] Montalembert.

[2] Montalembert.

[3] This term requires explanation. The two great sins of the Church
in Gaul were, first, simony, and secondly, the practice of admitting
unprepared laymen to Holy Orders and often to the Episcopate. This last
vice Gregory called “the heresy of Neophytes.”

[4] In a former volume I stated that Pius IX had for a short time
served in the Noble Guards. This was an error, for he never obtained
admittance, although I believe a portrait of him in the uniform was
extant in the earlier years of the nineteenth century. It may have
been altogether a “fake” or else taken to please his father when there
appeared to be some hope of the latter’s ambition being fulfilled.

[5] “Reminiscences of a Diplomatist’s Wife” (Hutchinson & Co.). “The
Looms of Time” (Isbister).

[6] The Islands, about a hundred in number, but most of them very
small and uninhabited, have been the cause of sharp contention and
have changed hands several times since their discovery in 1656—France,
Spain, England, and the United States have variously claimed them.
Twice the matter has been decided by an Englishman’s landing and
running up the Union Jack. The last time this occurred was in 1833,
when, in the middle of the quarrel, Captain Falkland took possession of
them on his own responsibility. Great Britain has held them ever since
as one of her recognized colonies. They are self-governing, and have
a population altogether of two thousand souls, the capital, Stanley,
claiming nearly half of the number.

[7] “A Popular Life of Pius IX,” Rev. Richard Brennan. (Benziger, 1877.)

[8] St. Peter the exorcist, martyred with the priest Marcellinus under
Diocletian. His name occurs in the Canon of the Mass.

[9] H. Chatard, “Le Pape Pie VII à Savone,” p. 83. (Plon. Nourrit et
Cie. Paris: 1887.)

[10] _Unchangeable principles_—unchangeable, that is to say, until, of
course, 1870, since when——!

[11] “Reminiscences of a Diplomatist’s Wife.”

[12] “Crimes Célèbres: Jeanne de Naples.”

[13] In our parlance all that is not the Adriatic is the Mediterranean,
but the Italians only give this name to the waters that separate
Italy and Spain from Africa, and differentiate the remainder as the
Ligurean Sea—in the Bay of Genoa, the Tyrrhenian that Rome and Naples
contemplate, and the Ionian, which washes up from Sicily under Italy’s
instep in the Gulf of Taranto.



Transcriber’s Notes

Original spelling and punctuation have been preserved as much as
possible. Minor typographical errors have been corrected without note.





*** End of this Doctrine Publishing Corporation Digital Book "More Italian Yesterdays" ***

Doctrine Publishing Corporation provides digitized public domain materials.
Public domain books belong to the public and we are merely their custodians.
This effort is time consuming and expensive, so in order to keep providing
this resource, we have taken steps to prevent abuse by commercial parties,
including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.

We also ask that you:

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Doctrine Publishing
Corporation's ISYS search for use by individuals, and we request that you
use these files for personal, non-commercial purposes.

+ Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort
to Doctrine Publishing's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a
large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the use of
public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.

+ Keep it legal -  Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for
ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just because
we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States,
that the work is also in the public domain for users in other countries.
Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we
can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of any specific book is
allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Doctrine Publishing
ISYS search  means it can be used in any manner anywhere in the world.
Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe.

About ISYS® Search Software
Established in 1988, ISYS Search Software is a global supplier of enterprise
search solutions for business and government.  The company's award-winning
software suite offers a broad range of search, navigation and discovery
solutions for desktop search, intranet search, SharePoint search and embedded
search applications.  ISYS has been deployed by thousands of organizations
operating in a variety of industries, including government, legal, law
enforcement, financial services, healthcare and recruitment.



Home