Title: Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric Peoples
Author: Nadaillac, Jean-François-Albert du Pouget, marquis de
Language: English
As this book started as an ASCII text book there are no pictures available.


*** Start of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric Peoples" ***


[Illustration]

[Illustration: Fossil Man of Mentone.]


Manners and Monuments
of
Prehistoric Peoples


By The Marquis de Nadaillac

Correspondent of the Institute

Author of “L’Amérique Préhistorique,” “Les Premiers Hommes et les Temps Préhistoriques,” etc.
With 113 illustrations

Translated by
Nancy Bell (N. D’Anvers)

Author of “The Elementary History of Art,” “The Life-Story of Our Earth,” “The Story of Early Man,” etc.

G. P. Putnam’s sons
New York
27 West Twenty-Third Street
London
24 Redford Street, Strand
The Knickerbocker Press
1894

Copyright, 1892 by Nancy Bell

Electrotyped, Printed, and Bound by The Knickerbocker Press, New York
G. P. Putnam’s Sons

Translator’s Note

The present volume has been translated, with the author’s consent, from the French of the Marquis de Nadaillac. The author
and translator have carefully brought down to date the original edition, embodying the discoveries made during the progress
of the work. The book will be found to be an epitome of all that is known on the subject of which it treats, and covers ground
not at present occupied by any other work in the English language.

Nancy Bell (N. D’Anvers).

Southbourne-On-Sea,
1891.

Contents.

Chapter   Page
I. The Stone Age, its Duration, and its Place in Time 1

II. Food, Cannibalism, Mammals, Fish, Hunting and Fishing, Navigation 47

III. Weapons, Tools, Pottery; Origin of the Use of Fire, Clothing, Ornaments; Early Artistic Efforts 79

IV. Caves, Kitchen-Middings, Lake Stations, “Terremares,” Crannoges, Burghs, “Nurhags,” “Talayoti,” and “Truddhi” 127

V. Megalithic Monuments 174

VI. Industry, Commerce, Social Organization; Fights, Wounds and Trepanation
231
VII. Camps, Fortifications, Vitrified Forts; Santorin; the Towns upon the Hill of Hissarlik 279

VIII. Tombs 343
 Index 383

Illustrations.

Figure  Page
 Fossil man from Mentone.

_Frontispiece_
1. Stone weapons described by Mahudel in 1734. 8

2. Copper hatchets found in Hungary and now in national museum of Budapest. 20

3. Copper beads from Connett’s Mound, Ohio (natural size). 21

4. Stone statues on Easter Island. 37

5. Fort-hill, Ohio. 39

6. Group of sepulchral mounds. 40

7. Ground plan of a pueblo of the Mac-Elmo valley. 41

8. Cliff-house on the Rio Mancos. 42

9. House in a rock of the Montezuma cañon. 43

10.  1. Fragments of arrows made of reindeer horn from the Martinet cave (Lot-et-Garonne).
2. Point of spear or harpoon in stag-horn (one third natural size).
3. and 4. Bone weapons from Denmark.
5. Harpoon of stag-horn from St. Aubin.
6. Bone fish-hooks pointed at each end, from Waugen. 61

11. Bear’s teeth converted into fish-hooks. 62

12. Fish-hook made out of a boar’s tusk. 62

13.  A. Large barbed arrow from one side of the Plan Lade shelter (Tarn-et-Garonne).
B. Lower part of a barbed harpoon from the Plantade deposit. 65 

14. Ancient Scandinavian boat found beneath a tumulus at Gogstadten. 73

15. Ancient boat discovered in the bed of the Cher. 75

16. A lake pirogue found in the Lake of Neuchâtel.
1. As seen outside.
2. and 3. Longitudinal and transverse sections.
Stones used as anchors, found in the Bay of Penhouet. 76

17. 1, 2, 3. Stones weighing about 160 lbs. each.
4. and 5. Lighter stones, probably used for canoes. 80

18. Scraper from the Delaware valley. 82

19. Implement from the Delaware valley. 82

20. Worked flints from the Lafaye and Plantade shelters (Tarn-et-Garonne). 83

21. 1. Stone javelin-head with handle. 2. Stone hatchet with handle. 89

22. 1. Fine needles. 2. Coarse needles. 3. Amulet. 4 and 6. Ornaments. 5. Cut flints. 7. Fragment of a harpoon. 8. Fragments of
reindeer antlers with signs or drawings. 9. Whistle. 10. One end of a bow (?). 11. Arrow-head. (From the Vache, Massat, and
Lourdes caves) 91

23. Amulet made of the penien bone of a bear and found in the Marsoulas cave. 92

24. Various stone and bone objects from California. 93

25. Dipper found in the excavations at the Chassey camp. 95

26. Pottery of a so far unclassified type found in the Argent cave (France). 98

27. 1. Lignite pendant. 2. Bone pendant. (Thayngen cave). 107

28. Round pieces of skull, pierced with holes (M. de Baye’s collection). 110

29. 
Part of a rounded piece of a human parietal.
Stiletto made of the end of a human radius.
Disk, made of the burr of a stag’s antler. 111

30. Whistle from the Massenat collection. 112

31. Staff of office. 113

32. Staff of office, made of stag-horn pierced with four holes. 114

33. Staff of office found at Lafaye. 115

34. Staff of office in reindeer antler, with a horse engraved on it (Thayngen). 115

35. Staff of office found at Montgaudier. 117

36. Carved dagger-hilt (Laugerie-Basse). 118

37. The great cave-bear, drawn on a pebble found in the Massat cave (Garrigou collection). 118

38. Mammoth or elephant from the Una cave. 119

39. Seal engraved on a bear’s tooth, found at Sordes.119

40. Fragment of a bone, with regular designs. Fragment of a rib on which is engraved a musk-ox, found in the Marsoulas cave. 120

41. Head of a horse from the Thayngen cave. 121

42. Bear engraved on a bone, from the Thayngen cave. 121

43. Reindeer grazing, from the Thayngen cave. 122

44. Head of _Ovibos moschatus_, engraved on wood, found in the Thayngen cave. 123

45. Young man chasing the aurochs, from Laugerie. 124

46. Fragment of a staff of office, from the Madelaine cave. 125

47. Human face carved on a reindeer antler, found in the Rochebertier cave. 125

48. The glyptodon. 128

49. _Mylodon robustus_.129

50. Objects discovered in the peat-bogs of Laybach, A. Earthenware vase. B. Fragment of ornamented pottery. C. Bone needle. D.
Earthenware weight for fishing-net. E. Fragment of jaw bone. 152

51. Small terra-cotta figures found in the Laybach pile dwellings. 153

52. Small terra-cotta figures from the Laybach pile dwellings. 154

53. Nurhag at Santa Barbara (Sardinia). 168

54. “Talayoti” at Trepuco (Minorca). 170

55. Dolmen of Castle Wellan (Ireland). 175

56. The large dolmen of Careoro, near Plouharnel. 176

57. Dolmen of Arrayolos (Portugal). 177

58. Megalithic sepulchre at Acora (Peru). 178

59. The great broken menhir of Locmariaker with Cæsar’s table. 186

60. Covered avenue of Dissignac (Loire-Inférieure), view of the chamber at the end of the north gallery. 189

61. Covered avenue near Antequera. 190

62. Ground plan of the Gavr’innis monument. 191

63. Monoliths at Stennis, in the Orkney Islands. 193

64. Cromlech near Bône (Algeria). 196

65. Dolmen at Pallicondah, near Madras (India). 201

66. Dolmen at Maintenon, with a table about 19½ feet long. 204

67. Part of the Mané-Lud dolmen. 208

68. Sculptures on the menhirs of the covered avenue of Gavr’innis. 210

69. Dolmen with opening (India). 211

70. Dolmen near Trie (Oise). 212

71. Bronze objects found at Krasnojarsk (Siberia). 237

72. Prehistoric polisher near the ford of Beaumoulin, Nemours. 239

73. Section of a flint mine. 242

74. Plan of a gallery of flint mine. 243

75. Picks, hammers, and mattocks made of stag-horn. 245

76. Cranium of a woman from Cro-Magnon (full face). 249

77. Skull of a woman found at Sordes, showing a severe wound, from which she recovered. 250

78. Fragment of human tibia with exostosis enclosing the end of a flint arrow. 252

79. Fragment of human humerus pierced at the elbow joint (Trou d’Argent). 253

80. Mesaticephalic skull, with wound which has been trepanned. 259

81. Trepanned Peruvian skull. 268

82. Skull from the Bougon dolmen (Deux-Sèvres), seen in profile. 273

83. Trepanned prehistoric skull. 274

84. Prehistoric spoon and button found in a lake station at Sutz.287

85. General view of the station of Fuente-Alamo. 293

86. Group at Liberty (Ohio). 299

87. Trenches at Juigalpa (Nicaragua). 300

88. Vases found at Santorin. 313

89. Vase ending in the snout of an animal, found on the hill of Hissarlik. 325

90. Funeral vase containing human ashes. 326

91. Large terra-cotta vases found at Troy. 327

92. Earthenware pitcher found at a depth of 19½ feet. 328

93. Vase found beneath the ruins of Troy. 328

94. Terra-cotta vase found with the treasure of Priam. 328

95. Vase found beneath the ruins of Troy. 329

96. Earthenware pig found at a depth of 13 feet. 330

97. Vase surmounted by an owl’s head, found beneath the ruins of Troy. 331

98. Copper vases found at Troy. 333

99. Vases of gold and electrum, with two ingots (Troy). 334

100. Gold and silver objects from the treasure of Priam. 335

101. Gold ear-rings, head-dress, and necklace of golden beads from the treasure of Priam. 336

102. Terra-cotta fusaïoles. 339

103. Cover of a vase with the symbol of the swastika. 340

104. Stone hammer from New Jersey bearing an undeciphered inscription. 341

105. Chulpa near Palca. 357

106. Dolmen at Auvernier near the lake of Neuchâtel. 359

107. A stone chest used as a sepulchre. 361

108. Example of burial in a jar. 363

109. Aymara mummy. 365

110. Peruvian mummies. 367

111. Erratic block from Scania, covered with carvings. 379

112. Engraved rock from Massibert (Lozère). 380



CHAPTER I.
The Stone Age: its Duration and its Place in Time.


The nineteenth century, now nearing its close, has made an indelible
impression upon the history of the world, and never were greater things
accomplished with more marvellous rapidity. Every branch of science,
without exception, has shared in this progress, and to it the daily
accumulating information respecting different parts of the globe has
greatly contributed. Regions, previously completely closed, have been,
so to speak, simultaneously opened by the energy of explorers, who,
like Livingstone, Stanley, and Nordenskiöld, have won immortal renown.
In Africa, the Soudan, and the equatorial regions, where the sources of
the Nile lie hidden; in Asia, the interior of Arabia, and the Hindoo
Koosh or Pamir mountains, have been visited and explored. In America
whole districts but yesterday inaccessible are now intersected by
railways, whilst in the other hemisphere Australia and the islands of
Polynesia have been colonized; new societies have rapidly sprung into
being, and even the unmelting ice of the polar regions no longer checks
the advance of the intrepid explorer. And all this is but a small
portion of the work on which the present generation may justly pride
itself.

Distant wars too have contributed in no small measure to the progress
of science. To the victorious march of the French army we owe the
discovery of new facts relative to the ancient history of Algeria; it
was the advance of the English and Russian forces that revealed the
secret of the mysterious lands in the heart of Asia, whence many
scholars believe the European races to have first issued, and of this
ever open book the French expedition to Tonquin may be considered at
present one of the last pages.

Geographical knowledge does much to promote the progress of the kindred
sciences. The work of Champollion, so brilliantly supplemented by the
Vicomte de Rougé and Mariette Bey, has led to the accurate
classification of the monuments of Egypt. The deciphering of the
cuneiform inscriptions has given us the dates of the palaces of Nineveh
and Babylon; the interpretation by savants of other inscriptions has
made known to us those Hittites whose formidable power at one time
extended as far as the Mediterranean, but whose name had until quite
recently fallen into complete oblivion. The rock-hewn temples and the
yet more strange dagobas of India now belong to science. Like the
sacred monuments of Burmah and Cambodia they have been brought down to
comparatively recent dates; and though the palaces of Yucatan and Peru
still maintain their reserve, we are able to fix their dates
approximately, and to show that long before their construction North
America was inhabited by races, one of which, known as the Mound
Builders, left behind them gigantic earthworks of many kinds, whilst
another, known as the Cliff Dwellers, built for themselves houses on
the face of all but inaccessible rocks.

Comparative philology has enabled us to trace back the genealogies of
races, to determine their origin, and to follow their migrations.
Burnouf has brought to light the ancient Zend language, Sir Henry
Rawlinson and Oppert have by their magnificent works opened up new
methods of research, Max Müller and Pictet in their turn by availing
themselves of the most diverse materials have done much to make known
to us the Aryan race, the great educator, if I may so speak, of modern
nations.

To one great fact do all the most ancient epochs of history bear
witness: one and all, they prove the existence in a yet more remote
past of an already advanced civilization such as could only have been
gradually attained to after long and arduous groping. Who were the
inaugurators of this civilization? Who ware the earliest inhabitants of
the earth? To what biological conditions were they subject? What were
the physical and climatic conditions of the globe when they lived? By
what flora and fauna were they surrounded? But science pushes her
inquiry yet further. She desires to know the origin of tire human race,
when, how, and why men first appeared upon the earth; for from whatever
point of view he is considered, man must of necessity have had a
beginning.

We are in fact face to face with most formidable problems, involving
alike our past and future; problems it is hopeless to attempt to solve
by human means or by the help of human intelligence alone, yet with
which science can and ought to grapple, for they elevate the soul and
strengthen the reasoning faculties. Whatever may be their final result,
such studies are of enthralling interest. “Man,” said a learned member
of the French Institute, “will ever be for man the grandest of all
mysteries, the most absorbing of all objects of contemplation.”1

Let us work our way back through past centuries and study our remote
ancestors on their first arrival upon earth; let us watch their early
struggles for existence! We will deal with facts alone; we will accept
no theories, and we must, alas, often fail to come to any conclusion,
for the present state of prehistoric knowledge rarely admits of
certainty. We must ever be ready to modify theories by the study of
facts, and never forget that, in a science so little advanced, theories
must of necessity be provisional and variable.

Truly strange is the starting-point of prehistoric science. It is with
the aid of a few scarcely even rough-hewn flints, a few bones that it
is difficult to classify, and a few rude stone monuments that we have
to build up, it must be for our readers to say with what success, a
past long prior to any written history, which has left no trace in the
memory of man, and during which our globe would appeal to have been
subject to conditions wholly unlike those of the present day.

The stones which will first claim our attention, some of them very
skilfully cut and carefully polished, have been known for centuries.
According to Suetonius, the Emperor Augustus possessed in his palace on
the Palatine Hill a considerable collection of hatchets of different
kinds of rock, nearly all of them found in the island of Capri, and
which were to their royal owner the weapons of the heroes of mythology.
Pliny tells of a thunder-bolt having fallen into a lake, in which
eighty-nine of these wonderful stones were soon afterwards found.2
Prudentius represents ancient German warriors as wearing gleaming
_ceraunia_ on their helmets; in other countries similar stones
ornamented the statues of the gods, and formed rays about their heads.3

A subject so calculated to fire the imagination has of course not been
neglected by the poets. Claudian’s verses are well known:

Pyrenæisque sub antris
Ignea flumineæ legere ceraunia nymphæ.

Marbodius, Bishop of Rennes, in the eleventh century, sang of the
thunder-stones in some Latin verses which have come down to us, and an
old poet of the sixteenth century in his turn exclaimed, on seeing the
strange bones around him

Le roc de Tarascon hébergea quelquefois
Les géants qui couroyent les montagnes de Foix,
Dont tant d’os successifs rendent le témoignage.

With these stones, in fact, were found numerous bones of great size,
which had belonged to unknown creatures. Latin authors speak of similar
bones found in Asia Minor, which they took to be those of giants of an
extinct race. This belief was long maintained; in 1547 and again in
1667 fossil remains were found in the cave of San Ciro near Palermo;
and Italian savants decided that they had belonged to men eighteen feet
high. Guicciadunus speaks of the bones of huge elephants carefully
preserved in the Hôtel de Ville at Antwerp as the bones of a giant
named Donon, who lived 1300 years before the Christian era.

In days nearer our own the roost cultivated people accepted the remains
of a gigantic batrachian4 as those of a man who had witnessed the
flood, and it was the same with a tortoise found in Italy scarcely
thirty years ago. Dr. Carl, in a work published at Frankfort5 in 1709,
took up another theory, and, such was the general ignorance at the
time, he used long arguments to prove that the fossil bones were the
result neither of a freak of nature, nor of the action of a plastic
force, and it was not until near the end of his life that the
illustrious Camper could bring himself to admit the extinction of
certain species, so totally against Divine revelation did such a
phenomenon appear to him to be.

Prejudices were not, however, always so obstinate. For more than three
centuries stones worked by the hand of man have been preserved in the
Museum of the Vatican, and as long ago as the time of Clement VIII. his
doctor, Mercati, declared these stones to have been the weapons of
antediluvians who had been still ignorant of the use of metals.

During the early portion of the eighteenth century a pointed black
flint, evidently the head of a spear, was found in London with the
tooth of an elephant. It was described in the newspapers of the day,
and placed in the British Museum.

In 1723 Antoine de Jussieu said, at a meeting of the _Académie des
Sciences_, that these worked stones had been made where they were
found, or brought from distant countries. He supported his arguments by
an excellent example of the way in which savage races still polish
stones, by rubbing them continuously together.

A few years later the members of the _Académie des Inscriptions_ in
their turn, took up the question, and Mahudel, one of its members, in
presenting several stones, showed that they bad evidently been cut by
the hand of man. “An examination of them,” he said, “affords a proof of
the efforts of our earliest ancestors to provide for their wants, and
to obtain the necessaries of life.” He added that after the re-peopling
of the earth after the deluge, men were ignorant of the use of metals.
Mahudel’s essay is illustrated by drawings, some of which we reproduce
(Fig. 1), showing wedges, hammers, hatchets, and flint arrow-beads
taken, he tells us, from various private collections.6

Bishop Lyttelton, writing in 1736, speaks of such weapons as having
been made at a remote date by savages ignorant of the use of metals,7
and Sir W. Dugdale, an eminent antiquary of the seventeenth century,
attributed to the ancient Britons some flint hatchets found in
Warwickshire, and thinks they were made when these weapons alone were
used.8

[Illustration: 1.]

Stone weapons described by Mahudel in 1734.

A communication made by Frère to the Royal Society of London deserves
mention here with a few supplementary remarks.9

This distinguished man of science found at Hoxne, in Suffolk, about
twelve feet below the surface of the soil, worked flints, which had
evidently been the natural weapons of a people who had no knowledge of
metals. With these flints were found some strange bones with the
gigantic jaw of an animal then unknown. Frère adds that the number of
chips of flint was so great that the workmen, ignorant of their
scientific value, used them in road-making. Every thing pointed to the
conclusion that Hoxne was the place where this primitive people
manufactured the weapons and implements they used, so that as early as
the end of last century a member of the Royal Society formulated the
propositions,10 now fully accepted, that at a very remote epoch men
used nothing but stone weapons and implements, and that side by side
with these men lived huge animals unknown in historic times. These
facts, strange as they appear to us, attracted no attention at the
time. It would seem that special acumen is needed for every fresh
discovery, and that until the time for that discovery comes, evidence
remains unheeded and science is altogether blind to its significance.

But to resume our narrative. It is interesting to note the various
phases through which the matter passed before the problem was solved.
In 1819, M. Jouannet announced that he had found stone weapons near
Périgord. In 1823, the Rev. Dr. Buckland published the “Reliquiæ
Diluvianæ,” the value of which, though it is a work of undoubted merit,
was greatly lessened by the preconceived ideas of its author. A few
years later, Tournal announced his discoveries in the cave of Bize,
near Narbonne, in which, mixed with human bones, he found the remains
of various animals, some extinct, some still native to the district,
together with worked flints and fragments of pottery. After this,
Tournal maintained that man had been the contemporary of the animals
the bones of which were mixed with the products of human industry.11
The results of the celebrated researches of Dr. Schmerling in the caves
near Liège were published in 1833. He states his conclusions frankly:
“The shape of the flints,” he says, “is so regular, that it is
impossible to confound them with those found in the Chalk or in
Tertiary strata. Reflection compels us to admit that these flints were
worked by the hand of man, and that they may have been used as arrows
or as knives.”12 Schmerling does not refer, though Lyell does, and that
in terms of high admiration, to the courage required for the arduous
work involved in the exploration of the caves referred to, or to the
yet more serious obstacles the professor had to overcome in publishing
conclusions opposed to the official science of the day.

In 1835, M. Joly, by his excavations in the Nabrigas cave, established
the contemporaneity of man with the cave bear, and a little later M.
Pomel announced his belief that plan had witnessed the last eruptions
of the volcanoes of Auvergne.

In spite of these discoveries, and the eager discussions to which they
led, the question of the antiquity of man and of his presence amongst
the great Quaternary animals made but little progress, and it was
reserved to a Frenchman, M. Boucher de Perthes, to compel the
scientific world to accept the truth.

It was in 1826 that Boucher de Perthes first published his opinion; but
it was not until 1816 and 1847 that he announced his discovery at
Menchecourt, near Abbeville, and at Moulin-Quignon and Saint Acheul, in
the alluvial deposits of the Somme, of flints shaped into the form of
hatchets associated with the remains of extinct animals such as the
mammoth, the cave lion, the _Rhinoceros incisivus_, the hippopotamus,
and other animals whose presence in France is not alluded to either in
history or tradition. The uniformity of shape, the marks of repeated
chipping, and the sharp edges so noticeable in the greater number of
these hatchets, cannot be sufficiently accounted for either by the
action of water, or the rubbing against each other of the stones, still
less ply the mechanical work of glaciers. We must therefore recognize
in them the results of some deliberate action and of an intelligent
will, such as is possessed by man, and by man alone. Professor Ramsay13
tells us that, after twenty years’ experience in examining stones in
their natural condition and others fashioned by the hand of man, he has
no hesitation in pronouncing the flints and hatchets of Amiens and
Abbeville as decidedly works of art as the knives of Sheffield. The
deposits in which they were found showed no sins of having been
disturbed; so that we may confidently conclude that the men who worked
these flints lived where the banks of the Somme now are, when these
deposits were in course of being laid down, and that he was the
contemporary of the animals whose bones lay side by side with the
products of his industry.

This conclusion, which now appears so simple, was not accepted without
difficulty. Boucher de Perthes defended his discoveries in books, in
pamphlets, and in letters addressed to learned societies. He had the
courage of his convictions, and the perseverance which insures success.
For twenty years he contended patiently against the indifference of
some, and the contempt of others. Everywhere the proofs he brought
forward were rejected, without his being allowed the honor of a
discussion or even of a hearing. The earliest converts to De Perthes’
conclusions met with similar attacks and with similar indifference.
There is nothing to surprise us in this; it is human nature not to take
readily to anything new, or to entertain ideas opposed to old
established traditions. The most distinguished men find it difficult to
break with the prejudices of their education and the yet more firmly
established prejudices of the systems they have themselves built up.
The words of the great French fabulist will never cease to be true:

Man is ice to truth;
But fire to lies.

One of the masters of modern science, Cuvier, has said14: “Everything
tends to prove that the human race did not exist in the countries where
the fossil bones were found at the time of the convulsions which buried
those bones; but I will not therefore conclude that man did not exist
at all before that epoch; he may have inherited certain districts of
small extent whence he re-peopled the earth after these terrible
events.” Cuvier’s disciples went beyond the doctrines of their master.
He made certain reservations; they admitted none, and one of the most
illustrious, Élie de Beaumont, rejected with scorn the possibility of
the co-existence of man and the mammoth.15 Later, retracting an
assertion of which perhaps he himself recognized the exaggeration, he
contented himself with saying that the district where the flints and
bones had been collected belonged to a recent period, and to the
shifting deposits of the slopes contemporary with the peaty alluvium.
He added—scientific passions are by no means the least intense, or the
least deeply rooted—that the worked flints may have been of Roman
origin, and that the deposits of Moulin-Quignon may have covered a
Roman road! This might indeed have been the case in the _Département du
Nord_, where a road laid down by the conquerors of Gaul has completely
disappeared beneath deposits of peat, but it could not be true at
Moulin-Quignon, where gravels form the culminating point of the ridge.
Moreover, the laying down of the most ancient peats of the French
valleys did not begin until the great watercourses had been replaced by
the rivers of the present day; they never contain, relics of any
species but such as are still extant; whereas it was with the remains
of extinct mammals that the flints were found.

It was against powerful adversaries such as this that the modest savant
of Abbeville had to maintain his opinion. “No one,” he says, “cared to
verify the facts of the case, merely giving as a reason, that these
facts were impossible.” Weight was added to his complaint by the
refusal in England about the same blue to print a communication from
the Society of Natural History of Torquay, which announced the
discovery of flints worked by the hand of man, associated, as were
those of the Somme, with the bones of extinct animals. The fact
appeared altogether too incredible!

But the time when justice would be done was to come at last. Dr.
Falconer visited first Amiens and then Abbeville, to examine the
deposits and the flints and bones found in them. In January, 1859, and
in 1860, other Englishmen of science followed his example; and
excavations were made, under their direction, in the massive strata
which rise, from the chalk forming their base, to a height of 108 feet
above the level of the Somme. Their search was crowned with success,
and they lost no blue in leaking known to the world the results they
had obtained, and the convictions to which these results lead led.16 In
1859 Prestwich announced to the Royal Society of London that the flints
found in the bed of the Somme were undoubtedly the work of the hand of
plan, that they had been found in strata that lead not been disturbed,
and that the men who cut these flints bad lived at a period prior to
the time when our earth assumed its present configuration. Sir Charles
Lyell, in his opening address at a session of the British Association,
did not hesitate to support the conclusions of Prestwich. It was now
the turn of Frenchmen of science to arrive at Abbeville. MM. Gaudry and
Pouchet themselves extracted hatchets from the Quaternary deposits of
the Somme.17 These facts were vouched for by the well-known authority,
M. de Quatrefages, who had already constituted himself their advocate.
All that was now needed was the test of a public discussion, and the
meeting of the Anthropological Society of Paris supplied a suitable
occasion. The question received long and searching scientific
examination. All doubt was removed, and M. Isidore
Geoffroy-Saint-Hilaire was the mouth-piece of an immense majority of
his colleagues, when he declared that the objections to the great
antiquity of the human race had all melted away. The conversion of men
so illustrious was followed of course by that of the general public,
and, more fortunate than many another, Boucher de Perthes bad the
satisfaction before his death of seeing a new branch of knowledge
founded on his discoveries, attain to a just and durable popularity in
the scientific world.

It must not, however, be supposed that popular superstition yielded at
once to the decisions of science, and it is curious to meet with the
same ideas in the most different climates, and in districts widely
separated from each other:18 Everywhere worked flints are attributed to
a supernatural origin; everywhere they are looked upon as amulets with
the power of protecting their owner, his house or his flocks. Russian
peasants believe them to be the arrows of thunder, and fathers transmit
them to their children as precious heirlooms. The same belief is held
in France, Ireland, and Scotland, in Scandinavia, and Hungary, as well
as in Asia Minor, in Japan, China, and Burn lap; in Java, and amongst
the people of the Bahama Islands, as amongst the negroes of the Soudan
or those of the west coast of Africa,19 who look upon these stones as
bolts launched from Heaven by Sango, the god of thunder; amongst the
ancient inhabitants of Nicaragua as well as the Malays, who, however,
still make similar implements.

The name given to these flints recalls the origin attributed to them.
The Romans call them _ceraunia_ from κεραυνός, thunder, and in the
catalogue of the possessions of a noble Veronese published in 1656, we
find them mentioned under this name.20 Every one knows Cymbeline’s
funeral chant in Shakespeare’s play:

Fear no more the lightning flash
Nor the all dreaded thunder-stone.

In Germany we are shown _Donner-Keile_, in Alsace _Dormer-Axt_, in
Holland _Donner-Beitels_, in Denmark _Tordensteen_, in Norway
_Tordenkeile_, in Sweden _Thorsoggar_, Thor having been the god of
thunder amongst northern nations; while with the Celts21 the
_Mengurun_, in Asia Minor the _Ylderim-tachi_, in Japan the
_Rai-fu-seki-no-rui_, in Roussillon the _Pedrus de Lamp_, and in
Andalusia the _Piedras de Rayo_ have the same signification. The
inhabitants of the Mindanao islands call these stones the teeth of the
thunder animal, and the Japanese the teeth of the thunder.22 In
Cambodia, worked stones, celts, adzes, and gouges or knives, are known
as thunder stones. A Chinese emperor, who lived in the eighth century
of our era, received from a Buddhist priest some valuable presents
which the donors said had been sent by the Lord of Heaven, amongst
which were two flint hatchets called _loui-kong_, or stones of the god
of thunder. In Brazil we meet with the same idea in the name of
_corsico_, or lightnings, given to worked flints; whilst in Italy, by
all exception almost unique, they are called _lingue san Paolo_.

May we not also attribute to the worship of stones some of the
religious and funeral rites of antiquity? According to Porphyry,
Pythagoras, on his arrival on the island of Crete, was purified with
thunder-stones by the dactyl priests of Mount Ida. The Etruscans wore
flint arrow-heads on their collars. They were sought after by the Magi,
and the Indians gave them an honored place in their temples. According
to Herodotus, the Arabs sealed their engagements by making an incision
in their hands with a sharp stone; in Egypt the body of a corpse before
being embalmed was opened with a flint knife; a similar implement was
used by the Hebrews for the rite of circumcision; and it was also with
cut stones that the priests of Cybele inflicted self-mutilation in
memory of that of Atys. At Rome the stone hatchet was dedicated to
Jupiter Latialis, and solemn treaties were ratified by the sacrifice of
a pig, the throat of which was cut with a sharp flint. According to
Virgil, this custom was handed down to the ancient Romans by the
uncouth nation of the Equicoles. At the beginning of the Christian
era., the heroes commemorated by Ossian still had in the centre of
their shields a polished stone consecrated by the Druids, and a saga
maintains that the _ceraunia_ assured certain victory to their owners.
On the other side of the Atlantic, the Aztecs used obsidian blades for
the sacrifices, in which hundreds of human victims perished miserably;
and similar blades are used by the Guanches of Teneriffe to open the
bodies of their chiefs after death. At the present day, the Albanian
Palikares use pointed flints to cut the flesh off the shoulder-blade of
a sheep with a view to seeking in its fibres the secrets of the future,
and when the god Gimawong visits his temple of Labode, on the western
coast of Africa, his worshippers offer him a bull slain with a stone
knife. Lumholtz,23 in the second of his recent explorations in
Queensland, tells us that the natives still use stone weapons, varying
in form and in the handles used, and that the weapons of the
Australians living near Darling River, as well as those of the
Tasmanians, are without handles.

During the first centuries of the Christian era, strange rites were
still performed in honor of dolmens and menhirs. The councils of the
Church condemned them, and the emperors and kings supported by their
authority the decrees of the ecclesiastics.24 Childebert in 554,
Carloman in 742, Charlemagne by an edict issued at Aix-la-Chapelle in
789,25 forbid their subjects to practise these rites borrowed from
heathenism. But popes and emperors are alike powerless in this
direction, and one generation transmits its traditions and
superstitions to another. In the seventeenth century a Protestant
missionary called in the aid of the secular arm to destroy a
superstition deeply rooted in the minds of his people; in England,
sorcerers were proceeded against for having used flint arrow-heads in
their pretended witchcraft; in Sweden, a polished hatchet yeas placed
in the bed of women in the pangs of labor; in Burmah, thunder-stones
reduced to powder were looked upon as an infallible cure for
ophthalmia; and the Canaches have a collection of stones with a special
superstition connected with each. But why seek examples so far away and
in a past so remote? In our own day anti in our own land we find men
who think themselves invulnerable and their cattle safe if they are
fortunate enough to possess a polished flint.

Prehistoric times are generally divided into three epochs—the _Stone
Age_, the _Bronze Age_, and the _Iron Age_. We owe this classification
to the archæologists of Northern Europe.26 It is neither very exact nor
very satisfactory, and fresh discoveries daily tend to unsettle it.27
Alsberg maintained that iron was the first metal used, founding his
contention on the scarcity of tin, the difficulty of obtaining alloys,
and on the sixty-one iron foundries of Switzerland which may date from
prehistoric times. The rarity of the discovery of iron objects, he
urged, is accounted for by the ease with which such objects are
destroyed by rust. There has never been a Bronze or an Iron age in
America, so that it would seem very doubtful whether all races went
through the same cycles of development. I myself prefer the division
into the _Palæolithic_ period, when men only used roughly chipped
stones, and the _Neolithic_ period, when they carefully polished their
stone weapons. “There may,” says Alexander Bertrand,28 “be one
immutable law for the succession of strata throughout the entire crust
of the earth, but there is no corresponding law applicable to human
agglomerations or to the succession of the strata of civilization. It
would be a very grave error to adopt the theory according to which all
human races have passed through the same phases of development and have
gone through the same complete series of social conditions.”

[Illustration: 2.]

Copper hatchets found in Hungary, and now in the National Museum of
Budapest.

It may perhaps be convenient to introduce a fourth period when copper
alone was used and our ancestors were still ignorant of the alloys
necessary for the production of bronze. Hesiod speaks of a third
generation of men as possessing copper only, and although it does not
do to attach undue importance to isolated facts, recent discoveries in
the Cevennes, in Spain, in Hungary, and elsewhere, appear to confirm
the existence of an age of copper (Fig. 2). We may add that the mounds
of North America contain none but copper implements and ornaments,
witnesses of a time when that metal alone was known either on the
shores of the Atlantic or of the Pacific29 (Fig. 3).

[Illustration: 3.]

Copper beads, from Connett’s Mound, Ohio (natural size).

It is impossible to fix the duration of the Stone age. It began with
man, it lasted for countless centuries, and we find it still prevailing
amongst certain races who set their faces against all progress. The
scenes sculptured upon Egyptian monuments dating from the ancient
Empire represent the employment of stone weapons, and their use was
continued throughout the time of the Lagidæ and even into that of the
Roman domination. A few years ago, on the shores of the Nile, I saw
some of the common people shave their heads with stone razors, and the
Bedouins of Gournah using spears headed with pointed flints. The
Ethiopians in the suite of Xerxes had none but stone weapons, and yet
their civilization was several centuries older than that of the
Persians. The excavations on the site of Alesia yielded many stone
weapons, the glorious relics of the soldiers of Vercingetorix. At Mount
Beuvray, on the site of Bibracte, flint hatchets and weapons have been
discovered associated with Gallic coins. At Rome, M. de Rossi collected
similar objects mixed with the _Æs rude_. Flint hatchets are mentioned
in the life of St. Éloy, written by St. Owen, and the Merovingian tombs
have yielded hundreds of small cut flints, the last offerings to the
dead. William of Poitiers tells us that the English used stone weapons
at the battle of Hastings in 1066, and the Scots led by Wallace did the
same as late as 1288. Not until many centuries after the beginning of
the Christian era did the Sarmatians know the use of metals; and in the
fourteenth century we find a race, probably of African origin, making
their hatchets, knives, and arrows of stone, and tipping their javelins
with horn. The Japanese, moreover, used stone weapons and implements
until the ninth and even the tenth century A.D.

But there is no need to go back to the past for examples. The Mexicans
of the present day use obsidian hatchets, as their fathers did before
them; the Esquimaux use nephritis and jade weapons with Remington
rifles. Nordenskiöld tells us that the Tchoutchis know of no weapons
but those made of stone; that they show their artistic feeling in
engravings on bone, very similar to those found in the caves of the
south of France. In 1854, the Mqhavi, an Indian tribe of the Rio
Colorado (California), possessed no metal objects; and it is the same
with the dwellers on the banks of the Shingle River (Brazil), the
Oyacoulets of French Guiana, and many other wandering and savage races.
Père Pelitot tells us that the natives living on the banks of the
Mackenzie River are still in the stone age; and Schumacker has given an
interesting example of the manufacture of stone weapons by the Klamath
Indians dwelling on the shores of the Pacific. It has been justly said:
“The Stone age is not a fixed period in time, but one phase of the
development of the human race, the duration of which varies according
to the environment and the race.”30

In thus limiting our idea of the stone age, we may conclude that alike
in Europe and in America,31 there has been a period when metal was
entirely unknown, when stones were the sole weapons, the sole tools of
man, when the cave, for which he had to dispute possession with bears
and other beasts of prey, was his sole and precarious refuge, and when
clumsy heaps of stones served alike as temples for the worship of his
gods and sepulchral monuments in honor of his chiefs.

Excavations in every department of France have yielded thousands of
worked flints, and there are few more interesting studies than an
examination of the mural map in the Saint Germain Museum on which are
marked with scrupulous exactitude the dwelling-places of our most
remote ancestors, and the megalithic monuments which are the
indestructible memorials of our forefathers.

In the Crimea were picked up a number of small flints cut into the
shape of a crescent exactly like those found in the Indies and in
Tunis, and the Anthropological Society of Moscow has introduced us to a
Stone age the memory of which is preserved in the tumuli of Russia. On
the shores of Lake Lagoda have been found some implements of
argillaceous schist, in Carelia and in Finland tools made of slate and
schist, often adorned with clumsy figures of men or of animals. The
rigor of the climate did not check the development of the human race;
in the most remote times Lapland, Nordland, the most northerly
districts of Scandinavia, and even the bitterly cold Iceland, were
peopled. The Exhibition of Paris, 1878, contained some stone weapons
found on the shores of the White Sea.

On several parts of the coast of Denmark we meet with mounds of an
elliptical shape and about nine feet high, with a hollow in the centre,
marking the site of a prehistoric dwelling. It was not until about 1850
that the true nature of these mounds was determined. Excavations in
them have brought to light knives, hatchets, all manner of stone, horn,
and bone implements, fragments of pottery, charred wood, with the bones
of mammals and birds, the skeletons of fishes, the shells of oysters
and cockles buried beneath the ashes of ancient hearths. To these
accumulations the characteristic name of _Kitchenmiddings_, or kitchen
refuse, has been given.

Several caves have recently been examined in Poland, one of which,
situated near Cracow, appears to belong to Palæolithic times. Count
Zawiska has already given an account of his interesting discoveries to
the Prehistoric Congress at Stockholm. In the Wirzchow cave he
identified seven different hearths, and took out of the accumulations
of cinders various amulets, clumsy representations of fish cut in
ivory, split bones, bears’, wolves’, and elks’ teeth pierced with a
hole for threading, and more than four thousand stone objects of a
similar type to those found in Russia, Scandinavia, and Germany. We
meet with similar traces of successive habitation in a cave near Ojcow;
the valuable contents of which included some beautiful flint tools,
some awls, bone spatulæ, and some gold ornaments, mixed, in the lower
of the hearths, with the bones of extinct animals, and in the upper,
with those of species still living.

The discoveries made in the Atter See and in the Salzburg lakes with
those in the Moravian caves prove what had previously been very stoutly
denied, the existence in those districts of ancient races at a very
remote date.

The most ancient inhabitants of Hungary, however, cannot be traced
further back than to Neolithic times. In that country have been found,
with polished stone implements, thousands of objects made of stag-horn,
or bone, almost all without exception finely finished off. The
discovery of copper tools and ornaments of a peculiar form in the
Danubian provinces, bears witness to a distinct civilization in those
districts, and confirms what we have just said about a Copper age.

From the Lake Stations of Austria and Hungary, we pass naturally to
those of Switzerland. We shall have to introduce to our readers whole
villages built in the midst of the waters, and a people long completely
forgotten. In many of these stations, none but stone implements have
been found, and on the half-burnt piles on which the huts had been set
up, it is still easy to make out the notches cut with flint hatchets.

We meet with similar pile dwellings, as these structures are called, in
France, Italy, Germany, Ireland, and England, for from the earliest
times man was constantly engaged in sanguinary contests with his
fellowmen, and sought in the midst of the waters a refuge from the ever
present dangers surrounding him.

The discoveries made in Belgium must be ranked amongst the most
important in Europe, and we shall often have occasion to refer to them.
Holland, on the other hand, having much of it been under the sea for so
long, yields nothing to our researches but a few arrow-heads, hatchets,
and knives made of quartz or diorite, and all of them of the coarsest
workmanship.

No less fruitful in results to prehistoric science are the researches
made in the south of Europe. The congress that met at Bologna, in 1871,
showed us that in the Transalpine provinces man was witness of those
physical phenomena which gave to Italy its present configuration; and
the exhibition in connection with the congress enabled us to get a good
idea of the primitive industry which has left relics behind it in every
district of the peninsula.

Some hatchets of a similar type to the most ancient found in France
were dug out of a gravel pit at San Isidro on the borders of the
Mançanarès, associated with the bones of a huge elephant that has long
been extinct; and a cave has recently been discovered near Madrid from
which were dug out nearly five hundred skeletons, the greater number
thickly coated with stalagmite. Near the bodies lay several flint
weapons, and some fragments of pottery.32 Cartailhac tells us of
similar discoveries in various parts of Portugal.33 The caves of
Santander have yielded worked bones and barbed harpoons; and those of
Castile, various objects resembling those of the Reindeer period of
France. It is, however, an interesting and important fact that the
reindeer never crossed the Pyrenees. Although so far excavations have
been anything but complete, we are already able to assert that during
Palæolithic times the ancient Iberia was occupied by races whose
industrial development was similar to that of modern Europe.

It will be well to mention also the excavations made on the slopes of
Mount Hymettus, and in the ever-famous plains of Marathon. Finlay has
brought together in Greece a very interesting collection of stone
weapons and implements which he picked up in great numbers at the base
of the Acropolis of Athens. All these discoveries prove the existence
of man at a time about which but yesterday nothing was known, and to
which it is difficult as yet to give a name, this existence being
proved by the most irrefragable of evidence, the work of his own hands.

Although the proofs of there having been a Stone age in Western Europe
are absolutely convincing, it is difficult to feel equally sure with
regard to the portions of the globe where so many districts are closed
to the explorer. Everywhere, however, where excavations have been made,
they have yielded the most remarkable results. M. de Ujfalvy has
brought diorite and serpentine hatchets and wedges from the south of
Siberia, and Count Ouvaroff tells us of a Quaternary deposit, the only
one known at present at Irkutsk, in Eastern Siberia, containing cut
flints. Near Tobolsk, Poliaskoff found some beautifully worked stones.
Other archæologists tell us of having found, in the east of the Ural
Mountains and on the shores of the Joswa, hammers, hatchets, pestles,
nuclei the shape of polygonal prisms, and round or long pieces of
flint, all pierced with a central hole, which are supposed to have been
spindle whorls. Lastly, Klementz tells us that the lofty valleys of the
Yenesei and its tributaries were inhabited in the most remote times by
races who developed a special civilization.

At the other extremity of the great Asiatic continent, a deposit of
cinders found at the entrance of a cave near the Nahr el Kelb yielded
some flint knives or scrapers, and more recently a prehistoric station
has been made out at Hanoweh, a little village of Lebanon, east of
Tyre. The flints are of primitive shapes, not unlike the most ancient
forms found in France. They were discovered in a mass of _débris_ of
all kinds, forming a very hard conglomerate. Some teeth, which had
belonged to animals of the bovidæ, cervidæ, and equidæ groups, were got
out with considerable difficulty, but the bones in the conglomerate
were too touch broken up to be identified. Worked flints and arrow- or
spear-heads were also found in considerable quantities in various parts
of the table-land of Sinai, and at the openings of the caves in which
the ancient inhabitants took refuge. It was with stone tools that these
people worked the mines riddling the sides of the mountains, and it is
still easy to make out traces of their operations.

We have already alluded to Japan; for a long time the barbarian Aïnos,
the earliest inhabitants of the country, were acquainted with nothing
but stone. Flint arrows were presented to the Emperor Wu-Wang eleven
hundred years before our era; the annals of one of the ancient
dynasties speak of flint weapons, and an encyclopædia published in the
reign of the Emperor Kang-Hi speaks of rock hatchets, some black and
some green, and all alike dating from the most remote antiquity.

Agates worked by the hand of man are found in great quantities in the
bone beds of the Godavery. Some javelin heads in sandstone, basalt, and
quartz, with scrapers and knives, most of them flat on one side and
rounded on the other, appear to be even more ancient than the agate
implements. Some of the celts resemble those of European type, others
the flint weapons found in Egypt, and the clumsiest forms may be
compared to those still in use amongst the natives of Australia. We may
also mention a somewhat rare type lately discovered in the island of
Melas, which have been characterized as saw-bladed knives. A letter
from Rivett-Carnac announces the discovery of weapons and stone
implements in Banda, a wild mountain district on the northwest of
India. The scrapers, he says, strangely resemble those of the
Esquimaux, and the arrow-heads those of the most ancient inhabitants of
America.34

Many megalithic monuments are met with in places widely removed from
each other in the vast Indian Empire. Captain Congreve, after
describing the cairns with their rows of stones ranged in circles, the
kistvaens or dolmens, the huge rocks placed erect as at Stonehenge, the
barrows hollowed out of the cliffs, declares with undisguised
astonishment that there is not a Druidical monument of which he had not
seen the counterpart in the Neilgherry Mountains.35

General Faidherbe divides Africa into two distinct regions—one north of
the Great Desert, where the inhabitants and the fauna and flora have
all alike certain characteristics in common with those of Europe; and
the other south of the Sahara, which was at one time separated from
that in the north by a vast inland sea. In this southern region we are
in Nigritia, or the Africa of the negroes, where the inhabitants in
their physical characteristics and in their language, the mammals, and
the plants, differ altogether from those of the north. In one point,
however, these two regions resemble each other: in both we recognize a
Stone age, which existed in Algeria and in Egypt, as well as on the
banks of the Senegal and at the Cape of Good Hope. The valley of the
Nile from Cairo to Assouan has yielded a series of objects in flint,
porphyry, and hornblendic rock, retaining traces of human workmanship,
and reminding us of similar implements of European type. These
objects,36 says M. Arcelin, are always found either beneath modern
deposits or at the surface of the upper plateaux at the highest point
to which the river rises; nothing has, however, been found in the
alluvial deposits of the Nile, in spite of the most persevering search.
At the Prehistoric Congress held at Stockholm, some worked flints were
produced that had been found in the Libyan Desert. This once inhabited
district, now without water or vegetation, can only be reached at the
present day with the greatest difficulty. Is not this yet another proof
of the great changes which have taken place since the advent of man?
Lastly, the Boulak Museum contains a whole series of stone weapons and
implements, showing in their workmanship a progressive development
similar to that we find in Europe. Many archæologists are of opinion
that the worked flints found in the plains of Lower Egypt date from
Neolithic times. Those alone are Paleolithic which have been found in a
deposit hard enough for the hollowing out of tombs, which are certainly
earlier than the eighteenth dynasty. We must add, however, that neither
with the Palæolithic nor with the Neolithic relics have been found any
bones of extinct animals. Some savants go yet further: they think that
these worked stones are but chips split off by the heat of the sun.37 A
phenomenon of this kind is mentioned by Desor and Escher de la Linth in
the Sahara Desert; Fraas quotes a similar observation made by
Livingstone in the heart of Africa, and one by Wetzstein, who, not far
from Damascus; saw hard basalt rocks split under the influence of the
early morning freshness. I have myself noticed similar phenomena in the
Nile valley, but it must be added that the fragments of rock broken off
by the combined influence of heat and humidity present very notable
differences to those worked by the hand of man, and cannot really be
mistaken for them.

In Algeria have been preserved some most interesting relics of
prehistoric times. If I am not mistaken, Worsaae was the first to note
the worked stones in the French possessions in Africa. They have been
picked up in great numbers, especially near the watercourses at which
the ancient inhabitants of the country slaked their thirst, as do their
descendants at the present day. The exploration of the Sahara daily
yields unexpected discoveries; and already fifteen different stations
formerly inhabited by man have been made out. In those remote days a
large river flowed near Wargla, which was then an important centre, and
a number of tools picked up bear witness to the former presence of an
active and industrious population. At one place the flint implements,
arrow-heads, knives, and scrapers are all of a very primitive type, and
were found sorted into piles. This was evidently a _dépôt_, probably
forming the reserve stock of the tribe. Wargla or perhaps Golea at one
time appears to have been the extreme limit of the Stone age in
Algeria, but quite recently traces of primitive man have been
discovered amongst the Tuaregs. These relics are hatchets made of black
rock, and arrow-heads not unlike those which the Arabs attribute to the
Djinn; but as we approach the south we find the flints picked up more
clumsily and unskilfully cut—a proof that they were the work of a more
barbarous people with less practical skill. It is the megalithic
monuments of Algeria, of which we shall speak more in detail presently,
that are the most worthy of attention. As in India, we meet with them
in thousands, and in certain parts of the continent they extend for
considerable distances. They consist of long, square, circular, or oval
enclosures—dolmens similar to those of Western Europe,—and almost
always surrounded by circles of upright stones. The silence of
historians respecting them need not make us doubt their extreme
antiquity, for did it not take a very long time to induce the
scientific men of our day to turn their attention to Algeria at all?

The exploration of Tunisia has enabled us to study the Stone age in
that district, and a few years ago it was announced that nearly three
thousand objects of different types had been found in thirteen
different localities.38 My son found near Gabes an immense number of
small worked flints not unlike a human nail, the origin and use of
which no one has been able to determine. The association of weapons and
implements roughly finished off, with chips and stones still in the
natural state, bears witness to the existence at one time of workshops
of some importance. The recent discoveries of Collignon correspond with
those in Algeria, and complete our knowledge of the basin of the
Mediterranean.

In the Cave of Hercules, in Morocco, which Pomponius Mela spoke of as
of great antiquity in his day, have been found a great many worked
flints, such as knives and arrow-heads. We shall refer later to the
important monument of Mzora and the menhirs surrounding it, the
builders of which certainly belonged to a race that lived much nearer
our own day than did the inhabitants of the Cave of Hercules.

The south of Africa is not so well known as the north, and the
difficulty of making explorations is a great obstacle to progress. For
some centuries, however, polished stone hatchets from the extreme south
of the continent have been preserved in the museums of Leyden and
Copenhagen, under the name of _thunderstones_, or _stones of God_. A
great many are found in British South Africa, especially at Graham’s
Town and Table Bay.39 Gooch, after describing the physical
configuration of the Cape, says that stone implements are found in all
the terraces at whatever level of the Quaternary deposits. With these
stone objects were found a good many fragments of coarse hand-made
pottery, that had been merely baked in the sun, and was strengthened
with good-sized pieces of quartz. Similar peculiarities are noticed in
ancient European pottery. We shall have to refer again to these
singular analogies, one of the chief aims of this book being to bring
them into notice.

In the torrid regions between the Vaal and the Zambezi rivers, we find
traces of a race of a civilization different from that of the savages
conquered by the English. At Natal the gradual progress of these
unknown people can be traced step by step. To the earliest period of
all belong nothing but roughly hewn flints, and no traces of pottery
have been found; then follow flint arrow-heads of more distinct form,
and here and there fragments of sun-dried pottery. Of more recent date
still are polished stone weapons and more finely moulded pottery;
whilst to the latest date of all belong weapons of considerable variety
of form, better adapted to the needs of man, and with these weapons
were found huge stone mortars which had been used for crushing grain,
and bear witness to the use of vegetable diet.

We also meet with important ruins in the Transvaal. Some walls are
still standing which are thirty feet high and ten thick, forming
imperishable memorials of the past. They are built of huge blocks of
granite piled up without cement. We know nothing of those who erected
them; their name and history are alike effaced from the memory of man,
and we know nothing either of their ancestors or of their descendants.

In the Antipodes certain curious discoveries point to the existence of
man in those remote and mysterious times, to which, for want of a
better, we give in Europe the name of the Age of the Mammoth and the
Reindeer; and everything points to the conclusion that man appeared in
the different divisions of the earth about the same time. Probably the
first appearance of our race in Australia was prior to the last
convulsions of nature which gave to that continent its present
configuration. “Scientific studies,” says M. Blanchard,40 “lead us to
believe that at one period a vast continent rose from the Pacific
Ocean, which continent was broken up, and to a great extent submerged,
in convulsions of nature. New Zealand and the neighboring islands are
relics of this great land.”

In the Corrio Mountains in New Zealand, at a height of nearly 4,921
feet above the sea-level, have been found flints shaped by the hand of
man, associated with a number of bones of the Dinornis, the largest
known bird. Other facts bear witness to an extinct civilization, which
we believe to have been extremely ancient, but to which, in the present
state of our knowledge, it is impossible to assign a date. In the
island of Tonga-Taboo, one of the Friendly group, is a remarkable
megalith, the base of which rests on uprights thirty feet high, and
supports a colossal stone bowl which is no less than thirteen feet in
diameter by one in height. In the same island is a trilithon consisting
of a transverse bar resting on two pillars provided with mortises for
its reception. The pillars weigh sixty-five tons, and a local tradition
affirms that the coralline conglomerate out of which they were hewn was
brought from Wallis Island, more than a thousand miles off. It is
difficult to explain41 how the makers of this trilithon managed to
transport, to work, and to place such masses in position. In a
neighboring island a circle of uplifted stones, covering an area of
several hundred yards, reminds us of the cromlechs of Brittany. The
so-called Burial-Mound of Oberea at Otaheite, if it really was
constructed with stone tools, is yet more curious. Imagine a pyramid of
which the base is a long square, two hundred and sixty feet long by
eighty-seven wide. It is forty-three feet high. The top is reached by a
flight of steps cut in the coralline rock, all these steps being of the
same size and perfectly squared and polished.42

[Illustration: 4.]

Stone statues on Easter Island.

On a rock at the entrance to the port of Sydney a kangaroo is
sculptured. In Easter Island (Rapa-Nui) La Pérouse discovered a number
of coarsely executed bust statues (Fig. 4). There are altogether some
four hundred of them, forming groups in different parts of the island.
The excavations conducted by Pinart in 1887 have proved these figures
to be sepulchral monuments. He managed to make a considerable
collection of crania and human bones. Round about the crater of the
Rana-Raraku volcano, forty of these figures have been counted, all of a
similar type, all cut in one piece of solid trachyte rock. In another
place are eighty busts with longer noses and thicker lips, forming a
group by themselves. The largest of them is some thirty-nine feet high.
On the sides of the volcano, scattered about amongst the statues, have
been picked up a considerable number of knives, scrapers, and pointed
pieces of obsidian, which were probably tools thrown away by the
sculptors of the figures.

These monuments and sculptures are certainly the work of a race very
different from the present natives, who are altogether incapable of
producing anything of the kind, and who retain absolutely no traditions
respecting their predecessors. This complete oblivion, which may appear
rather strange, is by no means rare amongst savage races, and Sir John
Lubbock cites a great many very curious examples. “Oral traditions,”
says Broca, “are changed and distorted by each succeeding generation;
and are at last effaced to give place to others as transitory, and thus
the most important events are, sooner or later, relegated to
oblivion.”43

We have dwelt at considerable length in another volume44 on the
earliest inhabitants of America. Much still remains unknown in spite of
the considerable and important work done of late years. The very name
of the New World seems to be altogether out of place, America being as
old, if not older, than any continent of the Eastern Hemisphere. Lund
has brought forward weighty reasons for his theory that the central
plateau of Brazil was already a country when the rest of the continent
was still submerged or at least represented merely by a few small
islets. This theory, however, even if it could be absolutely proved,
would not help us to fix the date of the earliest presence of man in
America, still less to say by what route he arrived there.

[Illustration: 5.]

Fort Hill, Ohio.

Certain facts, amongst which I would, in the first place, quote the
discoveries of Dr. Abbott in the alluvial deposits of the Delaware and
those recently announced in Nevada,45 prove the contemporaneity of men
like ourselves with the great edentate and pachydermatous mammals,
which were the most characteristic creatures of the American fauna. The
prehistoric inhabitants of North America were familiar with the
mastodon, those of South America with the glyptodon, the shell of which
on occasion served as a roof to the dwelling of primeval reran, which
dwelling was often but a den hollowed out of the ground. As in Europe,
the early inhabitants of America had to contend with powerful mammals
and fierce carnivora; and in the West as in the East man made up in
intelligence for his lack of brute force, and however formidable an
animal might be, it was condemned to submit to, or disappear before,
its master. In course of time Sedentary replaced Nomad races; shell
heaps, some of marine, some of riverine and lacustrine species, but all
alike mixed with a great variety of rubbish, were gradually piled up
extending for many miles and covering many acres of ground, bearing
witness to the existence of a population already considerable.

[Illustration: 6.]

Group of sepulchral mounds.

In other parts of America prehistoric races have left behind them huge
earthworks, lofty masses which were probably fortifications (Fig. 5),
temples, and sepulchral monuments (Fig. 6). These earthworks extend
throughout North America from the Alleghany Mountains to the Atlantic,
from the great lakes of Canada to the Gulf of Mexico. The name of the
people who erected them is lost, and we must be content with that of
Mound Builders, which commemorate their vast undertakings.

[Illustration: 7.]

Ground plan of a pueblo of the Mac-Elmo Valley.

At a period probably nearer our own, Arizona and New Mexico were
occupied by other maces, who built the so-called _pueblos_, which were
regular phalansteries, or communal dwellings, each member of the tribe
having to be content with one wretched little cell (Fig. 7). At some
distance from the men of the _pueblos_ lived the Cliff Dwellers, about
whom we know next to nothing; a few stone weapons and countless
fragments of pottery being all they have left behind them. These men
established themselves in situations which are now inaccessible, hewing
out a dwelling in the rocks on the mountains (Figs. 8 and 9) with
wonderful perseverance, and closing up the approaches with adobes or
sun-dried bricks, making incredible efforts to obtain for their
families what must have been at the best but a precarious shelter.46
These prehistoric races were succeeded in America by the Toltecs,
Aztecs, Chibcas, and Peruvians, all known in history, though their
origin is as much involved in obscurity as that of their predecessors.
Temples, palaces, and magnificent monuments tell of the wealth which
gold gives, a wealth, alas, which also enervated the vital forces, so
that the Spanish and Portuguese met with but little serious resistance
in their rapid conquests.

[Illustration: 8.]

Cliff-house on the Rio Mancos.

[Illustration: 9.]

House in a rock of the Montezuma Cañon.

Such are the facts with which we have to deal. In the following
chapters we shall consider more at length the problems they present,
but already we are led to one important conclusion: in every part of
the globe, in every latitude, in every climate, worked flints, whether
but roughly chipped or elaborately polished, present analogies which
must strike the most superficial observer. “We find them,” remarks an
American author, “in the tumuli of Siberia, in the tombs of Egypt, in
the soil of Greece, beneath the rude monuments of Scandinavia; but
whether they come front Europe or Asia, from Africa or America, they
are so much alike in form, in material, and in workmanship, that they
might easily be taken for the work of the same men.”

At a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science
in 1871, Sir John Lubbock showed worked flints from Chili and New
Zealand with others found in England, Germany, Spain, Australia, the
Guianas, and on the banks of the Amazon; which one and all belonged to
the same type. More recently the Anthropological Society of Vienna
compared the stone hatchets found near the Canadian lakes and in the
deserts of Uruguay, with others from Catania in Italy, Angermünde in
Brandenburg, and a tomb in Scandinavia, deciding that they were all
exactly alike. Lastly, those who studied at the French Exhibition of
1878 the hatchets, hammers, and scrapers, the bone implements, pottery,
and weapons brought from different places, the inhabitants of which had
no communication with each other, could not fail to notice in their
turn how impossible it was to distinguish between them. “So evident is
this resemblance,” says Vogt,47 “that we may easily confound together
implements brought from such very different sources.”

The same observation applies to megalithic monuments. Everywhere we
find these primitive structures assuming similar forms. It is difficult
enough to believe that the wants of man alone, such as the craving for
food, the need of clothing, and the necessity of defending himself,
have led in every case to the same ideas and the same amount of
progress. Even if this be proved by the worked flints, we cannot accept
a similar conclusion with regard to the megalithic monuments, which
imply reflection and a thought of the future far beyond the material
needs of daily life. Is it not more reasonable to regard a similitude
so striking as a proof of the unity of our race?

The human bones discovered are yet more convincing testimony.
Excavations have yielded some which may date from the very earliest
period of the existence of man upon the earth. They have been found in
caves and in the river drift, beneath the mounds of America and the
megalithic monuments of Europe, in the ice-clad districts of
Scandinavia and of Iceland, and in the burning deserts of Africa, but
not one of them owes its existence to men of a type different from
those of historic times or of our own day.48 MM. Quatrefages and Hamy
in their magnificent work “Crania Ethnica,” have been able to
distinguish prehistoric races and indicate the area they occupied.
These races are still represented, and their descendants of to-day
retain the characteristics of their ancestors.

One final conclusion is no less interesting. These absolutely countless
flints, these monuments of imposing size, these stones of immense
weight often brought from afar, these marvellous mounds and tumuli,
bear witness to the presence of a population which was already
considerable at the time of which we are endeavoring to make out the
traces. A long series of centuries must have been needed for a people
to increase to such an extent as to have spread over entire continents.
And time was not wanting. Whatever antiquity may be attributed to the
human race, whatever the initial date to which its first appearance may
be relegated, this antiquity is but slight, this date is but modern, if
we compare it with the truly incalculable ages of which geology reveals
the existence. At every turn we are arrested by the immensity of time,
the immensity of space, and yet our knowledge is still confined to the
mere outer rind of the earth, and science cannot as yet even guess at
the secrets hidden beneath that rind.

In concluding these introductory remarks, we must add that very great
difficulties await those who devote themselves to prehistoric
studies—difficulties such as noise but those who have attempted to
conquer them can realize. The rare traces of prehistoric man must be
sought amongst the effects of the cataclysms that have devastated the
earth, and the ruins piled up in the course of ages. We must show mall
wrestling with the ever-recurrent difficulties of his hard life, and
gradually developing in accordance with a law which appears to be
immutable. Such is the aim of this work, and it is with gratitude that
we assert at the beginning that the _pianta uomo_, the human plant, as
Alfieri calls our race, was endowed by the Creator from the first with
a very vigorous vitality, to enable it to contend with the dangers
besetting its steps in the early days of its existence, and with a
truly marvellous spirit, to be able to make so humble a beginning the
starting-point for a destiny so glorious.


1 M. Gaston.

2 Pliny calls them _ceraunia gemma_ (“Natural History,” book ii., ch.
59 book xxxvii., ch. 51).

3 S. Reinach proves clearly enough that the collections of the Emperor
Augustus were from Capri.

4 This skeleton was discovered in 1726 by Scheuchzer, a doctor of
Œningen, and by him placed in the Leyden Museum, with the pompous
inscription _Homo diluvii testis (Philosophical Transactions_, vol.
xxxiv.). Cuvier, by scraping away the stone, revealed the true nature
of the fossil.

5 “Ossium Fossilium Docimasia.”

6 “Mém. Acad. des Inscriptions,” 1734, vol. x., p. 163.

7 _Archæologia_, vol. ii., p. 118.

8 “The Antiquities of Warwickshire,” vol. iv., 1656.

9 _Archæologia_, vol. xiii., p. 105.

10 Castelfranco: _Revue d’Anthropologie_, 1887.

11 _Annales des Sciences Naturelles_, vol. xvii., p. 607. Cartailhac:
_Matériaux_, 1884.

12 “Recherches sur les Ossements Fossiles de la Province de Liège.”

13 _Athenæum_, 16 July, 1859.

14 “Discours sur les Révolutions du Globe,” third edition, p. 13,
Paris, Didot, 1861.

15 _Acad. des Sciences_, 18th and 23d May, 1863.

16 Lubbock: “On the Evidence of the Antiquity of Man Afforded by the
Physical Structure of the Somme Valley” (_Nat. Hist_. _Review_, vol.
ii.). Prestwich: “On the Occurrence of Flint Implements Associated with
the Remains of Extinct Species in Beds of a Late Geological Period”
(_Phil_. _Trans_., 1860). Evans: “Flint Implements in the Drift”
(_Arch_., 1860–62).

17 _Acad. des Sciences_, 1859, 1863.

18 Cartailhac: “L’Age de Pierre dans les Souvenirs et les Superstitions
Populaires.”

19 A short time before his tragic end, the noble and patriotic Gordon
sent to Cairo three hatchets or stone wedges found amongst the
Niams-Niams, who said they had fallen from Heaven, and who worshipped
then with superstitious rites (_Bull. Institut Égyptien_, 1886, No.
14).

20 “Museo Moscardo,” Padova, 1656.

21 According to M. Pitre de Lisle, the Bretons think that these stones
vibrate at every clap of thunder.

22 Roulin: _Acad. des Sciences_, December 28, 1868.

23 “Congrès d’Anthropologie et d’Archéologie Préhistorique,” Paris,
1889.

24 Council of Arles in 452, of Tours in 567, of Nantes in 658, of
Toledo in 681 and 692, and of Leptis in 743.

25 Baluze: “Capitularia Regum Francorum,” vol. i., pp. 518, 1231, 1237.

26 Steenstrup, Forchammer, Thomsen, Worsaae, and Nillsson. The
commission appointed by the Copenhagen Academy of Sciences presented
six reports on the subject between 1850 and 1856.

27 “Die Anfang des Eisens Cultur,” Berlin, 1886.

28 “Archéologie Celtique et Gauloise,” p. 46.

29 Dr. Much: “L’Age de Cuivre en Europe et son Rapport avec la
Civilisation des Indo-Germains,” Vienna, 1886. Pulsky: “Die Küpfer Zeit
im Ungarn,” Budapest, 1884. Cartailhac: “Ages Prehistoriques de
l’Espagne et du Portugal,” p. 211. E. Chantre: _Mat_., June, 1887; and
Berthelot: _Journal des Savants_, September, 1889.

30 Irenée Cochut: “Thèse presentée à la Faculté de Théologie
Protestante de Montauban.”

31 See my translation of the author’s admirable and exhaustive work on
“Prehistoric America,” chapters i. and iv.—Nancy Bell.

32 _Académie des Sciences_, May 23, 1881; “Antiquités du Musée de
Minoussink,” Tomsk, 1886–7.

33 “Les Âges Préhistoriques en Espagne et en Portugal.”

34 “Stone Implements from the Northwestern Provinces of India,”
_Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal_, Calcutta, 1883.

35 _Literary Journal of Madras_, vol. xiv.

36 “L’Âge de Pierre et la Classification Préhistorique d’après les
Sources Égyptiennes,” Paris, 1879.

37 Pitt Rivers: “On the Discovery of Chert Implements in the Nile
Valley,” British Association, York, 1881.

38 Belluci: “L’Eta della Pietra in Tunisia,” Roma, 1876, _Bol. della
Soc. Geog. Italiana_, 1876.

39 “The Stone Age of South Africa,” _Journ. Anth. Institute_, 1881.

40 _Revue des Deux-Mondes_, march 1, 1878.

41 De Quatrefages: _Rev. d’Ethnographie_, 1883, p. 97, etc.

42 Sir J. Lubbock: “Prehistoric Times,” pp. 483, 549.

43 _Ass. française_, le Havre, 1877. _Discours d’Ouverture_.

44 “Prehistoric America,” Paris, New York, and London.

45 See my translation of “L’Amérique Préhistorique,” chap. i., “Man and
the Mastodon.”—Nancy Bell.

46 Many interesting details respecting the Cliff Dwellers are given in
De Nadaillac’s “L’Amérique Préhistorique,” chap. v.—Nancy Bell.

47 _Congrès des Naturalistes Allemands_, Innsbruck, Sept., 1869,

48 “Quaternary man is always man in every acceptation of the word. In
every case in which the bones collected have enabled us to judge, he
has ever been found to have the hand and foot proper to our species,
and that double curvature of the spinal column has been made out, so
characteristic that Serres made it the distinctive attribute of his
human kingdom. In every case with him, as with us, the skull is more
fully developed than the face. In the Neanderthal skull so often quoted
as bestial, the cranial capacity is more than double that ever found in
the largest gorilla.” De Quatrefages: “Hommes Fossiles et Hommes
Sauvages,” p. 60.



CHAPTER II.
Food, Cannibalism, Mammals Fish, Hunting, and Fishing.


The first care of man on his arrival upon the earth was necessarily to
make sure of food. Wild berries, acorns, and ephemeral grasses only
last for a time, whilst land mollusca and insects, forming but a
miserable diet at the best, disappear during the winter. Meat must
certainly have been the chief food of prehistoric man; the
accumulations of bones of all sorts in the caves and other places
inhabited by him leave no doubt on that point. The horse, which in
Europe was hunted, killed, and eaten for many centuries before it was
domesticated, was an important article of diet, and was supplemented by
the aurochs, the stag, the chamois, the wild goat, the boar, the bare,
and failing them, the wolf, the fox, and above all the reindeer, which
multiplied rapidly in districts suitable to it. The elephant bones
picked up on Mount Dol and elsewhere are nearly all those of young
animals; and it is probable that they had been killed for food by man.
In the Sureau Cave in Belgium,1 in that of Aurignac in France, and
Brixham in England, have been found complete skeletons of the _Ursus
spelæus_, which bad evidently been dragged in with the flesh still on
them, for all the bones are in their natural position. In other caves,
the thorax and the vertebræ of the skeletons were missing; the
cave-man, having despatched his victim, bad evidently taken only the
more succulent parts into his retreat. Beasts of prey merely gnaw the
comparatively tender and spongy tops of the bones, leaving the hard,
compact parts untouched. In the caves that were inhabited by man,
however, we find the apophyses neglected, whilst the diaphyses are
split open. We cannot, therefore, make any mistake on this point, or
attribute to the beast of prey what is certainly the work of man.

Whilst he evidently preferred to hunt and eat the larger mammals, man
when pressed by hunger did not despise the small rodents, which were,
of course, more easily captured. Amongst piles of the bones of horses
and stags have been found the remains of martens, hedgehogs, and mice;
and from the Thayngen Cave have been taken the bones of more than five
hundred bares. In Belgium the water-rat seems to have been considered a
dainty, and in the Chaleux Cave alone were found more than twenty
pounds’ weight of the bones of this creature, nearly all bearing traces
of having been subjected to the action of fire.

The remains of birds are rarer, and Broca has remarked that the most
ancient hunting implements which have come down to us; those from the
Moustier Cave, for instance, were adapted rather to attack animals that
would show fight than those that would simply fly or run away. The
Gourdan Cave, however, has yielded the bones of the moor-fowl, the
partridge, the wild duck, and even the domesticated cock And hen; the
Frontal Cave, the thrush, the duck, the partridge, and the pigeon; and
in other caves were found the bones of the goose, the swan, and the
grouse. Milne-Edwards enumerates fifty-one species belonging to
different orders found in the caves of France, and M. Rivière picked up
the remains of thousands of birds in those of Baoussé-Roussé on the
frontier of Italy.2

The skulls of the mammals bad been opened, and the bones split. Brains
and marrow probably figured at feasts as the greatest delicacies.
Travellers, whose tales are a help to us in building up a picture of
the remote past of our race, relate that the Laplanders, as soon as an
animal is killed, break open its skull and devour the brain whilst it
is still warm and bleeding. This was probably also the custom amongst
prehistoric cave-men.

The flesh of animals was not, alas, the only meat eaten, and
excavations in different parts of the globe have led to the discovery
of traces of the practice of cannibalism which it is difficult not to
accept.3

Dr. Spring noticed at Chauvaux a great many bones which were nearly all
those of women and children, side by side with which lay others of
ruminants belonging to species still extant. All these bones bad alike
been subjected to great heat, and none but those which bad contained no
marrow were left unbroken. This appears an incontrovertible proof of
cannibalism, and Dr. Spring concludes that it was certainly practised
by the earliest inhabitants of Belgium. We must add, however, that
other excavations in the same cave at Chauvaux prove that it was used
as a burial-place, some skeletons being ranged in regular order with
weapons and stone implements placed beside them.4 M. Dupont mentions
having found in the caves of the Lesse, which date from the Reindeer
period, human bones mixed with other remains of a meal. He notes a
similar fact in another cave that he considers belongs to Neolithic
times. “But,” he adds, “none of these bones bear any trace of having
been struck with a flint or other tool with a view to their fracture.
If any of them are broken it is transversely, and the cause of the
fracture has been merely the weight of the earth above them; moreover,
they show no trace of the action of fire.”5 M. Dupont, therefore, still
retains some doubt of the cannibalism of the cave-men of the valley of
the Lesse, and attributes the presence of the bones of the dead amongst
the rubbish of all kinds accumulated by the living, to their idleness
and indifference. One example at the present day tends to confirm this
opinion, for travellers tell us of the same revolting carelessness
amongst the Esquimaux, who cannot certainly be classed amongst
cannibals.

The Abbé Chierici, speaking at the Brussels Congress6 of the
excavations in one of the Reggio caves, remarked that human bones were
mixed with those of animals, and that both showed traces of having been
burnt. These bones date from the Neolithic period, and with them were
picked up various objects of remarkable workmanship, including
fragments of pottery, half a grindstone for crushing grain, and some
admirably polished serpentine hatchets.

Other facts leave no doubt of the cannibalism of the earliest
inhabitants of Italy. Moreover, hesitation on this point is impossible
for other reasons, as Roman historians allude to the practice. Pliny,7
in saying how little removed was a human sacrifice from a meal, adds,
that it ought not to surprise us to meet with this monstrous custom
amongst barbarian races, as it prevailed in ancient times in Italy and
Sicily.

It is generally admitted that we can tell whether the fracture of long
bones was intentional by the way in which they were broken. This fact,
which is true alike with the bones of men and of animals, is the most
important proof we have of the cannibalism of the men of the Stone age.
To the examples already given, we can easily add others culled from
France. In the Pyrenees and in the caves of Lourdes and Gourdan, for
instance, human bones have been found mixed with the cinders and ashes
of the hearth, and still bearing the marks of the implements with which
they were broken.

At Bruniquel a human skull was found which had been opened in the same
way as the heads of ruminants amongst which it was picked up, and on
its external surface were deep notches, which appear to have been made
with a flint hatchet. Similar traces of revolting feasts on human flesh
are not at all rare; near Paris, at Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, and at
Varenne-Saint-Maur, for instance.8

The excavations in the Montesquieu-Avantès Cave, about six miles from
Saint-Girons, have brought to light a hearth covered over with a layer
of stalagmite; numerous fragments of human bones, crania, femora,
tibiæ, humeri, and radii were found in this layer, and in that of the
subjacent clay. In many cases the medullary orifice had been enlarged
to make it easier to get out the marrow. It is impossible to attribute
this to a rodent, for the bones gnawed by animals of that kind present
a regular series of marks. The conclusion is inevitable: these bones,
alike of men and of animals, were the remains of a meal.9

In Kent’s Hole, the celebrated cave in Devonshire, amongst many objects
dating from the Stone age, were found some human bones bearing traces
of having been gnawed by man. The eminent anthropologist, Owen, came to
a similar conclusion—that cannibalism had been practised—after
examining the jaw-bone of a child found in Scotland; and so did the
Rev. F. Porter, after the excavations near Scarborough, where several
skeletons were found under a tumulus, which had apparently been thrown
where they were discovered by accident.

The Cesareda caves in Portugal have yielded some bones split
lengthwise; and beneath the dolmen near the village of Hammer, in
Denmark, human bones and those of stags have been found half gnawed,
and showing only too clearly the origin of the marks upon them. Worsaae
quotes similar facts at Borreby, Chantres refers to the same thing in
the caves of the Caucasus, Captain Burton at Beitsahur, near Jerusalem,
Wiener in the _sambaquis_ of Brazil, even in deposits which he
considers of recent origin.10

Brazil is not the only part of the American continent in which we find
traces of the use of this revolting food. In the kitchen-middings of
Florida Wyman found human bones, which had been intentionally broken,
mixed with those of deer and beavers. The marrow had been taken from
all of them and eaten by man. Yet more recent discoveries of a similar
kind have been made in New England.11

We must, however, add that many of these facts are contested. Every
people considers it a point of honor to repudiate the idea that its
ancestors fed on human flesh, and yet everywhere history tells us of
the practice of cannibalism. Herodotus speaks of it amongst the
Androphagæ and the Issedones, people of Scythian origin; Aristotle
amongst the races living on the borders of the Pontus Euxinus; Diodorus
Siculus amongst the Galatians; and Strabo, in his turn, says: “The
Irish, more savage than the Bretons, are cannibals and polyphagous;
they consider it an honor to eat their parents soon after life is
extinct.”12

From the ancient tombs of Georgia have been taken human bones that have
been boiled or charred, which were doubtless those of the victims eaten
by the assistants in the _fêtes_ which have ever accompanied funeral
rites.

In the fourth century of our era Jerome speaks of having met in Gaul
with the Attacotes, descended from a savage Scotch tribe, who fed on
human flesh, and that though they possessed great herds of cattle and
flocks of sheep, with numbers of pigs, for whom their vast forests
afforded excellent grazing grounds13; and though the Scandinavian
kitchen-middings have not so far yielded any traces of the practice of
cannibalism, Adam of Bremen, who preached Christianity at the court of
King Sweyn Ulfson, represents the Danes of his day as barbarians clad
in the skins of beasts, chasing the aurochs and the eland, unable to do
more than imitate the cries of animals and devouring the flesh of their
fellow-men.14

Nothing could exceed the barbarity of the Mexican sacrifices, the
numbers of the victims, and the refinements of torture to which they
were subjected. Prisoners, who had often been fattened for months
previously, perished by thousands on the altars. The palpitating flesh
was distributed amongst the assistants, and a horrible custom compelled
the priests to clothe themselves in the still bleeding skins of the
unfortunate wretches, and to wear them until they rotted to pieces.

Without going back to an antiquity so remote, in how many different
regions of Africa and America, and in how many islands of Polynesia
have not our sailors and missionaries reported the practice of
cannibalism in our own day? It is difficult, therefore, not to believe,
although the fact cannot perhaps be very distinctly proved, that the
first inhabitants of Europe degraded as were the conditions of their
existence, did eat human flesh and acquire a depraved taste for it;
impelled thereto not only by the pangs of hunger, but also by a
revolting superstition.

Animals, however, were very plentiful all around. Stags, elks, aurochs,
horses, and the large pachyderms multiplied very rapidly in the wide
solitudes, the pasture lands of which afforded them a constantly
renewed supply of food, and the beasts of prey in their turn found an
easy prey in the ruminants.15 The ways of animals do not change, and
the travellers who are exploring the interior of Africa tell us that
now, as in the day we are trying to recall, hundreds of elephants and
rhinoceroses congregate in a limited area, whilst innumerable herds of
giraffes, zebras, and gazelles graze peacefully in the presence of man,
whose destructive powers they have not yet learnt to dread.

Delegorgue speaks of one lake peopled by more than one hundred
hippopotami, and of a region less than three miles in diameter
containing six hundred elephants. Livingstone tells us that he saw
troops of more than four thousand antelopes pass at a time, and that
these animals showed absolutely no fear. We may give a yet more curious
instance. Captain Gordon Cumming, crossing the plains stretching away
on the north of the Cape, saw troops of gazelles and antelopes,
compelled by a long drought to migrate in search of the water
indispensable to them, and be describes with enthusiasm one of these
migrations, telling us that the plain was literally covered with
animals, the hurrying herds defiling before him in an endless stream.
On the evening of the same day, a yet more numerous herd passed by in
the same direction, the numbers of which were absolutely incalculable,
but which, according to Cumming, must have exceeded several hundred
thousand.

Such must have been animal life in Europe in Quaternary times. “Grand
indeed,” cries Hugh Miller, “was the fauna of the British Isles in
those days. Tigers, as large again as the biggest Asiatic species,
lurked in the ancient thickets; elephants, of nearly twice the bulk of
the largest individuals that now exist in Africa or Ceylon, roamed in
herds; at least two species of rhinoceros forced their way through the
primeval forest, and the lakes and rivers were tenanted by hippopotami
as bulky and with as great tusks as those of Africa.”16

Material proofs of the presence of animals are not wanting. The
accumulation of coprolites in the cave of Sentenheim (Alsace) bears
witness to the number of bears which once haunted it. Nordmann took
from a cave near Odessa 4,500 bones of ursidæ, associated with no less
numerous relics of the large cave-lion and cave-hyena.17 The Külock
Cave, now some six hundred and fifty feet above the river, contained
the remains of no less than 2,500 bears, and similar relics occur by
thousands in the osseous breccia of Santenay and in the cave of Lherm,
where they form a regular ossuary. It would be easy to quote similar
facts from Belgian, German, and Hungarian caves. In almost every case
the position of the skeletons seems to show that the bears sought a
last refuge in the caves, and that death had surprised them during
their winter sleep. Pachyderms were no less numerous than bears. The
remains of mammoths are found from the north of Europe to Greece and
Spain, and we meet with them in Algeria, in Asia from the Altai
Mountains to the Arctic Ocean, and in America in Mexico and Kentucky.
They seem to have entrenched themselves especially in Siberia, whence
tusks are still exported as an article of commerce. In the extreme
North, those parts of Wrangel’s Land which have been explored are
strewn with the bones of mastodons, and in some parts of Sonora and
Columbia these remains form almost inexhaustible deposits.

Animals of the cervine and equine groups were, if possible, yet more
numerous. M. Piette estimates the number of reindeer whose bones he has
picked up in the Gourdan Cave as over. 3,000, and the number of cervidæ
found at Hohlefels is positively incalculable.

In 1826, Marcel de Serres called attention to the great number of the
bones of animals of the equine family found in the neighborhood of
Lunel-Viel; at Solutré, the remains of horses cover a great portion of
the slope which stretches from the eastern side of the mountain to the
bottom of the valley. Here are found those vast accumulations to which
the inhabitants of the valley give the characteristic name of
_horse-walls_. The number of horses, the bones of which have gone to
form these walls, may be estimated without exaggeration at 40,000. The
bones are mixed together in the greatest confusion, many of them show
traces of having been burnt, and the flesh of the horse was evidently
the favorite diet of the people of Solutré.18

At first man obtained by force, often aided by strategy, the animals he
coveted. He bad not yet learnt to tame them and reduce them to
servitude. Neither the reindeer nor the horse was as yet domesticated,
and neither in the caves nor in the various deposits elsewhere has a
complete skeleton been found, but only—a very significant fact—the
bones on which had been the greater amount of flesh. The absence of any
remains of the dog, so indispensable an animal in the keeping of
flocks, is yet another proof that domestication was still unpractised.

It was with most miserable weapons, such as a few stones, scarcely even
rough-hewn, and a few flint arrows, that the cave-man did not hesitate
to attack the most formidable animals, and with such apparently
inadequate means he succeeded in wounding and even killing them. The
French Museum possesses mammoth and rhinoceros bones bearing fine
scratches produced by the weapons which had been used to despatch the
animals. The metacarpus of a large beast of prey, found at Eyziès,
retains marks no less clear, and the skull of a bear front Nabrigas has
in it a large wound which must have been made by a missile of some
kind.

In Ireland a stone hammer was found wedged into the head of a _Cervus
megaceros_; in Cambridgeshire, the skull of an _Ursus spelæus_ still
containing the fragment of a celt which had given the animal his
deathblow; at Richmond (Yorkshire) the bones of a large deer which had
been sawn with a flint implement. The fine collection in the University
of Lund, contains a vertebra of a urns pierced by an arrow, and the
Copenhagen Museum, the jaw of a stag pierced by a fragment of flint.
Steenstrup mentions two bones of a large stag into which stone chips
had penetrated deeply, and in which the fracture had been gradually
covered over by the bony tissue. A bone of some bovine animal with an
arrow deeply imbedded in it has been taken from a bed of peat in the
island of Moën, celebrated for its tumuli and the number of objects
found in them. At Eyziès, a flint flake has been found firmly fixed in
one of the lumbar vertebrae of a young reindeer, and M. de Baye
mentions an arrow with a tranverse edge stuck in the bone of a
badger.19 The Abbé Ducrost found a flint arrow-head sticking in a
vertebra of a horse.

Nor were those already mentioned the only animals on which man made
war. We shall speak presently of the contests with each other, which
began amongst men in the very earliest days of humanity. Human bones,
perforated by arrows and broken by stone hatchets, bear ineffaceable
traces to this day of homicidal struggles.

In many places fresh-water and marine fish were utilized as food by
man. In the numerous caves of the Vezère, in those of Madeleine,
Eyziès, and Bruniquel, excavations have brought to light the vertebræ
and other bones of fishes, amongst which predominate chiefly those of
the jack, the carp, the bream, the drub, the trout, and the tench—in a
word, all the fish which still people our rivers and lakes. In the Lake
Stations of Switzerland, fish of all kinds are no less abundant. At
Gardeole, amongst the bones of mammals have been found the shells of
mollusca, and remains of the turtle and of goldfish. Fish was not,
however, caught by all these primitive people, not even by all those
who lived by the sea. In researches carefully carried on for years in
the Maritime-Alps, M. Rivière found neither fishing-tackle nor
fish-lines.

Whilst the cave-men of the south of France seem not to have utilized
any but fresh-water fish, the Scandinavians, at a date probably less
remote however, did not hesitate to brave the ocean. The
kitchen-middings contain numerous remains of fish, amongst which those
of the mackerel, the dab, and the herring are the most numerous. There,
too, we meet with relics of the cod, which never approaches the coast,
and must always be sought by the fisherman in the open sea.

Although we are in a position to assert that men were able to catch
fish during every prehistoric period, if not in every locality, we can
speak less positively of their mode of doing so. The earliest
fishing-tackle was doubtless of the most primitive description: the
bone of some animal, a fragment of hard wood, or even a fish-bone
pointed at each end and pierced with a hole, served their purpose (Fig.
10). The Exhibition of Fishing-Tackle held at Berlin in 1880 contained
several such implements, some of wood, others of bone. Others have also
been found in the Madeleine Cave, and in different stations of the
ancient inhabitants of Switzerland. It is interesting to note their
resemblance to those still in use amongst the Esquimaux.

[Illustration: 10.]

1. Fragments of arrows made of reindeer horn from the Martinet Cave
(Lot-et-Garonne).—2. Point of spear or harpoon in stag-horn (one third
natural size).—3. and 4. Bone weapons from Denmark.—5. Harpoon of
stag-horn from St. Aubin.—6. Bone fish-hook; pointed at each end, from
Wangen.

Prehistoric mail also turned to account the teeth of animals. We may
quote in this connection the molars of a bear from which the enamel and
the crown have been removed, and the thickness of which has been
lessened by rubbing (Fig. 11). The small flints picked up in great
numbers in the department of the Gironde also date from a remote
antiquity; they are sixteen millimetres long by four wide, and though
we cannot assert it as a fact, they are supposed to have been used for
catching fish.

[Illustration: 11.]

Bears’ teeth converted into fish-hooks.

[Illustration: 12.]

Fish-hook made out of a boar’s tusk.

The Museum of Lund possesses two flint fish-books of a curved shape,
one of them, which is four centimetres long by nearly three wide, was
found by the seashore; the other and smaller one came front the shores
of Lake Kranke.20 Fish-hooks made of bone, which is more easily worked
than flint, very soon replaced those in that material. They are
numerous in the Lake Stations of Wangen, Mooseedorf, and St. Aubin.
Some are cut out of the horns of oxen, others of stags’ antlers; while
others again are made of boars’ tusks (Fig. 12), but all alike greatly
resemble modern forms. The peat-bogs of Scania have yielded a bone
fish-hook seven centimetres long, which is considered very ancient, and
the Museum of Stettin possesses one, also very old, found in a gnarly
deposit of Pomerania. We must not forget to mention, although it
probably belongs to a much more recent period, a fish-hook in reindeer
horn, now in the Christiania Museum. It was found in a tomb in the
island of Kjelnoë, not far from the Russian frontier. Numerous
skeletons, wrapped up in swathings of birch-bark, repose in this tomb.
All around lay fragments of pottery, lance- and arrow-heads,21 and
combs of reindeer horn, the date of which it is impossible to fix
exactly.

In America, stone fish-hooks are rare. The most ancient are of bone,
and resemble those now in use. They have been picked up in Dakota, and
in the cinderheaps of Madisonville (Ohio), in Indiana, in Arkansas, on
the shores of Lake Erie, and in a kitchen-midding of Long Island. The
greater number of them are polished, and some of them have near the top
a hole by which they could be fastened to a line or cord. The
fish-hooks of California are remarkable for their rounded forms and
sharply curved points; the top was covered with a thick layer of
asphalt to which the line was probably fastened. They are numerous in
all the islands of the Pacific coast. In that of Santa Cruz Schumacker
excavated a tomb which must have been that of a fish-hook manufacturer,
for care had been taken to place near the deceased, not only the
implements of his craft, but also a number of fish-hooks in various
stages of advancement. The Californians used the shells of the _Mytilus
Californicus_ and _Haliotis_ to make fish-hooks, and these were even
more curved than those made of bone. The shape seems but little suited
for fishing, but even in our own day the natives of the Samoa Islands
use similar tackle with great success. The Indians of the northwest
coast make fish-hooks of epicea wood, and those of Arizona utilize for
the same purpose the long spikes of the cactus. It is very probable
that European as well as American races knew how to use wood in the
same manner. During the lapse of centuries, however, these fragile
objects have been reduced to dust, and we are unable to make any
further conjectures on the subject.

The use of bronze, the first metal to be generally employed, does not
seem to have introduced any great modifications in fishing-tackle.
Bronze fish-hooks are, however, thinner and lighter than those in other
materials, and resemble those in use amongst fishermen at the present
day. A certain number have been found in the Lake Stations of
Switzerland, in lakes Peschiera and Bourget, as well as in Scotland,
Ireland, and the island of Fünen off the coast of Denmark. We must not
omit to mention the important foundry of Larnaud, or the _cache_ of
Saint-Pierre-en-Chatre, both so rich in bronze objects. In America,
where the copper mines of Lake Superior were worked at a remote
antiquity, a few rare copper fish-hooks have been found, the greater
number in the Ancon necropolis.22 Gold fish-hooks are comparatively
more numerous, and have been discovered in New Granada and the Cauca
State.23 One of these was found some forty-nine feet below the surface
of the ground, and as there is no trace of disturbance, we cannot
assign to it a recent origin. The gold fish-hooks are about four inches
long, and look like big pins with the lower end bent back upon the
upper.

Other fishing implements were also used by our prehistoric ancestors.
At Laugerie-Basse a rough drawing shows us a man striking with a
harpoon a fish that is trying to escape. These harpoons were generally
made of reindeer horn (Figs. 10 and 13). Some had but one barb, others
several. One of the largest was found in the Madeleine Cave; it is
eight inches long, and has three barbs on one side and five on the
other. Most of these weapons have a notch in the handle, with the help
of which they could be firmly fastened to a spear or lance. Different
fashions prevailed in different localities, and sinews, leather thongs,
roughly plaited cords, creepers, and resinous substances were often
pressed into the service.

[Illustration: 13.]

A, a large barbed arrow from one side of the Plantade shelter
(Tarn-et-Garonne). B, lower part of a barbed harpoon from the Plantade
deposit.

Many harpoons have been found in the caves of the south of France;
others come from Belgium, from Keyserloch in Germany, Kent’s Hole in
England, from Conches, Wauwyl, and Concise in Switzerland. Excavations
in Victoria Cave, near Settle (Yorkshire), yielded amongst other
interesting objects a bone harpoon cut to a point and with two barbs on
either side. On the banks of the Uswiata, a little Polish river flowing
into the Dnieper, two harpoons made out of the horns of some bovine
animal were found, both in perfect preservation, and with several
barbs.24 Count Ouvaroff, in an excellent work published a little before
his death, mentions a bone spear from the shores of the Oka, and Madsen
and Montelius speak of Scandinavian harpoons. These weapons must have
been especially useful in the North during the severe frosts of winter.
The fisherman made a hole in the ice and struck the fish with his
harpoon when the poor creatures came up to the surface to breathe.

From the most remote times the Americans knew how to make and use
harpoons. As many as twenty-eight different kinds are known.25 In some
the barbs are bilateral, but most of them have them on one side only.
Some, however, are made of stag or elk horn, and one harpoon from Maine
is made of whalebone. A harpoon-point found near Detroit (Michigan) is
nearly a foot long by one inch thick. Excavations in a rock shelter in
Alaska yielded a harpoon which lay side by side with some of the most
ancient Quaternary mammals of America. A good many copper harpoon-heads
are also mentioned; one of the largest from Wisconsin is ten inches
long. Others have been found in the island of Santa Barbara
(California) and in Tierra del Fuego, where the natives of the present
day still use similar ones. These harpoons with barbs are by no means
simple weapons, the idea of which would naturally occur to the human
mind, so that it is really extremely strange to find weapons so
entirely similar in regions so different and so widely separated from
one another. This constant similitude in the working of the genius of
man is, as We shall never tire of repeating, one of the most striking
facts revealed by prehistoric researches.

Herodotus tells that the Pœni (Carthaginians) plunged baskets into the
water and drew them up full of fish. It is probable that the Lake
Dwellers of Helvetia employed a similar process, but these ancient
Swiss were already more advanced than that. They knew how to cultivate
hemp, to spin it, and to make nets of it; the remains of some of these
nets have often of late years been taken from the beds of the lakes.

It is almost impossible to class with any certainty the numerous Lake
Stations of Switzerland. Some few certainly date from the Stone age,
others from the transition period, between it and that of the early use
of metals, or even from the Bronze age. As therefore they have been
occupied at different times by different people, some of them having
even been still in use in the time of the Romans, it is most difficult
to fix with any precision the date to which belong the various objects
mixed together beneath the deep waters of the lakes. We can only say
that the nets differ very much in the size of the meshes, and the
thickness of the rope used. Those found at Robenhausen are very like
those in use in France at the present day. There has, in fact, been no
advance in the art of making fishing-tackle since the remote days of
the Lake Dwellers.

We are ignorant of the mode of manufacture of prehistoric nets. Did the
Lake Dwellers, as some archæologists are disposed to think, use a loom?
Did they use shuttles and rollers such as are employed by the Esquimaux
and Californians of the present day? It is impossible to say, but it is
supposed that the bears’ teeth sharpened to a point, found in some
stations, were used to tighten the meshes. These meshes were generally
square, and each one was finished of with a knot of the same size at
each intersection.

The lead weights so indispensable to fishermen of the present day for
sinking the nets, were represented in prehistoric times by stones.
These stones, which are drilled or notched, are found in all the Lake
Stations. The fragments of pottery pierced with a hole found at
Schussenried, a Lake Station of the Stone age on the Feder-See
(Wurtemburg), were probably used for the same purpose. In some of the
Swiss Lake Stations have also been found pieces of wood and cork,
pierced with one or more holes, which had certainly served as floats.

Numerous stone implements of the most primitive forms, often of rock
not native to the country, have been found in some of the islands of
Greece, as well as in Corsica, Sardinia, Elba, and Sicily. These
discoveries bear witness to the presence of man in these islands at a
very remote antiquity, though no other traces of the existence of
prehistoric human beings have as yet been found there. These men can
only have reached the islands by way of the sea. Boats were the only
means of communication between the Lake Dwellers of Switzerland and the
mainland, and, as we have seen, the ancient Scandinavians hunted fish
on the deep ocean. We must therefore admit that attempts at navigation
were made in the very earliest days of humanity. Alan, impelled by
necessity, or perhaps only by curiosity, was not afraid to launch his
bark, first upon the rivers, and later upon the more formidable waves
of the sea

Illi robur et æs triplex
Circa pectus erat, qui fragilem truci
Commisit pelago ratem
Primus.26

The Latin poet is right, and we cannot but admire those who were the
first to brave the terrors of the deep and the horrors of the tempest;
for they were gifted alike with the intelligence which conceives, the
courage that dares, and the strength that achieves.

Trees torn up by the roots by the force of the waters, and floating on
the surface of those waters, naturally attracted the attention of
primeval man, and the first boats were doubtless the trunks of such
trees roughly squared and then hollowed out with the help of fire.
Later experience led to the addition of a prow which would more easily
cleave the water, and a stern which would serve as a pivot. These
canoes, if such a name may be already given to them, were at first
guided by branches stripped of their leaves, or with long poles. Then
oars or paddles were introduced, which are better for beating the
water, and in later barks traces have been made out of what is supposed
to have been a mast, indicating the use of a sail. The art of
navigation may now be said to have been inaugurated. In different parts
of Europe have been found boats which certainly belong to very remote
times, though their exact date cannot be fixed. Their construction
greatly resembles that of the pirogues of the Polynesians, or the
kayaks of the Greenlanders. One of the most ancient, now in the Berlin
Provincial Museum, was taken from a peat-bog of Brandenburg.27 It is 27
feet long and scarcely 16 inches wide.

Sir W. Wilde describes several boats from the marshes and peat-bogs of
Ireland,28 many of which have handles cut in the wood at the ends, by
the help of which they could easily be dragged along overland. Sir W.
Wilde adds that the Irish also used _curraghs_, or _coracles_, which
were mere wicker frames covered with the skins of oxen. These frail
barks introduce us to a new mode of navigation; they are met with not
only in tire different countries of Europe, but also in America, and
were in use there in pre-Columbian times. Even more interesting
examples have been found in Scotland.29 Towards the close of last
century a pirogue was taken from the ancient bed of the Clyde at
Glasgow. Since then have been discovered, at depths varying from six to
twelve feet, more than twenty similar boats. The deposits in which they
lay had formerly been beneath the sea, but are now some twenty feet
above the level of the ocean. Great changes have therefore taken place
since these barks were launched upon the waves.30 Their mode of
construction is an excellent indication of the date to which they
belong. Some which are hollowed out of the trunks of oaks by the help
of fire, or with a blunt tool, are supposed by Lyell to date from the
Stone age. Others have clean-cut notches, evidently made with metal
implements. Some are made of planks joined together with wooden pegs,
and one canoe found in County Galway even contained copper nails. Most
of the boats from the bed of the Clyde seem to have foundered in still
waters. Some, however, were discovered in a vertical position, others
had the keel uppermost, and these latter had evidently sunk in a storm.
In one of these boats was a diorite hatchet of the kind characteristic
of Neolithic times; another, the wood of which was perfectly black, had
become as hard as marble, and in it was a cork plug. Then, as now, the
oak which yields cork was foreign to the cold climate of Scotland.

We will quote but one of the discoveries made in England. In 1881 a
canoe, hollowed out of the trunk of a tree, was found at Bovey-Tracey
in Devonshire. It lay in a deposit of brick-earth more than twenty-nine
feet below the highest level reached by the waters of the Bovey.31 It
was more than thirty-five inches wide, and its length could not be
exactly determined, the workmen having broken it in getting it out. An
eminent archæologist is of opinion that this boat dates from the
Glacial epoch, perhaps even from a more remote time. If this
hypothesis, the responsibility of which we leave to him, be correct,
this is the most ancient witness in existence of prehistoric
navigation. We must also mention a boat found near Brigg
(Lincolnshire), a few feet from a little river that flows into the
Humber. It is about forty-five feet long by three and a half feet wide,
and is some three feet high. The prow is fluted. There are no traces of
a mast, though the size of the boat must have made it difficult to
manage with oars alone.

One of the pirogues preserved at the Copenhagen Museum is made of one
half of the trunk of a tree, some six feet long, hollowed into the
shape of a trough, and cut straight at both ends.32 It is curious to
compare this clumsy structure with a boat recently discovered beneath a
tumulus at Gogstadten in Norway (Fig. 14), of which, though it dates
from historic times, we give a drawing, as it is a good illustration of
the progress made. The dead Viking had been laid in his boat, as the
most glorious of tombs; with its prow pointing seawards, for would not
the first thoughts of the chief when he awoke in another life be of the
sea which had witnessed his triumphs? The sides of the boat, which was
more than sixty-six feet long and fifteen across the widest part, were
painted, and around it was ranged a series of shields lapping over one
another like the scales of a fish, and not unlike the designs seen in
the celebrated Bayeux tapestry. A block of oak intended to receive the
mast was placed in the centre of the boat, and near the skeleton were
oars some fifteen feet long and similar in form to those now in use.

[Illustration: 14.]

Ancient Scandinavian boat found beneath a tumulus at Gogstadten.

Inlaying the foundations of the bridge of Les Invalides, Paris, a boat
was taken out of the mud which had lain there for many centuries. Like
most of those already mentioned, it had been made out of a single trunk
roughly squared. Everywhere, we must repeat once again, man’s original
ideas were the same; everywhere the tree floating on the top of the
water excited his curiosity, and became the starting-point for one of
his most important discoveries. Traces of similar attempts at
navigation are met with in other parts of France; a canoe was found in
the Loire near Saint Mars, and the Dijon Museum possesses another from
the same river, the latter some sixteen feet long, and traces have been
made out of what are supposed to have been seats, but may have been
mere contrivances for strengthening the boat. A canoe taken last year
from the bed of the Cher is of the shape of a trough closed at the end
by pieces of wood fixed by means of vertical grooves. The prow had been
shaped in the first instance in the trunk itself, and it was probably
owing to an accident, a collision perhaps, that it had had to be mended
in this way (Fig. 15).

[Illustration: 15.]

Ancient boat discovered in the bed of the Cher.

The Lake Dwellers of Switzerland owned boats from the time of their
first settlement in their water homes. One of them found at Robenhausen
is more than ten feet long, and is very shallow, varying from six to
eight inches. Like most of those already mentioned, it was hollowed out
of the trunk of a tree, bulging out towards the centre, and rounded at
the ends. So far none but stone tools have been found at the station of
Robenhausen, so that we must presume that it was with such tools that
the boat was made. The lakes of Bienne and. Geneva, and the stations of
Morges and Estavayer have also yielded boats which are doubtless less
ancient than those of which I have just spoken. In nearly all of them
the prow is curiously pointed. One of them from the Lake of Neuchâtel,
large enough to bold twelve people, has a beak at the stern and a
rounded prow; but there is no sign of any contrivance for keeping the
oars in place.

Lastly, a boat bas been found in Switzerland some 3,900 feet above the
valley of the Rhine, but no one can say how it came to be at such a
height.

[Illustration: 16.]

A lake pirogue found in the Lake of Neuchâtel. 1. As seen from the
outside. 2 and 3. Longitudinal and transverse sections.


These canoes, whatever their shape or size, can only have been worked
by means of oars, yet oars have seldom been found. The Geneva Museum,
however, has one which came from the muddy bed of an Italian lake, and
others are preserved in the Royal Museum of Dublin, which have every
sign of great antiquity. In de fault of the actual oars, we have other
proofs of their use. Gross33 mentions a boat (Fig. 16) in which holes
had been made in the upper parts of the sides to hold the oars. In 1882
a pirogue was taken out of the bed of the Rhone at Cordon (Ain), which
had been half buried in the mud of the river. The wood was black and
the upper portions were charred, but the middle part was still intact
and very hard. The holes, pierced in the sides at regular intervals,
may have served to keep the oars in place. The position of the rowers
at the bottom of the boat was very unsatisfactory. It was not, however,
until later that we find seats so placed as to enable the rowers to put
out all their strength. At a recent meeting of the Anthropological
Society (July 21, 1887) M. Letourneau observed that the rudder came
into use very slowly. It was not known to the Egyptians or to the
Phœnicians, nor, which is still more strange, to the Greeks and Romans.
Their vessels, whatever their size, were guided by two large oars
(_gubernaculum_) placed in the stern. The Chinese appear to have been
the only people who were acquainted with the use of the rudder from
time immemorial. It is probable that from them it passed to the Arabs
and even perhaps to the people of Europe.

A discovery made near Abbeville is the most ancient example we have of
the use of the mast. Some works being executed at the fortifications of
the town, brought to light a boat which must have been some twenty-one
feet long. Two projections form part of the planking, leaving between
them a rectangular space in which the mast was probably fixed.34

Professor Gastaldi speaks of a wooden anchor taken from a peat-bog near
Arona, beneath which was a pile dwelling. He dates it from the tinge
when the use of bronze was already beginning to spread in the north of
Italy. A stone of peculiar shape found at Niddau is, they say, an
_Ankerstein_ (anchor stone). This name is also given by Friedel to a
good-sized round lump of sandstone with a deep groove near the middle.
Lastly, Kerviler, in crossing a basin of the Bay of Penhouet, near
Saint-Nazaire, found several stones which had evidently been used to
keep boats at anchor, and with the aid of which we can get an idea of
the methods employed by ancient navigators (Fig. 17).

[Illustration: 17.]

Stones used as anchors, found in the Bay of Penhouet. 1, 2, 3, stones
weighing about 160 pounds each. 4 and 5, lighter stones, probably used
for canoes.

Such are the only details we have on the important subject of
prehistoric anchors, but we may add that ancient fishermen probably
ventured but a short distance from the land, and would not need
anchors, as they could easily carry their light boats on shore.

We leave now passed in review the conditions of the life of our remote
ancestors, noting the animals that were their contemporaries, and the
fish that peopled the watercourses near which they lived. We have
studied the earliest efforts at navigation, made in the pursuit of
fish, and we must now go back to examine the weapons, tools, and
ornaments of these ancient peoples, and trace in those objects the dawn
of art. This will be the aim of our next chapter.


1 In this cave were found the bones of 45 bears. In the Goyet Cave
(which bears the number 3), were found complete sets of the bones of 12
mammoths, 8 rhinoceroses, 57 bears, 57 horses, 24 hyænas, 35 reindeer,
6 uruses, 2 lions, with the bones of a great number of goats, chamois,
and boars. Dupont: “L’Homme pendant l’Âge de la Pierre,” p. 86.

2 These birds belonged to the rapaces, passeres, gallinaceous, wading,
and web-footed groups. Every order is represented, and nearly all the
bones were those of edible species, which had certainly served as food
to man.

3 Richard Andrée: “Die Anthropophagie eine Ethnographische Studie,”
Leipzig, 1887.

4 “Les Hommes de Chavaux et d’Engis” _Bul. Acad. Roy. de Belgique_,
vol. xx., 1853; vol. xviii. (new series), 1863; vol. xxii., 1866;
_Matériaux_, 1872. p, 517.

5 “L’Homme pendant les Âges de la Pierre,” p. 225.

6 “Compte Rendu,” p. 363.

7 “Hist. Nat.,” book vii., sec. 2.

8 Belgrand: “Le Bassin Parisien,” vol. i., p. 232.

9 _Bull. Soc. Anth_., 1869, p. 476.—_Ac. des Sciences_, 1870, first
week, p. 167.

10 _Archives du Musée National de Rio de Janeiro_, vol. i., 1876.

11 See my translation of De Nadaillac’s “Prehistoric America,” pp. 53,
58, and 59.”—N. D’Anvers.

12 “Geography,” book iv.

13 “Opera,” vol. ii., Migne edition, p. 335. Richard, of Cirencester,
says that the Attacotes lived on the shores of the Clyde, beyond the
great wall of Hadrian.

14 Schweden’s “Urgeschichte,” p. 341.

15 The felidæ were very numerous in Europe in Quaternary times. We may
mention two species of lions, _Leo nobilis_ and _Leo spelæus_, the
latter often confounded with the _delis spelæus_ of such frequent
occurrence in French caves, two species of tigers, _Tigris Edwardsiana_
and _Tigris Europæa_, the largest of the Quaternary felidæ, which was
some twelve feet long. We also know of seven species of leopards, six
species of cats, from the Serval to a little felis smaller than our
domestic cat; two species of lynx, and lastly the _machairodus_, a
beast of prey of considerable size, characterized by having
exceptionally long upper canines serrated like a saw. Probably these
beasts of prey were not all contemporaries, but succeeded each other.
(Bourguignat: “Histoire des Felidæ Fossiles en France dans les Dépôts
de la Période Quaternaire,” Paris, 1879.)

16 “Testimony of the Rocks,” p. 127, Edinburgh and Boston, 1857.

17 _Ossements Fossiles Trouvés à Odessa_. The cave-hyena resembles that
now living at the Cape.

18 Ducrost and Arcelin: “Stratigraphie de l’Éboulis de Solutré,”
_Mat_., 1876, p. 403_. Archives die Museum d’Hist. Nat. de Lyon_, vol.
1.

19 M. de Baye found a great many similar arrow-heads in the Petit-Morin
caves.

20 Nilsson: “The Primitive Inhabitants of Scandinavia.”

21 Captain Edward Johnson, who travelled about in New England from 1628
to 1632, relates that the children there spent their days in shooting
at the fish that appeared on the surface of the water, succeeding in
catching them with marvellous skill. “A History of New England,”
London, 1654.

22 Reiss and Steubel: “The Necropolis of Ancon in Peru,” London and
Berlin.

23 _Matériaux_, 1870, p, 348.

24 _Wiadomosei Archéologizne_, No. iv., Warsaw, 1882.

25 Ch. Rau: “Prehistoric Fishing in Europe and America.”

26 Horace: “Odes,” book i., ode iii.

27 Friedel: “Führer durch die Fischerei Abtheilung.”

28 “A Catalogue of the Antiquities in the Museum of the Royal Academy.”

29 _Proceedings of the Royal Academy of Scotland_, vol. iii. Dr. R.
Munro “Ancient Scottish Lake Dwellings or Crannoges,” Edinburgh, 1882.

30 Geikie, _Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal_, vol. xv. De Lapparent
“Traité de Géologie,” first edition, p. 518.

31 “Discoveries in the more Recent Deposits of the Bovey Basin,”
_Trans. Devonshire Ass_., 1883.

32 “Nordische Oldsager i der kongelige Museum i Kjobenhawn.”

33 “Les Proto-Helvètes,” _Nature_, 1880, 1st week, p. 151.

34 “Mém. Soc. d’Emulation d’Abbeville,” 1867.



CHAPTER III.
Weapons, Tools, Pottery; Origin of the Use of Fire, Clothing,
Ornaments; Early Artistic Efforts.


The Vedas show us Indra, armed with a wooden club, seizing a stone with
which to pierce Vritra, the genius of evil.1 Does not this call up a
picture of the earliest days of man upon the earth? His first weapon
was doubtless a knotty branch torn from a tree as be hurried past, or a
stone picked up from amongst those lying at his feet. These were,
however, but feeble means with which to contend with formidable feline
and pachydermatous enemies. Man bad not their great physical strength;
he was not so fleet a runner as many of them; his nails and teeth were
useless to him, either for attack or defence; his smooth skin was not
enough protection even from the rigor of the climate. Such inequality
must very quickly have led to the defeat of man, had not God given to
him two marvellous instruments: the brain which conceives, and the hand
which executes. To brute force man opposed intelligence, a glorious
struggle in which he was sure to come off victorious, for in the words
of Victor Hugo, “Ceci devait tuer cela.” The huge animals of Quaternary
times have disappeared for ever, whilst plan has survived, victor over
Nature herself. Even before his birth, an immutable decree had ordained
that nothing on the earth should check his development.

Man alone amongst the countless creatures around him knew anything of
the past, and he alone was able to predict the future. Even apes,
however great the intelligence that may be attributed to them, have
remained very much what they were from the first. In vain has one
generation succeeded another; they still obey the dictates of their
brutal instincts, as their ancestors did before them; and if apes
continue to propagate their species thousands of years hence they will
remain what we see them to be now. Dogs, too, will remain dogs,
elephants will continue to be elephants; beavers will make their dams
exactly like those of the present day, wasps will never learn to make
honey as bees do, and bees will never be able, like ants, to bring up
plant-lice to be their servants, or to enslave other families. Their
instincts are incapable of progress, and in their earliest efforts they
reach the limit assigned to them by the Eternal Wisdom. To man alone
has it been given to understand what has been done by his predecessors,
to walk more firmly in the path along which they groped, to pronounce
clearly the words they stammered. Without a doubt we descend from the
men who lived in the midst of primeval forests, or amongst stagnant
marshes, dwelling in caves, for the possession of which they often bad
to fight with the wild beasts around them. These men, however, knew
that one result achieved would lead to another, if similar means were
used; they saw that a pointed stone would inflict a deeper wound than a
blunt one on the animal they hunted, and therefore they learnt to
sharpen stones artificially; the skins of beasts, flung over their
shoulders, protected them from cold, and they learned to make garments;
seeds sprouted around them, and they learned to plant them; they
noticed the effect of heat upon metals, and tried to mix them; wild
animals wandered around them, and they learned to reduce them to
slavery. Every bit of knowledge won, and every progress made, became
the starting-point for fresh acquisitions, fresh advances, which
thenceforth remained forever the common heritage of the human race.

It was thus that experience early taught our remote ancestors that rock
chips more easily under the blows of a hammer when fresh from the
quarry; and everywhere men learnt to choose the stone best suited to
their purpose. For hatchets, wedges, and hammers, they used jade and
kindred substances, such as fibrolite, diorite, and basalt, which were
at the same time extremely durable, and very impervious to blows. For
spear- and arrow-heads, knives, saws, and all instruments requiring
sharp points and cutting edges, they employed quartz, jaspar, agate,
and obsidian, according to the situation of the worker; all these
materials, though extremely hard, being easily split into thin sharp
flakes. The blocks of stone were very methodically cut up; they were,
in fact, to use a very appropriate expression of M. Dupont’s, scaled
(_écaillês_). We give drawings of a few of these implements (Figs. 18,
19, and 20), which illustrate the earliest efforts of lean, efforts
which may be looked upon as the starting-point of all those industries
which in the course of centuries have developed results which it is
impossible to contemplate without astonishment.

[Illustration: 18.]

Scraper from the Delaware Valley.

[Illustration: 19.]

Implement from the Delaware Valley.


The host ancient tools which have come down to us were clumsy and
heavy, cut on both sides and pointed (Fig. 20). They may vary in
material, in size, and in finish, but they can always be easily
recognized.2 Were they man’s only weapons? We hesitate to believe it,
and the careful researches of M. d’Acy add to our incredulity.3 He
tells us that at Saint-Acheul, which was the very cradle of these
strange discoveries, the almond shape is found mixed with the pointed
amongst the Moustier flints, so that what is true in one place is not
in another, and any general conclusion would certainly be premature.

[Illustration: 20.]

Worked flints from the Lafaye and Plantade shelters (Tarn-et-Garonne).

It would take us a long time to enumerate the countries where tools of
the Chelléen4 type have been found. They are met with in the valleys of
the rivers of France, now imbedded in the flinty alluvium, now strewn
upon the surface of the soil. Though rare in Germany, they are found in
abundance in the southeast of England, and it is to this period that
must be assigned the discoveries at Hoxne, and in the basins of the
Thames, the Ouse, and the Avon. Similar discoveries have been frequent
in Italy, Spain, Algeria, and Hindostan. Dr. Abbott speaks of the
finding of such implements in the glacial alluvium of the Delaware
(Figs. 18 and 19), Miss Babitt in the alluvial deposits of the
Mississippi, Mr. Haynes in New Hampshire, Mr. Holmes in Colombia, and
other explorers in the basin of the Bridget and at Guanajuato in
Mexico. Everywhere these implements are identical in shape and in mode
of construction, and very often they are associated with the bones of
animals of extinct species.

Sometimes these Chelléen tools (the French call them _coups de poing_)
have retained at the base a projection to enable the user to grasp them
better; these certainly never had handles, but it will not do to draw
any general conclusions froth that fact; and an examination of the
collection of M. d’Acy, the most complete we have of relics of the
Chelléen period, proves on the contrary that certain tools could not
have been used unless they had been fixed into handles.

In the following epoch, to which has been given the name of Moustérien,
from the Moustier Cave (Dordogne), we already meet with more varied
forms, including scrapers, saws, knife-blades, and spear- or
arrow-heads, with the special characteristic of being cut on one side
only. These implements are found not only in the alluvium as are the
Chelléen _coups de poing_, but also in the cave or rock-shelter
deposits. Amongst the mammalian remains with which they are associated
are those of the mammoth, the _Rhinoceros tichorhinus_, the elk, the
horse, the aurochs, the cave-lion, the cave-hyena, and the cave-bear,
remarkable for the constancy of their characteristics. The _Elephas
antiquus_ and the _Rhinoceros Merckii_ that belonged to the preceding
period have now completely passed away, and the reindeer, now appearing
for the first time, are still far from numerous.

In the Solutréen period, so named after the celebrated Lake Station of
Solutré, we find stalked arrow-heads with lateral notches,5 flint-heads
of the form of laurel leaves, which are remarkable for their regularity
of shape and delicacy of finish; as compared with those of previous
periods, the forms are much more delicate and elegant. Many of the
caves of the south of France belong to this period. It is difficult to
mention them all, and even more difficult to make out a complete list
of contemporary mammalia; the deposits generally actually touch those
of another period, and the separation of the objects in them has not
always been made with all the care that could be wished. At Solutré,
remains of the horse predominate; whilst in other places those of the
reindeer are met with in considerable quantities, and with them are
found the bones of the cave-bear, the wild cat (a creature considerably
larger than the tigers of the present day), and of the mammoth, which
lived on in Europe many centuries.

Lastly to the Madeleine period, so named after the Madeleine Cave
(Dordogne), and considered one of the most important of the cave
epochs, belong tools and weapons of all manner of shapes and materials,
including bone, born, and reindeer antlers; from this time also date
barbed arrows and harpoons, batons of office, telling of social
organization; the engravings and carvings on which bear witness to the
development of artistic feeling. On the other hand, the flint
arrow-heads and knife-blades are not so finely cut; we see that man had
learned to use other materials than stone. The reindeer is the most
characteristic animal form of the Madeleine period.

To the times we have just passed in review succeeded others of a very
different kind, to which has been given the general naive of Neolithic.
The fauna, probably lender the influence of climatic and orographic
changes, underwent a complete transformation; the mammoth, the
cave-bear, the megaceros, and the large felidæ died out, the
hippopotamus was no longer seen, except in the heart of Africa; the
reindeer and other mammals that love to frequent the regions of
perpetual snow, retired to the extreme north; and in their place
appeared our earliest domestic animals, the ox, the sheep, the goat,
and the dog. Man, who witnessed these changes, continued to progress;
he abandoned his nomad for a sedentary life; he ceased to be a bunter,
and became an agriculturist and a shepherd. Everywhere we meet with
traces of new customs, new ideas, and a new mode of life. This progress
is especially seen in the industrial arts. Metals it is true are still
unknown, but side by side with tools, which are merely chipped or
roughly cut, we find for the first time hatchets, celts, small
knife-blades, and arrow-heads admirably polished by the long-continued
rubbing of one stone on another. Polishers, so much worn as to bear
witness to long service, are numerous in all collections, and rocks and
erratic blocks retain incisions which must have been used for the same
purpose.6

It is impossible to enumerate the number of polished hatchets which
have been found; their number is simply incalculable. Of all of them,
however, those of Scandinavia are the most remarkable for delicacy of
workmanship. With the fine hatchets of Brittany, may be compared the
blades found at Volgu, and preserved in the Museum of Copenhagen, and
those in pink, gray, and brown flint, from the Sordes Cave in the south
of France; but we cannot fix the date of the production of any of them.
One of the great difficulties of prehistoric research, a difficulty not
to be got over in the present state of our knowledge, is to distinguish
with any certainty the periods into which an attempt has been made to
divide the life-story of man from his first appearance upon earth.

Was there any abrupt transition from one period to another? Must we
accept the theory of a long break caused by geological phenomena, and
the temporary depopulation which was one of the consequences of these
phenomena? Did the new era of civilization date from the arrival of
foreign races, stronger and better fitted than those they succeeded for
the struggle for existence? Or are these changes merely the result of
the natural progress which is one of the laws of our being? These
questions cannot now be solved, and if the industries which are at the
present moment the object of our researches, bear witness to the
employment of a new process, that of polishing, we are bound to add
that everywhere Paleolithic forms are still persistent. Flints, merely
chipped, are clumsy tools, but there is no break in their series till
we come to the splendid specimens from Scandinavia or from Mexico. Of
the seven types of the Solutréen period, six are met with in the time
now under consideration.7 Five types of Solutréen javelins have also
been found in the Durfort Cave, and beneath the dolmens of Aveyron and
of Lozère. Neolithic weapons, such as those found in the Moustier Cave,
are not so numerous, but the type adopted there is not such a fine one
nor so carefully finished, which accounts for its having been more
rarely copied. If we examine the knives, awls, scrapers, and saws, we
come to the same conclusion, although comparison is not so easy. “A
knife is always a knife, an awl is always an awl,” remarks M.
Cartailhac; “they were made at every period, and their resemblance to
each other proves nothing with any certainty.”

Rounded stones of granite or sandstone seem however to have been
weapons peculiar to the Neolithic period. Dr. Pommerol recently spoke
at the Anthropological Society of Paris, of two such rounded stones
picked up in the Puy-de-Dôme. Similar stones have been discovered at
Viry-Noureuil, and M. Massénat has one in his collection from
Chez-Pourré. Are not these rounded stones of a similar character to the
_bolas_ flung by the ancient Gauls, and still in use amongst the
inhabitants of the pampas of South America?

As we have already remarked, plan from the earliest times must often
have held in his hands the stones which served him as weapons or as
tools. The marks of hammering on the smooth surfaces, the rounded
projections and the grooves worked in these stones, were evidently made
to prevent the hand or the thumb from slipping. Soon, however,
reflection led man to understand the increase of force he would gain by
the addition to the stone of a handle of wood or horn, stag or reindeer
antler. This addition of a handle was simple enough: the workman merely
bound it to the hatchet with fibrous roots, leather thongs, or
ligaments taken from the gut of the animals slain in the chase (Fig.
21). At first sight we are astonished at the results obtained with such
wretched materials, but it is impossible to dispute them, for we have
seen the same thing done in our own day.

[Illustration: 21.]

1. Stone javelin-head with handle. 2. Stone hatchet with handle.

Other hatchets, chiefly those of a small size, were fixed into sheaths
made of stag-horn, and two chief types of them have actually been made
out.8 The sheaths of the first type are short and end in quadrangular
beads. They are found most frequently in Switzerland, in the basins of
the Rhone and of the Saône, and throughout the south of France. Those
of the second type are pierced with a hole large enough to pass the
handle through. These are found in the northwest of France, in Belgium,
and in England.

Flint arrows of triangular or oval form, notched or stalked, were
everywhere used for a considerable length of time. They are found in
the numerous caves of France, beneath the _antas_ of Portugal, in the
tombs of Mykenæ, as well as among the Aïnos of Japan and the
Patagonians of South America. Their use necessarily involves that of a
bow, yet we do not know of a single weapon such as that, or of one that
could take its place, dating from Paleolithic times. Probably the rapid
decomposition of the wood of which bows were made has led to their
disappearance. De Mortillet9 mentions a bow found in a pile-dwelling in
a bog near Robenhausen, which he ascribes to the Neolithic period.
Another is known which was found at Lutz, also in Switzerland. To all
appearance the most ancient bows of historic times greatly resemble
these two prehistoric examples.

Though flint was the material par excellence of Quaternary times for
weapons and tools, it could not long suffice for the ever-growing needs
of man. Our museums contain a complete series of bone or stag-horn
implements such as darts, arrow-heads, barbed arrows, harpoons, fibulæ,
and finely cut needles often pierced with eyes (Fig. 22). The invention
of barbs is worthy of special notice; the series of points made the
blow much more dangerous, as the projectile remained in the flesh of a
wounded animal which was not able to get it out. But this was not the
only object of the barbs. Arranged symmetrically on either side of the
arrow they kept it afloat in the air like the wings of a bird, which
may perhaps have suggested their use and increased the effect and
precision of the shot.

[Illustration: 22.]

1. Fine needles. 2. Coarse needles. 3. Amulet. 4 and 6. Ornaments. 5.
Cut flint. 7. Fragment of a harpoon. 8. Fragments of a reindeer antler
with signs or drawings. 9. Whistle. 10. One end of a bow (?). 11.
Arrow-head. (From the Vache, Massat, and Lourdes caves.)


The Marsoulas Cave has yielded one bevelled arrow shaft, made of
reindeer antler, with a deep groove on the surface. A similar
arrow-head was found in the Pacard Cave, and in other places arrows
have been found with one or more grooves on the surface. Were these
grooves or drills intended to hold poison, and was man already
acquainted with this melancholy Diode of destruction? We know that the
use of poison was known at the most remote historic antiquity.10 The
Greeks and Scythians used the venom of the viper, and other peoples
employed vegetable poisons. There is nothing to prevent our believing
that similar methods were in use in prehistoric times.

[Illustration: 23.]

Amulet made of the penien bone of a bear, and found in the Marsoulas
Cave.

There is no doubt that it is the caves of the south of France which
have yielded the most interesting objects; needles with drilled eyes,
and barbed arrows have been picked up in considerable numbers at
Eyziès, Laugerie-Basse, at Bruniquel, Massat, and in the Madeleine
Cave. Dr. Garrigou mentions some rein deer or roebuck antlers found in
Ariège caves, which had been made into regular stilettos. In the
deposits at Lafaye were fouled stilettos or bodkins, varying in length
from two to six inches; needles measuring from nineteen to one hundred
and five millimetres and provided with eyes; at Marsoulas were found an
amulet made of the penien bone of a bear (Fig. 23), some pendants, and
some pointed pieces of bone which astonish us by the delicacy of their
workmanship, and the drawings with which they were adorned.

[Illustration: 24.]

Various stone and bone objects from California.

At Paviland, Dr. Buckland discovered a wolf bone cut to a point. Kent’s
Hole yielded a number of needles resembling those of the Madeleine
Cave; at Aggtelek (Hungary) were found some bones of the cave-bear
pointed to serve as daggers, cut into scrapers or pierced to serve as
amulets or ornaments. In Belgium, objects very similar to these have
been found made of reindeer antler and dating from the most remote
times. The antlers moulted by the reindeer in the spring were in
especial request.

Excavations in the sepulchral mounds near San Francisco (California)
have yielded thousands of bone implements (Fig. 24). Others similar to
them have been found in the layers of cinders at Madisonville (Ohio)
and beneath the numerous kitchen-middings of the coasts of the Atlantic
and Pacific.

The processes employed by the cave-men were very simple. In one of the
excavations superintended by him, M. Dupont11 picked up the radius of a
horse bearing symmetrically made incisions executed with a view to
getting off splinters of the bone. These splinters were rounded by
rubbing either with chips of flint, or on such polishers as are to be
seen in any of the museums; then one end was sharpened, and the other,
if need were, pierced with a hole. It is astonishing to find some of
them as fine as the steel needles of the present day, and with
perfectly round eyes made with the help of nothing but a rough flint,
and there would still be some doubt on the subject, if M. Lartet12 had
not obtained exactly similar results by working on fragments of bone
with the flints he had fouled in these excavations. Other experiments
of a similar kind were no less conclusive, for Merk13 perforated all
ivory plaque with a pointed flint which he used as a gimlet.

Some objects, which are supposed to date from Neolithic times, bear
witness to an altogether unexpected degree of civilization. In the
heart of Germany, in the peat-bogs of Laybach and Wörbzig on the banks
of the Saale, have been found earthenware spoons of the shape of modern
spatulæ; at Geraffin on Lake Bienne, a finely shaped spoon made of the
wood of a yew tree; and at Lagozza, another in shining black
earthenware. Lartet had already brought to light a bone implement
covered with ornaments in relief which he ascribed to the Palæolithic
period, and which he imagined had been used for extracting marrow; and
another archaeologist tells of objects in reindeer antler found in the
Gourdan Cave, which he thinks were used for a similar purpose. In the
Saint-Germain Museum are preserved the remains of spoons from the bed
of the Seine, and in the collections of England are fragments of bone
taken from beneath the West-Kennet dolmen, which were all probably
employed for extracting marrow. But the most important discovery of
all, which leaves no doubt on the subject, is that made by M. Perrault
at the Chassey Camp, near Chalon-sur-Saône, beneath a hearth dating
from Neolithic times. He collected fourteen earthenware spoons; one of
them of a round shape and remarkable for its size, was unfortunately
broken (Fig. 25). It is of brown earthenware with a rather rough
surface mixed with bits of flint, and is so much worn that it had
evidently been in use a long time. Lastly two spoons, also of
earthenware, have recently been found near Dondas (Lot-et-Garonne). The
use of spoons, which certainly marked considerable progress, must
therefore have spread rapidly.

[Illustration: 25.]

Dipper found in the excavations at the Chassey Camp.

Long previously, however, pottery of a great variety of form bore
witness to tire plastic skill of man. Every where we find vessels of
coarse material mixed with grains of sand or mica to give more
consistency to the paste which was baked in the fire, and had often no
further ornamentation than the marks of the fingers of the potter. Does
this pottery date from Palæolithic times, or were the earthenware
vessels later additions at the time of those disturbances of deposits
which are the despair of archæologists? A few examples may enable us
better to answer this question.

Fraas tells us that fragments of pottery have been found in all the
caves of Germany in which excavations have been made. He quotes that of
Hohlefels, where he himself picked up such fragments amongst the bones
of the mastodon, the mammoth, the rhinoceros, and the cave-lion, when
the remains of these animals were for the first time found in Germany.
In 1872, the making of the railway from Nuremberg to Ratisbon brought
to light a cave of considerable depth. In its lower deposits were found
nothing but the bones of hyenas, bears, and lions, of which the cave
had been the resort for centuries. Among the most ancient deposits,
relics of a similar kind were found in abundance, but now mixed with
numerous fragments of pottery, worked flints, and fish bones, including
those of the carp and the pike, with the bones of mammals, amongst
which predominated those of the rhinoceros, most of them intentionally
split open. At Argecilla, twenty leagues from Madrid, Vilanova
discovered a regular workshop, in which were knives and flint
arrow-heads, together with some very primitive pottery made of clay
that had evidently been brought from a distance, as there is none in
the district in which the pottery was found, In an upper deposit
Vilanova collected more than two hundred implements made of diorite, a
rock frequently used in Spain, some very remarkable celts of serpentine
dating from the Neolithic period, and numerous fragments of very
delicate pottery. Not far off he discovered another workshop,
containing some very fine hatchets perfectly polished, and some keramic
ware tastily ornamented. The progress made is as marked in the weapons
and tools as in the pottery.

We have also seen some fragments of earthenware from the caves of
Chiampo and Laglio, near Lake Como, and from that known as the Cave dei
Colombi, in tire island of Palmaria, which was occupied shortly before
the Neolithic period. But it is Belgium which yields the most decisive
proof on this subject, and a visit to the Brussels Museum is enough to
convince the most incredulous. The excavations made under M. Dupont in
the caves of the Meuse and the Lesse have again and again brought to
light fragments of pottery, associated with the bones of Palæolithic
animals. Schmerling, too, had already found similar fragments in the
Engis Cave, mixed with flint weapons of the rudest description; and his
discoveries have been strikingly confirmed by those recently made at
Spy, near Namur,14 and by others made by M. Fraipont.15 In portions of
this same Engis Cave not previously explored the learned professor of
Liège found, in 1887, fragments of a vase of ovoid form, some flints of
the Moustérien type, and some bones of extinct mammals. Most of the
pottery in the Brussels Museum is black and of primitive make; some few
fragments, however, are of finished workmanship. We may mention
especially an ovoid vase, remarkable for its size and for its lateral
projections. This vase, which is hand-modelled, came from the Frontal
Cave; the clay is of blackish hue mixed with little bits of calcareous
spar. M. Ordinaire, Vice-Consul for France at Callao, speaks of the
_cayanes_ or _macahuas_, which are earthenware basins of great symmetry
of form, made by the Combos women, without turning wheels or mills of
any kind. Though the elegant shape of the Frontal and other vases at
first surprises us, reflection convinces us that men who could cut
stones with such rare skill would certainly be able to produce equally
good pottery.

[Illustration: 26.]

Pottery of a so far unclassified type found in the Argent Cave
(France).

Similar instances may easily be quoted from France. Excavations at
Solutré have yielded several fragments of yellow, hand-made pottery
very insufficiently baked; and other pieces have been found in the
peat-bogs of Bastide de Béarn with the bones of reindeer, and worked
flints similar to those found in Quaternary deposits. We may add that
at Lafaye, Bize, and Pondre (Hainault) discoveries were made of pottery
mixed with human remains and with those of animals now extinct; and in
the Argent Cave (Basses-Alpes) a new type, shown in Fig. 26, has been
found which merits special attention. In the very earliest days of
prehistoric research the Nabrigas Cave (Lozère) was excavated by M.
Joly, who found in it many fragments of pottery. In a volume published
shortly before his death he relates the circumstances of his discovery,
and earnestly maintains its authenticity. Later excavations, made under
the direction of masters in prehistoric science, would have thrown some
doubts on the assertions made by the professor of Toulouse, if MM.
Martel and Launay had not brought forward a fresh proof in support of
it. “On the 30th August, 1885,”16 they say, “we picked up at Nabrigas
in a deep hole, untouched by previous excavations and not displaced by
water, some human bones and a piece of pottery side by side with two
skeletons of _Ursus spelæus_. The human bones, of indeterminate race,
included an upper left maxillary, still retaining three teeth, an
incomplete mastoid apophysis, and seven pieces of crania, belonging to
different individuals. The piece of pottery only measured one and a
half by two and a quarter inches; the clay is gray and friable, bound
together with big bits of quartz, mica, and a few particles of
charcoal.” There would appear to be no sufficient reason to question
the exactness of a discovery so carefully studied.

Many eminent archæologists, however, maintain that pottery was
completely unknown in Paleolithic times, and they do not hesitate to
attribute to a later period any deposit in which it occurs where its
presence cannot be accounted for by later displacements. M. Cartailhac
declares that he has never been able to establish either in the south
of France or in the central table-land a single fact which justifies us
in asserting that the men of the Reindeer period, still less those of
earlier epochs, knew how to make pottery. The first explorers, he adds,
did not always distinguish with sufficient care the vestiges of
different epochs, the relics of diverse origins. How often have bones
carried along by water, or brought where they are found by animals,
been mixed with those abandoned by men, or the deposits of the
Neolithic period with those of the earliest Quaternary times! How often
have the contents of a passage giving access to a cave been confounded
with those of the cave itself! Hence deplorable errors, which it is
impossible to rectify now. Evans and Geikie in their turn assert the
absence in England17 of Palæolithic pottery, and Sir J. Lubbock
energetically maintains this opinion.

Doubtless these are great authorities, and yet, in view of the facts
now known, it is difficult to believe that man was long a stranger to
the art of making pottery. Its invention required no great effort of
intelligence, and its fabrication presented no great difficulties. Man
had but to knead the soft clay which he trod under his foot, and the
plasticity of which he could not fail to notice. This clay hardened in
the sun, and hollows were formed as it shrunk—the first vessel was
discovered! Experience soon taught man to replace the heat of the sun
by that of the fire, and to add a few bits of some hard substance to
give the clay greater consistency. These first crude and clumsy vases
have been preserved to our own day as irrefutable witnesses to the work
of our ancestors. Though, therefore, we cannot be sure that pottery was
made in Quaternary times by all the races that peopled Europe,18 it is
impossible to deny that a great many of them were in possession of the
art. This difference in the degree of civilization attained to by men
living but short distances from each other need not surprise us, for
all travellers report similar facts amongst contemporary savage races.

The baking of pottery is a proof that the use of fire was known in the
most remote times. The existence in various places of masses of
cinders, fragments of charred wood, and half-calcined bones, proves it
yet more decidedly. At Solutré, at Louverné (Mayenne), at Saint-Florent
(Corsica), to give but a few examples, we find large slabs of
half-calcined stone, laid flat and covered with heaps of cinders and
all sorts of rubbish. These slabs formed the family hearth, where man
prepared his food, with the help of the fire he had learnt to ignite
and to keep burning.

How did man arrive at a discovery so vital to his existence? The Vedas
assign the origin of fire to the rubbing together in a storm of the dry
branches of trees. “The first men,” says Vitruvius,19 “were born, as
were other animals, in the forests, caves, and woods. The thick trees
violently agitated by the storm took fire, through the rubbing together
of their branches; the fury of the flames terrified the men who found
themselves near them and made them take to flight. Soon reassured,
however, they gradually approached again and realized all the
advantages they might gain for their bodies from the gentle warmth of
the fire. They added fuel to the flames, they kept the fire up, they
fetched other men whom they made understand by signs all the usefulness
of this discovery. The men thus assembled articulated a few sounds,
which, repeated every day, accidentally formed certain words which
served to designate objects, and soon they had a language which enabled
them to speak and to understand one another. It was, then, the
discovery of fire which led men to come together to form a society, to
live together, and to inhabit the same places.”

Without pausing to consider the somewhat puerile theories of Vitruvius,
or the myths which testify to the importance attached to fire by
primeval man, we are at liberty to suppose that a conflagration caused
by lightning or by the spontaneous combustion of vegetable materials in
a state of fermentation, or other similar phenomena, made known to man
the power of fire, and the use it might be to him. The accidental
striking together of two flints produced a spark; observation taught
men to obtain a similar result by the same process; a great step in
advance was made, and the future of humanity was assured. M. Dupont
picked up in the Chaleux Cave a kidney-shaped piece of iron pyrites,
hollowed out in a peculiar manner, which had evidently been used to
obtain the precious spark. The Christy collection contains a granite
pebble with a hole the shape of a cup, which had evidently been used to
obtain fire, by rubbing round in it a stick of very dry wood. The two
methods employed at the present day were therefore already in use.
Lumholz tells us that the Australians of Herbert River get fire by
rubbing two pieces of wood together. The Indians of the northwest of
Colorado, the Yapais of the Caroline Islands, and the Mincopies of the
Andaman Isles, with many other races, know no other process. We must,
however, still maintain a certain reserve in dealing with the
fire-obtaining implements of so imperfect a nature, and belonging to
times so remote as those called prehistoric.

During bad seasons, or in the bitter cold of winter, primeval man
contented himself with flinging over his shoulders the skins of the
animals he had killed. He prepared these skins with flint scrapers, and
sewed them together with bone needles. In hot weather man probably
roamed about stark naked. Shame is not a natural instinct; education
alone develops it. Writing in 1617, Fynes Morison speaks of having seen
at Cork young girls quite naked, engaged in crushing corn with a stone.
The Tchoutchi women, says Nordenskiöld, wear no clothes when in their
tents, however great the cold. In tropical countries men, women, and
children, all completely nude, went to meet the travellers who landed
on their shores. Count Ursel, in a recent journey in Bolivia, in going
through a little town, saw “near the public fountain some young girls
already growing up making their ablutions and playing about in the garb
of the earthly paradise.” Travellers who visited Japan a few years ago
reported that the inhabitants, without distinction of age or sex, came
out of the water in a state of complete nudity, presenting a strange
spectacle to European eyes. The sight of what is actually going on
amongst comparatively civilized people in our own day enables us to
understand better what must have been the state of things when the
whole world was in a state of barbarism.

It was not until much later, in the times to which the name of
Neolithic has been given, that men made stuffs, and replaced the skins
of animals by lighter and more flexible garments. The inhabitants of
the Lake Stations of Switzerland and of Italy cultivated hemp. At
Wangen and at Robenhausen have been found shreds of coarsely woven
cloth, and at Lagozza fragments of yet more primitive material. On some
of these pieces it is supposed that traces of fringe and attempts at
ornamentation have been made out. Even in the Périgord caves Lartet
noticed some long slim needles which could not have been used for
sewing skins; and he concluded that they were intended for more
delicate work, perhaps even for embroidery. A new art, and one which we
certainly should not have expected to find is now met with for the
first time.

It is probable that our savage ancestors tatooed themselves, or painted
their bodies, as did the Britons in the time of Cæsar, and as do modern
savages, or, not to go so far afield, as do English sailors and some of
the workingmen of France.20 At Montastruc have been picked up some
fragments of red chalk, and in Mayenne of red iron ore, whilst in the
cave of Spy was found a bone filled with a very fine red powder, and in
that of Saltpêtrière some powder of the same kind was discovered
preserved from destruction in a shell. Lartet and Christy have made
similar discoveries in the caves of the Dordogne; M. Dupont in a
shelter at Chaleux, and M. Rivière at Baoussé-Roussé. The Abbé
Bourgeois found at Villehonneur not only a piece of red chalk as big as
a nut, but also an oval-shaped pebble, which had been used for grinding
it, the interstices of the surface still retaining traces of coloring
matter.

Red chalk was not the only substance employed. At Chatelperron, were
picked up fragments of manganese; at Cueva de Rocca, near Valentia,
pieces of cinnabar; in the Placard Cave, bits of black lead; and in the
different stations in the Pyrenees, especially in that of Aurensan,
ochre has been found which was doubtless used for the same purpose. At
Solutré, ochre, manganese, and graphite were found; the last named had
been scraped with a flint, and the scratches made by it are still
distinctly visible. From a Westphalian cave, Schaafhausen took some
dark yellow ochre; at Castern (Staffordshire), a bit of this same
calcareous substance, worn with long service, was picked tip; in
Cantire (Argyleshire), a piece of red hematite, which had evidently
been brought from Westmoreland or Lancashire; and lastly, in Kent’s
Hole was found some peroxide of manganese.

All these fragments of ochre or manganese, red chalk or black lead,
were reduced to powder with the help of pebbles, artificially hollowed
out. Everywhere we meet with these primitive mortars, and side by side
with them other pebbles in their native condition, which had evidently
been used for crushing the coloring matter.

A recent discovery tends to confirm the hypothesis that these colors
were used for the decoration of the human body. A curious engraving on
a bone represents the head and arm of a man, and on the lower part of
the forearm it is easy to make out a four-sided design which evidently
indicated tatooing.

In every country, and in every climate, we find men as well as women
manifesting a taste for ornament. The progress of civilization has
greatly increased this taste, but it existed as a natural instinct in
the very earliest days of humanity, and the contemporary of the mammoth
and the cave-bear, the cave-man cowering in his miserable den, sought
for ornaments with which to deck himself. In the caves near the
stations occupied by primeval men we find little bits of fossil coral,
beads of hardened clay, the teeth of bears, wolves, and foxes, boars’
tusks, and the jawbones of small mammals, fish-bones, and belemnites
pierced with holes, and intended to be used as amulets or ornaments to
be worn round the neck. At Lafaye, we find the incisors of small
rodents serving the same purpose. The dweller in the Sordes Cave owned
a precious necklace made of forty bears’ and three lions’ teeth. The
teeth found often have on them ornamental lines, which doubtless
indicated the rank or celebrated the deeds of the chief. The Abbé
Bourgeois describes some stags’ teeth found at Villehonneur (Charente),
two of which bore scratches which may have had some signification. At
Cro-Magnon were picked up some ivory plaques pierced with three holes;
at Kent’s bole were found some oval disks measuring five by three
inches, which in the delicacy of their workmanship presented a curious
contrast to the other objects taken from the same cave. In the Belgian
caves here picked up some thin slices of jet and some ivory plaques,
and in those of the south of France fragments of steatite, cut into
rectangular and lozenge shapes, whilst in the Thayngen Cave was found a
pendant of lignite (Fig. 27). Men were not content with natural
products; fashion demanded new forms and fresh materials.

[Illustration: 27.]

1. Lignite pendant. 2. Bone pendant (Thayngen Cave).

But what most attracted the attention of the ancient inhabitants of
France were bright-colored shells. The caves of Roquemaure have yielded
nearly a thousand disks and beads made of cockle-shells; at Cro-Magnon
more than three hundred shells were picked up which formed a collar or
necklace, which was not however so valuable as that of the man of
Sordes. M. de Maret discovered at Placard numerous shells; some
belonging to ocean species still extant, and others fossils of forms
now extinct. Many of them are foreign to the country in which they were
found. From the most remote times therefore the inhabitants of the
present department of Charente fished in the Gulf of Gascony, crossed
Aquitania, visited the shell marl deposits of Anjou and Touraine, and
penetrated as far as the present Paris basin. The finding of the
_Cyprina Islandica_ in one of the French caves proves that the
prehistoric men of France even went as far away as the north of
England. This is by no means an isolated fact; numerous shells from the
department of Champagne had been taken to tire shores of the Lesse and
the Meuse. At Solutré have been found belemnites, ammonites, and
Miocene shells, which were certainly never native to that district,
with pieces of rock-crystal from the Alps, and beads made of a jadeite
of unknown origin.

In Scotland have been found necklaces of nerites and limpets; at
Aurignac, eighteen little plaques of cockle shell pierced with holes in
the centre. At Laugerie-Basse, a man overtaken by a landslip had been
crushed by the stones which had fallen upon him; time has destroyed his
clothes, but the shells with which he had decked himself are still
preserved.21 He had worn four on his forehead, two on each shoulder,
four on each knee, and two on each foot. All idea of these shells
having formed a necklace must be abandoned; they were all notched, and
had been used either to adorn or fasten the clothes.

The most interesting discoveries, however, were those made in the caves
of Baoussé-Roussé, of which we have so often spoken. M. Rivière picked
up the skeletons of two children, some thousand shells (_Nassa
neritea_) artificially pierced, which had been used to deck their
garments: Near an adult were other shells forming a necklace, a
bracelet, an amulet, and a garter worn on the left leg; whilst on the
head was a regular _résille_ or net, not unlike that of the Spanish
national costume, which net was made of small nerita shells and kept in
place by bone pins.

We must also mention amongst favorite ornaments beads made of jet and
of very fine ochreous clay dried in the sun, of calcareous crystalline
rock, and of grayish schist, and in other places of beads of amber or
of hyaline quartz, the brightness of which attracted the attention. At
the station of Menieux (Charente) with flints of a type to which it is
usual to give the names of Moustérien or Solutréen, excavations have
yielded numerous carefully polished balls of calx, varying in diameter
from one to two inches. If there had been any doubts as to their use,
those doubts would have been removed by the discovery at Laugerie-Basse
of a fragment of the shoulder-blade of a reindeer on which was engraved
the figure of a woman wearing round her neck a necklace of clumsy round
balls. Other yet stranger ornaments have been found, for which what we
have said about the cannibalism of early man should have prepared the
reader. Our ancestors of the Stone age adorned themselves with
necklaces of human teeth, and two skeletons have been dug out wearing
round their necks this token of their victories. M. de Baye possesses
in his collection some round pieces of skull pierced with holes (Fig.
28), and at the meeting of the American Association in 1886, at Ann
Arbor (Michigan) were presented some ornaments made of human bones from
a mound in Ohio.

In taking from the gangue in which it was imbedded a skull from the
megalithic monument of Vauréal, Pruner Bey noticed a fragment of a
human shoulder blade pierced with an incision in which was fixed a
little rounded piece of bone. This style of ornament seems to have
remained in use for many centuries, for M. Nicaise has lately
discovered at Moulin d’Oyes (Marne) a necklace made of calx balls,
shells, and pendants cut out of the scales of unio shells. On this
necklace hung a round piece of human cranium, and in the Gallic
cemetery at Varille, the exterior lamina of a human lumbar vertebra was
fastened to a necklace made of coral beads.

[Illustration: 28.]

Round pieces of skull pierced with holes (Al. de Baye’s collection).

We are also acquainted with facts of another order, which may be
mentioned in this connection. The men of Marjevols drank out of human
crania; the Grenoble Museum owns a drinking-vessel of this kind; others
have been discovered at Billancourt, at Chavannes, at the Chassey Camp,
and at Sutz, Æfelé, and Loci-as in Switzerland, as well as at
Brookville in the State of Indiana. Dr. Prunières possesses half a
human radius, probably that of a female, carefully polished and
converted into a stiletto (Fig. 29). Dr. Garrigou has an arrow-head
made of a human bone, Pellegrino a fibula converted into a polisher
found in the lower beds of the celebrated Castione _terremare_ near
Parma. At the meeting of the Prehistoric Congress in Paris in 1869,
Pereira da Costa mentioned a femora converted into a sceptre or staff
of office, and to conclude this melancholy list, Longpérier mentions a
human bone pierced with regular openings, which, by a strange irony of
death, served as a flute to delight the ears of the living. .

[Illustration: 29.]

Part of a rounded piece of a human parietal-Stiletto made of the end of
a human radius—Disk made of the burr of a stag’s antler.

One of the earliest necessities of human nature must have been
companionship; for help was absolutely necessary to enable man to cope
with the dangers surrounding him. Tribes, formed at first of members of
the same family, must have existed from the very dawn of humanity. The
reindeer phalanges, pierced to serve as whistles (Fig. 30), found at
Eyziès, Schussenreid, Laugerie-Basse, Bruniquel, in the Chaffaud Cave
and the Belgian shelters, in a peat-marsh of Scania, in the island of
Palmaria, and in many other places, were doubtless used to summon men
to war or to the chase. In the Cottes Cave were found some reindeer and
aurochs’ shanks, which may naturally be supposed to have served the
same purpose. The curious objects preserved in the Christy collections
must also have been used in war or in the chase. They bear, in addition
to the mark of their owner, notches of different shapes commemorating
his exploits in battle or in hunting. At Solutré, MM. Ducrost and
Arcelin noticed fragments of elephants’ tusks, calcareous plaques, and
some sandstone disks from the Trias, with notches and equidistant lines
evidently having a similar purpose.

[Illustration: 30.]

Whistle from the Massenat Collection.

From whistles to regular musical instruments the transition is simple.
Without describing that mentioned by M. de Longpérier, which we cannot
confidently assert to be of great antiquity, M. Piette, in one of his
numerous excavations, discovered a primitive flute made of two bird
bones which, when put together and blown into, produced modulations
similar to those of the pipes used by the people of Oceania; the
monotonous music of which is alluded to by Cook. Some time afterwards
M. Piette noticed similar bones in the Rochebertier collection. So far
we know of no other discovery of a similar kind.

The curious objects known under the name of staves of office would, if
it were needed, afford yet another proof that the men of the Stone age
lived in societies, possessed an organization, and acknowledged a
chief. The staves of office consist of large pieces of reindeer or stag
antler, artistically worked and presenting a pretty uniform appearance.
Their surface is decorated with carvings and engravings representing
animals, plants, and hunting scenes. They are thicker than they are
wide, and the care often taken to reduce the thickness is a proof that
an attempt was made to combine elegance and lightness with solidity
(Figs. 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35). Nearly all of them are pierced at one
end with large holes, of which the number varies. Some of these holes
were later additions. May we perhaps see in them the signs of a
priesthood, in which successive ranks were attained, and in which every
new achievement was rewarded with a new distinction? This is difficult
to prove, but these staves could not have been used as weapons or as
tools; the care taken to cover them with ornaments, with the long time
required for this decoration, shows the value their owners attached to
them. The impossibility of any other hypothesis is the best proof we
have of their use.

[Illustration: 31.]

Staff of office.


Amongst the marvellous objects collected by Dr. Schliemann at
Hissarlik, were two fragments of reindeer antler pierced with holes
presenting a singular resemblance to those we have been describing. We
may also compare with them the _pogomagan_, the badge of office of
Indian chiefs on the Mackenzie River, the Tartar _kemous_, the sticks
on which the Australians mark by conventional signs any event of
importance to themselves or their tribe, and the similar objects from
Persia, Assam, the Celebes, and New Zealand. But why seek examples so
far away? Is not the memory of these ancient insignia preserved in our
own day, and may they not have been the original forms of the sceptres
of our kings and the croziers of our bishops?

[Illustration: 32.]

Staff of office made of stag-horn pierced with four holes.

[Illustration: 33.]

Staff of office found at Lafaye.

[Illustration: 34.]

Staff of office in reindeer antler, with a horse engraved on it, found
at Thayngen.

These staves, of which hundreds have now been found, were picked up in
many different places, including the Goyet Cave in Belgium, the caves
of Périgord and Charente, and the Veyrier Station in Savoy. At
Thayngen, as many as twenty-three were found, all pierced with one hole
only.22 We must not omit to mention amongst these relies of ages gone
by, one of the most interesting found in 1887 at Montgaudier (Charente)
(Fig. 35), which bears on one side a representation of two seals, and
on the other of two eels, the former of which especially are executed
with a truth to form, boldness of execution, and delicacy of touch
which are positively astonishing when we remember that the artist (we
cannot refuse him this title) bad no tools at his disposal but a few
miserable flints or roughly pointed bones. The hinder limbs, so
strangely placed in amphibia, are faithfully rendered; each paw has its
five toes, the texture of the skin can be made out, the head is
delicately modelled; the muzzle with its whiskers, the eye, the orifice
of the ear, all testify to real skill. The existence of the seal in the
Quaternary epoch in the south of France was not known until quite
recently, when Mr. Hardy found in a cave near Périgueux the remains of
a seal (_Phoca grœnlandica_), associated with quite an arctic fauna. In
part at least therefore of the Quaternary period, very great cold must
have prevailed in Périgord.23

With this staff of office were picked up some pieces of ivory covered
with geometrical designs, engraved with some sharp implement,
stilettos, bone needles, knives, flint scrapers, and, stranger still,
the remains of the cave-lion, the cave-hyena, and the _Rhinoceros
tichorhinus_, all contemporaries of the most ancient Quaternary fauna.

[Illustration: 35.]

Staff of office found at Montgaudier.

It was not only on the staves of office that the men of the Stone age
exercised their talent. Many and varied are the subjects which have
been found engraved on plaques of ivory or on stone, and incised on
bears’ teeth or on stag horn. We represent one forming the hilt of a
dagger (Fig. 36), and another representing a bear with the convex
forehead, characteristic of the species, engraved on a piece of schist
(Fig. 37), and a mammoth engraved on an ivory plaque with its long
mane, trunk, and curved tusks (Fig. 38). The artist who depicted these
animals with such faithful exactitude evidently lived amongst them. The
first discovery of this kind was made by Joly-Leterme in the Chaffaud
Cave (Vienna); it was a reindeer bone on which two stags were
represented.24

[Illustration: 36.]

Carved dagger-hilt (Laugerie-Basse).

[Illustration: 37.]

The great cave-bear, drawn on a pebble found in the Massat Cave
(Garrigou collection).

In the Lortet Cave was found the bone of a stag on which could be made
out a representation of fish and reindeer, whilst at Sordes was
discovered a bear’s tooth with a seal engraved upon it (Fig. 39), at
Marsoulas a piece of rib on which is depicted an animal said to be a
musk-ox (Fig. 40), and at Feyjat (Dordogne) a bird’s bone bearing on it
a drawing of three horses moving rapidly along. I am obliged to pass
over many other most interesting examples, but I must not omit to
mention the magnificent examples which form part of the Peccadeau
collection at Lisle. Cartailhac mentions some chamois, an ox, and an
elephant; some engraved on the bones of deer and others on fragments of
ivory, or on reindeer antlers. The art of the cave-men was now at its
zenith.

[Illustration: 38.]

Mammoth, or elephant, from the Lena Cave.

[Illustration: 39.]

Seal engraved on a bear’s tooth found at Sordes.

But for one exception to which I shall refer again, it is curious to
note that we only find these engravings and carvings, which so justly
excite our astonishment in a district of limited extent, bounded on the
north by the Charente, on the south by the Pyrenees and extending on
the east no farther than the department of the Ariège. It is a pleasant
thought that in the midst of their struggle for existence, and when
they had to contend with gigantic pachyderms and formidable beasts of
prey, our most remote ancestors, the contemporaries of the mammoth and
the lion, already developed those artistic tendencies which are the
glory of their descendants.

[Illustration: 40.]

Fragment of a bone with regular designs. Fragment of rib on which is
engraved a musk-ox, found in the Marsoulas Cave.

[Illustration: 41.]

Head of a horse from the Thayngen Cave.

[Illustration: 42.]

Bear engraved on a bone from the Thayngen Cave.

I referred above to ail exceptional example of prehistoric art found
beyond the borders of France. In excavations in the Thayngen Cave, on
the borders of Switzerland and Wurtemberg, twenty most remarkable
examples were found, in which it is easy to recognize the horse (Fig.
41), the bear (Fig. 42), and the reindeer grazing (Fig. 43).25 All,
especially the last named, are rendered with such perfection, that it
was at first supposed that they were the work of a forger. A searching
inquiry has proved that they are nothing of the sort; a skilful
zoölogist would have been needed to represent the _Ovibos moschatus_
(Fig. 44), which retired many centuries ago towards the extreme north.
If we do find a few rare attempts at art in other districts, they are
absolutely rudimentary. The staff of office found in the Goyet Cave is
of very rude workmanship. The Brussels Museum contains a few other
specimens, of which the most important is a fragment of sandstone from
the Frontal Cave, on which a few uncertain scratches represent what
looks like a stag. Some indistinct traces of engraving have been made
out on the bones found in the Altamira Cave, near Santander, and
recently a bone on which a kind of horse was engraved, was picked up at
Cresswell’s Crags, Derbyshire, in a cave known in the district as
_Mother Grundy’s Parlor_. This specimen, as were those of Thayngen, was
associated with numerous bones of Quaternary animals, amongst which
those of the hippopotamus were the most curious.

[Illustration: 43.]

Reindeer grazing, from the Thayngen Cave.

The representation of the human figure is extremely rare. I have
already mentioned the young man trying to strike an aurochs which is
running away from him; and the woman wearing a necklace. The former
(Fig. 45), found at Laugerie, is engraved on a piece of reindeer antler
about twenty-five centimetres long. The aurochs with its head down and
quantities of bristling hair, widely open nostrils, arched and uplifted
tail, presents the appearance of a terrified animal endeavoring to
escape the danger threatening it. The man is naked, and has a round
head, his hair is stiff and seems to stand up on the top of his skull;
on the chin a short beard can clearly be made out; the face expresses
the delight and excitement of the chase. The neck is long, the arm
short, and the spine of unusual length. In the other example of the
representation of the human figure, that of the woman wearing a
necklace, drawn on a piece of a shoulder-blade of a reindeer, she is
seen lying by a stag, and would seem to be in an advanced state of
pregnancy. The piece of bone however is broken, and the head of the
woman is lost, which of course greatly lessens the value of the relic.

[Illustration: 44.]

Head of _Ovibos moschatus_ engraved on wood, found in the Thayngen
Cave.

[Illustration: 45.]

Young man chasing the aurochs, from Laugerie.

On a fragment of a staff of office from the Madeleine Cave is engraved
a man between two horses’ heads (Fig. 46). On a reindeer antler is
represented a woman with flat breasts and very high hips, followed by a
serpent; a shell from the crag near Walton-on-the-Naze had a human face
roughly engraved on one side. The Abby, Bourgeois, in the excavations
so fruitful of results at Rochebertier, found a rough carving of a
human face (Fig. 47); M. Piette at Mas d’Azil found a little bust of a
woman, carved on the root of the tooth of a horse. This statuette had a
low forehead, a prominent nose, a retreating chin, and breasts of the
negress type of the present day; characteristics quite unlike those of
the skeletons taken from this cave or those near it. We wonder whether
the artist meant to represent the features of a race other than his
own.26 M. du Bouchet mentions a rough sketch engraved on a flint
discovered near Dax; the workman, doubtless daunted by the difficulties
of his task, had abandoned it unfinished. It is, however, easy to tell
what it was meant for. The skull is low and flat, the nose but slightly
prominent, the eyes are oblique, and neither the mouth nor the chin are
finished. The magnificent collection of the Marquis de Vibraye contains
a little figure from Laugerie, representing a nude woman without arms.
Thin and stiff, she is chiefly remarkable for the exaggerated size of
the sexual organs, and for some peculiar protuberances on the loins. We
dwell upon the former peculiarity, because it is so far extremely rare,
whereas certain relics of the Greeks and Romans, in spite of the
comparatively advanced civilization of these two great races, are such
that they can only be exhibited in private museums. Such depravity as
this implies was then quite an exception among the cave-men, and but
for the one example I have just mentioned, I have no phallic
representations to refer to except the few from the Massenat
collection, which were shown at the Exhibition of 1889.

[Illustration: 46.]

Fragment of a staff of office, from the Madeleine Cave.

[Illustration: 47.]

Human face carved on a reindeer antler, found in the Rochebertier Cave
(Charente).


We must not close this account of the art efforts of the men of the
Stone age without mentioning the remarkable discovery by M. Siette, of
flints covered with lines and geometrical designs colored with red
chalk. These are the very earliest examples of the art of painting
which have hitherto come to our knowledge. They bear witness to a
remarkable progress made by our remote ancestors of the valleys of the
Pyrenees.

We cannot more appropriately close this chapter than by quoting the
magnificent verse of Lucretius, which brings before us, better than
could a long description, the condition of these men, and the humble
starting-point from which humanity has advanced to achieve its immortal
destiny:

Necdum res igni scibant tractare neque uti
Pellibus et spoliis corpus vestire ferarum,
Sed nemora atque caveos monteis sylvasque colebant
Et frutices inter condebant squalida membra
Verbera ventorum vitare imbreisque coactei.27



1 Indra, the all-seer, to whom it is given to pierce the cloud,
personified by Vritra, and “to open the receptacles of the waters with
his far-reaching thunder-bolts,” is of course the sun, the worship of
which was one of the earliest and most natural instincts of humanity;
whilst Vritra was in the first instance merely the symbol of the cloud,
intervening between heaven and earth, shutting out from men the light
of the sun, and keeping back the refreshing rain. The gradual
conversion of these natural phenomena into a good and a malignant
power, ever struggling for the mastery, is a forcible illustration of
the way in which myths are evolved.—Trans.

2 De Mortillet: “Le Préhistorique,” Paris, 1883, p. 133.

3 “Limon du Plateau du Nord de la France,” Paris, 1878. Acheuléen et
Moustérien: _Revue des Questions Scientifiques_ , October, 1880. _Bul.
Soc_. _Anth_., 1884, 1887.

4 _Chelléen_, so called from their having been found at Chelles
(Seine-et-Marne), where the remains of the _Elephas antiquus_, the most
ancient of the pachyderms now known in Europe, was associated with
these tools.

5 De Mortillet: “Musée Préhistorique,” pl. xvi. to xix.

6 M. de Mortillet enumerates 127 polishers found at various points in
thirty departments of France. “Le Préhistorique,” first edition, p.
534.

7 Piette: _Ass. Franç. pour l’Avancement des Sciences_, Nantes, 1875,
p. 909.

8 De Mortillet: “Le Préhistorique,” p. 544; “Musée Préhistorique,”
figs. 431 to 434.

9 “Musée Préhistorique,” fig. 410.

10 Lagneau: “De l’Uusage des Flèches empoisonnées chez les Anciens
Peuples l’Europe,” Ac. des Insc., 2d November, 1877.

11 “Les Temps Préhistoriques en Belgique,” p. 151.

12 “Reliquiæ Aquitanicæ,” p. 127.

13 _Nature_, 1876, second week, p. 5.

14 In this cave, in the second ossiferous deposit, were found four
fragments of pottery. De Puydt and Lohest: “L’Homme Contemporain du
mammouth.”

15 “La poterie en Belgique à l’ age du mammouth,” _Revue
d’Anthropologie_, 1887.

16 _Ac. des Sciences_, Nov. 9, 1885. We must add that at a later séance
M. Cartailhac contested, if not the facts, the conclusions deducted
from them.

17 But what is the value of categorical assertions of this kind in
presence of the fragments of pottery found at different levels in
Kent’s Hole? One of these fragments was so rotten that when placed in
water it formed a black liquid mud as it decomposed.

18 I have not space to speak here of the curious pottery found in
America. The most ancient specimens, moreover, are of much later date
than the Quaternary epoch. I can only refer those interested in the
subject to my book on “Prehistoric America,” published in French by M.
Masson of Paris, and in English in America by Messrs. G. P. Putnam’s
Sons.

19 “De Architectura,” book ii., c. i.

20 On the subject of tatooing an excellent work may be consulted by Dr
Magitot (“Ass. Franç. pour l’Avancement des Sciences,” Alger, 1881).

21 _Cypræa rufa, Cypræa lurida (Comptes rendus Acad. des Sciences_,
vol. lxxxiv., p. 1060).

22 On this point an excellent work may be consulted by S. Reinach: “Le
Musée de Saint Germain,” p. 232.

23 Vaudry: _Acad. des Sciences_, August 25, 1890.

24 A. Bertrand: _Acad. des Inscriptions_, April 29 and May 6, 1887.

25 Reinach in his “Catalogue of the Saint-Germain museum” gives the
best description I know of this now celebrated reindeer.

26 A. Milne Edwards: _Acad. des Sciences_, May 8, 1888.

27 “De Natura Rerum,” book v., v. 951, etc.



CHAPTER IV.
Caves, Kitchen-Middings, Lake Stations, “Terremares,” Crannoges,
Burghs, “Nurhags,” “Talayoti,” and “Truddhi.”


The earliest races of men lived in a climate less rigorous than ours,
on the shores of wide rivers, in the midst of fertile districts, where
fishing and the chase easily supplied all their needs. These races were
numerous and prolific, and we find traces of them all over Western
Europe, from Norfolk to the middle of Spain. What were the homes of
these men and their families? Did they crouch in dens, as Tacitus says
the German tribes did in his day? In his “Ancient Wiltshire,” Sir R.
Coalt Hoare says that the earliest human habitations were holes dug in
the earth and covered over with the branches of trees. Near Joigny
there still remain some circular holes in the ground, about fifty feet
in diameter by sixteen to twenty deep, known in the country under the
name of _buvards_. The trunk of a tree was fixed at the bottom and rose
above the ground, and the branches plastered with clay formed the roof.
The floor of these _buvards_ consists of a greasy black earth mixed
with bones, cinders, charcoal, and worked flints. Amongst the last
named, polished hatchets predominate, which proves that these refuges
were inhabited in Neolithic times, but there is nothing to prevent our
supposing that they were also occupied in the Palæolithic period.
Ameghino gives a still more striking example of an earth-dwelling. Near
Mercedes, about twenty leagues from Buenos Ayres, he picked up numerous
human bones, together with arrow-heads, chisels, flint knives, bone
stilettos and polishers, and bones of animals scratched and cut by man.
Later, Ameghino discovered the actual dwelling of this primeval man,
and his strange home was beneath the carapace of a gigantic armadillo,
the now extinct glyptodon seen in Fig. 48.

[Illustration: 48.]

The glyptodon.

“All around the carapace,” says Ameghino, “in the reddish agglomerate
of the original soil lay charcoal cinders, burnt and split bones, and
flints. Digging beneath this, a flint implement was found, with some
long split llama and stag bones, which had evidently been handled by
man, with some toxodon and mylodon teeth.” Fig. 49 represents the now
extinct mylodon. Some time afterwards, the discovery of another
carapace under similar conditions added weight to Ameghino’s
supposition.1 In the midst of the pampas, those vast treeless plains,
where no rock or accident of conformation affords shelter from heat or
cold or a hiding-place from wild beasts, man was not at a loss; he
hollowed out for himself a hole in the earth, roofing it over with the
shell of a glyptodon, and securing a retreat where he could be safe at
least for a time.

[Illustration: 49.]

Mylodon robustus.

It was not until later, driven to do so by the cold, that man learnt to
use the natural caves hollowed out in limestone rocks, either in
geological convulsions or by the quieter action of water. The absence
in the caves which have been excavated in America of implements of the
Chelléen type, the most ancient known as yet, would point to this
conclusion, though it is impossible to fix the earliest date of their
occupation. This date, moreover, varies very much in different
localities. The earth was but gradually peopled, and our ancestors
penetrated into different countries in successive migrations. Some
caves have recently been discovered in Wales, in the midst of Glacial
deposits.2 The Boulder Clay and marine drift on neighboring heights are
incontrovertible proofs of the submergence of this region, when Great
Britain was almost completely covered with ice. Excavations made in
1886 have brought to light a series of deposits, one above the other,
the gravel and red earth containing Quaternary bones and worked flints,
whilst the stalagmite and ooze are evidently of more recent origin.
This is the usual state of things in all the English eaves; but in
those of the Clyde, the bone beds had been disturbed and mixed with
striated pebbles and Glacial drift. From this Hicks, who superintended
the excavations, concluded that man and the Quaternary animals had
lived in those caves before the Glacial epoch, and before the great
submergence, which in some places was no less than some 1,300 feet
below the present level of the sea. If this were so, it would be one of
the most ancient proofs not only of the presence of man, but also of
the kind of habitation he first dwelt in. These conclusions have,
however, been hotly disputed. M. Arcelin3 remarks that there are in
England two exceptional geological landmarks, the Forest Bed
representing the last Pliocene formations, and the River Gravels, which
are the most ancient Quaternary deposits. Between the two, we find the
Boulder Clay of Glacial origin. Now the fauna of the caves of the
Clyde, far from resembling that of the Forest Bed, appears to be more
recent than that of the ancient deposits of the River Gravels. Amongst
this fauna we find neither the _Elephas antiquus_ nor the _Rhinoceros
Merckii_; the worked flints are not like those known as belonging to
the River-Gravel type, but the relics more nearly resemble those of the
Reindeer period of France. It is therefore impossible, in the present
state of our knowledge, to assert that man lived in the southwest of
England in the Glacial epoch, to the phenomena of which, if he
witnessed them, he must eventually have fallen a victim.

Our ancestors must constantly have disputed the possession of their
caves of refuge with animals, but there is often a certain distinction
between those chiefly occupied by man and the mere dens of wild beasts.
The latter are generally more difficult of access, and are only to be
entered by long, low, narrow, dark passages. Those permanently
inhabited by man are wide, not very deep, and they are well lighted.
That at Montgaudier, for instance, has an arched entrance some
forty-five feet wide by eighteen high. The cave-men had already learnt
to appreciate the advantages of air and light.

The caves are often of considerable height; that of Massat is some 560
feet high, that of Lherm is 655, that of Bouicheta nearly 755, that of
Loubens 820, and that of Santhenay is, as much as 1,344 feet high.
Those of Eyziès, Moustier, and Aurignac are also very lofty. As the
valleys were hollowed out by the rushing torrents of the Quaternary
floods, men sought a home near the waters which were indispensable to
their existence, and came to dwell on the shores of rivers. The most
ancient of the inhabited caves, therefore, are those on the highest
levels, but the difference in the nature of the country and the varying
force of geological action have led to so many exceptions, that all we
can say with any certainty is that the caves were inhabited at
different epochs. That of Montgaudier, for instance, was filled with an
accumulation of ooze about forty feet thick. Weapons and tools lay one
above the other from the bottom to the top, and it is easy to
distinguish the succession of hearths by the blackened earth, cinders,
charcoal, and crushed bones lying about them.

In the Placard Cave eight different deposits bear witness to the
presence of man; and these are separated by others bare of traces of
human occupation. The lowest deposit, which is some twenty-five feet
below the present level of the soil, contains worked flints of the
Moustérien type, above which, but separated by an accumulation of
_débris_ which has fallen from the roof, comes a layer in which was
found a number of arrow-heads of the shape of laurel leaves. The fauna
of both these levels includes the reindeer, the horse, and the aurochs.
As we go up we find, above another layer of _débris_, the Solutréen
type of tools and weapons represented by bone implements and numerous
arrow-heads, this time stalked and notched. The four following levels
correspond with those belonging to what is known as the Madeleine type,
and the arrow-heads are decorated with geometrical designs. The traces
of human occupation at different times, doubtless separated by long
intervals, are therefore very clearly defined. The Fontabert Cave, in
Dauphiné, contained, at a depth of about six feet, traces of fire and
roughly worked flints, and about three feet below the surface lay the
skeleton of a man, who had perhaps been overtaken by a fall of earth,
still holding in his hand a polished dipper of fine workmanship. Yet a
third and evidently more recent period is characterized by a jade
crescent. We might easily multiply instances of a similar kind, but
that we wish to avoid so much repetition.

We soon begin to find evidence of the progress made by man, and though
in Neolithic times he still continued to occupy caves he learned to
adapt them better to his needs. The rock shelters of the Petit-Morin
valley, so well explored by M. de Baye, are the best examples we can
give.

These caves are hollowed out of a very thick belt of cretaceous
limestone. They date from different epochs, and each presents special
characteristics which can easily be recognized. Some were used as
burial-places, others as habitations. In the former the entrance is of
irregular shape, the walls are roughly cut, and the work is of the most
elementary description. The sepulchral eaves were simply closed by a
large stone rolled into place and covered with rubbish, the better to
hide the entrance. The shelters used to live in show much more careful
work, and are divided into two unequal parts by a wall cut in the
living rock. To get into the second partition one has to go down steps,
cut in the limestone, and these steps are worn with long usage. The
entrance was cut out of a massive piece of rock, left thick on purpose,
and on either side of the opening the edges still show the rabbet which
was to receive the door. Two small holes on the right and left were
probably used to fix a bar across the front to strengthen the entrance.
A good many of these eaves are provided with an opening for
ventilation, and some skilful contrivances were resorted to for keeping
out water. Inside we find different floors, shelves, and crockets cut
in the chalk, and on the floors M. de Baye picked up shells, ornaments,
and flints, which were lying just where their owners had left them.
Very different is all this from the Vezère caves, and everything proves
an undeniable improvement in the conditions of life.

The most interesting of all the objects found in these caves are,
however, the carvings; but few date from Neolithic times, and some
archæologists have argued from their absence in favor of the
displacement everywhere of old races by the incursion of new-corners.
Some of these carvings represent hafted hatchets, the flint being
painted black to make the raised design stand out better. Others
represent human figures. In the Coizard Cave, for instance, was found a
roughly outlined representation of a woman with a prominent nose, eyes
indicated by black dots, highly developed breasts, but no lower limbs.
A necklace adorns her throat, and a pendant hanging from this necklace
is colored yellow. On the passage leading to the door is engraved
another figure which was originally more accurately drawn than the
others, but is not in such good preservation. In the Courjonnet Cave we
see a woman with a bird’s bead; she was probably one of the _lares
penates_, the protectors of the domestic hearth. We meet with this same
goddess at Santorin, and at Troy, and on the shores of the Vistula,
which is a very interesting ethnological fact.

The objects found in the sepulchral caves are important, and included a
number of arrow-heads with transverse cutting edges. There is no doubt
about their use; they have been picked up in black earth, in contact
with human bones, the decomposition of the soft parts of which caused
them to fall out of the mortal wound they had inflicted. With these
arrow-heads were found flint knives, large sloped scrapers, polishers,
and bone stilettos, the femora of a ruminant with a pig’s tooth fixed
on to each end, hoes made of stag horn, beads and pendants made of
bone, shell, schist, quartz, and aragonite, with the teeth of bears,
boars, wolves, and foxes, all pierced with holes. Some of the shell
anti schist beads were spread upon the surface of the skull, and
perhaps formed a net or _résille_, such as that already referred to as
found at Baoussé-Roussé.

For centuries this occupation of caves continued, offering as they did
a shelter that was dry and warm in winter, and cool in summer. Homer
tells us that the Cyclops lived on the heights of the mountains and in
the depths of the caves,4 and Prometheus says that, like the feeble
ant, men dwelt in deep subterranean caves, where the sun never
penetrated.5

Whilst the men of the Petit-Morin valley hollowed out caves, or
enlarged those made by nature, others took refuge in buts made of dried
clay and interlaced branches, or in tents of the skins of the animals
they had slain, and, though these fragile dwellings have disappeared,
leaving no trace, there yet remain indelible evidences of the presence
of many successive generations. Everywhere throughout the world we find
heaps of rubbish, consisting chiefly of the shells of mollusca and
crustacea, broken bones, flakes of flint, and fragments of stone and
bone implements, covering vast areas and often rising to a considerable
height.

Not until our own day did these rubbish heaps attract attention, and it
was reserved to our own generation, so interested in all that relates
to the past, to recognize their true significance. Steenstrup noticed,
in the north of Europe, that these mounds consisted nearly entirely of
the shells of edible species, such as the oyster, mussel, and
_littorina littorea_; that they were all those of adult specimens, but
not all subject to similar conditions of existence or native to the
same waters. The kitchen-middings, or heaps of kitchen refuse—such was
the name given to these shell-mounds—could not have been the natural
deposits left by the waves after storms, for in that case they would
have been mixed with quantities of sand and pebbles. The conclusion is
inevitable, that man alone could have piled up these accumulations,
which were the refuse flung away day by day after his meals. The
excavation of the kitchen-middings confirmed in a remarkable manner the
opinion of Steenstrup, and everywhere a number of important objects
were discovered. In several places the old hearths were brought to
light. They consisted of flat stones, on which were piles of cinders,
with fragments of wood and charcoal. It was now finally proved that
these mounds occupied the site of ancient settlements, the inhabitants
of which rarely left the coast, and fed chiefly on the mollusca which
abounded in the waters of the North Sea.

These primeval races, however savage they may have been, were not
wanting in intelligence. The earliest inhabitants of Russia placed
their dwellings near rivers above the highest flood-level known to or
foreseen by them. The Scandinavians were most precise in the
orientation of their homes, and M. de Quatrefages points out that the
kitchen-midding of Sœlager is set against a hill in the best position
for protecting those who lived near it from the north winds, which are
so trying in these districts on account of their violence. At Havelse,
says Sir John Lubbock, the settlement was on rather higher ground, and,
though close to the shore, was quite beyond the reach of the waves. The
English visitors had an excavation made whilst they were present, and
in two or three hours they obtained about a hundred fragments of bone,
many rude flakes, sling stones, and fragments of flint, together with
some rough axes of the ordinary shell-mound type. The excavations at
Meilgaard a little later by the same explorers were even more fruitful
in results.

Scandinavia does not appear to have been occupied in the Paleolithic
period, and the most ancient facts concerning it only date from the
expeditions of the Romans against the Teutons, and our knowledge even
of them is very incomplete.6 We are still ignorant of much which may
have been known to the Carthaginians and the Phœnicians. It is possible
that in the remote days under notice the Scandinavians were ignorant of
the art of tilling the ground, for so far no cereal or agricultural
product of any kind has been discovered, nor the bones of any domestic
animal, except indeed those of the dog, which may, however, have been
still in a wild state. Amongst the bones collected from the
kitchen-middings, those of the stag, the kid, and the boar are much the
most numerous. The bear, the urns, the wild cat, the otter, the
porpoise, the seal, and the small mammals, the marten, the water-rat
and the mouse, have also been found. At Havelse were collected more
than 3,500 mammal bones, amongst which do not occur those of the
musk-ox, the reindeer, the elk, or the marmot; their absence bearing
witness to a more temperate climate than that of the present day in the
regions under notice. The stag antlers found belong to every season of
the year, from which we may conclude that the people of these
districts, like the cave-men of the Pyrenees, had given up a nomad life
and remained at home all the year round, living in the dwellings they
had built upon the shores of the sea.

Amongst the birds found, we may mention the large penguin, now extinct,
the moor-fowl, which fed entirely on pine buds, and several species of
clucks and geese; whilst amongst the fish were the herring, the cod,
the dab, and the eel. The numerous relics of chelonia prove the
existence of numbers of the turtle tribe in the North Sea.

A great variety of objects, most of them of a coarse type, have been
found beneath the kitchen-middings; metals are however completely
absent, and it is probable that they were quite unknown to the
Scandinavians for several centuries after their arrival in the country.

It is easy to quote similar facts in other countries. In 1877, Count
Ouvarof mentioned, at the Archæological Congress at Kazan, some
kitchen-middings near the Oka, a little river flowing into the Volga
near Nijni-Novgorod. In excavating some _bougrys_, or little mounds of
sand overlooking the valley, he discovered amongst the layers of
alluvium, successive deposits of cinders and fragments of charcoal,
which appear to have been the remains of a fire. A little lower down in
another deposit were fragments of pottery, stone weapons and
implements, and an immense number of shells. Judging from these relics
of their daily life, this numerous population must have fed exclusively
on fish and mollusca, for excavations brought to light but few mammal
bones. The mollusca were all of species that only live in salt water.
From this we know that the waves washed the shores near this _bougry_,
and that a milder climate probably prevailed in these regions, making
life more supportable.

Virchow has recognized on the shores of Lake Burtneek in Germany, a
kitchen-midding belonging to the earliest Neolithic times, perhaps even
to the close of the Palæolithic period. He there picked up some stone
and bone implements, and notices on the one hand the absence of the
reindeer, and on the other, as in Scandinavia, that of domestic
animals. But in this case, the home of the living became the tomb of
the dead, and numerous skeletons lay beside the abandoned hearths.
Similar discoveries have been made in Portugal; shell-heaps having been
found thirty-five to forty miles from the coast, and from sixty-five to
eighty feet above the sea-level. Here also excavations have brought to
light several different hearths; and in many of the most ancient
kitchen-middings in the valley of the Tigris were found crouching
skeletons, proving that here too the home had become the tomb.7

Similar deposits are by no means rare in France. M. du Chatellier
mentions one in Brittany, which he estimates as 325 cubic feet in size.
From it be has taken spear- and arrow-heads, knives and scrapers, some
highly finished, others but roughly cut and often with scarcely any
shape at all. The population was evidently ichthyophagous, to judge by
the vast accumulations of shells of scallops, oysters, limpets,
pectens, and other mollusca. The few animal bones are those of the
stag, the bear, and certain wading birds.

At Canche, near Étaples, has been evade out a series of mounds forming
a semicircle some eight hundred and fifty feet in extent. These mounds
are made up of successive layers of shells and charcoal, the relics of
successive occupations. Lastly we must mention a kitchen-midding
situated at the mouth of the Somme, which is eight hundred and twenty
feet long by about one hundred wide. It consists principally of shells
of adult species, with which are mixed fragments of coarse black
pottery and numerous goat and sheep bones, the latter bearing witness
to a more recent date than that of the kitchen-middings of Scandinavia
or of Germany.

Throughout Europe similar facts are coming to light. Evans mentions
heaps of shells on the coasts of England. Chantre speaks of others near
Lake Gotchai in the Caucasus, and Nordenskiöld of others at Cape North,
to which he wishes to restore its true name of Jokaipi. He sass these
mounds are exactly like those of Denmark.

It is, however, chiefly in America that these heaps attract attention,
for there huge shell-mounds stretch along the coast in Newfoundland,
Nova Scotia, Massachusetts, Louisiana, California, and Nicaragua. We
meet with them again near the Orinoco and the Mississippi, in the
Aleutian Islands, and in the Guianas, in Brazil and in Patagonia, on
the coasts of the Pacific as on those of the Atlantic. Owing to the
darker color of the vegetation growing on them, the shell-heaps of
Tierra del Fuego are seen from afar by the navigator. For a long time
the true character of these mounds was not known, and they were
attributed to natural causes, such as the emergence of the ancient
coast-line from the sea, and it was not until lately that it was
discovered that they were the work of men.

Some of these kitchen-middings are of great size. Sir Charles Lyell
describes one on St. Simon’s Island, at the mouth of the Altamaha
(Georgia), which covers ten acres of ground and varies in height from
five to ten feet. It consisted almost entirely of oyster shells. In
America, as in Europe, excavations brought to light hatchets, flints,
arrows, and fragments of pottery. Another of these mounds, near the St.
John River, consists, as does that visited by Lyell, of oyster shells,
and is of extraordinary dimensions, being three hundred feet long, and
though the exact width cannot be made out, is certainly several hundred
feet across. Putnam8 gives an account of the excavation of one of these
mounds formed of shells of the _Mya, Venus, Pecten, Buccinum_, and
_Natica_ genera. It stretched along the sea-coast for a distance of
several hundred feet, it was from four to five feet thick, and
penetrated some distance below the surface of the ground. The valves
had been opened with the aid of heat, and the animal bones found with
the shells had been broken with heavy hammers which were found in the
kitchen-midding. The bones included those of the stag, the wolf, and
the fox. Fishes were also represented by remains of the cod, the
plaice, and chelonia by turtle shells. Some bird bones were also found,
and the knives, arrow- and spear-heads, scrapers, etc., were all of the
rudest workmanship. Mr. Phelps has superintended yet more important
excavations at Damariscotta9 and all along the coast to the month of
the Penobscot. In the lowest layers he made out ancient hearths, and
found numerous fragments of pottery which are the most ancient examples
of keramic ware found in New England, and were covered with incised
ornamentation of considerable refinement.

The kitchen-middings of Florida and Alabama are even more remarkable.
There is one on Amelia Island which is a quarter of a mile long with a
medium depth of three feet and a breadth of nearly five. That of Bear’s
Point covers sixty acres of ground, that of Anercerty Point one
hundred, and that of Santa Rosa five hundred. Others taper to a great
height. Turtle Mound, near Smyrna, is formed of a mass of oyster shells
attaining a height of nearly thirty feet, and the height of several
others is more than forty feet.10 In all of them bushels of shells have
already been found, although a great part of the sites they occupy are
still unexplored; huge trees, roots, and tropical creepers having, in
the course of many centuries, covered them with an almost impenetrable
thicket.

Whether man did or did not live in the basin of the Delaware at the
most remote times of which we have any knowledge, we meet with traces
of his occupation in the same latitude at more recent periods. At
Long-Nick-Branch is a shell-mound that extends for half a mile, and in
California there is a yet larger kitchen-midding. It measures a mile in
length by half a mile in width, and, as in similar accumulations,
excavations have yielded thousands of stone hammers and bone implements
(Fig. 24).

The shell-mounds of which we have so far been speaking are all near the
sea, but there is yet another consisting entirely of marine shells
fifty miles beyond Mobile. This fact seems to point to a considerable
change in the level of the ground since the time of man’s first
occupancy, for he is not likely to have taken all the trouble involved
in carrying the mollusca necessary for his daily food so far, when he
might so easily have settled down near the shore.

I cannot close this account of the kitchen-middings, without calling
attention to two very interesting facts. The importance of these mounds
bears witness alike to the number of the inhabitants who dwelt near
them, and the long duration of their sojourn. Worsaae sets back the
initial date of the most ancient of the shell-mounds of the New World
more than three thousand years. This is however a delicate question, on
which in the present state of our knowledge it is difficult to hazard a
serious opinion. It is easier to come to a conclusion on other points:
the close resemblance, for instance, between the kitchen-middings of
America and those of Europe. In both continents we find the early
inhabitants fed almost entirely on fish; their weapons, tools, and
pottery were almost identical in character; and in both cases the
characteristic animals of Quaternary times had disappeared, and the use
of metals still remained unknown. Are these remarkable coincidences the
result of chance, or must we not rather suppose that people of the same
origin occupied at the same epoch both sides of the Atlantic?

The man of the kitchen-middings evidently had a fixed abode. Long
since, the tent, the temporary shelter of the nomad, had given place to
the but. We have already said what this but may have been like, but the
most certain data we have as to human habitations at this still but
little known epoch, are those supplied by the Lake Stations of
Switzerland, and it is to our own generation that we are indebted for
the first discoveries relating to them.

The memory of these Lake Stations bad completely passed away, and it
was only the long drought which desolated Switzerland in 1853 and 1854,
and the extraordinary sinking of Lake Zurich, revealing the piles still
standing, that attracted the attention of archæologists. In the space
still enclosed by these piles lay scattered pell-mell stones, bones,
burnt cinders of ancient hearths, pestles, hammers, pottery, hatchets
of various shapes, implements of many kinds, with innumerable objects
of daily use. These relics prove that some of the ancient inhabitants
of Switzerland had dwelt on the lake where they were found, in a refuge
to which they had probably retired to escape from the attacks of their
fellow-men or wild beasts. Though they bad succeeded in getting away
from these enemies, they were to fall victims to a yet more formidable
adversary, and the half-burnt piles have preserved to our own day the
traces of a conflagration that destroyed the Lake dwelling so
laboriously constructed.

The discovery of these piles excited general interest, an interest that
was redoubled when similar discoveries revealed that all the lakes of
Switzerland were dotted with stations that had been built long
centuries before in the midst of the waters. Twenty such stations were
made out on Lake Bienne, twenty-four on the Lake of Geneva, thirty on
Lake Constance, forty-nine on that of Neuchâtel, and others, though not
so many, on Lakes Sempach, Morat, Mooseedorf, and Pfeffikon. In fact
more than two hundred Lake Stations are now known in Switzerland; and
how many more may have completely disappeared?

There is really nothing to surprise us in the fact of buildings rising
from the midst of waters. They are known in historic times; Herodotus
relates that the inhabitants of pile dwellings on Lake Prasias
successfully repelled the attacks of the Persians commanded by
Megabasus. Alonzo de Ojeda, the companion of Amerigo Vespucci, speaks
of a village consisting of twenty large houses built on piles in the
midst of a lake, to which he gave the name of Venezuela in honor of
Venice, his native town. We meet with pile dwellings in our own day in
the Celebes, in New Guinea, in Java, at Mindanao, and in the Caroline
Islands. Sir Richard Burton saw pile dwellings at Dahomey, Captain
Cameron on the lakes of Central Africa, and the Bishop of Labuan tells
us that the houses of the Dayaks are built on lofty platforms on the
shores of rivers. The accounts of historians and travellers help us to
understand alike the anode of construction of the Lake Stations and the
kind of life led by their inhabitants.

The Lake dwellings of Switzerland may be assigned to three different
periods. That of Chavannes, on Lake Bienne, belongs to the earliest
type. The hatchets found are small, scarcely polished, and always of
native rock, such as serpentine, diorite, or saussurite; the pottery is
coarse, mixed with grains of sand or bits of quartz; the bottoms of the
vases are thick, and no traces of ornamentation can be made out. The
pile-dwellings of the second period, such as those of Locras and
Latringen, show considerable progress; the hatchets, some of which are
very large, are well made. Several of them are of nephrite,
chloromelanite, and jade; and their number, as compared with those in
minerals native to Switzerland, varies from five to eight per cent.
Here and there in rare instances we find a few copper or bronze
lamellae amongst the piles. The pottery is now of finer clay, better
kneaded; and ornamentation, including chevrons, wolves’ teeth, and
mammillated designs, is more common. The handle, however, is still a
mere projection. The third period, which we may date from the
transition from stone to bronze, is largely represented; copper weapons
and tools are already numerous, and bronze is beginning to occur. The
stone hatchets and hammers are skilfully pierced, and wooden or horn
implements are often found. The vases are of various shapes, all
provided with handles, and are covered with ornaments, some made with
the fingers of the potter, others with the help of a twig or some fine
string. On the other hand, there are no hatchets of foreign rock;
commerce and intercourse with people at a distance had ceased, or at
least become rarer. The tools are fixed into handles of stag horn,
which are found in every stage of manufacture. The personal property of
the Lake Dwellers included bead necklaces, pendants, buttons, needles,
and horn combs. The teeth of animals served as amulets, and the bones
that were of denser material than born were used as javelin- or
arrow-heads. The arrows were generally of triangular shape and not
barbed.11

The distance from the shore of the most ancient of the Lake dwellings
varies from 131 to 298 feet. Gradually men began to take greater and
greater precautions against danger, and the most recent stations are
656 to 984 feet from the banks of the lake. The piles of the Stone age
are from eleven to twelve inches in diameter; those of the later epochs
are smaller. They are pointed at the ends, and hardened by fire. When
the piles had been driven into the bottom of the lake, a platform was
laid on them solid enough to bear the weight of the buts. This platform
was made of beams laid down horizontally, and bound together by
interlaced branches. Two modes of construction can easily be
distinguished. In one the platforms were upheld by numerous piles, ten
yards long, firmly driven into the mud. This is how the _Pfahlbauten,
Palafittes_, or pile dwellings situated in shallow waters were
generally put together. In other cases it seemed easier to raise the
soil round the piles, than to drive them into the hard rock which
formed the bed of the lake. Care was then taken to consolidate them,
and keep them in position with blocks of stone, clay, and tiers of
piles. Keller gives to these latter the name of _Packwerbauten_, and
other German archæologists call them _Steinbergen_.

The mean depth of the waters in those parts of the lakes formerly
occupied by the pile dwellings is from thirteen to sixteen feet, and we
can still make out the piles when the water is calm and clear. Worn
though they may be, their tops still emerge at a height varying from
one to three feet above the mud at the bottom of the lake. Their number
was originally considerable, and it is estimated that there were forty
thousand at Wangen, and a hundred thousand at Robenhausen. The area
occupied by the stations varies considerably; according to Troyon, that
at Wangen was seven hundred paces long by one hundred and twenty broad.
Baron von Mayenfisch explored seventeen sites in the Lake of Constance,
the area of which varies from three to four acres. At Inkwyl is a
little artificial island about forty-eight feet in diameter. The Lake
dwelling of Morges, which was still inhabited in the Bronze age, covers
an area of twelve hundred feet long by a mean width of one hundred and
fifty. It is, however, useless to enumerate the various calculations
that have been made, as they are founded on nothing but more or less
probable guesswork.

Excavations show that the buts that rose from the platforms were made
of wattle and hurdle-work. In different places calcined and
agglutinated fragments have been picked up, and pieces of clay which
had served as facing. The house to which they had belonged had been
destroyed by fire, and the clay, hardened in the flames, had resisted
the disintegrating action of the water. On one side this clay is
smooth, and on the other it still retains the marks of the interlaced
branches, which had helped to form the inner walls. Some of these marks
are so clear and regular that Troyon, noticing the way they curve, was
able to assert that the buts were circular, and that they varied in
diameter from ten to fifteen feet.

A recent discovery at Schussenreid (Wurtemberg) gives completeness to
our knowledge of the Swiss Lake dwellings. In the midst of a peat-bog
rises a but known as a _Knüppelbau_, which is supposed to date from the
Stone age. It is of rectangular form, and is divided into two
compartments communicating with each other by a foot-bridge consisting
of three beams laid side by side. The floors of this but are made of
rounded wood, and the walls of piles split in half. Excavations have
brought to light several floors, one above the other, and divided by
thick layers of clay. The rising of the level of the peat doubtless
compelled the Lake Dweller to add by degrees to the height of his
house.

The Proto-Helvetian race were well-developed men, and the bones that
have been collected show that they were not at all wanting in symmetry
of form or in cranial capacity. The crania found are distinctly
dolichocephalous, and their owners had evidently attained to no small
degree of culture and of technical skill. Judging from the length of
the femora found, though it must be added that they are mostly those of
women, the ancient Lake Dwellers were not so tall as the present
inhabitants of Europe. The smallness of the handles of their weapons
and tools points to the same conclusion.12

Though the importance and number of the discoveries made in Switzerland
render it the classic land of Lake Stations, it is not the only country
in which they have been found. They have been made out in the Lago
Maggiore and in the lakes of Varèse, Peschiera, and Garda in Lombardy;
in Lake Salpi in the Capitanata, and in other parts of Italy. Judging
from the objects recovered from these stations, they belonged partly to
the Stone and partly to the Bronze age.

The pile dwelling of Lagozza is one of the most interesting known to
us. It forms a long square, facing due east, and covers an area of two
thousand six hundred yards, now completely overgrown with peat six and
a half feet thick. Amongst the posts still standing can be made out a
number of half-burnt planks, which are probably the remains of the
platform. One of the posts was still covered with bark, and it was easy
to recognize the silver birch (_Betula alba_). Other posts consisted of
the trunks of resinous trees, such as the _Pinus picea_, the _Pinus
sylvestris_, and the larch, which now only grow in the lofty Alpine
valleys. Amongst the industrial objects found in the Lagozza pile
dwelling were polished stone hatchets, hammers, polishers of hard
stone, knife-blades, flint scrapers, and seven or eight arrows with
transverse cutting edges, a form rare in Italy.

Castelfranco,13 from whom we borrow these details, has also, in the
excavations he superintended, picked up a number of earthenware
spindle-whorls with a hole in the middle, amulets, and numerous pieces
of pottery, some fine and some coarse, according to the purpose for
which they were intended. The first mould had in most cases been
covered over with a layer of very fine clay spread upon it with the aid
of a kind of boasting-chisel. We may also mention a bone comb. The
combs found in Swiss Lake dwellings are of horn, with the exception of
one from Locras of yew wood.

What chiefly distinguishes the Lagozza pile dwelling, however, is the
absence of the bones, teeth, or horns of animals, and also of
fish-hooks, harpoons, or nets, so that we must conclude that the
inhabitants did not hunt or fish, that they did not breed domestic
animals, and were probably vegetarians. The researches of Professor
Sordelli confirm this hypothesis; from amongst the objects taken from
the peat he recognized two kinds of corn (_Triticum vulgare antiquorum_
and _Triticum vulagere hibernum_), six-rowed barley (_Hordeum
hexastichum_), mosses, ferns, flax, the Indian poppy (_Papaver
somniferum_), acorns, and an immense number of nuts and apples.

The acorns are those of the common oak, and their cups and outer rind
had been removed, so that they had evidently been prepared to serve as
food for, man; the apples were small and coriaceous, resembling the
modern crab-apple; the Indian poppy cannot have grown without
cultivation; but this was perhaps but an example of the same species
already recognized in the Lake dwellings of Switzerland. It is
difficult to say whether it was used for food or whether oil was
extracted from it.

We have already spoken of the discoveries made in Austria and Hungary.
Count Wurmbrand has described the difficulties with which explorers had
to contend. The lakes have in many cases become inaccessible swamps,
and in others, the waters having been artificially dimmed to regulate
their overflow, the sites of the pile dwellings are so far below the
level of the lakes that any excavations are impossible. Long and
arduous researches have, however, been rewarded with some success, and
the numerous objects recovered bear witness, as in Switzerland, to the
gradual progress made by the successive generations who occupied these
pile dwellings.

[Illustration: 50.]

Objects discovered in the peat-bogs of Laybach. A. Earthenware vase. B.
Fragment of ornamented pottery. C. Bone needle. D. Earthenware weight
for fishing-net. E. Fragment of jawbone.

A lake near Laybach had been converted in drying up into an immense
peat-bog, nearly thirty-eight miles in circumference, bounded on the
right and left by lofty mountains.14 When this bog was under water it
had been the site of several Lake Stations. One, for instance, has been
made out over three hundred and twenty yards from the bank. The piles,
which consisted of the trunks of oaks, beeches, and poplars, varying
from eight to ten inches in diameter, were placed at regular intervals.
The objects taken from the peat-bog are simply innumerable (Fig. 50),
and include hundreds of needles of different sizes, stilettos,
dagger-blades, arrows, and hatchets, with stag-horn handles. Coarse
black earthenware vases are equally numerous and are of a great variety
of form, but their ornamentation is of the most primitive description,
and was done sometimes with the nail of the potter, and sometimes with
a pointed bone. Little earthenware figures (Figs. 51 and 52) were also
found, some of which were sent from the Laybach Museum to the French
Exhibition of 1878. One of them is said to represent a woman, probably
an idol. This is one of the first known examples of the representation
of the human figure from a Lake dwelling. At Nimlau, near Olmutz, the
drying lip of a little lake brought to light a Lake Station surrounded
by the trunks of oak trees of a large size. They were piled up, one
above the other, and strongly bound together with osiers. These trunks
were evidently intended to fortify the station.

[Illustration: 51.]

Small terra-cotta figures, found in the Laybach pile dwellings.

The mode of construction of the Lake Stations of the marshes of
Pomerania is very different from that employed in Switzerland or in
Austria. The foundations rest on horizontal beams, kept in place either
by great blocks of rock or by piles driven in vertically. In many cases
notches had evidently been made, the better to place the cross-beams;
whilst in others forked branches had been selected, so that a second
branch could be fitted into the fork. Primeval man soon learnt to
appreciate the solidity of such a combination. Do these stations,
however, really date from prehistoric times? Virchow, returning to his
first opinion, now thinks that the pile dwellings of Germany belong to
the same epoch as the intrenchments known as _Burgwallen_, when metals
and even iron were already in general use. They were inhabited until
the thirteenth century, and it is easy to trace in them, as in those of
Switzerland, the signs of the successive occupations, the dwellings
having evidently been abandoned and restored later by fresh comers.

[Illustration: 52.]

Small terra-cotta figures, from the Laybach pile dwellings.

At the meeting of the British Association at Newcastle in 1863, Lord
Lovaine described a Lake Station in the south of Scotland, and Sir J.
Lubbock mentions one in the north of England. Others are known at
Holderness (Yorkshire), at Thetford, on Barton Mere, near Bury St.
Edmunds; but judging from the description of them they are not of
earlier date than the Bronze age.

Other stations are more ancient. A few years ago a number of piles were
found a little above Kew, beneath a layer of alluvium, and embedded in
the gravel which formed the ancient bed of the Thames. All around these
piles were scattered the bones of animals, of which those of the _Bos
longifrons_ were the most remarkable. The long bones had been split to
get out the marrow, an evident proof of the intelligent action of man.
In London two similar examples were found on the site of the present
Mansion House, and beneath the ancient walls of the city. They are
supposed to date from times earlier, not only than the cutting out of
the present course of the Thames, but before that invasion of the sea
which preceded the formation of the Thames valley, now the home of more
than four million men and women.

The Lake Stations of France are less important than those of the
neighboring countries. It is supposed that Vatan, a little town of
Berry, was built on the site of a Lake city. It is situated in the
midst of a dried-up marsh, and at different points piles have been
removed which were driven deep into the mud. We also hear of pile
dwellings in the Jura Mountains, in the Pyrenean valleys of
Haute-Garonne, Ariège, and Aude, as well as in those of the Eastern
Pyrenees. In the department of Landes, which on one side joins the
plateau of Lannemezan, and on the other the lofty plains of Béarn, are
many marshy depressions, where have been found numbers of piles, with
charred wood and fragments of pottery.

Discoveries no less curious have been made in the Bourget Lake, but the
dwellings rising from its surface date from a comparatively recent
epoch. The numerous fragments of pottery found prove that terra-cotta
ware had attained to a beauty of form and color unknown to primitive
times. Indeed some of the vases actually bear the name of the Roman
potter who made them. We must also assign to an epoch later than the
Stone age the buildings, remains of which have beet found in the
peat-bogs of Saint-Dos near Salies (Basses-Pyrénées). At a depth of
about thirty-two inches has been found a regular floor formed of trunks
of trees resting on piles and bound together in a primitive fashion
with the filaments of roots. These piles bear a number of deep
clean-cut notches, such as could only have been made with an iron
implement. In other parts of France there are Lake Stations, which were
occupied until the time of the Carlovingians. To this time belong the
pile dwellings of Lake Paladru (Isère), which were abandoned, so far as
we can tell, by their owners when they were swamped by the rising of
the water.

When the Lake Stations of Europe were inhabited, the characteristic
animals of the Quaternary epoch, such as the elephant, the rhinoceros,
the lion, and the hippopotamus had disappeared from that continent, and
their place was taken by the earliest domestic animals. The Lake fauna
of Switzerland includes about seventy species, thirty mammals
twenty-six birds, ten kinds of fish, and four reptiles.15 The mammals
were the stag, the dog, the pig, the goat, the sheep, and two kinds of
oxen. These animals were already domesticated, there can be absolutely
no doubt on this point, for in many _Pfahlbauten_ their very dung has
been found, a conclusive proof that they lived side by side with man.

The remains of the stag and of the ox are more numerous than those of
any other animal, and it is easy to see that every clay the importance
of a pastoral life became more clearly recognized. In the most ancient
Lake Stations, those of Mooseedorf, Wangen, and Meilen, for instance,
the stag predominates; in those of the western lakes, which are
comparatively more recent, relics of the ox are more numerous. In the
Lake village of Nidau, which dates from the Bronze age, a greatly
increased number of bones of domestic animals have been found, whilst
those of wild creatures become rarer and rarer. The progress of
domestication is evident, and it is no less certain that the lapse of
centuries must have been required for the formation of the herds which
evidently existed in certain localities. It is possible that these
animals may have first entered Europe in the wake of foreign invaders,
and before being reduced to servitude, they may have roamed about in a
wild state, and even have been contemporaries with species now extinct.
However that may be, there can be no doubt on one point, they could not
domesticate themselves; one race of creatures after another must have
fallen under the subjection of man, who gradually became the master of
all the animals that are still about us.

We do not meet in the pile dwellings with the common mouse, the rat, or
the cat, and the horse is very rare. It is the same with the
kitchen-middings and the caves occupied in Neolithic times. The
disappearance of the horse, so numerous in earlier epochs, is general,
and this would be inexplicable if history did not solve the mystery.
The Bible, which gives us such complete details of the pastoral life of
the Hebrews, speaks for the first time of the horse after the exodus
from Egypt of the children of Israel, and in Egypt itself the horse is
not represented in any monument of earlier date than the Seventeenth
Dynasty. It is the same in America, animals of the equine race, that
were so numerous in early geological times, had long since disappeared
on the arrival of the Spaniards, and the horses they brought with them
inspired the Mexicans and Peruvians with unutterable terror.

Domestic animals require regular food through the long winter months;
so that their presence alone is enough to prove that their owners were
tillers of the soil. The discovery in many of the Helvetian Lake
Stations of calcined cereals confirms this hypothesis. Amongst the
cereals found, corn is the most abundant, and several bushels of it
have been collected. In the department of the Gironde, regular silos or
subterranean storing-places for grain have been found in which the
calcined corn was stowed away. In the Lake Stations have also been
found millet, peas, poppy-heads, nuts, plums, raspberries, and even
dried apples and pears, doubtless set aside as a provision for the
winter. From the water at Cortaillod, have been taken, with a few ears
of barley, cherry-stones, acorns, and beechnuts16; and at Laybach, some
water-chestnuts (_trapa natans_) of a kind that has long since
disappeared from Carniola. Sometimes the cereals were roughly roasted,
crushed, and put away in large earthenware vessels; but in some places,
regular flat round loaves of bread have been found about one or two
inches thick, which were baked without leaven. We may well assert that
great changes lead taken place since the first arrival of man upon the
earth.

The so-called _terremares_ of Italy date from the same period as the
Danish kitchen-middings and the Swiss pile dwellings. They are met with
chiefly in Lombardy and in the ancient duchies of Parma and Piacenza,
and consist of low mounds rising from thirteen to sixteen feet above
the surface of the soil. In some cases a number of _terremares_, close
to one another, form regular villages covering an area of from five to
six miles square. Excavations of the _terremare_ have brought to light
rows of piles from seven to ten feet long, connected by transverse
beams, forming a regular floor, from which rose buts built in a similar
way to those of the Swiss pile dwellings, of interlaced branches or of
clay and straw, for no trace has been made out of the use of bricks or
of stones. The refuse of the kitchen and rubbish of all kinds rapidly
accumulated round about these buts, and formed the first nucleus of the
mound, which soon grew to a considerable height as one occupant of the
house succeeded another. When the refuse became too much of a nuisance,
the owner of the but set up fresh piles at a greater height on the same
site, laid down another platform, and built anew but. In some places
three such platforms have been found one above another.

As in the Lake Stations, excavations of the _terremares_ have brought
to light numerous bones of domestic animals; but those of wild
creatures, such as bears, stags, roedeer, and boars, are even rarer
than in Switzerland. The inhabitants evidently had other resources than
hunting at their command, and though the processes they employed were
but elementary, they cultivated corn, beans, vines, and various fruits.
Though iron was still unknown, some bronze objects have been found in
certain _terremares_, but these were only roughly melted pieces of
metal, showing no traces of having been either hammered or soldered.
Amongst the pottery found in the _terremares_, we must mention a number
of small objects not unlike acorns in form, pierced lengthwise, and
decorated with incised lines, some straight, others curved. Italian
archæologists call them _fusaïoles_, and Swiss savants, who have found
a great many in the lakes of their native country, give them the name
of _pesons de fuseau_. Both these names connect them with the process
of spinning; but their number renders this hypothesis inadmissible, and
when we give an account of the excavations carried on at Hissarlik,
under Dr. Schliemann, we shall be able to determine their character
(see Chapter VII.).

At Castione, near the town of Parma, and in several other parts of the
provinces of Parma and Reggio, _terremares_ have been discovered rising
from the midst of vast rectangular basins artificially hollowed out.
Some have concluded from this that the _terremarecolli_ as the
inhabitants of the _terremares_ have been called, were descended from
the people who built the pile dwellings of Switzerland, and that,
faithful to the traditions of their race, they hollowed out ponds in
default of natural lakes. If this were so, Italy must have been peopled
with a race that came over the Alps.17 Who or what this race was can
only be matter of conjecture. It cannot, however, have been the
Ligures, a branch of the great Iberian family, who were totally
ignorant of culture, and to whom the builders of the most ancient of
the _terremares_ were certainly superior; nor can it have been the
Etruscans, for all relics of that race, which are moreover easily
recognizable, were found quite apart from the deep deposits containing
the _terremares_. Many indications point to the conclusion that when
the Celts came down into Italy their knowledge of metallurgy was
already more advanced than that of the builders of the _terremares_. We
are therefore disposed to think with Heilbig, that the _terremarecolli_
were the Itali, of Arian race, who were the ancestors of the Sabini,
Umbri, Osci, and Latins. In the great migrations of races, the Itali
bad separated themselves from their brethren the Pelasgi, who had
remained in Epirus, and, continuing their march, they peopled
Switzerland and crossed the Alps, settling down in the fertile plains
watered by the Po, where it is easy even now to prove their presence.

In superintending the excavation of a _terremare_ at Toszig, in
Hungary, Pigorini,18 was greatly struck by the resemblance between it
and similar erections in Italy, especially that of Casarolo. This is
very much in favor of the Itali having been the builders. But the
objects collected in some of the _terremares_, those of Varano and
Chierici for instance, prove that they were inhabited from Neolithic
times, so that the Itali of Italy, if Itali they were, did but follow
the traditions of their predecessors. In spite, however, of zealous
study, all that relates to the origin of tribes and races remains
involved in the greatest obscurity, and we can but look to the future
to supply what the present altogether fails to give.

We have yet other tokens of the presence of the ancient races who
peopled Italy. Dr. Concezio Rosa19 noticed in the Abruzzi extensive
black patches on the ground, which bore witness to the former residence
of men. The excavation of these _Fondi di Cabane_, as they are called,
led to the finding of a great many stone knives and scrapers with
numerous bone stilettos and the bones of various animals, all of them
of species still living. Later, similar _fondi_ were found between the
Eastern Alps and Mount Gargano. In Reggio, at Rivaltella, at
Castelnuovo de Sotto, and at Calerno, they formed regular groups, and
from one of these stations more than one thousand worked flints were
collected. We mention them especially because they were of lozenge
(_selci romboidali_) and half-lozenge (_semi-rombi_) shapes, which are
forms unknown in other districts.

With these flints were hand-made vases with handles, the clay unmixed
with sand or quartz and ornamented with lines, grooves, and raised
knobs. These vases differ greatly from those found in the _terremares_;
are they then, as has been said, of earlier (late? It is impossible to
come to any decision on the point.

Before closing our account of prehistoric buildings surrounded by
water, we must say a few words on crannoges though there is the
greatest difference of opinion as to their date.

Crannoges are artificial islets raised above the level of certain lakes
in Ireland and Scotland20 by means of a series of layers of earth and
stone, and strengthened by piles, some upright, others laid down
lengthwise. Wylde counted forty-six in Ireland in his time, some of
them of considerable extent. That of Ardkellin Lough (Roscommon) is
surrounded by a wall of dry stones resting on piles. In other places
have been found the remains of stockades very intelligently set up in
such a manner as to break the force of the shock of the water.

To add to the difficulties of dealing with the subject of crannoges,
they were successively occupied for many centuries. They are mentioned
in the most ancient Irish legends, and even in the sixteenth century
they served as refuges for the kings of the country in the constant
rebellions that took place. The objects taken from the lakes belong to
very different epochs, and it is impossible to say anything positive as
to the time of their construction.

A but found in Donegal may, however, date from an extremely remote
age.21 It rested on a thick layer of sand brought front the neighboring
shore, and was covered over by a bed of peat slot less than sixteen
feet thick. Since the hilt was deserted by man the peat had gradually
accumulated till it had at last invaded the dwelling itself. The but
included a ground-floor, and one story about twelve feet long by nine
wide and four high. The walls consisted of beams scarcely squared,
joined together with wooden mortices and pegs. The roof, which was
probably flat, consisted of oak planks, the spaces between which had
been filled in with mortar made of sand and grease. On the ground-floor
lay several flint implements, showing no signs of having been polished,
a quartz wedge, and a stone chisel, which had evidently seen long
service. This chisel, the discoverers say, corresponded exactly with
the notches around the mortices. A regular paved way, formed of
sea-beach pebbles placed on a foundation of interlaced branches, led up
to a hearth made of flat stones measuring some three feet every way.
All about lay fragments of charcoal and broken nuts, the latter partly
burnt. Another but, with an oak floor resting on four posts, has
recently been discovered in County Fermanagh, beneath a deposit of peat
about twenty feet thick. No trace of metal has been found in either of
these Irish buts, and the thickness of the peat beneath which they lay
is another proof of their great antiquity. One serious objection,
however, is this: Were the Irish sufficiently advanced in prehistoric
times to be able to erect dwellings implying so considerable an amount
of civilization?

Crannoges are met with in Scotland as well as in Ireland, and
excavations in Loch Lee have enabled explorers to make out their mode
of construction. The Lake Dwellers began by piling up a number of
trunks of trees in the shallower waters of a lake. They then
strengthened these trunks with branches or beams about which the mud
collected till the whole formed an islet. All about this islet, beneath
the waters of the lake, were found various objects in stone, wood, and
horn, as well as some canoes several feet long. Similar crannoges are
to be seen on the lakes of Kincardine and Forfar, which Troyon thinks
date from the Stone age.22 If he be right, and we should not like to
make any assertion one way or the other, the bronze objects and the
enamelled glass bowls found near these dwellings prove that they were
occupied by several successive generations.

It is probable that Lake dwellings were also used in Asia and in Africa
from prehistoric times. History tells us that the inhabitants of
Phasis, the Mingrelians of the present day, lived in reed huts on the
water, and that they went from one islet to another in canoes hollowed
out of the trunks of oak-trees. A bas-relief from the palace of
Sennacherib, preserved in the British Museum, represents warriors
fighting on artificial islands made of large reeds. But here w e enter
the domain of history, and we must return to Neolithic times, and speak
of the habitations built of more durable materials and the ruins of
which are still standing.

It is impossible to say with any certainty to what period the most
ancient of these structures belong. It is probable that man early
learned to pile up stones, binding them together at first with clay,
and then with some stronger cements. The _burghs_ of Scotland, the
_nurhags_ of the island of Sardinia, the _talayoti_ of the Balearic
Isles, the _castellieri_ of Istria, are all ancient witnesses of the
modes of building employed in the most remote ages.

_Burghs, brocks_, or _broughs_ are numerous in Scotland,23 and also in
the islands of the Atlantic. For a long time they were supposed to be
of Scandinavian origin, but Sir J. Lubbock24 remarks With reason that
no building at all like them exists in Norway or in Denmark, and it is
difficult to admit the idea that the Scandinavians set up in the
islands tributary to them buildings which were unknown to their own
mainland. We are therefore disposed to think that these curious
structures, which were inhabited until the twelfth and thirteenth
centuries of the Christian era, are of much earlier date than the first
invasion by the Northmen, and that the burgh still standing on the
little island of Moussa, one of the Shetlands, is one of the best
examples that we can quote. A tower, forty-one feet high, rises on the
borders of the sea. The walls are of unhewn stones, piled up without
cement, and they form two circles, separated by a passage four feet
wide. In each story are a series of very small openings, intended to
admit air and light to the cell-like rooms inside, and to a staircase
that leads to the top of the tower. The only way into this burgh is
through a door only seven feet high, and so narrow that it is
impossible for two people to go in abreast.

The regularity of the building of this burgh, and the architectural
knowledge it implies, prevent our ascribing it either to the Stone or
even to the Bronze age; but we find in Scotland itself more ancient
examples, if we may so express ourselves, of domestic architecture.
These examples are subterranean dwellings, made of rough-hewn stones of
considerable size, laid down in regular courses, to which the names of
_earth-houses, Picts’ houses_, and _weems_ have been given. The walls
converge towards the centre, leaving an opening at the top, which was
covered in with large flat stones. These dwellings are certainly of
earlier date than the burghs, and the discovery of a _Picts’ house_
actually beneath the ruins of a burgh enables us to speak with
certainty on this point.

In Ireland similar proofs have been found of the great antiquity of
roan. More than one hundred towers have been found in that country, all
built of large stones, and varying in height from seventy to one
hundred and thirty feet, with a diameter of from eight to fifteen feet.
The most diverse origins have been attributed to these towers, from
prehistoric times to the centuries immediately preceding the Christian
era; from the time of the Druids to that of the Friars. According to
the point of view of different archæologists, they have been called
temples of the sun, hermitages, phallic monuments, or signal towers.

We meet with a similar problem in considering the _nurhags_, as in
considering the burghs. They have been justly called a page of history,
written all over the surface of Sardinia by an unknown people. Count
Albert de la Marmora counted three thousand of them a few years ago,
and more recent explorers tell us that this number is greatly exceeded.
Like the burghs, which they strangely resemble, the _nurhags_ are
conical towers with very thick walls made of huge stones, some Hewn,
others in their natural state, arranged in regular courses without
mortar. On entering one of them we find ourselves in a vaulted room,
which looks exactly like one half of an egg in shape. In the upper
stories are two, and sometimes three rooms, one above the other, to
which access is gained by steps cut in the walls. The whole structure
is crowned by a terrace (Fig. 53). We must add that the entrance to the
_nurhag_ is through an opening on a level with the ground, and so low
that one can only go in by crawling on the stomach.

Many conjectures have been made as to the use of these towers. Were
they temples in which to worship, or trophies of victory? Their number
is against either of these hypotheses. Were they then habitations or
towers of observation? Not the former certainly, for no one could live
between walls sixteen or twenty-two feet thick, shut out from air and
light. Some travellers think they were tombs, but excavations have
brought to light no bones or sepulchral relics. We can compare them to
nothing but the Towers of Silence, on which the Parsees expose their
dead to the birds of heaven, which are ever ready rapidly to acquit
themselves of their melancholy functions.

[Illustration: 53.]

Nurhag at Santa Barbara (Sardinia).

The origin of the _nurhags_ is as uncertain as their use. Diodorus
Siculus considered them very ancient, and one fact has come to light in
our day which enables us to arrive at a somewhat more exact decision.
The island of Sardinia was taken by the Romans from the Carthaginians
in 238 B.C., and an aqueduct, the ruins of which can still be seen, was
built by the conquerors on the foundations of an ancient _nurhag_, so
that the latter must belong to an earlier (late than the third century
before our era. Fergusson, who speaks with authority on everything
relating to the monuments of the Stone age, assigns the _nurhags_ to
the mystic times of the Trojan War. In all probability they were built
by an invading people. La Marmora thinks these invaders were the
Libyans; M. de Rougemont, in his history of the Bronze age, says that
the curved vault is the characteristic feature of Pelasgian
architecture, which is often confounded with that of the Phœnicians.
Although any final conclusion would be premature, we ourselves think
that the builders of the _nurhags_ belonged to the great stream of
emigration from the East, the course of which is marked by megalithic
monuments in so many parts of the world. In some instances, _nurhags_
were surrounded by cromlechs, of which most of the stones have now been
thrown down. Some of these stones bore prominences resembling the
breasts of a woman.

The accumulations of earth and rubbish about the _nurhags_ are, some of
them, from six to ten feet high. In the lower deposits have been found
coarse pottery, with no attempt at ornamentation, fragments of flint,
and obsidian hatchets of black basalt, or porphyry of the Palæolithic
type, arrow-head, flint knives, stones used in slings, and numerous
shells; whilst in the upper deposits were picked up black pottery and
fragments of bronze belonging to the transition period between the
Stone and Metal ages.

All over the island of Sardinia, side by side with the _nurhags_, rise
tombs to which have been given the name of _Sepolture dei Giganti_.
They are from thirty-two to thirty-nine feet long by a nearly equal
width, and are built, some of huge slabs of stone, some of stones of
smaller size. They are in every case surmounted by a pediment, formed
of a single block, and often covered with sculptures dating from
different epochs. These sepulchres are certainly of later date than the
_nurhags_, and in them have been found numerous implements of bronze,
but none of stone.

[Illustration: 54.]

“Talayoti” at Trepuco (Minorca).

The _talayoti_, of which one hundred and fifty are still standing in
the island of Minorca, are circular or elliptical truncated cones,
built of huge unhewn stones, laid one on the other without cement (Fig.
54). The most remarkable of all of them, that at Torello, near Mahon,
is thirty-three feet high. In many cases there are two stone, one
placed upright, the other across it, in front of the _talayoti_. The
meaning of these biliths is unknown.

Yet another series of cyclopean monuments are known under the name of
_nanetas_, and are not unlike overturned boats. Seven such _nanetas_
are still to be seen in the Balearic Isles. The one which is best
preserved consists of large unhewn stones of rectangular shape,
enclosing an inner chamber about six feet in width. The roof having
fallen in, its height cannot be exactly determined; we only know that
the lateral walls are some forty-five feet high.

In Algeria also have been preserved some towers built of stones without
cement. Some of them are square (_basina_) and surmounted by a small
dolmen, others are round (_chouchet_) and closed at the top by a large
slab of stone, as in the _nurhags_ we have just described.

It is difficult to bring this account to a close without mentioning the
_truddhi_ and the _specchie_ of Otranto.25 A _ truddhi _ is a massive
conical tower consisting of a heap of scarcely hewn stones piled up
without cement and with an exterior facing. Inside is a round room, the
roof of which is formed by a series of circular courses of stone
projecting one beyond the other. Sometimes a second chamber rises above
the first, which _is_ reached by steps cut in the facing, which steps
also lead to the platform on the top of the tower. Thousands of
_truddhi_ are to be seen in Italy; they date from every epoch, and the
people of Lecce and Bari continue to erect them as did their fathers
before them. Side by side with the _truddhi_ rise the _specchie_, which
are conical masses of stone, of greater height and probably of more
ancient date than the towers. Lenormant thinks they were used to live
in; but his opinion has been much questioned, and it is necessary to
speak on this point with great reserve.

The _castellieri_ of Istria, which the Slavonian peasants call
_starigrad_, are as yet but little known. Doubtless an examination of
them will bring out their resemblance to the _nurhags_ and _talayoti_.
They are, however, more than mere towers, forming regular _enceintes_
between walls formed of two facings of dry stones, the space between
which is filled in with smaller stones. There are fifteen of these
_castellieri_ in the district of Albona, a little town on the southeast
of Trieste. They were at first attributed to the Roman epoch, but later
researches relegate them rather to prehistoric times, and the discovery
near them of numerous stone implements rather tends to support this
latter opinion, but it must not be considered conclusive.

Perhaps we ought also to connect with the earliest ages of humanity the
stations recently discovered in Spain by MM. Siret.26 These were
evidently centres of population, surrounded by walls of a very
primitive description. We shall have to refer again to these
discoveries; we will only add now that in the black earth forming the
soil were found worked flints, polished diorite hatchets, pierced
shells, with various pieces of pottery, and mills for grinding corn. So
far, however though many of the stations have been explored, no trace
has been found of the use of metals.

A vast period of time, countless centuries, indeed, have passed away
since the close of the Paleolithic epoch. The burghs, _nurhags_, and
_castellieri_ show the progress of civilization, and at the same time
prove that this progress extended throughout Europe, and that at a time
not so very far removed from our own. The close resemblance between
buildings of different dates enables us to speak with certainty of the
connection between the races which succeeded each other in Europe. The
importance of these conclusions is very great, and will be brought out
still more in our study of megalithic monuments.


1 “El hombre seguramente habitaba las corazas de los Glyptodon Pero no
siempre las colocaba en la posicion que acabo de indicar.”—“La
Antiguedad del Hombre en el Plata,” vol. ii., p. 532.

2 “On Some Recent Researches in Cone-Caves in Wales,” _Proc. Geol.,
Asso_., vol. ix. “On the Flynnon, Benno, and Gwyu Caves,” _Geol. Mag_.,
Dec., 1886.

3 _Revue des Questions Scientifiques_, April, 1887.

4 “Odyssey,” book ix., v. 105–124.

5 Æschylus: “Prometheus Bound.”

6 A. Maury: “La Vieille Civilisation Scandinave,” _Revue des Deux
Mondes_, September, 1880.

7 F. de Olivera: “As Raças dos Kjoekkenmoeddings de Mugem,” Lisbon,
1881.

8 _Report Peabody Museum_, 1882.

9 _Report Peabody Museum_, 1882 and 1885.

10 Brinton: “Notes on the Floridian Peninsula,” Philadelphia, 1849.

11 We take many of these details from Dr. Gross’ excellent work on the
“Pile Dwellings of Switzerland.”

12 Virchow: “Drei Schädel aus der Schweiz.”

13 _Revue d’Anthropologie_, 1887, p. 607.

14 G. Cotteau: _Nature_, 1877, first week, p. 161.

15 Rutimeyer: “Fauna der Pfahlbauten in der Schweiz.”

16 _Anzeiger für Schweizerische Alterthums Künde_, April, 1884.

17 Comte Conestabile: “Sur les Anciennes Immigrations en Italie.”
Heilbig: “Beitrage zur Altitalischen Kultur and Kund Geschichte,” i.
Band. G. Boissier: _Révue des Deux-Mondes_, October, 1879.

18 _Bul. di Palethnologia Ital_., 1879. The _terpens_ of Holland,
though of much more modern date, greatly resemble the _terremares_.

19 “Ricerce di Archeologia Preistorica nella Valle della Vibrata.”

20 Wylie, _Arch. Brit_., vol. xxxviii. Wylde, _Proc. Royal Irish
Acad_., vol. i., p. 420.

21 _Arch. Brit_., vol. xxvi., p. 361. _Proc. Royal Irish Academy_, vol.
vii., p. 155.

22 “Habitations Lacustres des Temps Anciens et Modernes,” p. 170.

23 R. Munro: “Ancient Scottish Lake Dwellings or Crannoges, with a
Supplementary Chapter on Remains of Lake Dwellings in England,”
Edinburgh, 1882.

24 “Prehistoric Times.” Wilson: “Prehistoric Scotland.”

25 Nicolucci: “Scelse Lavorate, Bronzi e Monumenti di Terra d’Otranto.”
Lenormant, _Revue d’Ethnographie_, February, 1882 (_Bul. Soc. Anth_.,
1882 and 1884). S. Reinach: “Esquises Archéologiques.”

26 “Les Premiers Âges du Métal dans le Sud-Est de l’Espagne,” Brussels,
1887.



CHAPTER V.
Megalithic Monuments.


Megalithic monuments are perhaps the most interesting of all the
witnesses of the remote past, into the history of which we are now
inquiring, and of which so little is known. From the shores of the
Atlantic to the Ural Mountains, from the frontiers of Russia to the
Pacific Ocean, from the steppes of Siberia to the plains of Hindustan,
we see rising before us monuments of the same characteristic form,
built in the same manner. This is a very important fact in the history
of humanity, and of which it is difficult to exaggerate the importance.

What is the age of all these monuments? Were they all erected by one
race, which has thus carried on its traditions front one generation to
another? Were they the temples of the gods of this race, or the tombs
of their ancestors? Did the people who set them up come from the East,
or did they come from the North, on their way to the warmer regions of
the South? These and many other questions are eagerly discussed, but in
the present state of our knowledge not one of them call be answered in
a perfectly satisfactory manner. _Scire ignorare magna scientia_, said
an ancient philosopher, and this is a truth which we must often repeat
when we are dealing with prehistoric times.

[Illustration: 55.]

Dolmen of Castle Wellan (Ireland).

Under the name of megalithic monuments we include _tumuli, dolmens,
cromlechs, menhirs_, and _covered avenues_. It may at first sight
appear strange to include tumuli amongst stone monuments, but they
almost always enclose a dolmen, a cist, or a crypt communicating with
the outside by a covered passage. The excavation of more than four
hundred tumuli in England has brought to light now, a stone coffer made
of a number of stones set edgeways and called a _kistvaen_: now of a,
tomb hollowed out beneath the surface of the ground, and enclosed by
huge blocks of stone.1 Mounds are as numerous in Portugal as tumuli in
England, and the fact that they are of low height has led to their
being called _mamoas_ or _maminhas_, which signifies little mounds. In
Poland, tumuli consist of piles of massive stones; beneath each is a
cist made of four large slabs, and containing as many as eight or ten
urns full of calcined bones. The excavation of a tumulus in the plain
of Tarbes brought to light an enormous block of granite resting on
blocks of quartz. The spaces between these blocks were filled in with
rubble made of small stones cemented into one mass with clay.
Edwin-Harness Mound, near Liberty (Ohio), is 160 feet long by eighty or
ninety wide, and thirteen to eighteen high in the middle. It contained
a dozen sepulchral chambers.

[Illustration: 56.]

The large dolmen of Coreoro, near Plouharnel.

More rarely tumuli are merely artificial mounds of earth, sometimes
rising to a great height. Those of North America are the most
remarkable known. That of Cahokia is now ninety-one feet high,2 and was
formerly surmounted by a low pyramid, now destroyed. Its base measures
560 feet by 720, the platform at the top is 146 feet by 310 feet wide,
and it has been estimated that twenty-five million cubic feet of earth
were used in its construction. Major Pearse mentions a tumulus near
Nagpore, which is 3,900 feet in circumference, and 174 feet high.
Another between Tyre and Sarepta, is 130 feet high by 650 in diameter.
It has never been excavated.3

[Illustration: 57.]

Dolmen of Arrayolos (Portugal).

The dolmen type of monument is a rectangle of u hewn upright stones
covered over with a slab laid across them; this slab being the largest
block of stone that could be found in the neighborhood or obtained by
the builders.

Dolmens are generally found either on the top of a natural or an
artificial mound, in the middle of a plain, or on the banks of a
watercourse. We must mention, amongst others, those in Persia, which
are some 7,000 feet high and from twenty-one to twenty-six feet long by
six wide; that near Mykenæ, that of Aumède-Bas, excavated by Dr.
Prunières; that of New Grange, in Ireland, surmounted by a cromlech of
stones of considerable size, many of them brought from a distance; that
of Hellstone, near Dorchester, consisting of nine upright stones
supporting a table more than twenty-seven and a half feet in
circumference, seven feet wide and two and a half thick. The dolmens
near Saturnia, one of the most ancient Etruscan towns, include a
quadrangular room, sunk some feet into the earth, and having walls made
of blocks of stone and a roof of a couple of large slabs, sloped
slightly to let the rain run off. We give illustrations of the dolmens
of Castle Wellan in Ireland (Fig. 55), of Coreoro near Plouharnel
(Morbihan) (Fig. 56), of Arrayolos in Portugal (Fig. 57), and Acora in
Peru (Fig. 58), which will enable the reader to judge of the different
modes of construction employed in building these megalithic monuments.

[Illustration: 58.]

Megalithic sepulchre at Acora (Peru).

In some cases the dolmen, which alone is visible from without, is
placed upon a mound, covering a hidden sepulchral chamber, whilst in
others the crypt is replaced by a simple stone cist, generally of
rectangular shape. We may mention in this connection the dolmen of
Bekour-Noz at St. Pierre Quiberon, which is remarkable for its great
size, and rises from the midst of a cemetery in which a great many
coffins have been found. The bones they contained were unfortunately
dispersed at the time of their discovery.

Dolmens are scattered about in great numbers in the Kouban basin and
all along the coasts of the Black Sea occupied by the Tcherkesses.
These curious vestiges of an unknown civilization are still an unsolved
enigma to us, as are those of Western Europe; they are generally formed
of four upright slabs surmounted by a fifth laid horizontally, and one
of the supporting slabs is nearly always pierced with a small round or
oval opening. Excavations have brought to light arrow-heads, rings, and
bronze spirals, but Chantre, an authority of considerable weight, and
who has moreover had the advantage of actually seeing these megalithic
monuments of the south of Russia, attributes the objects found beneath
them to secondary interments, and does not hesitate in assigning the
more ancient monuments themselves to the Stone age. We must not omit to
mention the dolmens found in the southern portion of the island of Yezo
(Japan),4 nor that described by Darwin at Puerto Deseado (Patagonia).
They are both very similar to those of Europe.

To resume, dolmens, called _Hünengräber_ in Germany, _stazzona_ in
Corsica, _antas_ in Portugal, and _stendos_ in Sweden, have all alike
one large flat horizontal slab placed on two or more upright unhewn
stones. This is the one fixed rule; local circumstances, perhaps even
the caprice of the builders, decided the position and the mode of
erection. Often, as I have already remarked, dolmens are buried beneath
tumuli, but exceptions to this are numerous. General Faidherbe, after
having examined more than six thousand dolmens in Algeria, affirms that
the greater number have never been covered with earth.5 In the Orkney
Islands there are more than one hundred dolmens without tumuli, and
Martinet failed to find any trace of mounds in Berry. In Scotland and
Brittany we find dolmens buried, not beneath mounds of earth, but under
accumulations of pebbles, called _cairns_ in Scotland and _galgals_ in
Brittany. However minor details may vary, and they do vary infinitely,
one main idea everywhere dominated the builders, and that was the
desire to protect from all profanation the resting-place of what had
once been a human being.

Cromlechs are circles of upright stones often surrounding dolmens or
tumuli. Sometimes they form single circles, and at others two, three,
or even seven separate enclosures. They are common in Algeria, Sweden,
and Denmark, and in the last-named country two kinds are distinguished:
the _langdyssers_, which form an ellipse, and the _rundyssers_ which
form a perfect circle. In other countries cromlechs are slot so
numerous; there are but few in France, of which we may name those of
Kergoman (Morbihan), Lestridion in Plomeur, and Landaondec in Crozon
(Finistère). The last-named, known its _le temple des faux dieux_, is
closed by a double row of small menhirs. In Italy, the only cromlechs
known are those of Sesto-Calende and those of the plateau of Mallevalle
near Ticino. One of the latter still retains in their original position
fifty-nine huge granite blocks, forming a circular enceinte, a
semicircle, and an entrance avenue. A few leagues from the ancient Tyre
can still be seen a circle of upright stones. Ouseley describes another
at Darab, in Persia; a missionary speaks of three large circles at
Khabb, in Arabia, which circles he compares with those at Stonehenge;
and Dr. Barth tells us of a cromlech between Mourzouk and Ghât.

A kurgan, or tumulus, leaving been opened in the Kherson district,
three or four concentric circles were discovered beneath it,
surrounding a structure of considerable size.6 The cromlech of
Anajapoura in Ceylon, probably, however, erected comparatively
recently, consists of fifty-two granite pillars, about thirteen feet
high, encircling a Buddhist temple. At Peshawur is another circle,
fourteen of the stones of which are still upright, whilst traces can be
made out of an outer enceinte of smaller stones; in Peru there are
several cromlechs, whilst others have been found at the foot of
Elephant Mount, in the desert plains of Australia. The last-named vary
from ten to one thousand feet in diameter, but excavations beneath them
have brought to light only a few human bones.

At Mzora, in Morocco, the traveller will notice a mound of elliptical
shape, some 21 or 22½ feet high, flanked on the west by a group of
menhirs, and surrounded by an enceinte of upright stones which now
number about forty. In 1831, there were still ninety, and on the south
side were noticed two round pillars parallel with each other, which
probably formed an entrance.7 This group evidently originally formed
the centre of a series of megalithic monuments, for on the north and
southwest some fifty monoliths can still be made out, some still erect,
others fallen.8

It was in Great Britain, however, that cromlechs appear to have reached
their highest development. That of Salkeld in Cumberland includes
sixty-seven menhirs; that near Loch Stemster in Caithness,
thirty-three, whilst in Westmoreland, _Long Meg and her daughters_ are
still the objects of superstitious reverence. The remains at Avebury
are among the most remarkable prehistoric monuments still extant, and
evidently originally formed part of a most important group. This group
had an outer rampart of earth, with a ditch on the inner side, within
which was a circle of upright stones, probably numbering as many as one
hundred. Within this circle were two others of smaller size, each in
its turn enclosing yet another circle of upright stones. In the middle
of one of these inner circles, that on the north, was a dolmen, whilst
that on the south enclosed in the centre but a single upright menhir.
The stones used in constructing these various groups were all such as
are still to be found on the Wiltshire downs. From the southeastern
portion of the extensive earthen rampart, a stone avenue extended for a
considerable distance in a perfectly straight line, and is still known
as Kennet’s Avenue, on account of its leading to the village of Kennet.
The remains on Hakpen Hill and on Silbury Hill are all supposed to have
been originally connected with those at Avebury. The remains at Hakpen
consist of relics of two circles, one about 140 feet in diameter, the
other not more than forty. About eighty yards from the inner circle was
found a double row of skeletons, all with the feet pointing towards the
centre. Silbury Hill is itself an artificial conical mound, the largest
in England, 170 feet high, on which were originally no less than 650
upright stones, of which only twenty are still standing, surrounded by
a trench. In the centre of the circle of stones a single menhir of
great height still remains with three others sloped so as to form a
kind of crypt.

The megalithic monuments of Stonehenge, which are probably better known
than any others in the world, are perhaps also the most curious. The
group is supposed to have originally consisted of an outer stone
concentric circle some one hundred feet in diameter, formed by thirty
piers of solid masonry, of which about twenty can still be made out,
some few standing, others lying broken upon the ground. This outer
circle enclosed a second of similar shape but lesser diameter, within
which again were taro elliptic circles, the outer consisting of ten or
twelve sandstone blocks some twenty-two feet high, standing in pairs,
each pair united by a slab laid horizontally across, so as to form a
trilithon. The inner ellipse was formed by nineteen upright masses of
granite, within which was the famous slab of blue marble, by many
supposed to have been an altar. The pillars and lintels of the outer
portico, and those of the trilithons, are fitted together with the
greatest skill, with tenons and mortices, a remarkable exception to the
general rule with megalithic monuments. Everywhere in the neighborhood
of Stonehenge, as far as the eye can reach, are tumuli, all nearly
equidistant from the principal group of monuments, a fact which has led
many archæologists, including Henry Martin, to look upon. Stonehenge as
a temple surrounded by a necropolis. Excavations at Stonehenge have
yielded a few human bones which have escaped the flames, with some
stone and bronze weapons.

The megalithic monuments of Ireland are not less important, and a
recent survey has reported no less than 276 still standing.9 The
cromlechs of Moytura10 are supposed to commemorate the fearful combats
which took place between the _Firbolgs_, or Belgæ as they are called by
Irish antiquaries, and the Tuatha de Dananns, when the plains of Sligo
and Meath were dyed with blood, before the former were vanquished and
retired to Arran. There are still no less than fourteen dolmens and
thirty-nine cromlechs. The bones picked up beneath the stone circles,
which keep alive the memory of these sanguinary conflicts, are those of
the warriors who fell on the battlefield, but the story of how they met
their fate belongs rather to history than to the subject we are
considering. It is the same with the two huge monoliths of Cornwall.
which commemorate a battle between the Welsh King Howel Dha and the
Saxon Athelstane, as well as with the cromlechs of Ostrogothland,
where, in 736, took place the battle in which the old King Harold
Hildebrand was overcome and killed by his nephew, Sigurd-Ring. A group
of forty-four circles also marks the site of the celebrated combat of
1030, in which Knut the Great defied Olaf the patron saint of Norway.
We may also name in this connection the twenty circles of stone erected
at Upland in memory of the massacre of the Danish prince, Magnus
Henricksson, in 1161. Yet another group of circles marks the spot
where, about 1150, the Swedish heroine, Blenda, overcame King Sweyne
Grate. We might easily multiply instances of the erection in historic
times of similar monuments, but we have said enough to show that the
megalithic form was by no means confined to prehistoric days.

Menhirs properly so called, also known as _lechs_ in Brittany, are in
reality isolated monoliths or single upright stones, often of
considerable size. One of the best known is that of Locmariaker (Fig.
59) which was nearly seventy feet high.11 It was still standing in
1659, but is now overturned and broken into four pieces. The flat stone
resting on one portion of it is known as Cæsar’s table. On some
menhirs, notably on Sweno’s pillar in Scotland, a cross has been cut on
one side, showing either that this form of monument was early adopted
by Christians, or more probably, that it was adapted to their use after
having long previously been a relic of prehistoric times. On the other
side of Sweno’s pillar is a bas-relief of fairly good execution.

In some cases menhirs mark the site of a tomb, and sometimes, as is the
case with the obelisks of Egypt, they commemorate some happy event. A
standing stone in Scotland preserves the memory of the battle of Largs,
which took place in the thirteenth century, and a piously preserved
legend tells how the menhir of Aberlemmo was set up in honor of a
victory over the Danes in the tenth century.

[Illustration: 59.]

The great broken menhir of Locmariaker, with Cæsar’s table.

Some archæologists in view of the shape of certain menhirs and the
superstitions connected with then, think they must be phallic
monuments. Menhirs in France are quoted in this connection, cut into
the form of the phallus; and the same form occurs in some menhirs near
Saphos, in the island of Cyprus,12 and in others found amongst the
ruins of Uxmal, in Yucatan. Herodotus relates that Sesostris caused toy
be set up, in countries he conquered, monoliths bearing in relief
representations of the female sexual organs. These are, however, but
exceptions, isolated facts, and it would certainly never do to argue
from them that menhirs were connected with the worship of the
generative flowers of nature.

It is extremely difficult to get at the statistics of menhirs. A great
many have been overthrown, and yet more have disappeared altogether.
Probably, besides the alignments or stone avenues, there are not more
than twenty still standing.13 One thing is certain, the monolithic form
of monument has always had a great attraction for the human race, and
we meet with it in Egypt, Assyria, Persia, and Mexico, as well as in
England and Brittany. The historian speaks of such monuments in the
earliest of existing records; Homer refers to them in the Iliad,14 and
in the Bible we find it related that the Lord ordered Joshua to set up
twelve stones in memory of the crossing of the Jordan by the
Israelites.15

Alignments are groups of menhirs set up in one or wore rows. Sometimes
large slabs are laid across them, when they arc, called covered
avenues. One such alignment at Saint Pantaléon (Saône et Loire)
consists of twenty menhirs. The menhirs of El Wad, in Algeria, form
long avenues, running front west to east. The Arabs call them
_essenam_, and according to tradition they were erected in fulfillment
of a vow made in the hope of arresting the march of an enemy. The
tumulus of Run-Aour (Finistère) has two avenues running at right angles
to one another.16 This disposition, which is very rare, also occurs at
Karleby, in Sweden, and by a remarkable coincidence the length of the
avenues (about thirty-nine and fifty-five feet), is the same in both
cases. Sometimes such avenues form communications between several
dolmens, leading us to suppose that near the chief slept the members of
his family or his favorite companions.

The covered avenues are often built beneath masses of earth, and the
inner rooms became regular hypogea, These hypogea, or subterranean
chambers, are very common near Paris, and we may mention amongst many
others those of Meudon, Argenteuil, Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, Marly,
Chamant, La Justice, and Compans. The tombs of Denmark, the _Gang
Graben_ of Nilsson, show an arrangement somewhat similar, a vast
subterranean chamber being reached by a passage ending in a small stone
cist. The tumulus of Dissignac, near Saint-Nazaire (Fig. 60), shows
this strange arrangement of two galleries running parallel with each
other at a distance of about eighteen feet. The walls and ceilings are
made of slab, anti the interstices are filled in with flints. These
galleries are some thirty feet long, and their height insensibly
increases from about three to nine feet.

[Illustration: 60.]

Covered avenue of Dissignac (Loire-Inférieur); view of the chamber at
the end of the north gallery.

We must also mention the Cueva de Mengal, near the village of
Antequera, in the province of Malaga (Fig. 61) Twenty stones form the
walls of the crypt, five blocks of remarkable size serve as a roof, and
to ensure solidity three pillars are set upright inside of the junction
of the roof blocks. The crypt is some seventy-nine feet long, its
greatest width is about nineteen feet, and its height varies from about
eight to nine feet. The length of the Pastora room, near Seville is
about eighty-seven feet, but its height is not to be compared with that
of the one at Antequera. The square crypt at Pastora is very
interesting. One of the roof stones having been broken, it has been
strengthened by the addition of an inside pillar.17

[Illustration: 61.]

Covered avenue near Antequera.

At Gavr’innis, the length of the passage leading to the crypt exceeds
forty-two feet (Fig. 62), and the Long Barrow of West Kennet is more
than seventy-three feet long by a width in some parts exceeding
thirty-two feet. In the Long Barrows of Littleton, Nempnitt, and Uley,
the crypt is reached by an avenue, the entrance of which is closed by a
trilithon, and a similar arrangement is met with in many megalithic
monuments of Scania. The sepulchral chambers of oval shape, such as
that met with in the island of Moen, were surmounted by a tumulus some
100 yds. in circumference; twelve unhewn stones formed the walls, and
five large blocks the roof. In removing the earth from the Moen tomb,
the bones of several human individuals were found; and a skeleton,
doubtless that of the chief, lay stretched out in the middle of the
chamber, whilst the bones of the others had evidently been ranged
against the walls either in a sitting or crouching position. With the
bones were found a flint hatchet, which appeared never to have been
used, a number of balls of amber, and several vases of different
shapes.

[Illustration: 62.]

Ground plan of the Gavr’innis monument.

The megalithic monuments of Mecklenburg are supposed to date from
Neolithic times, and are constructed in two very different ways. The
_Hünengräber_, formed of huge blocks of granite set up at right angles
to each other, resemble the covered avenues of France and elsewhere; in
the so-called _Riesenbetten_, or giant’s beds, on the contrary, the
sepulchral chamber is merely sunk in the ground.

We must also mention the so-called _Grotte des Fées_, or fairy grotto,
forming part of so many of the megalithic monuments of Provence. This
fairy grotto includes an open-air gallery cut in the mountain limestone
and roofed in with huge flat stones. This gallery leads to a sepulchral
chamber not less than seventy-nine feet long.

The stones used for the covered avenue of Mureaux (Seine et Oise) carne
from the other side of the Seine, so that the builders must have
crossed the river in a raft. Excavations have brought to light several
skeletons that had been buried without any attempt at orientation, the
bores of which were still in their natural position. The objects found
in this tomb were very numerous mid belonged to the Neolithic period.18

We have now specified the chief forms and modes of arrangement of
megalithic monuments, and must add that they are often found in
juxtaposition. At Mané-Lud, for instance, on a rocky platform which had
been artificially smoothed, and which is some 246 feet long by 162 in
area, we find at the eastern extremity an avenue of upright stones, on
the west a dolmen, and in the centre a crypt surmounted by a conical
pile of stones. Between the cone and the avenue the ground is covered
with an artificial paving of small stones cemented together, and known
in France as a _nappe pierreuse_, and amongst the stones forming this
paving were found quantities of charcoal and bones of animals. The
megalith was completely buried beneath a mound of earth, or rather of
dried mud, the amount of which was estimated at more than 37,986 cubic
feet. At Lestridiou (Finistère), a cromlech forms the starting-point of
an alignment formed of seven rows of small menhirs, the mean height of
which above the ground does not exceed three feet; and these alignments
lead up to two covered avenues and a central dolmen. In other cases, in
England and the land of Moab for instance, alignments simply lead to
cromlechs; whilst in some few cases, as at Stennis (Fig. 63), the
menhirs are scattered about a plain in great numbers, with nothing
either in their form or their position, or in the traditions relating
to them, to throw the slightest light on their origin.

[Illustration: 63.]

Monoliths at Stennis, in the Orkney, Islands.

One of the most important monuments that have come down to us is that
of Carnac. The alignments of Menec, Kermario, and Kerlescant include
1,771 menhirs, of which 675 are still standing. The alignments of
Erdeven, which succeed those of Carnac, extend for a length of more
than a mile and a half. They originally included 1,030 menhirs, of
which 288 are still extant.

The archæologists of Brittany, carried away perhaps by their patriotic
enthusiasm, claim that when these monuments were intact they included
two thousand menhirs. What is really certain, however, is that a
definite plan was evidently followed, the distances between the
alignments tallying exactly; the menhirs being set up in straight
parallel lines gradually decreasing in size towards the east.
Excavations near them have brought to light fragments of charcoal,
masses of cinders, chips of silicate of flint, with numerous fragments
of pottery, and tools made of quartzite, granite, schist, and diorite,
similar to those met with under all the other megaliths of Morbihan.
This is yet another proof, if such were needed, that they were all the
work of the same race and all probably date from the same period.

The number of megalithic monuments in the world is simply incalculable.
M. A. Bertrand estimates the total number in France as 2,582,
distributed in 66 departments and 1,200 communes. They are most
numerous of all in Brittany; there are 491 in the Côtes-du-Nord, 530 in
Ille-et-Vilaine. I am not sure of the number in Morbihan, but I know it
is very considerable. The commission appointed at the instigation of
Henry Martin decided that there were as many as 6,310 megaliths in
France, but then amongst these were included polishing stones and
cup-shaped stones, with other similar relics of the remote past.
Lastly, a report recently presented to the Chamber of Deputies by M. A.
Proust estimates at 419 the number of groups classed by government. In
other countries these numbers are greatly exceeded. There are 2,000
megaliths in the Orkney Islands and a great many in the extreme north
of Scania, and in Otranto in the southern extremity of Europe, where
they resemble the _pedras fittas_ of Sardinia. Pallas, and after him,
Haxthausen, tells us that there are thousands of kurganes in the
steppes of Central and Southern Russia.19 These kurganes are cromlechs,
tombs surmounted by upright stones, square or conical hypogea, all
scattered about without any apparent system, surmounted by roughly
sculptured female busts, known amongst the common people as _kamena
baba_, or stone women. Tumuli, too, abound on the shores of the Irtisch
and of the Yenisei, mute witnesses to the former presence of a vanished
race of which we know neither the ancestors nor the descendants. These
monuments are, however, by some attributed to the Tchoudes, a people
who came from the Altai Mountains. The Esthonians, the Ogris or Ulgres,
the Finns, and perhaps even the Celts, are supposed to be branches of
the same ethnological tree. This is however quite a recent idea, and at
best but a mere hypothesis.20

Algeria presents a vast field for research, and it is easy to find
dolmens and cromlechs, such as that shown in Fig. 64, which are
sepulchres with a central dolmen surrounded by a double or triple
enceinte of monoliths driven into the ground. These monuments, much as
they differ in form and arrangement, are undoubtedly the work of one
strong and powerful race that dominated the whole of the north of
Africa; and are represented in historic times by the Berbers, and at
the present clay by the Kabyles.

[Illustration: 64.]

Cromlech near Bône (Algeria).

Although a very great many of them have been destroyed, the French
possessions in Algeria are still as rich in monuments of this kind as
any of the countries of Europe. On Mount Redgel-Safia six hundred
dolmens have been made out, with stone tables resting on walls of dry
stones and frequently surrounded by cromlechs. Dr. Weisgerber has
recently announced the discovery in the valley of Ain-Massin, on the
vest of Mzab,) of a cromlech consisting of a number of concentric
circles of large stones set upon an elliptical tumulus, more than
fifty-four square yards in area. Quite close is a workshop of flint
weapons, probably in use at the time of the erection of the
megaliths.21 In Midjana, the number of megaliths exceeds 10,000, and
General Faidherbe counted more than 2,000 in the necropolis of Mazela,
and a yet larger number in that of Roknia. “At Bou-Merzoug,” says M.
Feraud,22 “in a radius of three leagues, on the mountain as well as on
the plain, the whole country about the springs is covered with
monuments of the Celtic form, such as dolmens, demi-dolmens, menhirs,
avenues, and tumuli. In a word, there are to be found examples of
nearly every type known in Europe. For fear of being taxed with
exaggeration, I will not fix the number, but I can certify that I saw
and examined more than a thousand in the three days of exploration, on
the mountain itself, and on the declivities wherever it was possible to
place them. All the monuments are surrounded with a more or less
complete enceinte of large stones, sometimes set up in a circle,
sometimes in a square. In some cases the living rock forms hart of the
enceinte, which has been completed with the help of other blocks frolic
elsewhere. It is often difficult to decide where the monument end, and
the rock begins. When the escarpment was too abrupt, it was levelled
with the aid of a kind of retaining wall, which forms a terrace round
the dolmen. The dolmens in the plain seem to have been constructed with
even greater care. The enceintes are wider and the slabs of the tables
larger.” Megalithic monuments are met with even in the desert. A
pyramid built of stones without mortar rises up in the districts
inhabited by the Touaregs; and quite near to it are four or five tombs
surrounded by standing stones.

In Algeria, we also meet with quadrangular pyramids called _djedas_,
which measure as much as ninety feet on each face, but do not rise more
than three feet above the ground. The (lead were buried beneath them in
a crouching position. We know nothing either of the origin of these
djedas or of the date to which they belong.

The monuments of Tunisia were probably as numerous as those of Algeria.
We may note especially the vast area in Enfida, completely covered with
dolmens, one hundred of which are still standing, and in excellent
preservation, whilst the ruins of others strew the soil, bringing up
their original number to at least three thousand. Those described by M.
Girard de Rialle23 are yet more interesting. Near the village of Ellez,
on the road from Kef to Kerouan, are some fifteen covered avenues
distributed without apparent order, and rising from the midst of Roman
ruins. The upright stones vary from about ten to thirteen feet, and are
surmounted by huge slabs. The chief dolmen has within it as many as ten
chambers.

There are also numerous tumuli in Syria. We have already alluded to
that of Sarepta; and there are others near Antioch and in the plain of
Beka, between Lebanon and Anti-Lebanon. Major Conder, who as captain
conducted the interesting campaign organized by the Palestine
Exploration Society in 1881 and 1882, speaks of the exploration of the
rude stone monuments as one of the most interesting features of the
surveys, and says: “The distribution of the centres where these
monuments occur in Syria, is a matter of no little importance … no
dolmens, menhirs, or ancient circles have been discovered in Judæa, and
only one doubtful circle in Samaria. In Lower Galilee a single dolmen
has been found; in Upper Galilee four of moderate dimensions are known.
West of Tiberias is a circle, and between Tyre and Sidon an enclosure
of menhirs. At Tell el Kady, one of the Jordan sources, a centre of
basalt dolmens exists, and at Kefr Wal … there is another large centre.
At Amman several fine dolmens and large menhirs are known to exist … it
is doubtful, however, if all these examples added together would equal
the great fields of rude stone monuments to be found in Moab, for it is
calculated that seven hundred examples were found by the surveyors in
1881.24 There is one group of dolmens at Ali Safat, in Palestine, in
which the supports of the table are pierced with an opening. This is a
very interesting fact, to which I have already alluded, and to which I
shall have to refer again. Another group of some twenty dolmens was
discovered by M. de Saulcy on the plateau of El Azemieh, one of which
rises in the centre of a belt of roughly sculptured upright stones; and
yet a third group is to be seen near Mount Nebo, which Major Conder
thus describes: “Here a well-defined dolmen was found northwest of the
flat, ruined cairn, which harks the summit of the ride. The cap-stone
was very thick, and its top is some five feet from the ground. The
side-stones were rudely piled, and none of the blocks were cut or
shaped … In subsequent visits it was ascertained that on the south
slope of the mountain there is a circle about 250 feet in diameter,
with a wall of twelve feet thick, consisting of small stones piled up
in a sort of vellum.”25

With regard to the megalithic monuments of India, we can only repeat
what we have already said. Colonel Meadows Taylor has counted 2,129 in
the district of Bellary (Deccan) alone. Many legends are connected with
them which remind us of those of Europe, some attributing their
erection to dwarfs or rants, to fairies or to genii, whilst others
think they were the work of the Kauranas and Pandaves, the celebrated
families whose long struggle is described in the Mahabharata, and were
probably aboriginal races of the continent. The plain of Jellalabad and
of Nagpore, stud the valley of Cabul are literally strewn with these
monuments. They are not less numerous in the Presidency of Madras,
where they chiefly consist of subterranean chambers made of huge unhewn
stones or of dolmens above ground surrounded by one or more circles of
upright stones, such as are shorn in Fig. 65. Major Biddulph, when he
ascended the valleys of the Hindoo Koosh Mountains, was astonished to
see on every side megalithic monuments resembling those of his own
country, and, like them, the work of an unknown race.26

[Illustration: 65.]

Dolmen at Pallicondah, near Madras (India).

This is, of course, but a very rapid survey of the megalithic monuments
of our globe. They are most of them either tombs intended to hold the
bodies of the dead, or memorials set up in their honor. New facts are
constantly coming to light in this connection, and we may add to what
we have already said, that beneath the tumulus of Mugen, as in the
Cabeco d’Aruda ( Portugal), there are numerous skeletons; sixty-two
repose in the sepulchral chamber of Monastier (Lozère); the dolmen
known as the Mas de l’Aveugle (Gard) covers a circular cavity in which
fifteen corpses had been placed; that of La Mouline (Charente) also
enclosed a number of skeletons, all in a crouching position, whilst
above them were placed two clumsy vases, a pious offering to the
unknown dead. The prehistoric cemetery of Maupas contains several
crypts of irregular form, built of rubble stone, and surmounted by a
huge stone which had become corroded by age. In these crypts, too, the
dead were piled up on each other, and the relics found with them
justify us in assigning them to the Neolithic age. Beneath the dolmens
of Port-Blanc (Morbihan) were two upper layers of dead, stretched out
horizontally and separated by flat stones. In the Isle de Thinie
(Morbihan) excavations have brought to light twenty-seven stone cists
or coffins of different sizes, all intended to be used for burial.
Beneath the menhirs of Finistère, cinders and stones charred by fire
bear eloquent witness to the cremation of the dead. “Whenever a dolmen
has been opened in Finistère,” says Dr. Floquet, “cinders or bones have
been picked up; why, then, should we not admit that all dolmens are
tombs?” This is really a conclusion to which we are almost compelled to
come, and the names handed down by popular tradition are, if need be,
yet another proof of the same thing. One dolmen at Locmariaker, for
instance, is known as _le tombeau du vieillard_, a covered avenue at
Saint Gildas is _le champ du tombeau_, and farther on a pathway leading
to a ruined megalith is known as the _chemin du tombeau_. The Abbé
Harvard speaks of a remarkable monolith known as _la pierre du champ
dolent_, and another _champ dolent_ is met with near Rheims, whilst a
group of monuments near Tréhontereuc is called the _jardin des tombes_,
and the upright stones of Auvergne are known by the characteristic name
of the _plourouses_.

Whether we examine the megaliths of Germany or of Poland, the mounds of
Ohio or of Kentucky, of Missouri or of Arkansas, it is ever the same
thing; excavations bring to light striking proofs of their destination,
and everywhere we are led to the same conclusions.

Archæologists would certainly appear to have been justified in hoping
that the tombs thus scattered about all over the world would yield such
useful information as to lead to some final conclusions. Unfortunately,
however, this has not been the case. Often all trace of burial has
disappeared in successive displacements, and more often still, the home
of the dead has been violated in the hope, which turned out to be
imaginary, of finding treasures; whilst in other cases the earliest
inhabitants of the tombs have been removed to make way for their
successors, who in their turn were soon afterwards expelled. Victory
and defeat were not over with life, but were met with yet again in the
grave.

[Illustration: 66.]

Dolmen at Maintenon, with a table about 19½ feet long.

It has been well pointed out by Fergusson, in his “Rude Stone
Monuments,” that the megalithic architecture of the remote past is a
thing altogether apart; its special form indicating now the tendencies
of a race or group of races of mankind, now the particular degree of
civilization attained by a race at a certain period of its development.
A cursory view of these monuments as a whole would lead us to class
them all together as masses of rough, scarcely hewn stones piled up
without cement, and almost always without ornamentation. In studying
them one by one, however, we find, in spite of their undeniable family
likeness, if we may use such a term, that it is quite easy to snake out
certain differences, the result of the peculiar genius of the race by
whom they were erected, or of the nature of the materials the builders
had at their disposal. To take a case in point: Cromlechs are most
numerous in England, and dolmens in France, and in both these countries
we meet with a form of dolmen (Fig. 66) such as is rarely set up in
other districts; one of the extremities of the table resting on the
ground, and the other opt two supporting stones. In Scandinavia the
supports are erratic blocks, in India fragments of the rocks in the
neighborhood, in Algeria and the south of France buildings in courses
are often met with; in Brittany the monuments of Mané-er-H’roek and
Mané-Lud are paved with large stones. The ground from which rises the
dolmen of Caranda, near Fère in Tardenois (Aisne), is covered with
slabs, and the opening is closed with a flat stone resting on two
lintels. We cannot speak of Caranda without referring to the
discoveries and magnificent publications of M. F. Moreau, thanks to
whom the daily life of the Gauls, Gallo-Romans, and Merovingians is
brought vividly before us. To return, however to our monuments: As we
have seen, the crypt was in many cases divided into two or more
sepulchral chambers by walls made of stones. We find this arrangement
at Gavr’innis, at Gamat (Lot), at Alt-Sammit in Mecklenburg, in Wayland
Smith’s cave in Berkshire, and in a great many monuments in
Scandinavia. M. du Chatellier speaks of several megalithic monuments in
Finistère, including a central dolmen and several lateral chambers. The
chambered graves at Park Cwn in Wales, and at Uley in Gloucestershire,
contain side chambers, those of the former with a covered passage
between them, whilst in the latter the side chambers are grouped round
a central apartment. At New Grange, in Ireland, a passage more than
ninety-two feet long leads to a double chamber of cruciform shape, with
a roof of converging stones. Yet another fine example of a similar kind
is that of Maeshow in the Orkney Islands. The tomb of Vauréal
(Seine-et-Oise) contains three crypts of different sizes. The long
barrow of Moustoir-Carnac contained four separate chambers, the western
one of which is a dolmen of the kind known as _Grottes des Fées_, and
is supposed to be much older than the rest of the group. A central
circular chamber, with walls of upright stones, has a roof in which an
attempt has been made to form a kind of dome, the stones of which
project and overlap each other, marking, clumsy as is the construction,
a considerable advance on anything previously accomplished, and adding
considerably to the solidity of the monument.

An examination of the megalithic monuments still standing enables us to
judge of the difficulties with which their builders had to contend,
bearing in mind the primitive nature of their tools. We have already
given the dimensions of the stones forming the alignments at Carnac.
Those at Avebury vary in height from about fourteen to sixteen feet,
and in the Deccan is a tumulus surrounded by fifty-six blocks of
granite of an even greater size. One of the slabs of the
Pedra-dos-Muros (Portugal) is remarkable for its size; and the length
of the table of a dolmen on the road from Loudun to Fontevrault is more
than seventy-two feet long; that of the dolmen of Tiaret (Algeria) is
some seventy-five feet long by a width of nearly twenty-six feet and a
thickness of nine and a half feet. This extremely heavy block rests on
supports rising more than thirty-nine feet from the ground.27

Stone as well as wood can be much more easily cut in one direction than
in any other. Men early learnt to recognize this peculiarity, and to
take advantage of it in attacking rock. With their stone hammers they
struck in straight lines, always aiming at the same points, and then,
probably with the help of a fierce file, they succeeded in breaking off
fragments. They also employed wedges of wood, which they drove into
natural or artificial fissures, pouring water on to this wedge again
and again. The wood became swollen with the damp, and in course of time
a block of stone would be detached. Neither time nor sinewy arms were
wanting, and Fergusson has remarked that any one who has seen the ease
with which Chinese coolies transport the largest monoliths for
considerable distances, will not look upon the difficulties of
transport as insurmountable. A more serious difficulty would be the
placing of the table of the dolmen on the supports, which are often
raised to a great height above the ground. It is supposed that earth
was piled up against the jambs so as to form an inclined plane, up
which the table was slid into place with levers and rollers of the most
primitive form, such as were in use in the most remote antiquity.
Sometimes the way in which these stones are balanced is perfectly
marvellous. The Martine stone, near Livernon (Lot), for instance, is
the shape of a boat, and the slightest touch is enough to make it rock
on its two supports. That of Castle Wellan (Fig. 55) rests on three
stones pointed at the top, and some of the trilithons of India are of
even more remarkable construction.

Although, as a general rule, megalithic monuments are without
ornamentation, there are a good many exceptions in the case of dolmens
made of very hard granite, on which numerous carvings and engravings
have been made. It is, however, impossible to decipher any but a very
few of these signs, whether circles, disks, dots, tooth or leaf
mouldings, spirals, serpentine lines, lozenges, or strip.

M. du Chatellier describes at Commana (Finistère) an entrance gallery
loaded with carvings, and the walls of one of the Deux-Sèvres monuments
have on them some very rough representations of the human figure cut in
_intaglio_, whilst various megaliths of Ireland are adorned with
circles, spirals, stars, etc. One of the supports of the dolmen of
Petit-Mont-en-Arzon has on it a representation of two human feet in
relief; that of Couedic in Lockmikel-Baden is paired with flat stones
covered with engravings. On the granite ceiling of the crypt beneath
the dolmen of the Merchants, or as it is called in Brittany the _Dol
Varchant_, is engraved the figure of a large animal supposed to have
been a horse, but the head of which was unfortunately broken off at
some remote date.28 We often meet with representations of hammers,
sometimes with and sometimes without handle. We give an illustration of
one of the walls of the Mané-Lud monument (Fig. 67), which will enable
the reader to judge of the general character of these engravings.

[Illustration: 67.]

Part of the Mané-Lud dolmen.

The monument of the Isle of Gavr’innis, of which we have already
spoken, is the most remarkable of any for the richness of its
decoration. It includes a gallery, consisting of forty-nine blocks of
granite and two of quartz, leading to a spacious apartment. These
blocks were brought from a distance, and the fact that the little arm
of the sea separating the island from the mainland was crossed, proves
that the men who built the monument owned boats strong enough to carry
heavy loads. Excavations carried on in 1884 brought to light a pavement
consisting of ten large slabs of granite, and beneath this pavement was
found a kind of crypt at least three feet deep, the lower part of the
lateral menhirs forming the walls. We must add, however, that Dr. de
Closmadeuc, and his opinion should carry weight, thinks that when the
Gavr’innis monument was erected the island was connected with the
mainland. Three of the supports, forming the walls of the crypt, and
all those of the gallery are covered with chevrons or zig-zag
ornaments, circles, lozenges, and scrolls of which Fig. 68 will give
some idea, and which Mérimée compares to the tatooing of the
inhabitants of New Zealand. Megalithic monuments of Ireland and certain
stones in Northumberland are ornamented in a manner resembling the
Gavr’innis engraving, similar designs being produced by similar means,
and although the engravings of Morbihan are generally more clearly cut
and distinct, Ave note in all alike the same absence of regularity, the
same roughness of execution, the same strange types, the same disorder
in the arrangement of the signs, and the same care to preserve the
surface of the block in its natural condition.

[Illustration: 68.]

Sculptures on the menhirs of the covered avenue of Gavr’innis.

There has been a good deal of discussion about the orientation of
megalithic monuments, and the truth on that point once ascertained,
some light might be thrown on the aim of the builders. It is evident,
however, that there never was any general system of orientation. The
dolmens of Morbihan, it is true, nearly all face the east, doubtless in
homage to the sun rising in its splendor; but this is not the case in
Finistère, and the dolmens of Kervinion and Kervardel, for instance,
are set due north and south. Leaving Brittany, we are told by the Rev.
W. Lukis that the position of the megalithic monuments of England
varies considerably: most of the dolmens of Berry, Poitou, Aveyron, and
the island of Bornholm, face west; and those of Algeria are set
southwest, and northeast, so that it is really impossible to come to
any final conclusion.

Some of the megalithic monuments already noticed have a peculiarity to
which we must refer here on account of its importance. One of the
supports, in nearly every case that which closes the entrance, is
pierced with a circular opening. Sometimes, however, the opening is
elliptical or square.

[Illustration: 69.]

Dolmen with opening (India).

We meet with dolmens thus distinguished in India (Fig. 69), in Sweden,
in Algeria, in France, and in Palestine, where they are often
associated with sepulchral niches hewn out of the rock and also pierced
with an opening corresponding with that of the entrance. In Alemtejo
(Spain), square openings occur. West of Karleby in Sweden, is a
sepulchral chamber about twenty-nine feet long, made of slabs set
upright, all those facing south being pierced with a nearly circular
opening; and on the shores of the Black Sea dolmens made of four
upright stones surmounted by a slab, have, in every case, one of the
uprights pierced with an artificial opening about six inches in
diameter. These dolmens are said by the country people to have been set
up by a race of giants who built them as shelters for a dwarf people on
whom they had compassion.

[Illustration: 70.]

Dolmen near Trie (Oise).

In France, dolmens with openings are so numerous that it is difficult
to make a selection. That known as La Justice, near Beaumont-sur-Oise,
consists of a small vestibule and a very long mortuary chamber,
separated by a slab pierced with a round opening. We must also mention
the megalithic monument of Villers-Saint-Sépulchre at Trie (Oise) (Fig.
70), that of Grand-Mont, with many of those of Morbihan, of which that
of Kerlescant has an oval opening; the covered avenue of
Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, originally erected at the confluence of the
Seine and Oise, and now set up exactly as it was found at Saint
Germain, has an oval opening, and presents the exceptional feature, of
which I know no other instance, of having a stone for closing the
opening if necessary; the covered avenue of Bellehaye in Normandy,
reproduced with precision at the Paris Exhibition of 1889, which was
closed by a transverse stone with an opening some inches in diameter.

Of English examples we may mention the dolmens of Rodmarten and
Avening; Mérimée quotes several megalithic monuments in Wiltshire; and
Sir J. Simpson, the well-known and oft-described _Kit’s Cotty House_,
which is nothing more than a dolmen with an opening. _Holed Stones_, as
they are called, are numerous in Cornwall, the size of the opening
varying considerably; that at Men-an-Tol, for instance, is more than a
foot in diameter, whilst others are but a few inches long. At Orry’s
Grave, in the Isle of Man, two large stones are so placed as to leave a
circular space between them, which was evidently intended to serve the
same purpose, or at least was in accordance with the same superstition,
as were similar characteristics elsewhere. Setting aside the
interminable legends connected with dolmens having openings, there is
no doubt that this peculiarity of structure, which we meet with in
India as in Scandinavia, in the Caucasus as in France, shows that the
builders of all of them were impelled by a similar idea. These openings
are too small to allow of the introduction of other corpses, or to
afford to the living a refuge in the home of the dead; they could but
have served for the passing in of food, of which a supply was so often
left for the departed; or yet another interpretation is possible: they
may have been left for the soul or the spirit to leave its earthly
prison and take flight for those happy regions in which all races more
or less believe, and to which belief these openings may be witnessed to
the present day. M. Cartailhac, however, hazards yet another
explanation, and suggests that the megalithic monuments were intended
for the interment of whole families, and that the bodies were not
introduced into the tombs until all the flesh was gone, when the
skeletons might have been slipped through the openings left for that
purpose. The repeated disturbances of the remains in the graves have
unfortunately often entirely dispersed all the human bones.

It was in Brittany that the art of erecting dolmens reached its fullest
development, and it is there that the relics found in the tombs are of
the most important character. Nowhere do we find weapons more carefully
preserved, more delicately finished ornaments of a more remarkable
kind. The Museum of Vannes, where most of the valuable objects found in
the excavations are preserved, possesses quartzite, fibrolite, diorite,
and even nephrite and jadeite hatchets, some of which materials are not
native to Europe; as well as amber beads and a necklace of calaïte,
that precious stone described by Pliny, and which long remained unknown
after his time.

Hatchets or celts are more numerous than any other objects found
beneath dolmens of Brittany. A report, read by M. R. Galles to the
Société Polymathique of Morbihan, enumerates the objects found with the
dead beneath the dolmen of Saint-Michel. This report is a regular
inventory, in which figure eleven jade celts of great elegance of form
and varying from about three and a half to sixteen inches, two larger
celts of coarse workmanship both broken, twenty-six small fibrolite
celts with sharp edges, nine pendants, more than one hundred jasper
beads which had been part of a necklace, and lastly an ivory ring.
Other megalithic monuments were not less rich in relics. Thirty
hatchets were picked up at Tumiac; more than a hundred, nearly all of
tremolite, at Mané-er-H’roek; which were remarkable for their
regularity of form, their polish, and the variety of their colors. They
seldom bear any traces of having been used, and in many cases they
appear to have been intentionally broken, probably in conformity with
some funereal rite. Finistère, though not so rich as Morbihan,
furnished an important contingent. The excavations of the Kerhué-Bras
tumulus brought to light a sepulchral chamber which contained
thirty-three arrow-beads. Beneath other dolmens were picked up a number
of little plaques of slate, all pierced with holes; one of these pieces
of slate, which was oblong in form, bore on it a representation of a
sun with rays surrounded by ornaments not easy to make out. The Breton
megalithic monuments also contained numerous fragments of pottery, some
of which had formed part of vases without stands, such as those found
at Santorin and at Troy.

In other parts of France, similar discoveries have been made; shells
often brought from distant shores, glass beads, amber bowls, hatchets
and celts made of stone foreign to the country. Dr. Prunières presented
to the French Association, when it met at Bordeaux, a collection of
weapons and ornaments which came from the megalithic monuments of
Lozère. M. Cartailhac described at the Prehistoric Congress of
Copenhagen the dolmen of Grailhe (Gard). A skeleton was found beneath
it crouching in a corner; whilst round about it lay a knife, a flint
arrow-head, a vase of coarse pottery, and in the earth forming the
tumulus were picked up twenty arrow-heads, a hatchet of chloromelanite,
with numerous beads and fragments of pottery. Were these offerings to
the dead, or to the infernal deities, given to them in the hope of
propitiating them in favor of the deceased? Beneath the megalith of
Saint Jean d’Alcas were found beads of blue glass and of enamel which
Dr. Prunières, having compared with those in the Campana collection in
the Louvre, thinks are of Phœnician origin. The tumuli of the Pyrenees
have yielded calaïte beads of the shape of small cylinders pierced with
holes; and the dolmen of Breton (Tarn-et-Garonne) eight hundred and
thirty-two necklace beads, some of the shape of a heart. Beneath the
Vauréal dolmen were found five skulls in a row, and near one of them,
that of a woman, lay a necklace made of round bits of bone and slate,
on which hung a little jadeite hatchet as an amulet. These human relics
were also accompanied by a fibrolite celt, numerous little worked
flints, and some fragments of pottery. This arrangement of skulls in a
tomb is very rare, and the only thing I can compare it to is the row of
five horses’ heads placed at the end of the entrance gallery of
Mané-Lud.

At Alt-Sammit (Mecklenburg), were round stone hatchets, flint knives,
fragments of pottery covered with strive and ornaments; at Tenarlo
(Holland), urns and amber beads. At Ancress in the island of Jersey, we
find a regular necropolis dating from Neolithic times, and one hundred
vases or urns of different forms were collected. In the Long Barrow of
West Kennet, too, were found numerous fragments of pottery, and with
these fragments boars’ tusks longer than those of the boar of the
present clay, the bones of sheep, goats, roedeer, pigs, and of a large
species of ox, all of which are probably relics of a funeral feast. At
a little distance from West Kennet the Rev. Doyen Merewether found
several flint implements. Here too, then, as elsewhere, the home of the
living was side by side with the resting-place of the (lead.

Beneath the dolmens of West Gothland have been found polished stone
weapons and tools associated with the bones of domestic animals, in
many cases bearing traces of the work of the hand of man. At Olleria,
in the kingdom of Valencia, at Xeres de la Frontera, we find diorite
hatchets, and in Algeria vases filled with the shells of land mollusca.
In every clime we meet with tokens of the respect in which the dead
were held.

This respect is really very remarkable. The builders of the dolmens did
not hesitate to sacrifice their most precious objects, their richest
ornaments, their hatchets and precious stones brought from a distance
by their tribe in their long migrations. No one would dream of robbing
the sacred collection. Our own contemporaries, however civilized we may
flatter ourselves by considering them, would not prove themselves as
disinterested.

Hatchets, pottery, and personal ornaments of stone bone, etc., are not
the only artificial objects found beneath the megalithic monuments.
Metals, too, have been discovered, and M. Piette in one of his
excavations, came across a plate formed of very thin layers of gold
leaf welded together by hammering; and in several parts of the south of
France have been found olives made of gold and pierced lengthwise. The
dolmen of Carnouet in Brittany, insignificant as it appears and
containing but one small sepulchral chamber with no gallery of access
or lateral crypts, beneath a tumulus about thirteen feet high by some
eighty-five in diameter, and which was left untouched until our own
day, actually contained a golden necklace weighing over seven ounces;
in the crypt of the Castellet monument was found a golden plaque and a
golden bead; whilst the Ors dolmen in the isle of Oleron concealed a
nugget which had been rolled into the shape of a bead probably after
having been beaten thin with a hammer. At Plouharnel, two golden
amulets were found beneath a triple dolmen, and M. du Chatellier, in
excavating beneath a megalithic monument in Finistère, found a
magnificent chain of gold. A somewhat similar chain was taken from the
Leys dolmen near Inverness, and in 1842 Lord Albert Cunningham picked
up at New Grange (Ireland) two necklaces, a brooch, and a ring, all of
gold.

More than a hundred megalithic monuments of France have been found to
contain bronze, and this number would be more than doubled if we
counted the finds in tombs not connected with megaliths, such as those
of Aveyron and Lozère, where a few bits of bronze were found mixed with
numerous stone objects. One fifth of the weapons, especially the swords
and daggers found beneath the dolmens, are of bronze. At Kerhué in
Finistère, a number of bronze swords were arranged in a circle round a
little heap of cinders and black earth, relics, probably, of the
cremation of the dead, in honor of whom the tumulus had been erected.

Beneath the dolmens of Roknia (Algeria) were found thirteen bronze
ornaments, and two in silver gilt of very superior workmanship, and
under those of the Caucasus were picked up blue-glass beads,
arrow-heads, and bronze rings; but M. Chantre, who is an authority in
the matter, thinks these objects date from interments subsequent to the
erection of the dolmens.

Iron was much more rarely used than bronze in the greater part of
Europe. It was not even known in Scandinavia before the Christian era.
In Germany, Pannonia, and Noricum its use dates from the sixth or
seventh century B.C. Beneath the mounds of Central America we find but
a few fragments of meteoric iron, the rarity of which made them
extremely valuable; on the other hand iron was known to the Hellenes as
long ago as the fourteenth century B.C., and it had been employed in
Egypt for many centuries prior to that time. The most ancient
sepulchres of Malabar contain iron tridents, and Genesius dates their
use from before the deluge. It is therefore surprising to find that
some races remained for an illimitable time ignorant of the way to
procure a metal of such great utility.

Iron was not used in Brittany until towards the close of the period
during which megalithic monuments were erected. Stone, bronze, and iron
were found together in the Nignol tomb at Carnac, which dates from the
time when cremation was already practised. We find the same association
of different materials in the Rocher dolmen.

In the British Isles, especially in Scotland and in Ireland, bronze and
iron objects are more numerous than in France. At Aspatria, near St.
Bees in Cumberland, a cist was discovered containing the skeleton of a
man measuring seven feet from the crown of the head to the feet. Near
the giant lay numerous valuable objects, including an iron sword inlaid
with silver, a gold buckle, the fragments of a shield and of a
battle-axe, and the iron bit of a snaffle bridle. The great cairn of
Dowth, in Ireland, contained iron knives and rings mixed with bone
needles, copper pins, and glass and amber beads, all showing rapid
progress in the industrial arts. The remarkable cairns near Lough Crew
(Ireland), which were untouched and indeed unknown to archæologists
until 1863, were found to contain, amongst many other interesting
objects, numerous human bones, fragments of pottery, shells of marine
mollusca, 4,884 bone implements, and seven pieces of iron very much
oxidized. The tumuli of the Grand Duchy of Posen and those of Prussia
cover kistvaens containing funeral vases, weapons, and silver and gold
ornaments.

We are altogether in the dark as to the date or the use of the various
objects found in these tombs, and the coins bearing dates which are
often associated with them, do not seem to help us much, belonging as
they doubtless do to a much later period than the erection of the
monuments. We may, however, mention that near the surface of the mound
of Mané-er-H’roek eleven medals of Roman emperors from Tiberius to
Trajan were found; whilst under the tumulus of Rosmeur, on the Penmarch
Point (Finistère), were various Roman coins; at Bergous in Locmariaker,
at Mané-Rutual, and at other places in Brittany, coins of the earliest
Christian emperors; at Uley, in Gloucestershire, some coins of the time
of the sons of Constantine; at Mining-Low (Derbyshire), beneath a
kistvaen surrounded by a cromlech, some medals of Valentinianus; at
Galley-Low, with a magnificent gold necklace set with garnets, a coin
of Honorius, but as these last were found at the outer edge of the
mound there are doubts as to the time of their deposition; these doubts
were, however, to some extent set at rest by the finding of a coin of
Geta beneath the monument itself. We might multiply instances of
similar finds, but I will only mention one more, the discovery under
some Scotch barrows of silver necklaces and coins of the Caliphs of
Bagdad, bearing date from 88 887 to 945 A.D.

This last discovery confirms what I have already said, that the
introduction of the coins was of much later date than the erection of
the monument. Another fact adds weight to this decision. The most
ancient Gallic coins date from about three centuries before our era,
and the earliest British from a century earlier than that. How is it
that excavations have brought to light no specimens of either? The
Romans successively occupied all the countries of which we have just
spoken; the tombs themselves bear witness to their conquests; and it is
to the violation of the tombs, the displacements, and secondary
interments that we owe the introduction of coins, pottery, and bricks
that undoubtedly date from the Roman period, and were probably placed
beside their dead by the Roman legionaries.

Whatever may be the difficulties, however, we are already able to come
to certain definite conclusions. We cannot connect the megalithic
monuments with any one of the ancient religions known. They were
certainly not set up in honor of Odin or of Osiris, of Astarte or of
Athene, the Phoenician or the Egyptian, the Greek or the Roman gods;
their erection seems to have had but one end in view, to do honor to
the dead. Beneath none of them do we find the remains either of the
cave-bear or of the reindeer, still less of the mammoth or of the
rhinoceros; whereas we do constantly meet with the bones of animals
characteristic of Neolithic times. It is therefore to that period that
we must attribute the more ancient of these mysterious monuments. And
the setting up of such memorials continued throughout the intermediate
time between the Stone and Bronze ages, and through the Bronze and Iron
periods. It was, indeed, still practised now and then in the earlier
centuries of the Christian era. More than that, such monuments are even
now occasionally erected. The Khassias of India make cromlechs of
large, flat unhewn stones, some six to seven feet high, and the
Angami-Nagas of the extreme north of British India set up extensive
alignments of menhirs, similar to those of France. Inscriptions in the
old Irish cipher writing, known as ogham, prove that megalithic
monuments were erected in Ireland after the time of St. Patrick; and,
as we have already remarked, some of the Breton menhirs are surrounded
by crosses. In India, too, we find the symbol of the Christian faith,
and in 1867, were discovered on the shores of the Godavery between
Hyderabad and Nagpore, a few dolmens made of four upright stones
surmounted by one or two slabs of sandstone, and encircling a cross
which is said to date from the same age as the dolmens themselves. We
must add, however, that the most competent archæologists are of opinion
that this form of the cross was not introduced into India until about
the sixth or seventh century of our era. Probably the erection of
megalithic monuments was not discontinued in England or in France until
towards the eighth or ninth century after Christ; and the menhirs set
up later in Scotland and in Scandinavia prove how fondly the people of
those countries clung to ancient traditions. These rude stone monuments
were handed down from one race to another, from invaders to invaded,
from conquered to conquerors.

We must not, however, omit to mention one serious objection. Roman
historians, exact as is their description of Gaul, Britannia, and
Germania, are silent as to stone monuments. Tacitus does not refer to
Stonehenge or to Avebury. Cæsar was present at the naval battle between
his own fleet and that of the Veneti, in the Gulf of Morbihan, and if
the megalithic monuments of Carnac were then there, would they not have
arrested the attention of the great captain? This silence is the more
inexplicable as one of the earliest geographers mentions the stone of
Iapygia; Ptolemy speaks of a similar stone on the shores of the ocean;
Strabo, of a group of dolmens near Cape Cuneus; Quintus Curtius, of an
important alignment in Bactriana; Pliny, who mentions a leaning pillar
in Asia Minor, says nothing of the megalithic monuments of Gaul, which
he crossed several times. Moreover, Ausonius, Sidonius, Appollinaris,
and Fortunatus, who are so eager to glorify their own land, maintain a
similar silence with regard to these structures. Sulpicius, Severus,
and Gregory of Tours, old chroniclers of French history, also pass them
over without a word. More than that, Madame de Sévigné, who was
stopping at Auray in 1689, and visited its environs, writes to her
daughter of all she has seen and done, without alluding to the
alignments of Carnac, or of Erdeven, which were, of course, much more
complete in her day than in ours. In fact, they are mentioned for the
first time by Sauvagère, in his “Recueil des Antiquites de la Gaule,”
in which he attributes them to the Romans. We may therefore, perhaps,
conclude that these decayed and clumsy-looking monuments were despised
for generations, no one realizing their importance or caring to
penetrate their secrets.

If need were, we have yet other proofs of their extreme antiquity. In
excavating an alignment in the district occupied by the Kermario group,
a Roman encampment was discovered. The enceinte is represented by a
long wall about six feet thick, and propped up against this wall were
found a number of flat stones blackened with smoke, on which the
legionaries doubtless cooked their food. In some instances these
hearths were made on an overturned menhir, and other menhirs, which had
belonged to the alignment, were fitted into the walls. A Roman road
passes near Avebury, and, contrary to their general custom, the haughty
conquerors had turned aside to avoid the tumulus. These are decisive
proofs that in France and England at least the megalithic monuments
were erected before the advent of the Romans.

Difficult as it is to come to any definite conclusion as to the age of
the monuments, it is yet more difficult to ascertain to what race their
builders belonged. In the first place we ask: Are they all the work of
one race? The contrary, earnestly maintained by M. de Mortillet, has
long been the general opinion. M. Worsaae declared, at the Brussels
Congress,29 that the dolmens were erected by different peoples; M.
Cazalis de Fondouce,30 M. Broca,31 and M. Cartailhac,32 share this
belief. “Are not the monuments of huge stones,” says M. Fondouce, “the
product of a progressive civilization growing by degrees, rather than
the work of a single people maintaining their own manners and customs
in the midst of the old primitive populations they visited, without
borrowing anything from their hosts?” To Broca, the resemblance between
the dolmens of Europe, Africa, and even of America proves but one
thing: the similarity of the aspirations and powers of all men.
Everywhere, and at every time, men have aimed, in their monuments, not
only at durability, but at the expression of force and of power. It was
with this end in view that they erected menhirs and selected enormous
stones for their megalithic monuments. The dolmen, which looks like an
architectural building, is but a modification of primitive tombs. The
cave-man first turned to account natural or artificial rock shelters,
and when they were not to be had, he imitated them in such materials as
he had at his disposal. Hence we have crypts, kistvaens, and dolmens;
and the resemblance between them proves nothing as to the parentage of
their builders.

We may add that the distances between what we may call megalithic zones
is considerable. We meet, for instance, with dolmens in Circassia and
in the Crimea, but there are no others nearer than the Baltic. There
are none in the districts peopled by the Belgæ, from the Drenthe to the
borders of Normandy, nor are there any in the valleys of the Rhine or
of the Scheldt. There are but a few in Italy or in Greece, where
Pelasgic buildings were early erected, and bore witness to a more
advanced civilization. We meet with them again, however, in Palestine,
but we must traverse many miles before we find other examples at
Peshawur and in the valley of Cabul. It is difficult to overrate the
importance of these facts, or to explain these gaps. Are they, however,
so complete as has been supposed? The few travellers who have crossed
Afghanistan and Daghestan have seen tumuli which may have served as
points of union between the monuments of India and those of the
Caucasus. The megalithic monuments of Palestine and of Arabia may yet
be found to be linked with those of Algeria, by examples in the little
known regions between the Nile and the Regency of Tripoli. If our
ignorance forbids us to assert anything on this point, it equally
forbids our denying anything with any confidence. We may also add one
general remark: the countries where megalithic monuments are found,
abound in granite, in sandstone, and in flint, whilst other districts
have only very friable limestones; and, their monuments, if they were
ever erected, would have been more easily destroyed, the very ruins
disappearing and leaving no trace.

It has been said, moreover, that the mode of construction of the
dolmens, and we hate ourselves made the same remark, is far from being
the same everywhere. The dolmens of Brittany have sepulchral chambers
with long passages leading to them; those of the neighborhood of Paris
have wide covered avenues with a very short entrance lobby. In the
south of France we see nothing but rectangular compartments formed of
four or five colossal stones. All this is true enough; but if we
examine our old cathedrals of comparatively modern date, the common
origin of which is never disputed, we note differences no less
remarkable. On the other hand it is urged that if megalithic monuments
were all erected by one race, the objects they contain would certainly
resemble each other to a great extent. But even this is not the case.
The hatchets so numerous in the west of France are rare in the south;
those from the Algerian monuments are always of coarse workmanship,
whilst those of Denmark are highly finished. We might multiply
instances, but as a matter of fact do we not see the same kind of thing
in the present day, in spite of our railways and other modes of rapid
communication, and the perpetual intermarrying of modern peoples?
Compare the ornaments of Normandy with those of the Basque provinces,
those of Brittany with those of Burgundy, and surely the differences
between them will be found to be as great as we note in the weapons and
ornaments of the builders of the megalithic monuments.

To sum up: according to the opinion of many eminent savants, numerous
races have been in the habit of raising megalithic monuments, the form
of which varies _ad infinitum_ according to the genius or the
circumstances of each race, and according to the nature of the soil or
of the material at the disposal of the builders. All, however, belong
to one general type, and bear witness to one general influence, which
extended throughout the whole world at a certain epoch. M. Cazalis de
Fondouce, from whom I borrow these last observations, would probably
find it as difficult to say how a general influence was extended to
races of which he denies the common parentage, and the relations and
contemporaneity he can but guess at, as I myself should—granting the
contrary hypothesis—to explain how a people could wander about the
world in incessant migrations without modifying its own habits or
communicating to others its rites and its mode of erecting monuments.

We cannot, however, fail to recognize the evidence of facts. We can
understand how men were everywhere impelled to raise mounds above the
bodies of their ancestors, to perpetuate their memory or to enclose
their mortal remains between flat stones to save them from being
crushed by the weight of earth above them. We may even, by straining a
point, admit the idea that a large cist developed into a dolmen, but
when in districts separated by enormous distances we see monuments with
the wall pierced with a circular opening or combining an interior crypt
with an external mound and dolmen, it is impossible to look upon these
close resemblances as the result of an accidental coincidence, and
equally impossible to fail to conclude that the men whose funeral rites
were remarkable for such close similarity belonged to the same race.

What then was this race? Are these monuments witnesses of the great
Aryan immigration which was for so long supposed to have spread from
India over the continents of Asia and Europe, and of which the
Indo-European languages were said to preserve the memory? Or is it
really the fact that a relationship of language does not imply a
relationship of race? Were the builders of the dolmens Celts or Gauls,
Ligures or Cymri? was Henry Martin right in ascribing to the Cimerii of
Scandinavia the erection in the Bronze age of the megaliths of Ireland?
Was it the Turanians, with their worship of ancestor’s, their respect
for the tombs of their forefather’s, and their desire to perpetuate
their memory to eternity, who set up the dolmens of Brittany? Was it
not perhaps rather the Iberians, whose descendants still people Spain
and the north of Africa? According to Maury, the distribution of the
megalithic monuments of Europe marks the last refuge of vanquished
Neolithic races, fleeing before their conquerors. All these hypotheses
are plausible, all can be defended by arguments, the weight of which it
is impossible to deny, but none are capable of conclusive proof, none
can finally convince the student.33

An old Welsh poet, referring to the long barrows of his native land,
says that they are altogether inexplicable, and that it is impossible
to decide who set them up or who is buried beneath them. And surely
this ancient bard34 is right even now. Vainly do we question these
silent witnesses of the remote past. They give us no answer, and we can
but repeat here what we said at the beginning of this inquiry: Human
science is powerless to lift the veil biding the early history of
humanity. Will it ever be so? Or will the day yet dawn when the veil
will be rent asunder at last? Time alone can solve this question, which
is one of those secrets of the future as difficult to fathom as those
of the past.


1 Bateman: “Ten Years’ Diggings,” Preface, p. 11.

2 W. MacAdams: “The Great Mound of Cahokia.” Am. Ass., Minneapolis,
1883.

3 Pelagaud: “Préhistoire en Syrie.”

4 Moore, _Popular Science Monthly_, New York, March, 1880; _Zeitschrift
für Ethnologie_: Berlin, 1887.

5 “Monuments de Roknia,” p. 18.

6 Haxthausen: “Mém. sur la Russie,” vol. ii., p. 204; A. Bogdanow:
“Mat. pour Servir à l’Histoire des Kourganes,” Moscow, 1879; Margaret
Stokes: “La Disposition des Principaux Dolmens de l’Irlande,” _Rev.
Arch_., July, 1882.

7 Sir A. de Capell Brooke: “Sketches in Spain and Morocco.”

8 Tissot: “Récherches sur la Géographie Comparée de la Mauritanie
Tinigitane.”

9 Margaret Stokes: “La Distribution des Principaux Dolmens de
l’Irlande.” _Revue Arch_., July, 1882.

10 Sir W. Wilde: “Ireland, Past and Present.” Miss Buckland: “Cornish
and Irish Prehistoric Monuments.” _Anth. Inst., Nov_., 1879. O’Curry:
“Lectures on the Manuscript Materials of Irish History.”

11 _Bul. Soc. Pol. du Morbihan_, April, 1885.

12 S. Reinach, _Rev. Arch_., 1888. Wilson: “Megalithic Monuments of
Brittany.” Cartailhac: “La France Préhistorique,” in which the
measurements are given of the principal monuments of Brittany.

13 A. Bertrand: “Archéologie Celtique et Gauloise,” p. 105.

14 Iliad, book xxiii., v. 380.

15 Joshua, chap. iv., v. 13 _et seq_.

16 P. du Chatellier, _Mém_. _Soc. d’Emulation des Côtes-du-Nord_, vol.
xix.

17 Cartailhac: “Les Âges Préhistoriques en Espagne et en Portugal.”

18 Verreaux, _L’Anthropologie_, 1890, p. 157.

19 Haxthausen: “Mém. sur la Russie Mér., Vol. ii., p. 204. “Fouilles
des Kourganes,” par M. Sarnokoasof, _Revue Arch_., 1879. Much:
_Mittheilungen der Anth. Gesell. in Wien_, 1878.

20 On this point see the excellent work by Maury, “Les Monuments de la
Russie et les Tumulus Tchoudes,” and Meynier and Eichtal’s “Tumulus des
Anciens Habitants de la Sibérie.”

21 _Revue d’ Anth_., 1880, p. 655.

22 _Mém. de la Soc. Arch. de la Province de Constantine_, 1863.

23 “Monuments Mégalithiques de la Tunisie,” _Ant. Afric_., July, 1884.
Dr. Rouire: “Les Dolmens de l’Enfida,” _Bull. Geog. Hist_., 1886.

24 “Heth and Noah,” pp. 191 and 192.

25 “Heth and Moab,” p. 249.

26 “Tribes of the Hindoo Koosh,” Calcutta, 1881.

27 _Matériaux_, 1887, p. 458. M. Pallart (“Mon. Meg. de Mascaro”),
thinks that this dolmen was not erected by man, but that a long slab of
stone has slipped down the slopes of the mountain and rested on two
natural supports. It is not easy to accept this view.

28 Dr. de Closmadeuc, agreeing, I think, with Henry Martin, derives the
name of _Dol Varchant_ from _Dol March’-Hent_, the table of the horse
of the avenue.

29 _Compte rendu_, p. 421.

30 _Mat_., 1877, p. 470.

31 _Ass. Française_, Bordeaux, 1872, p. 725.

32 _Rev. d’Anth_., 1881, p. 283.

33 By permission of the author, the translator adds the following
quotation from Taylor’s “Origin of the Aryans,” p. 17, which is
referred to by Professor Huxley in his paper on the Aryan question in
the _Nineteenth Century_ for November, 1890. Taylor says: “It is now
contended that there is no such thing as an Aryan race in the same
sense that there is an Aryan language, and the question of late so
frequently discussed as to the origin of the Aryans can only mean, if
it means anything, a discussion of the ethnic affinities of those
numerous races which have acquired Aryan speech; with the further
question, which is perhaps insoluble, among which of these races did
Aryan speech arise and where was the cradle of that race?”

34 This poet is one of those whose work is to be found in the so-called
“Black Book of Caermarthen.” See also “The Four Ancient Books of Wales,
Containing the Cymric Poems Attributed to the Bards of the Sixth
Century.” Edinburgh, 1868.



CHAPTER VI.
Industry, Commerce, and Social Organization; Fights, Wounds and
Trepanation.


When we consider the discoveries connected with the Stone age as a
whole, we are struck with the immense numbers of weapons of every kind
and of every variety of form found in different regions of the globe.
The Roman domination extended over a great part of the Old World, and
it lasted for many centuries. Everywhere this people, illustrious
amongst the nations, has left tokens of its power and of its industry.
Roman weapons, jewelry, and coins occupy considerable spaces in our
museums; but numerous as are these relics of the Romans, they are far
inferior in number to the objects dating from prehistoric times, and
flints worked by the hand of man have been picked up by thousands in
the last few years, forming incontestable witnesses of the rapid growth
of a large population.

One important point remains obscure. Schmerling has excavated fifty
caves in Belgium, and only found human relics in two or three of them;
and of six hundred explored by Lund in Brazil, only six contained human
bones. Similar results were obtained in the excavations of the mounds
of North America, as well as in the caves of France. M. Hamy, in a book
published a few years ago, only mentions twelve finds of human bones,
which could, without any doubt, be dated from Palæolithic times. True,
this number has been added to by recent discoveries, but it is still
quite insignificant. It is the same thing with the kitchen-middings and
the Lake settlements. This paucity of actual human remains forms a gap
in the evidence relating to prehistoric man, which disturbances and
displacements do not sufficiently account for, and to which we shall
refer again when speaking of prehistoric tombs.

Worked flints are generally found in numbers in one place, probably
formerly a station or centre of human habitation. Men were beginning to
form themselves into societies, and the dwellings, first of the family
and then of the tribe, rapidly gathered together near some river rich
in fish, or some forest stocked with game affording plenty of food
easily obtained. The caves also afford proofs of the number of men who
inhabited them. In one alone, near Cracow, Ossowski discovered 876 bone
implements, more than 3,000 flint objects, and thousands of fragments
of pottery. From the Veyrier cave, near Mount Salève, were taken nearly
1,000 stone implements; from those of Petit Morin, 2,000 arrow-heads;
from that of Côttes, on the banks of the Gartampe, more than 264
pounds’ weight of flints, some of the Moustérien and others of the
Madeleine type, mixed with the bones of the rhinoceros, and of several
large beasts of prey of indeterminate species. The Abbé Ducrost picked
up 4,000 flints in one dwelling alone at Solutré, where the soil is
calcareous and flint is not native, so that it must have been brought
from a distance. More than 8,000 different objects were taken from the
fine Neolithic station of Ors in the isle of Oleron; 12,000 chips of
stone, bearing marks of human workmanship, were picked up in the
Thayngen Cave, and more than 80,000 in the different caves of Belgium.
The shelter of Chaleux alone yielded 30,000 pieces of stone, at every
stage of workmanship, from the waste of the manufactory to the highly
finished implement. Other explorers have been no less fortunate. The
Marquis of Wavrin found in the environs of Grez no less than 60,000
worked stones belonging to no less than thirty different types, chiefly
arrow-heads, some triangular, others almond-shaped, others again
cutting transversely, some with and some without feathers, some
stalked, others not; in a word, arrows of every known type. Nothing but
an actual visit to the Royal Museum of Brussels can give any idea of
the importance of the discoveries made in Belgium.

The environs of Paris are, however, no less rich. As early as
Palæolithic times the valleys of the Seine and its tributaries were
evidently inhabited by a numerous population. M. Rivière mentions a
station near Clamart, where, in a limited space, he picked up more than
900 flints, some worked, others mere chips, many of which bad been
subjected to heat. A sand-pit of Levallois-Perret yielded 4,000 stone
objects, and on the plateau of Champigny, full of such terrible
memories for the people of France, were found nearly 1,200 flints,
knives, polished hatchets, lance heads and scrapers, mixed with
numerous fragments of hand-made pottery without ornamentation.

Are yet other examples needed? At. de Mortillet estimates at more than
25,000 the number of specimens found on the plateau of Saint Acheul,
the scene of the earliest discoveries that revealed the existence of
man in Quaternary times; and the station of Concise, on Lake Neuchâtel,
which is one of the most ancient in Switzerland, yielded a yet more
considerable number. Many have, however, been lost or destroyed; the
ballast of the railway skirting the lake contains thousands of worked
stones and of pieces of the waste left in making them, all of which
were taken from the bed of the lake. It must not be forgotten that it
is only of late years that the importance of these relics of the past
has been recognized and that any one has dreamt of preserving or of
studying them.

The excavation of a gravel pit at Dundrum (County Down, Ireland)
yielded 1,100 flint implements, and M. Belluci himself picked up in the
province of Pérouse more than 17,000 pieces, chiefly spear-, lance-, or
arrow-heads, belonging to six different types. The Broholm Museum
contains 72,409 weapons and implements, all found in Denmark.

We can quote similar facts in other countries. Prehistoric stations are
numerous in the Sahara and throughout the Wady el Mya, in Algeria, and
we have already spoken of the numerous specimens found near Wargla. The
workshops in this district are generally surrounded by immense numbers
of ostrich eggs, which seem to indicate that that bird was already
domesticated.1

In America, Dr. Abbott has sent to the Peabody Museum more than 20,000
stones, which were collected by him at Trenton, on the banks of the
Delaware, and quite recently I was told that in sinking a well in
Illinois the workmen came upon a deposit of more than 1,000 worked
flints, all of oval form. Every one knows the importance of the recent
discoveries at Washington, and we might multiply examples _ad
infinitum_, for everywhere explorers come upon undoubted traces of the
active work and intelligence of comparatively dense populations, all of
whom had attained to about the same degree of development.

These numerous deposits often mark the, site of regular workshops,
tokens of the earliest attempt at social organization. In no other way
can we explain the piles of flints in every stage of workmanship lying
beside the lumps from which they were detached. One of the most
celebrated of these workshops is that of Grand-Pressigny, chief town of
the canton of the department of Indre-et-Loire, which is admirably
situated between two picturesque rivers, the Claise and the Creuse.

The flint implements of Grand-Pressigny, of which specimens can be seen
in all the museums of Europe, are some sixteen inches long, of light
color, pointed at one end and square at the other. One face is rough,
the other chipped into three oblong pieces, whilst the sides are
roughly hewn into saw-like teeth. If we examine these flints closely we
can easily make out the exact point, the _eye_, as workmen call it,
where the stone was struck. At Charbonnière, on the banks of the Saône,
to quote other examples, in a radius of less than a mile, were found
weapons, tools, and nuclei, which may be compared with those of
Grand-Pressigny. In some places the collections of flints still
remaining look as if they had been used for road-making. In some cases
hatchets, knives, and scrapers seem to have been buried in pits. Were
these the reserve stores of the tribe, or the so-called _caches_ of the
merchants?

It is difficult merely to name the different workshops or manufactories
discovered in the last few years. We must, however, endeavor to mention
the most important, for these workshops, we must repeat, are an
important proof of the existence of a society of organized working
communities. We meet with them on the shores of the bay of Kiel, in the
island of Anholt, in the midst of the Kattegat, and on the borders of
the Petchoura, and of the Soula, among the Samoieds. Virchow discovered
an arrow-head manufactory on the shores of Lake Burtneek, and in 1884
the Moscow Society of Natural Sciences made known the existence of
important workshops near the Vetluga River, in the province of
Kostroma, so that we know that in remote prehistoric times men lived
and fought in a rigorous climate in districts but sparsely populated in
our own day.

There is nothing to surprise us in all these facts. Recently near the
Yenesei River, in the heart of Siberia, were found bronze daggers,
hatchets and bridle bits (Fig. 71), all bearing witness in the beauty
of their workmanship to a more advanced state of civilization than the
Lake Dwellings or megalithic monuments farther south. Many of them are
ornamented with figures of animals, so that at an epoch less remote, it
is true, than the one we have been considering, but still far removed
from our own, we find that there was an intelligent race, with artistic
tastes, living in a country now so intensely cold as to be
uninhabitable to all but a few miserable nomad Tartars.

At Spiennes, near Mons, a field was discovered, known as the _camp des
cayaux_, strewn with flints, some uncut, others hewn, together with
knives and hatchets innumerable. There were also centres of manufacture
at Hoxne and Brandon, in England, at Bellaria in Bologna, and at Rome
on the Tiburtine Way. At Ponte-Molle, where worked flints were
discovered for the first time in Italy a few years ago, a workshop was
found, remarkable for the great number of stags’ antlers, from which
the middle part had been removed, doubtless to be used as handles for
tools. M. de Rossi, who gives us these details, thinks that this
station was inhabited in the Paleolithic period. In the settlement of
Concise have been found not only stone implements, but a great many
articles made of bone, so that this place was evidently an important
manufacturing centre. Knives, stilettos, and arrow heads were turned
out here, and in the hands of skilful workmen the tusks of the boars,
which abounded at this time in Switzerland, were converted into
excellent chisels.

[Illustration: 71.]

Bronze objects found at Krasnojarsk (Siberia).

To name the districts where tools were manufactured in prehistoric
times in France would be to give a list of all the departments. In the
commune of Saint-Julien du Saut we find a large manufactory where every
division of the Stone age is fully represented, from the time of the
simply chipped hatchet to that of the polished implement of rare
perfection. Everything bears witness to the prolonged residence of man
in a neighborhood which offered the attraction of vast deposits of
chalk with bands of flint that supplied alike weapons and tools.
Amongst others, we must name the so-called _atelier de la Treiche_,
near Toul, which extends for an area of about a hundred acres, that of
Bonaruc, near Dax; surrounded by waste lands covered with a scanty
vegetation; that of Rochebertier (Charente), which probably dates from
the Madeleine period; and that of Ecorche-Bœuf, near Périgueux. The
Abbé Cochet tells us of an atelier in the Aulne valley, and Maurice
Sand of another near La Châtre, where we meet with the most ancient
traces of man in Berry. In the fields, near an alignment not far from
Autun, were picked up numbers of hatchets of bard rock, barbed arrows,
flakes of flint worked into scrapers or chisels, whilst near them were
the very polishers on which they had been pointed.

We have just spoken of polishers, and we said some time ago that it was
by prolonged rubbing that the remarkable weapons of Neolithic times
were produced. We must add now that a whole series of the polishers
used are to be seen on the right bank of the Loing, near Nemours; one
of which is a regular table (Fig. 72), on which can be made out no less
than fifty grooves and twenty-five cup-like depressions.

[Illustration: 72.]

Prehistoric polisher, near the ford of Beaumoulin, Nemours.

One would have expected to find the ground near these polishers covered
with flakes of flint and pieces of tools of all kinds, but nothing of
the kind has been discovered; a fact which leads its to suppose that
the workmen only came down into the valley to finish off their weapons
by polishing them.

At the period we are considering all the continents were peopled, and
we must repeat, for it is the most important point of our present
study, that the civilization attained to by the inhabitants was
everywhere almost identical. Thus we find centres of manufacture
similar to those of Europe at the foot of the mountains of Tunis and of
Algeria. In one of the latter, at Hassi al Rhatmaia, the knives were
piled up in one place, the scrapers in another, and the arrow-heads in
a third. In this disposition M. Rabourdin thinks he sees a sign of the
division of labor, one of the most important features of modern
progress. M. Arcelin mentions a similar deposit on the summit of the
Jebel Kalabshee, near Esneh in Egypt, and a few years ago another was
found in Palestine, near the ancient Berytus, containing great numbers
of hatchets, saws, scrapers, and all the implements characteristic of
the Stone age; whilst amongst them lay the blocks from which they had
been cut. Asia Minor was evidently an important manufacturing centre
during the Stone age, and, as a matter of course, it must have had a
considerable population; and even in America discoveries of similar
extent have been made. At Kinosha, in Wisconsin, Lapham made out a
manufactory of flint and quartzite arrow-heads, which dates from
prehistoric times, and quite recently a yet more important centre of
industry has been discovered at St. Andrew (Winnipeg).

The manufactories of Spiennes and Brandon deserve special notice, as
they show us how our ancestors got the flint they used instead of
metal. At Spiennes,2 the excavations were begun in the open air, then
the chalk containing the flint was reached by the sinking of vertical
shafts, many of which were as much as forty feet in depth. These shafts
were connected with each other by galleries running in every direction,
but always following the belts of flints. Cuttings have brought to
light the very implements of the ancient miners. They were of the
simplest description, such as picks made of stag-horn and heavy stone
hammers, all alike bearing marks of long service.3

Similar results were obtained in England. Canon Greenwell explored near
Brandon, in Suffolk, a series of 254 shafts, known in the neighborhood
as Grime’s Graves. As at Spiennes, the shafts were connected by
galleries from three to five feet high, and one of theta was
twenty-seven feet long. The shafts and galleries had been hollowed out
with the help of picks exactly like those found in Belgium;
seventy-nine were picked up that had been thrown away by the workmen.4

Some few years ago MM. Cartailhac and Boule discovered one of these
primitive quarries at Mur de Barrez, the chief town of the department
of Aveyron.5

They made out eight shafts in the face of a layer of limestone some
eighty-one feet long, and at every turn of their excavations they came
to fresh shafts. These shafts opened out towards the top like funnels,
and the), were not more than three feet three inches below the surface,
the flint having been struck at that depth (Fig. 73). These shafts
were, in many cases, continued by galleries, as seen in our
illustration (Fig. 74), or by trenches, where the light is, however,
more or less shut out by small landslips. It is still easy, in spite of
this, to make out the floor of the mine, for it is trodden hard by the
feet of the ancient miners. Traces of charcoal, too, reveal the path
they took, and we learn at the same time that they used fire to help
them in their work.

[Illustration: 73.]

Section of a flint mine; _t_ vegetable earth, _c_ pure limestone, _c m_
Marly limestone, _s_ flint.

M. Boule,6 from whom we borrow these details, cannot restrain his
astonishment at the practical knowledge shown by these prehistoric
miners. He tells us that they sometimes left the flint standing as
pillars at pretty short intervals, or they propped up the galleries
with even more resistant material, cementing them with clay or with
calcareous earth taken from the detritus. In spite of these
precautions, landslips frequently occurred, and implements of stag-horn
(Fig. 75) have often been flattened by the fall of the roof of the
gallery. It is really curious to find implements of an exactly similar
kind used for exactly similar purposes at Spiennes, Brandon, Mur de
Barrez, and at Cissbury, to which, however, we shall have to refer
again. In the shafts of Aveyron, as in those of England, the marks of
blows of the picks are still to be seen, and in many cases a flint or
horn-pick point is still imbedded in the rock or limestone, as if the
miner had but just left his work.

[Illustration: 74.]

Plan of a gallery, half destroyed in making the excavation which
revealed its existence. U gallery still visible; G′ gallery destroyed
by the excavation.

In this last example of what has been done in France, we must also add
that of the shafts of Nointel (Oise) and those discovered in Maine by
M. de Baye, in both of which were found nodules of flint in different
stages of preparation, together with some stag-horn picks. In none of
these excavations was any metal implement found, or any trace of the
use of metal, so that we must conclude that the mines date from
Neolithic times.

We have seen how man gradually brought to perfection the tools and
weapons which were at first so clumsy. The growth of industry led to
the birth of commerce, or, to speak more accurately, to that of barter.
From the time of the earliest migrations intercourse was begun, or
rather was carried on, between the tribes, as they gradually dispersed,
often travelling considerable distances from each other, and fresh
proofs of these relations are continually brought to light as we become
better acquainted with prehistoric times. The flints worked by the
cave-men of Belgium, the fossil shells so numerous at Chaleux, in the
Frontal and Nuton caves, at Thayngen on the frontier between
Switzerland and Germany, in Italy, in the stations of anterior date to
the _terremare_ beds, have been found the shells of the pearl oyster of
the Indian Ocean, whilst in the caves of the south of France, such as
the Madeleine, that of Cro-Magnon, Bize in Hérault, and Solutré on the
banks of the Saône have been picked up the shells of Arctic marine
mollusca. The cave-man of Gourdan was decked with shells from the
Mediterranean, and the man of Mentone in his turn wore a head-dress
made of Atlantic shells. Fossil shells were also much sought after; we
have alluded to those from Champagne found in Belgium; others from the
shell-marl of Touraine and Anjou had been taken into the caves of
Périgord, whilst sea-urchins from the cretaceous strata of the south of
France were found in a prehistoric station of Auvergne, and M. Massenat
picked up at Laugerie-Basse two specimens of a species not met with
anywhere but in the Eocene deposits of the isle of Wight. The Neolithic
station of Champigny, near Paris, has yielded some objects from the
Alps, and from Belgium, from the Vosges Mountains, and the Puy de Dôme.

[Illustration: 75.]

Picks, hammers, and mattocks made of stag-horn.

In the caves of Périgord were also found fragments of hyaline quartz,
which must have been brought from the Alps or the Pyrenees. In Brittany
and in Marne flints foreign to these granite districts are numerous;
and Dr. Prunières tells us that similar discoveries were made under the
megalithic monuments of France, and that neither in the eroded
limestone districts of Lozère, known locally as _les causses_, nor
under the dolmens of Haute-Vienne, were found any but implements made
of rock not native to the country.

Hatchets, daggers, and nuclei, or as they are characteristically called
by the country people _livres de beurre_, from Grand-Pressigny, have
been picked up in the bed of the Seine, at Limagne in Auvergne, in
Brittany, at Saint Médard near Bordeaux, on the banks of the Meuse, and
even as far north as the Shetland Islands. At Concise was found red
coral from the Mediterranean, whilst the yellow amber of the Baltic was
picked up in the Lake Dwellings of Switzerland, beneath the dolmens of
Brittany, in sepulchral caves, such as those of Oyes (Marne) or
Lombrives (Ariège), beneath the megalithic tomb of La Roquette, at
Saint Pargoue (Hérault) beneath the dolmen of Grailhe (Gard), at
Malpas, and at Baume (Ardèche).7 These are nearly all Neolithic tombs,
though some few of them may date from the beginning of the Bronze age;
but the cave-men of France owned amber even earlier than this, for five
fragments have been found in the Aurensan Cave near
Bagnères-de-Bigorre, which was inhabited in Palæolithic times. Jadeite
and nephrite8 are met with in the Lake Dwellings of Switzerland and
Bavaria, as in the caves of Liguria and Sardinia; chloromelanite9 in
France, and obsidian10 in Lorraine, in the island of Pianosa and in the
Cyclades. We have already spoken of the calaïte11 found beneath the
dolmens of Brittany, and we may add now that it has also been found in
the caves of Portugal and beneath the megalithic monuments of the south
of France.

Commerce developed rapidly during Neolithic times, and, as far as we
can make out from traces left, its course was from the southeast to the
northwest. Streams and rivers were followed by merchants as by
emigrants, and at an extremely remote date the sea no longer arrested
the journeys of men. At a recent meeting of the British Anthropological
Institute, Miss Buckland dwelt on the resemblance in the material,
shape, and ornamentation of a golden cup found in Cornwall, to other
cups found at Mykenæ and at Tarquinii, and maintained that the Cornish
cup must have been the work of the same artisans, and have been brought
by commerce from what was then the extremity of the known world.

It is not only in Europe that we can trace the relations established
between men separated by vast distances, by oceans, and by apparently
impassable deserts. The shells of the Atlantic and those of the
Pacific, the copper of Lake Superior, the mica of the Alleghanies, and
the obsidian of Mexico lie together beneath the tumuli of Ohio, and
quite recently Mr. Putnam exhibited to the Society of Antiquaries a
collection of jade celts and ornaments, some from Nicaragua, others
from Costa Rica, and a hatchet with both edges sharpened from Michigan.
No deposit of jade has so far been discovered on the American
continent, so that we can only suppose these objects to have been
brought from Asia at an unknown date. The marks they retain of having
been rubbed up, and the holes made in them to hang them up, show what
store was set by them.

Monuments of many kinds scattered over different countries, weapons and
implements, relics as they are of a remote past, enable us to gain a
closer insight into the manners, customs, and mode of life of our
ancestors of the Stone age. We can picture their daily life, which we
know to have been one long struggle, without break or truce, for they
had to contend, not only with wild animals but with each other, to
fight for the use of their caves of refuge, for their hunting fields,
and for their watercourses; and later, the first shepherds had to do
battle for the pasturage necessary for their flocks. It is only too
certain that, from the earliest dawn of humanity, men gave way, without
any effort at self-control, to their brutal passions. The right of the
strongest was the only law, and wherever man penetrated his course was
marked by violence and by death. One of the femora of an old man was
found in the celebrated Cro-Magnon Cave, bearing a deep depression
caused by a blow of a projectile, and on the forehead of the woman that
lay beside him is a large wound made by a small flint hatchet (Fig.
76). This gash on the frontal bone penetrated the skull, and was
probably the cause of death, but not of sudden death, for round about
the wound are marks of an attempt at healing it.12 According to Dr.
Hamy, many of the bones found in the Sordes Cave have very curious
wounds. A gaping hole on the right parietal of a woman must have been a
terrible wound (Fig. 77). The woman of Sordes, like that of Cro-Magnon,
must have survived for some time; the marks of the removal of splinters
of bone, which can quite easily be made out, leave no doubt on that
point.13

[Illustration: 76.]

Cranium of a woman, from Cro-Magnon, seen full face.

In the Baumes-Chaudes caves, situated in that part of the valley of the
Tarn which belongs to the department of Lozère, Dr. Prunières picked up
numerous bones bearing scars, characteristic of wounds produced by
stone weapons.14 Some fifteen of these bones, such as the right and
left hip bones, tibiæ, and vertebrae, still contain flint points flung
with sufficient force to penetrate deeply the bony tissue. Always
indefatigable in his researches, Dr. Prunières also mentions having
found in the cave known as that of _L’Homme Mort_ bones bearing traces
of cicatrized wounds, and he presented to the Scientific Congress at
Clermont a human vertebra found beneath the Aumède dolmen pierced with
an arrow-head, which is, so to speak, encased in the wound by the
formation of bony tissue.

[Illustration: 77.]

Skull of a woman found at Sordes, showing a severe wound from which she
recovered.

Of the nineteen crania found in the Neolithic sepulchre of Vauréal two
show traces of old wounds. One of them, that of a woman, has three
different scars, two of which were of wounds that had healed, whilst
the third in the occiput was a gaping hole, which had evidently caused
death.

A sepulchral cave at Nogent-les-Vierges (Oise) contains the skeleton of
a man with a wound on the forehead, no less than four and a half inches
long by three broad. This man, who was dune young, the sutures being
still very apparent, survived this serious wound for some time.

The Gourdan Cave has yielded crania and jaws broken by blunt weapons,
whilst on other crania have been made out scratches and stripes which
could only have been produced after the hair and skin had been removed.
In the caves of the Petit-Morin valley, M. de Baye picked up some human
vertebra pierced with flints, the points of which were still imbedded
in the bones. In the Villevenard Cave one skull was found containing
three arrow-beads with transverse points imbedded in the skull, the
bone of which had closed upon them. Another arrow was lodged between
the dorsal vertebrae. It is probable that these arrows had remained in
the wounds; certainly that is the simplest way to account for their
position. About two miles from the caves of which we have been
speaking, M. de Baye discovered a sepulchre containing thirty
skeletons, all of adult and strongly built individuals. The bodies were
laid one above the other, and separated by large flat stones and a thin
layer of earth. This sepulchral cave contained seventy-three flint
points. As in the case of Villevenard, their position leads us to
suppose that these points had been sticking in the flesh of the bodies
when they were interred, and had fallen out when decomposition set in.
Probably the bodies were those of men who had fallen victims in a
bloody conflict that had taken place in the valley. In a cave at the
station of Oyes, was found stretched upon a bed of stones a skeleton
with a piece of flint, which had been flung with great force, imbedded
in the upper part of the humerus. Round about the wound are the marks
of many attempts at healing it.

Many of the human bones found in the Vivarais Cave bear traces of
having been violently fractured by stone weapons with tapering points.
In the Challes Cave (Savoy) lies the skeleton of a woman whose skull
was fractured by a flint weapon, but in this case death was evidently
immediate, at least if we may judge from the fact that there are no
signs of the wound having received any treatment. In the Castellet
Cave, a human vertebra contained the weapon which had pierced it, but
when the bone was touched the arrow-head broke off. It had, however,
been flung with such a sure hand that it had been driven ten inches
deep into the bony tissue. Here, too, the absence of any exostosis
proves that death quickly followed the wound.

[Illustration: 78.]

Fragment of human tibia with exostosis enclosing the end of a flint
arrow.

In other cases the victims seem to have lived for some time. We have
already spoken of wounds in crania that had healed, and we may add that
a few years ago a, human bone was presented to the Archæological
Society of Bordeaux which still retained a flint arrow-head in the
wound it had made. Traces could clearly be made out of the inflammation
caused by the presence of the foreign body, and the bony tissue
secreted by the periosteum had, so to speak, taken the mould of the
arrow (Fig. 78).

In the cave known as the Trou d’Argent (Basses-Alpes) amongst the bones
of ruminants and carnivora, fragments of pottery and rubbish of all
kinds, was found a piece of humerus (Fig. 79) pierced at the elbow
joint and very neatly cut at the lower end, no doubt with the help of
some of the implements of hard rock scattered about the cave. The
position of this human bone amongst the remains of animals and
fragments of a meal, points to its being a relic of a scene of
cannibalism; adding yet another proof to what I said at the beginning
of this work.

[Illustration: 79.]

Fragment of human humerus pierced at the elbow joint, found in the Trou
d’Argent.

Similar facts are reported front England and Germany. Dr. Wankel
mentions an interesting prehistoric deposit at Prerau, near Olmutz,
amongst the bones of animals belonging to the most ancient Quaternary
fauna, such as the mammoth, the cave-bear, the cave-lion, the glutton,
and the arctic fox; and amongst clumsy bone and ivory weapons and
ornaments he found a human jaw and a femur covered with strip produced
by flint hatchets. In 1801 Mr. Cunnington took several skeletons from a
barrow near Heytesbury, the skull of one of which had been broken with
a blunt implement; and Sir R. Hoare speaks of a skull from the
neighborhood of Stonehenge split open by a blow from one of these
formidable weapons. Several crania taken from a long barrow at West
Kennet have similar wounds.

Similar facts were noticed at Littleton-Drew, at Uley, at Cotswold, and
at Rodmarten, and from this Dr. Thurmam concluded that nearly all those
who were buried in long barrows had met with a violent death.15 He
speaks, however, of one skull pierced with a large hole, the edges of
which had become rounded smooth, showing the action of a recuperative
process, and proving that the injured man had long survived his serious
wound. In 1809, a farmer of Kirkcudbrightshire set to work to demolish
a large cairn that interfered with his tilling of the soil, and which,
according to popular tradition, was the tomb of a Scotch king. In
taking away the earth the workmen found a large stone coffin, in which
lay the skeleton of a man of great stature. The arm had been almost
separated from the trunk by the blow of a diorite hatchet, a broken bit
of which remained imbedded in the bone.16

One of the few crania that can with certainty be said to have belonged
to Lake Dwellers of Switzerland was found at Sutz, near Zurich; this
skull was fractured at the back. The roundness of the wound, which had
been serious enough to cause death, has led authorities to conclude
that it was made with one of the formidable pick-hammers, so many of
which were found in the lake of Bienne.17 Nilsson speaks of a human
cranium pierced with a flint arrow, and of another, both found at
Tygelso (Scandinavia), containing a dart made out of the antler of an
eland.18 At Chauvaux, at Cesareda, and Gibraltar other crania have been
found bearing the marks of mortal wounds, and if we cross the Atlantic
we meet with similar instances. Lund tells us that at Lagoa do
Sumidouro crania were found pierced with circular tools, whilst near
them lay the implements that had caused death.19 At Comox, in Vancouver
Island, a skeleton was found with a flint knife imbedded in one of the
bones, and at Madisonville (Ohio) another, one of the bones of which
was pierced by a triangular stone arrow; whilst beneath a mound in
Indiana was picked up a skull pierced by a flint arrow more than six
inches long. Excavations at Copiapo (Chili) brought to light the
skeleton of a man who had sustained no less than eight wounds from
arrows. The force with which they must have been shot is really
astonishing; one had broken the upper jaw and knocked out several
teeth, penetrating to the brain; and others were still sticking in the
vertebrae and ribs.20

In the New as in the Old World man survived many of these horrible
wounds, and a skull found under a mound near Devil’s River shows a
serious wound inflicted many years before death, and one of the
Peruvian crania in the Peabody Museum bears a long frontal fracture,
doubtless produced by the violent blow of a club; the five or six
fragments still to be made out are, so to speak, solidified, and the
wounded man had evidently lived on for many years, thanks apparently to
his good constitution alone, for there are no signs of the performing
of any surgical operation, such as the removal of the splinters of
bone, for instance.21

In 1884 a human vertebra, with an arrow-head imbedded in it, was picked
up on the island of Santa Cruz. The apophysis was broken, and the
extent of the fracture shows the great force of the blow. The victim
evidently died of the wound, for there is no sign of its having been
healed.

I have dwelt upon these deaths and wounds in spite of the inevitable
monotony of such a list, not because I wish to bring into prominence
the fact that from the earliest times the struggle for existence was
fierce and bloody, but because I am anxious to prove that in these
remote days an organized and intelligent society had grown up. No one
could have survived such wounds as we have described, but for the care
and nursing of those around him, such as the other members of his
family or of his tribe. The wounded one must have been fed by others
for months; nay more, he must have been carried in migrations, and his
food and resting-place must have been prepared for him. Moreover, and
this is of even yet more importance to our argument, they must have
been men able to treat wounds and to set bones.

This last fact has been proved beyond a doubt by the discovery of
numerous bones with the old wounds completely cicatrized. “In several
examples,” says Dr. Prunières, speaking in this connection, “we can
make out the fractures set with a neatness which gives us a very high
opinion of the skill of the Neolithic bone setters. The setting of one
fracture at the lower end of the tibia and of another at the neck of
the femur, are not inferior to what we should expect from the most
skilful surgeons of the globe.”22 A remarkable fact truly, but one
often met with in the most widely separated regions of the earth, the
importance of which cannot be overrated, and justifies the giving of a
few more details.

In 1873 Dr. Prunières, to whom science has reason to be very grateful
for his singular discovery, presented to the members of the French
Association, in session at Lyons, a human parietal with a rounded piece
of bone let into it. This piece of bone was rather larger than a
five-franc piece, and the skull into which it had been fixed was found
beneath the Lozère dolmen. A large opening, some three inches in
diameter, the edges of which were worn smooth, had been made in this
skull, and the piece of bone let into it was thicker than the skull
itself, as well as different in color, the cranium being dark and the
foreign piece of bone pale yellow. It was evident therefore that the
two pieces did not belong in life to one person, and that the rounded
piece had been cut out of some other skull. The following year Dr.
Prunières added fresh details about other rounded pieces of skull that
be had discovered let into crania, some of which pieces had evidently
been introduced during the life of the patient, who had died under the
operation of trepanation, whilst others had been put in after death.
Dr. Prunières in every case speaks of _rondelles_ or rounded pieces of
skulls, and we prefer to quote him exactly, but as a matter of fact the
trepanation was sometimes done with elliptical, triangular, or even
pyramidal pieces of bone.

Later no less than sixty fresh examples, corroborating Dr. Prunières’
discoveries, were found in the Baumes-Chaudes caves, and Broca in his
turn reported the finding of three crania in the cave of _L’Homme
Mort_, from which great pieces had been taken which had evidently not
been lost by accident.

From this time excavations and discoveries made under Dr. Prunières
succeeded each other rapidly. In 1887 his collection contained 167
crania or fragments of crania, all perforated, 115 of which were picked
up in the caves of Lozère, which are probably of more recent date,
beneath the dolmens of the _devèzes_, as those vast plains given lip to
pasturage are called. These dolmens, which were doubtless reserved for
the burial of chiefs, often contain many valuable objects. Beneath one,
for instance, were found fifteen beautiful darts of variegated flint,
four polished boars’ tusks, some schist pendants, some shells cut into
the shape of teeth, some bone and stone necklace beads, and, lastly,
two small bronze beads. These last-named objects justify us in dating
the dolmen from the Bronze epoch, when the use of bronze began to
spread over the district, though it was still not generally employed.

Attention once awakened, similar facts began to be announced from many
different quarters. In the Neolithic caves of Marne were found skulls
with rounded holes in them, pieces of skull such as are shown in Fig.
28, which were probably worn as amulets. M. de Baye has in his fine
collection more than twenty examples of trepanation, one of which is
shown in Fig. 80. In nearly every case the operation had been performed
after death; three examples alone show it to have been done during
life, and that the patient certainly survived, for the wound shows very
evident signs of having healed, and the edges of the openings no longer
bear the marks of the tool of the operator. On one of the three crania
there were two wounds near each other, but they were quite separate,
and were evidently not treated at the same time.

[Illustration: 80.]

Mesaticephalic skull, with wound which has been trepanned.

A tumulus in the Guisseny commune (Finistère), excavated about two
years ago, covered over a sepulchral crypt. At the southeastern
extremity was picked up a badly baked hand-made earthenware vase with
four handles. Beside the vase lay a skull, on which could be made out
traces of oxidation, which had probably been caused by the wearing of a
metal band, which has not been found. This skull bears on the right
side a little oval hole with cicatrized edges about an inch long by two
fifths of an inch broad. The discovery of a bronze dagger and two
bronze plaques leaves no doubt as to the age of this tumulus. This
example of trepanation is the only well authenticated one of which I
know in Brittany. It is true one skull has been mentioned as found
beneath the megalithic monument of Saint-Picoux de Quiberon (Morbihan),
which is even said to bear marks of sawing and scraping made in
attempting trepanation, but this fact has been very much questioned,
and the date at which the trepanation was performed, if performed it
were, is very doubtful.23 The proof we are seeking of the antiquity of
the operation of trepanation is not therefore to be found here.

On a plain amongst the hills of the right bank of the Seine, above
Paris, rises a mound resembling a promontory which is known as the
Guérin mound, and consists of a vast deposit of chalk which was
excavated long ago. Successive operations have brought to light eight
caves, most of which contained a number of human remains, which were
unfortunately dispersed without having been scientifically examined.
One alone, opened in 1874, contained numerous bones belonging to
individuals of every age and of both sexes, with polished flints,
fragments of pottery, and implements of stag-horn. Amongst these relics
was found the skull of an old man showing a very curious example of
trepanation. It was unfortunately broken by the workmen in the very
moment of discovery, and could only be very insufficiently examined.
Other examples, however, which could be properly authenticated, are not
wanting from the banks of the Seine and Marne; two fragments of skull
were found in the canton of Moret, one of which had been trepanned
during the life of its owner, and the other after death. We must also
mention the crania presented to the learned societies at the Sorbonne,
one of which came from the plateau of Avrigny, near Mousseaux-lès-Bray
(Seine-et-Marne). Side by side with the skeleton lay polished hatchets,
scrapers, and arrow-heads, fragments of pottery blackened by smoke, and
lastly a solitary bone of an ox, pierced with three holes at regular
distances, which had probably been used as a flute. Of nine crania
found in this excavation three were pierced, two after death and one
during life, the edges of the last named bearing very evident traces of
treatment.

A trepanned skull was also discovered in a Neolithic sepulchre near
Crécy-sur-Morin, where lay no less than thirty skeletons, remarkable
for the strongly defined section of the tibiae, whilst around were
strewn hatchets, flint knives, bones, stilettos and picks of siliceous
limestone with handles made of pieces of stag-horn. The tomb, built of
stones without mortar, contained two contiguous chambers separated by a
wall, and covered over by a stone weighing more than 1,200 tons. It
seems likely that this huge stone had not been moved—it must have been
beyond the strength of the makers of the tomb to lift it,—but that the
spaces beneath, in which the dead had been placed, had been merely
hollowed out. In the covered _Avenue des Mureaux_, of which I have
already spoken, were picked up several trepanned crania. The tools,
scrapers, and piercers, which had probably been used for the operation,
lay near the crania.

A Neolithic sepulchre containing three trepanned crania was opened at
Dampont, near Dieppe. The operation had been as neatly executed as if
it had been performed by one of our most distinguished surgeons. As at
Crécy, the sepulchral crypt was divided into two chambers, and the slab
between them was pierced with a square opening,24—a fresh example of
the curious practice of making openings, of which we have spoken in
treating of so many different regions, often apparently completely cut
off from communication with each other.

Beneath the Bougon dolmen (Deux-Sèvres), in the west of France, was
found a skull, and at Lizières in the same department, the skeleton of
a tall old man with a dolichocephalic skull and platycnemic tibiæ
bearing traces of old wounds badly healed. The bony tissue of the skull
was in an unhealthy state and the trepanation had evidently been part
of medical treatment. At Saint-Martin-la-Riviére (Vienna), a tomb
dating from Neolithic times contained five trepanned crania, on one of
which the perforation had been made by scraping. In this tomb was also
found a round piece of skull with a hole in it, which had doubtless
been used as a pendant. The other objects found in this sepulchre were
of a remarkable character, and included hatchets made of coralline
limestone, jade, fibrolite, and serpentine, the blades of flint knives,
arrows, some feathered, others stalked, some necklace beads, and a
number of vases, some apodal, others with flat stands, and nearly all
without any attempt at ornamentation. Beneath a dolmen near St.
Affrique, M. Cartailhac discovered a skull with two holes in it; one
near the bregma, which had been made during life, and the other on a
level with the lambda, which had not been made until after death.25 We
cannot now note the important conclusions founded on these two
perforations, we must be content with adding here that the tomb
contained four other skeletons with crania showing no trace of
trepanation; the tibiae were platycnemic and the humeri had the
so-called perforation of the olecranon farces, which certain
anthropologists, as I think without sufficient reason, consider
characteristic of inferior races. We must mention yet one more
discovery which it will not do to omit. A human parietal with a piece
missing that had evidently been taken out, was found beneath the
rock-shelter of Entre-Roches near Angoulême. The skull bore very
evident traces of the performance of an operation which may or may not
have been executed during life. Was it done to remove the diseased
bone—for it was diseased—in the hope of prolonging life? Did the
patient die under the hands of the surgeon, or was the piece of bone
taken out after death to be used as an ornament or an amulet? Any one
of these hypotheses is possible, and all we can say for certain is that
there is no sign of the wound having been healed in any way. This is a
common thing enough, and the interest of the discovery arises from a
different cause. The rock-shelter of Entre-Roches is supposed to date
from Paleolithic times, and if it were certain that there has been no
displacement of the soil on which the parietal was found, it is to be
concluded that trepanation was practised in the Quaternary period when
man was living amongst the large extinct pachydermata and felidæ. But
it will be difficult to admit this unless other discoveries confirming
it are made. If, however, we cannot prove that trepanation was
practised in France in Palæolithic times, we can assert that it was
continued down to the earliest centuries of the Christian era. One
remarkable case of trepanation was found, for instance, in the
Merovingian cemetery near St. Quentin; and a trepanned skull was
recently exhibited at a meeting of the Anthropological Society in
Paris, which had been found beneath a Merovingian tomb at Jeuilly. The
patient had long survived his wound. The skeleton was found in a stone
trough, narrower at the foot than at the head. The skeleton of a man
between forty and fifty years of age was found in a Frank cemetery at
Limet, near Liège. On the left parietal of the skull was an oval hole
as big as a pigeon’s egg, bearing traces of having been medically
treated. The patient, like the man of Jeuilly, certainly survived the
operation. His tomb, as were the resting-places of his neighbors in
death, was covered over with a huge unhewn stone, and beside him lay
another skeleton. A few nails and bits of wood were the only things
found in the tomb. We may also mention the skeleton of a Frank of
between fifty-five and sixty-five years of age with a trepanned skull,
found by M. Pilloy, in a cemetery of the St. Quentin _arrondissement_,
which also contained numerous objects dating from the sixth century
A.D.

So far we have only spoken of France, but similar facts are reported
all over Europe, and the difficulty really is to make a selection. Some
round pieces of skull, like those of Lozère, have been picked up in
Umbria26; and a skull, bearing traces of an operation, the aim of which
was to remove a portion of the left parietal, was found in the Casa da
Mouva (Portugal), which dates, as do so many in France, from Neolithic
times.

Goss mentions a discovery in one of the pile-dwellings of Lake Bienne,
of a skull with a large hole in it with bevelled edges. There is no
trace of this wound having healed, and the patient had evidently died
soon after the operation.

The Prague Museum possesses two crania found at Bilin in Bohemia; one,
of a pronounced dolichocephalic type, has near the middle of the right
parietal an opening measuring one and a half by two and a third inches;
the cicatrization is complete, and trepanation was evidently performed
long before death. The other is mesaticephalic, and bears a round
opening about one and a half inches in diameter. Dr. Wankel, to whom we
owe these details, is well known through other discoveries; his
excavations in the Bytchiskala Cave brought to light the skeleton of a
young girl of ten or twelve years old, who bad undergone the operation
of trepanation. The wound, which was on the right side of the forehead,
was half healed. The child still wore the ornaments she had been fond
of in life—bronze bracelets and a necklace of large glass beads.

Discoveries of a similar character succeeded each other in Bohemia, and
in nearly every case the operation of trepanation had been performed on
the upper part of the forehead. Not very long ago it was reported to
the Anthropological Society of Berlin that in excavating two tombs
containing the remains of burnt bodies at Trüpschutz, on the west of
Brux, some fragments of skull were picked up, showing traces of
trepanation. The edges of the wound in this case bad been healed, and
the patient had lived on after the operation. Professor Virchow came to
the same conclusion with regard to a skull from a Neolithic tomb which
bore on the right parietal traces of an ancient cicatrized wound. He
also tells us of the finding in Poland of a round piece of skull which
had evidently been worn as an amulet.27

In the north of Europe similar discoveries have been made. At Borreby,
in Denmark, a skull was found from which large pieces had been taken;
and another from beneath a dolmen at Noes, in the island of Falster,
had a hole in it no less than two and a quarter by one and three
quarter inches in size. In the one case the holes were parts of a wound
to which the victim had succumbed; in the other the edges were too
regular to have been caused by traumatism. A Russian skull, a cast of
which has recently been presented to the Italian Anthropological
Society, bears traces of two trepanations; one performed during life,
the other after death. The former had evidently been caused neither by
illness nor by a wound.

General Faidherbe discovered at Roknia, in Algeria, two trepanned
skulls, dating from a remote antiquity, in one of which the wound is
half an inch in diameter, and shows no sign of cicatrization; and
travellers speak of evident traces of similar operations on skulls
dating from the time of the Aïnos, the ancestors or predecessors of the
Japanese at the present day; and if we cross the Atlantic, we shall
meet with instances of trepanations executed in a similar manner, and
probably for similar reasons.

We meet with numerous examples of trepanation in America, and fresh
discoveries are daily made by the energetic men of science in that
country. Dr. Mantegazza28 mentions three examples of trepanation from
Peru, which are of very great interest. One skull, still bound up in
many cloths, was found in the Sanja-Huara Cave (province of Anta),
which had been twice trepanned, and on which yet two more attempts at
trepanation bad been made. The latter seem to have taken place at
different times, and death seems to have succeeded the last operation.
Another skull which had belonged to an adult of Huarocondo has two
frontal openings close to each other; the upper, of elliptical shape,
is of large size and was evidently made after death. Yet another skull
from the province of Ollantay-tambo bears a double trepanation,
evidently made during life. The healing of the parietal opening proves
that it was made before the wound in the forehead, in which the edges
have remained rough. Dr. Mantegazza thinks that in the two first cases
the operations took place after the patient had been wounded, but that
in the third, the patient operated upon bad been epileptic or perhaps
even insane. We find it difficult to follow the learned professor here,
as w e are ignorant of the grounds for his conclusions.

We give an illustration (Fig. 81) of a trepanned skull found in a
cemetery in the Yucay valley. A square piece has been cut out by making
four regular incisions. The bone shows traces of an ancient
inflammation, and many eminent surgeons, including Nélaton and Broca,
have not hesitated to attribute the opening, large as it is (seven by
six inches), to a surgical operation. If the incisions are carefully
examined it is easy to see that they were made with the help of a
pointed instrument, such as a clumsily made drill, for instance. Each
incision must have taken a long time to make, and we note with ever
increasing astonishment that the ancient Peruvians were not acquainted
with the use of iron or steel, and that the hardest metal they employed
was bronze.

[Illustration: 81.]

Trepanned Peruvian skull.

A few years ago a sepulchre was opened at Chaclacayo, at the foot of
Mount Chosica, not far from Lima. In this tomb lay three mummies, of a
man, a woman, and a child. Near them lay a human skull, having about
the middle of the forehead an opening, measuring some two and a half by
two inches. It is of polygonal form, and eight different incisions can
easily be made out, which appear to have been made with some notched
stone implement. On raising a strip of skin, still adhering to the
skull, there was seen on the front part of the sagittal suture a very
small perforation, the result either of a wound or of an operation
which bad taken place during life. It has been suggested that the piece
of bone taken from the skull had been used to make a lance or
arrow-head, which was superstitiously supposed by the owner to ensure
his victory. This is, however, a mere suggestion, of which no proof can
be given.

In other party of America discoveries have been made of trepanned
skulls, supposed to date from even more remote times than those we have
just been considering. A few years ago Professor Putnam found, in the
State of Ohio, some old wells idled with cinders and rubbish of all
kinds. From one of them, which was deeper than the others, he took
several crania, some of which bore evident traces of trepanation. From
a mound near Dallas (Illinois) were taken more than one hundred
skeletons, all of adults, placed side by side in a crouching attitude.
Every one of them had a round opening on the left temple, and in some
of these wounds the flint implement which had produced them was still
imbedded. It is very evident that we have here tokens of some funereal
rite, the meaning of which is uncertain, though it was evidently
practised also in districts very remote from Illinois. To mention yet
other examples, the excavation of a tumulus of irregular form near
Devil’s River (Michigan) has brought to light five skeletons buried u
right, whilst a sixth lay in the centre of the tumulus, which was
evidently, if w e may so express it, the place of honor. On each of the
six crania a perforation had been made after death.

A number of crania and parts of crania on which trepanation had been
performed have also been taken from several mounds on Chamber’s Island,
from beneath the mound in the neighborhood of the Sable River, near
Lake Huron, and near the Red River29 Gillman thinks that the Michigan
trepanations, which bad been made with clumsy tools, were simply holes
for hanging up skulls as trophies, as is still customary amongst the
Dyaks of Borneo; but this seems scarcely a tenable hypothesis, for as a
rule the skeletons lying in their last home are complete. Quite
recently were discovered, beneath a tumulus near Rock River, eight
skeletons, the skull of one of which bore a circular perforation made
during life, which rather upsets Gillman’s theory.

But to resume our narrative. The trepanations reported from North
America are generally posthumous, and we can prove nothing as to their
origin. Were they marks of honor made in some religious rite? Were they
openings to allow the spirit of the departed to revisit the body it had
abandoned? or, to suggest a far more worldly and revolting motive, were
they merely holes through which to pick out the brains of the dead. A
missionary, in a letter dated from Fort Pitt (Canada) in 1880,
describes the mode of scalping practised by the Redskins, and says that
they often take a round piece of skull as well as the scalp. May not
this be a case of atavism, or the transmission of a custom from one
generation to another, for the origin of which we must go back to the
most remote ages? In the present state of our knowledge, insufficient
as it is, this explanation is the most plausible.

It is even more difficult to come to a satisfactory conclusion with
regard to European examples of the practice we have been describing.
Trepanation was certainly practised in the treatment of certain
diseases of the bone, such as osteitis or caries. Professor Parrot
mentions a case worth quoting.30 A few years ago several skeletons were
found at Bray-sur-Seine (Seine-et-Marne) with numerous objects, such as
polished stone hatchets, bone stilettos, shell necklaces and ornaments,
all undoubtedly Neolithic. One of the crania had been trepanned, the
position of the operation showing that its object had been to treat an
osteitis. The operation had succeeded, and the cicatrization of the
bones, both about the wound and in the parts originally affected, shows
that recovery was complete. This is the only example we have of an
operation executed with a view to curing a disease that can actually be
seen, and it enables us to conclude that these men, of whom we know so
little, had some notion of surgery. Were trepanations also practised to
cure epilepsy or to heal mental affections? From the earliest times the
seat of these troubles was always supposed to be the brain, and an
ancient book of medicine recommends as a remedy the scraping of the
outside of the skull.31 In a recent book (“De la Trépanation dans
l’Épilepsie par le Traumatisme du Crâne”), Echeverria mentions several
cases of cure by trepanation when epilepsy had been the result of an
injury. Observation may have led our prehistoric ancestors to discover
this. May we date this custom then from prehistoric times? It is very
difficult to decide with certainty either for or against it.

Of one thing, however, we may be quite certain. The cranial
perforations so much like one another reported from districts so remote
and different in character, cannot be accidental. It is impossible to
attribute to chance the occurrence of injuries of exactly the same size
in crania of totally different origins. Setting aside the Entre-Roches
skull, the antiquity of which does not seem to us sufficiently
established, we find this custom maintained throughout the period
characterized by the use of polished stone weapons and implements, the
erection of megalithic monuments, and the domestication of animals. It
was practised by the men of the cave of _L’Homme Mort_ at the beginning
of the Neolithic period, and was still in use at Moret when metals
began to be known. The discoveries of Dr. Wankel, the excavations of
the tumulus of Guisseny, prove that trepanation was continued
throughout the Bronze age, whilst the Jeuilly and Limet tombs show that
it was not discontinued even in Merovingian times.

The long continuance of such a practice is a very interesting fact, and
we may mention a yet more curious one. How are we to explain
trepanations that had no apparent motive on crania showing no symptoms
of disease? How account for the repetition at different tunes of this
operation, first on the living subject and then on the corpse, as at
St. Affrique, Bougon (Fig. 82), at Feigneux (Oise), where Dr. Topinard
has recently made excavations in a Neolithic cave and reports that a
dolichocephalic skull of the same type as the crania of the cave of
_L’Homme Mort_, belonging to a man of about thirty years of age, bore
two perforations, one made during life, the other after death? The
first measured two and a third by two and a half inches, and was
surrounded by scratches, showing how clumsy the operator had been.32

[Illustration: 82.]

Skull from the Bougon dolmen (Deux-Sèvres), seen in profile.

In nearly every case the subjects operated on were young, and long
survived the operation. The knowledge of this fact was from the first a
very useful guide in the study of the subject of trepanation, and
eagerly pursued researches constantly confirm it. One skull, for
instance, from the cave of _L’Homme Mort_ (Fig. 83), had a large
opening produced partly by an old operation and partly by two
posthumous trepanations. The subject had been trepanned in childhood or
early youth. There could be no doubt on that point; cicatrization had
been complete, the bony tissue having returned to its original
condition. Then after death, at an adult age, the relations or friends
of the deceased had cut out further round portions of the skull as near
as possible to the old wound, probably with a view to keeping these
pieces as amulets.

[Illustration: 83.]

Trepanned prehistoric skull.

This was to Broca a flash of illuminating light, and according to him
was in some cases a religious rite, a ceremony of initiation, perhaps
even a custom inculcated by an established religion. The child who had
been subjected to it and had survived—as probably most of the victims
did survive,—attained to a certain position and celebrity in his life,
and after his death the fragments of his skull, especially those
portions near the old wound, became treasured relics, and were in the
end buried with their fortunate possessor on his death.

This superstition appears to have long survived even in historic times,
and a Gallic chain is quoted33 on which hung a round piece of skull
with three holes in it. In. deed, these ornaments were so much sought
after that counterfeits of them were made; at least, we cannot in any
other way account for the occurrence of objects exactly resembling
round pieces of human crania, but in reality made out of pieces of a
stag’s antler found in the Baumes-Chaudes Cave.

Yet another point deserves mention. It was evidently considered
undesirable that the crania from which pieces had been taken should be
left in a mutilated condition, and therefore pieces front other crania
were taken to fill up the gap, so that, says Broca,34 a new life was
evidently supposed to await the dead, for otherwise what object can the
restitution have served?

Dr. Prunières is also of opinion35 that the introduction into the
crania of certain deceased persons of round pieces from other skulls
implies the belief in another life. This explanation, hypothetical as
it is, is really very plausible, and it is a pleasant thought that our
remote ancestors had faith in a future life; which faith is alike the
greatest honor and the greatest comfort of humanity. Is not yet another
more striking proof of the belief in a second existence to be found in
the number of objects placed in tombs at all periods of time and in
every part of the world? It is this belief, raising man as it does
above the material needs of his daily life, which forms the true
grandeur of the human race, and if a nation once loses it it is sure to
relapse into barbarism.

When trepanning was the fashion there is no doubt that the operation
was performed in many different ways. Posthumous trepanations were
accomplished with the aid of a flint implement used as a chisel or a
saw. There was greater difficulty about an operation on a living
subject. Broca is of opinion that it was done with a drill turned round
and round in the skull in the way the French shepherds still treat
diseases of the crania in their sheep. The elliptical form of the wound
seemed to him to prove this, and he was further of opinion that when an
opening had been drilled in the skull at the point chosen, the
trepanation was completed by scraping the bone with a small flint
blade.36 Discoveries made since the death of the great French
anthropologist, however, compel us to modify this opinion. The
inflammation of the bone noticed along the edges of the trepanation
proves that a notched implement was used to saw out the piece of
skull.37

However the operation may have been performed, it is not one of great
danger to the patient or of great difficulty to the operator.
Experiments on animals with Quaternary flint implements have always
been successful, and have had no tragic results, which is the best
proof we can possibly give.

The size of the perforations made varies ad infinitum. One, the largest
known, is described which is no less than sixteen inches in diameter.38
Examples are known of the trepanation of every part of the skull, even
of the forehead, which at one time was supposed to have escaped. We
have ourselves given instances of frontal trepanation, and Dr.
Prunières mentions eleven cases in which the forehead had been operated
on.

To conclude, we must repeat that trepanation is not really a dangerous
operation, and the reason it is nearly always followed by the death of
the subject in our own time is because it is never attempted except in
desperate cases, and the fatal result is really caused by the cerebral
disease, on account of which the operation was performed. History tells
us of its practice in very ancient times; Hippocrates speaks of it as
often resorted to by Greek physicians. It is performed in the present
day by the Negritos of Papua and the natives of Australia and of some
of the South Sea Islands, where it is considered efficacious in many
maladies. We also find it practised by the rough miners of Cornwall and
the wild mountaineers of Montenegro.39 An army doctor who travelled in
Montenegro a few years ago said that it was no rare thing to meet men
who had been subjected to trepanation seven, eight, or even nine times.
It is an interesting question, though we must not enter into it here,
whether many races could stand such a number of operations as this.

The only instance we know in the present day of trepanation practised
as a religious rite, is met with among the Kabyles, who are established
at the foot of Mount Aurès on the south of the Atlas. The operation is
performed among them by the _thébibe_, one of their priests, by the aid
of a simple gimlet which he turns rapidly round between his fingers.
Among the Kabyles are men who have submitted to an operation of this
kind several times.

We have now passed in review the weapons of prehistoric peoples, the
wounds they caused, and the modes of healing them known to our
ancestors; we have still to study the modes of defence resorted to by
them in face of the many dangers by which they were surrounded; but the
importance of this subject is such as to deserve separate
consideration.


1 Foureau, _Bul. Soc. Géog_., June 1, 1883.

2 Munck has just discovered a similar station at Oburg (Hainault),
where similar implements, produced by similar processes as those at
Spiennes, were discovered.

3 Briart, Cornet, and Houzeau: _Rapport sur les découvertes faites à
Spiennes en 1867_. Malise: _Bul. Acad. royale de Belgique_.

4 _Journal, Ethnological Society_, 1818, p. 419.

5 _Académie des Sciences_, Nov., 1883. _Mat_. Jan., 1884. Nature, June
18, 1887.

6 _Nature_, June 16, 1887.

7 Heilbig: “Osservazioni sopra il Commercio del l’Ambra” (_Acad. dei
Lincei_). We must not confound the yellow amber of the Baltic with the
red amber found in Italy, in the mountains of Lebanon, and even in some
lignites in the south of France. Sadowski: “Le Commerce de l’Ambre chez
les Anciens.”

8 Nephrite is found in Turkestan, in Siberia, and in New Zealand.
Deposits of jadeite are known in Burmah, Jeannetay, and Michel—“Note
stir la Néphrite ou jade de Sibérie” (_Bul. Soc. Minéralogique de
France_, 1881). Meyer: “Die Nephritfrage kein ethnologische Problem,”
Berlin, 1882.

9 Objects made of chloromelanite have been picked up in thirty-eight of
the departments of France. No deposit of it is known now.—Fischer and
Damour: _Rev. Arch_., 1877.

10 Obsidian is chiefly found in the mines and quarries of Terro de las
Navajas (Mexico), known in the time of the Aztecs. Deposits have also
lately been discovered in Hungary and the island of Melos.

11 Calaïte differs from the turquoise by an equivalent of aluminium; it
was described by M. Damour in 1864. It is said that traces of it have
been found in the tin mines of Montebras, which appear to have been
worked from prehistoric times.—_Mat_., 1881, p. 166, etc. Cartailhac:
_Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1881, p. 295.

12 Broca: “Les Ossements des Eyziès,” Paris, 1868.

13 Lartet and Chaplain-Duparc: “Une Sepulture des Anciens Troglodytes
des Pyrénées.”

14 _Bull. Soc. Anth_., 1878, p. 215. The Baumes-Chaudes caves are the
most complete charnel houses of Neolithic times yet discovered. Dr.
Prunières collected in them as many as three hundred skeletons.

15 “In a large proportion of the long barrows I have opened, the skulls
exhumed have been found to be cleft apparently with a blunt weapon,
such as a club or stone axe.”—_Archæologia_, vol. xlii., p. 161, etc.

16 Wilson: “Prehistoric Annals of Scotland,” 2d ed., vol. i., p. 187.

17 Keller: “Pfahlbauten,” _Siebenter Bericht, p_. 27, Zurich, 1876.

18 “Habitants Primitifs de la Scandinavie,” pp. 212 and 213.

19 “On the Occurrence of Fossil Bones in South America.”

20 _Journal Anthropological Society_, May, 1882.

21 Wyman: _Report Peabody Museum_, 1874, p, 40.

22 This skill was not always shown, for Dr. Topinard speaks of a femur
found at Feigneux which had been so clumsily set that one part greatly
overlapped the other.—Bul. Soc. _Anth., p. 534_.

23 _Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1883, pp. 258–301; 1885, p. 412. _Bul. Soc.
Polymatique du Morbihan_, 1883, p. 12.

24 _Nature_, January 2, 1886.

25 _Bul. Soc. Anth. de Lyon_, 1883–1884.

26 Belucci: _Congrès Préhistorique de Lisbonne_, 1880, p. 471.

27 “Uber trepanirte Schädel won Giebiechenstein” (_Verh. der Berliner
Gesellschaft für Anth_., 1879, p. 64).

28 _Matériaux pour l’Histoire de l’Homme_, Aout, 1886.

29 American Ass., Detroit, 1875, Nashville, 1877; “Ancient Men of the
Great Lakes” “Additional Facts Concerning Artificial Perforation of the
Cranium in Ancient Mounds in Michigan.” See also on this question
generally Fletcher “On Prehistoric Trepanning and Cranial Amulets,”
Washington, 1882.

30 _Bul. Soc. Anth_., February 17, 1881.

31 Jehan Taxil: “Traité de l’Épilepsie, Maladie Appalée Vulgairement la
Gouttète aux Petits Enfants.”

32 _Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1887, p. 527.

33 De Baye: “Trépanations Préhistoriques,” p. 28, fig. 11.

34 _Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1877, p. 42. Broca constantly dwells on this
idea. “This funeral rite,” he said, addressing the Anthropological
Society, “implies belief in another life.”

35 _Ass. Française_, Lille, 1874, p. 631.

36 _Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1864, p. 199.

37 _Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1882, pp. 143, 535.

38 _Ass. Française_, Blois, 1884, p. 417.

39 Boulogne: _Mém. de Médecine et de Chirurgie Militaires_, 3d series,
Paris, 1868. Védrénes: “Le Trépanation du Crâne” (_Rev. Anth_.,
October, 1886).



CHAPTER VII.
Camps, Fortifications, Vitrified Forts; Santorin; The Towns upon the
Hill of Hissarlik.


Combativeness, to use the language of phrenology, is one of the most
lively instincts of humanity. The Bible tells us of the struggle
between the sons of Adam, and shows us might making right ever since
the days of primeval man. History is but one long account of wars and
conquests, victories or defeats, and progress is chiefly marked in
inventions which made battles more sanguinary and added to the number
of victims slaughtered. At the very dawn of humanity man learned to
make weapons; very soon, however, weapons ceased to appear sufficient.
The first fortification was doubtless the cave, which its owner
strengthened by closing the entrance with blocks of stone and piles of
broken rock, or by digging deep trenches about it.

Population rapidly increased and war was declared between tribe and
tribe, nation and nation, race and race. Terrible must have been the
struggles between invaders and the original possessors of the soil.
Means of defence were multiplied to keep pace with new modes of attack,
and our ancestors of the Stone age were intelligent enough to make
places of refuge in which on necessity they could shelter their wives
and children, and later, when they became sedentary, their flocks and
their stores of grain. In many different localities we find the remains
of camps and fortifications, which, to avoid using a more ambitious
term, we may characterize generally as enclosures.1

These primitive enclosures, says Bertrand in his “Archéologie Celtiquc
et Gauloise,” may have been very much more numerous than is supposed,
if we include amongst them, as it appears we ought, many ruins long
thought to date from the Roman era.

There is no doubt as to the purpose served by the camps, but we are not
prepared to speak as positively as does Bertrand as to their origin,
and the difficulty of deciding is very greatly increased on account of
these camps having been successively occupied at different epochs by
different peoples. Bearing in mind this reservation, we will now sum up
to the best of our ability all that is so far known about the most
important remains hitherto examined.

The residence of prehistoric man in the rich districts between the
Sambre and the Meuse is proved by worked flints, fragments of pottery,
and human bones dating from most remote times. The stations
successively occupied were situated near watercourses or copious
springs, and, where possible, on isolated escarped plateaux surrounded
by ravines. Hastedon, about a mile and a quarter from Namur, is one of
the best examples we can quote.2 The camp, first made out in 1865,
formed a long square, covering some thirteen hectares, or about
thirty-two acres. It is situated on an isolated mound connected with
the main plateau by an isthmus 227 feet long, and is protected on the
south and west by a deep ravine: To these natural defences men had
added important works to those parts that were accessible. The cutting
of trenches a few years ago brought to light walls of a mean thickness
of more than nine feet, formed of masses of rock and sand and round
pieces of wood parallel with a _revêtement_ of dry stones surmounted by
a palisade consisting of three pieces of wood parallel with the walls,
and seven perpendicular traverses. All the wood was charred; the
besieged had evidently been driven out by fire. Excavations led to the
finding of Roman coins; this and the resemblance of the palisades to
those described by Cæsar,3 the very name of Hastedon, and the tradition
everywhere prevalent in the district, that this bad been the site of a
Gallic Roman camp, led to the general adoption of that opinion. In
fact, Napoleon III. actually ordered excavations to be made in the hope
of finding traces of the Atuatuques, one of the roost warlike of the
tribes of northern Gaul; but side by side with historic relics were no
less than ten thousand flints. These are chiefly merely chips or nuclei
which had served as hammers, or long thin slices, with some few arrow-
and lance-heads often skilfully cut, some polished hatchets, and saws
with fine teeth. Nearly all are notched and worn with use, which does
away with the idea that the place where they were found was the site of
a workshop such as I have already described. With these worked flints
were found some fragments of coarse pottery, which could not possibly
be confounded with Roman or Gallic work. The flints and pottery, and
the walls put together without cement, point to the conclusion that if
the camp of Hastedon was occupied by the Roman legions, it was long
previous to their day inhabited by some Neolithic race, ignorant of the
use of any but stone weapons and implements.

The camp of Pont-de-Bonn in the commune of Modave (Namur) very much
resembles in its arrangement that of Hastedon.4 A mound stands out upon
the plain protected on the north and west by rocks difficult of access
and connected with the main plateau by a very narrow tongue of land.
Outside we can make out regular trenches parallel with each other, and
connected by a wall of masonry, at the foot of which wall were picked
up a good many iron nails. Inside the _enceinte_ itself worked flints
were associated with Roman coins. Are not these proofs in the first
place of a long Neolithic occupation, then of the residence of Gallic
Romans, and yet later of even more modern people of whom the masonry
walls and iron nails are relics?

Limburg also contains some defensive works, many centuries old, which
are as yet but little known. We may mention amongst them the so-called
dyke of Zeedyck, near Tongres, a formidable intrenchment some 2,186
yards long by more than 325 feet wide at the base, and of a height
varying from 49 to 65 feet; the earthen ramparts of Willem on the
Geule, the not less important ones of Houlem, with many others far away
from the great highways of communication, but within the limits of the
two provinces of Liège and Limburg.5

A few years ago Bertrand said that there are in France some four
hundred earthen _enceintes_, only sixty of which contain relics
connecting them with the Gallic Romans. Since Bertrand’s announcement
this number has been greatly increased, thanks to eagerly prosecuted
local researches. De Pulligny mentions a hundred in Upper Normandy6;
Martinet says they are very numerous in Berry; one of the most
remarkable, the quadrilateral of Haute-Brenne, covered an area of
nearly three thousand acres.7 Amongst the forests on the Vosges
Mountains were discovered long single and double walls, the course of
which follows the crest of the ramparts overlooking the valley of the
Zorn, between Lutzelbourg and Saverne.8 At Rosmeur, on Penmarch Point
(Finistère), Du Chatellier excavated two tumuli which appear to have
been connected with a series of defensive works encircling the whole
promontory.9 It would be merely fastidious to multiply instances, we
will content ourselves with describing a few of the most interesting of
these antique fortifications.10

The camp of Chassey (Saône-et-Loire) may be compared with those of
Belgium. It is situated on a plateau 2,440 feet long by a width varying
from 360 to 672 feet. A huge natural rocky barrier rises on the south
and east, whilst on the northeast and southwest we find two important
intrenchments made of huge blocks of stone with a _revêtement_ of
earth. One of these intrenchments is 45, the other only 29 feet high.
There is no trace inside of springs, and the inhabitants must always
have had to obtain their water-supply by artificial means. The cisterns
now in this camp appear to have been dug out with iron implements, and
are certainly of later date than the first occupation of the plateau.
Numerous objects picked up in the Chassey Camp belong to Neolithic
times, but the people who have occupied it since those remote days, the
men of the Bronze and Iron ages, the Gauls, the Romans, and the
Merovingians, have so turned over the ground that products of
industries, completely strange to each other, are everywhere mixed
together in inextricable confusion.11

There were originally a good many hearths about the camp, and it was
near to one of them that the spoon was found, figured in an earlier
chapter of this book (Fig. 25). With it were picked up polished
fibrolite, basalt, chloromelanite, serpentine, and diorite hatchets;
evidently made in the neighborhood, as is proved beyond a doubt by the
numerous chips and partly worked pieces lying about, as well as the
discovery of no less than thirty polishers, many of them showing signs
of long service. Bone implements of all kinds and whistles made of the
phalanges of oxen are also constantly found. Even if the presence of
these objects does not enable us to come to any final conclusion, they
are at least most useful and interesting in enabling us to put together
little by little a picture of the life of the most ancient inhabitants
of France.

The camp of Catenoy, Dear Liancourt (Oise) is arranged very much in the
same manner as that of Chassey.12 _Cæsar’s Camp_, as it is called by
the people of the neighborhood, forms a long triangle, the apex of
which rests on the eastern extremity of the plateau. Excavations have
yielded a number of Gallic-Roman objects, with some polished hatchets,
some broken, others intact, with stone and bone weapons, resembling but
for a few slight differences those we have described so often. Numerous
fragments of pottery were also picked up, which pottery, hand-made and
mixed with crushed shells, seldom has either handles or any attempt at
ornamentation. Weapons, implements, and pottery are all alike totally
different from any Roman or Gallic work known. It is impossible to
study the relics at Catenoy without coming to the conclusion that the
camp was occupied at periods prior to Gallic and Roman times, and that
there, as in many other districts, the Latin conquerors had succeeded
an unknown vanquished race.

De Quatrefages has accurately made out a series of works extending
along the left bank of the Nive, as far as Itsassou, and of which the
Pas-de-Roland marks the extreme limit. A merely superficial examination
is enough to show that these defences existed only on the side to which
access would otherwise have been easy, while the height overlooking the
river on the other side, which is impregnable by nature, has been left
untouched. Here too we find the name Cæsar’s Camp given to the relics,
a fact of common occurrence all over France, where the great captain
was long held in honor. Quatrefages is, however, of opinion that the
works are neither Roman, Gallic nor Celtic, and he even arrives by a
process of elimination at the conclusion that they were erected by the
Iberians, who preceded the Aryans, and have left so deep an impress on
all the countries they successively occupied. We do not feel able to
accept entirely this hypothesis; but no suggestion of the eminent
professor must be overlooked by those who earnestly seek with unbiassed
minds to ascertain the truth.

Gregory of Tours relates that at the time of the invasion of the
Vandals, the Gabali took refuge with their families in the _Castrum
Gredonense_, and there, for two years, energetically resisted the
invaders.13 Grèze, now a little market town of the department of
Lozère, is the _castrum_ of which the old French chronicler speaks, and
Dr. Prunières there collected forty stone hatchets, differing in no
material respect from others found in such numbers elsewhere, with
flint knives and scrapers, bone stilettos, and millstones, doubtless
used for grinding grain, all of which are to the learned French
professor proofs of the existence there of a Neolithic station before
the historic period.

In the department of Alpes-Maritimes a series of defensive works crown
the circle of mountains which rise from the shores of the
Mediterranean. These intrenchments certainly date from a remote period,
though we cannot assign them to any definite time, and the fact that
they have been repaired at different epochs proves that they were
successively occupied.14 They consist principally of circular or
elliptical _enceintes_ surrounded by walls of stones without mortar,
and they vary in diameter from some 39 to 328 feet. One of the largest
is that on the Colline des Mulets, above Monte Carlo.

[Illustration: 84.]

Prehistoric spoon and button found in a lake station at Sutz
(Switzerland).

Although the pile-dwellings of Switzerland and of the _terremares_ of
Italy would appear to have been in themselves protection enough, their
inhabitants did not neglect other means of defence, from which we may
gather that they were engaged in constant and terrible struggles. The
_terremares_ were generally surrounded by a talus or rampart of earth,
with an external fosse which protected the approaches to the dwellings.
The rampart of Castione (Parma), which dates from the Bronze age, was
even strengthened inside with large timber caissons.15 In Switzerland,
some works recently undertaken to deflect the course of the Aar, on its
exit from Lake Bienne, have led to the discovery of a village of the
Stone age, with the bridges leading to it and the little forts intended
to protect it.16 As have the neighboring settlements, this station has
yielded a great many arrows, hatchets, scrapers, and harpoons. We give
an illustration of a curious marrow spoon, and of a round object which
seems to have been a button (Fig. 84), as they mark the progress made.

Great Britain is intersected by lines of fortifications of unknown
origin, but certainly of extreme antiquity. We may mention Dane’s Dyke,
Wandyke, the Devil’s Dyke at Newmarket, and Offa’s Dyke, running from
the Bristol Channel to the Dee, and dividing England from Wales.
Ancient camps and intrenchments, Sir John Lubbock tells us, crown the
greater number of the hills of England. General Pitt-Rivers explored
several of these camps in the county of Sussex. Many extend over
considerable areas, and all contain numerous worked flints and other
relics of prehistoric industry. These relics are met with in great
numbers at the base of the intrenchments, so that we may justly
conclude that they date from the same epoch.

The most celebrated of these camps is that of Cissbury, three miles
north of Worthing. We may also mention that of Hod-Hill in Dorsetshire,
which greatly resembles the one at Cissbury, but we will describe the
latter in some detail.17 It is situated on a somewhat lofty plateau of
irregular form, its site having been chosen with great skill as one
offering great facilities for defence. The earthen ramparts and the
fosses protecting them cover an area of sixty acres, and their
importance varies according to the relief of the ground; thus the
thickness of the walls is very much greater on the eastern side where
an attack would have been most fraught with danger; four doors give
access to the interior, and on each side of these doors are ruins of
rectangular structures strengthening their defence. Archæologists,
however, are of opinion that these redoubts, though their construction
is exactly similar to the rest of the fortifications, are of more
recent date. In fact Roman tiles have been found amongst the ruins, but
these really prove nothing, as every one is agreed that Cissbury was
occupied by the Romans after the subjugation of England by them; and
the only point at issue is really whether the walls of which the ruins
still remain date from the Roman period, or from times prior to their
arrival. We ourselves lean to the latter opinion, as drinking-water is
absolutely wanting; a very important point, as the Roman generals
always made it their first care to pitch their camps near a good
water-supply. On the western slope at Cissbury on each side of the
ramparts are fifty funnel-shaped depressions, some of which are as much
as seventy feet in diameter and twelve feet deep. These holes may have
served as refuges, and the larger ones were certainly lived in, as is
proved by the charred stones of the hearths and the pieces of charcoal
found near them; moreover, Tacitus18 tells us that the Germans lived in
similar habitations. Whatever, however, may have been their ultimate
use, these hollows were in the first place dug out with a view to
obtaining flints in the marly chalk forming the bill; and recent
excavations have revealed the existence of galleries connecting the
depressions. When they became later human habitations some of the
inside openings were blocked up with lumps of chalk, carefully piled up
so as to make entrance extremely difficult, greatly adding to the
security of the inmates.

Thirty of these shafts were excavated in succession; and amongst the
rubbish of all kinds with which they were filled were found some well
cut celts, showing no trace of polish, and some weapons or tools of the
Moustérien type. The number of half-finished implements, and the even
greater quantity of chips, points to these shafts having formed a
centre of manufacture. Many of the implements were made of stag-horn,
and amongst them we must mention some picks which, curiously enough,
exactly resemble those of Belgium and the south of France.19 Similar
wooden picks are found in the copper mines of the Asturias, in the salt
mines of Salzburg, and in a petroleum well recently opened on the
frontier between the United States and Canada. In all these localities
traces can be made out of ancient mining operations. But to return to
Cissbury: from amongst the prehistoric ruins there were also taken,
numerous fragments of pottery, not at all like Roman ware, with the
bones of the horse, goat, boar, and ox, all still represented in the
fauna of England; with oyster-shells, and the shells of both land and
sea mollusca, of species still to be found in Great Britain. But no
trace has so far been discovered of metals, and neither the flint
implements nor the bones of animals have any of the marks of rust so
characteristic of the Bronze and Iron ages. Must we not then conclude
that these shafts were sunk at a time long prior to the earliest
historic period?

The walls of the subterranean galleries of Cissbury bore not only
cup-shaped ornaments, strive, and curved or broken lines, recalling
those on the megalithic monuments of Scotland and Ireland; but Park
Harrison has made out some regular _runes_, or written characters, of
which a reproduction was shown at the Paris Exhibition in 1878. This
last fact is the more curious, as Sayce discovered in a passage giving
access to a cave near Syracuse some characters somewhat similar in
form, to which he assigns a proto-Phœnician origin. We may add that
certain characters made out at Cissbury, differing but little from the
modern letter _b_ or the figure 6, are also found in the most ancient
Palmyrian, Copt, and Syrian alphabets. Were this fact completely
established, still more, if it were corroborated by other analogous
facts, we should in it have a very valuable indication of the relations
of England with the most ancient known navigators.

Germany also contains some ancient fortifications, of which the most
remarkable are the _Heidenmauer_ of Saint Odila, near Hermeskiel,
between the Moselle and the Rhine. Huge stones, piled up without
cement, form a triple _enceinte_, but there is nothing to connect these
remains with prehistoric times. It is the same with the intrenchments
in the Grand Duchy of Posen, the existence of which was announced at a
meeting of the Anthropological Society of Berlin.20 Many of these
defensive works, notably those of Potzrow and of Zabnow, bad been
erected on piles. In the district between Thorn and the Baltic are
numerous mounds of the shape of a truncated cone, the platform of which
is surrounded by an embankment some 590 feet in diameter.21 Near many
of these were picked up many broken human bones, mixed together in the
greatest confusion with weapon, hatchets, and hammers, resembling
Neolithic types. Everything bears witness to the struggles of which
these mounds were the scene.

Similar relies of a past still obscure are met with in the south of
Europe. Cartailhac has brought into notice the _citanias_, which are
strange fortified towns in Portugal. On the plateau of
Mouinho-da-Moura, southwest of Lisbon, were found numerous polished
hatchets, associated with shells of marine mollusca and the bones of
mammals belonging to species still extant.22 This station was protected
by intrenchments of so great an extent that it has been impossible to
examine the whole of them. There are also near the same place several
caves, now nearly choked up. One of them was originally a regular
tunnel; the cutting leading to the entrance was made of earth and small
stones; it contained the bones of animals, some cinders, and four large
vases of coarse workmanship. It is difficult to make out what this cave
was used for, the great confusion in which the bones lay excluding all
idea of its having been a tomb. Ribeiro had already made out at Lycea
an intrenched camp protected by clumsily constructed walls. Inside the
_enceinte_ he picked up numerous fragments of ornamented pottery, with
polished hatchets, shells, and a good many bones of animals. He also
made out several sepulchres.23

[Illustration: 85.]

General view of the station of Fuente-Alamo.

The prehistoric station of _La Muela de Chert_ in Maeztrago reminds us
of those of Portugal. It is situated on a little eminence, protected on
the north and east by the natural escarpment of the plateau, and on
other sides by a wall of some height made of stones without mortar.
Some foundations of an oval shape, on which doubtless were built the
homes of the inhabitants, can be made out in the middle of the
_enceinte_. We can, however, but repeat here what we have said so often
elsewhere, that it is impossible to fix the exact date at which these
intrenchments were made. The discovery, however, of polished flint
hatchets, diorite lance-heads, and a few bones of ruminants and cerviæ
unknown in Spain in prehistoric times, would appear to point to a very
considerable antiquity. Lastly, two young Belgian engineers24 have
lately made out between Almeria and Carthagena a considerable number of
prehistoric stations in which can be traced successively the different
Stone ages and those of Copper and of Bronze. Several of these stations
(Fig. 85) are regular fortified camps, protected by thick stone walls
cemented with a thin layer of clay. The fire which destroyed the
habitations has left behind, beneath the ashes and cinders, numerous
objects, with the aid of which we are able to form a picture of the
life led by the men who built the fortifications, and we know that they
were agriculturists, for the very stores of grain have been found
charred and agglutinated by fire. In the more recent stations flint,
which was in the earliest time the one material used, has disappeared
and is replaced by the copper, of which a plentiful supply was found in
the rich mines riddling the mountains. Excavations have even brought to
light the workshop of the metallurgist, with its moulds and vases
converted into crucibles, its essays at new forms, its scoriae, and
lastly its finished weapons, showing real skill in their production.

Although it is impossible to assign to them a definite date, we must,
to make this part of our work complete, say a few words on the
earthworks met with in Roumania. A former minister of that
principality, M. Odobesco,25 classes them as _valla, tumuli_, and
_cetati de pamentu_ or citadels.

The _valla_ include important works. One of them cuts across Valachie
parallel with the Danube and loses itself in Southern Russia. Another
crosses the north of Moldavia and Bessarabia, following a direction
convergent with the former. These _valla_, although they are known in
the country in which they occur as _Fossés de Trajan_, are certainly of
earlier date than the Roman occupation, and in fact Roman roads cut
across the intrenchments or fosses which have been levelled or covered
over to make way for them. Excavations of the large tumuli are not yet
sufficiently advanced for us to hazard an opinion about them. The
smaller ones, however, are seldom of Roman origin. The funeral vases of
calcareous stone which they contain bear witness clearly enough to
their destination, and also to the rite with which they were connected.

The _cetati de pamentu_ are regular earthen fortifications set up
within short distances of each other on all the heights overlooking the
torrential rivers of Roumania. These intrenchments, generally of round
or oval form, are protected by deep fosses, parapets, and palisades.
Masses of cinders and burnt earth bear unmistakable evidence to the
cause of their destruction. All about, excavations have brought to
light coarse pottery, grindstones for crushing grain, stores of millet
which had been damaged by the flames, and a few primitively constructed
bronze idols. When the vanquished Roumanians were driven from their
intrenchments, they had evidently learned to use bronze, but were
still, as we have already remarked, unacquainted with iron, as no
object in that material has been found, nor does anything bear any
trace of rust.

Thus, throughout Europe, man, in the presence of the many dangers
surrounding him, endeavored in the very earliest times to protect by
similar means his family, his flocks, and his wealth. In America we are
able to quote facts of even more importance. The vast territory
comprised between the Alleghanies and the Rocky Mountains, between the
great lakes of Canada and the Gulf of Mexico, is intersected with truly
colossal fortifications, almost all of them made entirely of earth. The
ancient Americans knew how to protect every height and every delta
formed by the junction of two rivers with redoubts, walls, parapets,
fosses, and circumvallations. Not without astonishment we make out a
regular system of fortresses connected with each other by deep trenches
and secret passages, some of them hewn out beneath the beds of rivers,
observatories on the heights, and concentric walls, some actually
strengthened with casemates protecting the entrances. All these works
were constructed by the so-called Mound-Builders, of whose ancestors or
of whose descendants absolutely nothing is known.

All the strongholds of the Mound-Builders rise near abundant
watercourses, and the best proof that can be given of the intelligence
which guided their constructors in their choice of sites, is the fact
of the number of flourishing cities such as Newark, Portsmouth,
Cincinnati, Saint Louis, Frankfort, and New-Madrid, etc., which were
built upon the ruins of various earthworks.

It would take us too long merely to enumerate all the ancient
fortifications still existing in North America. Moreover they all
resemble each other so much that the description of a few of them is
really all that is needed to prove their importance.

Fort Hill (Fig. 5, p. 39) rises from an eminence overlooking a little
river called Paint Creek; the walls vary in height from eight to
fifteen feet, and exceed thirty feet in thickness.26 Several doors
facilitate entrance, and one of them leads to a square _enciente_, the
walls of which have been almost entirely destroyed. This enclosure
probably contained the homes of the people, which may have been mere
cabins of adobes or sun-burnt bricks, or buts covered with rushes,
interlaced branches, or the skins of animals; on this point we are
reduced to guesswork. In the centre of the principal enclosure can be
made out, in almost every case, several much smaller enclosures, each
containing in their turn one or more mounds. Some think these were
consecrated to religious rites, but this is a mere conjecture, for
nothing is really known of the form of government or of the religion of
the Mound-Builders.

Forest trees have grown up on these abandoned ruins, succeeding other
vegetable growths; the huge girth of the decaying trunks proving their
longevity. Man, impelled by motives we cannot fathom, had abandoned the
districts where everything bears witness to his power and intelligence,
and the vigorous vegetation of nature once more has it all its own way.

The most remarkable group of prehistoric fortifications in North
America is perhaps that near Newark, in the valley of the Scioto. It
includes an octagonal _enceinte_ eighty acres in area, a square
_enceinte_ of twenty acres, with two others, one twenty the other
thirty acres in extent. The walls of the great circle are still twelve
feet high by fifty feet wide at the base. They are protected by an
interior fosse seven feet deep by thirty-five feet wide. According to
measurements carefully made by Colonel Whittlesey,27 the total area
covered by these intrenchments is no less than twelve square miles, and
the length of the mounds exceeds two miles. The large entrances
protected by mounds thirty-five feet high, the avenues leading to them
which are regular labyrinths, the quaintly shaped mounds—one, for
instance, represents the foot of a gigantic bird—all combine to strike
the visitor with astonishment. We give a representation (Fig. 86) of a
group, not unlike that we have just described, which is situated at
Liberty (Ohio), and includes two circles and one square. The diameter
of the great circle is 1,700 feet, and it encloses an area of forty
acres, whilst that of the smaller _enceinte is 500_ feet; the area of
the square, each side of which measures 1,080 feet, is twenty-seven
acres. The walls are not strengthened by any ditch, and, contrary to
general usage, the earth of which they are made was dug out from the
inside of the _enciente_ itself. We may also mention Old Fort (Greenup
County, Kentucky, successively described by Caleb Atwater, Squier, and
J. H. Lewis. It is situated forty feet above the river, and the total
length of the walls exceeds 3,175 feet. Six entrances give access to
it, and in the centre rises a mound representing some animal, a bear
probably, measuring more than 105 feet. Several small mounds, beneath
which were found human bones, cluster about the larger one.

[Illustration: 86.]

Group at Liberty (Ohio).

[Illustration: 87.]

Trenches at Juigalpa (Nicaragua).

We must not omit to name an extraordinary system of intrenchments at
Juigalpa, in Nicaragua, which so far as I know is quite unique. This is
a series of trenches extending for several miles (Fig. 87), varying in
width from nine and a half to thirteen feet; at equal distances are
oval reservoirs, the longest axis of which measures as much as
seventy-eight feet. In each reservoir are two or four mounds, probably
serving as watch-towers. We know nothing either of the people who
erected these singular structures or of the enemy from whom they formed
a protection. Nor can anything be guessed as to the way in which the
defence was conducted. All is involved in obscurity, and at every turn
we are compelled to repeat that prehistoric studies are weighted with
uncertainty, long and arduous study being necessary to bring ever so
little order into the chaos in which everything connected with them is
involved.

We must cursorily refer to some other fortifications which really
scarcely belong to our subject, though certain archæologists claim for
them a prehistoric origin. We refer to the vitrified forts, which are
strange structures in which stones, such as granite and gneiss,
quartzite and basalt, have been subjected to a heat so intense as to
produce vitrification.

These vitrified forts are _enceintes_, generally of round or elliptical
form, carefully erected where they were most needed for defence, and
protected by one or more ramparts.28 The ramparts all bear traces of
vitrification, more or less complete, which has, so to speak, cemented
them together. The vitrification is very unequal, being complete in
some parts and scarcely noticeable in others. It is evident that the
builders did not know how to direct their fire uniformly.

Ever since 1777 vitrified forts have been known in Scotland, and until
1837 they were supposed to exist nowhere else. About that time,
however, Professor Zippe called attention to similar ruins in Bohemia,
and later it was announced that discoveries of the same kind had been
made in various parts of France, Denmark, and Norway. Virchow speaks of
the _Schlaken Wälle_, or ramparts of vitrified scoria, near Kern29 and
Schaafhausen, and gave an account of them at a meeting of German
naturalists at Ratisbon. It would be easy to multiply instances.
Vitrified walls are known in the Puy-de-Dôme, in which the facing is of
clay, and draught flues, for regulating and fanning the flames, have
been made out. At Castel-Sarrazin is a camp refuge with similar
dispositions,30 and recently Daubree presented to the Académie des
Sciences a piece of porphyry artificially vitrified from the
prehistoric _enceinte_ of Hartmannswiller Kopf in Upper Alsace.31

It is in Scotland, however, that are situated the most remarkable
vitrified forts. A few years ago no less than forty-four were counted.
The most celebrated are those of Barry Hill and Castle Spynie in
Invernesshire, Top-O-Noth in Aberdeen, and a small fort which rises
from a lofty rock in the midst of the Strait of Bute. Vitrified cairns
also occur in the Orkney Islands, notably on the little isle of Sanday,
but the most interesting structures of the kind are Craig Phœdrick and
Ord Hill of Kissock, which rise up like huge pillars on the hills at
the entrance of Moray Firth, at a distance of three miles from each
other.32

Craig Phœdrick is now covered with a luxuriant vegetation of broom,
furze, and fern, with groves of firs and larches, amongst which the
explorer makes his way with difficulty to the fortifications, or rather
to the piles of massive blocks to which that name has been given. These
blocks form an acropolis of oval form, the upper part of which is a
flat terrace encircling a central basin some six and a half to nine and
a half feet deep, which may be compared to the craters of the extinct
volcanoes of Auvergne. The sides of the mound are strewn with cyclopean
blocks of vitrified granite, which evidently originally formed part of
the fortifications. It is on the eastern side, overlooking the valley
of the Ness, that the buildings are of the greatest importance; two
terraces can be made out, the lower projecting beyond the upper,
forming a double series of almost perpendicular fortifications,
constructed of vitrified blocks cemented together with thin layers of
mortar, spread without any attempt at regularity. The blocks form, with
the mortar, a conglomerate so compact that when struck with a hammer
they break without separating. Examination of fragments under the
microscope prove that they have gone through important mineralogical
transformations, under the influence of what must have been an
extremely high temperature. The heat must have been indeed intense
which could cause mica to disappear entirely, and feldspar to melt
almost completely.

The hill known as Ord Hill of Kissock is crowned, as is Craig Phœdrick,
with ruins still standing, but the vegetation about them is so dense
and thorny that it is difficult to make out the condition of the
remains. The ruins, which can only be seen from one side, appear
however to have formed part of fortifications, dating from the same
time and serving the same purpose as those of Craig Phœdrick. Were they
forts? There is certainly no sign of their having been used as
habitations. Or were they, as some archæologists are disposed to think,
beacon houses used for warning the people of the approach of the Norman
pirates or Scandinavian Vikings, whose depredations were not
discontinued until the eighth century of the Christian era? Hypotheses
are always easy, but proofs of these hypotheses are difficult to find,
and we confess we have none to bring forward.33

Passing to France, we find the greater number of vitrified forts in the
Département de la Creuse. At Châteauvieux is an _enceinte_ of oval
form, 416 feet wide at its broadest part.34 An earthwork, 22 feet wide
at the base, serves as foundation to a wall, the outer and inner
portions of which consist of small granite stones, arranged in regular
layers. The space between the two series of small stones is filled in
with a sheet of melted granite, some twenty-four inches wide, resting
on calcareous tufa. The whole mass is completely vitrified, and regular
geodes or nodules lined with crystals and draped with pendent drops of
melted rock have been produced.

The ancient fortress of Ribandelle, of circular form, rises above the
Creuse, opposite Châteauvieux. It was successively occupied by the
Celts, the Romans, and the Visigoths, but we are unable to fix the date
of its erection or the name of the people who built it. There remain
but a few ruins at the present day, but we can make out in them the
same mode of construction as that followed at Châteauvieux. The walls
are faced with unhewn stones, the outer side of which still retains a
natural appearance, while the inner is corroded and disintegrated. In
the wall itself, separated from the facings by beds of peat mould, are
great blocks of vitrified granite. The traces of the action of fire are
specially noticeable in the upper part of the walls, so that they were
evidently finished when the fusion took place.

The site of the furnace in these forts is difficult to determine. It
was evidently not situated under any of the blocks, for the earthworks
on which they rest retain no traces of the action of fire. Nor was it
situated at the side, for the outer facings have retained alike their
original form and consistency. Nor can the furnace have been lit on the
blocks, as heat exercises its action by radiating in every direction.
We are therefore forced to the conclusion that the fire was spread with
the aid of spaces left in the inside of the construction at various
points, for the vitrified mass is divided into blocks, about nine and
three fourths feet long, at very short distances from each other.

These few examples will be enough to give some idea of the strange
vitrified forts. Many of them retain traces of Roman. occupation. The
Guéret Museum possesses a fragment from the Ribandelle walls in which a
Roman tile is completely imbedded; and M. Thuot picked up other tiles
in a similar condition amongst the ruins. This is a very decided proof
that the vitrification took place after the arrival of the conquerors
of Gaul. The weapons and tools discovered would appear to confirm this
idea, and to suggest similar explanations of vitrification elsewhere.
If so, we shall have to admit that vitrified forts date from the
earliest centuries of the Christian era, and are not prehistoric at
all. We have, however, noticed them here on account of the grave doubts
in the matter, and because they furnish a striking and valuable
illustration of the relations existing from the most remote tunes
between widely separated races, and maintained until the present time.
In no other way can we account for the practice of the extremely
difficult and complicated operation of the vitrification of bard rocks
in districts so far apart as Norway and Scotland, Germany and the
midlands of France.

The more we think of the difficulties vitrification presents, the
greater is our astonishment. How was the fusion achieved of elements so
refractory alike in their structure and in the resistance offered by
accumulated masses of material? By what processes was heat brought up
to the 1300 degrees necessary for the fusion of granite? The
incineration and fusion of the materials of which the vitrified forts
are made, especially the granite ones of La Creuse and the Côtes du
Nord, bear witness, says Daubrée, to a surprising skill and knowledge
of the management of fire in those who burned them, but these qualities
were manifested also in extremely ancient metallurgical operations. It
is quite impossible to suppose the vitrification to have been the
result of a conflagration. No fire, whether accidental or the work of
an incendiary, could be powerful enough to produce such results. The
use of petroleum in the most terrible conflagrations of our own
time—those of the Commune in 1871, for instance—did calcine and
disintegrate stone, but I know of no case of vitrification.

The Keramic Museum of Sèvres contains several specimens which present
very notable differences to each other. Those from Château-Gontier are
formed of very close-grained quartzite granite of a greenish color
streaked with black. The conglomerate welding there together is a
vitrified scoria full of very small bubbles made by the escape of gas
which had not had sufficient strength to get out. The block from
Sainte-Suzanne (Mayenne) consists of quartz mixed with half calcined
grains of feldspar, bleached by the action of fused glass, which once
introduced filled up as it congealed all the vacant spaces with a
vitreous substance of light greenish-white color. The fractures are
green and bright, and are dotted with white points, which are all that
is left of the stones after their disintegration in the grip of a heat
that was alike intense and rapid in its action. The fragments brought
from Scotland differ from those just described. They consist of small
pieces of granite completely merged in a thick paste with which they
form the mass, the whole breaking together when it does break; and the
melted matter seldom has any bubbles in it.35

The process employed in cementing the materials of the vitrified forts
was then perfectly unique. The processes employed to obtain the
necessary heat varied according to circumstances and according to the
nature of the materials used. At Sainte-Suzanne and at La Courbe marine
salt was used as a flux. Captain Prévot36 thinks that the walls were
smeared with a coating of clay, and that as in the baking of bricks
spaces were left between so as to produce more intense heat. M. de
Montaiglon is of opinion that the buildings were in the first instance
erected without the use of any calcareous or argillaceous material, and
that glass in a state of fusion was poured over them afterwards, this
glass consolidating them and forming with them one indestructible mass.
M. Thuot seems much disposed to share this last opinion, but he thinks
that some chemical materials such as soda or potash were also used. Yet
one other possible solution may be mentioned, a solution which is
becoming more and more generally accepted, namely that the granite was
not after all really melted, but that the vitrification should either
be attributed to the fusion of the argillaceous mass, which has been
subjected to an igneous transformation, such as that which often takes
place in furnaces for baking bricks and in lime-kilns.37

Whatever explanation we may accept, however, the processes employed
certainly bear witness to a much more advanced state of civilization
than was acquired in the earliest ages of humanity. We have been led by
the great interest and mystery of the subject to dwell longer on it
than we intended, and we must hasten to return to prehistoric times
with a determination not to transgress again.

Fortifications are a proof of combined action leading to a common end;
they imply social organization, chiefs to command, workmen to obey. A
recent discovery enables us to form a very accurate picture of
prehistoric men gathered together not only for purposes of defence, but
in a society already rich, industrious, and, if we may so speak,
learning to cultivate the arts of peace.

The Ægean Sea has ever been the theatre of igneous phenomena, and the
three little islands of Thera, Therasia, and Aspronisi, which shut in
the Bay of Santorin, are built up chiefly of volcanic materials.38 In
1573 an eruptive cone suddenly appeared; in 1707 the inhabitants of
Santorin saw rise up a short distance from their shores a rock that
increased in size for several days and then suddenly split up. This
splitting up was succeeded by a great eruption of incandescent
materials; an eruption which lasted for no less than five years,
forming at the end of that time an island some 400 feet high by 3,279
feet in circumference. In 1866, after many violent shocks of
earthquake, the ground was rent asunder on this island and masses of
volcanic matter were belched forth, whilst on the other side of the
island the soil sank to such a degree that canoes were used to get to
houses which but the day before were nine feet above the sea-level.
This eruption went on until 1870, and the quantity of scoriæ vomited
forth during its continuance welded three islets, which had hitherto
been separate, to the principal island, of which they now form part. On
entering the Bay of Santorin we see on every side banks of lava, beds
of scoriæ, and piles of cinders of a purplish-gray color rising in
cliffs to a height of more than 1,312 feet. All these materials are the
result of innumerable eruptions, and the central crater of the volcano
is probably situated about the middle of the bay. It is supposed that
at one time a conical mountain, from 1,958 to 2,600 feet high, rose
where soundings now give a depth of water of over 1,300 feet. A sudden
break up of the mountain probably produced this abyss, and formidable
eruptions have led to the pouring forth of immense quantities of
pumice-stone. The three islets mentioned above would be the remains of
the old central cone, and a bed of pumice-stone from 98 to 131 feet
thick is spread over the whole of their surface, telling of a violent
cataclysm of which neither history nor tradition has preserved the
memory.

The letters of Pliny the Younger39 say that the eruption of Vesuvius
which caused the destruction of Portici lasted five days, and we know
that the houses are covered with a uniformly distributed bed of
pumice-stone some thirteen feet thick, and of cinders about three feet
thick. Everything points to the conclusion that a very similar
catastrophe overtook Santorin; there too whole villages were buried
beneath cinders, stones, and molten lava, belched forth by a volcano in
action; there too men were the witnesses and the victims of the
eruption, as is proved by an accidental circumstance which took place
some twenty-three years after.40

The removal of the _pouzzolana_, so called after the volcanic ashes of
Pozzuoli in Italy for the works on the Isthmus of Suez, necessitated
important excavations, and the cuttings revealed the existence of
dwellings which had been bidden away from the light of day for many
centuries. The masses of rubbish hiding these prehistoric ruins were
some sixty-five feet high, and consisted chiefly of volcanic ashes
piled up, for some accidental reason, in comparatively modern times.
Beneath the _pouzzolana_ a thin layer of humus contains fragments of
pottery of Hellenic origin; which marks the close of the historic
period, and covers over the mass of pumiceous tufa vomited out by the
volcano. It was in this tufa, which is eight feet thick, that the first
signs of buildings were discovered. Further excavation brought to light
two houses with doors, windows, and bearing walls. In one of these
houses there were five different rooms. Other discoveries rapidly
succeeded each other, alike in the island of Therasia and at Acrotiri,
the principal island, which has given its name to the group. The plan
of these houses is an irregular parallelogram, the angles of which are
rounded and the sides more or less curved. This arrangement differs
greatly from that adopted in Greece as well as from that in use at
Therasia after the time of the volcanic eruptions. The houses too are
quite different in their mode of construction. The walls consist of
great blocks of lava placed one above the other, without any trace of
cement or of lime, and are merely kept in place by a reddish earth
mixed with chopped straw or marine algae. Large branches of olive or
cypress trees, still with the bark on, are imbedded in the masonry.
These pieces of wood, the size of which varies considerably, were
probably added to give the necessary solidity to the walls in the
numerous earthquakes, the disastrous effects of which were only too
well known to the ancient inhabitants of Santorin. It is curious and
interesting to note the use of the same expedient among the inhabitants
of the islands of the Archipelago who are still exposed to the same
danger. The doors and windows are clumsily arched, and the roof seems
to have been a low vault. It was made of stones and coated with clay
and supported by the trunks of olive trees, the charred remains of
which lay upon the floors of the crushed homes. These trunks show no
sign of having been touched with metal tools; not a metal nail or clamp
has been found, and we cannot but conclude that the remains belong to
the age when stone alone was employed.

The inside walls were not glazed or decorated in any way, except in one
instance, that of a house at Acrotiri, from which the rubbish has been
cleared away, revealing on the walls a layer of lime on which was some
colored ornamentation which still retained an extraordinary brilliancy
when it was discovered.

In all the houses and in every room of each were found beneath the tufa
burying them masses of lava and volcanic scoriae, forming a most
eloquent witness of the cause of their destruction. Near one of the
houses of Therasia is a little cylindrical structure, about three feet
high; which cannot have been a well, as it rests directly on
impermeable lava, and was certainly not a cistern, as it is too small
for that. May it, as some think, have been an altar? We cannot tell,
and though the religious sentiment was probably no more absent among
these primitive races than it is among the barbarous peoples of our own
day, it does not do to express an opinion in the absence of positive
proof.

Successive excavations have yielded a number of objects which throw a
new light upon the manners and customs of the inhabitants. Terra-cotta
vases are more numerous than anything else (Fig. 88), and among them
preponderate large yellow vessels capable of holding about one hundred
quarts. Most of them have a clumsy brim, and a rough attempt has been
made at ornamentation by the potter with his fingers on the damp clay.
Other vases of finer clay, colored red or yellow, are covered with
ornaments and graceful arabesques; the garlands of fruit and flowers
are often of remarkably beautiful workmanship. Cups with well-shaped
rounded handles, made of some kind of red ferruginous earth, others of
gray material, were picked up in all the houses. These various vessels
were used for many different purposes; some to cook food, the marks of
the hearth being still on them, whilst others retained some of the
chopped straw with which the domestic animals had evidently been fed.
The most curious of all are those which are supposed to represent a
woman; the front part projecting and surmounted by a narrow neck bent
backwards, with two brown prominences supposed to stand for breasts,
and dots round the upper part representing a necklace, while ear-rings
are indicated by elliptical bands of different colors. We shall have to
refer again to these curious vases when we speak of the discoveries
made at Troy; we need only add now that the pottery found at Santorin
differs completely, alike in form and ornamentation, from the Greek,
Phœnician, and Etruscan specimens, of which the museums of Europe
contain so many. They are evidently therefore not of foreign origin,
but of native manufacture. The absence of clay in the island of
Santorin has thrown some doubt on this, however, but the researches of
M. Fouqué have revealed the former existence of a large valley, at the
base of the principal cone, which valley ran down to the sea-shore near
the island of Aspronisi; and in which probably was found the clay which
the potters of the district soon learned to turn to account.

[Illustration: 88.]

Vases found at Santorin.

With these vases were found some troughs for holding crushed grain, and
lava discs very much like those still in use among the weavers of the
Archipelago to stretch the woof of their tissues; skilfully graduated
lava weights, the correlation of which is very evident, as they weigh
8, 24, and 96 ounces; a flint arrow-head and a saw of the same material
with regular teeth; together with a great variety of other objects,
including many obsidian arrows and knives, reminding us in their shape
of those characteristic of the Stone age in North Europe.

Two rings of gold beaten very thin, and a little copper saw with no
trace of any alloy, are, so far, the only metal objects found in the
excavations. The origin of the former, moreover, is very uncertain, and
there has been much discussion as to where the rings came from. In
spite, however, of all the gaps in the evidence about them, there
remains no doubt that the inhabitants of Santorin were farther advanced
in civilization than the Lake dwellers of Switzerland, the builders of
the _terremare_ of Italy, or the Iberians of the south of Spain, who
were very probably their contemporaries; and we cannot refrain from
expressing our admiration of the wonderful progress made by the
inhabitants of the little group of volcanic islands under notice.

Before the catastrophe which overwhelmed them, Santorin was covered
with comfortable and solidly built houses. Men knew how to till the
ground, and gathered in crops of cereals, among which barley was the
most abundant, then millet, lentils, peas, coriander, and anise; they
had learned to domesticate animals, as is proved beyond a doubt by the
number of bones of sheep and goats; they kept dogs to guard their
flocks, and horses to aid in agricultural work; they knew how to weave
stuffs, to grind grain, to extract the oil from olives, and even to
make cheese, if we may give that name to the pasty white stuff found at
the bottom of a vase by Dr. Nomicos. They were acquainted with the
arch, and they used durable and brilliant colors. The copper saw is an
example of the first efforts of the natives at metallurgy; the gold and
obsidian which were foreign to the island bear witness to commercial
relations with people at a distance. They loved art, as proved by the
shape of their vases and the ornamentation on many of them, which is
really often worthy of the best days of Greece. All around we see signs
appearing as it were suddenly of a civilization, the origin and
tendencies of which are alike still unknown.

But one human skeleton has so far been found in Santorin, and that is
of an inhabitant who had evidently been overtaken in his flight and
crushed beneath the burning scoriæ from the volcano. This man was of
medium height, and is supposed to have been between forty and
forty-eight years old. The bones of the pelvis are firmly consolidated,
and the teeth are worn with mastication.

Let us endeavor to guess at the period when the people of Santorin
lived. De Longpérier tells us that vases similar to those left by them
are represented on the tomb of Rekmara amongst the presents offered to
Thothmes III., who lived in the eighth century B.C., but if so the
people of Santorin appear to have borrowed nothing in their intercourse
with Egypt. The first invasion of Greece by the Phœnicians is supposed
to have been in the fifteenth century B.C., but the buildings, the
pottery, and the various implements of Therasia and Acrotiri differ
essentially from those of the Phœnicians, who, moreover, from the
earliest times, used metals. Must we not therefore conclude that the
catastrophe which overwhelmed Santorin took place before the fifteenth
century B.C.? Conjectures as to the date of the fatal eruption, however
plausible, are of no use in anything relating to the origin of the
people, or the time of their first occupation of the island. On these
points all is still hopeless confusion, and we must wait for further
discoveries before we can hope to come to any conclusions in the
matter.

We have gone back to the very earliest days of man upon the earth; we
have shown that he was the contemporary of the mammoth and the
rhinoceros, of the cave-lion and the cave-bear; we have seen him
crouching in the deep recesses of his cave and fighting the battle of
life with no weapon but a few scarcely sharpened flints, leading an
existence infinitely more wretched than the animals about him. Not
without emotion have we watched our remote ancestors in their ceaseless
struggle for existence; not without emotion have we seen them gradually
growing in intelligence and energy, and attaining by slow degrees to a
certain amount of civilization. Santorin is a striking and brilliant
proof of their progress, and we shall appreciate this progress yet more
when we have examined the ruins piled up on the hill of Hissarlik.
There we shall close this portion of our work, for from the time when
the buildings of which these remains were the relics met their doom,
the use of metals, copper, bronze, gold, silver, and iron became
general. History began to be written, and it is her task to tell us of
the migrations of races, the early efforts of historic, races, the
foundation of empires. In a word, the prehistoric age was over; that of
self-conscious portraiture was now to begin.

A few years ago I was on the ancient Hellespont and my
fellow-travellers, grouped about the deck of our vessel, were trying to
make out on the receding coast of Asia the sites of Troy and of the
tumuli which were then still supposed to have been the tombs of
Achilles, Patrokles, and Hector, but which are now, thanks to the able
researches of Dr. Schliemann, known to belong to a comparatively modern
epoch. The streams, bearing the ever memorable names of Simoïs and
Scamander, were also eagerly pointed out by the watchers, recalling the
words of Lamartine:

Le nautonnier voguant sur les flots du Bosphore
Des yeux cherchait encore
Le palais de Priam et les tours d’Ilium.

Great indeed is the privilege of genius, immortalizing all that it
touches; for it must be pointed out that Troy was never an important
town, and the war in which it disappeared was in reality but one of the
incessant struggles between the petty princes of Greece and Asia.

When I visited the East, scholars were not at all agreed as to the site
of the town which was so long besieged by the Greeks; and certain
sceptical spirits even went so far as to deny that there ever was such
a person as Homer at all, or that if there were, he wrote the epic poem
which has borne his name so long. Tradition, however, was pretty
constant in pointing to the hill of Hissarlik as the site on which Troy
was built. Strabo was quite an exception in relegating the town to the
lower end of the bay; where the miserable little village of Akshi-koi
now stands. In 1788 a new idea was started; Lechevalier in his account
of his journey in Troas claims to have recognized the site of Troy at
Bunarbashi. At that time erudition was not very profound, and
Lechevalier’s site was accepted; indeed it was long maintained, and
quite recently it has been defended by Perrot. But the nineteenth
century is more exacting; the most plausible hypotheses are not enough
without facts to support them, and excavations at Akshi-koi and at
Bunarbashi show that there never was a town on either of these sites.

Excavations on the hill of Hissarlik, begun by Dr. Schliemann in 1871,
and carried on under his superintendence for more than ten years, have,
on the contrary, yielded most definite, satisfactory, and conclusive
results. At a depth of fifty-two feet the diggers came to the virgin
soil, a very hard conchiferous limestone. The immense masses of
_débris_ of which the embankment is made up date front different
epochs; we have before us, if we may use such an expression, a
perpendicular Pentapolis or series of five ancient cities one above the
other. One town was destroyed by assault and by fire; another rapidly
rose from its ruins, built with stones taken front the midst of those
very remains. The study of the piled-up rubbish enables us to build up
again a picture of the remote past with all its vicissitudes, and
Virchow may well say that the hill of Hissarlik will for ever be
considered one of the best authenticated witnesses of the progress of
civilization.41

The first layer of rubbish rests on the rock itself, and may very well
have belonged to the town built by Dardanus, of which Tlepolemus
relates the destruction by his grandfather Hercules.42 According to the
Homeric story six generations, and according to generally accepted
modern calculations two centuries, separate Dardanus from Priam. If
therefore we accept 1200 B.C. as the date of the Trojan war, the town
built by Dardanus would date from 1400 B.C., and we should possess
data, if not absolutely certain, at least approximately so.43

There remain but a few relics of the buildings erected by the first
inhabitants of the bill of Hissarlik, which relics consist of great
blocks of irregular size, with remains of bearing walls composed of
small stones cemented together with clay and faced with a glaze which
has withstood the wear and tear of centuries.

The second town, which would appear to have been that described in the
Iliad, was probably built by a race foreign to those who erected the
first. The hill, which was to become the Acropolis of the new town, was
surrounded by the new-comers with a wall several feet thick, of which
the foundations consisted of unhewn stones; whilst the upper part was
made of artificially baked bricks, the baking having been done after
they were put in place, by large fires lit in vacant places left at
regular intervals; an arrangement recalling what we have said in
speaking of vitrified forts.44 It is also interesting to note a similar
mode of construction at Aztalan in Wisconsin in structures which
probably date from the time of the Mound Builders. The walls at
Hissarlik were protected by re-entering angles and projecting forts.
The interior of the _enceinte_ was reached by three doors, and it is
still easy to make out the ruins of the different buildings. A room
sixty-five feet long by thirty-two wide is surrounded by very thick
walls, and towards the southeast is a square vestibule, opening into
the room by a large door.45 These, Dr. Schliemann thinks, were the
_naos_ and _pronaos_ of a temple dedicated to the tutelary gods of the
town. Quite close to them is another building with similar
dispositions; a square vestibule giving access to a large room, which
in its turn leads to a smaller apartment. These two buildings, which
are reached through a _propylæum_, are the only ones of which the
explorers have been able to make out the measurements with any
exactitude.

Other ruins are evidently remains of the royal residence. The homes of
the people were clustered on the sides and at the foot of the hill.
After the destruction of the town by the Greeks, the Acropolis formed
one vast mass of ruins, from which bits of walls stood out here and
there as mute witnesses of the catastrophe. The thin layer of black
earth covering the ruins seems to point to the speedy rebuilding of the
town. The houses of the third settlement are very irregularly grouped,
and consisted mostly of one story only, containing a number of very
small rooms. Some of the walls are of bricks with glazed facings,
others of very small stones cemented together with clay. In one house
of rather larger size than the others was found some cement made of
cinders, mixed with fragments of charcoal, broken bones, and the
remains of shells and pottery. On the northwest the new colonists
erected walls in place of those which had fallen down, but they were of
very inferior masonry, coarse bricks baked on the spot, in the way
customary among the Trojans, having formed the material.

The destruction of the third town was more complete than that of Troy.
The walls of the houses can still be made out rising to a certain
height, and it was upon them as foundations that the fourth colony set
up their abodes. These dwellings are smaller still, with flat roofs
formed of beams on which was laid a coating of rushes and clay. Every
generation appears to have been poorer than the last, alike in material
wealth and in fertility of resource.

The fifth colony spread northwards and eastwards. Their homes were
built very much in the same style as those of their predecessors. The
resemblance does not end there, and Dr. Schliemann notes that among the
ruins of the three towns, which successively rose from the site of
Troy, are found similar strange-looking idols, hatchets in jade,
porphyry, diorite, and bronze, goblets with two handles, clumsy stone
hammers, trachyte grindstones, and fusaïoles or perforated whorls
bearing symbolic signs of a similar form. Evidently the men who
succeeded each other after the great siege of Troy on the now
celebrated hill of Hissarlik belonged to the same race, perhaps even to
the same tribe. There are, however, certain notable differences which
must not be passed over. The later pottery is not of such fine clay or
so well moulded as the earlier specimens, nor are the stone hammers,
which appear to have been the chief implements used, of such good
workmanship. The piles of shells left to accumulate about the houses of
the fourth and fifth towns can only be compared to the kitchen-middings
so often referred to, and there is no doubt that those who left such
heaps of rubbish about their dwellings could not have been so civilized
as were the celebrated Trojans.

Beneath the ruins of the Greek town, which strictly speaking belongs to
history, Schliemann found a quantity of pottery of curious shapes and
very different to anything he had previously discovered. He ascribes
them to a Lydian colony which dwelt for a short time upon the hill.
This pottery resembles that known as proto-Etruscan, of which so many
specimens have been found in Italy. Probably the makers of both were
contemporaries.

By numerous and careful measurements Dr. Schliemann has been able to
determine exactly the thickness of the layers, which correspond with
the different periods during which Hissarlik was inhabited. The remains
of the Greek and Lydian towns extend to a depth of 7½ feet beneath the
actual level of the soil; the fourth layer, from 7½ to 15 feet; the
third, from 15 to 22½ feet; Troy itself, from 22½ to 32 feet; and
lastly Dardania, from 32 to 52 feet. The last layer carries us back to
the golden age of Greek art, where all doubt is finally at an end. The
bas-reliefs of remarkable workmanship bear witness to the Ilium,
founded in memory of Troy. This is the town visited by Xerxes,
Alexander the Great, and Julian the Apostate.46 That the town still
existed about the middle of the fourth century is proved by medals
taken from the ruins, but it evidently fell into decadence soon after
that time, for its very .name was forgotten by history, and it was
reserved for our own time to resuscitate the ancient city of Priam and
its successors from the ruins which lead been piled up by the
destructive hand of man and by the lapse of tinge. But this task has
been nobly achieved by the enthusiasm, scientific acumen, and we may
perhaps add good-fortune of an archæologist who cherished a positive
passion for everything relating to Homeric times.

The number of objects picked up at different stages of the excavations
was very considerable. Dr. Schliemann neglected absolutely nothing that
appeared to him at all worthy of his collection, which now belongs to
the Royal Museum of Berlin and contains some twenty thousand objects,
including weapons and implements, some of stone, others of bronze, and
thousands of vases and fusaïoles, gazing upon which we see rise before
our eyes a picture of a civilization unknown before but through the
Iliad and a few meagre historical allusions.

Before we note in detail the most remarkable of the objects in Dr.
Schliemann’s collection, we must add that recent researches have also
brought to light the remains of a little temple dedicated to Pallas
Athene and referred to in history, as well as those of a large Doric
temple erected by Lysimachus, and of a magnificent theatre capable of
holding six thousand spectators, and which probably dates from the end
of the Roman Republic. The human bones picked lip among the ruins of
the different towns play be attributed to the practice, already
general, of cremation. Virchow has examined the skull of a woman found
at Troy, which is of a pronounced brachycephalic type (82.5). The
crania from the third town, on the other hand, are dolichocephalic, the
mean cranial capacity being sixty-seven. If we could reason with any
certainty from cranial capacity, this would appear to point to a
different race, but it would not do to come to any positive conclusion
with only one Trojan cranium to judge by.

[Illustration: 89.]

Vase ending in the snout of an animal. Found on the hill of Hissarlik
at a depth of 45½ feet.

But to return to Dr. Schliemann’s fine collection. The pottery from the
first town, found at a depth of from thirty-two to fifty-two feet (Fig.
89), is superior alike in color, form, and construction, to the keramic
ware of the following periods. The potter’s wheel was unknown, or at
least very rarely used,47 and pottery was hand made and polished with
bone or wood polishers, the marks of which can still be made out. The
forms are varied and often graceful, many of them, as do those found in
the mounds of North America imitating those of the animals among which
the potters lived. The usual color of the keramic ware is black, some
times decorated with white lozenge-shaped ornaments. Some vases have
also been found colored red, yellow, and brown, and even decked with
garlands of flower and fruit, as are some of those of Santorin. We must
also mention some apodal vases, and others with three feet, used for
funeral purposes, containing human ashes (Fig. 90). The terra-cotta
fusaïoles, found in such numbers among the ruins of the towns that rose
successively from the hill of Hissarlik, are, on the other hand, rare
at Dardania, if we may retain that name.48

[Illustration: 90.]

Funeral vase containing human ashes. Found at a depth of 50 feet.

Excavations have brought to light more than six hundred celts or
knives, generally of smaller size than those found in Denmark or
France. Rock of many kinds, including serpentine, schist, felsite,
jadeite, diorite, and nephrite, were used; and saws of flint or
chalcedony, some toothed on one side only, others on both, are of
frequent occurrence. They were fixed into handles of wood or horn, and
kept in place with some agglutinative substance, such as pitch, several
of them still retaining traces of this primitive glue. We must also
mention awls, pins of bone and ivory, and ossicles or knuckle bones, in
every stage of manufacture, confirming the accounts of Greek
historians, who tell us of the great antiquity of the game played with
them. The Dardanians used wooden and bone implements and weapons almost
exclusively. It is impossible to say whether they were acquainted with
the use of metals, but we might assert that they were if we could quite
certainly attribute to them a certain mould of mica schist, found at a
depth of 45½ feet, which bad been used in the process of casting spits
and pins, which are supposed to be of more ancient date than the
fibulæ.

[Illustration: 91.]

Large terra-cotta vases found at Troy.

[Illustration: 92.]

Earthenware pitcher found at a depth of 19½ feet.

[Illustration: 93.]

Vase found beneath the ruins of Troy.

The most valuable objects of the collection come from the deposits
representing the town of Troy; they are all twisted, broken, and
charred, bearing witness to the fierceness of the flames in which the
town perished. These discoveries reveal to us the daily life of the
people of Troy. Judging from the number of boars’ tusks found, hunting
must have been a favorite pastime with them. The bones of oxen, sheep,
and goats, of smaller species than those of the present day, have also
been found. Horses and dogs were rare, and cats unknown. The domestic
poultry of the present day was also wanting, no remains of birds having
been found except a few bones of the wild swan and the wild goose. Fish
and mollusca, as proved by the immense numbers of bones and shells,
formed an important part of the diet of the Trojans. They also fed
largely on cereals, which they cultivated with success; and wheat, the
grains of which were very small, was known to them. The preservation of
these vegetable relics was due to carbonization.

[Illustration: 94.]

Terra-cotta vase found with the treasure of Priam.

[Illustration: 95.]

Vase found beneath the ruins of Troy.

The pottery discovered is of an infinite variety, and includes jars
from 4¾ feet to 7¾ feet high (Fig. 91), of Which Schliemann found more
than six hundred, nearly all of them empty. Their size need not
surprise us, for Ciampini49 speaks of a pottery _dolium_ of such vast
size and height that a ladder of ten or twelve rungs was needed to
reach the opening.50 With these jars were found some large goblets,
some long-necked vessels (Fig. 92), some amphoræ, and vases with three
feet (Fig. 93). Some of the vases had lids the shape of a bell (Fig.
94), others were provided with flaps or horns by which to lift them
(Fig. 95). The potter gave free vent to his imagination, but the
decorations representing fish-bones, palm branches, zigzags, circles,
and dots, are all of very inferior execution.

[Illustration: 96.]

Earthenware pig found at a depth of 13 feet.

[Illustration: 97.]

Vase surmounted by an owl’s head. Found beneath the ruins of Troy.

Two series of terra-cotta objects deserve special mention, one
representing animals, generally pigs (Fig. 96), though an example has
been found of a hippopotamus; a fact of very great interest, as this
animal does not live at the present day anywhere but in the heart of
Africa. We know from this terra-cotta representation that it lived in
Greece in the days of Troy. Pliny speaks of it in Upper Egypt in his
day, and according to Mariette it lived thirty-five centuries before
the Christian era in the delta formed by the mouth of the Nile. The
second series of objects referred to above as of special interest are
vases representing the heads of owls with the busts of women (Fig. 97).
It is easy to make out the beak, eyes, and ears of the bird, and the
breasts and navel of the woman. In some instances the face, breasts,
and sexual organs of a woman are represented by a series of dots
forming a triangle with the point downwards.51 Other dots represent a
necklace, and very similar designs are to be seen on the Chaldean
cylinders. Can we then connect them in any way with the relics of Troy,
and is it possible that the Trojans and Chaldeans were of common
origin? However that may be, the constant repetition of these signs
proves that they were of hieratic character. Terra-cotta was also used
for a very great number of other purposes, as was the case everywhere
before the introduction of metals. Some deep and some flat plates made
of very common clay have been found, together with buttons, funnels,
bells, children’s toys, and seals on which, some authorities think,
Hittite characters can be made out. No lamps, or anything that could
serve their purpose, have been found. The Trojans probably used torches
of resinous wood or braziers, when they required artificial light.

It would be impossible to give a list of the objects of every variety
found among the ruins of Troy, with the aid of which we can form a very
definite idea of the private life of its people. Some fragments of an
ivory lyre, and some pipes pierced with three holes at equal distances,
bear witness to their taste for music; a distaff, still full of charred
wool, deserted by the spinner when she fled before the conflagration,
tells of domestic industry and manual dexterity, while marble and stone
phalli prove that the generative forces of nature were worshipped.52

[Illustration: 98.]

Copper vases found at Troy.

The weapons and implements found included hæmatite and diorite
projectiles used in slings, stone hatchets, and hammers pierced to
receive handles, flint saws and obsidian knives. Metallurgy began to
play an important part, and stone with its minor resisting power was
quickly superseded by bronze. In fact, Virchow was certainly justified
in saying that the whole town belonged to the Bronze age. Iron was
still unknown, at least so far no trace of it has been found, either
among the ruins of Troy or of the towns which succeeded it. Several
crucibles and moulds of mica, schist, or clay have been found with one
of granite of rectangular shape bearing on each face the hollows in
tended to receive the fused metal. The Schliemann museum possesses
numerous battle-axes53 of bronze, some double-bladed daggers with
crooked ends, lances similar to those discovered at Koban,54 and
thousands of spits, some with spherically shaped heads, others of
spiral form. Some of these spits are made of copper, as are some large
nails weighing thirty ounces, so that this metal was evidently still
often used in a pure state.

[Illustration: 99.]

Vases of gold and electrum, with two ingots, found beneath the ruins of
Troy.

[Illustration: 100.]

Gold and silver objects from the treasure of Priam.

[Illustration: 101.]

Gold ear-rings, head-dress, and necklace of golden beads from the
treasure of Priam.

At the foot of the palace, the ruins of which rise from the Acropolis
at a depth of 27½ feet, the pick-axes of the explorers brought to light
metal shields, vases (Fig. 98), and dishes mixed together in the
greatest confusion, often soldered together by the intense heat to
which they had been subjected. They had probably been enclosed in a
wooden chest that was destroyed in the conflagration.55 We are
astonished at the wealth revealed to us. Cups, goblets, and bottles of
gold (Figs. 99 and 100) lay side by side with golden necklaces56 and
ear-rings of electrum.57 The ornaments that had belonged to women are
especially curious. At one place alone several diadems (Fig. 101) were
picked up, with fifty-six ear-rings, six bracelets, and nine thousand
minor objects, such as rings, buckles, buttons, dice, pins, beads, and
ornaments of a great variety.58 All these treasures were piled up in a
great silver vase, into which they had doubtless been hastily thrown in
the confusion of a precipitate flight. They are all of characteristic
forms, quite unlike anything in Assyrian or Egyptian art. Were they
made in Troy itself? Dr. Schliemann doubts it; he thinks that the
makers of such clumsy pottery are not likely to have been able to
produce jewelry of such delicate and remarkable workmanship. I should
not like to be so positive, for even amongst the most advanced peoples
we find very common objects mixed with others showing artistic skill.
Why should it not have been the same at Troy? I think that in future
Trojan art must take its place in the history of the progress of
humanity. The nineteenth century has brought that art to light, and by
a strange caprice of chance the treasures of Priam adorn the museum of
Berlin, and we have seen the diadem of fair Helen exhibited in the
South Kensington Museum of London.59

Treasures nearly as valuable as those we have been describing were
found in earthenware vases in several other parts of the ruins.
Unfortunately, many of the objects found were stolen and melted down by
the workmen, whilst others were taken to the Imperial Palace at
Constantinople, whence they are doomed to be dispersed. In 1873,
however, Dr. Schliemann was fortunate enough to hit upon a deposit
containing twenty gold ear-rings, and four golden ornaments which had
formed part of a necklace.60 Similar ornaments were found at Mykenæ,
near Bologna, in the Caucasus, in the Lake dwellings, and, stranger
still, on the banks of the Rio Suarez in Colombia.61

I will not add more to what I have already said about the towns which
succeeded each other on the ruins of Troy, and of which the successive
stages of rubbish on the hill of Hissarlik are the only witnesses left.
The flames spared none who settled on that doomed spot, and new
arrivals disappeared as rapidly as they came. The Ilium of the Greeks
and Romans alone enjoyed any prosperity, but it too was in its turn
swept away; and at the present day a few wandering shepherds and their
flocks are the sole dwellers upon the hill immortalized by Homer.

Before concluding this chapter I must refer once more to a, fact of
considerable interest. In that part of the deposits of Hissarlik which
represents Troy, Dr. Schliemann picked up the perforated whorls to
which the name of fusaïoles has been given (Fig. 102), and of which we
spoke in our account of the Lake Dwellings of Switzerland. These
fusaïoles are generally of common clay mixed with bits of mica, quartz,
or silica, though some few have been found at Mykenæ and Tiryns of
steatite. The clay whorls before being baked were plunged into a bath
of a very fine clay of gray, yellow, or black color, and then carefully
polished. They nearly all bear ornaments of very primitive execution,
such as stars, the sun, flowers, or animals, and more rarely
representations of the human figure.

[Illustration: 102.]

Terra-cotta fusaïoles.

We ourselves think these fusaïoles are amulets which were taken to Troy
by the Trojans, and piously preserved by their successors. One
important fact tends to confirm this hypothesis. A great number of them
bear the sign of the _swastika_ 62 (Fig. 103), the cross with the four
arms, the sacred symbol of the great Aryan race so long supposed to be
the source of all the Indo-European races. The _swastika_ is engraved,
not only on the fusaïoles, but also on the diadems of the daughters of
Priam, on the idols the Trojans worshipped, and on numerous objects
from the Lydian and Greco-Roman towns. We meet with the double cross
among the prehistoric races of the basin of the Danube, who colonized
the shores of the Troad and the north of Italy, and it was introduced
with the products of that antique civilization on the one side to the
Greeks, the Etruscans, the Latins, the Gauls, the Germanic races, the
Scandinavians, and the Bretons; and on the other to the people of Asia
Minor, Persia, India, China, and Japan.63

[Illustration: 103.]

Cover of a vase with the symbol of the _swastika_. Found at Troy.

This sign of the _swastika_ meets us at every turn; we find it on many
ancient Persian books, on the temples of India, on Celtic funeral
stones, and on a Hittite cylinder. It is seen on vases of elegant form
from Athens and Melos; on others from Ceres, Chiusi, and Cumæ, as well
as on the clumsy pottery recently discovered at Königswald on the Oder
and on the borders of Hungary; on bronze objects from the Caucasus, and
the celebrated Albano urn; on a medal from Gaza in Palestine and on an
Iberian medal from Asido. We see it on the Gallo-Roman rings of the
Museum of Namur, and on the plaques of the belt, dating from the same
epoch, which form part of the magnificent collection of M. Moreau.
Schliemann tells us of it at Mykenæ and at Tiryns. Chantre found it on
the necropoles of the Caucasus. It is engraved on the walls of the
catacombs of Rome, on the chair of Saint Ambrose at Milan, on the
crumbling walls of Portici, and on the most ancient monuments of
Ireland, where it is often associated with inscriptions in the ogham
character.64

The _swastika_ occurs twice on a large piece of copper found at
Corneto, which now belongs to the Museum of Berlin. Cartailhac noticed
it in the _citania_ of Portugal, some of which date from Neolithic
times.65 The English in the Ashantee war noticed it on the bronzes they
took at Coomassie on the coast of Guinea, and it has also been found on
objects discovered in the English county of Norfolk.

[Illustration: 104.]

Stone hammer from New Jersey bearing an undeciphered inscription.

Moreover, if we cross the Atlantic we find the same symbol engraved on
the temples of Yucatan, the origin of which is unknown, on a hatchet
found at Pemberton, in New Jersey (Fig. 104), on vases from a Peruvian
sepulchre near Lima, and on vessels from the _pueblos_ of New Mexico.
Dr. Hamy, in his “American Decades,” represents it on a flattened gourd
belonging to the Wolpi Indians, and the sacred tambours of the
Esquimaux of the present day bear the same symbol, which was probably
transmitted to them by their ancestors. The universality of this one
sign amongst the Hindoos, Persians, Hittites, Pelasgians, Celts, and
Germanic races, the Chinese, Japanese, and the primitive inhabitants of
America is infinitely strange, and seems to prove the identity of races
so different to each other, alike in appearance and in customs, and is
a very important factor in dealing with the great problem of the origin
of the human species.

We have dwelt much on the discoveries of Dr. Schliemann, but we must
add that, like all great discoveries, they have been very vigorously
contested.66 Boetticher, for instance, considers the ruins of Hissarlik
to be nothing more than the remains of a necropolis where cremation was
practised according to the Assyrio-Babylonian custom.67 A distinguished
and very honest savant, S. Reinach, constituted himself the champion of
this theory at the meeting of the Congress in Paris in 1889. Schliemann
replied very forcibly, and the meeting appeared to be with him in the
matter, as were also a number of men of science who visited Hissarlik
in 1888, and we think that in the end history will adopt the opinion of
the great Danish antiquarian.

We have now passed in review the chief of the works left behind him by
man from the earliest (lays of his existence to the dawn of historic
times. We must still show prehistoric man in the presence of death, the
universal destroyer, and learn from the evidence of the tombs of the
remote past how our ancestors met the common doom.


1 On this point an admirable book should be consulted, by De la Noë:
“Enceintes Préhistoriques,” _Mat_., 1888, p. 324, in which the author
says that positions protected by escarpments bordering the greater
party of the circumference of the _enceinte_ were at all times chosen
for the erection of fortifications. The absence of water, however,
often makes him hesitate in coming to a decision, and leads him to
think that the remains where it is absent must have been temples for
the worship of deities.

2 _Congrès Préhistoriques_, Brussels, 1872, p. 318.

3 “De Bello Gallico,” book vii., chap. xxiii.

4 Dupont: “Les Temps Préhistoriques en Belgique,” p. 235.

5 H. Bauduin: _Bul. Soc. Belge de Géographie_, 1879.

6 _Recueil des Travaux de la Société de l’Eure_, Évreux, 1879.

7 _Rev. d’Anth_., 1880, p. 469.

8 “Notice sur Quelques Monuments Trouvés sur le Sommet des Vosges”
(_Soc. des Monuments Historiques de l’Alsace_, vol. i.).

9 _Rev. d’Anth_., 1880, p. 295.

10 We may also mention the Pen Richard in Charente Inférieure, so well
described by Cartailhac in his “France Préhistorique,” p. 131.

11 Arcelin: “L’Âge de Pierre et la Classification Préhistorique,”
Paris, 1873. Flouest: “Notice sur le Camp de Chassey.” Perrault: “Un
Foyer de l’Âge de la Pierre Polie au Camp de Chassey” (_Mat_., 1870).
Coynart: “Fouilles au Camp de Chassey” (_Rev. Arch_., 1866 and 1867).

12 Ponthieux, “Le Camp de Catenoy” (Oise).

13 “Hist. Francorum,” book i., chap. xxxii.

14 De Rosemont: “Étude sur les Antiquités antérieures aux Romains.”
Desjardins: “Les Camps Retranchés des Environs de Nice.” Rivière: _Ass.
Française_, Rheims, 1880, p. 628.

15 Pigorini: “Terramara dell’Eta del Bronzo Situata in Castione de’
Marchesi.”

16 _Nature_, 1887, second week, p. 62.

17 Memoranda read to the Royal Society of Antiquaries in London
(_Archæologia_, vol. xlii., pp. 27–76). Lane Fox: _British
Association_, Bristol, 1875. Evans: “Stone Age.”

18 “Solent et subterraneos specus aperire, eosque multo insuper fimo
onerant, suffugium hiemi et receptaculum frugibus” (“De Moribus
Germanorum,” chap. xvi.).

19 _American Journal of Archæology_.

20 _Zeitschrift für Anthropologie_, 1874, p. 115; 1875, p. 127.

21 Zaborowski: “Monuments Préhistoriques de la Basse Vistule.”

22 Ribeiro: “Notice sur Quelques Monuments Préhistoriques du Portugal,”
Lisbon, 1878.

23 “Noticia de Algunas Estarves e Monumentos Prehistoricos.”

24 H. and L. Siret: “Les Premiers Âges du Métal dans le Sud-est de
l’Espagne.”

25 _Congrès Préhistorique de Copenhague_, p. 118.

26 Putnam: “Report Peabody Museum,” vol. iii., p. 348.

27 “Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley.”

28 See Dr. Hibbert in the _Transactions of the Society of Antiquaries
of Scotland_, vol. iv., Appendix, p. 181.

29 _Zeitschrift für Ethnographie_, 1870, p. 270.

30 Pomerol: “Murailles Vitrifiées de Châteauneuf,” _Ass. Franç_.,
Blois, 1884.

31 _Congrès Soc. Sav_., Sorbonne, 1882.

32 J. Marion: _Bul. des Soc. Savantes_, 4th series, vol. iv. Daubrée:
_Rev. Arch_., July, 1881.

33 Sir J. Lubbock compares the ruins of Aztalan, in America, with the
vitrified forts of Scotland; but we think this is a mistake, for the
walls of Aztalan consisted of irregularly shaped masses of hard,
reddish clay, full of hollows, retaining the impression of the straw or
dried grass with which the clay was mixed before it was subjected to
the action of heat, whether the application of that heat was
intentional or accidental. There is nothing about this at all
resembling the melted granite of the vitrified forts.

34 De Cassac: “Notes sur les Forts Vitrifiés de la Creuse.” Thuot: “La
Forteresse Vitrifiée du Pay de Gaudy,” p. 102.

35 We take most of these details from a note by M. A. de Montaiglon
published in the _Bulletin des Sociétés Savantes_.

36 _Mat_., 1881, p. 371.

37 _Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1884, p. 816, etc.

38 Fouqué, _Nature_, 1876, second week, p. 65.

39 Book vi., chap. xvi. and xx.—Pliny the Elder, uncle and father by
adoption of Pliny the Younger, lost his life in this catastrophe, which
took place in 79 A. D.

40 Cigalla: _Acad. des Sciences_, November 12, 1866. Fouqué: _Acad. des
Sciences_, March 25, 1867. “Un Pompéi Préhistorique,” _Revue des
Deux-Mondes_, October 15, 1869.

41 Schliemann: “Troy and its Remains,” translated by Philip Smith,
London, Murray, 1875; “Ilios Ville et Pays des Troyens,” translated by
Mme. E. Egger, Paris, Hachette, 1885; E. Burnouf: _Revue des
Deux-Mondes_, January 1, 1874; Virchow: “Alt Trojanische Gräber and
Schädel.”

42 Iliad, canto v., v., 692.

43 Egyptologists tell us that in the fourth year of the reign of Ramses
II., or about 1406 B.C., the Hittites placed themselves at the head of
a coalition against the Egyptian Pharaoh. With these Hittites, or
Khittas, whose descendants still dwell in the north of Syria, were the
Mysians, the Lycians, the Dardanians, and other tribes.

44 “Amérique Préhistorique” (Masson), translated by Nancy Bell (N.
D’Anvers), and published by Murray, London; Putnam, New York.

45 “Troy and its Remains,” plate ix. See also excellent essay on the
same subject by S. Reinach, which appeared in the _Revue Archéologique_
in 1885. Later investigations by Dr. Schliemann also brought to light a
remarkable resemblance between the buildings at Hissarlik and those of
Tiryns.

46 The British Museum contains a manuscript of the fourteenth century,
in which is a letter from Julian, written when he was emperor, between
361 and 363 A.D., and relating to his visit to Ilium.

47 The potter’s wheel was, however, in use at a very remote antiquity.
In China its invention is attributed to the legendary Emperor Hwang-Ti,
who is supposed to have lived about 2697 B.C. The wheel was also known
from the very earliest times in Egypt, and Homer (Iliad, c. xviii., v.
599) compares the light motions of the dancers represented on the
shield of Achilles to the rapid rotation of the potter’s wheel.

48 Rivett-Carnac: “Memorandum on Clay Discs Called Spindle Whorls and
Votive Seals Found at Sankisa” (Behar), _Journal Asiatic Society of
Bengal_, vol. xlix., p. 1.

49 “De Sacris Ædificiis,” ch. ix., p. 128.

50 It is interesting to note the discovery of urns closely resembling
those of Troy, and containing human remains, in Persia (Sir W. Ouseley:
“Travels in Persia”), and at Travancore, in the south of Malabar,
where, according to tradition, they were intended to receive the
remains of young virgins sacrificed in honor of the gods.—“Some
Vestiges of Girl Sacrifices,” _Journ. Anth. Inst_., May, 1882.

51 The vulva was sometimes represented by a large triangle. The same
peculiarity occurs on some black marble statuettes, found in the tombs
of the Cyclades and Attica. Three such statuettes from the island of
Paros are in the Louvre, and the British Museum owns a rich collection.
Dr. Schliemann also mentions a female idol made in lead of very coarse
workmanship, in which the sexual organs are represented by a double
cross.

52 The _phallus_ was, as we have already stated, the symbol of
generative force. Its worship extended throughout India and Syria; a
gigantic Phallus adorned the temple of the mother of the gods at
Hierapolis, and it was carried in triumph in processions through Egypt
and Greece. It is still worshipped in some places at the present day.
Near Niombo, in Africa, there is a temple containing several phallic
statues; at Stanley-Pool the fête of the _phallus_ is celebrated with
obscene rites. The Kroomen observe similar ceremonies at the time of
the new moon, and in Japan on certain fête clays young girls flourish
gigantic _phalli_ at the end of long poles. The _phallus_ is also often
represented on the monuments of Central America—on the stones of the
temples of Izamal and the island of Zapatero, for instance. Possibly
the worship of the productive and generative forces of nature was the
earliest religion of many primitive peoples, but all that is said on
the subject must be sifted with considerable care.

53 Similar hatchets of pure copper (Fig. 2) have been found in Hungary,
and Butler (“Prehistoric Wisconsin”) speaks of them also as being found
in North America.

54 The tin used is making bronze probably came from Spain or Cornwall,
perhaps also from the Caucasus, where small quantities of it are still
found. It was doubtless imported by the Phœnicians, the great
navigators of antiquity. See Rudolf Virchow’s “Das Grüberfeld Von Koban
im Laude der Osseten,” Berlin, 1883.

55 This idea gains probability from the fact that the remains of a key
were picked up near the treasure, which we have reason to suppose
belonged to Priam.

56 The gold may have come from the mines of Astyra, not far from Troy.

57 Electrum was the ancient name for amber, but was also given to an
alloy of gold and silver, the yellow color of which resembles that of
amber.

58 Dr. Schliemann gives a very careful description of all these
objects. See “Troy and its Remains,” Figs. 174 to 497, pp. 260 to 353.

59 The χρήδεμνον or diadem of the wife of Menelaus is a narrow fillet
from which hang several little chains formed of links alternating with
small leaves, and ending in rather larger leaves, these leaves all
representing the woman with the owl’s head, so characteristic of Trojan
art. The golden objects are all soldered with the same metals, which
modern goldsmiths seem unable to do. At Tiryns, which we believe to
have been contemporary with Troy, the art of soldering was unknown, and
ornaments were merely screwed together.

60 Bastian, _Zeitschrift der Berliner Gesellschaft für Erdkünde_, vol.
xiii., plates 1 and 2.

61 If we accept 1200 B.C. as the date of the Trojan war and the eighth
century as that of the foundation of Ilium, the towns that succeeded
each other on the hill of Hissarlik only lasted four centuries
altogether.

62 In the Vedas the word _swasti_ is often used in the sense of
happiness or good-fortune.

63 Comte Goblet d’Auriella, _Bul. Acad. Royale de Belgique_, 1889.

64 G. Atkinson, _Congrès Préhistorique_, Lisbon, 1880, p. 466.

65 “Ages Préhistoriques en Espagne et Portugal,” figs 410, 411, 412, p.
286.

66 Aussland, 1883. _Zeitschrift für Museologie and Antequaten Kunde_,
1884. Musœon, 1888 and 1889.

67 Virchow, who visited the remains at Hissarlik, treats this idea as
_furchtbaren Unsinn_ (ridiculous nonsense).



CHAPTER VIII.
Tombs.


The true history of man will be found in his tombs, says Thucydides;
and as a matter of fact the sepulchre has ever occupied much of the
thoughts of man, the result of a religious sentiment, a conviction that
all does not end with the life which so quickly passes by.

From the very earliest times we meet with tokens of the hopes and fears
connected with a future existence; but, as I have already stated, the
human bones that can with certainty be said to date from Palæolithic
times are very rare. We know but very few facts justifying us in
asserting that the contemporary of the mammoth and of the cave bear had
already learnt to respect the remains of what had once been a man like
himself. One of these few facts deserves, I think, to be noticed with
some detail.

In 1886, excavations in the cave of Spy1 (Namur), or rather in a
terrace some thirty-six feet long by nineteen and a half wide giving
access to it, brought to light two human skeletons. One was that of an
individual already advanced in life, probably of the feminine sex, the
other of a man in the prime of life. These skeletons were imbedded in a
very hard breccia containing also fragments of ivory and numerous
flints of very small size. Some of them had very fine scratches on both
sides. From what I could learn on the spot, the skeletons when found
were in a recumbent position. The bones, few of which were missing,
were still in their natural position, and near to one of them were
picked up several arrow- or lance-heads, one of which, of phtanite,
some two and a half inches long, was of the purest Moustérien type. The
bones were those of short, squat individuals, and the skulls were of
the type of the Canstadt race, the most ancient of which anything is
known; the thickness of the crania was about one third of an inch. The
forehead, is low and retreating, the eyebrows are prominent, and the
lower jaws strong and well developed.

At the same level and in that immediately above it were picked up the
remains of the mammoth, the _Rhinoceros tichorhinus_, the cave bear,
and the large cave hyena, the reindeer, and numerous other mammals
belonging to the Quaternary fauna. Everything points to the conclusion
that the man and woman whose remains have so opportunely come to light
were contemporary with these animals, and that their bodies were placed
after death in the cave in which they were found.

Belgium has furnished numerous examples of sepulchral caves, of a date,
however, less ancient than that we have been considering. Recent
excavations in the Chauvaux Cave revealed two skeletons leaning against
the walls in a crouching position, the legs tucked under the body. In
the Gendron Cave M. Dupont discovered seventeen skeletons lying in a
low, narrow passage, stretched out at full length with the feet toward
the wall, and arranged in twos and threes, one above the other. In the
middle of all these dead was the skeleton of one man placed upright, as
if to watch over the other bodies.

The Duruthy Cave at Sordes opens near the point of junction of the
waters of the Pan and Oloron, whence their united waters flow into the
Adour. At the northern extremity of this cave is a natural niche in
which lay more than thirty skeletons, some of men, some of women, and
some of children, mixed together in the greatest confusion. Worked
flints, bone stilettos, and ornaments lay around, all of the forms
characteristic of Palæolithic times.

It would seem that we have here evidence of the practice of a funeral
rite, which consisted in first stripping the bodies of flesh, and then
laying the bones in caves, where they were often left unnoticed by the
living occupants of the same refuge.2

The caves of Baoussé-Roussé, near Mentone, give fresh proof of the
extension of this rite, if we may so call it. The skeletons lay upon a
bed of powdered iron ore, in some cases as much as two fifths of an
inch thick, and this accumulation could not have taken place if the
skeleton had not been deprived of its flesh before inhumation. The
flesh must have been taken off by some rapid process, for the bones
remain, as a general rule, in their natural positions, united by their
tendons and ligaments. In Italy, says Issel, the cave men buried their
dead in the caves they lived in, a thin layer of earth alone separating
them from the living; the bodies, adds Pigorini,3 generally lay on the
left side, the head rested on the left hand, and the knees were bent.
Beside the skeleton was placed a vase containing red chalk, to be used
for painting the body in the new world it was supposed to be about to
enter.

We could quote similar discoveries in Sicily, Belgium, and the southern
Pyrenees. Beneath the tumulus of Plouhennec, in Brittany, bones were
strewn about in the greatest disorder. Some archæologists are of
opinion that the openings in certain dolmens were used for throwing in
the bones of the dead who successively went to join their ancestors. In
many of the Long Barrows of England the bones appear to have been flung
in pell-mell; the space was too narrow to hold the complete body, so
that before inhumation the flesh must have been separated from the
bones. In no other way can we explain the confusion in which the human
remains lay when they were discovered.4 Pigorini thinks this is a proof
that primitive races worshipped their dead, and held their bodies in
veneration.5 Perhaps they even carried them about in their migrations.
However that may be, the custom of separating the flesh from the bones
was continued until cremation became general. This would explain the
huge ossuaries found in regions so widely separated.

Although, however, the mode of sepulture we have just described was
practised for a long time in certain places, we cannot admit it to have
been general. In certain megalithic tombs we find dispositions similar
to those described in speaking of the Gendron Cave. Excavations beneath
the Port-Blanc dolmen (Morbihan) brought to light a rough pavement on
which lay numbers of skeletons, closely packed one against another,
which skeletons were probably those of men who had been held in honor,
and to commemorate whom the dolmen was set up. Separated from them by a
layer of stones and earth rested another series of skeletons, not so
closely packed as the first. The new-comers had respected their
predecessors, and no one had violated the sanctuary of the dead.
Similar facts were noted at Grand Compans, near Luzarches,6 and it is
evident that successive inhumations beneath dolmens often took place,
and instances might, if necessary, be multiplied.

Another singular funeral rite was practised in remote antiquity. Many
of the bones found in the various caves of Mentone were colored with
red hematite.7 As this was only the case with the bones of adults,
those of children retaining their natural whiteness, it evidently had
some special significance. In 1880, the opening of a cave of the Stone
age in the district of Anagni, a short distance from Rome, brought to
light the facial portion of a human cranium, colored bright red with
cinnabar. Nor are these by any means exceptional cases, for similar
coloration was noticed on bones picked up at Finalmarina and several
other places in Liguria and Sicily. The custom had therefore become
general in the Neolithic period in the whole of the Italian peninsula.8
We also meet with it in other countries; at the Prehistoric Congress,
when in session at Lisbon, Dolgado added to what was said about the
discoveries in Italy the fact that the cave men of Furninha practised a
similar rite. In the _kurganes_ of the department of Kiev crania were
found colored with a mineral substance, fragments of which were strewn
about near the skeletons. The most ancient of the _kurganes_ appear to
date from the Stone age, for in them were found implements made of
flint and reindeer-horn, mixed with the bones of rodents9 long since
extinct in that district. A similar practice is met with in the tombs
of Poland, many bones being covered with a coating of red color, in
some instances one fifth of an inch thick. Excavations in the Kitor
valley (province of Irkutsk, Siberia have brought to light several
tombs which appear to date from the sauce period as the _kurganes_ of
Kiew. The dead were buried with the weapons and ornaments they would
like to use in the new life which had begun for them. The tomb was then
filled in with sand, with which care was taken to mix plenty of red
ochre. It is difficult not to conclude that this was a relic of a rite
fallen into desuetude.

At the present day certain tribes of North America expose their dead on
the tops of trees, and before burying the bones, when stripped of their
flesh, cover them with a coating of a bright red color. In the island
of Espiritu Santo many human bones have also been picked up painted
with an oxide of argillaceous iron. These customs, strange as they may
appear, were evidently practised in honor of ancestors; atavism is as
clearly shown in customs and traditions as in physical structure.

At Solutré is a sepulchre formed of unhewn slabs of stone. The body of
the dead rested on a thick bed of the broken and crushed bones of
horses. The remains of reindeer were mixed with the human bones. Were
these too relics of funeral rites, and were the animal bones those of
the horses and reindeer that had belonged to their hunter? It is
impossible to say. Solutré, situated as it was on an admirable site on
a hill overlooking the valley of the Seine, protected from the north
winds and close to a plentiful stream, has also been a favorite resort
of man. In the tombs all ages are mixed together, and if some do indeed
date from Neolithic times, others are Roman, Burgundian, Merovingian.
There may be among them a certain number dating from the Reindeer
period; that is about all we can assert with any certainty in the
present state of our knowledge. The Abbé Ducrost, however, in an
important essay10 asserts that he has found incontrovertible proofs of
the interment of Solutréens on the hearths of their homes in
Palæolithic times. If this be so, the custom is one of frequent
occurrence, and has been continued for centuries; for De Colanges, in
his fine work on ancient cities, shows that at Rome the earliest tombs
were on the hearth itself of the dwelling. De Mortillet, on the other
hand, dwells very earnestly on the mode of inhumation at Solutré, and
sees in the juxtaposition of human remains and the _débris_ of hearths
but the result of displacement, and of the regular turning upside down
of which the hill of Solutré has been the scene. To this Reinach
replied, to the effect that, whereas a few years ago De Mortillet’s
authority led many archæologists to suppose that the men of the
Reindeer period did not bury their dead, facts, ever more important
than theories, have now proved beyond a doubt that this very decided
opinion is a mistake. Not only did the men of remote antiquity bury
their dead; they laid them, as at Solutré, on the hearths near which
they had lived.11

The dead were often buried seated or bent forward, and it is
interesting to note the same custom beneath the mounds of America and
the tumuli of Europe. It is touching to see how in death men wished to
recall their life on earth; the cradle was, so to speak, reproduced in
the tomb, and man lay on the bosom of earth, the common mother of
humanity, like the child on the bosom of his own mother. Perhaps, too,
the seated position was meant to indicate that man, who had never known
rest during his hard struggle for existence, had found it at last in
his new life. The men of the rough and barbarous times of the remote
past were unable to conceive the idea of a future different to the
present, or of a life which was not in every respect the same as that
on earth had been.

Whatever may have been the motive, this mode of burial was practised
from the Madeleine period.12 At Bruniquel, in Aveyron, the dead were
found crouching in their last home. This position is, however,
peculiarly characteristic of Neolithic times, and is met with
throughout Europe. Eight skeletons were recently discovered bending
forward in the sepulchral cave of Schwann (Mecklenburg). In Scandinavia
there are so many similar cases that it is difficult to make a
selection. Tit the sepulchral cave of Oxevalla (East Gothland) the dead
are all in crouching attitudes, and tumuli dating from the most remote
antiquity cover over a passage, formed of immense blocks of stone,
leading to a central chamber, in which are numerous seated skeletons
resting against the walls.

On the shores of the Mediterranean, excavations of the Vence Cave
(Alpes-Maritimes) brought to light a number of dead arranged in a
circle as if about to take a meal in common. The bodies were crouching
in the position of men sitting on their heels; the spinal column was
bent forward and the head nearly touched the knees. In the centre of
this strange group were noticed some fragments of pottery and the
remains of a large bird, a buzzard probably. Perhaps its death among
the corpses was a mere accident.13 The dolmens of Aveyron yielded some
flint-flakes and arrow-heads, pieces of pottery, pendants, and bone,
stone, shell, and slate-colored schist beads. Beneath one of these
dolmens was found one small bronze object, quite an exceptional
instance of the occurrence of that metal. The skeletons rested against
the walls. In one of the tombs some human bones, which bad been
originally placed at the entrance to the cave, had been moved to the
back; the vanquished had here, as in life, to give way before the
conquerors. Excavations in the Mané-Lud tomb have led explorers to
suppose that here too the corpses were buried in a crouching position.
It is the same at Luzarches and in the Varennes cemetery near
Dormans.14 In the last named were found traces of a fire that had been
lit above the tomb, and some pottery was picked up ornamented with
hollow lines, filled with some white matter not unlike barbotine. M. de
Baye says this mode of interment is confined to the district of Marne;
but for all that he himself gives an example of its practice
elsewhere.15

In the prehistoric tombs discovered at Cape Blanc-Nez, near Escalles
(Pas-de-Calais), the position in which the body had been interred could
be made out in four instances. The ends of the tibiæ, humeri, and
.radii were united, the bones of the hands were found near the
clavicles, so that the bodies had evidently been bending forward with
the arms crossed and the fingers pointing toward the shoulders.16
Similar facts are quoted from a cave at Equehen on the plateau which
stretches along the seashore on the east of Boulogne. The bodies, to
the number of nine, were crouching with the face turned toward the
entrance of the cave, which was closed with great blocks of sandstone.
Two polished stone hatchets, broken doubtless in accordance with some
sepulchral rite, had been placed near the skeletons.

Numerous human bones were found in the Cravanche Cave near Belfort,
which probably dates from the close of the Neolithic period, judging
from the total absence of metal and the shape of the flint and bone
implements picked up. Here too the bodies were bent almost double, the
head drooping forward and the knees drawn up nearly to the chin.
Several of these skeletons were completely imbedded in the stalagmite
which had formed in the cave, the head and knees alone emerging from
the solid mass. The position in which they were originally placed had
thus of necessity been maintained.17

A similar rite, for rite we must call this mode of burial, was
practised in Italy, and the Chevalier de Rossi speaks of a tomb of the
Neolithic period at Cantalupo, near Rome, in which one of the bodies
wag placed in the crouching attitude, which he says is familiar to all
who have studied ancient tombs.18 This practice was still continued in
protohistoric times; Schliemann noticed it in the excavations he
superintended at Mykenæ, and Homer says that amongst the Lybians the
dead were buried seated.

The necropolis near Constantine contains numerous megalithic monuments.
These are either round or square cromlechs surrounding sarcophagi, or
circular _enceintes_, in which the dead were laid in a trench. In the
former there are always a great many funeral objects in the tomb, and
the body of the dead is in a crouching posture; in the latter there are
few things beside the corpse itself, and that is in a recumbent
position. Do these peculiarities denote different races? Do the tombs
all date from the same period, or are these arrangements but fresh
indications of the difference everywhere maintained between social
classes? It is difficult to decide, and we must be content with
enumerating facts. We may add, however, that the crouching position of
corpses is constantly met with in Africa19 and in North and South
America, from Canada to Patagonia.20

The funeral rites of which we have spoken necessarily imply burial; man
did not abandon to wild beasts or birds of prey the bodies of those who
had once been like himself. At Aurignac, at Bruniquel, and in the
Frontal Cave, the cave man bad taken the precaution of closing with the
largest stones he could find the entrances to the last resting-places
of those belonging to him. The caves of _L’Homme Mort_, and of
Petit-Morin which date from Neolithic times, retain traces of similar
blocking up. There were five entrances to the cave of Garenne de
Verneuil (Marne) in which was a regular ossuary; the floor was paved
and the roof kept up with eleven upright stones. The objects in the
tomb with the dead were a clumsy earthenware vase, a few flint knives,
and some shell necklace beads.

The sides of the almost inaccessible mountains of Peru are pierced, at
a height of several hundred feet, with numerous caves which have nearly
all been artificially enlarged. It was in them that the Peruvians
placed their dead, and the people of the country still call them
_Tantama Marca_ or abodes of desolation. The entrances were concealed
with extreme care, but this care did not save the tombs from violation;
the greed for the treasures supposed to be concealed in the tombs was
too great for respect to the unknown dead to hold curiosity in check.

In other cases, the dead was laid near the hearth which had been that
of his home when living, and his abode during life became his tomb. The
dolmens, _cella_, and _Gangraben_ in Germany, and the barrows in
England, appear to bear witness to the prevalence of a similar custom
in those countries; and we find the same idea perpetuated even when
cremation became general. At Alba, in Latium, at Marino, near Albano,
at Vetulonia and Corneto-Tarquinia were discovered urns with doors,
windows, and a roof imitating human dwellings.21

Later, other modes of sepulture came into use. In Marne M. Nicaise made
out seven funeral pits22 resembling in shape, he tells us, long-necked
bottles with flat bottoms. One of these pits at Tours-sur-Marne
contained at least forty skeletons, and among the bones were found
thirty-four polished stone hatchets, fifty knives, two flint
lance-heads and a great many arrows with transverse edges, a necklace
of little round bits of limestone, several fragments of coarse pottery
which had been mixed with grains of silica and baked in the fire, and
lastly three little flasks made of stag-horn hollowed out in a curious
manner and with stoppers of the same material. These quaint little
flasks doubtless contained the coloring matter with which the dead had
painted their bodies when alive. All the objects of which we have
spoken belonged to the Neolithic period; but a flat bronze necklace
bead made by folding a thin slice of metal, a radius, and a bit of rib
bearing green marks resulting from long contact with metal, appear to
fix the date of this pit at the transition period between the Stone and
Bronze ages. If this be so it is quite an exceptional case of a
sepulchral pit dating from this time, for most of those known are of
much later origin. Those for instance of Mont-Beuvray, Bernard (La
Vendée), and Beaugency are not older than Gallo-Roman times.23
According to Count Gozzadini, those of Manzabotto in Italy, which are
twenty-seven in number, date from the IVth century after the foundation
of Rome, and are of Etruscan origin. They are constructed with small
pointed pebbles, with no trace of cement, and resemble in shape a long
amphora vase, or perhaps, to be more accurate, the clapper of a bell.
They are from six and a half to thirty-two and a half feet deep, with
an opening varying in diameter from one foot to nearly two and a half
feet.24

We have said so much in preceding chapters on monuments erected in
memory of the dead, that but little remains to be added here. Doubtless
there are many distinctions to be noted at different times and in
different countries, but everywhere the aim remains the same, and the
means used for attaining that end are radically the same all the world
over. Take for example the Aymaras, the most ancient race of Bolivia
and Callao; they laid their dead sometimes beneath megalithic monuments
(Fig. 58, p. 178) resembling the dolmens of Europe, sometimes beneath
towers or _chulpas_, which are however probably of more recent date.

[Illustration: 105.]

Chulpa near Palca.


_Chulpas_, generally of square or rectangular form, consist of a mass
of unhewn stones faced outside with blocks of trachyte or basalt,
painted red, yellow, or white. A very low door, always facing east, as
if in honor of the rising sun, gives access to a cist in which the dead
was laid. The _chulpa_ of our illustration (Fig. 105) is situated near
the village of Palca; it rises from an excavation four feet deep; its
height is about sixteen feet, and the cornice consists of _ichu_, a
coarse grass which grows in abundance on the mountains, and which after
being firmly compressed was cut with the help of sharp instruments. The
human bones, which were mixed together in the greatest confusion, made
a heap in the sepulchral chamber more than a foot high.

The mounds of Ohio also cover over sepulchral chambers of a peculiar
construction, being often formed of round pieces of wood, five to seven
feet long by five to six inches in diameter; near the bodies were
placed a few ornaments, chiefly copper ear-rings, shell beads, and
large flint knives. Most of the skeletons lay on the bare earth; but
one exception is mentioned in which the ground was paved with mussel
shells. A remarkable discovery has quite recently been made at Floyd
(Iowa), the account of which in Nature for January 1, 1891, we will
give in the words of Clement Webster: “In making a thorough exploration
of the larger mound … the remains of five human bodies were found, the
bones even those of the fingers, toes, etc., being, for the most part
in a good state of preservation. First, a saucer or bowl-shaped
excavation has been made, extending down three and three-quarter feet
below the surface of the ground around the mound, and the bottom of
this macadamized with gravel and fragments of limestone. In the centre
of this floor five bodies were placed in a sitting posture with the
feet drawn under them, and apparently facing the north. First above the
bodies was a thin layer of earth and ashes, among which were found two
or three small pieces of fine-grained charcoal. Nearly all the
remaining four feet of earth had been changed to a red color by the
long-continued action of fire.” Mr. Webster goes on to describe the
various skeletons and says of one of them, that of a woman: “The bones
in their detail of structure indicated a person of low grade, the
evidence of unusual muscular development being strongly marked. The
skull of this personage was a wonder to behold, it equalling if not
rivalling in some respects and in inferiority of grade, the famous
Neanderthal skull. The forehead, if forehead it could be called, is
very low, lower and more animal-like than in the Neanderthal specimen….
The question has been raised how was it that these five bodies were all
buried here at the same time, their bodies being still in the flesh.” …
Webster adds that the probability is that all but one of them had been
sacrificed at the death of that one, who had most likely been a chief.

[Illustration: 106.]

Dolmen at Auvernier near the Lake of Neuchâtel.

We have seen that men began by placing the bodies of their dead in
caves, and only later took to burying them underground when caves were
not to be had. Very often the corpse was placed between large unhewn
stones to keep off from it the weight of the tumulus above. Such were
the last resting-places alike of the men of Solutré and of those of
Merovingian times. In the necropolis of Vilanova, which is supposed to
date from times prior to the foundation of Rome, the tombs enclosed a
chest, the walls of which consisted of slabs of sandstone set on edge
and connected by a conglomerate of small stones. At Marzabotto, the
chests are made of bricks, and placed beneath a heap of pebbles. We
reproduce a chest discovered near the Lake Dwellings of Auvernier in
Switzerland (Fig. 106)25 and another (Fig. 107) brought to light by MM.
Siret in the south of Spain. These drawings will help us better than
long descriptions to form an idea of this mode of burial.

[Illustration: 107.]

A stone chest used as a sepulchre.

In other cases the dead body was enclosed in earthenware jars. At
Biskra in Algeria, two of these jars were found together; the one
containing the head, the other the feet of the departed. In some
instances the jar was replaced by a large clumsy earthenware basin,
some six and a half feet long by three feet wide. Such basins are
mentioned as having been found near Athens, but there is nothing to
help us to determine their date. The ancient Iberians used one large
jar only (Fig. 108) in which the dead was placed in a crouching
position, still wearing his favorite ornaments. The vase was closed
with a stone cover and placed in the tomb. We meet with the practice of
a similar mode of interment in historic times. The Chaldeans placed
their dead in earthenware vases; two jars connected at the neck serving
as a coffin. Excavations in Nebuchadnezzar’s palace brought to light
bodies bent nearly double and enclosed in urns not more than three feet
in height by about two feet in width. On the western coast of Malabar,
as far as Cape Comorin, we find near megalithic tombs large jars four
feet high by three feet in diameter filled with human bones. This mode
of sepulture was practised at Sfax, in the Chersonesus of Thracia, and
at the foot of the hill on which Troy was built. The tumulus of
Hanaï-Tepeh covered over a huge amphora in which crouched a skeleton,
and the wealthy Japanese loved to know they would rest in huge
artistically decorated vases, masterpieces of native pottery. If we
cross the Atlantic, we meet with the same custom in Peru, Mexico, and
on the shores of the Mississippi. At Teotihuacan, the bodies of
children were placed head downwards in funeral urns,26 and excavations
in the alluvial deposits of the Mississippi yielded, among immense
quantities of pottery, two huge rectangular basins glued together with
clay and containing the body of a young child. It is indeed interesting
to meet with the same practice in so many different places and to find
the genius of many races expressing itself in the same way in so many
diverse inventions, produced at times so widely separated.

[Illustration: 108.]

Example of burial in a jar.

It is probable that early man also turned to account the trees he saw
growing around him, using them as coffins for his dead. But the rapid
decay of this fragile case led to its total disappearance. A few
exceptions must, however, be mentioned. In 1840 some dredgers took from
the bed of the Saône, at Apremont, from beneath a bed of gravel five
feet thick, the trunk of a tree which still contained the bones that
had been placed in it. Similar discoveries were made in the Cher, and
in the celebrated cemetery of Hallstadt, near Salzburg. The cairns of
Scania covered over split trunks of oak and birch trees, which had been
hollowed out to receive the dead. At Gristhorpe, near Scarborough, in
England, a coffin was found made of scarcely squared planks roughly put
together; and another very like it was discovered at Hove, in Sussex,
the latter containing a splendid amber cup, evidence of the wealth of
the man who had been buried in this primitive coffin.27

The ancient Caledonians sewed up their dead in the skins of oxen before
burying them. The Egyptians also embalmed the ibis, the ox, the cat,
the crocodile, and other animals deified by them, and the bodies of
these creatures were then placed in vast subterranean chambers, where
they have been discovered in the present day in great numbers. The
Guanches of Teneriffe, the last representatives of the Iberians, and
probably the most ancient race of Europe, took out the intestines of
the corpse, dried the body in the air, painted it with a thick varnish,
and finally wrapped it in the skin of a goat. This last custom was
evidently a relic of the original idea of embalming, with a view to
rendering the mummy as nearly as possible indestructible and, to use a
happy expression of Michelet, to compel death to endure (_forcer la
mort de durer_). Our own contemporaries are thus able to look upon the
very features of those who preceded them on the earth some forty
centuries ago; and but yesterday photography reproduced in every detail
what was once Ramses the Great, one of the most glorious kings of
history.

[Illustration: 109.]

Aymara mummy.

Embalming was also practised in America. Recent travellers report28
having seen in Upper Peru tombs of the shape of beehives, made of
stones cemented with clay, each tomb containing one mummy or more in a
crouching position (Figs. 109 and 110). This custom was still practised
for many centuries; Garcilasso de la Vega tells us that the dead Incas
were seated in a temple at Cuzco, wearing their royal ornaments as if
they were still alive; their hands were crossed upon their breasts, and
their heads were bending slightly forward.29

The facts enumerated above prove that burial was long practised, though
it is impossible to say when it first cattle into use. About the time
of the beginning of the Bronze age, or perhaps even earlier, however, a
remarkable change took place in the ideas of man, and the dead instead
of being buried intact were consumed by fire on the funeral pile.

What can have been the origin of this custom? What race first practised
it? It has long been supposed by many archæologists that it was the
Aryans from the lofty Hindoo Koosh Mountains who first introduced into
Europe a civilization more advanced than that which had hitherto
obtained there, and taught the people to cremate instead of bury their
dead. This theory was accepted for a considerable time without
question, but of late years a new school, headed by Penka, has arisen
who claim that the reformers came not from the East but from the North.
The Marquis de Saporta had indeed before suggested that the primitive
races who were the contemporaries of the mammoth and the rhinoceros
came originally from the polar regions, where the remains of a
luxuriant vegetation prove that climatic conditions prevailed in remote
times of a very different character to those of the present day. The
lignites of Iceland are made up of tulip, plantain, and nut-trees, even
the vine sometimes occurring. In the ferruginous sandstones, associated
with the carboniferous deposits of Spitzberg, the beech, the poplar,
the magnolia, the plum tree, the sequoia, and numerous coniferous trees
can be made out. The sturdy sailors who dare the regions of perpetual
ice come across masses of fossilized wood in Banks, Grinnell, and
Francis Joseph’s Lands, at 88° N. Lat. Among this fossil wood Heer made
out the cypress, the silver pine, the poplar, the birch, and some
dicotyledons with caducous leaves. These were not relics of wood which
had drifted where it was found on floating ice, but of an actual local
vegetation, as proved by trunks still erect in their original
positions, buds, leaves, and flowers in every stage of growth, fruits
in every stage of ripening. The very insects that had lived on honey
from the flowers or on the leaves themselves could be identified. In
those remote days, life, abundant life, similar to that now only found
in the temperate countries farther south, flourished in those polar
regions, so long supposed to have never been anything but lifeless
deserts.

[Illustration: 110.]

Peruvian mummies.

All this, plausible as it is, does not, however, appear to be
conclusive on the point under discussion; and though we may have to
abandon the idea of the Aryans having introduced cremation, we are
scarcely, I think, in a position to say that races from the North were
the first to practise it. I have dwelt more fully on the question of
the origin of races and the evidence which language seems to give of a
common source in two papers called “Les Premiers Populations de
l’Europe,” which appeared in the _Correspondent_ for October 1 and
November 25, 1889. Whatever may be the final decision on the much
contested points involved in this controversy, one thing is certain
that cremation, involving though it does a complete revolution in
manners and customs, spread with very great rapidity. We meet with it
from Greece to Scotland and Scandinavia, from Etruria to Poland and the
south of Russia, in China as in Yucatan and certain parts of Central
America.

In the early days of history, cremation was practised all over Europe.
The Greeks attribute its inauguration to Hercules, and the funeral pile
of Patrokles is described in the Iliad. The Pelasgians and the
Proto-Etruscans burned their dead,30 and we are told of the
incineration of contemporaries of Jair, the third judge of Israel.

On the other hand, the earliest inhabitants of Latium buried their
dead. Visitors, who probably came by way of the valley of the Danube,
introduced the new custom, and for a long tune the two rites were
practised side by side. At Felsina and at Marzabotto we find instances
alike of inhumation and cremation, and at Vilanova only half the tombs
are those of corpses that had been cremated. In 365 of the tombs
excavated in the Certosa, near Bologna, only 115 show signs of
cremation having been practised. At Rome, the two rites were long both
performed, probably, however, by the two distinct peoples who formed
the primitive population of the town of Romulus. We know that Numa
Pompilius forbade the burning of his corpse; Cicero relates that Marius
was buried, and that Sulla, his fortunate rival, was the first of the
Cornelia _gens_ whose body was committed to the flames. We do not know
how early cremation was introduced in Gaul; we can only say that Cæsar
found it generally practised when be made his triumphal march across
the country.31 The celebrated excavations of Moreau prove that
inhumation and incineration were both practised among the Gallo-Romans
established in the eastern provinces of France. We may even assert that
the two rites were practised long before the introduction of the use of
metals. One thing is certain, the custom of cremation was but slowly
abandoned as Christianity spread, for Charlemagne, in an edict dated
789, ordered the punishment of death for those who dared to burn dead
bodies.

What we have just said about historic times applies equally to more
remote epochs. Thanks to the learned researches of Dr. Prunières32 we
are able to trace for a great length of time the modes of sepulture
adopted in Lozère. The cave men of the eroded limestone districts of
Les Causses took their dead to the caves in which their ancestors had
been laid, and the invaders, who were probably more civilized than
those they dispossessed, placed theirs beneath the dolmens which they
erected in their honor. In the sepulchral caves of Rouquet and of
_L’Homme Mort_ we find inhumation; beneath the megalithic monuments
dating from the end of the Neolithic period, we meet with the first
traces of cremation, but so far of a very incomplete cremation; the
action of the funeral fire had not been intense, and the bones were
hard and resisted the heat. Noting beneath certain dolmens a few bones
blackened by fire mixed with large quantities unaffected by it, one is
inclined to think with the learned Doctor, that after practising
cremation men had reverted to the old mode of burial. In the tumuli of
the Bronze age, on the other hand, where the date can be determined
with the aid of the ornaments and trinkets scatered about, the ustion
was more complete; the bones are friable and porous, crumbling into
dust when touched, and there is nothing to indicate that inhumation and
cremation were both practised.

It is strange indeed to find that incineration was practised from
Neolithic times in the wild mountains of Lozère. There can be no doubt
on the point, however, and excavations beneath the dolmen of
Marconnières strikingly confirm the earlier discoveries of Dr.
Prunières. Beneath a layer of broken stones and a very thin pavement,
was found a mass of human bones in the greatest confusion; some still
retaining their natural color, others blackened and charred by. fire.
Among these bones was picked up an arrow of rock foreign to the
country, three admirably polished lance-heads, and some finely cut
flint-darts. The dolmen contained no metal objects, and there was no
trace of metal on any of the bones.

At the same period the two rites appear to have been practised
simultaneously in Armorica, but there incineration was the dominant
custom. In one hundred and forty-five megalithic monuments supposed to
date from the Neolithic period, seventy-two give proof of incineration
and twenty of inhumation only. The others yielded a few cinders, but it
was impossible to come to any definite conclusion. In many cases, as we
have seen, the megalithic monument was surrounded by a double or triple
_enceinte_ of stones without mortar. Inside these _enceintes_ were some
small circular structures made of stones reddened by the action of
heat. In the lower part of these structures were openings to admit a
current of air to fan the flames. These strange structures, full of
cinders and black greasy earth, bear the significant name of _Ruches de
Crémation_.33 Of thirty-nine sepulchres of the Bronze age twenty-seven
gave evidence of incineration, two of inhumation, whilst ten decided
nothing one way or the other.34 The dolmen of Mont St.-Michel and that
of Tumiac are separated by a short distance only; they were erected by
the same race and probably about the same period, yet at Mont
St.-Michel we find incineration, while inhumation was practised at
Tumiac. How explain this difference in funeral customs? Does it imply a
diversity of race, of caste, of religion, or of social position, or may
it not rather be explained as being merely the result of those later
displacements which upset the most careful reasoning?

Whatever may have been the cause of the different modes of burial, we
meet with them in every country.

In Scandinavia, during the Bronze age, cremation and burial were
practised in about equal proportions. Similar facts are noticed in
Germany, but in the North incineration predominates, while in the West
it is inhumation. Beneath the cairns of Caithness in Scotland, we find
some bodies lying at full length, while others are in a bent position,
and large jars of coarse pottery filled with cinders and calcined bones
which had belonged to men of medium height. One of the largest of these
jars is fifteen or sixteen inches high by forty-nine wide at its
largest part.35 In excavating the barrows of the Orkney Islands, Petrie
noted the practice of both modes of burial36; but were those buried in
manners so different contemporaries? This is what we are not told, and
what we have to find out.

At Blendowo in Poland, beneath a cromlech was found an urn filled with
calcined bones, and thirty centimetres lower down a skeleton was
discovered buried in the sand. Near this body was found a coin of
Theodosius, and we wonder in vain whether both the individuals, whose
remains are thus within a common tomb, lived at the same time.
Throughout Prussia and in the Grand Duchy of Posen skeletons and jars
containing human ashes are met with in the same tombs.37 We must not
forget to note, especially, the necropolis of Hallstadt, which was
situated in the heart of the district of Bohemia occupied by the Boii.
The most ancient of the tombs in these vast burial-places date from
about two thousand years before the Christian era, and the Hallstadtian
period, as it is sometimes called, culminated during the first half of
the millennium immediately before the coming of Christ.38 Nine hundred
and ninety-three tombs have been excavated; all, to judge by the
objects found with the human remains, belonging to the Bronze age; of
these five hundred and twenty-seven contained buried bodies, and four
hundred and fifty-three cremated relics.39 This is a larger proportion
than in the primitive necropoles of Italy.

In the tombs in which burial was practised, the bodies were laid in the
trench without covering, and the remains of anything in the way of
slabs or coffins or protecting planks are very rare; in those tombs in
which cremation had been the rule, ustion had often been very
incomplete, sometimes the head and sometimes the feet having escaped
the flames.

Similar facts are noted at Watsch, at San Margarethen, and at Vermo in
Styria, at Rovesche in Southern Carniola, and at Rosegg in the valley
of the Drave. At Watsch, but ten skeletons were found, among two
hundred examples of incineration. In the cremation sepulchres, if we
may so call them, the cinerary urn was protected by large slabs; while
in those where burial was practised, the bodies were simply confided to
the earth as at Hallstadt; but by a singular contrast, the latter tombs
contained much more important relics, the objects with the dead being
more valuable and of finer workmanship. At Rovesche, the urn was placed
in a square chest made of unhewn stones. The buried bodies lay with the
head turned toward the east, an urn was placed at their feet, and their
shrouds were kept in place by bronze fibulæ, while on the fingers were
many rings of the same metal.

Lastly, to conclude this gloomy catalogue, excavations in the mounds of
Ohio and Illinois40 have shown that there too cremation and inhumation
are met with in sepulchres which everything tends to assign to the same
race and the same period.41 The sepulchral crypts of Missouri contain
several skeletons which had been subjected to intense heat. The human
bones were mixed with the remains of animals, fragments of charcoal,
and pieces of pottery, with sortie flint weapons. In a neighboring
mound excavations revealed no trace of cremation; the bodies were
stretched out upon the ground, and those who discovered them picked up
near them a valuable collection of flints and of carefully made
pottery. There is however nothing to show whether those who buried and
those who burnt their dead belonged to the same race or lived at the
same time. Cremation long survived among the most savage tribes of
Alaska and California, where it is still practised, and the Indians of
Florida preserve the ashes of their fathers in human skulls. In
California, the relations of the deceased covered their faces with a
thick paste of a kind of loam mixed with the ashes of the dead, and
were compelled to wear this sign of their grief until it fell off
naturally.

Although we meet with the burial of the dead either in a recumbent or a
crouching position, everywhere the minor ceremonies connected with
death are innumerable; each people, each race, indeed, having its own
custom, handed down from one generation to another, and piously
preserved intact by each successive family. Feasting was from the
earliest times a feature of the funeral ceremonies. An edict of
Charlemagne forbids eating and drinking on the tombs of the deceased,
and Saint Boniface, the apostle of Germany, complains bitterly that the
priests encouraged by their presence these feasts of death. We meet
with the same kind of thing among the lower classes at the present day,
and the cemeteries of Paris are surrounded with cafés and wine shops,
where too often grief is drowned in wine. The custom of holding these
feasts really comes down from the earliest inhabitants of Europe, and
the savage cave man gorged himself with food upon the tombs of those
belonging to him. At Aurignac, in the cave of _L’Homme Mort_, in the
Trou du Frontal, broken bones and fragments of charcoal bear witness to
the repast. Similar traces of feasts are met with beneath the dolmens
and the tumuli. From the Long Barrows have been taken the skulls and
feet of bovidæ, and it is probable that the other parts of the body had
been devoured by the assistants, and that the head and feet were placed
in the tomb as an offering either to the dead or to the divinities who
are supposed to have presided at the death. In the ancient sepulchres
of Wiltshire Sir R. Colt Hoare picked up the bones of boars, stags,
sheep, horses, and dogs; which he too considered were the remains of
funeral feasts.

Were feasts the only ceremonies connected with interments? We think
not. The body was often placed in the centre of the sepulchral chamber,
and around it were ranged the wives, servants, and slaves of the
deceased, condemned to follow their chief into the unknown world to
which he had gone. Beneath a dolmen of Algeria was found a crouching
skeleton with two crania lying at his feet, which crania had doubtless
belonged to victims immolated in his honor. The barrows of Great
Britain preserve traces of human sacrifices, and Cæsar says in speaking
of the Gauls: “Their funerals are magnificent and sumptuous. Everything
supposed to have been dear to the defunct during his life was flung
upon the funeral pile; even his animals were sacrificed, and until
quite recently his slaves and the dependants he had loved were burnt
with him.”42

The facts we have been noticing prove that early man cherished hopes of
immortality. All was not ended for him with death; a new life commences
beyond the tomb, marked—for his ideas could go no farther—by joys
similar to those he had known on earth, and events such as had occurred
during his life. What else could be the meaning of the weapons, the
tools of his craft, the vases filled with food placed near the defunct,
the ornaments and colors intended for his adornment, the wives, slaves,
and horses flung into the same tomb or consumed upon the same pile? It
is pleasing to find this supreme hope among our remote ancestors; and
clumsily as it was expressed, it implies a belief in a being superior
to man, a protecting divinity according to some, but according to some
few others a malignant and tyrannical spirit. The proofs so far to hand
are not enough to justify us in seriously asserting that ancestors were
worshipped by prehistoric man. But the subject is too important for us
to refrain from putting before the reader such indications of this
worship as have been collected, and which are necessarily connected
with the moral and material condition of our remote ancestors.

The radius of a mammoth was discovered at Chaleux, occupying a place of
honor on a large sandstone slab near the hearth. The Chaleux Cave dates
from the Reindeer period; at which time the mammoth had long since been
extinct in Belgium, so that there can be no doubt that the cave man had
taken this bone from the alluvial deposits of the preceding epoch, and
this huge relic of an unknown creature had been the object of his
veneration, a lar or protective divinity of his home. A somewhat
similar fact was discovered at Laugerie-Basse and, by a strange
coincidence, certain tribes of North America of the present clay
preserve the bone of a mastodon or of a cetacean in their buts as a
protection to their homes.

From Paleolithic times men were in the habit of cutting celts or
hatchets in chalk, bitumen, and other fragile substances, which were
certainly of no practical use. Thousands of similar objects in harder
rock, but showing no sign of wear or tear, have also been found, and
there is little doubt that they all alike served as amulets. This
superstitious respect for certain objects lasted for many centuries,
and was handed down from one generation to another. The tombs of the
Bronze and Iron ages are often found to contain flint hatchets, some of
them broken intentionally, a proof, as I have already said, that they
were connected with funeral rites of the nature of which we are
ignorant.

We also find votive hatchets beneath dolmens. By the side of some
skeletons at Cissbury lay flint celts. A hatchet one and a quarter feet
long was found in a Lake Station of Switzerland. It was of such friable
rock that it can have been of no use but as a symbol; perhaps, indeed,
it may have been a badge of office. Lastly, Merovingian tombs contain
hundreds of small flint celts, the last pious offerings to the
departed.43

We find hatchets engraved on the megalithic monuments of Brittany, on
the walls of the caves of Marne, and we meet with them again on the
other side of the Atlantic, evidently bearing the same signification,
implying respect for them as means of protection. De Longpérier has
published a description of a Chaldean cylinder, on which was
represented a priest presenting his offering to a hatchet lying on a
throne, and a ring was picked up at Mykenæ, on the stone of which was
engraved a double-bladed celt. We find the same idea in many different
mythologies. The word _Nouter_ (God) is translated in Egyptian
hieroglyphics by a sign resembling a celt, and the hatchet of Odin is
engraved on the rocks of Kivrik. On a number of Gallo-Roman _cippi_, we
find a hatchet beneath which we read the words, _Dis Manibus_, and
lower down the dedication, _Sub Ascia dedicavit_. At all times and
everywhere the hatchet appears as the emblem of force, and is the
object of the respect of the people. The tradition of its value and
importance is handed down from ancestors to descendants throughout many
generations.

[Illustration: 111.]

Erratic block from Scania, covered with carvings.

May we give a religious interpretation to the basins and cups hollowed
out on rocks and erratic blocks and on the so-called Roches Moutonnées,
with other monuments that have endured for many centuries (Figs. 111
and 112)? Or must we attribute them merely to passing caprice? Their
number and importance we think forbid the latter idea. We find such
blocks in Switzerland, in England, France, Italy, Portugal, and on the
frozen shores of the Baltic. They are no less numerous in India, and
they figure in the curious pictographs of the two Americas. There is no
doubt that we have here a common idea, and one it is impossible not to
recognize. How. else can we account for the similarity of arrangement
in the cup-shaped sculptures from the tumuli of Schleswig-Holstein and
those on the Indian rocks of Kamaou, or between those of Algeria and of
England?

[Illustration: 112.]

Engraved rock from Massibert (Lozère).

In Brittany and in Scotland these cup-like sculptures are found on
rocks and menhirs, on the walls of sepulchral chambers, on stones
forming the sides of _kistvæns_, accompanied in many instances with
radiated circles, which do not, however, help us to understand them
better. In Scandinavia they are known as _Elfen Stenavs_, or elf
stones, and the inhabitants come and place offerings on them for the
_Little People_. According to a touching tradition, these little people
are souls awaiting the time of their being clothed once more in human
flesh. In Belgium these strangely decorated stones are attributed to
the _Nutons_, dwarfs who are very helpful to mortals. In every country
there is some legend sacred to the sculptured stones.

Such are the only facts we have been able to collect respecting the
religious feeling of prehistoric races. They are not sufficient to
authorize any final conclusion on the subject. At every turn we are
compelled to admit our helplessness. But yesterday this past without a
limit was absolutely unknown to us, and to-day we are but beginning to
be able to obtain a glimpse into its secrets. We have been the laborers
of the first hour, it will be for those who come after us to complete
the task we have been able but to begin. May a genuine love of truth be
to them, as we may justly claim it has been to us, the only guide.


1 The true name of this cave is the _Betche aux Roches_. A very
excellent essay on the subject was read by the explorers, MM. de Puydt
and Lohest, in August, 1886, to the Historic Society of Belgium, and
“Les Fouilles de Spy,” by Dr. Collignon, published in the _Revue
d’Anthropologie_, 1887, may also be consulted. Excavations were also
carried on in the same cave in 1879 by M. Bucquoy (_Bul. Soc. Anth. de
Belgique_, 1887). He distinguished five ossiferous levels and picked up
some flints of the Moustérien type, and even some Chelléen hatchets, to
which he gave the name of coups _de poing_.—Fraipont and Lohest;
“Recherches sur les Ossements Humains Decouvertes dans les Dépôts
Quaternaires d’un grotte à Spy.”

2 We borrow these details from a valuable work by Cartailhac (_Mal_.,
1886, p. 441; _Rev. d’Anth_., 1886, p. 448). The conclusions of our
learned colleague are that we really know nothing of the funeral rites
of the men of Chelles and Moustier, and that it is to the Solutréen
period that we must assign the first really authenticated tombs.
Cartailhac’s admirable book, “La France Préhistorique,” p. 302, should
also be consulted.

3 “Ipui Antichi Sepolcri dell Italia.”

4 _Archæological Journal_, vol. xxii.

5 _Matériaux_, 1885, p. 299.

6 This dolmen was carefully excavated by MM. Hahn and Millescamps,
_Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1883, p. 312.

7 Rivière; _Congrès des Sciences Géographiques_, Paris, 1878.

8 _Atti della R. Acad. dei Lincei_, 1879–1880. Pigorini: _Bul. de Pal.
Italiana_, 1880, p. 33.

9 _Soc. Anth. de Munich_, 1886.

10 _Soc. Anth. de Lyon_, 1889.

11 “Histoire du Travail en Gaule,” p. 24.

12 Troyon: “De l’ Attitude Repliée dans la Sépulture Antique,” _Revue
Arch_., 1864.

13 _Matériaux_, 1875, p. 327.

14 A. Nicaise: _Matériaux_, 1880, p. 186.

15 _Arch. Préhistorique_, p. 178.

16 _Congrès Préhistorique de Bruxelles_, p. 299.

17 _Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1876, p. 191. Grad: _Nature_, 1877, 1st week, p.
314.

18 _Memorie sulle scoperte paleoethnologiche della campagna romana_.
Pigorini adds in his turn: “_I cadaveri erano abitualmente adagiati sul
fianco sinistro, col cranio appogiato sulla mano sinistre e le
ginocchia alquanto piegate in guisa che tavolta si trovarono le tibie
assai prossime alla cassa toracica_.”

19 Pallery: “Mon. Mégalithiques de Mascara,” _Bul. Soc. Ethn_., 1887.

20 Bancroft: “The Native Races of the Pacific,” vol. i., pp. 365, etc.
Moreno: “Les Paraderos de la Patagonie,” _Rev. d’Anth_., 1874.

21 “Nécropole de Colonna, prov. de Grosseto,” _R. Acad. dei Lincei_,
Roma, 1885.

22 _Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1880, p. 895.

23 Abbé Baudry et Ballereau: “Les Puits Funéraires du Bernard,” La
Roche-sur-Yon, 1873.

24 “Renseignements sur une Ancienne Nécropole Manzabotta, près de
Bologna,” Bologna, 1871.

25 Gross: “Les Proto-Helvètes.” Morel-Fatio: “Sépultures des
Populations Lacustres de Chamblandes.” As at Auvernier, a great many
bears’ tusks were found lying near the dead, which may possibly also
have had something to do with a funeral rite.

26 D. Charnay: _North American Review_, January, 1881.

27 Stuart: “The Early Modes of Burial.”

28 Vidal Seneze; _Bul. Soc. Anth_., 1877, p. 561.

29 “Histoire des Incas,” Paris, 1744, chap. xviii.

30 Conestabile: “De l’incinération chez les Etrusques.”

31 A. Bertrand: “Arch. Celtique et Gauloise,” Introduction.

32 _Ass. française_, Nantes, 1875; Havre, 1877.

33 Luco: “Exposition de Trois Monuments Quadrilatères par feu James
Miln,” Vannes, 1883.

34 P. du Chatellier: “Mém. Soc. d’Emulation des Côtes-du-Nord,” Saint
Brieuc, 1883.

35 _Proceedings Soc. Anth. of Scotland_, January 11, 1886.

36 “On the Ancient Modes of Sepulchre in the Orkneys” (_British
Association_, 1877).

37 Kohn and Mehlis: “Zür Vorgeschichte des Menschen im Ostlichen
Europa,” Iéna, 1879.

38 Hochstetter: “Die neueste Graber Funde von Watsch. und S.
Margarethen und der Kultur Kreiss der Hallstadter Period,” Wien, 1883.
Siebenter: “Bericht der Prehistorischen Commission,” Wien, 1884.

39 In these tombs were found 61 gold objects, 5,574 bronze, 593 iron,
270 amber, 73 glass, and 1,813 terra-cotta. A. Bertrand: _Rev.
d’Ethnographie_, 1883.

40 _Smithsonian Report_, 1881.

41 Putnam, xii. and _xx. Reports of the Peabody Museum_.

42 “De Bello Gallico,” book vi., cap. xix. Consult also Pomponius Mela:
“De Situ Orbis,” book iii., cap. ii.

43 In his fruitful excavations of Gallic, Gallo-Roman, and Merovingian
tombs, Moreau collected no less than 31,515 flint celts or hatchets,
which had evidently been votive offerings. See Album de Caranda:
“Fouilles de Sainte Restitute, de Trugny, d’Armentière, d’Arcy, de
Brenny,” etc.

WORKS BY MARQUIS DE NADAILLAC.


Prehistoric America. By the Marquis de Nadaillac. Translated, with the
permission of the Author, by Nancy Bell (N. D’Anvers), author of
“History of Art.” Edited, with notes, by W. H. Dall. Popular edition.
$2 25

CHIEF CONTENTS.—Man and the Mastodon—The Kjokkenmöddings and Cave
Relics—Mound-Builders—Pottery Weapons and Ornaments of the
Mound-Builders—Cliff-Dwellers and Inhabitants of the Pueblos—People of
Central America—Central American Ruins—Peru—Early Race—Origin of the
American Aborigines, etc., etc.

“The best book on this subject that has yet been published, … for the
reason that, as a record of facts, it is unusually full, and because it
is the first comprehensive work in which, discarding all the old and
worn-out nostrums about the existence on this continent of an extinct
civilization, we are brought face to face with conclusions that are
based upon a careful comparison of architectural and other prehistoric
remains with the arts and industries, the manners and customs, of “the
only people, except the whites, who, so far as we know, have ever held
the regions in which these remains are found.”—_Nation_.

The Customs and Monuments of Prehistoric Peoples. By the Marquis de
Nadaillac. Translated, with the permission of the Author, by Nancy Bell
(N. D’Anvers). Fully illustrated. 8vo. $3 00

CHIEF CONTENTS.—The Stone Age, its Duration, and its Place in
Time—Food, Cannibalism, Mammals, Fish, Hunting and Fishing,
Navigation—Weapons, Tools, Pottery; Origin of the Use of Fire,
Clothing, Ornaments; Early Artistic Efforts—Caves, Kitchen-Middings,
Lake Stations, “Terremares,” Crannoges, Burghs, “Nurhags,” “Talayoti,”
and “Truddhi”—Megalithic Monuments—Industry, Commerce, Social
Organization; Fights, Wounds and Trepanation—Camps, Fortifications,
Vitrified Forts; Santorin; the Towns upon the Hill of
Hissarlik—Tombs—Index.

G. P. PUTNAM’S SONS, PUBLISHERS,

NEW YORK AND LONDON.





*** End of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "Manners and Monuments of Prehistoric Peoples" ***

Copyright 2023 LibraryBlog. All rights reserved.