Home
  By Author [ A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z |  Other Symbols ]
  By Title [ A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y  Z |  Other Symbols ]
  By Language
all Classics books content using ISYS

Download this book: [ ASCII ]

Look for this book on Amazon


We have new books nearly every day.
If you would like a news letter once a week or once a month
fill out this form and we will give you a summary of the books for that week or month by email.

Title: Common-Sense Country
Author: Bevington, L. S.
Language: English
As this book started as an ASCII text book there are no pictures available.


*** Start of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "Common-Sense Country" ***


produced from images generously made available by The
Internet Archive)



             _“LIBERTY” PAMPHLETS._      _Price One Penny._

[Illustration: LIBERTY PRESS]



                         Common-Sense Country.


                                   BY

                            L. S. BEVINGTON.

[Illustration]

                                LONDON:
                PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY JAMES TOCHATTI,
           “LIBERTY” PRESS, 60, GROVE PARK TERRACE, CHISWICK.

------------------------------------------------------------------------



                           Liberty Pamphlets.


                             IN THE PRESS.

  =Socialism in Danger.= Part II. BY E. DOMELA NIEUWENHUIS. Translated
      by R. GRIERSON.

  =Parliamentary Politics in the Socialist Movement.= BY ERRICO
      MALATESTA.


            16 pp., 8vo., printed on toned paper, Price ONE PENNY.

  =Jones’ Boy: Dialogues on Social Questions= Between an ‘Enfant
      Terrible’ and his Father. By “Spokeshave.”

  =Liberty Lyrics=, BY L. S. BEVINGTON.

  =The Ideal and Youth.= BY ELISÉE RECLUS.

  =An Anarchist on Anarchy=, BY ELISÉE RECLUS.

  =In Defence of Emma Goldmann and the Right of Expropriation.= BY
      VOLTAIRINE DE CLEYRE.


                                FIRST SERIES.

  =The Why I Ams=: Why I Am a Socialist and an Atheist, by Conrad
      Naewiger; Why I Am a Social Democrat, by G. Bernard Shaw; Why I Am
      an Individualist Anarchist, by J. Armsden.


                                SECOND SERIES.

  =The Why I Ams=: Why I Am a Communist, by William Morris; Why I Am an
      Expropriationist, by L. S. Bevington.

                  *       *       *       *       *



                                LIBERTY:

                   A JOURNAL OF ANARCHIST COMMUNISM.


                Published Monthly.      Price One Penny.


                        THE CONTRIBUTORS INCLUDE

  LOUISE MICHEL, A. HAMON, W. MORRIS, P. KROPOTKIN, ERRICO MALATESTA,
  ELISÉE RECLUS, G. B. SHAW, L. S. BEVINGTON, J. GLEN, TOUZEAU PARRIS,
                                  AND
                   ALL THE BEST WRITERS AND THINKERS
                       IN THE SOCIALIST MOVEMENT.

------------------------------------------------------------------------



                         Common-Sense Country.

[Illustration]


There was a country where Common-sense had somehow got the upper hand.
In that country sense was as common as lunacy is in a madhouse. There
was a place for everything, and everything was either in that place, or
else was on the direct way there—the shortest way, the easiest way, the
cheapest way. In that country everybody was brought up with the notion
that the simplest plan in everything served everybody’s turn best, even
the clever people’s; and it was taken as a matter of course that if
things did not go wrong people wouldn’t. They read in their books of
history and comparative sociology that in countries were things do go
wrong, people go wrong too, in the blind, blundering attempt to
straighten things back a bit. But in Common-sense Country it was always
said when things went wrong that there had been some nonsense—that is,
empty word-play—in the heads or habits of the people, which had diverted
attention from realities, and caused the people to let things wander out
of the way.

In Common-sense Country all the commodities and goods, all the
instruments, utensils, and appliances—in short, all the “things”—had
very simple and unadventurous biographies, and, if they could have
spoken, they would not have had much harrowing information to impart
about the ravages of their tissues and textures caused by moth and rust,
nor yet of vicissitudes incurred at the hands of thieves breaking
through to steal. “I was needed: I was made: I was conveyed: I was
applied: I was consumed.” That would have summed up the history of a
thing in the country where things went right: only five short chapters.
In most countries, of course, all sorts of distressing and distracting
other chapters intervene. Thus: “I was coveted: I was done without: I
was lied for: I was hated for: I was speculated in: I was adulterated: I
was advertised. I was legislated about: I was sold (and my buyer with
me): I was squandered: I was hoarded: I was quarrelled over: I was
fought for: I was burgled: I was bombed.”

[Illustration: -ooo-]

In Common-sense Country there was a job for everyone, and everyone was
merrily, ardently, or placidly doing that job. No one was doing mere
“business” and calling it work. No one was doing real work and feeling
it “toil”. Dull jobs were done in short spells by an immense number of
people; delightful jobs were worked at for the pleasure of the thing, in
longer spells, and by a fewer number of people. It fell out so,
naturally, and because of common sense; nobody had to be at the trouble
of enforcing the arrangement. The man with the dullest or most fatiguing
job, as a matter of course, got the longest leisure for re-creation of
his naturally flagging zest for the job. The man with the pleasurable
and healthy job hardly knew leisure from job. The kindliest and most
able-bodied and jolliest of the people had common-sense reasons for
attending to the least appetizing tasks. Everybody knew they wanted
doing; and these kindly, vigorous, and jolly folks were those who cared
most about getting them done, and cared least about minor disagreeables.
They also liked the peculiar way in which other people shook hands with
them for it, and more than made it good to them in the way of respect
and hospitality wherever they went.

You never saw any feet without shoes in cold weather in Common-sense
Country. And you never saw any shoes heaped up thousands thick in
warehouses with no feet to put into them. Common-sense citizens had
grave objections, not only to cold, discomfort, and disease, but also
grave objections to the enormous expense of thought, time, material, and
goodwill, necessarily involved in any and every measure for keeping
empty shoes warm indoors, and human feet cold outside in the street. You
never came to a place in any Common-sense city where, by turning your
head to the right, you could see one horn of a dilemma in the shape of a
lot of grain or fish being destroyed on the lunatic excuse that it could
not be sold for more than it cost, while by turning your head to the
left the other horn of the dilemma became visible in the shape of men
and women (with their children) hungry, worried, and constantly at their
wits’ end, only because they could not buy back the comestibles they had
ploughed, reaped, milled, fished, and otherwise laboured to bring within
human reach.

[Illustration: -ooo-]

In Common-sense Country there were no jerry built houses, because people
could not see any reason for making insecure and unhealthy dwellings.
There were no ground landlords to make it disadvantageous to any builder
to build honestly; no builders so hard pressed, therefore, that they
were obliged to cause the masons to scamp work, use limeless mortar, or
unseasoned wood. No builder or mason, moreover, had (in the name of
common-sense) any object whatever in view so immediately as the
supplying of buildings wanted for use. He built houses for bakers,
clothiers, artists, and all sorts of other useful persons; and these
lived in the houses and produced food, clothing, works of art, and all
sorts of other useful things for the builder in exchange.

There was no waste of any energy or of any talent in Common-sense
Country. There were no churches and temples made with hands; because
hands had better things to do than build prisons to shut up souls in.
Also because in strict common sense the sky was holy enough to “sit
under,” and even to sing spiritual songs under. Besides,
Common-senseites had discovered that you could not get the sun and fixed
stars and all their lesser lights into the biggest of temples ever made
with hands. In Common-sense Country people liked daylight for their
minds and morals as well as for their bodies; and found it cheapest in
the long run.

[Illustration: -ooo-]

There were next to no shipwrecks on the coasts of Common-sense Country;
no one raced any ships to port in all weathers for the nonsensical
reason of getting in before other ships. People on shore could always
afford to wait a day or so for the weather, better than they could
afford to kill men, sink ships, and spoil cargoes through running amuck
at nature’s meteorological arrangements. It did not matter a jot to any
one which ship got in first, since all ships were full of supplies, and
sure to drop in, in natural order, as fast as needed. What sense of
hurry there was, founded of course on experience of the inconvenience of
waiting, led to all possible improvements in the art and science of
ship-building and engine-building, so that wind-and-wave difficulties
had been reduced to a minimum. So there was no colliding in fogs, no
bursting of boilers, no over-lading, and no un-seaworthy craft; also no
“Lloyd’s” agencies, to speculate on anyone’s want of common-sense, and
to live as parasites on the low moral vitality of the public, making
profit at its expense. When folk talked of “insuring” in that country,
they always meant making as sure as possible against chances of mishap.
To insure a ship was to build her well, fit her well, man her well, to
steer clear of shoals, and keep her in sound repair. Likewise with the
insurance of houses. And to insure your life, you had only to eat,
drink, and clothe yourself on hygienic principles, to avoid the
indolence or the over-taxing of any of your faculties, and to act fairly
by every one of your fellow-creatures with whom you had to do. In
common-sense language, insuring your life or property never meant to
make it worth anyone’s while to destroy either one or the other.

[Illustration: -ooo-]

No visible teacher taught common-sense in that country. Children were
born with it ready-made. It lay in their human nature. It taught itself.
It “growed” (like Topsy) because neither “business” nor “policy” existed
to check or warp it—indeed neither the policy of business nor the
business of policy were known at all, except as queer, sad, old
superstitions, suffered through and done with ages ago, during the time
when human generations were paying a big price in the purgatory of
civilization, for the privilege of having beaten other creatures in the
dangerous matter of language. Children in Common-sense Country were
never taught to be “wise and prudent,” because that was the way to
prevent anything of any interest or beauty or high import from being
“revealed.” Their little, honest, ignorant, simple questions received
honest, accurate, and simple answers, in language which they could
understand, and which they never needed to unlearn afterwards. And this
alike on all subjects. Every young man and young woman grew up with as
much common-sense in his or her head or expectations as the elders could
help them to. And each young man or young woman went on from a
common-sense starting point to use his or her faculties as individual
endowment suggested, so that each generation kept on fearlessly adding
to real knowledge by experimenting in new directions as common-sense
prompted; while the elders loved to have it so, and felt rewarded for
their good faith to the children, and were sometimes in their own turn
listeners, questioners, learners.

Common-sense citizens never said “Time is money.” They said that
money-minting, money-managing, and money-protecting entail endless waste
of time and trouble; that they are an abuse of human faculty, resulting
in a great deal of death—bodily, intellectual, moral, and spiritual.
Also it was said these and like employments were as nonsensical in their
objects as they were vicious in their effects. Money in Common-sense
Country had no meaning, any more than it has in a beehive. No one said
“Money is power.” Sometimes it was said “Money is weakness.” That was
when Common-senseites were speaking of the doings and miseries of the
inhabitants of Lunatic Land. (By the way, the word used was not _money_
but _mammon_.) One objection they had to money, beyond its
nonsensicalness, was its tendency—in proportion to the degree of its
accumulation in a man’s hand—to sap away his “soul,” his moral
individuality, his character. They said, “What can it profit a man to
lose his soul, and become a moral paralytic?” They observed also that
wherever in Lunatic Land mammon had accumulated in a man’s hand, it had
a tendency to put into his other hand a sceptre, a truncheon, a gatling
gun, or some other preposterous implement, making of that moral
paralytic a lord over two, or five, or ten cities, or markets, or
communities—as the case might be.

[Illustration: -ooo-]

As there was no mammon, there were none of those dismal things which are
eternal essentials where mammon reigns. There were no arsenals, no
armies, no police, no spies: no banks, no prisons, no poorhouses: no
brothels, no divorce courts, no nunneries, no confessionals: no “rings,”
no strikes, no infernal machines, no gallows. Common-sense found no sort
of use in any of these queer things. Common-sense knew by hearsay that
mammon could not reign without them; but then common sense found no
reason whatever for putting up with mammon, or paying its expenses.

There were many stores and depots where anyone who wanted anything for
wear, or consumption, or instruction, or pleasure, or any other use,
could go, or send and get it, or get it made. He never had to ask
“What’s the damage?” because in Common-sense Country damage was objected
to. Everyone knew that no one had got what he did not want, because
nobody was so insane as to cumber himself with the custody of anything
that was of no use or pleasure to him; so that to ask him to give up
what was of direct use or pleasure to him would damage him. No one was
short of anything, because the world is very fruitful, and human beings
are very numerous, very ingenious, and very industrious, and are able
and eager to make it more and more fruitful. Wealth in Common-sense
Country increased even faster than the population, so that there was
more leisure for every new generation born. Whatever was not of direct
use to the individuals who produced it, it was to the convenience of
these individuals to place in care, and outside custody altogether, so
that those to whom it was not superfluous might choose their own time
and put it to their own uses. It is only in Lunatic Land that everybody
(willingly or not) makes a practice of fining everybody else for the
privilege of living alongside of him on the same planet. It takes a
hereditary lunatic of many generations’ standing to go shamming about in
the roundabout, nonsensically solemn effort to convert man’s natural
home into a penal colony, by means of a cunningly devised system of
fines all round for being alive and active and wanting to stop so.

[Illustration: -ooo-]

In Common-sense Country there were horn ninety-five per cent. fewer
idiots, cripples, and otherwise afflicted mortals than are born
elsewhere. The few there were, were not felt as a burden; for those of
tender hearts found a natural pleasure in doing what could be done to
make life tolerable for these sad and ever diminishing exceptions; and
of course they were no expense in a land of plenty, where access was
free to whatever was wanted, without money and without price.

[Illustration: -ooo-]

In Common-sense Country words were true, and purposes single; even
newspapers expressed real opinions, and conveyed real information; fun
abounded, and nobody preached. Every shade of individuality was
respected and made welcome, variety being suggestive as well as
interesting. No one wheedled, no one canted, no one flattered, or
equivocated, or slandered; because none of these were necessary
expedients. There was never anything to fear from either honesty or
generosity in that land. People could have food, friends, fun, and
freedom without little abject servilities. Every individual was, as a
matter of course, left perfectly free on his capable side, while being
courteously and gladly aided, by custom and common consent, on his weak
side. So that there was nothing to prevent his voluntarily and naturally
making common cause with others in the overcoming of common
difficulties, and in the acquirement, production, and distribution of
all good things.

[Illustration: -ooo-]

There was no schism in that country, because there was no Church. There
was a great deal of religion, because Common-senseites had time to try
their best powers of life and mind on everything, and the more they
knew, the deeper depths of sheer wonderfulness did they find beneath the
new-won knowledge. They found that life, love, liberty, peace, progress,
and everything worth having came as the reward of adherence to certain
inexorable, universal laws, inherent in everything; laws in which there
was no variableness, nor shadow of turning; and also no respect of
persons. They had the intensest interest and zest in getting hold of
these laws, and in falling in with them as fast as they became visible;
and they never dreamt of making cheap and nasty substitutes for laws in
places or cases where none appeared of their own accord. As neither the
ignorance nor superstition of their fellows served anyone’s turn in a
country where citizens were free and trusted one another, no people in
black were kept to purvey either the one or the other, not even to women
or to the little children. All black arts were forgotten, and not
missed. On the other hand Common-sense Country was rich in prophets, or
poets, of the variety known as “born not made.”

[Illustration: -ooo-]

There was no sedition, because there was no State. Instead, there was
every where a most beautiful order; for common-sense, left to itself,
saw no use in a public muddle, or in a private scramble; such as exists
everywhere and all the while in Lunatic Land. It was moreover found that
there were a thousand simpler, cheaper, and surer (because more natural)
ways of forestalling and discouraging any atavistic aggressiveness on
the part of individuals, than bribing a number of strangers beforehand
to be in readiness to retaliate by proxy.

[Illustration: -ooo-]

There was no swindling because there was no competition. Instead, there
was endless emulation. The results of doing anything well, usefully, or
admirably were wholly pleasant. The social results of doing any thing
that wanted doing better and more easily and swiftly than it had been
done before, were so exceptionally pleasant that all the most energetic
and able people aspired and endeavoured to experience those results at
first hand. No man-imposed restriction thwarted or impeded any
experiment, and in the end the community learnt something useful by
every mistake made. General goodwill and prosperity were immense;
because there were no reasons at all for tricking anybody—quite the
reverse.

[Illustration: -ooo-]

Human nature was never made a butt for satire, or a subject of regret,
in Common-sense Country. No mud, no rotten eggs, no printers’ ink were
thrown at it. No one made a “living” by undertaking to convince others
of their unsuspected depravity, with promise of cure for it in exchange
for cash down and vows of allegiance. No one made any name or fame for
himself by undertaking to keep human nature in others in order, by means
of penal and restrictive regulations invented and imposed by human
nature in himself or his set. Common-senseites saw that human nature was
a branch of nature at large, and that to divide it against itself was
the surest way to get it out of gear. Whenever a proclivity was found to
be universal amongst humans, common-sense put the natural interpretation
on the fact, and respected the proclivity, however superficially
inconvenient in minor respects or exceptional cases. They respected it
as due to some instinct, implanted and developed by the law of
Lifewardness, and which it was therefore dangerous and disastrous
systematically to nullify and oppose. Their endeavour was, instead, to
become better acquainted with it.

[Illustration: -ooo-]

The great pleasure of trustful, unchecked sympathy, and of spontaneous
glowing kindliness, was enjoyed nowhere to such a degree as in
Common-sense Country. The old people, the little children, the animals
and birds had a happy time of it; and there was free exchange of
friendship and affection between the dumb and the human sharers of
earthly life. And in the healthy, breathable, moral atmosphere of
habitual good faith, fearless thinking, true speech, and sincere dealing
which (by dint of simple good sense) people had gradually instituted,
the necessary love of self, which takes such crude forms in Lunatic
Land, had overflowed at every point, and become indistinguishable from
the delicious, zest-giving, and inexhaustible pleasure of love for those
around.

There was Peace in Common-sense Country, and Goodwill among men; and
Happiness and Fullness of Life had become the Natural Order of the day.


   Printed by James Tochatti, at 60, Grove Park Terrace, Chiswick, W.

------------------------------------------------------------------------



                          TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES


 1. Silently corrected typographical errors and variations in spelling.
 2. Anachronistic, non-standard, and uncertain spellings retained as
      printed.
 3. Enclosed italics font in _underscores_.
 4. Enclosed bold font in =equals=.





*** End of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "Common-Sense Country" ***

Copyright 2023 LibraryBlog. All rights reserved.



Home