Title: Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 2, Vol. I, January 12, 1884
Author: Various
Language: English
As this book started as an ASCII text book there are no pictures available.


*** Start of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 2, Vol. I, January 12, 1884" ***

This book is indexed by ISYS Web Indexing system to allow the reader find any word or number within the document.

LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART, FIFTH SERIES, NO. 2, VOL. I, JANUARY 12,
1884 ***



[Illustration: CHAMBERS’S JOURNAL

OF

POPULAR

LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART

Fifth Series

ESTABLISHED BY WILLIAM AND ROBERT CHAMBERS, 1832

CONDUCTED BY R. CHAMBERS (SECUNDUS)

NO. 2.—VOL. I.      SATURDAY, JANUARY 12, 1884.      PRICE 1½_d._]



WHAT IS A PEER?


Judging from casual remarks often heard in ordinary conversation, it
would seem that not a few persons believe every man who is styled ‘Lord
So-and-so’ to be a peer. The notion indicated, though prevalent, is
wholly erroneous; and as the peerage of this realm, unlike that of
other countries, is a matter of substantial importance, not only in a
social but in a constitutional sense, an answer to the question, ‘What
is a peer?’ may not prove uninteresting.

The word ‘peer’ itself, etymologically, in no way denotes superiority
of position; on the contrary, strange to say, it denotes equality,
being simply a form of the Latin _par_, equal, and comes to us through
the French word _pair_, bearing the same meaning. How comes it, then,
that an ennobled person should be designated by a term which signifies
‘an equal?’; and of whom is such person an equal? One statement will
answer these questions—namely, that every peer of the realm is the
equal of every other peer of the realm—that is, of the United Kingdom;
just as the members of all other classes of the community are the peers
of each other in regard to citizen rights. We say ‘peer of the realm,’
because all peers are not entitled to be so styled. Thus, a member of
only the Irish peerage is not the equal of an English peer or a peer of
the realm, for the reason that he is not, by the mere reason of being
a peer of Ireland, entitled to a seat in the House of Lords. In other
words, he is not a peer or lord of parliament unless he is elected to
be such; a remark which requires explanation.

At the time of the union of Ireland with Great Britain, confirmed by
the statute 39 and 40 Geo. III. (1801), it was provided in the Act of
Parliament that the peers of Ireland should have the power to elect
twenty-eight representatives from amongst their own body to sit in the
Upper House of the united legislatures for life. Such representative
peers are chosen when necessary, and when elected, _are_ lords of
parliament, and have all the privileges of peers of the United Kingdom.
Other Irish peers who are not representative peers are in a very
different position. They are not lords of parliament, although they
_primâ facie_ enjoy all such privileges as appertain to the peerage
generally. And this being so, an Irish peer, whether representative
or not, cannot be arrested for debt, in which respect he is on an
equality with all peers of the realm. An Irish peer may also be elected
as a member of the House of Commons for a constituency in England
or Scotland (by 39 and 40 Geo. III. c. 67); but by such election he
becomes for the time being a commoner, and so _pro tem._ loses the
privileges of a peer. It will be remembered that Lord Palmerston, who
represented Tiverton in the House of Commons for so many years, was a
peer of Ireland; and the present member of parliament for East Suffolk,
Lord Rendlesham, is also an Irish peer. His lordship, therefore, though
the peer of all other Irish peers—not representative peers—is not a
peer of, say, Lord Carlingford and other noblemen who sit in the House
of Lords as of right.[1] Indeed, Lord Rendlesham, so long as he sits in
the Lower House of parliament, is of necessity simply a commoner.

As to peers of Scotland only, they also are entitled to elect
representatives out of their general body to sit in the House of Lords.
The number so elected is sixteen; but, unlike the Irish representative
peers, they sit only during the existence of the parliament for which
they are elected. On the other hand, a Scotch peer of any grade, unlike
an Irish peer, is a peer of Great Britain, and he cannot, therefore,
sit in the House of Commons for any constituency whatever. The only
difference between a Scotch peer and a peer of the United Kingdom
is, that the former cannot as of right—that is, unless elected a
representative peer—sit in the House of Lords; in all other respects he
is the peer of a peer of the realm.

When once, then, a nobleman—by which is here meant a person ennobled by
the Crown—takes his seat in the Upper House of parliament, he becomes
a peer of the realm—that is, a lord of parliament; and although the
well-known gradations of dukes, marquises, earls, viscounts, and barons
exist, yet, so far as parliamentary rights are concerned, all ennobled
persons who sit in the House of Lords are the peers or equals of each
other. We purposely make use of the word ‘nobleman,’ because the two
archbishops and all the bishops who sit there and vote too are not
peers; for although they are spiritual lords of parliament, are styled
‘My Lord,’ and—with the exception of the Bishop of Sodor and Man, who
has a ‘place but no voice’—may vote, they are not ‘noble,’ and their
dignity is not hereditary. For this reason, a peer merely for life, in
the absence of an Act of Parliament conferring privileges of peerage
upon him, would not be a ‘noble’ person. Accordingly, when Baron Parke
in 1856 was raised to the peerage for life as Lord Wensleydale, it was
decided by the Lords’ Committee of Privileges that his lordship could
not sit and vote as a peer. Selden, in his _Titles of Honour_, seems
to refer to life peerages as quite ordinary distinctions; but whether
they were so or not, it is clear that they were practically unknown,
or had fallen into disuse between his time (1584-1654) and that of
Lord Wensleydale. However, now, by section six of 39 and 40 Vict. c.
59 (the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, 1876), the Crown may appoint by
letters-patent two qualified persons to be Lords of Appeal in Ordinary,
with a salary of six thousand pounds per annum each. And these persons
shall be entitled for life to rank as Barons, ‘by such style as Her
Majesty shall be pleased to appoint, and shall during the time that
they continue in their office as Lords of Appeal in Ordinary, and no
longer, be entitled to a writ of summons to attend, and to sit and
vote in the House of Lords.’ But ‘their dignity as lords of parliament
shall not descend to their heirs.’ Since this enactment, three Lords of
Appeal in Ordinary have been created—namely, Lord Blackburn (formerly
Mr Justice Blackburn); Lord Gordon, who is dead; and Lord Watson. The
object of appointing these noble and learned persons to life peerages
is, ‘for the purpose of aiding the House of Lords in the hearing and
determination of appeals.’

So much for the term ‘peer’ as having reference to an ennobled
person.[2] But it is applicable, in fact, to all persons who are not
ennobled, for they are the ‘peers’ of each other. We all know the
old maxim that ‘every man has a right to be tried by his peers;’ in
other words, his equals. This is, in fact, one of the most important
features in Magna Charta: ‘No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned ...
otherwise than by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of
the land.’ This of course applies as much to noblemen as to commoners,
although its application to the former is, as we shall directly see,
somewhat modified. If John Smith and Thomas Jones were to enter into a
conspiracy to dethrone the sovereign, they would be guilty of treason,
and would be tried by their peers—namely, a common jury; but if the
Duke of A. and Viscount B., peers of parliament, conspired with a like
intent, they also would be entitled to be tried by their peers—who,
however, would be members of the House of Lords. Also, if Brown, Jones,
or Robinson, either singly or in combination, committed burglary,
arson, forgery, robbery, embezzlement, they, or he, would be guilty of
felony, and would be tried by their peers. So also would the Duke of A.
or the Earl of C., &c., as before. But if a peer of parliament were to
obtain money under false pretences, or commit perjury, he would not be
entitled to be tried in these cases by his peers, but would be tried by
those who are his peers only as members of the community. For although
the last-named offences are undoubtedly serious, the law regards them
as less so than the others, and styles them misdemeanours.[3] In all
trials for misdemeanours, then, a peer of parliament, when arraigned
upon a charge coming within this category, is only regarded as a peer
of persons in the lower grades of society. And although members of
the House of Lords enjoy immunity from arrest in civil cases—as do
also members of the House and barristers too when going to and from a
court—yet they are just as liable to arrest in any criminal case as
all other subjects are, so that here also they are only the peers of
their fellow-men whether noble or simple. As regards the proceedings
in courts of law, a peer is liable to be subpœnaed, and must, like a
commoner, obey the subpœna. And although, when acting on a jury[4] for
the purpose of deciding the guilt or innocence of a peer arraigned for
treason or felony, he is entitled—unlike a common juror—to give his
judgment on his honour, yet if he be called as a witness in a court of
law, he must, like any other man, be sworn on oath.

A peer when indicted, is bound, like any commoner, to plead to the
indictment; and if convicted, is liable to be punished precisely like
any other man (4 and 5 Vict. c. 22).

From what has been said, it will be seen that the civil rights of
peers are pretty much the same as those of all other subjects. What
privileges the most exalted peer possesses are rather of an ornamental
than a substantial character. And as every man, however humble may be
his origin, has a chance of becoming a peer, the complaints sometimes
heard about peers being a privileged class, &c., have, apart from
political considerations, but little foundation. Their so-called
privileges may thus be enumerated: They are exempt from arrest for
debt; they have a hereditary place in parliament, and, unlike members
of the House of Commons, they may vote by proxy, and may record their
‘protest’ against proceedings in their own House in its journals; as
permanent counsellors of the sovereign, they have an individual right
of access to the sovereign’s presence and audience while there; they
may wear coronets appropriate to their peerage rank, and scarlet cloth
robes marked in accordance with their degree; they are entitled to be
called ‘Your Grace’ or ‘Most Honourable,’ ‘Your Lordship’ or ‘Right
Honourable,’ according to circumstances. And when addressed by the
sovereign, they are styled his or her ‘cousin,’ with a variety of
ceremonious and endearing epithets prefixed to that term, more or less
so according to their rank. They may also sit in courts of law with
their hats on, if they like, during the proceedings.[5] And this will
explain why a peer is always accommodated with a seat on the bench in
court, when plain Mr Smith is either incapable of getting in at all, or
if in, is relegated to the gallery or other portion of the court set
apart for the public.

A man may be a peer by prescriptive right, by creation, or by
hereditary right; and peers are created in two ways, either by the
ancient mode of writ of summons, or by letters-patent. At the present
day, persons are almost invariably ennobled by the latter process. For
if a person summoned by the sovereign to attend parliament as a peer,
should die before he can take his seat, the peerage so created would
fail, and would, therefore, not descend to his heir. On the other hand,
a peerage created by letters-patent descends to the heir of the person
so ennobled under any circumstances. The writ of summons, however, is
not obsolete, and is used when, for some reason, it is deemed desirable
to call the eldest son of a peer to the Upper House of parliament
during his father’s lifetime. In this case, whether the person summoned
does or does not take his seat, is obviously immaterial, so far as the
descent of the father’s peerage is concerned, because, if the eldest
son has a son, the grandfather’s title will descend to him, if he
outlives his grandfather. When the eldest son of a peer is summoned to
the Upper House in his father’s lifetime, he sits by the baronial title
of the peerage. Thus, the Earl of Albemarle, who is also Viscount Bury
and Baron Ashford, being, in 1876, advanced in years, his eldest son,
Viscount Bury, was summoned to the House of Lords, not, however, as
such, but as Baron or Lord Ashford.

In the creation of a peerage, the limitations—that is to say,
the arrangements as to how it shall descend—may be analogous to
the limitations of real estate; for a title is just as much a
hereditament—which simply means something that can be inherited—as an
acre of land, except that the latter is termed in law a corporeal or
tangible hereditament, and the former an incorporeal hereditament.
Accordingly, a title may be _in fee_, in which case it will descend to
the heirs-general of the first holder; _in tail_, male or female, when
it descends to the eldest son, &c., or his brothers and their eldest
sons, &c.; or it may be, as we have seen, _for life_, when, at the
death of the holder, it expires.

Thus, not only may a man be created a peer, but a woman may also be
ennobled; and a woman may also occupy the status of a peeress by
marriage, whereas a man never can by marriage occupy even the status of
a peer. There are several instances of ladies holding peerages, as may
be seen by referring to Sir Bernard Burke’s magnificent and interesting
work; but we have no dukedom, marquisate, or viscounty, in what may be
called the female peerage. Peeresses by descent or by creation are the
only persons who are legally entitled to be called ‘Ladies in their
own right,’ and their titles descend to their sons and their daughters
according to circumstances. Real peeresses, and also those by marriage,
have most of the privileges of peers; but of course they cannot sit in
parliament and so forth; and if a peeress by marriage, being a widow,
remarries with a commoner, all her privileges cease, although she may
retain her title conferred by the first marriage. A peeress in her own
right, however, who marries a commoner is still a peeress, and does not
forfeit any of her privileges as such; but, as before indicated, she
cannot ennoble her husband, although she may her son or her daughter—of
course, after her own decease—by transmitting her title to him or her.

Daughters of dukes, marquises, and earls, are usually designated by
the title of ‘Lady,’ their Christian names being used before their
patronymic; and we often hear that Lady Matilda So-and-so is a lady in
her own right. Such, however, is not a correct statement; for the title
in such case is held by no absolute right, but only by a custom, itself
founded on what is called ‘the courtesy of the realm’—_curialitas
regni_.

And this brings us to an examination of the opening statement in our
paper—namely, that many people appear to think that every man styled
Lord So-and-so is necessarily a peer.

Now we have shown what a peer _is_; and it may be safely asserted, that
every person in this kingdom, be he whom he may, if not entitled to the
description we have given of a peer, his status, and his privileges,
is, to all intents and purposes, a commoner, just as much as though
he were a costermonger. But we have marquises, earls, viscounts, and
lords, in the House of Commons, and how is it that they sit there
bearing their titles? The answer is, that although they bear titles,
yet such are not titles of nobility, but are simply designations
allowed them by reason of their father’s rank; the permission being
accorded, as in the case of daughters of dukes, marquises, and earls,
by the ‘courtesy of the realm.’

Many dukes[6] have also a marquisate, an earldom, a viscounty, and a
barony attached to their dukedom; many marquises are earls, viscounts,
and barons; in the same way, an earl is generally a viscount and a
baron; while a viscount may have a barony attached to his peerage.
By the courtesy of England, the eldest son of all the peers above
mentioned, except the last, is allowed to assume his father’s second
title; but in reality such eldest son is in every respect nothing but
a commoner, so far as his legal rights are concerned. Thus, the eldest
son of the Duke of Bedford is styled Marquis of Tavistock, his father’s
second title; but as M.P. for Bedfordshire, he was not elected to sit
by that title, but as the Honourable So-and-so Russell, or rather,
perhaps, as So-and-So Russell, Esquire, commonly called Marquis of
Tavistock. And a similar rule prevails as to all other similar cases,
including instances where any son, not the eldest of a duke or marquis,
sits in the Lower House, which persons are all styled ‘Lord,’ with
their Christian and family surnames affixed. Thus, ‘Lord’ Randolph
Churchill, who is in law, Randolph Churchill, Esquire, commonly called
Lord Randolph Churchill, sits as member of parliament for Woodstock.
But neither he nor any other person bearing a mere courtesy title is
really a ‘nobleman,’ still less is he a peer of parliament, but in
legal contemplation a peer only of his own peers—that is to say, of
every commoner of the realm, and has no inherent rights or privileges
which they do not possess.

The eldest son of the sovereign is born a peer as Duke of Cornwall,
and as such, at twenty-one, is entitled to sit and vote in the House
of Lords. The other sons of the sovereign are not born peers, although
they are Princes, but they may be created peers; and to enable his or
her sons to sit in parliament, the sovereign usually confers peerages
on his or her younger sons. Hence, Prince Alfred became Duke of
Edinburgh; Prince Arthur, Duke of Connaught; and Prince Leopold, Duke
of Albany. As Princes, they could not sit in parliament; but having
been created peers, they can sit and vote and exercise all the other
rights of peers.

It does not follow that a peer of a certain grade in the Scottish or
Irish peerage, although entitled a peer of parliament, necessarily sits
and votes in the Upper House by the title which he ordinarily bears.
Thus, the Duke of Argyll as a lord of parliament is not really a duke,
but only a baron; and in the division lists of the House of Lords he is
always mentioned among the barons as Lord Sundridge. Again, the Duke of
Leinster, who, as regards the Irish peerage, is premier duke, marquis,
and earl, is nevertheless only Viscount Leinster so far as the House of
Lords is concerned, and by such title he sits and votes. As a matter
of politeness, however, both of the two distinguished persons just
mentioned are severally referred to by their more exalted titles when
spoken of in the House, or when their speeches are reported. Again,
locality does not necessarily indicate the status of a nobleman. Thus,
Lord Rendlesham, an Irish peer, takes his title from a Suffolk village;
and Lord Emly—formerly the Right Honourable W. Monsell—who takes his
title from a place in Ireland, is a peer of the United Kingdom. So also
of the Earls of Erroll and Enniskillen, who have respectively Scotch
and Irish titles, but are yet English peers—though the English peerage
is technically held in each case under a different title from that by
which these peers are generally known.

Lastly, although the grades of the peerage are dukes, marquises, earls,
viscounts, and barons, yet of these, earl is the oldest title so far
as regards the British peerage. The first earldom extant, though not
the first created, is that of Arundel, created by King Stephen in 1139.
Next come barons, of whom, however, we read long before the Conquest.
The first barony in the peerage is that of Kingsale (1181), already
alluded to. Dukes follow the barons, the first of them having been the
Duke of Cornwall, son of Edward III., created in 1377; then marquises,
the first of whom was De Vere, Marquis of Dublin, in the reign of
Richard II. (1377-1399). Not until the reign of Henry VI. (1422-1461)
do we hear of viscounts, and the title of the first viscounty—namely,
that of Viscount Beaumont, created in 1440—no longer exists.

We have thus endeavoured to answer the question, ‘What is a Peer?’ and
we trust that the foregoing statements have assisted any reader who may
have previously entertained confused notions concerning the subject
dealt with.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] It may be observed with regard to the Irish peerage, that the
Crown can create a new peer of Ireland only as often as three peerages
existing in 1801 become extinct. But in order to keep the peerage of
Ireland up to the number of one hundred, if one of that number becomes
extinct, the Crown may then create another. Of course we refer to the
Irish peerage pure and simple, and do not include peers who are peers
of Ireland as well as of the United Kingdom. As a peerage merely of
Ireland or of Scotland confers an empty title and nothing more, such a
dignity has ceased to be created.

[2] Peers as noblemen have likewise been styled by the Latin and French
appellations of Magnates, Les Grandes, Proceres, Domini, Seigneurs, and
Pares Regni.

[3] The distinction between felony and misdemeanour at common law was,
that a conviction for the former caused a forfeiture of the offender’s
goods, &c., to the Crown. The latter did not have this effect. The Act
33 and 34 Vict. c. 23 abolishes forfeiture for treason and felony; but
the distinction in other respects between felonies and misdemeanours
still exists.

[4] A jury of peers would be technically described as ‘the
lords-triers.’

[5] One peer, Lord Kingsale, of the Irish peerage, is entitled to be
covered even in the sovereign’s presence. This singular privilege is
of very ancient date. The peerage itself was created in 1181, and the
present holder of it is the thirty-first baron.

[6] We say ‘many,’ because all dukes, &c., do not hold the successive
titles. Thus, the eldest son of the Duke of Richmond and Gordon bears
the courtesy title of Earl of March, and by such style sits in the
House of Commons as member of parliament for West Sussex.



BY MEAD AND STREAM.


CHAPTER III.—WHAT IS TO BE.

The master of Willowmere, Dick Crawshay, was recognised throughout
the county as a perfect specimen of the good old style of yeoman
farmer. He was proud of the distinction, and proud of upholding all
the traditions of his rapidly diminishing class. It was not so much
owing to eccentricity or vanity, as to simple faith in what he believed
to be due to his position, that his dress invariably combined the
characteristics of the past and the present. His top-boots and breeches
were like those worn by his father; his long waistcoat was after the
pattern of his grandfather’s; whilst his short coat and billycock hat
belonged in some degree to his own day.

Rough and ready, outspoken in friendship or enmity, quick-tempered,
but never bearing malice, his whole creed was that a man should mean
what he says and say what he means. He was huge in person, height and
breadth, and many people had good reason to know that he was equally
huge in kindliness of heart.

Legends of his feats of strength in wrestling, boxing, horse-training
and riding, were often recounted by the old men of the district as
worthy examples of skill and prowess for their grandchildren to
emulate, or to amuse their cronies in the taproom of the _Cherry Tree_.

‘Ah, when I thinks on that day of the Hunt Cup Steeplechase, thirty
year ago!’ old Jerry Mogridge used to mumble over his jug of foaming
ale. ‘The young Maister—he were the young Maister Dick in them
days—entered his ’oss against some o’ the best blood out o’ Yorkshire,
not to mention what our own county turned out, and we had some rare
uns. We don’t have no such riding nor no such ’osses, I do believe,
nowadays.’

Then Jerry would pause to reflect over departed glories, press down the
ashes of his long clay-pipe carefully with his third finger and draw a
long breath.

‘You was there, Jerry,’ his neighbour observed.

‘There I was, for sure. And there was Maister Dick with his horse
Goggles that he was ready to back agin anything on four legs. It
were a sight, I tell you. Nine on ’em started, and Goggles took the
lead right away’—here old Jerry, with the stem of his pipe serving
as a pencil, began to trace on the table the imaginary lines of the
course—‘he cleared the water-jump pretty, and maybe half a dozen came
after. On the flat they was nigh equal, but—Lor’ bless you—Goggles was
only laughin’ at ’em. _He_ knowed as he could get away as soon as the
Maister pleased to give him head. They was a’most abreast when they
came near the ugly fence down by Farmer Tubbs’s land. Then Goggles got
his way. He were as brave as a lion—or a unicorn, for the matter o’
that—and he took the fence at the nighest but the worst part. We see
him rise in the air as it might be, and dip again. Then—well, then, if
he didn’t roll right over, and Maister Dick turned a somersault into
the ditch.’

There Jerry would stop again in order that his listeners might realise
the full horror of the position, emitting half-a-dozen deliberate puffs
of smoke from his mouth, and proceed with the pride of a bearer of good
news.

‘But the Maister was on his feet again afore you could count your
fingers. So was Goggles. The Maister give him a pat on the neck and,
says he: “If you can do it Goggles, I’m game.” With that he jumps into
the saddle and went tearin’ after them as was proud to think that he
was out o’ the chase, and he caught ’em up, and when they were about a
quarter of a mile from home, Goggles put on an extra spurt and came in
first by a neck. But that weren’t the end on it, for while everybody
was a-crowdin’ round about him, Dr Mauldon says:

‘“What’s the matter with your right arm, Dick, that it’s hangin’ so
limp-like at your side?”

‘“Dunno what it may be,” says Dick; “but it’s been no use to me since
we tumbled over the fence.”

‘“Broken, sure-ly,” says the doctor angry-like, “and you went on riding
the race—you’re a fool.”

‘“But I won it,” says Dick, “and I’m main proud on it, for there’s
summat more nor the cup hanging on to Goggles this blessed day.”

‘Six months after that steeplechase, he married Hesba Loughton,’ the
old man concluded with subdued but suggestive emphasis.

From that day the homestead of Willowmere had been a merry one,
notwithstanding the dark shadows which had from time to time crossed
it. Three children had been born, but one by one had passed away,
leaving a blank in the lives of mother and father which nothing could
fill. But it made them the more ready to welcome the child of Mrs
Crawshay’s sister when misfortune fell upon her. Madge had been at once
taken into their hearts as their own child, and had grown up with as
much love and respect for them as she could have given to her parents
proper.

On their part Mr and Mrs Crawshay were devoted to the girl, and allowed
her from the first to be mistress of the whole house. She wanted
books, they were at once obtained: she wanted a piano, and her wish was
gratified. In her education, they spared neither care nor money, but
Crawshay would never consent to her being banished to a boarding-school.

So she had grown up quite a home-bird, as her uncle used to say; being
endowed with mental capacity, however, she had made the most of every
opportunity for reading and learning. And through it all she took her
share in the household work, and her guardians had reason to be proud
of her.

Until the present occasion her uncle had never hinted that he expected
to be consulted in her choice of a husband. Even now he only warned
her that he would not approve of any of the Ringsford family. But the
warning came late, and surprised her the more as no distinct reason was
advanced for it. Although there had been no formal announcement that
she and Philip had come to the conclusion that they had been born for
each other and were dutifully ready to accept their fate, he had for
some time been regarded as her chosen suitor.

Their wooing had been free from petty concealments, and there had
not been much formal discussion on the subject between themselves.
Unconsciously they realised the fact that man or woman can no more be
in love and not know it than have the toothache and not feel it. They
may coquette with fancy but not with love. They may in modesty try to
hide it, but they know it is there. So there had been no ‘set scene’ of
asking and granting. A flash of the eyes—a touch of the hand—a quick,
joyful little cry—a kiss and all was known. They loved: they knew it;
and were happy in their hope of the future that lay before them.

This sudden change of her uncle’s mind in regard to Philip—for of
course he could refer only to him when he spoke of the Ringsford
people—presented a problem with which she had never expected to be
tried. Suppose her guardians should forbid her to marry Philip, would
she be able to obey them? Ought she to obey them?

There was no present answer for the questions, and yet they could
not be dismissed from the mind. She was glad to find that Philip was
innocent of any conscious cause of offence, and pleased that he should
go at once to seek an explanation.

       *       *       *       *       *

The stables, the barn, with their red-tile roofs washed with varying
shades of green, the cow-house and piggeries with a white row of
labourers’ cottages, formed a cosy group of buildings by the side of
the green lane which led from Willowmere to the main road between the
village of Kingshope and the little town of Dunthorpe.

Crawshay was standing in the gateway with a tall gentleman whose
features were almost entirely concealed by thick black beard, whiskers,
and moustache. By way of contrast perhaps, he wore a white hat. His
dark-blue frock-coat was buttoned tightly; in his claret-coloured scarf
was a horseshoe pin studded with diamonds; his boots were covered by
yellow gaiters. A smart man, evidently of some importance. He was
discussing with Crawshay the merits of a horse which was being trotted
up and down the lane for their inspection.

‘You won’t find anywhere a better bit of horse-flesh for your purpose,’
Crawshay was saying whilst he held the stem of an acorn-cup in the side
of his mouth like a pipe.

‘When you say that, Crawshay, I am satisfied, and he would be a fool
who was not. We’ll consider it a bargain.’

‘Give her another turn, Jerry.—There’s action for you!’ he added with
enthusiasm as the animal was trotted up and down the lane again.
‘There’s form!—proper, ain’t it? Seems to me that I can’t part with
her.’

‘You cannot help it now: we have struck the bargain,’ rejoined the
purchaser, grinning. He was aware that the farmer’s exclamation was
in no degree akin to any of the horse-dealer’s tricks to enhance the
animal’s value.

‘Well, you are a neighbour, Mr Wrentham, and that is always a sort of
comfort.’

‘I’ll be good to her, never fear. Now, I’m off.—Hullo, Hadleigh, how
are you? I am just bolting to catch my train. Good-bye.’

Mr Wrentham walked smartly into the stable-yard, got into his gig and
drove off, waving his hand to his two friends as he passed through the
gateway.

Philip, who just then had entered the gateway, was glad to see him go:
first, because he did not like the man, although frequently forced
into contact with him; and, second, because he wanted to be alone with
Crawshay.

The latter had not displayed any coldness and had given him the
customary greeting. He was patting the mare he had just sold and
passing his hand affectionately over her flanks whilst he repeated
various expressions of admiration, the burden of them all being:

‘He’s got a rare bargain, but he’s a smart fellow and he’ll be good to
you, old girl.’

‘I have been hunting for you everywhere,’ said Philip with his frank
smile and without any fear of the explanation which was about to take
place. ‘Are you going up to the house just now?’

‘No; I was meaning to go down to see how the lads are getting on with
the wheat. Am I wanted at the house?’

‘Not particularly; but I want to have a chat with you.’

‘Come along then. There’ll be time enough for chatting as we cross the
Merefield. What is it?’

‘That is exactly what I have got to ask you. What have I been doing
that you have been upsetting Madge by telling her that she is to have
nothing more to do with me?’

They were in the field—an extensive plain which had been once a morass.
Drainage and cultivation had converted it into valuable meadow-land.
The hedges which bounded it were studded with willows, and three trees
of the same kind formed a group in the centre. These trees and the
nature of the ground had doubtless suggested the name of the farm. In
wet seasons the Merefield justified its title by presenting a sheet
of water sometimes more than a foot deep, in spite of drains and
embankment to keep the river out.

‘That’s right, Philip, lad—straight from the shoulder; and I’ll make
answer likewise. I never told Madge that she was to have nought more
ado with you.’

‘I was sure of it,’ exclaimed the lover in cheerful confidence; ‘and
now I may call you Uncle Dick again. But you have given her a scare—you
know how seriously she takes things, and you will have to tell her
yourself that it was only your fun.’

Crawshay’s face had at first assumed an expression of internal
chuckling at some joke which amused and yet did not altogether please
him. Now, however, his brows contracted slightly, and he spoke gravely.

‘Ah, but it weren’t all fun neither.’

‘Then what in the name of goodness was it? I know that you had some
disagreement with my guv’nor the other day; but you are not going to
make us miserable on that score.’

‘I don’t want to put you out on any score: but your father may.’

‘My father!—nonsense. What could make you fancy that he would interfere
with me in this matter?’

Crawshay halted, close by the three willows, clasped his hands behind
him and looked straight at his young friend.

‘I am not going to tell you ought about what passed atween your
father and me,’ he said resolutely. ‘You can ask him if you like; but
if you’ll take a word of counsel from me, you won’t do it. You can
understand this much, however; I am not going to stand in your way with
Madge; but I am not going to let you stand in Madge’s way, neither.’

‘I do not see how that can be,’ answered Philip, perplexed by
Crawshay’s words and manner, ‘since we two have only one way before us.’

‘That is to say you think so now’——

‘And shall always.’

‘Ay, ay; we understand all that,’ said the elder, nodding with the
regretful scepticism of experience; ‘but there never was any harm done
by making sure of every foothold when passing through a bog. See if
we can’t clear things up a bit. When are you going away on this grand
journey that’s to make your fortune?’

‘In about a fortnight.’

‘And you’ll be away how long?’

‘Perhaps a year.’

‘Maybe two—maybe three.’

‘O no; there is no probability of that.’

‘There’s no saying. But what I want to be at now—and mind you, I’m not
doubting you, and I’m not like to doubt Madge—what I want to be at is
that while you are away in foreign parts you may change your mind—hold
hard a minute—Madge may change hers. Heaps of things may happen. So
that all I meant by what I said to her the other night is that you
should both be welcome to change if you think it best for yourselves.
So there are to be no bindings and pledges atween you. If you come back
and are of the same mind and she is content, I will not be against
you. Is it a bargain? It is a fair one, though you mayn’t think it
now; but you are not the lad I take you for if you don’t own it to be
common-sense and agree to it.’

‘I cannot see anything in it to disturb us,’ said Philip, ‘since you
leave us free to please ourselves.’

‘Ay, but you understand that when I say _free_, I mean it. If you are
going back to the house, you can tell Madge everything I’ve said.’

‘We could not desire any other arrangement. I am content, and she will
be. Whatever your tiff with my father may be about, it will not bother
us.’

‘Ah, you had better wait till you hear what he has to say,’ observed
the yeoman, with a droll shadow of a grin, as if he again recalled that
joke which amused but did not please him.



A ROMANCE OF ALMANACS.


If any book deserves the name of ‘irrepressible,’ it is the almanac.
Notwithstanding its great antiquity, it is still important; and though
we grow old, it renews its youth every year, and greets us regularly
with a kind of good-natured, ‘Here I am again!’ The oldest almanac in
existence is an Egyptian one, and may be seen in the British Museum.
Buried nearly three thousand years ago with some human contemporary
of Rameses the Great, it has been brought to light again, and copied
in fac-simile. Twenty-five columns are wholly or partially preserved.
The fortunate days are marked in black ink, and the unfortunate in
red—a curious instance of a superstition which European nations
have reversed. It contains observations about religious ceremonies,
cautions against unlucky times, and predictions as to the fate of
children born on certain days. But apart from this immense antiquity,
we find almanacs early occupying an important part in the Christian
economics. Indeed, to churchmen and to church-goers, they soon became
indispensable; the more so, as fast days, feast days, and saints’ days
increased in number.

Written almanacs of later date have not been traced farther back than
the second century; but from the eighth to the fifteenth there are many
beautiful specimens in existence. For every Missal, Psalter, Breviary,
&c., had a calendar in the beginning, pointing out to the faithful the
Church’s fasts and feasts; and King Athelstan’s Psalter, 703 A.D., also
exhibits lunar tables.

In Saxon almanacs, the signs of the zodiac do not appear; each month
is typified by some domestic or agricultural symbol—thus, ploughing
represents February; apple-gathering, September; the Christmas feast,
December. The illustrations of French almanacs of the same period
distinctly mark the nationality; while those of Flemish and Italian
origin are remarkable for their delicate fancies and marvellous beauty
of colouring. The French had also rhymes, preserving, in short,
satirical remarks, national peculiarities and prejudices.

After the tenth century, the almanacs were the great repositories of
astrology, medicine, proverbial wisdom, and popular superstitions.
All of them had lists of the lucky and unlucky days; but as yet there
were no predictions. Learned churchmen stealthily cultivated astrology
and astronomy; but the vulgar were left in ignorance as to whether
doleful Saturn was diffusing his baleful influence, or fiery Mars
bringing war and bloodshed. Each month in the year had at least two
unfortunate days, except April, which had only one; but that was the
terrible Walpurgis Night, specially given up to demons and witches.
However, as the English list differed from the French, and the French
from the Italian, a man by having the whole three could cheat fate and
defy misfortune. Friday has always been a black day; and there are even
yet people who have a mysterious dislike to it, who never heard of the
thirteen reasons duly set forth in these old almanacs, such as the
killing of Abel, the slaughter of the Innocents, the beheading of John
the Baptist, &c.

No part of these old almanacs is more positive and more unpleasant than
the medical department. Bleeding and herb-teas are specifics for every
malady. Each month had its particular herb, and nearly every month its
libation of human blood. September had two—the ‘liver vein’ is said to
be then ‘full of venom;’ and bleeding at the beginning and end of the
month, ‘most needful and comforting.’

From the homely character of the information in these early almanacs,
it is evident that they were intended for general use, and it is
probable every burgher possessed one; for we are apt to underrate the
extent of manuscript literature, and to overrate its price. That the
number of copyists was very great, is evident from the complaints
following the invention of printing, which, it was said, ‘deprived
hundreds of bread.’ Of these manuscript almanacs, three famous ones
remain—that in Lambeth Palace, bearing the date of 1460; that of John
Somers, written in Oxford, five hundred years ago; and the Oxford
almanac of 1386. The last was printed as a curiosity at the beginning
of the present century; and it may be noted, that in early days, Oxford
was the centre of almanac manufacture, astronomy and surgery being
mixed with religion and history.

The first printed almanac was published in Buda-Pesth in 1475.
Twenty years after it, the first printed English almanac appeared.
It contained much miscellaneous information; but the compiler was
consistently and gloriously mysterious. Others rapidly followed.
Twenty-five years ago, an almanac of that period (1495) was found in an
old chest in Edinburgh, and placed in the Bodleian Library, where it
may now be seen. It has on its title-page, ‘Flete Strete, by Wynkin de
Worde;’ and it consists of fifteen leaves, each leaf two inches square.

A French almanac which began to appear about this time, is still
published. It is called _Le Grand Compost et Calendrier des Bergers_,
and it claims to be four hundred years old. _A Prognostication of
Righte Goode Effecte_, was set forth by Leonard Digges in London, 1553.
It contains some queer astronomical and astrological observations. In
it we are told that the moon is fifteen thousand seven hundred and
fifty miles from the earth, and Mercury only twelve thousand eight
hundred and twelve; that Saturn’s conjunction with the moon caused
unlucky days; but the moon with Jupiter, fortunate ones. Venus gave
luck to woo and marry, and make pleasant pastimes, and, strangely
enough, ‘blood-letting’ is included among the latter. Mercury was good
to buy and sell under, and to send children to school.

Dr Dee’s almanac followed in 1571. This is a regular almanac, having a
list of days down one side of the page, and the other left blank for
memoranda. In this almanac we find among the rhymes that useful one
beginning, ‘Thirty days hath September,’ &c. Dr Dee’s almanac did not
make any prophecies, except against the Turk and the Pope, the downfall
of both of whom was constantly foretold. Before the end of Elizabeth’s
reign, almanacs had become a popular necessity. Many of them had shrewd
touches at the times—at the pride of the nobles, at the tricks of the
lawyers; and Pond in 1611 includes all the three ‘learned professions’
in his evil list.

The importance of the almanac from a commercial point of view
originally occurred to James I. He granted a monopoly of these
publications to the Stationers’ Company and the two universities, and
so filled his exchequer. We have a volume before us containing sixteen
almanacs for the year 1615. One of the chief things to be noted in
this collection is the list of historical events which at that date
were thought worth remembering. They are—the invention of printing,
the capture of Boulogne, the sweating sickness, the great plague, the
great frost of 1564, a blazing star in 1572, a deep snow in 1581, the
camp at Tilbury in 1588, the taking of Cadiz in 1596. Bretnor, a famous
almanac-maker of James’s reign, has the good and evil days in tables,
with warnings in such droll phrases, that they are worth a short
quotation. Thus the month of January shows that

      4, 8. All that you can.              1, 2, 7. Lost labour.
         9. What you desire.               3, 5, 6. On the losing side.
    13, 14. Both heart and hand.        10, 11, 12. All for your harm.
    17, 18. A fast friend.
21, 22, 23. Well ventured.                  15, 16. Nothing to your purpose.
    28, 29. Through the briers.             19, 20. But hard hap.
    30, 31. Past hope of recovery.  24, 25, 26, 27. Unfit for thy purpose.

Early in the reign of Charles I., the first commercial almanac was
published. It may be called the first _Poor Richard_. It contained
tables of interest, necessary tables of expenses, pithy proverbs
inculcating frugality and industry, and the usual melange of astrology
and medicine. About the same time the religious almanac appeared. A
rigid Puritan called Ranger was its editor. It is a gloomy production.

In Cromwell’s time, the almanacs are of a religious character; all
receipts and directions end ‘sermonwise.’ The famous William Lilly was
at this time the prince of astrologists and almanac-makers. At first,
he prophesied for the king. But he was shrewd enough to see, without
casting any horoscope, whose star was in the ascendant; and very soon
all the stars in their courses fought against Charles.

As a matter of statecraft, James did a wise thing when he legalised
astrology. Almanacs have always had a great influence with the mass;
and it was a subtle device to give the liberty of prophesying after
that legitimate fashion which should gloss with superstition ‘the
divine right of kings.’ But the universities finally grew ashamed
of their connection with the almanac, and sold their rights to the
Stationers’ Company. This Company was always on the side of the
ruling power. It had prophesied for Charles, and it had prophesied
for Cromwell. It sang Te Deum for the Restoration, as it had done for
the Protectorate. It dated its little books from the year ‘of our
deliverance by King William from popery and arbitrary government;’ and
it invoked the blessing of the planets on the last of the Stuarts.

When Lilly died, the Company employed his pupil Gadbury; and when
Gadbury died, his relative, Job Gadbury, prophesied through another
generation of credulous dupes. Then came the infamous John Partridge,
who was pilloried by Swift’s wicked wit in 1709. But at that time he
had been prophesying for the Stationers’ Company forty years. After
Swift’s attack, he refused to predict, and the Company, who did not
like to be laughed out of the profits of his reputation, published an
almanac which had Partridge’s name to it, but which Partridge never
wrote. This almanac was still dragging on an existence in 1828, with
the sins of a century and a half on its head. Francis Moore began
his career of imposture in 1698, and _Poor Robin_, the ribald hoary
jester of the Company, about the same time. A dozen years after the
Restoration, it also published a _Yea and Nay Almanac for the People
called by the men of the world, Quakers_. A more atrocious libel on
their faith and morals it is impossible to imagine.

In 1775, an enterprising bookseller called Carnan became possessed
with the idea that this corporation had no legal right to its monopoly
in almanacs, and he published one of his own. The Company sent him to
prison as regularly as he sold his annual commodities; but Carnan was
not a man to be put down. It is said he always kept a clean shirt in
his pocket, ready for a decent appearance before the magistrates; and
at length the Common Pleas decided in his favour. Then the Stationers’
Company appealed to Lord North; and as that minister wanted prophecies
to make the war against the American colonies popular, he brought in a
bill to the House of Commons re-investing the Company with the monopoly
which had been declared illegal. The two universities also—which had an
annuity from the Company—used all their influence against the solitary
bookseller. But he had a good cause, and he had Erskine to plead it;
and he triumphed.

When the French Revolution came, Moore was more terrific in his
prophecies and more awful in his hieroglyphics than ever. The people
wondered and trembled, and the sale of this almanac reached a point
without parallel in the annals of imposture. But the continent of
Europe had a rival even to Moore in the famous almanac of Liége. A
tradition ascribes it first to a canon who lived in 1590. Its early
numbers are published ‘with the permission of the superior powers;’
the later ones are content with ‘the favour of His Highness.’ It is
full of political predictions. In 1700, a French almanac called the
_Almanach Royal_ started a new idea, the one which has since made the
_Almanach de Gotha_ so famous—it gave the names and birthdays of all
the princes and princesses in Europe, lists of clergy, bar, army, and
diplomatic corps. The latter almanac has been brought to a high pitch
of perfection, and contains a vast amount of valuable and well-assorted
information.

Shortly after these French almanacs, there appeared a famous American
one—the _Poor Richard_ of Dr Franklin. He did not care to put his name
upon the title-page, and therefore it was duly credited to Richard
Saunders. It was published from 1733 to 1757, and was a great financial
success. It is now a rare book; a correspondent in _Notes and Queries_
mentions one sold in Philadelphia for fifty-two dollars.

In 1828, the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge took the
almanac in hand. Then the Stationers’ Company, perceiving that the day
of ignorance was dying and that decency would pay, issued a really
excellent one, called _The Englishman_. Yet superstition dies hard.
Only sixty years ago, the popular feeling was tested by leaving out of
Moore’s almanac that mysterious column showing the influence of the
moon on the different parts of the body. But the editors, being prudent
men, only issued one hundred thousand copies of this emendation, and
the result showed their wisdom. The omission was at once detected and
resented; nearly the whole issue was returned to the publishers, and
they were compelled to reprint the column, in order to retain their
popularity.

On the Repeal of the Stamp Act in 1834, almanacs started on their
course unfettered. One of the few that now deal in prognostications
of a political kind is Zadkiel’s. The comic almanac is a purely
modern feature of the little book—the pleasant wrinkle added by the
nineteenth century. Cruikshank, and those witty clever souls who were
the original staff of _Punch_, began the laugh, which America in
several publications of this kind has re-echoed. And it is hard to say
where this pushing, progressive, irresistible little book will not go.
The divine, the lawyer, the physician, the merchant, have all their
special almanacs. There are nautical, military, and literary almanacs.
We cannot buy a box of note-paper but we find one in it; our perfumer
sends it to us scented; our newspaper gives us one illustrated. With
such a cosmopolitan temper, and such a universal adaptability, it may
yet become the year-book of all nations, and the annual balance-sheet
of the world’s progress.



TWO DAYS IN A LIFETIME.

A STORY IN EIGHT CHAPTERS.


CHAPTER II.

Sir Frederick came forward with his set artificial smile, and shook
hands with Mrs Bowood with much apparent cordiality. He was a slightly
built man, rather under than over the ordinary height. As Mrs Bowood
had remarked, he did not look nearly so old as his years; but he had
taken great care of himself all his life, and he was now reaping
his reward. He was as upright as a dart, and there was something of
military precision in his carriage and bearing, although he had never
been in the army. His once coal-black hair was now streaked with gray,
but judiciously so, as though he were making a graceful concession
to the remorseless advance of time. How much of its tint was due to
nature and how much to art was a secret best known to himself and his
valet. His face was close shaven, except for a small imperial, which
was jet black. He had clear-cut aquiline features, and when younger,
would doubtless have been considered by most people as a very handsome
man. But his eyes were small, and their general expression was one of
cold suspicion; they lent a touch of meanness to his face, which it
would not otherwise have possessed. Sir Frederick was carefully dressed
in the height of the prevalent fashion, but with the more prominent
‘points’ artistically toned down to harmonise with the obligations of
advancing years.

‘Good-morning, Mrs Bowood,’ he said. ‘Is the Captain at home?’

‘Good-morning, Sir Frederick. You are quite a stranger.’—He had not
been to Rosemount for five days.—‘Charles is somewhere about the
grounds. I will send a servant to look for him.’

‘No, no, my dear Mrs Bowood; nothing of the kind, I beg. I will go in
search of him myself presently. I have driven over to see him about
that bay mare which I am told he wants to get rid of.’

Mrs Bowood smiled to herself. The excuse was too transparent. ‘Charles
is one of those men who are never happy unless they have something to
sell,’ she said.

‘Whereas your sex, if I may venture to say so’——

‘Are never happy unless there is something that we want to buy. How
thoroughly you understand us, Sir Frederick!’

‘Consider for how many years I have made you my study.’

‘What a pity you did not make better use of your time!’

‘Where could I have found another study half so charming?’

‘You would graduate with honours, I do not doubt.’

‘If you were one of the examining Dons, that might be possible.’—There
was a brief pause, then the Baronet said: ‘I trust that Lady Dimsdale
is quite well?’

‘Quite well, I believe. She, too, is somewhere about the grounds. This
lovely morning seems to have tempted every one out of doors.—You will
stay luncheon of course, Sir Frederick?’

‘You are too good. A rusk and a glass of claret are all that I take in
the middle of the day.’

It was one of the Baronet’s little weaknesses to like to be regarded as
a semi-invalid, especially by the ladies.

‘Captain Bowood must add his entreaties to mine, and persuade you to
stay.—By-the-bye, I had almost forgotten to ask after your nephew. Have
you heard from him lately?’

Sir Frederick became animated in a moment. ‘I had a letter from the
dear boy by last mail. He wrote in excellent spirits. I expect him over
on leave in the course of the autumn, when I shall take the liberty of
introducing him to my friends at Rosemount.’

‘I shall not fail to hold you to your promise.’

‘And now to find the Captain.’

‘The sun is rather oppressive. Had I not better send a servant?’

‘Thanks; no. I shall have no difficulty in finding him. _Au revoir._’
And with a smile and a bow, the Baronet made his exit. On reaching the
veranda, he paused to put up his umbrella, as a protection from the
sun, and then went gingerly on his way.

‘It is not Charles, but Laura, whom he has come to see,’ mused Mrs
Bowood as her eyes followed the Baronet. ‘There’s something in his
manner which makes me feel almost sure that he will propose before
the day is over; but now that Mr Boyd has put in an appearance, I am
afraid Sir Frederick’s chance is a very poor one.—By-the-bye, why did
Laura wear those jewels last night, which, as I have heard her say more
than once, she has never worn since before her marriage? Well, well;
I suppose that neither sentiment nor romance is quite dead, even when
people can look back upon their thirtieth birthday.’

Mrs Bowood took up her pen again; but at that moment a servant
entered the room. ‘Beg pardon, ma’am, but here’s a man come to mend
the drawing-room lamp; and the fishmonger is waiting to see you; and
there’s a young gent with spectacles and long hair come to tune the
pianos.’

‘Dear, dear! I shall have to finish my letter after luncheon, I
suppose.—I will come at once, Sparks. But I gave no instructions to any
one about tuning the pianos.’

‘Perhaps the Captain may have sent the young man, ma’am.’

‘Perhaps so; but he doesn’t generally interfere in such matters.’

Sparks left the room, and Mrs Bowood put away her unfinished letter in
the davenport. ‘What can have become of Mr Boyd?’ she said to herself.
‘I have seen nothing of him since breakfast. Probably, he and Laura are
somewhere in the grounds together; if so, poor Sir Frederick will have
to find another opportunity.’

As the Baronet, holding his umbrella over his head, paced slowly down
one of the winding sunny walks that led from the house, he kept a
careful watch on other walks to right and left of him. He was evidently
looking out for some one in particular. ‘Why delay longer? Why not do
it to-day and at once?’ he was asking himself as he walked along. ‘I
have purposely kept away from her for five days, only to find that her
image dwells more persistently in my thoughts than ever. It is true
that she rejected me once; but that was many years ago, when I was a
poor man, and it is no reason why she should reject me a second time.
She was a romantic school-girl then; she is a woman of the world now.
Yes; the match is a desirable one in every way for both of us. She has
money, and I have position. As the wife of Sir Frederick Pinkerton, she
would be a very different personage from the widow of a City drysalter;
and then her income added to mine would make a very comfortable thing.’
The Baronet would seem to have been unaware of that particular clause
in the late Sir Thomas’s will by which his widow would be deprived of
nearly the whole of her fortune in case she should marry again. It is
possible that his ardour might have cooled down in some measure, had he
been made aware of that important fact.

Presently he saw the object of his thoughts turn a corner of the path
a little distance away. Her eyes were bent on the ground, and she did
not see him. He stood still for a moment or two, watching her with a
critical air. He flattered himself that he had a fastidious taste in
most things that a gentleman should be fastidious about, and in women
most of all. ‘She will do—she will do!’ he muttered to himself with
an air of complacency. ‘She is really charming. She shall be Lady
Pinkerton before she is three months older.’

Lady Dimsdale happened to look up at this moment. She could not repress
a little start at the sight of Sir Frederick.

The Baronet pulled up his collar the eighth of an inch, squared his
shoulders, and went slowly forward.

Laura Dimsdale was a tall, graceful-looking woman. She was fair, with
a lovely clear complexion, which, especially when she became at all
animated, had not yet lost all the tints of girlhood. She had large
hazel eyes, instinct with sweetness and candour, delicately arched
eyebrows, and a mass of brown silky hair. If the usual expression of
her face when alone, or when not engaged in conversation, was not
exactly one of melancholy, it was at least that of a woman who has
lived and suffered, and to whom the world has taught more than one
bitter lesson. And yet in the old days at the vicarage, which now
seemed so far away, there had been no merrier-hearted girl than Laura
Langton; and even now, after all these years, the boundary that divided
her tears from her smiles was a very narrow one. She was gifted with
a keen sense of humour, and it did not take much to cause her eyes to
fill with laughter and her mobile lips to curve into a merry mocking
smile.

Sir Frederick lifted his hat, and twisted his mouth into a smile
that was a capital advertisement for his dentist. ‘This is indeed an
agreeable surprise, Lady Dimsdale. I came in search of Captain Bowood,
and I find—you!’

‘How cleverly you hide your disappointment, Sir Frederick!’ She gave
him her fingers for a moment as she spoke. ‘As I have not seen the
Captain since breakfast, I cannot tell you where to look for him. But
you have been quite a truant during the last few days. We have all
missed you.’ There was a mischievous twinkle in her eyes as she said
these words.

‘Hum, hum. You flatter me, Lady Dimsdale. Business of importance took
me to town for a few days.’ He had turned with her, and was now pacing
slowly by her side. ‘Do you know, Lady Dimsdale, he went on presently,
‘that I never see a garden nowadays which seems half so charming to me
as that dear, delightful wilderness of old-fashioned flowers behind
your father’s vicarage?’

‘It was certainly a wilderness, and very old-fashioned into the
bargain; but the flowers that grew there were very sweet.’

‘I spent many happy hours among its winding walks.’

‘And a few uncomfortable ones, I’m afraid. Have you forgotten that
afternoon when, as you sat eating strawberries and cream in the
summer-house, a caterpillar crawled down your neck? You made such
extraordinary faces, that for a minute or two I felt quite frightened.’

‘Hum. I had certainly forgotten the caterpillar,’ answered the Baronet,
not without a shade of annoyance.

‘And then I used to fancy that you were never quite easy in your mind
as we sat together in the garden. There were certainly a great many
frogs, and I think you never liked frogs.’

‘Not unless they were fricasséed. Trifling annoyances there might be,
Lady Dimsdale; but when the presiding divinity was so fair’——

‘The presiding divinity, Sir Frederick? A painted divinity! We gave
her a fresh coat of paint every spring. Poor old Aphrodite with her
shell—she used to stand in the middle of the fishpond. But you forget,
Sir Frederick, that she had lost her nose, and even a divinity hardly
looks so charming without a nose as with one.’

Sir Frederick gave a sniff, and replied in his loftiest manner: ‘When I
made use of the term “presiding divinity,” I need hardly say that I was
referring to yourself, Lady Dimsdale.’

‘I really beg your pardon, Sir Frederick, but no one ever called me a
divinity before. Do you know I rather like it.’ She led the way, as if
unconsciously, to a wide-spreading yew, round the bole of which a low
seat had been fixed. Here, in the grateful amplitude of shade, she sat
down, and the Baronet seated himself a little distance away. It may be
that she had some suspicion with regard to Sir Frederick’s errand this
morning, and had made up her mind to get it over and have done with it
at once and for ever.

‘Now for the plunge!’ said the Baronet to himself as he sat down. The
plumage of his self-conceit had been somewhat ruffled both by her words
and manner; but whatever temporary annoyance he might feel, it would
never do to betray it at such an all-important crisis.

‘You are still the same Laura Langton that you were during those
sunny days at the vicarage,’ he began in what he considered his most
insinuating manner. ‘The same charm, the same power of fascination
exist still. A happy time—at least for one of those two. But the ending
was not a happy one—no, anything rather than that.’

‘For which of the two people concerned was the ending not a happy one,
Sir Frederick?’

Her coldly contemptuous tone touched him to the quick. A deep flush
mounted to his face; for a moment or two he could not trust himself to
answer her. ‘I thank you, Lady Dimsdale,’ he said at last. ‘The reproof
implied by your words is a just one. To her, no doubt, the end was
seen from the beginning—a dramatic effect to be worked up to from the
opening of the comedy. To him it came as a thunder-clap, as a stab from
a hand that a moment before had been pressed to his lips. Day after day
he had been led on by eyes that seemed ever to brighten at his coming;
by smiles that seemed ever to be those of welcome; by low-voiced
replies; by a hundred pleasant lures, till at length the moment came
when his silence found itself a tongue. A few burning words, and
everything was told. The answer?—A mocking laugh, a scornful dismissal.
His paradise had been the paradise of a fool. He had helped a pretty
girl to pass away a few weeks in a dull country-house—and that was
all!’ Sir Frederick spoke in low, almost impassioned accents. Any third
person who might have chanced to overhear him would have been justified
in assuming that he had been cruelly jilted.

But not a muscle of Lady Dimsdale’s face moved, and her answer came in
tones as clear and incisive as those of a bell. ‘Were he here now of
whom you speak, I would say to him: “You have an excellent memory for
many things; is it possible that you can have forgotten Marietta Gray?”’

Sir Frederick started as if he had been stung. His face blanched
suddenly. ‘Marietta Gray!’ he stammered out. ‘What do you, Lady
Dimsdale, know of her?’

‘She was only a fisherman’s daughter, it is true,’ continued Lady
Dimsdale in her clear cold accents. ‘A pretty toy for a fine gentleman
to amuse himself with, and then to cast aside. I knew something of her,
and I heard her story. When, a little later, one of the strange chances
of life brought within my influence the man who had first won the
affections of that poor girl and then basely deserted her, I resolved
as far as lay in my power to avenge the cruel wrong. You have just told
me, Sir Frederick, how well I succeeded in my object. I am happy to
think, that the lesson has lingered so long in your memory.’

Sir Frederick rose and took one or two turns under the shade of the
branching yew. Not for years had the still waters of his life been so
deeply stirred. He took out his delicately perfumed handkerchief and
wiped his forehead with it. His hands trembled a little—a thing that
had rarely happened to him before. But through all his agitation and
surprise, he felt that he had learned to care more for Laura Dimsdale
during the last few minutes than he had ever cared for her before. If
it were possible for him ever to really love a woman, here was that one
woman. Even after all that had passed between them, he would ask her to
become his wife. She was a generous, large-hearted creature, he felt
sure; and now that she had stabbed him so cruelly, she would be the
first to stoop and bind up his wounds. ‘It’s the way of her sex,’ he
said to himself. Another reflection did not fail to impress itself upon
him: Not to every one is given the chance of marrying a Baronet with
six thousand a year. Women can forgive much under such circumstances.

Lady Dimsdale rose. ‘I must leave you now, Sir Frederick,’ she said.

‘One moment, if you please—just one moment,’ he urged.

She hesitated a little, and then sat down again. He spoke, standing in
front of her. ‘The words you said to me just now, Lady Dimsdale, were
very severe, but not more severe, perhaps, than the case warranted. _I_
can only cry _mea culpa_, and throw myself on your mercy. I have not a
word to urge in self-defence. But the past is the past; however much
we may regret it, we cannot alter or amend it. The passion I felt for
Laura Langton was sincere. There is proof of it in the fact that it
exists undiminished to the present day. The flame is still alight—the
ashes still glow with the fire that was first kindled fifteen years
ago. Lady Dimsdale, here and to-day, I repeat the offer I made you once
before—here and to-day I ask you once more to become my wife.’ His
manner was dignified, his words impressive.

The answer came without a moment’s hesitation: ‘Lady Dimsdale is
infinitely obliged to Sir Frederick Pinkerton. She will not answer him
to-day after the fashion she answered him years ago. She will simply
say to him as editors say of rejected contributions, “Declined with
thanks.”’

Sir Frederick changed colour. He had not expected so decided a rebuff.
He bowed gravely. ‘May I be permitted to hope that your decision is not
irrevocable—that it is open to reconsideration?’

‘Being a woman, I change my mind about many things; but I shall never
change it about this.’

At this moment a childish voice was heard calling: ‘Aunty Laura—Aunty
Laura, where are you? How tiresome of you to run away!’

Lady Dimsdale rose. ‘One of my tyrants is calling me, and I must obey.
You will excuse me, Sir Frederick, I am sure.’

Again came the voice: ‘Aunty Laura, where are you?’

Lady Dimsdale drew a child’s trumpet from her pocket and blew a few
notes on it. A moment later, Sir Frederick found himself alone.

‘Hum, hum. Rejected—and for the second time,’ he muttered to himself.
He was excessively chagrined. After the fashion of other men, having
failed to obtain the object of his desires, he appraised it at a higher
value than he had ever done before. ‘There must be another man in the
case. She would never have refused Sir Frederick Pinkerton and six
thousand a year, unless there were another man in the case. Who can he
be?’

He strolled slowly in the direction of the house. He would have a word
with Captain Bowood, and then he would take his leave. He entered
through the open French-windows, but the room was empty. A moment later
the door was opened noisily, and Miss Elsie Brandon burst into the room.

She was a tall slim girl, with very bright eyes, and features that were
instinct with vivacity. She gave the promise of considerable beauty
in time to come. Her hair, cut nearly as short as a boy’s, was a mass
of tiny yellow curls. She wore a pinafore, and a frock that scarcely
reached to her ankles—her aunt, Miss Hoskyns, had worn a pinafore and a
short frock at her age; consequently, they were the proper things for
young ladies to wear nowadays.

‘Oh, I beg your pardon, Sir Frederick, but I thought that perhaps
Charley might be here.’

‘Good-morning, Miss Brandon,’ said Sir Frederick as he held out his
hand.—‘And pray, who is Charley?’

‘Charley Summers, of course—Captain Bowood’s nephew.’

‘But I was under the impression that Captain Bowood had discarded his
nephew?’

‘So he has. Cut off his allowance, and forbade him the house eight
months ago.’

‘And yet you expect to see him here to-day?’ The Baronet was always
interested in the affairs of his neighbours, especially when those
neighbours happened to be people of property.

‘I don’t mind telling you, but I had a note from Charley this
morning—on the sly, you know.’

‘Pardon me, but young ladies in society don’t generally say “on the
sly.”’

‘Charley says it, and he was educated at Harrow. Anyhow, I had a note
from him, in which he said that he should certainly contrive to see me
to-day. It’s a great risk for him to run, of course; but that won’t
deter him in the least.’

‘You appear to be greatly interested in the young gentleman.’

‘Don’t call him a young gentleman, please—it sounds so awfully formal.
Didn’t I tell you that we are in love? No; I don’t think I did. Well,
we are. It’s a secret at present, and there are all sorts of dreadful
obstacles in the way. But we have made up our minds to get married
by-and-by, or else we shall commit suicide and die together.’ As Miss
Brandon spoke thus, she flung into the air the Latin grammar she had
been carrying and caught it deftly as it fell.

‘That would indeed be a terrible fate,’ said the Baronet with a smile.

‘By Jove, though, Sir Frederick, but we are serious!’

‘Young ladies in society don’t generally say “by Jove.”’

‘Charley does, and he was educated at Harrow.’ From a pocket in her
dress she drew a box of bon-bons, opened it and popped one between her
teeth. Then she proffered the box to Sir Frederick. ‘Have one?’ she
said with all the nonchalance imaginable.—The Baronet smiled, and shook
his head.—‘You need not notice my fingers, please,’ continued Miss
Brandon. ‘I’ve inked them. Somehow, I always do ink them when I’ve an
extra hard lesson to learn.—But I say, Sir Frederick, isn’t it a jolly
shame that a great girl like me should still be learning lessons? I’m
seventeen years two months and four days old.’

‘Young ladies’——

‘I know what you are going to say. I learned the word from Charley, so
it must be right. Well, it _is_ a shame. I’ve a great mind to run away.
I’ve five pounds saved up.’

‘Perhaps Charley, as you call him, might not like you to do that.’

‘No; I suppose not; and I must study him, poor boy. It’s an awful
responsibility—sometimes my brain reels under it.’ Again the Latin
grammar was flung high into the air and caught as it fell.

‘Is that the way you always learn your lessons, Miss Brandon?’

‘Not always. But, I say—I _do_ hate Latin. I shall never learn it; and
if I were to learn it, it would never be of any use to me.’

‘Young ladies in society don’t generally bite the corners of their
pinafores.’

‘Charley does, and—— No; that’s nonsense. Young ladies in society don’t
wear pinafores, so of course they have none to bite.’

At this moment, Captain Bowood entered the room, followed by a
foreign-looking young man, who was dressed in a shabby frock-coat
buttoned close up to the throat, and a pair of shoes very much down at
heel. In one hand he carried a hat that was considerably the worse for
wear. His long hair, parted down the middle, fell over his coat collar,
and he wore blue spectacles.

‘There you are, young man,’ said the Captain as he pointed to the
piano. ‘And the sooner you are done and off the premises, the better.’

‘Very good, sare. Much oblige,’ answered the stranger.

At the sound of his voice, Miss Brandon started and gazed earnestly at
the young man in the blue spectacles.

‘Good gracious! Why, it must _be_—it _is_ Charley!’ she muttered
under her breath. ‘My poor dear boy! But what a fright he has made of
himself!’



A KING OF ACRES.


III.—A RINGFENCE: CONCLUSION.

There were great elms in the Out-park, whose limbs or boughs, as large
as the trunk itself, came down almost to the ground. They touched the
tops of the white wild parsley; and when sheep were lying beneath, the
jackdaws stepped from the sheep’s back to the bough and returned again.
The jackdaws had their nests in the hollow places of these elms; for
the elm as it ages becomes full of cavities. These great trees often
divided into two main boughs, rising side by side, and afar off visible
as two dark streaks among the green. For many years no cattle had been
permitted in the park, and the boughs of the trees had grown in a
drooping form, as they naturally do unless eaten, or broken by animals
pushing against them. But since the times of agricultural pressure, a
large part of the domain had been fenced off, and was now partly grazed
and partly mown, being called the Out-park. There were copses at the
farther side, where in spring the May flowered, the purple orchis was
drawn up high by the trees and bushes—twice as high as its fellows in
the mead, where a stray spindle-tree grew; and from these copses the
cuckoos flew round the park.

But the thinnest hedge about the wheat-fields was as interesting as
the park or the covers; and this is the remarkable feature of English
scenery, that its perfection, its beauty, and its interest are not
confined to any masterpiece here and there, walled in or inclosed,
or at least difficult of access and isolated, but it extends to the
smallest portion of the country. Wheat-field hedges are the thinnest
of hedges, kept so that the birds may find no shelter, and that the
numerous caterpillars may not breed in them more than can be helped.
Such a hedge is so low it can be leaped over, and so narrow that it is
a mere screen of twisted hawthorn branches which can be seen through,
like screens of twisted stone in ancient chapels. But the sparrows come
to it, and the finches, the mice, and weasels, and now and then a crow,
who searches along, and goes in and out and quests like a spaniel.
It is so tough this twisted screen of branches that a charge of shot
would be stopped by it; if a pellet or two slid through an interstice,
the majority would be held as if by a shield of wicker-work. Old
Bartholomew, the farmer, sent his men once or twice along with
reaping-hooks to clear away the weeds that grew up here under such
slight shelter; but other farmers were not so careful. Then convolvulus
grew over the thin screen, a corncockle stood up taller than the hedge
itself; in time of harvest, yellow St John’s wort flowered beside it,
and later on, bunches of yellow-weed.

A lark rose on the other side, and so caused the glance to be lifted
and to look farther, and away yonder was a farmhouse at the foot of a
hill. Pale yellow stubble covered the hill, rising like a background
to the red-tile roof, and to the elms beside the house, among whose
branches there were pale yellow spots. Round wheat-ricks stood in a
double row on the left hand; count them, and you counted the coin of
the land—bank-notes in straw—and on the right and in front were green
meads, and horses feeding, horses who had done good work in plough-time
and harvest-time, and would soon be at plough again. There were
green meads, because some green meads are a necessity of an English
farmhouse, and there are few without them, even when in the midst of
corn. Meads in which the horses feed, a pony for the children and for
the pony-cart, turkeys, two or three cows; all the large and small
creatures that live about the place. When the land was torn up and
ploughed for corn of old time, these green inclosures were left to stay
on, till now it seems as if pressure of low prices for wheat would
cause the cornland to again become pasture. Of old time, golden wheat
conquered and held possession, and now the grass threatens to oust the
conqueror.

Had any one studied either of these three, the great elms in the
Out-park, or the thin twisted screen of hedge, or the red-tile roof,
and the yellow stubble behind it on the hill, he might have found
material for a picture in each. There was, in truth, in each far more
than any one could put into a picture, or than any one could put into
a book; for the painter can but give one aspect of one day, and the
writer a mere catalogue of things; but nature refreshes the reality
every day with different tints, and as it were new ideas, so that,
although it is always there, it is never twice the same. Over that
stubble on the hill there were other hills, and among these a coombe or
valley, in which stood just such another farmhouse, but so differently
placed, with few trees, and those low, somewhat bare in its immediate
surroundings, but above, on each side, close at hand, sloping ramparts
of green turf rising high, till the larks that sang above seemed
to sing in another land, like that found by Jack when he clomb the
beanstalk. Along this coombe was a cover of gorse, and in spring there
was a mile of golden bloom, richer than gold in colour, leading like a
broad highway of gold down to the house. From those ramparts in high
summer—which is when the corn is ripe and the reapers in it—there could
be seen a slope divided into squares of varied grain. This on the left
of the fertile undulation was a maize colour, which, when the sunlight
touched it, seemed to have a fleeting hue of purple somewhere within.
There is no purple in ripe wheat visible to direct and considering
vision; look for it specially, and it will not be seen. Purple forms
no part of any separate wheatear or straw; brown and yellow in the
ear, yellow in the upper part of the straw, and still green towards
the earth. But when the distant beams of sunlight travelling over the
hill swept through the rich ripe grain, for a moment there was a sense
of purple on the retina. Beyond this square was a pale gold piece, and
then one where the reapers had worked hard, and the shocks stood in
diagonal rows; this was a bronze, or brown and bronze, and beside it
was a green of clover.

Farther on, the different green of the hill turf, and white sheep,
feeding in an extended crescent, the bow of the crescent gradually
descending the sward. The hills of themselves beautiful, and possessing
views which are their property and belong to them; a twofold value.
The woods on the lower slopes full of tall brake fern, and holding
in their shadowy depths the spirit of old time. In the woods it is
still the past, and the noisy mechanic present of this manufacturing
century has no place. Enter in among the round-boled beeches which
the squirrels rush up, twining round like ivy in ascent, where they
nibble the beech-nuts forty feet aloft, and let the husks drop to your
feet, where the wood-pigeon sits and does not move, safe in the height
and thickness of the spray. There are jew-berries or dew-berries on a
bramble-bush, which grows where the sunlight and rain fall direct to
the ground, unchecked by boughs. They are full of the juice of autumn,
black, rich, vine-like, taken fresh from the prickly bough. Low down
in the hollow is a marshy spot, sedge-grown, and in the sedge lie
yellow leaves of willow already fallen. Here in the later months will
come a woodcock or two, with feathers so brown and leaf-like of hue,
and markings, that the plumage might have been printed in colours from
brown leaves of beech. No springes are set for the woodcocks now, but
the markings are the same on the feathers as centuries since; the brown
beech-leaves lie in the dry hollows the year through just as they did
then; the large dew-berries are as rich; and the nuts as sweet. It is
the past in the wood, and Time here never grows any older. Could you
bring back the red stag—as you may easily in fancy—and place him among
the tall brake, and under the beeches, he should not know that a day
had gone by since the stern Roundheads shot down the last of his race
hereabouts in Charles I.’s days. For the leaves are turning as they
turned then to the altered colour of the sun’s rays as he declines in
his noonday arch, lower and lower every day; his rays are somewhat
yellower than in dry hot June; a little of the tint of the ripe wheat
floats in the sunshine. To this the woods turn. First, the nut-tree
leaves drop, and the green brake is quickly yellow; the slender birch
becomes lemon on its upper branches; the beech reddens; by-and-by the
first ripe acorn falls, and there’s as much cawing of the rooks in the
oaks at acorn-time as at their nests in the elms in March.

All these things happened in the old old time before the red stags were
shot down; the leaves changed as the sunbeams became less brilliantly
white, the woodcocks arrived, the mice had the last of the acorns
which had fallen, and which the rooks and jays and squirrels had
spared for them after feasting to the full of their greediness. This
ancient oak, whose thick bark, like cast-iron for ruggedness at the
base, has grown on steadily ever since the last deer bounded beneath
it, utterly heedless of the noisy rattle of machinery in the northern
cities, unmoved by any shriek of engine, or hum, or flapping of loose
belting, or any volume of smoke drifting into the air—I wish that the
men now serving the great polished wheels, and works in iron and steel
and brass, could somehow be spared an hour to sit under this ancient
oak in Thardover South Wood, and come to know from actual touch of its
rugged bark that the past is living now, that Time is no older, that
nature still exists as full as ever, and to see that all the factories
of the world have made no difference, and therefore not to pin their
faith to any theory born and sprung up among the crush and pale-faced
life of modern time; but to look for themselves at the rugged oak-bark,
and up to the sky above the highest branches, and to take an acorn and
consider its story and possibilities, and to watch the sly squirrel
coming down, as they sit quietly, to play almost at their feet. That
they might gather to themselves some of the leaves—mental and spiritual
leaves—of the ancient forest, feeling nearer to the truth and soul,
as it were, that lives on in it. They would feel as if they had got
back to their original existence, and had become themselves, as they
ought to be, could they live such life, untouched by artificial care.
Then, how hurt they would be if any proposed to cut down that oak; if
any proposed the felling of the forest; and the death of its meaning.
It would be like a blow aimed at themselves. No picture that could be
bought at a thousand guineas could come near that ancient oak; but you
can carry away the memory of it, the picture and thought in your mind
for nothing. If the oak were cut down, it would be like thrusting a
stick through some valuable painting on your walls at home.

The common below the South Wood, even James Thardover with all his
desire for improvement could not do much good with; the soil, and
the impossibility of getting a fall for draining, all checked effort
there. A wild, rugged waste, you say, at first, glancing at the
rushes, and the gaunt signpost standing up among them, the anthills,
and thistles. Thistles have colour in their bloom, and the prickly
leaves are finely cut; rushes—green rushes—are notes of the season,
and with their slender tips point to the days in the book of the year;
they are brown now at the tip, and some bent downwards in an angle.
The brown will descend the stalk till the snipes come with gray-grass
colours in their wings. But all the beatings of the rain will not cast
the rushes utterly down; they will send up fresh green successors
for the spring, for the cuckoo to float along over on his way to the
signpost, where he will perch a few minutes, and call in the midst of
the wilderness. There, too, the lapwings leave their eggs on the ground
among the rushes, and rise, and complainingly call. The warm showers
of June call up the iris in the corner where the streamlet widens, and
under the willows appear large yellow flowers above the flags. Pink
and white blossom of the rest-harrow comes on bushy plants where the
common is dry, and there is heath, and heather, and fern. The waste has
its treasures too—as the song-thrush has his in the hawthorn bush—its
treasures of flowers, as the wood its beauties of tree and leaf, and
the hills their wheat.

The ringfence goes farther than this; it incloses the living creatures,
yet without confining them. The wing of the wood-pigeon as the bird
perches, forms a defined curve against its body. The forward edge of
the wing—its thickest part—as it is pressed to its side, draws a line
sweeping round; a painter’s line. How many wood-pigeons are there in
the South Wood alone, besides the copses and the fir-plantations? How
many turtle-doves in spring in the hedges and outlying thickets, in
summer among the shocks of corn? And all these are his—the Squire’s—not
in the sense of possession, for no true wild creature was ever any
one’s yet; it would die first; but still within his ringfence, and
their destinies affected by his will, since he can cut down their
favourite ash and hawthorn, or thin them with shot. Neither of which he
does. The robin, methinks, sings sweetest of autumn-tide in the deep
woods, when no other birds speak or trill, unexpectedly giving forth
his plaintive note, complaining that the summer is going, and the time
of love, and the sweet cares of the nest; telling you that the berries
are brown, the dew-berries over-ripe, and dropping of over-ripeness
like dew as the morning wind shakes the branch; that the wheat is going
to the stack, and that the rusty plough will soon be bright once more
by the attrition of the earth.

Many of them sing thus in the South Wood, yet scarce any two within
sound of each other, for the robin is jealous, and likes to have you
all to himself as he tells his tale. Song-thrushes—what ranks of them
in April; larks, what hundreds and hundreds of them on the hills above
the green wheat; finches of varied species; blackbirds; nightingales;
crakes in the meadows; partridges; a whole page might be filled merely
with their names.

These, too, are in the ringfence with the hills and woods, the yellow
iris of the common, and the red-roofed farmhouses. Besides which,
there are beings infinitely higher, something of whom has been said
in a previous chapter—namely, men and women in village and hamlet,
and more precious still, those little children with hobnail boots and
clean jackets and pinafores, who go a-blackberrying on their way to
school. All these are in the ringfence. Upon their physical destinies,
the Squire can exercise a powerful influence, and has done so, as the
school itself testifies.

Now, is not a large estate a living picture? Or rather, is it not
formed of a hundred living pictures? So beautiful it looks, its hills,
its ripe wheat, its red-roofed farmhouses, and acres upon acres
of oaks; so beautiful, it must be valuable; most valuable; it is
visible, tangible wealth. It is difficult to disabuse any one’s mind
of that idea; yet, as we have seen, with all the skill, science, and
expenditure Thardover could bring to bear upon it, all his personal
effort was in vain. It was a possession, not a profit. Had not James
Thardover’s ancestors invested their wealth in building streets
of villas in the outskirts of a great city, he could not have done
one-fifth what he had. Men who had made their fortunes in factories—the
noisy factories of the present century—paid him high rents for these
residences; and thus it was that the labour and time of the many-handed
operatives in mill, factory, and workshop really went to aid in
maintaining these living pictures. Without that outside income the
Squire could not have reduced the rents of his tenants so that they
could push through the depression; without that outside income he could
not have drained the lands; put up those good buildings; assisted the
school, and in a hundred ways helped the people. Those who watched the
polished machinery under the revolving shaft, and tended the loom,
really helped to keep the beauties of South Wood, the grain-grown
hills, the flower-strewn meadows. These were so beautiful, it seemed as
if they must represent money—riches; but they did not. They had a value
much higher than that. As the spring rises in the valley at the foot of
the hills and slowly increases till it forms a river, to which ships
resort, so these fields and woods, meads and brooks, were the source
from which the city was derived. If the operative in the factory, or
tending the loom, had traced his descent, he would have found that
his grandfather, or some scarcely more remote ancestor, was a man
of the land. He followed the plough, or tended the cattle, and his
children went forth to earn higher wages in the town. For the hamlet
and the outlying cottage are the springs whence the sinew and muscle of
populous cities are derived. The land is the fountainhead from which
the spring of life flows, widening into a river. The river at its broad
mouth disdains the spring; the city in its immensity disdains the
hamlet and the ploughman. Yet if the spring ceased, the ships could not
frequent the river; if the hamlet and the ploughman were wiped out by
degrees, the city must run dry of life. Therefore the South Wood and
the park, the hamlet and the fields, had a value no one can tell how
many times above the actual money rental, and the money earned by the
operatives in factory and workshop could not have been better expended
than in supporting it.

But it had another value still—which they too helped to sustain—the
value of beauty. Parliament has several times intervened to save the
Lake district from the desecrating intrusion of useless railways. So
too, the beauty of these woods, and grain-grown hills, of the very
common, is worth preservation at the hands and votes of the operatives
in factory and mill. If a man loves the brick walls of his narrow
dwelling in a close-built city, and the flowers which he has trained
with care in the window; how much more would he love the hundred living
pictures like those round about Thardover House. After any artificer
had once seen such an oak and rested under it, if any threatened to cut
it down, he would feel as if a blow had been delivered at his heart.
His efforts, therefore, should be not to destroy these pictures but
to preserve them. All the help that they can give is needed to assist
a King of Acres in his struggle, and the struggle of the farmers and
labourers—equally involved—against the adverse influences which press
so heavily on English agriculture.



MRS SHAW: THE LATE PRINCE IMPERIAL’S NURSE.


Visitors to Paris during the meretricious glories of the Second Empire
may possibly recall to mind that amidst the glare and glitter of that
feverish epoch, one wholesome and interesting sight was constantly to
be seen in the Tuileries gardens when the court was in residence at the
palace—a bright-looking child playing with his English nurse; and the
spectators were particularly attracted by the devoted attachment that
appeared to exist between them. The child was the Prince Imperial of
France; and his attendant, the pleasant-looking Yorkshire woman, was
known in Paris as Mrs Shaw. A curious history is connected with her
entrance into the imperial household, the story of which the writer
obtained from what she believes to be a well-authenticated source.

Mrs Shaw was a valued nurse in a family where she had lived for some
time, when one morning she startled her mistress with the announcement
that she had dreamt she was destined to have the charge of the future
Prince Imperial of France, and must leave her place at once. Although
the expected event was causing the greatest excitement in Paris,
it seems unlikely that it should have created much interest in a
quiet English establishment, and naturally enough, her inspiration
was treated as an unreasonable and inconvenient delusion. But no
persuasions or arguments could induce her to remain, or remove what
appeared to be an aberration of mind. Off she set, back to her
Yorkshire village, and sought an interview with the clergyman of the
parish, who appears to have been one of those worthy souls to whom his
parishioners could resort as to a father-confessor; and struck with
her determination and energy, he promised, after some expostulation,
to assist her to the best of his power, though holding out no hope of
success. He happened to have a slight acquaintance with the eminent
London physician who had been honoured by Her Imperial Majesty with
instructions to select a certain number of nurses, from whom she
herself would choose the one that seemed most fitting for the post.
Although besieged with applications, he consented to place Mrs Shaw
on his list of candidates, and to grant her an interview, which
resulted in his sending her with five others to Paris for the Empress’s
approval, who at once chose her; and her dream was fulfilled!

The strength of character that had carried her to this triumphant
issue, by no means deserted her in this new position. Amusing anecdotes
reached us from time to time of the way in which the sensible, homely
Yorkshire woman carried all before her in the imperial nurseries;
would have no foreign ways or interference from court dames or
lady-superintendents, or allow her small charge to be harassed with
tedious toilets and fatiguing ceremonials; and finally gained her
point, after personally appealing to the Emperor, who was only too glad
to have the child brought up in the healthy English fashion; and fully
appreciating her fidelity, gave orders that she was to rule alone,
without let or hindrance; and always treated her with the greatest
kindness and consideration.

And is it not possible that the true and perfect knight the Prince in
after-years became, may have been owing in some measure to this early
training in English ways and English thoughts, which made us look upon
him as the child of our adoption when in exile among us, and take a
mournful pride in his heroic martyrdom?

At the end of seven years, rumours of another tug of war reached us
from the nursery domain. Mrs Shaw was to retire with a pension, and the
Prince transferred to tutors and governors, as befitted his exalted
prospects. But she absolutely refused to go and break her heart and
the child’s too; and again gaining her point, was transformed into a
sort of Madame la Gouvernante, and allowed to retain her apartments in
the Tuileries; and a pleasant retreat they must have been for the poor
Prince, when bored and wearied with lessons and precepts and all the
miseries attendant upon high education, which seem to be inflicted in a
more burdensome form upon royal pupils than on their subjects, perhaps
because it is conducted on the solitary confinement fashion, without
the competition and other natural excitements of a public school. The
writer believes she afterwards married an officer in the Imperial
Guard, so that her fortunes were still more closely bound up with those
whom she loved and served so well; and we often wondered what became
of her in the dark days of Sedan and the downfall of their race, and
whether she lived to join them in exile, and share the last crushing
sorrow with the beloved and bereaved Empress.



A YEAR’S WOOING.


    ’Twas autumn when first they stood on the bridge;
    Ripe pears on the pear-tree, ripe corn on the ridge;
    The swallows flew swiftly far up in the blue,
    And speeding still southward, were lost to the view.
    Said he: ‘Can you love me, as I can love you?’
    She said, quite demurely: ‘Already I do!’

    ’Twas winter when next they met on the bridge;
    The pear-trees were brown, and white was the ridge;
    The swallows were feathering their nests in Algiers.
    She looked in his face, and she burst into tears!
    His nose it was pinched, and his lips they were blue.
    Said she: ‘I can’t love you!’ Said he: ‘Nor I you!’

    ’Twas spring-time when next they stood on the bridge,
    And white was the pear-tree, and green was the ridge;
    The swallows had thoughts of a speedy return;
    And the midges were dancing a-down the brown burn.
    He said: ‘Pretty maiden, let by-gones go by—
    Can you love me again?’ She said: ‘I can try.’

    ’Twas summer when next they stood on the bridge;
    There were pears on the pear-tree, tall corn on the ridge;
    The swallows wheeled round them, far up in the blue,
    Then swooped down and snapped up a midgelet or two.
    Said he: ‘Lest some trifle should come in the way,
    And part us again, will you mention the day?’
    She stood, looking down on the fast-flowing rill,
    Then answered, demurely: ‘As soon as you will!’

            H. L. R.

       *       *       *       *       *

Printed and Published by W. & R. CHAMBERS, 47 Paternoster Row, LONDON,
and 339 High Street, EDINBURGH.

       *       *       *       *       *

_All Rights Reserved._




*** End of this LibraryBlog Digital Book "Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 2, Vol. I, January 12, 1884" ***

Copyright 2023 LibraryBlog. All rights reserved.